Monthly Archives: January 2024

As Good As It Gets

Posted on by

Said Waller, I have no regrets
For things are “as good as it gets”
We’ve been quite outstanding
And reached that soft landing
Though rate cut forecasts won’t be met

Wow is all I can say.  While Treasury Secretary Yellen was brasher last week by explicitly saying they have achieved the mythical soft landing, Governor Waller’s speech yesterday went into great detail about his work in 2022 on Beveridge curve analysis that almost perfectly forecast the current situation.  I certainly hope he didn’t sprain his arm patting himself on the back.  The certitude that has been coming from Fed speakers and their acolytes, like ex Fed economist @claudia_sahm, is remarkable to me.  After literally a century of having no great insight into the workings of inflation, the Fed has now declared they have it under control because the past 6 months have seen price increases rise at a slowing pace.

Key Waller comments were as follows, “By late November, the latest economic data left me encouraged that there were signs of moderating economic activity in the fourth quarter, but inflation was still too high.  As of today, the data has come in even better. Real gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to have grown between 1 and 2 percent in the fourth quarter, unemployment is still below 4 percent, and core personal consumption expenditure (PCE) inflation has been running close to 2 percent for the last 6 months. For a macroeconomist, this is almost as good as it gets.”

He finished with this comment, although interestingly, the market did not applaud, “As long as inflation doesn’t rebound and stay elevated, I believe the FOMC will be able to lower the target range for the federal funds rate this year. This view is consistent with the FOMC’s economic projections in December, in which the median projection was three 25-basis-point cuts in 2024.”

Maybe the Fed really has stuck the landing and inflation is going to smoothly slide back to 2% and stay there while the economy ticks over at 2%-3% GDP growth.  Certainly, if the fiscal impulse continues to run at deficit levels of 8% of GDP, I would hope we could get 3% growth.  But to my understanding of the way the economy responds to policy actions, that 8% deficit is going to find itself into rising prices across the economy.  But then again, I’m just an FX guy.

In the end, the market heard Waller and decided that maybe higher for longer was still a thing.  The Fed funds futures market reduced its probability of a March rate cut to 60% from 70% before the speech and the bond market sold off pretty hard with yields closing at 4.07%, their highest level since the day before that December FOMC meeting when everybody was certain that the Fed had pivoted.  It seems the question now is, have they actually pivoted?

One of the problems they have is that the inflation data last month indicated the pace of price increases could be stabilizing around the 3.0%-3.5% level, rather than their target 2.0% level.  We have very consistently heard from all the acolytes that if you annualize the past 3 or 6 months’ worth of data, the Y/Y rate is pushing to 2.0%.  This, they claim, means the Fed has achieved their goal.  The problem with this argument is that the Fed’s goal is not simply touching a 2.0% inflation rate, it is to maintain it at that level over time.  That is a much more difficult landing to stick, and there is no evidence things will work out that way especially given we haven’t even reached a Y/Y rate of 2.0%!

Here’s another problem for that crew, inflation elsewhere in the world is not continuing its recent decline.  Yesterday, Canadian CPI data showed that the trend numbers, Trimmed-Mean (3.7%) and Median (3.6%) were both higher than forecast and higher than last month.  This morning, from the UK we learned that CPI rose 0.4% M/M, far more than expected with the Y/Y data rising to 4.0% headline and 5.1% core.  In both these nations, the recent trend had been lower but has now reversed.  While we have seen a significant rebalancing of markets and measured inflation has clearly fallen from its levels of the past two years, I would argue the evidence is scant that this trend is necessarily going to continue.  Wage growth continues to hold up as employees try to catch up to the huge price increases since 2019.  With the Unemployment Rate remaining near multi-decade lows, absent a major recession it appears it will be very difficult to continue to squeeze prices lower.  And this doesn’t even consider the fact that increased tensions in the Middle East and the rerouting of ships around the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa, is adding weeks and costs to any movement of goods or oil, and could last for a considerable length of time.

We have consistently heard from ECB members that rate cuts are not coming soon.  We have had a lot of pushback lately from FOMC members about the timing of any rate cuts with both sets of speakers explicitly saying the market is overexuberant in their current pricing.  As I wrote yesterday, I think we are looking at a bimodal outcome, either virtually no rate cuts, or many more because we are in a recession.  In either case, I think equity markets will need to reprice lower.  However, the impact of these two situations will be different on the dollar, the bond market and commodities.  We will discuss those outcomes tomorrow.

In the meantime, overnight was a sea of red (as opposed to the Red Sea) in equity markets with the Hang Seng (-3.7%) leading the way lower but weakness on the mainland as well (CSI -2.2%) and throughout the region.  Japanese stocks (Nikkei -0.4%) were actually the leaders in the space.  The China story was informed by their monthly data dump which showed GDP grew at a slightly weaker than forecast 5.2%, while IP (6.8%), Retail Sales (7.4%) and Fixed Asset Investment (3.0%) were all around expectations, but still soft overall and compared to last month.  The Unemployment Rate there ticked higher to 5.1%, and they put out a new version of the youth unemployment rate at 14.9%, which they insist is a better measure than the old one which was screaming higher and was discontinued when it breached 21%.

European equity markets are also under pressure, mostly down about -1.0% on the continent and lower by -1.75% in the UK after the data releases.  As to the US, after a lackluster session that was saved by a late day rally yesterday, futures this morning are lower by about -0.25% at 7:30.

In the bond market, after the large move yesterday, Treasury yields are unchanged on the day and European yields have edged up by about 1bp across the board with UK Gilts the exception, having jumped 10bps after the inflation readings.  JGBs continue their lackluster activity and while they rose 2bps overnight, they remain below 0.60% overall.  Again, slowing inflation there indicates little reason to believe they are going to change their monetary policy anytime soon.

On the commodity front, oil (-1.8%) is showing a lot more concern over demand destruction after the modestly weaker Chinese data than concern over supply issues from Middle East tensions.  Plus, with US rates higher, commodity prices tend to suffer anyway.  Gold, which got crushed yesterday amid the repricing of interest rates is unchanged this morning, licking its wounds while copper and aluminum trade either side of unchanged as the economic situation remains so uncertain right now.

Finally, the dollar remains king of all it sees this morning, rallying further after yesterday’s rally and now has retraced virtually all the weakness that came from Powell’s December “pivot”.  This has been true in both the G10 and EMG blocs as the dollar is almost universally higher this morning.  The one exception is the pound, which has managed a 0.35% rally on the back of the move in UK interest rates after the higher inflation data print this morning.  The key to remember here is that despite a great deal of chatter about the dollar’s demise, the reality is that it has moved very little, net, over the past year and is far higher than where it was 5 years ago.  If the Fed really is going to maintain higher for longer, which if inflation continues its rebound seems likely to me, then the dollar has to benefit.

Turning to the data, this morning we see Retail Sales (exp 0.4%, 0.2% ex autos), IP (0.0%) and Capacity Utilization (78.7%).  In addition, we have three Fed speakers this morning and then this afternoon we get the Fed’s Beige Book and NY Fed president Williams speaks.  Given what appears to be a change in tone from Waller, it will be interesting to see if the others follow his lead or push back.  I have to believe that we are going to see more higher for longer talk and how it is premature to talk about rate cuts in March.  If that is the case, the dollar should retain its recent strength and I expect risk assets to come under further pressure.

Good luck
Adf

Democracy’s Died

Posted on by

There once was a fellow named Trump
Whose plan was, Joe Biden, to dump
He started last night
By winning the fight
And heads to New Hampshire to stump

Political pundits worldwide
Now claim that democracy’s died
But markets don’t seem
In touch with that theme
Instead, interest rates are their guide

The Iowa caucus results can be no surprise to anyone as the polls were quite clearly in Donald Trump’s favor.  In the end, he won with slightly more than 50% of the vote while Governor DeSantis came second, Ambassador Haley was in third and Vivek Ramaswamy was a weak fourth.  Ramaswamy has now dropped out of the race and thrown his support behind Trump.  Next week, is the New Hampshire primary and then two weeks later is the South Carolina primary.  After that, comes Super Tuesday in early March, and quite frankly, it would be shocking, at this point, if Trump did not wrap up the nomination by then.

