Monthly Archives: February 2021

Pent-Up Demand

Posted on by

The one thing consistently heard
Is growth in H2 will be spurred
By pent-up demand
Throughout all the land
As people buy things they’ve deferred

But what if the virus has wrought
Some changes in what people sought
Perhaps now it’s saving
That people are craving
Not spending, as routinely thought

There appears to be one universal view regarding economic activity going forward; there is an enormous amount of pent-up demand for things that people have been craving since the onset of the widespread government lockdowns as a result of the spread of Covid-19.  This includes eating out, going to the gym, going to the movies and traveling on vacation.  And it seems pretty clear that there is some truth to this idea.  But given the trauma that governments around the world inflicted on their populations via the inconsistent messaging and lockdown mania, isn’t it possible that many people have reevaluated what they deem as most important?  I know that this author has certainly reconsidered what is really necessary to live a happy and fulfilling life, and I imagine I am not the only one.

But the point is, virtually every economist’s assumption in their econometric models is that there will be a substantial pick-up in activity, especially in those service sectors that have been decimated by the ongoing restrictions, in the second half of the year.  There is no doubt that savings rates are higher now than they were before the pandemic, with the latest BEA data showing a 13.7% rate at the end of 2020 vs. a 7.3% rate at the end of 2019.  But the 2019 data was below the long-term (75 year) average savings rate of 9.0%, and two-thirds the rate seen from the end of WWII to1989.  The point is recent profligacy by the American people is something of a historical anomaly.  While Americans never saved like some other cultures, where savings rates would hover in the 20% range, historically, people really did try to save some money.

The other thing to remember is the past twelve months have been remarkably traumatic to the entire nation, if not the entire world, with a generation of children having their educations disrupted and changed significantly.  As was evident in the wake of the Great Depression, an entire generation altered their behavior, as the Roaring 20’s morphed into the Depression.  The one thing that hasn’t changed is human nature, with peoples’ response to trauma informing their future activities.  This is all a long-winded way of saying that, perhaps, there isn’t nearly as much pent-up demand for things as is currently assumed.  Perhaps, the increase in savings rate is a way for people, in general, to feel a bit more secure about their situation.  While FOMO will never completely disappear, it certainly could wane.

With this in mind, it is possible to turn a more critical eye at forecasts for GDP growth around the world going forward.  For instance, the UK reported that Q4 GDP rose 1.0%, well above forecasts of a 0.5% increase, and insuring that despite likely negative growth in Q1, there will be no double-dip recession.  But BOE Chief Economist, Andy Haldane was positively effusive in his forecasts, saying, “A year from now, annual growth could be in the double digits.”  Wow is all I can say.  That is an optimistic point of view, but it is not an isolated one.  Here in the US, forecasts now indicate that GDP will grow 4.9% in 2021, well above trend and enough to offset 2020’s 3.5% decline.  And maybe they are right.  Certainly, equity markets are all-in on the idea.  However, I would be cautious in blindly accepting these numbers as gospel given no econometric model takes into account the changes wrought in perceptions by Covid-19.  I fear growth could be much less impressive as 2021 evolves which means markets will need to adjust their thinking.  Stay nimble!

On to today’s session, which has seen another lackluster performance across markets.  With most of Asia closed for the New Year holiday, only the Nikkei (-0.15%) was trading and it displayed a general lack of interest.  European bourses are mixed with the DAX (-0.5%) a key underperformer while the CAC and FTSE 100 are both flat on the day.  Given the better than expected data from the UK, it would seem that performance is a bit disappointing, but there are ongoing Brexit travails which seem to be putting a damper on things.  US futures, meanwhile, had spent the bulk of the overnight session in the green, but are now all lower by about 0.2%.  It appears we may be seeing some risk being unloaded into the holiday weekend.

Bond markets are ever so slightly firmer this morning, with the biggest mover Italian BTP’s (-1.5bps) after the FiveStar party voted to support Super Mario for PM.  Otherwise, Treasury yields are essentially unchanged as are bunds and Gilts.

Oil (WTI -1.0%) is under pressure again today, for the second consecutive session, but the uptrend remains firmly in place.  This has all the hallmarks of a modest correction.  Gold, however, is under pressure as well, and has been lagging most other commodities.  Base metals are mixed as are agriculturals, which, again, tells you that there is no strong theme in the markets.

As to the dollar, it is broadly higher this morning, albeit not dramatically so.  In the G10, the commodity currencies are under the most pressure (NZD (-0.5%, AUD -0.3%, CAD -0.3%) but we are also seeing weakness in the two havens with both JPY and CHF softer by 0.3%.  In the emerging markets, RUB (-1.0%) is the weakest of the bunch after the central bank explained they won’t be cutting rates further amid concerns over new sanctions to be imposed by the EU as well as the ongoing spread of Covid.  But aside from the ruble, while most currencies in the bloc are softer, the movement has been relatively small, on the order of -0.1% to -0.3%, indicating this is really a dollar story.

On the data front, the only thing we see today is the preliminary Michigan Sentiment Survey (exp 80.9), which would need to be wildly different to change any views.  As well, we continue to lack Fed speakers, and the data has clearly not shown “substantial further progress” on the Fed’s efforts to support the economy, so policy changes are not in the air.

The dollar’s consolidation after a nearly year-long decline continues, although, as I mentioned yesterday, there seems little impetus for the dollar to extend its corrective rally.  Rather, it feels like we are going to see a little more market chop with no direction into the holiday weekend,

Good luck, good weekend and stay safe
Adf

Our Dovish Song

Posted on by

Said Powell, you all would be wrong,
Til progress moves further along,
On jobs and inflation
To think there’s causation
For us to change our dovish song

I challenge anyone to put forward the name of a central bank board member, from any major central bank, who is anything but dovish.  Once upon a time there was a spectrum of views ranging from neo-Keynesians, who believed it was the central bank’s job to continually support economic activity to the Austrian scholars, who believed that the less central bank activity, the better.  The neo-Keynesians pushed to maintain the lowest interest rates possible to encourage capital investment and by extension further economic growth.  They were far less concerned with price implications and far more concerned with the employment situation.  The Austrians were highly focused on price stability and believed that stable prices allowed people to have the confidence to create products and services demanded by the public, which would drive economic growth.  And there was a great middle with central bankers adhering to some of those views, but willing to be pragmatic.

But that is all ancient history now as there is only one type of central banker left in the world, the uber-dove.  Literally, every comment made by any central banker, whether from the Fed, the ECB, the BOJ, the BOE or anyplace else, describes the need, not only for ongoing easy money, but for massive fiscal stimulus as well.  There isn’t even a lone, voice in the wilderness, arguing the other side anymore.  The financialization of economies, which itself is the result of more than a decade of easy money, has resulted in an evolution of views.  In essence, interest rates, per se, are not the focus, but financial conditions.  And one of the key variables in every central bank measure of financial conditions is the price of the stock market indices.  A higher stock market means easier money, in this model, and so leads to further growth.  I fear they have the causality backwards (easy money leads to a higher stock market), but my views don’t matter.  Even formerly staunch monetary hawks, notably the Bundesbankers, are all-in for more stimulus and see no reason to consider any potential negative consequences of these actions.

This was made clear once again yesterday by comments from Lagarde, Powell and Bailey, all of whom continue to explain that their respective central bank will do whatever is necessary to support the economy, and, oh by the way, more fiscal stimulus is necessary as they can’t do it all by themselves.  While current central bank messaging tells us rates will remain low until at least 2023, look for that terminal date to continue to get pushed back.  We have already seen this play out for the ECB, where in 2018, they tried to explain that rates would begin to normalize by the end of 2020.  We all know that never happened.  Now they claim when the PPE uses up its authorization in 2022, that will be enough.  But it won’t.  They will simply expand and extend the terms again.  Here at home, we have already heard from numerous Fed speakers that if inflation were to rise to 2.5% or 3.0%, they wouldn’t be concerned.  And Powell, yesterday, was clear that more fiscal stimulus was needed to help the economy, and that the Fed would be adding even more liquidity until “substantial further progress” is made toward their goals.

