Tag Archives: federal-reserve

Inflation’s Hemlock

Posted on by 
The story of note was a stock
That everyone thought was a lock
To go up forever
‘Cause Jensen was clever
And built AI chips round the clock

But suddenly, there was a shock
With Jensen’s head put on the block
So, his stock got crushed
With longs getting flushed
While all of the haters did squawk

And elsewhere, the Fed’s fiercest hawk
Explained that inflation’s hemlock
To not just the people
But also the sheeple
Who cut rates while talking the talk

First things first, Marvel was Select Dog yesterday and we look forward to the show tomorrow, the National Dog Show, which is televised on NBC right after the Thanksgiving Day parade.  We are hopeful that he will be Best of Breed and compete on TV.

Second, I can offer very little insight into the Nvidia situation.  I recall writing last year about the news of Singapore being the second largest market for their chips and discussing how those might have been heading to China.  I guess that was, in fact, the case.  My observation about Jensen Huang is that when men, and specifically men, get that rich and powerful, they become of the belief that nobody can touch them.  We have seen it in business and politics throughout history, and this is no different.

My take, FWIW, is that Nvidia is still going to be making chips and AI is going to continue to be a part of our future.  I saw someone on X this morning compare Nvidia to Enron, claiming the entire company is a fraud.  That feels extreme to me, but then I neither own the stock nor followed it closely.  If it is a fraud, it would certainly be the largest in history!  It would also have a deleterious impact on the rest of the global equity markets, so keep that in the back of your mind.

In the meantime, perhaps our time is better spent on the FOMC speakers who have turned incredibly hawkish over the past several weeks.  It’s almost as though the committee, looking through a post-election, political lens, has decided to concentrate on their PRIMARY mandate, stable prices.  It’s been six years since the core PCE, their preferred metric, has been at their 2.0% target or lower, a track record of failure unmatched in history as you can see in the FRED chart below.

As I’ve discussed here many times, there has been zero evidence that inflation would be retreating to their target for years, but they managed to cut the Fed funds rate from 5.33% to 3.63% anyway.  At the time I called it out as political, and nothing has changed my mind it was anything but.  Perhaps President Trump should have a national address and call them out by name as the ones who have overseen rising inflation and remind everyone that he wanted to fire a bunch of them, but the Supreme Court said he couldn’t.  If people are upset, they should take it up with the FOMC directly.  He could even, helpfully, offer up their addresses.

Removing my tongue from my cheek, my point is, and has been, the FOMC has been failing at its role for many years.  I’m trying to understand why they have suddenly decided inflation is too high.  Alas, politics continues to be the most likely answer to that question.

All week, we have been inundated by Fedspeak, and there are four more speeches on the calendar today.  While it is no surprise that the most hawkish, Hammack, Schmid, Logan and Waller, have been calling for more rate hikes, even the previously more moderate voices have been coming out strongly in favor of more hikes.  The below list of speakers offers an idea of just how much they want to get their point across.

Monday, November 9

  • Michelle Bowman (Vice Chair for Supervision) — ~8:40 AM
  • Austan Goolsbee (Chicago Fed) — ~10:00 AM
  • Tom Barkin (Richmond Fed) — ~12:15 PM

Tuesday, November 10

  • Christopher Waller (Governor) — ~4:00 AM (London event)
  • Lorie Logan (Dallas Fed) — ~10:50 AM
  • Jeffrey Schmid (Kansas City Fed) — ~1:30 PM
  • Michelle Bowman — ~3:30 PM
  • Anna Paulson (Philadelphia Fed) — ~6:30 PM

Wednesday, November 11

  • No major speakers listed (Veterans Day; Fed holiday for some releases)

Thursday, November 12

  • Beth Hammack (Cleveland Fed) — ~9:00 AM
  • Michael Barr (Governor) — ~10:00 AM
  • Austan Goolsbee — ~11:15–11:30 AM
  • Mary Daly (San Francisco Fed) — ~1:10 PM
  • Jeffrey Schmid — ~1:30 PM
  • John Williams (New York Fed) — ~6:30 PM

Friday, November 13

  • Susan Collins (Boston Fed) — ~9:10 AM
  • Michelle Bowman — ~10:50 AM
  • Mary Daly — ~11:10 AM–12:00 PM
  • Philip Jefferson (Vice Chair) — ~7:00 PM

More importantly, though, is the question of whether it is this hawkishness that is driving the bond market, or if it the bond market’s recent sharp back up in yields that is driving this hawkishness.  I would contend Chairman Warsh wants to believe the latter and there is an old bond market saying that goes, ‘when the Fed is worried about inflation, the bond market stops worrying but until then, the bond market is the one doing the work’.  If that still holds, I expect that given the near unanimity of hawkishness being expressed across the entire FOMC, that bond yields may well be peaking here.  That certainly feels out of consensus this morning.

The one thing that does seem clear, though, is that the dollar has been the main beneficiary of the recent hawkish tone in both the bond market and by the Fed.  Using the euro as our proxy, as you can see in the chart below, it has back to its lowest level since Liberation Day in April of last year.

Source: tradingecnomics.com.

However, once again I remind everyone that all the teeth-gnashing about the dollar’s strength is extremely myopic.  As you can see just over the past five years, the euro has been both much weaker and stronger.  If anything, it remains virtually impossible for me to look at Europe, with the fiscal problems and rioting in France, as well as the energy policies that are impoverishing the entire continent and think keeping capital there is the safe bet.  Add to that the fact that yields across Europe are substantially lower than in the US, and economic activity, which was released this morning at 1.3% for the Eurozone over the past year, is much slower.  So, low rates and slow growth, quite the combination, but maybe not where you want to invest.

As well, there has been recent discussion about the yen, which traded through 160 again yesterday, and is right there as I type, for the first time since the last intervention back in early September.  This has tongues wagging that the BOJ may need to come back to the market

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But consider the fact that the dollar is strong against everything as you can see in the below chart of the DXY and USDJPY over the past month.  The movement is virtually identical, hardly indicative of a weak yen, but rather a strong dollar.  No matter what the BOJ does, it will have virtually no impact of note, so I am extremely skeptical there will be any activity there.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, there is no better way to demonstrate this fact than to look at the EURJPY cross, which shows that the euro is, in fact, declining more rapidly than the yen as you can see below.  The idea of yen intervention is off the table in my mind.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, well, this is, theoretically, an FX commentary, so some days, that’s what you get.  Maybe the most interesting thing as we look through the rest of the markets is how little the Nvidia issue impacted equity markets overall.  The three main US indices fell by -0.35% yesterday, hardly a rout, and this morning futures are higher by 0.2% across the board as I type (7:20).

Last night, Asia was mixed with some gainers (Japan +0.5%, Taiwan +1.4%) and some laggards (China -0.7%, HK -1.6%, Korea -1.0%) with the rest of the region showing similar ups and downs.  Certainly, there was no overriding theme.  In Europe this morning, bourses are tantamount to unchanged as the data showed weak growth and rising inflation but was released as expected.  And of course, given there is no tech space of which to speak in Europe, selling tech shares doesn’t impact those indices!

The bond market, though stable this morning (Treasury yields +1bp, European sovereigns +2bps to 3bps) has seen yields rise rapidly during the past week.  In the US, as you can see in the below chart, we are higher by 32bps in the past week.  As per my discussion above, perhaps we are toppish if the Fed is going to get on the case.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, commodities have moved to the back burner.  Again, it’s almost as though affordability was a political issue, not a real one, as since the election, I cannot remember hearing about one person explaining prices are rising too quickly that was not a Fed speaker.  Oil is bored and little changed this morning, still below $90/bbl.  EIA inventory data showed builds in both crude and gasoline and the price of gasoline is lower by -18.4% in the past month with heating oil (a diesel proxy) -12.1%.  It continues to be difficult to know what to think about the Iran situation as we continue to get mixed messages regarding the US stance.  Are there negotiations?  Have they ended?  President Trump indicated there would be no escalation and that seems to be the driver in oil markets for now.

