Category Archives: Uncategorized

Smokin’

Posted on by

The GDP number was smokin’
As animal spirits have woken
The Core PCE
If higher than three
Could slay rate-cut talk that’s been spoken

Thus, if the Fed’s data dependent
The ‘conomy’s truly resplendent
So, please do explain
Why rate cuts are sane
Seems rates ought, instead, be ascendent

By now you are all aware that Q4 GDP was a significantly better than expected 3.3% SAAR, far above the 2.0% analyst forecasts and far above the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow readings.  For everyone who is looking for that recession, thus far it still appears to be somewhere further down the road.  At some point, it is certain, there will be a recession but the when is the big question.

Now, a different question would be what is driving the economic activity that we have seen?  That answer is far easier to determine as in the equation that defines economic growth: Y=C+I+G+NX (exports-imports), the variable that is growing most consistently is the G, government spending. Simply look at the size of the budget deficit. This is not to say that government spending is not growth as measured, just that it is not organic growth that feeds on itself.  It is the organic kind that is the sign of a healthy economy.  Government spending can be analogized as gaining weight but not growing stronger, i.e. getting fat.

Regardless, though, of the reasons for the growth, it is real in the sense that more activity is taking place.  This implies that demand continues to be robust.  Since this is the case, I would ask all those who are expecting the Fed to cut rates by May at the latest, but begging for a March rate cut, why do you think that is appropriate?

First off, another way to say data dependent is to call the Fed reactive.  This means that the Fed is explicitly going to be behind the curve and react to the data they see, they are not going to pre-empt expectations for future economic outcomes.  Back in the day, when Alan Greenspan was Fed chair, he would raise rates occasionally to head off what he thought was incipient inflation, but rate cuts were then, and have always been, reactive to problems in the economy.  That is why, generally, rate decline much faster than the rise.  This cycle was quite the exception but then Chairman Powell was in denial for a very long time before he figured out he had made a mistake.  It is this reason that I believe the Fed funds outcome is bimodal, that either there will be only one or two token cuts, or we will see 300bps or more as the economy craters.  Based on yesterday’s data, I’m still in the one cut camp this year as per my 2024 forecasts.

It is important to remember that the Fed’s dot plot is not the road map, per se, it is merely a compilation of each member’s individual forecasts.  But they are just that, forecasts, and as we saw with yesterday’s GDP number, FORECASTS ARE WRONG ALL THE TIME!  There is no reason to believe the Fed or its members, who have an atrocious forecasting record, know where things are going to be later this year, let alone in 2025 or 2026.

Back to my point, to drive it home; the Fed has explained they are going to be reactive to the data when it comes to setting policy rates.  So far, the data is pointing to continued solid, above trend, economic growth and the employment situation remains strong (Initial Claims at 200K, Unemployment Rate at 3.7%).  As well, inflation remains well above their target.  Once again, I will ask, why will they be cutting rates in H1?  If they do, it implies that things have gotten a whole lot worse in a hurry, and that, my friends, will not be a positive for risk assets.

Turning to the overnight session, after a solid equity market performance in the US, where all three major indices rallied a bit, Asia took a different path as both Japanese and Chinese shares fell 1.35% or more.  Apparently, the luster of the Chinese fiscal and market support has faded a bit, but that hasn’t stopped those who got long Japanese shares in that pairs trade I discussed yesterday, from continuing to sell.  Interestingly, the data overnight showed that Tokyo CPI, on every measure, was much softer than forecast implying that the BOJ has far less need to consider tightening policy in the near future.  I would have thought that would have helped Japanese shares, but not so much.  Europe, though, is having a much better day with the CAC (+2.1%) leading the way on the back of very strong results by LVMH, the luxury goods firm.  But all the indices are higher on the continent.  Alas, US futures are a bit softer at this hour (7:00), but only just and really it is the NASDAQ which has been lagging a bit.

In the bond market, activity has been muted everywhere as investors and traders around the world await this morning’s PCE data in the US.  Treasury yields, which slid a few bps yesterday, are unchanged on the day and European sovereigns are all seeing yields drift lower by between 1bp and 3bps.  Perhaps the least surprising move is JGB yields sliding 3bps overnight on the back of that Tokyo CPI data.  As an indication of what those numbers are like, Headline and Core both printed at 1.6% Y/Y, significantly below the December readings and the lowest in nearly two years.

While oil prices have backed off a bit this morning, -0.8%, they have had an excellent week, up nearly 5% on the back of the stronger showing in the US economy, the fiscal stimulus stories in China and the fact that Ukraine was able to successfully attack a Russian oil shipping facility, closing it down and reducing supply.  In the short-term, it does feel like there are more potential catalysts to drive this price higher, but the long-term question remains open.  As to the metals markets, they continue to do very little with marginal gains or losses on a day-to-day basis as we have been trendless in gold and copper for the past several months.  We will need to see some fundamental changes in the supply/demand equation to shake out of this lethargy, but that remains true in many markets.  Data of late is a Rorschach test as there always seems to be a data point to help someone justify their view, regardless of their view.  We need to see things align more clearly for a change in either direction.

Finally, the dollar, which has been grinding ever so slightly higher over the past month or two, is a bit softer overall this morning, roughly 0.3% across the board in both the G10 and EMG blocs.  Arguably, the most important data overnight was that Tokyo CPI, but the yen is actually unchanged on the session, lagging the euro and pound, but not responding very much.  Interestingly, despite oil’s decline, NOK is slightly firmer, so this is really a modest dollar weakness story for now.  Perhaps in anticipation of a soft PCE number?

So, let’s turn to the data today.  Everything comes at 8:30 and here are the consensus views right now: Personal Income (0.3%), Personal Spending (0.4%) PCE (0.2% M/M, 2.6% Y/Y), and most importantly, Core PCE (0.2% M/M, 3.0% Y/Y).  Much has been made of comments that Governor Waller made a few weeks ago which have been interpreted as ‘knowledge’ that the M/M number would be soft, 0.1%, dragging all the other indicators with it.  As well, Treasury Secretary Yellen ostensibly explained that the recession has been avoided and the soft landing achieved so inflation is no longer a problem.  And maybe that will be the case.  But inflation is a funny thing.  It is insidious and extremely difficult to remove from an economy as complex as the United States once it is embedded there.  I have no idea where today’s data will print, but I will say that my bias is that inflation is stickier than the rate cut advocates believe.

As to the market reaction, that is also very difficult to anticipate.  Yesterday in my assessment of what would occur in response to a hot number, I was right about the dollar and oil, but not about stocks and bonds, both of which rallied.  As of now, the Fed funds futures market continues to price a 50:50 chance of a March cut.  I feel like we will need to see a very soft number today to keep that stable.  And if the M/M number is 0.3%, I would expect that March probability to shrink rapidly.  However, for now, those looking for rate cuts remain on top in the game, and they will only give up their views kicking and screaming.  Keep your ears peeled.

Good luck and good weekend
Adf

Possibly Soaring

Posted on by

So far this week, things have been boring
With data or news not outpouring
But starting today
More stuff’s on the way
With GDP possibly soaring

As well, we’ll hear from M Lagarde
Who’s promised her backbone is hard
It’s too soon to cut
As there’s still a glut
Of funds spread all over the yard

Heading into this morning’s data releases, we have had remarkably little on which to focus this week.  Flash PMI data yesterday was modestly better than expected, although manufacturing is still trending in recession around Europe and Asia.  Perhaps the biggest surprise was in the US where the manufacturing print was a solid 50.3, the first time it has been above the boom/bust line since last April.  However, that was not enough to quicken any pulses.

