Far From Dead

Posted on by 
Tomorrow we’ll hear from the Fed
With pundits not sure where they’ll tread
Some call for a hike
So, Warsh can out psych
Inflation that seems far from dead

But others claim hikes he will thwart
Awaiting the task force report
With oil retreating, 
Though some call it fleeting,
The hawks he will likely abort

The one thing we cannot forget
Is all of the outstanding debt
A hike may create
A weaker growth rate
An outcome he’ll surely regret

Let us turn out attention to the FOMC meeting which begins today and culminates in tomorrow’s policy statement and then the press conference that ensues.  On the whole, I would say that Chairman Warsh has already achieved a key objective, market uncertainty about the outcome.  A point I have been making for a very long time is that uncertainty is what creates an anti-fragile market as positioning is inevitably reduced, and more importantly, so is leverage.  And this is true in every market.  While there may have been value in forward guidance at the onset of the GFC such that the Fed wanted to calm markets down, that time is long past.  

Interestingly, perhaps the one individual who is unhappiest is Nick Timiraos at the WSJ, the former Fed whisperer.  He exhibited great power in the market because he was seen as former Chairman Powell’s mouthpiece when Powell wanted to convey information without being directly attributed.  However, it appears that there will be no Fed whisperer in a Warsh Fed, although I suspect even if there is someone, it will not be Powell’s man to whom Warsh turns.  So Timiraos is on the outs anyway.  But you can tell how unhappy he is by the tone of his recent articles like the one last night trying to insinuate that Warsh will not get his way.

At the same time, Bloomberg has an article this morning explaining how Citadel Securities’ chief economist is expecting a hike.  In my opinion, this is how it should be.  Wall Street economists and analysts make enough money that they should be able to do the work themselves and have their own opinions, not merely regurgitate what they hear from the Fed speakers.  (After all, I make no money and have opinions!)

Reiterating my view quickly, I do not see a hike for the following reasons:

  1. Recent data releases point to cooling inflation offering a respite on concerns of runaway prices
  2. Delaying any action until the task forces complete their work and help reset the way the Fed approaches things feels like the goal
  3. The Federal government cannot afford a rate hike as they migrate more and more issuance to the short end of the curve that will directly be impacted.

The counter view basically revolves around the idea that Warsh can ‘earn’ market credibility by hiking now, whether or not it is a policy error.  I don’t think he is concerned about losing credibility at this stage and has set the table, via the task forces, to show he means business when it comes to changing the Fed.  We all find out tomorrow.

As traders await all the news
On earnings, it seems there are views
That AI is losing
Its luster and cruising
Toward outcomes where stocks sing the blues

In my discussion about parabolic markets yesterday, I mentioned the Korean KOSPI index but after last night’s price action, I think a picture is in order.  This from wolfstreet.com.

As I explained, parabolic moves do not end in a range, they fall like the chart above with pullbacks greater than 50% the norm.  This implies that the KOSPI is not done yet, and given the KOSPI is basically two stocks, Samsung and SK Hynix, both of which are major semiconductor manufacturers, it doesn’t speak well to the semiconductor space in the US either.  Tomorrow, we hear from MSFT and META and then Thursday we get AAPL and AMZN earnings reports.  My take is much is riding on these earnings reports as any indication that growth is starting to slip will feed into my discussion yesterday regarding the second derivative and how that is the driver.  In fact, we saw the announcement yesterday by Nvidia that they were guaranteeing $250 billion of debt for OpenAI to build a new datacenter in Ohio.  At cycle ends, the pace of activity tends to increase as the players want to get things done before the collapse.  I fear that is what we are watching.

Ok, let’s look at markets.  As I’ve already touched on the KOSPI, which fell -10.8% last night, it is not surprising that most of the rest of Asia had a rough go as well.  Tokyo (-4.0%), Taiwan (-4.65%) and China (-2.8%) were the biggest losers overnight although HK (+0.4%) managed to eke out some gains.  In fact, looking across the region, away from the big three mentioned above, it was a more mixed picture.  Indonesia (-0.9%) is having its own problems as the central bank governor resigned and there have been numerous scandals and other cabinet resignations lately undermining both the rupiah (-0.1% and back to multidecade lows) and the stock market there.

As to Europe, given they have no tech sector and the tech sector is the area under the most pressure, I guess we should not be surprised that bourses there are modestly higher this morning, mostly up around +0.3% across the board.  A very pleasant experience compared to the gyrations seen elsewhere.  And US futures at this hour (7:10) are mixed with NASDAQ (-1.1%) suffering while the DJIA (+0.5%) is fine and the SPX is caught in the middle, basically unchanged.

In the bond market, yields continue to edge lower, with Treasuries (-3bps) leading the way and European sovereign yields all lower between -1bp and -2bps. UK gilts (-3bps) are also performing well as the market awaits the BOE’s policy decision on Thursday.  Then JGB yields (-2bps) have slipped in concert as the market awaits the BOJ decision Friday.  At this point, consensus across the board is for no movement, although there has been a discussion regarding the BOJ with some analysts believing a hike is possible.

Turning to commodities, oil (-1.6%) is not the center of attention today for once, and is pushing back toward $80/bbl.  The ongoing decline appears to be based on comments that diplomacy is once again being tried to resolve the Iran situation and the Strait of Hormuz.  Perhaps more surprisingly the metals markets are also falling this morning (Au -1.3%, Ag -2.2%, Cu -1.1%) as their inverse relationship with oil is being tested.  

Finally, the dollar is ever so slightly firmer this morning, but mostly on the order of 0.1% or 0.2%.  AUD (-0.4%) is the worst performer in either G10 or EMG blocs as central bank comments led to a reduction in the probability of a rate hike there next month.  One other thing to note is USDJPY, where, as I type, the market is trading at 163.92, a scant 8 pips from the next big, round number at 164.00, a level almost touched last Thursday (163.99 was the high) but when it trades, it will almost certainly be hailed as an important milestone regarding potential intervention.  I don’t agree with that assessment.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Again, a key feature of BOJ intervention has been an effort to address a volatile market, but as you can see below, while the direction of travel has been consistent, the only volatility has come from BOJ interventions.  Everything else is a slow, steady deterioration of the yen.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, there is plenty upcoming this week in addition to the Fed, including PCE on Thursday.

TodayGoods Trade Balance-$100.0B
 Case-Shiller Home Prices1.3%
 Consumer Confidence92.3
WednesdayFOMC Decision3.75% (unchanged)
ThursdayBOE Rate Decision3.75% (unchanged)
 Initial Claims200K
 Continuing Claims1800K
 Q2 GDP2.1%
 Personal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.3%
 PCE-0.1% (3.7% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% (3.3% Y/Y)
FridayBOJ Rate Decision1.0% (unchanged)
 Employment Cost Index0.8%
 Chicago PMI56.0
 Michigan Sentiment 54.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, the FOMC meeting will be the big story along with the earnings data, although I imagine that the PCE data may garner some interest for now, at least until we learn what measures of inflation the Fed is going to use going forward.  My fear is the equity market can crack, for now, and that will drive overall trading activity.  As to the dollar, I see no reason for a large move in either direction until we see new policies.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Spicey

Posted on by 
Though Friday things looked pretty dicey
With tech stocks then seen as quite pricey
New word that the bombing
Has ended was calming
And stock markets opened quite spicey

Of course, it can be no surprise
That oil’s now well off its highs
The dollar is slipping
Though yields are just dripping
As bond traders still agonize

President Trump changed his mind about continuing the recent bombing campaign against Iran over the weekend amid questions about alleged US munitions supplies.  But whatever the reason, this was music to the risk markets with oil (opening -6.4%) falling sharply while equity futures (NASDAQ opening +1.25%) rebound from last week’s declines.  Once again, headline risk remains the biggest risk there is in markets.  Note the huge gap lower in the oil market early Sunday evening in the chart below from tradingeconomics.com

At this point, it is a fool’s errand to try to estimate where oil prices are heading going forward as the next headline is likely to be the key driver, and that is a complete unknown.