I only mention this because of all the elections this year, arguably the US presidential one is the most impactful on the world at large as well as financial markets.  I will remind you of the equity market behavior in 2016 when Trump was elected the first time and as the evening progressed, the initial response was to see equity futures fall sharply as it became clearer that Trump was going to win, but by the time the markets opened in NY, they had completely reversed and rallied quite sharply, several percent.  Ultimately, I would not be surprised to see more market impacts this year as well.  It is one of the reasons that I believe the major theme this year is going to be more volatility across all markets than we have seen in the past several years combined.

However, right now, we are too early in the cycle and there has been no change of views or broad polling results, so investors are going to focus elsewhere, namely central bank actions.  This brings us to the question of will the Fed actually be cutting interest rates six times in 2024, or more accurately, will they be reducing the Fed funds rate by 150bps?  Funnily enough, I think that may be the least likely outcome of the array of possibilities that exist.  Instead, I expect that the futures market is pricing in an almost binary outcome.  On the one hand, the Fed remains true to their comments that inflation remains too high and while some cuts will come, it is very premature, so perhaps only one or two cuts this year.*  On the other hand, the recessionistas are correct, a hard landing is coming and the Fed is going to have to cut by 300bps or 350bps to support the market.  Play with these probabilities and it is pretty easy to come up with a scenario that shows 150bps of cuts this year.

But for now, whatever my views on how the Fed and other central banks are going to behave, the only important thing is what the market is anticipating.  This takes us back to the market’s assumption about the Fed’s reaction function regarding all the data that is coming our way.  Hence, the fact that the market largely ignored what appeared to be a hotter than expected CPI print last week, but jumped all over a softer than expected PPI print is telling in and of itself.  The market is desperate for the Fed to cut rates which will open the doors for all the other central banks to cut rates.

And in truth, I think this is exactly what we should expect for the time being.  The market is all-in on the idea that not only has the peak in inflation been seen, but that it is quickly falling back to the 2% target that is almost universal.  And they are all-in on the idea that central banks will be able to lower rates back to much more comfortable levels for those in debt while supporting risk asset prices.  My take is we will need to see a long series of data that indicates anything other than this scenario before market views change.  So, any data that indicates inflation remains sticky will be ignored, while data that indicates it is falling sharply will be regurgitated constantly.  The same will be true in the employment and production data.  All I’m saying is we need to be prepared to see certain data that doesn’t fit the narrative get completely ignored for now.  Manage your risk accordingly.

As to the overnight session, things have been less optimistic overall with most stock markets in Asia under pressure, even Japan (Nikkei -0.8%) and Hong Kong (-2.2%) really feeling pressure although mainland Chinese shares held in there after word that the Chinese government would be issuing an emergency CNY 1 trillion (~$139 billion) of debt to fund spending domestically.  As to Europe, all red there, albeit only on the order of -0.4% across the board and US futures are also lower this morning, something around -0.25% at this hour (7:45).

In the bond market, after the US holiday prevented any changes of note yesterday, we see Treasury yields backing up 7bps this morning, a similar move to what we saw in Europe yesterday.  Arguably, this seems like a catch-up move.  In fact European sovereign yields are essentially unchanged on the day as German GDP data confirming the recession of 2023 did nothing to change views, nor surprisingly, did slightly better than expected UK employment data where wage growth was seen rising less rapidly than anticipated.  JGB yields remain moribund and the idea that the BOJ is going to change anything seems a more and more distant prospect for now.

Oil prices (+0.6%) are a touch higher amid further threats from the Houthis as well as some missile attacks by Iran on areas in Iraq and Syria.  I cannot keep up with all the different allegations here, but we cannot ignore the fact that things seem to be escalating.  This cannot be a good outcome for oil prices, or perhaps more accurately, seems likely to push them higher.  The higher interest rates are weighing on precious metals with gold and silver both lower, but surprisingly, copper and aluminum are both rallying this morning.

Finally, the dollar is flexing its muscles this morning, higher against all its counterparts in both the G10 and EMG spaces.  AUD, NOK and SEK have all declined by -0.8% or so, leading the way in the G10 space, although -0.6% covers the bulk of the rest of the bloc.  In the EMG space, KRW (-1.25%), PLN (-1.0%) and MXN (-1.0%) are the laggards across an entire bloc that is under pressure.  This is all about the dollar this morning with no idiosyncratic stories to drive things.

On the data front, we only have the Empire State Manufacturing Index (exp -5.0) and we hear from Fed Governor Waller as well at 11:00.  It seems to me that the market has really gone a bit too far in its bullish beliefs and today is a bit of a correction.  Unless we start to see a lot more push back regarding policy ease though, I expect this movement will be short-lived.  Although ultimately, I believe that we will see a weaker economy, higher inflation and weaker asset prices, I do not think that is the near-term view.  Rather, I expect we will see more dip buying for risk assets by tomorrow at the latest.

Good luck
Adf

*I am well aware that the recent dot plot indicated a median expectation of 75bps of rate cuts this year, but do not forget that the dispersion of that grouping was quite wide, with one assuming no cuts and several assuming just one or two.  I feel it is very weak thinking to say the Fed has indicated three rate cuts this year, they have done no such thing!

Xi’s Heart Was Broken

Posted on by

The Taiwanese people have spoken
And President Xi’s heart was broken
The DPP won
Convergence is done
And Xi’s wrath has like been awoken

The results of the first presidential election around the world in 2024 are in and Lai Ching-te, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s candidate, and sitting vice-president, has won.  This is absolutely not the outcome that Chinese President Xi Jinping was looking for as his administration apparently orchestrated a great deal of election interference in order to get the opposition candidate into the seat.  Overall, the DPP does not have a majority in the Legislature so getting things done will be a challenge for Mr Lai, but as sitting VP, he is clearly quite politically capable.  It is important to know that he has not advocated for independence, which is the brightest red line President Xi sees, but his attitude is quite interesting now with his view that Taiwan is already, de facto, a state, and therefore doesn’t need to declare independence.

At this time, it doesn’t appear as if there will be any change in the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.  I imagine that Xi will continue to order periodic harassment of Taiwanese shipping and encroach on their airspace, but it strikes that the odds of invasion, at least currently, remain extremely low.  If Xi learned nothing else about war from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it is that things don’t always work out as assumed.  Add to this lesson Xi’s recent purging of numerous high-ranking military officers on corruption and incompetence charges, and I suspect that the stalemate here will continue.  As such, I don’t anticipate any economic impact of note from this particular situation going forward.  At least not this year or next.

In Iowa, temps are sub-freezing
In Davos, it’s not as displeasing
The difference is stark
As both places mark
Their efforts, control, to be seizing

As it is Martin Luther King Day here in the US, so banks and the stock market are closed, I thought it might be a good time to discuss two events that are occurring in very different parts of the world and with very different views of the world, namely the Iowa caucuses and the beginning of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland.

Starting with Iowa, this is the official beginning of the Presidential election cycle in the US with the first votes and the first delegates to be allocated.  This year, for the first time, it is only the Republicans caucusing as it appears President Biden, who came a weak 5th there in 2020, decided that he didn’t want to be embarrassed and so essentially canceled the vote.  As to the Republicans, they will be braving sub-zero temperatures throughout the state with the latest polls I have seen, courtesy of Five thirty-eight.com showing former President Trump with 52.7% of the vote, followed by Nikki Haley (18.7%), Ron DeSantis (15.8%) and Vivek Ramaswamy (6.4%).  This result is in line with the national polls and certainly indicates that, as of now, President Trump is going to be the Republican nominee.

That prospect is anathema to the entire Democratic Party, as well as to many Republicans, but even more interesting is how the rest of the world finds the prospects so alarming.  In fact, it seems to be a major topic at WEF as President Trump was essentially dismissive of the WEF agenda when he was last in office and if we have learned anything about WEF, it is they cannot stand being dismissed, especially by world leaders.

