Tag Archives: #phillipscurve

The Citizen’s Pain

Posted on by 
Last night, t’was Australia that showed
Employment growth had not yet slowed
And so, please expect
The central bank sect
To keep on the rate hiking road

They’ll not be content til they’ve slain
Inflation, and end this campaign
Yet, if all along
Their thesis is wrong
They’ll ne’er feel the citizen’s pain

On a very slow day in the markets, the most noteworthy news came from Down Under, where the Unemployment Rate fell back to 3.5% in a bit of a surprise while job growth continued at a speedier pace than analysts forecasted.  The market response was immediate with the Aussie dollar jumping sharply and it is now higher by 1.0% on the session, the leading gainer across all currencies, G10 or EMG today.  The rationale for the move is quite straightforward as market participants simply expect the RBA to maintain tighter policy than previously expected.  In the OIS market, the probability of a rate hike at the next RBA meeting on August 1st rose to 48% from just 27% prior to the release.  And correspondingly, Australian government bond yields jumped more than 8bps on the news.

Ultimately, the question that must be addressed is, does strong employment growth lead to higher prices overall?  As my good friend @inflation_guy has said consistently, we should all be ecstatic to have a wage-price spiral as the implication is prices rise AFTER our wages rise, so we are always ahead of the curve.  But we all know, and it has been made abundantly clear in this cycle, that wages follow prices higher.  One need only look at how prices continue to rise on a much more continuous basis than your salaries to see this clearly.  

However, this is gospel in the central banking sect of economists, that tight labor markets drive the general price level higher.  You may have heard of the Phillips Curve, which was a study done in 1958 regarding the relationship between the price of labor (i.e. wages) and the unemployment rate in the UK from 1861-1957.  William Phillips was the New Zealand economist who performed the analysis and basically it confirmed what we all learned in Economics 101, reduced supply of labor drove up wages while an increased supply of labor pushed wages lower.  Nowhere in the study did it discuss the general price level.  That came later with a litany of big name economists, finally with Milton Friedman explaining that in the long-run, there was no relation between wages and inflation, although on a short-term basis, it could evolve.

As so often happens in today’s world, it was easier to take the short-cut view, and that had an intuitive appeal, hence the current central bank mantra of we must bring wage growth down.  (Will they ever get concerned over bringing money growth down?  I fear not.).  At any rate, this is the widely accepted view of the world and so whatever its structural merits, when employment data shows a tighter labor market, the market response is to expect higher policy interest rates.  This was the story last night, hence the Aussie’s rally along with yields Down Under, and this has been the story consistently since the beginning of 2022, when global central banks embarked on the current round of policy tightening.  This is also why we consistently hear Chairman Powell explain that in order for the Fed to reach its 2% inflation target, there will need to be some pain, i.e. people need to lose their jobs.

But away from that, there has been very little of note ongoing.  Equity markets in Asia were unable to match yesterday’s modest gains in the US, with the Nikkei (-1.25%) the laggard of the bunch.  European bourses, however, have had a better go of it, with most of them higher on the order of 0.4% although Sweden’s OMX is down nearly -1.0% on the session bucking the trend.  US futures this morning are softer as there were several weaker than expected earnings numbers overnight including Netflix and Tesla.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have moved higher by 3bps this morning in the 10-year space, but even more in the 2-year space as the yield curve inversion gets deeper, now back above -101bps.  However, European sovereign bonds are little changed on the day with no data of note and the market trying to determine just how hawkish/dovish the ECB will be one week from today.  As to JGBs, their yields have stopped rising and they remain 5bps below the cap.  Do not expect any BOJ action next week.

Oil prices are a touch higher after a lackluster session yesterday, but remain above the key $75/bbl level.  Meanwhile, gold (+0.25%) continues to edge higher and is once again closing in on $2000/oz despite obvious catalysts or lower US interest rates.  As to the base metals, both copper and aluminum are nicely higher this morning as the entire commodity comlex is feeling some love.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure as not only is AUD firmer, but also NOK (+1.1%) on the back of oil’s gains, and virtually the entire bloc except for the pound (-0.3%) which still seems to be suffering from yesterday’s inflation data.  In the EMG bloc, CNY (+0.8%) is the leading gainer, a surprising outcome given its generally managed low volatility, but the fact that the PBOC did NOT reduce the Loan Prime Rate last night, in either the 1-year of 5-year term, was a bit of a surprise to the market as there is a growing belief the Chinese government will be adding more stimulus to a clearly slowing economy there.    But in this bloc, there are also a number of laggards with MXN (-0.4%) the worst of the bunch on what appears to be some profit-taking as traders start to position for the first rate cut since October 2020.

