The peace talks have yet to conclude
And yesterday, both sides pursued
A little more fighting
Despite the gaslighting
Which helped push the price up in crude
But it still remains far below
The levels where it needs to go
To foster more drilling
And help in refilling
The buffers from which barrels flow
As we start the week, oil prices have rebounded from last week’s close (as per the below chart) as progress on the peace talks remains slow, at best, and there was another series of military attacks by both sides, with each side claiming defensive maneuvers.

Source: tradingeconomics.com
Now, I am not a military scholar, but firing missiles at another nation doesn’t sound defensive, rather I would use the word retaliatory. And there is no way we can know who initiated what during the latest exchange, as both sides claim the other did and there is no neutral arbiter. But my take is that there is still a way to go before this is over. Certainly, the IRGC seems committed to the last man, at least for now, and President Trump has indicated he is in no hurry. Personally, I am still thinking a July 4th resolution timeline.
I did, however, see an increase in the discussion about the imminent collapse of supplies and the estimates that oil prices will finally (?) head up to the $150-$200/bbl level that a number of pundits have forecast. But looking through these X posts, they are retweeting the comments I posted on Friday from the Exxon SVP Neil Chapman. Time will tell if they are correct and the changes in the system have not been sufficient, at least not yet, to address the reduction of available oil from the Gulf. But so far, whatever calculations have been made regarding demand destruction and additional production elsewhere, plus the rerouting of oil away from the Strait has been sufficient to prevent the worst-case scenarios that have been painted since this began back in March. Plus, the one thing of which I am highly confident is that going forward, the Strait of Hormuz will not be nearly as strategic as it currently seems. Production elsewhere and pipelines will reduce its importance dramatically.
The BOJ meets
In two weeks’ time. Do rate hikes
Still matter? Tough call.
Two weeks from tomorrow, the BOJ meets to discuss monetary policy with the backdrop that the yen is essentially back to the levels seen in April just before the most recent bout of intervention.

Source: tradingeconomics.com
The swaps market is pricing in a 78% probability of a 25bp rate hike, which would take the base rate to 1.00%, still amongst the lowest in the world, but its highest level since September 1995 as you can see below in the chart from tradingview.com

Think about that for a moment, interest rates in Japan have been below 1.0% for more than 30 years. That is an extraordinary situation. Consider the bubble that was blown in the US by having rates that low for ‘only’ a decade following the GFC, or for an even shorter time post-Covid. I guess we need to ask why Japanese equities never inflated the same way. Perhaps that is the best evidence of the financialization of the US economy vs. that of Japan. Liquidity in Japan didn’t lead to FOMO of the latest investment thesis.
Nonetheless, my take is there is a modest fear about the yen weakening much further and so the BOJ will hike rates. Alas, since the market is already priced for that outcome, it is not clear it will do much to moderate the yen’s weakness, at least if they only go 25bps. Now, if they hike 50bps and explain more hikes are on the way, that will matter. The problem with that theory is that the latest CPI reading in Japan was 1.4%, well below their 2.0% target, and it has been that way since January as per the below chart. It seems it could be tricky for Ueda-san to explain a very aggressive rate hike with the current inflation reading.

Source: tradingeconomics.com
Ok, I think those are the stories of note so let’s review market activity overnight. let’s finish with commodities where oil’s gains (+3.6%) are not having the typical response in the metals markets with gold ‘only’ lower by -0.8% and silver (+0.6%) and copper (+2.5%) higher. I don’t believe we are at the point where these markets are truly independent, but perhaps some of this negative correlation has been overdone.
In the FX markets, the dollar is modestly higher vs. most of its G10 counterparts with NZD (-0.6%) the laggard, but the rest of the group mostly softer by between -0.1% and -0.2%. In other words, not too significant, and this includes the yen (-0.1%). I believe all the yen talk is based on the idea that the BOJ meeting is close enough that it is a topic of conversation in a dull market. Now, if the yen were to weaken dramatically ahead of the meeting, that would certainly change some views. As to the EMG bloc, it is a bit more mixed although movement, overall, remains muted. BRL (+0.4%) is the biggest winner with no particular newsworthy events to note, but when looking at the chart, it really hasn’t done too much since the middle of last month when the news about Lula’s competition broke with Bolsonaro fils suddenly less likely to compete for president.

Source: tradingeconomics.com
But otherwise, it is a mix of gainers and laggards on the order of 0.1% to 0.3% in either direction.
In the bond market, yields have ticked higher everywhere following oil’s rebound with Treasury yields higher by 2bps and most of Europe higher by 4bps. US yields continue to drive the global situation, certainly directionally, if not in magnitude.
Finally, equity markets appear quite sanguine regarding the oil price rise as Asian markets saw a mix of gainers (Tokyo +0.9%, HK +0.9%, Korea +3.7%! Taiwan +1.4%, Singapore +1.0%) and laggards (China -1.0%, India -0.7%) although clearly far more positive than negative. Meanwhile, in Europe, the picture is mixed but with much less movement as Germany (+0.4%) and France (+0.1%) edge higher while Spain (-0.2%) and the UK (-0.2%) both slipped. The news here was the PMI data which largely declined from last month, but not quite as far as forecast. At this hour (7:30) US futures are all pointing higher between 0.2% and 0.6%.
On the data front, as it is the beginning of a new month, we get plenty including the NFP report on Friday.
| Today | ISM Manufacturing | 53.0 |
| ISM Prices Paid | 85.5 | |
| Tuesday | JOLTs Job Openings | 6.82M |
| Wednesday | ADP Employment | 110K |
| ISM Services | 53.7 | |
| Factory Orders | 4.6% | |
| -ex Transport | 0.8% | |
| Thursday | Initial Claims | 213K |
| Continuing Claims | 1790K | |
| Nonfarm Productivity | 0.8% | |
| Unit Labor Costs | 2.3% | |
| Friday | Nonfarm Payrolls | 85K |
| Private Payrolls | 78K | |
| Manufacturing Payrolls | 0K | |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3% | |
| Average Hourly Earnings | 0.3% (3.4% Y/Y) | |
| Average Weekly Hours | 34.3 | |
| Participation Rate | 61.7% | |
| Consumer Credit | $16.0B |
Source: tradingeconomics.com
The labor market is certainly confusing compared to what many of us have known throughout our careers. It is obvious the change in immigration stance by this administration has had a major impact, but so, too, has AI and company responses to that. I continue to read bifurcated takes on AI either destroying everybody’s jobs or creating many new ones with both sides absolutely certain of the outcome. One thing I will note is that while the BLS NFP numbers have been subject to major revisions given the inadequacies of the birth/death model for small businesses, I wonder about the ADP data, which I understand is a count of all the paychecks they distribute. But that data also gets revised, so there is no perfect solution. What I do think is clear is that less new jobs are necessary to maintain the Unemployment Rate at levels which, in the past, would have been deemed a huge success for the Fed and government.
As to today, headline bingo remains the biggest risk, but there is an awful lot of belief that the equity train rolls on and with it, so too with the dollar’s broad strength in my view as funds flow into the US to hop on board.
Good luck
Adf











