So, let’s turn our attention to some more fundamental questions that have been brewing in the background and are pretty complex.  I want to start with a remarkable Substack piece I read this weekend which had a completely different perspective on the AI investment thesis than anything that I have seen anywhere else.  And it is quite a persuasive piece.  While I have linked it above, it is quite a long read, so the highlights are as follows:

  • The AI boom is not a tech boom; it is a credit driven real estate cycle
  • This is virtually identical to the run-up to the subprime housing crisis and GFC
  • The key to understand is the second derivative of growth, acceleration.
  • GroundBreaker’s (the author) thesis is that the second derivative on AI valuation has already rolled over and the future for AI stocks is pretty bleak, at least in the medium term.

Below are two charts from his Substack to help describe the issue:

This is a basic description of the movements of the underlying (blue line), its velocity (growth rate, yellow line) and its acceleration (the change in its growth rate, red line).  As you can seem growth can still be increasing, but at a slower rate, and that’s the problem he highlights.  

Below is a chart of OpenAI’s valuation metrics (remember it’s private so the values are episodic, not continuous, but the point is if the change in the rate of growth of the valuation metric starts declining, that is the break where things become a problem, i.e. they may not be able to finance their projected growth going forward.  

And as you can see, it is already heading lower.  This does not speak well to the future for OpenAI, and I would argue, the entire space, as many have made the case this is all Ponzi finance, meaning the funding cannot be repaid on cashflows, only on increasing valuations.  

Now consider the subprime crisis where the problems started when the rate of housing price increases rolled over and all those 2-year teaser rates could no longer be financed at higher valuations.  That’s when they all went bust!  Here’s the thing; the 2nd derivative rolled over in late 2006, the first hiccups didn’t happen until mid-2007 with SocGen closing some funds, Lehman didn’t go bust until September 2008 and the equity market didn’t bottom until March 2009.  It can take a long time for this to play out, but beware the cycle, it could well repeat in AI linked investments.

So, there’s that to consider.

The other thing that I’ve been pondering is gold and its meaning within the financial markets.  Unlike the AI discussion above, I want to discuss two very real sides to this story.  On the one hand, the ongoing destruction of the value of fiat currencies by all major central banks’ policies is real.  Money continues to get printed and inflation continues to rise debasing those fiat currencies.  Adding to the problem is the massive government debt issuance which, if history holds, will be sopped up by those very same central banks, adding to the debasement.  The search for a neutral reserve asset to replace US treasuries is real, but the transition will take a very long time, in my view.  However, all this speaks to increased demand for the barbarous relic, and when that is priced in declining fiat currencies, a higher price.  I think it’s a very strong argument and has been made by many, including this poet.  After all, gold is often thought of as the ultimate inflation hedge.

So, what is the flipside?  As I have written frequently regarding oil prices, we cannot ignore the market pricing and what it is telling us.  Understand that I have been a gold bull for a long time and strongly believe in the long-term debasement concern.  But as a long-time trader and market participant, it is very difficult for me to look at the below, long-term chart of gold and not think that there is a much further decline on the cards.  Parabolic moves, historically, do not resolve by trading sideways for extended periods of time, they fall back… a lot!

While we have recently seen several parabolic moves in market prices, notably the NASDAQ and KOSPI, I want to highlight the last time the NASDAQ had a parabolic move, during the tech bubble in 1999-2000.  The chart below is a logarithmic chart of the QQQ ETF.  As you can see back in 2000 – 2002, it fell a very long way after the bubble burst, some 88%, a much larger move than during the GFC!  

There is one other trading market, that while many may dismiss its meaning, I would contend is very representative of the way markets behave across all asset classes, Bitcoin.  The below chart shows it from its beginning, and you can see a number of essentially parabolic moves higher, each resolving with a decline of at least 50% and at times more than 70%.

Source: coinmarketcap.com

My point is that gold shows all the signs of having peaked for a while, and it has ‘only’ fallen some 25% from its highs.  From a trading history perspective, there is nothing that would seem to prevent a move down to $2800/oz or so, a 50% retracement from the high.  

So, which is it?  As I remain long gold in the personal portfolio, I have been a beneficiary of the long climb higher and would love to see it continue.  And there is much to be said for the debasement theory.  But both sides of this argument can be correct with the time frame the key differentiator. We could see a further short-term decline before a renewed upward move of significant magnitude.  Much will depend on how global macroeconomics and economic statecraft plays out over the coming months/years.  And this is why trading is hard!  One last thing describing just how much things have changed regarding gold and sentiment around it, this headline in Bloomberg this morning is remarkable, Gold Climbs as Pause in Mideast Fighting Curbs Inflation Risk.  

Ok, sorry for my rants, but a brief tour of markets show things are exactly as you would expect based on the reduction of tensions in Iran. Equity markets are higher around the world as per the below tradingeconomics.com screen shot, and don’t be fooled by Brazil, it hasn’t opened yet and there are no futures, so that was Friday’s performance.

As to bond yields, they too, are lower across the board as per the below Bloomberg.com screenshot.  Canada, Mexico and Brazil markets are not yet opened, hence the lack of movement.

Oil has fallen further than when I started writing last evening with WTI (-8.2%) and Brent (-9.7%) both sharply lower.  Regarding Brent, apparently there has been a resumption of flows through Kazakhstan which is helping even more there.  Metals are higher (Au +1.1%, Ag +2.2%, Cu +0.9%), which is keeping with the latest theme.  And finally, the dollar is broadly softer, as also would be expected given the movement in other markets.  The two key exceptions here are NOK (-0.7%) which is clearly a reaction to the movement in oil prices and KRW (-0.8%) which actually started the session much stronger but has reversed.  While I read a rationale about concerns over a Fed rate hike, given the movement in oil and yields, that doesn’t seem right.  Rather, after a more than 6% appreciation over the course of the past 3 weeks, it seems more like a reflexive bounce in the dollar.

Source: tradingeconmomics.com

On the data front today, this morning brings Durable Goods (exp 2.5%, 0.8% ex-Transport) but that is all.  I will go deeper tomorrow, and remember, the FOMC meets this week with the current pricing 33% for a hike, even after the decline in oil prices today.  I remain in the no move camp but will discuss tomorrow.

And that’s more than enough.

Good luck

Adf

Commit Seppuku

Posted on by 
Alas, nothing’s changed in Iran
And feces is hitting the fan
So, pundits feel strongly, 
Although I think wrongly
A rate hike is part of the plan

In fairness, the bond market, too
Is on board, that ere July’s through
The Fed will have raised
Won’t they be amazed
If Warsh won’t commit seppuku?

Yesterday’s dominant theme was the fact that oil prices had risen so aggressively with WTI above $90/bbl and Brent touching $100/bbl.  Interestingly, both are lower this morning, WTI (-2.5%) and Brent (-2.7%) and both are back below those big psychological levels despite no seeming changes on the ground in Iran.  The Houthis are still causing trouble in the Bab al Mandeb, the US is still attacking sites along the Persian Gulf and there are no peace discussions ongoing.  A headline in the WSJ this morning explained, Trump Is Losing Patience Over an Iran War With No Clear End in Sight.

But really, the bigger discussion has been about US yields (and correspondingly global yields) as they continue to head higher.  Below is a screenshot from Bloomberg showing the yield curve and how yields have changed in the past month and year.

There has been quite a bit of digital ink spilled over the concept that short-dated T-bills have now priced in a rate hike next week, as per Wolfstreet.com,

“The 2-month Treasury yield spiked by 13 basis points today and by 15 basis points during the week to close at 3.95%, according to Treasury Department’s yield calculation. This is at the upper end of the Fed’s target range after it hikes by 25 basis points, which would bring its target range to 3.75%-4.0%. And it is 32 basis points above the Effective Federal Funds Rate (EFFR, blue), which the Fed targets with its policy rates. This is a stunning move, pricing in a “surprise” rate hike at the FOMC meeting next week.”