So, what does this mean for markets?  It means that the inflation of asset price bubbles will continue, and that when looking at foreign exchange, the question will be which nation will maintain the easiest (or tightest) relative policy.  The broad view remains the Fed has more firepower than any other central bank, which is a key reason so many (present company included) believe the dollar will eventually decline.  But it will not be without a fight.  No other country believes they can afford for their own currency to appreciate or they won’t be able to achieve their goals.  Perhaps the real question is, what will be the catalyst to stop the flow of easy money?  And truthfully, I cannot see one on the horizon.  Traditionally, it would have been a rise in inflation, but that would be warmly welcomed by the current central bank heads, so there is really nothing left.

But perhaps, we are seeing a bit of fatigue on investors’ parts, as the trend higher in asset prices seems to have stalled for a time.  Certainly, there has been no decline of note, but it is not racing up like it had previously.  Does this mean the end is near?  I doubt it.  But remember this, when the last black swan appeared, Covid, central banks, notably the Fed, had some monetary policy room to adjust rates and try to address the problem.  When that next rare black avian appears, with rates already at zero or negative throughout the G10, what do they do next?

And on that cheery thought, let’s take a quick tour of what has been a pretty dull overnight session, where the Lunar New Year has begun to be celebrated.  In Asia, only the Hang Seng (+0.45%) was open with Japan closed for Coming of Age day, and Shanghai celebrating New Year’s.  PS, the Chinese celebration lasts for a full week.  In Europe, stocks started off mixed, but have edged higher over the past few hours with the DAX (+0.6%) leading the way followed by the FTSE 100 (+0.1%) and finally the CAC essentially unchanged on the day.  US futures markets are all higher, led by the NASDAQ (+0.5%) with the other two key indices up around 0.3%.

Bond markets, despite the growing positivity in stocks, are pretty healthy today as well.  Perhaps the never-ending promises by central bankers to continue to buy bonds is helping.  So, while Treasury yields are essentially unchanged, in Europe, Bunds, OATs and Gilts have all seen yields decline by about 2.3 basis points, and that price action is consistent across the smaller markets as well.

Oil (-0.7%) is lower today for a true change of pace, as it has rallied for the previous eight consecutive sessions.  Arguably, this is simply a trading pause, as there is no news of note that would drive the market.  Meanwhile, gold is unchanged on the day, although there is strength in the base metals space while ags remain mixed.

As to the dollar, it is under very modest pressure this morning, with AUD (+0.35%) the leading gainer in the G10 after mildly positive comments from the Treasury Secretary there.  But away from this, no other currency has moved even 0.2%, indicating there is nothing happening.  In the emerging markets, LATAM currencies are the leaders (CLP +0.8%, BRL +0.6%, MXN +0.5%) although don’t count out ZAR (+0.75%) either.  The ZAR story is a response to much better than expected mining production data while CLP has seen investor inflows into the bond market increase and Brazil is benefitting from a bill just passed granting autonomy to the central bank.  Be careful on MXN, as Banxico meets today and is expected to cut interest rates again, with a 25bp cut priced into the market, but some looking for more.

On the data front, yesterday’s CPI data was a bit softer than forecast, but didn’t seem to have much impact on the markets, although the dollar did edge lower after the release.  This morning, Initial Claims (exp 760K) and Continuing Claims (4.42M) are all we get and there are no Fed speakers slated.  So, on this snowy day in the northeast, I would look for the dollar to remain rangebound as it seeks its next catalyst.  To my eyes, the correction appears to be over, but we will need something else to get the dollar selling bandwagon rolling again.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf

To Sell or To Buy

Posted on by

As markets await CPI
For signals to sell or to buy
The Fed looks for ways
This reading to raise
But not for an outcome too high

Overnight activity in the markets has been fairly dull as investors and traders await a series of events that will unfold as the day progresses.  On the data front, Jan CPI readings are due with expectations as follows:

CPI (M/M) 0.3%
CPI (Y/Y) 1.5%
-ex food & energy (M/M) 0.2%
-ex food & energy (Y/Y) 1.5%

Source : Bloomberg

The one consistent thing about CPI readings since the nadir last May is that the outcome has been higher than forecast in 7 out of those 8 readings.  Perhaps it is time for economists to reconsider the variables in their forecasting models.  The implication is that inflation, which the Fed continues to avow is far too low, may not be as low as they say.

Now, despite the fact that the Fed (and pretty much every major central bank) has decided to ignore inflation readingsa until they get too high, instead focusing on supporting economic activity, the market still cares about inflation.  This is made clear by the ongoing discussion on real interest rates which are simply the result of the nominal interest rate less the inflation reading.  For example, while 10-year Treasury yields have risen to 1.15%, the real rate, using the December core CPI reading of 1.6%, is -0.45%.  When applied to the current 2-year Treasury yield of 0.115%, the real yield falls to -1.485%.

And this is where it starts to get interesting.  It turns out that investors are extremely focused on real yields as demonstrated by their correlation to different assets, notably the dollar and gold, but also stocks.  It is these negative real yields that continue to drive the search for yield which has resulted in non-investment grade (aka junk) bonds to be in such demand.  In fact, these less creditworthy instruments now yield less than 4.0%, a historic low, and not nearly enough to compensate for the risk of default.  But for investors, the real yield is +2.35%, far higher than they can receive elsewhere, and so worthy of the risk.  (When you read about those worrywarts who claim that central banks have distorted markets beyond recognition, this is the type of thing they are highlighting.)

But it is not just fixed income investors who focus on the real yield.  These yields impact virtually every investment.  Consider, for a moment, gold, an asset which pays no dividend and has no cash flow.  When real interest rates are high, there is a significant opportunity cost to holding the precious metal.  But as real yields decline below zero, that opportunity cost converts into a benefit which is why the correlation between real yields and gold is strongly negative (currently -0.31% with strong statistical significance).

Or consider the dollar.  There are many things that go into determining the dollar’s value at any given time, but clearly, interest rates are one of them.  After all, interest rates are a key feature of every currency discussion and define the activity in the carry trade.  Now, the dollar’s historic haven status along with that of Treasury bonds means that when things get bad, investors flock to both dollars and Treasuries which drives nominal, and therefore real, yields lower.  But in more benign circumstance, when there is no panic, relative real yields is a key driver in the FX market, with negative real US yields associated with a weaker dollar.  In fact, this is my main thesis for the second half of 2021, that inflation will continue to rise while the Fed will cap Treasury yields (because they have to) and the dollar will suffer accordingly.

Which brings us back to this morning’s CPI reading.  My sense is that we are reaching the point where the market will take higher inflation readings as a dollar negative, so beware any surprise in the data.

Adding to today’s mix, and arguably a key reason that overnight markets have been so dull, is that we are set to hear from three major central bank heads, starting with Madame Lagarde this morning, the BOE’s Andrew Bailey at noon and then our very own Chairman Jay at 2:00 this afternoon.  Keep in mind the following themes when listening: the ECB is carefully monitoring the exchange rate; the BOE has instructed banks to prepare for NIRP although claims this is not a policy change, and the Fed remains unconcerned if inflation were to rise to 2.5% or 3.0%.  All of this points to the idea that real yields, around the world, are going to decline further.  Sorry savers!

Now to the markets this morning.  While Asian equity markets performed well (Nikkei +0.2%, Hang Seng +1.9%, Shanghai +1.4%), the same is not true in Europe, where there is a mixture of red and green on the screen.  Here we see the FTSE 100 (+0.3%) as the leader, while both the CAC (-0.1%) and DAX (-0.2%) can find no traction today.  Finally, US futures are all higher by about 0.3% after consolidating yesterday at their recent closing highs.

Bond markets are under very modest pressure this morning with Treasury yields higher by 1 basis point and similar moves seen in Europe.  The one exception is Italy, which has seen 10-year yields decline to a new record low of 0.499% as investors anticipate great things from Mario Draghi’s turn as Prime Minister.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.5%) continues to grind higher in its drive for $60/bbl, while gold is little changed on the day.  Base metals are all modestly higher but agriculturals are actually backing off a bit this morning.  Again, the picture is best described as mixed.

