Tag Archives: #politics

Quite Miffed

Posted on by

By now, each of you is aware
More tariffs, the Prez did declare
Some nations will scream
While others will scheme
To Trump, though, in war all is fair
 
The market reaction was swift
With equities in a downshift
While Treasuries rallied
Pure gold, lower, sallied
And everyone worldwide’s quite miffed

 

Once again, President Trump did exactly what he told us he was going to do from the start.  He applied reciprocal tariffs on virtually every nation in the world, although at a rate claimed to be ~50% of their tariffs on the US, (as calculated by the White House and which included quotas and non-tariff barriers as well.)  In addition to Israel, which pledged to reduce tariffs to 0% on US goods if the US would do the same, it appears Canada has also agreed that deal.  I expect that we will hear different responses from nations all around the world, but remember, the one thing the president has made clear is that retaliation by other nations will be met with a significantly higher response from the US.  I expect that smaller nations may find themselves in very difficult straits, although larger ones have more potential to respond.  But, in the end, the US remains the consumer of last resort, and every nation on the list realizes that losing the US market will not help their economies.

The market response was immediate with US equity futures plummeting on the open of the evening session and sharp declines in Asian equities as well.  Treasury yields fell along with the dollar, while gold after an initial rally, reversed course and is now lower on the day as well.

Analysts around the world are out with early forecasts of the “likely” impacts of these tariffs although I would take them with a grain of salt.  Remember, analyst macro models have been pretty useless for a while, ever since the underlying conditions changed as I described earlier this week, so it is not clear to me that applying broken models to a new event is likely to offer accurate estimates of future activity.  However, there is a pretty clear consensus, which is that inflation is going to rise while economic activity is going to decline, probably into a recession.  Personally, I am confused by this analysis as every one of these analysts continues to believe that a recession drives prices lower and reduces inflation, but I’m just reporting on what I have seen.

If pressed, I expect that we will see several nations reduce their tariff structures in response to this, similar to Canada and Israel, and US tariffs will decline there as well.  Other nations will dig in their heels and trade activity between the US and those nations will decline.  But I will not even hazard a guess as to which nations will do what.  Political pain is a funny thing, and different leaders respond differently.

My sincere hope is that now that the tariffs have been imposed, we can move on with our lives and discuss other issues because frankly, I am really tired of this topic.

Masked by the tariff mania was news that the US Senate has moved forward on its budget resolution bill which if passed and combined with the House, will allow the process to start to legislate for fiscal year 2026.  Both versions maintain the 2017 tax cuts, both seek unspecified spending reductions and while each has a different price tag, my take is this process will be completed before too long.  It would truly be miraculous if Congress actually submitted department spending bills on a timely basis, rather than the omnibus bills that have been the norm for quite a while.  That would be true progress in how the government works.

Anyway, let’s see where things stand this morning.  The one thing we know is that despite President Trump’s constant discussion on tariffs, market participants were not prepared.  Ironically, yesterday saw modest gains in US equity indices but as of now (6:40) US futures are sharply lower (NASDAQ -3.8%, SPX -3.6%, DJIA -2.6%).  Of course, the damage has been significant everywhere with equities lower worldwide.

In Asia, Vietnam (-7.2%) was the worst hit index, actually the worst in the world, as tariffs there rose to 46%.  Given Vietnam has been a way station for exports from China to the US, I expect that we will see some swift action by the government there to address the situation.  But elsewhere in Asia, while the losses were universal, they were not as bad as might be expected.  Tokyo (-2.6%) led the way lower with Chinese shares (Hang Seng -1.5%, CSI 300 -0.6%) also falling, but not collapsing.  Korea (-0.8%) and India (-0.4%) fell but were also not devastated.

In Europe, though, the pain is more consistent and larger, net, than Asia as per the below snapshot from Bloomberg.  This will be the most interesting thing to watch as there has been a great deal of huffing and puffing about a response, but will European nations, who sell a great deal into the US, risk a worse outcome, or will they reduce their own tariffs?

Something else that has declined sharply is bond yields around the world.  Treasury yields are lower by a further -6bps, and that is the basic decline seen across Europe as well.  Asia saw even greater drops in yields with JGB’s (-12bps) breaking the trendline that had been in place since the BOJ first started hiking rates last year and Governor Ueda made clear his intention to continue to do so.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It appears that investors are anticipating a global recession, at least based on the movements in government bond yields around the world.

In the commodity space, oil (-4.7%) has reversed much of its recent gains as the recession narrative has eclipsed the Iran war/sanctions narrative.  However, despite the sharp decline, oil remains nearly $3/bbl above the lows seen at the beginning of March, just one month ago.  In the metals market, gold, which initially traded to new highs on the tariff announcement reversed course about lunchtime in Asia and is now down by more than -2.0%.  My take is this is a short-term impact as investors sell liquid assets with gains to cover margin calls, rather than any negative feelings about gold in the wake of the news.  Instead, I suspect that the barbarous relic will regain its footing shortly as the ultimate haven asset in difficult times, and clearly many now see difficult times ahead.  Silver (-3.9%) and copper (-0.4%) are also softer, much more on the economic concerns than the risk concerns.

Finally, the dollar, shockingly, is broadly lower this morning.  While we have been consistently informed that a very clear response to the US imposing tariffs would be other currencies weakening vs. the dollar to offset the impact, apparently that model is also broken.  Versus it’s G10 counterparts, the dollar is under severe pressure today.  EUR (+1.75%), JPY (+1.7%), CHF (+2.1%), SEK (+2.1%) and even NOK (+1.1%) despite the collapse in oil prices, have all moved to within 1% of the dollar’s lows seen last September.  But to keep things in perspective, I don’t know that I would call the dollar “weak” here.  The below chart of DXY shows that even over the past 20 years, the dollar has been MUCH lower and only spent a relatively small amount of time above current levels.  

Source: Koyfin.com

Interestingly, other than the CE4, which track the euro closely, most EMG currencies have not seen the same boost vs. the dollar, although most are somewhat higher.  MXN (+0.6%), KRW (+0.6%) and INR (+0.5%) have all gained modestly.  ZAR (0.0%) and CNY (-0.2%) are the only currencies that have bucked the trend and followed the economic theory.  

Turning to the data, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims as well as the Trade Balance (-$123.5B) at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see ISM Services (53.0).  The thing about this data is it ought to have no impact whatsoever as last night’s tariff announcements completely changed the playing field.  So whatever things were, they are not representative of the future, at least the near future.  There are also a couple of Fed speakers, but again, there is no way they can determine how they will react until the real economic effects of these tariffs start to play out.

There have been many analysts who continue to believe that President Trump will not be able to tolerate a substantial decline in the equity market despite the fact that he has not discussed it at all, and he, along with Treasury Secretary Bessent have consistently said their goal is a lower yield on 10-year Treasuries.  Well, they are getting their wish right now, regardless of the reason.  

The president has done virtually everything he said he was going to do regarding the border, government efficiency and now tariffs.  There are many skeptics who believe that he is out to force economic change on the backs of the bottom 90% of earners to benefit himself and others in the top 1%.  But he has consistently said his goal is to help the middle class.  His view of reindustrialization and more self-sufficiency while reduced international adventures continues to be the driving force of his policies.  There is no reason to believe he is going to change that view.  Do not look for a reversal of what he has done simply because the S&P 500 declines.  I think the trend is going to be for the dollar to continue to decline along with interest rates, while commodities rally.  Equity markets are going to be a tale of two markets, likely with previous highflyers suffering and previously overlooked companies benefitting.  

The world is changing a lot, so the best thing you can do is maintain your hedges to mitigate the impact.

Good luck

Adf

Fast or Slow Death?

Posted on by

As markets all take a deep breath
Concerns are that, just like Macbeth
The President will
The ‘conomy kill
The question is, fast or slow death?

 

Personally, I am hopeful that we can stop discussing tariffs after today.  It’s not that they will decrease in importance, but they will no longer be the primary topic.  Instead, they will be a secondary explanation for anything that anybody decides is wrong with the economy, or the country or the world.  Recession? Tariffs are the cause.  Inflation? Tariffs are the cause.  War? Tariffs are the cause.  Duke loses in the semis?  Tariffs are the cause.  

FWIW, which is probably not that much, my view is the market has absorbed this conversation and the correction we have seen over the past weeks in the equity market is the result of growing expectations of much slower growth or a recession.  Arguably, the biggest concern should be that US equity markets continue to trade at historically rich valuations and any negative catalyst can serve to both depress future expectations and compress multiples, and that’s how you get large equity market declines.

