Changing Fast

Posted on by

At this point most traders are thrilled
It’s Friday, ‘cause throughout that guild
Exhaustion is rife
From bulls’ and bears’ strife
O’er whether their dreams be fulfilled
 
As well, all the narrative writers
Are stuck pulling college all-nighters
With facts changing fast
Their latest forecasts
Do naught but encourage backbiters

It has certainly been an interesting week in financial markets, at least most of them, with significant moves throughout the commodity, equity and cryptocurrency spaces.  We even saw a jump in bond prices yesterday after a really lousy JOLTS Jobs number (6.54M compared to 7.2M expected) and a higher-than-expected Initial Claims number of 231K.  Suddenly, questions about the labor market are front of mind, and prospects for a March Fed Funds cut rose to 23% for a time, although have slipped back to 17% as of this morning.  But one need only look at a few charts (all from tradingeconomics.com) showing the daily movement in some popular trading vehicles to understand why traders are thankful the week is ending.  For instance, 

Silver (+4.75%), which had a 34% range last Friday and has fallen 39% since its high 8 days ago:

Gold (+2.1%), which showed the same pattern, albeit not quite as dramatically:

Natural Gas (+3.4%), which rose $2.65 and reversed $2.00 on a $3.00 base over the past two weeks:

And Bitcoin (+5.8%), which has fallen nearly 50% since its highs in early October and 22% in the past week:

Now, it must be remembered that Bitcoin has a long history of massive drawdowns, with a 50% drawdown in spring of 2021 and a 75% drawdown from November 2021 through October 2022. We shouldn’t be surprised as Bitcoin is essentially a pure risk asset, so is completely narrative driven.  And as the narrative writers try to keep up with the facts on the ground, they are trying to figure out how to sell the story that Bitcoin, which was ostensibly designed to be an alternative to the fiat currency system, has become so tightly linked to the fiat financial system.

In the end, though, the commodity markets are beholden to the marginal demand/supply of the last molecule available.  I have not seen anything change with respect to demand for power to drive the economy, the demand for silver to build out electronics or the demand for gold by central banks.  To me, while prices for these commodities can whipsaw aggressively as the global regime changes, ultimately, I remain confident demand will continue to be the story.  (Bitcoin is an entirely different beast and one I will not discuss in depth other than to highlight its volatility along with the rest of these markets.)

Anyway, you can understand why traders are exhausted.  In fact, my forecast for next week is that we are highly unlikely to see the same size movements, although choppiness will still be the rule.

You may have noticed I missed oil (-0.4%) which has also seen some volatility as per the below chart, but not quite at the same level as the others.  Part of that is the oil market is much larger and more liquid and part of that is that the whole Iran/US discussions question has provided fodder for both bulls and bears in short intervals resulting in no net movement over the past week.

From what I can piece together, the situation in Iran is coming to a head regarding the regime there.  The talks today are ongoing, but there is other information that appears to indicate preparations are being made for a transitional government, and the State Department just warned all US citizens to leave Iran.  Something is up which will certainly drive more oil volatility.

If we look at bonds, Treasury yields fell -8bps yesterday and have rebounded by 2bps this morning.  That was the largest single day move we’ve seen since October, and basically took the market right back to that 4.20% level that had been home for weeks.

There continues to be a lot of confusing data and information regarding the economy as yesterday’s weak jobs data conflict with the broader idea that the hyperscalers are spending 2% of GDP on capex this year and forecasts for the budget deficit continue to run around 2%.  It seems like it will be difficult for a recession to come about with that much new spending in the economy, but as we have seen over the past decades, the beneficiaries of that spending are not necessarily the population cohort that is currently upset.  I guess the question is, is economic growth real if the population doesn’t feel it?  That will certainly be the political question come November.

As to European yields, they all followed Treasuries lower, especially after the BOE 5-4 vote to leave rates on hold offered a much more dovish signal than anticipated, and the ECB harped on the strength of the euro and how that could bring down their inflation forecasts, hinting at lower rates going forward.

In the equity markets, yesterday saw a tough day in the US as the tech/AI story continues to get beaten up right now, and that was more than enough to offset strength in things like defensives and staples.  But this morning, US futures are higher by about 0.5% as I type (8:00).  In Asia, Japan (+0.8%) bucked the US trend on the back of excitement about the upcoming election where Takaichi-san is expected to gain a mandate.  However, China (-0.6%), HK (-1.2%), Korea (-1.4%) and Australia (-2.0%) all had the same fate as the US.  Given the weight of technology companies in Asian indices, I suspect we are going to see more volatility here as different narratives come about on AI and investment and the social/political impacts.  As to Europe, modest gains are the story with the DAX (+0.5%) and IBEX (+0.9%) leading the way higher with the former benefitting from yesterday’s surge in Factory orders as well as a better-than-expected trade balance today.  As to Spain, it has been trending higher and nothing has come out to change that view for now.

Finally, the dollar is giving back some of yesterday’s gains but remains within that longer term trading range.  Using the dollar index (DXY) as our proxy, you can see just how little things have changed.  All the talk last week of the breakdown in the dollar has been forgotten for now, although I continue to read about China building a digital currency backed by gold.  I discussed that earlier this week and why I continue to believe that is unrealistic at this time.

But the weird thing about the DXY is it doesn’t seem to reflect what is happening in individual currencies.  For instance, AUD (+0.85%), GBP (+0.45%) and NOK (+0.9%) are all much stronger although the euro (+0.15%) and JPY (0.0%) not so much.  In the EMG bloc, MXN (+0.8%), ZAR (+1.1%), HUF (+0.8%) and KRW (+0.3%) are all having a very good session despite no specific news that would seem to drive that.  Historically, I never paid attention to the DXY because nobody who actually trades FX pays it any mind.  However, as a trading vehicle, it has gained many adherents which is why I mention it.  So, as we look across the currency universe, the dollar is having a tough day.

On the data front, we only see Michigan Sentiment (exp 55.0) and Consumer Credit ($8.0B).  We also hear from Governor Jefferson, but nobody seems to be listening to any Fed speakers right now, Secretary Bessent is a far more important voice for the markets.

We have seen massive moves across many markets lately, with excessive moves correcting, but I remain stubbornly of the view that while things got ahead of themselves, the underlying trends are still in place, at least in commodities.  As to the dollar, it’s not dead yet, but its future will depend on the administration’s ability to achieve their goals regarding the economic adjustments and inward investment.  

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Gone Astray

Posted on by

Though Friday will lack NFP
We still will have something to see
The States and Iran
Will meet in Oman
To talk about nuke strategy
 
But til they, in fact, do sit down
Be careful as crude moves around
And what if talks fail
To find holy grail
Beware oil shorts and their frowns
 
With that as the background today
The narrative has gone astray
’Cause all kinds of tech
Resemble a wreck
While metals are fading away

Sometimes it’s hard to determine which stories are really driving markets as there are so many that have potential conflicts between them.  With that in mind, I will start with oil this morning, which has seen a bit of choppiness during the past week on the back of on-again, off-again, on-again talks due to be held between the US and Iran.  See if you can guess where the worries about a US military strike gained ground, were quashed by news of potential talks, saw a military skirmish in the Strait of Hormuz and then when talks were reconfirmed.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Net, there is still an underlying concern about the situation, which is why, I believe, the price of crude (-1.1%) is still above $64/bbl.  Remember, it was not that long ago when it had seemed to find a comfort zone below $60/bbl.  It strikes me that if some type of accommodation is reached at these talks, where Iran gives up its nuclear weapon dreams and stops funding terrorism (I believe these are the administration’s goals) then there is plenty of room for oil prices to slide back below $60/bbl and continue what had been a longer term down trend as per the below chart.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

After all, given the fact that Venezuelan oil is going to be returning to the market, the continued expansion of production in Guyana, Brazil and Argentina, and now the idea of welcoming Iran back into the good graces of nations, that is a lot of potential supply that is currently not available.  My concern is if Iran agrees to those terms, it may be an existential threat to the theocracy, so I guess they need to weigh that risk vs. the risk that the US does escalate militarily, which could also be an existential risk to the theocracy.  Net, choppiness seems to be the likely road ahead.

