Vaporized

The powers-that-be are concerned
That Argentine voters have spurned
Advice they’ve provided
And rather decided
It’s time some new lessons were learned

And so, we cannot be surprised
The media pundits advised
Milei should step back
And take a new tack
Lest talking points get vaporized

It has been quite a slow session overnight.  There has been precious little new in the way of data or commentary of note with respect to the current economic story.  At the same time, the Thanksgiving holiday has trading desks thinly staffed and the Fed is noteworthy in its absence from the tape.  As such, the news cycle has been filled with the OpenAI saga, something far outside the scope of this poet, the ongoing political infighting that is a constant thrum in the background, and one very interesting thing, the mainstream response to the election of Javier Milei as president of Argentina.

Given the dearth of other news, and the fact that I believe this has the opportunity to be quite impactful going forward, I thought I would take a little time and discuss this further.

According to Wikipedia, which in this case I have no reason to disbelieve, Milei, while new to politics, is a serious economist.  He has earned two masters degrees in the subject, taught at university and is a widely published author on the subject.  The point is, he has very clear ideas on how economies work from a theoretical perspective and having grown up in Argentina during one of its earlier hyperinflations, from a practical aspect as well.

What makes all this so fascinating is the deluge of articles that have been published in the WSJ, Bloomberg, CNN, the New York Times, et al. which are quite keen to highlight that his views are highly unorthodox and will fail dramatically, dragging the nation into an even deeper hole.  In fact, I cannot find a single mainstream media source that believes his ideas will succeed.  However, 56% of the voters in Argentina, who are actually living through the economic disaster of the mainstream views, thought differently.

Perhaps the clearest signal of this disagreement is that the Merval, Argentina’s main equity index, rose 7.1% yesterday on the news of his election.  One need not be a conspiracy theorist to understand that if Milei is successful in righting the Argentine ship by throwing out the current orthodoxies, it will call into question everything that finance ministries throughout the G10 have been claiming and doing.  As I wrote yesterday, I believe this election has the potential to signal a beginning of a significant change in the make-up of governments around the world.  Do not be surprised when there is significant support for 3rd party candidates in the US; when AfD wins an outright majority in a state election or two in Germany; and if Mexico throws the ruling PRI out of office.  As Neil Howe and William Strauss wrote in their tour de force, The Fourth Turning, this is the time when major upheavals occur.  Be prepared for more volatility in financial markets as these changes make their way into the system.  In other words, stay hedged!

Ok, back to the markets as they currently sit.  Yesterday’s strong US equity performance found limited follow-through around the world.  Asian indices were mostly slightly lower and European indices are mixed with the DAX (+0.2%) edging higher while the CAC (-0.25%) and FTSE 100 (-0.5%) are both under pressure.  As to US futures this morning, at this hour (7:30), they are ever so slightly softer, -0.1%.

In the bond market, Treasury yields edged lower yesterday amid a relatively quiet session and are a further 1bp softer this morning.  European sovereign yields are also a touch softer, somewhere between -2bps and -4bps, generally speaking, while JGB yields fell a further 5pbps overnight and are now down to 0.69%.  This is certainly a far cry from the idea of tighter Japanese policy, although the yen continues to strengthen.  Two noteworthy aspects in the Treasury market are that the 20yr auction yesterday went off without a hitch as the tail was actually negative (the highest yield was lower than the when-issued price) and dealers only took down 9.5% of the auction.  This is a far cry from the terrible 30-year auction we saw last week.  But the other thing that is not getting much press is the fact that the yield curve continues to reinvert with the 2yr-10yr spread back to -48bps this morning.  Recall, this had fallen as low as -15bps and looked like it was about to normalize just a few weeks ago.  Arguably, investors are telling us that the prognosis for future growth is declining although they are still uncertain as to when the Fed will begin cutting rates.

Oil prices, which have rallied for the past several sessions, are a touch softer this morning as the market has become confused to the key drivers.  Does OPEC+ and its production matter more than economic activity?  Are supplies tight or loose?  I expect that we are going to continue to see uncertainty and volatile price action until something clearer shows up.  As to the metals markets, gold and silver have both rallied this morning with gold creeping back toward that $2000/oz level, although not yet breaking through.  But base metals are mixed with very minor movement.  While equity investors remain convinced the soft landing is a given, the commodity space is far less certain.