I might argue that the biggest problem WEF has is their agenda is running into the realities of physics and economics.  It turns out that many people are not willing to give up material progress that requires the use of fossil fuels or farming, and that seems to run contra to the WEF stated goal of, you will own nothing, and you will be happy.  For now, despite the vast amount of wealth that individual members of WEF control, its direct impact on the macroeconomy has been felt through government policies.  In fact, it seems clear these policies have been a driving force in the rise in populism around the world completely to oppose those policies, and that is not about to change.  At least not until the other 39 elections due this year around the world have been completed.  This is a key reason I believe we are going to see far more populism in many places, and that will have real economic consequences.

Consider for a moment, what populist policies might look like.  They are very likely to increase government spending on things like healthcare and retirement to the detriment of spending on things like energy and defense.  There will be an increase in the amount of reshoring manufacturing and buy local programs and I suspect that there will be more isolationism as a theme.  One of the things all these policies have in common is they will all be inflationary.  And that is something which will need to be considered in both investment and hedging decisions going forward.

Ultimately, the one thing of which I am confident is that the idea of a secular deflation makes very little sense.  Rather, a combination of current and potentially populist future policies is much more likely to result in higher inflation across the board.  Governments will find this convenient as it will help depreciate the real value of their growing debt piles and encourage them to continue to spend on these populist policies.  However, viewing this from a business’s point of view, it will require a focused approach on managing costs and pricing products and services appropriately.  Keep your eyes on the big picture, not just the most recent result.

Despite the fact that the holiday is a US holiday, it seems that most markets have decided to take the day off as well.  While European equity markets are drifting lower, that seems to be in response to the fact that Germany fell into official recession last year and its prospects remain dim for 2024.  Japanese equities continue their run as interest rates in Japan are drifting lower as all the talk of the end of ZIRP slowly fades away alongside fading inflation in the country.

Arguably, the one place where things are moving is European bond markets where yields have risen between 6bps and 8bps across the board despite what appears to be weaker than forecast Eurozone IP data.  On the surface, the data today would have indicated a bond rally, not sell-off, but it seems inflation remains a concern there as well.

Oil prices have slipped a bit overnight but remain in the middle of their recent trading range despite the escalation of tensions after the US and UK bombed Houthi sites in Yemen at the end of the week.  More and more shipping companies are avoiding the area driving up shipping costs, extending lead times, and adding to upward inflation pressures.  As to the metals markets, gold is little changed, and copper and aluminum are acting independently with copper higher and aluminum lower although there are no obvious catalysts for either.

Finally, the dollar is a bit stronger this morning, with JPY (-0.6%) continuing its recent slide as the market removes higher interest rates from its collective bingo card.  But the buck is strong pretty much everywhere with a few EMG currencies also falling by -0.5% or more (BRL, KRW, TWD).  However, with the US out, I don’t anticipate much further activity.

There is no data today nor Fedspeak so for those of you who are working today, it should be quiet in markets overall.

Good luck
Adf

Some Shocks

Posted on by

While many still seek goldilocks
The problem is we’ve seen some shocks
Inflation won’t fall
And oil’s in thrall
To US and UK war hawks
 
But if we adhere to the data
It’s really not looking that great-a
For those who think Jay
Will soon lead the way
By cutting the Fed’s funding rate-a

We are back to being inundated with new information from both economic data and global events, both of which are driving markets for now.  Interestingly, depending on the asset class, it seems that some are studiously ignoring what this new information means, at least what it has historically meant.

Let’s start with yesterday’s CPI data, which printed higher than forecast on both the headline (3.4%) and core (3.9%) measures.  One needn’t be a market technician to look at the chart below of annualized CPI over the past five years and consider the possibility that the downtrend has ended, and we are reversing higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

To the extent that financial data has trends, and I think that is a very realistic estimate of how things work, the Fed may have a much tougher time squeezing the last 1.0% – 1.5% out of the inflationary process than many seem to believe.  At least many in the bond market seem to believe that as despite the hotter than expected CPI data, bond yields actually declined yesterday.  As well, there is no indication from the Fed funds futures market that they have changed their view on the number of rate cuts coming in 2024 with an even higher probability of a March cut, > 70% this morning, and still 6 cuts priced in for the entire year.  

Regarding this seeming dichotomy, it is almost as if the market is trying to force the Fed’s hand.  Historically, the Fed has tried not to ‘surprise’ markets when it comes to decisions, keeping a close eye on market pricing on the day of each meeting.  As such, if the market is pricing in a cut or a hike, the Fed has been highly likely to follow through in the past.  When there have been disagreements, the Fed will typically roll out lots of speakers to get their view across before the meeting in order to prevent that surprise on meeting day.  As well, it is very clear that there is virtually no expectation of a rate adjustment at the FOMC meeting on January 31st, so perhaps the Fed doesn’t feel it is warranted to be that concerned yet.  And of course, the data may turn in the direction of much softer inflation and even modestly worse employment so a cut will become the de facto norm.  But my point is, the March 20th meeting is just 67 days away.  For an economy whose trends move very slowly, it seems like the market may be a bit ahead of itself in this case.

We did hear from three Fed speakers yesterday, Mester, Barkin and Goolsbee, all of whom indicated that while the broad direction of things seemed pretty good, a rate cut in March is very premature.  In fact, that has been the consistent theme from every Fed speaker and the market just doesn’t seem to care.  We will see two PCE reports, two more CPI reports and two more NFP reports before the March FOMC meeting.  And they will all be part of Q1 data, not Q4 data, so will at least have more relevance to the current situation.  Maybe the market is correct, and inflation is going to turn back lower, and the first signs of economic weakness will convince Powell and friends it’s time to preemptively cut rates.  However, even if that turns out to be the case, it is hard for me to see that as a > 70% probable outcome.  Of course, I am just an FX poet, so maybe I just don’t get it.

The other topic that is making an impact is the Middle East.  You may recall that oil prices had been on the soft side as the market saw weakening demand due to an impending recession with massive supply gains coming from better and better producer efficiency.  In fact, I wrote about the latter this past Sunday in Oil’s Price is not Rising.  However, all that efficiency is unimportant when compared to the escalation that we saw last evening in the Middle East, where US and UK forces attacked Houthi positions in Yemen in retaliation for the Houthi attacks on shipping in the Red Sea.  This morning, oil is higher by 3.5% and since Monday, the rise has been 6.6%.  

This poses several problems overall.  First, of course, is the widening of the Middle East conflict being a problem in and of itself.  The US military is already straining with its mission given the number of different places US troops are in harm’s way throughout the Middle East and Asia.  The one thing we have learned throughout history is that war is inflationary.  So, escalations in fighting will ultimately lead to escalations in prices of many things.  Oil is merely the first casualty.  

If you are Jay Powell whose current mission is to reduce inflationary pressures, a widening military conflict is not going to help the situation.  In fact, it is likely that he will be called upon to support the military by ensuring the Treasury can issue as much debt as necessary at reasonable prices.  This means the end of QT and a restarting of QE.  If that were to be the case, and that is a big if, inflation would start another strong leg higher, and markets will be greatly impacted.  Commodity prices will rise, the dollar will likely weaken, a bear steepening for bond yields would be in the cards and equity markets would rally, at least initially.  But it would throw out any ideas of low inflation.  I am not saying this is the current expectation, just that it is something that needs to be considered as events unfold going forward.

A quick look at the impact on markets today shows that equity markets are non-plussed by the escalation as yesterday’s benign US performance was followed by another rally in Japan although Chinese shares continue to lag after a big data dump showed economic activity there remains export oriented into a slowing global growth situation.  Inflation remains moribund there, the Trade Surplus grew, and domestic funding continues to grow at a slower and slower pace.    In Europe, though, there does not seem to be much concern as equity indices are all higher by about 0.5% although US futures are suffering a bit, -0.35%, at this hour (7:45).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are 3bps higher this morning than yesterday’s close, although they remain right at 4.00%, so are not really moving very much right now.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields, which closed before the US yields declined late, are all down about 3bps this morning, helped by confirmation that final inflation readings in Europe remained at recent lows.  In the UK, the net data dump showed slightly weaker than forecast IP and GDP data which has helped drive the bid in Gilts. A quick JGB look, where yields fell 2bps, revolves around a story that the BOJ is going to reduce its end of year inflation forecast thus reducing the probability of any policy change anytime soon.  This is one of the things helping the Nikkei and also a key driver of USDJPY higher.

