Tag Archives: economics

In a Trice

Posted on by

While jobs data Friday was fine
The weekend has seen a decline
In positive news
As riots infuse
LA with a new storyline
 
The protestors don’t like that ICE
Is doing their job in a trice
So, Trump played a card,
The National Guard
As markets search for the right price

 

Despite all the anxiety regarding the state of the economy, with, once again, survey data like ISM showing things are looking bad, the most important piece of hard data, the Unemployment report, continues to show that the job market is in solid shape.  Friday’s NFP outcome of 139K was a few thousand more than forecast, but a lot more than the ADP result last Wednesday and much better than the ISM indices would have indicated.  Earnings rose, and government jobs shrunk for the first time in far too long with the only real negative the fact that manufacturing payrolls fell -8K.  But net, it is difficult to spin the data as anything other than better than expected.  Not surprisingly, the result was a strong US equity performance and a massive decline in the bond market with 10-year yields jumping 10bps in minutes (see below).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But that is not the story that people are discussing.  Rather, the devolution of the situation in LA is the only story of note as ICE agents apparently carried out a series of court-warranted raids and those people affected took umbrage.  The face-off escalated as calls for violence against ICE officers rose while the LAPD was apparently told to stand down by the mayor.  President Trump called out the National Guard to protect the ICE agents and now we are at a point of both sides claiming the other side is acting illegally.  Certainly, the photos of the situation seem like it is out of hand, reminding me of Minneapolis in the wake of George Floyd, but I am not on site and can make no claims in either direction.  

It strikes me that for our purposes here, the question is how will this impact markets going forward.  A case could be made that the unrest is symptomatic of the chaos that appears to be growing around several cities in the US and could be blamed for investors seeking to move their capital elsewhere, thus selling US assets and the dollar.  Equally, a case could be made that haven assets remain in demand and while US equities do not fit that bill, Treasuries should.  In that case, precious metals and bonds are going to be in demand.  The one thing about which we can be sure is there will be lawsuits filed by Democratic governors against the federal government for overstepping their authority, but no injunctions have been issued yet.

However, let’s step back a few feet and see if we can appraise the broader situation.  The US fiscal situation remains cloudy as the Senate wrangles over the Big Beautiful Bill (BBB), although I expect it will be passed in some form by the end of the month.  The debt situation is not going to get any better in the near-term, although if the fiscal package can encourage faster nominal growth, it is possible to flatten the trajectory of that debt growth.  Meanwhile, the tariff situation is also unclear as to its results, with no nations other than the UK having announced a deal yet, although the administration continues to promise a number are coming soon.

If I look at these issues, it is easy to grow concerned over the future.  While it is not clear to me where in the world things are that much better, capital flows into the US could easily slow.  Yet, domestically, one need only look at the consumer, which continues to buy a lot of stuff, and borrow to do it (Consumer Credit rose by $17.9B in April) and recognize that the slowdown, if it comes, will take time to arrive.  Remember, too, that every government, everywhere, will always err on the side of reflating an economy to prevent economic weakness, and that means that the first cracks in the employment side could well lead to Fed cuts, and by extension more inflation.  (This note by StoneX macro guru Vincent Deluard discussing the Cancellation of Recessions is a must read).  I have spoken ad nauseum about the extraordinary amount of debt outstanding in the world, and how it will never be repaid.  Thus, it will be refinanced and devalued by EVERY nation.  The question is the relative pace of that adjustment.  In fact, I would argue, that is both the great unknown, and the most important question.

While answering this is impossible, a few observations from recent data are worth remembering.  US economic activity, at least per the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow continues to rebound dramatically from Q1 with a current reading of 3.8%.  Meanwhile, Chinese trade data showed a dramatic decline in exports to the US (-35%) but an increased Trade Surplus of $103.2B as they shifted exports to other markets and more interestingly, imports declined-3.4%.  in fact, it is difficult to look at this chart of Chinese imports over the past 3 years and walk away thinking that their economy is doing that well.  Demand is clearly slowing to some extent, and while their Q1 GDP was robust, that appears to have been a response to the anticipated trade war.  Do not be surprised to see Chinese GDP slowing more substantially in Q2 and beyond.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Europe has been having a moment as investors listen to the promises of €1 trillion or more to build up their defense industries and flock to European defense companies that had been relatively cheap compared to their US counterparts.  But as the continent continues to insist on energy suicide, the long-term prospects are suspect.  Canada just promised to raise its defense spending to 2% of GDP, finally, a sign of yet more fiscal stimulus entering the market and the UK, while also on energy suicide watch, has seen its service sector hold up well.

The common thread, which will be exacerbated by the BBB, is that more fiscal spending, and therefore increased debt are the future.  Which nation is best placed to handle that increase?  Despite everything that you might believe is going wrong in the US, ultimately the economic dynamism that exists in the US surpasses that of every other major nation/bloc.  I still fear that the Fed is going to cut rates, drive inflation higher and undermine the dollar before the year is over, but in the medium term, no other nation appears to have the combination of skills and political will to do anything other than what they have been doing already.  And that is why the long-term picture in the US remains the most enticing.  This is not to say that US asset prices will improve in a straight line higher, just that the broad direction remains clear, at least to me.

Ok, I went on way too long, sorry.  As there is no US data until Wednesday’s CPI, we will ignore that for now.  A market recap is as follows:  Asia had a broadly stronger session with Japan, China, HK, Korea and India all following in the US footsteps from Friday and showing solid gains.  Europe, though, is mostly in the red with only Spain’s 0.25% gain the outlier amongst major markets.  As to US futures, they are essentially unchanged at this hour (7:00).

Treasury yields have backed off -2bps from Friday’s sharp climb and European sovereign yields are softer by between -3bps and -4bps as although there has been no European data released; the discussion continues as to how much the ECB is going to cut rates going forward.  JGB yields were unchanged overnight.

In the commodity space, while oil (+0.3%), gold (+0.1%) and even silver (+0.8%) are edging higher, platinum has become the new darling of speculators with a 2.8% climb overnight that has taken it up more than 13.5% in the past week and 35% YTD.  Remarkably, it is still priced about one-third of gold, although there are those who believe that is set to change dramatically.  A quick look at the chart below does offer the possibility of a break above current levels opening the door to a virtual doubling of the price.  And in this environment, a run at the February 2008 all-time highs seems possible.

Finally, the dollar is softer across the board this morning, against virtually all its G10 and EMG counterparts.  AUD (+0.55%) and NZD (+0.7%) are leading the way, but the yen (+0.5%) is having a solid session as are the euro and pound, both higher by 0.25%.  In the emerging markets, PLN (+0.7%) is the leader with the bulk of the rest of the space higher by between +0.2% and +0.4%.  BRL (-0.3%) is the outlier this morning, but that looks much more like a modest retracement of recent gains than a new story.

Absent both data and any Fedspeak (the quiet period started on Friday), we are left to our own devices.  My take is there are still an equal number of analysts who are confident a recession is around the corner as those who believe one will be avoided.  After reading the Deluard piece above, I am coming down on the side of no recession, at least not in a classical sense, as no politician anywhere can withstand the pain, at least not in the G10 and China.  That tells me that while Europe may be the equity flavor of the moment, commodities remain the best bet as they are undervalued overall, and all that debt and new money will continue to devalue fiat currencies.

Good luck

Adf

Hard to Resolve

Posted on by

The OECD has declared
That growth this year will be impaired
By tariffs, as trade
Continues to fade
And no one worldwide will be spared
 
The funny thing is, the US
This quarter is showing no stress
But how things evolve
Is hard to resolve
‘Cause basically it’s just a guess

 

The OECD published their latest economic outlook and warned that global economic growth is likely to slow down because of the changes in tariff policies initiated by the Trump administration.  Alas for the OECD, the only people who listen to what they have to say are academics with no policymaking experience or authority.  It is largely a talking shop for the pointy-head set.  Ultimately, their biggest problem is that they continue to utilize econometric models that are based on the last 25-30 years of activity and if we’ve learned nothing else this year, it is that the world today is different than it has been for at least a generation or two.

At the same time, a quick look at the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow forecast for Q2 indicates the US is in the midst of a very strong economic quarter.

Now, while the US does not represent the entire OECD, it remains the largest economy in the world and continues to be the driver of most economic activity elsewhere.  As the consumer of last resort, if another nation loses access to the US market, they will see real impairment in their own economy.  I would argue this has been the underlying thesis of the Trump administration’s tariff negotiations, change your ways or lose access, and that is a powerful message for many nations that rely on selling to the US.

Of course, it can be true that the US performs well while other nations suffer but that is not the OECD call.  Rather, they forecast US GDP growth will fall to 1.6% this year, down from 2.4% last year and previous forecasts of 2.2%.