And here is his accompanying chart.

Of course, what makes all this so juicy is that Chairman Warsh has gone out of his way to end forward guidance so market participants are now left to their own devices to determine what the Fed may do, something most of them have either forgotten, or never knew, how to do.  

Let’s consider, for a moment, some potential outcomes and the rationales behind them.  First, it is critical to remember that Warsh needs a majority of the voters, so at least 7, to get to a result.

  • No change (poet’s estimated probability 90%) – the most recent inflation data, both CPI and PPI were much cooler than expected thus offering significant cover to leave policy on hold.  Add to that the fact that the task forces will not have completed their work and report on anything.  This means Warsh can reasonably say, before we do anything, let’s make sure we are looking at things that are fit for purpose.  One last thing to recall is that if energy prices are the driver, raising interest rates will not produce more energy, so it is the wrong action to solve the problem.
  • 25bp hike (10% probability) – while there have been several FOMC members who discussed the needs for hiking rates as inflation was becoming uncomfortably high, I don’t believe that contingent is large enough to make up a majority, especially of voters.  In addition, the history of central bank rate hikes into energy price spikes is replete with disasters across the board.  After all, the same pundits who are calling for a hike explain that rising energy prices are like a tax and weaken economic activity.  Certainly, the Treasury market price action indicates there are many who believe a hike is coming and if we look at Fed funds futures markets, the probability is higher than mine at about 30% as per the below chart from cmegroup.com, but look at how much that has changed over the past month.  My point is that there is no consistency of view.
  • 50bp hike (NO CHANCE) – there is a group in the analyst community who are calling for a shock maneuver of a 50bp hike.  The rationale seems to be that this would burnish Warsh’s hawkish credentials, and the bond market would rally on the news.  But even if he wanted to do this, and I don’t think that is the case at all, it would require him to get six others to go along.  There is no way that type of viewpoint exists on the committee, I am convinced.  This is clickbait in my view, analysts making outlandish calls so people will read their stuff.

In the meantime, though, yields do continue to rise around the world.  While this morning, they have backed off from yesterday’s recent highs (UST -1bp, bunds -2bps, gilts -4bps, OATs -3bps, BTPs -3bps), they remain just below levels not seen in several years.  One interesting thing about the European sovereign market is the fact that yields in Greece (3.90%) are lower than in either France (3.99%) or Italy (4.01%).  It wasn’t that long ago that Greece was the poster child for fiscal profligacy and lived through a depression.  But give them credit, they learned and now run a primary surplus in their fiscal account, something not seen in many other nations these days, certainly not the US, France or Germany.

But rising rates are wreaking havoc with equity markets, and that has become another fiscal problem since tax receipts from capital gains is such a significant part of the tax base these days, at least in the US.  So, yesterday’s desultory performance in the US, led lower by the NASDAQ’s -2.15% decline, was followed with a similarly negative feeling in Asia (Tokyo -2.7%, China -1.7%, HK -1.0%, Korea -5.7%, Taiwan -2.7%) with the similarity that they are all tech focused.  But weakness in the region was virtually universal, albeit not as dramatic.

In Europe, though, things are looking better after very solid Flash PMI data across the board.  So, Germany (+0.7%) is leading the way higher along with Spain (+0.8%) although France (+0.3%) and the UK (+0.1%) are also in the green, with the latter despite the fact that new PM Burnham is already discussing raising property taxes.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are marginally higher.  Despite yesterday’s angst, the NASDAQ has not been able to breach the key support level I am watching, as per the below chart.  (If it does, I will be looking to buy QQQ puts, but we shall see if that happens.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Briefly regarding metals markets, with oil under pressure today, we cannot be surprised that the metals markets are climbing with gold (+0.2%), silver (+1.2%) and copper (+0.1%) all in the green.  Earlier this week it appeared that relationship may have broken, but it has reasserted itself for now.

Finally, the dollar is little changed this morning, perhaps slightly softer.  But it has rallied over the past week alongside yields as per the below chart of the DXY.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The major outlier today is KRW (+0.9%) although that is simply an ongoing extension of the central bank’s efforts to add liquidity and internationalize the currency.  Thus far, it has been pretty successful, at least their discussions of the process.  Since things don’t really change until January 2027, I guess we will need to wait until later to find out if it holds up.

But I also wanted to mention the yen (0.0%) which yesterday touched yet another new 40-year low (dollar high).  I have created a chart of USDJPY from FRED data so you can get a sense of how quickly the yen appreciated back then in the wake of the Plaza Accord.  The red circled area down leg took place almost entirely in June 1986.

And that’s pretty much it.  On the data front we get Flash PMIs (exp Manfacutring 54.3, Services 51.5) and New Home Sales (610K).  Once again, we are at a summer weekend so I expect that by noon, things will really slow down.  I don’t believe today’s data will have an impact, and I expect a pretty dull day overall.  Arguably, until the FOMC, absent a major turn in the Gulf, things should remain fairly stagnant as there is no data of note to change opinions. 

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

A Bad Taste

Posted on by 
For weeks, things appeared to get better
As yields slipped and helped every debtor
But we’ve seen some changes
With yields breaking ranges
And oil back to the pacesetter

So, stocks are not really embraced
While bonds have left all a bad taste
The dollar’s moved higher
While gold’s back to dire
With analysts worldwide disgraced

Investors are not as happy this morning as they had been for the past several weeks as the situation in Iran and the Middle East appears to be deteriorating again.  The US continues to attack Iranian missile launchers and fortifications on a daily basis while Iran continues to fire missiles at targets throughout the Gulf region.  As well, the Houthis are back at it in the Red Sea restricting oil flows through there as well.  Arguably the chart below of oil (+4.0%) is the most descriptive view of what is driving everything.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Crude is higher by 29% in the past month and back above $90/bbl.  This makes things tough on everybody but the oil companies.  Does this mean we are running out of oil?  I don’t think that is the case.  Rather, the short-term impediments to shipping it are driving the price.  But the price is rising nonetheless and that is impacting everything else.  If you recall when things kicked off in this war back in March, the oil price was the primary catalyst for movement in every market. As things seemed to settle down and it appeared there was an opportunity for a resolution, focus turned back to things like earnings for equities and interest rate differentials for currencies with oil in the background.  But it appears we are back to, as oil goes, so goes every other market.

For instance, here is a chart of oil and 10-year Treasury yields over the past month.  As you can see, the trajectory, especially over the past several sessions, is quite similar.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But if we look at 10-year yields across Europe, we can see that they are all climbing in sync as well.

German yields have reached their highest level in 15 years according to Bloomberg.

The entire moderation story is falling apart.  So, now instead of conversations discussing the relative merits of AI and whether it will be a boon for mankind or end it, we are discussing the probability that the world will end soon.  I guess it’s no surprise that risk is under pressure.  Of course, the latter conversation doesn’t seem that coherent to me as if there is concern over the end of the world, I would have thought gold would have a better bid!

At any rate, oil is the main story and the driver of every market.  It underpins the question of whether the ECB will hike rates today (they won’t) or whether the FOMC will do so next week (also, they won’t) but the probabilities for those moves have risen.  It has also detracted from the earnings stories, or perhaps exacerbated the negatives, or perceived negatives.

For instance, Alphabet reported last night and Q2 revenues beat estimates coming in at $119.8 billion.  But all the talk is of free cash flow, which in this Bloomberg chart shows how much they are spending on the AI buildout.

Here’s my question, is it bad that Alphabet is spending its money to improve its future?  If it recognizes the criticality of AI to the future of its own existence, it seems like a reasonable move.  Of course, the naysayers claim that spending all that cash is a waste.  I don’t know the answer, and I suspect nobody does yet, but companies spending their cash flow on improving their business seems to be the whole idea behind having companies in the first place.  

