Tag Archives: #Fed

How They Debase

Posted on by

The world’s central banks, as a whole
Have signaled they need to control
Not only the pace
Of how they debase
Their cash, but of digging for coal

Thus, now the Big 3 have explained
The policies they have ordained
Will fund, efforts, green
But not what is seen
Endorsing ‘brown’ growth unrestrained

Last night’s BOJ meeting resulted in exactly zero monetary policy surprises but did serve to confirm that the central banking community has decided to take on a task well outside their traditional purview; climate change.  While they left policy unchanged, as universally expected, they announced that they would be introducing a new funding measure targeting both green and sustainability-linked loans and bonds.  In other words, as well as purchasing JGB’s, equities and ETF’s, they are going to expand their portfolio into ESG bonds.  The interesting thing is that the universe of ESG bonds in Japan is not that large, so the BOJ is going to wind up buying non-JPY denominated assets.  In other words, they are going to be selling a bunch of newly printed yen and converting it into other currencies to achieve their new goals.  This sounds suspiciously like FX intervention, but dressed in more politically correct clothing.  The impact, however, is likely to be a bias for a somewhat weaker yen over time.  For those of you with yen assets, keep that in mind.

Meanwhile, we have already heard from both the Fed and ECB that they, too, are going to increase their focus on climate.  Here, too, one might question whether this is an appropriate use of central bank resources.  After all, it’s not as though the economy in either place is humming along with solid growth, low inflation and excellent future prospects based on strong productivity.  But hey, combatting climate change is far trendier than the boring aspects of monetary policy, like trying to address rapidly rising inflation without tightening policy and risking a crash in equity markets.

In the end, the only thing this shift in policy focus will achieve is longer-lasting inflation.  The effort to develop new and cleaner energy by starving current energy production of capital will result in higher prices for the stuff we actually use.  Over a long enough time horizon, this strategy can make sense; alas we live our lives in the here and now and need energy every day to do so.  Germany is the perfect example of what can happen when politics overrides economics. Electricity prices in Germany average $0.383 (€0.324) per kWh.  In the US, that number is $0.104 per kWh.  Ever since the Fukushima earthquake led to Germany scrapping their nuclear fleet of power reactors, the price of electricity there has more than tripled.  I fear this is in our future if monetary policymakers turn their attention away from their primary role.

Of course, higher inflation is in our future even if they don’t do this, and there is no evidence yet, at least from the Fed or ECB, that they are about to change the current monetary policy stance that is exacerbating that inflation.  However, almost daily we are seeing markets respond to data and comments from other countries that are far more concerned with the inflationary outlook.  Last week the RBNZ ended QE abruptly and indicated they may start raising rates soon.  Last night, CPI there jumped to 3.3%, the highest level since 2011 and above their target band.  It should be no surprise that NZD (+0.45%) rose after the print as did local yields as expectations for a rate hike accelerated.  In fact, I believe this is what the immediate future will look like; smaller countries with rising inflation will tighten monetary policy and their currencies will appreciate accordingly.

Turning to today’s markets, risk was under pressure overnight after a generally weak US session.  Led by the Nikkei (-1.0%), most of Asia was softer, but not all (Hang Seng 0.0%, Shanghai -0.7%, Australia +0.2%).  Europe, which had been higher on the opening has since drifted down and is now mixed with the DAX (0.0%) unchanged while the CAC (-0.5%) lags the rest of the continent and the FTSE 100 (+0.2%) has managed to hold its early gains.  US futures have also held onto small gains with all three indices up about 0.2%.

Bond markets are somewhat mixed as Treasuries (+2.5bps) sell off after yesterdays rally where yields fell 5bps.  However, European sovereigns are all in demand this morning with yield declines ranging from 1.0 to 1.8 basis points.  Commodity markets show crude slightly higher (+0.15%), gold under pressure (-0.7%) and base metals mixed (Cu -0.3%, Al +0.3%, Sn +0.7%).

In the FX markets, aside from kiwi, NOK (+0.25%) has rallied on oil’s rebound from its lows earlier this week, but the rest of the G10 is softer.  It should be no surprise JPY (-0.35%) is the worst performer, while the other currencies are simply drifting slightly lower, down in the 0.1% – 0.2% range.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (+1.5%) is the big winner as it regains some of the ground it lost earlier in the week on the back of the rioting there.  The government has sent in the army to key hot spots to quell the unrest and so far, it seems to be working thus international investors are returning.  Otherwise, we see gains in RUB (+0.3%) and MXN (+0.3%), both of which benefit from oil and tighter monetary policy from their respective central banks.  On the downside, TWD (-0.4%) has been the worst performer in the bloc as dividend repatriation from foreign equity holders pressured the currency.  This is not a long-term issue.   Away from that, some of the CE4 are drifting lower alongside the euro but there has not been much other news of note.

On the data front this morning we see Retail Sales (exp -0.3%, +0.4% ex autos) as well as Michigan Sentiment (86.5).  After two days of Powell testimony, where he continued to maintain there would be no policy tightening and that inflation is transitory, today we hear from NY’s Williams, one of the key members of the FOMC, and someone who has remains steadfastly dovish.

The dollar’s recent strength seems to have reached its limit so I expect that we could see a bit of a pullback if for no other reason than traders who got long during the week will want to square up ahead of the weekend.

Good luck, good weekend and stay safe
Adf

Poor Madame Lagarde

Posted on by

As prices worldwide start to rise

And central banks, rates, normalize

Poor Madame Lagarde

May soon find it hard

To ably, her goals, realize

Let me start by saying that I will be out of the office starting tomorrow, returning July 6th.

Despite the fact that the markets in the US are showing only limited signs that the Fed is actually considering tightening, the punditry continues to believe that tapering asset purchases is next up on the Fed’s agenda.  In fact, the discussion is becoming granular with respect to which assets they should consider addressing.  The two current theses are; reduce purchases of both Treasuries and Mortgages at a similar rate, or just reduce Mortgage purchases given the bubble the Fed has blown in the housing market.  And there are FOMC members on both sides of that argument although it cannot be surprising that the more dovish members continue to insist that buying $40 billion / month of Mortgage-backed securities is having absolutely no impact on the housing market.  But the point is that the analyst community is fully on board with the idea the Fed is going to be reducing its asset purchases soon.

I highlight this because when combined with the fact that so many other countries are more definitively moving past unlimited policy ease, with some already tightening, it becomes interesting to consider which nations are not considering any policy changes.  And this is where the ECB comes into view.

As of now, the ECB (and BOJ) insist that there are no plans to change their policy mix anytime soon.  And yet, they seem to have the opposite problem of the Fed, the market is pricing in rate increases there, currently a 0.10% hike by the end of Q3, and bond yields have been rising steadily with German bund yields almost back up to 0.00%.  (As an aside, it continues to be remarkable to me that one can make the statement, back up to 0.00%!)  Given the slower trajectory of growth thus far in Europe, especially with respect to inflation readings, Madame Lagarde and her cadre of central bankers certainly have their work cut out for them to maintain the policy stance they desire and believe is necessary to support the economy there.  Will the ECB be forced to ease further in some manner, like extending PEPP in order to achieve their aims?

In contrast, despite the fact that the Fed is talking about talking about tapering, and the dot plot indicated a majority of FOMC members believe they will be raising rates by the end of 2023, the bond market remains sanguine over the prospect of either higher inflation or higher interest rates.  Go figure.  

