Tag Archives: #debate

Feelings of Doubt

Posted on by

Two candidates took to the stage
But neither of them could assuage
The feelings of doubt
‘bout how things turn out
And how we can all turn the page
 
Meanwhile there’s news south of the border
Where AMLO, the courts, did reorder
This has raised some fears
That in coming years
The nation will lack law & order

 

Before I start, please take a moment to remember those 2,977 nnocent lives lost on this horrible day 23 years ago, this generation’s day of infamy.

Now, on to the market discussion.  I don’t know about you, if you watched the debate, but frankly I was pretty bored and disappointed by the whole thing.  I heard many platitudes from both sides, many accusations from both sides, and couldn’t help but notice how the moderators interjected themselves consistently in favor of Vice-president Harris via their “fact-checking”.  All in all, I don’t think we learned that much, although Harris is certainly more coherent than Biden was.  My guess is that very few undecided voters changed their minds.  As to the market’s reaction, perhaps the only notable result was that gold rallied slightly as no matter who wins the election, the idea that fiscal prudence is on the agenda remains anathema to both sides.  Equity futures were slightly lower when the debate started, and still slightly lower when it ended, as well as this morning.  It ought not be surprising as the impact of politics on equity markets has always been unclear in the short run.

The other political story of note was that in Mexico, AMLO, who remains president for a few more weeks, was able to finally get the change to the constitution he has been seeking his entire term, which now allows for judges, including supreme court justices there, to be elected rather than appointed.  The concern is that this will politicize the judicial system.  An independent judiciary is a key ingredient for international investors as they seek some comfort that business decisions can be fairly considered.  However, judicial elections may call that into question and that is likely to have a longer-term negative impact on the Mexican economy.  As you can see from the chart below, the peso has been massively underperforming since April, falling more than 22% and breaching the 20.00 peso level for the first time in more than 2 years, as concerns over this issue have grown.  Add to this the fact that inflation in Mexico has drifted slowly lower and expectations are rising for more aggressive rate cuts by Banxico, and you have the recipe for a weaker currency.  While the peso has bounced 0.9% this morning, this trend lower remains clear for now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With all that out of the way, it is time to turn to this morning’s big news, the August CPI report.  Current median expectations are for a 0.2% M/M, 2.6% Y/Y rise in the headline number and a 0.2% M/M, 3.2% Y/Y rise in the ex-food & energy reading.  However, I have seen estimates ranging from 0.0% M/M to 0.3% M/M based on various subcomponents like used cars, apparel and shelter.  Ahead of the release, I have no further information than that, but let’s consider what can happen in either situation.

First, we know that the Fed is going to cut rates next week, regardless of the number today.  Currently, the Fed funds futures market is pricing a 29% probability of a 50bp cut.  A quick look at the below table from the CME shows this is close to the lower end of the range of expectations over the past month, which back in August were at 51%.

source: cmegroup.com

The current working assumption seems to be that a soft number will virtually assure a 50bp cut regardless of any other economic data, while a 0.3% print will lock in a 25bp cut.  Once again, given the apparent resilience of the economy, the rationale for cutting rates aggressively remains elusive.  The cynic in me might point to the fact that Chairman Powell is a private equity guy, someone who made his fortune in that space, and he has been receiving pressure from all his old friends and colleagues to cut rates to help resurrect the sales activity in that market.   While that may seem glib, given the way things work in the corridors of power in Washington, it cannot be ruled out.  However, history has shown that when the Fed begins a cutting cycle with 50 bps, it is generally because they are behind the curve and recession is already here.  If that is the situation, while next week a 50bp cut may be well received by equity investors, the medium-term outlook is not nearly as bright.  At this point, the question is, how will markets respond to the data.

Let’s start with looking at how things behaved overnight.  Yesterday’s mixed US session, with the DJIA slipping while both the S&P and NASDAQ rallied was followed by uniform weakness in Asia.  Perhaps nobody there was enamored of the debate, which was taking place while those markets were open, but we saw the Nikkei (-1.5%) fall sharply with weakness also in the Hang Seng (-0.75%) and CSI 300 (-0.3%). In fact, only Singapore (+0.5%) managed any gains during the session with every other regional market declining.  But that is not the story in Europe, where all markets are higher, albeit not that much higher.  Spain’s IBEX (+0.65%) is the leader with other markets showing gains of between 0.1% (FTSE 100) to 0.3% (DAX).  For those who are concerned that a Trump victory may isolate Europe more than a Harris victory, perhaps there was more encouragement she could win after the debate.