You can tell how dull things have been by the fact that the biggest news yesterday came from the Fed regarding the BTFP.  The BTFP (Bank Term Funding Program), you may recall, is the facility the Fed invented last March in the wake of the collapse of Silicon Valley and Signature banks.  The idea was they would lend money to the banks without the banks taking a haircut on the value of the collateral, so lending 100% of the collateral’s face value despite the fact the bonds were trading at 75 cents on the dollar.  It was designed to tide over weak banks and ostensibly had less stigma than borrowing from the Fed’s Discount Window, which is supposed to tide over weak banks.  But the funding was cheaper given the collateral price adjustment and over time, it garnered about $110 billion in utilization.  However, last November, when the market decided that the Fed was going to cut rates aggressively in 2024, the funding formula for these loans fell substantially below the IOER that the Fed pays to banks, reaching a spread of 60bps.  So, banks started using the BTFP to earn risk free cash.  Well, the Fed got tired of that game and as of today, raised the cost of funding thus eliminating the arbitrage.  And that was the most interesting thing in the markets yesterday!

But that was then.  Now we get to look ahead to a few key pieces of information starting with US Q4 GDP’s first reading (exp 2.0%) as well as Durable Goods (1.1%, 0.2% ex transport) and Initial (200K) and Continuing (1828K) Claims data.  That will be followed by the ECB’s press conference at 8:45 where Madame Lagarde will be able to reiterate her strong views that despite a very weak Eurozone economy, they have not yet solved the inflation problem and they are not going to cut rates anytime soon.  I have ignored the ECB official decision time as there is a vanishingly small probability that they will adjust rates from the current 4.0% level.

The question for market participants is whether any of this will matter, or if we still need to see the next crucial information, tomorrow’s PCE data and, of course, the FOMC meeting and press conference next Wednesday.  My sense is that much will revolve around that GDP print.  The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow is forecasting a 2.4% print for Q4, still above the economists’ consensus, albeit not as far above as in Q3.  Given the market’s ongoing strong belief that the Fed is going to be aggressively cutting rates this year, an outcome at the GDPNow level or higher would certainly have a market impact, likely seeing a sell-off in bonds and a reduction in the probability of rate cuts going forward.  The natural extension of this would be a stronger dollar, weaker stocks and probably stronger oil prices as the demand side of the equation would be rising.

But in this topsy-turvy world where good news is bad, the converse is also likely true, a soft print will reinforce the ideas that the Fed is going to cut sooner and more aggressively which will have a short-term positive impact on stocks and bonds, although the dollar will suffer accordingly.

One of the market conversations about the Fed has been regarding the political implications of their moves and whether they may cut sooner just to try to avoid any appearance of a political bias.  But as I think about that, while the very small minority of people in this country who focus on the economy and markets will certainly have opinions on the subject, I would contend that for the vast majority of folks, whether the Fed cuts 25bps in March or May or June is just not going to change their lives nor change their vote.  Remember, monetary policy works with “long and variable” lags, so even if they do cut in March, it probably won’t start to feed through into any economic impact before the election.  The only conceivable impact would be that money-market fund yields would fall that 25bps, an annoyance but not a significant change.  My point is far too much emphasis is put on the potential political nature of this and I think it is overblown.

Turning to the overnight market activity, Chinese shares continue to benefit from the recent monetary and fiscal support that the government is adding with shares in HK and the mainland both higher by 2% overngith.  Meanwhile, Japanese shares were essentially unchanged, although that spread continues to narrow.  As to European bourses, they are softer this morning with the DAX (-0.5%) falling after weaker than forecast IFO data across the board indicating not only weak current conditions but weak prospects as well.  (As an aside, this is why it is so difficult to believe that Lagarde will hold off on rate cuts until the summer.  A weak Germany is a problem for the Eurozone.)   finally, after a mixed session yesterday, US futures are edging a bit higher as I type (7:45).

In the bond market, Treasury yields, which rose a few bps on the session yesterday, are essentially unchanged this morning but European sovereign yields are higher by 2bps across the board, perhaps in anticipation of something from the ECB.  JGB yields continue to creep higher as well, up another 2bps overnight as there is a growing confidence that the BOJ is going to exit their negative interest rate policy by April.  Right now I would still fade that bet.

Oil prices (+0.9%) have continued to rally with WRTI back above $75/bbl and Brent above $80/bbl.  Yesterday’s EIA inventory data showed surprisingly large drawdowns in crude and most distillates although gasoline inventories rose a bunch.  As well, it appears that the costs of transport are starting to drive the overall price higher with more and more shipping traffic avoiding the Red Sea.  Meanwhile, metals markets, after an ok day yesterday, are essentially unchanged this morning.

Finally, the dollar, which fell sharply yesterday, is mixed but broadly unchanged across the board.  Looking at my screen the largest move I see is KRW (-0.4%) with every G10 currency within 0.25 of yesterday’s closes.  At this point, the market is biding its time for today’s data as well as tomorrow’s PCE and next week’s FOMC meeting.  Unless that GDP number is a big miss in either direction, which I outlined above, I suspect a very quiet session here.

Right now, we are in a wait and see mode, so, let’s wait and see what the data brings and we can evaluate after the releases.

Good luck
Adf

Seems Like a Crisis

Posted on by

The Chinese have not finished yet
Their efforts to counter the threat
Of weaker stock prices
Which seems like a crisis
So new triple R rates were set

But one thing I don’t understand
Is while CCP’s in command
Just why do they care
‘Bout stocks anywhere
Perhaps communism ain’t grand

Yesterday, the Chinese government announced that there would be up to CNY 2 trillion of support for Chinese equity markets in their latest effort to stanch the 3-year bear market.  But apparently, that was not enough as last night Pan Gongsheng, the PBOC governor, announced they were reducing the Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR or triple R) in order to free up additional loan capacity for the banks.  The move, a 0.50% cut in the ratio will ostensibly release another CNY 1 trillion into the economy.

There are two issues I’d like to address here.  First, given the property market in China remains under significant pressure as activity still seems to be lethargic, at best, and the economy overall is not really expanding at a significant pace, why do they think that allowing more loans will encourage people to take more loans.  After all, last week, they left the Loan Prime Rates unchanged, so were not trying to encourage more activity, and it is not clear that loan capacity has been a constraint in any manner during the past several years.  As global growth remains slow overall, it is entirely possible, if not likely, that there is just reduced demand for Chinese manufactures around the world right now.

The second issue is a bigger picture question, why does the Chinese Communist Party care at all about the stock market?  After all, a reading of Das Kapital would explain that there is no place for private ownership at all in a communist system and by extension, no place for shareholders.  The state is supposed to own everything.  My conclusion is that Xi, and the entire CCP, are full of s*it regarding their belief in communism.  In fact, I would contend that is true for every communist regime on the planet.  Rather, those in charge in communist regimes merely see it as the most effective way to command all the power and wealth personally and could care less about the concepts Marx espoused.  In the end, I would argue that the human condition is one where acquiring as much power and wealth as possible is the driving goal for most people.  While many people have much smaller ambitions, the sociopaths who rise to leadership roles in politics know no bounds as to what they believe is their due.  Just sayin!

Regardless of the underlying rationale, though, the PBOC had the desired impact as both the Hang Seng (+3.6%) and the CSI 300 (+1.4%) rallied sharply on the news.  As well, the Nikkei (-0.8%) slid a bit further as it seems there had been a growing position by CTAs and hedge funds in the long Japan/short China trade which I illustrated yesterday.  If China is rebounding, I expect that Japanese shares will have further to slide in the near-term.  As well, after another day with some record high closings in the US yesterday, European bourses are all in the green nicely this morning with the DAX (+1.3%) leading the way although the other main indices are also higher by about 1%.  The laggard here is the UK (+0.4%) and I attribute this movement to the Flash PMI data which was released this morning showing that continental growth continues to slide, hence increasing the chance of a rate cut sooner, while UK data was a bit better than expected, and well above 50 across the board, implying the BOE will lag any rate cuts going forward.  And happily, as I type at 8:00, US futures are all nicely in the green as well.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are a touch softer this morning, down 2bps, but still hanging right around the 4.10% level which has been a pivot for the past week.  European sovereigns have seen yields decline about 3bps across the board after that soft PMI data, while UK Gilts have moved the other direction on the stronger data there.  Of more interest, I think, is that JGB yields have jumped 5bps overnight and are now back above 0.70%.  It seems that there is an evolution in thinking regarding Ueda-san’s comments after the BOJ meeting Monday night, and the belief that they will be exiting NIRP in April is growing stronger.  We shall see.

Commodity prices are higher across the board this morning with oil (+0.3%) continuing to find support, arguably from the troubles in the Middle East, although some short-term issues like the shuttering of a Russian export terminal after a Ukrainian attack have also had an impact.  But metals markets are universally higher this morning as well, with gold (+0.25%) far less impressive than copper (+2.0%) or aluminum (+0.9%) as positivity from the Chinese RRR cut and the potential for stronger growth on the mainland feed through the markets.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning across the board.  This is true in the G10 bloc with the euro and pound both firmer by 0.5%, while the yen (+0.8%) and CHF (+0.8%) are having even better days.  Similarly, the EMG bloc has seen gains across the board with the leader ZAR (+1.1%) on the back of those metals gains, but strength in PLN (+0.8%), CZK (+0.7%) and HUF (+0.65%) showing their high beta with respect to the euro, and gains in APAC currencies (KRW +0.4%, SGD +0.3%, CNY +0.3%) and LATAM currencies (MXN +0.6%, BRL +0.8%) as it is unanimous regarding the dollar’s weakness.

On the data front, today brings only the Flash PMI data (exp 47.9 manufacturing, 51.0 services) and the EIA oil inventories.  There are no Fed speakers due to the quiet period, so I foresee market activity focused on equity earnings releases although none of the big names are due today.  Right now, the dollar is under pressure amid ongoing belief that the Fed is going to cut ahead of other central banks.  Until that story changes, I expect that we could see a bit more dollar weakness.  But in the end, tomorrow’s GDP and Friday’s PCE data are going to really drive views.  Look for a quiet one today.

Good luck
Adf

Others to Blame

Posted on by

Apparently, President Xi
Is not very happy to see
That stocks made in China
Have lost all their shine-a
So, feels he must buy by decree
 
The upshot is two trillion yuan
Is what he will spend, whereupon
He’ll then get to claim
Twas others to blame
Though it’s his ideas that keep on
 
Last night the BOJ meeting was the non-event that was widely expected.  There was no change in policy and when looking at their forecasts, if anything they lowered their inflation views a touch for next year, thus reducing the chance of a policy change even more.  The follow-on commentary was not very inciteful either, explaining that they are prepared to take additional easing measures if necessary but uncertainties on the price outlook are high.  In other words, we still don’t know how to achieve our goal of sustainable 2% inflation so we’re going to watch a bit longer.
 
The punditry has decided that Ueda-san is going to adjust policy at the April meeting after the spring wage negotiations have been completed, but personally, i don’t believe he feels a compelling need to do anything absent a major decline in the yen from current levels.  After all, the economy is still ticking over nicely and the stock market has been rallying consistently for a year and is back at 34-year highs, approaching the 1989 bubble peak.  However, if USD/JPY were to trade back above 150 again and start to move more quickly, I suspect that might be the catalyst the BOJ and Ueda-san need to change their tune.
 
Arguably, of far more interest last night was the news that China is now considering a support package for the stock market there!  (For a communist country, it is quite ironic how much Xi Jinping cares about the most capitalistic institution there is, the stock market.)  The headline number is CNY 2 trillion (~$278 billion) which will be sourced from Chinese state-owned companies (SOEs) overseas and ostensibly will flow into the offshore market for Chinese shares as well as the Hang Seng in Hong Kong.  The below chart, courtesy of Weston Nakamura’s excellent substack is quite explanatory as to why Xi may be feeling some pressure.

 

The dramatic widening of the spread between Hong Kong and Japanese shares has been remarkable in the first three weeks of 2024, a substantial acceleration of what we have seen since November of last year.  My sense is Xi is taking it personally that the world is dismissing China as a serious global player as evidenced by the fact that nobody wants to invest there at all.  Obviously, there are sanction and tariff issues as well as a comprehensive effort by many western companies to reduce their reliance on China as part of their individual supply chains, but I guess this has become too much to bear for President Xi. 

While this mooted number is twice as large as the previous discussions, it remains to be seen if it will be effective beyond the knee-jerk response by the Hang Seng today (+2.6%).  After all, the Chinese property market is still a disaster, and all the other problems remain intact.  Chinese share prices have been falling for 3 years now, and my sense is it will take real policy changes rather than a buying spree by SOEs to change any views.  Perhaps communist-based stock markets are an oxymoron after all.

Away from those two stories though, not very much is ongoing.  Mainland Chinese shares also rose, but far less, just 0.4%, while Japanese shares were essentially unchanged on the day after the BOJ’s meeting.  In Europe, equity markets are a touch softer, although only about -0.2% or so across the board and after yet another positive day in the US yesterday, US futures are pointing slightly higher at this hour (7:45), about 0.2%.

In the bond market, yesterday’s price action is being reversed with yields across the US (+2bps) and Europe (+2bps across virtually all nations) backing up a bit.  As there continues to be a lack of data on which to trade, this price action seems almost like a classic risk-on take, with equities higher, the dollar softer, and bonds falling in price as well.  However, given that the movement is just 2bps, I would not get excited about any new information here.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.75%) is slipping a bit this morning, but has been performing pretty well over the past week on the back of the ongoing tensions in the Middle East.  However, we are seeing positive price action in the metals space this morning with gold (+0.2%) and copper (+0.5%) both pushing a bit higher.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning, with no consistency across either the G10 or EMG blocs.  CNY (+0.3%) has rallied on the strength of the financing package while ZAR (+0.8%) is benefitting from the metals complex rally, as is CLP (+0.35%) and AUD (+0.25%).  However, the euro (-0.2%) is sliding along with several EMG currencies, notably PLN (-0.75%) and MXN (-0.5%), as idiosyncratic stories drive markets this morning rather than a broad dollar narrative.

The only marginal piece of data this morning is the Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index (exp -11), yet another manufacturing index that has been performing quite poorly.  Interestingly, there was a Twitter (X?) thread this morning from Anna Wong (@annaeconomist), a senior economist at Bloomberg, describing some potential reasons as to why the Initial Claims data, which has been running far lower than the recessionistas expect due to eligibility issues and the fact that UI pays so little, people would rather driver for Uber than collect.  This is another indirect sign that the economy is not nearly as positive as many, especially the soft-landing proponents and equity bulls, would have you believe.  Food for thought.

As to the rest of the day, given the lack of other data as well as the anticipation of the Thursday and Friday info on GDP and PCE, I anticipate a quiet session overall.  Momentum remains higher in stocks, but bonds are uncertain, and the dollar is mixed.  Don’t look for too much movement in either direction here today.

Good luck

Adf

With Conceit

Posted on by

On Friday, two final Fed speakers
Explained they are both simply seekers
Of lower inflation
Hence, justification
That they’re simply policy tweakers
 
We now have nine days til they meet
When both bulls and bears will compete
To offer their vision
While casting derision
On each other’s views with conceit
 
It appears to be a slow day to start what has the potential for quite an interesting week.  While the Fed is in their quiet period, we have central bank meetings in Japan, the Eurozone, Norway and Canada as well as the first look at Q4 GDP and the all-important December PCE data.  As I said, while it is slow today, there is much to anticipate.

