Tag Archives: #Bessent

Like Love Unrequited

Posted on by 
Said Trump, we can all use $5K
To help with our life’s day-to-day
So, vote for the R’s
And your cookie jars
Will fill up with this bonus pay

The pundits are clearly united
That this idea’s crazy and blighted
But of more concern
Is buyers will spurn
The 10-year like love unrequited

I guess we cannot be but so surprised that populist President Donald Trump has said he will hand out $5000 to every adult US citizen if the Republicans retain both the House and the Senate during the mid-term elections.  He is, after all, a populist.  And that is what populists do; they promise things to the people to get elected.  While this may be abhorrent to the alleged ‘hard’ money analysts on Wall Street, it strikes me that this is a brilliant way to get those leaning Socialist to vote for the Republicans.  After all, their entire MO is to get money for no work, and that’s exactly what this is.  It is laughable to me that there is now concern that if this were to go forward, it would cost ~$1 trillion and ‘where would the money come from?’ is now the big question.  The money would come from where all the money for government spending comes from, more Treasury issuance.  

Which brings us to a more important question regarding markets, if there is a new line item in the 2027 budget, $5000 bonuses, how will the bond market respond?  Here the situation is very clear, yields continue to rise.  If you look at the chart below comparing 10-year yields with their counterpart TIPS yields, you can see that inflation is edging higher as a concern (nominal yields are rising more quickly than real yields).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While I don’t believe this is a direct response to the Trump bonus plan, rather to the ongoing climb in oil and related energy prices, I’m confident the bonus plan is not helping the situation.  

This dovetails nicely with the other key topic of discussion in the market; how the Fed will respond to this information as well as the PPI/CPI data to be released later today and tomorrow.  I chuckled at the WSJ headline, A Tiny Shift in the Inflation Rate Could Decide the Fed’s Next Move as the implication is that if the M/M reading for core CPI is 0.2%, the Fed will stand pat but if it is 0.3% it will hike.  And maybe that is the way things will work out.  But if that is the case, it sure seems to me like they would be missing the forest for the trees.  This is especially so since Chairman Warsh was explicit in that he wanted to see the underlying trend, and as we all know, a single data point does not a trend make.

Currently, the Fed funds futures market is back to pricing a 64% probability of a rate hike next week, although as per the below chart from rateprobability.com, you can see that the Fed appears to be one of the most dovish central banks around.

The ECB is virtually guaranteed to hike 25bps this morning and are priced to hike 3 more times during the next 10 months.  I keep wondering how they reconcile a Eurozone economy that is barely growing with hiking rates to reduce demand, and by extension, inflation.  This is where Keynesianism has a really hard time.  In fact, one of the big benefits of Kevin Warsh not having a PhD in economics is that he has never been indoctrinated into that school of thought.

In fact, if you recall Warsh’s first press conference, he lauded the bond market for doing the Fed’s job, raising the cost of funding so the Fed didn’t need to move.  Well, after a lull, the bond market is doing the hard work again.

As an aside, Secretary Bessent’s bond buybacks will take place today and, certainly in no surprise to me, the amount has been increased to $6 billion.  (Remember the ‘at least double’?). In truth, I expect that this program will increase in size each week going forward and ultimately become meaningful with respect to the size of the bond market.  Of course, looking at the bond market’s pricing today, with yields rising another 2bps, the punditry is once again calling out Bessent for not being able to do what he explained.  Funnily, though, they have stopped talking about the yen continuing to decline even though they were quick to dismiss Bessent’s activities there as well.  Personally, I’m going to wait a little longer before I declare the program a success or failure!

Ok, let’s turn to markets this morning.  Oil (+1.7%) continues to climb as the Iran conflict is showing no signs of cooling off.  It is not hard to see the trend in the chart below, and it is not clear what will alter this trend absent a major change in Iran.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

At the same time, the metals markets are under pressure this morning, with copper (-4.75%) leading the way lower and taking gold (-0.3%) and silver (-2.2%) down as well.  I don’t believe anything has changed with respect to the long-term prospects of metals, but they are quite volatile and always have been.  Copper has been subject to tariffs and the LME – COMEX spread and arbitrage is a key part of the price action there, dwarfing fundamentals right now.

But higher energy prices have weighed on risk appetite everywhere with equity markets struggling in most places around the world.  Yesterday’s US weakness was followed by a general decline throughout Asia (China -0.5%, HK -1.3%, Australia -1.0%, Taiwan -0.5%, Indonesia -1.3%) with only Tokyo (+0.2%) bucking the trend.  The only real news came from Down Under where two RBA members were explicitly hawkish, essentially promising a rate hike at the end of this month and the market has priced in two more going forward, a tightening of expectations.

In Europe, though, despite (because of?) the imminent rate action by the ECB today, equity markets are mixed with some gainers (Italy +0.4%, Spain +0.3%) and some laggards, (UK -0.4%) with Germany essentially unchanged.  There has been no data to alter any views, but I guess we will need to hear what Madame Lagarde has to say later this morning.

Quickly, European sovereign yields are little changed this morning but broadly continue to follow Treasury yields higher and JGB yields (+3bps) bounced after their recent dip.  Recall, I mentioned this pattern yesterday.

Finally, the dollar remains generally quiet, although in the last few hours, we have started to see a bit of dollar strength.  JPY (-0.4%) is edging lower as are NOK (-0.7%) despite rising oil prices and ZAR (-0.45%) because of declining metals prices.  However, most other currencies remain +/-0.1% from yesterday’s closing levels.

On the data front, we get a bunch today.

Initial Claims205K
Continuing Claims1780K
PPI0.4% (5.3% Y/Y)
Core PPI0.3% (4.6% Y/Y)
Existing Home Sales3.98M

Source: tradingeconomics.com

We also see the EIA oil inventory data with a slight draw expected.  I suspect that the ECB is likely to be a nonevent and that PPI, unless it is dramatically different than forecasts, will also have a limited impact.  Oil prices are back in the driver’s seat so we will have to see if this rally continues, or it is, like we have seen in both bonds and yen, speculative driven.

Good luck

Adf

All-Knowing

Posted on by 
The war in Iran’s getting hotter
With tankers now under the water
So, oil is climbing
Which right now is priming
A stock market starting to totter

Meanwhile, Scotty Bessent is crowing
Take care ‘bout the shade that you’re throwing
Now, I am the house
And while you may grouse
In markets, I now am all-knowing

Remember back at the end of July when the MOF/BOJ intervened in the FX markets and the US Treasury was ostensibly right alongside them, selling €13 billion vs. yen, give or take a nickel.  And then, for the next month, the yen behaved as it ordinarily does after an intervention, it slowly crawled lower (dollar higher) as per the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So far, so normal.  But something changed a week ago as there has been another significant leg lower in the dollar with no sign of official activity.  The story at the time, which has been neither confirmed nor denied, was that the GPIF was moving funds back into Japan to the tune of several billion dollars’ worth, and that certainly fit the price action.  But that was a one-day event.  And yet, here we are this morning with USDJPY plumbing new lows for the move, more than 2% below levels reached last week.  Something else is happening.

Which brings us to Secretary Bessent.  Yesterday, speaking at an event at SMU in Dallas, he made the following comments, “I am the house now, so when we intervene with the Japanese yen, I have pretty good insight into what the Japanese, what the Bank of Japan is going to do, what Japanese policymakers are going to do.  And you can bet against me if you want.”   On the one hand, those are pretty arrogant comments to come from any politician, especially one who knows exactly the limits of power governments have when it comes to markets.  (Remember, he was instrumental in the trade that broke the pound back in 1992 and forced it out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism).  On the other hand, not only does he understand markets extremely well, he also has a setup where one of the key drivers of the market he is pushing against has been increasing leverage, and leverage is very fragile.  

If we look at futures positioning as our proxy, you can see in the below chart from cotsignal.com that there are still quite a few net short JPY futures positions, although those positions have been reduced over the past month.

Remember, too, when looking at currency futures positions, they represent a tiny fraction of the market, <1%, but they do offer directional views.  The point is that the net short JPY trade remains quite large, and if Japanese investors are truly starting to bring their money home, the yen can strengthen quite a bit further.  As an aside, while this may correlate with a sell-off in risk assets, it is important to understand that the causality in this case would be reversed, so yen strength would be the driver, not the risk-off response.  As I wrote yesterday, my take is 140-145 is a viable target, a level that would offer a solid adjustment without necessarily resulting in a major negative response in other risk assets.  We shall see.

Turning to oil (+2.3%), over the past two months, we have seen WTI rally from a low of $67.0/bbl to today’s price of $95.17/bbl, a 42% climb as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Clearly things are not getting better in Iran, or Russia/Ukraine, but the former appears to be the proximate cause for this move.  Ostensibly, the US sank three Iranian oil tankers near Kharg Island after the Iranians fired ballistic missiles at two US warships.  The Iranians claimed they hit the ships, the US claimed they didn’t and that is what you would expect to hear.  I have no idea what is true, although it appears to be true that those tankers are sunk.

My two cents, if they are worth even that, is that Iran has decided that if it can force gasoline and diesel prices high enough ahead of the midterm elections, that can serve to weaken President Trump and his resolve in this war if the Republicans lose power.  Maybe yes, maybe no.  Today is the beginning of the Republican mid-term convention in Dallas, a new idea designed to excite the Republican base to get out and vote.  From what I have read, polls remain close in several key states where senatorial elections are going to take place, and both the House and Senate are up for grabs.  This will certainly be the main story for the next two months.

Which takes us to action in other markets.  Equities remain under pressure almost universally.  After yesterday’s weak US performance, Asia had a more subtle performance with only a few markets showing substantial strength (Korea +1.4%) or weakness (India -1.1%, Singapore -0.7%) while the rest of the region saw movement of just +/-0.2% or so.  However, the same cannot be said for Europe, where substantial declines are the order of the day (Spain -2.3%, France -1.7%, Germany -1.5%, UK -0.8%) as rising oil prices, Brent is over $100/bbl, have weighed heavily on profit prospects there.  Too, US futures at this hour (7:10) are pointing lower with declines on the order of -0.5% or so.

In fact, Europe is having a rough day overall as bond markets there are all under pressure as you can see in the below Bloomberg screenshot.

While the ECB is almost certain to hike rates tomorrow by 25bps, it appears bond investors in Europe are seeking a greater commitment to fight inflation.  Alas for Madame Lagarde, the fact that Eurozone growth is hovering just below 1% per annum makes it hard for the Keynesian view of how to fight inflation (raise rates) to help the economies there.  As to Treasury yields, they continue to creep higher, up 2bp this morning at 4.81% and the recent winner continues to be JGB markets, with the 10yr yield there slipping -1bp.  However, before we get too enamored of the JGB price action, a quick look at the chart for the past 6 months shows that we have seen this type of movement, a move higher with a several session retracement, at least eight times during this period.  It could be nothing more than ordinary trading here.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Looking briefly at the metals markets, gold (+1.1%) is rallying this morning despite the rise in oil, a break from that recent negative correlation, and it is dragging silver (+0.9%) along for the ride.  Copper (-0.8%) however, is not playing the same game.

Finally, the dollar…well away from the yen, the dollar is doing nothing.  The DXY is still hovering either side of 99.0 and other than the yen’s move today, +0.3%, there are really no currencies that have moved more than 10 basis points in either direction.  Right now, FX is secondary except USDJPY.

On the data front, there are no releases and as we are in the Fed’s quiet period, there are no Fed comments on the calendar.  For now, markets are going to maintain their focus on Iran and oil prices and on the yen story.  Absent more headlines in either of those, I see no reason for major excitement today.  But remember, we do get CPI on Friday, so there is still something critical on the near horizon.

Good luck

Adf

Monet’ry Bleating

Posted on by 
Today it is all about Kevin
And whether, bond markets, he'll leaven
But what if his talk
Does naught to unlock
His views? For bond bears t'will be heaven

Remember, the them of this meeting
Is payments, not monet'ry bleating
Well, if that's the case
There will be a race
In which, only short, are competing

Markets have remained quiet for the past several sessions as investors, traders and algorithms all turn their focus to Jackson Hole, Wyoming this morning awaiting the sage comments of Fed Chair Kevin Warsh.  The market punditry seems convinced he will lay out things like his reaction function to data and his views on where monetary policy is headed.  Of course, I think they are talking their book as they are desperate to write about that.  We know this because all they have written about lately is how awful Warsh is for not telling them all that stuff.

But I have a sneaking suspicion that any discussion of monetary policy will be fleeting, at best, as the title of the symposium is “Financial Innovation: Implications for Payments and Policy.”  Frankly, this sounds like an opportunity for Warsh to wax poetic on the future of money and stablecoins and how the Fed will deal with these new vehicles and their impact on monetary policy.  I have already discussed the idea that stablecoins are going to be inflationary in their own right, and here is an article that describes the situation better than I can.  But in this context, and with the potentially major ramifications of the US government’s embrace of stablecoins, it would not be a surprise for Chairman Warsh to essentially ignore the current interest rate structure and focus entirely on the balance sheet.

If that is the direction of his speech, I expect that the bond bears will look to double down and really hit the futures market hard, driving yields higher extending the recent move seen in the chart below.

Source: barchart.com

But I also do not rule out Secretary Bessent taking advantage of that and buying them aggressively.  Would it really be a surprise if Bessent, a former hedge fund trader who understands both bond math and the way markets work extremely well, used his ‘at least’ $4 billion of buying power to purchase futures, utilizing leverage to expand the impact significantly?  At current margin levels, that $4 billion could purchase at least $60 billion equivalent in futures or 600,000 contracts in the first week of activity alone.  I think that could drive a pretty good short squeeze, exactly what Bessent wants to see.  Below is a chart of the Commitment of Traders report for 10-year note futures showing a net short of ~915k.  What kind of impact would buying 600k futures have?

Source: cotsignal.com

My take is there would be quite a few hedge fund traders whose bonuses would be negatively impacted!

This is all speculation, obviously, but from what I have read around, the market is really looking for something I sense Warsh is not going to give them.  Prepare for more volatility ahead after several weeks of limited movement.  Just sayin’.

In the meantime, let’s run down market movements overnight, although there was not a lot of excitement.  Yesterday’s US rally was followed by broad-based, albeit not excessive, strength throughout most of Asia (Japan +0.4%, HK +0.1%, Australia +0.6%, Taiwan +0.8%) although both China (-0.4%) and Korea (-1.8%) did not partake.  Given the Nvidiphoria, Korea is a surprising outcome, but volatility in that market has been extreme as I have shown in the past.  

European bourses are also higher this morning (France +0.9%, Spain +0.5%, German +0.5%) after data showed improved business confidence throughout the continent although GDP continues to be lackluster (e.g., France 0.7% Y/Y in Q2).  But sentiment indicators are picking up there slightly and, after all, equity markets are supposed to be forward looking.  Maybe things will get better in Europe, although given their energy policies and the fact that they are behaving far more like grasshoppers than ants these days with respect to Natural gas storage (see chart below), things may get tougher if they are wrong about global warming.

As to US futures, at this hour (7:15) while NASDAQ futures are softer (-0.6%) the other two major indices are essentially unchanged ahead of Mr Warsh.

