Change at the Top

Democracy lives and it dies
By voting for folks who devise
The laws to define
What’s right, or a crime
And this year, there’s much to surmise
 
Some sixty-four nations will vote
And watch as incumbents scapegoat
Political foes
For national woes
And claim they’re the best antidote
 
However, results that we’ve seen
Show that many nations are keen
For change at the top
Or leastwise, to swap
The current regimes’ philistines

 

So, I know I am not a political analyst, but I try to be a keen observer of trends around the world.  After all, to understand the macroeconomic situation globally, one needs to at least be aware of the politics in the major nations.  As such, I am going to attempt to analyze the elections we have seen around the world to date and see if we can use this trend to look ahead and forecast how things may turn out here in the US come November.

As of today, 35 nations have held elections for either Parliament (Congress), president, or both ranging from St. Maarten to India and many in between with respect to populations.  Arguably the most important have been India, Mexico, South Africa, Taiwan, Russia, Indonesia and Iran.  That list is based on both population and geopolitical importance.  

A look at the results shows the following:

  • India – PM Modi lost significant support and will now be ruling in a coalition, rather than his previous majority.  This was a far cry from the anticipated super-majority he sought.
  • Mexico – AMLO’s hand-picked successor, Claudia Sheinbaum won handily and the Morena party won a supermajority in the lower house, but not in the Senate, so there are great expectations for significant changes unchecked by congress there.
  • South Africa – President Ramaphosa and the African National Congress (ANC) the party that has ruled this nation by itself since the end of apartheid in 1994, lost their absolute majority and is casting about for a coalition partner to allow them to remain in power.
  • Taiwan – New President Lai Ching-te, an avowed separatist relative to China won, but the people did not give him the parliamentary majority to enable significant policy changes
  • Russia – was this really an election?
  • Indonesia – New President Prabowo, a former soldier and defense minister is tipped to be far more aggressive in his handling of dissent and criticism, a concern for some, but clearly given the size of his majority (>58%) something the people are ready for.
  • Iran – This is difficult to assess as the parliamentary elections have been overshadowed by the recent accidental death of the president in a helicopter crash, with a presidential election slated for June 28th.

As well, starting tomorrow, there will be voting for the European Parliament by all twenty-seven member nations.  This is a three-day process so we should know the results by next week.

In the meantime, let me offer my take on the results in a broad-brush manner.  People around the world are unhappy with their leadership and are seeking change.  More importantly, current incumbents are really annoyed by the fact that their populations are not happy.  It has been quite a long time since there have been so many efforts by governments to control all dialog and censor anything that offers an opposing view to government rules, laws and commands.

For instance, in India, despite being very popular, Modi must now account for the fact that he has lost majority support.  He has done much good for the nation, but clearly, there is a large segment of the population that does not feel they are benefitting and were looking for change.

In South Africa, it was a little different as the economic situation there is a wreck.  Inflation is rising (5.3% and climbing), Unemployment is rampant (32.9%) and confidence readings are negative while GDP stagnates. Even though the ANC has ruled for 30 years, people want change, especially since there have been numerous allegations of corruption at the top, and the country continuously has blackouts because of failures with energy policy.

In Taiwan, while former president Tsai Ing-wen was widely admired and had high favorability ratings, there is a clear concern over too much saber rattling with the mainland.  Arguably, China spent a lot of money to interfere in that election but was unsuccessful in getting their candidate elected.  However, the population there does not want war, and that seems to be the driving force.

My point is that even popular leaders have found that their popularity is not necessarily translating into power.  It is not hard to understand why this is the case given that inflation has been a global phenomenon, and the list of military conflicts has grown and forced many nations to choose sides rather than simply do what’s seen as best for themselves.

I know I ignored Mexico here, the exception that proves the rule, although perhaps the people felt that AMLO didn’t go far enough and given the huge rise in crime from the cartels there, people were looking for a stronger government to act, hence the supermajority.

What does this mean for Europe this weekend and the US later in the year?  I have been quite clear in my views that this is a change election year.  The current left leaning coalition in the European parliament is in danger of losing its ability to enact any legislation.  We have seen these changes in the Netherlands and Sweden, and Germany’s AfD party continues to gain adherents alongside the National Front in France and Italy’s European Conservative party.  Germany has three landes (state) elections in September, all in the former East Germany, where AfD is strongest.  While every other party has indicated they will not enter a coalition with AfD, I predict that in at least one of these states, AfD will win outright, and that will really shake things up.  As to the European parliament, the voting bloc on the right may be large enough to prevent almost all new legislation.  

Meanwhile, turning back home, the US election season is heating up and here, too, I would argue the population is very unhappy.  This is evident by the dreadful polling numbers of President Joe Biden, and perhaps even more significantly, by the growth in the number of Trump converts from previously solid democratic voters (watch this 2 minute video and ask yourself if Joe Biden is in trouble or not).  The efforts to utilize the DOJ to prevent Trump from contesting the election is not going over well across the nation, and I believe it will be seen as the biggest own goal in this process.

While I believe that Mr Trump WILL BE PUT IN JAIL because the Democratic party is desperate to do anything to tarnish him, it will not matter.  In fact, it will martyr him even further.  Remember, Nelson Mandela was jailed before being elected president, Vaclav Havel of the Czech Republic was imprisoned before being elected president, Lech Walesa of Poland was imprisoned before being elected president, Lula da Silva of Brazil was imprisoned before being elected president, Mohandas Gandhi was imprisoned for sedition, and yet still became leader of India.  History shows that the people of a nation can see through the political efforts of an incumbent party in their effort to remain in power, and when they demand change, they will get it.

With this in mind, my views on the economic situation remain that inflation continues to be a major impediment for every government worldwide, but if recent data is truly an indication of slowing economic activity, the outcome could well be easier monetary policy, but still weak growth, rising inflation, a falling dollar and rising commodities.  

Politics clearly matters, but it is a longer-term issue.  For now, all the efforts by governments and central banks to apply band-aids for the current ailments seem unlikely to be effective in the timeline required to alter the current broad-based unhappiness amongst the electorate.  Change is coming, and there will be hell to pay on the other side as all these short-term fixes will simply leave the long-term problems in worse shape.

One poet’s views, and I welcome any commentary and pushback.

Thanks

Adf