Aside from oil prices rising, we are seeing gold (+1.0%) on the move today on the back of the Middle East escalation although the base metals are mixed.  One other commodity note is uranium, a market which has been getting a lot more love lately given the recent acceptance by a portion of the eco community that its ability to generate electricity without producing CO2 is a net benefit.  40 nations have promised to increase their nuclear power use and demand for uranium has been rising amid a market where there is very limited supply and annual production does not meet current annual demand, let alone projected future demand.  I simply wanted to highlight that there are price movements all over the place and while uranium may not be a major contribution to inflation, the fact that its price is rising so rapidly (100% in the past year) is not going to push inflation lower.

Finally, the dollar is firming up this morning as risk assets come under pressure.  This is a typical war footing, where investors flee to the dollar in times of stress, just like they flee to gold.  While the movement thus far has not been substantial, just 0.3% on average, it definitely has room to move further if things deteriorate in the Red Sea.

On the data front, we see PPI this morning, expected 0.9% headline, 2.0% ex food & energy, although given CPI was released yesterday, I doubt it will matter very much.  As well, we hear from Minneapolis Fed president Kashkari, so it will be interesting to see if he has a different take than March is too soon, but things seem to be going well.

As we head into the weekend, the Middle East is the wild card.  If things heat up, look for oil prices to continue to rise and risk to be discarded.  That will probably help the bond market for now, and the dollar, but stocks will suffer.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Jay’s Coronation

Posted on by

The word for today is inflation
With many convinced its cessation
Is just round the bend
So, growth will ascend
Alongside Chair Jay’s coronation
 
But what if inflation don’t slow?
And rather, continues to grow
Can bonds stand the pain?
Will stocks feel the strain?
Or will we go on with the show?

The first thing to mention is the Bitcoin ETF was approved by the SEC last evening and the price…is basically unchanged.  As I mentioned yesterday, it seems quite ironic that Bitcoin, a shining symbol of freedom from the government and regulation is now tightly ensconced in government and regulation.  Do not be surprised if it becomes a much less interesting asset having lost one of the key things that makes it different.  Just a thought.

Ok, on to the more important stuff, the economy and today’s CPI report.  Current consensus forecasts are as follows: CPI 0.2% M/M (3.2% Y/Y) and -ex food & energy 0.3% M/M (3.8
% Y/Y).  If realized, these represent a 0.1% rise in the headline and 0.2% decline in the core readings from last month on an annual basis.  Now, in the broad scheme of things, and more importantly, in our day-to-day lives, that 0.1% or 0.2% has absolutely no meaning or impact.  However, the importance allotted to that 0.1% is remarkable.  Entire narratives will be spun about how the Fed has been amazing in their ability to achieve a soft landing, or the Fed is a group of 17 incompetent fools based on an estimated data point that is often revised and does not clearly measure what the words in its name describe.  As such, let’s simply focus on the market reaction function rather than the meaning of the data.

Heading into the release, my take is that given the recent run of softer than forecast inflation readings around the world, whatever the economists and analysts have forecast, the market is leaning toward a soft print.  The fact that oil prices fell about -6% during the month of December, although gasoline prices were nearly unchanged, has tongues wagging.  As well, discussions about slowing growth in China and their negative PPI as a driver of deflation is another key element of the narrative. 

Counter to this is the fact that the Fed refuses to take their victory lap.  Yesterday, John Williams explained, “My base case is that the current restrictive stance of monetary policy will continue to restore balance and bring inflation back to our 2% longer-run goal.  As inflation comes down over time, my expectation is interest rates will also come down over time.”  In other words, things are going well, but we have not reached the finish line.  This certainly didn’t sound like someone who was ready to cut interest rates in two months’ time although the market continues to price a better than 2/3 probability that the Fed will do just that.  Now, if we take him at his word and inflation fell another 0.6% or more by March, maybe that would be enough to get them into a cutting mood.  But I just don’t see that.

One of the things that is often either overlooked or not well understood is the fact that things move REALLY slowly in the economy, especially when it comes to measured moves of economic data points.  Of course, the exception that proves this rule was the Covid recession, but in order to get data to move at the same speed as markets required virtually every government in the world to shut their economies down at the point of a gun!  My take is that will not happen again in our lifetimes, regardless of the threat.  As such, we need to recognize that, to use a well-worn metaphor, the economy is an aircraft carrier and turning it takes time.  

When applying this concept to inflation, and prices more generally, especially wages, they don’t move that quickly.  In fact, they move quite slowly.  People get annual raises, not weekly or monthly ones.  While gasoline prices move up and down on a daily basis, the same is not true for menu prices, items in the supermarket or rent.  Real-time price adjustments are a flaw feature of financial markets, not of real life.  While many will point to the fact that the shelter portion of CPI (and PCE) is a smoothed average of the past twelve months and so not indicative of today’s situation, I would counter that most of the people who pay rent haven’t moved in the past twelve months and their rent remains the same.  It is certainly not declining, and I am still looking for that first story of the landlord who saw the CPI data slipping and cut his tenants rent to keep in line!  

The point is that expectations of a sharp move in a slow-moving data series are misplaced.  Much has been made of the fact that if you annualized the last 3 months or 6 months of CPI monthly data, CPI is already below the Fed’s target of 2.0% and so they should be cutting.  Personally, I find that ridiculous.  But more importantly, the Fed, as evidenced by Williams’ comments above, has no truck with that idea.  Add to this the fact that growth seems to be holding in at trend or better, despite interest rates being “too high” according to the cutting advocates, and it becomes that much harder to believe the Fed is ready to go.

Net, regardless of today’s number, the Fed is not going to change its mind soon.  Markets, however, are a different story.  If the readings are soft, look for a big rally in both stocks and bonds, for the dollar to fall, and for commodity prices to rally nicely.  At least initially.  And the converse should be true as well, a hot number will see red numbers in the stock market, higher yields, a stronger dollar and commodities come under pressure.

Leading up to the number, here’s what we see.  After a nice day in the US yesterday, Asian markets were all in the green led by the Nikkei continuing its rip higher, but this time dragging Chinese shares along for the ride.  In Europe, it appears things are more circumspect as they await the CPI data with most markets +/- 0.2% or less on the day while US futures are currently (7:30) modestly in the green.

Bond yields are definitely in the low inflation reading camp as Treasury yields have fallen 4bps this morning and we are seeing similar movement all across Europe.  The one exception to this story is Japan, where JGB yields edged higher by 2bps despite a couple of soft Leading Economic Index numbers.  However, since the peak, just below 1% in early November, this trend remains clearly lower for yields.

Apparently, the hijacking of an oil tanker in the Persian Gulf has been seen as an escalation of the situation there and oil prices are higher by nearly 2% this morning, although that simply takes the weekly change back to flat.  Gold prices are rallying, 0.5%, and not surprisingly in this environment, so are base metals prices with both copper and aluminum higher by 0.6% this morning.

Finally, on the dollar front, it is lower after a small decline yesterday.  This is of a piece with the inflation expectation story and the idea that the Fed is preparing to cut rates, boost stocks and undermine the dollar.  Even the yen has rallied a bit today, so no currencies are really bucking the trend of a weak dollar, whether G10 or EMG.

Aside from the CPI data, as it’s Thursday we also see Initial (exp 210K) and Continuing (1871K) claims and then early this afternoon we hear from Tom Barkin again.  At this stage, the Fed seems to be of a mind that things are going well, and they are not about to rock the boat in either direction.  Absent a huge surprise in the data this morning, I think this slow grind toward risk on continues.

