Tag Archives: #china

The Fools

Posted on by

In April, it starts with the Fools
But two days thereafter the rules
For importing cars
To where Stars and Bars
Fly will change with tariffs as tools
 
For Europe, the pain will be keen
At least that’s what most have foreseen
And poor crypto bros
Will find their Lambos
May soon cost a price quite obscene

 

While the political set continues to harp on the “Signal” story, markets really don’t care about political infighting between the parties.  Rather, their focus is keenly attuned to President Trump’s confirmation that starting on April 3rd, there will be a 25% tariff imposed on all imported autos from everywhere in the world.  This is particularly difficult for European auto manufacturers as they produce a far smaller proportion (VW 21%, BMW 36%, Mercedes 41%) of their vehicles in the US than do the Japanese (Honda 73%, Toyota 50%, Nissan 52%), although the Koreans will be impacted as well (Hyundai/Kia 33%).  Ironically, according to Grok, where I got all this information, GM only produces about 54% of their vehicles sold in the US, in the US, with the rest coming from Canada and Mexico.  As an aside, Tesla produces all their vehicles in the US.

Particularly hard hit are the specialty manufacturers like Porsche, Ferrari and Lamborghini, which produce none of their vehicles in the US.  Of course, given the price points of these vehicles, my sense is it may not really hurt their sales as if you are spending $250k on a car, you can likely afford to spend $312.5k as well.  In fact, in a funny way, these tariffs may enhance the Veblen effect where people will brag about paying the higher price as it puts it out of reach of more people.

Nonetheless, the action merely confirms that President Trump is very serious with respect to changing the world’s trading model.  I saw something interesting this morning in that Paul Krugman, who made his name, and won his Nobel Prize, based on work regarding international trade and was the prototypical free trader, has adjusted his views after recognizing that nations need to maintain some manufacturing capabilities for security reasons.  I assure you, if Krugman, who has been a vocal liberal critic of every Republican idea for the past twenty years, agrees with this policy, it will be very difficult for anyone to reject it.

In a perfect world (globo economicus?) free trade accrues benefits to all.  But we don’t live in that world and national priorities often supersede these issues.  The pandemic highlighted the weaknesses that the US had developed in its ability to manufacture key items necessary for its continued economic and defense survival. And remember this, for the world at large, their idea of free trade is they should be able to sell whatever they grow/manufacture into the US with no barriers, but US manufacturers need to be subject to barriers in order to protect other nations’ favored industries and companies.  That world is now history with new rules being written every day and most of them by Donald Trump.

So how have markets responded to this tariff confirmation?  Not terribly well.  Yesterday’s US equity selloff was pretty significant led by the NASDAQ’s -2.0% decline.  In Asia, the Nikkei (-0.6%) also sold off as did Korea (-1.4%), Taiwan (-1.4%) and Australia (-0.4%).  On the other hand, both China (+0.3%) and Hong Kong (+0.4%) managed a better session, seemingly as a rebound against declines in the previous session with the only news showing that Chinese industrial profits fell by -0.3% compared to a Y/Y decline of -3.3% in December.  However, a quick look at a chart of this data for the past five years tells me they need to seasonally adjust it in order to get something meaningful, so I don’t think it really impacted markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to European shares, it should be no surprise that the tariff announcements have negatively impacted shares there with declines of between -0.2% (Spain) and -0.7% (Germany).  US futures though, at this hour (7:00) are little changed on the session.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to creep higher, up another 3bps this morning and back to levels last seen a month ago.  This cannot be helping Secretary Bessent’s blood pressure, although he very clearly has a plan in mind.  There is much stagflation discussion in the markets by the punditry as they assume tariffs will slow growth and raise prices and bonds are not the favored investment in that scenario.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields are all sliding this morning, largely down -2bps, amid growth concerns on the back of the tariff announcements.  The one exception here is UK Gilts (+7bps) as the UK Budget announcement indicated slightly more gilt issuance would be necessary to fund the government’s spending plans.  However, there is a growing concern over the financial management of the Starmer government overall.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.35%) is slipping from yesterday’s closing levels and continues to flirt with the $70/bbl level but has not been able to breech it since late February.  Apparently, there are questions as to whether the auto tariffs will reduce demand.  Personally, I would think it is the opposite as more older, less fuel efficient cars will remain on the road here.  As to gold (+1.0%) after a several day pause, it appears that it is resuming its very strong trend higher.  You know what we haven’t heard about lately?  Ft Knox auditing.  I wonder if that is getting arranged or is now so old a story nobody cares.  Silver (+1.0%) is along for the ride although copper (-0.4%) is taking a breather after a breathtaking run to new all-time highs this year.  Look at the slope of the copper chart and you can see why it is pausing, at the very least.