It begs the question, on what did investors base the value of Alphabet before AI?  If it was seen as only a cash cow, it certainly traded at a very high multiple for a boring business.  But today, it will be tarred with the oil brush along with all stocks.

Ok, I have gone far afield here, let’s get back to markets overnight.  Yesterday’s lackluster US session was followed by strength throughout most of Asia.  Tokyo (+0.5%), China (+0.25%), HK (+1.3%) and Korea (+4.4%) all had solid sessions with Korea continuing to define what volatility means in equity markets.  Look at the expansion in the daily ranges in this barchart.com chart of the KOSPI over the past month.  It’s remarkable!

European bourses, though, are having a much rougher go of things this morning as Brent crude approaches $100/bbl.  France (-1.1%), Italy (-1.9%), Spain (-0.6%) and Germany (-0.6%) are under real pressure this morning as earnings numbers there have been lackluster and the broader macro picture deteriorates all the while.  As to US futures, right now (7:40), they are pointing lower led by the NASDAQ (-1.2%) although it has not yet breached that critical support level as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

We’ve already discussed bond markets, with yields higher this morning by between 2bps and 3bps across Treasuries and all European sovereign markets.  Turning to the metals, while we had a couple of days where they rallied alongside oil, this morning they have reversed course with gold (-1.3%), silver (-2.6%) and copper (-0.7%) all under pressure.  It seems the interest rate story is today’s discussion as higher yields are the topic du jour.

Finally, the dollar is stronger across the board this morning, although most of this strength just materialized over the past few hours with the Asia session broadly unchanged.  But no matter how you slice it, the dollar is firmer vs. all its G10 counterparts by about 0.25% and almost all of its EMG counterparts by a similar amount.  The exceptions this morning are BRL (+0.25%) and KRW (+0.3%).  Regarding Brazil, you must remember they are an oil exporter, so benefit from high oil prices and have amongst the highest real interest rates around, so draw capital for that as well in the carry trade.  The real has appreciated about 8.5% during the past year, so this is nothing new.  As to KRW, the government’s efforts at internationalization continue to be paying off and a look at the chart below shows that this trend is quite strong right now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There was an interesting article in Bloomberg this morning explaining how the dollar’s weakness vs. LATAM currencies has begun to bite for local companies but I find it quite interesting when it comes to discussions about the dollar; some find it too strong and are looking for it to tumble while others complain it is too weak!  Seems nobody is ever happy here!

On the data front we see Chicago Fed National Activity (exp 0.14) as well as Initial (212K) and Continuing (1809K) Claims.  Of course, we have the ECB announcement shortly, although no change is expected.  Something getting very little press is the fact that Crude Oil stocks rose in the US last week, but I guess that doesn’t suit the narrative!

This market is entirely focused on oil, and as it moves, so will everything else.  If oil keeps climbing, look for stocks and gold to fall while yields and the dollar rise.  If oil reverses, so with those moves.

Good luck

Adf

Out in the Cold

Posted on by 
So, suddenly, silver and gold
Are both getting bought and not sold
But oil’s still rising
So, what are folks prizing?
Perhaps risk’s now out in the cold

At least, here at home that’s the case
As AI stocks sell off apace
And what of the buck?
It’s basically stuck
While bonds are just standing in place

Arguably, the biggest change in market relations in the past two sessions is that the metals markets have rallied alongside the price of oil.  Since basically the beginning of this conflict, this has been one of the conundrums in markets.  Gold, which has a long history as a safe haven, started selling off (granted from a parabolic move) shortly before the US attacked Iran.  In fact, many ascribed the sell off to the naming of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair given the view he was the most hawkish of the potential candidates.  But once the fighting started, gold continued to decline, falling some 27% from its initial burst higher at the beginning to its recent low, below $4000/oz.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of course, the oil story is quite different as there were far more twists and turns in the price action as the military activity ebbed and flowed and as comments about ceasefires and peace talks were made and denied on a regular basis.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But certainly, the impression from the recent price action was that when oil rallied, gold sold off and vice versa.  The ostensible rationale was that higher oil prices would drive inflation higher and interest rates would follow thus reducing the attractiveness of holding gold.  And perhaps that was true, at least to some extent.  However, that was never a satisfying explanation to me.  And, throughout the conflict I have maintained that the medium and long-term views for the metals was quite positive.

However, something seemed to have happened yesterday, and I see no indication of exactly what that was, but we saw oil, gold and silver all rally nicely on the day.  The oil story is clear as the latest issue is the Houthis now blocking Saudi ships from traversing the Bab-al-Mandeb at the southern tip of the Red Sea and reducing flows.  But the metals story remains a mystery.  Granted, this has only been ongoing for a bit more than twenty-four hours, but the magnitude of the metals moves (Au +3.0%, Ag +5.7%) in the past two sessions is pretty substantial for markets that had been doing very little but sliding for months.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t believe this has been short covering, as in reality, both markets had lost speculative interest given the lack of volatility over the past months, and so short sellers were not involved.  There were far too many other, juicier targets for them.  As to the dollar, which has long had a negative correlation to the precious metals, as it has traded in a 1% range for the past month, as per the below chart, it is hard to ascribe much causality there.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

However, I sense that we are beginning to see some changes to the relationships that have held for the past several months, so we need to be alert for other seeming anomalies.

Turning to the other markets, and continuing with FX, while generically today, it is doing very little as per the below screenshot,

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It is worth discussing the yen, which yesterday traded below (dollar above) the 163 level for the first time since 1986.  Not surprisingly, we heard from FinMin Katayama as follows: “The situation involving the US and Iran has taken a sudden turn for the worse — a deterioration that the world did not foresee — creating a very difficult environment. Our policy remains completely unchanged: We will take appropriate and bold action at any time, should the need arise.”  However, as I have maintained, given the incredibly slow pace of the decline of the currency and given that speed of decline and the volatility in markets has always been an important part of the MOF’s decision matrix regarding intervention, it seems we are not near that step.  One need only compare the JPY to KRW, a currency with low historic volatility, to see that the yen has not been very active.  In fact, the biggest movements have been caused by the MOF in their intervention and comments.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There has been an increase in market discussion regarding whether the BOJ is going to hike rates again at the end of this month, which is not the market forecast, nor would it be considered the norm given they hiked rates last month.  Most analysts expect the pace of rate hikes to be every six months as they gradually tighten policy.  Of course, they could change that, but again, the yen’s weakness has many fundamental drivers with rates being only one of the issues.  Personally, I don’t see a hike next week, but I guess anything is possible.

Which leaves us with bonds where yields around the world are creeping higher on a regular basis, Treasuries +1bp, European sovereigns +3bps today, and equities.  Yesterday was a solid day in the stock market in the US with tech stocks leading the way higher.  And while Europe is following suit this morning (UK +1.2%, France +0.8%, Spain +1.0%, Germany +0.3%), last night’s Asian markets were less buoyant.  Tokyo (-0.2%), China (-0.5%) and HK (-1.0%) led the charge lower although there were some bright spots, notably Singapore (+1.2%), Taiwan (+1.3%) and Korea (+0.7%).  I guess overall it was a mixed session.  As to US futures this morning, as I type at 8:05 they are pointing lower led by NASDAQ futures (-1.5%).  

Net, some of the relationships with which we had become familiar seem to be breaking up a bit.  I think no matter how you slice the equity market, it is trading at rich levels, so a correction of some sort seems realistic.  I presume that if the tech earnings next week disappoint, we will see a pretty big downdraft.  As to oil, while there is still plenty around, the war drums are beating louder and that is not helping things.  But bonds and the dollar are sitting this move out, at least for now.

There is no data released today and the Fed is in its quiet period, so we remain beholden to headlines from Iran, the White House and other earnings outcomes.  I have a sense of uneasiness about the day, but nothing to put my finger on.