Good luck

Adf

Markets Are Waiting

Posted on by

The macro event of the day
Is actually micro I’d say
The markets are waiting
For all the debating
‘Bout Bitcoin to end in OK
 
The irony here is too great
As TradFi, the Bitcoin bros, hate
But they’re still a buyer
If number goes higher
‘Cause really, it’s all ‘bout the rate

It is a very slow day in the markets as evidenced by the fact that the biggest story is whether or not the SEC is going to approve a cash Bitcoin ETF.  Today is the deadline for the first application to be approved, or not, and the working belief is that if they are going to approve one, they will approve all 13 that have applied in order to prevent any concerns over favoritism to a particular manager.  Yesterday afternoon, there was a tweet from the SEC that indicated approvals had been made, but then within 10 minutes, the SEC denied that was the case and explained their X (Twitter) account had been hacked.

One of the interesting things of late in this space is that there has been a 20% rally in Bitcoin since the beginning of December, seemingly in anticipation of this event.  This price action has many believing we are looking at a ‘buy the rumor, sell the news’ type story with expectations that a short-term sell-off is coming after the announcement.  However, last night, after the erroneous Tweet, Bitcoin rallied more than 2% before turning back around on the retraction.

With that in mind, the more ironic issue, at least to me, is that there is so much excitement in the Bitcoin community for a traditional finance product like an ETF.  Institutionalizing Bitcoin and creating all the same structure and regulation as any other trading vehicle seems at odds with the entire concept of a new digital transaction medium that does not require a centralized system and is free to one and all.  Arguably, what it highlights is that the entire appeal of Bitcoin is that it is a highly speculative and volatile trading vehicle and is appreciated solely because its number can go up really fast!

In the end, just as the odds of a BRICS currency coming along and usurping the dollar’s throne as top currency in the world (at least when it comes to utilization) are close to zero, the same holds true here.  Bitcoin is never going to replace any fiat currency in the role of money.  Just as with every other asset, its value is entirely dependent on what someone will pay for it.  While an ETF will widen the population that is involved in the space, and perhaps ensure that the government never makes any effort to cut it off from the banking world, it will not change the world in any way, shape or form.

Away from this, the market is turning its focus toward tomorrow’s CPI report in the US as the next critical piece of information for the macro story.  Recent data elsewhere in the world has continued to show a cooling rate of inflation, with Australia’s overnight print at 4.3% a tick lower than expected while Norway’s 5.5% Core rate was also a tick lower than expected.  This follows yesterday’s Tokyo CPI which came in soft and is continuing the theme that the Fed, and central banks around the world, have successfully put the inflation genie back into the bottle.  Personally, I think it is premature to make that claim as I have seen very limited evidence that prices for rent are falling and based on the wage data we saw last week in the NFP report, wage rises, at 4.1%, remain well above the rate necessary to see a stable 2% inflation outcome.  But that is the narrative and it is being pushed hard by Yellen and the mainstream media.

As to today, yesterday’s directionless session in the US led to a mixed performance in Asia where the Nikkei continued its recent rally, up another 2% and back to levels last seen in February 1990 as the Japanese bubble was deflating.  However, Chinese shares remain under pressure with the Hang Seng (-0.6%) continuing its recent slide and mainland shares faring no better.  In Europe, the screens are a pale red, with losses on the order of -0.2% or so across the board and US futures are essentially unchanged at this hour (7:15).

In the bond market, 10-year Treasury yields have edged down 2bps this morning and are trading right on 4.00%.  European sovereign yields are little changed on the day.  After a bond sell-off (yield rally) for the past several weeks, it seems that a bit of dovish commentary from some ECB members, notably de Guindos and Centeno has calmed things down a bit.  And you will not be surprised that JGB yields have slipped another 1bp lower this morning as inflation concerns subside everywhere.

Oil prices are little changed today, holding onto yesterday’s gains but not really responding to a new wave of missile and drone attacks by the Houthis in the Red Sea against some tankers.  Too, gold prices are only edging a bit higher, 0.25%, and essentially have remained in a very narrow range for the past six weeks.  As to the base metals, copper has rallied nicely this morning, up 1% but aluminum is unchanged on the session.

Finally, the dollar is under modest pressure this morning against most currencies, but the yen is the exception, falling -0.4% with the dollar back above 145.00.  I believe you cannot separate the Nikkei rally from the yen decline and the ongoing interest rate story in Japan.  With softer inflation readings leading traders and investors to reduce the likelihood of any monetary policy change by the BOJ, those are exactly the moves that would be expected.  In the meantime, the market is staring to price in a slightly higher probability of a March rate cut by the Fed, up to 67.6% despite no indication from any Fed speaker that is on the table.  However, while this is the narrative, I expect the dollar will have a little trouble going forward against both G10 and EMG currencies.

There is no noteworthy economic data today, but we do hear from NY Fed President Williams at 3:15 this afternoon.  Yesterday’s comments by Michael Barr were interesting in that he was adamant that the BTFP (the lending facility put into place in the wake of last year’s Silicon Valley Bank collapse) was going to be wound down when its term of 1 year comes up in March.  Personally, I am skeptical that will be the case, but at the very least, we can expect it to make a quick appearance as soon as there is any other banking trouble.

And that’s really it for today.  Until tomorrow’s CPI, there is very little about which to get excited.  I don’t believe the Bitcoin story, while mildly interesting, is going to have any impact on other markets for any length of time.  So, we shall be biding our time for another twenty-four hours at least.

Good luck

Adf

Magical Stuff

Posted on by

A critical piece of inflation’s
Aligned with the broad expectations
Of where it will be
In one year and three
As this feeds Jay’s model’s foundations
 
So, yesterday’s data release
That showed expectations decrease
Is magical stuff
And could be enough
To make sure all tight’ning will cease

 

While Thursday’s CPI report remains the key data point this week, there are plenty of other data points that get released on a regular basis that can give clues to how the economy is behaving, and perhaps more importantly to how the Fed’s reaction function may respond.  One of the lesser-known inflation readings is published by the NY Fed each month and shows Consumer Inflation Expectations one year ahead.  As can be seen in the below chart from tradingeconomics.com, the trend has been very positive (lower inflation expectations) for the past two years.

This must warm Powell’s heart as it appears his efforts at anchoring inflation expectations continue to work.  When combining this data with comments from two Fed speakers, Bostic and Bowman, who both indicated some satisfaction with the recent trajectory of inflation and were comfortable with the idea of rate cuts later this year, it is easy to see why yesterday was such a bullish one for risk assets.

Perhaps of more interest, at least to me, was the Consumer Credit Change report which showed that in November, consumer credit rose by a very large $23.75B!  This was the largest increase in twelve months and plays to the idea that people are using their credit cards to purchase consumer staples because they cannot afford them anymore.  On the flip side, given the way economic growth is measured, this will be a positive for Q4 as it implies more ‘stuff’ is being bought.  To my eye, this seems to be a short-term positive, but offers the chance of being a medium-term negative as delinquency in loans is typically not seen in a beneficial light and there are already many stories of people being overextended on their credit cards.

As well, Tokyo CPI was released overnight at 2.4%, 2.1% Core, which was right on expectations, but more importantly, indicative of the fact that inflation pressures in Japan are quickly ebbing.  Perhaps the BOJ’s view that they did not see sustainable price inflation despite almost 2 years of CPI prints above their 2.0% target, is turning out to be correct.  This has huge implications as it means there is little reason for the BOJ to consider exiting its current monetary policy combination of NIRP and QE combined.  As an aside, 10-year JGB yields fell 2bps last night and are currently at 0.58%.  This does not seem like a panicky level, nor one that is necessarily going to attract a lot of internationally invested Japanese money back home.  For all the JPY bulls out there, this is not a good sign.

Away from that news, European data continues to show Germany in a world of hurt, with IP falling -0.7% in November, far worse than expected and the 6th consecutive decline in the series.  However, Eurozone unemployment fell a tick, back to 6.4% and the lowest in the history of the series.  Meanwhile, the ECB just published a report indicating that the inflation suffered by the Eurozone was due almost entirely to supply chain disruptions with a small dose of energy price spike.  It had nothing to do with their policies!  To an outsider like me, this sounds like they are preparing to cut rates as soon as they can.  I wouldn’t be surprised if Madame Lagarde was on the phone with Chairman Powell right now!

