Tag Archives: #politics

Starting to Fret

Posted on by

In DC, they’re starting to fret
That Trump will make good on his threat
If government closes
The risk that it poses
Is markets become quite upset

 

There is yet another budget showdown in Washington as the Biden administration never passed the bills necessary to fund the government for the rest of this fiscal year ending on September 30th.  The previous continuing resolution (CR) expires at midnight on Saturday and if a new funding law is not enacted, then a government “shutdown” occurs.  Now, a government shutdown is not like a company that runs out of money shutting down.  Rather roles the President deems essential continue to operate, along with the military, but other roles see the people furloughed until new legislation is passed.  Everybody gets paid back wages when things go back to normal.

The situation is that the House of Representatives did pass a CR to fund the government at almost the exact same levels as last year and sent it to the Senate.  However, in the Senate, it needs to beat a filibuster, so needs 60 votes to pass and get to President Trump’s desk.  However, last night, Senate Minority Leader Shumer declared the Democrats would not support the bill, so would rather have the government shut down.  This is a big change from the previous 3 times that there were government shutdowns, because each of those was blamed on Republican intransigence.  

In the end, whatever the politics, the market impact has been negative for stocks while bonds held up, even rallied.  Of course, previous shutdowns all were amidst very different economic environments as inflation was quiescent and bull markets in both stocks and bonds were extant.  As such, arguably, the momentum behind the market was sufficient to offset any concern over the shutdown.  But this time markets are already under pressure going into the potential shutdown.  I fear that market dislocation, at least in the equity markets, could be far more severe if this one occurs.  Something to keep in mind.

The history shows the US
Has long done all things to excess
But now, as they try
With less, to get by
The pundits complain of regress

Reading the WSJ this morning, I couldn’t help but think of the George Costanza opposite day episode of Seinfeld when reading the Heard on the Street column decrying the fact that the Trump administration is seeking to rein in fiscal excess.  Of course, this is an issue that has been fodder for the punditry for a long time, how the US was living beyond its means and borrowing too much money.  But now, this article is concerned about the opposite.  The key concern is that if the US government doesn’t continue to run massive deficits, the economy will slow and corporate profits will fall dramatically, resulting in falling equity prices.

Arguably, this would always be the case if a change of this nature were to be made.  And remember, the punditry was all in on making these changes.  However, now, they point to Germany and the DAX, which has outperformed US markets over the past several weeks as the model.  (chart below from WSJ)

And what is Germany doing so well?  Why, they are talking about borrowing an extra €500 billion, eliminating their debt brake that ensures budget deficits remain below 0.35% of GDP, and funding a huge buildup in defense spending.  Germany, which has long been seen as the only source of fiscal rectitude is now being lionized for getting rid of that trait.  As I said, opposite day!

The lesson, if you haven’t learned it yet, is that the ascendance of Donald Trump to the presidency is going to continuously change many long-held beliefs in governments around the world, as well as in the punditry, who may find that things which seemed great in theory may have consequences previously unconsidered.  From a market perspective, this means volatility will continue to be the best estimate for the future.

Ok, let’s turn our attention to markets and see how things performed overnight.  After yesterday’s mixed session in the US, where the DJIA could not manage a gain despite cooler than expected CPI readings, overnight saw a mixed picture as well.  Japan was either side of unchanged while both Hong Kong (-0.6%) and China (-0.4%) slipped as did most other Asian markets with Malaysia (+1.7%) the true exception.  In Europe, though, screens are green as excess government spending is rewarded, although the gains are modest, 0.3% or so.  

On the topic of excess spending regarding Germany, I read yesterday that the plan to alter the constitution may have serious problems (meaning that spending may not materialize) because about 50 Bundestag members in the old parliament lost their seats in the election, so it is not clear they will be willing to vote to overturn the constitution during the current lame duck session and allow the debt brake to be set aside for defense purposes.  As I said when the story first arose, we are still a long way from Germany paying their own way defensively.  US futures, meanwhile, are slightly softer at this hour (7:15).

In the bond market, yesterday saw yields climb a few bps and this morning those trends remain with Treasury yields (+2bps) not climbing as much as European sovereigns (+3bps to 4bps) as there appears to still be a level of confidence that all the extra defense spending will happen.  One story that should have Europeans concerned is that the European Commission, in their effort to find funding for their newly found defensive aggressiveness, have spied the €10 trillion in savings that European citizens hold.  Frau von der Leyen, the European Commission President was quoted as saying, ”we’ll turn private savings into much needed investment.” 

Call me crazy but my economics classes taught me the identity that Savings º Investment, so I am not sure why those savings aren’t already being invested.  Perhaps European citizens are not investing where Frau von der Leyen wants and that is the problem.  At any rate, I suppose even if Germany fails to overcome its constitutional debt brake, the EU will get there anyway.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.3%) is edging lower after a nice run for the past several days as it bounced off the bottom of its trading range.  Yesterday’s EIA data showed a large draw in gasoline, but I am given to understand that is a seasonal thing (H/T Alyosha).  Meanwhile, nothing has dissuaded investors that gold (+0.25%) is a good thing to hold as it rallied further after yesterday’s gains, although both silver (-0.3%) and copper (-0.4%) are a touch softer this morning.

Finally, the dollar is somewhat firmer this morning, albeit not dramatically so.  Of course, it has been under significant pressure during the past week+, so this trading response ought be no surprise.  SEK (-0.8%) is the laggard in the G10, but you must remember that it has been the leading gainer over the past month.  Meanwhile, AUD (-0.5%) and NZD (-0.45%) are also under a bit of pressure this morning, but the rest of this bloc has seen far less movement.  In the emerging markets, HUF (-0.6%) is the laggard with the rest of the bloc seeing declines on the order of -0.3% or less.  As I said, nothing dramatic here to see.

Yes, yesterday’s CPI data was a bit cooler than anticipated, but as my friend The Inflation Guy™, Mike Ashton, explained here, I wouldn’t get too excited that inflation is collapsing back to the Fed’s 2% target.  This morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1900K) Claims data as well as PPI (headline 0.3%, 3.3% Y/Y; core 0.3%, 3.5% Y/Y). However, given CPI is already out, I don’t think it will have much impact.  Rather, as we have observed lately, politics remains the key driver of all market reactions.  The unfolding government shutdown in the US and the German debt drama are the two most noteworthy issues right now, but Ukraine and the Middle East are still out there to offer surprises.

Once again, volatility is the only thing about which we can be sure.  That said, my confidence is growing that the dollar will decline over time.

Good luck

Adf

In a Trice

Posted on by

The calendar’s not e’en turned twice
Since Trump, with JD as his Vice
Have taken the reins
And beat up on Keynes
While weeding out waste in a trice
 
For markets, the problem, it seems
Is rallies are now merely dreams
So, equity buyers
Are putting out fires
While thinking up pump and dump schemes
 
For bondholders, it’s not so clear
If salvation truly is near
But one thing seems sure
The buck will endure
Much weakness throughout this whole year

 

We have not even reached 50 days of a Trump presidency as of this morning and nobody would fault you if you estimated we had three years of policies enacted to date.  The pace of changes has been blistering and clearly most politicians, let alone investors, have not been prepared for all that has occurred.

One of the things that I read regularly is that Trump is destroying the Rules Based Order (RBO) which was underpinned by the Pax Americana of the US essentially being the world’s policeman.  This is cast as a distinct negative under the premise that things were going great and now, he is upsetting the applecart for his own personal reasons.  Of course, market participants had grown quite accustomed to this framework, had built all sorts of models to profit from it and with the Fed’s help of monetization of debt, were able to gain significantly at the expense of those without market linked assets.  Hence, the K-shaped recovery.

But while that is a lovely narrative, is it really an accurate representation of the way of the world?  If the US was truly the world’s policeman, and we certainly spend enough on defense to earn that title, perhaps it was time for the US to be fired from that role anyway.  After all, there is currently raging military conflict in Ukraine, Lebanon, Syria, Congo, Sudan and the ongoing tensions in Gaza.  That’s a pretty long list of wars to claim that things were going great.

Secondly, the question of financing all this conflagration, as well as other economic goals, notably the alleged transition to net zero carbon energy production, appears to be reaching the end of the line.  While the US can still borrow as needed, (assuming the debt ceiling is raised), the reality is that the US gross national debt outstanding is greater than $36,000,000,000,000 relative to GDP that is a touch under $28,000,000,000,000.  On a global basis, total (not just government) debt is in excess of $300,000,000,000,000 while global GDP clocks in somewhere just north of $100,000,000,000,000.  Arguably, on a credit metric basis, the world is BB- or B+, a clear indication that all that debt is unlikely to be repaid.

