Two candidates took to the stage
But neither of them could assuage
The feelings of doubt
‘bout how things turn out
And how we can all turn the page
 
Meanwhile there’s news south of the border
Where AMLO, the courts, did reorder
This has raised some fears
That in coming years
The nation will lack law & order

 

Before I start, please take a moment to remember those 2,977 nnocent lives lost on this horrible day 23 years ago, this generation’s day of infamy.

Now, on to the market discussion.  I don’t know about you, if you watched the debate, but frankly I was pretty bored and disappointed by the whole thing.  I heard many platitudes from both sides, many accusations from both sides, and couldn’t help but notice how the moderators interjected themselves consistently in favor of Vice-president Harris via their “fact-checking”.  All in all, I don’t think we learned that much, although Harris is certainly more coherent than Biden was.  My guess is that very few undecided voters changed their minds.  As to the market’s reaction, perhaps the only notable result was that gold rallied slightly as no matter who wins the election, the idea that fiscal prudence is on the agenda remains anathema to both sides.  Equity futures were slightly lower when the debate started, and still slightly lower when it ended, as well as this morning.  It ought not be surprising as the impact of politics on equity markets has always been unclear in the short run.

The other political story of note was that in Mexico, AMLO, who remains president for a few more weeks, was able to finally get the change to the constitution he has been seeking his entire term, which now allows for judges, including supreme court justices there, to be elected rather than appointed.  The concern is that this will politicize the judicial system.  An independent judiciary is a key ingredient for international investors as they seek some comfort that business decisions can be fairly considered.  However, judicial elections may call that into question and that is likely to have a longer-term negative impact on the Mexican economy.  As you can see from the chart below, the peso has been massively underperforming since April, falling more than 22% and breaching the 20.00 peso level for the first time in more than 2 years, as concerns over this issue have grown.  Add to this the fact that inflation in Mexico has drifted slowly lower and expectations are rising for more aggressive rate cuts by Banxico, and you have the recipe for a weaker currency.  While the peso has bounced 0.9% this morning, this trend lower remains clear for now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With all that out of the way, it is time to turn to this morning’s big news, the August CPI report.  Current median expectations are for a 0.2% M/M, 2.6% Y/Y rise in the headline number and a 0.2% M/M, 3.2% Y/Y rise in the ex-food & energy reading.  However, I have seen estimates ranging from 0.0% M/M to 0.3% M/M based on various subcomponents like used cars, apparel and shelter.  Ahead of the release, I have no further information than that, but let’s consider what can happen in either situation.

First, we know that the Fed is going to cut rates next week, regardless of the number today.  Currently, the Fed funds futures market is pricing a 29% probability of a 50bp cut.  A quick look at the below table from the CME shows this is close to the lower end of the range of expectations over the past month, which back in August were at 51%.

source: cmegroup.com

The current working assumption seems to be that a soft number will virtually assure a 50bp cut regardless of any other economic data, while a 0.3% print will lock in a 25bp cut.  Once again, given the apparent resilience of the economy, the rationale for cutting rates aggressively remains elusive.  The cynic in me might point to the fact that Chairman Powell is a private equity guy, someone who made his fortune in that space, and he has been receiving pressure from all his old friends and colleagues to cut rates to help resurrect the sales activity in that market.   While that may seem glib, given the way things work in the corridors of power in Washington, it cannot be ruled out.  However, history has shown that when the Fed begins a cutting cycle with 50 bps, it is generally because they are behind the curve and recession is already here.  If that is the situation, while next week a 50bp cut may be well received by equity investors, the medium-term outlook is not nearly as bright.  At this point, the question is, how will markets respond to the data.

Let’s start with looking at how things behaved overnight.  Yesterday’s mixed US session, with the DJIA slipping while both the S&P and NASDAQ rallied was followed by uniform weakness in Asia.  Perhaps nobody there was enamored of the debate, which was taking place while those markets were open, but we saw the Nikkei (-1.5%) fall sharply with weakness also in the Hang Seng (-0.75%) and CSI 300 (-0.3%). In fact, only Singapore (+0.5%) managed any gains during the session with every other regional market declining.  But that is not the story in Europe, where all markets are higher, albeit not that much higher.  Spain’s IBEX (+0.65%) is the leader with other markets showing gains of between 0.1% (FTSE 100) to 0.3% (DAX).  For those who are concerned that a Trump victory may isolate Europe more than a Harris victory, perhaps there was more encouragement she could win after the debate.

In the bond market, after some significant declines in yields yesterday, where Treasury yields fell nearly 10bps, this morning they have fallen a further 2bps and are now back to their lowest level since June 2023.  At 3.6%, nearly 200bps below Fed funds, the bond market seems to be pricing in a recession.  Interestingly, neither stocks nor credit spreads are pricing that same outcome.  European sovereign yields also fell sharply yesterday, although not as much as Treasury yields, more like 5bps, and this morning they are a bit lower again, somewhere between -1bp and -3bps.  Perhaps the most interesting outcome is that JGB yields have slipped 4bps, once again delaying the idea that the BOJ is going to tighten policy soon.

In the commodity markets, oil (+2.6%) has rebounded sharply this morning as concerns over Hurricane Francine shutting in Gulf of Mexico production rise ahead of expected landfall later today.  However, the trend here remains lower as demand concerns remain front and center and supply continues to grow.  My sense is that the declining demand is a signal that economic activity is slowing, but it will return with a return to more robust global growth.  In the metals markets, everything is back in the green with gold (+0.2%) once again pushing toward its recent all-time highs, while both silver and copper show strength this morning.  I believe those moves are related to the anticipation of larger cuts by the Fed and other central banks coming soon.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure across the board this morning, also playing along with the theme of the Fed cutting rates more aggressively going forward.  In fact, literally every currency in both the G10 and EMG blocs are stronger today with most modestly so, on the order of 0.2%, although we have seen MXN (+0.85%) rebounding from its recent declines discussed above, and ZAR (+0.45%) benefitting from the strength in metals markets.

Aside from the CPI data, the only other news is the EIA oil inventories, where last week saw a large draw overall, and the only forecast I see is for a modest build of <1mm barrels.  However, CPI will determine today’s price action.  I think we are in a ‘good news is good’ scenario so a soft number should see a rally in stocks, bonds and commodities while the dollar suffers further.  On the flip side, a high print should see the opposite reaction.

As I reread my note, it appears to be an accurate description of the fact that there are features in the data pointing to further economic strength and other pointing to weakness.  Truly, nobody knows what lies ahead.

Good luck

Adf