Source: tradingeconomics.com’

Finally, the dollar is broadly softer this morning, with the euro, pound and Aussie all gaining on the order of 0.3%.  As well, NOK (+0.3%) is firmer after the Norgesbank surprised some and left rates on hold with a relatively hawkish message about the future.  But there is weakness vs. the greenback around with JPY (-0.3%), MXN (-0.3%) and INR (-0.2%) all leaning the other way.  Another tariff related story is that India is planning to cut its tariffs in half for the US, a very clear victory for President Trump. 

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims data as well as the third and final look at Q4 GDP (2.3%).  Part of the GDP data is Real Final Sales (4.2%) which is a key indicator for what happens here given consumption represents ~70% of the economy.  We do hear from Richmond Fed president Barkin this afternoon, but right now, Fed speakers are speaking into the void.

International statecraft continues to be the underlying thesis of global relations and President Trump’s goals of reshoring significant amounts of manufacturing and jobs along with it is still the primary driver.  There has been far less talk of the Mar-a-Lago Accord as that seems to be losing its luster.  If countries adjust their trade policies, Trump will continue in this direction.  While that may include short-term economic weakness and some pain, for both the economy and the stock markets, there is no indication, yet, he is anywhere near blinking.  One thing to keep in mind is that an overvalued stock market can correct by prices falling sharply, but also by prices stagnating for a long time while earnings catch up and multiples compress.  We may very well be looking at the latter scenario, so no large gains nor losses, just choppy markets going forward.  As to the dollar, lower still seems the direction of travel overall from current levels, but probably in a very gradual manner.

Good luck

Adf

Not Worried

Posted on by

‘Bout markets, Scott Bessent’s not worried
As favor with specs can’t be curried
Instead, what he seeks
Is policy tweaks
To help growth, though folks want that hurried
 
Meanwhile, Chairman Jay and his team
Continue their policy theme
Inflation’s still falling
Although they are calling
For patience, as bulls start to scream

 

“I’ve been in the investment business for 35 years, and I can tell you that corrections are healthy, they are normal,” Bessent said Sunday on NBC’s Meet The Press. “I‘m not worried about the markets. Over the long term, if we put good tax policy in place, deregulation and energy security, the markets will do great.”

The above comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent yesterday morning (quote courtesy of Bloomberg.com) have garnered a remarkable amount of commentary amidst both the political and market punditry.  My first comment is I must be much older than Mr Bessent, since I have been in the investment business for 43 years.  However, as I have written numerous times over the course of the past years, the market has not cleared for a very long time.  Since the 1987 stock market crash, when then Fed Chair Greenspan started pumping liquidity into the financial markets to stabilize things, and realized he could do that to prevent serious downturns, we have seen two significant downdrafts, the tech bubble and the housing market crash, both of which were immediately met with massive liquidity injections, extremely low interest rates and for the latter, the advent of QE.

All of that liquidity has resulted in market excesses across many markets and has been a key driver in the stock market’s exceptional rise since the Covid blip.  Adding to that was the massive fiscal spending (remember those 7% budget deficits?) which has helped to insure that not only did markets rise, but so did retail prices.