But perhaps now is a good time to ask about the validity of GDP as a marker for everyone.  You may recall that in Q1, US GDP fell -0.2% (based on the most recent update received last Thursday) and that the media was positively gleeful that President Trump’s policies appeared to be failing.  Now, if Q2 GDP growth is 4.6% (the current reading), do you believe the media will trumpet the success?  Obviously, that is a rhetorical question.  But a better question might be, does the current calculation of GDP measure what we think it means?

If you dust off your old macroeconomics textbook, you will see that GDP is calculated as follows:

Y = C + I + G + (X – M)

Where:

Y = GDP

C = Consumption

I = Investment

G = Government Spending

X = Exports

M = Imports

In the past I have raised the question of the inclusion of G in the calculation, as there could well be a double counting issue there, although I suppose that deficit spending should count.  But the huge disparity between Q1 and Q2 this year is based entirely on Net Exports (X -M) as in Q1, companies rushed to over order imports ahead of the tariffs and in Q2, thus far, imports have fallen dramatically.  But all this begs the question, is Q2 really demonstrating better growth than Q1?  Remember, the GDP calculation was created by John Maynard Keynes back in the 1930’s as a policy tool for England after WWI.  The world today is a far different place than it was nearly 100 years ago, and it seems plausible that different tools might be appropriate to measure how things are done.  

All this is to remind you that while the economic data matters a little, it is not likely to be the key driver of market activity.  Instead, capital flows typically have a much larger impact on market movements which is why central bank policies are so closely watched.  For now, capital continues to flow into the US, although one of the best arguments against President Trump’s policy mix (and goals really) is that they could discourage those flows and that would have a very serious negative impact on financial markets.  Of course, he will trumpet the real investment flows, with current pledges of between $4 trillion and $6 trillion (according to Grok) as offsetting any financial outflows.  And in fairness, I believe the economy will be better served if the “I” term above is real foreign investment rather than portfolio flows into the S&P 500 or NASDAQ.

There is much yet to be written about the way the economy will evolve in 2025.  I remain hopeful but many negative things can still occur to prevent progress.

Ok, let’s take a look at how markets are absorbing the latest data and forecasts.

The barbarous relic and oil
Spent yesterday high on the boil
While bond yields are tame
These rallies may frame
A future where risk may recoil

I’ll start with commodities this morning where we saw massive rallies in both the metals and energy complexes yesterday as gold (-0.8% this morning) rallied nearly 2% during yesterday’s session and both silver (-1.4%) and copper (-1.7%), while also slipping this morning, saw even bigger gains with silver touching its highest level since 2012.  Copper, too, continues to trade near all-time highs as there is an underlying bid for real assets as opposed to fiat currencies.  Meanwhile, oil (+0.3%) rallied nearly 4% yesterday and is still trending higher, although remains in the midst of its trading range.  Given the bearish backdrop of declining growth expectations and OPEC increasing production, something isn’t making much sense.  Lower oil prices have been a key driver of declining inflation readings around the world.  If this reverses, watch out.

Turning to equities, yesterday’s weak US start turned into a modest up day although the follow through elsewhere in the world has been less consistent.  Tokyo was basically flat while Hong Kong (+1.5%) was the leader in Asia on the back of the story that Presidents Trump and Xi will be speaking this week as well as some solid local news.  But elsewhere in Asia, the picture was more mixed with modest gains and losses in various nations.  In Europe, despite a softer than expected inflation reading this morning, with headline falling to 1.9%, equity indices have been unable to gain much traction in either direction.  This basically cements a 25bp cut by the ECB on Thursday, but clearly the trade situation has investors nervous.  Meanwhile, US futures are pointing slightly lower at this hour (7:25), but only on the order of -0.2%.

Bond yields, which backed up yesterday, are sliding this morning with -2bps the standard move in Treasuries, European sovereigns and JGBs overnight.  We did hear from Ueda-san last night and he promised to adjust monetary policy only when necessary, although given base rates there are 0.5% and CPI is running at 3.5%, I’m not sure what he is looking at.  The very big picture remains there is too much debt in the world and the big question is how it will be resolved.  But my take is that won’t happen anytime soon.

Finally, the dollar, which had been under pressure yesterday has rebounded this morning, regaining much of the losses seen Monday.  The euro (-0.5%) and pound (-0.4%) are good proxies for the magnitude of movement we are seeing although SEK (-0.7%) is having a little tougher time.  In fairness, though, SEK has been the best performing G10 currency so far this year, gaining more than 13%.  In the EMG bloc, PLN (-1.0%) is the laggard, perhaps on the election results with the right-wing candidate winning and now calling into question the current government there and its ability to continue to move closer to the EU policy mix.  It should also be noted that the Dutch government fell this morning as Geert Wilders, the right-wing party leader, and leading vote getter in the last election, pulled out of the government over immigration and asylum issues.  (and you thought that was just a US thing!). In the meantime, I will leave you with the following 5-year chart of the DXY to allay any concerns that the dollar is about to collapse.  While we are at the bottom of the range of the past 3 years, we have traded far below here pretty recently, let alone throughout history.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, JOLTs Job Openings (exp 7.1M) and Factory Orders (-3.0%, 0.2% ex Transport) are on the docket and we hear from 3 more Fed speakers.  But again, Fed comments just don’t have the same impact as they did even last year.  In the end, I do like the dollar lower, but don’t be looking for a collapse.

Good luck

Adf

So Mind-Blowing

Posted on by

On one hand, the chorus is growing
That US debt is so mind-blowing
The ‘conomy will
Slow down, then stand still
As ‘flation continues its slowing
 
But others remind us the data
Does not show a slowing growth rate-a
And their main concerns
Are Powell still yearns
For rate cuts to help market beta

 

As many of us enjoyed the long weekend, it appears it is time to put our noses back to the proverbial grindstone.  I know that as I age, I find the meaning of the Memorial Day holiday to grow in importance, although I have personally been very fortunate having never lost a loved one in service of the nation.  However, as the ructions in the nation are so evident each day, I remain quite thankful for all those that “…gave the(ir) last full measure of devotion” as President Lincoln so eloquently remarked all those years ago.

But on to less important, but more topical things.  A week ago, an X account I follow, The Kobeissi Letter, posted the following which I think is such an excellent description of why we are all so confused by the current market gyrations.  

Prior to President Trump’s second term, I would contend that the broad narrative had some internal consistency to it, so risk-on days saw equity markets rally along with commodities while bond prices would fall (yields rise) and the dollar would sink as well.  Similarly, risk-off days would see pretty much the opposite.  And it was not hard to understand the logic attached to the process.  

But here we are, some four plus months into President Trump’s term and pretty much every old narrative has broken into pieces.  I think part of that stems from the fact that the mainstream media, who were purveyors of that narrative, have been shown to be less than trustworthy in much of what they reported during the Biden Administration, and so there is a great deal of skepticism now regarding all that they say, whether political or financial.

However, I think a bigger part of the problem is that different markets have seen participants focusing on different idiosyncratic issues rather than on the bigger picture, and so there are many mini narratives that are frequently at odds.  Add to this the fact that there continues to be a significant dichotomy between the soft, survey data and the hard, calculated data, with the former pointing toward recession or stagflation while the latter seems to be pointing to stronger economic activity, and the fact that if you ask twenty market participants about the impact of President Trump’s tariff policies, you will receive twenty-five different explanations for why markets are behaving in a given manner and what those policies will mean for the economy going forward.

It is at times like these, when there are persuasive short-term arguments on both sides that I step back and try to look at bigger picture events.  In this category I place two things, energy and debt.  Energy is life.  Economic activity is simply energy transformed and the more energy a nation has and the cheaper it is, the better off that economy will be.  President Trump has made no bones about his desire to cement the US as the number one energy producer on the planet and to allow affordable energy to power the economy forward.  As that occurs, that is a medium- and long-term bullish backdrop.

On the other hand, we cannot forget the debt situation, which is an undeniable drag on economic activity.  Forgetting the numbers per se, the fact that the US debt/GDP ratio is at wartime levels during peacetime (well, US peacetime) with no obvious end to the spending is a key concern.  But it is not just the US with a growing debt/GDP ratio.  Here is a listing from tradingeconomics.com of the G20’s ratios.  (Russia is the bottom of the list but not relevant for this discussion.)

And remember what has been promised by Germany and the Eurozone with respect to defense spending? More than €1 trillion for Germany and it sounds, if my addition is correct, like upwards of €1.7 trillion across the continent.  And all of that will be borrowed, so that is another 22% in Germany alone.  The point is the global debt/GDP ratio remains above 300% for public and private debt.  As government debt grows above 100%, at some point, we are going to see central banks, in sync, clamp down on longer-term yields.  