On the data front, yesterday’s housing data in the US was soft, with downward revisions to the previous month’s numbers.  This morning we see Initial (exp 240K) and Continuing (1722K) Claims as well as Philly Fed (-10.0), Existing Home Sales (4.20M) and Leading Indicators (-0.6%), the last of which have been pointing to recession for nearly a year.  However, once again, I expect the dollar will be beholden to the equity markets as none of these data points are likely to move the needle ahead of the FOMC next week.

For now, I think choppy price action is the likely outcome until we get more clarity from Powell and the Fed, as well as Lagarde and the ECB next week.  Who will be the most hawkish?  That is the $64 billion question.

Good luck
Adf

A Lack of Pizzazz

Posted on by

This week, central banks, numb’ring three
Released information that we
Interpreted as
A lack of pizzazz
So, don’t look for tight policy

Yesterday’s release of the ECB Minutes from their January meeting didn’t garner nearly as much press as the FOMC Minutes on Wednesday. However, they are still important. The topic du jour was the analysis necessary to help them determine if rolling over the TLTRO’s was the appropriate policy going forward. Not surprisingly, the hawks on the committee, like Austria’s Ewald Nowotny, said there is no hurry and a decision doesn’t need to be taken until June when the first of these loans fall below twelve months in their remaining term. I am pretty sure that he is against adding any more stimulus at all. At the same time, given the recession in Italy and slowing growth picture throughout Germany and France, and given that Italian and French banks had been the first and third most active users of the financing, in the end, the ECB cannot afford to let them lapse. I remain 100% convinced that these loans will be rolled over in an effort to ‘avoid tightening financial conditions’, not in order to ease them further. However, the market impact of the Minutes was muted at best, as has been this morning’s data releases; one confirming that German GDP was flat in Q4, and more importantly, the decline in the Ifo Business Climate indicator to 98.5, its lowest level in four years. Meanwhile, Eurozone inflation remains absent from the discussion with January’s data confirmed to have declined to a 1.4% Y/Y rise. Nothing in this data indicates the ECB will tighten policy in 2019, and quite frankly, I would be shocked to see them move in 2020 as well.

The other central bank information of note was the Bank of Canada, where Governor Poloz spoke in Montreal and explained that while the current policy setting (base rates are 1.75%) remain below their range of estimates of the neutral rate (2.5%-3.5%), current conditions dictate that there is no hurry to tighten further, especially with the ongoing uncertainty emanating from the US and the overall global trade situation. So here is another central bank that had been talking up the tightening process and has now backed away.

In virtually every case, the central banks continue to hang their hats on the employment market’s strength, and the idea that a tight jobs market will lead to higher wages, and thus higher inflation. The thing is, this Phillips Curve model has two flaws; first it only relates lower unemployment to higher wages, not higher general inflation; and second, it is based on an analysis of the UK from 1861-1957, which may not actually be a relevant timeline compared to the global economy in 2019. And one other thing to remember is that employment is a lagging indicator with respect to economic signals. This means that it is backward looking and has been demonstrated to have limited predictive power. My point is that despite a clearly strong employment situation, it is still entirely possible that global growth can slow much further and much more quickly than policymakers would have you believe.

Back to the currency markets, the upshot of all the new information was that traders have essentially left both the euro and the Loonie unchanged for the past two days. In fact, they have left most currencies that way. This morning’s largest G10 mover is the pound, which just recently has extended its losses to -0.40% after it became clear that the EU was NOT going to make any concessions regarding the backstop issue as had been believed just yesterday. The latest story is that the UK is going to ask for a three-month extension, which is likely to be granted. The thing is, the problem is not going to get any easier to solve in three months’ time than it is now. This will simply extend the time of uncertainty.

Of course, the other story is the trade talks and the positive spin that we continue to hear despite the information that there remain wide differences on key issues like enforcement of any deals as well as the speed with which the Chinese are willing to open up their markets. It is all well and good for the Chinese to say they will buy more corn, or more soybeans or more oil, but while nice, those pledges don’t address the question of IP protection and state subsidies. I remain concerned that any deal, if it is brokered, will be much less impactful than is claimed. And it is quite possible that the US will not remove any of the current tariffs until they have validation that the Chinese have upheld their side of any deal. I feel like the market is far too optimistic on this subject, but then again, I am a cynic.

While FX markets have been slow to respond to these stories, we continue to see equity markets wholeheartedly embrace the idea that a deal is coming soon and there is no reason to worry. Last night, Chinese equity markets rallied sharply (Shanghai +1.9%), although the Nikkei actually slipped -0.2%. European markets this morning are higher by around 0.4%-0.5%, as they, too, seem bullish on the trade picture. Certainly, it is not based on the economic picture in the Eurozone.

But as we have seen for the past several weeks, central banks, Brexit and trade are the only stories that matter. Right now, investors and traders are giving mixed signals, with the equity markets feeling positive, but currency and bond markets much less so. My money is on the bond market vs. the stock market as having correctly analyzed the situation.

Good luck and good weekend
Adf