As to the metals markets, rising interest rates have been killing them as the alternative to non-yielding gold and silver has become far more attractive.  While they are stable this morning, since late August, as you can see below, gold (-16.3%) and silver (-27.5%) have both been under significant and steady pressure.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no evidence that governments are going to stop printing money as their promises remains far larger than their fiscal means.  But as long as we continue to hear the hawkish commentary, I suspect the metals will struggle.

On the data front, this morning brings PPI (exp 0.4%,6.6% Y/Y headline; 0.3%, 5.0% Y/Y core) but with CPI already out, will it matter?  And as per the above, we have four more Fed speakers to regale us with why they need to raise rates further.  At this point, as you can see from the cmegroup.com table below, pricing for a full 100bps further of hikes is starting to come around.  Personally, I don’t see it, but I’m not on the Fed.

There is a great deal of uncertainty right now in markets, with many things that had been assumed being called into question.  However, the data continues to show that despite the angst, economic activity in the US continues to move along well.  With the rate situation as it is, you have to like the dollar to continue its recent rise.

Sorry for the extended length this morning, but I missed so much yesterday 

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

His Quixotic Quest

Posted on by 
While passing time ere comes the Fed
And after predictions misled
Most traders are waiting
For Warsh advocating
Some view as they all look ahead

But that seems unlikely, at best
As Kevin, each time he’s been pressed
Refuses to say,
Lest his words might sway,
His views in his Quixotic quest

With the midterm elections now less than a week away, and after the bruising that many traders and investors absorbed from the Brazilian election results, it is not surprising that markets are fairly quiet.  After all, it is very hard to explain to your manager why you not only got crushed once, but twice, on unexpected election results.

As such, I feel like most markets have put broad themes on hold and are, instead, looking at more specific potential catalysts for movement.  Of course, the FOMC meeting falls into that category, as does every central bank meeting along with corporate earnings. So, let’s turn out attention to the central banks.  As an example of how things can behave, last night, the RBNZ left rates on hold at 2.75%, surprising the market which was nearly fully priced for a 25bp rate hike. You can see the market response in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, according to the BIS data, average daily volume in NZD is about $118 billion, of which $43 billion is in the spot market.  While that may sound like a lot, keep in mind the total FX market trades something on the order of $9.5 trillion per day, of which ~$3 trillion is spot, so NZD represents a bit over 1.2% of the market, hardly a harbinger of the future.  However, it is instructive as to what can happen when outcomes surprise markets.  We just saw what happened in Brazil, which was arguably a much larger surprise than a potential 25bp rate hike.  (This goes back to why I have protection for my portfolio expiring after the election next week.)

But let’s focus on today’s meetings where first, the BOC is forecast to hike their base rate by 25bps, to 2.50%.  Now, if we look at the history of USDCAD over the past year and add interest rate decisions and GDP reports, there is no obvious relationship between those data points and the currency’s movement as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

First off, their base rate has been on hold for quite a while.  Secondly, GDP has generally risen over the period, although the currency has weakened as well.  In fact, it is hard to discern any strong pattern.  Now, if the BOC stands pat, I suspect that the Loonie will fall initially, but I don’t believe it would head back to its lows (USD highs) more than 2% away. There is just not enough interest to drive that in my view.  And, with the Fed still on deck at that time, with the futures market pricing just a 10% probability of a hike, and Kalshi a 5% probability, a surprise there would be of much greater magnitude.

So, is there a possibility that the Fed hikes?  Of course, there is always a possibility but based on the last comments from other Fed speakers and the fact that the data since they have been in their quiet period has not shown dramatic changes from when they were still speaking, I agree with the odds.  The combination of the political questions of the Fed acting immediately ahead of an election, and the lack of compelling data that things have changed argues for no movement.  (The fact that raising interest rates is not obviously going to do anything about inflation anyway is not even part of their discussion, although is something we should all understand.  As The Inflation Guy highlighted yesterday, Keynesians see higher rates as impacting the demand side of the economy, which they clearly do, but never discuss the supply side of the economy, which is also directly impacted.  Which one matters more is the question.)

What I will say is, if they do hike, it will have a dramatic impact on all markets with equities likely to suffer significantly, the dollar likely to rally and long-dated bonds likely to rally (yields decline) as investors would take that as a sign that the Fed is more serious about inflation.  But I just don’t see it.  In the meantime, let’s look at how other markets are behaving.

Yesterday’s tech led US rally in stocks was followed by a more mixed session in Asia, with the obvious winners (Korea +6.6% after SK Hynix earnings were phenomenal and Taiwan +2.0%) along with Tokyo (+1.1%) and China (+0.9%) as official support showed up again.  But elsewhere in the region, things were far less interesting except that in New Zealand, despite the surprise rate move, equities could not rally.  In Europe, red is today’s tale with Spain (-1.3%) the laggard after Santander’s earnings, though strong, disappointed and its stock dragged the whole index lower.  As to the rest of the continent and the UK, indices are softer by between -0.1% and -0.3%, representing indifference ahead of the Fed.  And US futures?  At this hour (7:30) they are mixed, with DJIA a touch lower while both the S&P and NASDAQ are higher by a bit.

In the bond markets, yields are largely unchanged this morning across Treasuries and most European sovereigns with only Italian BTPs (+4bps) showing any movement of note.  While two smaller agencies reaffirmed Italy’s BBB+ rating, the broad trend in rates and concerns over the Meloni government’s ability to rein in spending have some investors nervous.  As well, the ECB meets tomorrow, and while no change is expected, everything I have heard from ECB speakers has leaned toward hawkishness, so while markets are pricing just a 3% probability of a hike, I guess we cannot rule it out. (see Brazil elections!)

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.7%) is bouncing again although as you can see in the below chart, has remained in a $98/$104 range for the past several weeks.  Now, while that is pretty wide, given oil’s volatility this year, I might argue it’s actually pretty narrow.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Here, too, the election is everything as more and more analysts and commentators are expecting an increase in hostilities when the election is past, something I discussed several weeks ago.  But we cannot ignore that there are ongoing efforts to negotiate a settlement between the US and Iran, although I have a hard time seeing that outcome in the near term.

Meanwhile, the metals markets have largely maintained their negative correlation with oil and both gold (-0.3%) and silver (-1.0%) are softer this morning.  However, it is worthwhile noting that the barbarous relic continues to find support at the $4000/oz level and has since it first broke through there last November.  Remember, central banks around the world continue to buy gold, although it has lost its speculative shine.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is little changed today but is consolidating its recent marginal strength.  The DXY is back above 102, although has not yet reached its spike high from two weeks ago near 103 as you can see below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One thing I would highlight is that yesterday’s Consumer Confidence number was MUCH stronger than forecast, printing at 91.7 more than 10 points above expectations.  However, the long-term downtrend there remains intact.  I imagine this cannot have hurt the dollar.  The one true outlier this morning is CLP (+0.8%) which seems to be benefitting from the central bank’s recent affirmation that inflation risks remain too high and future hikes are still on the table.

And that’s really it.  The only other news today is EIA oil inventory data with no net change expected and then the FOMC.  Microsoft reports earnings after the bell, but the world can be a very different place by then depending on what Chairman Warsh does, or doesn’t, say at the press conference.

Close to the vest with protection seems the best way to be positioned right now.