Now, along comes a Treasury Secretary who hasn’t married himself to higher stock markets on a day-to-day basis and instead is focused on the long-term.  What I find most interesting is that the same pundits who are screaming about Bessent and Trump destroying the economy, were all-in on the discussion of how the US debt was going to ultimately cause a collapse.  Yet as the administration explicitly tries to address that issue (you may disagree with their methods, but that is their clear goal) suddenly, the fact that stock prices are falling is a tragedy of biblical proportions.  Here’s the thing, the worst performer, the NASDAQ, is down about -12% since its peak last month as per the below chart.  I might argue that is hardly a collapse.  In fact, a healthy correction doesn’t seem to be a bad description.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no doubt that uncertainty about the near-term direction of the economy has grown, and there is no doubt that President Trump’s mercurial tendencies make long-term planning difficult.  However, I would contend we are a long way from the apocalypse or even a stockopalypse.  But once again, I highlight that volatility remains the key metric for now, and that hedging exposures remains very important.

With that as backdrop, the FOMC meets on Wednesday and while there is no expectation of any rate move, the market continues to price three rate cuts for the rest of the year, pretty much one each quarter.  A key unknown is just how hawkish or dovish Fed members currently find themselves given the recent market gyrations.  As well, while inflation had seemingly been the primary focus, with all the concern over a significant slowdown in the US economy, there are now many who believe we will see a rising Unemployment Rate despite a lack of evidence from the weekly Claims data.  These same pundits are also certain that Trump’s tariff policy will lead to rising inflation, really putting the Fed in a bind with a stagflationary outcome.  And maybe that is what will happen.

But I would contend it is far too early to assume that is our future.  First off, on the inflationary front, energy prices have fallen, a key inflation component, and as far as the tariffs are concerned, if they reduce demand, that is likely to cap prices. If on the other hand, demand is not reduced, I don’t see slowing growth as the likely outcome.  

In the end, if the economy is adjusting from one with far more government spending support, to one with more organic private sector economic activity, the transition may be bumpy, but the outcome will be far stronger.  We shall see if that is how things evolve.

In the meantime, let’s look at how the world has responded to the latest stories.  Friday’s US equity rebound was welcomed everywhere, although the key narrative remains the end of American exceptionalism, at least as regards equity markets.  Friday also saw the exiting German Bundestag agree to eliminate the debt brake for infrastructure and defense, with Chancellor-to-be Merz agreeing to waste spend €100 billion on climate related projects to convince the Green Party, which is out of the new government, to vote in the rule change before the new government is seated.  It is not clear to me how spending that money on net-zero ideas will defend Germany, but then I am just a poet, not a German policymaker.

As to Asian markets, other than mainland China (-0.25%) green was the predominant color on screens overnight with Japan (+0.9%), Australia (+0.8%) and Hong Kong (+0.8%) all following the US.  One of the remarkable things, though, is that Chinese data overnight showing IP (5.9%), Retail Sales (4.0%) and Fixed Asset Investment (4.1%) was generally solid.  Of course, Unemployment (5.4%) rose 2 ticks, an unwelcome outcome, and House prices (-4.8%) continue to decline, albeit at a slowing rate, but neither of those speak to a rebound in the Chinese economy.  The end of the Chinese NPC offered more platitudes about supporting the consumer, but it is not clear where the money is coming from.  And recall, more than 60% of Chinese household wealth remains tied up in housing investment, which continues to decline in value.  The Chinese have a long way to go in my view.