In the bond market, yields continue to creep back higher with Treasury yields (+1bp) the best performer after JGB yields (+4bps) rose overnight and European sovereign yields have climbed between 2bps and 3bps this morning.  As I highlighted yesterday, or more accurately, the WSJ did the work for me, European yields have been climbing more rapidly than US yields lately as European nations have demonstrated no ability to rein in spending, and in fact, are planning the guns AND butter approach as they build out their defense capabilities while maintaining their nanny states.  What can possibly go wrong? 🙃

In the commodity space, we continue to hear that the Strait of Hormuz is either open or closed depending on the source, although the fact that oil continues to flow has me leaning toward more open than closed.  This morning WTI (-0.6%) is slipping a bit, although it rallied a bit yesterday.  There was a very interesting article in Bloomberg yesterday regarding the shale drillers’ ability to increase production dramatically by using more surfactants (soap) to help the oil flow, gains of 20% or more in a well, which simply reminds us of the amazing technology that exists in that sector.  There is no shortage of oil folks, and likely never will be.  As to the metals markets, gold is flat this morning and silver (+1.3%) is rising again, back above $70/oz.  Copper (+0.6%), too, is having a solid session.  Nothing has changed my views on the metals going higher over time.

Finally, the dollar has been stuck in neutral as we await Chairman Warsh with the DXY still hovering right above 99.00.  We have not discussed the yen (-0.2%) much lately as it has not been noteworthy, but now that it has been one month since the major intervention, I thought it worthwhile to take a peek at the chart and see how its doing.

Source: tradingeconomcis.com

I challenge you to explain the difference to me between the price action after the last interventions and this one.  The intervention in May took about 6 weeks to unwind and the yen continued lower for another 6 weeks before they stepped in again alongside the US.  Pretty much the only thing I can see that really stops this move is if I am right about Bessent squeezing the shorts and driving yields sharply lower.  In that case, USDJPY would fall sharply without intervention.  Otherwise, it’s hard to get excited about anything in the FX markets right now.

And that’s really it for today.  At 8:30 Canadian GDP (exp 3.4%) is released and then we see Chicago PMI (57.0) and Michigan Confidence (51.0) when Warsh starts to speak.  We also get the annual NFP revision although I have not seen any estimates for that.  But as I have said all week, it’s all about Kevin.  Now we wait and see.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

A Great Deal of Sorrow

Posted on by 
With Warsh set to speak on the morrow
The rate at which we all can borrow
Has been creeping higher
Which for some is dire
And causing a great deal of sorrow

The question is what will he say
Inflation'ry fears, to allay
Seems most want to hear
That during this year
Fed funds will rise without delay

Arguably, the biggest story this morning is that Nvidia’s earnings beat handily and Jensen’s forecasts were even more bullish.  The upshot is NASDAQ futures are rallying (+0.7%) and we saw strength in the tech sectors in equity markets overnight (Korea +1.5%, Taiwan +0.3%, China +0.9%), although it was not as euphoric as might have been expected.  I read this morning that price targets for Nvidia have been raised dramatically now, so there doesn’t seem to be any slowing of that thought process.

But otherwise, bond markets remain the focus as the combination of Secretary Bessent’s efforts to hold down long-term yields and anticipation of Fed Chair Warsh’s speech tomorrow are the main topics of conversation.  Interestingly, as much as the punditry loves to hate the US for its fiscal profligacy and the story of US yields rising has been top of mind, this morning the WSJ reminded its readers that the story in the US is not quite as bad as that in other major nations like France, Italy, the UK and Japan.  The below chart leads the story on the subject and is worth seeing.

The point is that virtually every Western nation is in the same boat and is likely to stay there for the foreseeable future.  The global regime that had been in place for upwards of 40 years; globalization leading to outsourcing manufacturing and financialization of major corporations is changing before our eyes.  Covid awakened many to the fact that the G10 had become dangerously reliant on China as a supplier for too many critical inputs which led to serious strategic concerns and weakness.  As that perceived weakness is being addressed by nations around the world, it turns out it costs a lot of money to do so, and nations are struggling to figure out how to pay for it.  Promises made when those nations could apply all their tax revenue to social causes are hard to keep when those resources are now being called upon to address strategic and security needs.  Hence the massive borrowing we have seen throughout the G10 and the corresponding rise in government bond yields.

But one of the interesting things about this process is that despite government yields rising, corporate bond yields have been quite well behaved, with credit spreads remaining near their tightest levels ever.  I saw this chart this morning which helps explain that seeming anomaly and it helped clarify my thinking.

Basically, it is explaining that US corporates during Covid refinanced their debt at the rock-bottom levels of the time and reduced their interest expense dramatically.  Meanwhile, due to arguably the single greatest fiscal policy error of all time by then Secretary Janet Yellen, the US didn’t term out its debt, instead going the other way, issuing more T-bills when yields were low, thus government interest payments, as we hear on a daily basis, have climbed dramatically. I’m still waiting for some news organization to ask her about this boneheaded decision, but I won’t hold my breath.

At any rate, the bond market story is the one currently with legs and I assume that will be true at least until Chairman Warsh speaks tomorrow.  While speeches of this nature are often quite dry, I am truly looking forward to hearing what he has to say.

In the meantime, let’s see how other markets are behaving this morning.  After yesterday’s very modest declines in the US, the rest of Asia was mixed as Tokyo (-0.25%) slid alongside HK (-0.3%), neither being a major concern.  Australia (-1.0%) was the worst performer out there after stronger Household spending data bolstered the case for an RBA hike next month raising the probability to 54%.

Europe, however, is having a tougher time this morning led by Paris (-1.1%) where concerns are rising based on both a Fitch credit review of the country (last year they were downgraded one notch to A+) as well as growing uncertainty over the presidential election next year as the main candidates describe their policies to business leaders in a debate format.  But both Spain (-0.5%) and the UK (-0.5%) are also under pressure with only Germany (+0.2%) bucking the trend after a slightly better than expected GfK Consumer Confidence reading of -26.6.  I think it is worthwhile, though, to get a better idea of the situation in Germany, and by extension all of Europe, to look at that confidence measure’s history below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Sure, the reading was better, but how awful must confidence be in Germany.  I guess this is the way people respond to their suicidal energy policies.

While I discussed bonds in general above, I didn’t mention the overnight movement which has seen yields continue to edge back higher led by Treasuries (+2bps) with European sovereigns right there, rising between 1bp and 2bps.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.3%) has been trading around unchanged all night as it was slightly lower when I first sat down.  We continue to hear conflicting stories about the situation in Iran and the Gulf and whether tankers are transiting the Strait, but we have still not seen any blowout in prices.  EIA inventories yesterday showed a small net draw in gasoline and distillates, but crude remains available and Cushing inventories are being rebuilt.  As to metals, gold is flat this morning with silver (+0.6%) edging higher.  There continues to be real support for the precious metals as both grind slowly higher.

Finally, the dollar continues to languish, doing very little overall.  Despite much excitement several weeks ago about the dollar breaking out higher, the fact remains that the DXY is basically in exactly the same place it was in April 2025 as you can see below.  As I have repeatedly explained, at some point the dollar will matter again to markets, but I’m not sure what will drive that change.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As it is Thursday, we see the weekly Initial (exp 208K) and Continuing (1790K) Claims data.  We also see the Goods Trade Balance (-$99.0B) and then some tertiary data.  Today has all the hallmarks of a sleeper as we await Chairman Warsh tomorrow.   

Good luck

Adf

Run-Of-The-Mill

Posted on by 
The funniest thing that I read
Was Bloomberg, in which someone said
That Bessent's bond buys
Have seen prices rise
So maybe, he's not a blockhead

Meanwhile, today brings PCE
Which pundits are anxious to see
If it comes out hot
They'll claim Warsh has wrought
Disaster and sip their Chablis

But if PCE remains chill
The pundits, when ink meets their quill,
Will pivot to stories
In new categories
And claim it was run-of-the-mill

As we await this morning’s PCE data (exp 0.1%, 3.6% Headline; 0.2%, 3.3% Core), as well as a bunch of other stuff like Personal Income (0.2%), Personal Spending (0.1%) and GDP (1.5%), many in the market continue to discuss the pros and cons of Treasury Secretary Bessent’s efforts to push down longer dated Treasury yields.  Before this morning, it was widely reported, or perhaps loudly reported is more accurate, that this was a desperate act and demonstrated that he didn’t know what he was doing and was simply a Trump puppet.  But the top story in Bloomberg this morning is titled “Bessent Bounce Starts to Emerge in Long Bond Market Metrics”.  In the story, they describe that despite all the controversy and certainty it would fail, it seems to be working for now.

Certainly, based on yesterday’s bond market price action, where 10-year yields slid -6bps, that may be the case.  And remember, the increased buybacks aren’t going to take place for another two weeks, so we still don’t know how much the Treasury is going to buy.  Personally, I like the idea of Treasury buying bond futures, where there is a massive speculative short position, and squeezing them all badly.  Remember, he was a hedge fund manager and knows exactly how that process works.  (As an aside, I have a feeling that Druckenmiller’s op/ed was him talking his book because he is short futures as well.)

At any rate, now that complaining about Bessent is not in tune with today’s market, the punditocracy has pivoted back to Chairman Warsh trying to anticipate what he is going to say Friday morning.  As Warsh remains tight-lipped about everything, it is much easier for the pundits to make claims without being proven instantly wrong.  And whatever Warsh says, you can be sure the pundits will claim they knew it all along!

Meanwhile, in the markets, I believe oil (-2.6% today, -5.0% in the past week) continues to slide and is back at levels seen earlier this month around $80/bbl as per the below chart. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I am continually amazed at the commentary regarding oil and Iran and potential peace talks as the response to virtually every statement by the Trump administration about the situation, whether about the ability to traverse the Strait, or the status of talks with Iran, is to dismiss it out of hand by many commenters on X, but when Iranian propaganda media makes claims, it is taken as gospel.  Yesterday I recall Iran claiming economic sanctions won’t matter, they are prepared, and yet today there are stories of how Iran and Oman are furiously trying to come to some type of agreement.  I do not know the situation on the ground there but after 6 months of bombardment and embargos on their oil exports, my sense is the IRGC is feeling a lot of pressure.  I guess we shall see, but in the meantime, oil inventories remain robust with no shortages seen.

As to other markets, let’s tour around to see what’s happening.  Completing the commodity group, metals are consolidating weekly gains with gold (-0.8%) and silver (-0.2%) slipping a bit although both remain higher by more than 2% this week and about 15% in the past month.  Copper is little changed.

In the bond market, after yesterday’s sharp decline in yields, where European sovereigns followed Treasuries, albeit not quite as far, this morning has seen yields back up 1bp across both the treasury and European markets.  As I have been saying, I believe this market is waiting for Chairman Warsh to speak before deciding its next move.

In the equity markets, US markets all rallied yesterday afternoon and closed near their highs with that price action following across most of Asia.  Tokyo (+0.6%), HK (+0.6%) and China (+0.85%) all had good sessions as did Korea (+1.0%) and Taiwan (+1.5%) as all those tech related markets await Nvidia’s earnings to be reported after today’s US close.  The exception here was Australia (-0.4%) which slipped after higher than forecast inflation readings were released and markets have increased the probability of a rate hike by the RBA at their September meeting to 45% from about 25% prior to the release as you can see in the chart below from rateprobability.com.

In Europe, equity markets are fairly quiet overall with modest gains of 0.2% to 0.4% everywhere except the UK which has seen a decline of -0.2%.  Ironically, despite the problems the UK is having with energy prices, two key members of the FTSE 100, Shell and BP are lower on the lower oil price and that is dragging down the index.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:40), NASDAQ (-0.5%) futures are softer, but the other major indices are little changed.

Finally, the dollar is slightly firmer this morning but continues to be an afterthought in markets.  The DXY is exactly where it was yesterday when I wrote and the only true outlier today is AUD (+0.25%) which is benefitting from higher interest rate expectations.  Otherwise, the dollar is modestly firmer against most every counterparty of note.  At some point, the dollar will get interesting again, I just don’t know when that will be.

And that is really it today.  Perhaps there will be a deal from Iran although I doubt it.  

Instead, a tribute to one of the true superstars of our time, and by all accounts one of the finest human beings ever, Ms Dolly Parton.

Good luck

Adf

A Desperate Act

Posted on by

A key market story yesterday was that the Treasury buyback operations, you know the ones that would be “at least” doubled to $4 billion per event, could grow much larger as secretary Bessent would tap the Treasury General Account (TGA) for this purpose.  Now the TGA is the federal government’s checking account.  It is where your taxes get paid into, along with the receipts from bond sales and tariffs.  It is also the account that pays all the federal government’s obligations like salaries and purchases of defense and other equipment.  The current balance (a/o Aug 21st) is about $936 billion according to the Treasury website.  Obviously, that is a huge amount of money, but then the federal government has a huge amount of payment obligations.  I bet it is a hard checking account to balance!

Now, technically, I presume that all their operations are paid by the TGA.  The mechanics would work that Treasury would issue T-bills, receive the cash in the TGA and use that cash to buy back bonds.  But the implication was that he would just spend the money that was already there.  Personally, I doubt that will be the outcome, and frankly, it almost sounded more like a threat than a future course of action.  But it did get tongues wagging.  

According to Grok, these comments came in an interview on CNBC at a bit after 9:00 yesterday morning.  The chart below shows the bond market price action from that point onward, which tells me that while there was a modest initial response, it completely disappeared until another catalyst (lower oil prices I believe) helped push yields down early this morning.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But this clearly struck a nerve as in this morning’s WSJ, Stan Druckenmiller, Bessent’s mentor at the old Soros hedge fund, wrote an op/ed decrying the move.  As I survey all that I have learned thus far, it seems clear that Bessent is looking to remove duration from the market in an effort to drive longer dated yields lower.  But his tools are limited compared to the Fed’s abilities and, at least right now, it does not appear the Fed is going to cooperate.  The first operations aren’t scheduled until September 7th, so until then, it is all just speculation, and I’m not even going to try.

The other thing that Secretary Bessent did yesterday, that may have a larger impact on things, was announce sweeping new sanctions on Iran and countries that do any residual business with Iran in an effort to add further pressure on the regime.  It is possible, but not clear to me, that this is part of the rationale for this morning’s decline in the price of oil (-3.0%).  However, if you look at the chart of oil for the past 24 hours, it is remarkably similar to that of the 10-year Treasury above.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ostensibly, the news here, which of course would impact bond yields, is that the Pakistani army chief was intermediating between the US and Iran in an effort to find a solution and reduce tensions in the Gulf.  That would certainly be a welcome outcome for all, but I’m not holding my breath.  However, this price action has set the tone for risk markets this morning, so let’s take a look.

While Asia was mixed overnight (Tokyo +0.5%, China -0.3%, HK 0.0%) following the mixed US session, with pressure still evident on the tech sector, Europe is firmer this morning across the board (Germany +0.8%, Spain +0.4%, France +0.4%, UK +0.25%) with all those rallies timed almost exactly alongside the oil and bond moves.  As you can see in the chart below, the same is true in the US where futures at this hour (7:25) are also higher and moved right alongside other equity markets.  As to specific stories here, I think there is a great deal of breath holding for the Nvidia earnings report tomorrow after the close.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the bond market, as mentioned above, yields are lower across both Treasuries (-3bps) and all European sovereigns with the entire bloc seeing yields decline by between -3bps and -4bps.  It appears this all revolves on the same story driving oil and equities.

In the metals markets, gold (-0.2%) is edging lower but basically consolidating another strong day yesterday.  It is reasonable to conclude that market participants are growing cautious regarding US debt given there is no indication of spending restraint.  But the reality is that markets are growing cautious of all G10 debt given that statement regarding spending restraint is universally true in that bloc.  I continue to believe we are going to see governments around the world try to ‘run it hot’ with nominal GDP growth rising faster than government spending, thus reducing the real burden.  However, running it hot generally means higher inflation, and that is something that is a political problem.  As to the other metals, silver (-1.2%) is under pressure, although still far higher over the past week and month, while copper (+0.5%) is a bit firmer this morning.

Finally, the dollar is still sleeping this morning, virtually unchanged on the DXY at 99.00 and virtually unchanged vs. almost every major counterpart.  The biggest mover is INR (+0.35%) a major beneficiary of lower oil prices and not surprisingly, NOK (-0.2%) is suffering on the same catalyst.  But otherwise, everything is +/- 0.1% from yesterday’s close.

On the data front, there is not a ton this week, although PCE comes tomorrow, but really all eyes remain on Chairman Warsh’s speech Friday morning.

TodayCase-Shiller Home Prices1.7%
 New Home Sales620K
 Consumer Confidence90.2
WednesdayPCE0.1% (3.7% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% )3.3% Y/Y)
 Q2 GDP1.5%
 Durable Goods0.7%
 -ex Transport0.5%
 Personal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.2%
ThursdayGoods Trade Balance-$99.0B
 Initial Claims208K
 Continuing Claims1811K
FridayChicago PMI57.0
 Warsh Speech 
 Michigan Sentiment51.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, the EIA oil inventories are expected to see another build as there remains ample supply, at least so it seems.  While PCE is important, I think it will be less so given the pending Warsh comments.  To me, tomorrow’s Nvidia earnings and then Warsh are the keys for the rest of the week, absent a major change in Iran, and alas, I don’t see that.

The bond brouhaha is much ado about nothing I believe as it will not change the trajectory of Federal spending, and that is what is necessary to have a long-term impact.  Unfortunately, that usually takes a crisis, and those are unpleasant.  They also take a VERY long time to develop, after all Argentina imploded for nearly 100 years before electing Javier Milei who promised to do something about it.  It has only been 25 years here since we last ran a budget surplus.  I fear it could be much longer before things really change.

Good luck

Adf

Things Are Bleak

Posted on by

The one thing on which you can rely is that there is a large segment of the punditry who will complain about every action taken by financial authorities, often offering ad hominem comments to make their case while demonstrating their own ignorance.  The benefit you have here is that I know there are many things I don’t know and don’t pretend otherwise.

Of course, I am referring to the Treasury Secretary’s recent announcement to ‘at least’ double the activity in their bond purchase program.  Once again, let me remind everyone that Secretary Bessent did not unilaterally pass laws to enact spending, that was Congress’s doing and the dramatic increase in spending has been ongoing for at least 25 years.  Just like every treasurer in every company, Bessent’s primary job is to ensure there is sufficient funding, and that is what he is doing.  Machinations as to the tenor of the debt are left to his discretion and fortunately, he is a man with an extraordinarily broad and deep understanding of financial markets.

The claims that he is panicking now are ridiculous, although I’m sure he isn’t thrilled with the situation.  But he inherited the situation, he didn’t create it.  For every doomster out there explaining the bond market is going to collapse, or the government is going to be forced to change their ways, my response is, don’t hold your breath.  

While yields have certainly risen over the past several years, that was from the extremes of Covid policy.  If you take a longer look, as per the chart below from FRED, the current level of 10-year yields is hardly dramatic, and actually, as I have written before, remains well below the long-term average.

Now, I understand that the amount of debt outstanding is much larger, on both an absolute and relative to GDP basis, but I also know that there is literally a 0.0% probability that the US will not repay that debt.  The question is what the real value of the dollars you receive will be when they are returned, and there, the picture is less bright.  Of course, as you can see from the below chart, also from FRED, this is hardly a new concept either.  In fact, ever since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913, the value of the dollar has declined by about 97%.  This is not a new phenomenon.

Which brings us to Chairman Warsh.  I find it interesting that the punditry believes that Bessent’s activities were completely independent of Warsh.  The two are BFF’s for god’s sake, and speak every week, if not every day.  Each has a job to do, and each is working to achieve it.  Inherently, Warsh’s job is made more difficult because of the US fiscal situation, not because Bessent is tweaking the Treasury’s maturity ladder.

And here’s the thing, both men are working to make institutional changes in hidebound institutions that are fighting things tooth and nail.  Frankly, I sincerely hope both are successful.  Back to Warsh.  Friday, he will speak at the KC Fed’s annual Jackson Hole Symposium, this year titled “Financial Innovation: Implications for Payments and Policy.”  Now, that is a bit afield from the details of monetary policy, as I suspect the policy part of the title refers more to the stablecoin question rather than the size of the Fed’s balance sheet.  But I am confident he will discuss current monetary policy in some manner.  I am also confident he will not offer suggestions as to the next rate move.  

The current narrative has morphed into, the problem for markets/analysts is not the lack of forward guidance, it is those people don’t understand the Fed’s reaction function.  This, too, is disingenuous in my mind as Chairman Warsh has made clear, his function is to reduce inflation to the 2% target, and he has clear ideas how to do that.  The problem is his ideas are different than the neo-Keynesian views that dominate the Fed (and every other central bank), and so are making people uncomfortable.  He has made very clear he is happy to allow the bond market to do the Fed’s work, tightening policy.  He is also very politically astute and clearly understands Bessent’s actions.  I would contend that of all the dysfunction in the government, the least concern should be afforded to the Fed/Treasury nexus.

And finally, it appears that the latest trade talks with Canada have broken down and both sides will be imposing tariffs on the other side.  My personal view is this is a mistake, only because there is no predatory relationship between the two nations, but politics is politics and PM Carney has called on national pride as his rationale.  The thing for the US is, it isn’t going to matter that much. According to Grok, Canadian imports represent ~10% of total US imports and ~1.5% of GDP, so higher tariffs on that relatively small amount is not going to change much.  For Canada, though, exports to the US represent ~20% of GDP, so interruption there is going to hurt a lot more.  Something tells me we will get a deal here pretty soon though as both sides will benefit.

The market’s initial reaction in USDCAD was a slight hit to the Loonie (-0.6%) as you can see in the chart below.  But the CAD has been appreciating over the past month like every other currency vs. the dollar, and this move is hardly breathtaking.  My take is USDCAD remains far more beholden to the broad dollar story with this simply a blip.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Sticking with the currency theme, the dollar more broadly is a touch higher this morning, with the DXY up 0.2% and modest gains vs. most of its G10 and EMG counterparts.  With the dollar back in the middle of its broader long-term range, it is hard to get excited in either direction at this point.  Certainly, a case can be made that we will see a significant decline going forward if the worst-case scenarios play out, but that is not my base case.  Rather, I have a sense that we are going to remain somnolent in the dollar for a while to come, at least until policies are clearer and that is anybody’s guess as to the timing.

Looking at commodity markets, oil (-2.2%) which spent most of last week rising on increased concerns over Iran and the situation there, has reversed course this morning on two stories.  First, it appears that flows through the Strait of Hormuz have been picking up again as per this article, although it remains very uncertain as to the full amounts.  However, oil is moving.  The second story is the latest set of sanctions that the US is set to impose on Iran and secondary nations that trade with Iran as a means to effectively starve the regime there.  Regardless, lower oil prices are certainly better than higher from a global perspective.

Meanwhile, despite the dollar’s modest strength this morning, the barbarous relic (+1.1%) is higher by 15% since the beginning of August and really appears to be building strength in the move.  Is this related to concerns over fiat currency debasement in the US and elsewhere?  Probably as that 5000-year history of holding value in all times is starting to seem quite attractive.  Not surprisingly, this has helped silver (+0.5%) and copper (+0.1%).

Source: tradingeconomics.com (that green bar on the right appears to be a misprint)

In the bond market, yields are edging lower this morning with Treasuries (-3bps) leading the way and most European sovereigns, as well as JGBs seeing -1bp declines.  Nothing has changed the big picture here with too much government debt being issued around the world, but I have a feeling everyone is waiting for Chairman Warsh on Friday before taking their next steps.

Finally, equity markets which had a decent session in the US on Friday, are more mixed.  In Asia, the big markets all fell (Tokyo (-0.75%, HK -1.9%, China -1.2%, Korea -3.1%, Taiwan -1.0%) with only Australia (+0.5%) bucking the trend on stronger commodity prices.  In Europe, it has been a very quiet session, no surprise at the end of August, with bourses there within 0.2% of Friday’s close.  US futures, though, are being dragged down by tech and the NASDAQ (-0.8%) at this hour (8:05) although the other indices are only marginally softer.

As I’ve run on too long as it is, I will cover data this week tomorrow given there is nothing to be released today.  The oil story and anecdotes about tech are the keys for now absent a major White House surprise, something you can never rule out.

Good luck

Adf

In Tears

Posted on by

As I wrote yesterday, “at least” did a lot of work in the Treasury announcement as it opened the door for significantly larger purchases of longer dated bonds, enough to truly have a market impact.  Most of the initial analysis on the announcement focused on the extra $2 billion to be purchased in each operation.  But what if, instead of $2 billion, they purchase $50 billion each time?  Suddenly, that is a significant reduction in long bonds outstanding, and the program will have a much greater price impact.  Which leads to this Bloomberg headline and story, Bessent Says He’s Ready to Expand Treasury Buybacks.  I believe it would be a mistake to dismiss the Treasury’s ability to achieve their goals as, after all, they do make the rules.

The upshot is that after a one-day rally in bonds, yields retraced those early declines (see chart below) and stocks fell sharply yesterday, clearly not the desired outcome.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Much hay has been made regarding the total US debt surpassing $40 trillion the other day, although I see that as merely a reaction to a big round number, not dissimilar to a trading situation in, for example USDJPY, where the market is focused on 160.00 and a break is seen as significant from a trading perspective, but less so from a policy perspective.  I am not seeking to downplay the problems that exist in the US regarding fiscal policy.  I am, after all, a hard money guy (it’s why I am working on USDi, the only inflation tracking cryptocurrency) and a proponent of a much smaller government with much reduced spending.  And that is what is necessary to address the problems at the root.  But that takes Congress and, alas, seems highly unlikely anytime soon.  Personally, I will not bet against Bessent, but that seems to be a popular idea right now.  It is certainly a popular thesis on X.

This saga is only beginning, and I expect that it will be a key topic of conversation for a while, at least until we see a substantial move in yields from the current level.  It is interesting to note, however, the difference in attitude from Chairman Warsh, who explained the market was doing the Fed’s job for them by pushing up yields thus tightening policy, and Secretary Bessent who continues to say that yields don’t represent fundamentals.  Of course, both sides are talking their respective books, so say what they need to say.  Part of me thinks they have dinner together and laugh over how they are confusing markets.

Let’s start our market descriptions with gold (+1.7%) this morning as it is extending its rally of the past two weeks.  A look at the chart below shows the trend line lower from the peak in late January (the date Kevin Warsh was named Fed Chair) was broken on August 6th and has been driving higher since, up 8% since that day and more than 15% since the low print on June 30th.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Silver (+2.3%) and copper (+2.1%) are also rallying here as there is a growing skepticism about financial assets and it appears investors are looking for things that are not reliant on government promises to retain value.  While I rarely discuss Bitcoin, that has rallied nearly 25% this week on largely the same story, although it has also benefitted from additional Treasury regulations being promulgated as part of the GENIUS Act and hopes for the CLARITY Act to pass soon as well.  Interestingly, BTC bottomed on June 30th as well.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to oil prices (+0.35%) they are creeping higher this morning as the ongoing Iran situation remains unresolved with no end in sight.  A key piece of news, that hasn’t gotten that much attention, is that the UAE has completely shut off all trade with Iran after two of its ships were attacked in the Gulf.  This matters hugely for Iran as the UAE was a significant trade conduit in things like machinery and equipment, as well as food and other necessities.  This will help the US sanctions regime significantly.  In fact, yesterday, Iranian Minister Ghalibaf, in a meeting in Baghdad explained that if the economy suffers further, that will be a major problem for the military and the nation.  Maybe this is going to end sooner than later after all.

If we turn to the bond market, while Wednesday saw a sharp decline in yields, yesterday saw that reverse, as per the chart at the top of the note and this morning, yields are unchanged from yesterday’s close.  That is true in the US and across every European market.  It feels like investors are waiting for the next piece of information.  The exception here is JGBs (+4bps) where yields rose after inflation data was released at 1.9% (1.8% core) as expected, but trending higher again as government efforts to mitigate the impact of higher energy prices are starting to falter.  As you can see in the chart below, though, the inflation regime in Japan has changed dramatically from the previous decades.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the stock markets, yesterday’s US performance was pretty crummy (a technical term), with declines on the order of -1% across all major indices.  But that did not follow through so much in Asia (China +0.6%, HK +1.2%, Korea +0.9%, Taiwan +0.65%) although the Nikkei (-0.3%) did lag.  Nor did it have an impact in Europe, although other than Spain (+0.7%), the other major markets are higher by about 0.1% only.  And US futures this morning are in the green, +0.5% across the board, at this hour (7:30).  A key part of yesterday’s US declines was a disappointing earnings report for Walmart, where although they beat earnings, their forecasts going forward were softer.

Finally, the dollar is under further pressure this morning, falling against almost every major counterpart with some substantial declines.  For instance, commodity currencies (AUD, NZD, NOK, ZAR) are all firmer by about +0.7% this morning following their local commodity strengths higher, although CLP (-0.1%) is an outlier here.  But we are also seeing strength in the EUR (+0.25%), GBP (+0.2%), JPY (+0.3%) and CAD (+0.35%) from the G10 bloc and similar gains from EMG currencies (MXN +0.3%, PLN (+0.4%), HUF (+0.6%) and the biggest gainer, KRW (+0.7%) which continues to benefit from capital inflows as well as repatriation by SK Hynix after the US IPO.  If we use the DXY (-0.25%) as our proxy the recent downtrend also started at the end of June as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Two things here.  First, despite this decline, the dollar remains right in the middle of its longer-term range and until we break below 96.50 on the DXY, I do not believe the day-to-day movement indicates much.  Second, though, and more importantly, the FX markets are typically the release valve for pressures in a given economy, as no government can control capital flows, the exchange rate and monetary policy simultaneously, as pointed out by Robert Mundell in 1960 and 1963 (the so-called impossible trinity).  In this case, if the US continues to struggle with the debt situation, or else decides to head down the YCC road for real (meaning the Fed caps yields and buys whatever bonds necessary to do so), the dollar will suffer dramatically and likely boost inflation.  But we are a long way from that situation I believe, and it will take time to get there, if that is the direction.

On the data front, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the Philly Fed’s blowout number of 47.4 yesterday with the manufacturing sector the biggest beneficiary.  This morning all we see is Flash PMI data (exp 53.9 Mfg, 54.0 Services) although with both the Philly and Empire State readings so strong, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a much stronger read here as well.

And that’s it for the week.  Certainly, it was more exciting than anticipated given the Treasury/Bessent announcement, but until we see just how many bonds they buy in a few weeks, we really don’t know how things will play out.  In the meantime, earnings have continued to be strong generally, and I see no reason for risk assets to decline for now.  The dollar, however, is starting to look a little shaky, and if we see a bit more of a fall, I might get concerned.

Good luck and good weekend

adf

Just a Ruse

Posted on by 
Said Scottie, since Congress keeps spending
And frankly, it seems never-ending
We’re going to buy
More bonds as we try
To stop yields from keeping ascending

The market response to this news
Was instant, as it did infuse
A bid to all risk
With movement quite brisk
Though skeptics claim it’s just a ruse

Boy, I leave you alone for one day and look what happens!

At 8:33 yesterday morning, the following announcement hit the US Treasury website [emphasis added]:

Treasury Announces Increased Sizes of Nominal Long-End Liquidity Support Buybacks Beginning September 9

WASHINGTON, D.C. —The U.S. Department of the Treasury is increasing, by at least double, the size of liquidity support buyback operations for longer-dated nominal coupon securities (the 10-year to 20-year sector and the 20-year to 30-year sector).  The current maximum size of $2 billion per operation will be at least $4 billion per operation. 

This change is effective September 9, 2026 and will be in effect for the remainder of this refunding quarter (through November 4, 2026).  Treasury will provide more information about future buyback sizes at the next Quarterly Refunding, scheduled for November 4, 2026. 

This increase in buyback operation sizes reflects Treasury’s desire to provide greater liquidity support in longer-dated nominal sectors where there is consistent strong sponsorship from market participants, as evidenced by the significant volume of high-quality offers Treasury routinely receives in longer-dated buyback operations.

An updated tentative Treasury buyback schedule will be released at a later date.

First, here is a picture of the market reaction in the DXY and gold, the two things that responded most aggressively.  (I inverted the scale for the DXY, so it fell on the news.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And here is the bond market response with that gap occurring between 8:30 and 8:35.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, this was a big deal, right?  Well, that’s a good question and one worth discussing.  As a baseline, the size of the current program that they are doubling is a maximum of $2 billion per operation, which means that the new limit is at least $4 billion per operation.  Now, while an extra $2 billion of demand is nothing to sneeze at, we must consider how much of that debt is currently outstanding.  According to Claude, which took the data from the Treasury website, there is about $3.7 trillion of debt that currently has between 10 and 30 years left to maturity, held by private investors.  When adding the intragovernmental holdings and the Fed, that number appears to be about $5.4 trillion.  

There are seven more of these operations planned before the November deadline, so they will be purchasing an additional $14 billion of notional value, probably paying about $8 billion in cash given it all has much lower coupons so trades at a steep discount to par (and funding it by issuing T-bills).  And if we do the math, that means they will have absorbed (assuming the smaller outstanding of privately held debt) 0.38% of the notional.  

The caveat here is the ‘at least’.  Arguably they could buy any amount and stay within the confines of the announcement and that would certainly have a much larger impact.  But everything I have read is focused on the extra $2 billion.

With that in mind, and while I’m just an FX poet, my long experience in markets tells me that removing 38 basis points worth of some security or asset from a market is unlikely to have a major long-term impact on the supply/demand balance given there is real elasticity here.

So, while yesterday’s moves were certainly impressive (gold +4.3%! as an example) I might contend that the movement was based on the narrative rather than the actual market impact.  But the one thing we have learned of late is that the narrative matters.

Many in the market have immediately claimed that this is an act of desperation as Secretary Bessent seeks to drive longer end yields lower.  Others have claimed that this is the beginning of Yield Curve Control (YCC), although the fact they are issuing more T-bills to buy the bonds makes it a lot more like Operation Twist, when the Fed did the same thing, sold the front of the curve to buy the back, thus maintaining the same size balance sheet but removing duration from the market.  If this were YCC, they would need to print more money to buy those bonds, and the Treasury cannot do that, only the Fed can and they are not part of the process.

Here’s what I know, Scott Bessent is a very smart guy, and somebody who understands markets better than any Treasury Secretary since Bob Rubin and maybe better, certainly better than you or I.  I also know he has been dealt a very bad hand; 2,3,5,7,8, off-suit in poker terms, so doesn’t have many good options.  And I know that he has zero control over spending amounts which falls to Congress and the President, with him merely implementing the spending, not deciding how much to spend.  I don’t know if this will be effective beyond yesterday’s market movement, but if he is able to get the narrative moving in the right direction, (i.e. there is a reduction in duration available to the market so prices there should rise and yields concomitantly fall), it may offer some more breathing room.  The fact that he is using the tools available to manage the government’s balance sheet is a huge positive.  I can only say, good luck Scott.

While there are probably other stories of some import, this was the one that got the most engagement, and I think the one with the potential longest-term impacts on things.  So, let’s see how other markets responded.  It was interesting to me that the equity markets did not wholly embrace this action, although there was an initial rally, much of it faded by the end of the session with very modest gains at the end of the day.  Asian markets, however, fared very well with Tokyo (+1.4%), China (+0.1%), HK (+0.8%) and Korea (+5.9%!) all rallying and taking almost the entire region higher.  I think it is worth showing a chart of Korea’s KOSPI to demonstrate the increase in volatility we have seen on a regular basis there since the Iran war began.  Just look at the expansion of the daily ranges, especially since May, compared to the size of those bars for the prior six months.  This is another indication that the way things were is no longer the way they are.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

In Europe, though, equity price action is desultory this morning, with modest declines of about -0.4% or so across all major markets with Spain (-0.1%) the outlier.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are edging lower led by the NASDAQ (-0.5).

In the bond market this morning, yesterday’s euphoria is being tempered with Treasury yields backing up 3bps.  European sovereigns, though, are little changed to +1bp, although they didn’t respond to the Treasury market in any real sense yesterday.  That makes sense since Bessent’s announcement was highly US specific.  As to JGB yields, they did slip -4bps overnight, and there are many who draw a direct link to Treasuries and USDJPY, with official efforts by the US to cap both of those things.

Speaking of the yen (-0.3%), it was one of the largest beneficiaries of the announcement, rallying nearly 1% as you can see in the chart below.  However, this morning it is slipping a bit, and frankly, the post-intervention pattern has not been altered by yesterday’s move.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, most currencies rallied yesterday on the news but this morning, the picture is more mixed as we see both gainers (GBP +0.2%, EUR +0.15%, NOK +0.15%) and laggards (INR -0.25%, SEK -0.3%, ZAR -0.35%).  In essence, while yesterday’s moves were large and broadly dollar lower, this morning there is more nuance.  As it happens, the DXY (-0.1%) is edging lower today, but remains directly in the middle of that long-erm 96.50 / 100.50 range at 98.71.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, commodity prices show oil (+3.1%) continuing its recent rebound and back to its highest level in about a month.  But if I look at the chart below, it remains in the middle of its much wider range as well, if anything somewhat closer to the bottom than the top.  At this point, it is impossible to know what is happening in the Gulf war and frankly, I think market participants who don’t trade oil directly, have moved on to other drivers.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the metals markets, after yesterday’s remarkable rallies, it ought not be that surprising that they are consolidating this morning (Au -0.7%, Ag -0.3%. Cu -1.1%).  There are some analysts who believe that copper is getting set to roll over and decline in price as the narrative about shortages of supply for ever increasing data center and power production demand grow long in the tooth and may already be priced in.

On the data front, yesterday’s Minutes showed that there were non-voters who also would have been inclined to raise interest rates back in July, but we know that we have seen softer data since that meeting, so it is unclear if that is still the case.  As well, EIA oil inventories rose again, >4 million barrels, so tank bottoms are still covered!  This morning we get the weekly Initial (exp 210K) and Continuing (1790K) Claims as well as Philly Fed (25.0) and Leading Indicators (+0.1%).  There are still no Fed speakers, and I continue to believe that Chairman Warsh’s speech next week is the most important thing on the horizon.

Until then, I imagine yesterday’s surprise announcement is the biggest news we will get for a while and that we are likely to see markets return to their somnolence.  But there is a new narrative forming, the US is going to ignore inflation and push rates lower, which if it is followed implies higher commodity and equity prices and a falling dollar.

Good luck

Adf

A Future, Dystopic

Posted on by

On Monday, an analyst wrote
His thoughts how AI might promote
A future, dystopic
Though somewhat myopic
And offering no antidote
 
Although prior views had explained
That once AI’s suitably trained
Most labor would suffer
And lacking a buffer
Folks’ politics would be quite strained

This is the research report that got tongues wagging on Wall Street yesterday and the fear it allegedly engendered was impressive.  In essence, it said that by 2028, AI would replace vast swaths of the labor force, notably white-collar workers, and that it would lead to a massive recession, and more importantly to the Street, a significant decline in stock prices.  The back and forth on X was amusing all day as there were those who hyperventilated over the coming tragedy, and those who fought back.

It is important to understand this was not a prediction, per se, but one of the scenarios they came up with, although clearly the most dramatic one.  It certainly gained a lot of clicks and notoriety, and let’s face it, isn’t that the idea these days?

Given that the tariff story has now become too complex for anyone to truly understand, and while we all await the denouement in Iran, this appeared to be the best thing to occupy time amongst the trading community.  Personally, I spent the entire morning shoveling snow, but then, I’m no longer a trader.

The upshot is that the major indices all fell more than 1% while gold and silver rallied and bond yields fell.  Fear was palpable.  But will it last?

Last month’s yen rate checks
Came not from Ueda-san
But Bessent, himself

The other story of note was almost an aside, although it helps outline recent movement in USDJPY.  We all remember last month when the yen rallied very sharply during a Friday session in NY as word got out the Fed was “checking rates”.  As a reminder, this is when the Fed calls out to bank FX desks and asks for prices, although doesn’t actually deal.  However, the signal is strong as all the banks recognize the opportunity for intervention, and the news quickly spreads through the market with the effect you can see in the chart below.  During the next three sessions, the yen rallied 4.5%.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

During my career, I had never heard of this activity driven by anyone other than the BOJ, as they were always the most concerned with the yen’s value.  Certainly, they may have been responding to US pressure, but it was always their call.  Now the news comes out that Treasury Secretary Bessent did this on his own last month, a clear indication that the administration is not happy with an over weak yen.  This sets an interesting precedent regarding who controls any given currency.  Now, I doubt we will see this type of thing frequently, but we need to keep it in the back of our mind.  Meanwhile…

Seems Takaichi
Told Ueda, higher rates
Are not helping her

Last night, in a surprise to many in the market, news of a meeting between PM Takaichi and BOJ Governor Ueda resulted in Takaichi-san imploring Ueda-san to leave rates alone, rather than continue raising them.  Higher rates are not helping her growth agenda, and I imagine her belief set is that if the yen weakens too far, she can always intervene, and now that we know about Bessent’s actions, she can count on the US to help.  But I cannot observe this and think anything other than the market is going to test 160 and do so before long.  One poet’s opinion.

Ok, let’s see how markets traded overnight.  First off, last night was the first that all of Asia was back at work so overall liquidity was improved.  However, the results were mixed with Tokyo (+0.9%) ignoring the AI driven US rout while the Hang Seng (-1.8%) fell right alongside the US.  China (+1.0%) rallied in its first day back but consider that simply offset the decline of their last session and, like most other markets, it remains relatively unchanged over the period.  Meanwhile, the tech sense was strong with Korea (+2.1%) and Taiwan (+2.75%) both up nicely while India (-1.3%) suffered under the AI fear umbrella.  Elsewhere in the region, there was no pattern of note with both gainers and losers.

In Europe, the largest markets (UK, Germany and France) are basically unchanged this morning while both Spain (-0.7%) and Italy (-0.4%) are under some pressure.  There is talk of tariff issues, but I’m not sure why only those two markets are taking the heat.  As to the US, at this hour (7:00), all three major indices are higher by about 0.2%.

In the bond market, after a -4bp decline in Treasury yields yesterday they are unchanged this morning while European sovereigns are seeing yields slip -1bp across the board.  Too, JGB yields (-2bps) have continued their slow descent as it appears investors have acclimatized to the risks of Takaichi-nomics.  I think we will have to see inflation figures there to get a better sense.  Regarding Treasury yields, I’m not sure I can explain why I feel this way, but given how bearish sentiment is for bonds, (leveraged players are short >1 million futures contracts), it feels to me like we could see a short-term continuation of the recent rally with yields heading back to test the 3.8% level at least.  I understand both the fiscal argument and the technical argument (see long-term chart below) but neither rules out a short-term rally to inflict pain.  After all, that is what markets do best!  (full transparency, I bought some June TLT call spreads yesterday, so I am talking my book!)

Source: finance.yahoo.com

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.3%) continues to hold its recent Iran inspired gains as the world awaits the outcome of Friday’s meetings between the US and Iran.  I have no insight as to the potential outcome here other than what I read, but it does seem like there will be some type of military action as I do not see Iran ceding anything.  As to the precious metals, gold (-1.0%) is giving back yesterday’s gains but remains in its recent uptrend after the end-January crash, although it has yet to regain the old highs.  I imagine this will take more time, but it also seems quite likely to happen. This is still a quite bullish chart in my view.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Interestingly, silver is little changed this morning as there continues to be much talk of delivery questions at the COMEX given the apparent lack of available ounces relative to outstanding contracts.  My take is things will get rolled as they usually do, but if not, beware a major spike higher on Friday!

Finally, the dollar continues to be the least interesting space there is with today’s JPY (-0.8%) move the exception that proves the rule.  Having already touched on that situation, there is literally nothing else to describe in either G10 or EMG currencies as +/-0.15% describes the entire session.

As to data this week, here’s what we have coming:

TodayCase Shiller Home Prices1.4%
 Consumer Confidence87.0
ThursdayInitial Claims216K
 Continuing Claims1872K
FridayPPI0.3% (2.6% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (3.0% Y/Y)
 Chicago PMI52.5

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to this bit, we hear from seven more Fed speakers across nine venues, but I still don’t think anybody cares.  The market has priced out any rate cuts before Powell leaves, although there is still one cut priced for the year, expected in October.  

Frankly, it is not surprising that markets have calmed down so much given how much activity we saw in January.  As I wrote then, markets have a great deal of difficulty maintaining high volatility as traders and investors simply get tired and tune out.  We will need a new catalyst to get things going, either an attack on Iran or some new China news in my view.  Tariffs are no longer interesting, and frankly I think Iran and AI have both lost some pizzazz.  Maybe the UFO releases will get things going again!

Good luck

Adf