Good luck

Adf

A Desperate Act

Posted on by

A key market story yesterday was that the Treasury buyback operations, you know the ones that would be “at least” doubled to $4 billion per event, could grow much larger as secretary Bessent would tap the Treasury General Account (TGA) for this purpose.  Now the TGA is the federal government’s checking account.  It is where your taxes get paid into, along with the receipts from bond sales and tariffs.  It is also the account that pays all the federal government’s obligations like salaries and purchases of defense and other equipment.  The current balance (a/o Aug 21st) is about $936 billion according to the Treasury website.  Obviously, that is a huge amount of money, but then the federal government has a huge amount of payment obligations.  I bet it is a hard checking account to balance!

Now, technically, I presume that all their operations are paid by the TGA.  The mechanics would work that Treasury would issue T-bills, receive the cash in the TGA and use that cash to buy back bonds.  But the implication was that he would just spend the money that was already there.  Personally, I doubt that will be the outcome, and frankly, it almost sounded more like a threat than a future course of action.  But it did get tongues wagging.  

According to Grok, these comments came in an interview on CNBC at a bit after 9:00 yesterday morning.  The chart below shows the bond market price action from that point onward, which tells me that while there was a modest initial response, it completely disappeared until another catalyst (lower oil prices I believe) helped push yields down early this morning.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But this clearly struck a nerve as in this morning’s WSJ, Stan Druckenmiller, Bessent’s mentor at the old Soros hedge fund, wrote an op/ed decrying the move.  As I survey all that I have learned thus far, it seems clear that Bessent is looking to remove duration from the market in an effort to drive longer dated yields lower.  But his tools are limited compared to the Fed’s abilities and, at least right now, it does not appear the Fed is going to cooperate.  The first operations aren’t scheduled until September 7th, so until then, it is all just speculation, and I’m not even going to try.

The other thing that Secretary Bessent did yesterday, that may have a larger impact on things, was announce sweeping new sanctions on Iran and countries that do any residual business with Iran in an effort to add further pressure on the regime.  It is possible, but not clear to me, that this is part of the rationale for this morning’s decline in the price of oil (-3.0%).  However, if you look at the chart of oil for the past 24 hours, it is remarkably similar to that of the 10-year Treasury above.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ostensibly, the news here, which of course would impact bond yields, is that the Pakistani army chief was intermediating between the US and Iran in an effort to find a solution and reduce tensions in the Gulf.  That would certainly be a welcome outcome for all, but I’m not holding my breath.  However, this price action has set the tone for risk markets this morning, so let’s take a look.

While Asia was mixed overnight (Tokyo +0.5%, China -0.3%, HK 0.0%) following the mixed US session, with pressure still evident on the tech sector, Europe is firmer this morning across the board (Germany +0.8%, Spain +0.4%, France +0.4%, UK +0.25%) with all those rallies timed almost exactly alongside the oil and bond moves.  As you can see in the chart below, the same is true in the US where futures at this hour (7:25) are also higher and moved right alongside other equity markets.  As to specific stories here, I think there is a great deal of breath holding for the Nvidia earnings report tomorrow after the close.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the bond market, as mentioned above, yields are lower across both Treasuries (-3bps) and all European sovereigns with the entire bloc seeing yields decline by between -3bps and -4bps.  It appears this all revolves on the same story driving oil and equities.

In the metals markets, gold (-0.2%) is edging lower but basically consolidating another strong day yesterday.  It is reasonable to conclude that market participants are growing cautious regarding US debt given there is no indication of spending restraint.  But the reality is that markets are growing cautious of all G10 debt given that statement regarding spending restraint is universally true in that bloc.  I continue to believe we are going to see governments around the world try to ‘run it hot’ with nominal GDP growth rising faster than government spending, thus reducing the real burden.  However, running it hot generally means higher inflation, and that is something that is a political problem.  As to the other metals, silver (-1.2%) is under pressure, although still far higher over the past week and month, while copper (+0.5%) is a bit firmer this morning.

Finally, the dollar is still sleeping this morning, virtually unchanged on the DXY at 99.00 and virtually unchanged vs. almost every major counterpart.  The biggest mover is INR (+0.35%) a major beneficiary of lower oil prices and not surprisingly, NOK (-0.2%) is suffering on the same catalyst.  But otherwise, everything is +/- 0.1% from yesterday’s close.

On the data front, there is not a ton this week, although PCE comes tomorrow, but really all eyes remain on Chairman Warsh’s speech Friday morning.

TodayCase-Shiller Home Prices1.7%
 New Home Sales620K
 Consumer Confidence90.2
WednesdayPCE0.1% (3.7% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% )3.3% Y/Y)
 Q2 GDP1.5%
 Durable Goods0.7%
 -ex Transport0.5%
 Personal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.2%
ThursdayGoods Trade Balance-$99.0B
 Initial Claims208K
 Continuing Claims1811K
FridayChicago PMI57.0
 Warsh Speech 
 Michigan Sentiment51.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, the EIA oil inventories are expected to see another build as there remains ample supply, at least so it seems.  While PCE is important, I think it will be less so given the pending Warsh comments.  To me, tomorrow’s Nvidia earnings and then Warsh are the keys for the rest of the week, absent a major change in Iran, and alas, I don’t see that.

The bond brouhaha is much ado about nothing I believe as it will not change the trajectory of Federal spending, and that is what is necessary to have a long-term impact.  Unfortunately, that usually takes a crisis, and those are unpleasant.  They also take a VERY long time to develop, after all Argentina imploded for nearly 100 years before electing Javier Milei who promised to do something about it.  It has only been 25 years here since we last ran a budget surplus.  I fear it could be much longer before things really change.

Good luck

Adf

Beguiled

Posted on by 
It turns out, inflation of late
Did not start to accelerate
Instead, it was mild
With doves now beguiled
But not yet declaring checkmate

The odds of a hike keep on sliding
But ere the Committee’s deciding
In two weeks, we’ll hear
Chair Warsh try to steer
The narrative with gentle (?) chiding

The fears over rising inflation have been allayed for the moment after yesterday’s CPI data was released right on expectations with monthly increases of 0.1% headline and 0.2% core and Y/Y results of 3.4% and 2.5% respectively.  For all those who have been pining for that rate hike ASAP, this was unwelcome news.  The below table from cmegroup.com shows how things have changed over the past month.

On July 13, markets were pricing a 75% probability of a hike in September with thoughts of a 50bp hike a reality.  This morning, the probability of that September rate hike has fallen to just 36%.  You may recall that I have been consistent in my views that there would be no rate hikes this year, and that continues to be my view.  If we look at the entire Fed funds futures curve, as per the next table, we now have one hike priced for December only, compared with two plus hikes several months ago.

This is not to say I believe that inflation is dead, just that it is not accelerating away.  As my friend The Inflation Guy points out in his piece on yesterday’s CPI, the data was boring, “Boring, right on expectations. The bad news is that it is boring and right on expectations…at 3%.”  This is still a far cry from the Fed’s self-defined 2% target, but fears of “Amerizuela” type outcomes are vastly overblown.  (However, you still want to protect you purchasing power and one effective way to do that is via USDi, the only inflation tracking cryptocurrency.)

Now, we still have a bunch more data before the next FOMC meeting, including today’s PPI, PCE at the end of the month and another NFP and CPI reading in September.  As well, we cannot forget that Chairman Warsh will have the opportunity to clarify his thinking at the Jackson Hole soiree on Friday morning, August 28th.

So, has anything really changed that much after the CPI report?  While the reality hasn’t shifted, it does appear that market participants are beginning to adjust their views a bit.  One number does not a trend make, nor will it have bolstered Warsh’s credibility, assuming that is in question, either.  This is a saga that will continue to play out over time.  It seems to me that if the Fed really wanted to fight inflation effectively, they would be digging much deeper into why they continue to hold >$1.9 trillion in MBS on their balance sheet and run an ample reserves framework.  Going back to scarce reserves allows the market to drive interest rates, something clearly on Chairman Warsh’s wish list.  But that will have to wait for the task force reports.