Finishing commodities, precious metals have reversed the reversal and are down sharply this morning (Au -1.7%, Ag -11.0%, Pt -4.4%).  Volatility remains extremely high and given the competing narratives of a) it was a bubble, and b) the fundamentals remain in place, I expect we will continue to see price action like this for a while yet.  Although remember my strong belief that markets can only maintain volatility of this nature for a few weeks as at some point, all the participants simply become too tired to trade.  There was a very interesting chart I saw on X this morning that showed the price action in gold during the German hyperinflation of the Weimar Republic a bit over 100 years ago.  

I’m not implying we are heading to a hyperinflation, just that gold (and silver and platinum) prices can move very far in short order, as we’ve seen.  In the end, nothing has changed the fundamentals with demand for gold still price insensitive, demand for silver still greater than mining supply with the same true for platinum.  But it will be a rough ride for a little while yet.

So, let’s turn to the equity markets, where there are far more plugged-in analysts than me, but I want to take a higher-level look.  While yesterday’s price action was mixed (NASDAQ and S&P lower, DJIA higher) it seems to indicate that there is an ongoing rotation out of tech stocks into other areas, amongst them consumer staples, energy and defensives.  What I find so interesting about this, though, is that if I look at a chart of the three major US indices, they are all the same chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Granted, the NASDAQ had the highest high back in November, but, in reality, they all move very much in sync.  This begs the question, what can we expect going forward?  At the end of the day, I still believe that stocks represent the value created in the economy.  As such, if the Trump administration’s plans to reduce regulations and encourage banks to lend more to the real economy, rather than purchase financial assets, can be implemented effectively, that is a very real positive for equity markets over time.  However, that probably means a much less steady climb, especially if the Fed is not explicitly supporting assets as the new Chair, Warsh, tries to shrink the balance sheet.  It is going to be messy and there are going to be a lot of cross narratives and claims, so at any given time, the only reality will be increased volatility.  But at least there’s a plan.

As to the rest of the world’s equity markets, it does appear as the bifurcation between those nations that are willing to work closely with the US and those working closely with China is likely to continue.  It remains to be seen which bloc will outperform, although I like the US odds given the legal structure and the demographics.  

With all that in mind, let’s look at the overnight price action.  Asia had a tough go of it given the high proportion of tech names there.  While Tokyo (-0.9%) slipped along with China (-0.6%) the real laggards were Korea (-3.9%) and Taiwan (-1.5%) and there were far more laggards (India, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia) than gainers (Singapore, HK).  This is the tech story writ large.  In Europe, even though they largely lack tech, weakness is the norm (Spain -1.1%, Germany -0.2%, UK -0.3%) although the French (+0.3%) have managed to buck the trend.  It is not clear why Spain is lagging so badly, although perhaps PM Sanchez’s efforts to import 500K new people while unemployment remains at 10%, the highest in the EU, has some concerned.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are pointing higher by about 0.2%.

In the bond market, once again there is nothing going on.  Treasury yields are almost exactly unchanged since early Friday morning, although we did see a dip and rebound after the Warsh announcement.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The US yield curve is steepening as 30-year yields edge higher although those remain below 5.0%, a level that many are watching closely as a signal of a bondmageddon.  On the continent, European sovereign yields have edged higher by 1bp to 2bps, but activity is muted ahead of the ECB meeting announcement (exp no change) scheduled later this morning.  UK yields have edged lower by -1bp after the BOE left rates on hold, as expected, with a 5/4 vote, the 4 looking for a cut.  I continue to believe that the odds are for the ECB to cut rates again far sooner than the market is pricing.  And JGB yields slipped -2bps overnight as market participants await Sunday’s election results.  Given PM Takaichi is forecast to win with an increased majority, it is hard for me to believe that if she does, JGB’s will sell off sharply on the idea she has promised more unfunded spending, they already know that.

Lastly, the dollar is firmer this morning, continuing to defy all the calls for its demise.  The pound (-0.8%) is the laggard after the BOE sounded a bit more dovish than expected, but we are seeing losses across the entire G10 bloc.  As to the EMG bloc, ZAR (-0.7%) is the laggard, but given the dramatic reversal in precious metals, that is no surprise.  Otherwise, losses on the order of -0.3% or so are the norm.

On the data front, Initial (exp 212K) and Continuing (1850K) Claims lead the way and later we see the JOLTs Job Openings Report (7.2M).  The word is that the NFP report will be released next Wednesday with CPI next Friday.  Atlanta Fed president Bostic speaks later this morning, but I continue to believe that until we hear from Mr Warsh, the Fed’s words have very little impact.  Arguably, the neutering of the Fed is why the bond market remains so quiet.  Traders have lost their cues.

Risk attitudes are getting revisited around the world as the seeming permanence of increased risk appetite is starting to be called into question.  There is no better signal of this than Bitcoin, which has broken back below $70K this morning to its lowest level since October 2024.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It was January 2024 when the ETF, IBIT, started trading and BTC was about $43K at that time.  As BTC is a pure risk asset/vehicle, it’s recent decline may well be the biggest signal that risk-off is coming.  That could well impede the Trump efforts to rebuild the US manufacturing base, but perhaps, it could also encourage it, as business risks are easier to understand than market risks.  The volatility is not over.

Good luck

Adf

Dissension

Posted on by

It seems that there’s still quite some tension
As metals and stocks show dissension
Though Friday both puked
Of late, metals juked
Much higher, to stocks contravention
 
So, what can we learn from this split?
That tech stocks all now trade like sh*t
While silver and gold
Are what folks will hold
And bonds? No one just gives a whit

It seems the government shutdown has ended, just as quickly as it began and the only people impacted are traders who were looking forward to the NFP data on Friday.  Given the shutdown was only for a few days, and that apparently, all the data was already collected, it was the compilation that was being delayed, I presume we will get the numbers next week.  Of course, this is a government bureaucracy, so it may take a bit longer.  Nonetheless, this morning we see the ADP Employment number (exp 48K) and analysts will have to work from that, plus the reports like the ISM hiring data, to give their views of the economy.  It really all does seem like theater, I must admit.

Anyway, away from that, the only other news of note that is impacting markets has been an increase in tensions in Iran after the US shot down an Iranian drone heading toward the US aircraft carrier, Abraham Lincoln.  However, it appears that talks are still scheduled for Friday, so oil (+0.2% today, +1.4% since yesterday morning) is creeping back higher, although remains well below the levels seen last week when concerns over a US attack there were mounting.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Which takes us to markets and what appear to be the key internal drivers.  Starting today with stocks, the narrative revolves around concern that AI is going to destroy software companies and SaaS models since their user base will no longer need those companies.  As well, there are the lingering concerns about the AI investment bubble and the circular dealing between Nvidia and its customers being an indication of the end of the era.  This is akin to what happened during the tech bubble in 2000-01 and has been highlighted by numerous analysts for several months, although is gaining more traction of late.  Finally, the Business Development Companies (BDC’s) and PE firms are under increasing pressure as their portfolio of loans and positions, many of which are being hurt by AI, are starting to hemorrhage cash.  This trifecta has been weighing on the NASDAQ, preventing any significant strength, although other sectors, notably energy and materials, have been doing pretty well.

The funny thing is, while the NASDAQ (-1.4%) fell yesterday amid widespread US equity weakness, if I look at the chart (below from tradingeconomics.com) it doesn’t seem that negative, rather it seems to be consolidating ahead of another leg higher.  But then, I am no technician, so don’t pay attention to me.

However, the narrative is strong here that the world is about to end because Nvidia hasn’t made a new high in the past three months.  I am no tech stock expert, but my take from the cheap seats is that future equity market outcomes are going to continue to be reliant on the success of the Trump administration’s plans regarding reshoring and changing the nature of trade.  It is likely to be bumpy, especially if the Fed does not cut rates to support equity markets, especially since that has been the MO for the past 40 years.  But I remain positive overall.