If we consider things considering this information, perhaps the RBO had outlived its usefulness.  Arguably, the loudest complaints are coming from those who benefitted most greatly and are quite unhappy to see things change against them.  But as evidenced by the polls taken after President Trump’s speech last Tuesday evening, the bulk of the American public is still strongly supporting this agenda.  The idea that the president and his Treasury secretary are seeking to engineer a short-term recession early, blame it on fixing Biden’s mess, and having things revert to stronger growth in time for the 2026 mid-term elections is not crazy.  In fact, there have been several comments from both men that short-term pain would be necessary to achieve a stabler, long-term gain.

So, what does this mean for the markets?  You have no doubt already recognized that volatility is the main event in every market, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.  But some of the themes that follow this agenda would be for US equities to suffer relative to other markets, as the last decade plus of American exceptionalism, led by massive deficit spending and borrowing, would reverse under this new thesis.  Add to this the sudden realization that other nations are going to be investing significantly more in their own defense, and money will be flowing out of the US into Europe, Japan and emerging markets around the world.

Bonds are a tougher call as a weaker economy would ordinarily mean lower yields, but the question of tariff impacts on prices, as well as reshoring, which, by definition, will raise prices, could mean we see the yield curve steepen with the Fed cutting rates more aggressively than currently priced, but 10-year and 30-year yields staying right where they are now.

I believe this will be a strong period for commodities as all that foreign capex will be a driver, as will the fact that, as I will discuss shortly, the dollar is likely to underperform significantly.  Gold will retain its haven characteristics as well as remain in demand for foreign central banks, while industrial metals should hold their own.  As to oil, my take is lower initially, as OPEC returns its production and slowing GDP weighs on demand, at least for a while, although eventually, I suspect it will rebound along with economic activity.

Finally, the dollar will remain under significant pressure across the board.  Clearly, Trump is seeking a weaker dollar to help the export industries, as well as discourage imports.  Add to this the potential for lower yields, lower short-term rates, and an exit of equity investors as US stocks underperform, and you have the making of at least another 15% decline in the greenback this year.

With this as backdrop, we need to touch on three key stories this morning.  First, Friday’s NFP report was pretty much in line with expectations at the headline level but seemed a bit weaker in some of the underlying bits, specifically in the Household Survey where a total of 588K jobs were lost and there was a large increase in the number of part-time workers doing so for economic reasons.  Basically, that means they wanted full-time work but couldn’t find a job.  Markets gyrated after the release, with yields initially sliding but then rebounding to close higher on the day.  Equities, too, closed higher on the day although that had the earmarks of a relief rally after a lousy week overall.  The thing about this report is that it did not include any of the government changes that have been in the press, so next month may offer more information regarding the impact of DOGE and their cuts.

The second story comes from north of the border where Mark Carney, former BOC and BOE head, was elected to lead the Labour Party in Canada and replace Justin Trudeau.  As is always the case, when there is new leadership, there is excitement and he said he will call for a general election in the next several weeks, ostensibly to take advantage of this new momentum.  It seems that President Trump’s derision of not only Trudeau, but Canada as well in many Canadian’s eyes, will play a large role with the two lead candidates, Carney and Poilievre, fighting to explain that they are each better placed to go toe-to-toe with Trump on critical issues.

Here’s the thing, though.  Despite much angst about the US-Canada relationship on the Canadian side of the border, the market viewpoint is nothing has really changed.  a look at the chart below shows that after a bout of weakness for the Loonie in the wake of the US election and leading up to Trump’s tariff announcements, USDCAD is basically unchanged since mid-December, with one day showing a spike and reversal in early February.  My point is that the market has not, at least not yet, determined that the Canadian PM matters very much.

Source: tradingecoomics.com

The last story to discuss is Chinese inflation data which was released Saturday evening in the US and showed deflation in February (-0.7% Y/Y) for CPI and continuing deflation in PPI (-2.2%).  In fact, as you can see from the below chart, PPI in China has been in deflation for several years now.  Recently there have been several articles explaining this offers President Xi a great opportunity for significant stimulus because no matter how much the government spends and how much debt they monetize, inflation won’t be a problem for a long time to come.  I would counter that given deflation has been the norm for several years, they have had this opportunity for quite a while and done nothing with it.  Why will this time be different?  Ultimately, the default result in China is when things are not looking like they will achieve the targeted growth of “about 5%”, you can be sure there will be more investment to build things up adding still more downward pressure on prices as production facilities increase.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The renminbi’s response to this news has been modest, at best, with a tiny decline overnight of -0.25%.  And a look at the chart there shows it is remarkably similar to the CAD, with steady weakness through December and then no real movement since then.  Given the dollar’s recent weakness overall, this seems unusual.  Although, we also know that China prefers a weaker currency to help support their export industries, so perhaps this in not unusual at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, this note is already overly long, so will end it here.  We do have important data later this week with both CPI and Retail Sales coming.  As well, the consensus from the Fedspeak is that they are pretty happy right here and not planning to do anything for a while.

The big picture is best summarized, I believe, by the idea that we are at the beginnings of a regime change in markets as discussed above.  Volatility continues to be the driving force, so hedging remains crucial for those with natural exposures.

Good luckAdf

Things Are Creaking

Posted on by

Before Mr Trump started speaking
The Chinese explained things are creaking
As growth there is slow
So now they will blow
More funds to achieve what they’re seeking

 

The Chinese government has outlined a very active agenda for 2025 as the current pace of growth in their economy remains sluggish at best.  They continue to focus on a 5% headline GDP target and have promised to increase the budget deficit by a similar amount, so the idea of organic growth seems to be dead.  They reiterated their plan to recapitalize the big banks with CNY 500 billion and are looking to raise defense spending by 7.2%.  Long term debt issuance will increase with CNY 1.3 trillion planned for this year and they talk about adding 12 million urban jobs.  It all sounds fantastic.
 
But will it work?  Of course, there is no way to know yet, but if history is any guide, the mercantilist structure of the Chinese economy remains extremely difficult to overcome and replace with a more consumer-focused economy.  The property market there remains in terrible shape and that continues to be a drag on the overall economy as individuals, who had been encouraged to invest in property as a means of creating a retirement nest egg find themselves with much less disposable income and an illiquid and depreciating asset.
 
President Trump’s tariffs are not going to help them at all, but it is unclear if they will be significantly detrimental.  While I would not bet against China reporting 5% GDP growth in 2025, given the questionable reliability of their data, it is not clear it will be reflective of the state of the nation.
 
My take on market impacts are as follows: Chinese yields will climb as more debt is issued while growth will allegedly increase, Chinese equities should benefit If they are successful at getting things moving, but the yuan will have a harder time in my view, as capital flows to the nation remain stunted.  Of course, much will also depend on the evolution of US policy, which has been erratic, to say the least.

Said Trump, It’s a “new golden age”
As finally, we turn the page
On four years of waste
And so, we’ll make haste
With changes despite Dem outrage

Of course, the other big news was last night’s speech by President Trump to a joint session of Congress where he outlined both the many things he has accomplished in the first 6 weeks of his presidency, but also his plans for the rest of the time.  While many are still reeling from the speed with which changes are being made, there was no indication that his pace is going to slow.

Mr Trump did acknowledge that there may be some short-term pain as the economy adjusts to the changes he has wrought, but he remains focused on the long-term and how to achieve a strong economy with a far better balance sheet and a smaller government.  The implication is that he is still the avatar of volatility, and that aspect will not be changing.

Let us, though, take a step back and look at a much bigger picture.  For the past seventeen years, the US economy was the clear leader in global growth with massive government spending and budget deficits incurred to drive the process.  Meanwhile, while most of the rest of the world exited the pandemic with a burst of reopening growth, they have all lagged the US.  The chart below shows the ratio of the MSCI US index / MSCI World index and demonstrates that investment into the US, following that leading growth profile, has been historic in its effects.

Source: longtermtrends.net

But that situation seems to be changing.  President Trump is openly seeking to reduce the size of the US government and withdraw spending on many foreign adventures while the rest of the world is doing the opposite.  As per the above, China has just announced significant new stimulus.  As well, Europe, now that they need to become more responsible for their own defense, has also announced a major spending plan to rearm themselves.  This is the real sea change, I think, and the one that is going to have the biggest medium and long-term impacts on markets everywhere.  Changes in the level of capital flows and changes in trade patterns are going to significantly impact the value of the dollar as well as stocks, bonds and commodities.  It is a brave new world, so attention must be paid.