However they couch it, and however they do it, whether actual yield curve control, through regulations requiring banks and insurance companies to hold more government bonds on their balance sheets with no capital charges, or through adjustments to tax driven accounts like IRA’s and 401K’s, requiring a certain amount of government debt in the portfolio to maintain the tax deferred status, I expect that is what we are going to see.  And even with oil prices declining, which I think remains the trend, inflation is going to be with us for a long time to come as debt will be monetized.  It is the only solution absent a depression.  And every central bank will be in on the joke.  Which takes us to this morning…

As yields were soaring
The BOJ kept quiet
Until yesterday

Apparently, the bond vigilantes have spent the past decades learning Japanese.  At least that is what I conclude from the price action, and more importantly, the BOJ’s recent response in the JGB market. As you can see in the chart below, there has been a significant reversal in 30-year JGB yields with similar price action in both the 20-year and 40-year varieties.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

You may recall that last week, the Japanese government issued 20-year bonds, and the auction went quite poorly, with yields rising sharply (that was the large green candle six sessions ago). Well, it seems that the BOJ (along with the Ministry of Finance) have figured out that the bond situation in Japan is reaching its limits. After all, in less than two months, 30-year JGB yields rose 100 basis points from a starting point of about 2.2%.  That is an enormous move.  Now, if we look at the table above, we are reminded that Japan’s debt/GDP ratio is the highest in the developed world at well over 200%.  In addition, the BOJ owns more than 53% of all JGBs outstanding.  Quite frankly, it is easy to make the case that the BOJ has been monetizing Japanese debt for years.  

As it happens, last week the BOJ held one of their periodic (actually, the 22nd) “Bond Market Group” meetings in which they discuss with various groups of market participants the situation in the JGB market regarding liquidity and trading capabilities and the general functioning of the market.  The two charts below, taken from the BOJ’s website (H/T Weston Nakamura) demonstrate that there is growing concern in the market as to its ability to continue along its current path.

The concern demonstrated by market participants is a clear signal, at least to me, that we are entering the end game.  For all the angst about the situation in the US, with excessive fiscal expenditures and too much debt, Japan has that on steroids.  And while Japan has the benefit of being a net creditor country, the US has the advantage of having both the strongest military in the world and issuing the world’s reserve currency.  As well, the US neighborhood is far less troublesome than Japan’s in East Asia with two potential protagonists, China and North Korea.  All I’m saying is that after decades of kicking the can down the road, it appears that the road may be ending for Japan and difficult policy decisions regarding spending, deficits and by extension JGB issuance are coming soon.

It’s funny, many economists have, in the past, described the US situation as Japanification, with rising debt and slowing growth.  But perhaps Japanification will really be the road map for how to respond to the first true limits on the issuance of government debt for a major economy.  Last night, JGB yields fell across the board, dragging global yields down with them.  The yen (-0.8%) weakened sharply, reversing its trend of the past two weeks, while the Nikkei (+0.5%) rallied.  Perhaps market participants are feeling comforted by the fact the Japanese government seems finally ready to recognize that things must change.  But this is the beginning of that process, not the end, and there will be many twists and turns along the way.  Stay tuned.

Ok, I really ran on, but I feel it is critical for us all to recognize the debt situation and that there are going to be changes coming.  As to other markets overnight, this is what we’ve seen.  Asia was mixed with gainers (Hong Kong, Australia, Singapore) and laggards (China, Korea, India, Taiwan) but nothing moving more than 0.5% in either direction.  Europe, on the other hand, has been the beneficiary of President Trump delaying the tariffs on the EU until July 9th, with all the major indices higher led by the DAX (+0.8%) which also rallied more than 1% yesterday.  Say what you will about President Trump, he has gotten trade discussions moving FAR faster than ever before in history.  US futures, at this hour (6:15) are also pointing nicely higher, more than 1.3% across the board.

We’ve already discussed bond yields where 10yr Treasury yields have backed off by 5bps this morning although European sovereign yields have not benefitted quite the same way with declines of only 2bps on average.  But the trend in all cases is for lower yields right now.  Hope springs eternal, I guess.

In the commodity space, with the new view on tariffs, risk is abating and gold (-1.5%) is being sold off aggressively.  Not surprisingly, this has taken the whole metals complex with it.  As to oil (+0.1%) it continues to trade in its recent $60 – $65 range and while the trend remains lower, it is a very slow trend.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is perking up this morning, not only against the yen, but across the board.  On the haven front, CHF (-0.6%) is sinking and the commodity currencies (AUD -0.6%, NZD -0.8%, SEK -0.6%) are also under pressure.  But the euro (-0.4%) is lower and taking the CE4 with it.  In fact, every major counterpart currency is lower vs. the dollar this morning.

On the data front, this morning brings Durable Goods (exp -7.8%, -0.1% ex-transport), Case Shiller Home Prices (4.5%), and Consumer Confidence (87.0). We also hear from NY Fed President Williams this evening.  Chairman Powell spoke at the Princeton graduation ceremony but said nothing about policy.  I will review the rest of the week’s data tomorrow.

Bonds are the thing to watch for now, especially if we are going to see more active policy adjustments to address what has long been considered an unsustainable path.  The question is, will there be fiscal adjustments that help?  Or will central banks simply soak up the bonds?  While I hope it is the former, I fear it is the latter.  Be prepared.

Good luck

Adf

A True F’ing Cluster

Posted on by

Seems everyone just wants to sell
Their equities and bonds as well
But what will they do
With funds they accrue
If everything’s all gone to hell?
 
I guess it’s why gold still has luster
And Bitcoin’s become a blockbuster
The future’s unclear
And there’s growing fear
That this is a true f’ing cluster

 

It is difficult to highlight any particular driver of any market movement this morning.  I imagine yesterday’s US equity selloff left a sour taste in the mouths of investors around the world which may help explain why virtually every equity market in Asia (Nikkei -0.85%, Hang Seng -1.2%, Korea -1.2%, India -0.8%) was lower last night or is so (CAC -1.0%, DAX -0.9%, IBEX -0.9%, FTSE 100 -0.65%) this morning.  But bonds are hardly the destination of those funds with yields essentially unchanged this morning after yesterday’s bond sell-off (yield rally).  In fact, in Japan, the long end of the curve, 30-year and 40-year, yields have each traded to new record highs.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, if investors are selling stocks and not buying bonds, exactly what are they doing with the funds?  Gold, (-0.5%) which has had a nice run in the past week, is lower this morning, so it doesn’t appear money is heading there.  Too, platinum (-0.3%) is softer this morning after a massive rally this week.  Oil (-1.6%) is lower, NatGas (-1.1%) is lower, and in truth, it is difficult to find anything doing well.  Except perhaps Bitcoin (+1.0%), which has rallied nearly 7% this week and more than 18% in the past month and is trading at new all-time highs.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It appears that we have reached a point where the market narrative on virtually every asset class (crypto excepted) is that the future is bleak.  There is a bull market in the number of analysts forecasting stagflation because of the US tariff policy and a nascent bull market in the number of analysts calling for much higher US (and by extension other national) yields given the fiscal follies that continue to be evidenced every day.  As much press as the US gets for its massive, peacetime fiscal deficit, in a quieter voice, the IMF just warned France that its fiscal deficits were unsustainable as they, too, are above 7% of GDP.

Our concern should be that central bankers around the world are all going to respond in unison and that response is going to be debt monetization.  Inflation targets are fine as far as they go, but they are not the raison d’etre of central banks.  On a deeper level, central banks, whether independent or not, exist to assure that their respective governments can continue to borrow and fund their expenditures.  Absent a massive fiscal tightening wave around the world, something that seems highly unlikely in our lifetimes, central banks will always be the lender of last resort to their governments.

Now, we already know that fiscal tightening can be accomplished as President Javier Milei in Argentina has accomplished an extraordinary feat down there.  My concern is that it took decades of irresponsible fiscal policy and an almost complete absence of available financing to get the people to vote for change.  Folks, no matter your views about how bad things are in the US or Europe or Japan, we are not even close to the situation there.  So, we know what the future roadmap looks like, Argentina has paved the way, but we are just getting started, I fear.  And in the US, given the advantage of having the global reserve currency, we are much further from a denouement than other Western nations.  

In sum, if you want to know why gold and bitcoin are doing well, I believe they are pointing to the inevitable outcome of global debt monetization, or perhaps debt jubilees.  Owning assets that are a liability of a government that can change the rules if they so desire is not a safe place to be, especially in a fourth turning.  I think this is the message we need to start to understand.  This is not to say things are going to fall apart tomorrow, just that I believe this is the direction of travel.

Well, that was darker than I expected when I started writing this morning, but alas, that is where things lead.  The one thing I haven’t discussed is the dollar and FX markets.  But unlike other markets, FX is a truly relative game, where the dollar’s strength (or weakness) is also manifest as another currency’s weakness (or strength).  A broad-based dollar move, may be a harbinger of other market movements being seen as either better or worse than the US in a macro context, but let’s face it, despite all the angst recently of the dollar’s weakness, the euro is higher by just 4.5% in the past year!  Similarly, the pound (+5.5%) has not moved that far although the yen (+8.5%) has shown more life, albeit from a starting point that was at multi decade lows.  The fact that the dollar is modestly higher this morning, on the order of 0.3%ish across most currencies does not really tell us much.

Let’s take a look at the data we’ve seen so far in the session, with today being Flash PMI day.  In Japan, while Manufacturing edged slightly higher to 49.0, it is still sub-50, and the Services number was weaker taking the Composite below 50.0.  In Europe, France was little changed from last month with all three readings below 50, Germany was much softer than last month with all three readings below 49 and the Eurozone softened, as you would expect, with readings around 49.5.  In fact, as we await US data, India is the only economy showing vibrancy with readings above 60!  (I neglected the UK but alas, they are quickly making themselves irrelevant anyway.  But for good order’s sake, they did manage to tick up from last month, although the Composite is still below 50.)

In the US this morning we get the weekly Initial (exp 230K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims data as well as the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (-0.2) at 8:30.  Then the Flash PMI data (Mfg 50.1, Services 50.8) comes at 9:45 and Existing Home Sales (4.1M) at 10:00.  We also hear from NY Fed President Williams, but is he really going to tell us something new?  I don’t think so.

Sorry to have been so bleak this morning, perhaps the weather has contributed to the mood, but it is hard to find financial positives in the short run.  I was truly excited by the concept of the US cutting spending, but I fear that ship has sailed for now.  If DOGE did nothing else, it opened our eyes to the very specific ways in which government money is being spent on things that had no net benefit for the nation, although obviously the recipients were happy.  Perhaps someday these things will be addressed, but if Argentina is any example, it could still take decades.

Good luck

adf

They Will Get Burned

Posted on by

In Europe, the corporate elite
Have started, their worries, to bleat
They’re now quite concerned
That they will get burned
If dollar sales start to retreat
 
For years, when the dollar was rising
Weak unit sales, it was disguising
But now the buck’s falling
Which they find appalling
As earnings forecasts, they’re downsizing
 

Markets are very interesting constructs.  Not only do they help find a clearing price for supply and demand of something, but they also tend to take on anthropomorphic characteristics in many eyes as some type of creature beyond anyone’s control, but with a tinge of malevolence.  Part of that latter feeling comes from markets’ ability to make every pundit seem like a fool.  After all, it was just 3 days ago when I was reliably informed by the punditry that equity values were set to collapse as the US economy entered a depression.  It seems we may have to wait a few more days for that situation to play out.  And, in fact, they have now changed their tune.  While ascribing the rebound to President Trump’s reversal on some issues, the overall doom and gloom story has moved to the background.  But if there is one thing I have continuously discussed since Trump’s election is that volatility was very likely to increase, and that has certainly been the case. 

Shifting our focus to the FX markets, though, I couldn’t help but chuckle at a Bloomberg article this morning titled, The Dollar’s Slide is Raising Red Flags for Corporate Earnings.  As I am based in the US, the fact that this was a front-page article had me somewhat confused.  A long career in speaking with corporate accounts on FX made it clear that a weak dollar was the best thing for earnings of US multinationals.  Generally, when the dollar was strong, CFOs would ascribe any earnings problems to that issue as a catch-all excuse, but when the dollar declined, outperformance by a company was the result of brilliant execution.

So, you can understand my initial confusion.  But upon reading the article, it turns out they were talking about European corporates, who for the first time in three years find that hedging their US dollar sales is critical.  Not only that, but they have also been quick to highlight that all new hedges will be at worse rates and therefore future earnings are already sure to be impacted.  Now, a quick look at the chart below does show that the euro has risen to its highest level in three years.  But it also shows that compared to the past 20 years, the euro is nowhere near high levels. In fact, it sits well below the median price (somewhere in the 40th percentile actually).  Perhaps European corporate Treasurers have simply forgotten their history.  Or more likely, just like US corporate Treasurers when the dollar is rising, they are seeking a scapegoat.

I cannot emphasize enough that the FX rate is not the driver, but the release valve for all the things that happen in the global economy.  Other actions take place, whether interest rate changes, policy or market, economic adjustments, policy or market, or exogenous events, and the FX rate is the place where equilibria are found.  In fact, arguably, that is the biggest flaw in the Trump administration’s idea that if they weaken the dollar, it will solve policy problems.  The dollar is the tail to the economy’s dog.

In the meantime, the reason one runs a hedge program with consistency is to mitigate the big moves in FX and their impacts on earnings.  But remember, even the best hedge programs lag large secular moves.

Ok, I’ll step down off my high horse and let’s look at how markets behaved overnight.  After yesterday’s second consecutive rally in the US, the picture elsewhere in the world is more mixed.  In Asia, the Nikkei (+0.5%) continued its rebound but the Hang Seng (-0.75%) and CSI 300 (-0.1%) saw no benefit overnight.  Elsewhere in the region winners and losers were pretty evenly split and nobody saw a movement of more than 0.8% in either direction.  In Europe, red is today’s color, but it’s a pale red with losses across the board of the 0.1% to 0.25% variety.  The only news overnight was German Ifo data, which showed a bit of a surprising uptick in the current business climate as well as expectations.  Perhaps the promise of more German fiscal largesse is outweighing concerns over tariffs.  As to US futures, they, too, are lower by about -0.15% at this hour (7:20).

In the bond market, yields are sliding around the world with Treasuries (-3bps) continuing to back away from their recent highs while European sovereigns see yields decline between -3bps and -4bps.  Even JGB yields slipped -1bp overnight.  My take is some of the fear has ebbed away from the market.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.1%) remains in its recent trading range, with a still very large gap above the market in price terms.  The demand story seems fixed at weakening demand because of either slowing growth, or the electrification of everything or something like that, while the supply story is starting to see hints that oil companies are going to back off production with prices at current levels.  The latter feels like the larger short-term risk, although nothing has changed my longer-term view of lower prices here.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.7%) is rebounding after a difficult two days, arguably some real profit taking was seen.  Meanwhile silver (-0.5%) which actually outperformed gold for the past two sessions is giving some of those gains back and copper (+0.8%) is continuing its rebound after a dramatic decline from the all-time highs seen just one month ago.  Talk about a V-shaped recovery!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is softer this morning, giving back about half of yesterday’s 1% gains.  In the G10, SEK and NOK (both +1.1%) are leading the way although the euro (+0.6%) is having a good day, as is the yen (+0.75%). The pound (+0.5%) is a bit of a laggard but after seeing this interview of Ed Miliband (UK Secretary of Energy and Climate Change), and his either inability to understand the implications of his policy, or his willingness to lie about it, I cannot believe the pound will continue to track the euro.  The UK’s energy policy appears designed to destroy the UK economy.  Consider that solar power is a key pillar of their future efforts to achieve net zero carbon emissions, and the UK is the nation that gets the least solar coverage in the world.  After all, it rains there half the time.  Meanwhile, the government is keen to end all other sources of energy.  No matter what you think of President Trump’s policies, they are not nationally suicidal like the UK’s.

Turning to the EMG bloc, gains are the norm, but not universal.  The CE4 are doing well but ZAR (-0.2%) and KRW (-0.6%) with the latter suffering from weaker than expected GDP growth in Q1 while the former, after a strong run since early in April, appears to merely be taking a breather.

We finally see some notable data this morning with Initial (exp 222K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims, Durable Goods (2.0%, 0.3% ex-Transport) and the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (0.11) all at 8:30, then at 10:00 we get Existing Home Sales (4.13M).  Yesterday saw New Home Sales pick up more than expected and the Beige Book indicate that economic activity was unchanged from the past, but uncertainty had risen.

Here’s what we know; the world is not ending but it is continuing to change from the structures created in the post WWII period.  This process is just beginning and anybody who claims to know where things are headed is lying.  I continue to believe in my bigger picture views, but day to day, there is no rhyme or reason, especially given the importance of headline bingo.

Good luck

Adf

Tripping Off Tongues

Posted on by

Recession is tripping off tongues
And pundits ain’t twiddling their thumbs
Political shades
Are driving tirades
And screams at the top of their lungs
 
But are we that likely to see
A minus in our ‘conomy?
We certainly could
And probably should
But life doesn’t always agree

 

The major discussion point over the weekend has been recession, and how likely we are to see one in the US in the coming months.  Of course, this matters to the punditry not because of any concern over the negative impacts a recession has on the population, but ‘more importantly’ because recessions tend to result in sharp declines in equity values.  And let’s face it, do you honestly believe that the editors of the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal are remotely interested in the condition of the majority of the population?  Me neither. 

However, if they can call out something that they believe can impede President Trump, or detract from his current high ratings, they will play that over and over and over.  Funnily enough, when I went to Google Trends, I looked up “recession” over the past 90 days with the result below:

That peak was on March 11 although there was no data of note that day compared to a reading of 9 today. Looking at the news of that day, even CNN had a hard time finding bad news with the four top stories being 1) the Continuing Resolution vote in the House being passed, 2) the Department of Education announcing a 50% RIF, 3) 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum being imposed and 4) Ukraine accepting terms for a 30-day ceasefire.  From an economic perspective, the tariffs clearly will have an impact, but it seems a leap that the average American can go from 25% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to recession in one step.  And based on the positive responses that continue to be seen regarding President Trump’s efforts to reduce the size of government, I doubt the DOE cuts were seen as the beginning of the end of the economy.  

And yet, recession was the talk of the punditry this weekend.  To try to better understand why this is the case, I created the following table of several major economic indicators and their evolution since December, prior to President Trump’s inauguration.

Key indicatorsDecJanFeb
NFP323125151
Unemployment Rate4.10%4.00%4.10%
CPI2.90%3.00%2.80%
Core CPI3.20%3.30%3.10%
PCE2.60%2.50% 
Core PCE2.90%2.60% 
IP1.10%0.30%0.70%
Capacity Utilization77.60%77.70%78.10%
ISM Mfg49.250.950.3
ISM Services5452.853.5
Retail Sales0.70%-1.20%0.20%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Once again, while I am certainly no PhD economist, this table doesn’t strike me as one demonstrating a clear trend in worsening data, certainly not on an across-the-board basis.  Rather, while you might say January was soft, the February data has largely rebounded.  My point is that despite ABC, NBC, Bloomberg, the BBC and CNN all publishing articles or interviews on the topic this weekend, I’m not yet convinced that is the obvious outcome.

My good friend the Inflation Guy™, Mike Ashton, made an excellent point in a recent podcast of his that is very well worth remembering.   The breadth of the US economy is extraordinarily wide and covers areas from manufacturing to agriculture to finance to energy and technology along with the necessary housing markets as well as the entire population consuming both goods and services.  Added to the private sector, the government sector is also huge, although President Trump and Elon Musk are trying hard to shrink it.  But the point is that it is not merely possible, but likely, that while some areas of the economy may go through weak patches, that doesn’t mean the entire economy is going to sink into the abyss.

If we think back to the last two recessions, the most recent was Covid inspired, which resulted from the government literally shutting down the economy for a period of several months, while giving out money.  Net, things weakened, but even then, there were stronger parts and weaker parts.  Go back to the GFC and the housing bubble popped and dragged banks along with it.  That was the problem because banking weakness inhibits the free flow of money and that will impact everyone.

The question to be asked now, I would suggest is, are we likely to see another catalyst that will have such widespread impacts?  Higher tariffs are not going to do the trick.  Shrinking government, although I believe it is critical for a better long-term trajectory for the economy, will have a short-term impact, but it is not clear to me that it will negatively impact the economy writ large.  Certainly, the Washington DC area, but will it impact the Rocky Mountain area?  Or Texas and Florida?  

Now, a recession could well be on the way.  Running 7% budget deficits was capable of papering over many holes in the economy and pumping lots of liquidity into it as well.  If those deficits shrink, meaning spending shrinks, the pace of activity will slow.  But negative?  It seems a stretch to me, at least based on what we have seen so far.  One last thing here, is how might this potential weakening economic growth impact inflation? Now, we all ‘know’ that a recession causes inflation to decline, don’t we?  Hmmm. While that makes intuitive sense, and we hear it a lot, perhaps the Inflation Guy™ can help here as well.  Back in February he wrote a very good explanation about how that is not really the case at all, at least based on the macroeconomic data.  The truth is economic growth and inflation have very little correlation at all.

Of course, perhaps the most critical issue for the punditry is, will a recession drive stock prices lower?  Here the news is far less sanguine if you are a shareholder and believe there is going to be a recession.  As you can see from the below chart of the S&P 500, pretty much every recession for the last 100 years has resulted in a decline in stock market indices.

Source: macrotrends.net

This is a log chart so some of those dips don’t seem that large, but the average downturn during a recession is about 30%, although that number can vary widely.  To sum it up, while the data doesn’t scream recession to me, it cannot be ruled out.  As well, both President Trump and Secretary Bessent have indicated that weakness is likely going to be a result of their early actions, although the idea is to pave the way for a more stable economic performance ahead.  As I have written repeatedly, volatility is likely the only thing of which we can be certain as all these changes occur.  Hedge your exposures!

Ok, let’s look at the overnight activity.

The rumor is Trump may delay
His tariffs as he tries to weigh
How much he should charge
And how much, writ large,
These nations are going to pay

Equity futures in the US are higher this morning as the big story is that President Trump is considering narrowing the scope of nations who will have tariffs imposed on April 2nd.  Apparently, his administration has identified the “dirty fifteen” nations with the largest bilateral imbalances and they will be first addressed.  The telling comment in the WSJ article I read was when Trump said, “Once you give exemptions for one company, you have to do that for all. The word flexibility is an important word. Sometimes there’s flexibility, there’ll be flexibility.”  To my ear, the final plans are not in place, but my sense is he will impose then remove tariffs, rather than avoid them initially.  Interestingly, that story was written last night, yet Asian equity markets were not that ebullient.  Japan (-0.2%) saw no benefit although Chinese shares (HK +0.9%, CSI 300 +0.5%) fared better. Things elsewhere in the region were mixed with both gainers (India, Thailand) and laggards (Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia) with many bourses little changed overall.

In Europe, green is the predominant color this morning but movement is modest with Spain’s IBEX (+0.4%) the leader and lesser gains elsewhere.  While US futures are all higher by about 1% or more at this hour (6:45) apparently the Europeans aren’t as excited at the tariff delay process.

In the bond market, yields have backed up virtually across the board with Treasuries (+4bps) leading the way higher and most European sovereigns showing yields rising by 1bp or 2bps.  It’s interesting, while there has been much discussion regarding German yields having traded substantially higher in the wake of the effective end of the debt brake and anticipation of much further issuance, a look at the chart below tells me that after that gap higher on the news, concerns over German finances have not deteriorated at all.  And after all, the difference is about 25bps higher, hardly the end of the world.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.7%) is continuing its gradual rebound from the lows seen on, ironically, March 11th.  Arguably, what this tells us is that despite the weekend barrage of recession focused articles, the market doesn’t really see that outcome.  In the metals, strength is the word, again, with copper (+1.25%) making new all-time highs on the back of China’s stated goals of growing its strategic stockpile.  Not surprisingly, both gold (+0.2%) and silver (+0.6%) are also climbing this morning alongside copper as commodities remain in greater demand than a recession would indicate.

Finally, the dollar is a bit softer despite rising Treasury yields with both the euro (+0.3%) and pound (+0.4%) bouncing after last week’s modest declines.  And this is despite lackluster Flash PMI readings this morning out of Europe.  The biggest winner is NOK (+0.6%) which given the dollar’s broad weakness and oil’s rebound makes perfect sense.  Otherwise, while the dollar’s weakness is broad, it is no deeper than the aforementioned currencies.

Given the length of this note already (my apologies) and the dearth of data to be released, with only the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (exp +0.08), I will cover data tomorrow as we do end the week with GDP and PCE data.

Headline bingo remains the key concern for all market participants, but ultimately, my altered view of a softer dollar and higher commodities remains intact.

Good luck

Adf

Starting to Fret

Posted on by

In DC, they’re starting to fret
That Trump will make good on his threat
If government closes
The risk that it poses
Is markets become quite upset

 

There is yet another budget showdown in Washington as the Biden administration never passed the bills necessary to fund the government for the rest of this fiscal year ending on September 30th.  The previous continuing resolution (CR) expires at midnight on Saturday and if a new funding law is not enacted, then a government “shutdown” occurs.  Now, a government shutdown is not like a company that runs out of money shutting down.  Rather roles the President deems essential continue to operate, along with the military, but other roles see the people furloughed until new legislation is passed.  Everybody gets paid back wages when things go back to normal.

The situation is that the House of Representatives did pass a CR to fund the government at almost the exact same levels as last year and sent it to the Senate.  However, in the Senate, it needs to beat a filibuster, so needs 60 votes to pass and get to President Trump’s desk.  However, last night, Senate Minority Leader Shumer declared the Democrats would not support the bill, so would rather have the government shut down.  This is a big change from the previous 3 times that there were government shutdowns, because each of those was blamed on Republican intransigence.  

In the end, whatever the politics, the market impact has been negative for stocks while bonds held up, even rallied.  Of course, previous shutdowns all were amidst very different economic environments as inflation was quiescent and bull markets in both stocks and bonds were extant.  As such, arguably, the momentum behind the market was sufficient to offset any concern over the shutdown.  But this time markets are already under pressure going into the potential shutdown.  I fear that market dislocation, at least in the equity markets, could be far more severe if this one occurs.  Something to keep in mind.

The history shows the US
Has long done all things to excess
But now, as they try
With less, to get by
The pundits complain of regress

Reading the WSJ this morning, I couldn’t help but think of the George Costanza opposite day episode of Seinfeld when reading the Heard on the Street column decrying the fact that the Trump administration is seeking to rein in fiscal excess.  Of course, this is an issue that has been fodder for the punditry for a long time, how the US was living beyond its means and borrowing too much money.  But now, this article is concerned about the opposite.  The key concern is that if the US government doesn’t continue to run massive deficits, the economy will slow and corporate profits will fall dramatically, resulting in falling equity prices.

Arguably, this would always be the case if a change of this nature were to be made.  And remember, the punditry was all in on making these changes.  However, now, they point to Germany and the DAX, which has outperformed US markets over the past several weeks as the model.  (chart below from WSJ)

And what is Germany doing so well?  Why, they are talking about borrowing an extra €500 billion, eliminating their debt brake that ensures budget deficits remain below 0.35% of GDP, and funding a huge buildup in defense spending.  Germany, which has long been seen as the only source of fiscal rectitude is now being lionized for getting rid of that trait.  As I said, opposite day!

The lesson, if you haven’t learned it yet, is that the ascendance of Donald Trump to the presidency is going to continuously change many long-held beliefs in governments around the world, as well as in the punditry, who may find that things which seemed great in theory may have consequences previously unconsidered.  From a market perspective, this means volatility will continue to be the best estimate for the future.

Ok, let’s turn our attention to markets and see how things performed overnight.  After yesterday’s mixed session in the US, where the DJIA could not manage a gain despite cooler than expected CPI readings, overnight saw a mixed picture as well.  Japan was either side of unchanged while both Hong Kong (-0.6%) and China (-0.4%) slipped as did most other Asian markets with Malaysia (+1.7%) the true exception.  In Europe, though, screens are green as excess government spending is rewarded, although the gains are modest, 0.3% or so.  

On the topic of excess spending regarding Germany, I read yesterday that the plan to alter the constitution may have serious problems (meaning that spending may not materialize) because about 50 Bundestag members in the old parliament lost their seats in the election, so it is not clear they will be willing to vote to overturn the constitution during the current lame duck session and allow the debt brake to be set aside for defense purposes.  As I said when the story first arose, we are still a long way from Germany paying their own way defensively.  US futures, meanwhile, are slightly softer at this hour (7:15).

In the bond market, yesterday saw yields climb a few bps and this morning those trends remain with Treasury yields (+2bps) not climbing as much as European sovereigns (+3bps to 4bps) as there appears to still be a level of confidence that all the extra defense spending will happen.  One story that should have Europeans concerned is that the European Commission, in their effort to find funding for their newly found defensive aggressiveness, have spied the €10 trillion in savings that European citizens hold.  Frau von der Leyen, the European Commission President was quoted as saying, ”we’ll turn private savings into much needed investment.” 

Call me crazy but my economics classes taught me the identity that Savings º Investment, so I am not sure why those savings aren’t already being invested.  Perhaps European citizens are not investing where Frau von der Leyen wants and that is the problem.  At any rate, I suppose even if Germany fails to overcome its constitutional debt brake, the EU will get there anyway.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.3%) is edging lower after a nice run for the past several days as it bounced off the bottom of its trading range.  Yesterday’s EIA data showed a large draw in gasoline, but I am given to understand that is a seasonal thing (H/T Alyosha).  Meanwhile, nothing has dissuaded investors that gold (+0.25%) is a good thing to hold as it rallied further after yesterday’s gains, although both silver (-0.3%) and copper (-0.4%) are a touch softer this morning.

Finally, the dollar is somewhat firmer this morning, albeit not dramatically so.  Of course, it has been under significant pressure during the past week+, so this trading response ought be no surprise.  SEK (-0.8%) is the laggard in the G10, but you must remember that it has been the leading gainer over the past month.  Meanwhile, AUD (-0.5%) and NZD (-0.45%) are also under a bit of pressure this morning, but the rest of this bloc has seen far less movement.  In the emerging markets, HUF (-0.6%) is the laggard with the rest of the bloc seeing declines on the order of -0.3% or less.  As I said, nothing dramatic here to see.

Yes, yesterday’s CPI data was a bit cooler than anticipated, but as my friend The Inflation Guy™, Mike Ashton, explained here, I wouldn’t get too excited that inflation is collapsing back to the Fed’s 2% target.  This morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1900K) Claims data as well as PPI (headline 0.3%, 3.3% Y/Y; core 0.3%, 3.5% Y/Y). However, given CPI is already out, I don’t think it will have much impact.  Rather, as we have observed lately, politics remains the key driver of all market reactions.  The unfolding government shutdown in the US and the German debt drama are the two most noteworthy issues right now, but Ukraine and the Middle East are still out there to offer surprises.

Once again, volatility is the only thing about which we can be sure.  That said, my confidence is growing that the dollar will decline over time.

Good luck

Adf

In a Trice

Posted on by

The calendar’s not e’en turned twice
Since Trump, with JD as his Vice
Have taken the reins
And beat up on Keynes
While weeding out waste in a trice
 
For markets, the problem, it seems
Is rallies are now merely dreams
So, equity buyers
Are putting out fires
While thinking up pump and dump schemes
 
For bondholders, it’s not so clear
If salvation truly is near
But one thing seems sure
The buck will endure
Much weakness throughout this whole year

 

We have not even reached 50 days of a Trump presidency as of this morning and nobody would fault you if you estimated we had three years of policies enacted to date.  The pace of changes has been blistering and clearly most politicians, let alone investors, have not been prepared for all that has occurred.

One of the things that I read regularly is that Trump is destroying the Rules Based Order (RBO) which was underpinned by the Pax Americana of the US essentially being the world’s policeman.  This is cast as a distinct negative under the premise that things were going great and now, he is upsetting the applecart for his own personal reasons.  Of course, market participants had grown quite accustomed to this framework, had built all sorts of models to profit from it and with the Fed’s help of monetization of debt, were able to gain significantly at the expense of those without market linked assets.  Hence, the K-shaped recovery.

But while that is a lovely narrative, is it really an accurate representation of the way of the world?  If the US was truly the world’s policeman, and we certainly spend enough on defense to earn that title, perhaps it was time for the US to be fired from that role anyway.  After all, there is currently raging military conflict in Ukraine, Lebanon, Syria, Congo, Sudan and the ongoing tensions in Gaza.  That’s a pretty long list of wars to claim that things were going great.

Secondly, the question of financing all this conflagration, as well as other economic goals, notably the alleged transition to net zero carbon energy production, appears to be reaching the end of the line.  While the US can still borrow as needed, (assuming the debt ceiling is raised), the reality is that the US gross national debt outstanding is greater than $36,000,000,000,000 relative to GDP that is a touch under $28,000,000,000,000.  On a global basis, total (not just government) debt is in excess of $300,000,000,000,000 while global GDP clocks in somewhere just north of $100,000,000,000,000.  Arguably, on a credit metric basis, the world is BB- or B+, a clear indication that all that debt is unlikely to be repaid.

If we consider things considering this information, perhaps the RBO had outlived its usefulness.  Arguably, the loudest complaints are coming from those who benefitted most greatly and are quite unhappy to see things change against them.  But as evidenced by the polls taken after President Trump’s speech last Tuesday evening, the bulk of the American public is still strongly supporting this agenda.  The idea that the president and his Treasury secretary are seeking to engineer a short-term recession early, blame it on fixing Biden’s mess, and having things revert to stronger growth in time for the 2026 mid-term elections is not crazy.  In fact, there have been several comments from both men that short-term pain would be necessary to achieve a stabler, long-term gain.

So, what does this mean for the markets?  You have no doubt already recognized that volatility is the main event in every market, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.  But some of the themes that follow this agenda would be for US equities to suffer relative to other markets, as the last decade plus of American exceptionalism, led by massive deficit spending and borrowing, would reverse under this new thesis.  Add to this the sudden realization that other nations are going to be investing significantly more in their own defense, and money will be flowing out of the US into Europe, Japan and emerging markets around the world.

Bonds are a tougher call as a weaker economy would ordinarily mean lower yields, but the question of tariff impacts on prices, as well as reshoring, which, by definition, will raise prices, could mean we see the yield curve steepen with the Fed cutting rates more aggressively than currently priced, but 10-year and 30-year yields staying right where they are now.

I believe this will be a strong period for commodities as all that foreign capex will be a driver, as will the fact that, as I will discuss shortly, the dollar is likely to underperform significantly.  Gold will retain its haven characteristics as well as remain in demand for foreign central banks, while industrial metals should hold their own.  As to oil, my take is lower initially, as OPEC returns its production and slowing GDP weighs on demand, at least for a while, although eventually, I suspect it will rebound along with economic activity.

Finally, the dollar will remain under significant pressure across the board.  Clearly, Trump is seeking a weaker dollar to help the export industries, as well as discourage imports.  Add to this the potential for lower yields, lower short-term rates, and an exit of equity investors as US stocks underperform, and you have the making of at least another 15% decline in the greenback this year.

With this as backdrop, we need to touch on three key stories this morning.  First, Friday’s NFP report was pretty much in line with expectations at the headline level but seemed a bit weaker in some of the underlying bits, specifically in the Household Survey where a total of 588K jobs were lost and there was a large increase in the number of part-time workers doing so for economic reasons.  Basically, that means they wanted full-time work but couldn’t find a job.  Markets gyrated after the release, with yields initially sliding but then rebounding to close higher on the day.  Equities, too, closed higher on the day although that had the earmarks of a relief rally after a lousy week overall.  The thing about this report is that it did not include any of the government changes that have been in the press, so next month may offer more information regarding the impact of DOGE and their cuts.

The second story comes from north of the border where Mark Carney, former BOC and BOE head, was elected to lead the Labour Party in Canada and replace Justin Trudeau.  As is always the case, when there is new leadership, there is excitement and he said he will call for a general election in the next several weeks, ostensibly to take advantage of this new momentum.  It seems that President Trump’s derision of not only Trudeau, but Canada as well in many Canadian’s eyes, will play a large role with the two lead candidates, Carney and Poilievre, fighting to explain that they are each better placed to go toe-to-toe with Trump on critical issues.

Here’s the thing, though.  Despite much angst about the US-Canada relationship on the Canadian side of the border, the market viewpoint is nothing has really changed.  a look at the chart below shows that after a bout of weakness for the Loonie in the wake of the US election and leading up to Trump’s tariff announcements, USDCAD is basically unchanged since mid-December, with one day showing a spike and reversal in early February.  My point is that the market has not, at least not yet, determined that the Canadian PM matters very much.

Source: tradingecoomics.com

The last story to discuss is Chinese inflation data which was released Saturday evening in the US and showed deflation in February (-0.7% Y/Y) for CPI and continuing deflation in PPI (-2.2%).  In fact, as you can see from the below chart, PPI in China has been in deflation for several years now.  Recently there have been several articles explaining this offers President Xi a great opportunity for significant stimulus because no matter how much the government spends and how much debt they monetize, inflation won’t be a problem for a long time to come.  I would counter that given deflation has been the norm for several years, they have had this opportunity for quite a while and done nothing with it.  Why will this time be different?  Ultimately, the default result in China is when things are not looking like they will achieve the targeted growth of “about 5%”, you can be sure there will be more investment to build things up adding still more downward pressure on prices as production facilities increase.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The renminbi’s response to this news has been modest, at best, with a tiny decline overnight of -0.25%.  And a look at the chart there shows it is remarkably similar to the CAD, with steady weakness through December and then no real movement since then.  Given the dollar’s recent weakness overall, this seems unusual.  Although, we also know that China prefers a weaker currency to help support their export industries, so perhaps this in not unusual at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, this note is already overly long, so will end it here.  We do have important data later this week with both CPI and Retail Sales coming.  As well, the consensus from the Fedspeak is that they are pretty happy right here and not planning to do anything for a while.

The big picture is best summarized, I believe, by the idea that we are at the beginnings of a regime change in markets as discussed above.  Volatility continues to be the driving force, so hedging remains crucial for those with natural exposures.

Good luckAdf

Dynamited

Posted on by

Investors don’t seem that excited
‘Bout Germany’s now expedited
Designs to rearm
And that caused much harm
To Bunds, with their price dynamited

 

One of the biggest impacts of President Trump’s recent friction with Ukraine and its security is that European nations now realize that their previous ability to make butter, not guns, because the US had enough guns for everybody is no longer necessarily the case.  Mr Trump’s turn inward, which should be no surprise given his campaign rhetoric and America First goals, apparently was a surprise to most European leaders.  It seems they couldn’t believe the US would change course in this manner.  Regardless, the upshot is that Europe finds itself badly under armed and is now promising to change this.

The country best placed to start this process is Germany, where soon-to-be Chancellor, Friedrich Merz has promised a €500 billion spending spree on new defense items.  However, as the Germans don’t have this money laying around, they will need to borrow it.  The wrinkle in this plan is that enshrined in Germany’s constitution is a debt brake designed to prevent fiscal profligacy, kind of like this.  So, Merz has proposed waiving the debt brake for defense expenditures, but in order to do so, will need a two-thirds majority vote in the Bundestag (German parliament).  Now given AfD has been quite anti-war, it is not clear he will be able to obtain the requisite votes but for now, that is not the concern.

However, the German bund market clearly believes he will be successful as evidenced by the chart below. Overall, German 10-year yields rose 30bps yesterday, a dramatic move, and dragged most European sovereigns along for the ride as the new narrative is that all European nations will increase borrowing to spend on their defense.  It is worth noting, though, that the reason German yields have been so low is because the economy there has been exhibiting approximately 0% growth for more than a year as they continue to commit energy suicide seek to achieve their idealistic greenhouse gas emission goals.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The trick, though, is that while Germany, with a debt/GDP ratio around 60%, has plenty of fiscal space to follow through, assuming they can alter their constitution, the rest of Europe is in a much more difficult spot with both France and Italy already under EU scrutiny for their budget deficits and debt/GDP ratios.  Recall, a key aspect of the Eurozone’s creation was the regulation designed to keep national budget deficits below 3% of GDP and drive the debt/GDP ratios to 60% or below.  Right now, Germany is the only nation that fits within those parameters. 

While I have no doubt that they will alter the rules as necessary elsewhere in Europe and certainly given the now perceived existential crisis for Europe, those limits are sure to be ignored, the story in Germany remains different because of the constitution.  Markets, though, clearly believe that a lot more debt is about to be issued by European nations, hence the dramatic decline in bond prices and jump in yields.  

But there are other knock-on effects here as well, notably that the euro is climbing dramatically against the dollar, up nearly 4% in the past week, and far ahead of the pound and most G10 currencies with only the SEK (+1.0% overnight, +6.1% in past week) outperforming the single currency.  For a while I have suggested that short-term rates were losing their sway over the FX markets and traders were looking at 10-year yields.  Certainly, the recent price action indicates that remains the case as Treasury yields (+2bps) have bounced off their lows but have risen far less than their G10 counterparts.  In fact, a look at the movement in 10-year government bond yields over the past month and year reveals just how significant these changes have been.

Source: Bloomberg.com

I feel safe in saying that for the next several weeks, perhaps months, this story of European defensive revival and the knock-on effects is going to be top of mind for both investors and pundits.  Only history will determine if these dramatic changes in policy stances will have been effective in reducing the chance of war or not and if they will have been beneficial or detrimental to economies around the world. As much of the current narrative is driven by politics rather than economics, punditry on the latter is going to be worse than usual.  Once again, I harken back to the need for a robust hedging plan for all those with exposures.  As recent price action across all markets demonstrates, volatility is back, and I believe here to stay for a while.

Ok, let’s run down the rest of the markets not yet discussed.  Yesterday’s US equity bounce was widely appreciated by many although this morning, futures markets are all pointing lower by between -0.75% and -1.25%, enough to wipe out yesterday’s gains.  As to Asia overnight, Japan (+0.8%) followed the US and both Hong Kong (+3.3%) and China (+1.4%) are continuing to get positive vibes from the Chinese twin meetings of policymakers.  More stimulus continues to be the driving belief there although China’s history has shown their stimulus efforts have tended to fall short of initial expectations.  As to Europe, this morning only the DAX (+0.5%) is continuing yesterday’s gains as concerns begin to grow that while Germany can afford to spend more money on defense, the rest of Europe is not in the same situation, so government procurement contracts may be less prevalent than initially hoped.  This is evident in the -0.4% to -1.0% declines seen across both the UK and most of the rest of the continent.

We’ve already discussed bonds, although I should mention that JGB yields have risen 10bps as well, up to new highs for the move and finally above 1.50%

In the commodity space, oil (+0.65%) which has had a very rough week, falling more than -5% in the past seven days, seems to be finding a bit of support.  Recall yesterday’s chart showing the bimodal distribution and that we are now in supply destruction territory.  Ultimately, that should support the price, but the timing is unclear.  In the metals markets, this morning sees red across the board, although not dramatically so, with both precious and base metals sagging on the order of -0.5%.

And lastly the dollar continues to decline, albeit not as swiftly as yesterday.  However, while it is considerably weaker vs. its G10 counterparts, versus the EMG bloc, the story is far less clear.  For instance, the only notable EMG currency gaining ground this morning is CLP (+1.2%) while virtually every other major emerging market currency is actually slipping a bit.  Look at this list; CNY -0.2%, MXN -0.25%, PLN -0.3%, ZAR -0.15%, INR -0.3% and HUF -0.5%.  I have a feeling we are going to see more behavior like this going forward, where G10 currencies are now trading on a different basis than EMG currencies.

On the data front, this morning brings Initial (exp 235K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims as well as the Trade Balance (-$127.4B) and Nonfarm Productivity (1.2%) and Unit Labor Costs (3.0%) all at 8:30.  We also hear from two more Fed speakers, Waller and Bostic later in the day.  Yesterday’s ADP employment data was much weaker than expected, falling to 77K, while the ISM Services data held up well although the prices paid piece did rise.  In addition, there has been a change in tone from the Fed speakers as we are now hearing mention of the possibility of stagflation due to the Trump tariffs, although there was no indication as to which way they will lean if that is the economic path forward.

I continue to highlight volatility as the watchword for now and the near future at least.  As long as politics has become the key driver, and as long as President Trump is that driver, given his penchant to shake things up, the one thing of which I am sure is we have not seen the last dramatic change in perception.  With that in mind, my view is the dollar will remain under pressure for a while yet.

Good luck

Adf

Eyes Like a Bat

Posted on by

The new Mr Yen
Is watching for excess moves
With eyes like a bat

 

While every day of this Trump presidency is filled with remarkable activity at the US government level, financial markets are starting to tune out the noise.  Yes, each pronouncement may well be important to some part of the market structure, but the sheer volume of activity is overwhelming investment views.  The result is that while markets are still trading, there seem to be fewer specific drivers of activity.  Consider the fact that tariffs have been on everyone’s mind since Trump’s inauguration, but nobody, yet, has any idea how they will impact the global macro situation.  Are they inflationary?  Will sellers reduce margins?  Will there be a strong backlash by the US consumer?  None of this is known and so trading the commentary is virtually impossible.

With that in mind, it is worth turning our attention this morning to Japan, where the yen (-0.4%) has been steadily climbing in value, although not this morning, since the beginning of the year as you can see from the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Amongst G10 currencies, the yen is the top performer thus far year-to-date, rising about 5%.  Arguably, the key driver here has been the ongoing narrative that the BOJ is going to continue to tighten monetary policy while the Fed, as discussed yesterday, is still assumed to be cutting rates later in the year.  

Let’s consider both sides of that equation.  Starting with the Fed, just yesterday Atlanta Fed president Bostic explained to a housing conference, “we need to stay where we are.  We need to be in a restrictive posture.”  Now, I cannot believe the folks at the conference were thrilled with that message as the housing market has been desperate for lower rates amid slowing sales and building activity.  But back to the FX perspective, what if the Fed is not going to cut this year?  It strikes me that will have an impact on the narrative, and by extension, on market pricing.

Meanwhile, Atsushi Mimura, the vice finance minister for international affairs (a position known colloquially to the market as Mr Yen) explained, when asked about the current market narrative regarding the BOJ’s recent comments and their impact on the yen, said, “there is no gap with my view.  Amid high uncertainty, we have to keep watching the impact of any speculative trading on, not only the exchange market, but also financial markets overall.”  

If I were to try to describe the current market narrative on the yen, it would be that further yen strength is likely based on the assumed future narrowing of interest rate differentials between the US and Japan.  That has been reinforced by Ueda-san’s comments that they expect to continue to ‘normalize’ policy rates, i.e. raise them, if the economy continues to perform well and if inflation remains stably at or above their 2% target.  With that in mind, a look at the below chart of Japanese core inflation shows that it has been above 2.0% since April 2022.  That seems pretty stable to me, but then I am just a poet.

Source: tradingecomnomics.com

Adding it all up, I feel far better about the Japanese continuing to slowly tighten monetary policy as they have a solid macro backdrop with inflation clearly too high and looking like it may be trending a bit higher.  However, the other side of the equation is far more suspect, as while the market is pricing in rate cuts this year, recent Fed commentary continues to maintain that the current level of rates is necessary to wring the last drops of inflation out of the economy.

There is a caveat to this, though, and that is the gathering concern that the US economy is getting set to fall off a cliff.  While that may be a bit hyperbolic, I do continue to read pundits who are making the case that the data is starting to slip and if the Fed is not going to be cutting rates, things could get worse.  In fairness to that viewpoint, the Citi Surprise Index is pointing lower and has been declining since the beginning of December, meaning that the data releases in the US have underperformed expectations for the past two months. (see below)

Source: cbonds.com

However, a look at the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimate shows that Q1 is still on track for growth of 2.3%, not gangbusters, but still quite solid and a long way from recession.  I think we will need to see substantially weaker data than we have to date to get the Fed to change their wait-and-see mode, and remember, employment is a lagging indicator, so waiting for that to rise will take even longer.  For now, I think marginal further yen strength is the most likely outcome as we will need a big change in the US to alter current Fed policy.

Ok, let’s see how markets have behaved overnight.  Yesterday saw a reversal of recent US equity performance with the DJIA slipping while the NASDAQ rallied, although neither moved that far.  In Asia, the Nikkei (+0.3%) edged higher as did the CSI 300 (+0.2%) although the Hang Seng (-0.3%) gave back a small portion of yesterday’s outsized gains.  The rest of the region, though, was under more significant pressure with Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all seeing their main indices decline by more than -1.0%.  In Europe, red is the most common color on the screen with one exception, the UK (+0.35%) where there is talk of resurrecting free trade talks between the US and UK.  But otherwise, weakness is the theme amid mediocre secondary data and growing concern over US tariffs.  Finally, US futures are nicely higher this morning after Nvidia’s earnings were quite solid.

In the bond market, Treasury yields (+4bps) have backed up off their recent lows but remain in their recent downtrend.  Traders keep trying to ascertain the impacts of Trump’s policies and whether DOGE will be able to find substantial budget cuts or not with opinions on both sides of the debate widely espoused.  European sovereign yields have edged higher this morning, up 2bps pretty much across the board, arguably responding to the growing recognition that Europe will be issuing far more debt going forward to fund their own defensive needs.  And JGB yields (+4bps) rose after the commentary above.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.1%) is bouncing after a multi-day decline although it remains below that $70/bbl level.  The latest news is that Trump is reversing his stance on Venezuela as the nation refuses to take back its criminal aliens.  Meanwhile, gold (-1.1%) is in the midst of its first serious correction in the past two months, down a bit more than 2% from its recent highs, and trading quite poorly.  There continue to be questions regarding tariffs and whether gold imports will be subject to them, as well as the ongoing arbitrage story between NY and London markets.  However, the underlying driver of the barbarous relic remains a growing concern over increased riskiness in markets and rising inflation amid the ongoing deglobalization we are observing.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer overall vs. its G10 counterparts, with the yen decline the biggest in the bloc.  However, we are seeing EMG currency weakness with most of the major currencies in this bloc lower by -0.3% to -0.5% on the session.  In this case, I think the growing understanding that the Fed is not cutting rates soon, as well as concerns over tariff implementation, is going to keep pressure on this entire group of currencies.

On the data front, we see the weekly Initial (exp 221K) and Continuing (1870K) Claims as well as Durable Goods (2.0%, 0.3% ex Transport) and finally the second look at Q4 GDP (2.3%) along with the Real Consumer Spending piece (4.2%).  Four Fed speakers are on the calendar, Barr, Bostic, Hammack and Harker, but again, as we heard from Mr Bostic above, they seem pretty comfortable watching and waiting for now.

While I continue to believe the yen will grind slowly higher, the rest of the currency world seems likely to have a much tougher time unless we see something like a Mar-a Lago Accord designed to weaken the dollar overall.  Absent that, it is hard to see organic weakness of any magnitude, although that doesn’t mean the dollar will rise.  We could simply chop around on headlines until the next important shift in policy is evident.

Good luck

Adf