Looking around the rest of the world, last night saw a mixed picture, although definitely more green than red.  While Tokyo (-0.8%) slid along with Malaysia and the Philippines, the rest of the region had a nice session led by Korea (+1.6%), China (+0.8%) and Australia (+0.8%).  It appears the tech fears were less concerning there, either that or PE and BDC companies aren’t yet so prevalent.  In Europe, meanwhile, despite mixed PMI Services data, there are more gainers than laggards led by the UK (+1.0%), which does have miners, benefitting from the rebound in metals prices.  But France (+0.9%) and Spain (+0.15%) are also higher although Germany (-0.2%) is lagging after a modest miss in the PMI data. As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are pointing higher by about 0.25%.

Back to metals, which continue to be THE story these days, gold (+2.0%) has reclaimed the $5000/oz level and while it is lower in the past week, remains nearly 17% higher YTD.  Silver (+6.0%) is also rebounding nicely along with platinum (+3.8%) as more and more discussions have ascribed last Friday’s rout to month end delivery and position issues amongst a few very large players who were able to prevent some major damage to their own balance sheets.  However, as I have maintained all along, the fundamentals are unchanged; there is a shortage of silver for industrial use and has been for several years.  As to gold, there is no indication that central banks have stopped buying.  These continue to be long-term plays and will likely drag the entire metals sector along for the ride.

What about bonds, you may ask?  Well actually, nobody is asking about bonds!  They remain mired in a tight range with dueling narratives about the long-term view.  On the one hand, there are those who continue to look at the US debt load, and the expectation of fiscal deficits as far as the eye (or the CBO) can see, and expect supply issues to dominate, forcing the government to seek inflation to create the soft default necessary to pay back the debt.  They will point to the long-term trend, which saw yields decline for 40 years and then reverse back in 2020 (see chart below from finance.yahoo.com) as evidence that yields are going to trend higher for the next decades.

On the other side, you have those who believe the future is deflationary, with AI driving massive increases in productivity and driving down prices, while focusing on Truflation’s recent readings of 1.0% and claiming that is the way.  Personally, I have more sympathy for the former view than the latter, as it is increasingly difficult for me to understand the view that AI will be able to achieve all its currently stated desires without sufficient energy and materials, whose increasing prices are going to limit any downside in inflation.  As well, while a Warsh Fed chairmanship may strive to change the current central bank model of QE whenever needed, there is zero evidence any other central banks are going to follow suit.  

In the meantime, the tension between those two views has kept yields in a very tight range for a while, and we need an exogenous catalyst to break that range.  Peace in Ukraine?  War in Iran?  I’m not sure.

Finally, the dollar is a touch firmer this morning, notably against the yen (-0.6%), which continues to give back its gains from two Friday’s ago when the Fed ‘checked rates’ in the NY session as seen in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

However, the point was made this morning, and it is a good one, that while Japanese 10-year yields are at 2.24%, 10-year yields, 10-years forward are about 4.10%, which would be a devastating yield for the Japanese government given its debt/GDP ratio remains above 230%.  It is difficult to get excited about owning the yen with that backdrop, especially given the demographic implosion of population that is ongoing there.  As to the rest of the currency market, Zzzzz.  Aside from the narrative of the dollar is dead, which gets recycled by somebody every day, it is very hard to look at recent price action and think something remarkable is going to happen.  We will need major monetary and fiscal policy changes, which while they may arrive, are going to take quite some time to get here.

And that’s really it this morning.  Aside from ADP, we get the ISM Services (exp 53.5) and we get the Quarterly Treasury refunding announcement, which will garner a great deal of attention only if Secretary Bessent explains he is going to issue more bonds and less bills, which seems unlikely.  Monday’s ISM data was quite strong.  Strength today could well portend that the US economy has a bright future ahead, in the near term, and that should support stocks and the dollar, while commodities will benefit from the increased demand.  Bonds?  Well, we’ll see which side of that argument is correct.  And what happens if the deficits are smaller than expected?  That is the question nobody is asking because the ‘smart’ folks don’t believe it is possible.  Remember, the dollar is still king.

Good luck

Adf

Bane and Hellfire

Posted on by

Though not getting near as much press
A shutdown, once more’s, added stress
To labor releases
And so, we’ll miss pieces
Of data.  For Wall Street, a mess
 
But once again, I need inquire
Are shutdowns a bane and hellfire?
Or are they instead
A way to spearhead
More funding cuts we should desire?

It seems that once again, the government shut down, at least partially, on Saturday night because the Senate refuses to pass the required funding legislation.  At this point, 6 of the 12 funding bills are already signed into law, so the shutdown is not as extensive.  But more interestingly, it is not garnering nearly the headlines that this situation did last autumn.  

In fact, I only mention it because the most direct impact we are likely to see is that, once again, the BLS will not be releasing data on time, notably today’s JOLTS Job Openings report and Friday’s NFP data.  So, while Ken Griffin will miss more opportunities to make money via his HFT algorithms front running retail traders, the rest of us probably don’t care all that much.

Which brings me to the question of the size of the federal government.  Stick with me here.  Along these lines, I want to highlight a very interesting piece written by Michael Nicoletos which is well worth reading on the subject of naming Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair.  Prior to reading this article, I had come to the view that while Warsh would not technically be joining the Cabinet (Fed independence and all that), he is going to be working shoulder to shoulder with Treasury Secretary Bessent (they have worked together before and are close friends apparently) to achieve their goal of restructuring the way the US economy functions.  

Much has been made of how it will be impossible for Warsh to cut rates (as Trump desires) while reducing the Fed’s balance sheet, which is something for which Warsh has repeatedly called.  The missing piece of the puzzle, which I have rarely seen mentioned other than in this article, is regulations, specifically bank regulations.  If the Fed reduces the need for banks to hold Treasuries for safety/liquidity reasons, it allows them to lend more money to the real economy which will support actual economic activity.  The result can be that instead of Fed primed monetary stimulus, the nation could see business investment (consider the amount of promised inward investment to the US on the back of the trade deals) which can result in sustainable growth with less monetary support.  This is a completely different framework than we have seen since, arguably, Paul Volcker, as it was Alan Greenspan who first created the Fed put.  Frankly, it is the most bullish prospect I have seen in a long time.  Read the article!

One other thing Warsh is keen to do is near and dear to my heart, reduce the size of the Fed and the Fed’s transparency of thought.  Less press conferences, less interviews, ending forward guidance, and less Fedspeak overall would be a blessing for us all!

Ok, on to markets.  Precious metals continue to be the major mover and shaker across all markets with the last several days declines being sharply reversed this morning.  I think gold (+5.3%) and silver (+8.3%) deserve their own charts (from tradingeconomics.com) given the extraordinary nature of the recent price action.  While the volatility here has been extreme, as I have repeatedly said throughout this move, the fundamentals have not changed, so demand for metals, especially silver into a deficient market, remains the ultimate driver.

Obviously, both metals remain far below their recent peaks, seen just last Thursday, but recall, parabolic tops always see retracements of this nature.  My expectation going forward is that both these metals, and copper (+3.2%) and platinum (+6.2%) will be heading higher again, albeit not quite as quickly as we saw during January.  One other thing adding to the bullishness is the announcement of Project Vault, a US stockpile of strategic minerals including copper and silver as well as a long list of rare earth elements.  Remember what happens when a price insensitive buyer enters the market.  You want to be long!

As to energy markets, oil (+0.35%) and NatGas (-1.2%) are both a bit less active this morning as the latter, which tumbled 25% yesterday on the end of the cold wave, is finding a new home while oil continues to soften based on the upcoming talks between the US and Iran which has reduced concerns of a military intervention there.

Compared to the commodities space, the rest of the markets are quite dull, indeed.  Turning to the stock market, yesterday saw solid gains in the US after much stronger than expected ISM Manufacturing data (52.6 vs expected 48.5) which was the strongest reading since August 2022.  As you can see from the below chart of this statistic, the US manufacturing sector has suffered greatly for more than 3 years, and that is true in the employment statistics there as well.  Is this the beginning of the great reshoring?  It is too early to tell, but if we see this for the next several months, you can be sure the narrative is going to change.