Finally, the dollar is also themeless today, with G10 currencies seeing modest strength from Europe (CHF +0.1%, GBP +0.1%, EUR flat) while NZD (-0.4%) leads the way lower for the Asian bloc.  However, there has been no data, or comments, yet, that would explain the movement.  This smacks of position adjustments as the recent dollar rebound tops out.

EMG currencies have similarly shown no general direction with both gainers and losers about equally split.  KRW (+0.9%) is the big winner after short positions were closed out ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday that begins tonight.  But beyond that, the winners saw gains of 0.2% or less, hardly the stuff of dreams.  Meanwhile, on the negative front, BRL (-0.6%) is opening in the worst spot as concerns grow over the fiscal situation as the country seems set to increase Covid related expenditures with no plans on how to pay for them.  The next worst performer is CZK (-0.5%) but this is more difficult to discern as there has been neither news nor data to drive the market.  This has all the earmarks of a significant flow that the market has not yet fully absorbed.

And that’s really it for the day.  The big picture remains that the dollar has bounced from its correction highs but has not yet been able to convincingly turn back down.  This argues for a few more sessions of choppiness unless we receive new news.  Perhaps CPI will be much higher (or lower) than expected, either of which can drive movement.  Or perhaps we will hear something new from one of the three central bank heads today which will change opinions.  But for now, choppy with nowhere to go seems the most likely outcome.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf

The Feathers of Hawks

Posted on by

It seems like the feathers of hawks
Turn whiter when each of them talks
On Monday, Loretta
Said policy betta
Stay easy for pumping up stocks

For those of you not familiar with a word ladder, it is a type of puzzle where you start with a word, Hawk, for example, and change one letter in each step, while maintaining the order of the letters, to form another word and keep doing so until you arrive at the desired second word.  The object is to complete this task in as few moves as possible.  In this way, this morning’s task is to use a word ladder to turn hawk into dove (one possible answer below).

Once upon a time, in the economic community, there were two schools of thought as to how monetary policy would best serve a nation.  There were hawks, who believed that Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek had identified the most effective way for central banks to behave; namely minimalist activity and allowing the markets to work.  The consequences of this policy view were that economic cycles would exist but would be moderated naturally rather than allowing bubbles to inflate and interest rates would be set by the intersection of supply and demand.  On the other side of the debate were the doves, whose hero was John Maynard Keynes (although Stephanie Kelton of MMT fame is quickly rising up the ranks) and who believed that an activist central bank was the most effective.  This meant constant monetary interventions to support demand, alongside fiscal interventions to support more demand.  As to the consequences of this policy, like unsustainable debt loads, or rising inflation, they were seen as ephemeral and unimportant.

But that was soooo long ago, at least a full year.  In the interim, Covid-19 appeared as a deadly and virulent disease. While we have learned that it is particularly dangerous for the elderly and for those with comorbidities, there is also another group which has basically been made extinct, monetary hawks in public policy positions.  For the longest time, the two most hawkish members of the FOMC were Kansas City’s Esther George and Cleveland’s Loretta Mester.  However, at the very least, Ms. Mester has now shown that she coos like a dove as per her comments yesterday about US monetary policy, “We’re going to be accommodative for a very long time because the economy just needs it to get back on its feet.”

The global central bank community is all-in on the idea that ZIRP, NIRP and QE are the new normal, and as long as equity markets around the world continue to rally, they are not going to change their views.  In a related note, the BOJ is in the midst of continuing its policy review and the question of how they should describe their ETF purchases has come up.  It seems that while a number of board members would like to pare back the purchases, they are unwilling to explain that for fear the market would misinterpret their adjustments as a policy change and the result would be a sharp equity market sell-off.  And we know that cannot be tolerated!

The point is, no matter which central bank you consider, they have all reached the point where their previous actions have resulted in fragile markets and they appear to have lost the ability to change policy.  In other words, there is no end in sight to easy money, inflation be damned.

Which, of course, is exactly what we saw yesterday in markets, as equities rallied in the US, with all three major indices closing at new all-time highs.  Asian markets mostly followed through with the Nikkei (+0.4%), Hang Seng (+0.5%) and Shanghai (+2.0%) all nicely firmer, although Australia’s ASX (-0.9%) couldn’t find any love.  And perhaps, that is the story in Europe, as well, this morning, with various shades of red painting the screen.  The DAX (-0.5%) is the worst performer, with both the CAC (-0.1%) and FTSE 100 (-0.1%) more pink than red.  As to US futures, they find themselves in the unusual position of being negative at this hour, but only just, with all three indices looking at losses of between 0.1% and 0.2%.

Bond markets are clearly in more of a risk-off mood than a risk-on one, with Treasury yields lower by 2.2bps this morning and more than 4bps lower than the peak seen yesterday.  European markets have seen less movement, with yields in the major markets all down less than one basis point, hardly a strong signal, although notably, Italian 10-year yields, at 0.502%, have traded to a new historic low level.  Excitement over the prospect that Super Mario can fix Italy remains high.

On the commodity front, oil’s early gains have reversed, and it is now essentially flat on the day, although it remains within pennies of the highs set early this morning above $58/bbl.  Gold (+0.7%) is rebounding strongly, from the lows seen last Tuesday, with silver (+1.3%) even stronger.  Of course, all these non-fiat currency plays pale in comparison to Bitcoin (+17%) which exploded higher as the progenitor of one bubble (a certain EV maker in California) explained it bought $1.5 billion worth of Bitcoin for its Treasury reserves.

With this type of price action in commodities, as well as with the ongoing conversion of US monetary hawks into doves, it should not be surprising that the dollar is lower this morning, pretty much across the board.  In the G10 space, CHF and JPY are leading the way higher (+0.6% each) as investors seem to be running for havens not called the dollar.  But the euro (+0.45%) has also gained nicely and any thoughts that January’s price action was anything other than a short-term correction are now quickly fading away.  It will be interesting to see how the market responds to tomorrow’s CPI data, as that has the opportunity, if it prints higher than forecast, to alter views on real interest rates.  I have maintained that declining real yields will undermine the dollar, but I have to admit, I didn’t expect it to happen this early in the year.

EMG currencies are also firm this morning, led by ZAR (+0.6%) and RUB (+0.5%), on the back of commodity price rises, but with a pretty uniform strength throughout the CE4 and LATAM.  The one exception is BRL (-0.3%), the worst performing currency in the world this morning, as a lower than expected CPI print for January has traders shedding the belief that the central bank may be forced to raise rates any time soon.

On the data front, NFIB Small Business Optimism printed lower than last month and worse than expected at 95.0, not a good sign for the economy, but probably a boost for the view that more stimulus is coming.  At 10:00, we see JOLTs Job Openings (exp 6.4M), although that tends to be ignored.

The only Fed speaker today is St Louis’ Bullard, whose tendencies before Covid-19 were dovish, and he certainly hasn’t changed his views.  As such, and given that the market seems to have rejected the notion of a further USD correction higher, it looks like the dollar’s downtrend is getting set to resume.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf

One possible answer:  I would love to see others
Hawk
Hark
Hare
Have
Hove
Dove

De Minimis Sellin’

Posted on by

There once was a Fed Chair named Yellen
Whose term saw di minimis sellin’
Of bonds or of stocks
As from her soapbox
She promised a balance sheet swellin’

But now she’s the Treasury Sec
And her goal’s to get a blank check
For spending, not saving
Though that might be paving
The way to a financial wreck

Investors continue to add to their risk portfolios this morning amid the never-ending hopes for yet more fiscal stimulus from the US.  This can be seen most clearly from the combination of rising stock prices and rising bond yields.  In classic risk-on fashion, the ongoing speculative mania continues to drive equity markets higher around the world.  Asia is uniformly green, with the Nikkei (+2.1%) leading the way but strength in Shanghai (+1.0%) and Hong Kong (+0.1%).  The concern for the latter has to do with the upcoming Lunar New Year holiday and the fact that the link between the mainland and Hong Kong stock markets will be turned off during that period, thus reducing inflows. Meanwhile, Europe is also firmer across the board with Italy’s FTSE MIB (+1.4%) the leader as investors gain confidence that Super Mario Draghi will be as “successful” a PM as he was an ECB President.  But the FTSE 100 (+0.95%), CAC (+0.6%) and DAX (+0.3%) are all firmer with the DAX lagging on the back of weaker than expected IP data (0.0%, exp +0.3%) indicating that the ongoing lockdowns in Germany, which are slated to continue for another 6 to 8 weeks, are taking a toll.  And don’t worry, US futures are all green too, higher by roughly 0.4% each.