The thing about the tariff story is that while later today we will all find out the details, the actual impacts will take months, at least, to be determined.  For instance, the story that Israel has just decided to drop all tariffs on US made products, thus avoiding them on Israeli products is something I suspect we may see more frequently than now assumed.  Perhaps there would be no greater irony for all the naysayers than if this ‘end of free trade’ moment actually inspired a significant reduction in tariffs around the world as nations seek to retain access to the US.  I’m not saying this will be the case, but given the US is the consumer of last resort, running a nearly $1 trillion trade deficit, pretty much every other nation relies on the US as a market for some portion of their production.

Along these lines, I must ask, why is it that other nations, who apply tariffs and other non-tariff barriers like quotas or regulatory restrictions, to US products do so if tariffs are such a great evil?  Apparently when the French, for example, seek to protect their industries and farmers, it is healthy for the economy, but when the US does, it is world-ending.  Just sayin’

So, is the dip now to be bought?
Or are things still overly fraught?
The overnight session
Did naught for that question
As no one knows what Trump has wrought

Since there are literally no other stories to discuss regarding finance and markets right now, let’s turn to the overnight and see how markets are behaving in the runup to the Liberation Day announcement.  Yesterday’s mixed, but mildly positive, session in the US led to a mixed session in Asia with no real trend.  Even within a nation (Nikkei +0.3%, TOPIX -0.4%) there was no clarity.  Chinese shares were basically flat, Korea and Singapore fell while India and Malaysia rallied.  No movements approached even 1.0% so it is probably fair to say we didn’t learn anything.  However, European bourses are under pressure across the board this morning led by the DAX (-1.3%) and FTSE 100 (-0.9%).  Clearly, there is significant concern that the US tariffs, which are set to come into force immediately upon their announcement, will have a significant negative impact on European companies.  Certainly, German auto makers, who rely greatly on the US market, are likely to be negatively impacted, but as I said, it remains to be seen what actually occurs.  I guess considering that European shares have been performing well of late, with gains on the order of 10% or more YTD, some investors have decided to take their money and run.  

source: tradingeconomics.com

Meanwhile, US futures are pointing lower at this hour (7:10) down about -0.5% across the board.

In the bond market, while there is a lot of huffing and puffing that tariffs will be inflationary, yields are sliding this morning with Treasury yields (-2bps) declining to their lowest levels since last October, and a similar amount to most European sovereigns.  I suppose bond investors are more concerned over the mooted recession than the inflationary impact of tariffs.  Too, JGB yields slid -3bps, back to their lowest level in a month as questions remain about the BOJ’s future path as well as Japanese growth prospects in the new trade regime.

Turning to commodities, oil (-0.35%) has slipped a bit further but remains well up on the week as a story regarding the US moving more military assets toward the Middle East from Asia makes the rounds.  We cannot forget that President Trump has already initiated secondary sanctions on Venezuelan crude, and threatened to do so on Russian crude if Putin doesn’t agree to the ceasefire.  Meanwhile, Iran is always in Trump’s crosshairs while they remain a perceived threat to go nuclear.  As to the metals markets, gold (+0.1%) continues to edge higher with any pullbacks both short term and modest.  One look at the chart below shows how many more green days there have been than red ones over the past 6 months.  I see nothing to stop this trend.  As to the other metals, they are higher this morning and continue to trade well overall.  I believe the case can be made that going forward, commodity markets, and the shares of companies in the space, are set for some real outperformance in the new world order.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is mixed as well, with some widely disparate movements seen.  For instance, NZD (+0.9%) is having a good day, perhaps because direct trade with the US is di minimus, or perhaps because it has been weakening so much for the past 6 months, down nearly 10% even after today’s rally, over that period, that it is a simple bounce.  At the same time, ZAR (-1.0%) is sliding despite the ongoing gold rally, although there are growing concerns over the outcome of the budget there and how it will be funded and impact the economy.  But in truth, as I look across the board, there are probably more currency gainers than losers this morning, which ironically is exactly the opposite of the forecast impact of tariffs by the US.  Just remember, as Yogi Berra allegedly explained, “in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is.” Detailed market outcomes based on economic theories rarely hold up.

On the data front, this morning brings ADP Employment (exp 105K) and Factory Orders (0.5%, 0.7% ex-Transport) as well as the EIA oil inventories.  Yesterday afternoon’s API inventories showed a large build, but expectations are for draws today.  We also hear from Adriana Kugler, Fed governor, but ironically, all the Fed talk is now about tariffs and not about monetary policy.

Today is a crapshoot, with no way to even guess how things will evolve.  Also, beware the initial reaction as it may not represent a new view, but rather the unwinding of current positions.  Until further notice, though, I still think the dollar has a slow decline in its future.

Good luck

Adf

Aren’t Just Rumors

Posted on by

Give plaudits to President Xi
Who’s trying to show it is he
That’s offering deals
To help grease the wheels
Of trade, which he claims will be free
 
The problem is Chinese consumers
Have not been in very good humors
And history shows
The Chinese impose
Restrictions that are aren’t just rumors

 

Market activity can well be described as lackluster, with equity indices generally slipping lower while bond markets wobble and the dollar retraces some of its recent losses.  In fact, the only markets really showing a trend right now are gold (+0.4%), silver (-0.1%) and copper (-0.2%), all of which have rallied sharply over the past month and year.  Obviously, the major discussion point is President Trump’s tariff policy and how that will impact economies around the world.  Recent focus has been on how other nations will respond with a variety of poses taken by different leaders, from conciliatory to combative.

So, it is with great interest that we see another impact of the Trump administration, the sight of China’s communist party leader, Xi Jinping, trying to convince foreign company CEO’s that investing in China is a good deal.  A lead article in Bloomberg this morning describes a large gathering in China where President Xi hosted CEO’s of numerous companies from around the world in an effort to portray China’s policies as investment friendly.

This makes sense given the trend in foreign direct investment toward China over the past years.  As can be seen in the chart below from the Bloomberg article, it has not been a pretty sight.  And remember, this all occurred before President Trump was elected.  Clearly, there were concerns prior to Mr Trump escalating the trade conflicts with the US.  

I find it somewhat ironic, though, that Xi is trying to promote Chinese policy as an island of stability in the world.  Consider how he has capriciously destroyed the private education market, or even the tech market until reversing course after the DeepSeek announcement, all while the housing market continues to implode.  Given the rest of the world has lost patience with China’s mercantilist policies and the flood of cheap goods they produce with government support, I am at a loss to understand the appeal of investing in China.  Using it as an export base is a nonstarter, and history has shown that nearly every foreign company that looked at China’s population as a great untapped market for their products has been hugely disappointed.  The exceptions are the luxury goods makers, where the global brand and cachet were too strong for domestic competitors to overcome.  But that is a small segment of the market.  

Instead, the usual outcome is forced technology transfer which results in a state-supported competitor for their products around the rest of the world.  I am confident there will be companies that choose to invest, if for no other reason than to curry favor with Xi and open the doors to further potential sales, but the trend of late is not promising.  Ultimately, property laws and their enforcement are the keystone for inward investment into any nation and China has no history of treating foreign companies fairly, or domestic ones for that matter.

But really, the flow of direct market news and economic data has been secondary with far more political news leading conversations.  The impact of tariffs on economic activity and inflation, as well as on market performance remains unclear with arguments being made on both sides as to potential benefits or detriments.  FWIW, which is probably not much, my take is the impacts will be very unevenly spread, and how that impacts broad based numbers is unknowable at this time.  I fear we will all need to be reactive for now, although for those with outstanding exposures, there is no better argument for maintaining robust hedge ratios given the overall uncertainty.

Ok, let’s take a look at the overnight action in markets.  After yesterday’s US declines, we saw much of Asia follow suit with Tokyo (-1.8%) particularly hard hit as PM Ishiba thought that he was making headway with President Trump but found out that Japanese auto manufacturers were going to be subject to those tariffs as well.  Adding to the pressure were the “Minutes” from the last BOJ meeting which implied further rate hikes are on the horizon. Both Hong Kong (-0.65%) and China (-0.45%) also slipped and, in fact, almost every major market in Asia (Korea, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand) also fell, some quite sharply.  Apparently, Xi’s efforts at creating that stability haven’t yet been successful.  

In Europe, red is also the dominant color with most continental bourses lower by around -0.6%, also on the tariff story.  The one exception here is the UK, which released a passel of data showing growth was modestly firmer than expected at 1.5% led by Retail Sales growing 1.0%, rather than declining by -0.3% as expected.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15) they are pointing slightly lower, about -0.2%.

In the bond market, yields are backing off around the world with Treasuries (-3bps) lagging European price action where sovereigns have seen yields decline between -4bps and -6bps.  Even JGB yields have slipped -4bps.  In Europe, inflation data from France and Spain came in softer than expected which has encouraged the move there, and we even heard arch ECB hawk, Robert Holzmann, explain that funding defense spending via bond purchases (i.e. QE) was viable.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.2%) which rallied yesterday to touch the elusive $70/bbl level is slipping back a bit, but the trend remains clearly higher as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, in the currency markets, the dollar is firmer once again with modest rallies vs. the euro (-0.3%) and pound (-0.2%) as well as strength against the Scandies (SEK -0.6%, NOK -0.3%).  However, the picture in the EMG bloc is more mixed with ZAR (+0.35%) showing strength alongside gold’s rally, and INR (+0.2%) bucking the trend after having agreed to reduce tariffs on US products.  Throughout the rest of the bloc, there has been generally little change.

Turning to the data this morning, there is plenty that will be keenly watched.  Personal Income (exp 0.4%), Personal Spending (0.5%) and the PCE data (headline 0.3%, 2.5% Y/Y and core 0.3%, 2.7% Y/Y) all get released at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see Michigan Sentiment (57.9) and you can be sure people will be talking about the Inflation Expectations piece (1yr 4.9%, 5yr 3.9%), especially if it syncs with their narrative.  There are two more Fed speakers, Governor Barr and Atlanta Fed president Bostic, but nothing any Fed speaker has uttered has mattered at all, maybe since Trump was inaugurated.

My read on overall sentiment is that investors are wary of the future, but not yet ready to abandon the stocks only go up narrative.  Regarding the dollar, the recent trend remains modestly lower, as per the below, but it is hard to get excited about large moves, at least for today.  Again, Trump clearly wants it lower and seems likely to get his way, at least to some extent.  The one thing I truly do like is commodities, which I believe will remain well bid overall.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

The Fools

Posted on by

In April, it starts with the Fools
But two days thereafter the rules
For importing cars
To where Stars and Bars
Fly will change with tariffs as tools
 
For Europe, the pain will be keen
At least that’s what most have foreseen
And poor crypto bros
Will find their Lambos
May soon cost a price quite obscene

 

While the political set continues to harp on the “Signal” story, markets really don’t care about political infighting between the parties.  Rather, their focus is keenly attuned to President Trump’s confirmation that starting on April 3rd, there will be a 25% tariff imposed on all imported autos from everywhere in the world.  This is particularly difficult for European auto manufacturers as they produce a far smaller proportion (VW 21%, BMW 36%, Mercedes 41%) of their vehicles in the US than do the Japanese (Honda 73%, Toyota 50%, Nissan 52%), although the Koreans will be impacted as well (Hyundai/Kia 33%).  Ironically, according to Grok, where I got all this information, GM only produces about 54% of their vehicles sold in the US, in the US, with the rest coming from Canada and Mexico.  As an aside, Tesla produces all their vehicles in the US.

Particularly hard hit are the specialty manufacturers like Porsche, Ferrari and Lamborghini, which produce none of their vehicles in the US.  Of course, given the price points of these vehicles, my sense is it may not really hurt their sales as if you are spending $250k on a car, you can likely afford to spend $312.5k as well.  In fact, in a funny way, these tariffs may enhance the Veblen effect where people will brag about paying the higher price as it puts it out of reach of more people.

Nonetheless, the action merely confirms that President Trump is very serious with respect to changing the world’s trading model.  I saw something interesting this morning in that Paul Krugman, who made his name, and won his Nobel Prize, based on work regarding international trade and was the prototypical free trader, has adjusted his views after recognizing that nations need to maintain some manufacturing capabilities for security reasons.  I assure you, if Krugman, who has been a vocal liberal critic of every Republican idea for the past twenty years, agrees with this policy, it will be very difficult for anyone to reject it.

In a perfect world (globo economicus?) free trade accrues benefits to all.  But we don’t live in that world and national priorities often supersede these issues.  The pandemic highlighted the weaknesses that the US had developed in its ability to manufacture key items necessary for its continued economic and defense survival. And remember this, for the world at large, their idea of free trade is they should be able to sell whatever they grow/manufacture into the US with no barriers, but US manufacturers need to be subject to barriers in order to protect other nations’ favored industries and companies.  That world is now history with new rules being written every day and most of them by Donald Trump.

So how have markets responded to this tariff confirmation?  Not terribly well.  Yesterday’s US equity selloff was pretty significant led by the NASDAQ’s -2.0% decline.  In Asia, the Nikkei (-0.6%) also sold off as did Korea (-1.4%), Taiwan (-1.4%) and Australia (-0.4%).  On the other hand, both China (+0.3%) and Hong Kong (+0.4%) managed a better session, seemingly as a rebound against declines in the previous session with the only news showing that Chinese industrial profits fell by -0.3% compared to a Y/Y decline of -3.3% in December.  However, a quick look at a chart of this data for the past five years tells me they need to seasonally adjust it in order to get something meaningful, so I don’t think it really impacted markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to European shares, it should be no surprise that the tariff announcements have negatively impacted shares there with declines of between -0.2% (Spain) and -0.7% (Germany).  US futures though, at this hour (7:00) are little changed on the session.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to creep higher, up another 3bps this morning and back to levels last seen a month ago.  This cannot be helping Secretary Bessent’s blood pressure, although he very clearly has a plan in mind.  There is much stagflation discussion in the markets by the punditry as they assume tariffs will slow growth and raise prices and bonds are not the favored investment in that scenario.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields are all sliding this morning, largely down -2bps, amid growth concerns on the back of the tariff announcements.  The one exception here is UK Gilts (+7bps) as the UK Budget announcement indicated slightly more gilt issuance would be necessary to fund the government’s spending plans.  However, there is a growing concern over the financial management of the Starmer government overall.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.35%) is slipping from yesterday’s closing levels and continues to flirt with the $70/bbl level but has not been able to breech it since late February.  Apparently, there are questions as to whether the auto tariffs will reduce demand.  Personally, I would think it is the opposite as more older, less fuel efficient cars will remain on the road here.  As to gold (+1.0%) after a several day pause, it appears that it is resuming its very strong trend higher.  You know what we haven’t heard about lately?  Ft Knox auditing.  I wonder if that is getting arranged or is now so old a story nobody cares.  Silver (+1.0%) is along for the ride although copper (-0.4%) is taking a breather after a breathtaking run to new all-time highs this year.  Look at the slope of the copper chart and you can see why it is pausing, at the very least.

Source: tradingeconomics.com’

Finally, the dollar is broadly softer this morning, with the euro, pound and Aussie all gaining on the order of 0.3%.  As well, NOK (+0.3%) is firmer after the Norgesbank surprised some and left rates on hold with a relatively hawkish message about the future.  But there is weakness vs. the greenback around with JPY (-0.3%), MXN (-0.3%) and INR (-0.2%) all leaning the other way.  Another tariff related story is that India is planning to cut its tariffs in half for the US, a very clear victory for President Trump. 

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims data as well as the third and final look at Q4 GDP (2.3%).  Part of the GDP data is Real Final Sales (4.2%) which is a key indicator for what happens here given consumption represents ~70% of the economy.  We do hear from Richmond Fed president Barkin this afternoon, but right now, Fed speakers are speaking into the void.

International statecraft continues to be the underlying thesis of global relations and President Trump’s goals of reshoring significant amounts of manufacturing and jobs along with it is still the primary driver.  There has been far less talk of the Mar-a-Lago Accord as that seems to be losing its luster.  If countries adjust their trade policies, Trump will continue in this direction.  While that may include short-term economic weakness and some pain, for both the economy and the stock markets, there is no indication, yet, he is anywhere near blinking.  One thing to keep in mind is that an overvalued stock market can correct by prices falling sharply, but also by prices stagnating for a long time while earnings catch up and multiples compress.  We may very well be looking at the latter scenario, so no large gains nor losses, just choppy markets going forward.  As to the dollar, lower still seems the direction of travel overall from current levels, but probably in a very gradual manner.

Good luck

Adf

Another Broadside

Posted on by

Investors don’t know where to hide
As Trump lands another broadside
Last night he did roil
All those who buy oil
From Vene, with tariffs applied
 
But yesterday, too, he amended
How tariffs would soon be extended
The lesson to learn
Is you’ll ne’er discern
His methods, so don’t be offended

 

Once again, the tariff game changed yesterday, although this time in two directions.  The first, and newest idea is that the US will impose “secondary” tariffs on all nations that buy oil from Venezuela.  The idea is to pressure Venezuela to concede to US demands by reducing the market for their one exportable commodity, at least the only one in demand (Tren de Aragua gang members, while a key export, have limited demand it seems).  This decision is being described as a new tool of statecraft, but it strikes me this is no different than previous international efforts like the apartheid movement, by isolating a nation for its behaviors.  Regardless, this was seen as bullish for oil prices.  The reason, as eloquently explained by Ole Hanson, Saxo Bank’s Head of Commodity Strategy, as per the below, is that Venezuelan and Iranian oil production has risen significantly over the past 4 years, offsetting the production cuts of the rest of OPEC+.  Take that oil out, and the demand/supply balance tips toward more demand.

It remains to be seen how this impacts specific countries, but apparently, China is the largest importer of sanctioned crude, so obviously, not a positive for President Xi.  Alas for Chevron, the deal they cut with the Biden administration to restart activity in Venezuela is looking shakier by the day.

But that is only one of the tariff stories.  The other was that there may be changes to previously expected actions come April 2nd, with imposition of tariffs being a bit more gradual nor as widespread as initially feared.  Recall, the idea of the reciprocal tariffs was almost every other nation charges higher tariffs on US goods than the US charges on their goods, so simply raising US tariffs to their levels would be effective.  The next step was focusing on the so-called “Dirty 15” nations that run the major trade surpluses with the US, but now he has indicated that some nations will get breaks.  I particularly loved this comment, “I may give a lot of countries breaks. They’ve charged us so much that I’m embarrassed to charge them what they’ve charged us, but it’ll be substantial, and you’ll be hearing about that on April 2.”

In any event, Trump’s specialty is his ability to think outside the box, or perhaps more accurately, break the box and move to a different container.  There is much consternation amongst business managers, and understandably, since planning is much more difficult in this environment.  However, as I have repeatedly written, the one thing on which we can count is continued higher volatility across all markets.  That condition requires a robust hedging plan for all those who have exposures, that is your only realistic protection.

Other than the tariff story, though, we have not seen much new information so let’s take a look at how markets have handled the latest tariff saga.  Yesterday’s broad US equity rally, on the back of a reduced tariff outlook, was followed by less positive price action in Asia.  While the Nikkei (+0.5%) rallied, potentially on the yen’s recent weakness, Hong Kong (-2.4%) was under great pressure on a weaker tech sector as earnings there were disappointing last quarter.  However, the CSI 300 (0.0%) which has far less tech in its makeup, didn’t budge.  As to the rest of the region, there were more gainers (Taiwan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Indonesia) than losers (Korea, Philippines, Thailand), so arguably the US rally and tariff story helped a bit.

In Europe, though, things are looking solid this morning with green everywhere on the screen and generally substantially so.  The DAX (+0.9%), CAC (+1.2%) and IBEX (+1.1%) are all having solid sessions after German Ifo Expectations data was released a touch better than expected at 87.7, but as importantly, 2 points better than last month.  However, a look at the history of this index shows that while recent data has turned mildly positive, compared to its long-term history, things in Germany remain in lousy shape.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to US futures, at this hour (7:10), they are little changed on the day as traders await the next pronouncements with great uncertainty.

In the bond market, though, yields have been climbing everywhere with Treasury yields higher by 2bps this morning after jumping 5bps yesterday.  In fact, we are back at the highest levels in a month, although still well below the peaks seen in early January or last spring.  But this move has dragged European sovereign yields along for the ride with across-the-board gains of 4bps-5bps and similar movement in JGBs overnight.  One of the alleged reasons for this bond weakness were hawkish comments from two ECB members, Slovakia’s Kazimir and Estonia’s Müller.  However, dovish comments from Greece’s Stournaras and Italy’s Cipollone would have seemed to offset that, and did so in the FX markets, but not in the bond market.

Turning to commodities, oil (+0.4%) continues to climb and is once again approaching $70/bbl.  In fact, since that fateful day, March 11th, it has rallied consistently as can be seen below.  I still don’t understand why that date seemed to offer a change of view, but there you go.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the metals markets, this morning is once again seeing a bullish tone with both precious and industrial metals in demand.  Gold (+0.5%) continues to be one of the best performing assets around, although so far this year silver (+1.5%) and copper (+1.15%) have been amongst the few things to beat it.  I believe this trend has legs.

Finally, the dollar is softer this morning, falling against both its G10 and EMG counterparts almost universally.  SEK (+0.9%) is the leader in the clubhouse, although we have seen solid gains from AUD (+0.5%) and NZD (+0.6%) with both the euro (+0.2%) and pound (+0.2%) lagging the pace but in the same direction.  JPY (+0.4%) which has suffered a bit lately, is following the broad dollar move this morning.  in the EMG bloc, the CE4 (+0.4% across all of them) is setting the tone with ZAR (+0.4%) right there.  Otherwise, the movement has been a bit more modest (MXN +0.2%, KRW +0.15%), but still putting pressure on the dollar.

Turning to the data, as I never got to show the week ahead, here we go:

TodayCase-Shiller Home Prices4.8%
 Consumer Confidence94
 New Home Sales680K
WednesdayDurable Goods-1.0%
 -ex Transport0.2%
ThursdayInitial Claims225K
 Continuing Claims1890K
 GDP Q4 Final2.3%
 GDP Final Sales Q43.2%
 Goods Trade Balance-$134.6B
FridayPersonal Income0.4%
 Personal Spending0.5%
 PCE0.3% (2.5% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.3% (2.7% Y/Y)
 Michigan Sentiment57.9

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, the PCE data Friday will be the most interesting piece of data released, although we cannot ignore Case-Shiller today.  I keep looking at prices rising there at nearly 5% and wondering why economists expect inflation to fall.  If home prices are rising 5% per year, and they represent one-third of the CPI, it doesn’t leave much room for other prices to rise to achieve 2.0%.  Just sayin’.  In addition, we hear from seven different Fed speakers this week.  Now, I have been making a big deal about how Fedspeak doesn’t seem to matter as much anymore.  Perhaps this week, given the overall uncertainty across markets, it will matter.  However, the Fed funds futures market continues to price a bit more than two rate cuts for the rest of the year, which has not changed very much at all in the past month.  I still don’t think the Fed speakers matter right now.

Markets are highly attuned to whatever Trump says about tariffs.  Absent a new war, and maybe even if one starts, I suspect traders (or algos) will focus on that exclusively.  But despite all this, nothing has altered my longer-term view that the dollar will weaken, and commodities remain strong going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Tripping Off Tongues

Posted on by

Recession is tripping off tongues
And pundits ain’t twiddling their thumbs
Political shades
Are driving tirades
And screams at the top of their lungs
 
But are we that likely to see
A minus in our ‘conomy?
We certainly could
And probably should
But life doesn’t always agree

 

The major discussion point over the weekend has been recession, and how likely we are to see one in the US in the coming months.  Of course, this matters to the punditry not because of any concern over the negative impacts a recession has on the population, but ‘more importantly’ because recessions tend to result in sharp declines in equity values.  And let’s face it, do you honestly believe that the editors of the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal are remotely interested in the condition of the majority of the population?  Me neither. 

However, if they can call out something that they believe can impede President Trump, or detract from his current high ratings, they will play that over and over and over.  Funnily enough, when I went to Google Trends, I looked up “recession” over the past 90 days with the result below:

That peak was on March 11 although there was no data of note that day compared to a reading of 9 today. Looking at the news of that day, even CNN had a hard time finding bad news with the four top stories being 1) the Continuing Resolution vote in the House being passed, 2) the Department of Education announcing a 50% RIF, 3) 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum being imposed and 4) Ukraine accepting terms for a 30-day ceasefire.  From an economic perspective, the tariffs clearly will have an impact, but it seems a leap that the average American can go from 25% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to recession in one step.  And based on the positive responses that continue to be seen regarding President Trump’s efforts to reduce the size of government, I doubt the DOE cuts were seen as the beginning of the end of the economy.  

And yet, recession was the talk of the punditry this weekend.  To try to better understand why this is the case, I created the following table of several major economic indicators and their evolution since December, prior to President Trump’s inauguration.

Key indicatorsDecJanFeb
NFP323125151
Unemployment Rate4.10%4.00%4.10%
CPI2.90%3.00%2.80%
Core CPI3.20%3.30%3.10%
PCE2.60%2.50% 
Core PCE2.90%2.60% 
IP1.10%0.30%0.70%
Capacity Utilization77.60%77.70%78.10%
ISM Mfg49.250.950.3
ISM Services5452.853.5
Retail Sales0.70%-1.20%0.20%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Once again, while I am certainly no PhD economist, this table doesn’t strike me as one demonstrating a clear trend in worsening data, certainly not on an across-the-board basis.  Rather, while you might say January was soft, the February data has largely rebounded.  My point is that despite ABC, NBC, Bloomberg, the BBC and CNN all publishing articles or interviews on the topic this weekend, I’m not yet convinced that is the obvious outcome.

My good friend the Inflation Guy™, Mike Ashton, made an excellent point in a recent podcast of his that is very well worth remembering.   The breadth of the US economy is extraordinarily wide and covers areas from manufacturing to agriculture to finance to energy and technology along with the necessary housing markets as well as the entire population consuming both goods and services.  Added to the private sector, the government sector is also huge, although President Trump and Elon Musk are trying hard to shrink it.  But the point is that it is not merely possible, but likely, that while some areas of the economy may go through weak patches, that doesn’t mean the entire economy is going to sink into the abyss.

If we think back to the last two recessions, the most recent was Covid inspired, which resulted from the government literally shutting down the economy for a period of several months, while giving out money.  Net, things weakened, but even then, there were stronger parts and weaker parts.  Go back to the GFC and the housing bubble popped and dragged banks along with it.  That was the problem because banking weakness inhibits the free flow of money and that will impact everyone.

The question to be asked now, I would suggest is, are we likely to see another catalyst that will have such widespread impacts?  Higher tariffs are not going to do the trick.  Shrinking government, although I believe it is critical for a better long-term trajectory for the economy, will have a short-term impact, but it is not clear to me that it will negatively impact the economy writ large.  Certainly, the Washington DC area, but will it impact the Rocky Mountain area?  Or Texas and Florida?  

Now, a recession could well be on the way.  Running 7% budget deficits was capable of papering over many holes in the economy and pumping lots of liquidity into it as well.  If those deficits shrink, meaning spending shrinks, the pace of activity will slow.  But negative?  It seems a stretch to me, at least based on what we have seen so far.  One last thing here, is how might this potential weakening economic growth impact inflation? Now, we all ‘know’ that a recession causes inflation to decline, don’t we?  Hmmm. While that makes intuitive sense, and we hear it a lot, perhaps the Inflation Guy™ can help here as well.  Back in February he wrote a very good explanation about how that is not really the case at all, at least based on the macroeconomic data.  The truth is economic growth and inflation have very little correlation at all.

Of course, perhaps the most critical issue for the punditry is, will a recession drive stock prices lower?  Here the news is far less sanguine if you are a shareholder and believe there is going to be a recession.  As you can see from the below chart of the S&P 500, pretty much every recession for the last 100 years has resulted in a decline in stock market indices.

Source: macrotrends.net

This is a log chart so some of those dips don’t seem that large, but the average downturn during a recession is about 30%, although that number can vary widely.  To sum it up, while the data doesn’t scream recession to me, it cannot be ruled out.  As well, both President Trump and Secretary Bessent have indicated that weakness is likely going to be a result of their early actions, although the idea is to pave the way for a more stable economic performance ahead.  As I have written repeatedly, volatility is likely the only thing of which we can be certain as all these changes occur.  Hedge your exposures!

Ok, let’s look at the overnight activity.

The rumor is Trump may delay
His tariffs as he tries to weigh
How much he should charge
And how much, writ large,
These nations are going to pay

Equity futures in the US are higher this morning as the big story is that President Trump is considering narrowing the scope of nations who will have tariffs imposed on April 2nd.  Apparently, his administration has identified the “dirty fifteen” nations with the largest bilateral imbalances and they will be first addressed.  The telling comment in the WSJ article I read was when Trump said, “Once you give exemptions for one company, you have to do that for all. The word flexibility is an important word. Sometimes there’s flexibility, there’ll be flexibility.”  To my ear, the final plans are not in place, but my sense is he will impose then remove tariffs, rather than avoid them initially.  Interestingly, that story was written last night, yet Asian equity markets were not that ebullient.  Japan (-0.2%) saw no benefit although Chinese shares (HK +0.9%, CSI 300 +0.5%) fared better. Things elsewhere in the region were mixed with both gainers (India, Thailand) and laggards (Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia) with many bourses little changed overall.

In Europe, green is the predominant color this morning but movement is modest with Spain’s IBEX (+0.4%) the leader and lesser gains elsewhere.  While US futures are all higher by about 1% or more at this hour (6:45) apparently the Europeans aren’t as excited at the tariff delay process.

In the bond market, yields have backed up virtually across the board with Treasuries (+4bps) leading the way higher and most European sovereigns showing yields rising by 1bp or 2bps.  It’s interesting, while there has been much discussion regarding German yields having traded substantially higher in the wake of the effective end of the debt brake and anticipation of much further issuance, a look at the chart below tells me that after that gap higher on the news, concerns over German finances have not deteriorated at all.  And after all, the difference is about 25bps higher, hardly the end of the world.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.7%) is continuing its gradual rebound from the lows seen on, ironically, March 11th.  Arguably, what this tells us is that despite the weekend barrage of recession focused articles, the market doesn’t really see that outcome.  In the metals, strength is the word, again, with copper (+1.25%) making new all-time highs on the back of China’s stated goals of growing its strategic stockpile.  Not surprisingly, both gold (+0.2%) and silver (+0.6%) are also climbing this morning alongside copper as commodities remain in greater demand than a recession would indicate.

Finally, the dollar is a bit softer despite rising Treasury yields with both the euro (+0.3%) and pound (+0.4%) bouncing after last week’s modest declines.  And this is despite lackluster Flash PMI readings this morning out of Europe.  The biggest winner is NOK (+0.6%) which given the dollar’s broad weakness and oil’s rebound makes perfect sense.  Otherwise, while the dollar’s weakness is broad, it is no deeper than the aforementioned currencies.

Given the length of this note already (my apologies) and the dearth of data to be released, with only the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (exp +0.08), I will cover data tomorrow as we do end the week with GDP and PCE data.

Headline bingo remains the key concern for all market participants, but ultimately, my altered view of a softer dollar and higher commodities remains intact.

Good luck

Adf

Starting to Fret

Posted on by

In DC, they’re starting to fret
That Trump will make good on his threat
If government closes
The risk that it poses
Is markets become quite upset

 

There is yet another budget showdown in Washington as the Biden administration never passed the bills necessary to fund the government for the rest of this fiscal year ending on September 30th.  The previous continuing resolution (CR) expires at midnight on Saturday and if a new funding law is not enacted, then a government “shutdown” occurs.  Now, a government shutdown is not like a company that runs out of money shutting down.  Rather roles the President deems essential continue to operate, along with the military, but other roles see the people furloughed until new legislation is passed.  Everybody gets paid back wages when things go back to normal.

The situation is that the House of Representatives did pass a CR to fund the government at almost the exact same levels as last year and sent it to the Senate.  However, in the Senate, it needs to beat a filibuster, so needs 60 votes to pass and get to President Trump’s desk.  However, last night, Senate Minority Leader Shumer declared the Democrats would not support the bill, so would rather have the government shut down.  This is a big change from the previous 3 times that there were government shutdowns, because each of those was blamed on Republican intransigence.  

In the end, whatever the politics, the market impact has been negative for stocks while bonds held up, even rallied.  Of course, previous shutdowns all were amidst very different economic environments as inflation was quiescent and bull markets in both stocks and bonds were extant.  As such, arguably, the momentum behind the market was sufficient to offset any concern over the shutdown.  But this time markets are already under pressure going into the potential shutdown.  I fear that market dislocation, at least in the equity markets, could be far more severe if this one occurs.  Something to keep in mind.

The history shows the US
Has long done all things to excess
But now, as they try
With less, to get by
The pundits complain of regress

Reading the WSJ this morning, I couldn’t help but think of the George Costanza opposite day episode of Seinfeld when reading the Heard on the Street column decrying the fact that the Trump administration is seeking to rein in fiscal excess.  Of course, this is an issue that has been fodder for the punditry for a long time, how the US was living beyond its means and borrowing too much money.  But now, this article is concerned about the opposite.  The key concern is that if the US government doesn’t continue to run massive deficits, the economy will slow and corporate profits will fall dramatically, resulting in falling equity prices.

Arguably, this would always be the case if a change of this nature were to be made.  And remember, the punditry was all in on making these changes.  However, now, they point to Germany and the DAX, which has outperformed US markets over the past several weeks as the model.  (chart below from WSJ)

And what is Germany doing so well?  Why, they are talking about borrowing an extra €500 billion, eliminating their debt brake that ensures budget deficits remain below 0.35% of GDP, and funding a huge buildup in defense spending.  Germany, which has long been seen as the only source of fiscal rectitude is now being lionized for getting rid of that trait.  As I said, opposite day!

The lesson, if you haven’t learned it yet, is that the ascendance of Donald Trump to the presidency is going to continuously change many long-held beliefs in governments around the world, as well as in the punditry, who may find that things which seemed great in theory may have consequences previously unconsidered.  From a market perspective, this means volatility will continue to be the best estimate for the future.

Ok, let’s turn our attention to markets and see how things performed overnight.  After yesterday’s mixed session in the US, where the DJIA could not manage a gain despite cooler than expected CPI readings, overnight saw a mixed picture as well.  Japan was either side of unchanged while both Hong Kong (-0.6%) and China (-0.4%) slipped as did most other Asian markets with Malaysia (+1.7%) the true exception.  In Europe, though, screens are green as excess government spending is rewarded, although the gains are modest, 0.3% or so.  

On the topic of excess spending regarding Germany, I read yesterday that the plan to alter the constitution may have serious problems (meaning that spending may not materialize) because about 50 Bundestag members in the old parliament lost their seats in the election, so it is not clear they will be willing to vote to overturn the constitution during the current lame duck session and allow the debt brake to be set aside for defense purposes.  As I said when the story first arose, we are still a long way from Germany paying their own way defensively.  US futures, meanwhile, are slightly softer at this hour (7:15).

In the bond market, yesterday saw yields climb a few bps and this morning those trends remain with Treasury yields (+2bps) not climbing as much as European sovereigns (+3bps to 4bps) as there appears to still be a level of confidence that all the extra defense spending will happen.  One story that should have Europeans concerned is that the European Commission, in their effort to find funding for their newly found defensive aggressiveness, have spied the €10 trillion in savings that European citizens hold.  Frau von der Leyen, the European Commission President was quoted as saying, ”we’ll turn private savings into much needed investment.” 

Call me crazy but my economics classes taught me the identity that Savings º Investment, so I am not sure why those savings aren’t already being invested.  Perhaps European citizens are not investing where Frau von der Leyen wants and that is the problem.  At any rate, I suppose even if Germany fails to overcome its constitutional debt brake, the EU will get there anyway.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.3%) is edging lower after a nice run for the past several days as it bounced off the bottom of its trading range.  Yesterday’s EIA data showed a large draw in gasoline, but I am given to understand that is a seasonal thing (H/T Alyosha).  Meanwhile, nothing has dissuaded investors that gold (+0.25%) is a good thing to hold as it rallied further after yesterday’s gains, although both silver (-0.3%) and copper (-0.4%) are a touch softer this morning.

Finally, the dollar is somewhat firmer this morning, albeit not dramatically so.  Of course, it has been under significant pressure during the past week+, so this trading response ought be no surprise.  SEK (-0.8%) is the laggard in the G10, but you must remember that it has been the leading gainer over the past month.  Meanwhile, AUD (-0.5%) and NZD (-0.45%) are also under a bit of pressure this morning, but the rest of this bloc has seen far less movement.  In the emerging markets, HUF (-0.6%) is the laggard with the rest of the bloc seeing declines on the order of -0.3% or less.  As I said, nothing dramatic here to see.

Yes, yesterday’s CPI data was a bit cooler than anticipated, but as my friend The Inflation Guy™, Mike Ashton, explained here, I wouldn’t get too excited that inflation is collapsing back to the Fed’s 2% target.  This morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1900K) Claims data as well as PPI (headline 0.3%, 3.3% Y/Y; core 0.3%, 3.5% Y/Y). However, given CPI is already out, I don’t think it will have much impact.  Rather, as we have observed lately, politics remains the key driver of all market reactions.  The unfolding government shutdown in the US and the German debt drama are the two most noteworthy issues right now, but Ukraine and the Middle East are still out there to offer surprises.

Once again, volatility is the only thing about which we can be sure.  That said, my confidence is growing that the dollar will decline over time.

Good luck

Adf

In a Trice

Posted on by

The calendar’s not e’en turned twice
Since Trump, with JD as his Vice
Have taken the reins
And beat up on Keynes
While weeding out waste in a trice
 
For markets, the problem, it seems
Is rallies are now merely dreams
So, equity buyers
Are putting out fires
While thinking up pump and dump schemes
 
For bondholders, it’s not so clear
If salvation truly is near
But one thing seems sure
The buck will endure
Much weakness throughout this whole year

 

We have not even reached 50 days of a Trump presidency as of this morning and nobody would fault you if you estimated we had three years of policies enacted to date.  The pace of changes has been blistering and clearly most politicians, let alone investors, have not been prepared for all that has occurred.

One of the things that I read regularly is that Trump is destroying the Rules Based Order (RBO) which was underpinned by the Pax Americana of the US essentially being the world’s policeman.  This is cast as a distinct negative under the premise that things were going great and now, he is upsetting the applecart for his own personal reasons.  Of course, market participants had grown quite accustomed to this framework, had built all sorts of models to profit from it and with the Fed’s help of monetization of debt, were able to gain significantly at the expense of those without market linked assets.  Hence, the K-shaped recovery.

But while that is a lovely narrative, is it really an accurate representation of the way of the world?  If the US was truly the world’s policeman, and we certainly spend enough on defense to earn that title, perhaps it was time for the US to be fired from that role anyway.  After all, there is currently raging military conflict in Ukraine, Lebanon, Syria, Congo, Sudan and the ongoing tensions in Gaza.  That’s a pretty long list of wars to claim that things were going great.

Secondly, the question of financing all this conflagration, as well as other economic goals, notably the alleged transition to net zero carbon energy production, appears to be reaching the end of the line.  While the US can still borrow as needed, (assuming the debt ceiling is raised), the reality is that the US gross national debt outstanding is greater than $36,000,000,000,000 relative to GDP that is a touch under $28,000,000,000,000.  On a global basis, total (not just government) debt is in excess of $300,000,000,000,000 while global GDP clocks in somewhere just north of $100,000,000,000,000.  Arguably, on a credit metric basis, the world is BB- or B+, a clear indication that all that debt is unlikely to be repaid.

If we consider things considering this information, perhaps the RBO had outlived its usefulness.  Arguably, the loudest complaints are coming from those who benefitted most greatly and are quite unhappy to see things change against them.  But as evidenced by the polls taken after President Trump’s speech last Tuesday evening, the bulk of the American public is still strongly supporting this agenda.  The idea that the president and his Treasury secretary are seeking to engineer a short-term recession early, blame it on fixing Biden’s mess, and having things revert to stronger growth in time for the 2026 mid-term elections is not crazy.  In fact, there have been several comments from both men that short-term pain would be necessary to achieve a stabler, long-term gain.

So, what does this mean for the markets?  You have no doubt already recognized that volatility is the main event in every market, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.  But some of the themes that follow this agenda would be for US equities to suffer relative to other markets, as the last decade plus of American exceptionalism, led by massive deficit spending and borrowing, would reverse under this new thesis.  Add to this the sudden realization that other nations are going to be investing significantly more in their own defense, and money will be flowing out of the US into Europe, Japan and emerging markets around the world.

Bonds are a tougher call as a weaker economy would ordinarily mean lower yields, but the question of tariff impacts on prices, as well as reshoring, which, by definition, will raise prices, could mean we see the yield curve steepen with the Fed cutting rates more aggressively than currently priced, but 10-year and 30-year yields staying right where they are now.

I believe this will be a strong period for commodities as all that foreign capex will be a driver, as will the fact that, as I will discuss shortly, the dollar is likely to underperform significantly.  Gold will retain its haven characteristics as well as remain in demand for foreign central banks, while industrial metals should hold their own.  As to oil, my take is lower initially, as OPEC returns its production and slowing GDP weighs on demand, at least for a while, although eventually, I suspect it will rebound along with economic activity.

Finally, the dollar will remain under significant pressure across the board.  Clearly, Trump is seeking a weaker dollar to help the export industries, as well as discourage imports.  Add to this the potential for lower yields, lower short-term rates, and an exit of equity investors as US stocks underperform, and you have the making of at least another 15% decline in the greenback this year.

With this as backdrop, we need to touch on three key stories this morning.  First, Friday’s NFP report was pretty much in line with expectations at the headline level but seemed a bit weaker in some of the underlying bits, specifically in the Household Survey where a total of 588K jobs were lost and there was a large increase in the number of part-time workers doing so for economic reasons.  Basically, that means they wanted full-time work but couldn’t find a job.  Markets gyrated after the release, with yields initially sliding but then rebounding to close higher on the day.  Equities, too, closed higher on the day although that had the earmarks of a relief rally after a lousy week overall.  The thing about this report is that it did not include any of the government changes that have been in the press, so next month may offer more information regarding the impact of DOGE and their cuts.

The second story comes from north of the border where Mark Carney, former BOC and BOE head, was elected to lead the Labour Party in Canada and replace Justin Trudeau.  As is always the case, when there is new leadership, there is excitement and he said he will call for a general election in the next several weeks, ostensibly to take advantage of this new momentum.  It seems that President Trump’s derision of not only Trudeau, but Canada as well in many Canadian’s eyes, will play a large role with the two lead candidates, Carney and Poilievre, fighting to explain that they are each better placed to go toe-to-toe with Trump on critical issues.

Here’s the thing, though.  Despite much angst about the US-Canada relationship on the Canadian side of the border, the market viewpoint is nothing has really changed.  a look at the chart below shows that after a bout of weakness for the Loonie in the wake of the US election and leading up to Trump’s tariff announcements, USDCAD is basically unchanged since mid-December, with one day showing a spike and reversal in early February.  My point is that the market has not, at least not yet, determined that the Canadian PM matters very much.

Source: tradingecoomics.com

The last story to discuss is Chinese inflation data which was released Saturday evening in the US and showed deflation in February (-0.7% Y/Y) for CPI and continuing deflation in PPI (-2.2%).  In fact, as you can see from the below chart, PPI in China has been in deflation for several years now.  Recently there have been several articles explaining this offers President Xi a great opportunity for significant stimulus because no matter how much the government spends and how much debt they monetize, inflation won’t be a problem for a long time to come.  I would counter that given deflation has been the norm for several years, they have had this opportunity for quite a while and done nothing with it.  Why will this time be different?  Ultimately, the default result in China is when things are not looking like they will achieve the targeted growth of “about 5%”, you can be sure there will be more investment to build things up adding still more downward pressure on prices as production facilities increase.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The renminbi’s response to this news has been modest, at best, with a tiny decline overnight of -0.25%.  And a look at the chart there shows it is remarkably similar to the CAD, with steady weakness through December and then no real movement since then.  Given the dollar’s recent weakness overall, this seems unusual.  Although, we also know that China prefers a weaker currency to help support their export industries, so perhaps this in not unusual at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, this note is already overly long, so will end it here.  We do have important data later this week with both CPI and Retail Sales coming.  As well, the consensus from the Fedspeak is that they are pretty happy right here and not planning to do anything for a while.

The big picture is best summarized, I believe, by the idea that we are at the beginnings of a regime change in markets as discussed above.  Volatility continues to be the driving force, so hedging remains crucial for those with natural exposures.

Good luckAdf

Things Are Creaking

Posted on by

Before Mr Trump started speaking
The Chinese explained things are creaking
As growth there is slow
So now they will blow
More funds to achieve what they’re seeking

 

The Chinese government has outlined a very active agenda for 2025 as the current pace of growth in their economy remains sluggish at best.  They continue to focus on a 5% headline GDP target and have promised to increase the budget deficit by a similar amount, so the idea of organic growth seems to be dead.  They reiterated their plan to recapitalize the big banks with CNY 500 billion and are looking to raise defense spending by 7.2%.  Long term debt issuance will increase with CNY 1.3 trillion planned for this year and they talk about adding 12 million urban jobs.  It all sounds fantastic.
 
But will it work?  Of course, there is no way to know yet, but if history is any guide, the mercantilist structure of the Chinese economy remains extremely difficult to overcome and replace with a more consumer-focused economy.  The property market there remains in terrible shape and that continues to be a drag on the overall economy as individuals, who had been encouraged to invest in property as a means of creating a retirement nest egg find themselves with much less disposable income and an illiquid and depreciating asset.
 
President Trump’s tariffs are not going to help them at all, but it is unclear if they will be significantly detrimental.  While I would not bet against China reporting 5% GDP growth in 2025, given the questionable reliability of their data, it is not clear it will be reflective of the state of the nation.
 
My take on market impacts are as follows: Chinese yields will climb as more debt is issued while growth will allegedly increase, Chinese equities should benefit If they are successful at getting things moving, but the yuan will have a harder time in my view, as capital flows to the nation remain stunted.  Of course, much will also depend on the evolution of US policy, which has been erratic, to say the least.

Said Trump, It’s a “new golden age”
As finally, we turn the page
On four years of waste
And so, we’ll make haste
With changes despite Dem outrage

Of course, the other big news was last night’s speech by President Trump to a joint session of Congress where he outlined both the many things he has accomplished in the first 6 weeks of his presidency, but also his plans for the rest of the time.  While many are still reeling from the speed with which changes are being made, there was no indication that his pace is going to slow.

Mr Trump did acknowledge that there may be some short-term pain as the economy adjusts to the changes he has wrought, but he remains focused on the long-term and how to achieve a strong economy with a far better balance sheet and a smaller government.  The implication is that he is still the avatar of volatility, and that aspect will not be changing.

Let us, though, take a step back and look at a much bigger picture.  For the past seventeen years, the US economy was the clear leader in global growth with massive government spending and budget deficits incurred to drive the process.  Meanwhile, while most of the rest of the world exited the pandemic with a burst of reopening growth, they have all lagged the US.  The chart below shows the ratio of the MSCI US index / MSCI World index and demonstrates that investment into the US, following that leading growth profile, has been historic in its effects.

Source: longtermtrends.net

But that situation seems to be changing.  President Trump is openly seeking to reduce the size of the US government and withdraw spending on many foreign adventures while the rest of the world is doing the opposite.  As per the above, China has just announced significant new stimulus.  As well, Europe, now that they need to become more responsible for their own defense, has also announced a major spending plan to rearm themselves.  This is the real sea change, I think, and the one that is going to have the biggest medium and long-term impacts on markets everywhere.  Changes in the level of capital flows and changes in trade patterns are going to significantly impact the value of the dollar as well as stocks, bonds and commodities.  It is a brave new world, so attention must be paid.

In the meantime, let’s see the markets’ initial response to the recent spate of news.  The tariff news has served to undermine US equities for the past two sessions and is still dragging on some markets, but the new spending promises are the new drivers.  So, in Asia, while the Nikkei (+0.2%) managed only a modest rally, the Hang Seng (+2.8%) exploded higher on the Chinese stimulus story although surprisingly, the CSI 300 (+0.5%) did not do nearly as well.  But elsewhere in the region, it was mostly large gains with Korea, India, Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all rallying more than 1%.  The laggards were Australia and New Zealand, which seemed to focus on the negatives of tariffs.

In Europe, Germany’s DAX (+3.4%) is the beneficiary of most of the mooted defense spending as not only are there quite a few defense focused firms, but rumors are that the government is going to coopt the auto manufacturers into building defense equipment (shades of WWII).  As well, the rest of the continent is flying (CAC +1.9%, IBEX +1.6%) and even the UK (+0.45%) is benefitting although there is growing concern that the BOE is not going to be aggressively cutting rates to support the economy because of still sticky inflation.  As to US futures, they are bouncing this morning and higher by 0.4% at this hour (7:00).

In the bond market, while Treasury yields rebounded from their recent lows yesterday, gaining 9bps on the day, this morning they are unchanged.  However, a look at European sovereigns tells the story of investors anticipation of a big uptick in new issuance to fund that defense spending.  The picture below is that of German yields, as an example, showing its 20bp rise this morning, but the entire continent has seen yields rise by at least 16bps!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The market clearly believes the Europeans are going to move forward!

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.6%) remains under pressure as despite the mooted fiscal stimulus, there continues to be more concern over excess supply than newly created demand.  The below chart is quite interesting as a history of long-term price activity in oil with the interpretation that if we are near the supply destruction level, the future for prices is likely to be bullish.  Something to keep in mind. (as an aside, Josh_Young_1 is an excellent follow on X for oil ideas and information.)

As to the metals markets, gold is little changed but copper (+4.7%) has clearly gotten excited over the Chinese stimulus as well as the European defense spending, where copper will be an important piece of the puzzle.

Finally, the dollar is under substantial pressure this morning vs. both G10 and EMG currencies.  Given the yield changes, and my view that 10-year yields have become the FX driver, rather than short-term rates, it should be no surprise that the euro (+0.6%) is rallying to levels not seen since November.  The pound (+0.3%) is following suit, also making 5-month highs.  But the really impressive moves are in the peripheral European currencies with SEK (+1.1%) and PLN (+1.1%) both trading back to levels not seen since September.  On the tariff front, both MXN (+0.25%) and CAD (+0.1%) are lagging the main move but still managing a very modest rally v. the greenback.

In this brave new world, where the US is not the fiscal profligacy leader, but that role is assumed by others, my sense is that the dollar may well have topped for a much longer-term period.  While at the beginning of the year I was confident that the dollar would outperform, the policy changes we have seen since then have altered my views.  While volatility will still be rampant, I believe the broad direction will be a lower dollar going forward.

On the data front, this morning brings ADP Employment (exp 140K) as well as ISM Services (52.6) and Factory Orders (1.6%).  Then we see the EIA oil inventories where a small draw is expected and at 2:00pm, the Fed’s Beige book.  Perhaps the best thing about the changing world order is that central banks are losing some of their market power.  As I wrote yesterday, perhaps US rates are destined to fall as both the president and Chair Powell are keen to see that happen.

At this point, I think the dollar may have seen its highs for quite a while.  Remember, FX trends tend to be very long-term in nature.  For those of you who are payables hedgers, keep that in mind going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Recession in Sight

Posted on by

There once was a policy view
That tariffs, we all should eschew
But President Trump
Explained on the stump
To this idea, he wouldn’t hew
 
And so, as the clock struck midnight
Trump’s tariffs once more saw the light
Most analysts say
The tariffs will weigh
On growth, with recession in sight

 

By now you are all aware that as of 12:01 EST this morning, 25% tariffs have been imposed on all imports from both Canada and Mexico except energy products, which have seen 10% tariffs imposed.  As well, all Chinese imports have been hit with an additional 10% tariff.  Once again, President Trump has proven to be a man of his word, promising these tariffs during his election campaign and imposing them now.

The mainstream view is that these tariffs are a disaster and will send the economy into a recession.  In fact, the International Chamber of Commerce said a depression was likely.  As well, there is much concern that inflation will rise during the recession, which for Keynesians must be a very difficult concept to grasp given their strongly held belief that a recession will result in declining inflation.

Now remember, I am just a poet, so please take that into account when I offer my views here.  First, we have no idea how things will play out.  The one thing about which I am extremely confident is that there will be numerous behavioral changes by everyone because of these tariffs.  The first question is who will absorb the cost of the tariffs.  Remember, essentially the definition of a recession is that demand is declining.  Will companies be able to pass through the higher costs?  In some instances, they likely will, but in others probably not.  Anecdotally, there was a story in the WSJ that Chipotle will see its costs rise because of the tariff on avocados from Mexico but will not change their prices to account for that.  I’m confident they are not the only company who will absorb those costs.

However, there will certainly be companies that believe they can raise prices and maintain their sales and will try to do that.  My point is each company will evaluate the environment under which they operate and respond in the profit-maximizing manner, but each company’s scenario will be different.

Second, let’s consider the reason that President Trump is such a strong believer in tariffs.  He sees them as the stick to achieve his goals.  I would argue there are two goals in sight.  With Canada and Mexico, he is still unsatisfied with their efforts on the border and with fentanyl smuggling and is very keen to push that to completion.  However, the broader goal is to return manufacturing to America from its decampment overseas, mostly to Southeast Asia, during the past forty years.  And remember, he is seeking to implement a carrot as well, looking to cut corporate taxes to 15% going forward, which would put the US in the lowest quartile of corporate tax rates in the world.  While this morning the headlines are all about the tariffs and their potential destruction, just yesterday, Taiwan Semiconductor announced they would be investing $100 billion to build new fabrication plants in Arizona.  That is exactly the response Trump is seeking.

We all recognize that the world today is very different than it was even two months ago as President Trump has taken an extraordinary number of steps to implement the ideas upon which he was elected.  Interestingly, a large majority of the public remains strongly in his camp with approval ratings for many of his policies well above 60% and as high as 80%.  While markets are clearly unhappy as they have no idea how things will play out, and companies are now faced with far more uncertainty as they attempt to plan for their future, there is no reason to believe this process is going to change anytime soon.  

Keep one other thing in mind, unlike Trump’s first term in office, where he was constantly touting the strength of the stock market as a vote of confidence, this time around he and Treasury Secretary Bessent have been entirely focused on the 10-year yield and getting that rate down.  After a 7bp decline yesterday, he has been successful there. (see chart below) I would be surprised if Trump speaks about the stock market much at all for a while.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With that in mind, let’s see how markets have been handling the tariff imposition.  After yesterday’s rout in the US, where a higher open morphed into a sharply lower close on the day, we saw red throughout Asia (Nikkei -1.2%, Hang Seng -0.3%, CSI 300 -0.1%) and Europe (DAX -2.1%, CAC -1.2%, IBEX -2.3%).  In fact, it is far harder to find a market that has rallied at all, although US futures at this hour (6:40) are pointing slightly higher.  However, after the sharp declines, an early bounce is not uncommon though not necessarily a harbinger of activity for the day.  All of this makes sense as public companies are likely going to see impacts on their profitability either because of reduced sales or reduced margins, or both, with tariffs now in place.  (Well, private companies are going to feel the same pressures, but there are no markets for them to worry about.). The worry for investors is given the extremely high price multiples that currently exist across so many companies, margin pressures can be problematic for stock prices.  For the near term, it is easy to make the case that equities have further to fall.

In the bond market, after yesterday’s Treasury yield decline, there has been a modest 1bp bounce, although as per the above chart, the trend remains lower.  In Europe, the news just hit the tape that the Eurozone is creating a plan to rearm the continent allowing for European countries to exceed debt restrictions to enable them to borrow and spend the money on this task.  The mooted amount is €800 billion, meaning that markets can expect that much new debt issuance across the continent in the coming months and years.  However, it appears investors are viewing the situation overall and are far more concerned with potential slowing growth than on increased issuance as yields have slipped one or two basis points across all nations in Europe.  Perhaps that is a signal that there is little belief in the likelihood of this new plan coming to fruition.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.4%) continues its slide as a combination of worries over future growth due to the US tariffs and the OPEC+ announcement that they would start to bring production back online beginning in April (just 138K bbl/day, but the signal is quite clear that more is on the way) has traders unnerved.  Certainly, this is part of what President Trump is seeking, lower oil prices to help keep a lid on inflation, and there is no doubt he has pressured OPEC+ on the issue.  Remember, too, that if gasoline prices fall at the pump, that is a key driver of inflation perceptions for everyone.  As to the metals markets, we are seeing a split this morning with precious (Au +1.0%, Ag +0.65%) rallying on uncertainty and fear while copper (-1.2%) seems to be suffering on recession fears.

Finally, the dollar is lower again this morning with the DXY breaking back below 106 for the first time since early December as a signal of the broad trend.  This is interesting as the textbooks claim that if the US imposes tariffs, the dollar will strengthen, or more accurately other currencies will weaken, to offset those tariffs, and yet this morning CNY (+0.55%) and CAD (+0.45%) are bucking that trend although MXN (-0.2%) is behaving as most would expect.  But the dollar’s weakness is broad based, and my take is given the movement in interest rates, which are suddenly declining far more rapidly than anticipated just a week ago (Fed funds futures are now pricing in 75bps of cuts this year with a 11% probability of a cut in March, up from 2% last week) the dollar bull case is under real pressure.  I have maintained all along that if the Fed reignited their easing policy, the dollar would suffer.  Funnily enough, despite any angst between Chairman Powell (remember him?) and President Trump, they both may see lower rates as their preferred outcome.  In that case, the dollar has further to fall.

There is no hard data set to be released today although we do hear from NY Fed President Williams this afternoon.  This could be the first hint that the Fed’s caution is abating, and further rate cuts are in store.  Of course, with Powell on the calendar for Friday, if there is a change in tone, most market participants will be waiting to hear it from him.

The watchword has shifted from caution to uncertainty.  The tariffs have thrown sand into the gears of the economy and markets.  It remains to be seen how much impact they will have, but for now, fear is rising although the dollar is not following suit.  I think Trump must be happy, but I’m not sure how many in the markets are.

Good luck

Adf