Source: tradingecommics.com

In Asia, Tokyo (+3.9% and a new all-time high) rallied on the stronger US market, the ISM data and the weaker yen supporting profitability of Japanese exporters.  Korea (+6.8%) saw a huge move on the back of semiconductor makers Samsung and SK Hynix, while the government there seeks to get investors to bring money home to support the currency. India (+2.5%) rallied on the news of a trade deal with the US that reduces tariffs to 18% and gets them to stop purchasing Russian oil, buying from the US instead and generally, there were gains everywhere in the region, even Australia despite the RBA hiking their base rate (as expected) but sounding more hawkish than traders assumed.

In Europe, the picture is more mixed and far less impressive with gains and losses on the order of +/-0.2% across the board.  While earnings data has been solid generally, there is ongoing concern about the outcome of Russia/Ukraine talks and a mix of data with French inflation falling to 0.3% Y/Y and Spanish Unemployment rising although the ECB, which meets Thursday is not expected to adjust policy.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:10) they are higher by 0.25% or so.

In the bond market, the strong ISM data saw 10-year yields back up 4bps yesterday, and they have edged a further 1bp higher this morning.  European sovereign yields are higher by 2bps across the board, as are JGB yields.  It seems we may be seeing the initial pricing of stronger economic activity.  However, if we take a longer-term perspective of bond yields, as per the below chart, it shows us that, frankly, while there have certainly been some ups and downs, yields are little changed overall in the past 2 ½ to 3 years on a net basis.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As I wrote in the beginning, there are changes afoot in policy making circles, certainly in the US which drives the entire global financial markets, so it remains to be seen how this all plays out.  While I think there is scope for a period of higher rates in the short term, if the administration is successful in their playbook, that would likely indicate lower yields over time.

Finally, the dollar continues to defy every call for its demise.  This morning, the DXY is unchanged and back toward the middle of its trading range.  The big mover overnight was AUD (+0.8%) which dragged NZD (+0.6%) along for the ride.  As well, LATAM currencies (MXN +0.4%, BRL +0.4%, CLP +1.0%) continue to perform well, as they have over the past year.  Of course, real interest rates in Mexico (+3.3%) and Brazil (+10.75%) are far higher than in the US and that has been drawing in a great deal of investment while CLP continues to track copper prices.  Again, I am confident that President Trump is unconcerned that the dollar is declining vs. Mexico and Brazil as it helps US export competitiveness.  As to the euro, remember that when it pressed 1.20, the first thing we heard was how the ECB may need to respond if the euro becomes too strong.  My money is still on the next ECB move being a cut.

And that’s all there is today.  Data has gone missing and I cannot believe that anybody cares what Richmond Fed president Barkin has to say at this stage of the game.  That means we are back to headline bingo to drive movement.  Through all this, nothing has changed my view that the dollar is still the cleanest dirty shirt in the laundry.  And if Bessent and Warsh can get things done as they perceive, it will simply be the only clean shirt around.

Good luck

Adf

Memory-Holed

Posted on by

Since Thursday, the world has adjusted
Its views about what can be trusted
The safety of gold
Is memory-holed
As retail becomes more disgusted
 
Perhaps we should not be surprised
That China has now advertised
A latent desire
The yuan should move higher
As status, reserve’s, emphasized
 
And one last thing, can it be true
That markets have taken their cue
From Fed Chair-select
I am circumspect
I guess, though, that’s what traders do

Wow!  It has been a remarkable couple of trading sessions, that’s for sure.  As we start this morning, precious metals remain the story, with both gold (-2.25%) and silver (-1.25%) still sliding, although both have rebounded from their worst levels of the overnight session as you can see in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Certainly, the debasement trade had gotten awfully crowded, but ask yourself, do you believe that people suddenly decided fiat currencies are great again?  Me neither.  As we have learned many times in the past, markets overshoot in both directions when something changes sentiment.  Which brings me to my second question, is this really all about Kevin Warsh?  If so, what a harsh introduction to his new role.  I understand the idea that Warsh’s perceived hawkish bias runs contra to how the narrative had evolved, but my experience is that it is rarely a single catalyst that causes a market adjustment of the type we have just seen.  The one time that comes to mind was the Plaza Accord, but at that time, the G7 nations all came out and declared they were adjusting monetary policy toward a particular goal.  Assuming a new Fed chair is going to make changes of that nature seems aggressive.

Nonetheless, this is where we are.  Thursday’s narratives have all been destroyed and new ones have yet to be written.  So, for now, I anticipate choppy trading, although nothing has changed the underlying fundamentals for metals, the dollar or the economy, at least not yet.

Which brings me to another interesting development over the weekend.  Apparently, back in 2024, Chinese President Xi Jinping made a speech to a group of provincial officials, that had heretofore not been publicized, where he declared his ambition to have the yuan become a reserve currency.  This is an interesting idea, but one that I believe will be very difficult for him to achieve, at least given his apparent desire to control every aspect of the Chinese economy.  After all, for other nations to hold a currency as part of their reserves, they will want complete, unfettered access to convert it at any time they desire.  Otherwise, as a reserve manager, why would you even consider holding it as part of your national wealth.  

One thesis is that China is going to back the CNY with gold, but I challenge that thesis.  Let’s do a little thought experiment here.  

  1. China claims CNY is gold backed, so it is safer than USD which is backed only by the full faith and credit of the US government.
  2. Saudi Arabia sells China lots of oil and gets paid in CNY
  3. Since the Saudis can’t really do anything with their CNY, they go to the PBOC and say, here’s your CNY, give me gold.
  4. China says
    1. no problem, or
    1. no way

Which do you think is more likely, a) or b)?

China claiming that CNY is backed by gold because they have bought a bunch lately is no different than the US claiming the USD is backed by gold because we hold a bigger bunch in Ft Knox.  It is meaningless unless those who hold bank notes, or their digital form, can convert it.  Even at the government level, and I find it difficult to believe that China will ever permit that type of transaction.  But it sure makes for good headlines to offset the debasement trade debacle that just played out!

As we have observed over the past months, things do change quickly these days, so who knows what tomorrow will bring.  But for now, let’s look at how the rest of the markets behaved overnight.

I’m going to start with bonds because they are the easiest.  Virtually nothing has happened for weeks.  Treasury yields (-1bp) have slipped slightly, as have JGB yields (-1bp) while European sovereign yields have edged higher by 1bp across the board.  I would think if risk views had really changed, there would be more activity here.  Perhaps the biggest surprise is JGB’s where the most recent poll for the election coming Sunday has her LDP coalition winning a landslide 300 seats.  If that is the case, based on the earlier concerns of her apparent willingness to increase unfunded spending, I would have thought JGB’s would suffer.  But not today.

Turning to stocks, while Friday’s US performance was lackluster, it was a virtual star relative to the metals space.  As to Asia last night, it was ugly with Japan (-1.25%), China (-2.1%), HK (-2.2%) and Australia (-1.0%) all under pressure as it appears a combination of fears over changing global dynamics mixed with weakness in mining company shares after the metals rout.  Korea (-5.3%) meanwhile, really took it on the chin with a sharp reversal of recent gains that had outpaced almost all other major markets.  Indonesia (-4.9%) also got crushed, but then they have had problems since the threat of reduced status.  India (+1.2%) was the only market gainer of note.

Europe, though, has neither tech nor mining companies of note and so is higher across the board this morning, led by Spain (+0.8%) and Germany (+0.6%) after very slightly better than expected PMI data this morning. As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are slightly softer with the NASDAQ (-0.5%) the laggard.

Oil (-4.75%) is backing off significantly this morning as there appears to have been a reduction in the rhetoric between President Trump and Iran, with negotiations mooted for some time this week or next, ostensibly in Turkey.  Nat Gas (-17.1%) is giving back some of its recent gains as US temperatures exit the polar vortex and come back to more normal winter temps.

