No Longer Benign

The war in the Gulf shows no sign
Of ending by any deadline
Some victims now bleeding
Are bonds, with yields speeding
To levels no longer benign

Already we’ve seen, efforts, great
By nations, impacts, to abate
So, price caps on gas
Worldwide came to pass
But will central banks raise their rate(s)?

Nothing of note has changed in the Iran war as the US continues to refrain from further attacks while negotiations to end the conflict ostensibly continue.  Both sides have made their demands, but from what I have read about them, neither side can accept the others wishes.  If pressed, my take is the ongoing US pause is simply allowing the Marines and 82ndAirborne to get into place for their attempt to take over and control Kharg Island and the other small islands in the Strait.  Frankly, I would not bet against their tactical success in that endeavor.  However, it is not clear how Iran will respond in that situation.  After all, if the US does control Kharg Island, that means Iran no longer controls their own revenue stream, and that is truly existential for the regime.  However, I could be completely wrong about this, which is why I am not a military strategist.

But I think it is worthwhile taking a peek at the bond market this morning.  For the first few weeks of the war, while yields edged higher, there was no indication that investors were getting terribly nervous about the longer-term impacts of the war.  However, that no longer seems to be the case.  I have several charts below showing US, UK and German 10-year yields over the past six months, and then a longer-term perspective showing those same yields over the past 20 years. 

Six months of yields

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Long-term charts (source marketwatch.com)

UK Gilts

German bunds

US Treasuries

As you can see from the first chart, yields across all three of these nations have risen sharply now in the past month.  In fact, the numbers are US (+52bps), UK (+83bps) and Germany (+47bps).  It is very clear that fixed income investors are getting worried, and reasonably so given the idea that inflation readings, at least in the short-term, are going to be much higher.  As to the longer-term view, though there is certainly a similarity amongst the movement of yields of all three nations, UK yields are currently at their highest level since the GFC, July 2008; German yields are at their highest level since the Eurozone bond crisis in 2011, but Treasury yields were higher at the beginning of this year, and 25bps higher in late 2023.  

This is not to dismiss the potential problems that may arise if government bond yields continue to rise, especially given the already extraordinarily high debt/GDP ratios that exist throughout the G10.  However, I am not prepared to concede that the US is going to collapse because 10-year yields are back at 4.50%.

What we have seen, though, almost everywhere in the world, is government attempts to cap prices on energy, whether gasoline, diesel or even electricity, to help moderate some of the obvious pain that higher energy prices are inflicting on their populations.  We have also heard a great deal from central bankers about needing to tighten monetary policy to combat the rising inflation, despite the fact that inflation is coming from a supply shock in energy rather than either excess demand or money supply.  I fear that will not work out that well if they do so, but as is often the case, central banks (and governments in general) feel they must “do something” when an exogenous event, out of their control, occurs.  Ultimately, history has shown that is when policy mistakes are made.  Here’s hoping the hostilities end quickly enough so nations don’t make those mistakes.

Away from bonds, with yields higher this morning across the board (US +5bps, Germany +5bps, UK +11bps, Japan +11bps) and the rest of the European sovereigns somewhere in between, if we turn to oil (+2.7%), WTI is pushing back up to $100/bbl this morning, which I take as an indication market participants are getting nervous things will last longer than they thought a few days ago.  You can see the chart below that oil has rallied steadily all week since the Tweet that things were going to be ending soon back on Monday.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The more interesting price action to me, this morning, is that gold (+0.7%) is also higher this morning, which may be the first session since the first day of the attacks, where both have risen in sync.  There is a story around that Turkey sold 58 tons of gold right when things began, but even at $5000/oz, that is only about $9 billion of gold compared to average daily trading volumes of between $200 billon and $300 billion (according to Grok).  My point is that would not be enough to move markets like we have seen in gold, but it could well be a harbinger of what other nations did as well.  Again, there is no sense that the long history of gold’s role is changing here.

As to equity markets, yesterday’s weakness in the US has been followed across Europe (DAX -1.6%, CAC -1.1%, FTSE 100 -0.75%, IBEX -1.4%) but the picture in Asia was more nuanced.  While the Nikkei (-0.4%) slipped a bit, both China (+0.6%) and HK (+0.4%) managed to rally as did Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand albeit not very much.  On the downside, though, India (-2.2%) made up for the fact it was closed on Thursday, while Korea (-0.4%) and Taiwan (-0.7%) both slipped and the rest of the region edged lower by lesser amounts.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are lower by about -0.35%.

Finally, the dollar continues to be a major beneficiary of the war as the DXY is back above 100 this morning with several EMG currencies coming under greater pressure today.  We see CLP (-1.1%) feeling the pain of copper’s inability to rally at all, as well as INR (-0.6%) and MXN (-0.5%) suffering this morning.  NOK (+0.2%) continues to benefit from oil’s recent strength, and CAD (+0.1%) is holding its own on the same basis, but both the euro (-0.15%) and pound (-0.2%) are struggling as the energy problem there is a major detriment to their economies.

The only US data this morning is Michigan Sentiment (exp 54.0) while yesterday’s Jobs data continues to show that layoffs are not increasing in any meaningful way, which I believe is a result of the dramatic change in immigration policy as well as deportations.  Like so much of what is ongoing these days, old models regarding the labor market are no longer representative of the new reality on the ground.  I suspect this is true across large segments of the economy which just means that relying on econometric models will be a fraught exercise going forward.  Here is a reason to pity the central bank community as they are truly flying blind now.

And that’s all there is today.  To me, we are biding our time until the Marines land on Kharg Island and then we will see a new phase of the war.  It is a high risk, high reward venture as success would certainly reopen the Strait of Hormuz and oil prices would plummet quickly.  Failure, however, would leave Iran with greater control over that key chokepoint and potentially cause greater difficulties elsewhere in the world, not least because it would call into question the US ability to project power.  War is not only hell, but also incredibly risky.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Banish Conceit

The back story of every war
Is nobody knows what’s in store
Especially now
As Trump’s sacred cow
Is changing his message once more

So, yesterday morning, his Tweet
Led many to think a retreat
Was on the horizon
But Trump is surprisin’
With him, one must banish conceit

This morning the story is talks
Twixt both sides are unorthodox
As leaders o’er there
Are fighting since there’s
Nobody in charge, doves nor hawks

Obviously, the Iran situation remains the key driver of all market activity at this point and the stories about negotiations are the lead.  From what I can gather, and there is no definitive source I trust completely, a number of nations including Russia, Egypt, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have been trying to get conversations going.  Of course, the biggest problem is determining who speaks for Iran as the bulk of their previous leadership has been decapitated.  My take is there are different factions, some really hard line apocalyptics who would rather the entire world burn down, especially the US and Israel, than end the hostilities, and there are others who are more pragmatic and want the fighting to end, while perhaps being willing to give up some previous goals, like nuclear weapons ownership.

Everything that I have read about the Iranian leadership structure is that there are many military group leaders who have preset plans if there is no central leadership, and I assume that is why headlines from this morning about ongoing Iranian missile attacks continue.  While I am no military strategist, just a poet, from what I have read, if the USMC does, in fact, take over Kharg Island, it is defensible militarily and would essentially end Iranian funding completely.  Trump’s comments about the US and Iran running the facility together would imply the US can determine how much oil is shipped while Iran earns the proceeds.  In that scenario, it would be possible for the US to starve Iran of the money they need to continue their reign of terror and support for proxy groups.  That could well be a very satisfactory outcome for everybody but the mullahs who continue to seek the destruction of Israel and the US.  It would also reopen the Strait of Hormuz and we would see dramatic reversals in the price of oil and inflation fears.  In fact, I bet rate cuts by central banks would be back on the table immediately!

Ok, enough prognostication from someone in the peanut gallery.  Let’s see how markets have responded some 24 hours after Trump’s tweet yesterday morning.  volatility remains the primary feature of every financial market led by oil futures.  As you can see in the chart below of the last week of WTI price action, there has been a nearly $18 trading range, about 20% of movement in that timeline.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With the black sticky stuff higher by 2.2% this morning, I would argue that there will be no sense of calm in the markets until oil heads back toward its pre-war levels of $60/bbl or so.  If you recall, we discussed the support at $55/bbl in December and questioned what was driving the rise from there.  The daily chart for the past six months below offers a better sense of what I believe the market will find reassuring.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One other thing to remember is that the futures market remains in steep backwardation.  A look at the table below shows that prices for future delivery remain upwards of $20/bbl less than prompt prices.  All the evidence indicates that this war will be over soon.

Source: barchart.com

Sticking with commodities, precious metals have found some support with gold (+0.5%) and silver (+1.1%) both hanging on this morning.  

Turning to equity markets, yesterday’s solid rallies in the US, with all three major indices rising more than 1% was followed by broad strength in Asia (Tokyo +1.4%, HK +2.8%, China +1.3%) with more gainers (Korea, India Australia, Indonesia) than laggards (Taiwan, Malaysia, New Zealand) elsewhere in the region.  Two newsworthy items here were that Australia and the EU have signed a free trade agreement reducing tariffs between the two substantially, while RBNZ governor Breman talked about hiking interest rates if inflation picks up because of oil’s rise.  (As an aside, that would be a catastrophic error for the nation if she did it.)

Meanwhile, in Europe, it is a far less exciting session as they were able to respond to the Trump tweet during yesterday’s trading.  So, this morning, the DAX (-0.35%) is the laggard while the rest of the continent is +/-0.2% or less on the day.  This morning’s Flash PMI releases were broadly negative in tone as while Manufacturing readings were a touch better than expected Services in Germany, France, the UK and the EU overall, all showed substantial weakness.  I guess the prospect of another energy crisis in Europe is taking its toll.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are basically unchanged.

In the bond market, after a reversal yesterday, where Treasury yields slipped nearly -5bps, this morning they have backed up 3bps.  Bond investors remain caught between the idea that inflation is going to be a problem because of higher energy prices and the idea that the economy is going to slip into a recession because of higher energy prices.  Remember, too, there is an underlying dynamic where many analysts believe the US is going to hit a financing wall and yields are going to explode much higher.  But that story has been with us for quite a while, so I don’t put great stock in it for now.  

European sovereign yields also slipped yesterday and this morning they are little changed to slightly higher, with both France and Italy (+2bps) the worst performers and all other continental bonds, along with Gilts, essentially unchanged.  As to JGBs, last night yields slipped -5bps on both the prospects of the war ending and lower oil prices as well as a better-than-expected inflation reading where headline fell to 1.3% and core to 1.6%, down from 2% in January and a tick below expectations.

A funny thing about Japanese inflation is that if I look at a chart over the past 5 years, it is not hard to make the case that the BOJ has things moving in the right direction, and of course a reading of 1.6% is below their target.  In fact, if you look at the chart below comparing Japanese (blue bars) and US (gray space) core inflation, I expect Chairman Powell would give anything to have the Japanese chart!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar, while firmer this morning (DXY +0.3%) has traded right back into its long-term trading range of 96/100.  Again, I cannot look at the chart below and conclude that the dollar is going anywhere anytime soon.  If skyrocketing oil prices and a war in Iran cannot get a real breakout, I think we will have to go back to interest rate differentials as the driver!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to specific currencies, ZAR (-1.35%) is the day’s laggard as the recent sharp decline in both gold and platinum weigh on the nation’s accounts, as well as their status as a major energy importer.  We’ve also seen weakness in PLN (-0.5%), HUF (-0.6%), INR (-0.5%) and, interestingly, AUD (-0.5%) despite the latter’s deal with the EU.  I think ongoing high energy prices remain the issue here.  For the majors, -0.2% is the order of the day for the euro, pound, yen and Swiss franc.

On the data front, there’s not a ton of data this week.

TodayNonfarm Productivity Q42.0%
 Unit Labor Costs Q43.5%
 Flash Manufacturing PMI51.3
 Flash Services PMI51.5
ThursdayInitial Claims210K
 Continuing Claims1860K
FridayMichigan Sentiment53.8
 Michigan Inflation Expected3.2%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to the modest data releases, we hear from 5 Fed speakers over 7 venues this week, but it is very hard for me to believe that anything they say will matter while the war hogs the headlines.

Prognostication is silly here as headlines drive everything.  My sense is playing it close to the vest remains the best strategy.  But remember this, despite all the pearl clutching and teeth gnashing, the S&P 500 is just 6% from its high print back in January.  This has not even achieved what is typically considered a correction.  The lesson here is that history shows we can decline much further, but also that there is a lot of resilience in the market right now, hence, close to the vest.

Good luck

Adf