The second piece of this puzzle is the bond market, which is behaving exactly as expected in a risk-on session by selling off nicely.  In fact, Treasury yields have touched new highs for the move with the 10-year at 1.19% (+2.9bps) while 30-year bonds have just traded to 2.00% for the first time since Feb 19 of last year, right as the Covid crisis was beginning.  But this is not an isolated US feature, we are seeing higher yields throughout Europe, Italy excepted, as Bunds (+2.6bps), OATs (+2.5bps) and Gilts (+3.3bps) are all under pressure today.  Why, you may ask, are European bond markets selling off if the story is US stimulus?  Because it’s one big global trade, and if the $1.9 trillion stimulus package gets passed, the idea is a faster US recovery will support European and Asian companies that sell into the US.

Of course, politics being what it is, even control of the House and Senate doesn’t mean that passing a bill this large is easy.  And this is where Ms Yellen comes in, she needs to forcefully make the case passage is critical for the nation’s economy.  The problem is that the recent data trend, which has been generally better than expected (excluding Friday’s jobs data) points to the fact that perhaps not so much stimulus is needed.  So, on the Sunday morning talk shows she was emphatic in her comments that it is critical, and that erring by spending too much is a significantly better mistake than spending too little.  Interestingly, even some left-leaning economists don’t back that view.  Notably, Larry Summers, former director of the National Economic Council for President Obama, and Olivier Blanchard, former chief economist at the IMF, have highlighted the risks to this package on two fronts; first, it could result in inflation and second, it may prevent the passage of other legislation focused on infrastructure and green investment deemed more important.

Now, the one thing we know about Congress is that virtually none of the members of either the House or Senate have any understanding of economics or finance.  As such, they take their cues from their financial backers staffers and the pronouncements of eminent economists from their side of the aisle.  And this is what makes the Summers and Blanchard comments noteworthy, they are both clearly left of center and both are arguing for less Covid stimulus. Janet has her work cut out for her to get what she wants.  Ironically, the fact that this package may not be passed until March is probably a positive for stocks, after all, that means another 4-6 weeks of stimulus hopes!

A quick look at commodity prices shows that virtually every commodity price is higher this morning led by oil (+1.3%), but with strength in precious metals (gold +0.4%, silver +1.0%) and agriculturals (wheat +0.7%, corn +0.6%).  Again, this is a risk-on market.

The one piece of the relation trade narrative that continues to fail, however, is the weak dollar story.  For now, before inflation data starts to rise sharply and real yields tumble, rising US rates are leading to a rising US dollar.  So, this morning the pound (-0.4%) is the laggard, but the weakness is across the board.  Even NOK (-0.1% and CAD (-0.15%) are softer despite the ongoing oil price rally.  In fact, the entire commodity bloc is suffering despite firmer commodity prices.  This is true in emerging markets as well which is led lower by ZAR (-1.0%) and both BRL (-0.7%) and MXN (-0.7%) today.  The rand story continues to be virus related as the vaccine rollout stalls given the realization that the new strain of virus is not responding well to the AstraZeneca vaccines they have.  In fact, the vaccine story is part of the LATAM problems, but of greater consequence is the fact that as US yields rise, the carry trade is becoming less attractive, and both these currencies are beneficiaries of carry.  On the plus side in EMG, KRW (+0.35%) is the best performing currency around after virus restrictions were eased somewhat amid declining infection statistics.

Speaking of statistics, it is a very quiet week on the data front, with CPI the marquis number on Wednesday.

Tuesday NFIB Small Biz Optimism 97.5
JOLTs Job Openings 6.4M
Wednesday CPI 0.3% (1.5% Y/Y)
-ex food & energy 0.2% (1.5% Y/Y)
Thursday Initial Claims 760K
Continuing Claims 4.41M
Friday Michigan Sentiment 80.9

Source: Bloomberg

Regarding the CPI data, it has printed higher than the survey in all but one month since June and given the ongoing inflationary pressures of higher commodity prices and supply chain issues, my sense is we will see that again.  On the speaking front, just three Fed speakers this week, Mester today, Bullard tomorrow and then Chairman Powell speaks Wednesday afternoon.  This makes Wednesday the day to watch.  Until then, I expect the market will focus on stimulus matters and equity prices.  If US yields continue to rise I suspect the dollar will test resistance again, with the key level in the euro at 1.1910.  Once again, nothing has changed my medium-term view about dollar weakness, and last week did see a halving of the long euro positions in the CFTC data, but for now, I feel like the dollar still has the upper hand.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf

Money’s Still Free

Posted on by

There once was a time, long ago
When traders all just had to know
If payrolls were strong
So they could go long
If not, they would sell with the flow

But these days, with ZIRP and QE
Attention’s not on NFP
Instead it’s the pace
Of central bank grace
And making sure money’s still free

One of the biggest changes in the market environment since the onset of the global pandemic has been the change in what markets find important.  This is not the first time market focus has changed, nor will it be the last, but a change has definitely occurred.  Consider, for a moment, why the market focuses so intently on certain data points.  Essentially, traders and investors are looking for the information that best describes the policy focus of the time, and therefore, changes in that information are sufficient to change opinions, at least in the short term, about markets.  And remember, that policy focus can come from one of two places, either the Fed or the Administration.

A step back in time shows that in the early 1980’s, when Paul Volcker was Fed Chair, the number that mattered the most was the M2 money supply which was reported on Thursday afternoons.  In fact, the market impact grew so large that they had to change the release time from 3:50 pm to 4:10 pm, after the stock market closed, to reduce market volatility. Trading desks would have betting pools on the number and there were a group of economists, Fed watchers, whose entire job was to observe Fed monetary activity in the markets and make estimates of this number.  At the time, the Fed would not explicitly publish their target Fed Funds rate, they would add and remove liquidity from the money markets in order to achieve it.  And, in fact, you never heard comments from FOMC members which is why Fed Chairs are now compelled to testify to Congress twice a year.

But as time passed and the economy recovered from the recession of 1980-81, the Reagan Administration became highly focused on the US Trade Balance, (especially the deficit with Japan) which became THE number right up through the early 90’s.  Once again, betting pools were common on trading desks and futures markets would move sharply in the wake of the 8:30am release.

At some point there, while Alan Greenspan was still Fed Chair, but there was a new administration, the market turned its attention away from trade and started to focus on domestic indicators, with payrolls claiming the mantle of the best indicator of economic activity.  This suited the Fed, given its mandate included employment, and it suited the Clinton Administration, given they were keen to show how well the economy was doing in order to distract the populace from various scandals.

With the change in Fed Chair from Greenspan to Ben Bernanke, the Fed suddenly became a very different source of market information.  No longer did economists need to read tea leaves, but instead the Fed told us explicitly what they were doing and where rates were set.  Thus, during the GFC, Bernanke was on the tape constantly trying to guide markets to his preferred place.  And that place was full employment, so payrolls still mattered a great deal.  Of course, the market still cared about other things, like the level of interest rates, but still, NFP was seen as the single best indicator available.  Remember, during Bernanke’s leadership, the Fed initiated the QE that began the expansion of its balance sheet and changed the way the Fed worked, seemingly forever.  No longer would the Fed adjust the reserve balances in the system, instead, they would simply post an interest rate and if supply or demand didn’t suffice to achieve that rate, they would step into the markets and smooth things out.