And that’s really all we have seen overnight.  After yesterday’s strong rebound in the US, the overnight equity picture was somewhat mixed with Japan having a good session on the weak inflation data although the Hang Seng continues to slide.  Overall, there was no unifed trend in Asia with gainers and losers both.  European shares, though, are in the red this morning led by Spain’s IBEX (-1.75%) although that is the outlier worst performer.  (It seems that a single stock, Grifols, a pharma name, is down -28% on some recent reports about manipulated accounting and that is dragging the whole index lower.). However, US futures are also softer, down about -0.4% at this hour (8:00).  There is still much discussion if last week’s sell-off was just a reaction to a huge late 2023 rally, or the beginning of something much bigger.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have edged up 1bp this morning but remain either side of 4.0% for now.  European yields, though, are higher across the board once again, by between another 5bps and 6bps.  Now, this move is based on yesterday’s close, which saw a drop in yields at the end of the session there.  While the trend in European yields looks higher, they are little changed from this time yesterday.

Oil prices (+3.1%) are rebounding nicely from yesterday’s sharp decline.  You may recall that Saudi Arabia cut its selling price yesterday and the market read that as a sign of weak demand.  However, this morning, that story has faded and continuing tensions in the middle east seem to be having a bigger impact.  This is confirmed by the fact that gold (+0.35%) is rebounding as well although the base metals are mixed this morning with copper slightly higher and aluminum slightly lower.

Finally, the dollar is a touch stronger this morning, but not really by much.  Versus the G10, I see gains of about 0.15% or so with NOK (+0.25%) the exception as it is responding to the rebound in oil.  Versus the EMG bloc, the picture is clearer with almost all these currencies a bit softer, albeit between -0.2% and -0.4% generally.  The dollar continues to be the least interesting asset bloc around for now and is likely to remain so until the Fed starts to actually change policy rather than simply hint at it.

On the data front, we see the Trade Balance (exp -$65.0B) and we have already seen NFIB Small Business Optimism print at a better than expected 91.9.  But, while that is a nice outcome, recall that the index is back at levels below Covid and only above those seen in 2008 and 1980!  Fed Vice-Chair for regulation, Michael Barr speaks at noon, but my guess is he will be right in line with the recent commentary that things look good, but they are not done yet.

As I wrote yesterday, with the bulk of the focus on Thursday’s CPI print, I expect that while markets might be choppy, there will not be much directional information overall.  

Good luck

Adf

Ending QT

Posted on by

The lady from Dallas explained
The balance sheet might be constrained
So, ending QT
Is likely to be
The way the Fed’s goals are attained
 
However, investors ain’t sure
That ending QT is the cure
So, worries abound
As traders have found
Most stocks have now lost their allure

Over the weekend, Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, whose previous role was head of markets at the NY Fed and so knows a thing or two about the monetary plumbing, explained in a speech that QT, at its current pace, is likely going to be too restrictive going forward.  While she threw in the obligatory line about the idea the Fed may still need to raise the Fed funds rate if inflation remains too robust, I would contend that this is another sign the Fed is coming to the end of its tightening regime.  She explained that the swift decline in the Reverse Repo (RRP) facility indicated there may be a significant decline in liquidity in markets and that could have a detrimental impact on equity prices the economy’s future path and derail the widely assumed soft-landing scenario.

For some context, the RRP facility peaked almost exactly one year ago, touching about $2.55 trillion as the Fed was paying more on excess reserves than was available in short-term paper and Treasury bills.  But as the government has flooded the market with T-bills of late, and there is no indication that pace is going to slow down, the yield on bills rose above the IOER rate the Fed was paying.  As such, money market funds have pushed funds from the RRP into purchasing bills and the RRP facility now has “just” $694 billion as of Friday.  A look at the chart below from the FRED database of the St Louis Fed shows the sharp downward trajectory of the facility’s balances.  But also notice that prior to March 2021, this facility basically was at $0 for its entire history.  My point is that this facility does not have a long history of supporting market activities or liquidity, rather it is a recent construct designed to help smooth out temporary fluctuations.  It’s just that the concept of temporary here seems akin to the Fed’s concept of transitory when it comes to inflation.

At any rate, the FOMC Minutes also mentioned the idea that QT would likely need to slow down, and the committee needed to discuss the proper timing of these things.  Logan’s comments were exactly in this vein as the Fed seem like they are working very hard to prepare market participants for the beginning of an easing cycle.  It’s kind of funny that throughout November and December, the Fed seemed a bit concerned that markets were overexuberant, but after a modest equity market sell-off to start the year, much of which can probably be put down to profit-taking on a tax advantaged* basis, they seem suddenly concerned that things are falling apart.

Logan’s comments were in the wake of Friday’s data which showed NFP stronger than expected, although another month of downward revisions for previous readings, and showed wages gaining a bit more than expected.  The initial move here was that further tightening was on the way, or certainly that easing was delayed, but then the ISM Services index was released at 10:00am and it was much worse than expected, 50.6, with the Employment sub-index printing at a horrible 43.7, its lowest level excluding the Covid months, and indicative that perhaps the job market is not quite so robust.  This helped unwind the tightening discussion and Friday’s markets ultimately closed little changed.

Which brings us to this morning, where the most noteworthy price action is in the commodity space with oil (-2.8%) sharply lower after Saudi Arabia cut its pricing indicating that demand is slow, and gold (-1.25%) falling sharply although a rationale there is far harder to find given the dollar is essentially unchanged on the day and it certainly doesn’t appear that peace is breaking out in either Israel/Gaza or in Ukraine.

While there has been a bit of data released from Europe, none of it was substantially different from expectations and it showed that the status quo remains there, overall, a weak Eurozone economy with prices still on the sticky side.  As well, there have been no speakers this morning which just leaves us all unsure of the next big thing.

Now, in fairness, we do have the next big data point coming on Thursday, CPI in the US, which I am assured by so many analysts is THE critical data point.  I was also confident that NFP was critical, so perhaps CPI will be less exciting than forecast.  In the meantime, a look at the rest of the overnight session shows that Japan was on holiday so there was no market activity, but Chinese shares have continued their weak ways, falling more than -1.3% across all the indices there.  It seems to me that despite some very real efforts to inculcate fear of China by certain politicians, President Xi has an awful lot of domestic issues to address.  European shares, though, are little changed with a few very modest gainers (DAX +0.15%) and a few very modest decliners (FTSE 100 -0.2%) and everything else in between.  US futures are softer this morning as the weekend story regarding Boeing’s 737 Max being grounded is weighing on the stock and the market as a whole.

In the bond market, Treasuries are unchanged on the day while European sovereigns are all seeing yields climb between 4bps and 5bps.  This move seems like a catch-up to Friday’s US price action, which if you remember saw a sharp decline in yields early and a rebound later on.  Ultimately, this space will continue to be driven by the central banks with the Fed funds futures market still pricing in a > 60% probability of a 25bp cut in March with Europe seen likely to follow shortly thereafter.

Having already touched on commodities, a look at the dollar shows that while the euro, pound and yen are all little changed, there is a bit more movement in the dollar’s favor amongst some less liquid currencies with AUD (-0.4%), NOK (-0.85% on weak oil prices) and KRW (-0.4%) leading the way.  I continue to see the FX markets as an afterthought to the broad economic picture right now but have not changed my view that if the Fed does lead the way in easing policy, the dollar is likely to slide.

On the data front, here is what this week brings:

TodayConsumer Credit$9B
TuesdayNFIB Small Biz Optimism91.0
 Trade Balance-$65.0B
ThursdayInitial Claims210K
 Continuing Claims1853K
 CPI0.2% (3.2% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.2% (3.8% Y/Y)
FridayPPI0.1% (1.3% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.2% (1.9% y/Y)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As well, we do hear from several Fed speakers this week starting with Bostic today and then Williams and Kashkari as the week progresses.  At this stage, I expect that we are likely to see less volatility as my guess is most profit adjustments have been made and all eyes are turned to CPI on Thursday.  Until then, it is likely to be a dull week (famous last words!)

Good luck

Adf

*This tax advantage is simply that taxes will not be due until April 2025, so perhaps tax deferred is a better description.

