At this point, it’s who do you trust?
‘Bout ‘flation, ‘cause as I’ve discussed
To some it seems hot
For others, it’s not
And so far, no one’s got it sussed

The thing is this PCE story
Is more than just mere allegory
Chair Jay and his team
Still harp on the theme
That higher for longer brings glory

I read far too much economic analysis each day as I try to glean interesting ideas from very smart people who are happy to offer them up.  Hopefully, my doing this allows you to spend your time doing more important things while still keeping abreast of the macroeconomic situation.  But, boy, I cannot remember a time when there was such vehement disagreement on a single statistic.  There have been many times where economic bulls look at all the data and see great things while the bears see death warmed over.  But that is generally based on a collection of items.  However, right now, literally every other piece that I read, all published by very reputable analysts and economists tells the opposite story.  One piece will explain that yesterday’s 0.4% rise in core PCE was just an aberration and that it is destined to reverse lower going forward largely because housing inflation is going to decline.  The next piece will point to yesterday’s release and explain that the recent three-month or six-month trend has turned higher in the critical core services component, and that there is no sign it is going to reverse.

The greatest (or worst) thing about economics is since it is not a hard science, everybody can have a view, typically back it up with some piece of data or another and make their case.  While ultimately, the proof is in the pudding, when economists are wrong, they will typically fall back on they missed the timing, not the actual direction of travel.

By this time, if you have been following my writings, you are aware I am in the ‘inflation is sticky’ camp, and I have not been surprised by the fact that it has stopped declining.  For 2 years we have been hearing that housing inflation is due to fall because of a massive supply of new apartments coming on the market soon, and yet I believe it is now 28 consecutive months where the housing component of CPI has risen at least 0.4% on the month.  I think one of the problems with the oversupply analysis is that it doesn’t account for the fact that a large proportion of those apartments are luxury apartments with very pricey rents.  As such, it is difficult for average or median rental prices to decline.  At the same time, the Case-Shiller Home price index rose 6.1% last month, which is not indicating any decline in single family home prices.  Given the proportion of housing in the inflation indices, whether CPI or PCE, if shelter costs are rising, you can bet that inflation will be rising.  And that’s where we stand.

The next question is, what does this mean for the Fed and their reaction function and then, how will it impact financial markets?  Well, we heard from four more Fed speakers yesterday and they remained consistent with their recent comments, i.e., there’s no need to rush as the economy remains strong and inflation isn’t declining as quickly as we hoped, but we remain confident that the time for rate cuts will come as the year progresses.  As of this morning, the market is pricing about an 80% chance of a June rate cut and is still pricing 3 ½ cuts for the year.  Meanwhile, Treasury yields have edged lower by 2bps, but remain well above the levels seen just one month ago, more than 40bps higher.  And lastly on this subject, equity markets are basically ignoring the data completely and focusing on internal factors like flows.  As such, my thought yesterday that they might stumble a bit, even with a lower PCE print, turned out to be completely wrong.  The party is still raging there.

As we look ahead, I would contend that the big picture remains exactly the same.  On the price front, yesterday’s data did nothing to dissuade me from my sticky inflation thesis.  At the same time, yesterday’s other data showed that manufacturing remains in a recession (Chicago PMI fell to 44.0), but the labor market is holding up (Initial Claims edged higher to 215K, although Continuing Claims were substantially higher at 1905K).  For much of last year I was far more focused on the NFP number as being the most important based on the idea that the Fed could not withstand a significant uptick in Unemployment for political reasons.  I have a sense that dynamic is going to reassert itself going forward.  If last month’s number was the aberration that many claim, and we see weakness next Friday, I believe that will really impact the narrative and we will see May come back on the table for the first rate cut.  But if it remains strong, the bar for cutting rates will remain quite high.

With that in mind, let’s look at the overnight session.  Asia was on fire with the Nikkei (+1.9%) leading the way after Ueda-san pushed back on the message from Takata we discussed yesterday.  He cautioned patience was necessary and until they saw and digested the wage outcomes later this month, there was no reason to do anything, especially given the recent weakness in GDP growth.  That caused the yen to give back yesterday’s gains and a weaker yen tends to help Japanese stocks.  But there was strength in China, albeit not as much, with the indices there and in Hong Kong rising by 0.5% or so.  We did see Chinese PMI data which printed as expected (Manufacturing 49.1, Non-Manufacturing 51.4, Caixin 50.9), which implies nothing has changed on the mainland regarding the economy.  Next week’s plenary sessions are still the China bulls’ hope for more stimulus.

European shares are generally firmer, with only the CAC (0.0%) the laggard as the rest are higher by 0.5% or more.  PMI data here was also largely in line with the Flash data last week and is being spun as the beginning of a turn higher.  However, ECB speakers continue to push back on the need for rate cuts soon which is not supporting equities on the continent.  As to the US futures market, after another rally to all-time highs yesterday, this morning sees very little movement ahead of the ISM data.

While Treasury yields have edged lower, all of Europe have seen their sovereign yields rise by between 3bps and 6bps, arguably on the idea that the worst of the economic story has passed.  I’m not sure I agree with that, but that is all I can get from the data.  Overnight, JGB yields edged 1bp higher, but are still sitting right at 0.70%, the level at which they have been trading for the past 5 weeks give or take a nickel.

Oil prices (+1.2%) are continuing their recent rise with WTI pushing back toward $80/bbl, as traders continue to expect OPEC+ to maintain their production cuts.  As well, from a market internal perspective, the backwardation in the curve is steepening.  Briefly, this means that front month prices are higher than prices further out the curve, which in the futures market is a signal that there is excess demand for physical.  That demand is the bullish signal.  As to the metals markets, gold (+0.5%) is breaking above its recent range high at $2050/oz, as the dollar, after a strong day yesterday, is ceding some of those gains.  However, base metals can’t get going with both copper and aluminum sliding by about -0.25% this morning.

Finally, as mentioned, the dollar is sagging a little with only the yen performing worse.  But its losses are generally quite modest, on the order of 0.1% or 0.2% for both G10 and EMG currencies.  And while it is under pressure today, the trend so far in 2024 is still very clearly for dollar strength.  Given the continued hawkish tone from the Fed, I see no reason for that to change anytime soon.

On the data front, both ISM Manufacturing (exp 49.5) and Michigan Sentiment (79.6) are due at 10:00 this morning and then we hear from five different Fed speakers as the day progresses, including Governor Waller, maybe the second most influential voice on the FOMC.  It is hard for me to believe that they are going to change their tune, especially given that yesterday’s PCE data gave no hint that their 2.0% target was right around the corner.

Summing up, consider the fact that the US continues to benefit from a massive fiscal impulse, relatively cheap and abundant energy prices and the tightest monetary policy in the G10.  With that in mind, we continue to see international capital flow into the country (look at the stock market!) and I suspect those things need to change for the dollar’s trend to change.  That is not going to happen today.

Good luck and good weekend
Adf