Finally, the dollar is doing little this morning.  Friday saw a solid rebound across the board, about 1%, but today, the biggest movers are ZAR (+0.8%) which is shocking given the move in gold, MXN (+0.5%), where traders believe the Banco de Mexico is likely to be a bit more hawkish than previously thought and CNY (+0.25%) I guess on the reserve currency story.  But the G10 are all little changed and the one other thing of note is that Secretary Bessent ruled out US intervention in the yen, although it remains little changed on the session near 155.00.

On the data front, as it is the first week of the month, we finish off with NFP.  Here’s what else is coming:

TodayISM Manufacturing48.5
 ISM Prices Paid60.5
TuesdayJOLYs Job Openings7.1M
 Economic Optimism Index47.9
WednesdayADP Employment40K
 ISM Services53.5
ThursdayInitial Claims210K
 Continuing Claims1825K
FridayNonfarm Payrolls70K
 Private Payrolls60K
 Manufacturing Payrolls-10K
 Unemployment Rate4.4%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.6% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34..2
 Participation Rate62.3%
 Michigan Sentiment55.8

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, we hear from 5 more Fed speakers, but quite frankly, I expect that the only Fed voice that is going to matter for a while is Warsh, and he is not on the slate that I can see.  

We have seen a dramatic change in market mindset since Thursday, but we have not seen any change at all in policy or economics.  At this point, it is clear the market was overdone (remember, trees don’t grow to the sky), but that doesn’t mean the underlying thesis was wrong.  I still think that the need for commodities is substantial, and we will see prices go higher.  As to the dollar, there is no indication it is about to collapse, nor would I expect it.  Until such time as other nations are clamoring to own CNY, the dollar remains the only game in town.  Big picture, I still like it vs. other fiat currencies.

Good luck

Adf

Kurtosis

Posted on by

Get ready to hear ‘bout kurtosis
An idea what very few knows is
In this case they’ll say
Fat tails did hold sway
Be careful, though, ere there’s psychosis

This definition from slideserve.com is probably the most comprehensible one that I have seen around, so thought it would be useful to understand.  And below, is a chart that shows the shape of distributions of outcomes.  Markets live on the blue line below.

The reason this is important was made evident on Friday given the extraordinary movement seen in markets.  It is important to understand that both commodity and financial markets have always demonstrated leptokurtosis in their behavior.  This means that the tails are fatter than a normal distribution’s tails.  In other words, there are far more large movement events than a normal probability distribution would expect or predict.  So, while I have read that Friday’s decline in gold and silver prices were anywhere between a 5SD and 12SD move (it doesn’t really matter for our purposes, just suffice it to say it was quite large), there is nothing to say it cannot happen again tomorrow.  You will undoubtedly read from some that this movement shouldn’t have occurred during the life of the universe it was so statistically improbable, but that is based on a normal distribution.

Understand, too, that market makers, especially in options markets which rely on the basic math of the normal distribution, are well aware that tails are fat.  It is why volatility curves in all markets have smiles or smirks, as these are an effort to take account of those fat tails.  It turns out the math for fat tail distributions is incredibly complex, so traders are happy with the smile approximations.

Which brings us to the question of what really happened and why did it happen on Friday?  The answer is, nobody really knows.  I have seen several writeups that certainly make sense, and are likely to have been part of the process, but in markets, given the millions of variables that are part of the market process (consider how many individuals trade the stuff in addition to things like economic variables and supply/demand information for commodities), it is difficult to pinpoint an exact catalyst. 

Many are pointing to the naming of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair, on the surface a more hawkish pick than had been expected earlier in the week, although on Thursday, his Kalshi odds were already above 90%, so would seem to have been priced.

What we do know is that leverage was high and that prices were massively extended on technical indicators.  Parabolic moves tend to crash in the same way they rise.  Certainly, once things got going, margin calls were rampant and there was a great deal of forced selling.  The chart below shows just how extensive the move was, and I highlighted the opening of the NY session.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The great thing about moves like this are the conspiracy theories that arise as an explanation.  Here’s the thing about conspiracy theories, once there are more than two people involved, it tends towards a leak. 

So, what do we know?  Comex futures prices when Asia opens tonight are going to be a lot lower than when they went home on Friday.  But…Chinese licensing restrictions remain in place; no new silver mines have been discovered let alone gone into production; both individuals and central banks in Asia continue to buy the stuff; and the premium for physical metal in Shanghai remains steep.  The fundamentals have not changed with regard to the metals themselves.

How about the financing questions?  Is Warsh a hawk?  My take is he is going to work hand in glove with Scott Bessent to address the economic issues in the nation.  So, I would look for support (i.e. QE) for issuance, although it is entirely realistic that when (if) Warsh sits down in the chair, there will be fewer Fed fund rate cuts than might have been seen with another choice.  Warsh is going to essentially join the Cabinet, as they work to implement their vision of how to overcome the debt and deficit issues.

Is this, more hawkish view, the rationale behind the moves on Friday?  It probably played a role, but it is difficult to ascribe movement of that nature, especially given its self-generated response to positioning, to a single data point.

One other thing to note was that the dollar, which was set to collapse according to so many, rebounded sharply alongside the precious metals’ declines, albeit not quite as far.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I never looked at the screens on Friday because I know that when moves like that happen, it’s easy to regret the trades you make.  But the underlying thesis remains unchanged.  I was not counting on the dollar’s decline to drive precious metals’ prices higher, and that relationship has broken down to a large extent anyway.  It is not clear to me that having a perfect understanding of the drivers of Friday’s markets is critical.  If I hearken back to Black Monday in October 1987, when the S&P 500 fell 22%, Ace Greenberg, then chairman at Bear Stearns, said it best when asked about what happened.  His reply was, “Markets move, next question.”

Remember that, markets move.

Good luck

Adf

Leverage Thumbscrews

Posted on by

The President said that today
He’d let us know who’ll replace Jay
The favorite is Warsh
But that could be harsh
For markets, or so people say
 
But really, this morning, the news
Is silver and gold have the blues
It turns out their prices
Were causing a crisis
For players with leverage thumbscrews

The big news this morning, is that President Trump is ostensibly going to announce former Fed governor Kevin Warsh as his selection for the next Fed Chair.  His history has been as someone who has disagreed with many Fed decisions, and he skews to the hawkish side of the spectrum, which seems odd for Trump who everyone expected would nominate a dove. He is clearly quite capable of doing the job and brings a significant amount of intellectual firepower to the role.  It remains to be seen, if he is nominated, how the confirmation process will proceed, as well as what Jay Powell will do when his Chairmanship is up (his term runs until 2028).

The interesting connection for me is the number of stories that have linked this rumor to major market moves overnight, especially in the precious metals space.  So, let’s jump in and look at a few charts to offer some perspective on things.  

As we all live in the moment, it is often difficult to consider history in its fullness.  Look at the three charts of gold (from tradingecomomics.com) that follow, each over a different timespan, 1week, 1year and 5 years.

1 week:

1 year:

5 years:

What do you notice:  there is no question that gold (-4.7% or $250/oz) has fallen sharply overnight.  that is evident in the first two charts.  However, a look at the first chart shows you that despite a decline of that magnitude, the barbarous relic is still higher THIS WEEK!  While gold has been exploding higher, it only crossed above $5000/oz for the first time on Sunday night in Asian trading.  Now, I expect the bulk of the discussion will center around the 1-year chart which shows the dramatic decline as that is the newsworthy story, the ‘collapse’ in the price.  But if we zoom out further, to the 5-year perspective, which has weekly candles, the last down week was in December.  Market technicians will point to the shape of the most recent weekly candle, which is typically referred to as a hammer candle, and explain it signals a reversal in trend.  And maybe it does.  But the fact is volumes on the way up were much higher than those overnight, which does not portend panic selling.  Trees don’t grow to the sky, and a reversal was always expected.  Here we are.

The price action in silver overnight was almost identical, albeit more violent as has been the case with the rally as well.  Platinum too.  A couple of other things to consider about this:

  • Today is month end, a time when positions are typically adjusted and rebalanced, so given the tremendous rally seen this month in the metals, selling is what rebalances things.
  • China has not changed its policy regarding gold purchases nor its policy on license restrictions for the export of silver, so to the extent that those were driving forces in the rally, they still exist
  • There is no evidence the world is a safer place this morning than it was yesterday morning.  There’s no peace in Ukraine; the Ayatollah has not relinquished power; Cuba and Venezuela remain in the status quo, and Europe continues to try to figure out how to power themselves without relying on the two largest energy exporters in the world, the US and Russia.