Good luck

Adf

Decidedly Iffy

Posted on by 
Though war in Iran keeps on going
The impact is not really showing
Risk assets seem fine
And oil’s benign
So, bubbles still need some more blowing

As I often say, markets are perverse and recent price action is a perfect example of this reality. As the US struck Iranian targets for the 10th consecutive day, and risk appetite during yesterday’s US session clearly waned such that all three major indices closed slightly in the red after solid openings, it was easy to expect a continuation of a risk-off attitude this morning.  But as you can see from the tradingeconomics.com screenshot below at 6:45 this morning, only Australia last night did not get the memo.

So, for now, it appears that everything is just fine.  The big banks all reported blow-out earnings last week and next week we are looking forward to the big tech names’ earnings reports.  Now, recent price action has shown that companies that miss their estimates are punished severely, so there is ample opportunity for more fireworks this week.  But so far, a look at the chart of the NASDAQ below shows the line in the sand that must hold in many market technicians’ eyes to keep the party going, and it continues to hold.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It’s funny, yesterday afternoon I was considering buying some QQQ puts as my concern was that we were about to break down and a 5%-8% correction would be quite reasonable.  My read on the sentiment was turning decidedly negative, although I didn’t pull the trigger, deciding to wait for the actual break before acting.  And last night I wrote the following limericks, expressing my sense of things.

The mood is decidedly iffy
With stock market bulls getting miffy
And now we’ve heard calls
For much further falls
With bears’ attitudes, oh so sniffy

So, two things have risk-takers tense
The first is the increasing sense
That war in Iran
Has no master plan
And may cause, more problems, immense

The second is whether AI
Has peaked, or has further to fly
If we’ve seen the top
The ensuing drop
Will bring a Wall Street hue and cry

In fact, I think it is instructive to help understand just how quickly sentiment can change without any obvious catalyst.  For the life of me, reading through the headlines this morning, there is nothing I have seen that would cause me to believe things are so much better today than at the close yesterday.  But perhaps this is a case of less market activity allowing a bit more volatility in markets.  After all, it is summer and there are many market participants on vacation on any given day.  According to Grok, in the past 5 trading sessions, average volume for NASDAQ shares was about 7.6 billion, but as large as that is, it is well below the YTD average of around 9.0 billion.  In reduced volume markets (no matter how large they are) there can be large, unexplained moves based on individual flows.  I’m grasping at straws here!

Regardless, this is where we stand this morning.  There are headlines dueling between further military action and further efforts at peace talks, with markets clearly preferring the latter rather than the former.  Oil prices (+0.9%) remain within their recent range although are creeping higher this morning.  Is this a prelude to a move back to $100/bbl?  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The problem with that story is that there continues to be a massive supply of crude oil around.  And Ukraine’s success in attacking Russian refineries has actually brought more crude to market as the Russians can no longer refine their own in the same volumes thus are shipping it to anyone who will buy it. 

Products, though, are a different story as the lack of refining capacity (US refiners are running at about 98% capacity) has led to record high crack spreads.  (The crack spread is the value of the products created from crude; gasoline, jet fuel and diesel largely, compared to the price of a barrel of crude.  The higher that spread the more profitable the business is for refiners, and the more we pay at the pump). Referring back to the chart above, the blue line is gasoline futures in NY, which as you can see are much closer to their early war highs despite the more dramatic decline in oil (green line).

In fact, this chart may be the best metaphor for the current sentiment in the US with the population suffering from rising gasoline prices while the government touts the decline in crude prices.

Net, I am having trouble finding a single coherent narrative that is widely believed.  So, let’s look at how other markets behaved overnight, having already seen equities and oil.  Bond yields rose yesterday with Treasury yields higher by 5bps and a further tick up this morning.  Similar price action was seen in Europe although more of these markets are +2bps this morning, rather than the +1bp in Treasuries.  And JGB yields rose 3bps overnight.  

Speaking of Japan, you may recall the story from about two weeks ago where Japanese FinMin Katayama expressed the idea that Japanese pension funds should consider investing more domestically, bringing home some of their massive $3+ trillion in assets.  The market got quite excited about that and as you can see in the below chart, the yen immediately rallied.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Well, that was sooooo two weeks ago!  This morning, the yen is just 5 pips, as I write, from breeching the peak seen before the last intervention scare.  As you can see in the chart, the move is extremely gradual, but in this case, the tortoise is being played by the yen.  I saw more discussion on this pension story this morning but while I think it is highly probable to play out over time, I think the timeline is better measured in years, not weeks, or even months.  As such, the gradual depreciation of the yen seems likely to continue.  Elsewhere, it remains very hard to get excited about the dollar vs. any currency right now.  Sure, NOK (+0.6%) is rallying on the oil rally, and perhaps the real surprise today is ZAR (+0.5%) which despite higher oil has seen higher gold prices help sustain it.  But if we look at the dollar writ large, the ‘breakout’ from its year-long range seen back in mid-June has been a damp squib as per the below chart of the DXY.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Perhaps the big surprise this morning is the metals (Au +1.2%, Ag +4.2%, Cu +3.1%) are all higher despite the rise in oil prices and yields.  While I remain long term constructive on the metals sector, it is very difficult to understand what is driving today’s price action at this point.

And that’s really it today.  There are no frontline data points to be released so I expect that oil sentiment will continue to lead markets although there will certainly be excitement about equities if they can maintain the rally today.  As to the dollar, nobody seems to care.

Good luck

Adf

Iran’s Bases, to Stress

Posted on by 
For nine days and nights the US
Has sought, Iran’s bases, to stress
So, ships through the Strait
Will now have to wait
Until Trump has made more progress

The upshot is prices for crude
Have risen a fifth and are skewed
Right now, to go higher
As three key suppliers
All find their production subdued

Oil (-0.7%) started the overnight session more than 2% higher after nine consecutive days of US military strikes on Iranian ports and missile sites amid more threatening rhetoric on both sides.  It certainly seemed like things were rapidly deteriorating.  Iran struck targets in Jordan as well as Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain as the conflict escalates.  As such, we cannot be surprised that there has been a steady rise in the price of oil during this period.  Since the increase in fighting, WTI prices have risen about 20%. However, a quick look at the chart below shows that things reversed overnight.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The proximate cause for this reversal was commentary from Secretary Rubio that Iran has signaled an interest in resuming negotiations.  Additionally, there is another story about other Gulf intermediaries, although unnamed, who are trying to bring proposals toward the same end.  Now, the one thing I know is that both sides in this conflict (and any conflict really) put out reams of propaganda, especially about the conflict.  With that in mind, we have no way of knowing whether negotiations are going to restart or not.  However, it appears market participants are willing to believe that is the case.  

What does this mean for markets?  If we have learned nothing else throughout this conflict, it is that many old relationships are no longer operating the way they had in the past.  Consider gold for a moment.  Prior to this conflict it was considered the ultimate safe haven, the thing you wanted to own if things got really bad and there was an escalating war.  And yet, here we are with gold having fallen some 25% since the US first bombed Iran as you can see below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, two things about this are that first, that followed a remarkable rally for the previous twelve months, so a correction wasn’t crazy and second, it seems that one of the key drivers in the price decline was selling of gold by sovereigns that needed the money including Russia and Turkey.  After all, that is why those reserves exist, for a rainy day, and it was certainly raining hard.  Nonetheless, that narrative theme, owning gold in case of war, has not played out at all as expected.  

Or we can look at the equity markets, especially tech stocks.  It is hard to look at the chart of the NASDAQ below and conclude that the Iran conflict was anything but beneficial for them.  This, too, runs counter to the general narrative prior to the war that risk assets would suffer during a war.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, if we widen our lens a bit to include other nations’ equity markets, Korea in this case, the story is not so sanguine.  As you can see from the below chart of the KOSPI, it has fallen 29% since it peaked about one month ago.