In the meantime, let’s see the markets’ initial response to the recent spate of news.  The tariff news has served to undermine US equities for the past two sessions and is still dragging on some markets, but the new spending promises are the new drivers.  So, in Asia, while the Nikkei (+0.2%) managed only a modest rally, the Hang Seng (+2.8%) exploded higher on the Chinese stimulus story although surprisingly, the CSI 300 (+0.5%) did not do nearly as well.  But elsewhere in the region, it was mostly large gains with Korea, India, Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all rallying more than 1%.  The laggards were Australia and New Zealand, which seemed to focus on the negatives of tariffs.

In Europe, Germany’s DAX (+3.4%) is the beneficiary of most of the mooted defense spending as not only are there quite a few defense focused firms, but rumors are that the government is going to coopt the auto manufacturers into building defense equipment (shades of WWII).  As well, the rest of the continent is flying (CAC +1.9%, IBEX +1.6%) and even the UK (+0.45%) is benefitting although there is growing concern that the BOE is not going to be aggressively cutting rates to support the economy because of still sticky inflation.  As to US futures, they are bouncing this morning and higher by 0.4% at this hour (7:00).

In the bond market, while Treasury yields rebounded from their recent lows yesterday, gaining 9bps on the day, this morning they are unchanged.  However, a look at European sovereigns tells the story of investors anticipation of a big uptick in new issuance to fund that defense spending.  The picture below is that of German yields, as an example, showing its 20bp rise this morning, but the entire continent has seen yields rise by at least 16bps!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The market clearly believes the Europeans are going to move forward!

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.6%) remains under pressure as despite the mooted fiscal stimulus, there continues to be more concern over excess supply than newly created demand.  The below chart is quite interesting as a history of long-term price activity in oil with the interpretation that if we are near the supply destruction level, the future for prices is likely to be bullish.  Something to keep in mind. (as an aside, Josh_Young_1 is an excellent follow on X for oil ideas and information.)

As to the metals markets, gold is little changed but copper (+4.7%) has clearly gotten excited over the Chinese stimulus as well as the European defense spending, where copper will be an important piece of the puzzle.

Finally, the dollar is under substantial pressure this morning vs. both G10 and EMG currencies.  Given the yield changes, and my view that 10-year yields have become the FX driver, rather than short-term rates, it should be no surprise that the euro (+0.6%) is rallying to levels not seen since November.  The pound (+0.3%) is following suit, also making 5-month highs.  But the really impressive moves are in the peripheral European currencies with SEK (+1.1%) and PLN (+1.1%) both trading back to levels not seen since September.  On the tariff front, both MXN (+0.25%) and CAD (+0.1%) are lagging the main move but still managing a very modest rally v. the greenback.

In this brave new world, where the US is not the fiscal profligacy leader, but that role is assumed by others, my sense is that the dollar may well have topped for a much longer-term period.  While at the beginning of the year I was confident that the dollar would outperform, the policy changes we have seen since then have altered my views.  While volatility will still be rampant, I believe the broad direction will be a lower dollar going forward.

On the data front, this morning brings ADP Employment (exp 140K) as well as ISM Services (52.6) and Factory Orders (1.6%).  Then we see the EIA oil inventories where a small draw is expected and at 2:00pm, the Fed’s Beige book.  Perhaps the best thing about the changing world order is that central banks are losing some of their market power.  As I wrote yesterday, perhaps US rates are destined to fall as both the president and Chair Powell are keen to see that happen.

At this point, I think the dollar may have seen its highs for quite a while.  Remember, FX trends tend to be very long-term in nature.  For those of you who are payables hedgers, keep that in mind going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Recession in Sight

Posted on by

There once was a policy view
That tariffs, we all should eschew
But President Trump
Explained on the stump
To this idea, he wouldn’t hew
 
And so, as the clock struck midnight
Trump’s tariffs once more saw the light
Most analysts say
The tariffs will weigh
On growth, with recession in sight

 

By now you are all aware that as of 12:01 EST this morning, 25% tariffs have been imposed on all imports from both Canada and Mexico except energy products, which have seen 10% tariffs imposed.  As well, all Chinese imports have been hit with an additional 10% tariff.  Once again, President Trump has proven to be a man of his word, promising these tariffs during his election campaign and imposing them now.

The mainstream view is that these tariffs are a disaster and will send the economy into a recession.  In fact, the International Chamber of Commerce said a depression was likely.  As well, there is much concern that inflation will rise during the recession, which for Keynesians must be a very difficult concept to grasp given their strongly held belief that a recession will result in declining inflation.

Now remember, I am just a poet, so please take that into account when I offer my views here.  First, we have no idea how things will play out.  The one thing about which I am extremely confident is that there will be numerous behavioral changes by everyone because of these tariffs.  The first question is who will absorb the cost of the tariffs.  Remember, essentially the definition of a recession is that demand is declining.  Will companies be able to pass through the higher costs?  In some instances, they likely will, but in others probably not.  Anecdotally, there was a story in the WSJ that Chipotle will see its costs rise because of the tariff on avocados from Mexico but will not change their prices to account for that.  I’m confident they are not the only company who will absorb those costs.

However, there will certainly be companies that believe they can raise prices and maintain their sales and will try to do that.  My point is each company will evaluate the environment under which they operate and respond in the profit-maximizing manner, but each company’s scenario will be different.

Second, let’s consider the reason that President Trump is such a strong believer in tariffs.  He sees them as the stick to achieve his goals.  I would argue there are two goals in sight.  With Canada and Mexico, he is still unsatisfied with their efforts on the border and with fentanyl smuggling and is very keen to push that to completion.  However, the broader goal is to return manufacturing to America from its decampment overseas, mostly to Southeast Asia, during the past forty years.  And remember, he is seeking to implement a carrot as well, looking to cut corporate taxes to 15% going forward, which would put the US in the lowest quartile of corporate tax rates in the world.  While this morning the headlines are all about the tariffs and their potential destruction, just yesterday, Taiwan Semiconductor announced they would be investing $100 billion to build new fabrication plants in Arizona.  That is exactly the response Trump is seeking.

We all recognize that the world today is very different than it was even two months ago as President Trump has taken an extraordinary number of steps to implement the ideas upon which he was elected.  Interestingly, a large majority of the public remains strongly in his camp with approval ratings for many of his policies well above 60% and as high as 80%.  While markets are clearly unhappy as they have no idea how things will play out, and companies are now faced with far more uncertainty as they attempt to plan for their future, there is no reason to believe this process is going to change anytime soon.  

Keep one other thing in mind, unlike Trump’s first term in office, where he was constantly touting the strength of the stock market as a vote of confidence, this time around he and Treasury Secretary Bessent have been entirely focused on the 10-year yield and getting that rate down.  After a 7bp decline yesterday, he has been successful there. (see chart below) I would be surprised if Trump speaks about the stock market much at all for a while.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With that in mind, let’s see how markets have been handling the tariff imposition.  After yesterday’s rout in the US, where a higher open morphed into a sharply lower close on the day, we saw red throughout Asia (Nikkei -1.2%, Hang Seng -0.3%, CSI 300 -0.1%) and Europe (DAX -2.1%, CAC -1.2%, IBEX -2.3%).  In fact, it is far harder to find a market that has rallied at all, although US futures at this hour (6:40) are pointing slightly higher.  However, after the sharp declines, an early bounce is not uncommon though not necessarily a harbinger of activity for the day.  All of this makes sense as public companies are likely going to see impacts on their profitability either because of reduced sales or reduced margins, or both, with tariffs now in place.  (Well, private companies are going to feel the same pressures, but there are no markets for them to worry about.). The worry for investors is given the extremely high price multiples that currently exist across so many companies, margin pressures can be problematic for stock prices.  For the near term, it is easy to make the case that equities have further to fall.

In the bond market, after yesterday’s Treasury yield decline, there has been a modest 1bp bounce, although as per the above chart, the trend remains lower.  In Europe, the news just hit the tape that the Eurozone is creating a plan to rearm the continent allowing for European countries to exceed debt restrictions to enable them to borrow and spend the money on this task.  The mooted amount is €800 billion, meaning that markets can expect that much new debt issuance across the continent in the coming months and years.  However, it appears investors are viewing the situation overall and are far more concerned with potential slowing growth than on increased issuance as yields have slipped one or two basis points across all nations in Europe.  Perhaps that is a signal that there is little belief in the likelihood of this new plan coming to fruition.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.4%) continues its slide as a combination of worries over future growth due to the US tariffs and the OPEC+ announcement that they would start to bring production back online beginning in April (just 138K bbl/day, but the signal is quite clear that more is on the way) has traders unnerved.  Certainly, this is part of what President Trump is seeking, lower oil prices to help keep a lid on inflation, and there is no doubt he has pressured OPEC+ on the issue.  Remember, too, that if gasoline prices fall at the pump, that is a key driver of inflation perceptions for everyone.  As to the metals markets, we are seeing a split this morning with precious (Au +1.0%, Ag +0.65%) rallying on uncertainty and fear while copper (-1.2%) seems to be suffering on recession fears.