Ok, let’s see how markets other than Fed funds have responded to this news and data.  Since we are on the rates subject, let’s start there this morning with bonds which have seen yields slip -2bps in Treasuries and between -1bp and -3bps in Europe.  Oil prices (-2.1%) are slipping this morning so that appears to be the proximate cause of the yield move, a bit less concern over inflation.  Yesterday, after the CPI data, we also saw Treasury yields drop -2bps, so for now, fears of an imminent test of 5.0% on 10-year Treasuries seem overblown.  JGB yields, though, continue to creep higher, another 2bps overnight and are now just 3bps below their multi-decade high of 2.90% as per the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Speaking of Japanese rates, Bloomberg has an article this morning explaining that the Takaichi administration is ok with the BOJ raising rates sooner, a change in the market’s perspective if not an outright change of view there.  Alas for those looking for a stronger yen and the end of the carry trade, the impact of the report was essentially nil as you can see in the chart below.  The three large, red candles just to the right of center represent the immediate aftermath of the release of the report.  Net, USDJPY is virtually unchanged on the day and the trend since the intervention remains for the dollar to move higher.  My sense is perceptions of Fed rate activity is going to have a bigger impact than the BOJ for now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the FX market, +/- 0.2% covers the gamut for both G10 and EMG blocs.  It wasn’t just the CPI report that was boring, so are FX markets overall.

Turning to equities, yesterday’s US market response was benign with only the NASDAQ showing much life, gaining 0.5%.  In Asia, though we did see Tokyo (+1.1%) rise despite talk of the BOJ being more aggressive.  Of course, the real price action remains in Korea (+3.6%), which is redefining what equity index volatility actually means.  Otherwise, there were some gainers (Taiwan, New Zealand, India) and more laggards (China, HK, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia) but none of these moves topped 1% in either direction.  

European bourses, however, are feeling a bit better this morning led by Spain (+0.7%) and Germany (+0.5%) as earnings seem to be the driver here helping Spanish shares despite the tick higher in inflation there.  UK shares (-0.2%) are lagging after GDP and production data was on the disappointing side while the Trade Deficit expanded further.  And at this hour (7:30) US futures are little changed to slightly higher.

Finally, turning to commodities, oil’s decline seems to be attributable to the IEA reducing its global oil demand outlook (although they have been wrong about this for several years as they try to push a peak oil, transition to wind/solar narrative that is just not happening) as well as the fact that yesterday’s EIA data showed a 17+mm barrel build, a far cry from the slight draw expected and another blow to the tank bottoms story.  As to the precious metals, the luster is gone (Au -0.5%, Ag -0.6%, Cu -0.5%) although copper remains quite close to its all-time highs, and both gold and silver remain in short-term uptrends after seemingly having bottomed back in July.

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 202K) and Continuing (1800K) Claims data along with PPI (0.2%, 4.9% Y/Y) and core PPI (0.3%, 4.2% Y/Y).  It strikes me that neither of these releases are going to be major market movers.

It is summer, and I assure you trading desk vacation schedules are far more important than secondary economic data releases.  I suspect another boring day overall here.  In fact, I suspect that until Warsh speaks in two weeks, we may see very little activity across most markets.

Good luck

Adf

Smart or Insane

Posted on by 
While pundits all like to complain
About everything, smart or insane
When stock markets rise
It’s no real surprise
That few people care what they’re sayin’

As penance for yesterday’s overly long diatribe, I will keep this morning’s much shorter, especially since there is not nearly so much interesting to discuss.  There are still many discussions on the whys and wherefores of the US joining with Japan in intervening in the FX markets, with a pretty even mix of those saying it won’t matter and those saying it is a game changer.  As you can see from the chart below, this morning the beleaguered JPY (-0.45%) is slipping a little, but hardly enough to matter in the context of last week’s gains.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of course, we won’t really know how effective this bout of intervention has been for at least a few weeks/months, as the history, clearly shown on the chart is a big move higher followed by a gradual depreciation in the yen.  Will that play out again?  My suspicion is that absent a policy change by the BOJ (i.e. a more aggressive rate hike schedule) or the Japanese government (i.e. less fiscal stimulus) the answer is no.  This is especially true if the Fed raises rates, although I still do not believe that is coming soon.  

However, it is important to remember that the Fed funds futures market is confident of a hike by October, with a two-thirds probability of one next month as per the below cmegroup.com table.

Turning to the other major discussion from yesterday, the ongoing feedback/blowback from the Fed’s no movement, and more importantly from Warsh’s behavior during the press conference, that too remains a topic of discussion with pundits on both sides adamant that he was either right or wrong on both measures.  The only thing I am sure about is that he doesn’t care much about what the pundits are saying.  Rather, he is very likely focusing on getting his points across to the rest of the committee, and that will be a tough job.

In 2025, FOMC members gave, on average, one speech a day which added to the forward guidance which was a key tool in their toolbox.  You know I often railed against the ongoing verbal diarrhea from these folks as from the best I could tell, nothing said was ever designed to sway opinion, merely to burnish each speaker’s credentials.  And they clearly loved the quasi fame that came with it.  In fact, I suspect it is that very quasi fame the committee is most reluctant to cede.  Chairman Warsh has his work cut out for him.

As to today’s new stories, there are none, at least none of note.  There are more conflicting comments from President Trump and the Iranians about negotiations or not.  Yesterday’s ISM data was quite positive, coming in at 55.6 vs 54.0 expected, just another indication that the US economy continues to tick along quite nicely.  After that, the news heads towards the political with several key primary elections to be held today with DSA candidates picked to win and run in the general elections in November.

But what has everybody happy is the fact that equity markets are showing strength once again.  I read that of the S&P companies that have already reported, 85% have beaten estimates, a much higher than normal percentage (76% is the norm), and another positive for market bulls.  

So, let’s take a look at how markets behaved overnight with that theme.  The strong US performance was followed by a more mixed session in Asia, although there were more gainers (Tokyo, China, Korea, Australia, Indonesia, New Zealand) than laggards (HK, India, Philippines).  The tech story remains the major story since the oil story has become so confusing on a daily basis, I feel like most investors have moved on.  Meanwhile, in Europe, it is a broadly positive session as well led by Germany (+0.6%) and the UK (+0.35%) while France (+0.1%) and Spain (0.0%) are not quite as happy.  Arguably, the biggest news in Europe continues to be the unprecedented flood of illegal immigrants into Ceuta, Spain and the punditocracy is actively expressing their opinions on the issue, although whether there is a direct impact on the equity market in Madrid is unclear.  Lastly, US futures at this hour (7:20), are all pointing higher again as the market awaits earnings from SpaceX this afternoon after the close.

In the bond market, there continues to be a great deal of garment rending and teeth gnashing amongst the financial illuminati as yields hold the bulk of their recent gains.  This morning Treasury yields have backed up 1bp after yesterday’s -5bp decline, although European sovereign yields are generally lower by -1bp this morning.  As of now, there is no answer to the question of is the bond market focused on inflation or excess issuance although it could well be a little of both.

Remember when oil (-0.8%) was the only market that mattered, and all other trading looked there first.  We heard stories about $200/bbl coming soon and tank bottoms as reserves emptied and a growing concern about future economic activity.  Well, that never really happened.  As I type, WTI is back below $80/bbl and I particularly like this chart that calculates the mean price over the past 6 months ($86/bbl) and shows no trend whatsoever.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

To me, this implies there is a new equilibrium although I suspect that when the hostilities cease, and I believe they will at some point this year, we will see sharply lower prices for crude and products.  As to metals markets, they remain relatively uninteresting with modest gains today (Au +0.2%, Ag +2.4%, Cu +1.7%).