Source: Bloomberg.com

But is that war related?  Or is that the air coming out of what appears to have been a massive bubble in semiconductor stocks.  Recall, about 40% of the value of the KOSPI is made up of just two companies, SK Hynix and Samsung, and both have mooned because they build semiconductors that are in huge demand due to the AI race around the world.  

Now, one of the few truisms in markets is that every shortage is followed by a glut as the high prices from the shortage lead to massive overinvestment in whatever is lacking.  So, consider this comment from someone I believe is quite reliable.

There will be a comeuppance in tech sector shares, I believe, although I would not dare to guess when.  Semiconductors are historically a cyclical industry, and I don’t think anything has changed about that, except perhaps the amplitude of this cycle.  But there will be a downwave and likely one that wipes out many of the gains seen.

And how has the escalation/de-escalation played out elsewhere?  Well, Chinese shares rallied (+1.5%, HK +2.3%) although that was because the Chinese plunge protection team was in the market buying shares, and they told us so.  Tokyo was closed for Marine Day and otherwise, Friday’s weak US performance was followed by general declines, although far less than Korea’s -4.5%.  As to Europe, there is very little ongoing this morning with virtually no data, no commentary and limited market movement.  Arguably, the only story of note was the official resignation of Kier Starmer as PM and the installation of Andy Burnham, although that has resulted in the FTSE 100 selling off -0.5%, the laggard in Europe.  And given his history, including a lack of experience and stated preferences for far-left policies, I think there could be more to come there.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are slightly higher across the board, +0.3% or so.

Treasury yields have edged higher by 2bps, and European sovereign yields are higher by 1bp across the board with only UK gilts (+3bps) doing worse.  But it remains difficult to look at 10-year yields and get overly excited about anything.  I grant that there has been some choppiness, but in the big scheme of things, a 20bp range on a 4.5% handle over the course of the past month is not all that shocking, especially given the backdrop of a war and extremely volatile oil prices.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With oil retreating, the three major metals, gold (+0.4%), silver (+2.4%) and copper (+1.2%) are all firmer this morning.  That relationship has been quite consistent, I will admit.

Finally, the dollar remains uninteresting overall with the DXY little changed although there have been two stories of note.  First, KRW (+0.6%) has rallied more than 5% over the past several weeks as the BOK works to change its status from a restricted currency to one that is freely convertible.  They have just announced plans for that to become the reality starting in January 2027 and I expect that it will help the won going forward.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While the downside of convertibility is a potential increase in volatility, one need only look at the chart above to see it was already reasonably volatile.  But the positive is that KRW can become a viable asset for international utilization, opening up investment to a much wider community and that is inherently strengthening.

The other story is INR (0.0%) which while little changed this morning, saw another bout of central bank intervention on Friday as you can see on the chart below (the long green spike downward on the second candle from the right).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Alas, the 1.4% gain was very short-lived and merely wasted some more of the RBI’s reserves.  The rupee is likely to remain under pressure until the Iran conflict ends as higher oil prices are a severe impediment to the Indian economy.  I cannot help but think that we are going to test 100.00 at some point before the end of 2026, although I also imagine we will see some more substantial changes from India going forward to help mitigate the impact.  But other currencies are doing little overall.

On the data front, it is an extremely quiet week with the ECB meeting (no change expected) arguably the highlight on Thursday.

TodayLeading Indicators-0.1%
ThursdayECB Rate Decision2.25% (unchanged)
 Chicago Fed Index0.14
 Initial Claims212K
 Continuing Claims1809K
FridayNew Home Sales610K
 Flash PMI Manufacturing54.5
 Flash PMI Services51.5

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As we are in the quiet period, there will be no Fedspeak until, at least, the FOMC meeting next week.  So, the war remains the story to watch, and who knows how that will go this week.

Good luck

Adf

Risk-Taking Cracks

Posted on by 
The president told us elections
Were filled with some lethal infections
He’s unclassified
More docs to help guide
The courts to start making corrections

Meanwhile in Iran more attacks
Has led to some risk-taking cracks
Thus, oil is higher
While semis look dire
Have we seen the market climax?

A few words on the president’s speech last night as it was widely touted.  In it, he explained he declassified a trove of documents offering proof that there have been many election irregularities over the past six years, naming China as a major player in the process.  These documents are available online for all to see and ostensibly refute (I have not read them, nor am I likely to do so) that our elections have been secure in the US.  In fact, the same government analysts that have declared there to have been no issues are the ones who these documents purport to show were interfering.  My only observation, especially on this topic, is that no matter the proof available, minds have long been made up, and this will not change opinions, at least until arrests are made and trials are held.

Which takes us to more relevant market issues.  Arguably, the poster child for semiconductor stocks is the Korean KOSPI (-6.4%), where just two companies, both major players, Samsung and SK Hynix, represent some 40% of the index value.  As you can see from the below chart, it has been tough sledding for the past month, with that market closing lower by nearly 28% from its highs on June 22nd.

Source: barchart.com

And while that may be extreme, if we look across major markets in Asia, there was some rough times last night almost everywhere.  Tokyo (-4.0%), HK (-1.8%), China (-3.6%) and Taiwan (-6.5%) all had serious dislocations downward.  And, of course, the thread running through them all is the tech exposure.  There has been much discussion of a rotation out of tech and AI stocks into other areas, with financials and energy amongst the beneficiaries, and certainly, last night’s price action supports that thesis.  Interestingly, India (+1.25%) completely bucked that trend, but then, India is perceived to be a major loser from the AI story, so if that is unwinding, I guess it’s no surprise that India benefits.  Elsewhere in the region, things were far less volatile.

As to Europe, despite a glaring dearth of technology companies, equity markets there are also under pressure this morning (DAX -0.9%, CAC -0.9%, IBEX -0.5%, FTSE 100 -0.1%) although that is more likely to be a response to the fact that oil prices have picked back up as the US resumes more aggressive military activities against Iran.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:45), they are all lower led by the NASDAQ (-1.8%) although both the SPX and DJIA are down by -0.7%.

Which takes us to oil.  The black, sticky stuff is higher by 2.0% this morning, although, as you can see from the chart below, it is still hovering right around $80/bbl, the level I described as its new home earlier in the week.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The key question here remains just how much of an interruption in economic activity has been caused by the Iran conflict.  Not dissimilar to the election question at the top, it seems the two sides of this argument are dug in and will countenance no discussion that they are misreading the situation.  There are still analysts who discuss tank bottoms and the idea that now that so many reserve inventories have been released, we are quickly approaching a situation where their much mooted $200/bbl is right around the corner.  And yet, despite the tick higher overnight, the market continues to price a relative lack of concern over future supplies.  As always, I go with prices as the best arbiter, but that’s just me.  The massive production increases from the US and Canada, as well as Brazil and Guyana, increases from Venezuela and the workarounds by the Gulf nations to get their oil to market continue to demonstrate that supply is available.  

One wild card that is very difficult to completely understand is China, where things are always opaque, and where their imports have fallen sharply, thus reducing demand.  Was that demand “destroyed” in the sense that it will never return?  Seems unlikely.  Rather, my best guess, and it is just a guess, is that China tapped into their own SPR and has been using that, rather than importing.  Whatever the situation, there appears to be no shortage of oil available.  

One other thing weighing on the price has been Ukraine’s success in attacking Russian refining capacity.  If the Russians cannot refine their oil, they need to sell it as crude rather than products, and that is adding to the inventories available for sale.  It is also part of the explanation as to why products prices and the crack spread remain so high, more oil, less refining.

Looking at precious metals, gold (+0.4%) closed below $4000/oz yesterday for the first time since last November as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Silver (-0.4%) also remains under pressure and this morning copper (-1.9%) is suffering alongside the precious space.  But perhaps a few words on what gold really represents are in order.