So, who do we believe when surveying the current situation?  On the one hand, it is always tough to argue with the market.  Whether or not we understand the actual drivers, the collective intelligence of investors tends to be exceptionally accurate at recognizing trends and future outcomes.  On the other hand, the phrase, ‘don’t fight the Fed’ has been around for a long time because it has proven to be an effective input into any investment thesis.  The problem is, when those two indicators are at odds with each other, choosing the likely outcome is extraordinarily difficult, more so than normal.

One way to think about it is that both can be right if you consider they may have differing timelines.  For instance, the market tends to discount actions in the 9 month to 1year timeframe while the Fed may well be considering more immediate actions.  However, in this case, I feel like the Fed is looking at a similar timeline as the market.  Ultimately, as I’ve mentioned before, it appears the Fed remains completely reactive to market movement.  Thus, right now, regardless of their rhetoric, my take is if the market demands easier policy, they will make it known via a sell-off in equities that will result in the Fed stepping in with support.  If, on the other hand, the market is comfortable with the current situation, a continued benign rise in equities is on the cards.  As the Fed has put themselves in the position of reactivity, my money is on the market this time, not the Fed.  We shall see.

As I was quite delayed this morning, a very quick recap of the overnight session shows that risk was under pressure in Asia but that Europe has responded very well to much stronger than expected confidence indicators for manufacturing and consumers across the continent.  So while all three main Asian indices fell about 1.0%, Europe has seen gains of at least 0.6% with the DAX up 1.2%.

As it happens this morning, Treasury prices have edged a bit lower with the 10-year yield rising 2bps, but that was after a nice rally yesterday, so we continue to trade right around 1.50%.  Big picture here is nothing has changed.  European sovereigns are softer as risk appetite improves on the continent, with 2.0bp rises in the major markets.

While oil prices (+0.5%) are a bit firmer, the metals complex is under pressure this morning with gold and silver both down sharply (-1.4%) and base metals also falling (Cu -1.0%, Al -0.7%).

The metals’ movement is more in sync with the dollar, which has rallied against all its G10 peers and most EMG currencies.  AUD (-0.7%) and NZD (-0.7%) are the laggards here with NOK (-0.6%) next in line.  Obviously, oil is not the driver, although Aussie and Kiwi would suffer from metal price declines.  However, it appears that Covid continues to haunt many countries and the market seems to be responding to perceptions that growth will be slowing rather than continuing its recent uptrend.  

In EMG, RUB (-0.8%), PLN (0.65%) and ZAR (-0.6%) are amongst the worst performers with ruble and rand clearly impacted by metals prices while the zloty seems to be suffering from a more classical interpretation of inflation’s impact on a currency, as higher inflation expectations are leading to a weaker currency.

On the data front, Case Shiller House Prices rose 14.88%, higher than expected and continuing the trend that has been in place for more than a year.  Later we get Consumer Confidence exp (119.0) although it seems unlikely with payrolls coming on Friday, that the market will pay much attention.

Only Thomas Barkin from Richmond speaks on behalf of the Fed today, but there is no reason to believe that it will change any views.  The narrative is still the same.

The dollar is feeling quite strong this morning and seems likely to maintain those gains as the day proceeds.  If the market truly believes the Fed is going to taper, we should see the evidence in the bond market with higher yields.  But for now, the dollar’s strength feels more like short-covering than a change in the long-term view of ultimate dollar weakness.  However, this can persist for a while (just like inflation 😊)

Good luck, and have a great holiday weekend.  I will be back on the 6th.

Adf

Nirvana Awaits

Posted on by

While Powell and friends fail to see

Inflation rise dangerously

Down south of the border

They fear its disorder

And burden on society






So, Mexico shocked and raised rates





While Fedspeak back here in the States





Continues the story





It’s all transitory





And claiming Nirvana awaits





Mexico became the latest emerging market nation to raise interest rates when they surprised the analyst’s community as well as markets by raising their base rate by 0.25% yesterday afternoon to 4.25%.  The FX market response was swift and certain with the peso gaining more than 1.0% in the first minutes after the announcement although that has since slightly abated.  “Although the shocks that have affected inflation are expected to be of a transitory nature, given their variety, magnitude and the extended time frame in which they have been affecting inflation, they may pose a risk to the price formation process,” the Banxico board explained in their accompanying statement.  In other words, although they are paying lip service to the transitory concept, when CPI rose to a higher than expected 6.02% yesterday, it was apparently a step too far.  Expectations for further rate hikes have already been built into the markets while views on the peso are improving as well.





The juxtaposition yesterday of Mexico with the UK, where the BOE left policy rates on hold at 0.10% and maintained the QE program intact despite raising its inflation forecast to 3.0% for next year, is quite interesting.  Historically, it was the emerging market central banks who would seek growth at any cost and allow inflation to run hot while trying to support the economy and the developed market central banks who managed a more disciplined monetary policy, working to prevent inflation from rising while allowing their economy’s to grow without explicit monetary policy support.  But it seems that another symptom of the Covid-19 pandemic is that it has reversed the ‘polarity’ of central bank thinking.  Mexico is the 4th major EMG nation (Russia, Brazil and Poland are the others) to have raised rates and are anticipated to continue doing so to combat rising prices.  Meanwhile, when the Bank of Canada reduced the amount of its QE purchases, it was not only the first G10 bank to actually remove some amount of monetary largess, it was seen as extraordinary.  





In the States, yesterday we heard from six more Fed speakers and it has become evident that there are two distinct views on the FOMC as to the proper course of action, although to a (wo)man, every speaker exclaimed that inflation was transitory.  Several regional Fed presidents (Bullard, Bostic and Kaplan) are clearly in the camp of tapering QE and potentially raising rates by the end of next year, but the Fed leadership (Powell, Clarida, Williams) are adamantly opposed to the idea of tightening policy anytime soon.  And the thing is, the hawks don’t even have a vote this year, although they do get to participate in the conversation.  The upshot is that it seems highly unlikely that the Fed is going to tighten policy anytime at all this year regardless of inflation readings going forward.  While ‘transitory’ has always been a fuzzy term, my take has always been a 2-3 quarter view, but yesterday we started to hear it could mean 2 years or more.  If that is the case, then prepare for a much worse ultimate outcome along with a much weaker dollar.





As markets and investors digest the latest central bank dogma, let us peruse the latest price action.  Yesterday’s equity market price action led to yet another set of new all-time highs in US indices and even Mexico’s Bolsa rose 0.75% after the rate hike!  Overnight saw a continuation of that view with the Nikkei (+0.65%), Hang Seng (+1.4%) and Shanghai (+1.15%) all rallying nicely.  Perhaps a bit more surprisingly this morning has seen a weaker performance in Europe (DAX -0.15%, CAC -0.1%, FTSE 100 +0.1%) despite slightly better than expected Confidence data out of Germany and Italy.  As vaccinations proceed apace on the continent, expectations for a renewed burst of growth are rising, yet today’s stock markets seem unimpressed.





At the same time, despite all the Fedspeak and concern over inflation, the 10-year Treasury yield has basically been unchanged all week and seems to have found a new home at 1.50%, right where it is now.  Since it had been a harbinger for markets up until the FOMC meeting last week, this is a bit surprising.  As to Europe, bonds there are actually under some pressure this morning (Bunds +1.7bps, OATs +2.9bps, Gilts +1.2bps) although given equity market performance, one is hard-pressed to call this a risk-on move.  Perhaps these markets are responding to the better tone of data, but they are not in sync with the equity space.





In commodity markets, prices are mixed this morning.  While oil (-0.25%) is softer, gold (+0.5%) and silver (+1.0%) are looking awfully good.  Base metals, too, are having a better session with Cu (+0.4%), Al (+1.5%) and Sn (+0.2%) all performing well.  Crop prices are also rising, between 0.25% and 0.5%.  Fear not for oil, however, as it remains firmly ensconced in its uptrend.