Finally, the dollar is lower again this morning with the DXY breaking back below 106 for the first time since early December as a signal of the broad trend.  This is interesting as the textbooks claim that if the US imposes tariffs, the dollar will strengthen, or more accurately other currencies will weaken, to offset those tariffs, and yet this morning CNY (+0.55%) and CAD (+0.45%) are bucking that trend although MXN (-0.2%) is behaving as most would expect.  But the dollar’s weakness is broad based, and my take is given the movement in interest rates, which are suddenly declining far more rapidly than anticipated just a week ago (Fed funds futures are now pricing in 75bps of cuts this year with a 11% probability of a cut in March, up from 2% last week) the dollar bull case is under real pressure.  I have maintained all along that if the Fed reignited their easing policy, the dollar would suffer.  Funnily enough, despite any angst between Chairman Powell (remember him?) and President Trump, they both may see lower rates as their preferred outcome.  In that case, the dollar has further to fall.

There is no hard data set to be released today although we do hear from NY Fed President Williams this afternoon.  This could be the first hint that the Fed’s caution is abating, and further rate cuts are in store.  Of course, with Powell on the calendar for Friday, if there is a change in tone, most market participants will be waiting to hear it from him.

The watchword has shifted from caution to uncertainty.  The tariffs have thrown sand into the gears of the economy and markets.  It remains to be seen how much impact they will have, but for now, fear is rising although the dollar is not following suit.  I think Trump must be happy, but I’m not sure how many in the markets are.

Good luck

Adf

Balling Their Fists

Posted on by

The world is no longer the same
Since Trump put Zelenskiy to shame
Now Europe insists
They’re balling their fists
And this time it isn’t a game
 
But markets just don’t seem to care
That, anymore, war’s in the air
Instead, what’s decisive
Is that the new price of
All cryptos has answered their prayer

 

Last Friday’s remarkable live TV meeting between Presidents Trump and Zelenskiy in the Oval Office has rocked the entire world, or certainly the entire Western World.  The unwillingness of Zelenskiy to consider a ceasefire and Trump’s dismissal of him from the White House, even before lunch, has clearly changed a lot of views of how things are going to evolve from here.

The most noteworthy result is the sudden realization by the EU and NATO that the US is committed to ending the war and is not interested in spending much, if any, more money on the subject.  The response by the EU, an emergency meeting in London yesterday where every nation committed to a strong defense of Ukraine, including boots on the ground, is remarkable.  My fear is that if they proceed along these lines, and French or British soldiers are attacked/shot during the conflict, NATO will seek to invoke Article 5 and drag the US into the conflict.  Certainly, that appears to be Zelenskiy’s goal, to get the US to fight Russia on their behalf.  (Although, there are those who might say the Biden administration was using Ukraine to fight Russia on their behalf, so this is justified not surprising.). In the end, I believe this path is terrifying as that would result in two nuclear powers meeting on the battlefield, perhaps a cogent definition of WWIII.

However, there is little evidence that market participants are terribly concerned about this situation.  Perhaps they are confident that this is all bluster and ultimately President Trump’s plan of increasing US economic interests in Ukraine will be enacted and a sufficient deterrent to prevent that outcome.  Or perhaps this is a YOLO moment, where the belief is, if nuclear war destroys the world, I can’t stop it, so I better make as much money as possible now.  I recognize geopolitical risk is tough to price, but I would have expected a lot more flight to safety than so far seen.

In fact, in markets, the true story of the weekend was the announcement of a cryptocurrency reserve to be created by the US although no specific size was revealed.  While I don’t typically write on the topic, that is because the crypto space has not yet, in my view, become enough of an influence on the macro world to matter.  However, this could change that.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One cannot be surprised that crypto currency prices have rallied dramatically on the back of the announcement, which almost seemed timed to arrest what had been a very sharp decline in those prices recently.  It is too early to really determine if this will draw cryptocurrencies closer to mainstream economic and financial discussion, but I would argue it is closer now than it has ever been before.

In Europe, the scoop on inflation
Does not seem ripe for celebration
While CPI slipped
Most forecasts, it pipped
So, slower but not near cessation

Eurozone CPI data was released this morning and the response to the outcome is quite interesting.  The data showed that headline fell from 2.5% to 2.4%, while core fell from 2.7% to 2.6%.  Obviously, that is a step in the right direction.  Alas, analysts’ forecasts were looking for a 0.2% decline in both readings, so while the data was good, it was worse than expectations.  In a perfect encapsulation of how narrative writing is so critical, both the WSJ and Bloomberg wrote articles explaining how the declines had set the table for the ECB to cut rates at their meeting this Thursday with neither one discussing market forecasts.

Now, a look at the market response shows that European sovereign yields have all risen between 6bps and 9bps, hardly the response one would expect in a lower inflation world.  As well, with Treasury yields higher only by 5bps this morning, as they bounce from their recent declines, the euro (+0.7%) has rallied sharply on the day.  

Much has been made of the European’s new commitments to increase defense spending, especially in the wake of yesterday’s meeting discussed above, and the requisite increases in defense spending that would accompany this new stance.  However, increased European defense spending has been a story for the past many weeks as President Trump has been railing against European members of NATO for not holding up their end of the bargain.  I guess the meeting added a greater sense of urgency, but remember, not an additional dime has been spent yet, nor even legislated.  Talk is cheap!

But there you have it.  Despite what appears to be a giant step closer to a major global conflagration, the market response has been a more classic risk-on result, with bond yields rising, the dollar falling and most equity indices doing fine.  Some days, things don’t make much sense.

Time for a quick recap of overnight markets then.  Friday’s strong US equity rally was followed by strength in Tokyo (+1.7%) and Australia (+0.9%) although both Hong Kong and China were little changed in the session. It appears Chinese traders are awaiting the news from Wednesday’s NPC meeting where the government will define their economic growth targets for the current year and how they might achieve them.  In Europe, Spain (-0.1%) is the laggard with the rest of the continent doing well, led by Germany (+1.1%).  It seems there are more defense companies there to benefit from all this mooted spending than elsewhere, hence the rally. Lastly, US futures are higher by 0.35% or so at this hour (7:00).

We have already discussed bonds, where yields are higher everywhere, including Japan (+4bps) as all the war talk has investors convinced there will be a lot more government borrowing everywhere in the world going forward.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.25%) has been trading either side of unchanged in the overnight session but seems to be consolidating after last week’s declines.  I continue to believe that if the Ukraine war does end (and I believe that will be the outcome regardless of Europe’s hawkish turn), oil prices are likely to slide further as one of the likely outcomes will be the end of sanctions against Russian oil and Russian oil transports.  Meanwhile, gold (+0.6%) which had a rough week last week, is bouncing and dragging the entire metals complex higher with it.  If war is truly in the air, gold and silver seem likely to rally further.

Finally, the dollar is under great pressure this morning across the board.  Not only is the euro higher, but only JPY (-0.4%) is weaker vs. the dollar in the G10 as this seems a very risk-on initiative.  SEK (+1.3%) is the leader, perhaps because it is on the front lines of the potential war?  Seriously, I have no explanation there.  But EMG currencies are also rallying with HUF (+2.1%) the big winner, although the entire CE4 is stronger.  Again, this makes little sense to me if the politics is pushing toward war as all those nations are on the front lines.  Meanwhile, MXN (+0.4%) is managing to rally despite the ongoing threat of tariffs to be imposed tonight at midnight.  I continue to read numerous stories on the potential impacts of tariffs with dramatically different takes.  In the end, it appears that at least some things will go up in price, although fears of widespread massive price rises seem a bit overdone.

On the data front, along with Thursday’s ECB meeting, Friday brings the payroll report and there is plenty of stuff between now and then.

TodayISM Manufacturing50.5
 ISM Prices Paid56.2
WednesdayADP Employment 140K
 ISM Services52.9
 Factory Orders1.6%
 -ex Transport0.3%
 Fed’s Beige Book 
ThursdayECB Rate Decision2.75% (current 3.00%)
 Trade Balance-$93.1B
 Initial Claims340K
 Continuing Claims1870K
 Nonfarm Productivity1.2%
 Unit Labor Costs3.0%
FridayNonfarm Payrolls153K
 Private Payrolls138K
 Manufacturing Payrolls5K
 Unemployment Rate4.0%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (4.1% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.2
 Participation Rate62.6%
 Consumer Credit$15.5B

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to this, we hear from 7 more Fed speakers at 9 venues including Chairman Powell Friday afternoon at 12:30.  Now, I have made a big deal about the fact that the Fed has lost much of its sway in the market to President Trump.  I believe that Powell’s speech will tell us much about whether they are unhappy about this, or whether they will be quite comfortable sinking into the background.  Given Powell’s previous antagonistic relationship with President Trump, I would think it would be the latter.  But every central banker seems drawn to the limelight like moths to a flame, so I would not be surprised to see something more dramatic.

As things currently stand, I see the ongoing efforts to cut government spending as a critical piece of the US fiscal puzzle.  The more success that DOGE and the administration has in this process, the better the potential outcomes for the US, tariffs or not.  This could increase private sector activity and reduce the deficit, thus slowing the debt issuance, and perhaps, weighing on inflation.  However, this is a longer-term process, not something that will happen in weeks, but over quarters.  In the meantime, I cannot get past the Ukraine situation as the biggest potential risk factors around, and if escalation is in the cards, I would expect Treasury yields to decline amid growing demand while the dollar rallies along with the yen as a haven.  Hopefully not but be prepared.

Good luck

Adf

As It’s Been Wrote

Posted on by

Though China would have you believe
Their goals, they are set to achieve
Their banks are in trouble
From their housing bubble
So capital, now, they’ll receive
 
Meanwhile, with Ukraine there’s a deal
For mineral wealth that’s a steal
This will help the peace
If war there does cease
And so, it has broader appeal
 
But really, the thing to denote
Is everything is anecdote
The data don’t matter
Unless it can flatter
The narrative as it’s been wrote

 

Confusion continues to be the watchword in financial markets as it is very difficult to keep up with the constant changes in the narrative and announcements on any number of subjects.  And traders are at a loss to make sense of the situation.  This is evidenced by the breakdown in previously strong correlations between different markets and ostensibly critical data for those markets.  

For example, inflation expectations continue to rise, at least as per the University of Michigan surveys, with last week’s result coming in at 4.3% for one year and 3.5% for 5 years.  And yet, Treasury yields continue to fall in the back end of the curve, with 10-year Treasury yields lower by nearly 15bps since that report was released on Friday.  So, which is it?  Is the data a better reflection of things?  Or is market pricing foretelling the future?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

At the same time, the Fed funds futures market is now pricing in 55bps of cuts this year, up from just 29bps a few weeks ago.  Is this reflective of concerns over economic growth?  And how does this jibe with the rising inflation expectations?  

Source: cmegroup.com

If risk is a concern, why is the price of gold declining?  

Source: cnn.com

My point is right now, at least, many of the relationships that markets and investors have relied upon in the past seem to be broken.  They could revert to form, or perhaps this is a new paradigm.  In fact, that is the point, there is no clear pathway.

Sometimes a better way to view these things is to look at policy actions at the country level as they reflect a government’s major concerns.  I couldn’t help but notice in Bloomberg this morning the story that the Chinese government is going to be injecting at least $55 billion of equity into their large banks.  Now, government capital injections are hardly a sign of a strong industry, regardless of the spin.  This highlights the fact that Chinese banks remain in difficult straits from the ongoing property market woes and so, are clearly not lending to industry in the manner that the government would like to see.  I’m not sure how injecting capital into large banks that lend to SOE’s is helping the consumer in China, which allegedly has been one of their goals, but regardless, actions speak louder than words.  Clearly the Chinese remain concerned over the health of their economy and are doing more things to support it.  As it happens, this helped equity markets there last night with the Hang Seng (+3.3%) ripping higher with mainland shares (+0.9%) following along as well.  Will it last?  Great question.

Another interesting story that seems at odds with what the narrative, or at least quite a few headlines, proclaimed, is that the US and Ukraine have reached a deal for the US to have access to Ukrainian rare earth minerals once the fighting stops.  The terms of this deal are unclear, but despite President Zelensky’s constant protests that he will not partake in peace talks, it appears that this is one of the steps necessary for the US to let him into the conversation.  Now, is peace a benefit for the markets?  Arguably, it is beneficial for lowering inflation as the one thing we know about war is it is inflationary.  If peace is coming soon, how much will that help the Eurozone economy, which remains in the doldrums, and the euro?  Will it lower energy prices as sanctions on Russian oil and gas disappear?  Or will keeping the peace become a huge expense for Europe and not allow them to focus on their domestic issues?

Again, my point is that there are far more things happening that add little clarity to market narratives, and in some cases, result in price action that is not consistent with previous relationships.  With this I return to my preaching that the only thing we can truly anticipate is increased volatility across markets.

With that in mind, let’s consider what happened overnight.  First, US markets had another weak session, with the NASDAQ particularly under pressure.  (I half expect the Fed to put forth an emergency rate cut to support the stock market.)  As to Asian markets, that Chinese news was well received almost everywhere except Japan (Nikkei -0.25%) as most other markets gained on the idea that Chinese stimulus would help their economies.  As such, we saw gains virtually across the board in Asia.  Similarly, European bourses are all feeling terrific this morning with the UK (+0.6%) the laggard and virtually every continental exchange higher by more than 1%.  Apparently, the Ukraine/US mineral rights deal has traders and investors bidding up shares for the peace dividend.  Too, US futures are higher at this hour, about 0.5% or so across the board.

As to bond yields, after a sharp decline in Treasury yields over the past two sessions, this morning, the 10-year is higher by 1bp, consolidating that move.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields are all slipping between -2bps and -4bps as the peace dividend gets priced in there as well.  While European governments may be miffed they have not been part of the peace talks, clearly investors are happy.  Also, JGB yields, which didn’t move overnight, need to be noted as having fallen nearly 10bps in the past week as the narrative of ever tighter BOJ policy starts to slip a bit.  While the yen has held its own, and USDJPY remains just below 150, it appears that for now, the market is taking a respite.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.25% today, -2.0% yesterday) has convincingly broken below the $70/bbl level as this market clearly expects more Russian oil to freely be available.  OPEC+ had discussed reducing their cuts in H2 this year, but if the price of oil continues to slide, I expect that will be changed as well.  Certainly, declining oil prices will be a driver for lower inflation, arguably one of the reasons that Treasury yields are falling.  So, some things still make some sense.  As to the metals markets, gold (-0.2%) still has a hangover from yesterday’s sharp sell-off, although there have been myriad reasons put forth for that movement.  Less global risk with Ukraine peace or falling inflation on the back of oil prices or suddenly less concern over the status of the gold in Ft Knox, pick your poison.  Silver is little changed this morning but copper, which had been following gold closely, has jumped 2.7% this morning after President Trump turned his attention to the red metal for tariff treatment.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning, recouping most of yesterday’s losses.  G10 currencies are lower by between -0.1% (GBP) and -0.5% (AUD) with the entire bloc under pressure.  In the EMG space, only CLP (+0.45%) is managing any strength based on its tight correlation to the copper price.  But otherwise, most of these currencies have slipped in the -0.1% to -0.3% range.

On the data front, New Home Sales (exp 680K) is the only hard data although we do see the EIA oil inventory numbers with a small build expected.  Richmond Fed president Barkin speaks again, but as we have seen lately, the Fed’s comments have ceased to be market moving.  President Trump’s policy announcements are clearly the primary market mover these days.

Quite frankly, it is very difficult to observe the ongoing situation and have a strong market view in either direction.  There are too many variables or perhaps, as Donald Rumsfeld once explained, too many unknown unknowns.  Who can say what Trump’s next target will be and how that will impact any particular market.  In fact, this points back to my strong support for consistent hedging programs to help reduce volatility in one’s financial reporting.

Good luck

Adf

Confusion

Posted on by

Confusion continues to reign
O’er markets though pundits will feign
That they understand
The movements at hand
Despite a quite rocky terrain
 
The speed with which Trump changes views
Can even, the algos, confuse
The pluses, I think
Are traders must shrink
Positions, elsewise pay high dues

 

For the longest time I believed that the algos were going to usurp all trading activity as their ability to respond to news was so much faster than any human.  Certainly, this has been the key to success for major trading firms like Citadel and Virtu Financial.  And they have been very successful.  I think part of their success has been that we have been in an environment where both implied and actual volatility has declined in a secular manner, so not only could they respond quickly, but they could lever up their positions with impunity as the probability of a large reversal was relatively less.

However, I believe that the algos and their owners may have met their match in Donald Trump.  Never before has someone been so powerful and yet so chaotic in his approach to very important things.  Many pundits complain that even he doesn’t have a plan when he announces a new policy.  But I think that’s his secret, keep everyone else off balance and then he has free reign.  Chaos is the goal.

The market impact of this is that basically, for the past three months since shortly after his election, the major asset classes of stocks, bonds and the dollar, have chopped around a lot, but not moved anywhere at all.  How can they as nobody seems willing to believe that the end game he has explained; reduced deficits, reduced trade balance, lower inflation and a strong military presence throughout the Western Hemisphere, is going to result from his actions.  And in fairness, some of the actions do have a random quality to them.  But if we have learned nothing from President Trump’s time in office, including his first term, it is that he is very willing to tell us what he is going to do.  It just seems that most folks don’t believe he can do it so don’t take it seriously.

So, let’s look at how markets have behaved in the past three months.  The noteworthy result is that the net movement over that period has been virtually nil.  Look at the charts below from tradingeconomics.com:

S&P 500

10-Year Treasury

EUR/USD

While all these markets have moved higher and lower in the intervening period, they have not gone anywhere at all.  The biggest mover over this time is the euro, which has rallied 0.54% with the other major markets showing far less movement than that.

One interesting phenomenon of this price action is that despite significant uncertainty over policy actions by the President and the implications they may have on markets, and even though recent price action can best be described as choppy rather than trend like, the VIX Index remains in the lowest quartile of its long-term range. Certainly, it has risen slightly over the past few weeks, but to my eye, it looks like it is underpricing the chaos yet to come.  

Source Bloomberg.com

While I have no clearer idea how things will unfold than anyone else, other than I have a certain amount of faith that the President will achieve many of his goals in one way or another, I am definitely of the belief that volatility is going to be the coin of the realm for quite a while going forward.  We have spent the past many years with numerous strategies created to enhance returns via selling volatility, either shorting options or levering up, and that is the trend that seems likely to change going forward.  The implication for hedgers is that maintaining hedge ratios while having a plan in place is going to be more important than any time in the past decade or more.

Ok, let’s take a look at how markets did move overnight.  Yesterday’s net negative session in the US was followed by similar price action in Asia.  Tokyo (-1.4%), Hong Kong (-1.35) and China (-1.1%) all suffered on stories about tariffs and extra efforts by the Trump administration to tighten up export controls on semiconductors.  It should be no surprise that virtually every index in Asia followed suit with losses between -0.3% (Singapore) and -2.4% (Indonesia) and everywhere in between.  Meanwhile, in Europe, the picture is not as dour as there are a few winners (Spain +0.9% and Italy +0.5%) although the rest of the continent is struggling to break even.  The data point that is receiving the most press is Eurozone Negotiated Wage Growth (+4.12%) which rose less than in Q3 and has encouraged many to believe the ECB will be cutting rates next week.  Interestingly, Joachim Nagel, Bundesbank president was on the tape telling the rest of the ECB to shut up about their expectations of future rate moves as there is still far too much uncertainty and decisions need to be made on a meeting-by-meeting basis.  Apparently, oversharing is a general central bank affliction, not merely a Fed problem.  As to US stocks, at this hour (6:50) they are little changed.

In the bond market, yields continue to slide, at least in the US, with Treasury yields down -6bps this morning and back to levels last seen in December.  Apparently, some investors are beginning to believe Secretary Bessent regarding his goal to drive yields lower.  As well, he has reconfirmed that there will be no major increase in the issuance of long-dated paper for now.  European sovereigns, though, are little changed this morning with only UK gilts (-3bps) showing any movement after the CBI Trades report printed at -23, a bit less bad than expected.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.15%) is little changed this morning after a very modest rally yesterday.  But the reality here is that oil, like other markets, has been in a trading range rather than trending, although my take is that the longer-term view could be a bit lower.  Gold (-0.35%), though lower this morning, is the one market that has shown a trend since Trump’s election, and truthfully since well before that as you can see in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, with both the euro and pound rising 0.3% alongside the CHF (+0.3%) and JPY (+0.2%). Commodity currencies, though, are less robust with very minor losses seen in MXN, ZAR and CLP.  Given the decline in 10-year yields, I am not that surprised at the dollar’s weakness although it is in opposition to the gut reaction that tariffs mean a higher dollar.  This is of interest because yesterday President Trump confirmed that the 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico were going into effect next week.  As I explained above, it is very difficult to get a sense of short-term price action here although given the clear intent of the president to improve the competitiveness of US exporters, he would certainly like to see the dollar decline further.  

It is very interesting to watch this president reduce the power of the Fed with words and not even have to attack the Chairman like he did in his first term.  It will be very interesting to see how Chair Powell responds to the ongoing machinations.

On the data front, this morning brings only the Case-Shiller Home Price Index (exp +4.4%) and Consumer Confidence (102.5).  We do hear from two Fed speakers, Barr and Barkin, but as I keep explaining, their words matter less each day. (It must be driving them crazy!)

It is hard to get excited about markets here.  There is no directional bias right now and the lack of critical data adds to the lack of information.  As well, given the mercurial nature of President Trump’s activities, we are always one tape bomb away from a complete reversal.  While I don’t see the dollar collapsing, perhaps the next short-term wave is for further dollar weakness.  

Good luck

Adf

Scapegoated

Posted on by

The people of Germany voted
With Friedrich Merz, at last, promoted
The nation, to lead
Though sure to misread
The sitch, with the Right still scapegoated

 

The result of the German Federal elections was very much as expected, the CDU/CSU won 28.5% of the votes and the largest share while AfD garnered 20.8%, the SPD just 16.4% (it’s worst showing in modern times) and the Greens gaining 11.6%.  A tail of other mostly very left-leaning parties made up the balance.  However, one cannot look at a map of the distribution of votes without noticing that the part of the country that was East Germany prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall, still sees things very differently than the rest of the nation.

Source: Reuters.com

Regardless of the distribution, however, the outcome will result in some sort of coalition government, almost certainly to be a combination of the CDU and SPD.  On the surface, it would seem this left-right coalition will be doomed to failure, and that could well be the case, but because the consensus amongst the ‘right-thinking’ people in politics is that AfD is the devil incarnate, or perhaps more accurately, Hitler incarnate, Herr Merz will not be able to rule with a sure majority of conservative voters.

As with virtually every election, the economy is a top priority of the voters, especially since GDP growth, as measured, has essentially been zero for the past three years as per the below chart, and is mooted to stay there on present policies.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One of the key issues that is currently under discussion there is the constitutionally enshrined ‘debt-brake’ which prevents the German government from running deficits of greater than 0.35% of GDP in any fiscal year.  In order to change the constitution, there needs to be a 2/3’s approval in the Bundestag, but AfD holds a blocking minority and one of their policy platforms has been fiscal prudence.

Arguably, this begs a larger question, what exactly constitutes economic growth?  For instance, if government debt is rising more quickly than economic output, is that actually a growing economy?  And is that process sustainable going forward?  It is quite interesting to look at the government debt dynamics of different nations and ask that question, especially since Germany’s situation really stands out.  

Perhaps, after looking at this group of charts, it is worth reevaluating exactly how much actual growth has been occurring and how much economic activity has simply been government borrowing recycled into the economy across all these nations.  Of course, this process has not been restricted to G-7 nations, it is a global phenomenon, with China doing exactly the same thing as are virtually all nations.  In fact, Germany is unique amongst large nations for bucking the trend.

The reason this issue matters is there is a limit to how far a government can increase its leverage ratio.  At some point, investors will stop buying debt which will force the central bank to buy the debt.  Of course, they will do so by printing more money and devaluing the currency.  We know this because we have seen it happen before many times throughout history with Germany’s Weimar Republic in 1923, Argentina in the 1980’s and Zimbabwe in 2007-2008 as just the most recent examples.  In fact, the reason the Germans have the debt brake is that there is a national memory of that hyperinflation from a century ago.

Circling back to the growth question, what is it that constitutes economic growth?  If you remember your college macroeconomics classes, this is the equation that is used to calculate economic activity in an economy:

            Y = C + I + G + NX

Where:

Y = GDP

C = Consumption

I = Investment

G = Government spending

NX = Net Exports

This equation is taken as gospel in the economics and political worlds.  However, it is not often recalled that it was created in the 1930’s by John Maynard Keynes.  It is not a law of nature, but merely was Keynes’ way of expressing something that had not been effectively measured previously.  Nearly 100 years later, though, perhaps it is time to reevaluate the process.  Remember, economies grew prior to Keynes creating this equation when government activity was a much smaller proportion of the economy.  But as we can see by the dramatic rise in government debt, that is no longer the case.  Perhaps Germany is a peek behind the GDP curtain that shows absent constantly increasing government borrowing, economic growth is stagnant.  Neil Howe’s Fourth Turning could well be the conclusion of this period of government excess, where things will be extremely volatile during the change, but less government will be the norm on the other side, at least for a few generations!