But first let’s finish up last week, where the equity rally continued unabated despite continued pushback from Fed speakers.  Notably, SF’s Mary Daly, who is usually a reliable dove, was very clear that it is too soon to consider cutting interest rates.  Her exact words, “We need to see more evidence that it is heading back down to 2% consistently and sustainably for me to feel confident enough to start adjusting the policy rate,” seem pretty clear that she is not ready for a cut yet.  Meanwhile, Chicago’s Austan Goolsbee was similarly confident that it is premature to consider cutting rates any time soon.  

Arguably, of more importance is the fact that the Fed funds futures market is now pricing in slightly less than a 50% probability of a rate cut in March and about 5 rate cuts this year, rather than the 6 to 7 cuts that were in the price ten days ago.  So, we heard a great deal of jawboning to remove just one rate cut from the market perception.  For the life of me, I cannot look at the recent CPI data as well as the situation in the Red Sea and the Panama Canal, where though caused by different situations, show similar outcomes in forcing a significant amount of shipping volumes to change their route to a longer, more costly one and see lower inflation in our future.  I understand that there was a disinflationary impulse, but to my eye that has ended.

Now, it is entirely possible that we see the rate of inflation decline on the back of a recession, but that is not the market narrative at this point.  Rather, the market appears to be priced for the perfection of a soft landing, where the Fed will be able to tweak rates lower while inflation continues to soften, and unemployment remains low.  Alas, I still see that as a pipe dream.  As I have written in the past, it seems far more likely that we see either one rate cut as the economy continues to perform and inflation remains stubborn or 10 or more amidst a sharp slowdown in economic activity and rising unemployment, but five doesn’t seem correct to me.

In the meantime, today is a waiting game for all the things yet to appear this week.  Looking at the overnight activity, we continue to see the dichotomy between China and Japan with the former seeing its equity markets continue to crater (CSI 300 -1.6%, Hang Seng -2.3%) while the latter has made yet another new 34 year high (Nikkei +1.6%).  Last night, the PBOC left their key Loan Prime Rates unchanged, as expected, but still a disappointment to a market that is desperate for some stimulus from the government there.  So far, all the activity has been directly in the financial markets where the Chinese have banned short-selling and “advised” domestic institutions to stop selling any equities, and yet the markets there continue to underperform.  Perhaps President Xi will decide that common prosperity requires fiscal stimulus of a significant nature, but that has not yet been the case.  Both the Hang Seng and mainland markets have fallen precipitously, but there is no obvious end game yet.  Meanwhile, European bourses are all in the green, on the order of 0.5% while US futures are higher by a similar amount at this hour (7:45).

Bond markets are having a better day around the world today with yields falling everywhere.  Treasury yields are the laggard, only down by 3bps, while European sovereigns have fallen 5bps and even JGB’s fell 1 bp overnight.  Perhaps it is the sterner talk by central bankers regarding rate cuts (ECB speakers have also pushed back hard on the idea that rate cuts are coming in March, with the June meeting the favorite now), which has investors becoming more comfortable that inflation will continue its recent declines.  As there has been exactly zero data released today, that is the most rational explanation I can find.

In the commodity markets, quiet is the word here as well with oil (+0.35%) edging higher, thus holding onto last week’s gains, while metals markets are mixed.  Gold is unchanged on the day; copper is modestly softer, and aluminum is modestly firmer.  As has been the case for the past several weeks, there is not much information to be gleaned from these markets right now.  I expect that over time, we will see commodity prices trade higher as the decade long lack of investment in the sector plays out, but in the short-term, there is little on which to see regarding price trends, absent a major uptick in the Middle East dynamics.  After all, even avoiding the Red Sea hasn’t had much impact.

Lastly, the dollar is mixed overall.  Against its G10 counterparts, JPY, GBP and NZD all have edged higher by about 0.2%, but we are seeing similar weakness in NOK and AUD.  In the EMG bloc, we actually see a few more laggards than leaders with ZAR (-0.8%), HUF (-0.5%), and KRW (-0.4%) all suffering a bit on the session while CLP (+0.5%) is the leading light in the other direction.  Ultimately, the big picture here remains the dollar is tied to the yield story and if the Fed really does maintain higher for longer, the dollar will find support.

As mentioned above, there is a lot of data to digest this week as follows:

TuesdayBOJ Rate Decision-0.1% (unchanged)
WednesdayFlash Manufacturing PMI48.0
 Flash Services PMI51.0
 Bank of Canada Rate Decision5.0% (Unchanged)
ThursdayNorgesbank Rate Decision4.5% (Unchanged)
 ECB Rate Decision4.0% (Unchanged)
 Durable Goods1.1%
 Q4 GDP2.0%
 Chicago Fed National Activity0.03
 Initial Claims200K
 Continuing Claims1828K
FridayPersonal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.4%
 PCE0.2% (2.6% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% (3.0% Y/Y)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, the end of the week is when we get inundated, although the Eurozone Flash PMI data comes on Wednesday as well.  But without a major data miss, all eyes and ears will be on the central banks right up until we see Friday’s PCE data.  Regarding that, there is a growing expectation that the core number will be quite soft, with many pundits calling for an annual number below 3.0% on the core reading.  However, given what we have seen from inflation readings everywhere, including the slightly hotter than forecast CPI numbers, I would fade that view.

The one thing of which I am confident is that if the Core PCE print is soft, you can expect the futures markets to price 6 or 7 cuts into this year and more cuts everywhere with the concomitant rise in both stock and commodity prices, especially given the Fed’s inability to push back immediately.  However, my view is that the world of today is not the world of the past 15 years, and that higher inflation and higher interest rates are an integral part of the future.  As well, unless there is a financial crisis of some sort, where more banks are under pressure like last March, I remain in the very few rate-cuts camp and think the equity rally has an expiry date before the summer.  As to the dollar, I think it holds up well in that circumstance.  While I changed my view based on the Powell pivot at the December FOMC meeting, the data has not backed him up, at least not yet.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Restrictive

Posted on by

The Fed keeps on spinning the tale
They’re watching like hawks so that they’ll
Be able to jump
In case Donald Trump
Does not look like going to jail
Be able to act
And not be attacked
If ‘flation forecasts start to fail
 
Twas Bostic’s turn yesterday to
Explain that the policy skew
Is still quite restrictive
Though that’s not predictive
Of what they may finally do
 
Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic was the latest FOMC member to regale us with his views on current policy settings amid two speeches yesterday.  The essence of his comments lines up with what we have heard for the past two weeks; policy is sufficiently restrictive to help drive inflation down to their 2% target, but they will be vigilant if that is not the outcome.  One of the things that he mentioned, and that has been a really popular chart crime over the past few months, at least for the doves, is he discussed annualizing the most recent three months of PCE data and the most recent 6 months of PCE data as proof that they are doing a good job.  In fact, in one of his two presentations, he used the following chart:

Unquestionably, if you look at the orange line, which represents the annualized value of the past 3 months, it shows that PCE is “now” running below their target.  But let me ask you a question, looking back to H1 of 2022, when inflation was peaking.  Both the 3-month and 6-month changes were well above the annual number at the time.  Do any of you remember the focus on those short-term nonsense numbers?  Me neither.  My point is the only number that matters is the actual annual one as that is their target.  Any indication that it is flattening or turning higher, just like the CPI data did earlier this month, is going to put paid to this story.  While I have no idea where next week’s data is going to print, we must be wary of the narrative spin on the actual data.  If we know one thing about the Fed, by definition, they are reactive.  That is what following the data means.  If they were predictive, they would move before the data, but they never do that. 
 
So, all this talk of cutting before inflation gets too low is not monetary policy.  However, we cannot rule out a cut based on the political implications as they view rate cuts as a way to boost the economy and try to ensure the current president is re-elected rather than the likely Republican candidate gets back in.  Alas, for now, we will have to live with the spin.  Today we hear from two more Fed speakers, SF’s Mary Daly and Governor Michael Barr.  I suspect we will hear exactly the same message from both.  Too early for cuts, but they are ready when the time comes.
 
Meanwhile, across the pond, the preponderance of ECB speakers has been very clear that March is off the table for a rate cut but June seems to be what they see as likely.  Here, too, they see the trend as their friend, but inflation readings are still nowhere near their 2.0% target.  However, it is clear that the pain of higher rates is having a much larger impact on Europe than on the US as GDP data continues to deteriorate.  Germany is in recession and much of the rest of the continent is on its way.  The benefit for Madame Lagarde is that the Europeans did not inject nearly as much stimulus during the Covid years as the US, so it is likely the Eurozone economy is following a better-known path.  In the end, though, they are very anxious for the Fed to get started as they really want to start cutting rates, I believe, but with inflation still far above target and the Fed still holding on, they would have no rational explanation for their actions.
 
One last thing to note is CPI in Japan was released last night and it fell to 2.6% headline and 2.3% core.  Any idea that the BOJ was going to need to tighten policy in the near-term to fight too high inflation has been dissipating quickly.  It turns out that they may have been correct to leave policy unchanged as now they do not need to do anything to be in the right spot.  The market response mostly made sense as the yen weakened with the dollar now above 148, while the Nikkei rose another 1.4% and is pushing those recent 30+ year highs.  The weird thing, though, was the JGB market which saw yields rally 4bps, back to their highest level in a month.  I have been unable to find any solid explanation for this move as certainly it is not fundamental.
 
Anyway, let’s look at the rest of the overnight session to see how things are feeling as we close the week.  After a solid US equity session yesterday, most of Asia had a good go of things with rallies pretty much everywhere except China and Hong Kong.  The equity markets in both those nations have been under significant pressure lately and show no signs of turning.  While the market is not the economy, President Xi has already called for the end of short sales and is now leaning on domestic institutions to not sell at all.  With the property market already in the tank, a rapidly declining stock market is not a good look for the concept of prosperity for all.  Europe, though, is modestly higher this morning and US futures are also in the green following yesterday’s session.
 
In the bond markets, Treasury yields are little changed on the day, but remain above the 4.10% level that some are calling a key technical spot.  European sovereigns, though, are all rallying more aggressively with yields falling between 3bps and 7bps despite what are continuous calls for the ECB to maintain tight policy for longer than the market is pricing.  Perhaps investors are feeling better about inflation prospects if the ECB holds the line.
 
After a rally yesterday, oil prices are essentially unchanged this morning.  The unrest in the Red Sea continues with the Houthis firing more missiles and fewer and fewer ships willing to transit the area while yesterday’s tit-for-tat Iran-Pakistan missile attacks are now merely history.  The fact that oil remains below $74/bbl implies it is not really pricing any possibility of a larger Middle East conflict.  That seems pretty hubristic to me as the probabilities seem to be far larger than zero.  As to the metals markets, both precious and base metals are firmer this morning in sync with softer yields and a softer dollar. 
 
Speaking of the dollar, while it is ever so slightly lower on a DXY basis this morning, it continues to hold the bulk of its gains for the past month.  Versus G10 currencies, the picture is mixed with GBP (-0.2%) underperforming after absolutely abysmal Retail Sales data was released this morning, but the rest of this bloc is higher by about 0.2% or so on average.  In the EMG space, the direction is broadly for currency strength, but the movement remains modest at best, on the order of 0.1%-0.3%.  In other words, not much is going on here.
 
On the data front, yesterday brought a mixed picture with Housing data slightly better than expectations, although starts fell compared to last month.  Initial Claims printed at 187K, their lowest in a very long time, but Philly Fed was at a worse than expected -10.6, not as bad as Empire State, but still not too bullish!  Today brings Michigan Sentiment (exp 70.0) and Existing Home Sales (3.82M) as well as the above-mentioned Fed speakers.  After today, the Fed is in their quiet period, so we will have to make up our own minds as to what the data means.
 
For now, the market seems quite comfortable buying dips and as evidenced by the Fed funds futures market, is still pricing a 55% chance of a March cut.  While that probability is shrinking slowly, there are still 6 cuts priced in for the year.  At this point, my thesis of the market fighting the Fed for the first half of the year before capitulating to higher inflation prospects and higher yields amid slowing growth remains my best guess.  But that is just me.  Absent something really surprising from Daly or Barr, I suspect that there will be limited price movement going into the weekend.
 
Good luck and good weekend
Adf
 

Looks Askance

Posted on by

On Wednesday, twas John Williams chance
To help explain, though at first glance
Inflation is sinking
No Kool-aid, he’s drinking
So, at cuts, he still looks askance

And backing him up in this view
Was Retail Sales, which really grew
There’s no indication
That US inflation
Is going to fall down near two

The pushback by FOMC speakers continued yesterday as NY Fed president Williams was the latest to explain that although things were heading in the right direction, the committee was unlikely to cut rates anywhere nearly as quickly as the market is pricing.  Here are the money lines, “My base case is that the current restrictive stance of monetary policy will continue to restore balance and bring inflation back to our 2 percent longer-run goal. I expect that we will need to maintain a restrictive stance of policy for some time to fully achieve our goals, and it will only be appropriate to dial back the degree of policy restraint when we are confident that inflation is moving toward 2 percent on a sustained basis.” [Emphasis added]. Once again, the idea that the Fed is going to cut rates in March seems awfully remote, at least based on what they are telling us.

Now, it is entirely possible that the data starts to deteriorate more rapidly with growth clearly falling and Unemployment starting to rise more rapidly and if that were to occur, I think a March cut would not be impossible.  But then yesterday we saw a much better than expected Retail Sales print, (headline +0.6%, ex autos +0.4%) with the Y/Y growth up to 5.6% (nominal).  Data like that is not indicative of a collapse in economic activity.  The fact that much of it is reliant on a combination of massive fiscal stimulus and increased credit card debt does not mean the growth is false.  It merely sets up for weakness later.

In the end, the Fed funds futures market is backing away a bit further from that March rate cut with the probability reduced to 61% now from 70% just a week ago.  It can be no surprise that between the Williams comments and the stronger data, Treasury yields backed up 5bps and equity markets suffered a bit more, down about -0.5%.

To me, the key question is, at what point will the market accept that 6 rate cuts are not the most likely outcome this year?  Clearly, they are not ready to do so yet, although based on the equity market performance so far this year, there is a little bit of nervousness, at least, making its way through the investment community.  Analyzing the price action over the past month and considering the information that we have gotten since the last FOMC meeting, the outlier seems to be Powell’s dovishness at the press conference, not the macroeconomic data nor the commentary from other Fed speakers.  Of course, Powell’s voice is clearly the most important, but when both Waller and Williams, his two top lieutenants, reiterate that maintaining restrictive policy is the right move for now, I have to believe that the next FOMC statement is going to reiterate that stance.

What does all this say about the future?  Well, since everything is data dependent, or at least that’s what they tell us, then we need to continue to watch the data to help understand the reaction function.  The problem is that there is no consistency in the data.  For instance, in addition to yesterday’s strong Retail Sales data, we saw stronger than expected NFP and higher than expected CPI readings, all three being critical real data points.  On the flip side, we have seen weaker than expected ISM data, both manufacturing and services and Tuesday’s Empire State Manufacturing Index fell to -43.7, a level only exceeded by the Covid readings in early 2020.  In fact, that index has fallen more than 50 points in the past two months.  The upshot is that we continue to see negative survey data and solid real data.  So, I ask you, which set of data is the Fed watching more closely?

FWIW my assessment of the situation is as follows: the Fed is aware of the goldilocks narrative but has not bought into it at this stage, at least not Powell and his two key lieutenants, and they are the ones that matter. Whatever the survey data, if the hard data holds up, they are going to maintain policy right where it is.  While we know they care about surveys (look at their focus on inflation expectations), I think Powell is still very afraid of being Arthur Burns redux.  Right now, it looks like the outlier was the Powell press conference, not all the push back.  I changed my entire thesis based on that pivot and that may have been a mistake.  However, if we start to see weaker hard data, so Housing softens, PCE is soft, GDP misses expectations or something like that, look for goldilocks to make a return.  Otherwise, regardless of the survey data, I fear risk assets are going to have trouble as are bond markets which have priced in a lot of rate cuts.

Speaking of push back, we continue to hear ECB speakers on the same page as the Fed, rate cuts are not coming on the market’s current timeline.  June seems to be the earliest it will happen there unless the Fed cuts sooner.  I continue to believe given the very weak growth profile in Europe that Madame Lagarde is quite anxious to get started cutting rates, but she knows she cannot do so yet.  I imagine that Interpol will have an APB out on goldilocks pretty soon as they want to capture her and keep her in the public’s eye.

One other thing to mention away from the financial markets is what appears to be a further escalation of fighting in the Middle East.  Last night, Pakistan retaliated against Iran with missile strikes of their own, ostensibly killing Pakistani militants who were based in Iran.  Whatever the rationale may be for these moves, the one truism is that things in the Middle East are getting more dangerous and that is going to pressure oil prices higher.  We have seen that this morning, with small gains, but I would suggest that will be the direction of travel if this keeps up.

Ok, on to markets where yesterday’s lackluster US equity performance was largely ignored as Japanese stocks were just barely lower, Chinese and Hong Kong stocks finally rebounded a bit and the rest of APAC saw more gainers than losers.  European markets are firmer this morning, in what could well be a trading bounce as there was no data to encourage the process and US futures are firmer at this hour (7:30) by about 0.5%.

After yesterday’s continuation bounce in yields, this morning we are seeing a bit of a pullback with Treasury and most European sovereign yields lower by about 2bps.  The one outlier is Japan, where JGB yields picked up 3bps, although that could well be a delayed response to yesterday’s Treasury price action as the Japanese data overnight was quite soft (Machinery Orders and IP both falling in November) and not indicative of tighter policy in the future.

Aside from oil’s modest gains, gold has rebounded a bit this morning, up 0.5%, arguably on the increased tensions in Iran/Pakistan but the base metals are under pressure today.  Lately, it is very difficult to glean much information from the base metals as confusion over whether Chinese growth is real, and how overall growth is progressing seems to be keeping traders on the sidelines.

Finally, the dollar is backing off its highs from yesterday, but the movement has not been large, about 0.2% broadly across both G10 and EMG currencies.  The most noteworthy outlier is ZAR, where the rand has rallied 0.85% on the back of that gold strength.

On the data front today, Housing Starts (exp 1.48M), Building Permits (1.426M), Initial Claims (207K), Continuing Claims (1845K) and Philly Fed (-7) all show up at 8:30.  As well, Atlanta Fed president Raphael Bostic speaks twice today, early and late, so it will be very interesting to hear if he is going to push back further on the Powell pivot or agree with it.

Today brings both hard and survey data, so if it all lines up one way or the other, perhaps it will be a driver.  But my take is we will continue to see a mixed picture and so will be highly reliant on Fedspeak as after Bostic today, we get Daly and Barr tomorrow and then the quiet period.  I think a risk rebound is in order just because things have been weak.  But I am worried about the longer-term trend now that Powell is seeming more and more like the outlier, not the driver.

Good luck
Adf

As Good As It Gets

Posted on by

Said Waller, I have no regrets
For things are “as good as it gets”
We’ve been quite outstanding
And reached that soft landing
Though rate cut forecasts won’t be met

Wow is all I can say.  While Treasury Secretary Yellen was brasher last week by explicitly saying they have achieved the mythical soft landing, Governor Waller’s speech yesterday went into great detail about his work in 2022 on Beveridge curve analysis that almost perfectly forecast the current situation.  I certainly hope he didn’t sprain his arm patting himself on the back.  The certitude that has been coming from Fed speakers and their acolytes, like ex Fed economist @claudia_sahm, is remarkable to me.  After literally a century of having no great insight into the workings of inflation, the Fed has now declared they have it under control because the past 6 months have seen price increases rise at a slowing pace.

Key Waller comments were as follows, “By late November, the latest economic data left me encouraged that there were signs of moderating economic activity in the fourth quarter, but inflation was still too high.  As of today, the data has come in even better. Real gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to have grown between 1 and 2 percent in the fourth quarter, unemployment is still below 4 percent, and core personal consumption expenditure (PCE) inflation has been running close to 2 percent for the last 6 months. For a macroeconomist, this is almost as good as it gets.”

He finished with this comment, although interestingly, the market did not applaud, “As long as inflation doesn’t rebound and stay elevated, I believe the FOMC will be able to lower the target range for the federal funds rate this year. This view is consistent with the FOMC’s economic projections in December, in which the median projection was three 25-basis-point cuts in 2024.”

Maybe the Fed really has stuck the landing and inflation is going to smoothly slide back to 2% and stay there while the economy ticks over at 2%-3% GDP growth.  Certainly, if the fiscal impulse continues to run at deficit levels of 8% of GDP, I would hope we could get 3% growth.  But to my understanding of the way the economy responds to policy actions, that 8% deficit is going to find itself into rising prices across the economy.  But then again, I’m just an FX guy.

In the end, the market heard Waller and decided that maybe higher for longer was still a thing.  The Fed funds futures market reduced its probability of a March rate cut to 60% from 70% before the speech and the bond market sold off pretty hard with yields closing at 4.07%, their highest level since the day before that December FOMC meeting when everybody was certain that the Fed had pivoted.  It seems the question now is, have they actually pivoted?

One of the problems they have is that the inflation data last month indicated the pace of price increases could be stabilizing around the 3.0%-3.5% level, rather than their target 2.0% level.  We have very consistently heard from all the acolytes that if you annualize the past 3 or 6 months’ worth of data, the Y/Y rate is pushing to 2.0%.  This, they claim, means the Fed has achieved their goal.  The problem with this argument is that the Fed’s goal is not simply touching a 2.0% inflation rate, it is to maintain it at that level over time.  That is a much more difficult landing to stick, and there is no evidence things will work out that way especially given we haven’t even reached a Y/Y rate of 2.0%!

Here’s another problem for that crew, inflation elsewhere in the world is not continuing its recent decline.  Yesterday, Canadian CPI data showed that the trend numbers, Trimmed-Mean (3.7%) and Median (3.6%) were both higher than forecast and higher than last month.  This morning, from the UK we learned that CPI rose 0.4% M/M, far more than expected with the Y/Y data rising to 4.0% headline and 5.1% core.  In both these nations, the recent trend had been lower but has now reversed.  While we have seen a significant rebalancing of markets and measured inflation has clearly fallen from its levels of the past two years, I would argue the evidence is scant that this trend is necessarily going to continue.  Wage growth continues to hold up as employees try to catch up to the huge price increases since 2019.  With the Unemployment Rate remaining near multi-decade lows, absent a major recession it appears it will be very difficult to continue to squeeze prices lower.  And this doesn’t even consider the fact that increased tensions in the Middle East and the rerouting of ships around the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa, is adding weeks and costs to any movement of goods or oil, and could last for a considerable length of time.

We have consistently heard from ECB members that rate cuts are not coming soon.  We have had a lot of pushback lately from FOMC members about the timing of any rate cuts with both sets of speakers explicitly saying the market is overexuberant in their current pricing.  As I wrote yesterday, I think we are looking at a bimodal outcome, either virtually no rate cuts, or many more because we are in a recession.  In either case, I think equity markets will need to reprice lower.  However, the impact of these two situations will be different on the dollar, the bond market and commodities.  We will discuss those outcomes tomorrow.

In the meantime, overnight was a sea of red (as opposed to the Red Sea) in equity markets with the Hang Seng (-3.7%) leading the way lower but weakness on the mainland as well (CSI -2.2%) and throughout the region.  Japanese stocks (Nikkei -0.4%) were actually the leaders in the space.  The China story was informed by their monthly data dump which showed GDP grew at a slightly weaker than forecast 5.2%, while IP (6.8%), Retail Sales (7.4%) and Fixed Asset Investment (3.0%) were all around expectations, but still soft overall and compared to last month.  The Unemployment Rate there ticked higher to 5.1%, and they put out a new version of the youth unemployment rate at 14.9%, which they insist is a better measure than the old one which was screaming higher and was discontinued when it breached 21%.

European equity markets are also under pressure, mostly down about -1.0% on the continent and lower by -1.75% in the UK after the data releases.  As to the US, after a lackluster session that was saved by a late day rally yesterday, futures this morning are lower by about -0.25% at 7:30.

In the bond market, after the large move yesterday, Treasury yields are unchanged on the day and European yields have edged up by about 1bp across the board with UK Gilts the exception, having jumped 10bps after the inflation readings.  JGBs continue their lackluster activity and while they rose 2bps overnight, they remain below 0.60% overall.  Again, slowing inflation there indicates little reason to believe they are going to change their monetary policy anytime soon.

On the commodity front, oil (-1.8%) is showing a lot more concern over demand destruction after the modestly weaker Chinese data than concern over supply issues from Middle East tensions.  Plus, with US rates higher, commodity prices tend to suffer anyway.  Gold, which got crushed yesterday amid the repricing of interest rates is unchanged this morning, licking its wounds while copper and aluminum trade either side of unchanged as the economic situation remains so uncertain right now.

Finally, the dollar remains king of all it sees this morning, rallying further after yesterday’s rally and now has retraced virtually all the weakness that came from Powell’s December “pivot”.  This has been true in both the G10 and EMG blocs as the dollar is almost universally higher this morning.  The one exception is the pound, which has managed a 0.35% rally on the back of the move in UK interest rates after the higher inflation data print this morning.  The key to remember here is that despite a great deal of chatter about the dollar’s demise, the reality is that it has moved very little, net, over the past year and is far higher than where it was 5 years ago.  If the Fed really is going to maintain higher for longer, which if inflation continues its rebound seems likely to me, then the dollar has to benefit.

Turning to the data, this morning we see Retail Sales (exp 0.4%, 0.2% ex autos), IP (0.0%) and Capacity Utilization (78.7%).  In addition, we have three Fed speakers this morning and then this afternoon we get the Fed’s Beige Book and NY Fed president Williams speaks.  Given what appears to be a change in tone from Waller, it will be interesting to see if the others follow his lead or push back.  I have to believe that we are going to see more higher for longer talk and how it is premature to talk about rate cuts in March.  If that is the case, the dollar should retain its recent strength and I expect risk assets to come under further pressure.

Good luck
Adf

Democracy’s Died

Posted on by

There once was a fellow named Trump
Whose plan was, Joe Biden, to dump
He started last night
By winning the fight
And heads to New Hampshire to stump

Political pundits worldwide
Now claim that democracy’s died
But markets don’t seem
In touch with that theme
Instead, interest rates are their guide

The Iowa caucus results can be no surprise to anyone as the polls were quite clearly in Donald Trump’s favor.  In the end, he won with slightly more than 50% of the vote while Governor DeSantis came second, Ambassador Haley was in third and Vivek Ramaswamy was a weak fourth.  Ramaswamy has now dropped out of the race and thrown his support behind Trump.  Next week, is the New Hampshire primary and then two weeks later is the South Carolina primary.  After that, comes Super Tuesday in early March, and quite frankly, it would be shocking, at this point, if Trump did not wrap up the nomination by then.

I only mention this because of all the elections this year, arguably the US presidential one is the most impactful on the world at large as well as financial markets.  I will remind you of the equity market behavior in 2016 when Trump was elected the first time and as the evening progressed, the initial response was to see equity futures fall sharply as it became clearer that Trump was going to win, but by the time the markets opened in NY, they had completely reversed and rallied quite sharply, several percent.  Ultimately, I would not be surprised to see more market impacts this year as well.  It is one of the reasons that I believe the major theme this year is going to be more volatility across all markets than we have seen in the past several years combined.

However, right now, we are too early in the cycle and there has been no change of views or broad polling results, so investors are going to focus elsewhere, namely central bank actions.  This brings us to the question of will the Fed actually be cutting interest rates six times in 2024, or more accurately, will they be reducing the Fed funds rate by 150bps?  Funnily enough, I think that may be the least likely outcome of the array of possibilities that exist.  Instead, I expect that the futures market is pricing in an almost binary outcome.  On the one hand, the Fed remains true to their comments that inflation remains too high and while some cuts will come, it is very premature, so perhaps only one or two cuts this year.*  On the other hand, the recessionistas are correct, a hard landing is coming and the Fed is going to have to cut by 300bps or 350bps to support the market.  Play with these probabilities and it is pretty easy to come up with a scenario that shows 150bps of cuts this year.

But for now, whatever my views on how the Fed and other central banks are going to behave, the only important thing is what the market is anticipating.  This takes us back to the market’s assumption about the Fed’s reaction function regarding all the data that is coming our way.  Hence, the fact that the market largely ignored what appeared to be a hotter than expected CPI print last week, but jumped all over a softer than expected PPI print is telling in and of itself.  The market is desperate for the Fed to cut rates which will open the doors for all the other central banks to cut rates.

And in truth, I think this is exactly what we should expect for the time being.  The market is all-in on the idea that not only has the peak in inflation been seen, but that it is quickly falling back to the 2% target that is almost universal.  And they are all-in on the idea that central banks will be able to lower rates back to much more comfortable levels for those in debt while supporting risk asset prices.  My take is we will need to see a long series of data that indicates anything other than this scenario before market views change.  So, any data that indicates inflation remains sticky will be ignored, while data that indicates it is falling sharply will be regurgitated constantly.  The same will be true in the employment and production data.  All I’m saying is we need to be prepared to see certain data that doesn’t fit the narrative get completely ignored for now.  Manage your risk accordingly.

As to the overnight session, things have been less optimistic overall with most stock markets in Asia under pressure, even Japan (Nikkei -0.8%) and Hong Kong (-2.2%) really feeling pressure although mainland Chinese shares held in there after word that the Chinese government would be issuing an emergency CNY 1 trillion (~$139 billion) of debt to fund spending domestically.  As to Europe, all red there, albeit only on the order of -0.4% across the board and US futures are also lower this morning, something around -0.25% at this hour (7:45).

In the bond market, after the US holiday prevented any changes of note yesterday, we see Treasury yields backing up 7bps this morning, a similar move to what we saw in Europe yesterday.  Arguably, this seems like a catch-up move.  In fact European sovereign yields are essentially unchanged on the day as German GDP data confirming the recession of 2023 did nothing to change views, nor surprisingly, did slightly better than expected UK employment data where wage growth was seen rising less rapidly than anticipated.  JGB yields remain moribund and the idea that the BOJ is going to change anything seems a more and more distant prospect for now.

Oil prices (+0.6%) are a touch higher amid further threats from the Houthis as well as some missile attacks by Iran on areas in Iraq and Syria.  I cannot keep up with all the different allegations here, but we cannot ignore the fact that things seem to be escalating.  This cannot be a good outcome for oil prices, or perhaps more accurately, seems likely to push them higher.  The higher interest rates are weighing on precious metals with gold and silver both lower, but surprisingly, copper and aluminum are both rallying this morning.

Finally, the dollar is flexing its muscles this morning, higher against all its counterparts in both the G10 and EMG spaces.  AUD, NOK and SEK have all declined by -0.8% or so, leading the way in the G10 space, although -0.6% covers the bulk of the rest of the bloc.  In the EMG space, KRW (-1.25%), PLN (-1.0%) and MXN (-1.0%) are the laggards across an entire bloc that is under pressure.  This is all about the dollar this morning with no idiosyncratic stories to drive things.

On the data front, we only have the Empire State Manufacturing Index (exp -5.0) and we hear from Fed Governor Waller as well at 11:00.  It seems to me that the market has really gone a bit too far in its bullish beliefs and today is a bit of a correction.  Unless we start to see a lot more push back regarding policy ease though, I expect this movement will be short-lived.  Although ultimately, I believe that we will see a weaker economy, higher inflation and weaker asset prices, I do not think that is the near-term view.  Rather, I expect we will see more dip buying for risk assets by tomorrow at the latest.

Good luck
Adf

*I am well aware that the recent dot plot indicated a median expectation of 75bps of rate cuts this year, but do not forget that the dispersion of that grouping was quite wide, with one assuming no cuts and several assuming just one or two.  I feel it is very weak thinking to say the Fed has indicated three rate cuts this year, they have done no such thing!

Xi’s Heart Was Broken

Posted on by

The Taiwanese people have spoken
And President Xi’s heart was broken
The DPP won
Convergence is done
And Xi’s wrath has like been awoken

The results of the first presidential election around the world in 2024 are in and Lai Ching-te, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s candidate, and sitting vice-president, has won.  This is absolutely not the outcome that Chinese President Xi Jinping was looking for as his administration apparently orchestrated a great deal of election interference in order to get the opposition candidate into the seat.  Overall, the DPP does not have a majority in the Legislature so getting things done will be a challenge for Mr Lai, but as sitting VP, he is clearly quite politically capable.  It is important to know that he has not advocated for independence, which is the brightest red line President Xi sees, but his attitude is quite interesting now with his view that Taiwan is already, de facto, a state, and therefore doesn’t need to declare independence.

At this time, it doesn’t appear as if there will be any change in the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.  I imagine that Xi will continue to order periodic harassment of Taiwanese shipping and encroach on their airspace, but it strikes that the odds of invasion, at least currently, remain extremely low.  If Xi learned nothing else about war from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it is that things don’t always work out as assumed.  Add to this lesson Xi’s recent purging of numerous high-ranking military officers on corruption and incompetence charges, and I suspect that the stalemate here will continue.  As such, I don’t anticipate any economic impact of note from this particular situation going forward.  At least not this year or next.

In Iowa, temps are sub-freezing
In Davos, it’s not as displeasing
The difference is stark
As both places mark
Their efforts, control, to be seizing

As it is Martin Luther King Day here in the US, so banks and the stock market are closed, I thought it might be a good time to discuss two events that are occurring in very different parts of the world and with very different views of the world, namely the Iowa caucuses and the beginning of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland.

Starting with Iowa, this is the official beginning of the Presidential election cycle in the US with the first votes and the first delegates to be allocated.  This year, for the first time, it is only the Republicans caucusing as it appears President Biden, who came a weak 5th there in 2020, decided that he didn’t want to be embarrassed and so essentially canceled the vote.  As to the Republicans, they will be braving sub-zero temperatures throughout the state with the latest polls I have seen, courtesy of Five thirty-eight.com showing former President Trump with 52.7% of the vote, followed by Nikki Haley (18.7%), Ron DeSantis (15.8%) and Vivek Ramaswamy (6.4%).  This result is in line with the national polls and certainly indicates that, as of now, President Trump is going to be the Republican nominee.

That prospect is anathema to the entire Democratic Party, as well as to many Republicans, but even more interesting is how the rest of the world finds the prospects so alarming.  In fact, it seems to be a major topic at WEF as President Trump was essentially dismissive of the WEF agenda when he was last in office and if we have learned anything about WEF, it is they cannot stand being dismissed, especially by world leaders.

I might argue that the biggest problem WEF has is their agenda is running into the realities of physics and economics.  It turns out that many people are not willing to give up material progress that requires the use of fossil fuels or farming, and that seems to run contra to the WEF stated goal of, you will own nothing, and you will be happy.  For now, despite the vast amount of wealth that individual members of WEF control, its direct impact on the macroeconomy has been felt through government policies.  In fact, it seems clear these policies have been a driving force in the rise in populism around the world completely to oppose those policies, and that is not about to change.  At least not until the other 39 elections due this year around the world have been completed.  This is a key reason I believe we are going to see far more populism in many places, and that will have real economic consequences.

Consider for a moment, what populist policies might look like.  They are very likely to increase government spending on things like healthcare and retirement to the detriment of spending on things like energy and defense.  There will be an increase in the amount of reshoring manufacturing and buy local programs and I suspect that there will be more isolationism as a theme.  One of the things all these policies have in common is they will all be inflationary.  And that is something which will need to be considered in both investment and hedging decisions going forward.

Ultimately, the one thing of which I am confident is that the idea of a secular deflation makes very little sense.  Rather, a combination of current and potentially populist future policies is much more likely to result in higher inflation across the board.  Governments will find this convenient as it will help depreciate the real value of their growing debt piles and encourage them to continue to spend on these populist policies.  However, viewing this from a business’s point of view, it will require a focused approach on managing costs and pricing products and services appropriately.  Keep your eyes on the big picture, not just the most recent result.

Despite the fact that the holiday is a US holiday, it seems that most markets have decided to take the day off as well.  While European equity markets are drifting lower, that seems to be in response to the fact that Germany fell into official recession last year and its prospects remain dim for 2024.  Japanese equities continue their run as interest rates in Japan are drifting lower as all the talk of the end of ZIRP slowly fades away alongside fading inflation in the country.

Arguably, the one place where things are moving is European bond markets where yields have risen between 6bps and 8bps across the board despite what appears to be weaker than forecast Eurozone IP data.  On the surface, the data today would have indicated a bond rally, not sell-off, but it seems inflation remains a concern there as well.

Oil prices have slipped a bit overnight but remain in the middle of their recent trading range despite the escalation of tensions after the US and UK bombed Houthi sites in Yemen at the end of the week.  More and more shipping companies are avoiding the area driving up shipping costs, extending lead times, and adding to upward inflation pressures.  As to the metals markets, gold is little changed, and copper and aluminum are acting independently with copper higher and aluminum lower although there are no obvious catalysts for either.

Finally, the dollar is a bit stronger this morning, with JPY (-0.6%) continuing its recent slide as the market removes higher interest rates from its collective bingo card.  But the buck is strong pretty much everywhere with a few EMG currencies also falling by -0.5% or more (BRL, KRW, TWD).  However, with the US out, I don’t anticipate much further activity.

There is no data today nor Fedspeak so for those of you who are working today, it should be quiet in markets overall.

Good luck
Adf