As J.P. Morgan said in 1912, before the Federal Reserve was created, “Gold is money, everything else is credit.” Certainly, the second part of the statement is correct as your bank deposits rely on your bank standing behind them, making you a creditor of your bank.  Federal Reserve Notes are paper obligations of the US government, so again, represent purchasing power, but as we have learned, a decreasing amount of it every day.  Meanwhile, gold has a 5000-year history of being accepted as a thing of inherent value.  Now, the widely accepted definition of money these days is it must have three characteristics; it serves as a medium of exchange, a store of value and a unit of account.  Gold historically has served as the first two, although rarely as a unit of account.  Rather, gold holdings were always converted into whatever the unit of account was at the time.

Which takes us to the present, why does gold continue to represent a part of the financial markets, and over the past several years, an increasingly important part.  I would contend this is all of a piece with the broader changes in the global community, notably the end of the Pax Americana, where the US no longer chooses to (or can) guarantee the peace of the post WWII and Cold War worlds.  Instead, we have seen a constant increase in debt by every nation as governments around the world seek to placate their own citizens and are unable to pay for all the goodies they offer, thus borrow the difference.  

However, the freezing of Russian reserve assets by the West in the wake of the invasion of Ukraine has altered many views about what is safe and represents value, and what is paper and doesn’t represent value and central bankers, charged with maintaining a nation’s wealth, have gone back to gold as the one thing they know will retain value given it is nobody’s liability.  The chart below shows activity in May, which is similar to what has been happening virtually every month, that central banks are relatively price insensitive, buying the stuff as a strategic asset.  And the sellers, were selling because they needed the money!

One last chart to make the point about gold and purchasing power.  The below chart from the FRED database demonstrates just how much purchasing power the dollar has lost since the Fed came into existence; i.e. just how much inflation has destroyed the real value of the dollar.  For reference, that opening level is 1021 compared to today’s 29.9, a 97.1% devaluation in 113 years of the Fed.  It can be argued that the Fed has failed catastrophically in their effort to maintain the value of the dollar.

Ok, quickly elsewhere bond yields have edged lower, with Treasuries (-3bps) leading the way and European sovereigns either unchanged or having slipped by -1bp.  JGBs overnight also slid -2bps, but overall, while there is a lot of discussion about yields, they are not moving very far.

Finally, the dollar is a bit firmer this morning with the pound (-0.3%), Aussie (-0.4%) and euro (-0.1%) all slipping although NOK (+0.2%) is benefitting from oil’s move.  In the EMG bloc, though, there is more trouble with KRW (-0.5%), ZAR (-0.6%) and MXN (-0.3%) representative of more anxiety there.  Ultimately, I still have a hard time getting too bearish the dollar in the current world.

On the data front this morning brings Housing Starts (exp 1.31M) and Building Permits (1.40M) as well as IP (0.2%) and Capacity utilization (76.2%).  Finally, at 10:00 we see Michigan Sentiment (51.0).  There are no Fed speakers scheduled, and they are entering their quiet period, so we won’t hear from them until the meeting on the 29th.  (Perhaps we won’t hear from them anymore after that too!). 

Summing up, Iran and oil are still key drivers, equity market rotation is happening, although given how far it has moved, we may be near the end of that process, and yields have no direction.  Regarding yields, we may have reached the point where the issue is not inflation concerns, per se, but rather the sheer volume of debt that is going to be issued going forward, and the fact that private investors want more yield to be persuaded to buy it.  As to the dollar?  Like I said, I just don’t see the bear case over any longer-term horizon.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Many Critiques

Posted on by 
This evening the president speaks
And pundits have many critiques
Meanwhile in Iran
There’s no clear game plan
As havoc, the president wreaks

But right now, seems traders don’t care
‘Bout Persia or any warfare
Instead, soft inflation
Has changed the narration
So, pundits, high rates now foreswear

Some days, it’s simply more difficult to find stories that bring coherence to the narrative.  But let me try.  Yesterday’s PPI data was also much cooler than forecast, although still clearly quite high on a year over year basis, but it certainly added to Tuesday’s CPI result and has changed a lot of views regarding the Fed’s future actions.  For instance, if we look at my favorite CME table for current probabilities of future rate moves, we see that there is now just a 10% probability of a hike in two weeks’ time, and just one hike priced in for the next 18 months.

Remember, Monday, there was a 40% probability of a hike priced for the July meeting and two+ hikes priced through 2027.  (As I recall, I was an advocate of fading that price action.)  I expect that this will alter the narrative as calls for an immediate rate hike to burnish Warsh’s, and the Fed’s, credibility are likely to fade away.  In the meantime, he didn’t say anything new at the Senate testimony and the rest of the Fed talking heads continue to reiterate that they would be comfortable raising rates if inflation pressures rise.  Remarkably, they didn’t seem to notice the recent numbers.

Turning to the Strait of Hormuz, the US blockade of Iranian vessels is back in force and there have been a significant number of new US attacks on Iranian military sites.  As well, the IRGC has fired drones/missiles at several tankers trying to exit the Strait on the Omani side.  I read this morning that the president is considering whether to escalate things by attacking Kharg or Qeshm Islands, two key Iranian strongholds, and my guess is if that were to be the case, the oil market would likely take a turn higher.  But right now, WTI is effectively unchanged on the day, and has been since Monday’s rise.  I guess $80/bbl +/- is the new home.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the President’s speech tonight, the word is it is going to involve election related issues, seemingly regarding the integrity of elections, the SAVE Act and the results of the 2020 elections.  Recall, Tulsi Gabbard, before she resigned to care for her husband, declassified a great deal of information and some portion apparently was election related.  Alas, this will simply further stoke partisan feelings as there is very little evidence that showing proof of something political has the ability to change the opposing viewpoints of partisans.

So, away from oil, we are now into earnings season, and the big banks all had monster quarters while there is growing angst over the AI sector and whether the main players will be able to make the money that was assumed for so long.  So, while yesterday saw US indices trade higher, the overnight session has been far less positive.

Starting in Asia, Tokyo (-2.8%), China (-1.9%) and Korea (-6.4%) all felt the pain of semiconductor weakness although HK (+1.3%) bucked the trend with most of the rest of the region showing far less movement in either direction.  There was precious little data to drive things, so this clearly seemed to be tech sector woes.  In Europe, broad, but modest, weakness is today’s theme with both France and Germany lower by -0.65% with Spain (-0.5%) also under pressure and the UK (-0.3%) the best of the bunch after GDP data was mildly better than the last reading at 1.3% Y/Y in May.  While the Trade Balance improved a bit, IP was weak and although it has been spun as a positive report, it hardly quickens the pulse.  Meanwhile, at 7:20 this morning, NASDAQ futures are lower by -1.1% although the other two major indices are little changed.  Tech is definitely under pressure here.

In the bond market, this morning we are seeing yields higher by basically 2bps across the board in Treasuries and European sovereigns.  Much is being made of the French OAT 30-year yield this morning as it trades to its highest level since the GFC as per the below from barchart.com.

While this headline of the highest rate in X years is splashy, what we have been seeing consistently, across all nations, is that debt issuance continues to rise and central banks have not been absorbing nearly as much as they had in the more recent past.  This means that the private sector needs to buy bonds, and they are demanding higher yields.  Someone made the point (and I cannot remember where I first read it, but it is valid) that bond yields appear to be less about inflation concerns, per se, and more about the ability for markets to absorb the ever-increasing amount of debt being issued by governments…and companies.  Just look at how much debt is being issued by the hyperscalers to fund their AI buildout.  Regardless of what happens to the front end of the curve and central bank rate activities, it does feel like the back end of the curve is where the signal is going to be found going forward.

Precious metals continue to bat about, rallying and then giving those gains back, but net remain under pressure as gold (-0.75%) and silver (-1.9%) are both softer this morning although copper (+0.7%) continues to find support.  It is difficult to look at the gold chart and be optimistic about a reversal of fortune in the near-term.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

However, as per the discussion above regarding the increasing issuance of government debt around the world, at some point, the larger fiat vs. physical stores of value question is going to reassert itself and gold will be one of the main beneficiaries of that story.  Alas, it has a history of doing nothing from a price perspective for years on end.

