The rally in stocks was amazing
And bonds, they as well, came out blazing
The dollar was smoked
As oil bulls choked
While metals are now upward gazing
Does this mean the markets embraced
The outcome with no real distaste?
Or were traders short
And forced to abort
Those views in a manner posthaste?
My sense is t’was more of the latter
Though there is a fair bit of chatter
That gridlock implies
New lawmaking dies
As Congress, the Prez, wants to shatter
We do live in interesting times as the discrepancy between what the data implies and how the population responds is the widest I can ever remember. In the past, this level of popular angst was only really visible during serious recessions, going back to the 1970’s, and certainly the twin recessions of 1981 and 82. But more recently, the GFC was a major blow to both the economy and the markets and everybody was miserable and scared together. However, since then, things have changed. I guess I should have seen Tuesday’s outcome because ahead of the 2016 election, my thesis was that the recovery from the GFC was only felt by the political insiders with the rest of the country feeling left behind, and that was evidence of the change that was coming. And all the discussion of the K-shaped economy should have been the clue that this was also going to be a change election, and it certainly was. I guess the question is, where do we go from here?
Perhaps no chart better describes the change in tone than the below of the DJIA (blue line) and the NASDAQ (green line).

Source: tradingeconomics.com
This is the very embodiment of the rotation trade as blue chip companies have benefitted from the perception of what the Democratic majority is going to do compared to the previous leaders, the AI and semiconductor sectors. This effect has also been seen internationally as in Asia, Tokyo (-1.8%), Korea (-5.3%) and Taiwan (-3.2%) all suffered greatly last night while the rest of the region saw solid gains (India +2.6%, Australia +2.6%, New Zealand +2.2%). You will have noticed I left out China (+0.3%) and HK (+3.7%) as their performance was more a result of official Chinese support than a sentiment indicator, with the plunge protection team actively buying a series of ETFs in the session.
In Europe, the Bloomberg screenshot below tells the story eloquently. As there are vanishingly few tech firms on the continent, when tech is under pressure and other companies are performing well, you can bet Europe will shine.

As to the US this morning, the thesis continues to play out with NASDAQ futures -0.6% while DJIA futures are +0.6% at this hour (6:45).
Bond markets are a bit more confusing to me as they are supposed to be the ‘smart’ money and yet they appear to be simply responding to lower oil prices with no thoughts of the future. Certainly, oil prices have declined a bunch, although they rebounded 1.0% this morning, but are still under $90/bbl. However, it seems that the strong belief is that oil prices are going to remain lower, and drag product prices with them, as suddenly, peace in Iran (and Ukraine?) are becoming an assumption. However, if we think through the Democratic platform, with their ongoing efforts to kill the oil and gas industry and support wind and solar as the future of energy, it is virtually designed to raise prices, and by extension, feed into inflation. But for now, the strong belief that lower energy prices are coming is the narrative. So, yields continue to slide. As you can see in the below Bloomberg screenshot, over the past month there is just one market that has seen higher yields, Brazil, which is election related. But otherwise, although yields remain higher than one year ago, they are lower everywhere else in the world over the past month.

In fact, it was just one month ago when the peak concern over Treasury yields was reached with forecasts for 6% and 7% 10-year yields becoming common. I wonder where those guys are now.
We discussed oil already, but the precious metals markets have been amongst the biggest beneficiaries of this new thesis with gold (+1.7%) having rallied $238/oz since its month-end spike low, a more than 6% rise.

Source: tradingeconomics.com
Silver, too, has seen a massive bounce off those month end lows, as per the below, more than $4.00/oz or more than 8%.

Source: tradingeconomics.com
Now, the story here is all about lower oil prices leading to lower yields along with a lower dollar and thus a benefit for metals prices. And that is certainly true. But I wonder, is there something else driving this movement? There had been a significant amount of short-selling in these markets as traders who were all-in on the higher yields play were sure metals had lost their luster. Clearly, some part of this recent jump is short covering. And what of the long-term thesis that the debasement of all fiat currencies will result in higher metals, and all commodities, prices? I haven’t heard about the debasement trade lately at all, but do not be surprised if that starts to come back into vogue going forward. After all, as I wrote yesterday, there is zero indication that a Democratic congress is going to consider austerity.
And lastly, the dollar, which fell sharply yesterday, is little changed this morning, or maybe slightly higher on net. The BOE hiked rates by 25bps as universally expected and the pound has not responded although there was a Bloomberg article this morning describing how on a trade weighted basis, the pound is back to its highest level in a decade on the back of resilient growth and expectations for more rate hikes going forward.
Here’s the thing about the FX markets, they are relative plays pitting one currency vs. another. Now, if you look at the yield table above, with a couple of exceptions, Brazil, France and Switzerland, yields have slipped between 30bps and 40bps across the board. Is a 10bp differential really enough to get traders excited? I don’t think so. Rather, the dollar remains a flow driven product and the biggest risk to the dollar, in my view, is if the inward investment that we have been seeing for the past two years, declines, let alone reverses.
Regardless of the government, the US remains the most dynamic economy in the world, and investment is going to come this way, but any slowdown will certainly weigh on the greenback. It remains to be seen how this plays out going forward once the new Congress is in place in January. Interestingly, I think the best thing about this is my suspicion that the new majorities are going to spend all their time trying to ‘get’ Trump and his administration and ignore legislation of consequence. A perfect example of gridlock being a benefit.
Remember, tomorrow we see the payroll report, but ahead of that we have a bunch of stuff this morning including: Initial Claims (exp 196K), Continuing Claims (1710K), Nonfarm Productivity (2.8%) and Unit Labor Costs (0.6%). We also hear from three Fed speakers, Hammack the hawk, Logan the hawk and Barkin, a moderate. Yesterday’s ADP Employment number was stronger than expected at 86K while the Trade Deficit was slightly smaller at -$105.0B. ISM Services was a touch light at a, still strong, 54.5 and there was a small net draw in EIA inventories. Net, if you look at the data, there is no evidence the economy is doing poorly. But that is certainly the zeitgeist.
Investors are comfortable with the new rotation narrative and the idea that oil prices are going to fall and bring inflation lower. Along with that idea is the dollar will retreat. Maybe, but I am not that confident that is the way things play out for very long.
Good luck
Adf















