Ok, sorry for the history and theoretical discussion, but that chart of German government debt vs. the rest of the world was really eye-opening.  Let’s turn to markets from the overnight session.

After Friday’s sharp downward movement in the US, the picture in Asia was far more mixed.  Japan (+0.25%) managed a small gain while Hong Kong (-0.6%) and China (-0.2%) both lagged.  Elsewhere in the region, New Zealand (-1.8%) stood out for its weakness, although Korea, India and Taiwan were all softer in the session as well.  Ironically, it seems that better than expected Retail Sales data in NZ hurt sentiment for further policy ease by the RBNZ and concerns over trade with China given US pronouncements is also hurting the situation there, at least for today.

In Europe, Germany’s DAX (+0.9%) is leading the way higher after IfO Expectation data was released a touch better than forecast at 85.4.  However, it is important to remember that while this was a positive outcome, the average reading prior to Covid was between 95 and 103.  As to the rest of Europe, there are more gainers than laggards but little of real note absent any other data.  US futures at this hour (7:00) are pointing higher by at least 0.5% across the board.

In the bond market, Friday saw a very sharp decline in yields, -10bps in Treasuries, after weak readings in the Flash PMI data, especially services at 49.7, Existing Home Sales and Michigan sentiment.  That helped bring global yields lower.  This morning, Treasuries have bounced just 1bp and we are seeing similar rises in most of Europe.  JGB yields are also unchanged and have continued to consolidate near recent highs.

In the commodity markets, after a sharp sell-off on Friday on the back of stories about increased supply from Kurdistan, oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning.  Meanwhile gold (+0.5%) is rebounding from its regular Friday sell-off, almost as though there were efforts by some to depress the price at the end of every week.  It will be interesting to see what happens this Friday which is month end as well.  As to silver and copper, they are little changed and dull this morning.

Finally, the dollar is asleep this morning, with very limited movement vs. almost any of its counterparts.  USDJPY remains below 150, but the yen has actually fallen -0.3% on the session, while the biggest movers are in Eastern Europe (CZK +0.8%, HUF +0.4%, PLN +0.35%), perhaps on the back of the German election results offering hope for a more useful German government.  We shall see about that.  Otherwise, nobody is concerned over the dollar right now.

On the data front this week, it is a quiet one with PCE data the highlight on Friday.

TodayChicago Fed Natl Activity0.21
TuesdayCase Shiller Home Prices4.4%
 Consumer Confidence103.0
WednesdayNew Home Sales680K
ThursdayInitial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1874K
 Q4 GDP (2nd look)2.3%
 Real Consumer Spending4.2%
 Durable Goods2.5%
 -ex Transport0.3%
FridayPersonal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.2%
 PCE0.3% (2.5% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.3% (2.6% Y/Y)
 Chicago PMI41.5

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to the data, we also hear from seven Fed speakers over 9 venues, but again, are they really going to change the cautious approach at this stage?  And does it even matter?  For now, financial markets are far more focused on President Trump and his cabinet’s activities than interest rate policy which seems set to remain in place for a while.

When it comes to the dollar, nothing has changed my perspective on relative interest rates in the front end, with US rates likely to be far stickier at current levels than others, but the back end has a potentially different outcome.  Recall that Bessent and Trump are focused on the 10-year yield and getting that lower and seem far less concerned over the Fed for now.  To achieve that they will need to demonstrate the ability to reduce spending and the deficit situation.  While a promising start has been seen with DOGE, we are still a long way from a balanced budget.  My take is the dollar, writ large, is going to take its cues from the 10-year yield for now, so bonds are the market to watch.  If we see yields head back toward 4.0%, the dollar will decline and any significant move higher in yields will likely see the dollar climb as well.

Good luck

Adf

Having a Fit

Posted on by

Seems Europe is having a fit
‘Cause Putin and Trump may submit
A plan for the peace
Where there’s an increase
In spending the Euros commit
 
Remarkably, though peace would seem
The basis of many a dream
Seems many despise
The fact that these guys
Don’t care Europe can’t stand this scheme

 

Here’s the thing about President Trump, you never know what he is going to do and how it is going to impact market behavior.  A case in point is the growing momentum for further peace negotiations between the US and Russia, with Ukraine basically going to be told how things are going to wind up.  On the one hand, you can understand Ukraine’s discomfort as they don’t feel like they are getting much say in the matter.  On the other hand, it seemed increasingly clear that the end game, if there is no US intervention of this nature, would be for Russia to bleed Ukraine of its fighting age population while systematically destroying its infrastructure.

The thing I find most remarkable is the number of pundits who hate this outcome despite the end result of the cessation of the fighting and destruction.  After three years of conflict, and with other nations willing to allow Ukrainians to die on the front lines while they preened about saving democracy, there was no serious push to find a solution.  I have no strong opinion on the terms that have been floated thus far, and I don’t believe rewarding a nation for aggressive action is the best outcome, but Russia has proven throughout history that they are willing to sacrifice millions of their own citizens in warfare, and the case for a Ukrainian victory seemed remote at best.  As experienced traders well understand, sometimes you have to cut your position so you can focus on something else.  Seems like a good time to cut the positions here.

Speaking of positions, let us consider what peace in Europe may mean for financial markets.  Yesterday I discussed how European NatGas prices have more than doubled since the war began.  If they return to their pre-war levels, that dramatically enhances Europe’s economic prospects, despite their ongoing climate policies.  Clearly, the FX market got that memo as the euro has rallied back to its highest level since December 2024 save for a one-day spike just after Trump’s inauguration.  In fact, it is not hard to look at the chart below and see a bottom forming in the single currency.  While the moving average I have included is only a short-term, 5-day version, you have to start somewhere.  While the fundamentals still seem to point to further downside in the single currency, between the Fed’s pause and more hawkish stance opposite the ECB’s ongoing policy ease, the medium-term picture could be far better for the Europeans.  If the war truly does end, it would likely see a significant uptick in investment and economic activity as they seek to rebuild Ukraine, and we could see substantial capital flows into the European economies.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As well, oil prices, continue to trade near the bottom of their recent trading range as the working assumption seems to be that with a peace treaty, Russian oil would no longer be sanctioned, enhancing global supplies.  A look at the trend line in the chart below seems to indicate that is the direction of the future.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The other remarkable thing is the decline in yields, where yesterday, despite a very hot PPI number, which followed Wednesday’s hot CPI number, Treasury yields fell back 7bps.  While there are likely some other aspects to this move, notably the ongoing story regarding DOGE and the attack on waste and fraud in the US, yesterday’s move was not indicative of fear, rather I read it as a positive sign that investors are betting on a chance that President Trump can be successful with respect to reducing the massive overspending by the government.  Clearly, this is early days regarding President Trump’s ability to get a handle on spending, and it could all blow up as legislative compromises may significantly water down any benefits, but I contend the market is showing hope right now, not fear.

And that, I would contend, is the big underlying driver of markets right now.  The prospects for peace and the potential impacts are the focus.  While tariffs are still a big deal, and yesterday’s talk about reciprocal tariffs is simply the latest in a long line of these discussions and pronouncements, the market seems to be getting tired of that conversation.  If we recap the current situation, central bank activities have lost their importance amid a huge uptick in governmental actions, both fiscal and geopolitical.  In many ways, I think this is great, the less central bank, the better.

Ok, let’s see how markets continue to absorb these daily haymakers from President Trump and the responses from other governments.  Clearly, the US equity market remains far more fixated on Trump’s actions than on higher inflation potentially forcing the Fed to raise rates.  In fact, despite the hot PPI print, the futures market has actually increased its expectation for rate cuts this year to 35bps.  That doesn’t make sense to me, but I’m just an FX poet. 

If we turn to Asian markets, Hong Kong (+3.7%) was the big winner overnight as a combination of growing expectations for more Chinese government stimulus to be announced soon, along with the ongoing tech positivity in the wake of the DeepSeek announcement got investors excited.  On the mainland, shares (CSI 300 +0.9%) were also higher, but not as frothy.  Meanwhile, the weaker dollar hindered the Nikkei (-0.8%) as the yen has gained 1.3% since the CPI data on Wednesday.  In Europe, the picture is mixed with the CAC (+0.4%) the best performer and the DAX (-0.4%) the worst performer.  Eurozone GDP surprised on the upside in Q4, growing…0.1%!! Talk about an explosive economy.  However, that was better than forecast and helped avoid a recession.  The interesting thing about European equity markets, though, is that despite a dismal economic backdrop, most major markets are trading at or near all-time highs.  Further proof that the market is not the economy.  As to US futures, ahead of this morning’s Retail Sales data, they are flat.

