The world that we knew ere the virus
Was different, and much more desirous
‘Cause we got to ease
Whenever we’d please
And ‘flation was rare as papyrus
A few disparate thoughts this morning as there doesn’t seem to be a real theme in markets.
Starting with Chairman Powell’s comments yesterday regarding the Fed’s policy framework and how they were reviewing the current framework established in 2020, to see if it was still appropriate. It was during that policy discussion that the Fed came up with the idea of average inflation targeting, rather than maintaining a stable rate. However, Chairman Powell was candid yesterday when he explained, “The idea of an intentional, moderate overshoot proved irrelevant to our policy discussions and has remained so through today.” Ya think?
Of course, being the consummate central banker, he made sure to explain that their future failures would not be their fault. As explained in the WSJ by the Fed whisperer himself, Nick Timiraos, Powell explained that higher real interest rates might “reflect the possibility that inflation could be more volatile going forward than in the intercrisis period of the 2010s. We may be entering a period of more frequent, and potentially more persistent, supply shocks—a difficult challenge for the economy and for central banks.”
However, unlike the pre-Trump era, it’s not clear the market paid much attention to Mr Powell. Going forward, I do expect the Fed to have more market sway again, but it may be a little while before that is the case. But I think it is worthwhile for us to understand how they are thinking.
While pundits expressed they were certain
The US is who would be hurtin’
From tariffs and Trump
It turns out the slump
Is elsewhere, as he’d been assertin’
One of the themes following President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcements amongst much of the punditry was that the US was shooting itself in the foot and the US economy would be the loser in the end. My thesis had been that the US, as the consumer of last resort, was far more important to other nations’ economic growth than vice versa. Now, we know that the first look at Q1 GDP in the US was a negative number, but we also know that was entirely the result of the uptick in imports that came ahead of the tariffs. Meanwhile, private economic activity in the US grew and government activity shrank, both distinct economic positives.
Well, it turns out that the rest of the world is finding that when the US market is not as welcoming of their exports as previously seen, those economies find themselves under pressure. Yesterday we saw weaker Eurozone GDP and last night Japanese GDP declined much more than expected, -0.2% in Q1 leading to a -0.7% Y/Y result. The change in trade relations and weaker exports were the driver. Now, this is just one quarter, and not necessarily a trend, especially if trade negotiations conclude on a timely basis. But Japanese inflation remains sticky on the high side while growth is ebbing. The BOJ is unlikely to change policy anytime soon as they, like most central banks, try to figure out the underlying trends.
My take is this is going to be the scenario through the summer, and likely into the early autumn as trade deals get concluded but their impacts will take time to feel. I suspect that central banks will be reluctant to be too aggressive in either direction given the propensity of President Trump to upset the applecart of policy decisions. Ultimately, I see this as the backdrop that will result in more market volatility in both directions in response to the currently unknown policy announcements that are sure to come. If you are a hedger, maintain those hedge ratios, even if they are a little pricey, the alternative could be far worse. If you are a speculator, keep your positions smaller than you might think. Wrong is only a Trump tweet away.
And finally, let’s talk of peace
Which most folks would like to increase
Could we really see
A Trump policy
That gets global fighting to cease?
I’m going to don my tinfoil hat for a paragraph or two here, but I think we must consider the possibilities that Mr Trump has far larger plans for a geopolitical realignment than most are aware. I discussed the remarkable Iranian proposal to re-enter the brotherhood of nations yesterday. The recent history of war shows that it is a) hugely profitable for a select number of companies and b) generally inflationary. Mr Trump’s overtures throughout the Middle East this week, as he seems to be cementing relationships with the leadership there could well have a motive beyond lower oil prices. I read a remarkable piece from Dr Pippa Malmgrenyesterday that pulled together many threads as to potential motivations for Trump’s activities and they were framed as the enemy is not necessarily Russia or China or Iran, but rather the deep-state in the US (I told you it was tinfoil hat territory). There is a group in government who profits immensely from the ongoing war footing and who are not interested in seeing peace break out all over.
I have no idea if Mr Trump can be successful in this endeavor, but if he is, the implications for markets will be significant. Oil prices will be far lower, as will commodity prices generally given the result could easily see more access granted for mining/drilling/growing. Inflation will remain under control which would reduce interest rates, and by extension remove some pressure from the US budget situation. As well, reduced defense requirements would also help the budget. The dollar would maintain its status as the global reserve currency and focus would return to economic growth rather than geopolitical mischief. And this feels like a pretty good state for equities, at least those that are not defense focused. Maybe crazy…but maybe not.
Ok, really quick around the world. In equities, mixed is the best description of the US yesterday and Asia overnight with no real outstanding movers in either direction. Europe is all green this morning, with gains on the order of 0.6%, but I think that is based on the idea the ECB is going to continue to cut rates going forward given inflation there remains low and growth is declining. US futures, at this hour (7:15) are pointing slightly higher, 0.25%.
Bond markets rallied yesterday with Treasury yields sliding 10bps and falling another -3bps this morning. European sovereign yields tracked Treasuries yesterday and are actually leading the way today with yield declines on the order of -4bps to -6bps across the entire continent and the UK. Even JGB yields fell -2bps overnight.
In the commodity space, oil (+0.25%) bounced from its worst levels of the morning during the session yesterday but has created a new gap above the price to add to the really big gap from the beginning of April.

Source: tradingeconomics.com
My take is the market sees the possibility of lower oil prices going forward as supply is set to increase further. There has been some discussion about how low oil prices will reduce capex in the space, and that is probably true, but what are oil companies going to do if they don’t drill for oil? My view is they will still drill. Meanwhile, gold is under pressure again as fear seems to be abating around the world. This morning the barbarous relic is lower by -2.0% and that is taking both copper and silver along with similar declines.
Finally, the dollar is a bit softer this morning, with NZD (+0.5%) the biggest mover in either the G10 or EMG blocs. JPY, EUR, MXN, ZAR are all just basis points different this morning than yesterday with a few gainers and a few laggards but no real trend to note here. I think it is very clear Mr Trump would like to see the dollar’s value decline in the FX markets for competitiveness reasons, but right now, uncertainty is the driving force.
On the data front, yesterday’s big surprise in PPI (-0.5%) seemed to be the driving force behind the bond market rally. But there was also a huge surprise in the Philly Fed New Orders sub-index, which jumped 41.7 points, a 4.3SD move and the largest in the history of the series. Perhaps things aren’t as negative as some would have us believe. As to this morning, we get Housing Starts (exp 1.37M) and Building Permits (1.45M) at 8:30 followed by Michigan Consumer Sentiment (53.4) at 10:00.
It is very difficult to determine if the recent equity rally is just a bear market rally, or if things are going to be fine. Given the still uncertain policy outcomes both domestically and globally, there are still many possible paths forward. I wonder if gold, which had been a harbinger of concerns about the future is now telling us that the worst has passed. Certainly, a movement toward peace in the Middle East is going to be a net positive for risk appetite, which when I translate that back to the dollar, implies my view of weakness going forward remains intact.
Good luck and good weekend
Adf