It beggar’s belief that this is entirely a reaction to the rumored naming of Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair.  As I type early this morning, the prices of precious metals are already bouncing nicely off their lows.  I do not know what drove this move specifically, but I do not believe that the big picture story has changed.

This segues nicely into another key narrative this week, the dollar’s massive break lower.  Earlier this week I had written about how the DXY was approaching a double bottom on the charts and many in the market were convinced that if we traded below that level, and more importantly, closed below the level, which was 96.22, that it opened the door for a much more significant leg lower.  I addressed this, pointed out that the dollar was still in the broad middle of its long-term trading range, but acknowledged that a move lower was quite realistic.  Well, as of yet, we have not closed below the key level, and this move is shaping up as a potential bounce back into the range.  As you can see in the chart below, the baseline is still holding on.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, the dollar is stronger across the board this morning (EUR -0.2%, GBP -0.2%, JPY -0.5%, CHF -0.4%, ZAR -1.1%, CLP -0.6%) although these declines are abating in a similar fashion to the precious metals price action this morning.   Here, too, portfolio rebalancing would indicate that traders would be buying dollars given its decline this month.  Has anything really changed in the FX markets overnight?  All the recent policy decisions were exactly as expected.  Data overnight showed that European GDP continues to muddle along at just 1.3%, hardly a rationale to invest aggressively on the continent.  Is this dollar rebound just a response to the Warsh story and his presumed hawkishness?  Or is it the normal ebb and flow of markets.  I am not yet willing to concede the dollar is breaking lower, I need more proof for that, but I certainly cannot rule out that outcome, regardless of who the new Fed chair is.  

How about other markets?  Equities in the US yesterday were hampered by Microsoft’s earnings release Wednesday, with its decline dragging down the NASDAQ, although the DJIA managed to recoup all its early losses and finish in the green (barely).  But Asian bourses had a more difficult time.  While Japan (-0.1%) was little changed, both China (-1.0%) and HK (-2.1%) fell sharply, and I don’t believe those markets were responding to the Warsh rumor.  It appears that HK, especially, was the victim of month end profit taking and rebalancing as it has had quite a good run this month.  The other key laggard in the region was Taiwan (-1.45%) while the rest of the markets in the time zone were +/-0.5% or so, or less.  

European shares, though, are all firmer this morning led by Spain (+1.6%) after GDP data there was a tick better than expected at 2.6%.  But gains are universal (DAX +0.85%, CAC +0.7%, FTSE 100 +0.4%) as earnings results were enough to offset the generally lackluster data.  Perhaps the idea of another ECB rate cut is entering the collective consciousness, although according to the ECB’s own forecast tool, there is a 10% probability of a 25bp rate HIKE.  I’ll believe that when I see it.  As to US futures, they are softer this morning as I type (7:10), with declines on the order of -0.3% across the board, which is also a rebound from levels earlier this morning.

Bonds:  nobody seems to care.  Yields have edged higher by 1bp virtually across the board this morning and still remain within the recent trading ranges.  It is quite interesting how little financial markets are focusing on this key source of information.  

And before I leave, oil (-0.5%) has backed off its recent top, although remains higher by 6.5% this week as concerns over a possible US action in Iran continue to haunt traders.

On the data front, this morning brings PPI (exp 0.2%, 2.7% Y/Y) for headline and (0.2%, 2.9% Y/Y) for core as well as Chicago PMI (44.0).  Too, we get the first Fed speaker, Governor Bowman, but the only Fed news that is going to matter today is the mooted announcement about the next Chair.

What have we learned this week?  Volatility is alive and well in the commodity space, and, although not quite to the same extent, in the equity space.  Bonds are boring and the dollar continues to refuse to stick to the narrative that its days in the sun are over.  Regarding the dollar, remember that despite all the talk of the dollar’s collapse, the only thing we have heard from ECB members is that if the euro rises too much (i.e. the dollar falls sharply) that is a problem and they will need to respond.  It’s been an eventful month in the markets.  I suspect that this may be a map for at least the first half of the year.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Commodities Blazing

Posted on by

According to Jay and the Fed
The ‘conomy’s moving ahead
So, rates are on hold
With rallies in gold
And stocks and the dollar instead
 
But really, the thing that’s amazing
Is nobody cares about phrasing
Or Dot plots or pressers
‘Cause now all the stressors
Are Trump and commodities blazing

Once upon a time, the FOMC meeting was THE story for markets during the week leading up to the meeting and through the Chair’s press conference explaining the many virtues of what they did and why they did it.  Of course, this has not always been the case.  If we head back to the pre-Alan Greenspan days, the FOMC was peopled by 18 anonymous members and the Fed Chair, at that time Paul Volcker, and nobody ever spoke to the press and only grudgingly to Congress, they simply managed the money supply to the best of their ability to achieve their mandates.  The biggest data point of every week was the Thursday afternoon M2 release, and there was an entire subculture of ‘Fed watchers’, similar to ‘Kremlin watchers’ whose job was to read the tea leaves based on market behavior and data in trying to determine how the Fed would behave going forward.

Almost the only time Chairman Volcker spoke in public was at the semiannual Humphrey-Hawkins testimony to Congress, but he basically never answered any questions and clearly didn’t care what either Senators or Congressmen asked.

But then we got the “Maestro”, Alan Greenspan, who after Black Monday in October 1987, created the first Fed put.  At that time, the rest of the FOMC was still largely anonymous, but Greenspan craved the limelight, if only to try to show how much smarter he was than everybody else.  Famously, he explained in Congressional testimony in 1996, “If you understood what I said I must have misspoken.”  Greenspan was more available to the press than Volcker, but the rest of the committee remained in the background.

However, that simply set the table for the ensuing Fed chairs, Bernanke, Yellen and now Powell, all of whom give press conferences and clearly encouraged their minions to get out there and deliver the message.  As so many struggling leaders explain, it’s not the substance, it’s the messaging that’s the problem.  This is what we have all been dealing with since Bernanke sat down in 2006, mandated press conferences and pushed the narrative as a critical part of policy.

Then, along came President Trump’s second term, and times, they are a-changing.  While Trump rails on Powell to cut rates and lambastes him regularly, it turns out, the combination of new fiscal and economic policy is driving monetary policy into the background, at least from the perspective of market participants.  The result is that while FOMC members still get out there and give interviews regularly, they are never newsworthy.  In fact, my suspicion is that the reason Chairman Powell made his little video announcing the Fed received subpoenas was as an effort to get back on the front page, a place he and his committee members have clearly grown to enjoy, and from which they are increasingly absent.

Which brings us to the meeting yesterday where…nothing happened.  Policy rates remain unchanged, as universally expected, two voters wanted 25bp cuts (Miran and Waller), and they admitted that economic activity moved up from “moderate” to “solid”.  In the most stinging rebuke, the market virtually ignored the entire process.  In fact, the discussion about the next Fed chair is ebbing into the background.  My take is this is a better situation for all involved.  I only hope it stays this way.

So, what did happen?  Stocks were flat, bonds were flat, the dollar rebounded a bit, and commodities continue to rocket higher.  Let’s take a turn around markets overnight and start with commodities as that is where all the action is.