Oil’s Price is not Rising

Posted on by

Recession has yet to appear
And Janet has signaled, ‘all clear’
But many still worry
She’s in quite a hurry
To help Biden’s prospects this year
 
One key to this outcome, surprising
Has been oil’s price is not rising
Now, why would that be
If strong ESG
Intentions force drilling downsizing?

This note is a departure from my daily missive as I wanted to address a bigger picture concern regarding the evolution of the US, and global, economy.  I would contend that one of the underlying theses that has been part of the market narrative for quite a while is that there is a finite supply of oil and hydrocarbons available beneath the surface and that since all the easy stuff has already been found, the cost of extraction is going to rise and push the oil price higher along with those costs.  I’m confident that if you have paid any attention to the discussion, you will have heard about peak oil being forecast (the IEA just claimed it will occur in 2030, although that was pushed back from 2028 in last year’s report) and a theory known as Hubbard’s peak theory, which explains that once an oil field has produced half its reserves, its ability to continue to produce at previous levels is dramatically reduced, thus reducing output.

In fact, this was a cornerstone of my mental model regarding inflation and the economy for the past several years.  Forgetting for a moment that oil prices are quite volatile as can be seen in the below long-term chart from tradingeconomics.com, one can argue that the broader trend has been for higher oil prices.

As such, if oil prices, and the concurrent price for all types of energy, was going to continue to rise, it seems difficult to believe that inflation would stabilize.  After all, energy is an input into virtually every part of the economy and if oil was rising, stable inflation would require deflation in other areas.  Now, during the past twenty odd years, with China’s entry into the WTO and the broader global economy, their rapid expansion clearly weighed on the price of manufactured goods.  But I believe it is a fair assessment to say that factor is currently dissipating and will continue to do so going forward as evidenced by the significant rise in populist politics around the world.  After all, a key part of populism is the inward-looking aspect, supporting domestic activity and shunning imports in an effort to keep jobs in the home country.

With this as a baseline thesis, the question at hand is what can change this view?  Well, I recently read a terrific article and listened to a very interesting podcast with an analyst who goes by the name of Doomberg.  Doomberg made some really great points about some little-known features of the oil and gas markets which tend to be ignored or glossed over, but which are ultimately very important.  Arguably, the most important was to recall that technology improvements are not simply made by Apple and Microsoft, but by energy firms as well, and they have been improving their efficiency in extracting oil and oil products dramatically.  Perhaps the number that will really blow your mind is that the US, by itself, is currently producing ~20 million barrels/day of oil and oil-type products (usually described as Natural Gas liquids or NGLs) which makes the US by far the largest producer of energy on the planet, dwarfing Saudi Arabia and Russia.  And despite all the efforts by those who are desperate to end oil production completely, these numbers are almost certainly going to continue to grow as cheap energy is the most critical feature to develop a growing economy and improve living standards.

The fact that the US economy continues to plug along and avoid recession, and the fact that despite very real concerns over an escalation of the fighting in the middle east and what that might do to the short-term supply of oil, the price of oil is trading far closer to recent lows than highs, indicates to me that there is a great deal of truth in this view.  In fact, I have become persuaded that I need to adjust my world view accordingly.  You know what they say about new information and changing your mind.

So, I am going to rough out a new mental model with this new information on the key input to economic activity, the price of energy, and see how I think things may evolve over time.

The first thing to note is that global growth, writ large, is likely to outperform current estimates going forward.  After all, if cheap energy becomes more widely available, then the billions of people who live in Africa, Asia and Latin America who subsist on minuscule amounts of energy each day are going to see substantial improvements in their lives.  (Of course, I cannot account for the political machinations which may prevent this, but I believe that no matter how inept or corrupt these governments are, some portion will get through to the population.)  The upshot of this is emerging market economies are likely to grow at a more rapid clip which will require more resources and feed through to more economic activity around the world.  While there will be constraints on this growth eventually, for the next several years at least, and probably for a decade or more, I expect that the story will be a large net positive.

But perhaps more importantly for a more current economic outlook, the availability of relatively cheap energy is going to be a huge boon for the developed world.  For instance, the below graph explains a great deal about the current situation in Germany with respect to the fact that it is experiencing a recession and the fact that the populist, right-wing AfD political party is making huge gains in the polls.

Energy intensive industry that had been built on the back of cheap natural gas imported from Russia has been fleeing the country with major companies building facilities in the US to take advantage of the fact that natural gas prices in the US are <$3.00/mmBTU while in Europe they remain above $9.00/mmBTU although they have fallen from their highest levels last year.  Consider, though, what will happen if the abundance of cheap energy about which I am hypothesizing becomes reality.  Suddenly, many more countries, even those without their own natural supplies of energy, will be able to take advantage of the benefit of cheap energy.  If we know one thing it is that all the energy produced will be consumed in some manner, and the cheaper the cost of production, the more widely spread will be its availability.

I highlight Germany as an illustration of what will almost certainly occur worldwide.  In other words, reducing the cost of the key input into virtually all economic activity, namely energy, is going to support a very real increase in that activity.

As to the inflation story, here too, much of the blame falls on political efforts to control certain sectors of an economy or to show favor to others, which impedes appropriate price discovery.  And that will never change, I fear.  However, it becomes much easier to believe that if we eliminate a key plank of the long-term inflation narrative, namely resource constraints driving prices higher, that general price inflation will have far less staying power.  

Putting this together leads to a very different, and much more positive, outcome than I had envisioned previously, and than I believe, many had envisioned.  For a given level of nominal GDP growth, more will be real growth and less will be price adjustments, a truly beneficial outcome.  

The next question then is how might this impact financial markets going forward?  This is always a treacherous question given nobody really knows.  But, looking at the four main market segments; interest rates, equities, commodities and FX, here are my first thoughts.

Interest Rates – The first thing to consider is that there is an enormous amount of debt currently outstanding around the world, something on the order of $300 trillion to $350 trillion.  The two macroeconomic ways to pay back debt are to inflate it away or to generate sufficient economic activity to outstrip the accumulation of that debt.  As my contention is inflation will be lower alongside higher productivity, this is a sea change in thinking.  While I had always expected inflation to be the likely course, this opens the possibility for growth to do the work.  While debtors typically like inflation, especially governments, this new paradigm is likely to be even more effective.  Net, I expect that the general level of interest rates will decline somewhat everywhere as higher productivity should help creditworthiness as well as governments.  Faster real economic activity should generate more tax revenues and reduce issuance from that perspective thus easing the oversupply problem.

Equity markets – This outcome should be a net long-term benefit for equity markets as the underlying aspect is that economic growth should accelerate.  However, while companies may perform well at the bottom line, equity markets are a function of the underlying company and the value multiple that investors place on those companies.  Right now, valuations remain far higher than long term historical values.  For instance, the current Shiller Cyclically Adjusted PE Ratio (CAPE) is at 31.78.  This compares to a mean of 17.07 and median of 15.96 over the past 150 years.  While improved productivity on the back of cheaper energy is likely to raise the appropriate level for this statistic, it still appears quite richly valued.  For instance, if 20.00 is a more appropriate price multiple in this new world, which would be a 25% increase on the median, the market is still massively overvalued.  As such, equity prices might still decline despite this good economic outcome.  However, I would say that given emerging market, and even European market pricing is much less robust, cheaper and more abundant energy should help those markets dramatically.

Commodities – Here, the tale will be told by the political machinations going forward.  By rights, commodity prices everywhere should decline, at least initially, if energy prices decline, if for no other reason than the cost of producing them will decline.  However, the ESG mindset remains widespread and there remain a disturbingly large number of people who want to stop all commodity production activity, oil & gas, metals, and even foodstuffs.  If this group is able to maintain political power, they can prevent all the possible benefits.  But even if we assume they lose power as people decide that improved living standards are more valuable to them than concerns over global warming, the fact that there may be an extraordinary amount of cheaply available energy does not mean there is an extraordinary amount of copper, nickel or aluminum available.  At some point, we could see physical constraints manifest themselves, but at least initially, I expect that other commodity prices will follow energy prices lower.