And lastly, in FX markets, the dollar is under modest pressure across most of the G10, with the bulk of the bloc firmer by between 0.1% and 0.2%, and only GBP (-0.2%) softer.  While we did see a slightly weaker than expected GfK Consumer Confidence number for the UK last night (-9 vs. expected -7) we also just saw CBI Retail Sales print at a much better than expected level.  In the end, it is hard to ascribe the pound’s movement, or any of the G10 really, to data.  It is far more likely positions being adjusted into the weekend.





In the emerging markets, the dollar is having a much tougher time with ZAR (+1.0%) and KRW (+0.6%) the leading gainers, but a number of currencies showing strength beyond ordinary market fluctuations.  While the rand’s move seems outsized, the strength in commodity prices is likely behind the trend in ZAR lately.  As to KRW, it seems that as well as the general risk on attitude, the market is pricing in the first policy tightening in Seoul and given the won’s recent mild weakness, traders were seen taking advantage to establish long positions.





We have some important data today led by Personal Income (exp -2.5%), Personal Spending (0.4%) and Core PCE (0.6% M/M, 3.4% Y/Y).  Then at 10:00 we see Michigan Confidence (86.5).  I want to believe the PCE data is important, but I fear that regardless of where it prints, it will be ignored as a product of base effects and so not a true reflection of the price situation.  Yesterday, Claims data was a bit worse than expected as was Durable Goods.  This is not to say things are collapsing, but it is growing more and more apparent, at least based on the data, that the peak in the economy has already been seen.  In fact, the Atlanta Fed GDPNow model has fallen back below 10.0% and appears to be trending lower.  The worst possible outcome for the economy would be slowing growth and rising inflation, and I fear that is where we may be heading given the current fiscal and monetary policy settings.  





That combination will be abysmal for the dollar but is unlikely to be clear before many more months have passed.  For now, I expect the dollar will revert to its risk profile, where risk-on days will see weakness and risk-off days see strength.  Today feels far more risk-on like and so a little further dollar weakness into the weekend seems a reasonable assumption.





Good luck, good weekend and stay safe





Adf

			

	
	



				
					


	

		

			Feeling Upbeat
		


				

			Posted on  by 		

			


		

		

The last central bank set to meet





This month is on Threadneedle Street





No change is expected





Though some have projected





The hawks there are feeling upbeat





Market focus this morning will be on the Bank of England’s policy meeting as it is the last of the major central banks to meet this month.  We have already had a tumultuous time between the ECB’s uber dovishness and the Fed’s seeming turn toward the hawkish side of the spectrum.  Of course, the Fed has largely tried to walk that idea back, but it remains firmly implanted in the market dialog.  As to the UK, growth there, despite more draconian lockdown measures still being imposed in the face of the delta variant of Covid, has been expanding rapidly according to the GDP readings while PMI data points to a continuation of that trend.  Not surprisingly, given the supply side constraints that are evident elsewhere in the world, the UK is also dealing with that issue and so prices have been rising apace.  In fact, the CPI data released last week showed the highest print in more than two years.  Of course, that print was 2.1%, hardly a number to instill fear in anyone’s heart.





And yet, the amount of talk about the need to tighten monetary policy in the UK is remarkable.  At least in the US, we are looking at exceptionally high CPI data, with numbers not seen in decades.  In contrast, CPI in the UK averaged nearly 3.0% for all of 2017, well above the most recent reading.  Not only that, but it was only at the last meeting that the BOE reaffirmed that QE was necessary to support the economy.  The idea that in 6 weeks things have changed that much seems fanciful.  That’s not to say that the committee won’t be discussing potential tightening down the road, especially if recent economic trends continue, but I find it hard to believe that given the ongoing disruptions that are still extant, there can be any serious considerations of change.  As it stands, the market is currently pricing a 15 basis point hike by next June, which would take the base rate back up to 0.25%.  





Arguably, the fact that the market is this focused on what should be a non-event is a good indication of the lack of interesting stories at the moment.  With the ECB and Fed behind us, and with both central banks furiously trying to drive the narrative to their preferred story of transitory inflation and no reason to worry, traders are looking for any opportunity to make a buck.  Some of the previous ideas, whether Bitcoin or meme stocks, have largely lost their luster.  The inflation trade, too, is having a harder time as so many commodity prices have retreated from their early Spring highs.  In this situation, it is not unusual for traders to focus on any potential catalyst far in excess of its importance.  I would contend, that is exactly what we are seeing here and that when the BOE announcement comes, it will have nothing to add to the story.





It can be no surprise, then, that market activity overnight has been extremely quiet overall.  As traders and investors look for the next big thing, volumes tend to decrease, and volatility can abate for a short period of time.  For instance, equity markets in Asia showed almost no pulse with both the Nikkei and Shanghai indices unchanged on the day while the Hang Seng managed to eke out a 0.25% gain.  Europe, on the other hand, is having a go of it, with gains in the DAX (+0.8%) and CAC (+1.0%) after much stronger than forecast confidence data was released.  The FTSE 100 (+0.3% ahead of the BOE) seems to want to join the party but is awaiting the BOE release before really moving.  And, after several desultory sessions with very limited movement in the US, futures this morning are higher by 0.5% across the board.





Bond markets are similarly quiet with modest price declines in Treasuries (+0.8bps), Bunds (+0.9bps) and OATs (+0.9bps) seen at this hour.  Gilts are essentially unchanged, clearly awaiting the BOE meeting before traders are willing to get too involved.





Commodity prices started the session with a mix of gainers and losers, but at this hour, most have turned lower.  Oil (-0.2%) is just backing off slightly but remains in a strong uptrend.  While precious metals (Au +0.2%, Ag +0/6%) stick out for being a bit higher on the day, we are seeing weakness in Copper (-0.2%), Aluminum (-0.4%) and most of the ancillary metals as well as the agricultural space with the three main crops all lower by at least 1.0%.





As to the dollar, it is a bit softer this morning with NOK (+0.4%) the leading gainer despite oil’s reversal from early morning gains.  But there is strength in SEK (+0.3%), NZD (+0.25%) and essentially the entire G10 bloc, albeit only modest in size.  It is difficult to point to specific catalysts for this movement, although Sweden’s PPI data did print much higher than forecast leading to some speculation, they too would soon be tightening policy.





***BOE leave policy unchanged, rates on hold***





The first reaction to the BOE news is a modest decline in the pound (-0.2%) although I expect it will remain choppy for now.





Quickly turning to the EMG bloc, the dollar is softer here almost universally with RUB (+0.45%) the leading gainer and PLN (+0.4%) right behind it.  The latter is benefitting from talk that rising inflationary pressures will lead to tighter monetary policy, while the ruble, along with the krone, seems to be maintaining its early gains despite oil’s pullback.  





On the data front, this morning brings the usual weekly Initial Claims (exp 380K) and Continuing Claims (3.46M) as well as Durable Goods (2.8%, 0.7% ex transport).  We also get the final look at Q1 GDP (6.4%) which is forecast to be unchanged from the previous reading.  Tomorrow we will see Core PCE, which is the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, but we can discuss that then.





Overall, it is shaping up to be a dull day.  Further comments from the BOE are highlighting the transitory nature of inflation there, with a statement indicating that while 3.0% inflation will be coming, it will not last very long.  As I continue to type, the pound continues to slide, now down 0.3%, and interest rate markets are adjusting as well, with the rate hike scenario being pushed further into the future.  





The one area where we could get some movement is from the Fed speakers, with six on today’s calendar.  Yesterday, Atlanta Fed president Bostic was the first since the FOMC meeting last week, to reiterate that tapering would be appropriate soon as well as higher rates.  But the preponderance of evidence remains that the Fed is uninterested in doing anything for a long while yet.  I think things will get more interesting for them later in the year if inflation figures continue to run hot, but for now, they remain confident they are in control.





As to the dollar, unless we start hearing a lot more hawkish rhetoric from the Fed speakers, my sense is that it will continue to drift slightly lower in its current trading range.





Good luck and stay safe





Adf

			

	
	



				
					


	

		

			Bears Have Retreated
		


				

			Posted on  by 		

			


		

		

At first, no one thought it could be





That Powell would lessen QE





But less than a week





Was needed to wreak





Destruction ‘pon his new decree




















The bond market bears have retreated





With steepeners now all deleted





While stocks are unsure





If this is the cure





And just how this news should be greeted















Last week’s FOMC meeting continues to be the main topic of market discussion as many assumptions have been questioned, especially those of the inflationist camp.  The change in the dot plot was clearly unforeseen and has been the talk of the market ever since.  Arguably, there are two key questions that have arisen in the wake of the meeting; 1) what happened to the Fed’s insistence that they would not adjust policy preemptively based on forecasts? and 2) is maximum employment no longer deemed to be an Unemployment Rate near 3.5%?





What has been made very clear, however, is that the market still believes the Fed can address inflation, or at the very least, that the market buys the Fed’s transitory inflation narrative.  Regarding the latter, it relies almost entirely on the idea that supply-side bottlenecks will be quickly addressed, thus forcing prices lower and reducing the inflationary threat.  My question is, why do so many assume that restarting production can be accomplished so quickly?  In many cases, businesses have closed, thus no longer manufacturing products.  In others, businesses are running shorter or fewer shifts due to the inability to hire/retain staff to operate.  Glibly, many say that those businesses can simply raise wages to attract staff.  And while that may be true, you can be sure that will result in rising prices as well.  So, if supply returns at a higher price point, is that not still inflationary? 





Under the theory that a picture is worth a thousand words, I have created a decision matrix that outlines my sense of how things may play out over the coming months.  Having observed the Fed and its reaction function to market situations for quite a long time, I remain convinced that despite all the rhetoric regarding maximum employment or inflation expectations, the single most important data point for the Fed is the S&P 500.  History has shown that when it declines sharply, between 10%-20%, they will step in, ease policy in some manner and seek to assuage the investment community regardless of trivialities like inflation, GDP growth or unemployment.  Thus far, nothing the Fed has done has changed that opinion.





Remember, these are my personal views and I assigned rough probabilities along with estimates of what could happen under the defined scenarios.  Ultimately, the question that keeps haunting me is; if inflation is transitory, why would they need to taper policy easing?  After all, the underlying assumption is that the current policy remains economically supportive without negative inflationary consequences, so why change?  I believe the answer to this question belies the entire Fed narrative.  But that’s just me.  The highlighted area is the expected outcome in one year’s time based on Friday’s closing markets (BCOM = Bloomberg Commodity Index).  Interestingly, the math worked out where I saw weaker stocks, higher yields, a weaker dollar and higher commodities.  In truth, if inflation is in our future, that does not seem to be wrong.










As to markets this morning, while Asian equity markets were largely under pressure (Nikkei -3.3%, Hang Seng -1.1%, Shanghai +0.1%), still reeling from the Fed’s allegedly hawkish stance, Europe is modestly firmer (DAX +0.7%, CAC +0.3%, FTSE 100 +0.2%).  Perhaps hawks only fly East.  US futures are also higher this morning, by roughly 0.5%, as the early concerns over tighter policy have clearly been allayed, by what though, I’m not sure.





Of course, all the real action has been in the bond market, where yields worldwide have fallen sharply since the FOMC meeting.  Not only have yields fallen, but curves have flattened dramatically as well with movement on both ends of the curve, shorter dated yields have risen under the new assumption that the Fed will be raising rates, while the bank end has rallied sharply with yields declining as investors ostensibly believe that inflation is, in fact, transitory.  While the overnight session has seen minimal movement (Treasuries 0.0bps, Bunds =0.4bps, Gilts -0.3bps), the movement since Wednesday has been impressive.  The $64 billion question is, will this new movement continue into a deeper trend, or reverse as new data is released.





Commodity prices have not yet abandoned the inflation story, at least some of them haven’t.  Oil (+0.2%) continues to perform well as demand continues apace and supply remains in the crosshairs of every ESG focused investor.  Precious metals have rallied on the back of declining yields, both real and nominal, but base metals have slipped as there is a growing belief that they were massively overbought on an inflation scare that has now been defused.  Funnily enough, I always had the commodity/inflation relationship the other way around, with higher commodity prices driving inflation.





Finally, the dollar this morning is weaker from Friday’s levels, but still generally stronger from its levels post FOMC.  The crosscurrents here are strong.  On the one hand, transitory inflation means less reason for a depreciating currency while on the other, lower rates that come with less inflation make the dollar less attractive.  At the same time, if risk is going to be back in vogue, the dollar will lose support as well. 





On the data front, there is a fair amount of data this week, although nothing of note today.





TuesdayExisting Home Sales5.71M
WednesdayFlash PMI Manufacturing61.5
 Flash PMIM Services70.0
 New Home Sales871K
ThursdayInitial Claims380K
 Continuing Claims3481K
 Durable Goods2.9%
 -ex transport0.7%
 Q1 GDP6.4%
FridayPersonal Income-2.7%
 Personal Spending0.4%
 Core PCE0.5% (3.9% Y/Y)
 Michigan Sentiment86.5





Source: Bloomberg





As well as all of this, we heard from ten different Fed speakers, including Chairman Powell testifying to Congress tomorrow afternoon.  It would seem there will be a significant effort to fine tune their message in the wake of last week’s meeting and the market volatility.





The dollar’s strength had been predicated on the idea that US yields were increasing and if that is no longer the case, my sense is that the dollar is likely to retrace its recent steps higher.  For those who with currency payables, keep that in mind.





Good luck and stay safe





Adf

			

	
	



				
					


	

		

			Hard to Explain
		


				

			Posted on  by 		

			


		

		
For those who believe that inflation


Is soon to explode ‘cross the nation


It’s hard to explain


Why yields only wane


Resulting in angst and vexation


But there is a possible clue


That might help the bond bears’ world view


In Q1 Ms. Yellen


Had Treasury sellin’


More bonds than the Fed could accrue


However, that’s no longer true


As Powell, through all of Q2


Will buy more each week


Than Janet will seek


To sell.  Lower yields then ensue.


With the FOMC meeting on the near horizon, traders are loath to take large positions in case there is a major surprise.  At this point, the market appears to broadly believe that any tapering talk is not going to happen until the Jackson Hole meeting in August, so the hawks are not expecting a boost.  At the same time, there is virtually no expectation that the Fed would consider increasing QE, thus the doves remain reliant on the transitory inflation narrative.  As it stands, the doves continue to hold the upper hand as while last week’s CPI print was shockingly high,  there has been much written about the drivers of that number are all due to level off shortly, and inflation will soon head back to its old 1.5%-2.0% range.


One of the things to which the doves all point is the 10-year yield and how it has done nothing but decline since the beginning of the quarter.  Now, that is a fair point, but the timing is also quite interesting.  While pundits on both sides of the discussion continue to point to inflation expectations and supply chain breakages and qualitative measures, there is something that has gotten far less press, but could well account for the counterintuitive movement in Treasury yields amid much higher inflation prints: the amount of Treasuries purchased by the Fed vs. the amount of new Treasuries issued by the Treasury.


In Q1, the US government issued net $342 billion while the Fed bought $240 billion in Treasury securities as part of QE.  (Remember, the other $120 billion was in mortgage-backed securities).  Given that foreign government buying of Treasuries has virtually disappeared, it should be no surprise that yields rose in order to attract buyers.  Q2, however, has seen a very different dynamic, as the US government has only issued $70 billion this quarter while the Fed continues to buy $240 billion each quarter.  With a price insensitive buyer hoovering up all the available securities and more, it is no surprise that Treasury yields have fallen.  Why, you may ask, has the Treasury only issued $70 billion in new debt?  Two things are driving that situation; first, Q2 is the big tax payment quarter of the year, so lots of cash flows into the Treasury; and second, the Treasury at the end of last year had $1.6 trillion in cash in their General Account at the Fed, which is essentially the government’s checking account.  However, they have drawn those balances down by half, thus have not needed to issue as much debt.


It’s funny how the move in yields just might be a simple supply/demand story, but that is not nearly as much fun as the narrative game.  So, let’s take a glimpse into Q3 planned Treasury issuance, which is widely available on the Treasury’s own website.  “During the July – September 2021 quarter, Treasury expects to borrow $821 billion in privately-held net marketable debt, assuming an end-of-September cash balance of $750 billion.”  The Fed, of course, is expected to buy another $240 billion in Treasuries in Q3, however, that appears to be a lot less than expected issuance.  My spidey-sense is tingling here, and telling me that come July, we are going to start to see yields turn higher again.  Far from the idea of tapering, if yields are rising sharply akin to Q1’s price action, we could see the Fed increase QE!  After all, somebody needs to buy those bonds.  And while this will be going on in the background, what we will largely read about is the changes in the narrative and inflation expectations.  As Occam pointed out with his razor, the simplest explanation is usually the best.


If this, admittedly, rough analysis has any validity, it is likely to have some very big impacts on markets in general, and on the dollar in particular.  In fact, if yields do reverse and head higher, especially if we move toward that 2.0% 10-year yield (or further) look for the dollar to find a lot of support.


As to market activity today, things remain fairly quiet with the recent positive risk attitude intact, but hardly excessively so.  Starting with equities in Asia, the Nikkei (+0.75%) had a nice gain after a better than expected IP print but was lonely with a holiday in China and through much of the continent keeping other markets closed.  Europe is in the green, but the gains are mostly modest (DAX +0.2%, CAC +0.2%, FTSE 100 +0.4%) as a slightly better than expected IP print along with continued dovish comments from Madame Lagarde help underpin the equity markets there.  Meanwhile, US futures are also modestly higher, but the NASDAQ’s 0.3% rise is by far the largest.


Turning to the bond market this morning, Treasury yields have backed up 0.8bps, but remain well below the 1.50% level which was seen as key support.  As per the above, I imagine that it will be a month before the real fireworks begin.  In Europe, while we did hear from Lagarde, we also heard from uber-hawk Robert Holtzmann, Austria’s central bank president, who was adamant that barring another Covid related shutdown, the PEPP will end in March.  Italian BTP’s were the most impacted bond from those comments with yields rising 2.0bps, while the main markets are seeing virtually no movement this morning.


In the commodity space, there is a real dichotomy today with oil (+0.7%) continuing its recent rally while gold (-1.1%) has fallen sharply.  Base metals have been mixed with relatively modest movement, but agricultural prices have fallen sharply (Soybeans -0.8%, Wheat -2.6%, Corn -2.8%) which appears to be a response to improved weather conditions.


Finally, the dollar has no real direction this morning.  NOK (+0.35%) is the leading gainer in the G10 on the back of oil’s rally but after that, there is a mix of gainers and losers, none of which have moved 0.2% implying no real new driving forces.  In the EMG bloc, last night saw KRW (-0.5%) catch up to Friday’s dollar rally, and this morning we see ZAR (-0.45%) as the worst performer on what seems to be market technicals, with traders beginning to establish new ZAR shorts after a very strong rally during the past year.  Some think it has gone too far.  But really, the FX market is not terribly interesting right now as we all await the Fed on Wednesday.


On the data front, there is some important information coming as follows:






Tuesday
Retail Sales
-0.6%





-ex autos
0.4%





PPI
0.5% (6.2% Y/Y)





-ex food & energy
0.5% (4.8% Y/Y)





IP
0.6%





Capacity Utilization
75.1%




Wednesday
Housing Starts
1640K





Building Permits
1730K





FOMC Decision
0.00% – 0.25%




Thursday
Initial Claims
360K





Continuing Claims
3.42M





Philly Fed
31.0





Leading Indicators
1.3%






Source: Bloomberg


So, while tomorrow will see much discussion regarding the growth narrative after Retail Sales, the reality is everybody is simply focused on the Fed on Wednesday.  Until then, I expect range trading.  After that…


Good luck and stay safe


Adf

			

	
	



				
					


	

		

			A ZIRP Doctrinaire
		


				

			Posted on  by 		

			


		

		
The lady who once ran the Fed


And, Treasury, now runs instead


Explained higher rates


Right here in the States


Are something that she wouldn’t dread


But when she was Fed Reserve chair


And she had a chance to forswear


That rates should stay low


Her answer was, no


As she was a ZIRP doctrinaire


“If we ended up with a slightly higher interest rate environment it would actually be a plus for society’s point of view and the Fed’s point of view.  We’ve been fighting inflation that’s too low and interest rates that are too low now for a decade.  We want them to go back to a normal interest rate environment, and if this helps a little bit to alleviate things then that’s not a bad thing, that’s a good thing.”  So said Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in a Bloomberg News interview as she was returning from the G7 FinMin meeting in London.


What are we to make of these comments?  Arguably, the first thing to note is that the myth of Fed independence is not merely shattered, but rather that the Treasury now explicitly runs both fiscal and monetary policy.  Can Chairman Powell resist a call for higher rates from his boss?  And yet this is diametrically opposed to everything we have heard from the majority of the FOMC lately, namely until “substantial further progress” is made toward achieving their key goal of maximum employment, policy is going to remain as is.  In other words, they are going to continue to buy $120 billion per month of Treasury and mortgage backed paper.  However, QE’s entire raison d’etre is to keep rates lower.  Does this mean tapering is going to begin soon?  Will they be talking about it at next week’s FOMC meeting?  Again, based on all we had heard up through the beginning of the quiet period, there was only a small minority of FOMC members who were keen to slow down the purchases.  Is Yellen a majority of one by herself?


The other thing that seems odd about this is that elsewhere in the interview she strongly backed the need for the proposed $4 trillion of additional government spending, which is going to largely be funded by issuing yet more Treasury debt.  I fail to understand the benefit, for the Treasury (or taxpayers) of spending more on debt service due to higher interest rates.  Or perhaps, Yellen was simply saying she thought spreads over Treasuries should rise, so others paid more, but the US still paid the least amount possible.  Somehow, though, I don’t believe the latter sentiment is what she meant.  (A cynic might assume she was short Treasuries in her PA after Friday’s data and was simply looking for a quick profit.  But, of course, no government official would ever seek to gain personally from their official role…right?)


Regardless of her motivation, the market took it to heart and 10-year Treasury yields have backed up 2.5 bps this morning, although that is after Friday’s very strong rally (yields fell more than 7 basis points) on the back of the weaker than expected NFP report convinced the market that tapering was now put off for much longer.


Which brings us to Friday’s data.  Once again, the NFP report missed the mark, with a gain of 559K, well below the 675K expected.  Interestingly, despite last month’s even bigger miss, revisions were miniscule, just 27K higher.  So, at least according to the BLS, job growth is not nearly as fast as previously expected/hoped.  What makes this so interesting was last week’s ADP data showed nearly 1 million new jobs were taken.  It appears that Covid has had a significant impact on econometric models as well as the economy writ large.  Of course, the stock market took this goldilocks scenario as quite bullish and we saw equity markets rally nicely on Friday.


In sum, Yellen’s comments seem a bit out of step with everything we had previously understood.  There is, though, one other possibility.  Perhaps Ms Yellen understands that inflation is not going to be transitory and that the Fed may well find itself forced to raise rates to address this situation.  If this is the case, then the fact that the Treasury Secretary has already explained she thinks higher rates would be “a good thing,” it leaves the Fed the leeway needed to address the coming inflationary wave.  One thing is certain, the inflation discussion is going to be with us for quite a while yet.


Market activity overnight has been fairly dull despite the Yellen comments, with equity markets mixed in Asia (Nikkei +0.3%, Hang Seng -0.45%, Shanghai +0.2%) although European markets have started to climb after a very slow start (DAX +0.2%, CAC +0.3%, FTSE 100 +0.3%).  US futures are mixed to slightly lower as NASDAQ futures (-0.35%) feel the force of potentially higher interest rates, while the other two indices are little changed.  (Remember, tech/growth stocks are akin to having extremely long bond duration, so higher interest rates tend to push these stocks lower.)


As mentioned, Yellen’s comments have led to Treasuries falling, and we have seen the same behavior in Europe with sovereigns there looking at yields higher by between 1.5 and 2.0 bps at this hour.  Higher interest rates have also had a negative impact on commodity prices with oil (-0.4%), gold (-0.25%), copper (-1.0%) and aluminum (-1.0%) all under pressure.  The one exception in the commodity space is foodstuff where the grains are all higher by at least 1.5% this morning.


Finally, the currency market is mixed although arguably leaning toward slight dollar weakness.  In the G10, the most notable mover is NOK (+0.5%) which is gaining despite oil’s weakness on the assumption that it will be the first G10 country to actually raise interest rates, with Q4 this year now targeted.  But away from that, the other 9 currencies are within 0.2% of Friday’s close with no stories of note.  In the emerging markets, MXN (+0.85%) is the runaway leader after yesterday’s elections handed AMLO a loss of his supermajority in the Mexican congress.  It seems investors are glad to see a check on his populist agenda of spending.  Beyond that, we see TRY (+0.5%) benefitting from hopes that President Biden’s meeting with Turkish President Erdogan will result in reduced tensions between the two countries.  And lastly, KRW (+0.3%) continues to see investment inflows drive the currency higher.


On the data front, there was nothing of note overnight, but this week has some important activities, namely US CPI and the ECB meeting.






Tuesday
NFIB Small Biz Optimism
100.9





Trade Balance
-$68.5B





JOLTS Job Openings
8.3M




Thursday
ECB Meeting






CPI
0.4% (4.7% Y/Y)





-ex food & energy
0.4% (3.4% Y/Y)





Initial Claims
370K





Continuing Claims
3.7M




Friday
Michigan Sentiment
84.2






Source: Bloomberg


Clearly, all eyes will be on CPI later this week as while widely expected to be rising again due to base effects, it is important to remember that it has risen far faster than even those expectations.  While the Fed remains quiet, the ECB is likely to reiterate that it is going to be keeping a ‘stepped up pace’ of asset purchases.  Although there is a great deal of belief in the dollar weakness story, I assure you, the ECB is not interested in the euro rallying much further.  Just like the Chinese, it appears most countries have had enough of a weak dollar.  Until the next cues, however, it seems unlikely that there will be large movement in the FX market.


Good luck and stay safe


Adf

			

	
	



				
					


	

		

			Filled with Frustration
		


				

			Posted on  by 		

			


		

		
The Beige Book explained ‘round the nation


That growth was up, as was inflation


As well, we all learned


Of job offers spurned


And businesses filled with frustration


Meanwhile, round the world, PMI’s


Of Services were no surprise


As nations reopen


Most people are hopin’


The world will, at last, normalize


Ahead of tomorrow’s NFP report in the US, one which given last month’s extraordinary miss will be closely scrutinized by both investors and the Fed, most markets appear to be biding their time in narrow ranges.  This was largely true yesterday and so far, remains the case in the Asian and European sessions.  This lull in activity offers an excellent time to consider the supporting data that we have received in the past twenty-four hours, as well as the remainder due this morning.


Starting with the Fed’s Beige Book yesterday, the report highlighted the features of the economy we have been hearing about for the past several months.  The lifting of Covid inspired restrictions has led to strong increases in demand for products and services ranging from houses and cars to hotels and restaurants.  Business owners indicated that a combination of supply chain bottlenecks and increased demand have been forcing prices higher and that they saw no reason for that to end soon.  They also continue to comment on their inability to hire the workers necessary to satisfy demand, especially in lower wage segments of the economy.  The anecdote I feel best illustrates the issue came from St Louis where a job fair held by a dozen restaurants to fill more than one hundred open positions drew only twelve candidates!  It certainly appears as though the ongoing extra Federal unemployment benefits being offered through September are discouraging a lot of people from going back to work.


One of the underlying beliefs regarding the Fed’s transitory inflation story is that supply chain interruptions will quickly resolve themselves.  And it is not just the Fed that believes this will be the case, but virtually every other economist as well.  But I wonder, what prompts their faith in that outcome?  After all, with available labor scarce, who is going to relink those chains?  Consider, as well, industries like mining and extraction of raw materials.  Shortages of copper and iron ore require the reopening of mines or excavating new ones.  One of the impacts of Covid was that not only were current operating mines closed, but capex was drastically cut, so there is a significant disruption in the exploration process.  Add to that the rise of ESG as a business objective, which will, at the very least slow, if not prevent, the opening of new sources of these raw materials, and it becomes quite easy to believe that these bottlenecks will remain for more than just a few months.  In fact, it would not be surprising if it was several years before the supply/demand balance in many commodities is achieved.  Given the current assessment is a lack of supply, you can be certain that prices will continue to rise far longer than the Fed will have you believe.


As to the overnight session, we were regaled with the Services PMI data from around the world.  In Asia we saw Australia solid, at 58.0, and right in line with last month, while Japan, 46.5, did show a marginal increase, but remains well below the growth-contraction line of 50.0.  China’s Caixin data, at 55.1, was disappointing vs. expectations as well as lower by 1.2 points compared to April’s reading.  Is the Chinese economy beginning to roll over?  That is a question that is starting to be asked and would also explain the PBOC’s sudden concern over a too-strong renminbi.  In a strong economy, a rising currency is acceptable, but if things are not as good, currency strength is an unwelcome event.  Finally, the last major Asian nation reporting, India, showed awful data, 46.4, demonstrating the huge negative impact the recent wave of Covid infections is having on the economy there.


The European story was a bit better overall, with Germany (52.8 as expected), France (56.6 as expected), Italy (53.1 better than expected) and the Eurozone (55.2 slightly better than expected) all demonstrating the recovery is underway on the continent.  As well, the UK continues to burn brightly with a 62.9 reading, more than a point higher than forecast.  And don’t forget, later this morning the US releases both the PMI data (exp 70.1) as well as ISM Services (63.2) both demonstrating that the US economy remains the global leader for now.  With that in mind, it is kind of odd that the dollar is so hated, isn’t it?


The other data coming this morning will give us our first hints at tomorrow’s NFP with ADP Employment (exp 650K) released 15 minutes before both Initial (387K) and Continuing (3.614M) Claims.  As well, at 8:30 we see Nonfarm Productivity (5.5%) and Unit Labor Costs (-0.4%), which on the surface would indicate there are no wage pressures at all but continue to be distorted by the past year’s data outcomes.


As to the market situation, while equity markets in Asia were mixed (Nikkei +0.4%, Hang Seng -1.1%, Shanghai -0.4%), Europe has turned completely red (DAX -0.5%, CAC -0.4%, FTSE 100 -0.9%) despite the solid PMI data.  This feels far more like some profit taking ahead of tomorrow’s data as well as the upcoming ECB meeting next week.  US futures are also under pressure, with all three major indices lower by between 0.5% and 0.75%.


What is interesting about the market is that despite the selloff in stocks, we are seeing a selloff in bonds as well, with Treasury yields higher by 1.5bps and European sovereigns all higher by at least 1 basis point (Bunds +1.1bps, OATs +1.4bps, Gilts +2.7bps).  This, of course, begs the question, if investors are selling both stocks and bonds, what are they buying?


The answer is not clear at this point.  Oil (WTI -0.1%) while outperforming everything else, is still down on the day, as are gold (-0.65%) and silver (-1.4%).  Base metals?  Well, copper (-1.0%) is clearly not the winner, although aluminum (+0.25%) is the only green spot on the screen.  Well, that and agricultural products with Soybeans (+1.25%), Wheat (+1.0%) and Corn (+0.85%) all quite strong this morning, punctuating the idea that food inflation is running at its highest level in more than a decade according to a just released UN report.  That is something I certainly see every week at Shop-Rite and I imagine so does everyone else.


Finally, a look at the FX market shows the dollar is having a pretty good day all around.  In the G10, the pound (+0.1%) is the only currency to hold its own vs. the greenback, with the rest of the bloc lower by between 0.2% and 0.4%.  Frankly, this simply looks like a risk-off session as investors are selling both stocks and bonds across the G10, and no longer need to hold the local currencies.  In the EMG bloc, the story is largely the same, with only INR (+0.25%) rising and the rest of the bloc under some pressure.  The rupee movement seems to be more technical as alongside weak PMI data, the RBI meeting, coming up tonight, is expected to see policy remain unchanged with a dovish bias given the ongoing Covid problems in the country.  On the downside, while most currencies are lower, aside from TRY (-0.5%) on slightly lower inflation, therefore less need to maintain high rates, the rest of the bloc’s declines are only on the order of -0.2%.  Finally, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention yesterday’s price action in LATAM currencies, where we saw significant strength in BRL (+1.5%) and CLP (+1.1%) which has been a broad continuation of funds flowing back into the region.


We have a few more Fed speakers today, but they all say exactly the same thing all the time, it seems, that they are thinking about considering starting a discussion on tapering.  In this vein, there was a big announcement yesterday that the Fed would be unwinding one of the emergency bond buying programs, the secondary market corporate program, and selling out the $13 billion of bonds and ETF’s they own.  Of course, that is such a tiny proportion of their balance sheet, and of that market in truth, it seems unlikely to matter at all.


My observation lately has been that NY tends to go against the prevailing trend for the day during its session, meaning on a day like today, when the dollar is well bid as NY arrives, I would look for a bit of dollar selling.  We shall see, but in fairness, all eyes are really on tomorrow.


Good luck and stay safe


Adf

			

	
	



				
					


	

		

			High Tide
		


				

			Posted on  by 		

			


		

		
The dollar continues to slide

But is risk approaching high tide?

Last night t’was the Kiwis

Who hinted that their ease

Of policy may soon subside


As well, from the Fed yesterday

Three speakers had two things to say

It soon may be time

To change paradigm

Inflation, though, ain’t here to stay


“There will come a time in upcoming meetings, we’ll be at the point where we can begin to discuss scaling back the pace of asset purchases.”  So said, Fed Vice-Chairman Richard Clarida yesterday.  “We are talking about talking about tapering,” commented San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly in a CNBC interview yesterday.  And lastly, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans explained, “the recent increase in inflation does not appear to be the precursor of a persistent movement to undesirably high levels of inflation.  I have not seen anything yet to persuade me to change my full support of our accommodative stance for monetary policy or our forward guidance about the path for policy.”


The Fed’s onslaught of forward guidance continues at full speed as virtually every day at least two or three Fed speakers reiterate that policy is perfect for the current situation, but in a nod to the growing chorus of pundits about higher inflation, they are willing to indicate that there will come a time, at some uncertain point in the future, when it may be appropriate to consider rolling back their current policy initiatives.


But ask yourself this; if inflation is going to be transitory, that implies that the current policy settings are not a proximate cause of rising prices.  If that is the case, why discuss tapering?  After all, high growth and low inflation would seem to be exactly the outcome that a central bank wants to achieve, and according to their narrative, that is exactly what they have done.  Why change?


This is just one of the conundra that is attendant to the current Fed policy.  On the one hand, they claim that their policy is appropriate for the current circumstance and that they need to see substantial further progress toward their goals of maximum employment and average 2% inflation before considering changing that policy.  On the other hand, we have now heard from five separate FOMC members that a discussion about tapering asset purchases is coming, which implies that they are going to change their policy.  Allegedly, the Fed is not concerned with survey data, but want to see hard numbers showing they have achieved their goals before moving.  But those hard numbers aren’t here yet, so why discuss changing policy?


The cynical answer is that the Fed actually doesn’t focus on unemployment and inflation, but rather on the equity markets foremost and the bond market secondarily.  Consider, every time there has been a sharp dislocation lower in stocks, the Fed immediately cuts rates to try to support the S&P.  This has been the case since the Maestro himself, Alan Greenspan, responded to the 1987 stock market crash and has served to inflate numerous bubbles since then.


A more charitable explanation is that they have begun to realize that they are in an increasingly untenable position.  Since the GFC, the Fed has consistently been very slow to reduce policy accommodation when the opportunity arose and so the history shows that rates never regain their previous peak before the next recession comes along.  Recall, the peak in Fed funds since 2009 was just 2.50%, reached in December 2018 just before the Powell Pivot in the wake of a 20% drawdown in the S&P 500.  In fact, since 1980, every peak in Fed Funds has been lower than the previous one.  The outcome of this process is that the Fed will have very little room to cut rates to address the next recession, which is what led to QE in the first place and more importantly has served to reduce the Fed’s influence on the economy.  Arguably, then, a major reason the Fed is keen to normalize policy is to retain some importance in policymaking circles.  After all, if rates are permanently zero, what else can they do?


It is with this in mind that we turn our attention elsewhere in the world, specifically to New Zealand, where the RBNZ signaled that its Official Cash Rate (Fed funds equivalent) may begin to rise in mid-2022.  This is a full year before previous expectations and makes the RBNZ the 3rd G10 central bank to talk about tightening policy sooner than thought.  The Bank of Canada has already started to taper QE purchases and the BOE has explained they will be starting next year as well.  It should be no surprise that NZD (+1.15%) is the leading gainer in the FX market today, nor that kiwi bonds sold off sharply with 10-year yields rising 8bps.


Do not, however, mistake this for a universal change in policy paradigm, as not only is the Fed unwilling to commit to any changes, but the BOJ remains in stasis and the ECB, continues to protest against any idea that they will be tightening policy soon.  For instance, just this morning, ECB Executive Board Member and Bank of Italy President, Fabio Panetta, said, “Only a sustained increase in inflationary pressures, reflected in an upward trend in underlying inflation and bringing inflation and inflation expectations in line with our aim, could justify a reduction in our purchases.  But this is not what we projected in March.  And, since then, I have not seen changes in financing conditions or the economic outlook that would sift the inflation path upward.”


Investors and traders have been moving toward the view that the ECB would be tapering purchases before 2023 as evidenced by the rise in the euro as well as the rise in European sovereign yields.  But clearly, though there are some ECB members (Germany, the Netherlands) who would be very much in favor of that action, it is by no means a universal view.  Madame Lagarde will have her hands full trying to mediate this discussion.


For now, the situation remains that the central bank narrative is still the most important one for markets, and the fact that we are seeing a split amongst this august group is a key reason FX volatility remains under pressure.  The lack of an underlying theme to drive the dollar or any bloc of currencies in one direction or the other leaves price action beholden to short-term effects, large orders and the speculator community.  We need a new paradigm, or at least a reinvigoration of the old one to get real movement.


In the meantime, the dollar continues to drift lower as US yields continue to drift lower.  Right now, the bond market appears to have faith in the Fed narrative of transitory inflation, and as long as that is the case, then a weaker dollar and modestly higher stock prices are the likely outcome.


Today’s price action, NZD excepted, showed that to be the case, with APAC currencies performing well, but otherwise a mixed bag.  Equity markets are marginally higher and bond yields have largely fallen in Europe, although Treasuries are little changed after a 4bp decline yesterday.  Gold is actually the biggest winner lately, having traded back above $1900/oz as investors watch the slow destruction of fiat currency values.  But in the FX space, the USD-Treasury link remains the most important thing to watch.


Good luck and stay safe

Adf

			

	
	



				
					


	

		

			Not Really There
		


				

			Posted on  by 		

			


		

		
There once was a Fed Reserve Chair

Whose minions explained with fanfare

Though prices were climbing

With all the pump priming

Inflation was not really there


Investors responded with glee

And bought everything they did see

So, risk was a hit

While yields fell a bit

As money remains largely free


Brainerd, Bostic and Bullard, though sounding like a law firm, are actually three FOMC members who spoke yesterday.  In what has been a remarkably consistent performance by virtually every single member of the committee (Robert Kaplan excepted), they all said exactly the same thing: prices will rise due to bottlenecks and shortages in the near-term, but that this was a short-term impact of the pandemic response, and that soon those issues would abate and prices would quickly stabilize again.  They pointed to ‘well-anchored’ inflation expectations and reminded one and all that they have the tools necessary to combat inflation in the event their version of events does not come to pass.  You have to give Chairman Powell credit for convincing 16 ostensibly independent thinkers that his mantra is the only reality.


The market response was one of rainbows and unicorns, with rallies across all assets as risk was snapped up everywhere.  After all, it has been nearly two weeks since the CPI print was released at substantially higher levels than anticipated raising fears amongst investors that the Fed was losing control.  But two weeks of soothing words and relatively benign data has been sufficient to exorcise those inflation demons.  In the meantime, the Fed continues to purchase assets and expand its balance sheet as though the economy is teetering on the brink of destruction while they await the “substantial progress” toward their goals to be met.


One consequence of the Fed’s QE program has been that high-quality collateral for short term loans, a critical part of the financial plumbing of the US (and global) economy has been in short supply.  For the past two months, Treasury bill issues have been clearing at 0.00%, meaning the government’s cost of financing has been nil.  This is due to a combination of factors including the Treasury running down the balances in the Treasury General Account at the Fed (the government’s checking account) and the ongoing Fed QE purchases of $80 billion per month.  This has resulted in the Treasury needing to issue less T-bills while simultaneously injecting more funds into the economy.  Banks, meanwhile, wind up with lots of bank reserves on their balance sheets and no place to put them given the relative dearth of lending.  The upshot is that the Fed’s Reverse Repurchase Program (RRP) is seeing unprecedented demand with yields actually starting to dip below zero.  This is straining other securities markets as well given the bulk of activity in markets, especially derivatives activity, is done on a margin, not cash, basis.  While so far, there have not been any major problems, as the stress in this corner of the market increases, history shows that a weak link will break with broader negative market consequences.  For now, however, the Fed is able to brush off any concerns.


The result of the constant commentary from Fed speakers, with three more on the schedule for today, as well as the fading of the memories of the high CPI print has been a wholesale reengagement of the risk-on meme.  Growth continues to rebound, while zero interest rates continue to force investors out the risk curve to find a return.  What could possibly go wrong?


Today, the answer is, nothing.  Risk is back with a vengeance as evidenced by a strong equity session in Asia (Shanghai +2.4%, Hang Seng +1.75%, Nikkei +0.7%) and a solid one in Europe as well (DAX +0.8%, CAC +0.15%, FTSE 100 0.0%).  The Chinese (and Hong Kong) rally seems to be a product of the PBOC focusing their attentions on the commodity market, not equities, as the source of imbalances and a potential target of interventionist policies thus allowing speculators there to run free.  German equities are the beneficiary of better than expected ZEW data, with both the current conditions (95.7) and Expectations (102.9) indices leading the way.  While yesterday’s US equity rally faded a bit late in the day, futures this morning are all pointing higher by about 0.3%.


Arguably, the FOMC trio had a bigger impact on the bond market, where 10-year Treasury yields are now back below 1.60%, down 1 basis point this morning and at their lowest level in more than two weeks.  It is certainly hard to believe that the bond market is remotely concerned about inflation at this time.  Remember, though, Friday we see the core PCE print, which is the number the Fed truly cares about, and while it is forecast to print above the 2.0% target, (0.6% M/M, 2.9% Y/Y) we also know that the Fed strongly believes this is transitory and is no reason to panic.  Markets, however, if that print is even stronger, may not agree with that sentiment.


Commodity prices are having a less positive day as the ongoing concerns about Chinese actions to prevent price rises continues to weigh on sentiment.  Oil has slipped just a bit (-0.3%) but we are seeing declines in Cu (-0.4%), Al (-1.1%) and Fe (-3.1%), all directly in the crosshairs of the Chinese government.  Agricultural product prices are mixed today while precious metals remain little changed.


Finally, the dollar is mostly lower this morning with broad weakness seen in the EMG bloc, but less consistency in G10.  While SEK (+0.5%) leads the way higher, the rest of the bloc has been more mixed.  NOK (-0.2%) is clearly suffering from oil’s decline, while JPY (-0.2%) seems to be giving ground as havens are unloved.  EUR (+0.25%) has been helped by that German ZEW data as well as the beginnings of a perception that the Fed is going to be more aggressively dovish than the ECB for a long time to come.  In that event, the euro will certainly rise further, although it has a key resistance level at 1.2350 to overcome.


ZAR (+0.7%) leads the emerging market parade higher as concerns over inflation there abate, and South Africa continues to have amongst the highest real yields in the world.  KRW (+0.4%) is next in line as consumer sentiment in South Korea rose to its highest level in 3 years.  The other noteworthy move has been CNY (+0.2%) not so much for the size of the move as much as for the fact that it has breached the 6.40 level and the government has indicated they are going to be taking additional steps to open the FX market in China to help local companies hedge their own FX risks. The only laggard of note is TRY (-0.3%) which is suffering as President Erdogan has replaced yet another member of the central bank’s board, inviting concerns inflation will run higher with no response.


Data today shows Case Shiller Home Prices (exp +12.5%) as well as New Home Sales (950K) and Consumer Confidence (119.0), none of which are likely to change either Fed views or market opinions.   As mentioned above, three Fed speakers will regale us with their sermon on transitory inflation, and I expect that the dollar will remain under pressure for the time being.  In fact, until we see core PCE on Friday, it is hard to make a case that the dollar will turn around and only then if the number is higher than expected.


Good luck and stay safe

Adf