Finally, the dollar remains under pressure as sliding Treasury yields weigh on the greenback.  Once again JPY (+055%) is the leading gainer in the G10 and remarkably, CNY (+0.35%) is leading the way in the EMG space.  What is quite interesting here is that the spot USDCNY rate in the market has fallen below the fixing rate for the first time since June.  You may recall that the spot rate had been hovering at the 2% band limit for quite a while.  This is another indication that the near-term outlook for the dollar remains lower.

On the data front, we get the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (exp 0.02) and Existing Home Sales (3.9M) this morning and then the FOMC Minutes at 2:00 this afternoon.  You may recall that the Statement in the beginning of the month was seen as hawkish, but the press conference was seen as dovish and they talked about how financial conditions had tightened and helped the Fed along.  But now, those conditions have eased again.  Also, we have heard from so many Fed speakers in the interim, it is hard to believe that whatever they said three weeks ago is newsworthy.

So, with more eyes on the clock ,as folks want to get away for the holiday and are worried about travel conditions, than market conditions, I suspect today, and tomorrow and Friday, will be very quiet indeed.

Good luck

Adf

Could Cause Contraction

A story that’s gained lots of traction
Is Jay will soon jump into action
By cutting the rates
They charge for short dates
Cause high real rates could cause contraction

In fact, this idea ‘s gone mainstream
And it’s now a favorite theme
But history shows
The ‘conomy grows
Despite real rates high with esteem

After a spate of slightly softer than expected data in the US, it is very clear the consensus in markets is that not only is the Fed finished raising rates, but that cuts are coming soon.  At this point, based on pricing on the CME for Fed funds futures, the Fed is going to cut rates by 100 basis points next year.  While I’m certainly no PhD economist (thank goodness!), this strikes me as a mistake.  Consider the following:

  1. If the economy really does go into recession in Q1 or Q2 of next year, where GDP turns negative and the Unemployment Rate rises close to 5.0%, it strikes me that the Fed is going to cut a lot more than 100bps.  In fact, the one thing we know is that Fed funds tend to decline much more rapidly than they rise as the Fed is usually responding late to some crisis.  So, a simple model can be created that shows 100bps of rate cuts is made up of a 20% probability of no movement at all; a 60% probability of 50bps of cuts next year as they try to tweak policy at the margin, and a 20% probability of 350bps of cuts as they respond to a recession and get aggressive.  Now, you can adjust those probabilities in any number of ways, but that seems reasonable to me.  However, that is not the market narrative.  Rather, the narrative is that the Fed is going to start to cut rates because policy is already overtight (real rates are positive) and they will want to get ahead of the curve.
  2. However, exactly why will the Fed need to cut, absent a full-blown recession?  Going back to 1982, these are the highest and lowest levels for real 10Yr yields, real Fed funds (defined as Fed funds – CPI) and Y/Y GDP each quarter:
 Real 10YrReal Fed fundsGDP Y/Y
Max7.60%8.30%9.60%
Min-0.35%-7.90%-2.20%

            Data: FRED database, calculations Fxpoet

So, we have seen real yields, both short- and long-term much higher and much lower than the current situation.  But the funny thing is, the relationship between GDP growth and real interest rates, whether 10Yr or overnight, is basically zero.  In fact, I ran the numbers and came up with an R2 of just 0.03 which tells me that there is no relationship of which to speak.  My point is just because real rates have risen to a positive level in the past year does not mean that the Fed has ‘overtightened’.  It just means that they have tightened policy trying to address what they still see as too high inflation.  It also does not indicate that because real yields have risen over the past quarters, that the economy is about to crash.  That’s not to say we are going to necessarily avoid recession, but the point is it will take much more than modestly higher real interest rates to push us over the edge.  At least that’s my view.

But for now, most markets are getting quite excited about the idea that peak interest rates are behind us and that the upcoming lower interest rates are going to support risk assets, especially equities, aggressively.  I feel a lot can go wrong with that model, but then I’m just an FX guy.

The Argentine people have spoken
As they want to fix what’s been broken
So, starting today
The new prez, Milei
Must change more than merely a token

A brief comment on this electoral outcome.  While Argentina’s economy is quite small on the global scale, I believe this is a harbinger of far more electoral shake-ups in 2024 and 2025.  We need only go back to 2015 when the Austrian presidential election was initially called for the complete outlier candidate, a non-politician as well as a right-wing firebrand, before being overturned by the courts there.  That story preceded the Brexit vote and then, of course, the election of Donald J Trump as US President in 2016.  People were very clearly tired of the political elite explaining why the masses needed to suffer while the elite got along just fine.  

The ensuing resistance by the entrenched politicians was fierce and so we saw Trump lose his reelection bid amidst great turmoil and then the election and collapse of Liz Truss in the UK.  But it appears that things have gotten worse in the broad populace’s collective mind, with inflation remaining stubbornly high, and perceptions of opportunity shrinking.  Combining those features with a growing distrust of media and government pronouncements after the Covid situation, where vaccines did not prove as efficacious as promised and, in fact, seemed to result in at least as many harms as benefits, and people are ready for a new look.

So, be prepared for some more non-traditional electoral winners next year.  Presidential elections are due in Taiwan, Mexico and the US with major regional elections throughout Germany, Canada, South Korea, India and the UK as well as the European Parliament.  Many people are quite pissed off at the incumbents around the world so look for more fragmentation and new faces.

This implies that much of how we consider the macroeconomic picture could well change.  And that means market volatility seems likely to increase further.  Just something to keep in mind, and an even more important reason to maintain hedges for major exposures, whether FX or interest rates.

Ok, it was easy to spend time on these issues as there is really nothing else going on.  Overnight, the only news was that the PBOC left their Loan Prime rates unchanged, as expected, so not really newsworthy.  Else, the biggest news over the weekend was arguably the Argentine elections.

It should not be surprising that market movement has been quite muted with the biggest equity move in Hong Kong (+1.85%) which is just a retracement of its recent woes.  Otherwise, Japanese markets fell somewhat (-0.6%) and the rest of APAC was very muted.  In Europe, there is a mix of gains and losses with nothing more than +/- 0.25%, so no real news and US futures are essentially unchanged at this hour (7:00).

Bond yields are, overall, a touch firmer this morning with Treasury and most European sovereign yields up 3bps.  But that is after another decline on Friday, and the 10yr remains quite close to its new home of 4.50%.  The ‘inflation is dead’ theme had a lot of proponents last week, but as we head into this, holiday shortened, week with limited new economic data, I suspect that things are going to be quiet without any new trends taking hold.  The market technicians explain that 4.33% and then 4.00% are the key yield supports.  So far, the first has held and I expect we will need to see much softer data to break it.

Oil prices are rebounding further this morning, up 1.5%, as there is talk that OPEC+ may be set to cut production even further with the price now below the level when they first initiated cuts in the summer.  There seems to be a disconnect between the official supply and demand data and the price, where the data would indicate prices should be higher.  One possible explanation has been that more Iranian oil has been reaching the market than officially allowed and so weighing on prices.  Alas, that is a very hard story to prove.  As to the metals markets, precious metals are softer this morning, but still retain the bulk of their recent gains while copper (+0.4%) is higher after Chinese demand indicators started to show strength.  

Finally, the dollar is starting to edge lower this morning as NY walks in the door after a very quiet overnight session.  USDJPY is the leader here, falling -0.8%, and we are seeing a large decline in USDCNY (-0.55%) as well.  Recently, there has been a distinct uptick in the number of pundits who are calling for a sharp decline in USDJPY.  Much is predicated on reading between the lines on Ueda-san’s pronouncements and expecting that QQE is finally going to end there.  Ironically, 10yr JGB yields are down to 0.74%, well below the highs seen at the beginning of the month and do not appear to be headed higher, at least for now.  To the extent that the Japanese MOF actually does want a stronger yen, something about which I am not at all certain, one must beware the idea that they could come in and intervene now, when they are jumping on the bandwagon rather than trying to stop a rush against them.  It would certainly be a lot more effective and would likely change a lot of opinions.  The one thing I have learned in my time in the markets is that when USDJPY starts to move lower, it can do so very quickly and for quite a long way.  

Away from those two currencies, both Aussie and Kiwi are firmer by about 0.6%, benefitting from strength in the renminbi as well as most commodity prices.  Not surprisingly, NOK (+0.5%) is rallying although it is a bit more surprising that CAD is essentially unchanged on the day.  Also remarkable is that CNY is the biggest mover in the EMG space, with most other currencies just barely changed on the day.

During this holiday week, there is very little data to be released with Existing Home Sales (exp 3.9M) tomorrow along with the FOMC Minutes and then Durable Goods (-3.2%, +0.1% ex transport) on Wednesday along with the Claims data.  Happily, it appears that the FOMC has taken this week off and will not be adding to their recent commentary.

Overall, the short-term trend appears to favor softness in interest rates leading to modest strength in risk assets and weakness in the dollar.  I am not yet convinced that is the long-term view, but for this week, I think that’s a fair bet.

Good luck

Adf