Finally, in the FX markets, away from the yen the dollar is under a bit of pressure this morning.  First, for all of you who follow the DXY and were excited by the ostensible breakout above 100.50, as you can see in the below chart, that story appears to have ended for now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But away from the yen this morning, the rest of the G10 have all shown modest gains led by AUD (+0.5%) after some positive household spending data.  Otherwise, 0.1% to 0.2% is the state of the day.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (+0.4%) is the leader of the pack on the combination of softer oil prices and stronger metals prices.  Too, BRL (+0.25%) and MXN (+0.25%) seem to be benefitting on the same basis.  Otherwise, it’s hard to get excited here.  Perhaps another bout of intervention will perk things up, but I doubt that will happen soon.

On the data front, there’s quite a bit to be released this week culminating in the Friday NFP report.

TodayTrade Balance-$73.0B
 JOLTs Job Openings7.4M
 Factory Orders0.2%
 -ex Transport0.5%
WednesdayASP Employment70K
 ISM Services54.5
ThursdayInitial Claims202K
 Continuing Claims1790K
 Nonfarm Productivity0.6%
 Unit Labor Costs2.1%
FridayNonfarm Payrolls80K
 Private Payrolls79K
 Manufacturing Payrolls4K
 Unemployment Rate4.2%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.5% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.3
 Participation Rate61.6%
 Consumer Credit$10.85B

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, there are three Fed speakers, and I wonder (and am hopeful) that we hear less and less from them going forward.  Obviously, all eyes will be on the payrolls on Friday, and we can dive into that later in the week.  But today, it is hard to get excited about anything.

Good luck

Adf

Pundits and Bores

Posted on by 
The fallout from Warsh’s decision
To leave rates without a revision
Has opened the doors
For pundits and bores
With hawks and doves set for collision

For some, Warsh has failed from the start
As they felt a rate hike was smart
But others explain
That under his reign
It’s markets that play the main part

For a no action outcome by the Fed last week, it certainly is interesting how much digital ink has been spilled discussing the outcome of that meeting and, depending on which side of the argument you fall, whether it was the right move or an error.  You know I have been of the belief that there will be zero rate hikes this year and nothing has changed that opinion yet.

There is a great deal of conversation regarding the Fed’s credibility and how despite Warsh’s tough talk about achieving their 2% inflation goal at his first meeting, by doing nothing last week, he has trashed that credibility.  My first thought here is, given the Fed has failed in its key objective for more than 5 straight years on its own terms, it is difficult for me to accept they had a lot of credibility left to trash.  But my second thought is to listen to the Chairman’s words about allowing the market to do its job, and not simply watch the Fed, and I realize there are an awful lot of analysts and pundits who don’t know how to do that and therefore are extremely uncomfortable now.  As I wrote last week, these folks get paid a lot of money by Wall Street and now they have to earn it.  So perhaps that explains the ongoing diatribes.

Much has been made of the fact that between the June and July FOMC meetings, US Treasury yields rose substantially as you can see from the below chart.

Source” tradingeconomics.com

At the close on Friday, they had risen 34bps in the 30-year and 28bps in the 10-year), although this morning, with oil prices (-5.6%) falling on the back of a renewed diplomatic initiative in Iran, both of those bonds have seen yields back off by 5bps. 

Now, one of the things that Warsh specifically explained in the press conference was that the market had raised rates already, effectively doing the Fed’s job for them.  And here is the point of departure, I believe, regarding the punditry viewpoint and the Warsh viewpoint.  Warsh has been explicit in saying he wants the Fed’s footprint in the markets to shrink.  He wants market participants to, “play the ball, not the referee”.  However, the pundits claim that the only reason rates rose was in anticipation of the Fed hiking rates.  

So, let’s try a little thought experiment.  Assume there was no Fed, instead that money supply was mechanically increased by 2% per year and that all interest rates were determined by the market.  Do you believe that in this scenario, a government running consistent extremely large deficits would not drive interest rates higher than they otherwise would be, without a central bank to officially do so?  I know I do.  Is that any different than the market pushing yields higher because they are concerned with excess supply of Treasuries and other inflation concerns?  

The Fed has had a major, and in Warsh’s (and my) view, too large impact on markets for a long time, since Black Monday in 1987.  Change is hard and the punditry does not like the fact that they are going to have to actually think and pay attention to many variables in order to have a viable view on things, so they are all crying and claiming Warsh is making a huge mistake.  While not surprising, I think they are completely wrong.  

It is also important to understand that the current yields in the bond market are anything but ordinary. Below is a chart I created with FRED data and included the long-term average 10-year yield since 1962, which happens to be 5.81%, more than 100bps above current levels.  For a very long time, a good rule of thumb for the 10-year yield was it should be approximate the nominal GDP growth rate, but we have gone through such a long period of financial repression, that idea faded away.  Perhaps that is coming back into vogue, so at the long-term average, we could see 3.8% GDP growth and 2.0% inflation.  And even today, it could represent 2.7% GDP growth and 2.0% inflation.  I don’t think anybody would be unhappy with that outcome.

My understanding is the task forces will not be reporting until early next year.  At the same time, I am convinced that Mr Warsh is very serious about making significant changes at the Fed going forward, and I applaud that.  But it is going to require him to convince 18 other people who have been inculcated in a process that has proven to be a failure but offers comfort to those people because they know how it works.  Change is very hard, and this will be harder than most.  One last thing, the biggest change is going to be the balance sheet.  The Fed continues to buy T-bills and expand the balance sheet as they continue to seek to maintain “ample” reserves, so banks have liquidity.  I would not be surprised if when we hear from Chairman Warsh at the Jackson Hole meeting at the end of the month, he indicates the Fed will stop buying bills at the next meeting moving further down the path of change.

Surprising comments
Bessent admitted the Fed
Joined the Japanese

The following statement released by Japan’s MOF is quite a surprise, at least the fact that they admitted to the action, something that has rarely been the case in the past.  

Some have made the point that given Japan is the largest holder of Treasury securities in the world (other than the Fed) and that they would need to sell their Treasuries to fund intervention, this was the driving force.  Certainly, the US is not keen to have holders sell their bonds at this point.  As you can see in the chart below, this intervention has had a larger impact than the previous bouts which were solo Japanese efforts.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

At the dollar’s low, the yen appreciated about 5% in the past two sessions, certainly a very large move.  One of the other things that was interesting was that ostensibly, the Treasury sold EURJPY, not USDJPY.  Perhaps they had extra euros lying around they no longer wanted.  According to BOJ data, it appears the Japanese spent something like $33 billion on the intervention, but I have no indication as to the US effort.

Joint intervention is pretty rare, with the last time being in the wake of the earthquake/tsunami at Fukushima in 2011 when the yen strengthened dramatically.  But it also has a better track record than solo intervention, although absent significant fiscal changes, on both sides of this equation, I suspect that within a few months, the yen will weaken again.

Ok, I feel like that’s enough for one morning.  The oil story, as I mentioned, is that the President has called off the mooted weekend attacks and diplomacy is back on the table.  Interestingly, the metals markets are not as excited by that with gold (+0.15%), silver (+0.6%) and copper (+0.75%) all higher, but not by very much, especially given the size of the decline in crude prices.  And product prices (gasoline -3.4%, heating oil -3.0%) are also sharply lower.

As also mentioned above, bond yields have backed off with European sovereigns sliding far more than Treasuries, between -6bps (Germany, Netherlands) and -9bps (UK, Italy, Greece).  However, JGB yields (+3bps) did not get the memo although I suppose that has more to do with the belief that the BOJ is going to be forced to hike rates as part of the joint US-Japanese currency efforts.

As to the equity markets, after Friday’s US rally, the picture in Asia was mixed, despite the oil price decline, although for Japan, a stronger yen is often a problem for Japanese equities.  The worst performers were Korea (-5.1%), Tokyo (-0.9%) and China (-1.0%) while much of the rest of the region followed the US higher (HK +0.5%, India +0.7%, Taiwan +0.6%, Australia +0.5%) with the smaller exchanges mostly higher as well.

In Europe, things are generally bright with Germany (+1.4%), France (+1.3%) and Spain (+0.75%) all nicely higher despite (because of) modestly weaker PMI data although the UK (0.0%) has not been able to overcome its PMI weakness.  Now, in fairness to the UK, its 51.9 reading, while weaker than last month and forecast, is still about the best in Europe.  As to US futures, they are all in the green, led by the DJIA (+0.8%) at this hour (7:00).

Finally, the dollar is kind of confused overall.  The big winner today is KRW (+1.0%) although that trade has been ongoing for more than a month and is approaching an 8% gain over that period.  The yen (+0.4%) continues to climb, albeit less aggressively, although the other G10 currencies are generally under pressure (GBP -0.15%, AUD -0.3%, CAD -0.2%, NOK -0.6%).

However, I must mention something that Alyosha wrote this morning in Market Vibes that is worth considering; two of the major positions in markets were short bonds and short yen.  Joint intervention by the US and Japan to sell EURJPY has likely forced a lot of covering in both of those markets and it would not be surprising to see more activity like that and further short covering.  Japan is the largest holder of French bonds as well as Treasuries and could easily sell those without a peep from the US.  

Ok, I have gone way over my daily quota this morning, although there were a couple of really big, and complex stories to discuss.  On the data front, today brings ISM Manufacturing (exp 54.0) and I will delve into the rest of the week’s data, including Friday’s payroll report tomorrow.

Good luck

Adf

Commit Seppuku

Posted on by 
Alas, nothing’s changed in Iran
And feces is hitting the fan
So, pundits feel strongly, 
Although I think wrongly
A rate hike is part of the plan

In fairness, the bond market, too
Is on board, that ere July’s through
The Fed will have raised
Won’t they be amazed
If Warsh won’t commit seppuku?

Yesterday’s dominant theme was the fact that oil prices had risen so aggressively with WTI above $90/bbl and Brent touching $100/bbl.  Interestingly, both are lower this morning, WTI (-2.5%) and Brent (-2.7%) and both are back below those big psychological levels despite no seeming changes on the ground in Iran.  The Houthis are still causing trouble in the Bab al Mandeb, the US is still attacking sites along the Persian Gulf and there are no peace discussions ongoing.  A headline in the WSJ this morning explained, Trump Is Losing Patience Over an Iran War With No Clear End in Sight.

But really, the bigger discussion has been about US yields (and correspondingly global yields) as they continue to head higher.  Below is a screenshot from Bloomberg showing the yield curve and how yields have changed in the past month and year.

There has been quite a bit of digital ink spilled over the concept that short-dated T-bills have now priced in a rate hike next week, as per Wolfstreet.com,

“The 2-month Treasury yield spiked by 13 basis points today and by 15 basis points during the week to close at 3.95%, according to Treasury Department’s yield calculation. This is at the upper end of the Fed’s target range after it hikes by 25 basis points, which would bring its target range to 3.75%-4.0%. And it is 32 basis points above the Effective Federal Funds Rate (EFFR, blue), which the Fed targets with its policy rates. This is a stunning move, pricing in a “surprise” rate hike at the FOMC meeting next week.”

And here is his accompanying chart.

Of course, what makes all this so juicy is that Chairman Warsh has gone out of his way to end forward guidance so market participants are now left to their own devices to determine what the Fed may do, something most of them have either forgotten, or never knew, how to do.  

Let’s consider, for a moment, some potential outcomes and the rationales behind them.  First, it is critical to remember that Warsh needs a majority of the voters, so at least 7, to get to a result.

  • No change (poet’s estimated probability 90%) – the most recent inflation data, both CPI and PPI were much cooler than expected thus offering significant cover to leave policy on hold.  Add to that the fact that the task forces will not have completed their work and report on anything.  This means Warsh can reasonably say, before we do anything, let’s make sure we are looking at things that are fit for purpose.  One last thing to recall is that if energy prices are the driver, raising interest rates will not produce more energy, so it is the wrong action to solve the problem.
  • 25bp hike (10% probability) – while there have been several FOMC members who discussed the needs for hiking rates as inflation was becoming uncomfortably high, I don’t believe that contingent is large enough to make up a majority, especially of voters.  In addition, the history of central bank rate hikes into energy price spikes is replete with disasters across the board.  After all, the same pundits who are calling for a hike explain that rising energy prices are like a tax and weaken economic activity.  Certainly, the Treasury market price action indicates there are many who believe a hike is coming and if we look at Fed funds futures markets, the probability is higher than mine at about 30% as per the below chart from cmegroup.com, but look at how much that has changed over the past month.  My point is that there is no consistency of view.
  • 50bp hike (NO CHANCE) – there is a group in the analyst community who are calling for a shock maneuver of a 50bp hike.  The rationale seems to be that this would burnish Warsh’s hawkish credentials, and the bond market would rally on the news.  But even if he wanted to do this, and I don’t think that is the case at all, it would require him to get six others to go along.  There is no way that type of viewpoint exists on the committee, I am convinced.  This is clickbait in my view, analysts making outlandish calls so people will read their stuff.

In the meantime, though, yields do continue to rise around the world.  While this morning, they have backed off from yesterday’s recent highs (UST -1bp, bunds -2bps, gilts -4bps, OATs -3bps, BTPs -3bps), they remain just below levels not seen in several years.  One interesting thing about the European sovereign market is the fact that yields in Greece (3.90%) are lower than in either France (3.99%) or Italy (4.01%).  It wasn’t that long ago that Greece was the poster child for fiscal profligacy and lived through a depression.  But give them credit, they learned and now run a primary surplus in their fiscal account, something not seen in many other nations these days, certainly not the US, France or Germany.

But rising rates are wreaking havoc with equity markets, and that has become another fiscal problem since tax receipts from capital gains is such a significant part of the tax base these days, at least in the US.  So, yesterday’s desultory performance in the US, led lower by the NASDAQ’s -2.15% decline, was followed with a similarly negative feeling in Asia (Tokyo -2.7%, China -1.7%, HK -1.0%, Korea -5.7%, Taiwan -2.7%) with the similarity that they are all tech focused.  But weakness in the region was virtually universal, albeit not as dramatic.

In Europe, though, things are looking better after very solid Flash PMI data across the board.  So, Germany (+0.7%) is leading the way higher along with Spain (+0.8%) although France (+0.3%) and the UK (+0.1%) are also in the green, with the latter despite the fact that new PM Burnham is already discussing raising property taxes.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are marginally higher.  Despite yesterday’s angst, the NASDAQ has not been able to breach the key support level I am watching, as per the below chart.  (If it does, I will be looking to buy QQQ puts, but we shall see if that happens.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Briefly regarding metals markets, with oil under pressure today, we cannot be surprised that the metals markets are climbing with gold (+0.2%), silver (+1.2%) and copper (+0.1%) all in the green.  Earlier this week it appeared that relationship may have broken, but it has reasserted itself for now.

Finally, the dollar is little changed this morning, perhaps slightly softer.  But it has rallied over the past week alongside yields as per the below chart of the DXY.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The major outlier today is KRW (+0.9%) although that is simply an ongoing extension of the central bank’s efforts to add liquidity and internationalize the currency.  Thus far, it has been pretty successful, at least their discussions of the process.  Since things don’t really change until January 2027, I guess we will need to wait until later to find out if it holds up.

But I also wanted to mention the yen (0.0%) which yesterday touched yet another new 40-year low (dollar high).  I have created a chart of USDJPY from FRED data so you can get a sense of how quickly the yen appreciated back then in the wake of the Plaza Accord.  The red circled area down leg took place almost entirely in June 1986.

And that’s pretty much it.  On the data front we get Flash PMIs (exp Manfacutring 54.3, Services 51.5) and New Home Sales (610K).  Once again, we are at a summer weekend so I expect that by noon, things will really slow down.  I don’t believe today’s data will have an impact, and I expect a pretty dull day overall.  Arguably, until the FOMC, absent a major turn in the Gulf, things should remain fairly stagnant as there is no data of note to change opinions. 

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Some Heartburn

Posted on by 
Chairman Warsh, to the House, testified
And explained that his tolerance died
For higher inflation
Throughout this great nation
And ‘bout this, he will not backslide

But prior to his starlike turn
Investors and markets did learn
That CPI fell,
Though not a death knell,
And caused, for rate hawks, some heartburn

It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. – Abraham Lincoln

The attributed saying above, while not certain that it was uttered by President Lincoln, still makes its point eloquently, as well as somewhat humorously.  And I strongly believe that every member of the FOMC should take it to heart before they speak.  In fact, they should be thanking Chairman Warsh for his efforts to shut them up, because then they won’t sound quite so foolish.

For instance, just Monday, Governor Waller, in a speech in New York, finished with the following line, “But I don’t take the inflationary signals I have discussed today lightly. If we get another hot reading on core inflation this week, then the FOMC will need to consider tightening monetary policy in the near term.”  Oops!

And this is one of the issues because many believe that the FOMC gets the data earlier than the release date and so have inside information.  Thus, when Waller talks about the risk of a hot print, many think he knows something.  And this is yet another reason that ending forward guidance and reducing the commentary of the FOMC will be valuable.  

By now, I am sure you are aware that yesterday’s CPI reading was the largest downside miss since Covid in 2020, with the headline number falling -0.4% on the month and the annual slipping back to 3.8% while the core number was flat with the annual falling to 2.6%.  Now, as the Inflation Guy explains, this was the product of numerous subcomponents declining, not just the price of oil/gasoline and this is not the venue to discuss them (read the link).  

But it certainly helped Chairman Warsh in the timing of his testimony as nobody there could ‘blame’ him for still rising prices, at least for now.  As expected, several House members tried to get interest rate information from him, but he remains firm that the Fed’s mission is to drive inflation lower and this will be done through both interest rate and balance sheet policy changes, not through forward guidance.

It is not surprising that the market responded dramatically with the following chart from Polymarket (taken from Kobeissi on X) showing an impressive change of heart.

While I use the Fed funds futures chart from the CME as my guidepost, there is something to be said for the wisdom of crowds here.  Remember, this is a binary call, not a gradient one.  But even the futures markets adjusted significantly, and rightly so, with the probability of a July hike there falling to 16% from 40% when I wrote yesterday morning.  As well, while there is still more than one rate hike priced for 2026, the calculated change has declined to 33bps from 43bps yesterday morning.

Source: cmegroup.com

Skepticism remains rife regarding Chairman Warsh and his attempt to change the way things are done at the Fed, but personally, I am quite optimistic that he is attacking the real problems.  Remember, the Fed is a 114-year-old institution with an extremely long memory and a staff that, like most of government, believes they know what is best for others.  I strongly subscribe to the monetarist view that printing more money leads to more inflation, but making a change that dramatic all at once is just not possible.  Let us be thankful that Chairman Warsh appears to have a better understanding and is working to change things.  And remember, he has only been in the Chair for two months, give him some time.

As I start to recap markets, it is quite interesting that the price of oil seems to have decoupled from the war in Iran.  I say this because as I type at 7:15, a bit more than an hour after CentCom explained they had instituted another wave of military attacks on Iran, WTI is largely indifferent to the news.  While it has edged higher by 0.7%, a look at the chart below of the past 24-hours shows essentially no response.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, let’s turn to equities, which rallied on the CPI data in the US yesterday and saw follow through in Asia with Tokyo (+1.5%), HK (+1.4%) and Korea (+6.25%) all having strong sessions as did almost every market in the region.  However, there was an exception, China (-0.2%) which while not disastrous, substantially lagged other markets.  Arguably, the proximate cause of that disappointment was the disappointing data released last night as per the below:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Certainly, GDP at 4.3%, below even Xi’s reduced target must be concerning and Fixed Asset Investment (housing) continues to crumble.  It is very difficult to look at this data, as well as their monetary data which, for instance, shows loan growth not merely trending lower, but doing so at an accelerating rate as per the below chart and conclude things are going will there for the economy or the equity markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Europe, though, continues to lag with all the major bourses lower as the DAX (-0.8%) leads the way followed by Spain (-0.6%) and then France and the UK both slipping -0.2%. (I guess World Cup results are not indicative of their equity markets!). As to US futures, at this hour (7:25) they are all up very slightly.

Bond yields fell yesterday, notably the 2yr slipping -6bps, while the 10yr only fell -3bps.  This morning, though, yields are edging back higher with Treasury yields up 2bps and European sovereign yields higher by between 3bps and 4bps.  While equity markets remain sanguine about Iran, it seems bond markets are having a tougher time.  JGB yields (-2bps) are bucking the trend as there are still those who are looking for Japanese pension funds to start bringing more money home.

While the metals markets rallied yesterday, this morning they are under pressure again with gold (-0.6%) and silver (-1.2%) giving back yesterday’s gains while copper (-0.3%) is consolidating after jumping a dime yesterday.

Finally, the dollar is sidelined this morning with no notably large movements in either the G10 or EMG blocs.  A brief word on the yen, which has certainly been the subject of much digital ink spillage lately, as it seems all those thoughts of the pension fund support for the yen are not part of the FX conversation.  We remain less than 50 pips from the peak seen back on June 30 and I see very little reason for the broader trajectory to change.  The BOJ is not going to waste its reserves in this process, and given the gradual movement, I don’t think they are that upset.  As long as PM Takaichi is planning to spend more money, whether on infrastructure or investment, given they are borrowing all of it, a strong yen seems highly improbable.

On the data front, this morning brings PPI (exp 6.2% headline, 5.2% core) and the Empire State Manufacturing Index (8.8) at 8:30.  Then, at 9:45 the BOC will most likely leave their base rate on hold at 2.25% and at 10:00, Chairman Warsh will testify to the Senate Banking Committee.  We also get the Fed’s Beige Book this afternoon, EIA oil inventories and three more Fed speakers, although with Warsh speaking, will anybody care?  Especially since they continue to make fools of themselves with their own forward guidance.

The most remarkable thing to me is how insouciant market participants have become despite increased hostilities in the Gulf.  But both oil and equity traders have seemingly decided that other things matter more.  With that in mind, it is hard to get excited about too much these days.  Unless we see markets breaking their recent ranges, in either direction, I suspect that the weight of summer, and reduced liquidity is going to prevent anything substantial from happening anytime soon.

Good luck

Adf

Subterfuge

Posted on by 
The narrative right now is run
By hawks who think Warsh is the one
To raise short-term rates
Right out of the gates
And so, they’re long bucks by the ton

Thus, futures positions are huge
With no effort at subterfuge
But if they are wrong
About being long
The hawks will have all been the stooge

In an otherwise quiet session, this morning I am going to borrow from Ole Sloth Hansen, the futures maven at Saxo Bank.  He publishes a Substack that is well worth reading if you are actively involved in the markets as he breaks down futures positions and offers context.  This morning I am going to juxtapose those positions with my views, which are diametrically opposed to the way the market is currently positioned.

Starting with the FX market, he has created a wonderful chart showing that the net non-commercial long USD position against eight major currencies has reached 10-year highs.  Interestingly, the DXY is not anywhere near those highs, although it appears that is the growing expectation of many traders.

Arguably, this is based on the idea that Chairman Warsh is Paul Volcker redux and will be quite hawkish going forward.  Now, I cannot tell if this is the narrative because, absent forward guidance, narrative writers must now think on their own and are incapable of doing so, or if they truly believe that despite all the talk that rising oil prices were going to feed through to inflation readings, declining oil prices won’t have the same impact on the way down.

But it is not just the FX trading community that is on board with this story, so too is the short-term interest rate trading community.  While LIBOR has been forced out of existence, SOFR (Secured Overnight Funding Rate) is the new benchmark in interest rate markets and, naturally, there is an active futures market there as well.  As you can see from the below chart, also from Mr Hansen, the current positioning is strongly expecting higher short-term interest rates.

This is completely in accord with the Fed funds futures market where the market continues to price a 25% probability of a hike at the end of July and a virtual certainty of a hike by October.  By my calculations, as per the chart from cmegroup.com below, the market is pricing about 30bps of rate hikes by the December meeting.

Or course, by now you know that my view is the Fed will not be hiking rates at all, and as measured inflation slides back (just look around the world and at oil prices) the narrative will belatedly shift to the need willingness to reduce rates on Warsh’s part and all these market positions will adjust.  

My longer-term positive view of the dollar is based on the ongoing investment inflows into the US, for real investment, not merely equity market participation, and nothing has happened to change that view.  In fact, the announcement yesterday by Toyota that they will be expanding their San Antonio truck and SUV plant with a $3.6 billion investment is just the latest in a series of these announcements.  But that is not the carry trade driving things.  In fact, ironically, we could easily see US rates slide a bit as the dollar rallies on natural investment demand rather than financial demand.  As well, if I am correct, the Fed funds futures market is going to head back to pricing no rate hikes, perhaps as soon as next week after the CPI data is released.

I think the lesson is that the narrative writers need to bone up on their understanding of macroeconomics and international finance as the central bank policy driver may not be the future.  Certainly, if Mr Warsh has anything to say about it, and he does, that will likely be the case.

Which takes us to the overnight session. The most excitement overnight was for Belgium as they completely outplayed the USMNT in a 4-1 victory in Seattle.  But otherwise, the story that Iran fired two missiles at ships heading through Hormuz helped support oil prices, but as I type, they are higher by just 0.7% (~50¢/bbl) so not really very much.  The interesting discussion in the oil market this morning is the fact that Iranian oil, which is no longer sanctioned, cannot seem to find any buyers with some 58 million barrels in floating storage and no takers.  Meanwhile, despite ongoing buying by central banks around the world, gold (-0.5%) continues to struggle, although appears to be putting in a base and silver (-1.4%) is suffering as well.  

In the bond market, yields are creeping higher with both Treasuries and European sovereigns all higher by 2bps this morning with a similar move by JGBs overnight.  My take is this is less of an inflation concern than a supply concern.  Certainly, there is no indication that the US, Europe or Japan are about to slow down their fiscal stimulus, with Europe now further ramping up its defense spending as the US pressures NATO further.  To me, this is where the rubber will meet the road as if Warsh really does seek to reduce the Fed’s balance sheet, it is not clear where buyers are going to be found to replace them.  I suspect we will see more regulatory freedom for banks and insurance companies to hold Treasuries without capital penalties, but that is a big hole to fill.  

In the equity markets, yesterday’s US rally was followed by a reversal in Asia with Korea (-4.9%) leading the way lower on the back of weakness in SK Hynix stock despite stellar earnings.  But that dragged down the entire region (Japan -2.1%, China -1.0%, HK -0.5%, Taiwan -2.3%) and various declines everywhere else except Singapore (+1.4%) although I can find no specific catalyst for that outlier move.  In Europe, things are more mixed with Germany (-0.7%) under pressure although there is modest strength in the UK (+0.3%), France (+0.2%) and Spain (+0.1%).  All the talk here is about defense spending, although one would have thought that would help Germany the most.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:55), NASDAQ futures are following Asia lower, -1.3%, but the other indices are little changed.

Finally, the dollar is generally a bit stronger this morning, at least against its G10 counterparts, although JPY (+0.1%) is holding up.  But the dollar’s gains are minimal, about 0.1% to 0.2%, so it is difficult to get too excited.  In the EMG bloc KRW (+1.0%) is the clear leader after the country expanded trading hours in the currency markets, and there has been modest strength in BRL (+0.4%) and INR (+0.4%) although neither has seen any major policy changes.

On the data front, yesterday’s ISM Services data was right on the button at 54.0.  This morning we see the Trade Balance (exp -$78.5B) and that’s it.  The hawkish Fed story continues to be the most popular, and until we see some data that can undermine that story, I expect it will remain in place.  Tomorrow’s FOMC Minutes should be interesting as there was obviously a lot of back and forth at the meeting, but since we have already heard further from Mr Warsh, and it is way too early to hear back from the task forces, I suspect we are in for more quiet markets for now.

Good luck

Adf

My House

Posted on by 
Said Kevin, the Fed’s now MY house
And views that we choose to espouse
Will no longer guide
So, when we decide
To move, we expect some to grouse

As well, we are set to review
Our policies all the way through
So, comms will be changed
And data arranged
In truth, it is quite the to-do

This is an evening note as I will be unavailable to write tomorrow morning as we head off to show GCH Nubia’s Take Your Breath Away, aka Marvel to a show.  That is his handler and the judge who awarded him Best of Breed that day.

But not surprisingly, the only thing that really mattered today was the FOMC meeting.  I have to say, having watched the entire press conference I am really impressed with Chairman Warsh.  I love the fact that he shortened the statement and that they are ending forward guidance.  And it was quite interesting that half the reporters’ questions were trying to get guidance about what the Fed may do in the future, despite him repeating that there was no more forward guidance.  My take is Fed reporters are going to have to learn about how markets work and more importantly, market practitioners are going to make up their own minds rather than rely on the Fed to bail them out.  This is all really positive!

The most noteworthy thing was the creation of five task forces to address issues with the way the Fed currently does things on the following subjects:

  1. Communications
  2. Balance Sheet
  3. Data Sources
  4. Productivity and Jobs
  5. Inflation Framework

So, it strikes me that Chairman Warsh is going to look to reprogram the Fed, something that has been sorely in need.  Do not be surprised when much of the commentary is negative on these subjects because those are the folks who benefitted from the old way of doing things.  They now need to change their models and their narratives and they are unhappy.  Another benefit.

The upshot of the meeting was that rates were left on hold and the dot plot, where Warsh did not supply a dot, showed that half the committee thought rates appropriate, and half thought they would be higher by the end of the year.

Of course, this largely jibes with the Fed funds futures market as you can see in the latest table from the CME.

Of course, looking at this table, something seems amiss for September, perhaps there was a large position put in place that drove the market.  At any rate stock markets were unhappy with the major indices slipping -1.0% or more after the FOMC although bonds did very little and commodities continue to show oil slipping while gold and silver rise.  As to the dollar, it rallied pretty much across the board.

It is way too early to anticipate exactly how things are going to play out, but I am encouraged.  I strongly believe a little price volatility is a small price to pay to reduce systemic risk by reducing leverage in the system, and that is very likely to be the outcome if Mr Warsh has his way.  My forecast is the “ample reserves” balance sheet program is going to change before he is done.  If that is the case, I think they will have a real opportunity to get inflation under control.  As well, I believe that prospect will undermine much of the ‘death of the dollar’ narrative.  It truly will be significant.  We shall see.

Good luck

Adf