Payrolls were still the focus through Chair Yellen’s term, especially since her background is as a labor economist, so the employment half of the mandate was far more important to her than the inflation half, and so, if anything, NFP took on greater importance.

Jay Powell’s turn at the Fed started amid a period where the economy was getting significant fiscal support and interest rates were trying to be normalized.  In fact, the Unemployment Rate had fallen to its lowest level in more than 50 years and seemed quite stable there, so Powell seemed to have an easy job, just don’t screw things up.  Alas, his efforts to continue normalizing interest rates (aka tightening policy) resulted in a sharp equity market correction in December 2018.  The President was none too pleased with that outcome, as the Trump administration was highly focused on the stock market as a barometer of its performance.  Thus, once again, the Fed stepped in to stabilize markets, and turned from tightening policy to easing in the Powell Pivot.  And perhaps that is the real message here, the most important data point to both the Fed and every administration is not payrolls or unemployment or inflation.  It is the S&P500.

But Covid’s shock to the market was unlike anything seen in a century, at least, and arguably, given the interconnectivity of the global economy compared to the last pandemic in 1918-20, ever.  So, the first NFP data points were shocking, but the market quickly grew accustomed to numbers that would have been unthinkable just months prior.  Instead, the numbers that mattered were the infection count, and the mortality rate.  And arguably, those are still the numbers that matter, along with the vaccination rate and the stimulus size.  All of these have been the market’s primary focus since March last year, and until the idea of the government lockdown fades, are likely to continue to be the keys for market behavior.

Which brings us back to this morning, when the payroll report is to be published.  Does it really have that much impact any longer?  Or has its usefulness as an indicator faded?  Well, it seems apparent that market participants are far more intent on hearing from Fed speakers and trying to discern when monetary accommodation is going to be reduced (never) than on the jobs number.  In fact, given virtually every major central bank has explained that rates will remain at current levels for the next 3 to 4 years, at least, the only thing the data can tell us is if that will last longer than currently expected.

Ok, ahead of payrolls we have seen a general embrasure of risk, with equity markets strong, following yesterday’s US rally.  The Nikkei (+1.5%) and Hang Seng (+0.6%) both performed well although shanghai (-0.2%) slipped slightly.  In Europe, the CAC (+1.1%) leads the way followed by the DAX (+0.3%) after weak Factory order numbers (-1.9%) and the FTSE 100 (+0.1%).  US futures are currently trading higher by about 0.5% to round things out.

Bond markets are behaving as you would expect in a risk on session, with 10-year Treasuries printing at a new high yield for the move, 1.16%, up 2.1bps.  In Europe, the bond selling is greater with Bunds (+2.5bps) and Gilts (+5.3bps) getting tossed in favor of stocks.  Commodities are still in vogue, with oil (+1.0%) and gold (+0.4%) firm alongside all the base metals and agriculturals.

Finally, the dollar, is acting a bit more like expected, softening a bit while risk is being acquired.  The dollar’s recent rally alongside the equity rally seemed unusual compared to recent history, but today, things look more normal.  S,o NOK (+0.4%) and CAD (+0.3%) lead the G10 charge while JPY (-0.15%) is today’s laggard.  Clearly these stories are commodities and risk preference.  In the EMG space, APAC currencies were under a bit of pressure overnight, led by KRW (-0.4%) and MYR (-0.25%), but this morning we are seeing strength in TRY (+1.0%), RUB (+0.8%) and MXN (+0.4%) to lead the way.  The CE4 are also performing relatively well alongside modest strength in the euro (+0.2%).

Now the data:

Nonfarm Payrolls 105K
Private Payrolls 163K
Manufacturing Payrolls 30K
Unemployment Rate 6.7%
Average Hourly Earnings 0.3% (5.0% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours 34.7
Participation Rate 61.5%
Trade Balance -$65.7B

Source: Bloomberg

Which brings us back to the question, does it really matter?  And the answer is, not to the stock market, and therefore not really to the Fed.  However, a strong number here could well hit the bond market pretty hard as well as support the dollar more fully.  We shall see.  FWIW, I don’t believe the dollar’s correction is over, and another 1%-2% is entirely viable in the short-run.

Good luck, good weekend and stay safe
Adf

Contracted, Not Grown

Posted on by

There once was a continent, grand
Whose culture and history fanned
Both science and art
Which helped to jumpstart
Expansion across all the land

But lately the data has shown
That Europe’s contracted, not grown
This bodes ill for those
Who purchased euros
As markets take on a new tone

Entering 2021, one of the highest conviction trades amongst the analyst and investment community was that the dollar would decline sharply this year.  After all, it fell broadly and steadily in 2020 from the moment it peaked in mid-March on the initial pandemic fears.  But the narrative that developed was that the Fed would be the king of all monetary easers, pumping so much liquidity into markets that the surfeit of dollars would simply drive the value of the greenback lower vs. all its main counterparts.  Adding to the tale was the election of Joe Biden as president, and the belief that he would be able to enact massive stimulus to help reflate the economy, thus adding fiscal stimulus to the Fed’s already humongous monetary efforts.  The pièce de résistance was the Georgia runoff elections, when the Democrats gained effective control of the Senate, and so all of these dreams seemed destined to come true.

However, there was always one conundrum that never made sense, at least to me, and that was the idea that the dollar would decline while the US yield curve steepened.  The thesis was that all the fiscal stimulus would result in massive Treasury issuance (check), which would result in higher yields as the market had trouble absorbing all that debt (partial check) and then the dollar would decline sharply (oops).  The problem is that historically, as the US yield curve steepens, the dollar typically rallies.

The other quibble with this narrative was that it seemed to ignore the facts on the ground in Europe.  It was never realistic to believe that the ECB would sit back and allow the euro to rally sharply without responding.  And of course, that is exactly what we have seen.  In the past three weeks, we have heard from numerous ECB speakers, including Madame Lagarde, that the exchange rate is quite important in their deliberations.  The proper translation of that comment into English is, if the euro keeps rallying, we will directly respond via further easing or even intervention if necessary.  Remember, Europe can ill afford a strong euro from both a growth and inflationary perspective, and they will do all they think they can to prevent it from coming about.

At the same time, there is another issue that the dollar bears seemed to neglect, the pathetic state of affairs in the Eurozone economy, as well as the vast incompetence displayed throughout the continent with respect to the inoculation of their populations with the new Covid vaccines. Based on current trends, the US and UK will have vaccinated 75% of their respective populations by the end of 2021.  Italy, Germany and France are looking at 2024 at the earliest to achieve the same milestone.  Ask yourself how beneficial that will be for the Eurozone economy if the current lockdowns remain in place for the next 2-3 years.

The one possible saving grace for this view is that the Fed responds more aggressively to any steepening of the yield curve.  While Europe cannot afford for the euro to rise, the US cannot afford for interest rates to rise, at least not very much.  While yields have clearly risen from their summer lows, they remain extremely accommodative.  However, if yields should start to rise further, say because inflation starts to accelerate, the Fed seems destined to stop that move, either explicitly, via YCC, or tacitly via extending and expanding QE such that they absorb all the new Treasury issuance and prevent yields from rising.  Of course, this will result in much deeper negative real yields which, in my view, will be what leads to the dollar’s eventual decline.  Given Europe’s much duller inflationary pulse, it will be much harder for the ECB to drive real yields in Europe as low as in the US.  But that is a story for the second half of 2021, not the first.

Which brings us to today’s activity.  The discussion above was prompted by the much weaker than expected Eurozone Retail Sales data released this morning, with December’s monthly growth at 2.0% and the Y/Y number at just 0.6%, half of expectations.  And this was before the extended and expanded lockdowns in January.  It is increasingly evident that the Eurozone is in its second recession in just over a year, again, hardly a rationale to buy its currency.  Which makes it completely unsurprising that the euro has declined yet again, -0.4%, and breaking below the psychological 1.20 level.  For those keeping track, this is he fourth consecutive day of declines and it is pretty easy to look at a chart and see a downtrend developing.  In fact, since its peak on January 7, the euro is down a solid 3%.