FX – Since FX is a relative game, this outcome is all about the relative adoption of this new paradigm.  The first nations to embrace this view and see improved economic activity are likely to see their currencies strengthen as investment flows in.  The fact that they will be able to keep interest rates lower will not necessarily hurt these currencies’ value as investors will be flocking to their equity markets and real investments, not looking for currency arbitrage.  Of course, at this time, there is no way to know who will embrace this idea and lead the pack, but the US certainly has a head start given it is the source of much of the cheap energy and the concomitant technology driving it.  But you can bet that China will get on this bus quickly, once they recognize its existence, and after that, widespread adoption will drive things.  In fact, my biggest concern is that the politics will hold back Europe as they remain enthralled by their climate virtue signaling and it may take far longer to change that view.  Either that, or a really cold winter with people running out of energy.  So initially, I think this is quite dollar supportive, but over time, we will need to see the evolution of the process.

This is the essence of my evolving view, better real economic activity and increased productivity alongside lower inflation on the back of abundant, and therefore, relatively cheap energy is a growing probability in my mind. If this scenario plays out, it will have very real impacts on financial markets, but more importantly on our everyday lives, and for the latter, I expect quite positive impacts.  However, given the current state of politics, this transition will likely take much longer in some parts of the world than others.  Keep that in mind as you consider these issues.  And remember, these are my first takes.  I could well be wrong about the market impacts and welcome comments offering different views.

I apologize for the length of this note, but that is why I put it out on a Sunday rather than a weekday!

Good luck

Adf

Quite Frail

Posted on by

While everyone’s waiting to see
How high or low payrolls might be
The news from elsewhere
Is starting to wear
Quite thin, look at China’s Zhongzhi
 
This bankruptcy sounds the alarm
That others there might come to harm
The soft-landing tale
Which still is quite frail
Has started to lose its quaint charm

Before we start on the payroll report, I think it is important to mention a significant issue that was revealed last night in China, where Zhongzhi, one of the largest non-bank financial and investment companies on the mainland, filed for bankruptcy and liquidation.  It has been missing both interest and principal payments for the past several months and it simply became too great a problem to ignore any longer.  The data released indicates that the company had ~$31 billion more in liabilities than assets and has become one of the largest bankruptcies in China’s history.  

The company was a major player in the property market there, although its main business was high yielding investment products, essentially structured notes, where much of the property backed collateral has fallen dramatically in value and where cash flows that had underpinned the notes have now ceased amid the property collapse.  This is hardly an advertisement for the Chinese economy and another sign that things there remain in a downtrend.  While the renminbi is marginally firmer this morning, up 0.2%, that is a consequence of the PBOC establishing the CFETS fixing at a much stronger than expected level in their effort to prevent substantial weakness in the currency.  

The upshot is that the Chinese economy remains in difficult straits, and the government’s reluctance to increase fiscal support is being felt everywhere.  (On the other hand, the PBOC has added $600 billion in liquidity to the economy in the past week.)  Ongoing weakness in Europe is another problem for Chinese exporters and the ongoing disagreements and tariff wars with the US simply add additional pressure to President Xi.  Next Saturday the first big election of 2024 will be held, in Taiwan, and if the incumbent party retains control, currently the betting favorite, Xi may find himself with quite a few problems to address this year.  A weak economy, rising geopolitical tensions globally and a rejection of his entreaties to the people of Taiwan is a bad look for a megalomaniacal dictator like Xi.  Just sayin’.

OK, let’s turn to this morning’s big story, the NFP report.  Here are the analyst consensus estimates according to tradingeconomics.com:

Nonfarm Payrolls170K
Private Payrolls130K
Manufacturing Payrolls5K
Unemployment Rate3.8%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.4
Participation Rate62.7%
ISM Services 52.6
Factory Orders2.1%

Now, yesterday we saw two other pieces of employment data, the ADP (164K and much higher than expected) and Initial Claims (202K and much lower than expected).  These numbers have many in the market looking for a strong print although the correlation between ADP and NFP has been underwhelming for quite a while.  While we can discuss the merits of the estimates and the overall strength of the economy, I think we are better served, this morning, to focus on the potential impacts of a given number and how that has been evolving so far this week/year.

This morning, the 10-year yield is up to 4.04%, some 25bps above the lows touched post-Christmas, and starting to indicate that some people are having second thoughts on the idea of the Fed aggressively cutting rates this year.  As an example, while I never believed there to be a chance of a rate cut at the end of January, the market was pricing a 17.5% chance of that just a week ago.  This morning the probability is down to 4.7%.  As well, just last week the market was pricing in 6 rate cuts in 2024.  That is now down to 5 cuts and fading. One of the big stories around this morning is that someone has put on a very large option position expiring later today that the 10-year yield will be above 4.15%.  To profit, this trade will require one of the largest yield moves seen in months.

The point is that the nirvana belief set that had been driving markets since the beginning of November is clearly under a significant amount of pressure here.  After all, the NASDAQ has had 5 consecutive negative closes, bond yields, as mentioned, have rallied sharply and are breaking through short-term technical resistance, the dollar is rallying, and the bulls are feeling quite unloved.

Is this the end of the bull story?  Frankly I don’t believe that is the case.  However, risk assets got a bit overexuberant during November and December and have come a long way in a short time.  It is not surprising to see a retracement of prices to help unwind some of the froth.  Ultimately, I believe the question that matters in the medium and long term is the state of the economy and whether the recent growth trajectory will continue, or if we have peaked for now.

One of the things that has me concerned in the medium term is the fact that the government continues to run a massive fiscal deficit despite what appears to be a reasonably strong economy.  Recall, Keynes instructed governments to spend during recession, but tighten their belts during good times.  However, the new mantra is far more in line with Modern Monetary Theory, which is spend as much as you can at all times.  

A quick thought experiment regarding the underlying economy might look like this: GDP = $27 trillion, Federal spending = $10 trillion, Federal deficit = $1.7 trillion.  What if the government didn’t run a deficit, but was neutral?  Removing that much stimulus from the economy would have a significant negative impact on the US economy’s growth trajectory, which is the reason no politician wants to do that.  But the question at hand is how healthy is the economy on its own?  And are growth prospects there really that substantial?  One of the keys to the recent employment picture is that government jobs continue to grow rapidly (look at the gap between NFP and private payrolls).  As long as the US government can continue to borrow money cheaply to fund its profligate ways, it is completely realistic to expect the economy to continue to grow.  However, the reason the bond market story is so important is that the bond market is the place where it will become clear if this is possible.  If Treasury yields continue their recent climb, the pressure on the economy will increase, and the pressure from the government on the Fed to support the bond market will increase.  Forget ending QT.  If the Fed were to find itself in a place where they needed to restart QE to support the bond market, that would be an incredibly important signal that inflation was going to accelerate again, and likely commodity prices would follow.  That would also be a very negative sign for the dollar.  So, lower bonds, lower dollar, higher commodities and likely a nominal rise in equities, at least initially.  My point is there is much about which we need be concerned and wary.

In the quickest of recaps possible, equities around the world have mostly been under pressure with only Japan managing to rally but weakness in China and across all of Europe.  The same is true with US futures, all in the red this morning by about -0.3%.

Bond yields are also rising around the world (except in Japan) with gains on the order of 6bps-8bps across the continent, similar to what we saw in Australia overnight. 

Oil prices are rebounding this morning, up 1.3%, despite much larger than expected inventory builds shown in yesterday’s IEA data, but the metals markets are continuing under pressure for now with the base metals weak and gold edging lower.

And finally, the dollar is continuing its rebound led by USDJPY, where the yen is down a further 0.4% and back above 145 for the first time since early December.  In the G10 space, I would say the movement has been about -0.3% overall, but in the EMG space, things are a bit more active with average declines here of about -0.7% across the three main geographic blocs.

That’s really it.  Now we just wait for the payroll report and later this morning the ISM Services number, and then we get to hear from Tom Barkin again, but it would be shocking if his view changed from just two days ago.  For some reason, I have a feeling the payroll data will fall short this morning, but that’s just a feeling.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf