It seems that investors are waiting For Powell, and so they’re debating Will he be a hawk And still talk the talk Or will he be accommodating? The punditry seems unpersuaded Another rate hike could be slated So, most views expressed Say; time to invest! And bearish ideas must be faded
It is almost as if we are still on holiday given the lack of price movement across most markets so far this week. In fact, other than the Chinese markets (Hang Seng -1.0%), which are continuing to suffer from the ongoing implosion of their property bubble, market activity yesterday in the US, overnight through the rest of Asia and in Europe this morning has been quite muted. Perhaps the tone has been very mildly bearish, with declines on the order of -0.25% or so, but that comes in the wake of gains as much as 10% or more through the month of November. As such, it should be no surprise to see a bit of portfolio rebalancing. Certainly, there is a lot more discussion about the soft/no-landing scenario and we are beginning to see S&P 500 prognostications for the end of 2024 being above 5000.
The premise seems to be that inflation has been defeated, and that while the Fed may wait a few more months before cutting rates, by this time next year they will be celebrated for having achieved the elusive soft-landing. The implication is that once they are more comfortable that inflation is dead, they will start to cut rates because…? And that is where I get lost. If the economy continues to grow with rates at 5%, exactly why should the Fed consider cutting them? The only reason I can see is that the pressure from the administration grows too intense as the cost of refinancing the currently outstanding and growing debt continues to rise dramatically. The problem with this outcome, however, is that if the Fed is seen to be cutting rates under pressure from the administration to reduce financing costs, it is likely to signal to the market that fiscal policy is in complete control (yesterday’s discussion on fiscal dominance is apropos here). Historically, when that happens, inflation is not merely, not dead, it is ready to roar.
The implications of this policy direction are unlikely to be welcome in government, in boardrooms or in households, as rising inflation and a declining currency are a toxic mix for economic success. Let’s think this through before cheering it on.
As we progress toward the 2024 presidential election, it is abundantly clear that the federal government is going to seek to spend as much money as possible. Not only that but I am confident they learned the lessons from the GFC and Covid that QE simply pumps up asset prices while helicopter money is far more effective in getting cash into the hands of the voters. Given the recent surveys that show 80% of the country believes they are worse off than prior to President Biden’s election, the recipe to address this is quite clear; give more money directly to the people. And so, you can be sure that there will be numerous fiscal giveaways as 2024 unfolds.
The problem is that these giveaways do not create organic growth in the economy, rather they are the antithesis of organic growth. As such, tax revenues will continue to lag, and the deficit will continue to grow ever larger. Already, the cost of funding the outstanding ~$34 trillion in debt has reached $1 trillion, more than the government spends on defense, the largest non-entitlement program. As well, the average tenor of US Treasury debt continues to decline with almost half needing to be refinanced by the end of 2025. If interest rates remain at 5.5% and the Treasury continues to skew toward T-bills rather than coupons, that $1 trillion bill is going to grow to $2 trillion pretty quickly. That will require even more debt issuance to repay, and the cycle will grow ever larger and faster.
It doesn’t take much imagination to see where this could be headed and there is a history of how it has worked in the past, notably with Weimar Germany in 1921-1923 and more recently, in Zimbabwe in 2008-2009 and again in 2019, and, of course, Argentina today. The classic response to this problem is to institute yield curve control so that those debt payments are contained. Of course, that means that government debt will pay negative real yields, and the Fed will wind up owning most of it*. The natural consequence here will be that the dollar will likely decline sharply, at least against ‘real’ stuff like commodities, and a little less-so against quasi-real stuff** like equities. Versus other currencies it is much harder to tell because if the US is in this situation, other countries are likely to be in difficult straits as well, so the FX value of the dollar may not collapse. Of course, other countries may not have the same debt dynamics as the US, and those currencies will likely hold up better than the rest.
My fear is this is the new direction of travel. It is not a given by any stretch, but it is going to seem quite attractive to politicians of every stripe, regardless of their political affiliation or ostensible principals because, remember, to an elected politician, the most important policy is one that gets them re-elected and they will vote for anything that they believe will help them in that cause, principals be damned.
Will this have any impact today? Very unlikely. But it is important to remember this possible path as we await to hear more Fed speakers, but notably Chairman Powell on Thursday morning. Any hint that the pressure to cut is working (and I am sure there is plenty of pressure for that from Treasury and the executive branch) and we will see a massive rally in equities, bonds and commodities as the dollar declines. At least at first. In fact, it is for this reason that I believe that we are going to hear much more hawkish rhetoric from all the Fed speakers this week, and that Powell will be particularly so. They understand the potential ramifications of capitulation and are not yet ready to allow it.
As to today’s markets, bond yields are within 1bp of yesterday’s closes but leaning lower right now, US equity futures are basically unchanged as are gold and the entire metals complex although oil is edging higher on the news that Saudi Arabia is pushing for another 1mm bbl/day production cut at Thursday’s OPEC+ meeting.
On the data front, yesterday’s New Home Sales data was quite weak, with both prices and volumes falling. This morning we see Case Shiller Home Prices (exp 4.0%) and Consumer Confidence (101.0) and we hear from four Fed speakers, Goolsbee, Waller, Bowman and Barr. Look for that hawkish tilt. It is also supomatsu, the day when spot FX settles on month end, so I expect FX volumes to pick up a bit, but historically, this is more of a swap exercise than a directional one, and so looking for directional movement based on this would be a mistake in my view.
If I am correct and hawkishness is the Fed mantra today, I expect the dollar will be able to edge a bit higher along with yields, but until Powell speaks, I suspect we will remain fairly muted overall.
Good luck
Adf
*There is another possibility with regards to ownership of treasury debt to prevent the Fed from owning all of it, new rules can be instituted that require banks, insurance companies and even your 401K or IRA accounts to maintain a certain percentage of assets in treasury bonds. So, in the latter case, which has already been discussed in Washington, you could see 20% or 30% of your retirement next egg forced into negative real yielding assets for a long time. I assure you that will not help your retirement situation!
** I use the term quasi-real stuff as equities represent shares in a real business, so there is underlying value to that business and its assets, although not quite the same as owning the actual hard assets they represent.