Finally, the dollar, which suffered yesterday, with the DXY slipping -0.5%, is not very interesting this morning.  the pound, interestingly, has slipped -0.3% despite what many are trying to spin as a positive GDP report.  The other noteworthy mover is KRW (+0.4%) on the back of the BOK raising interest rates by 25bps to 2.75% last night.  While this was widely expected, the rhetoric about faster growth driving the need for higher rates has been a boon to the won.  (And remember, this was despite the KOSPI getting crushed last night on weakness in the two big semiconductor firms.)

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 217K) and Continuing (1820K) Claims as well as Retail Sales (0.2%, -0.1% ex autos) and the Philly Fed (13.0).  With the recent surprises in CPI and PPI, I’m sure there will be a lot of focus on this morning’s Retail Sales data.  Certainly, a weak number will feed into the new, growing narrative, that the economy is slowing and rate hikes are slipping from view.  But yesterday’s Empire Mfg number was quite strong. There are still many inconsistencies in the data, which if nothing else, allows every analyst to point to something and claim they are right.

Ultimately, to me the great concern is an escalation of US activity in Iran, especially bringing troops into play.  In that case, I think things would change a lot, and we could well see another jump in oil prices.  But absent that, right now there is a lot of noise, but not much signal.  I don’t think the big picture has changed, i.e. investment into the US remains strong and that is going to support both the economy and the dollar.  But there will be many twists and turns.

Good luck

Adf

Some Heartburn

Posted on by 
Chairman Warsh, to the House, testified
And explained that his tolerance died
For higher inflation
Throughout this great nation
And ‘bout this, he will not backslide

But prior to his starlike turn
Investors and markets did learn
That CPI fell,
Though not a death knell,
And caused, for rate hawks, some heartburn

It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. – Abraham Lincoln

The attributed saying above, while not certain that it was uttered by President Lincoln, still makes its point eloquently, as well as somewhat humorously.  And I strongly believe that every member of the FOMC should take it to heart before they speak.  In fact, they should be thanking Chairman Warsh for his efforts to shut them up, because then they won’t sound quite so foolish.

For instance, just Monday, Governor Waller, in a speech in New York, finished with the following line, “But I don’t take the inflationary signals I have discussed today lightly. If we get another hot reading on core inflation this week, then the FOMC will need to consider tightening monetary policy in the near term.”  Oops!

And this is one of the issues because many believe that the FOMC gets the data earlier than the release date and so have inside information.  Thus, when Waller talks about the risk of a hot print, many think he knows something.  And this is yet another reason that ending forward guidance and reducing the commentary of the FOMC will be valuable.  

By now, I am sure you are aware that yesterday’s CPI reading was the largest downside miss since Covid in 2020, with the headline number falling -0.4% on the month and the annual slipping back to 3.8% while the core number was flat with the annual falling to 2.6%.  Now, as the Inflation Guy explains, this was the product of numerous subcomponents declining, not just the price of oil/gasoline and this is not the venue to discuss them (read the link).  

But it certainly helped Chairman Warsh in the timing of his testimony as nobody there could ‘blame’ him for still rising prices, at least for now.  As expected, several House members tried to get interest rate information from him, but he remains firm that the Fed’s mission is to drive inflation lower and this will be done through both interest rate and balance sheet policy changes, not through forward guidance.

It is not surprising that the market responded dramatically with the following chart from Polymarket (taken from Kobeissi on X) showing an impressive change of heart.

While I use the Fed funds futures chart from the CME as my guidepost, there is something to be said for the wisdom of crowds here.  Remember, this is a binary call, not a gradient one.  But even the futures markets adjusted significantly, and rightly so, with the probability of a July hike there falling to 16% from 40% when I wrote yesterday morning.  As well, while there is still more than one rate hike priced for 2026, the calculated change has declined to 33bps from 43bps yesterday morning.

Source: cmegroup.com

Skepticism remains rife regarding Chairman Warsh and his attempt to change the way things are done at the Fed, but personally, I am quite optimistic that he is attacking the real problems.  Remember, the Fed is a 114-year-old institution with an extremely long memory and a staff that, like most of government, believes they know what is best for others.  I strongly subscribe to the monetarist view that printing more money leads to more inflation, but making a change that dramatic all at once is just not possible.  Let us be thankful that Chairman Warsh appears to have a better understanding and is working to change things.  And remember, he has only been in the Chair for two months, give him some time.

As I start to recap markets, it is quite interesting that the price of oil seems to have decoupled from the war in Iran.  I say this because as I type at 7:15, a bit more than an hour after CentCom explained they had instituted another wave of military attacks on Iran, WTI is largely indifferent to the news.  While it has edged higher by 0.7%, a look at the chart below of the past 24-hours shows essentially no response.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, let’s turn to equities, which rallied on the CPI data in the US yesterday and saw follow through in Asia with Tokyo (+1.5%), HK (+1.4%) and Korea (+6.25%) all having strong sessions as did almost every market in the region.  However, there was an exception, China (-0.2%) which while not disastrous, substantially lagged other markets.  Arguably, the proximate cause of that disappointment was the disappointing data released last night as per the below:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Certainly, GDP at 4.3%, below even Xi’s reduced target must be concerning and Fixed Asset Investment (housing) continues to crumble.  It is very difficult to look at this data, as well as their monetary data which, for instance, shows loan growth not merely trending lower, but doing so at an accelerating rate as per the below chart and conclude things are going will there for the economy or the equity markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Europe, though, continues to lag with all the major bourses lower as the DAX (-0.8%) leads the way followed by Spain (-0.6%) and then France and the UK both slipping -0.2%. (I guess World Cup results are not indicative of their equity markets!). As to US futures, at this hour (7:25) they are all up very slightly.

Bond yields fell yesterday, notably the 2yr slipping -6bps, while the 10yr only fell -3bps.  This morning, though, yields are edging back higher with Treasury yields up 2bps and European sovereign yields higher by between 3bps and 4bps.  While equity markets remain sanguine about Iran, it seems bond markets are having a tougher time.  JGB yields (-2bps) are bucking the trend as there are still those who are looking for Japanese pension funds to start bringing more money home.

While the metals markets rallied yesterday, this morning they are under pressure again with gold (-0.6%) and silver (-1.2%) giving back yesterday’s gains while copper (-0.3%) is consolidating after jumping a dime yesterday.

Finally, the dollar is sidelined this morning with no notably large movements in either the G10 or EMG blocs.  A brief word on the yen, which has certainly been the subject of much digital ink spillage lately, as it seems all those thoughts of the pension fund support for the yen are not part of the FX conversation.  We remain less than 50 pips from the peak seen back on June 30 and I see very little reason for the broader trajectory to change.  The BOJ is not going to waste its reserves in this process, and given the gradual movement, I don’t think they are that upset.  As long as PM Takaichi is planning to spend more money, whether on infrastructure or investment, given they are borrowing all of it, a strong yen seems highly improbable.

On the data front, this morning brings PPI (exp 6.2% headline, 5.2% core) and the Empire State Manufacturing Index (8.8) at 8:30.  Then, at 9:45 the BOC will most likely leave their base rate on hold at 2.25% and at 10:00, Chairman Warsh will testify to the Senate Banking Committee.  We also get the Fed’s Beige Book this afternoon, EIA oil inventories and three more Fed speakers, although with Warsh speaking, will anybody care?  Especially since they continue to make fools of themselves with their own forward guidance.

The most remarkable thing to me is how insouciant market participants have become despite increased hostilities in the Gulf.  But both oil and equity traders have seemingly decided that other things matter more.  With that in mind, it is hard to get excited about too much these days.  Unless we see markets breaking their recent ranges, in either direction, I suspect that the weight of summer, and reduced liquidity is going to prevent anything substantial from happening anytime soon.

Good luck

Adf