In a Trice

The calendar’s not e’en turned twice
Since Trump, with JD as his Vice
Have taken the reins
And beat up on Keynes
While weeding out waste in a trice
 
For markets, the problem, it seems
Is rallies are now merely dreams
So, equity buyers
Are putting out fires
While thinking up pump and dump schemes
 
For bondholders, it’s not so clear
If salvation truly is near
But one thing seems sure
The buck will endure
Much weakness throughout this whole year

 

We have not even reached 50 days of a Trump presidency as of this morning and nobody would fault you if you estimated we had three years of policies enacted to date.  The pace of changes has been blistering and clearly most politicians, let alone investors, have not been prepared for all that has occurred.

One of the things that I read regularly is that Trump is destroying the Rules Based Order (RBO) which was underpinned by the Pax Americana of the US essentially being the world’s policeman.  This is cast as a distinct negative under the premise that things were going great and now, he is upsetting the applecart for his own personal reasons.  Of course, market participants had grown quite accustomed to this framework, had built all sorts of models to profit from it and with the Fed’s help of monetization of debt, were able to gain significantly at the expense of those without market linked assets.  Hence, the K-shaped recovery.

But while that is a lovely narrative, is it really an accurate representation of the way of the world?  If the US was truly the world’s policeman, and we certainly spend enough on defense to earn that title, perhaps it was time for the US to be fired from that role anyway.  After all, there is currently raging military conflict in Ukraine, Lebanon, Syria, Congo, Sudan and the ongoing tensions in Gaza.  That’s a pretty long list of wars to claim that things were going great.

Secondly, the question of financing all this conflagration, as well as other economic goals, notably the alleged transition to net zero carbon energy production, appears to be reaching the end of the line.  While the US can still borrow as needed, (assuming the debt ceiling is raised), the reality is that the US gross national debt outstanding is greater than $36,000,000,000,000 relative to GDP that is a touch under $28,000,000,000,000.  On a global basis, total (not just government) debt is in excess of $300,000,000,000,000 while global GDP clocks in somewhere just north of $100,000,000,000,000.  Arguably, on a credit metric basis, the world is BB- or B+, a clear indication that all that debt is unlikely to be repaid.

If we consider things considering this information, perhaps the RBO had outlived its usefulness.  Arguably, the loudest complaints are coming from those who benefitted most greatly and are quite unhappy to see things change against them.  But as evidenced by the polls taken after President Trump’s speech last Tuesday evening, the bulk of the American public is still strongly supporting this agenda.  The idea that the president and his Treasury secretary are seeking to engineer a short-term recession early, blame it on fixing Biden’s mess, and having things revert to stronger growth in time for the 2026 mid-term elections is not crazy.  In fact, there have been several comments from both men that short-term pain would be necessary to achieve a stabler, long-term gain.

So, what does this mean for the markets?  You have no doubt already recognized that volatility is the main event in every market, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.  But some of the themes that follow this agenda would be for US equities to suffer relative to other markets, as the last decade plus of American exceptionalism, led by massive deficit spending and borrowing, would reverse under this new thesis.  Add to this the sudden realization that other nations are going to be investing significantly more in their own defense, and money will be flowing out of the US into Europe, Japan and emerging markets around the world.

Bonds are a tougher call as a weaker economy would ordinarily mean lower yields, but the question of tariff impacts on prices, as well as reshoring, which, by definition, will raise prices, could mean we see the yield curve steepen with the Fed cutting rates more aggressively than currently priced, but 10-year and 30-year yields staying right where they are now.

I believe this will be a strong period for commodities as all that foreign capex will be a driver, as will the fact that, as I will discuss shortly, the dollar is likely to underperform significantly.  Gold will retain its haven characteristics as well as remain in demand for foreign central banks, while industrial metals should hold their own.  As to oil, my take is lower initially, as OPEC returns its production and slowing GDP weighs on demand, at least for a while, although eventually, I suspect it will rebound along with economic activity.

Finally, the dollar will remain under significant pressure across the board.  Clearly, Trump is seeking a weaker dollar to help the export industries, as well as discourage imports.  Add to this the potential for lower yields, lower short-term rates, and an exit of equity investors as US stocks underperform, and you have the making of at least another 15% decline in the greenback this year.

With this as backdrop, we need to touch on three key stories this morning.  First, Friday’s NFP report was pretty much in line with expectations at the headline level but seemed a bit weaker in some of the underlying bits, specifically in the Household Survey where a total of 588K jobs were lost and there was a large increase in the number of part-time workers doing so for economic reasons.  Basically, that means they wanted full-time work but couldn’t find a job.  Markets gyrated after the release, with yields initially sliding but then rebounding to close higher on the day.  Equities, too, closed higher on the day although that had the earmarks of a relief rally after a lousy week overall.  The thing about this report is that it did not include any of the government changes that have been in the press, so next month may offer more information regarding the impact of DOGE and their cuts.

The second story comes from north of the border where Mark Carney, former BOC and BOE head, was elected to lead the Labour Party in Canada and replace Justin Trudeau.  As is always the case, when there is new leadership, there is excitement and he said he will call for a general election in the next several weeks, ostensibly to take advantage of this new momentum.  It seems that President Trump’s derision of not only Trudeau, but Canada as well in many Canadian’s eyes, will play a large role with the two lead candidates, Carney and Poilievre, fighting to explain that they are each better placed to go toe-to-toe with Trump on critical issues.

Here’s the thing, though.  Despite much angst about the US-Canada relationship on the Canadian side of the border, the market viewpoint is nothing has really changed.  a look at the chart below shows that after a bout of weakness for the Loonie in the wake of the US election and leading up to Trump’s tariff announcements, USDCAD is basically unchanged since mid-December, with one day showing a spike and reversal in early February.  My point is that the market has not, at least not yet, determined that the Canadian PM matters very much.

Source: tradingecoomics.com

The last story to discuss is Chinese inflation data which was released Saturday evening in the US and showed deflation in February (-0.7% Y/Y) for CPI and continuing deflation in PPI (-2.2%).  In fact, as you can see from the below chart, PPI in China has been in deflation for several years now.  Recently there have been several articles explaining this offers President Xi a great opportunity for significant stimulus because no matter how much the government spends and how much debt they monetize, inflation won’t be a problem for a long time to come.  I would counter that given deflation has been the norm for several years, they have had this opportunity for quite a while and done nothing with it.  Why will this time be different?  Ultimately, the default result in China is when things are not looking like they will achieve the targeted growth of “about 5%”, you can be sure there will be more investment to build things up adding still more downward pressure on prices as production facilities increase.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The renminbi’s response to this news has been modest, at best, with a tiny decline overnight of -0.25%.  And a look at the chart there shows it is remarkably similar to the CAD, with steady weakness through December and then no real movement since then.  Given the dollar’s recent weakness overall, this seems unusual.  Although, we also know that China prefers a weaker currency to help support their export industries, so perhaps this in not unusual at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, this note is already overly long, so will end it here.  We do have important data later this week with both CPI and Retail Sales coming.  As well, the consensus from the Fedspeak is that they are pretty happy right here and not planning to do anything for a while.

The big picture is best summarized, I believe, by the idea that we are at the beginnings of a regime change in markets as discussed above.  Volatility continues to be the driving force, so hedging remains crucial for those with natural exposures.

Good luckAdf

Inundated

Investors have been inundated
By news that has been unabated
There’s tariffs and war
Plus rate cuts and more
With stocks and bonds depreciated
 
Now looking ahead to today
The payroll report’s on its way
As well, later on
With nothing foregone
We’ll hear from our own Chairman Jay

 

It has certainly been an interesting week in both markets and the world writ large.  So much has happened and yet so much is still unclear as to how things may evolve going forward.  Through it all, volatility is the only constant.  To me, what has become abundantly clear is the post WWII order is being dismantled, and every nation is trying to determine its place in the future.  This is a grave threat to those who benefitted from flowery words and limited action, which covers a wide swath of government leaders around the world.  I’m not sure if this is the 4th Turning, or if this is merely the prelude, with the impacts of all these changes what brings the 4thTurning about.  Regardless, history is clearly in the making.

I do not have the bandwidth to continuously follow the tariff story, although yesterday’s news was there will be more delays for both Canada and Mexico.  China received no such relief and at their National People’s Congress they seemed resolute in their pushback and highlighted their own achievements.  The data from China, though, tells me that their goals for more domestic consumption remain far in the distance.  Last night they reported their Trade Balance for the January/February period (they always combine because of the Lunar New year disruptions) and it jumped to $170.5B, far greater than anticipated.  While exports underperformed slightly, growing only 2.3% compared to a 5% estimate, it was the imports that really tells the story.  Imports fell -8.4%, a significant shortfall from both last year and consensus estimates, and an indication that the Chinese consumer is not yet the type of force that President Xi would like to see.  

In fact, a look at the chart below showing imports for the past 10 years demonstrates that very little has changed on this front.  As I wrote yesterday, converting a mercantilist economy into a consumer-focused one is a huge lift, and one that the CCP has not yet figured out.  It is not clear that they ever will.  Meanwhile, the obvious explanation for the huge jump in the trade balance was companies pre-ordering things to get ahead of the tariffs.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Moving on to the Ukraine situation, while yesterday’s news was of the “whatever it takes” moment for defending Europe, this morning it seems there are some caveats attached.  Of course, the first caveat is the changing of the German constitution to allow them to spend all that money.  The second seems to be that not every European nation is on board for the massive spending increase and continuation of the war.  There are many political and financial hurdles to overcome in this story in Europe, and this morning’s European equity markets are indicative of the idea that this is not a straight-line higher.  In fact, every equity market in Europe is lower this morning, led by the DAX (-1.5%) although with solid declines elsewhere as well (CAC -1.0%, FTSE 100 -0.5%).  This, too, is a story with no clear end in sight.  One unconfirmed story I saw was that the group convened by the UK last weekend has not been able to agree terms for additional support.

Meanwhile, yesterday the ECB cut their short-term rates by 25bps, as widely expected, with the Deposit Rate now down to 2.50%.  The funny thing is nobody really noticed.  This is of a piece with my observation that central bankers just don’t have that much sway on market activity these days, it is all about politics and statecraft, not monetary policy.  This morning, Eurozone GDP for Q4 was released at 0.2%, a tick higher than forecast but still lower than Q3’s 0.4%.  There is no doubt the financial mandarins of Europe are keen to get this defense spending going, because otherwise they will continue to preside over a stagnant economy.  

But here’s an interesting thing to consider.  Germany has made a big deal about this new willingness to spend €500 billion outside the bounds of their budget framework on defense.  However, they continue with their Energiewende policy which has been the Achilles Heel of the German economy and will prevent them from actually producing armaments if they seek to continuously reduce fossil fuel powered energy for renewables.  It is almost as if this is theater, rather than policy, but that may just be my cynicism speaking.

Moving on to the US, this morning brings the Payroll Report with the following current median estimates:

Nonfarm Payrolls160K
Private Payrolls111K
Manufacturing Payrolls5K
Unemployment Rate4.0%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (4.1% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.6%

Source: tradingeconomics.com          

As well, we hear from Chairman Powell at 12:30pm, along with Bowman, Williams and Kugler in the hours leading up to that.  But again, I ask, do they matter to the markets right now?  Certainly, there is much discussion that the US economic data is starting to show more weakness, and there are many who are saying that long-anticipated recession is going to become evident.  If that is the case, we could certainly see the Fed cut rates, but again, my take is markets are far more attuned to 10-year yields than Fed funds.  And remember, while 10-year yields are clearly quite inflation sensitive, what we also know that questions over budget deficits and supply are critical to their pricing as well.  This was made evident yesterday in Germany.

I have glossed over market activity overnight so will give a really short update here.  Yesterday’s weakness in the US was followed by broad weakness throughout Asia, with most markets there lower on the day, notably Japan (-2.2%), but declines almost everywhere.  We have already discussed European bourses and at this hour (7:30) US futures are basically unchanged ahead of the data.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are slipping back -3bps this morning and we are seeing similar price action across most of Europe although Spain (+1bp) is bucking the trend on some domestic issues.  It is easy to believe that the Germany story was a bit overblown, and remember, if they cannot change the constitution, I expect a rally in Bunds (lower yields) along with a selloff in the DAX and the euro.

Speaking of the euro, it is continuing its sharp ascent, up another 0.6% this morning.  however, something to keep in mind regarding all the huffing and puffing about the euro is that with this sharp move higher in the past week, it is merely back to the middle of its 3-year trading range.  So, is this as big a deal as some are saying?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But the overall currency picture is more mixed with both AUD (-0.6%) and NZD (-0.5%) lower along with CAD (-0.2%).  There are other gainers (GBP +0.2%, SEK +0.7%) and other laggards (ZAR -0.2%) although I would say the broad direction is still for dollar weakness.  

Finally, oil (+1.5%) is bouncing this morning, although this could well be a trading bounce as I have seen no new news on the subject.  I guess the delay on Canadian tariffs probably played a role as well.  Gold (+0.4%) is also firmer although both silver (-0.4%) and copper (-1.2%) are lagging.  In fairness, the latter two have had significant up weeks so are likely seeing some profit taking.

Once again, I will remark that for those who have real flows and exposures, the current market situation is why hedging is critical to maintain financial performance.  Nobody really knows where anything is going to go, but right now, it feels like the one thing we know is prices will not remain where they currently are for very long.

Good luck and good weekendAdf

Dynamited

Investors don’t seem that excited
‘Bout Germany’s now expedited
Designs to rearm
And that caused much harm
To Bunds, with their price dynamited

 

One of the biggest impacts of President Trump’s recent friction with Ukraine and its security is that European nations now realize that their previous ability to make butter, not guns, because the US had enough guns for everybody is no longer necessarily the case.  Mr Trump’s turn inward, which should be no surprise given his campaign rhetoric and America First goals, apparently was a surprise to most European leaders.  It seems they couldn’t believe the US would change course in this manner.  Regardless, the upshot is that Europe finds itself badly under armed and is now promising to change this.

The country best placed to start this process is Germany, where soon-to-be Chancellor, Friedrich Merz has promised a €500 billion spending spree on new defense items.  However, as the Germans don’t have this money laying around, they will need to borrow it.  The wrinkle in this plan is that enshrined in Germany’s constitution is a debt brake designed to prevent fiscal profligacy, kind of like this.  So, Merz has proposed waiving the debt brake for defense expenditures, but in order to do so, will need a two-thirds majority vote in the Bundestag (German parliament).  Now given AfD has been quite anti-war, it is not clear he will be able to obtain the requisite votes but for now, that is not the concern.

However, the German bund market clearly believes he will be successful as evidenced by the chart below. Overall, German 10-year yields rose 30bps yesterday, a dramatic move, and dragged most European sovereigns along for the ride as the new narrative is that all European nations will increase borrowing to spend on their defense.  It is worth noting, though, that the reason German yields have been so low is because the economy there has been exhibiting approximately 0% growth for more than a year as they continue to commit energy suicide seek to achieve their idealistic greenhouse gas emission goals.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The trick, though, is that while Germany, with a debt/GDP ratio around 60%, has plenty of fiscal space to follow through, assuming they can alter their constitution, the rest of Europe is in a much more difficult spot with both France and Italy already under EU scrutiny for their budget deficits and debt/GDP ratios.  Recall, a key aspect of the Eurozone’s creation was the regulation designed to keep national budget deficits below 3% of GDP and drive the debt/GDP ratios to 60% or below.  Right now, Germany is the only nation that fits within those parameters. 

While I have no doubt that they will alter the rules as necessary elsewhere in Europe and certainly given the now perceived existential crisis for Europe, those limits are sure to be ignored, the story in Germany remains different because of the constitution.  Markets, though, clearly believe that a lot more debt is about to be issued by European nations, hence the dramatic decline in bond prices and jump in yields.  

But there are other knock-on effects here as well, notably that the euro is climbing dramatically against the dollar, up nearly 4% in the past week, and far ahead of the pound and most G10 currencies with only the SEK (+1.0% overnight, +6.1% in past week) outperforming the single currency.  For a while I have suggested that short-term rates were losing their sway over the FX markets and traders were looking at 10-year yields.  Certainly, the recent price action indicates that remains the case as Treasury yields (+2bps) have bounced off their lows but have risen far less than their G10 counterparts.  In fact, a look at the movement in 10-year government bond yields over the past month and year reveals just how significant these changes have been.

Source: Bloomberg.com

I feel safe in saying that for the next several weeks, perhaps months, this story of European defensive revival and the knock-on effects is going to be top of mind for both investors and pundits.  Only history will determine if these dramatic changes in policy stances will have been effective in reducing the chance of war or not and if they will have been beneficial or detrimental to economies around the world. As much of the current narrative is driven by politics rather than economics, punditry on the latter is going to be worse than usual.  Once again, I harken back to the need for a robust hedging plan for all those with exposures.  As recent price action across all markets demonstrates, volatility is back, and I believe here to stay for a while.

Ok, let’s run down the rest of the markets not yet discussed.  Yesterday’s US equity bounce was widely appreciated by many although this morning, futures markets are all pointing lower by between -0.75% and -1.25%, enough to wipe out yesterday’s gains.  As to Asia overnight, Japan (+0.8%) followed the US and both Hong Kong (+3.3%) and China (+1.4%) are continuing to get positive vibes from the Chinese twin meetings of policymakers.  More stimulus continues to be the driving belief there although China’s history has shown their stimulus efforts have tended to fall short of initial expectations.  As to Europe, this morning only the DAX (+0.5%) is continuing yesterday’s gains as concerns begin to grow that while Germany can afford to spend more money on defense, the rest of Europe is not in the same situation, so government procurement contracts may be less prevalent than initially hoped.  This is evident in the -0.4% to -1.0% declines seen across both the UK and most of the rest of the continent.

We’ve already discussed bonds, although I should mention that JGB yields have risen 10bps as well, up to new highs for the move and finally above 1.50%

In the commodity space, oil (+0.65%) which has had a very rough week, falling more than -5% in the past seven days, seems to be finding a bit of support.  Recall yesterday’s chart showing the bimodal distribution and that we are now in supply destruction territory.  Ultimately, that should support the price, but the timing is unclear.  In the metals markets, this morning sees red across the board, although not dramatically so, with both precious and base metals sagging on the order of -0.5%.

And lastly the dollar continues to decline, albeit not as swiftly as yesterday.  However, while it is considerably weaker vs. its G10 counterparts, versus the EMG bloc, the story is far less clear.  For instance, the only notable EMG currency gaining ground this morning is CLP (+1.2%) while virtually every other major emerging market currency is actually slipping a bit.  Look at this list; CNY -0.2%, MXN -0.25%, PLN -0.3%, ZAR -0.15%, INR -0.3% and HUF -0.5%.  I have a feeling we are going to see more behavior like this going forward, where G10 currencies are now trading on a different basis than EMG currencies.

On the data front, this morning brings Initial (exp 235K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims as well as the Trade Balance (-$127.4B) and Nonfarm Productivity (1.2%) and Unit Labor Costs (3.0%) all at 8:30.  We also hear from two more Fed speakers, Waller and Bostic later in the day.  Yesterday’s ADP employment data was much weaker than expected, falling to 77K, while the ISM Services data held up well although the prices paid piece did rise.  In addition, there has been a change in tone from the Fed speakers as we are now hearing mention of the possibility of stagflation due to the Trump tariffs, although there was no indication as to which way they will lean if that is the economic path forward.

I continue to highlight volatility as the watchword for now and the near future at least.  As long as politics has become the key driver, and as long as President Trump is that driver, given his penchant to shake things up, the one thing of which I am sure is we have not seen the last dramatic change in perception.  With that in mind, my view is the dollar will remain under pressure for a while yet.

Good luck

Adf

Things Are Creaking

Before Mr Trump started speaking
The Chinese explained things are creaking
As growth there is slow
So now they will blow
More funds to achieve what they’re seeking

 

The Chinese government has outlined a very active agenda for 2025 as the current pace of growth in their economy remains sluggish at best.  They continue to focus on a 5% headline GDP target and have promised to increase the budget deficit by a similar amount, so the idea of organic growth seems to be dead.  They reiterated their plan to recapitalize the big banks with CNY 500 billion and are looking to raise defense spending by 7.2%.  Long term debt issuance will increase with CNY 1.3 trillion planned for this year and they talk about adding 12 million urban jobs.  It all sounds fantastic.
 
But will it work?  Of course, there is no way to know yet, but if history is any guide, the mercantilist structure of the Chinese economy remains extremely difficult to overcome and replace with a more consumer-focused economy.  The property market there remains in terrible shape and that continues to be a drag on the overall economy as individuals, who had been encouraged to invest in property as a means of creating a retirement nest egg find themselves with much less disposable income and an illiquid and depreciating asset.
 
President Trump’s tariffs are not going to help them at all, but it is unclear if they will be significantly detrimental.  While I would not bet against China reporting 5% GDP growth in 2025, given the questionable reliability of their data, it is not clear it will be reflective of the state of the nation.
 
My take on market impacts are as follows: Chinese yields will climb as more debt is issued while growth will allegedly increase, Chinese equities should benefit If they are successful at getting things moving, but the yuan will have a harder time in my view, as capital flows to the nation remain stunted.  Of course, much will also depend on the evolution of US policy, which has been erratic, to say the least.

Said Trump, It’s a “new golden age”
As finally, we turn the page
On four years of waste
And so, we’ll make haste
With changes despite Dem outrage

Of course, the other big news was last night’s speech by President Trump to a joint session of Congress where he outlined both the many things he has accomplished in the first 6 weeks of his presidency, but also his plans for the rest of the time.  While many are still reeling from the speed with which changes are being made, there was no indication that his pace is going to slow.

Mr Trump did acknowledge that there may be some short-term pain as the economy adjusts to the changes he has wrought, but he remains focused on the long-term and how to achieve a strong economy with a far better balance sheet and a smaller government.  The implication is that he is still the avatar of volatility, and that aspect will not be changing.

Let us, though, take a step back and look at a much bigger picture.  For the past seventeen years, the US economy was the clear leader in global growth with massive government spending and budget deficits incurred to drive the process.  Meanwhile, while most of the rest of the world exited the pandemic with a burst of reopening growth, they have all lagged the US.  The chart below shows the ratio of the MSCI US index / MSCI World index and demonstrates that investment into the US, following that leading growth profile, has been historic in its effects.

Source: longtermtrends.net

But that situation seems to be changing.  President Trump is openly seeking to reduce the size of the US government and withdraw spending on many foreign adventures while the rest of the world is doing the opposite.  As per the above, China has just announced significant new stimulus.  As well, Europe, now that they need to become more responsible for their own defense, has also announced a major spending plan to rearm themselves.  This is the real sea change, I think, and the one that is going to have the biggest medium and long-term impacts on markets everywhere.  Changes in the level of capital flows and changes in trade patterns are going to significantly impact the value of the dollar as well as stocks, bonds and commodities.  It is a brave new world, so attention must be paid.

In the meantime, let’s see the markets’ initial response to the recent spate of news.  The tariff news has served to undermine US equities for the past two sessions and is still dragging on some markets, but the new spending promises are the new drivers.  So, in Asia, while the Nikkei (+0.2%) managed only a modest rally, the Hang Seng (+2.8%) exploded higher on the Chinese stimulus story although surprisingly, the CSI 300 (+0.5%) did not do nearly as well.  But elsewhere in the region, it was mostly large gains with Korea, India, Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all rallying more than 1%.  The laggards were Australia and New Zealand, which seemed to focus on the negatives of tariffs.

In Europe, Germany’s DAX (+3.4%) is the beneficiary of most of the mooted defense spending as not only are there quite a few defense focused firms, but rumors are that the government is going to coopt the auto manufacturers into building defense equipment (shades of WWII).  As well, the rest of the continent is flying (CAC +1.9%, IBEX +1.6%) and even the UK (+0.45%) is benefitting although there is growing concern that the BOE is not going to be aggressively cutting rates to support the economy because of still sticky inflation.  As to US futures, they are bouncing this morning and higher by 0.4% at this hour (7:00).

In the bond market, while Treasury yields rebounded from their recent lows yesterday, gaining 9bps on the day, this morning they are unchanged.  However, a look at European sovereigns tells the story of investors anticipation of a big uptick in new issuance to fund that defense spending.  The picture below is that of German yields, as an example, showing its 20bp rise this morning, but the entire continent has seen yields rise by at least 16bps!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The market clearly believes the Europeans are going to move forward!

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.6%) remains under pressure as despite the mooted fiscal stimulus, there continues to be more concern over excess supply than newly created demand.  The below chart is quite interesting as a history of long-term price activity in oil with the interpretation that if we are near the supply destruction level, the future for prices is likely to be bullish.  Something to keep in mind. (as an aside, Josh_Young_1 is an excellent follow on X for oil ideas and information.)

As to the metals markets, gold is little changed but copper (+4.7%) has clearly gotten excited over the Chinese stimulus as well as the European defense spending, where copper will be an important piece of the puzzle.

Finally, the dollar is under substantial pressure this morning vs. both G10 and EMG currencies.  Given the yield changes, and my view that 10-year yields have become the FX driver, rather than short-term rates, it should be no surprise that the euro (+0.6%) is rallying to levels not seen since November.  The pound (+0.3%) is following suit, also making 5-month highs.  But the really impressive moves are in the peripheral European currencies with SEK (+1.1%) and PLN (+1.1%) both trading back to levels not seen since September.  On the tariff front, both MXN (+0.25%) and CAD (+0.1%) are lagging the main move but still managing a very modest rally v. the greenback.

In this brave new world, where the US is not the fiscal profligacy leader, but that role is assumed by others, my sense is that the dollar may well have topped for a much longer-term period.  While at the beginning of the year I was confident that the dollar would outperform, the policy changes we have seen since then have altered my views.  While volatility will still be rampant, I believe the broad direction will be a lower dollar going forward.

On the data front, this morning brings ADP Employment (exp 140K) as well as ISM Services (52.6) and Factory Orders (1.6%).  Then we see the EIA oil inventories where a small draw is expected and at 2:00pm, the Fed’s Beige book.  Perhaps the best thing about the changing world order is that central banks are losing some of their market power.  As I wrote yesterday, perhaps US rates are destined to fall as both the president and Chair Powell are keen to see that happen.

At this point, I think the dollar may have seen its highs for quite a while.  Remember, FX trends tend to be very long-term in nature.  For those of you who are payables hedgers, keep that in mind going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Recession in Sight

There once was a policy view
That tariffs, we all should eschew
But President Trump
Explained on the stump
To this idea, he wouldn’t hew
 
And so, as the clock struck midnight
Trump’s tariffs once more saw the light
Most analysts say
The tariffs will weigh
On growth, with recession in sight

 

By now you are all aware that as of 12:01 EST this morning, 25% tariffs have been imposed on all imports from both Canada and Mexico except energy products, which have seen 10% tariffs imposed.  As well, all Chinese imports have been hit with an additional 10% tariff.  Once again, President Trump has proven to be a man of his word, promising these tariffs during his election campaign and imposing them now.

The mainstream view is that these tariffs are a disaster and will send the economy into a recession.  In fact, the International Chamber of Commerce said a depression was likely.  As well, there is much concern that inflation will rise during the recession, which for Keynesians must be a very difficult concept to grasp given their strongly held belief that a recession will result in declining inflation.

Now remember, I am just a poet, so please take that into account when I offer my views here.  First, we have no idea how things will play out.  The one thing about which I am extremely confident is that there will be numerous behavioral changes by everyone because of these tariffs.  The first question is who will absorb the cost of the tariffs.  Remember, essentially the definition of a recession is that demand is declining.  Will companies be able to pass through the higher costs?  In some instances, they likely will, but in others probably not.  Anecdotally, there was a story in the WSJ that Chipotle will see its costs rise because of the tariff on avocados from Mexico but will not change their prices to account for that.  I’m confident they are not the only company who will absorb those costs.

However, there will certainly be companies that believe they can raise prices and maintain their sales and will try to do that.  My point is each company will evaluate the environment under which they operate and respond in the profit-maximizing manner, but each company’s scenario will be different.

Second, let’s consider the reason that President Trump is such a strong believer in tariffs.  He sees them as the stick to achieve his goals.  I would argue there are two goals in sight.  With Canada and Mexico, he is still unsatisfied with their efforts on the border and with fentanyl smuggling and is very keen to push that to completion.  However, the broader goal is to return manufacturing to America from its decampment overseas, mostly to Southeast Asia, during the past forty years.  And remember, he is seeking to implement a carrot as well, looking to cut corporate taxes to 15% going forward, which would put the US in the lowest quartile of corporate tax rates in the world.  While this morning the headlines are all about the tariffs and their potential destruction, just yesterday, Taiwan Semiconductor announced they would be investing $100 billion to build new fabrication plants in Arizona.  That is exactly the response Trump is seeking.

We all recognize that the world today is very different than it was even two months ago as President Trump has taken an extraordinary number of steps to implement the ideas upon which he was elected.  Interestingly, a large majority of the public remains strongly in his camp with approval ratings for many of his policies well above 60% and as high as 80%.  While markets are clearly unhappy as they have no idea how things will play out, and companies are now faced with far more uncertainty as they attempt to plan for their future, there is no reason to believe this process is going to change anytime soon.  

Keep one other thing in mind, unlike Trump’s first term in office, where he was constantly touting the strength of the stock market as a vote of confidence, this time around he and Treasury Secretary Bessent have been entirely focused on the 10-year yield and getting that rate down.  After a 7bp decline yesterday, he has been successful there. (see chart below) I would be surprised if Trump speaks about the stock market much at all for a while.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With that in mind, let’s see how markets have been handling the tariff imposition.  After yesterday’s rout in the US, where a higher open morphed into a sharply lower close on the day, we saw red throughout Asia (Nikkei -1.2%, Hang Seng -0.3%, CSI 300 -0.1%) and Europe (DAX -2.1%, CAC -1.2%, IBEX -2.3%).  In fact, it is far harder to find a market that has rallied at all, although US futures at this hour (6:40) are pointing slightly higher.  However, after the sharp declines, an early bounce is not uncommon though not necessarily a harbinger of activity for the day.  All of this makes sense as public companies are likely going to see impacts on their profitability either because of reduced sales or reduced margins, or both, with tariffs now in place.  (Well, private companies are going to feel the same pressures, but there are no markets for them to worry about.). The worry for investors is given the extremely high price multiples that currently exist across so many companies, margin pressures can be problematic for stock prices.  For the near term, it is easy to make the case that equities have further to fall.

In the bond market, after yesterday’s Treasury yield decline, there has been a modest 1bp bounce, although as per the above chart, the trend remains lower.  In Europe, the news just hit the tape that the Eurozone is creating a plan to rearm the continent allowing for European countries to exceed debt restrictions to enable them to borrow and spend the money on this task.  The mooted amount is €800 billion, meaning that markets can expect that much new debt issuance across the continent in the coming months and years.  However, it appears investors are viewing the situation overall and are far more concerned with potential slowing growth than on increased issuance as yields have slipped one or two basis points across all nations in Europe.  Perhaps that is a signal that there is little belief in the likelihood of this new plan coming to fruition.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.4%) continues its slide as a combination of worries over future growth due to the US tariffs and the OPEC+ announcement that they would start to bring production back online beginning in April (just 138K bbl/day, but the signal is quite clear that more is on the way) has traders unnerved.  Certainly, this is part of what President Trump is seeking, lower oil prices to help keep a lid on inflation, and there is no doubt he has pressured OPEC+ on the issue.  Remember, too, that if gasoline prices fall at the pump, that is a key driver of inflation perceptions for everyone.  As to the metals markets, we are seeing a split this morning with precious (Au +1.0%, Ag +0.65%) rallying on uncertainty and fear while copper (-1.2%) seems to be suffering on recession fears.

Finally, the dollar is lower again this morning with the DXY breaking back below 106 for the first time since early December as a signal of the broad trend.  This is interesting as the textbooks claim that if the US imposes tariffs, the dollar will strengthen, or more accurately other currencies will weaken, to offset those tariffs, and yet this morning CNY (+0.55%) and CAD (+0.45%) are bucking that trend although MXN (-0.2%) is behaving as most would expect.  But the dollar’s weakness is broad based, and my take is given the movement in interest rates, which are suddenly declining far more rapidly than anticipated just a week ago (Fed funds futures are now pricing in 75bps of cuts this year with a 11% probability of a cut in March, up from 2% last week) the dollar bull case is under real pressure.  I have maintained all along that if the Fed reignited their easing policy, the dollar would suffer.  Funnily enough, despite any angst between Chairman Powell (remember him?) and President Trump, they both may see lower rates as their preferred outcome.  In that case, the dollar has further to fall.

There is no hard data set to be released today although we do hear from NY Fed President Williams this afternoon.  This could be the first hint that the Fed’s caution is abating, and further rate cuts are in store.  Of course, with Powell on the calendar for Friday, if there is a change in tone, most market participants will be waiting to hear it from him.

The watchword has shifted from caution to uncertainty.  The tariffs have thrown sand into the gears of the economy and markets.  It remains to be seen how much impact they will have, but for now, fear is rising although the dollar is not following suit.  I think Trump must be happy, but I’m not sure how many in the markets are.

Good luck

Adf

I Am Your Savior

Investors are showing concern
‘Bout tariffs and Trump, so they spurn
The riskiest stuff
But that’s not enough
To help generate a return
 
Seems most of the holdings in favor
Are no longer risk takers’ flavor
How long before Jay
Will finally say
QE is here, I am your savior

 

Have you bailed out on your risk exposures yet?  Because if not, it certainly seems you are behind the curve!  At least, that’s what it feels like this morning as trepidation underlies every player’s market activity.  Based on the commentary, as well as the Fear & Greed Index, you might think we are in a depression!

Source: cnn.com

But are things really that bad?  I know that the past week has seen a modest drawdown in equity prices, but after all, on February 20th, they reached yet another new all-time high, at least as per the S&P 500.  Since then, as you can see below, the decline has been less than 5%.  And while the market has traded below its 50-day moving average (blue line), a key technical indicator, it remains well above both the 200-day version of the same (purple line) and the longer-term trend line.  My point is it feels like the narrative is overstating the magnitude of the move thus far.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Is this the beginning of the end?  While you can never rule that out, as major corrections can occur at any time, I have no reason to believe this will be the case.  Much has been made of yesterday’s Initial Claims print at 242K, much higher than forecast as a harbinger of future economic weakness.  However, looking at the past 3 years of weekly data here, while certainly in the upper levels of readings, it is not nearly the only occurrence and not nearly the highest reading.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One data point does not make a trend and to my eye, looking at this chart, there is no discernible trend in either direction.  Yet part of the narrative evolution is that the DOGE cuts in government jobs, along with all the headline spending cuts, is setting the economy up for much slower growth in the short run.

In fact, this issue goes back to one about which I wrote several days ago here regarding the impact of government spending on actual economic activity.  The current view of economic activity includes government spending.  If President Trump’s goal is to reduce that spending, regardless of the net long-term benefits of such actions, GDP readings are going to decline initially.  Yes, there will be more productive use of capital with less regulation and less government, but that will take some time to become evident.  In the meantime, weaker economic activity is likely to be the outcome.

I have frequently written that there has not been a market clearing event since, arguably, October 1987, when equity markets plunged and erased significant excess and speculation.  Alas, newly minted (at the time) Fed Chair Greenspan stepped in and promised to support markets with ample liquidity the next day which opened the way for far more Fed intervention in markets leading up to Ben Bernanke and the first QE programs in the wake of the GFC in 2009 and every QE version since then.  While the movement so far does not remotely indicate the end of the world, based on the Fed’s history, once equity markets correct about 20%, they tend to become far more active in supporting the markets economy.  Will this time be different?  Given the Fed’s seeming underlying desperation to cut rates to begin with, my take is if the correction reaches 15% – 20%, we will see just that.

To sum things up, risk assets are under pressure on the basis of 1) excessive valuations, 2) the Trump efforts to reduce wasteful spending (which while wasteful is still spending and counted as economic activity), and 3) the idea that Trump’s imposition of tariffs is going to dramatically raise inflation and slow growth further.  Given the mainstream media’s inherent hatred of the president, they will certainly be playing up this theme for as long as they can as they try to force Trump to change tack.  But Trump, and Treasury Secretary Bessent, have been clear that their concern is 10-year bond yields, and getting them to lower levels.  A natural corollary of the current risk-off sentiment is that bond yields tend to decline.   Look at the chart below which shows that since Trump’s inauguration, 10-year yields are down nearly 40bps.  I would argue that Trump and Bessent are perfectly comfortable with the market right now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, let’s move on to the overnight activity.  Sticking to the bond theme, while Treasuries, this morning, are unchanged, they did decline all yesterday afternoon and this morning European sovereigns are all lower by -2bps.  As well, JGB yields have also slipped by -3bps as we are seeing risk aversion evident all around the world.  Of course, the problem with all G10 nations (Germany excepted) is that they all have very high debt/GDP ratios and in Europe, especially, this is a problem as they have begun to realize they need to spend a great deal more on defense than they have in the past.  And all that spending is going to be funded by more borrowing.  The tension between additional issuance driving yields higher and risk aversion driving yields lower is going to be the theme of European bond markets for a while.

In the equity world, it is not a pretty picture anywhere in the world.  After yesterday’s US rout, with the NASDAQ (-2.8%) leading the way lower, Asian bourses were all in the red.  Japan (-2.9%), Hong Kong (-3.3%), China (-2.0%), Korea (-3.4%), India (-1.9%)… the list goes on across the entire region with only New Zealand (+0.5%) bucking the trend on some better than expected local earnings and consumer confidence data.  European markets, though, are in a bit better shape as they suffered yesterday and are consolidating those losses this morning with most markets trading +/- 0.3% on the session.  We have seen a lot of European inflation data this morning, most of it lower than forecast which has encouraged the view that the ECB will be cutting rates more aggressively going forward.  US futures, too, are higher at this hour (7:00), on the order of 0.5% as they bounce from yesterday’s, and truly the past week’s, declines.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.25%) is back under pressure and back under $70/bbl.  The latest fear is that slowing economic activity around the world will reduce demand for the black sticky stuff and drive prices lower still.  Remember this, oil supply is restricted not by geology, but by politics.  As nations determine that cheaper energy is critical to their future, expect to see more effort to produce more oil.  Meanwhile, metals markets are also under pressure with gold (-0.5%) still falling despite its ostensible risk profile.  However, the barbarous relic remains well above $2800/oz and I continue to believe that this correction is just that, and not the reversal of a trend.  Too many things are happening around the world to induce more fear and in that scenario, gold is the oldest store of value around.  The rest of the metals complex is also under pressure with copper (-1.2%) slipping back a bit.  It is important to remember, though, that despite the recent declines, all the major metals are still nicely higher on the month.  

Finally, the dollar is a bit firmer again this morning after a rally yesterday as well.  In classic risk-off fashion, investors flocked to the dollar, arguably to buy Treasuries.  So, we are seeing weakness in NZD (-0.6%), JPY (-0.4%) and CHF (-0.3%) in the G10 and weakness in KRW (-0.5%), ZAR (-0.2%) amongst others in the EMG bloc.  Here the story remains the impacts of Trump’s tariffs and how they will be applied, if they will be applied, as well as a general fear factor which tends to help the dollar.  Consider, too, ideas that the ECB is going to cut rates will not help the single currency.

On the data front, this morning brings Personal Income (exp +0.3%), Personal Spending (0.1%), and the PCE data where Headline (0.3%, 2.5% Y/Y) and Core (0.3%, 2.6% Y/Y) will be the most important data points.  As well, we will see Chicago PMI (40.6) which has been below 50.0 in every month but one since August 2022.  

There is no question that the economic data has been softening lately.  We saw that with the Citi Surprise Index as well as the continuous stream of commentary by the economic bears who point to underlying pieces of data that point in that direction (whether housing or employment indicators and the recent weak PMI data).  

Consider this, an early recession in Trump’s term can be blamed on the Biden administration as well as set things up for future growth, certainly in time for the mid-term elections.  As well, it will likely help reduce the yield on the 10-year, an explicit goal.  This scenario likely means short-term weakness with an eye to longer term growth.  The dollar is likely to benefit early on, at least until the Fed steps in.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Eyes Like a Bat

The new Mr Yen
Is watching for excess moves
With eyes like a bat

 

While every day of this Trump presidency is filled with remarkable activity at the US government level, financial markets are starting to tune out the noise.  Yes, each pronouncement may well be important to some part of the market structure, but the sheer volume of activity is overwhelming investment views.  The result is that while markets are still trading, there seem to be fewer specific drivers of activity.  Consider the fact that tariffs have been on everyone’s mind since Trump’s inauguration, but nobody, yet, has any idea how they will impact the global macro situation.  Are they inflationary?  Will sellers reduce margins?  Will there be a strong backlash by the US consumer?  None of this is known and so trading the commentary is virtually impossible.

With that in mind, it is worth turning our attention this morning to Japan, where the yen (-0.4%) has been steadily climbing in value, although not this morning, since the beginning of the year as you can see from the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Amongst G10 currencies, the yen is the top performer thus far year-to-date, rising about 5%.  Arguably, the key driver here has been the ongoing narrative that the BOJ is going to continue to tighten monetary policy while the Fed, as discussed yesterday, is still assumed to be cutting rates later in the year.  

Let’s consider both sides of that equation.  Starting with the Fed, just yesterday Atlanta Fed president Bostic explained to a housing conference, “we need to stay where we are.  We need to be in a restrictive posture.”  Now, I cannot believe the folks at the conference were thrilled with that message as the housing market has been desperate for lower rates amid slowing sales and building activity.  But back to the FX perspective, what if the Fed is not going to cut this year?  It strikes me that will have an impact on the narrative, and by extension, on market pricing.

Meanwhile, Atsushi Mimura, the vice finance minister for international affairs (a position known colloquially to the market as Mr Yen) explained, when asked about the current market narrative regarding the BOJ’s recent comments and their impact on the yen, said, “there is no gap with my view.  Amid high uncertainty, we have to keep watching the impact of any speculative trading on, not only the exchange market, but also financial markets overall.”  

If I were to try to describe the current market narrative on the yen, it would be that further yen strength is likely based on the assumed future narrowing of interest rate differentials between the US and Japan.  That has been reinforced by Ueda-san’s comments that they expect to continue to ‘normalize’ policy rates, i.e. raise them, if the economy continues to perform well and if inflation remains stably at or above their 2% target.  With that in mind, a look at the below chart of Japanese core inflation shows that it has been above 2.0% since April 2022.  That seems pretty stable to me, but then I am just a poet.

Source: tradingecomnomics.com

Adding it all up, I feel far better about the Japanese continuing to slowly tighten monetary policy as they have a solid macro backdrop with inflation clearly too high and looking like it may be trending a bit higher.  However, the other side of the equation is far more suspect, as while the market is pricing in rate cuts this year, recent Fed commentary continues to maintain that the current level of rates is necessary to wring the last drops of inflation out of the economy.

There is a caveat to this, though, and that is the gathering concern that the US economy is getting set to fall off a cliff.  While that may be a bit hyperbolic, I do continue to read pundits who are making the case that the data is starting to slip and if the Fed is not going to be cutting rates, things could get worse.  In fairness to that viewpoint, the Citi Surprise Index is pointing lower and has been declining since the beginning of December, meaning that the data releases in the US have underperformed expectations for the past two months. (see below)

Source: cbonds.com

However, a look at the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate shows that Q1 is still on track for growth of 2.3%, not gangbusters, but still quite solid and a long way from recession.  I think we will need to see substantially weaker data than we have to date to get the Fed to change their wait-and-see mode, and remember, employment is a lagging indicator, so waiting for that to rise will take even longer.  For now, I think marginal further yen strength is the most likely outcome as we will need a big change in the US to alter current Fed policy.

Ok, let’s see how markets have behaved overnight.  Yesterday saw a reversal of recent US equity performance with the DJIA slipping while the NASDAQ rallied, although neither moved that far.  In Asia, the Nikkei (+0.3%) edged higher as did the CSI 300 (+0.2%) although the Hang Seng (-0.3%) gave back a small portion of yesterday’s outsized gains.  The rest of the region, though, was under more significant pressure with Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all seeing their main indices decline by more than -1.0%.  In Europe, red is the most common color on the screen with one exception, the UK (+0.35%) where there is talk of resurrecting free trade talks between the US and UK.  But otherwise, weakness is the theme amid mediocre secondary data and growing concern over US tariffs.  Finally, US futures are nicely higher this morning after Nvidia’s earnings were quite solid.

In the bond market, Treasury yields (+4bps) have backed up off their recent lows but remain in their recent downtrend.  Traders keep trying to ascertain the impacts of Trump’s policies and whether DOGE will be able to find substantial budget cuts or not with opinions on both sides of the debate widely espoused.  European sovereign yields have edged higher this morning, up 2bps pretty much across the board, arguably responding to the growing recognition that Europe will be issuing far more debt going forward to fund their own defensive needs.  And JGB yields (+4bps) rose after the commentary above.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.1%) is bouncing after a multi-day decline although it remains below that $70/bbl level.  The latest news is that Trump is reversing his stance on Venezuela as the nation refuses to take back its criminal aliens.  Meanwhile, gold (-1.1%) is in the midst of its first serious correction in the past two months, down a bit more than 2% from its recent highs, and trading quite poorly.  There continue to be questions regarding tariffs and whether gold imports will be subject to them, as well as the ongoing arbitrage story between NY and London markets.  However, the underlying driver of the barbarous relic remains a growing concern over increased riskiness in markets and rising inflation amid the ongoing deglobalization we are observing.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer overall vs. its G10 counterparts, with the yen decline the biggest in the bloc.  However, we are seeing EMG currency weakness with most of the major currencies in this bloc lower by -0.3% to -0.5% on the session.  In this case, I think the growing understanding that the Fed is not cutting rates soon, as well as concerns over tariff implementation, is going to keep pressure on this entire group of currencies.

On the data front, we see the weekly Initial (exp 221K) and Continuing (1870K) Claims as well as Durable Goods (2.0%, 0.3% ex Transport) and finally the second look at Q4 GDP (2.3%) along with the Real Consumer Spending piece (4.2%).  Four Fed speakers are on the calendar, Barr, Bostic, Hammack and Harker, but again, as we heard from Mr Bostic above, they seem pretty comfortable watching and waiting for now.

While I continue to believe the yen will grind slowly higher, the rest of the currency world seems likely to have a much tougher time unless we see something like a Mar-a Lago Accord designed to weaken the dollar overall.  Absent that, it is hard to see organic weakness of any magnitude, although that doesn’t mean the dollar will rise.  We could simply chop around on headlines until the next important shift in policy is evident.

Good luck

Adf

As It’s Been Wrote

Though China would have you believe
Their goals, they are set to achieve
Their banks are in trouble
From their housing bubble
So capital, now, they’ll receive
 
Meanwhile, with Ukraine there’s a deal
For mineral wealth that’s a steal
This will help the peace
If war there does cease
And so, it has broader appeal
 
But really, the thing to denote
Is everything is anecdote
The data don’t matter
Unless it can flatter
The narrative as it’s been wrote

 

Confusion continues to be the watchword in financial markets as it is very difficult to keep up with the constant changes in the narrative and announcements on any number of subjects.  And traders are at a loss to make sense of the situation.  This is evidenced by the breakdown in previously strong correlations between different markets and ostensibly critical data for those markets.  

For example, inflation expectations continue to rise, at least as per the University of Michigan surveys, with last week’s result coming in at 4.3% for one year and 3.5% for 5 years.  And yet, Treasury yields continue to fall in the back end of the curve, with 10-year Treasury yields lower by nearly 15bps since that report was released on Friday.  So, which is it?  Is the data a better reflection of things?  Or is market pricing foretelling the future?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

At the same time, the Fed funds futures market is now pricing in 55bps of cuts this year, up from just 29bps a few weeks ago.  Is this reflective of concerns over economic growth?  And how does this jibe with the rising inflation expectations?  

Source: cmegroup.com

If risk is a concern, why is the price of gold declining?  

Source: cnn.com

My point is right now, at least, many of the relationships that markets and investors have relied upon in the past seem to be broken.  They could revert to form, or perhaps this is a new paradigm.  In fact, that is the point, there is no clear pathway.

Sometimes a better way to view these things is to look at policy actions at the country level as they reflect a government’s major concerns.  I couldn’t help but notice in Bloomberg this morning the story that the Chinese government is going to be injecting at least $55 billion of equity into their large banks.  Now, government capital injections are hardly a sign of a strong industry, regardless of the spin.  This highlights the fact that Chinese banks remain in difficult straits from the ongoing property market woes and so, are clearly not lending to industry in the manner that the government would like to see.  I’m not sure how injecting capital into large banks that lend to SOE’s is helping the consumer in China, which allegedly has been one of their goals, but regardless, actions speak louder than words.  Clearly the Chinese remain concerned over the health of their economy and are doing more things to support it.  As it happens, this helped equity markets there last night with the Hang Seng (+3.3%) ripping higher with mainland shares (+0.9%) following along as well.  Will it last?  Great question.

Another interesting story that seems at odds with what the narrative, or at least quite a few headlines, proclaimed, is that the US and Ukraine have reached a deal for the US to have access to Ukrainian rare earth minerals once the fighting stops.  The terms of this deal are unclear, but despite President Zelensky’s constant protests that he will not partake in peace talks, it appears that this is one of the steps necessary for the US to let him into the conversation.  Now, is peace a benefit for the markets?  Arguably, it is beneficial for lowering inflation as the one thing we know about war is it is inflationary.  If peace is coming soon, how much will that help the Eurozone economy, which remains in the doldrums, and the euro?  Will it lower energy prices as sanctions on Russian oil and gas disappear?  Or will keeping the peace become a huge expense for Europe and not allow them to focus on their domestic issues?

Again, my point is that there are far more things happening that add little clarity to market narratives, and in some cases, result in price action that is not consistent with previous relationships.  With this I return to my preaching that the only thing we can truly anticipate is increased volatility across markets.

With that in mind, let’s consider what happened overnight.  First, US markets had another weak session, with the NASDAQ particularly under pressure.  (I half expect the Fed to put forth an emergency rate cut to support the stock market.)  As to Asian markets, that Chinese news was well received almost everywhere except Japan (Nikkei -0.25%) as most other markets gained on the idea that Chinese stimulus would help their economies.  As such, we saw gains virtually across the board in Asia.  Similarly, European bourses are all feeling terrific this morning with the UK (+0.6%) the laggard and virtually every continental exchange higher by more than 1%.  Apparently, the Ukraine/US mineral rights deal has traders and investors bidding up shares for the peace dividend.  Too, US futures are higher at this hour, about 0.5% or so across the board.

As to bond yields, after a sharp decline in Treasury yields over the past two sessions, this morning, the 10-year is higher by 1bp, consolidating that move.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields are all slipping between -2bps and -4bps as the peace dividend gets priced in there as well.  While European governments may be miffed they have not been part of the peace talks, clearly investors are happy.  Also, JGB yields, which didn’t move overnight, need to be noted as having fallen nearly 10bps in the past week as the narrative of ever tighter BOJ policy starts to slip a bit.  While the yen has held its own, and USDJPY remains just below 150, it appears that for now, the market is taking a respite.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.25% today, -2.0% yesterday) has convincingly broken below the $70/bbl level as this market clearly expects more Russian oil to freely be available.  OPEC+ had discussed reducing their cuts in H2 this year, but if the price of oil continues to slide, I expect that will be changed as well.  Certainly, declining oil prices will be a driver for lower inflation, arguably one of the reasons that Treasury yields are falling.  So, some things still make some sense.  As to the metals markets, gold (-0.2%) still has a hangover from yesterday’s sharp sell-off, although there have been myriad reasons put forth for that movement.  Less global risk with Ukraine peace or falling inflation on the back of oil prices or suddenly less concern over the status of the gold in Ft Knox, pick your poison.  Silver is little changed this morning but copper, which had been following gold closely, has jumped 2.7% this morning after President Trump turned his attention to the red metal for tariff treatment.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning, recouping most of yesterday’s losses.  G10 currencies are lower by between -0.1% (GBP) and -0.5% (AUD) with the entire bloc under pressure.  In the EMG space, only CLP (+0.45%) is managing any strength based on its tight correlation to the copper price.  But otherwise, most of these currencies have slipped in the -0.1% to -0.3% range.

On the data front, New Home Sales (exp 680K) is the only hard data although we do see the EIA oil inventory numbers with a small build expected.  Richmond Fed president Barkin speaks again, but as we have seen lately, the Fed’s comments have ceased to be market moving.  President Trump’s policy announcements are clearly the primary market mover these days.

Quite frankly, it is very difficult to observe the ongoing situation and have a strong market view in either direction.  There are too many variables or perhaps, as Donald Rumsfeld once explained, too many unknown unknowns.  Who can say what Trump’s next target will be and how that will impact any particular market.  In fact, this points back to my strong support for consistent hedging programs to help reduce volatility in one’s financial reporting.

Good luck

Adf

Confusion

Confusion continues to reign
O’er markets though pundits will feign
That they understand
The movements at hand
Despite a quite rocky terrain
 
The speed with which Trump changes views
Can even, the algos, confuse
The pluses, I think
Are traders must shrink
Positions, elsewise pay high dues

 

For the longest time I believed that the algos were going to usurp all trading activity as their ability to respond to news was so much faster than any human.  Certainly, this has been the key to success for major trading firms like Citadel and Virtu Financial.  And they have been very successful.  I think part of their success has been that we have been in an environment where both implied and actual volatility has declined in a secular manner, so not only could they respond quickly, but they could lever up their positions with impunity as the probability of a large reversal was relatively less.

However, I believe that the algos and their owners may have met their match in Donald Trump.  Never before has someone been so powerful and yet so chaotic in his approach to very important things.  Many pundits complain that even he doesn’t have a plan when he announces a new policy.  But I think that’s his secret, keep everyone else off balance and then he has free reign.  Chaos is the goal.

The market impact of this is that basically, for the past three months since shortly after his election, the major asset classes of stocks, bonds and the dollar, have chopped around a lot, but not moved anywhere at all.  How can they as nobody seems willing to believe that the end game he has explained; reduced deficits, reduced trade balance, lower inflation and a strong military presence throughout the Western Hemisphere, is going to result from his actions.  And in fairness, some of the actions do have a random quality to them.  But if we have learned nothing from President Trump’s time in office, including his first term, it is that he is very willing to tell us what he is going to do.  It just seems that most folks don’t believe he can do it so don’t take it seriously.

So, let’s look at how markets have behaved in the past three months.  The noteworthy result is that the net movement over that period has been virtually nil.  Look at the charts below from tradingeconomics.com:

S&P 500

10-Year Treasury

EUR/USD

While all these markets have moved higher and lower in the intervening period, they have not gone anywhere at all.  The biggest mover over this time is the euro, which has rallied 0.54% with the other major markets showing far less movement than that.

One interesting phenomenon of this price action is that despite significant uncertainty over policy actions by the President and the implications they may have on markets, and even though recent price action can best be described as choppy rather than trend like, the VIX Index remains in the lowest quartile of its long-term range. Certainly, it has risen slightly over the past few weeks, but to my eye, it looks like it is underpricing the chaos yet to come.  

Source Bloomberg.com

While I have no clearer idea how things will unfold than anyone else, other than I have a certain amount of faith that the President will achieve many of his goals in one way or another, I am definitely of the belief that volatility is going to be the coin of the realm for quite a while going forward.  We have spent the past many years with numerous strategies created to enhance returns via selling volatility, either shorting options or levering up, and that is the trend that seems likely to change going forward.  The implication for hedgers is that maintaining hedge ratios while having a plan in place is going to be more important than any time in the past decade or more.

Ok, let’s take a look at how markets did move overnight.  Yesterday’s net negative session in the US was followed by similar price action in Asia.  Tokyo (-1.4%), Hong Kong (-1.35) and China (-1.1%) all suffered on stories about tariffs and extra efforts by the Trump administration to tighten up export controls on semiconductors.  It should be no surprise that virtually every index in Asia followed suit with losses between -0.3% (Singapore) and -2.4% (Indonesia) and everywhere in between.  Meanwhile, in Europe, the picture is not as dour as there are a few winners (Spain +0.9% and Italy +0.5%) although the rest of the continent is struggling to break even.  The data point that is receiving the most press is Eurozone Negotiated Wage Growth (+4.12%) which rose less than in Q3 and has encouraged many to believe the ECB will be cutting rates next week.  Interestingly, Joachim Nagel, Bundesbank president was on the tape telling the rest of the ECB to shut up about their expectations of future rate moves as there is still far too much uncertainty and decisions need to be made on a meeting-by-meeting basis.  Apparently, oversharing is a general central bank affliction, not merely a Fed problem.  As to US stocks, at this hour (6:50) they are little changed.

In the bond market, yields continue to slide, at least in the US, with Treasury yields down -6bps this morning and back to levels last seen in December.  Apparently, some investors are beginning to believe Secretary Bessent regarding his goal to drive yields lower.  As well, he has reconfirmed that there will be no major increase in the issuance of long-dated paper for now.  European sovereigns, though, are little changed this morning with only UK gilts (-3bps) showing any movement after the CBI Trades report printed at -23, a bit less bad than expected.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.15%) is little changed this morning after a very modest rally yesterday.  But the reality here is that oil, like other markets, has been in a trading range rather than trending, although my take is that the longer-term view could be a bit lower.  Gold (-0.35%), though lower this morning, is the one market that has shown a trend since Trump’s election, and truthfully since well before that as you can see in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, with both the euro and pound rising 0.3% alongside the CHF (+0.3%) and JPY (+0.2%). Commodity currencies, though, are less robust with very minor losses seen in MXN, ZAR and CLP.  Given the decline in 10-year yields, I am not that surprised at the dollar’s weakness although it is in opposition to the gut reaction that tariffs mean a higher dollar.  This is of interest because yesterday President Trump confirmed that the 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico were going into effect next week.  As I explained above, it is very difficult to get a sense of short-term price action here although given the clear intent of the president to improve the competitiveness of US exporters, he would certainly like to see the dollar decline further.  

It is very interesting to watch this president reduce the power of the Fed with words and not even have to attack the Chairman like he did in his first term.  It will be very interesting to see how Chair Powell responds to the ongoing machinations.

On the data front, this morning brings only the Case-Shiller Home Price Index (exp +4.4%) and Consumer Confidence (102.5).  We do hear from two Fed speakers, Barr and Barkin, but as I keep explaining, their words matter less each day. (It must be driving them crazy!)

It is hard to get excited about markets here.  There is no directional bias right now and the lack of critical data adds to the lack of information.  As well, given the mercurial nature of President Trump’s activities, we are always one tape bomb away from a complete reversal.  While I don’t see the dollar collapsing, perhaps the next short-term wave is for further dollar weakness.  

Good luck

Adf

Scapegoated

The people of Germany voted
With Friedrich Merz, at last, promoted
The nation, to lead
Though sure to misread
The sitch, with the Right still scapegoated

 

The result of the German Federal elections was very much as expected, the CDU/CSU won 28.5% of the votes and the largest share while AfD garnered 20.8%, the SPD just 16.4% (it’s worst showing in modern times) and the Greens gaining 11.6%.  A tail of other mostly very left-leaning parties made up the balance.  However, one cannot look at a map of the distribution of votes without noticing that the part of the country that was East Germany prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall, still sees things very differently than the rest of the nation.

Source: Reuters.com

Regardless of the distribution, however, the outcome will result in some sort of coalition government, almost certainly to be a combination of the CDU and SPD.  On the surface, it would seem this left-right coalition will be doomed to failure, and that could well be the case, but because the consensus amongst the ‘right-thinking’ people in politics is that AfD is the devil incarnate, or perhaps more accurately, Hitler incarnate, Herr Merz will not be able to rule with a sure majority of conservative voters.

As with virtually every election, the economy is a top priority of the voters, especially since GDP growth, as measured, has essentially been zero for the past three years as per the below chart, and is mooted to stay there on present policies.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One of the key issues that is currently under discussion there is the constitutionally enshrined ‘debt-brake’ which prevents the German government from running deficits of greater than 0.35% of GDP in any fiscal year.  In order to change the constitution, there needs to be a 2/3’s approval in the Bundestag, but AfD holds a blocking minority and one of their policy platforms has been fiscal prudence.

Arguably, this begs a larger question, what exactly constitutes economic growth?  For instance, if government debt is rising more quickly than economic output, is that actually a growing economy?  And is that process sustainable going forward?  It is quite interesting to look at the government debt dynamics of different nations and ask that question, especially since Germany’s situation really stands out.  

Perhaps, after looking at this group of charts, it is worth reevaluating exactly how much actual growth has been occurring and how much economic activity has simply been government borrowing recycled into the economy across all these nations.  Of course, this process has not been restricted to G-7 nations, it is a global phenomenon, with China doing exactly the same thing as are virtually all nations.  In fact, Germany is unique amongst large nations for bucking the trend.

The reason this issue matters is there is a limit to how far a government can increase its leverage ratio.  At some point, investors will stop buying debt which will force the central bank to buy the debt.  Of course, they will do so by printing more money and devaluing the currency.  We know this because we have seen it happen before many times throughout history with Germany’s Weimar Republic in 1923, Argentina in the 1980’s and Zimbabwe in 2007-2008 as just the most recent examples.  In fact, the reason the Germans have the debt brake is that there is a national memory of that hyperinflation from a century ago.

Circling back to the growth question, what is it that constitutes economic growth?  If you remember your college macroeconomics classes, this is the equation that is used to calculate economic activity in an economy:

            Y = C + I + G + NX

Where:

Y = GDP

C = Consumption

I = Investment

G = Government spending

NX = Net Exports

This equation is taken as gospel in the economics and political worlds.  However, it is not often recalled that it was created in the 1930’s by John Maynard Keynes.  It is not a law of nature, but merely was Keynes’ way of expressing something that had not been effectively measured previously.  Nearly 100 years later, though, perhaps it is time to reevaluate the process.  Remember, economies grew prior to Keynes creating this equation when government activity was a much smaller proportion of the economy.  But as we can see by the dramatic rise in government debt, that is no longer the case.  Perhaps Germany is a peek behind the GDP curtain that shows absent constantly increasing government borrowing, economic growth is stagnant.  Neil Howe’s Fourth Turning could well be the conclusion of this period of government excess, where things will be extremely volatile during the change, but less government will be the norm on the other side, at least for a few generations!

Ok, sorry for the history and theoretical discussion, but that chart of German government debt vs. the rest of the world was really eye-opening.  Let’s turn to markets from the overnight session.

After Friday’s sharp downward movement in the US, the picture in Asia was far more mixed.  Japan (+0.25%) managed a small gain while Hong Kong (-0.6%) and China (-0.2%) both lagged.  Elsewhere in the region, New Zealand (-1.8%) stood out for its weakness, although Korea, India and Taiwan were all softer in the session as well.  Ironically, it seems that better than expected Retail Sales data in NZ hurt sentiment for further policy ease by the RBNZ and concerns over trade with China given US pronouncements is also hurting the situation there, at least for today.

In Europe, Germany’s DAX (+0.9%) is leading the way higher after IfO Expectation data was released a touch better than forecast at 85.4.  However, it is important to remember that while this was a positive outcome, the average reading prior to Covid was between 95 and 103.  As to the rest of Europe, there are more gainers than laggards but little of real note absent any other data.  US futures at this hour (7:00) are pointing higher by at least 0.5% across the board.

In the bond market, Friday saw a very sharp decline in yields, -10bps in Treasuries, after weak readings in the Flash PMI data, especially services at 49.7, Existing Home Sales and Michigan sentiment.  That helped bring global yields lower.  This morning, Treasuries have bounced just 1bp and we are seeing similar rises in most of Europe.  JGB yields are also unchanged and have continued to consolidate near recent highs.

In the commodity markets, after a sharp sell-off on Friday on the back of stories about increased supply from Kurdistan, oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning.  Meanwhile gold (+0.5%) is rebounding from its regular Friday sell-off, almost as though there were efforts by some to depress the price at the end of every week.  It will be interesting to see what happens this Friday which is month end as well.  As to silver and copper, they are little changed and dull this morning.

Finally, the dollar is asleep this morning, with very limited movement vs. almost any of its counterparts.  USDJPY remains below 150, but the yen has actually fallen -0.3% on the session, while the biggest movers are in Eastern Europe (CZK +0.8%, HUF +0.4%, PLN +0.35%), perhaps on the back of the German election results offering hope for a more useful German government.  We shall see about that.  Otherwise, nobody is concerned over the dollar right now.

On the data front this week, it is a quiet one with PCE data the highlight on Friday.

TodayChicago Fed Natl Activity0.21
TuesdayCase Shiller Home Prices4.4%
 Consumer Confidence103.0
WednesdayNew Home Sales680K
ThursdayInitial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1874K
 Q4 GDP (2nd look)2.3%
 Real Consumer Spending4.2%
 Durable Goods2.5%
 -ex Transport0.3%
FridayPersonal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.2%
 PCE0.3% (2.5% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.3% (2.6% Y/Y)
 Chicago PMI41.5

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to the data, we also hear from seven Fed speakers over 9 venues, but again, are they really going to change the cautious approach at this stage?  And does it even matter?  For now, financial markets are far more focused on President Trump and his cabinet’s activities than interest rate policy which seems set to remain in place for a while.

When it comes to the dollar, nothing has changed my perspective on relative interest rates in the front end, with US rates likely to be far stickier at current levels than others, but the back end has a potentially different outcome.  Recall that Bessent and Trump are focused on the 10-year yield and getting that lower and seem far less concerned over the Fed for now.  To achieve that they will need to demonstrate the ability to reduce spending and the deficit situation.  While a promising start has been seen with DOGE, we are still a long way from a balanced budget.  My take is the dollar, writ large, is going to take its cues from the 10-year yield for now, so bonds are the market to watch.  If we see yields head back toward 4.0%, the dollar will decline and any significant move higher in yields will likely see the dollar climb as well.

Good luck

Adf