After several days of substantial movement in the bond market, it seems that traders have taken a long weekend given the virtual absence of movement here.  Treasury yields are unchanged on the day and European sovereign yields are higher by 1bp.  

In the commodity markets, on the day, oil prices are unchanged, although as per the above chart, it appears the trend is lower.  US NatGas (+1.8%) is rallying on forecasts for another cold spell, but European NatGas (-4.85%) continues to fall as prospects for peace indicate new supplies, or perhaps, renewed supplies.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.15%) is continuing its positive momentum but the big mover today is silver (+2.7%) which seems to be responding to some large option expirations in the SLV ETF (h/t Alyosha) which seem set to drive substantial demand for delivery.  

Finally, the dollar remains under pressure overall, although the movement has generally not been that large today.  The big outlier in the G10 is NZD (+0.9%) which has responded to the delay in the reciprocal tariff implementation until April.  Elsewhere in this bloc, gains are universal, but modest with movement between just 0.1% and 0.2%.  In the EMG bloc, the dollar is also under pressure with ZAR (+0.65%) a major gainer as precious metals continue to be in demand.  CLP (+1.15%) is also continuing to benefit from copper’s ongoing rally.  The exception to this movement has been Asia where most regional currencies are modestly softer this morning, KRW, TWD, INR, as the tariff talks still seem to be the driving force in these markets.

On the data front, we finish the week with Retail Sales (exp -0.1%, +0.3% ex autos), then IP (0.3%) and Capacity Utilization (77.7%).  Yesterday’s PPI data was several ticks hotter than forecast and seems to put paid to the idea that inflation is heading back to the Fed’s target.  This afternoon we hear from Dallas Fed president Lorrie Logan, but again, it is hard to make the case that the Fed is the driver of anything right now.

Fundamentals still point to dollar strength, I would argue, but the market is not paying attention. Rather peace and the peace dividend are now the driver in the FX markets and to me, that implies we are set to see the dollar give back some of its gains from the past 6 months.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Norms to Eschew

Posted on by

For market practitioners, Trump
Is more than a modest speed bump
His willingness to
Most norms to eschew
Can force long-term views to go bump
 
Meanwhile, as the markets prepare
For Powell to sit in his chair
In front of the Senate
A popular tenet
Is more rate cuts he will foreswear

 

It is very difficult to keep up with the news these days as President Trump really does address so many disparate issues in such short order, it is hard to know which ones will potentially impact markets and which will simply be headline fodder.  Obviously, the tariff discussions remain front and center, but even those plans seem to be evolving at a very fast pace, and while yesterday he did invoke 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, that has literally become old news already.  The next question is what will occur with the latest idea of reciprocal tariffs, where the US will charge the same tariff on imports from other nations as those nations charge on imports from the US.

Generally speaking, US tariffs are the lowest overall around the world, which arguably is exactly what Trump wants to address.  I am not going to argue the merits or detractions of tariffs, that is pointless.  The only thing to consider is if they are implemented, what are the potential impacts.  One of the key things to remember about the effectiveness of tariffs is the price elasticity of the products being tariffed.  If, for instance, a product has substantial competition and is easily replaced, the nation being tariffed is likely going to absorb the bulk of the pain.  Consider Colombia and how quickly they caved regarding the deportations.  While I am not a coffee drinker, and I am sure there are those who believe Colombian coffee is the best, coffee also comes from Brazil, Vietnam, Hawaii and Indonesia, and as none of those nations (and obviously Hawaii) were subject to tariffs, Colombia would have paid the freight had they been implemented.

But, for a product like solar panels, where there are few suppliers other than the Chinese, to the extent the demand remained in place, the purchaser would see higher prices.  Turning to steel and aluminum, the below graphic shows the top 10 global steel producing nations and how much they produced in 2024.  This graphic says all you need to know about why President Trump is unhappy with China and their trade policies.  (well, this and the next one)

Source: worldsteel.org

And while this is not an exact apples-to-apples comparison, the below chart shows forecasts for steed demand in 2023 and 2024.  The mismatches are clear as China, South Korea and Japan have a significant surplus to export while the US and India need imports.

Source: mrssteel.com.vn

The point is President Trump is seeking to address that imbalance and is of the mind that the US would be better off if we make our own steel.  In fact, this is simply part of his entire philosophy to reshore US manufacturing capabilities.

Now, steel is a traded commodity, although in financial markets, not so much.  But changes in the flows of imports and exports will have an impact on FX markets, while tariffs could well also impact investment flows. In fact, it is not hard to see why Nippon Steel wants to buy US Steel.  if they own a steel manufacturer in the US, they can increase production with no concerns over tariffs.

Remember, too, this issue is merely a microcosm of the potential chaos that will be seen across industries and nations, both of which will impact financial markets.  Once again, I harp on the idea that a robust hedging program is a necessity these days.

Turning to today’s activities, Chairman Powell will be testifying before the Senate Banking Committee this morning.  On the one hand, I wonder if he is upset by the fact that virtually nobody is concerned about what he says these days as Trump continues to dominate every conversation.  For someone who has become quite accustomed to being the center of attention with respect to markets, this may well be a blow to his vanity and ego.  On the other hand, it is also quite possible that maintaining a low profile is precisely his strategy here, and if that is the case, I expect we will not learn anything new at all.  The Fed mantra is currently that they will be cautious before implementing any further rate cuts.  Remember, CPI is released tomorrow as well, so when he goes before the House, they will have that information in hand.  But to Powell’s benefit, Treasury Secretary Bessent made clear he and President Trump are far more concerned about the 10-year yield than Fed funds.  This may be the most amazing transformation of all, a Fed chair who becomes a wallflower!

Ok, after yesterday’s US equity rally, the story in Asia was far less positive.  Japan and Australia were unchanged while the Hang Seng (-1.1%) and CSI 300 (-0.5%) both suffered, perhaps on the tariff impositions.  Elsewhere in the region, Taiwan and South Korea both had solid sessions while weakness was evident in Indonesia, India and the Philippines.  In fact, all three of those markets have been declining steadily since October, with declines between 15% and 20% as prospects in those economies seem concerning, especially with Trump’s tariff mania.  In Europe, virtually every market is unchanged this morning as the EU quickly explained they would retaliate against any US tariffs.  Of course, that is what makes Trump’s reciprocal tariff structure so interesting.  How can Europe complain that other nations impose the same level of tariffs they do?  Meanwhile, at this hour (7:05), US futures are pointing slightly lower, about -0.25%.

In the bond market, yields are climbing with Treasuries higher by 3bps, now 12bps above the lows seen early last week, while in Europe, yields are substantially higher, with France (+10bps) leading the way, but the rest of the continent showing rises of between 4bps and 6bps.  Part of this move on the continent is driven by a catch up to yesterday afternoon’s US yield rally.  As to the French, seemingly their Unemployment Report, which showed a much better than expected 7.3%, may have investors concerned about quickening growth and inflation.  That feels like a lot, but there are no real explanations I have seen.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.5%) is continuing to rebound off its recent lows, although still looks like it is in the middle of its trading range.  Gold (-0.7%) and silver (-1.2%) are both finally retracing some of the extraordinary rally that we have been witnessing for the past two months.  Copper (-2.7%), too, is under pressure this morning, unwinding some of its recent spectacular gains.

Finally, the dollar is very modestly softer, but not universally so.  For instance, the euro (+0.2%) and yen (-0.2%) seem to offset each other while most other G10 currencies have moved even less.  In the EMG bloc, though, INR (+0.9%) is the biggest gainer as the RBI has been intervening to address what had been an acceleration in the rupees decline in the past few weeks (see below).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Elsewhere in the space, gains are less impressive, with moves on the order of +0.4% (PLN and HUF) or smaller.

On the data front, the NFIB Small Business Optimism Index was released at a softer than expected 102.8 as it seems the Trumpian chaos is having an effect for now.  Otherwise, the only thing is Powell and three other Fed speakers, but again, given the relative lack of discussion regarding Powell, the other three will get even less press in my view.

It is difficult to claim nothing has changed lately, but perhaps more accurately, there is no clear directional change at this point.  We need to start seeing some consistency in the policy impacts and that is likely to take months.  Until then, volatility is the watchword across all markets.

Good luck

Adf