Copper (+6.1%) is the overnight star, soaring in Asia to record highs.  As with virtually all commodities right now, blame is laid at the feet of the weakening dollar (it didn’t move overnight) and with uncertainties about President Trump’s next actions and the potential risks attendant to those actions when they occur.  As we have seen with both gold (+1.9%, +27.1% in the past month) and silver (+1.3%, +54.6% in the past month), there is no doubt that fiat currencies are losing their status as a store of value, regardless of the interest rates they pay.  While copper’s movement has not been as extraordinary as that of either gold or silver, the trend, as you can see in the chart below, remains clearly higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The underlying reality for all these metals is that the financialization of economies all around the world has resulted in far more market activity than was necessarily warranted by the physical markets.  And physical markets need ounces and pounds of stuff, which have very long lead times to get out of the ground.  As a trader, I look at these moves in precious metals and am very concerned they are overdone but as somebody with a basic understanding of physics, I see no reason to believe that the demand for these metals is going to slow down anytime soon.  The below chart shows just how extraordinary the silver move has been, and the table below it really tells the tale.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to oil (+2.6%), it is heading higher this morning on increasing fears that the President is going to initiate a military action to depose the Ayatollah in Iran.  Concerns are rising about Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz as well as its ability to respond via missile attacks.  Remember, though, a market that moves on a political issue will revert once that issue has either occurred, or clearly won’t occur, so do not mistake this move for the beginning of a new trend.  Consider what happened to oil after Russia invade Ukraine and after they invaded Crimea in 2014.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Turning to the equity markets, yesterday’s US blahs were followed with a bit more price action in Asia as though Japan (-0.7%) slipped a bit, China (+0.8%), HK (+0.5%), Korea (+1.0%) and Taiwan (-0.8%) all so more significant movement, albeit not offering a larger theme given the relative gains and losses.  Elsewhere in the region, the smaller exchanges showed more red than green.  In Europe, Germany (-1.15%) is the dog, falling on idiosyncratic weakness in SAP and Deutsche Bank following weak earnings and forecasts, but the rest of the space is performing well (UK +0.4%, France +0.65%, Spain +0.4%) as earnings there have been relatively solid.  And, at this hour (7:10), US futures are pointing higher by about 0.25% or so as earnings numbers have been strong so far this week, highlighted by Meta last night.

In the bond market, activity is less frenetic with Treasury yields unchanged this morning, European sovereigns catching a bit of a bid as yields slip -2bps across the board and JGB yields (+2bps) rising after the latest poll showing PM Takaichi increasing her odds of getting an LDP majority in the Diet next week.  Something to watch closely going forward is the shape of the yield curve as there is growing concern that long-end rates may rise regardless of the Fed (yet another sign the Fed is losing its sway).  In fact, I suspect if that is the case, that we will see yet another bout of QE, although they will find an alternate name.

Finally, in the FX markets, despite all the pearl clutching about the end of the dollar, there is no movement of note in any currency today, with the entire screen showing gains or losses of 0.3% or less with one exception, CLP (+0.5%) following the remarkable jump in copper’s price.  The linked article is quite funny as they explain all the negatives of a weak dollar and then also explain that ECB members are concerned about a too strong euro.  I am frequently confused by whether a strong currency is good or bad for a nation, but I guess it depends on the narrative you are trying to push.

On the data front, weekly Initial (exp 205K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims come at 8:30 as does the Trade Balance (-$40.5B).  We also see final Nonfarm Productivity (4.9%) and Unit Labor Costs (-1.9%) which if those numbers are met indicate quite positive economic activity.  Then, at 10:00 we see Factory Orders from November (1.6%), but that is such old data I don’t think it matters.

Remember, it is Trump’s world (and Bessent) and we’re just living in it.  The White House is the source of all the news so let’s all be happy that the Fed is fading into the background.  With that in mind, based on President Trump’s goals, a weaker dollar is clearly his desire, at least in the short run, although I continue to see scope for longer term strength.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Gory

Posted on by

While yesterday, there was one story
‘Bout silver and gold and their glory
By end of the session
The dollar’s depression
Was headlining comments quite gory
 
The narrative now speaks of trends
Which lead to a dollar that ends
The problem they’ve got
Is history’s taught
That cycles and dollars are friends

The dollar is clearly under pressure lately as discussed here yesterday morning.  Using the DXY as our proxy, it has traded and closed through the recent double bottom (see chart below), and the doomsayers are licking their chops that their views of the demise of the dollar are finally coming to fruition. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And I am not here to say the dollar is about to reverse course higher.  While I remain medium and long-term bullish on the buck, it doesn’t feel like the time to get long.  However, look at the chart below, to get a longer-term perspective on the dollar’s history.  This chart starts back in 1985, which is just before the Plaza Accord where it was agreed the dollar was too strong and central banks around the world intervened and altered policy to change it.  But here we are at 96ish in a market that has spent no little time below 80 with several drops below 75.  My point is, the dollar tends towards long cycles.  It is entirely possible that we peaked in late 2022 for this cycle and are now heading lower from there.  But I remain highly confident that it will reverse course and rebound. Not tomorrow, but this is not the end.  Just remember that when you read the eulogies for the buck.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

One other thing that seems to be getting headlines is that the president was asked his views on the dollar’s recent weakness and was (rightly) nonplussed over the issue as described here.  After all, this is a man who constantly rails against the artificial weakness of the yen and the yuan, and who is seeking to rebalance the trade account.  All that points to a weaker dollar, so it beggar’s belief that this is a surprise to the market.

One last thing while I’m on my high horse.  I couldn’t help but notice this article about Banque de France chief Villeroy explaining that the weakening dollar may impact ECB policy-making with a throwaway line about diminishing confidence in the dollar stemming from the unpredictability of US economic policy.  First off, US policy is very clear, run it hot!  And second, it is remarkable that when the euro was tumbling, we never saw this same introspection about Eurozone/EU economic policy and their self-destructive energy policies.  My point is, nothing we are currently witnessing is new in any way at all, but rather part of the longer-term cycle of FX markets.

OK, how has this dollar move impacted other markets?  Well, yesterday’s US equity session was marked by a rotation back to tech as the NASDAQ (+0.9%) had a fine day while the DJIA (-0.8%) fell hard.  This led to a mixed session in Asia with the Nikkei little changed (although other indices there were under steady pressure), while HK (+2.6%) exploded higher on news that China has licensed its first Nvidia H200 chips to Alibaba and someone threw money at China Vanke, one of the collapsing Chinese real estate firms.  The mainland was modestly higher (+0.25%) but there was strength in Korea (+1.7%), Taiwan (+1.5%) and India (+0.6%).  On the downside, Indonesia (-7.3%) tumbled after MSCI indicated they may downgrade the market there to frontier status due to lack of liquidity.

In Europe, red is today’s color led by Spain (-1.1%) and France (-1.0%) with the latter seeing weakness in luxury stocks while the former appears to be unwinding some of its recent strength with no particular catalyst, merely a negative view overall in Europe.  Germany (-0.2%) and the UK (-0.4%) are also softer without anything specific.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:40) they are pointing higher with NASDAQ (+1.1%) leading the way again.  As an aside, the S&P 500 futures are above 7000 now, and the cash market looks set to break that big round number this morning.

In the bond market, as we await the FOMC policy decision (no change expected) and the subsequent press conference, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning after having edged higher by 2bps yesterday.  European sovereign yields are all basically softer by -2bps, perhaps on the back of the euro’s strength.  After all, Villeroy hinted that if the euro remains strong, they may need to cut rates again.  Interestingly, JGB yields (-5bps) fell after BOJ Minutes from the December meeting (remember, they already met again last week) indicated that some members were concerned over the weaker yen driving inflation higher.  Talk about stale news.  My sense here is this is much more about the election and JGB’s will track Takaichi-san’s support level with lower yields coincident with weakening support, potentially preventing her Liz Truss moment.

In the commodity space, oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning but has rallied more than 7% in the past month after a solid session yesterday.  Looking at the chart, the trend clearly remains lower, but the short-term reversal is also quite clear.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The dollar’s recent weakness is supporting all commodities (given they are generally priced in USD, other nations can afford more with the dollar’s slide), but the bigger picture remains that there is an extraordinarily large amount of the stuff around and much of the angst over its recovery is political (look at Europe) rather than geologic.  Nat Gas (-4.5%) is backing off its extended levels as temperatures are forecast to rebound early next week (cannot happen soon enough for me, where’s global warming when you need it?), but the long-term story here remains positive as it continues to be the energy source of choice for timely access with the least environmental impact.

Turning to metals, gold (+1.6%) continues to trade to new highs on the ‘all of the above’ thesis (weak dollar, debasement trade, geopolitical risk, central bank buying) and shows no signs of slowing down.  Silver (-0.1%), however, has been so incredibly volatile it is starting to become a concern for all involved.  It is not normal for 10%-12% daily moves in any product, let alone one with so much involvement from both retail and institutional players.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The silver market has gone into backwardation which means that there is significant demand for the actual metal.  And prices in Shanghai trade at a significant premium to the COMEX.  Shanghai is a delivery market.  We will need to watch deliveries at futures expirations closely going forward.

Finally, the dollar today is bouncing off yesterday’s session lows but remain under pressure overall.  After trading through 1.20 yesterday, the euro (-0.6%) has backed off a bit and we have seen similar moves through much of the rest of the G10 (GBP -0.6%, SEK -0.7%, NOK -0.7%, CHF -0.9%).  The yen (-0.3%) continues to be caught between potential intervention fears and fears of unfunded spending.  In the EMG bloc, we have seen CE4 currencies all suffer on the order of -0.7% or so, although APAC currencies are little changed this morning.  The one currency bucking the trend is CLP (+0.2%) which remains closely connected to copper (+1.0%).

On the data front, yesterday’s Consumer Confidence Index fell sharply, a further indication that there is a split between most of the economic numbers and people’s beliefs.  Today, aside from the Fed, we hear from the BOC (no change expected) and we get EIA oil inventories with a small draw forecast after several weeks of large builds.  Too, later in the day the Banco do Brazil will announce their policy (no change expected).

The thing that makes me happy is the Fed is an afterthought today.  While the cacophony of noise that comes from media is extremely difficult to parse given the biases underlying almost all one reads or hears, to me, the question will be whether people start to believe things are getting better, and that is more political than economic in my view.  In the meantime, the dollar appears to be set for a bit of further weakness, but do not mistake this for the end of the dollar or the dollar’s role in the global economy.

Good luck

Adf

No One Can Kill

Posted on by

Remarkably, metals are still
The story that no one can kill
The rally refuses
To stop, as gold cruises
And silver gives traders a thrill

The funny thing about financial markets is that it goes through periods where a single story dominates the narrative so completely that everything else gets viewed through the lens of that story.  We have seen this happen many times with recent situations like tariffs, the Fed, Covid, Brexit, Russia, etc.  Well, these days, precious metals are the story through which everything else is defined.

Consider, for those who are inherently bearish the dollar, the remarkable rally in precious metals serves as proof positive of the theory.  For those who have been antagonistic to the equity rally, and let’s face it, there has been a huge amount of discussion about the equity bubble and overvaluation of the Mag7 stocks, it is a huge relief that precious metals have now outperformed equities on numerous timescales, whether looking over the past week, month, quarter, year or decade.  You see, they will claim, metals have been the best investment.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the above chart, I have randomly selected Oct 2, 2022, as it appeared to be a local low over the past 5 years in both the S&P 500 and gold.  Since then, while the S&P has gained very impressive 190%, gold is up an even more remarkable 300%.

The bond story is more interesting as, usually, throughout history there has been an inverse relationship between yields and metals as higher yields foregone were an additional ‘cost’ of holding metals and traders generally sought to prevent that outcome.  Yet, if we go back to that same random date, the relationship has essentially broken down.  In fact, as you can see from the chart below, yields have edged modestly higher while gold has exploded.  And if we turn to JGB yields, which we all know are rising sharply, they are almost following gold’s trajectory directly.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My point is, these days you cannot read an analysis about anything, whether the markets or the global economy, without the framework entailing the price of gold and silver.

As such, the major question facing all market participants is what is driving this extraordinary performance.  At this point my take is gold, and silver, have essentially become a Rorschach test for the viewers investing and political framework.  So, we are going to see a lot of different explanations as to the cause of this movement.

FWIW, my take, which is all that you get here, is there are a few things combining to juice this move.  First, the overriding theory of fiat currency debasement continues to gain adherents, not that economists are moving from the Keynesian to Austrian school of economics, but with M2 around the world growing at 12% while global GDP grows at 3%, the fundamental of too much money chasing too few goods has even broken through the Keynesians’ armor.  This leads to the natural next step that, those who are aware and are charged with maintaining the real value of their holdings, see gold as a better long-term investment given its history.  Enter central banks, who were, of course, further encouraged once the US froze Russian assets after their invasion of Ukraine.

This has bled into an increasing discussion of the overall geopolitical situation, notably tensions driven by the US interdiction in Venezuela, the uprising in Iran and the ongoing stress between the US and Europe and Canada over trade.  All these things have forced many to consider that traditional haven assets, notably Treasuries, may not be so haven-like after all.  Yet another reason to like gold.

And when any story gains traction like this has, we then get inundated with the ‘tourists’ who flood social media with their views, especially as to whether this is a blow-off top and the move is over, or whether there is much further to run.  I particularly like the below chart as an encapsulation of the market.

It is remarkable to me that the same folks who have demonstrated their expertise on Venezuelan oil production and the legality of Trump’s tariffs are now so clearly expert on the price of gold and silver, why they haven’t moved like this in the past and whether this is, or isn’t the top of the market.  Thank goodness we have them all!!

In the meantime, let’s turn to the market price action to see how things have behaved overnight.  starting, sensibly, with the precious metals, despite a late day pullback from its highs yesterday, gold (+1.3%) and silver (+6.7%) show no signs of stopping yet.  Personally, I remain in the camp that structural industrial shortages combined with China’s gating of exports of silver are likely to maintain a bid under the stuff for quite a while yet.  The fact that the US has listed it as a strategic metal is something not widely discussed nor remembered but is quite important as a demand signal.  Copper (-2.1%), however, is backing off its recent highs, although remains within spitting distance of its recent all-time highs.  As to oil (-0.15%) which used to be the belle of the commodity ball, it is stuck around $60/bbl with no obvious driver in the short-term in either direction.  Don’t forget NatGas (-4.8%), which is higher by 65% this week on the back of the polar conditions forecast to remain at least through the end of the week.

Turning to equities, yesterday’s US gains were followed by gains almost everywhere else in the world.  Tokyo (+0.85%), HK (+1.35%), Australia (+0.9%), Korea (+2.7%), India (+0.4%) after they signed their FTA with Europe, and Taiwan (+0.8%) were all in fine fettle last night.  Only China (0.0%) missed the boat, although there was no obvious reason for that outcome.  In Europe, too, we see almost all green on the screen with only Germany (0.0%) not taking part in the fun.  Otherwise, modest gains of 0.3% are the order of the day elsewhere in the UK and on the continent.  As to US futures, they are also pointing higher, about 0.5% at this hour (7:35).

In the bond market, JGB yields (+5bps) are the story, as the leadup to the election and its potential outcome dominate discussion.  My take is higher yields implies the market is anticipating PM Takaichi to win and improve her margin in the Diet, thus allowing more unfunded spending.  But in the US and Europe, yields have edged higher by 1bp to 2bps amid lackluster trading.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure yet again with the DXY (-0.3%) slipping, and as you can see in the below chart, now approaching a double bottom, a break of which seems likely to open up a more substantial decline.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The dollar weakness is broad based this morning, with most currencies gaining by that 0.3% amount and only CHF (+0.75%) showing real leadership.  The yen (+0.4%) has been hanging around the post ‘rate check’ levels and I would contend today’s movement is about the dollar writ large rather than the yen in particular.  I did read that option traders are bidding up short-dated USD puts across numerous currencies as either fear is growing, or they think that DXY break is going to open a major move.  We shall see,

On the data front, yesterday say a huge Durable Goods print, another sign of economic strength.  This morning, we see Case Shiller Home Prices (exp 1.2%) and Consumer Confidence (90.9).  As well, the FOMC meeting starts with current expectations of no policy change at tomorrow’s meeting.

Gold and silver continue to dominate the conversation and I freely admit, I have been along for the ride and am getting nervous, at least in the short term.  As to the dollar, it does look awful right now, and if DXY breaks that line at 96.22 with any impetus, we could be in for another sharp leg lower.

Good luck

Adf