In the bond market, after some significant declines in yields yesterday, where Treasury yields fell nearly 10bps, this morning they have fallen a further 2bps and are now back to their lowest level since June 2023.  At 3.6%, nearly 200bps below Fed funds, the bond market seems to be pricing in a recession.  Interestingly, neither stocks nor credit spreads are pricing that same outcome.  European sovereign yields also fell sharply yesterday, although not as much as Treasury yields, more like 5bps, and this morning they are a bit lower again, somewhere between -1bp and -3bps.  Perhaps the most interesting outcome is that JGB yields have slipped 4bps, once again delaying the idea that the BOJ is going to tighten policy soon.

In the commodity markets, oil (+2.6%) has rebounded sharply this morning as concerns over Hurricane Francine shutting in Gulf of Mexico production rise ahead of expected landfall later today.  However, the trend here remains lower as demand concerns remain front and center and supply continues to grow.  My sense is that the declining demand is a signal that economic activity is slowing, but it will return with a return to more robust global growth.  In the metals markets, everything is back in the green with gold (+0.2%) once again pushing toward its recent all-time highs, while both silver and copper show strength this morning.  I believe those moves are related to the anticipation of larger cuts by the Fed and other central banks coming soon.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure across the board this morning, also playing along with the theme of the Fed cutting rates more aggressively going forward.  In fact, literally every currency in both the G10 and EMG blocs are stronger today with most modestly so, on the order of 0.2%, although we have seen MXN (+0.85%) rebounding from its recent declines discussed above, and ZAR (+0.45%) benefitting from the strength in metals markets.

Aside from the CPI data, the only other news is the EIA oil inventories, where last week saw a large draw overall, and the only forecast I see is for a modest build of <1mm barrels.  However, CPI will determine today’s price action.  I think we are in a ‘good news is good’ scenario so a soft number should see a rally in stocks, bonds and commodities while the dollar suffers further.  On the flip side, a high print should see the opposite reaction.

As I reread my note, it appears to be an accurate description of the fact that there are features in the data pointing to further economic strength and other pointing to weakness.  Truly, nobody knows what lies ahead.

Good luck

Adf

Our Future’s Austere#debate,#china,

Posted on by

This evening there’ll be a debate
And markets are willing to wait
To see if the polls
Will change who controls
The future, and all of our fate
 
Until then, it seems pretty clear
Investors are waiting to hear
Amid all the lies
If taxes will rise
And whether our future’s austere

 

It seems that all eyes have begun to focus on this evening’s debate between former President Trump and Vice-president Harris, with both sides bombarding every source of information available to the average person with their own spin.  Within the market context, the debate is about which candidate’s policies will be better for the economy and by extension equity markets.  As I am just a poet, this is all far above my pay grade.  Trying to be somewhat objective (and I’m sure you have figured out I lean toward the traditional conservative view of less government is better), from what I have read, neither side paints a particularly enticing picture.  

Tariffs have never proven effective, but the concept of taxing unrealized capital gains is abhorrent, and if enacted would be extremely detrimental to the nation.  Ultimately, I think the phrase, energy is the economy, is one to keep in mind as understanding that idea leads to an understanding of how policy choices will impact economic activity over time.  One need only look at Germany’s economic suicide following their Energiewende policy that has raised the price of electricity dramatically (it is 3x US prices) and led to a slow-motion collapse of the nation’s once strong manufacturing sector, to get a glimpse of the future without cheap and abundant energy.

So, with the Fed in their quiet period, let’s turn our attention overseas for any other news of note.  Chinese trade data was released overnight and showed a further increase in their trade surplus ($91B), news which probably did not brighten President Xi’s day as imports remain incredibly weak, a strong signal that the domestic economy is still stumbling along poorly under the weight of the ongoing collapse in the property bubble there.  The problem was highlighted by Exports growing 8.7% while Imports grew just 0.5%.  Chinese markets were largely unimpressed with this as the CSI 300 rose just 0.1% (although that is better than many of its recent sessions) and the renminbi slipped 0.1% despite a broader trend of modest dollar weakness.

The other notable data was from the UK where the employment situation continues to improve, with the Unemployment Rate falling to 4.1% while wages keep growing at 5.1% and there was a significant uptick in Employment by 265K with all of that data at least as good as expectations with some exceeding them.  When combining the resilience of the employment situation with the fact that inflation remains well above target in the UK, it continues to be difficult to understand the near desperation that the BOE has to cut interest rates.

In fact, that last comment can be applied to the US as well.  A look at the data shows that the job market, while not as robust as it had been last year, remains pretty solid, at least according to the BLS and the recent NFP report, while inflation, no matter how it is measured, remains well above the Fed’s 2.0% target.  In fact, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow data moved higher after the NFP report and is now sitting at 2.5% for the current quarter, which would follow the 3.0% Q2 measure.  Again, other than Powell’s promise to cut rates at Jackson Hole, it is not clear the data is pointing to that, at least not the data on the surface.  In fact, Torsten Slok, a well-known economist at Apollo Group, has put out a very interesting compilation of very current data showing that the economy seems to be doing fine.  My point is from the Fed’s perspective, this incredible desire to cut rates seems odd.

But that is the reality, central banks everywhere really want to cut rates, and come Thursday, the ECB will be the next to do so.  The question of 25bps or 50bps for the Fed next week seems almost moot compared to the fact that the market is pricing in 250bps of cuts by the end of next year.  Here’s the problem with that pricing; if the Fed does stick the soft landing, that seems like far too much policy ease without driving a significant uptick in inflation screwing up the soft landing theme.  However, if the economy does fall into recession, they will cut a lot more than that, probably on the order of 350bps to 400bps (Fed funds falling to 1.50% – 2.00%).  And one more thing to remember, QT continues in the background as the Fed gradually reduces the size of its balance sheet.  But can they continue to remove that liquidity while cutting rates as much as the market anticipates?  That feels like a very tough task and in truth, if the Fed is cutting rates, I think we are more likely to see QT turn into QE than anything else.  

So, regardless of the lack of activity today, there is much still to come.  As to today, let’s survey the rest of the markets outside China.  After yesterday’s solid rallies across US equity indices, other than Japan (-0.2%) and Korea (-0.5%), the rest of Asia had solid performances with gains ranging between 0.2% (HK) and 0.75% (Indonesia).  Europe, too, is mixed this morning with some modest gains (CAC, IBEX) and some modest declines (DAX, FTSE 100) with the latter more surprising given the solid employment data.  Perhaps that is the market showing concern the BOE will not cut rates as much as previously expected.  As to US futures, they are little changed at this hour (7:50).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are higher by 1bp this morning and we have seen similar rises across the entire European sovereign market.  Of more interest is the fact that the US 2yr-10yr yield curve is now positively sloped by 3bps this morning, with the long inversion finally having ended.  At least at those maturities.  But if you look at the 3mo (4.98%) – 2yr (3.68%) spread of -130bps, that is dramatically inverted with the market pricing in a huge amount of Fed rate cuts coming ahead.  I cannot help but look at that and be confused about equity analysts’ collective view of significant profit growth going forward.  One of those seems wrong.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.2%) which had a nice bounce yesterday on concerns over Hurricane Francine hitting the Gulf of Mexico tomorrow, has given it all back after the weaker Chinese consumption data.  Meanwhile, metals prices, which also rallied yesterday amid the general good feelings, are little changed overall this morning.

Finally, the dollar is little changed net this morning as the euro has edged down a few pips while the pound has rallied a similar amount.  In fact, in the G10, only NOK (+0.45%) is showing any movement of substance after lower-than-expected inflation data has reduced the probability of further rate cuts by the central bank there.  Amazingly, in the EMG bloc, movements have been even smaller with really nothing of note to discuss amid overall changes of +/-0.2% or less.

On the data front, the NFIB Small Business Optimism Index was released earlier this morning at 91.2, more than 2 points below last month and expectations and an indication that the small business community remains concerned about future economic activity.  There are no speakers and no other data this morning, so I expect the currency markets to do little until after the debate this evening.  If one candidate is particularly effective, we may see some movement, but otherwise, I sense that people are awaiting tomorrow’s CPI for the next catalyst to make a move.

Good luck

Adf