Tag Archives: #Warsh

A Warshach Test

Posted on by 
While narrative writers obsessed
For some this was a Warshach test
The doves and the hawks
Each messaged their flocks
That Warsh, to their views, acquiesced

Meanwhile, in Iran bombs are falling
And President Trump is name calling
However, despite
The restarting fight
Risk assets keep on, higher, crawling

So, the FOMC Minutes were released, and they were hawkish dovish irrelevant.  The best expression of this came from Bloomberg’s Joe Weisenthal when he posted this on X,

Two simultaneous takes on the release that he received.  And I confess, I read those Minutes and didn’t learn anything at all.  It seems that the decision to leave rates on hold was unanimous although several committee members would have voted for a hike as well.

What does this say about the state of things?  I am very hopeful that we are on our way to a Fed that is less intrusive in market activities, both by reducing its balance sheet size, something that Chairman Warsh has expressly indicated as a goal, and by hearing less from committee members.  As @inflation_guy, Mike Ashton explains here, if forward guidance is dead, then why do we need to hear from any FOMC members about anything?  All those speeches were simply each member’s way to get their opinion out there and try to influence markets.  As I have frequently written, we would be much better off if the Fed were opaquer in their decision making as it would reduce risk and leverage and that would enhance financial market stability.  For everyone who wants Warsh to be Volcker redux, remember, back then, there were probably fewer than 10 people on Wall Street, let alone anywhere else, who could name a single member of the FOMC other than Mr Volcker himself.  That is an aspirational goal!

How did the market respond to the Minutes?  They basically ignored them.  Equity markets, which had opened much lower, were already in the process of reclaiming those losses when the Minutes were released and edged higher from there, with no meaningful change in trajectory as you can see in the below chart of the S&P 500.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

How about bonds?  Well, here is the 10-year chart and you tell me if the Minutes had an impact.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I guess the real question is will the rest of the world’s central banks follow Mr Warsh’s lead and seek to end forward guidance and simply go about their job of managing inflation?  One can always hope.

Which takes us to the other story of note, the apparent end of the ceasefire in Iran and the question of what is now happening in the Strait of Hormuz.  First, let’s be clear, nobody really knows as the fog of war remains thick.  Obviously, yesterday saw a sharp rise in the price of oil as concerns over future transits of the Strait rose dramatically.  However, as of this morning, while WTI (+0.6%) has edged slightly higher from yesterday’s closing levels, as you can see from the chart below, it seems to have found a new short-term home here around $74/bbl.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Scrolling through X this morning, the $200/bbl analysts were back at it, explaining that this time, with all those inventories having already been used up, we are going to see much higher prices.  But weirdly, yesterday’s EIA data showed an inventory build of 3 million barrels.  I keep seeing charts of the US SPR and how it is at its lowest level since 1982 implying that we are on the cusp of running out like this one from Bob Elliott.  Now, Bob Elliott is a really smart guy, but I feel like the piece of the puzzle that is missing in these analyses is that right now, the US is producing just under 14 million bpd of oil, plus another ~7.5 million bpd of natural gas liquids and 110 billion cubic feet/day of dry natural gas.  In fact, we are a massive exporter of oil and products, so perhaps a better question is, why do we need an SPR anymore?  After all, it was created when we were at the mercy of the Middle East and producing just 8.6 million bpd.  That is no longer the case.

My take is the world can run perfectly well on $75/bbl oil and there is plenty of supply at that level.  In addition, we have seen numerous announcements of how Gulf oil producers are building new methods of transport away from the Strait, and over time, that will no longer be a choke point with any meaning.  War is exciting to market participants for about two weeks, at which point they get bored and move on to the next big thing.  After all, the Ukraine war has been ongoing for 4 years and it doesn’t get a mention in market commentary.  Next week we start to see earnings releases for Q2 and that will be much more interesting for equity, and likely all other, markets.

In the meantime, let’s see what happened overnight.  Based on the mix of information, we cannot be surprised that there were mixed outcomes in equity markets around the world.  Yesterday’s US split (DJIA -1.1%, NASDAQ +0.2%) was followed by gains in Tokyo (+1.4%), China (+2.5%), Korea (+0.6%) and India (+0.3%) while HK (-0.7%), Taiwan (-0.8%) and the Philippines (-0.8%) all slid a bit.  There was no rhyme or reason here.  The only data of note overnight was Chinese inflation data where CPI fell to +1.0%, while PPI rose to +4.1%.  It strikes me that Chinese companies will continue to see pressure on their margins.

In Europe, things are also mixed with Spain (+0.8%), Italy (+0.7%) and France (+0.3%) all higher while the UK (-0.6%) is slipping and Germany is little changed.  As to US futures, they are leaning higher at this hour (7:50).

Bond markets seem to have stopped selling off as yields this morning are little changed (Treasury +1bp, Bunds +1bp, Gilts -3bps, OATs -3bps).  JGBs were unchanged overnight.  The 10-year auction yesterday went pretty well with a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.59, although with yields at 4.58%, it is not that surprising there was real demand.  I will say this, bonds, too, are a market with some smart folks with diametrically opposed views of the future outcome.  Both 3% and 6% are seen as the next major destination depending on the analyst.

Interestingly, metals markets are showing some life this morning with gold (+0.8%), silver (+1.4%) and copper (+2.2%) all bouncing off recent lows.  This is a bit out of character compared to recent price action relative to oil, but maybe we are putting in some bottoms here.

Finally, the dollar is, net, little changed this morning.  In the G10, NZD (+0.65%) is the big mover, which continues on the back of their rate hike from yesterday.  But otherwise, +/-0.1% is the norm here.  In the EMG bloc, KRW (-0.5%) is giving back some of its recent gains but continues to hover near multi-decade lows.  The recent gains have been on the back of a record current account surplus, but it remains an interesting conundrum that despite the massive gains in the Korean stock market, the currency has not attracted more buying interest.  Otherwise, modest EMG gains on the order of +0.1% are today’s story.

On the data front, we see Initial (218K) and Continuing (1820K) Claims as well as Existing Home Sales (4.20M) today.  In addition, there are two Fed speakers as I imagine getting them to shut up will take some time.  However, I wonder, will they really add to the discussion?

Oil continues to be the driving force in markets, but right now, my sense is eyes are turning to upcoming earnings releases.  Of course, we also get CPI next week, which will be a critical number for markets, at least for now.  

Good luck

Adf

Really Vexed

Posted on by 
Said Warsh, when I think of what’s next
For prices, I’m not really vexed
The narrative’s starting,
A new view, imparting
That lower, is what it expects

While futures have yet to adjust
The more this idea gets discussed
The more it’s presumed
The hike story’s doomed
While negative vibes turn to dust

Fed Chair Warsh was in Sintra, Portugal yesterday on a panel with Madame Lagarde, BOE Governor Bailey and BOC Governor Macklem answering questions about monetary policy, forward guidance, and the future of economies as they are impacted by AI.  Now, despite Mr Warsh’s adamant explanation at the last FOMC presser that forward guidance was dead, that didn’t stop the interviewer from asking about the Fed’s likely future moves repeatedly.  This is getting tiresome.  

Nonetheless, here is the comment I believe was most important. “Expectations of future inflation [over the last four weeks] have come down. Inflation risks have come down,” and anyone expecting the Fed would tolerate inflation running above its 2% goal “would be disappointed,” he added.

So, the first thing I did was look at the CME’s probability matrix based on its Fed funds futures contract, and there is no evidence to support Warsh’s comments there.  As you can see from the below table, it looks virtually identical to what we have seen over the past week, a hike in October and a 40% chance of a second one in December.

Now, I will cut him some slack because, while I agree with him and expect that we will see lower inflation readings this month, simply on the back of the decline in energy prices, the rate hike narrative has been building for a while and has many adherents.  My take is that the above table will not change very much until we have seen the two key data points this month, today’s NFP and CPI which is due to be released on Bastille Day.

While I’m on the subject, here is the current view of today’s median expectations according to tradingeconomics.com

Nonfarm Payrolls110K
Private Payrolls110K
Manufacturing Payrolls3K
Unemployment Rate4.3%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.5% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.3
Participation Rate61.7%
Initial Claims220K
Continuing Claims1810K
Factory Orders-1.8%
-ex Transport0.4%

Yesterday saw a slightly softer than expected ADP employment number, 98K vs. the 113K expected and 122K last month, but as you can see from the chart below, comparing ADP to NFP, while the trend remains similar in both, there are an awful lot of wiggles in any given month.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As things currently stand, the market’s strong Keynesian belief is if NFP is strong, that will be inflationary although it is quite clear that Chairman Warsh does not adhere strictly to that viewpoint (another reason I like him) as he anticipates significant productivity enhancements going forward on the back of AI adoption.  But my point is, if we see a strong print this morning, I would look for the market to price more aggressively for a rate hike.  I guess we’ll find out shortly.

In the meantime, let’s see what happened overnight.  Starting with commodity markets, oil (-1.5%) continues to slide regardless of the group of doomporners who insist that we are about to run out of oil, or that Iran now controls the Strait of Hormuz and will kill the global economy.  In fact, from a technical perspective, we have filled the gap that opened back on March 2nd, the first day markets were open after the conflict began.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My question for all those who remain certain that we have merely delayed oilmageddon is, how low will prices need to fall before they are willing to admit they misread the reality of the global oil market?  And, with oil sliding, precious metals (Au +0.8%, Ag +1.1%) are finding support.  It seems to me there is a lot of wood left to chop in the PM market, but I maintain my longer-term bullish outlook.

Turning to the bond market, yields rose again yesterday in the US (10-year +6bps) and have edged higher again this morning by 1bp.  My sense is this is based on the idea that Warsh’s final comment from above about tolerating above-target inflation has the hawks all bulled up.  Perhaps, Sintra helped the hawkish case elsewhere as well as European sovereign yields are all higher this morning by between 4bps and 5bps and JGB yields overnight jumped 8bps.

But there is a kink in the narrative now as despite this perceived hawkishness in the bond market, the FX market clearly heard a different tune.  This is clearest in USDJPY, my favorite recent discussion, as you can see in the chart below.  The yen jumped 0.7% ostensibly on the idea that Warsh’s comments about reduced inflation expectations implied a less hawkish Fed, despite the bond market reading the comment about unwillingness to tolerate inflation as a more hawkish Fed.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But it’s not just the yen.  The dollar is lower vs. virtually all its counterparts in both G10 and EMG spaces.  So, the question you need to ask yourself is, who do you believe?  Bond traders or FX traders?  Historically, observers call bond investors/traders the ‘smart’ money, but they have made plenty of mistakes in the past.  And the thing about FX traders is they seem to be far nimbler.  Of course, you know I am an FX guy, and as it happens, I think this is the market that has it right.

Finally, equity markets had a mixed performance in Asia (Japan -2.5%, China -3.0%, Korea -7.9%) as tech stocks have been feeling some pain, but we did see gains in HK (+0.8%), India (+0.8%) and Singapore (+1.1%) as a counterbalance.  That Korean number was impressive, but mostly what we are seeing there is serious volatility as the KOSPI is even more concentrated than the NASDAQ with just two companies, Samsung and SK Hynix, representing about 40% of the index.  If they have a bad day, the index does as well.

In Europe, though, things are brighter this morning with gains across the board (Germany +0.9%, Spain +0.9%, France +0.8%, UK +0.5%) although there is no obvious catalyst for the move.  There was no data of note (Eurozone Unemployment fell to 6.2% but that seems unlikely to be the driver) so perhaps the very fact there are no tech companies in Europe and tech is what is currently under pressure makes Europe seem a bargain.  As to US futures, ahead of all the data this morning, they are little changed.

And that’s really it for today.  As tomorrow is a holiday, there will be no poetry, so I wish you all a wonderful holiday weekend.  3 Cheers for the USMNT after their Round of 32 victory last night (alas it was on way too late for me to watch, but we will all be cheering on Monday night.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

40-Year Nadir

Posted on by 
Each day, one more pip
As the yen slides to the next
40-year nadir

The current blame is
The Fed’s recent hawkishness
What if that’s all wrong?

I feel like I must apologize by focusing on the yen again this morning, but quite frankly, there is not that much else to discuss.  And in fairness, it is not as though the yen’s move overnight, edging lower by a further -0.1%, is all that much to write about.  However, the yen has been getting a great deal of press as there is a cadre of analysts who are ‘certain’ that the MOF/BOJ is going to step in and intervene again soon, although I have seen more discussion of how 170 is in the cards as well.

Now, as it is the beginning of the second half of the year, I thought I might look at what I wrote at the beginning of the year regarding the yen to see how it’s going.  And while it is far too early to discern if I was prescient, things are looking pretty good right now.  Below, I have copied my yen discussion from back in January.  You decide if I’m on track.

A turn to the East where the Sun Also Rises
Will teach us that, really, there are no surprises
To date you’ve heard much ‘bout the rise in yen rates
With pundits opining the Carry Trades’ fates
This year, so they say, look for much stronger yen
As local investors buy yen bonds again
Thus, all the hedge funds who’ve been funding their trades
By borrowing yen, and they’ve done so in spades,
Will need to buy back all that Japanese Money
The outcome, for yen shorts, will not be so sunny
But what if this idea of yen heading home
Is wrong?  This implies quite a different syndrome

At this point there’s no sign the government there
Is ready, more spending and debt, to forswear
Instead, what seems likely is more of the same
More government spending in all but its name
So, debt will continue to rise without end
And up to One-Eighty the buck will ascend

So, with that in mind, let’s see what we learned overnight.  First, Japanese Tankan data was released and the economy, or at least the corporate sector, seems in fine fettle.  The below chart of the Large Manufacturer’s Index shows the strongest reading since 2017.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Clearly, the corporate set is not unhappy with the yen’s movement.  Now, there was yet another Bloomberg articlediscussing comments from the current Mr Yen, Atsushi Mimura, and reflecting on the fact that the MOF is in regular contact with Secretary Bessent and the Treasury department and there is no obvious concern on then US’s part with the current level of the yen.  

However, the consensus view is that the yen’s recent decline has been driven by the change in attitude regarding the FOMC.  The idea is that while the market was anticipating Fed rate cuts back in January, the comments by Chairman Warsh (more of which we will hear later this morning from Sintra, Portugal) have turned things around dramatically and we are now pricing a one-third chance of a hike at the end of July, a certain hike in October and another 40% probability of a second hike in December as per the below CME table.

So, if we take this sentiment shift into account, we can look at the last month of trading in USDJPY, which basically encompasses two weeks before the FOMC meeting and two weeks since.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And, if you do the math, it seems that the yen weakened 0.72% (from 159.45 => 160.60) in the first two weeks of June and 1.32% (160.60 => 162.72) since the FOMC meeting.  I completely agree that modest change in trajectory is the result of this newfound belief in Fed hawkishness.  Of course, you all know that I don’t believe that is what the Fed is going to do, and in fact, my 180 call at the beginning of the year had nothing to do with the Fed raising rates, it was all about deterioration of Japan’s fiscal account.  However, as we learned this morning from Europe, where inflation fell to 2.8% headline, 2.4% core, both much lower than last month and forecasts (good thing the ECB hiked into the energy price shock, right?) we can look forward to at least a few months of softening inflation in the US as well based simply on the ongoing decline in oil prices (-1.0% this morning) and continuing to trend lower as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Softer US inflation numbers are going to undermine the call for rate hikes, and I expect to see those hikes priced out of the markets by the end of July.  That alone should help prevent the yen from collapsing in the short-term, although their long-term problems remain extant.

But one thing to keep in mind is that we are coming up to a holiday weekend in the US with market liquidity impaired.  It would not be surprising to see the MOF step in to markets Friday when liquidity is thin and they will get more bang for their buck.  But the yen is a basket case regardless of US rates.  Like I said, short-term, maybe a dip in USDJPY back toward 155 on the back of intervention, but longer-term, unless they change their fiscal policies, lower the yen will go.

Otherwise, there is not much new to discuss.  Equity markets finished the quarter with their best result in forever, with the NASDAQ rising ~30%.  Seems like it will be hard to repeat that again, and this morning, futures are slightly in the red, about -0.3% or so.  As to the rest of the world (do we really care?) last night saw Tokyo (+0.6%) rally along with India (+0.6%) and Taiwan (+1.9%) but the rest of the region slumped led by Korea (-2.0%) which had been the leader, with China (-0.4%) and HK (-0.6%) also falling and the rest of the regional bourses seeing more red than green.  In Europe, there is more negativity than not with only the DAX (+0.2%) edging higher after their PMI release (50.3) was slightly better than expected, although still weak.  However, the rest of Europe is softer this morning (Spain -0.7%, France -0.65%, UK -0.4%) amid unimpressive PMI results.

In the bond market, yesterday saw US yields pop nearly 10bps in what appeared to be a major futures led move.   Certainly, yesterday’s data releases didn’t indicate dramatic strength in the economy, just that things are still fine.  But things being what they are as the Treasury market drives global bond yields, we did see yields climb everywhere yesterday and have followed on in Europe this morning with sovereign yields higher by between 3bps and 5bps across the board.  JGB yields (+3bps) rose overnight as well, although Treasury yields are little changed this morning.  I feel like this move will be reversed by month end, if not sooner.

In the metals markets, oil’s decline has seen support for both gold (+0.4%) and silver (+0.6%) although copper (-1.6%) is struggling this morning.  Nonetheless, I continue to like the long-term outlook for metals.

Finally, the rest of the dollar story is one of strength for the greenback with the euro (-0.25%) slipping back below 1.1400 and every G10 currency under pressure.  Meanwhile, in the EMG bloc, KRW (-0.7%) is today’s dog, as it approaches its GFC levels as the equity market selling weighed on the currency.  Otherwise, broad dollar strength, but nothing dramatic.

On the data front, ISM Manufacturing (exp 54.0) is coming later this morning as are the EIA oil inventory data. And, of course, Mr Warsh’s speech at 9:00am.  It will be quite interesting to hear what he has to say, as I think it will be the most critical thing for the session, and frankly, I have no idea where he may go.

So, as we head into a holiday weekend, less positioning is better, and choppiness is to be expected.

Good luck

Adf

Peace Was in Sight

Posted on by 
The weekend saw missiles in flight
As both sides continued the fight
But just ere the open
The market put hope in
The idea that peace was in sight

So, here we are first thing today
And focus has moved far away
We’re back to AI
And pie in the sky
As stocks, once again, make more hay

Much has been made of the fact that President Trump is hyper aware of financial markets and seeks to ensure that whatever is happening in the world, it happens on weekends so that by the time markets reopen, the situation appears far less dire, hence less need to sell stocks.  This weekend is a perfect example as Friday after the close, it was announced that the US had responded to the several Iranian attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz last week with significant force.  The early punditry on Friday night and Saturday was that when markets reopened, the recent decline in oil prices would reverse as that has been predicated on a more lasting peace.  But then, last night shortly before futures markets opened, there were announcements that the US had finished its response and that the peace talks were back on under the guise of the 60-day ceasefire.  

I have to say, though, it almost appears as if Iran is in on the joke.  After all, if not, wouldn’t they try to force Trump’s hand during market hours?  Just asking.  Whatever the case, the situation as we wake up this morning is that oil (+0.8%) has edged back higher near $70/bbl but certainly doesn’t have the feel of breaking out higher.  Meanwhile, equity markets are generally positive and have been overnight while bond yields and the dollar are little changed.  in other words, there’s not much happening this morning.

In reality, it is not that surprising that things are quiet.  It is summer and summer markets are typically somewhat less active.  As well, away from the uncertainties of the Iran conflict, economic activity seems to be ticking along pretty well.  Arguably, the biggest story remains AI and both its potential impact on workers and the economy as well as the questions about its ability to generate sufficient revenue to repay the hundreds of billions of dollars being spent on it.  But those are longer-term stories, not day-to-day.

Which takes us to this morning.  Frankly, I don’t think there is an interesting market related them right now.  Instead, we have much time-biding until the next big thing.

Let’s start with commodities as oil continues its multi-month decline from the early April peak.  it remains very difficult to look at the below daily chart and think, damn, oil is about to run away higher.  At least for me.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There are still numerous analysts who maintain that the drawdown of reserves is going to come back and haunt the market, driving prices much higher as inventories fall and tank bottoms are reached.  And I am sure they earnestly believe those outcomes are ordained.  But the relative wisdom of market prices disagrees.

Remember back when this all started, there was another point that was made by these same analysts, that fertilizer shortages would be manifest and food prices would rise much higher.  The story was that the closing of the Strait would reduce the ability of Qatar to produce and ship LNG and that was a critical input into the making of Urea.  Let me show you the price chart for Urea.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While it certainly rose initially, apparently there is sufficient urea around to continue with agriculture as we know it.  Again, much of the initial fear seems to have been misplaced.  I do not know if that is because analysts didn’t really understand the way these markets operated, or because they have models that they have used for years, and those models are no longer fit for purpose.  My observation is that many analysts try to determine the price trends by looking at their understanding of both supply and demand of a given commodity.  But I might argue that the price is what defines both supply and demand, and that at given prices, those two curves adjust to make the system work.  Think of it as price is the independent variable, not supply/demand.

Moving on to the metals markets, they remain under pressure this morning with both gold (-1.3%) and silver (-1.9%) unable to find support, especially the latter.  Copper (-0.3%) is holding up better and I continue to believe that all three will fare well over time, but not right now.

In the equity markets, Friday’s nondescript US markets were followed by more strength (Tokyo +0.15%, HK +1.6%, China +1.2%, Australia +0.7%, Taiwan +1.0%) than weakness (Korea -0.2%, India -0.5%, Indonesia -1.3%) in Asia.  The big news overnight was the South Korean government supporting a massive semiconductor investment by the two big Korean firms, SK Hynix and Samsung, to build four more fabs.  In Europe, though, things are less positive with Germany’s unchanged performance leading the way although the declines elsewhere (UK -0.2%, France -0.3%, Spain -0.4%) are hardly devastating.  We ought not be surprised that US futures are higher this morning as I type (7:25) led by the NASDAQ (+0.9%) as the AI/semiconductor theme continues.

Bond markets continue to do very little with yields essentially unchanged on the day in Europe or the US.  10-year Treasury yields are currently 4.37%, well off the highs seem a month ago near 4.70% when there was much discussion about a breakout higher.  But look at the below longer-term chart of the 10-year Treasury yield and tell me that anything substantive has happened in the past 3+ years.  Since yields rise alongside the 2022 inflation surge, we have seen very little net movement.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is a bit softer this morning but is clearly not the focus today.  I continue to read analyses about Chairman Warsh and what he is going to do and why he will not be able to achieve his goals.  The implication is that either he will need to be ultra hawkish, raise rates quickly and the dollar will soar, or he will wind up with QE 5 or 6 or whatever number we are on, and the dollar will collapse.  My personal view is neither of those scenarios will play out.  As I wrote in the wake of his first meeting, I expect inflation data will ease along with the recent decline in energy prices, and he will be able to do nothing without consequences as he works to change the way things work there.  In the meantime, the dollar will remain supported by real investment flows.

On the data front, even though it is a holiday-shortened week with markets closed Friday for July 4th, we get a lot of data.

TuesdayCase-Shiller Home Prices0.8%
 Chicago PMI60.0
 JOLTS Job Openings7.28M
 Consumer Confidence94.2
WednesdayADP Employment113K
 ISM Manufacturing54.0
 ISM Prices Paid79.0
ThursdayNonfarm Payrolls110K
 Private Payrolls115K
 Manufacturing Payrolls3K
 Unemployment Rate4.3%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.5% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.3
 Participation Rate61.7%
 Initial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1825K
 Factory Orders-2.1%
 -ex Transport0.4%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, all eyes will be on the payroll data on Thursday.  But Chairman Warsh will be at Europe’s version of Jackson Hole, in Sintra Portugal and speaking at 9am Wednesday morning.  It will certainly be interesting to hear what he has to say there.

It doesn’t seem like there is much about which to get excited today, or tomorrow frankly.  So, Warsh and then NFP will be this week’s story absent another major flareup in the gulf.

Good luck

Adf

My House

Posted on by 
Said Kevin, the Fed’s now MY house
And views that we choose to espouse
Will no longer guide
So, when we decide
To move, we expect some to grouse

As well, we are set to review
Our policies all the way through
So, comms will be changed
And data arranged
In truth, it is quite the to-do

This is an evening note as I will be unavailable to write tomorrow morning as we head off to show GCH Nubia’s Take Your Breath Away, aka Marvel to a show.  That is his handler and the judge who awarded him Best of Breed that day.

But not surprisingly, the only thing that really mattered today was the FOMC meeting.  I have to say, having watched the entire press conference I am really impressed with Chairman Warsh.  I love the fact that he shortened the statement and that they are ending forward guidance.  And it was quite interesting that half the reporters’ questions were trying to get guidance about what the Fed may do in the future, despite him repeating that there was no more forward guidance.  My take is Fed reporters are going to have to learn about how markets work and more importantly, market practitioners are going to make up their own minds rather than rely on the Fed to bail them out.  This is all really positive!

The most noteworthy thing was the creation of five task forces to address issues with the way the Fed currently does things on the following subjects:

  1. Communications
  2. Balance Sheet
  3. Data Sources
  4. Productivity and Jobs
  5. Inflation Framework

So, it strikes me that Chairman Warsh is going to look to reprogram the Fed, something that has been sorely in need.  Do not be surprised when much of the commentary is negative on these subjects because those are the folks who benefitted from the old way of doing things.  They now need to change their models and their narratives and they are unhappy.  Another benefit.

The upshot of the meeting was that rates were left on hold and the dot plot, where Warsh did not supply a dot, showed that half the committee thought rates appropriate, and half thought they would be higher by the end of the year.

Of course, this largely jibes with the Fed funds futures market as you can see in the latest table from the CME.

Of course, looking at this table, something seems amiss for September, perhaps there was a large position put in place that drove the market.  At any rate stock markets were unhappy with the major indices slipping -1.0% or more after the FOMC although bonds did very little and commodities continue to show oil slipping while gold and silver rise.  As to the dollar, it rallied pretty much across the board.

It is way too early to anticipate exactly how things are going to play out, but I am encouraged.  I strongly believe a little price volatility is a small price to pay to reduce systemic risk by reducing leverage in the system, and that is very likely to be the outcome if Mr Warsh has his way.  My forecast is the “ample reserves” balance sheet program is going to change before he is done.  If that is the case, I think they will have a real opportunity to get inflation under control.  As well, I believe that prospect will undermine much of the ‘death of the dollar’ narrative.  It truly will be significant.  We shall see.

Good luck

Adf

Future With Dread

Posted on by 
The story today is the Fed
And whether, when looking ahead
Inflation they see
Stays well above three
Or if it just might fall instead

Meanwhile, every comment I’ve read
Discussing the ‘deal’ have all said
Too much was conceded
The US retreated
And look to the future with dread

Starting with the MOU with Iran, and having read the text of the agreement, at least the one published by Bloomberg, Iran has sworn to never have a nuclear weapon and then will effectively be readmitted to polite society, with sanctions and restrictions eventually removed.  The several comments I have read on the deal highlight numerous potential loopholes and semantics regarding tolls and fees and are uniformly unhappy with the deal.  But I’ve also read that many on Iran’s side are unhappy with the deal.  Arguably, the best sign the deal is going to last is just that, neither side got everything they wanted, but both got some of the things they wanted.  Time will tell how this all plays out, but certainly the oil market remains positive that the direction of travel is toward a normalization of flows through the Strait of Hormuz.

However, while the political pundits are going to continue to focus on that issue, markets have turned their focus to the FOMC meeting and how things play out under new Chairman Kevin Warsh.  The previous Fed whisperer, Nick Timiraos at the WSJ, continues to push Governor Powell’s message as there is not yet a new Fed whisperer.  My take is Timiraos will not be the one simply because his loyalties will not lie with Warsh. 

The thing in which we can be most confident is there will be no rate change at today’s meeting although the market continues to price a rate hike in December as per the below CME table.

All the drama will come with the release of the SEP (Summary of Economic Projections) which is the quarterly document the Fed publishes showing the range of economic forecasts by the individual FOMC members regarding GDP, Unemployment and interest rates.  This document also includes the dot plot.  It is important to note that the SEP only started to be released in 2007, so this is not a long-standing tradition, but part of Ben Bernanke’s changes to the institution.

And this is a key feature of what makes Kevin Warsh different.  He has indicated that the Fed talks too much (I agree) and believes that some ambiguity in what is going on is a desired outcome.  This is a controversial stance as Wall Street has minted money on the back of forward guidance, recognizing the Fed has their back whenever they blow up because they built up huge leverage and were wrong.  

While I completely understand the idea that political discussions need to be in the open, I am far more suspect with respect to monetary policy discussions.  Prior to forward guidance, market participants were far more cautious in their positioning as the probability of getting the direction of a trade wrong was far greater.  But once the Fed says, ‘rates are going to stay low for a very long time’, traders can lever up positions massively relying on the fact that their funding costs are going to remain in check.  And it is the massive leverage where the risks to the market lie, not the level of rates per se.

So, the question today is how Chairman Warsh will handle his desire to reduce communications compared to the previous actions of publishing the data and numerous FOMC members speeches.  One thought is he may refuse to put his own forecasts into the document, a sign of what he wants going forward but I am confident he has other ways to move forward.

The other issue is the question of the tone of the statement, which had ostensibly been leaning dovish but seems now likely to be neutral.  My sense is whatever he does, it will be incremental, at least at the beginning, but I anticipate that he is going to make substantial changes to the way the FOMC operates during his tenure as that is why he was put in the role. 

So, with that as our backdrop, let’s see how markets have absorbed the text of the deal as we all await the FOMC this afternoon.  Yesterday’s mixed US performance, with only the DJIA managing a gain while tech stocks dragged down both the NASDAQ and the S&P, was followed by more positivity than not in Asia with gains in Japan (+0.7%), China (+1.0%), Korea (+1.6%) and India (+0.5%) while HK (-0.75%) slipped a bit.  It is always a bit of a surprise when HK and China move in opposite directions, and it seems today’s split arose from different interpretations from a policy conference regarding future PBOC activities as well as potential future government support for a clearly weakening consumer economy.  Other regional exchanges had a mix of gainers and laggards as well, as the overall session was directionless.

In Europe, the picture is also mixed although the movement has been more muted than those in Asia.  Both Germany and the UK are flat to slightly lower this morning with the former under pressure after BMW offered a terrible profit forecast while the latter, despite lower-than-expected inflation readings, is lagging on growth concerns.  However, France (+0.2%) and Spain (+0.5%) have both managed to rally a bit on some slightly positive earnings news.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are modestly higher across the board.

Bond yields are generally little changed this morning with only UK gilts (-5bps) and JGBs (-4bps) showing any movement at all.  Gilts responded positively to the inflation data while JGBs seemed to take solace in the trade data showing Japan was back to a deficit.  

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.7%) is having a very quiet session after several sharp declines in a row while metals markets are largely unchanged this morning.  It appears even traders here are awaiting the FOMC outcome.  One thing I have seen is a recent report from the World Gold Council showing 45% of central banks surveyed plan to buy the barbarous relic in the next 12 months.

And finally, the dollar is slightly stronger this morning, but like most other markets, not showing much movement at all.  The below chart of the DXY for the past month shows just how lackluster price action has been with a total range of just 1.5%.  The red line is the midpoint of that range showing there is just not a lot of pressure in either direction right now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Meanwhile, USDJPY has basically spent the past two weeks hovering just above 160.00 with nary a peep from the MOF or BOJ.  Again, the situation there is the policy changes necessary to strengthen the yen are likely to have very negative economic consequences initially, and that is not something any government is likely to do.

On the data front, ahead of the Fed we see Retail Sales (exp +0.5%, +0.5% ex-autos) and then the EIA oil inventories with more draws expected.  And that’s really all there is.  I anticipate a very quiet session ahead of the Fed and then all will depend on how the market interprets Warsh’s signals.

Good luck

Adf

Changing the Fate

Posted on by 
With things in the Gulf getting hotter
And risk assets heading to slaughter
The question on lips
Can stocks e’er eclipse
Their highs, or ‘stead sink ‘neath the water
 
But really, the question I’d ask
Is Chairman Warsh up to the task
Of changing the fate
Of the Fed funds rate
And if so, what will he unmask?

It is very difficult to focus on the Gulf situation as not only is it fluid, but there is also no direction of travel whatsoever.  So, this morning I want to have a different conversation.  Let me start by explaining this isn’t my idea, per se, although the analysis is solely mine.  Listening to the Macro Voices podcast Sunday morning while walking the dog, (he’s the one on the left)

Michael Every was on and expressed a very interesting thought, one that I had not considered, nor heard anywhere else.  What if the Fed, as Chairman Warsh seeks to adjust how it works, decides that they are going to put their fingers on the scale with respect to the interest rates paid by different industries, not merely by differently rated credits.  The idea is that in conjunction with the Treasury, Warsh and Bessent would decide which industries needed to have the most cost-effective funding for the nation to be able to maintain and develop the industries necessary for national defense reasons.

Now, I know this is anathema to almost all of us having been raised on the idea(l) of free markets and that markets are better at allocating, well everything, but in this case credit, than any cabal of central bankers.  And in a world where markets were truly free and where everyone competed on a level playing field, I am 100% in agreement with that view.  Alas, I’m not sure if you noticed, but that is not the world in which we live.

If Covid taught us nothing else, it was that 40 years of globalization and creating the most efficient processes for manufacturing resulted in significant fragility in those very processes.  It turns out that while economists in the US, Europe, Japan, the World Bank and IMF all explained that this was a great outcome (the US prints paper notes and gets lots of stuff for it), that only works when there is peace on earth.  During this period, China chose to play by a different set of rules, explaining they were just a poor country so didn’t need to play by the G10’s rules, and massively subsidized numerous industries while essentially ignoring all environmental issues.  That tilted the playing field pretty aggressively, and while President Trump has been adamant about that very issue for a decade, he was largely ridiculed, right up until Europe recently figured out that China was eating their lunch too, and now they are looking to impose tariffs on China’s excessive exports.  There is an excellent Substack that comes out Sunday mornings called The Brawl Street Journal,written by an analyst in Germany.  This week’s, linked here, explains that very issue extremely well.

So, I’ve set the table here, and the key to understand is the table is tilted horribly, with China getting the benefit of the doubt for almost everything.

Now, let’s consider what Mr Every’s idea would mean.  Below is a chart showing current 10-year yields for Treasuries and a series of corporate bonds delineated by their credit ratings.

Data: streetstats.finance

Makes sense, less creditworthy names pay more.  That is how things have always been within a market system as the worse the credit rating, the higher the perceived risk of the investor and therefore the higher yield they demand.

But what if that were to change?  What if the Fed and Treasury decided that companies that manufactured products, be they semiconductors, automobiles, tractors, airplanes or flat panel screens, and mining companies that mined in the US (and Canada) and energy extraction companies that drilled in the US (and Canada) needed a lower cost of capital to be more competitive globally as those companies were the ones necessary for the US to maintain its global hegemon status.  But media companies, and retailers, non-bank financial institutions and home health services companies, for example, were not deemed as critical.  Perhaps the new “credit” curve might look like this instead (all hypothetical)

The point is, China has been subsidizing numerous manufacturing industries for decades with the goal of excess production designed to drive other nations’ competitors out of business and gain a strategic advantage in all those industries.  It is why President Trump’s tariffs were a problem for them, and the rest of the world, as the US had been the dumping ground for much excess Chinese production in the past, and now that stuff is going elsewhere.  

The world we once knew is no longer the world in which we live.  Mr Every’s term, economic statecraft, is much more applicable today than any time in the past 40 years, probably longer, since the end of WWII.  Statecraft implies nations will use all the power they have, economic, military and diplomatic, to achieve their desired goals.  For more than 70 years, the US did not play by those rules under the assumption that if they created a level playing field, and even tilted it in favor of weaker allies, peace would reign.  China doesn’t play by those rules, and that is how we have arrived where we are.  

This is all hypothetical, but remember, Chairman Warsh has talked about restructuring the Fed.  All the economists think he is talking about shrinking the balance sheet.  But what if he is talking about completely changing credit markets with Fed support?  I would argue that is not on many bingo cards.

So, briefly, let’s consider how markets would respond to this action by the ‘new’ Fed.  Here are my conclusions, I would love to hear yours.

  • Stocks – broadly lower, although clearly favored sectors would continue to perform well.  But overall leverage would shrink and that has been a huge part of this rally.
  • Bonds – a steeper Treasury yield curve seems certain as subsidies for those favored industries will weigh on the US budget.  Meanwhile, non-favored industries would find themselves with real difficulties in terms of financing.
  • Commodities – offsetting forces here as industrial metals would see increased demand, and getting supply on line takes years if not a decade, but energy may result in a glut sooner as drilling takes much less time to get going.  Precious metals would soar, I believe, on the basis of investors and central banks, seeking an asset with no counterpart.
  • FX – this is the toughest call as different nations will be impacted in very different manners.  Commodity producing nations (e.g., Chile, Norway, US) should see relative strength.  Consuming nations would likely suffer somewhat, although Japan and Korea, for instance, could essentially fall within the US umbrella as their key industries are the US focus.

Again, this is all hypothetical but is probably worth some thought.  In the meantime, a brief tour of markets overnight after Friday’s sharp declines in the US shows nobody is very happy this morning.  The tradingeconomics.com screenshot below shows futures as of 6:10am.

What sticks out to me is Italian equities are bucking the trend, although there has been no data and I cannot find a specific catalyst there.  Also, it is interesting that US futures are broadly higher this morning despite growing concerns that the situation in the Gulf is going to heat up again.  But Asia had a rough session and most of Europe is feeling a little pain as well.

In the bond market, after climbing on Friday, yields continue higher this morning across the board.  The below Bloomberg screenshot explains things well.  Recognize that Canadian and Mexican markets haven’t opened yet and Australian markets were closed last night for the King’s Birthday.  But net, there is growing concern over inflation on a worldwide basis it appears.  

Turning to the commodity markets, oil (+3.8%) is higher again, after falling on Friday as there were missile attacks by Iran on Israel in response for Israel’s ongoing attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon. This situation remains fraught and frankly nobody has any idea when it will settle down into something a bit less volatile.  If we look at a chart of the past six months of oil price movement, I have drawn a line at $95/bbl, which to my eye offers a pretty good estimate of the average since things began.  There are still many doomsayers who believe $200/bbl oil is coming soon, but that has been their forecast since March.  Something to remember about commodity markets is that they do not forecast the future, they are the prices at which physical stuff clears, so it appears that so far, there is ample inventory available.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Not surprisingly, given the recent relationship between gold and oil, the barbarous relic is lower this morning by -0.7% while silver, though unchanged on the day, suffered dramatically on Friday, falling $6/oz or about 8%.

Finally, the dollar is little changed this morning, but that is after a sharp rally on Friday in the wake of the much better than expected NFP data (+172K with revisions higher in the previous two months of +93K) which helped push yields higher as a rate hike this year has now been priced by the futures market as per the below CME table.

But more than just the futures market is thinking that way.  The below chart showing the 2-year Treasury vs. Fed Funds shows that not only have 2-year yields moved above Fed funds, but they are accelerating higher.  This is seen as another harbinger of a higher Fed funds rate.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, the DXY is back over 100.00, USDJPY breeched 160.00, and is right on that number as I type at 6:50am, and generally, the dollar is pushing the top of its recent ranges.  The one exception here is KRW (+1.6%) where the central bank and Finance Ministry both were actively jawboning the currency higher after it traded to yet another new low (dollar high).

As there is no data of note this morning, I will go through that tomorrow given how long things got today.  The world is changing rapidly and the most important thing, I think, is to recognize that old relationships may no longer be valid.  Nimbleness is critical, whether investing or hedging.

Good luck

Adf

Narrative Doom

Posted on by 
The crude price continues to fall
But one thing that has us in thrall
Is narrative doom
Where pundits all fume
God dammit, we’ll soon hit the wall

But under the headlines we learn
It’s really not quite the concern
The major details
Of SPR sales
Are by next year all will return

Oil puked yesterday, down nearly -6% despite the news that the EIA inventories fell dramatically as well.  The total draw was just under 18 million barrels, which on the surface is a new record draw.  Charts like the below were all over the place as the narrative writers were busy calling for the end of American Exceptionalism er.. the dollar, er.. US energy dominance.

However, I am not convinced that is the case.  The first clue is that oil prices collapsed and if the doom porn was accurate, I don’t believe that would be happening.  Instead, there is a far better explanation which I am lifting in its entirety from my friend JJ who writes market vibes and has been trading oil for as long as I have been trading FX.  If you care about oil markets, you really need to be reading what he says.

The DOE is releasing 172 million barrels of SPR oil with swaps rather than outright sales. Companies borrow SPR crude now and they pay it back plus a premium in more barrels later which based on the curve could be as much as 25% more barrels. This is explicitly designed to grow the reserve by at least 200 million barrels “at no cost to the taxpayer” and it will.

These are not “draws.” They are loans. The swaps are repaid ratably from November 2026 through September 2028. Earlier return structures have lower premiums.

In other words, the administration is taking advantage of the major backwardation in the oil futures curve and selling prompt and buying forward, taking oil instead of cash at a discounted basis.  If we understand this, it helps us understand why there is no panic in the oil markets, at least not in the US WTI market.

And, whether or not the IRGC is negotiating or getting ready to annihilate us all, my sense is this is a much bigger part of the picture than anyone is considering, except actual oil traders.  But it is not nearly as sexy a narrative, especially if you hate President Trump and can try to tar him with yet another problem.

And as we have learned lately, as goes oil, so goes the entire market.  So, it should be no surprise that equities and precious metals rallied as oil fell alongside Treasury yields and the dollar.  Pretty ordinary actually.

For Jay in his last time as Chair
Where soon, Kevin Warsh we’ll compare
The Minutes revealed
That rises in yield
Would soon change to common from rare

“A majority of participants highlighted…that some policy firming would likely become appropriate if inflation were to continue to run persistently above 2%.”  This statement from the FOMC Minutes of the last meeting at the end of April is actually quite galling.  Even though the FOMC has settled on the inflation reading that has historically run lower than all others, Core PCE, a metric, by the way, that doesn’t even try to represent a consumer’s experience, they have singularly failed to achieve their 2.0% target for more than five years running now.  In the chart below from tradingeconomics.com, the leftmost bar is at 2.2% from March 2021, right as the Covid monetary insanity started to accelerate.  This chart should be Jay Powell’s epitaph, a singular failure in the seat.  After all, as awful as I thought Janet Yellen was in the role, her track record was not this bad!

Of course, now that Mr Warsh is due to be sworn in tomorrow, you can be certain that the punditry will lay the entirety of blame on the fact that inflation is running hot on him directly because, well, President Trump appointed him and they generally hate President Trump.  Of course, I would contend this was not really a newsworthy release as we all already knew that the FOMC had turned more hawkish, and we have seen Fed funds futures begin to price in the probability of a rate hike by the end of the year.  

In the end, though, the oil price remains the key driver of all market activity for the foreseeable future.  So, let’s see how the rest of the markets behaved after yesterday’s sharp decline and given that the black, sticky stuff is sliding a little further this morning, currently down -0.75% at 6:00am.  Remember, too, that Monday afternoon, WTI was more than $10/bbl higher than it is right now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finishing the commodity space, the metals, which all rallied yesterday, have slipped a bit despite oil’s slide this morning with gold (-0.3%), silver (-1.0%) and copper (-1.0%) all under modest pressure.  I must admit that the price action in both gold and silver is starting to make me question the long-term case, let alone the short-term case, to hold them.  Copper, however, seems like it will be in such demand as the electrification of everything increases, that any price declines should be snapped up.

In the equity markets, as mentioned above, yesterday saw gains in the US which were then followed up by what seemed to be a strong earnings report from Nvidia, although I read that there were those who were disappointed they didn’t guide things even higher.  The follow through in Asia was mixed with Tokyo (+3.1%), Taiwan (+3.4%) and Korea (+8.4%) following the tech lead from the US.  Interestingly, both China (-1.4%) and HK (-1.0%) did not follow along, but sold off, ostensibly on profit taking after their recent rallies.  The other big laggard in this time zone was Indonesia (-3.5%) which reacted negatively to government export restrictions on key commodities like palm oil and metals as still-high oil prices take their toll on the economy.

As to Europe this morning, there is not much of which to speak with the major indices all +/- 0.2% or less after Flash PMI data showed weakening activity, notably in Services, although the market is still pricing two rate hikes this year by the ECB.  US futures at this hour (6:35) are pointing slightly lower, with the NASDAQ (-0.6%) leading the way.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have backed up 3bps this morning after tumbling -8bps yesterday.  Right now, they sit right at 4.60%.  As it happens, yields fell everywhere yesterday alongside oil’s price decline, so it is no surprise that modest gains are the order of the day with German bunds (+1bp) outperforming the rest of the continent where yields are higher by 3bps to 4bps across the board.

Finally, the dollar, which had been very quiet all evening, virtually unchanged when I sat down at my desk a 90 minutes ago, is starting to rally a bit here, which explains all the movements.  Apparently, there was just an announcement by Iran regarding uranium, which not surprisingly, has changed the tone of the market.

This explains the dollar’s sudden revival, higher by 0.25% across the board, oil’s sudden rebound, it is now higher by 2.5% at 6:45, and the decline in metals prices.  It also neatly matches bond yields higher.  So, if negotiations are struggling, we should expect to see further risk-off behavior.

On the data front, this morning brings Initial (exp 210K) and Continuing (1790K) Claims, Housing Starts (1.41M), Building Permits (1.39M), Philly Fed (+18.0) and then a little later the Flash PMI readings (Mfg 53.8, Services 51.1).  But as we have just seen in the past 45 minutes, everything is still attached to oil, so that is the key to watch.  All the market correlations remain intact for now, and I suspect they will continue to do so until this conflict is well and truly over.  In fact, it is situations like this, where news changes market pricing so dramatically in short order, that demands hedging programs to be maintained for everyone.  Let’s face it, nobody is going to get it right all the time.

Good luck

Adf

Hot, Hot, Hot

Posted on by 
So, prices were all Hot, Hot, Hot
Resulting from Trump’s Iran shot
But do not forget
The government’s debt
And spending, with what that has wrought

Meanwhile, Trump, to Beijing, has flown
As both sides seek a temperate zone
Where it is agreed
To what both sides need
And neither, the outcome, bemoan

For a change, Iran is not the lead story today in markets.  Instead, there is much angst over yesterday’s CPI reading, which was hotter than forecast, and much pontificating as to what will come from the summit between Presidents Trump and Xi that starts tonight in Beijing.  Let’s take inflation first.

The results showed the month-on-month readings for headline (0.6%) and core (0.4%) which translated into annual readings of 3.8% and 2.8% respectively.  I always turn to The Inflation Guy™, Mike Ashton, when trying to understand CPI readings and have linked here his description of the report and things driving it, which you should all read.  However, I will offer his conclusion here:

“Wrapping this up, the read is actually pretty easy. Inflation is not just in energy, but right now is fairly wide as the diffusion index shows. Some of that is related to energy…the price of diesel fuel affects trucking costs, which affects other goods prices…and some of it is related to the fact that wage growth is no longer slowing. Any way you look at it, as I said the read is pretty easy: the Fed obviously isn’t going to be tightening into an oil shock. But there is nothing here that gives them cover to ease into an oil shock either. Warsh inherits a pickle.”

I know the Fed targets Core PCE, not Core CPI, but I include the below chart of the latter to remind us all of just how far from their target the Fed has been for the past 5+ years.  Powell may have bitched about political pressure, but he received none during the Biden administration and he failed dismally then too.  Just sayin’.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

(One last thing I will note is that USDi, which I mentioned yesterday, will return 10.2% annualized during the month of June, on top of this month’s 12.6% return.  Folks, you really should own some.  You can mint it at www.usdicoin.com ).

We cannot be surprised that yields rose yesterday on the back of the CPI result with the 10-year rising a further 3bps right after the number and 4bps on the day.  This takes us to a 10bp rise in the past three sessions including this morning as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It also is the highest yield since last summer and clearly is not moving in the direction the administration would like to see.  The thing is, now that we are several months into the Iran war and oil prices have been elevated since the beginning of March, we are going to see more pass through of price increases due to energy costs, at least until demand starts being destroyed.  That is always the market tension, rising prices force behavioral adjustment unless the central bank accommodates those prices by increasing money supply.  It is, of course, that action which helps drive generalized inflation as opposed to specific price increases.  Mr Warsh, who was confirmed as a Fed governor by the Senate yesterday and faces another vote today to become Fed Chair, although I expect that will be without fireworks either, will have has work cut out for him.

Moving on to the Beijing summit, the key to remember is that summits are where things are signed amid a ceremony, they are not events to negotiate details.  Secretary Bessent has been in Asia all week and he has met with Chinese Premier Le Hifeng, clearly discussing terms of what can be agreed.  One would expect that the focus will be on Iran and having China press Iran to come to an agreement, trade between the nations, especially in AI related technology and rare earth elements, and Taiwan.  I have no way of knowing what will be announced, but I’m confident Mr Trump wouldn’t be going if there wasn’t a deal of some sort already agreed.

So, let’s see how markets have behaved overnight.  Yesterday’s US session, which started out looking pretty awful, moderated throughout the day to wind up with fairly benign outcomes.  Weirdly, this led to some dramatic differences in Asia with some strong gainers (Korea +2.6%, Japan +0.85%, China +1.0%, Singapore +1.2%) and some serious laggards (Indonesia -2.0%, Taiwan -1.25%) with some lesser weakness (Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and HK).  I might argue that most investors were excited about the potential results of the summit, but if so, perhaps it implies a change in the US position regarding Taiwan, and that could well be a negative there.

In Europe, the picture is also mixed as Germany (+0.7%) is having a solid session on some solid earnings reports from the pharma sector, although France (-0.4%) is under pressure after the Unemployment Rate there jumped to 8.1%, its highest print in five years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Otherwise, the rest of Europe is mixed with little of note.  US futures at this hour (7:30) are also mixed with DJIA (-0.25%) lagging but the other two major indices showing gains of 0.25%.

While we discussed Treasuries above, looking elsewhere around the world, yields this morning in Europe are essentially unchanged, having risen on the back of the US CPI report yesterday.  However, overnight, JGBs saw yields rise 4bps on that inflation fear, and they have made yet another new 19-year high as per the below chart (dates are in European terms).

In the commodity markets this morning, oil is essentially unchanged as it is clear nobody knows how things will play out in Iran.  There have been numerous commentators competing to describe just how much oil has been missing from the market and how soon (June? July? September?) the infrastructure will crash and it will be a global depression.  But they keep having to push their timeline further out as the combination of more production outside the gulf plus the ingenuity of getting production there to other markets via trucks and trains, has mitigated the overall price risk.  Again, here in the US, there is no risk of a shortage of any type as we continue to export our net surplus of products.  I have not read about the blockade lately, but I think that speaks to the fact it must be effective because most articles wanted to describe it as a failure and not doing its job.  If Iranian oil is not getting to market, their financial troubles are growing apace which is the key pressure point.

As to the metals markets, given the lack of movement in oil, it should be no surprise that gold (-0.25%) is little changed as well.  However, something is changing here and that is silver (+1.0%) and copper (+2.0%) are both starting to distance themselves from the gold trade as both remain critical inputs into the electrification story.  A quick look at the chart below of the two elements shows how just in the past two days, silver has broken away from gold.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is firmer again today, continuing to ignore the many calls for its demise.  But as we have seen in most other markets today, the magnitude of the movement is unimpressive.  So, DXY (+0.2%) is an excellent proxy for virtually the entire FX market this morning.

On the data front, today brings PPI (exp 0.5% M/M, 4.9% Y/Y) and core (0.3% M/m, 4.3% Y/Y) although with CPI already released, I doubt it will get much interest.  We also get the EIA oil inventory data which is looking for continued draws of roughly 6 million barrels across crude and products.  there are Fed speakers too, but when was the last time anyone listened to anything they had to say with interest?  Exactly.

It is shaping up to be a quiet session (famous last words) and I suspect all the news of note will come from Beijing tonight.

Good luck

adf

Gamesmanship

Posted on by 
Iran has implied they will skip
The coming Islamabad trip
But if they don’t show
The risks of war grow
For them it’s high stakes gamesmanship

Meanwhile markets blithely ignore
The likely resumption of war
But can it be true
That conflict, part two
Will open the next rally’s door?

Ostensibly, a second round of peace talks are due to get underway today in Islamabad, Pakistan, but whether they will remains an open question, at least as of right now at 6:20am in NY.  As always, it is difficult to know what comments are true or were even made by the players involved as propaganda remains Iran’s largest current export.  I have seen comments allegedly from Iranian sources that claim they both will not attend, and that they will attend.  I guess we will know before the day ends as none of the negotiators is named Schrödinger.

As well, President Trump has indicated he is uninterested in extending the cease-fire even one more day if they do not attend.  At this point, it appears that the hardest line members of the IRGC that have survived are the ones in charge over there, and my take is they are not very interested in negotiating as any result would likely end their grip on power.  After all, if they are prevented from having nuclear weapons capability to destroy their sworn enemies of Israel and the US, what exactly is their raison d’etre?  

Thus, my fear is that fairly soon, the second stage of this conflict is going to ignite.  If this is the case, the recent market insouciance over the situation seems likely to change dramatically, at least for a little while.  This implies that oil prices will spike higher again along with the dollar, while equities and gold will slump.  I assume bond yields, too, will rise somewhat.  Looking at a chart of yields, though, the current level is right in line with where they were for much of 2025 and at the beginning of 2026, and I am left to wonder if the move lower in yields in January and February, was the anomaly, not the return to current levels.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I remain suspect of the thesis that inflation is going to decline dramatically because of AI implementation and have felt that way since far before the war began.  Over a long period of time, as AI utilization increases, I do believe it will improve productivity significantly (I see what it has done for me with just limited uses, none of which involve the wordsmithing this note!), but it is difficult for me to foresee a significant deflationary impulse absent a significant reduction of money in the system, and I don’t see that on the horizon any time soon.  The point is, yields don’t seem to be wrong overall in my eyes.

Now, Kevin’s about to sit down
In front of each Senate assclown
They’ll ask him ‘bout rates
But whate’er he states
The Dems will vote no with a frown

The other noteworthy story is that Fed Chair nominee, Kevin Warsh, is having his hearings at the Senate Finance Committee today.  There is a great deal of discussion in the press regarding whether he will simply be a Trump puppet, or become a Trump whisperer, or be an independent voice.  As well, there has been a recent conversion from Fed chair worship amongst the mainstream media, to encouragement for FOMC dissent to anything he wants to do, simply because he was appointed by Trump, so they seek his failure.  It is really quite tiresome.  Frankly, whatever he says is likely to be irrelevant as we already know that every Senate democrat will vote against because…Trump, and most Senate republicans will vote for and when it comes to the floor, he will be confirmed.  

That said, it is a tough job to take right now, regardless of the president, given the goals he has stated, the current situation with respect to the Fed’s monetary stance, and the potential for dramatic changes in economic outcomes because of the war.  I know I wouldn’t want the job!

Ok, let’s analyze that insouciance from overnight.  While yesterday started off with a negative tone, by the end of the day, US equity markets were little changed with the NASDAQ and S&P slipping just -0.25% while the DJIA was unchanged.  Futures this morning are pointing higher by 0.5% at 7:20am.  Overnight, Asian markets were mostly higher, some by a significant amount (Korea +2.7%, Taiwan +1.75%) which continues to baffle me given the impending energy crisis that is about to hit the region.  The larger markets were also firmer (Tokyo +0.9%, HK +0.5%, China +0.2%) with the rest of the region +/- 0.3% or so.  Fear is not evident here.

As to Europe, there is also no fear with Germany (+0.7%) leading the way higher despite the worst ZEW Expectations result since December 2022.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But Spain (+0.6%), France (+0.3%) and the UK (+0.15%) are also higher this morning.  Fear is not an option.

In the bond market, yields this morning are basically unchanged across the board and nobody is paying attention to this market right now.  The only remotely interesting news is that Nikkei News reported the BOJ is not going to raise rates at their meeting next week, and they apparently have a 100% accurate track record in this situation.  Nobody cares about this right now.

Oil (-0.2%) is hanging around awaiting the next story from the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, sitting between the level seen when it was declared the Strait was reopened and the level it touched when that was denied.  As you can see from the chart below, not only has oil been hanging around, but trading volumes (the light grey bars below the price chart) also appear to be sinking.  Everybody is holding their breath for the next thing here.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Meanwhile, metals are under some pressure this morning (Au -0.7%, Ag -0.9%, Pt -0.2%, Cu 0.0%) but volumes here are also muted.  It’s not just the oil market waiting for the next steps, that’s for sure.

Finally, the dollar is a bit firmer this morning, with DXY (+0.1%) pretty representative of the entire space.  One outlier is NZD (+0.3%) after inflation data released last night was higher than expected and market participants started pricing in another rate hike there.  But otherwise, this market is also bored and boring.  There was a Bloomberg article this morning explaining that hedge funds are starting to layer in bets on a rising euro given how low implied volatility is in the options market, but the very fact that implied volatility is so low, around 6%, tells me that nobody really cares.

On the data front, Retail Sales (exp 1.4%, 1.4% ex-autos, 0.2% control group) is due.  The big jump is because the data measured is nominal terms, so the dramatic jump in gasoline prices will have raised Retail Sales a lot, hence the focus on the control group that doesn’t include gas.  

And that’s really it.  The Warsh hearings will get headlines right up until something happens in either Pakistan from the talks, or Iran because there were no talks.  There are many known unknowns right now, and that explains the lack of trading volume.  But real price movement in every market will rely on unknown unknowns, which by definition are opaque, at best.  Once again, my advice remains, play things close to the vest.

Good luck

Adf