But the dollar is performing well against all its G10 brethren, and most EMG counterparts as well.  SEK (-0.6%) and NOK (-0.5%) are the worst performers with the latter somewhat surprising given that oil (+0.75%) continues to rally.  It seems that both these countries are seeing doubts over their ability to inoculate their populations from Covid similar to the Eurozone, so it should not be surprising that their currencies decline.  The same is true of CAD (-0.25%) where the current trend for vaccinations shows it will take a full ten years to vaccinate 75% of Canada’s population!  I imagine the pace will increase, but it does demonstrate the futility so far.  CAD, however, has not been as weak as the euro given the benefits from the rising oil price seem to be offsetting some of its other problems.

In the Emerging markets, ZAR (-0.8%) is the worst performer today, falling on a combination of broad dollar strength and concerns over the possibility of a debt crisis as the nation’s debt/GDP ratio has climbed rapidly to 80%, and with its still high yields, debt service ability is becoming a bigger problem.  Of course, there is also a new strain of Covid, first identified there, that has increased virulence and is working against the economy.  With the euro lower, it is no surprise that the CE4 have followed it down, and we are also seeing weakness in MXN (-0.6%), again, after central bank comments indicating possible rate cuts in the future.  On the flipside, TRY (+0.5%) is the star performer today, continuing to gather interest given its world-beating interest rate structure and promises from the central bank to maintain those yields.

While I skipped over both equity and bond markets today, it is only because there was precious little movement in most cases and certainly no discernible trend.

On the data front, yesterday saw better than expected ADP Employment and ISM Services prints, once again highlighting the differences between the US and Europe.  This morning brings a raft of data as follows: Initial Claims (exp 830K), Continuing Claims (4.7M), Nonfarm Productivity (-3.0%), Unit Labor Costs (4.0%) and Factory Orders (0.7%).  With Payrolls tomorrow, all eyes will be on the Initial Claims number, but it is hard to believe any print will change market sentiment.

Finally, the BOE met this morning and left policy unchanged, as expected.  However, they did tell banks to start preparing for negative interest rates going forward.  While they claim the policy is not imminent, it seems unlikely that they are asking banks to prepare for a low probability event.  Despite significant evidence that negative rates do not help the economy, although they do help stock prices, the BOE looks like it is going to ignore that and go there anyway.  The only analyses that showed NIRP was beneficial was produced by the central banks that are operating under NIRP.  This cannot be good for the pound over time.

For the day, the dollar is starting to gain momentum to move higher, and I think a slow continuation of this move is likely.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf

Markets Rejoice

Posted on by

He once said, “Whatever it takes”
To fix all the prior mistakes
Is what he would do
And Draghi came through
Though that was ere Covid outbreaks

But now Italy’s in a bind
As Conte, the PM, resigned
So, Draghi’s first choice
(And markets rejoice)
To lead a land that’s much maligned

***FLASH***  Mario Draghi accepts mandate to form new Italian government!

Now that GameStop fever is ebbing, far more quickly than Covid-19 I might add, it is time to look elsewhere for market drivers and sentiment.  With this in mind, we turn to the nation that puts the “I” in PIGS, Italy.  My personal experience in Italy is that it is a beautiful country, with extraordinary history and even better food.  The people are warm and welcoming, and it is truly a delightful place.  Alas, it is also, historically, one of the worst run nations on earth.  Attention to detail and a sense of urgency are two things that tend to be missing from the Italian culture, but both are necessary to be able to govern effectively.  Thus, it is not surprising that Italy has had 66 different governments since the end of WWII, with the most recent one falling two weeks ago.  The norm has been for coalitions, often fractious, to come together on short-term issues and then fall apart when longer term questions need to be addressed.

This is an apt description of the current situation, where PM Giuseppe Conte, a law professor with no previous political experience, was tapped to lead a disparate coalition of center-left and radical-left parties in an effort to prevent Matteo Salvini’s Lega Nord, a right-wing party, from taking control.  While this effort stumbled along for nearly two years, it recently foundered when a key supporter of the coalition, Matteo Renzi, withdrew his support and Conte lost a vote of no-confidence in the Italian Senate.  Conte has been unable to piece together another coalition which leaves two choices; the President, Sergio Mattarella, can appoint someone else to try to do so, or elections must be held.

Enter Mario Draghi.  Since his time as ECB President ended in 2019, he has been relatively quiet on most issues, and has not been willing to get involved in the morass of Italian politics at all.  Arguably, because of that, he remains the most popular public figure (non sports or entertainment) in the country.  And so, President Mattarella is meeting with Draghi today to ask him to form a new government with wide latitude to do “whatever it takes” to fix Italy’s many problems.  While the early word from political figures there is mixed, at best, the market thinks this is the best idea since sliced bread.  This is clear from both the equity market, where the FTSE MIB has rallied by a world-beating 2.7% today, as well as from the bond market, where BTPs have rallied sharply with yields falling 9.2 basis points and the spread to bunds has fallen to just over 100 basis points, its tightest level since 2016.

Remember, Italy has been one of the worst hit nations from Covid, as the infections appeared there early and the economy is hugely reliant on tourism and services, exactly the areas Covid destroyed.  Add to that the government’s general incompetence which has slowed the distribution of the vaccines (although in fairness, this seems to be true throughout Europe, Germany included) and you have a situation where the economy, which shrunk 9.0% in 2020, remains on course to shrink again through at least the first half of 2021.  It is not clear, by any means, that Draghi will accept the position, nor if he does, if he will be able to bring together the disparate views in the Italian congress to pass legislation that helps the situation.  But, boy, the markets are all-in on the trade!

The Draghi story has been icing on the market bullish cake this morning with risk continuing to be embraced as US stimulus talks turn away from the bipartisan idea and therefore toward a quicker passage under budget reconciliation terms (where the Senate does not have a chance to filibuster).  As well, in many nations we have seen upticks in data releases, although there are still some, notably China, where the data is falling short of estimates.

Starting with equities, Asia saw strength in the Nikkei (+1.0%) and Hang Seng (+0.2%) but Shanghai (-0.5%) fell after Caixin PMI Services data (52.0) fell short of expectations and pretty significantly from last month’s reading of 56.3.  While still above the key 50.0 level, momentum in China appears to be stalling for now.  Europe is all green, but Italy is truly the outlier.  The DAX (+0.7%) comes next and then the CAC (+0.3%) and FTSE 100 (+0.2%) are both positive, but just barely.  As to US futures, after yesterday’s strong session, with all three indices rising around 1.5%, and after some strong earnings reports yesterday afternoon, futures are higher by modest amounts, led by the NASDAQ’s 0.6% climb.

Bond markets are offering the same message, with yields higher in Treasuries (2.1bps), bunds (1.1bps) and Gilts (1.1bps).  Meanwhile, the bonds of the PIGS are all rallying on the combination of general risk attitude and the hope that good news in Italy will spread.

Oil continues its winning ways, rising another 0.5% this morning which puts WTI above $55/bbl, a level many technicians believe opens the way for a sharper rally from here.  Gold, after a dreadful day yesterday, is still under modest pressure, down 0.15%, but silver, after an even more dreadful day yesterday, having fallen more than 8%, is actually bouncing a bit, and up 0.5% as I type.

Finally, the dollar is generally stronger vs. G10 currencies, with only AUD and NZD (both +0.1%) showing any life.  The kiwi story is based on stronger than expected employment data indicating the economy is rebounding and more monetary support may not be necessary, while Aussie seems to be benefitting from strong PMI data.  But otherwise, the dollar is on top this morning, with broad-based gains although they are not substantial.  SEK (-0.4%) is the worst performer, followed by the pound (-0.25%) and euro (-0.25%), both of which saw underwhelming PMI services data. In the EMG bloc the picture is more mixed, with both gainers and losers, although it is hard to piece together a coherent story.  The CE4 are the laggards, down 0.3% on average as they track the euro.  LATAM is also underperforming, although both MXN and BRL are softer by just 0.2%.  On the plus side, RUB (+0.3%) leads the way, arguably on oil’s uptick, and then some APAC currencies eked out marginal gains as well.  However, given the modest magnitude of movement, this feels an awful lot like position adjustments.

On the data front today we see ADP Employment (exp 50K) and ISM Services (56.7).  The former will attract more attention than the latter, in my view, as the market looks ahead to Friday’s NFP data. It would also be a mistake if I did not mention that Eurozone CPI was released this morning at a much higher than expected 0.9% (1.4% core) which is hard to reconcile with the collapsing economic activity.  Although perhaps, inflation is not dependent on demand as much as supply, and central bankers have it completely wrong.  Nah.

For now, the dollar’s correction continues, and we are right at the 1.2010 level that proved the breakout point in December.  At this stage, a move to 1.1950 seems a good bet, but we will need to see many more positions unwind if we are to overcome the dollar weakness narrative.  The confusing part is the ongoing equity rally alongside the dollar rally, something we have not seen for quite a while.  But that doesn’t mean it can’t continue for a while longer.  I still like the dollar to fall in H2, but right now, momentum is building for further dollar strength.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf

Both Need Downgrading

Posted on by

Excitement in markets is fading
With GameStop and silver both trading
Much lower today
As sellers convey
The message that both need downgrading

Well, it appears that the GameStop bubble is deflating rapidly this morning, which is only to be expected.  Short interest in the stock has fallen from 140% of market cap to just 39% as of yesterday’s close.  This means that there is precious little reason for it to rally again, as, if you recall, the company’s business model remains a bad fit for the times.  The top tick, last Thursday, was $483 per share.  In the pre-market this morning it is trading at $172, and I anticipate that before the end of the month, it will be trading back to its pre-hype $17-$18 level.  But it was fun while it lasted!

Meanwhile silver, yesterday’s story, has also fallen sharply, -4.7% as I type, as the mania there seems to have been more readily absorbed by a much larger market.  The conspiracy theory that the central banks and JP Morgan have been manipulating the price lower for the past several decades has always been hard to understand but was certainly more widespread than I expected.  The major difference between silver and GME though, is that silver has a real raison d’etre as an industrial metal, as well as a traditional store of wealth and monetary metal.  Last year silver’s price rose 46.5%, leading all precious metals higher.  And, in the event that inflation does begin to show itself again, something I believe is coming soon to a screen near you, there is a strong case to be made for it to rally further.  This is especially so given the ongoing debasement of all fiat currencies by central banks around the world as they print more and more each day.

Down Under the RBA stunned
The market and every hedge fund
Increasing QE
As they want to see
The Aussie increasingly shunned

While other major central banks stood pat in their recent policy meetings, the RBA last night surprised one and all by increasing the amount of QE by A$100 billion, at A$5 billion / month, meaning they will continue the program well into 2022.  As well, they explained that they would not consider raising rates until 2024 at the earliest as they work to push unemployment lower.  This means, the overnight rate will remain at 0.1% and YCC for the 3-year bond will also remain at that level.  Interestingly, the market had tapering on its mind, as ahead of the meeting AUD had rallied nearly 0.6%, with analyst discussions of tapering rampant.  As such, it is no surprise that the currency gave up those gains immediately upon the release of the statement, and has now fallen 0.25% on the day, the worst laggard in the G10.

With the FOMC meeting behind us, Fed speakers are going to be inundating us with their views for the next month, so be prepared for a lot more discussion on this topic.  Remember, before the quiet period ahead of the January meeting, four regional presidents were talking taper, with two seeing the possibility of that occurring late in 2021.  Chairman Powell, however, tried to squelch that theory in the statement and press conference.   Yesterday, uber-dove Neel Kashkari expressed his view that it is “..key for Fed to keep foot on monetary policy gas.”  Meanwhile, Raphael Bostic and Eric Rosengren both harped on the need for additional fiscal stimulus to revive the economy, with Bostic once again explaining that tapering when economic growth picks up will be appropriate, although giving no timeline.  (He was one of the four discussing a taper ahead of the meeting.)  We have seven more speakers this week, some of them multiple times, so there will certainly be headline risk as this debate plays out in public.

But for now, markets are sanguine about the possibility of central bank tightening in any way, shape or form, as once again, risk is being embraced across the board.  Starting in Asia, we saw green results everywhere (Nikkei +1.0%, Hang Seng +1.2%, Shanghai +0.8%), with the same being true in Europe (DAX +1.1%, CAC +1.6%, FTSE 100 +0.5%).  US futures are pointing in the same direction with gains on the order of 0.75% at 7:00am.

Bond markets are also on board the risk train, with yields rising in Treasuries (+2.9 bps) and throughout Europe (Bunds +2.7bps, OATs +2.2bps, Gilts +3.1bps).  Part of this positivity seems to be coming from the release of Eurozone Q4 GDP data, which was not quite as bad, at -0.7% Q/Q (-5.1% Y/Y) as forecast.  That outcome, though, was reasonably well known ahead of time as both Germany and Spain printed Q4 GDP at +0.1% in a surprise last week.  Unfortunately, the ongoing lockdowns throughout Europe, which have been extended into March in some cases, point to another quarter of economic contraction in Q1, thus resulting in a second recession in short order on the continent.  With that in mind, while we have not heard much from ECB speakers lately, it is certainly clear that there is no taper talk in Frankfurt at this time.

Which takes us to the currency markets.  The G10 bloc is split with EUR (-0.25%) matching AUD’s futility, while the rest of the European currencies are all modestly lower.  Commodity currencies, however, are holding their own led by CAD (+0.35%) which is benefitting from oil’s rally (+1.3%), although NOK (+0.1%) has seen less benefit.  EMG currencies, however, lean toward gains this morning, with MXN (+0.8%), BRL (+0.6%) and RUB (+0.6%) leading the way, each benefitting from higher commodity prices.  Even ZAR (+0.5%) is higher despite the lagging in precious metals.  But that story is far more focused on ZAR interest rates, which are an attractive carry play in a risk on scenario.  The laggards in this bloc are basically the CE4, tracking the euro, and even those losses are minimal.

While there is no data this morning in the US, we do have important statistics coming up later in the week as follows:

Wednesday ADP Employment 50K
ISM Services 56.7
Thursday Initial Claims 830K
Continuing Claims 4.7M
Nonfarm Productivity 4.0%
Unit Labor Costs -3.0%
Factory Orders 0.7%
Friday Non Farm Payrolls 60K
Private Payrolls 100K
Manufacturing Payrolls 31K
Unemployment Rate 6.7%
Average Hourly Earnings 0.3% (5.0% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours 34.7
Participation Rate 61.5%
Trade Balance -$65.7B
Consumer Credit $12.0B

Source: Bloomberg

So, plenty to see, but will we learn that much?  Obviously, all eyes will be on the payroll data, which given the rise in Initial Claims we have seen during the past month seems unlikely to surprise on the high side.  As such, anticipating sufficient data exuberance to get the Fed doves to talk about tapering seems remote.

Adding it all up leaves the current short dollar squeeze in place, with an opportunity, I think, for the euro to trade back below 1.20 for a time, but nothing we have seen or heard has changed my view that the dollar will fall in the second half of the year.  For those of you with payables, hedging sooner rather than later should be rewarded over time.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf

GameStop

Posted on by

The company still known as GameStop
Whose model for business, a mall shop
Was heavily shorted
Has seen those shorts thwarted
By buyers whose bubble will not pop

While I recognize GameStop (GME) seems to have absolutely nothing to do with the FX markets, I have been asked by a number of people to explain what happened, so I thought I would offer a relatively short explanation of the events, which were truly remarkable.  And arguably, this is much more about markets in general, and market sentiment in particular.

As always, I think a little perspective is in order.  GME was born in 1984 as Babbage’s in Dallas, Texas.  After a series of mergers, it was acquired by Barnes & Noble in 1999, who merged it with another company, Funco, Inc. and renamed this entity GameStop.  It went public in 2002, was spun off from Barnes & Noble in 2004, and then grew as a business.  Its business model was to be the go-to place for electronic games, and it eventually opened more than 5000 sites throughout malls in the US and around the world.  The problem, of course, is that even before Covid-19, bricks and mortar retail space was suffering.  This was especially so for this business, where games can be downloaded over the internet, and disks and cartridges have lost their appeal.  Covid seemed like the last straw, as malls all over the country were closing and saw extraordinary reductions in foot traffic, thus devastating the company’s business.

Over the course of the past twelve months, short interest in GME stock skyrocketed, as a number of hedge funds expected that the company would file Chapter 11 relatively soon.  After all, revenues had fallen more than 30% on a Q/Q and Y/Y basis, and profitability had disappeared.  In truth, it seemed a pretty logical bet.  However, hedge funds, being hedge funds, and reveling in as much leverage as possible given ZIRP, actually created short positions that grew to 140% of the outstanding float of the stock!  How, you may ask, is that possible?  Well, clearly, there was some naked shorting going on, which means that some of them were selling the stock without having borrowed it to deliver.  Oh, yeah, that is illegal these days.  It is also entirely possible that some brokers holding the stock rehypothecated it, meaning they lent it out more than once, also illegal.

Fast forward to three weeks ago, where a financial analyst, whose Reddit handle is Roaring Kitty, figured out that the short positions in this stock were untenable.  He posted on the Reddit thread WallStreetBets, which picked up traction and encouraged people to buy the stock.  Hence, the stock started to rise after months, if not years, in the doldrums.

The next step came from the options market, where the several million followers of WallStreetBets figured out that the leverage available in buying out of the money call options (also known as low delta call options) was extraordinary, and so they bought millions of them.

As a former option market maker (not in stocks, but FX, bonds and commodities), I can tell you that selling low delta options is a very dangerous trade.  This is because, if the market starts to move toward the strike price, as a hedger, I am forced to buy ever more underlying to hedge my position.  This is called gamma hedging and is the bread and butter of what options traders do all day long.  But the combination of the extraordinary demand for low delta GME calls and the recognition by the hedge funds with extensive short positions fed on itself into a frenzy.  At some point, the prime brokers who were handling those hedge funds’ business had to make margin calls and close out the short positions.  And those type of buyers are completely insensitive to price, because the prime broker doesn’t pay the freight, it is the hedge fund with the short position that is getting stopped out, that takes the losses.

Now, remember, because of the size of the short position, greater than the amount of stock outstanding, this process has taken a while to unfold, and is probably not done yet.  It has, however, busted those hedge funds, who have lost billions of dollars, as well has shown that they were not all that smart after all.  Alas, I fear that all the Robinhooders who were a huge proportion of the buyers are going to find themselves in a bad state as well.  After all, GME is still a dying business with the wrong business model for today.  A $1 billion market cap is probably a lot more appropriate than the current $23 billion market cap, so look for the stock to decline going forward, although probably not as quickly as it rose.

From our perspective, though, I think the lesson of GME is more about what it says about sentiment in the markets these days.  This type of price action and market activity has historically been confined to the last stages of a mania of some sort. In other words, to my eyes, and remember, I have seen market crashes starting in 1987, Tokyo in 1989, 1999-2000, and 2008-2009, this smacks of the true “irrational exuberance” made famous by former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan in 1996.  Whether it is rising rates, disappointment in the slower than expected rollout of the vaccine, or pressure on profit margins and earnings misses, I expect that shedding risk is going to be the norm for the next two quarters at least.  This is not to say we are going to see a collapse in stock markets, just that the gains of the pasts several months and years are unlikely to be repeated.

Which brings us to this morning, where the newest target for a short squeeze by the WSB crowd is silver.  Silver has opened higher by around 8%-10% and is now pressing $30/oz.  The last time silver traded above that level was March 2013, in the wake of the Eurozone debt crisis, and the only other time it did so was in 1980, when the Hunt brothers tried to corner the market.  Understand this, in 1980, the market was smaller, there were more natural buyers of silver for industrial uses, notably Eastman Kodak for film emulsion, and the Hunt’s failed dismally once the COMEX changed the rules.  Today, in a much larger market ($1.5 trillion) with far less industrial demand, this seems destined to fail, at least with respect to achieving the same type of impact as GME.  But that doesn’t mean the price can’t go higher in the short run.

Ok, on to FX, where today is PMI day, with the most noteworthy results coming from China over the weekend.  Noteworthy in the sense that they were all worse than expected (Mfg 51.3, Services 52.4 and Caixin 51.5) and all represented pretty big declines from last month.  In addition, the forward-looking pieces, like New Orders and Employment also fell sharply, so it doesn’t bode well for February.  Recall, China has locked down much of the northern part of the country to prevent the spread of Covid and this is occurring right before the start of the Lunar New Year holiday, the busiest travel time of the year, historically, in the country.  The point is, if expectations are for China’s economy to drive global growth, we could be seeing a longer delay before things pick up.

European PMI’s were generally in line with expectations on the manufacturing side and a number of other emerging market economies saw better than anticipated results.  Again, this simply highlights that the recovery in H1 is likely to be quite uneven.

As to markets, despite early losses in Asia and US futures, equity markets have turned around and were robustly higher overnight (Nikkei +1.55%, Hang Seng +2.15%, Shanghai +0.6%) and are all higher throughout Europe (DAX +1.5%, CAC +1.5%, FTSE 100 +1.2%).  US futures, which had opened the overnight session down as much as 1% are now all higher by more than that.

Bond markets are also demonstrating risk-on characteristics, albeit on a much more subdued basis.  Treasury yields have edged higher by 1.2bps, while bunds are essentially unchanged along with OATs and Gilts.  What we are seeing is PIGS bonds rallying with yields in Italy (-3.2bps) and Greece (-2.7bps) falling the most.

With silver leading the way, gold (+0.7%), too, is higher and so is crude oil (+0.5%).  In other words, risk is in favor here.  Interestingly, the FX market is not as convinced, at least not if we believe that risk-on is synonymous with a weaker dollar.  CHF (-0.6%) is the worst performer, which as a haven makes some sense, but EUR (-0.5%) leads the rest of the European group down, after German Retail Sales fell -9.6%!  The commodity currencies have not been as badly impacted (CAD -0.3%, AUD -0.2%).  Actually, today’s best performing G10 currency, other than the dollar, is the pound, which is basically flat as the success they’ve had with their vaccine program (13% of the population has already been vaccinated, the most by far for a large nation) has investors of the belief that the UK will lead the recovery.

EMG currencies are having a more mixed session with TRY (+1.7%) the leading gainer on further hawkish comments from the new central bank head there helping convince traders that tighter monetary policy will be with us for a while.  MXN (+1.15%) is next in line, on the strength of the commodity rally, along with ZAR (+0.75%) on the same basis.  Remember, Mexico is the largest silver producing country in the world, so the big rally in silver is clearly helping the peso.  On the downside, CNY (-0.6%) suffered on its data, and the CE4 are all falling similar amounts to the euro.  The rest of the bloc is less interesting and mixed as to gainers and losers.

On the data front, ISM Manufacturing (exp 60.0) is the main release today, with Construction Spending (+0.8%) due as well.  It is a payroll week, but I will delve into that more tomorrow as this note is already exceptionally long.  We do hear from three Fed speakers today, with a mix of uber doves and regular doves, so if anything, I expect that we will see more talk of needing more stimulus.  Speaking of which, the political fight over the proposed $1.9 trillion new bill continues but, in the end, you know that they will pass another bill with a lot more money being spent.

For all the conviction as the new year began that the dollar would decline sharply, the price action through January has clearly shaken some people.  However, positioning seems to be remaining steady, and I still believe that as inflation rises, real yields will fall sharply and the dollar along with it.  But for now, the dollar continues to push out the weak shorts, and quite frankly, this move does not feel like it is ending.  At this stage, a move in the euro toward 1.1950 seems quite viable.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf