Tag Archives: #Warsh

In Tears

Posted on by

As I wrote yesterday, “at least” did a lot of work in the Treasury announcement as it opened the door for significantly larger purchases of longer dated bonds, enough to truly have a market impact.  Most of the initial analysis on the announcement focused on the extra $2 billion to be purchased in each operation.  But what if, instead of $2 billion, they purchase $50 billion each time?  Suddenly, that is a significant reduction in long bonds outstanding, and the program will have a much greater price impact.  Which leads to this Bloomberg headline and story, Bessent Says He’s Ready to Expand Treasury Buybacks.  I believe it would be a mistake to dismiss the Treasury’s ability to achieve their goals as, after all, they do make the rules.

The upshot is that after a one-day rally in bonds, yields retraced those early declines (see chart below) and stocks fell sharply yesterday, clearly not the desired outcome.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Much hay has been made regarding the total US debt surpassing $40 trillion the other day, although I see that as merely a reaction to a big round number, not dissimilar to a trading situation in, for example USDJPY, where the market is focused on 160.00 and a break is seen as significant from a trading perspective, but less so from a policy perspective.  I am not seeking to downplay the problems that exist in the US regarding fiscal policy.  I am, after all, a hard money guy (it’s why I am working on USDi, the only inflation tracking cryptocurrency) and a proponent of a much smaller government with much reduced spending.  And that is what is necessary to address the problems at the root.  But that takes Congress and, alas, seems highly unlikely anytime soon.  Personally, I will not bet against Bessent, but that seems to be a popular idea right now.  It is certainly a popular thesis on X.

This saga is only beginning, and I expect that it will be a key topic of conversation for a while, at least until we see a substantial move in yields from the current level.  It is interesting to note, however, the difference in attitude from Chairman Warsh, who explained the market was doing the Fed’s job for them by pushing up yields thus tightening policy, and Secretary Bessent who continues to say that yields don’t represent fundamentals.  Of course, both sides are talking their respective books, so say what they need to say.  Part of me thinks they have dinner together and laugh over how they are confusing markets.

Let’s start our market descriptions with gold (+1.7%) this morning as it is extending its rally of the past two weeks.  A look at the chart below shows the trend line lower from the peak in late January (the date Kevin Warsh was named Fed Chair) was broken on August 6th and has been driving higher since, up 8% since that day and more than 15% since the low print on June 30th.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Silver (+2.3%) and copper (+2.1%) are also rallying here as there is a growing skepticism about financial assets and it appears investors are looking for things that are not reliant on government promises to retain value.  While I rarely discuss Bitcoin, that has rallied nearly 25% this week on largely the same story, although it has also benefitted from additional Treasury regulations being promulgated as part of the GENIUS Act and hopes for the CLARITY Act to pass soon as well.  Interestingly, BTC bottomed on June 30th as well.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to oil prices (+0.35%) they are creeping higher this morning as the ongoing Iran situation remains unresolved with no end in sight.  A key piece of news, that hasn’t gotten that much attention, is that the UAE has completely shut off all trade with Iran after two of its ships were attacked in the Gulf.  This matters hugely for Iran as the UAE was a significant trade conduit in things like machinery and equipment, as well as food and other necessities.  This will help the US sanctions regime significantly.  In fact, yesterday, Iranian Minister Ghalibaf, in a meeting in Baghdad explained that if the economy suffers further, that will be a major problem for the military and the nation.  Maybe this is going to end sooner than later after all.

If we turn to the bond market, while Wednesday saw a sharp decline in yields, yesterday saw that reverse, as per the chart at the top of the note and this morning, yields are unchanged from yesterday’s close.  That is true in the US and across every European market.  It feels like investors are waiting for the next piece of information.  The exception here is JGBs (+4bps) where yields rose after inflation data was released at 1.9% (1.8% core) as expected, but trending higher again as government efforts to mitigate the impact of higher energy prices are starting to falter.  As you can see in the chart below, though, the inflation regime in Japan has changed dramatically from the previous decades.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the stock markets, yesterday’s US performance was pretty crummy (a technical term), with declines on the order of -1% across all major indices.  But that did not follow through so much in Asia (China +0.6%, HK +1.2%, Korea +0.9%, Taiwan +0.65%) although the Nikkei (-0.3%) did lag.  Nor did it have an impact in Europe, although other than Spain (+0.7%), the other major markets are higher by about 0.1% only.  And US futures this morning are in the green, +0.5% across the board, at this hour (7:30).  A key part of yesterday’s US declines was a disappointing earnings report for Walmart, where although they beat earnings, their forecasts going forward were softer.

Finally, the dollar is under further pressure this morning, falling against almost every major counterpart with some substantial declines.  For instance, commodity currencies (AUD, NZD, NOK, ZAR) are all firmer by about +0.7% this morning following their local commodity strengths higher, although CLP (-0.1%) is an outlier here.  But we are also seeing strength in the EUR (+0.25%), GBP (+0.2%), JPY (+0.3%) and CAD (+0.35%) from the G10 bloc and similar gains from EMG currencies (MXN +0.3%, PLN (+0.4%), HUF (+0.6%) and the biggest gainer, KRW (+0.7%) which continues to benefit from capital inflows as well as repatriation by SK Hynix after the US IPO.  If we use the DXY (-0.25%) as our proxy the recent downtrend also started at the end of June as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Two things here.  First, despite this decline, the dollar remains right in the middle of its longer-term range and until we break below 96.50 on the DXY, I do not believe the day-to-day movement indicates much.  Second, though, and more importantly, the FX markets are typically the release valve for pressures in a given economy, as no government can control capital flows, the exchange rate and monetary policy simultaneously, as pointed out by Robert Mundell in 1960 and 1963 (the so-called impossible trinity).  In this case, if the US continues to struggle with the debt situation, or else decides to head down the YCC road for real (meaning the Fed caps yields and buys whatever bonds necessary to do so), the dollar will suffer dramatically and likely boost inflation.  But we are a long way from that situation I believe, and it will take time to get there, if that is the direction.

On the data front, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the Philly Fed’s blowout number of 47.4 yesterday with the manufacturing sector the biggest beneficiary.  This morning all we see is Flash PMI data (exp 53.9 Mfg, 54.0 Services) although with both the Philly and Empire State readings so strong, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a much stronger read here as well.

And that’s it for the week.  Certainly, it was more exciting than anticipated given the Treasury/Bessent announcement, but until we see just how many bonds they buy in a few weeks, we really don’t know how things will play out.  In the meantime, earnings have continued to be strong generally, and I see no reason for risk assets to decline for now.  The dollar, however, is starting to look a little shaky, and if we see a bit more of a fall, I might get concerned.

Good luck and good weekend

adf

Some Despair

Posted on by 
The story of late is the Bond
Where holders are now all despond
As governments spend
On infinite end
And traders are now far less fond

One question is, what will they buy?
With funds that, to bonds, don’t apply
Are stocks on their list?
With gold, will they tryst?
Or keep it in cash til they die?

As well, one must ask if the Chair
Is comfy or has some despair
Perhaps in his speech
Next Friday he’ll preach
He’ll offer more than laissez-faire

The bond market is where the narrative has turned as yields have broken above multi-year highs and apocalyptic scenarios are a dime a dozen.  As you can see from the chart below from Yahoo Finance, the last time the 30-year yield touched its current yield of 5.31% was June 2007 and the last time it closed at this level or higher was June 2004.  That’s a pretty long time.

So, is this the aberration or is this the norm?  I guess the answer to that question is; how do you define the norm?  If you look at the very left edge of the chart above, in February 1985, the 30-year yield reached 11.9%, and in truth, was higher than that before then.   This was the legacy of Paul Volcker’s attack on the rampant inflation he inherited when he sat down in the Fed Chair.  While many of you will not remember, I’m sure you have all heard of his willingness to drive interest rates higher (which he did by withdrawing bank reserves from the market, not unilaterally raising interest rates like the Fed does today) until such time as inflation cracked.  This resulted in the twin recessions early in the 1980’s and made life very difficult for small businesses around the country.  But it was effective.  As you can see in the chart below I constructed from FRED data, the average CPI during Volcker’s term was 6.17%, and although it did briefly dip below 2%, it finished right around 4%.  

But what his actions did was create the prerequisite for a 40-year bond market rally, where prices rose and yields declined.  That bottomed in 2020 during Covid and has since reversed course.  Now, I think it is fair to say that the Covid year was an aberration as the Fed executed QE on steroids, pumping up their balance sheet by about $4 trillion.  Of course, in the wake of the GFC, the Fed quadrupled their balance sheet from ~$1 trillion to ~$4 trillion prior to Covid as you can see in the below chart from FRED.

During the pre-Covid period, measured inflation never rose very high at all, in fact many Fed members, including Chairs Bernanke, Yellen and Powell, all expressed concern about “too low” inflation!  The answer to this seeming conundrum was that all that money flowed into financial markets thus inflating asset prices, not consumable prices.  But when the government handed out stimulus checks, three times, during Covid and the aftermath, as well as PPP loans and increased jobless benefits, the more recent $4 trillion of QE came rushing into the real economy and we experienced too much money chasing too few goods and services, which drove the dramatic rise in CPI in 2021-2022, something which we all still experience.

But the question remains, are 4% bond yields the norm?  5%? 6%?  A rule of thumb from my early days in the markets, which was back in the mid 1980’s, was that the 10-year yield should approximate the nominal GDP growth rate, which given a ‘normal’ yield curve, would imply that the 30-year yield should be somewhere between 50bps and 100bps above that level.  In the current ‘run it hot’ paradigm, where virtually every Western country is borrowing and spending money aggressively, and where nominal GDP just printed at 7.9% in Q2 (it was 5.8% in Q1), it is not hard to make the case that the 30-year bond yield remains ‘cheap’.

Of course, it has been a long time since that heuristic was widely known, and almost all market participants today have never lived in that world.  In fact, most traders on major bank and fund desks, started their careers after the GFC so have no experience with the previous monetary regime.  

Let’s cut to the chase.  Is this the end of the world?  Absolutely not, as I have shown, it’s not even an unusual place for yields.  Are financial markets going to benefit from this?  Probably not too much, at least not universally.  There will be sectors that do well and others that suffer under a higher rate regime.  Will the economy suffer?  So far, it has shown impressive resilience, but that is a consequence of the ‘run it hot’ thesis.  If that stops or even slows down if Congress reduces its spending (as if!), then I imagine we will see equity markets suffer pretty significantly alongside bonds.  The current situation remains fragile, and while Chairman Warsh is trying to instill some antifragility to the market by forcing traders and investors to think for themselves, thus reducing their risk profiles, it is likely to get pretty bumpy if he succeeds.

So, how is this impacting markets around the world?  Let’s take a tour.  Yesterday’s modest weakness in the US was followed by a generally weak session in Asia (Tokyo -2.5%, China -0.3%, Korea -1.5%, India -0.6%, Taiwan -1.2%) with Tech obviously under pressure, although HK managed to stay unchanged and New Zealand (+1.0%) saw fit to rally on stronger commodity prices.  In Europe this morning, bourses are lackluster with Germany, France and Italy all lower while Spain has edged higher and the UK is little changed after GDP data  met expectations.  US futures, though, are under pressure this morning led by the NASDAQ (-1.3%) at this hour (7:55).

In the bond market, yields are higher around the world with Treasuries (+2bps) performing slightly better than European sovereigns (+4bps across the board) although Gilts and JGBs are also only higher by 2bps.  It does appear that bond investors are starting to get antsy about things, but history tells us things will need to get MUCH worse on the spending/deficit side before governments are forced to change their ways.  Certainly, given the concerns over a Democratic sweep in Congress in November, there is no reason to believe that spending will slow.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.6%) is following on yesterday’s gains as uncertainty over the Hormuz situation and increased concern over Ukraine’s attacks on Russian oil infrastructure continue to drive fear in markets.  I cannot opine on these things as despite the fact there are voluminous reports, it is nearly impossible to tell signal from noise.  As to the metals markets, after a pretty solid session yesterday, they are softer this morning (au -0.5%, Ag -1.0%, Cu -1.0%) although trends continue to develop higher here.

Finally, the dollar continues to be a sleeper overall, with the DXY unchanged on the day and most major currencies doing very little.  One aberration is KRW (+0.4%) which has seen some significant investment inflow from real money accounts, part of the reason it has performed so well lately.  But spare a moment for the yen (-0.2%) which refuses to strengthen no matter how hard Ueda, Takaichi or Bessent wish it to be so.  As you can see from the chart below, the aftermath of the most recent intervention is remarkably similar to the previous bout, (and every bout before that).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My take is we will continue to see a gradual depreciation in the yen until the BOJ acts decisively (don’t hold your breath for that) or the Fed reverses course and starts cutting.  As of this morning, the probability of a September hike in the US is 34% and in Japan it is 79%.  We shall see.

On the data front, we get Housing Starts (exp 1.35M), Building Permits (1.37M), IP (0.3%) and Capacity Utilization (76.3%), none of which I expect to move markets.  Despite the growing concerns in the bond market, the movement has been quite contained and amid lighter than normal staffing through the summer, I still don’t anticipate a lot of movement.  I still think we are waiting for Warsh next Friday before anything big happens.

Good luck

Adf

Held At Bay

Posted on by 
The doldrums have finally arrived
As interest in markets nosedived
While stocks still creep higher
The marginal buyer
Is sleeping and must be revived

But it seems unlikely today
Is going to show us the way
I think, til Warsh speaks, 
And that’s in two weeks,
Excitement will be held at bay

While not every market is completely stagnating, for the past seven sessions, despite NFP, CPI and many stories about oil and war, market price action has been extremely dull.  Whether we look at stocks:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Or bonds, which in fairness have been a little choppier but still gone nowhere:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The dollar:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Or even oil, which in the past week has barely moved on net:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

We are very clearly in the summer doldrums.  I think even the narrative writers have gone on summer holiday as there is precious little to discuss.  Yes, we’ve seen a soft NFP report and softer than expected CPI and PPI data, but that has not generated much excitement.  While the Iran situation can always find something for people to discuss, certainly based on the recent EIA oil inventory data, the ‘running out of oil’ story has been put to bed.

Frankly, there is very little to discuss, and I have a feeling it is going to stay that way until we hear from Chairman Warsh at the Jackson Hole summer confab in exactly two weeks.  As it’s August, we already knew that Europe was on vacation, but other than some primary elections in the US, where the effort to generate excitement ahead of the midterms in November has not yet gained traction, what is really new?  Arguably, the most interesting story is Enes Kanter Freedom, the ex-NBA player declaring for the WNBA draft as the WNBA cannot seem to figure out how to define a woman.

So, to keep things brief, I will give a quick rundown now and send you on your way.  Yesterday’s modest gains in US equities were followed by a mixed session in Asia with Tokyo (+0.6%), Korea (+2.4%, which these days is a modest movement here) and Indonesia (+1.6%) all gaining while China was flat and HK (-1.1%), Australia (-0.8%) and Taiwan (-0.5%) all slipped a little.  It is hard to tell a story about this outcome.  

In Europe, only Germany (+0.7%) is showing any life, reaching another record high on the back of some more strong earnings reports, mostly from German defense manufacturers.  But the rest of the continent is little changed, +/- 0.1%.  And at this hour (7:10), US futures are also +/-0.1%, in other words flat.

In the bond market, Treasury yields, which slipped -5bps yesterday as both PPI and oil prices were softer, have edged higher by 1bp.  However, European sovereign yields are all higher by between 3bps and 4bps this morning, although it is not clear what is driving this movement.  In truth, if I use bunds as my example, while like Treasuries, the price action has been choppy, as you can see in the below chart from tradingeconomics.com, we haven’t gone anywhere in weeks.

As to JGB yields, this morning they are unchanged, hanging on just below the recently achieved multi-decade highs.  

But speaking of Japan, while the yen (+0.2%) is slightly stronger this morning, as you can see in the chart below, the post intervention pattern remains in force.  In fact, Bloomberg had an article about how speculators used the intervention to reload on short JPY positions.  But the more interesting thing I saw this morning was the following Tweet:

Now, I don’t know how they arrived at that number, and while I always thought the trade was in excess of $3 trillion, $20 trillion is much larger than I expected, but if this is true, it certainly adds a certain stress level to the global economy.  I have maintained that outward Japanese investment in financial products, so purchases of non-Japanese bonds and stocks buy Japanese institutions is a part of this process and adds to the number.  I assume that is part of the calculation Deutsche has made, but I could be wrong, I have not seen the actual report.  But along those lines, in the most recent week, Japanese investors purchased >¥1.6 trillion (~$10 billion) in foreign bonds, keeping up the flow.

If we look at just the G-SIB banks, the major players in international finance, according to Grok, their total combined balance sheets summed to about $78.4 trillion at the end of 2025.  Of course, assuming the carry trade makes heavy use of derivatives for financing, much of that alleged $20 trillion may not show up on their balance sheets, but perhaps it represents as much as 15% of bank assets.  This is quite a concern, especially as, again according to Grok, those same banks have only ~$4.7 trillion in Tier 1 capital.  

So, if these numbers are even in the ballpark, it tells a tale of a highly leveraged banking system that is subject to major convulsions if a certain series of events unfold, notably, the carry trade loses its luster.  (if you ever wondered why goldbugs are goldbugs, this is exhibit A).  The thing to remember is it has taken decades for this trade to accumulate, and it will not decumulate in weeks, or even months, but will take years to do so.  As well, if things start to turn, you can be certain that central banks will do their best to prevent a runaway train, and they have enormous power, specifically the power to print money, to slow things down.  But that doesn’t mean things won’t get ugly if this is the future.  I hark back to my comments regarding the end of forward guidance and how that will enhance markets’ collective anti-fragility.  It feels like the global financial system, if this is true, is seriously fragile!

Ok, let’s wrap up.  In FX, the dollar is softer this morning across the board, with the DXY (-0.4%) quite representative of the movement across both G10 and EMG currencies.  However, the thing to remember here is that we are still rangebound overall for the past year in G10 currencies, although we have seen broad based strength in a number of EMG currencies like MXN, BRL and ZAR , all of which have much higher real rates than the US.

Lastly, oil (+0.3%) is a touch higher, while metals prices (Au +0.3%, Ag +0.8%) are also firming up on the softer dollar.  But there is little to discuss here.  News that the US is sending another aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf area got oil to rise earlier, but that is fading already.

On the data front, this morning brings Retails Sales (+0.1%, +0.2% -ex autos) and then Michigan Sentiment (54.5) at 10:00.  There is one Fed speaker, an Atlanta Fed VP and acting President as they seek a new President.  However, given her acting status and the fact Atlanta is not a voter, I don’t think anybody will even listen!

So, absent a seriously strong Retail Sales report, the die is cast for another slow day in my view. 

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Beguiled

Posted on by 
It turns out, inflation of late
Did not start to accelerate
Instead, it was mild
With doves now beguiled
But not yet declaring checkmate

The odds of a hike keep on sliding
But ere the Committee’s deciding
In two weeks, we’ll hear
Chair Warsh try to steer
The narrative with gentle (?) chiding

The fears over rising inflation have been allayed for the moment after yesterday’s CPI data was released right on expectations with monthly increases of 0.1% headline and 0.2% core and Y/Y results of 3.4% and 2.5% respectively.  For all those who have been pining for that rate hike ASAP, this was unwelcome news.  The below table from cmegroup.com shows how things have changed over the past month.

On July 13, markets were pricing a 75% probability of a hike in September with thoughts of a 50bp hike a reality.  This morning, the probability of that September rate hike has fallen to just 36%.  You may recall that I have been consistent in my views that there would be no rate hikes this year, and that continues to be my view.  If we look at the entire Fed funds futures curve, as per the next table, we now have one hike priced for December only, compared with two plus hikes several months ago.

This is not to say I believe that inflation is dead, just that it is not accelerating away.  As my friend The Inflation Guy points out in his piece on yesterday’s CPI, the data was boring, “Boring, right on expectations. The bad news is that it is boring and right on expectations…at 3%.”  This is still a far cry from the Fed’s self-defined 2% target, but fears of “Amerizuela” type outcomes are vastly overblown.  (However, you still want to protect you purchasing power and one effective way to do that is via USDi, the only inflation tracking cryptocurrency.)

Now, we still have a bunch more data before the next FOMC meeting, including today’s PPI, PCE at the end of the month and another NFP and CPI reading in September.  As well, we cannot forget that Chairman Warsh will have the opportunity to clarify his thinking at the Jackson Hole soiree on Friday morning, August 28th.

So, has anything really changed that much after the CPI report?  While the reality hasn’t shifted, it does appear that market participants are beginning to adjust their views a bit.  One number does not a trend make, nor will it have bolstered Warsh’s credibility, assuming that is in question, either.  This is a saga that will continue to play out over time.  It seems to me that if the Fed really wanted to fight inflation effectively, they would be digging much deeper into why they continue to hold >$1.9 trillion in MBS on their balance sheet and run an ample reserves framework.  Going back to scarce reserves allows the market to drive interest rates, something clearly on Chairman Warsh’s wish list.  But that will have to wait for the task force reports.

Ok, let’s see how markets other than Fed funds have responded to this news and data.  Since we are on the rates subject, let’s start there this morning with bonds which have seen yields slip -2bps in Treasuries and between -1bp and -3bps in Europe.  Oil prices (-2.1%) are slipping this morning so that appears to be the proximate cause of the yield move, a bit less concern over inflation.  Yesterday, after the CPI data, we also saw Treasury yields drop -2bps, so for now, fears of an imminent test of 5.0% on 10-year Treasuries seem overblown.  JGB yields, though, continue to creep higher, another 2bps overnight and are now just 3bps below their multi-decade high of 2.90% as per the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Speaking of Japanese rates, Bloomberg has an article this morning explaining that the Takaichi administration is ok with the BOJ raising rates sooner, a change in the market’s perspective if not an outright change of view there.  Alas for those looking for a stronger yen and the end of the carry trade, the impact of the report was essentially nil as you can see in the chart below.  The three large, red candles just to the right of center represent the immediate aftermath of the release of the report.  Net, USDJPY is virtually unchanged on the day and the trend since the intervention remains for the dollar to move higher.  My sense is perceptions of Fed rate activity is going to have a bigger impact than the BOJ for now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the FX market, +/- 0.2% covers the gamut for both G10 and EMG blocs.  It wasn’t just the CPI report that was boring, so are FX markets overall.

Turning to equities, yesterday’s US market response was benign with only the NASDAQ showing much life, gaining 0.5%.  In Asia, though we did see Tokyo (+1.1%) rise despite talk of the BOJ being more aggressive.  Of course, the real price action remains in Korea (+3.6%), which is redefining what equity index volatility actually means.  Otherwise, there were some gainers (Taiwan, New Zealand, India) and more laggards (China, HK, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia) but none of these moves topped 1% in either direction.  

European bourses, however, are feeling a bit better this morning led by Spain (+0.7%) and Germany (+0.5%) as earnings seem to be the driver here helping Spanish shares despite the tick higher in inflation there.  UK shares (-0.2%) are lagging after GDP and production data was on the disappointing side while the Trade Deficit expanded further.  And at this hour (7:30) US futures are little changed to slightly higher.

Finally, turning to commodities, oil’s decline seems to be attributable to the IEA reducing its global oil demand outlook (although they have been wrong about this for several years as they try to push a peak oil, transition to wind/solar narrative that is just not happening) as well as the fact that yesterday’s EIA data showed a 17+mm barrel build, a far cry from the slight draw expected and another blow to the tank bottoms story.  As to the precious metals, the luster is gone (Au -0.5%, Ag -0.6%, Cu -0.5%) although copper remains quite close to its all-time highs, and both gold and silver remain in short-term uptrends after seemingly having bottomed back in July.

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 202K) and Continuing (1800K) Claims data along with PPI (0.2%, 4.9% Y/Y) and core PPI (0.3%, 4.2% Y/Y).  It strikes me that neither of these releases are going to be major market movers.

It is summer, and I assure you trading desk vacation schedules are far more important than secondary economic data releases.  I suspect another boring day overall here.  In fact, I suspect that until Warsh speaks in two weeks, we may see very little activity across most markets.

Good luck

Adf

They Mostly Confuse

Posted on by 
We’re back to the Strait of Hormuz
As driver to all traders’ views
Both Trump and Iran
Have proffered a plan
But really, they mostly confuse

The, otherwise, story of note
Is coming as CPI’s quote
If hot, Chairman Warsh
Will field comments, harsh
If cool, he’ll be able to gloat

Oil prices (+1.5%) are higher again this morning and have now been up five consecutive sessions, rising 10% in that run as you can see in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is a theory that the rhetoric in Iran increases when they have oil to sell so need higher prices, but once those cargoes have been sold, they talk peace again.  I don’t think you can rule out that hypothesis although I certainly have no corroborating evidence it’s true.  The one thing I did note yesterday is an Iranian comment that as long as sanctions remain, diplomacy cannot happen which tells me that economic sanctions are biting harder.  Whatever, the situation on the ground (or water) is over there, I have no insight per se. 

Much has been made over the fact that the SPR is at its lowest level since 1983 and has fallen below 300 million barrels with all the attendant pearl clutching while simply ignoring the fact that the SPR releases have been oil swaps with the back ends starting to come back in the next several months in greater amounts than have been released.  Maybe the end is nigh regarding oil, and the doomsters will get their $200/bbl outcome, but I would still take the under there.

In sync with the oil price rise we have seen yields rise, as well (see chart below), around the world.  But here, it appears that Chairman Warsh is the favored scapegoat for all the world’s inflation problems.  To hear his critics explain, if only he would give us forward guidance, everything would be fantastic.  Hedge funds could load up on leverage and increase their profits, real money investors would be comfortable that future real returns would be acceptable and, most importantly, the punditry would be able to explain all this to us plebes and burnish their beliefs in their own brilliance.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But I wonder if there is not another explanation for rising yields that has nothing to do with the Fed, the idea that debt issuance, from both government and private sources, is growing dramatically and all that supply is weighing on prices, hence driving up yields.  We already know that governments around the world continue to issue debt willy-nilly, so there is nothing to discuss there.  But now the AI hyper scalers are issuing massive amounts of debt to pay for all the GPUs and data centers and power as the race to “win” in AI continues at an increasing pace.  

It is, of course, this last issue which has many pundits explaining that QE will soon reemerge as the only viable way for all that debt to get bought.  If central banks buy government debt that will leave funds for private investors to buy AI related debt.  And maybe that is the way it will work out although Chairman Warsh has thus far only discussed shrinking the balance sheet, not expanding it.

Please understand I am not ignoring the many serious problems that exist within the current fiscal and monetary frameworks around the world.  Government spending remains excessive as evidenced by the fact that virtually every nation in the world is running significant budget deficits as per the below table from tradingeconmics.com (notice China, a country that seems to get a pass on this score from the punditry).

All I am saying is that the idea that all of this is going to fall apart quickly is highly improbable.  As much as purists would like for there to be consequences for bad policy decisions, governments everywhere have an enormous number of tools to delay the pain, and they use them all the time.  Whether that is subsidies or tax cuts or regulations prohibiting competition, all these things substitute short-term gains for long-term problems.  But they will still be used regularly.

So, to recap, increasingly hawkish rhetoric on the Iran situation has driven oil prices higher which is increasing inflation concerns.  Adding to that is the ongoing fiscal profligacy of virtually every major government which is also weighing on bond prices and driving yields higher in sync.  And basically, the punditry has decided it’s all Kevin Warsh’s fault.  Too much will be made of tomorrow’s CPI report, whether it is hot or cool, that is the one things of which I am certain.

Ok, yesterday’s lackluster US session with all three major indices slipping a bit was followed by weakness in China (-0.8%) and HK (-1.1%) but elsewhere in Asia, things were mixed with Korea (+0.7%) gaining and the other regional bourses generally +/-0.5% or so.  Tokyo was closed for Mountain Day and the only other news of note from the region was the RBA left rates on hold at 4.35%, as expected, but expressed concerns about both slowing growth and future inflation.  Interestingly, Australian stocks were slightly higher despite that news, +0.2%.

In Europe, Spanish stocks (+0.5%) are the leader on the strength of Banco Santander’s share repurchase announcement while the rest of the continent and the UK are little changed.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:35) they are little changed.

While we have broadly discussed bond yields rising, and yesterday they were higher by 4bps-5bps in the US and Europe, this morning they are unchanged across the board.  Now, they were higher again this morning when I started to write, but it seems there was just a comment from Pakistan that the US and Iran are close to an agreement which has turned things around.  Oil prices, too have slipped back to unchanged on the day from an hour ago.

In the metals markets, gold (-0.2%) and silver (-0.9%) are backing off solid sessions yesterday and copper (+0.8%) continues to march higher.

Finally, the dollar is, net, little changed this morning, although we cannot ignore the fact that the yen fell -1.0% during yesterday’s session.  In fact, a look at the yen chart continues to show the market response to intervention, an immediate rally and a gradual decline resuming.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the space, KRW (+0.3%) is the actual largest mover today, and that is not enough of a move to spin any story.  The DXY remains just below 100 and firmly within its yearlong trading range and some pundits are saying the fact that it is not rallying during the current conditions, with yields rising and fear all about, is an indication that the dollar is losing its status.  However, I am confident if you offered those same pundits payment in dollars, they would grab them as greedily as possible!

On the data front, this is inflation week plus a few more things as follows:

TodayExisting Home Sales4.05M
WednesdayCPI0.1% (3.4% Y/Y)
 Ex food & energy0.2% (2.5% y/Y)
ThursdayInitial Claims202K
 Continuing Claims1800K
 PPI0.2% (4.9% Y/Y)
 Ex food & energy0.3% (4.2% Y/Y)
FridayRetail Sales0.1%
 -ex autos0.2%
 Michigan Sentiment54.5

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, all eyes will be on CPI tomorrow as investors and analysts look for clues as to how the Fed may behave going forward.  Speaking of the Fed, Cleveland Fed president Hammack said in an interview yesterday that she thought the Fed needed to raise rates more than 25bps to get inflation under control.  But as I think about the Fed and its dual mandate, of maximum employment and stable prices, I cannot help but wonder what they consider maximum employment.  While they have defined stable prices (incorrectly in my view) as Core PCE rising 2.0% per annum, they have never tied themselves to a number on employment.  So, here’s a thought.  Look at the Labor Force participation rate, which as per the data last Friday fell to 61.4%, that is the lowest level since 1975 (excepting Covid) as per the below chart from FRED.

That hardly seems maximal, but then, I’m just an FX guy, not a Fed PhD.  After all, if we take the plain meaning of the word maximum, as per the American Heritage Dictionary, I cannot look at the chart above and conclude they have achieved that part of their mandate either.

But that’s just me.  Anyway, if there is going to be movement on the Iran story, that will drive the immediate market movements, but you can be sure that in the current environment, it will all come back to the Fed and whatever they may do going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Smart or Insane

Posted on by 
While pundits all like to complain
About everything, smart or insane
When stock markets rise
It’s no real surprise
That few people care what they’re sayin’

As penance for yesterday’s overly long diatribe, I will keep this morning’s much shorter, especially since there is not nearly so much interesting to discuss.  There are still many discussions on the whys and wherefores of the US joining with Japan in intervening in the FX markets, with a pretty even mix of those saying it won’t matter and those saying it is a game changer.  As you can see from the chart below, this morning the beleaguered JPY (-0.45%) is slipping a little, but hardly enough to matter in the context of last week’s gains.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of course, we won’t really know how effective this bout of intervention has been for at least a few weeks/months, as the history, clearly shown on the chart is a big move higher followed by a gradual depreciation in the yen.  Will that play out again?  My suspicion is that absent a policy change by the BOJ (i.e. a more aggressive rate hike schedule) or the Japanese government (i.e. less fiscal stimulus) the answer is no.  This is especially true if the Fed raises rates, although I still do not believe that is coming soon.  

However, it is important to remember that the Fed funds futures market is confident of a hike by October, with a two-thirds probability of one next month as per the below cmegroup.com table.

Turning to the other major discussion from yesterday, the ongoing feedback/blowback from the Fed’s no movement, and more importantly from Warsh’s behavior during the press conference, that too remains a topic of discussion with pundits on both sides adamant that he was either right or wrong on both measures.  The only thing I am sure about is that he doesn’t care much about what the pundits are saying.  Rather, he is very likely focusing on getting his points across to the rest of the committee, and that will be a tough job.

In 2025, FOMC members gave, on average, one speech a day which added to the forward guidance which was a key tool in their toolbox.  You know I often railed against the ongoing verbal diarrhea from these folks as from the best I could tell, nothing said was ever designed to sway opinion, merely to burnish each speaker’s credentials.  And they clearly loved the quasi fame that came with it.  In fact, I suspect it is that very quasi fame the committee is most reluctant to cede.  Chairman Warsh has his work cut out for him.

As to today’s new stories, there are none, at least none of note.  There are more conflicting comments from President Trump and the Iranians about negotiations or not.  Yesterday’s ISM data was quite positive, coming in at 55.6 vs 54.0 expected, just another indication that the US economy continues to tick along quite nicely.  After that, the news heads towards the political with several key primary elections to be held today with DSA candidates picked to win and run in the general elections in November.

But what has everybody happy is the fact that equity markets are showing strength once again.  I read that of the S&P companies that have already reported, 85% have beaten estimates, a much higher than normal percentage (76% is the norm), and another positive for market bulls.  

So, let’s take a look at how markets behaved overnight with that theme.  The strong US performance was followed by a more mixed session in Asia, although there were more gainers (Tokyo, China, Korea, Australia, Indonesia, New Zealand) than laggards (HK, India, Philippines).  The tech story remains the major story since the oil story has become so confusing on a daily basis, I feel like most investors have moved on.  Meanwhile, in Europe, it is a broadly positive session as well led by Germany (+0.6%) and the UK (+0.35%) while France (+0.1%) and Spain (0.0%) are not quite as happy.  Arguably, the biggest news in Europe continues to be the unprecedented flood of illegal immigrants into Ceuta, Spain and the punditocracy is actively expressing their opinions on the issue, although whether there is a direct impact on the equity market in Madrid is unclear.  Lastly, US futures at this hour (7:20), are all pointing higher again as the market awaits earnings from SpaceX this afternoon after the close.

In the bond market, there continues to be a great deal of garment rending and teeth gnashing amongst the financial illuminati as yields hold the bulk of their recent gains.  This morning Treasury yields have backed up 1bp after yesterday’s -5bp decline, although European sovereign yields are generally lower by -1bp this morning.  As of now, there is no answer to the question of is the bond market focused on inflation or excess issuance although it could well be a little of both.

Remember when oil (-0.8%) was the only market that mattered, and all other trading looked there first.  We heard stories about $200/bbl coming soon and tank bottoms as reserves emptied and a growing concern about future economic activity.  Well, that never really happened.  As I type, WTI is back below $80/bbl and I particularly like this chart that calculates the mean price over the past 6 months ($86/bbl) and shows no trend whatsoever.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

To me, this implies there is a new equilibrium although I suspect that when the hostilities cease, and I believe they will at some point this year, we will see sharply lower prices for crude and products.  As to metals markets, they remain relatively uninteresting with modest gains today (Au +0.2%, Ag +2.4%, Cu +1.7%).

Finally, in the FX markets, away from the yen the dollar is under a bit of pressure this morning.  First, for all of you who follow the DXY and were excited by the ostensible breakout above 100.50, as you can see in the below chart, that story appears to have ended for now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But away from the yen this morning, the rest of the G10 have all shown modest gains led by AUD (+0.5%) after some positive household spending data.  Otherwise, 0.1% to 0.2% is the state of the day.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (+0.4%) is the leader of the pack on the combination of softer oil prices and stronger metals prices.  Too, BRL (+0.25%) and MXN (+0.25%) seem to be benefitting on the same basis.  Otherwise, it’s hard to get excited here.  Perhaps another bout of intervention will perk things up, but I doubt that will happen soon.

On the data front, there’s quite a bit to be released this week culminating in the Friday NFP report.

TodayTrade Balance-$73.0B
 JOLTs Job Openings7.4M
 Factory Orders0.2%
 -ex Transport0.5%
WednesdayASP Employment70K
 ISM Services54.5
ThursdayInitial Claims202K
 Continuing Claims1790K
 Nonfarm Productivity0.6%
 Unit Labor Costs2.1%
FridayNonfarm Payrolls80K
 Private Payrolls79K
 Manufacturing Payrolls4K
 Unemployment Rate4.2%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.5% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.3
 Participation Rate61.6%
 Consumer Credit$10.85B

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, there are three Fed speakers, and I wonder (and am hopeful) that we hear less and less from them going forward.  Obviously, all eyes will be on the payrolls on Friday, and we can dive into that later in the week.  But today, it is hard to get excited about anything.

Good luck

Adf

Pundits and Bores

Posted on by 
The fallout from Warsh’s decision
To leave rates without a revision
Has opened the doors
For pundits and bores
With hawks and doves set for collision

For some, Warsh has failed from the start
As they felt a rate hike was smart
But others explain
That under his reign
It’s markets that play the main part

For a no action outcome by the Fed last week, it certainly is interesting how much digital ink has been spilled discussing the outcome of that meeting and, depending on which side of the argument you fall, whether it was the right move or an error.  You know I have been of the belief that there will be zero rate hikes this year and nothing has changed that opinion yet.

There is a great deal of conversation regarding the Fed’s credibility and how despite Warsh’s tough talk about achieving their 2% inflation goal at his first meeting, by doing nothing last week, he has trashed that credibility.  My first thought here is, given the Fed has failed in its key objective for more than 5 straight years on its own terms, it is difficult for me to accept they had a lot of credibility left to trash.  But my second thought is to listen to the Chairman’s words about allowing the market to do its job, and not simply watch the Fed, and I realize there are an awful lot of analysts and pundits who don’t know how to do that and therefore are extremely uncomfortable now.  As I wrote last week, these folks get paid a lot of money by Wall Street and now they have to earn it.  So perhaps that explains the ongoing diatribes.

Much has been made of the fact that between the June and July FOMC meetings, US Treasury yields rose substantially as you can see from the below chart.

Source” tradingeconomics.com

At the close on Friday, they had risen 34bps in the 30-year and 28bps in the 10-year), although this morning, with oil prices (-5.6%) falling on the back of a renewed diplomatic initiative in Iran, both of those bonds have seen yields back off by 5bps. 

Now, one of the things that Warsh specifically explained in the press conference was that the market had raised rates already, effectively doing the Fed’s job for them.  And here is the point of departure, I believe, regarding the punditry viewpoint and the Warsh viewpoint.  Warsh has been explicit in saying he wants the Fed’s footprint in the markets to shrink.  He wants market participants to, “play the ball, not the referee”.  However, the pundits claim that the only reason rates rose was in anticipation of the Fed hiking rates.  

So, let’s try a little thought experiment.  Assume there was no Fed, instead that money supply was mechanically increased by 2% per year and that all interest rates were determined by the market.  Do you believe that in this scenario, a government running consistent extremely large deficits would not drive interest rates higher than they otherwise would be, without a central bank to officially do so?  I know I do.  Is that any different than the market pushing yields higher because they are concerned with excess supply of Treasuries and other inflation concerns?  

The Fed has had a major, and in Warsh’s (and my) view, too large impact on markets for a long time, since Black Monday in 1987.  Change is hard and the punditry does not like the fact that they are going to have to actually think and pay attention to many variables in order to have a viable view on things, so they are all crying and claiming Warsh is making a huge mistake.  While not surprising, I think they are completely wrong.  

It is also important to understand that the current yields in the bond market are anything but ordinary. Below is a chart I created with FRED data and included the long-term average 10-year yield since 1962, which happens to be 5.81%, more than 100bps above current levels.  For a very long time, a good rule of thumb for the 10-year yield was it should be approximate the nominal GDP growth rate, but we have gone through such a long period of financial repression, that idea faded away.  Perhaps that is coming back into vogue, so at the long-term average, we could see 3.8% GDP growth and 2.0% inflation.  And even today, it could represent 2.7% GDP growth and 2.0% inflation.  I don’t think anybody would be unhappy with that outcome.

My understanding is the task forces will not be reporting until early next year.  At the same time, I am convinced that Mr Warsh is very serious about making significant changes at the Fed going forward, and I applaud that.  But it is going to require him to convince 18 other people who have been inculcated in a process that has proven to be a failure but offers comfort to those people because they know how it works.  Change is very hard, and this will be harder than most.  One last thing, the biggest change is going to be the balance sheet.  The Fed continues to buy T-bills and expand the balance sheet as they continue to seek to maintain “ample” reserves, so banks have liquidity.  I would not be surprised if when we hear from Chairman Warsh at the Jackson Hole meeting at the end of the month, he indicates the Fed will stop buying bills at the next meeting moving further down the path of change.

Surprising comments
Bessent admitted the Fed
Joined the Japanese

The following statement released by Japan’s MOF is quite a surprise, at least the fact that they admitted to the action, something that has rarely been the case in the past.  

Some have made the point that given Japan is the largest holder of Treasury securities in the world (other than the Fed) and that they would need to sell their Treasuries to fund intervention, this was the driving force.  Certainly, the US is not keen to have holders sell their bonds at this point.  As you can see in the chart below, this intervention has had a larger impact than the previous bouts which were solo Japanese efforts.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

At the dollar’s low, the yen appreciated about 5% in the past two sessions, certainly a very large move.  One of the other things that was interesting was that ostensibly, the Treasury sold EURJPY, not USDJPY.  Perhaps they had extra euros lying around they no longer wanted.  According to BOJ data, it appears the Japanese spent something like $33 billion on the intervention, but I have no indication as to the US effort.

Joint intervention is pretty rare, with the last time being in the wake of the earthquake/tsunami at Fukushima in 2011 when the yen strengthened dramatically.  But it also has a better track record than solo intervention, although absent significant fiscal changes, on both sides of this equation, I suspect that within a few months, the yen will weaken again.

Ok, I feel like that’s enough for one morning.  The oil story, as I mentioned, is that the President has called off the mooted weekend attacks and diplomacy is back on the table.  Interestingly, the metals markets are not as excited by that with gold (+0.15%), silver (+0.6%) and copper (+0.75%) all higher, but not by very much, especially given the size of the decline in crude prices.  And product prices (gasoline -3.4%, heating oil -3.0%) are also sharply lower.

As also mentioned above, bond yields have backed off with European sovereigns sliding far more than Treasuries, between -6bps (Germany, Netherlands) and -9bps (UK, Italy, Greece).  However, JGB yields (+3bps) did not get the memo although I suppose that has more to do with the belief that the BOJ is going to be forced to hike rates as part of the joint US-Japanese currency efforts.

As to the equity markets, after Friday’s US rally, the picture in Asia was mixed, despite the oil price decline, although for Japan, a stronger yen is often a problem for Japanese equities.  The worst performers were Korea (-5.1%), Tokyo (-0.9%) and China (-1.0%) while much of the rest of the region followed the US higher (HK +0.5%, India +0.7%, Taiwan +0.6%, Australia +0.5%) with the smaller exchanges mostly higher as well.

In Europe, things are generally bright with Germany (+1.4%), France (+1.3%) and Spain (+0.75%) all nicely higher despite (because of) modestly weaker PMI data although the UK (0.0%) has not been able to overcome its PMI weakness.  Now, in fairness to the UK, its 51.9 reading, while weaker than last month and forecast, is still about the best in Europe.  As to US futures, they are all in the green, led by the DJIA (+0.8%) at this hour (7:00).

Finally, the dollar is kind of confused overall.  The big winner today is KRW (+1.0%) although that trade has been ongoing for more than a month and is approaching an 8% gain over that period.  The yen (+0.4%) continues to climb, albeit less aggressively, although the other G10 currencies are generally under pressure (GBP -0.15%, AUD -0.3%, CAD -0.2%, NOK -0.6%).

However, I must mention something that Alyosha wrote this morning in Market Vibes that is worth considering; two of the major positions in markets were short bonds and short yen.  Joint intervention by the US and Japan to sell EURJPY has likely forced a lot of covering in both of those markets and it would not be surprising to see more activity like that and further short covering.  Japan is the largest holder of French bonds as well as Treasuries and could easily sell those without a peep from the US.  

Ok, I have gone way over my daily quota this morning, although there were a couple of really big, and complex stories to discuss.  On the data front, today brings ISM Manufacturing (exp 54.0) and I will delve into the rest of the week’s data, including Friday’s payroll report tomorrow.

Good luck

Adf

Sense of Foreboding

Posted on by 
Well, three little piggies said, whoa!
We think Fed funds rates are too low
But nine said, no way
We think they’re OK
And if hikes come, we should go slow

As well, pundit angst is exploding
Because they are now stuck decoding
The sparse words Warsh tenders
And so, story vendors
Now all have a sense of foreboding

It is truly remarkable to me how much angst was generated because Chairman Warsh refuses to offer any guidance whatsoever on what the Fed may do going forward.  The same people who have railed at the Fed for being the underlying cause of economic problems, are now furious that he is trying to change their operating process.  This tells me that much of that previous concern was theater as those same folks were either making a lot of money in the previous system or had a level of comfort that their positions were protected by the Fed put.

One of the biggest impacts the Fed has had in our society has been Ben Bernanke’s “portfolio-balance channel”, better known as trickle-down economics.  His idea that buying Treasuries and forcing investors out the risk curve was a major driver of the current wealth and income inequalities that exist in today’s K-shaped economy.  In fact, I would contend that we are seeing the results of that monetary experiment lately with the rise of the DSA in politics and the growing belief by many in the younger generations that they cannot get ahead regardless of their effort, so YOLO and socialism are a better fit.

The Fed is more than a century old and has had unchecked power during that entire period.  Paul Volcker was the last Fed chair to be able to ignore (or withstand) the politics in order to do the right thing and address inflation.  Everybody else has been captured by the organization.  My take is currently the other 18 members of the FOMC all despise Warsh because they all hate President Trump, and Warsh is Trump’s man.  Powell was Trump’s man too, but the Fed culture captured and converted him.  Their biggest problem is Bessent and Warsh are besties and so Warsh has political cover. But they won’t go down without a fight.

My strong view is that ending the ample reserves framework and shrinking the balance sheet is the best thing the Fed can do for the economy and to fight inflation.  It will take time, but that is clearly his goal.  We shall see if he’s successful.  But in the meantime, it appears that all the analysts who got paid a lot of money by Wall Street to do very little are now going to start having to earn their keep and think and figure out things on their own.   And that is a really good outcome.  As I continue to write, less certainty may bring more short-term volatility, but it will reduce the opportunity for excess leverage and reduce market fragility.  And that is something to be sought.

So, how did the market respond?  This chart from wolfstreet.com is annotated beautifully.

The equity market decided they didn’t like uncertainty and are growing increasingly scared there may not be a Fed put anymore.  And so, we saw weakness across the Americas yesterday with US and Canadian indices falling sharply into the close.  Is this the end of the world?  I don’t think so although you might be confused by reading some of the commentary. Overnight, though, things were more mixed with some laggards (China -1.1%, Korea -1.2%, Australia -0.8%, New Zealand -1.5%) and some gainers (Tokyo +0.7%, HK +0.2%, India +0.3%, Indonesia +1.6%).  The continued fighting in Iran (the US launched another series of strikes last night) as well as concerns over the tech sector valuation remains a generic equity market issue right now. 

Europe, though, is in the green this morning (Spain +1.4%, France +0.9%) with Germany and the UK unchanged, as generally better than expected, albeit still soft, GDP data was released this morning as per below:

CountryActualPreviousExpected
France Q/Q0.2%-0.1%0.2%
France Y/Y0.7%0.8%0.8%
Spain Q/Q0.7%0.6%0.6%
Spain Y/Y2.7%2.7%2.5%
Netherlands Q/Q0.4%0.3%0.2%
Netherlands Y/Y1.3%1.4%1.2%
Germany Q/Q0.2%0.4%0.1%
Germany Y/Y0.9%0.7%0.6%
Italy Q/Q0.2%0.3%0.1%
Italy Y/Y1.0%0.8%0.7%
Eurozone Q/Q0.4%0.0%0.2%
Eurozone Y/Y1.0%0.5%0.5%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Hardly the stuff to quicken your pulse, but better than it could have been.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are in the green with the NASDAQ (+1.25%) leading the way after MSFT reported excellent numbers last night which has been enough to offset META’s miss.

As to the bond market, after the FOMC, the yield curve steepened significantly with 10-year yields climbing 9bps and 30-year yields rising 11bps at their peak.  the chart below of the 30-year shows it well.  In addition, we continue to hear that the 30-year yield is now its highest since 2008.  Again, I would ask all those complaining, you hated what the Fed did before, what did you expect would happen if it changed?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

European sovereign yields also rose yesterday, albeit not as far, more in the 5bp range, and JGB yields rose 6bps overnight.  The BOE left rates on hold, as expected today with 3 votes to raise rates and 6 to stand pat.  Overnight, JGB yields rose 6bps and other Asian yields rose further.  As usual, the Treasury curve is the leader here.

However, it is interesting to note that 2yr Treasury notes actually fell -5bps yesterday as the market continues to adjust its views of what is going to happen going forward.  Chairman Warsh was explicit in saying that he welcomed market movement doing the Fed’s work for them, and if inflation remains a concern, and it does, yields should rise.  In fact, if the Fed starts to shrink its balance sheet (and remember it is still buying T-bills), I expect the curve to steepen and the front-end rates to decline.

In the commodity market, remarkably despite further US attacks on IRGC military sites, oil (-1.3%) is slipping this morning.  This is another market where things are not necessarily following the previous narrative.  As to metals, they are firmer this morning with gold (+0.3%), silver (+0.9%) and copper (+2.2%) all starting the day in good shape.

Finally, the dollar is softer this morning as the DXY (-0.2%) slips back toward its breakout level of 100.50 once again.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Somebody on Twitter made the point that if the dollar can’t rally amid rising yields, that is a problem.  But my observation, and I believe the numbers back me up, is that the dollar tends to follow short-term yields, like the 2-year, rather than the 30-year bond.  The yen (+0.3%) is having a good day and has backed below 163.00 for the moment taking some pressure off the MOF and the intervention watch.  KRW (+0.6%) continues its remarkable rally which appears to be built on a combination of repatriation of earnings by SK Hynix and Samsung as well as the proceeds from the SK Hynix US IPO, and the strong economic activity plus the BOK’s efforts to internationalize the won.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But overall, the dollar is under pressure this morning.  and remember, this is not something that the Trump administration worries about, rather they embrace it for its trade benefits.

On the data front, we get a bunch of stuff today as follows:

Initial Claims200K
Continuing Claims1800K
PCE-0.1% (3.7% Y/Y)
Core PCE0.2% (3.3% y/Y)
Q2 GDP (second look)2.1%
Personal Income0.3%
Personal Spending0.3%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It’s funny, now that Chairman Warsh seems to be de-emphasizing PCE, will it be as important going forward?  Probably still today where a hot number raises the probability of a September hike which currently sits at 63.4%.

Mercifully, there are no Fed speakers today or tomorrow so perhaps we can let the data guide the markets.  Overall, oil still matters a lot, headlines still matter a lot, while the dollar could well slip back into its previous trading range, especially on a soft PCE reading.

Good luck

Adf

The Die Isn’t Cast

Posted on by 
This morning, investors don’t know
Exactly which way things will go
Unlike in the past
The die isn’t cast
So, some pundits will eat some crow

The question is how will the Fed
Explain how they’re looking ahead?
If Warsh has his way
There’s not much they’ll say
But others, more views, want to spread

As market participants prepare for today’s FOMC statement with the potential for a rate hike, as well as the ensuing press conference, I cannot help but marvel at the recent increase in analysts doing their jobs and being forced to think about what can happen.  This is the healthiest thing about this process I believe.  It is also a very different approach than some current FOMC members have taken as they seem quite dismissive of the process.  For instance, in the WSJ article I cited yesterday, I want to highlight this paragraph;

“Governor Christopher Waller, a former economics professor with a reputation for saying what others won’t, put Warsh on the spot, according to several people familiar with the dinner. What’s the point of all this, he asked. Tell me who you’re putting on these groups, he said, and I’ll tell you what they’ll say. There were no brilliant ideas out there that everyone had somehow missed.”  

This is the very definition of hubris, Governor Waller saying he already has all the ideas and, essentially, the task forces are a waste of time.  Every member of the FOMC and every one of the 300+ or 500+ or however many PhDs who work there are Neo Keynesians and all see the world in exactly the same way.  In fact, they clearly believe that their collective view is the ‘only’ view that is correct.  And yet they have failed at their mission statement for more than 5 straight years.  My take is they are all terribly frightened that other ideas will not only be more effective, but that they will demonstrate all the mistakes the current FOMC has made prior to Chairman Warsh’s appointment.

As of 6:45 this morning, the currently priced probability for a hike, as per the Fed funds futures market, is ~38%, an unusual amount of uncertainty on the day of the meeting.  However, as you can see from the table below, there is virtual certainty of a hike in September and a high probability of one in December as well.  Personally, I disagree they will hike at all this year, but that is what makes markets.

Source: cmegroup.com

It has been two years since there has been this much uncertainty ahead of the meeting, and back then it was a question of 25bps or 50bps as a cut, which I would argue is qualitatively different then determining if there would be any action at all.  Otherwise, you need to go back quite a while to see this type of uncertainty, pre-GFC and the beginning of forward guidance.

Meanwhile, the other story of note is the Iranian attack on a US air base in Jordan and renewed fighting in the Gulf region, more than simply in Iran, which has oil prices rebounding sharply from yesterday’s lows, up 5.0% this morning.  The biggest problem with the oil market, from a market perspective, is that it is all headline risk, whether more attacks, peace talks or some other comment from either President Trump or Iran.  The one thing of which I am certain is that this conflict will not last forever and that when it is over, oil prices will fall back sharply and that over time, the Strait of Hormuz will see its transits decrease to ~5% of the global oil market, making it largely irrelevant to the conversation.

Which takes us to the market activity overnight.  Semiconductor companies continue to have some serious problems as SK Hynix reported earnings last night, which, while they beat expectations, their guidance was weaker than expected.  Given what we have seen from the sector lately, it cannot be a surprise that the KOSPI fell another -6.0% last night.  The chart below shows the relative performance of the KOSPI and NASDAQ over the past 5 years, and I have highlighted the peak.  As you can see, the KOSPI massively outperformed (and we thought the NASDAQ was a bubble!) although it is falling back to earth rapidly.  In fact, YTD, it is only higher by 34.4%, after having nearly doubled at the peak.

Source: Bloomberg.com

Elsewhere in Asia, Taiwan (-3.8%) also suffered as did the Nikkei (-1.5%) although other Japanese indices held up just fine.  China (+0.7%) and HK (+2.0%) had solid sessions and most of the rest of the region performed reasonably well.  Remember, once we get past the Fed today, all eyes will turn to Tokyo for the BOJ meeting which comes Friday.

In Europe, it is a mixed picture with concerns over the rising oil price driving some of the concern as we have also seen yields back up a bit.  Spain’s IBEX (-1.5%) is the laggard, but that appears to be a profit taking situation as the market there had rallied to record highs recently.  Elsewhere, France (-0.5%) is soft while the UK (+0.3%) is picking up slightly after some positive housing news and Consumer Credit activity while the DAX is little changed.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:40) they are edging higher, 0.25% or so.

As I mentioned, yields are backing up this morning with Treasuries (+2bps) outperforming vs. European sovereigns which are all higher by between 3bps and 4bps.  This seems entirely a reaction to the rebound in oil prices as there has not been enough other news to matter.

Metals markets are having another session where the relationship with oil is askew.  Gold is unchanged this morning while silver (+1.0%) has edged higher despite the oil rally.  But these metals remain in a downtrend trading in virtual lockstep as per the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning, depending on which counterpart you watch.  The DXY (-0.1%) is a touch softer although there has not been much movement at all in the euro, pound or yen.  In the G10, AUD (-0.5%) is the worst performer after inflation data overnight was cooler than expected and the probability of a rate hike fell even further.  NOK (+0.3%) is responding to oil’s rebound and everything else is minimal.  In the EMG, ZAR (-0.5%) is the laggard du jour on the higher oil prices although in fairness, it is holding its own vs. the gold price, having only declined about 2.5% in the past six months despite the sharp, 25% decline in the price of gold.  

You can be sure that after the FOMC today, all eyes will turn to the BOJ and the yen as the next major discussion point for the FX markets.

And that’s really it today.  The only data is the EIA oil inventories with a small draw expected.  And of course, the FOMC this afternoon.  My take is not much will happen ahead of 2:00, but remember, a large portion of the market has their bet wrong as to the outcome, so if nothing else, expect some volatility in the aftermath.

Good luck

Adf

Far From Dead

Posted on by 
Tomorrow we’ll hear from the Fed
With pundits not sure where they’ll tread
Some call for a hike
So, Warsh can out psych
Inflation that seems far from dead

But others claim hikes he will thwart
Awaiting the task force report
With oil retreating, 
Though some call it fleeting,
The hawks he will likely abort

The one thing we cannot forget
Is all of the outstanding debt
A hike may create
A weaker growth rate
An outcome he’ll surely regret

Let us turn out attention to the FOMC meeting which begins today and culminates in tomorrow’s policy statement and then the press conference that ensues.  On the whole, I would say that Chairman Warsh has already achieved a key objective, market uncertainty about the outcome.  A point I have been making for a very long time is that uncertainty is what creates an anti-fragile market as positioning is inevitably reduced, and more importantly, so is leverage.  And this is true in every market.  While there may have been value in forward guidance at the onset of the GFC such that the Fed wanted to calm markets down, that time is long past.  

Interestingly, perhaps the one individual who is unhappiest is Nick Timiraos at the WSJ, the former Fed whisperer.  He exhibited great power in the market because he was seen as former Chairman Powell’s mouthpiece when Powell wanted to convey information without being directly attributed.  However, it appears that there will be no Fed whisperer in a Warsh Fed, although I suspect even if there is someone, it will not be Powell’s man to whom Warsh turns.  So Timiraos is on the outs anyway.  But you can tell how unhappy he is by the tone of his recent articles like the one last night trying to insinuate that Warsh will not get his way.

At the same time, Bloomberg has an article this morning explaining how Citadel Securities’ chief economist is expecting a hike.  In my opinion, this is how it should be.  Wall Street economists and analysts make enough money that they should be able to do the work themselves and have their own opinions, not merely regurgitate what they hear from the Fed speakers.  (After all, I make no money and have opinions!)

Reiterating my view quickly, I do not see a hike for the following reasons:

  1. Recent data releases point to cooling inflation offering a respite on concerns of runaway prices
  2. Delaying any action until the task forces complete their work and help reset the way the Fed approaches things feels like the goal
  3. The Federal government cannot afford a rate hike as they migrate more and more issuance to the short end of the curve that will directly be impacted.

The counter view basically revolves around the idea that Warsh can ‘earn’ market credibility by hiking now, whether or not it is a policy error.  I don’t think he is concerned about losing credibility at this stage and has set the table, via the task forces, to show he means business when it comes to changing the Fed.  We all find out tomorrow.

As traders await all the news
On earnings, it seems there are views
That AI is losing
Its luster and cruising
Toward outcomes where stocks sing the blues

In my discussion about parabolic markets yesterday, I mentioned the Korean KOSPI index but after last night’s price action, I think a picture is in order.  This from wolfstreet.com.

As I explained, parabolic moves do not end in a range, they fall like the chart above with pullbacks greater than 50% the norm.  This implies that the KOSPI is not done yet, and given the KOSPI is basically two stocks, Samsung and SK Hynix, both of which are major semiconductor manufacturers, it doesn’t speak well to the semiconductor space in the US either.  Tomorrow, we hear from MSFT and META and then Thursday we get AAPL and AMZN earnings reports.  My take is much is riding on these earnings reports as any indication that growth is starting to slip will feed into my discussion yesterday regarding the second derivative and how that is the driver.  In fact, we saw the announcement yesterday by Nvidia that they were guaranteeing $250 billion of debt for OpenAI to build a new datacenter in Ohio.  At cycle ends, the pace of activity tends to increase as the players want to get things done before the collapse.  I fear that is what we are watching.

Ok, let’s look at markets.  As I’ve already touched on the KOSPI, which fell -10.8% last night, it is not surprising that most of the rest of Asia had a rough go as well.  Tokyo (-4.0%), Taiwan (-4.65%) and China (-2.8%) were the biggest losers overnight although HK (+0.4%) managed to eke out some gains.  In fact, looking across the region, away from the big three mentioned above, it was a more mixed picture.  Indonesia (-0.9%) is having its own problems as the central bank governor resigned and there have been numerous scandals and other cabinet resignations lately undermining both the rupiah (-0.1% and back to multidecade lows) and the stock market there.

As to Europe, given they have no tech sector and the tech sector is the area under the most pressure, I guess we should not be surprised that bourses there are modestly higher this morning, mostly up around +0.3% across the board.  A very pleasant experience compared to the gyrations seen elsewhere.  And US futures at this hour (7:10) are mixed with NASDAQ (-1.1%) suffering while the DJIA (+0.5%) is fine and the SPX is caught in the middle, basically unchanged.

In the bond market, yields continue to edge lower, with Treasuries (-3bps) leading the way and European sovereign yields all lower between -1bp and -2bps. UK gilts (-3bps) are also performing well as the market awaits the BOE’s policy decision on Thursday.  Then JGB yields (-2bps) have slipped in concert as the market awaits the BOJ decision Friday.  At this point, consensus across the board is for no movement, although there has been a discussion regarding the BOJ with some analysts believing a hike is possible.

Turning to commodities, oil (-1.6%) is not the center of attention today for once, and is pushing back toward $80/bbl.  The ongoing decline appears to be based on comments that diplomacy is once again being tried to resolve the Iran situation and the Strait of Hormuz.  Perhaps more surprisingly the metals markets are also falling this morning (Au -1.3%, Ag -2.2%, Cu -1.1%) as their inverse relationship with oil is being tested.  

Finally, the dollar is ever so slightly firmer this morning, but mostly on the order of 0.1% or 0.2%.  AUD (-0.4%) is the worst performer in either G10 or EMG blocs as central bank comments led to a reduction in the probability of a rate hike there next month.  One other thing to note is USDJPY, where, as I type, the market is trading at 163.92, a scant 8 pips from the next big, round number at 164.00, a level almost touched last Thursday (163.99 was the high) but when it trades, it will almost certainly be hailed as an important milestone regarding potential intervention.  I don’t agree with that assessment.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Again, a key feature of BOJ intervention has been an effort to address a volatile market, but as you can see below, while the direction of travel has been consistent, the only volatility has come from BOJ interventions.  Everything else is a slow, steady deterioration of the yen.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, there is plenty upcoming this week in addition to the Fed, including PCE on Thursday.

TodayGoods Trade Balance-$100.0B
 Case-Shiller Home Prices1.3%
 Consumer Confidence92.3
WednesdayFOMC Decision3.75% (unchanged)
ThursdayBOE Rate Decision3.75% (unchanged)
 Initial Claims200K
 Continuing Claims1800K
 Q2 GDP2.1%
 Personal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.3%
 PCE-0.1% (3.7% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% (3.3% Y/Y)
FridayBOJ Rate Decision1.0% (unchanged)
 Employment Cost Index0.8%
 Chicago PMI56.0
 Michigan Sentiment 54.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, the FOMC meeting will be the big story along with the earnings data, although I imagine that the PCE data may garner some interest for now, at least until we learn what measures of inflation the Fed is going to use going forward.  My fear is the equity market can crack, for now, and that will drive overall trading activity.  As to the dollar, I see no reason for a large move in either direction until we see new policies.

Good luck

Adf