Quickly, European bourses are all modestly higher this morning, on the order of 0.3% or so, as hope springs eternal that the rearming of Europe will drive profit margins higher.  Unfortunately, at this hour (7:15), US futures are pointing lower, about -0.25% across the board, although that is up from earlier session lows.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps this morning, but are really just trading around in their new trading range of 4.20% to 4.35% as investors try to get a handle on which of the big themes are going to drive markets going forward.  European sovereigns are all seeing rallies, with yields slipping -5bps to -6ps which seems out of step with the news about the end of the German debt brake.  Perhaps bond investors don’t believe the legislation will pass, or perhaps that they won’t spend the money after all.  As to JGB yields, the edged lower by -1bp in the 10yr, although longer dated paper has seen yields rise with 40-year bonds touching 3.0% for the first time in their relatively short history.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.4%) is continuing to bounce of its lows from last week but remains well below levels seen at the beginning of the month.  The US attack on the Houthis is being called the beginning of an escalation in the Middle East by some, and perhaps that has traders concerned.  On the flip side, ostensibly, Presidents Trump and Putin are to speak tomorrow in an effort to get peace talks moving along, potentially a bearish oil signal.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.6%) remains in great demand having crested the $3000/oz level last week and rising from there.  This has helped both silver and copper, with the latter, despite concerns over slowing economic activity, pushing closer to $5.00/lb.  There is much talk of shortages in the market driving the price action.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning with every G10 currency firmer led by NZD (+0.6%) and AUD (+0.4%) although gains elsewhere are on the order of +0.25%.  This story seems to go hand-in-hand with the German defense spending and the end of US exceptionalism.  As to the EMG bloc, most of these currencies are also stronger this morning, but the magnitude of these moves is generally less than the G10 bloc.  Recall, Trump wants a lower dollar, and my default is that is where we are headed at this point.

On the data front, we have an action-packed week ahead starting this morning.

TodayRetail Sales0.6%
 -ex autos0.4%
 Empire State Manufacturing-0.75
TuesdayHousing Starts1.375M
 Building Permits1.45M
 IP0.2%
 Capacity Utilization77.8%
WednesdayFOMC Rate Decision4.50% (unchanged)
ThursdayInitial Claims224K
 Continuing Claims1880K
 Philly Fed12.1
 Existing Home Sales3.92M
 Leading Indicators-0.2%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As we have seen over the past many months, I suspect that this week’s data will be likely to give analysts on both sides of the economy is stronger/weaker argument new fodder.  While the Fed won’t be doing anything, and despite their relative decline in importance, I suspect that Chairman Powell’s press conference will still get a lot of attention.

While we don’t know what the future will bring for sure, I remain convinced that the dollar will slide, and commodities will rally.  As to stocks and bonds, well your guess is as good as mine.

Good luck

Adf

In a Trice

Posted on by

The calendar’s not e’en turned twice
Since Trump, with JD as his Vice
Have taken the reins
And beat up on Keynes
While weeding out waste in a trice
 
For markets, the problem, it seems
Is rallies are now merely dreams
So, equity buyers
Are putting out fires
While thinking up pump and dump schemes
 
For bondholders, it’s not so clear
If salvation truly is near
But one thing seems sure
The buck will endure
Much weakness throughout this whole year

 

We have not even reached 50 days of a Trump presidency as of this morning and nobody would fault you if you estimated we had three years of policies enacted to date.  The pace of changes has been blistering and clearly most politicians, let alone investors, have not been prepared for all that has occurred.

One of the things that I read regularly is that Trump is destroying the Rules Based Order (RBO) which was underpinned by the Pax Americana of the US essentially being the world’s policeman.  This is cast as a distinct negative under the premise that things were going great and now, he is upsetting the applecart for his own personal reasons.  Of course, market participants had grown quite accustomed to this framework, had built all sorts of models to profit from it and with the Fed’s help of monetization of debt, were able to gain significantly at the expense of those without market linked assets.  Hence, the K-shaped recovery.

But while that is a lovely narrative, is it really an accurate representation of the way of the world?  If the US was truly the world’s policeman, and we certainly spend enough on defense to earn that title, perhaps it was time for the US to be fired from that role anyway.  After all, there is currently raging military conflict in Ukraine, Lebanon, Syria, Congo, Sudan and the ongoing tensions in Gaza.  That’s a pretty long list of wars to claim that things were going great.

Secondly, the question of financing all this conflagration, as well as other economic goals, notably the alleged transition to net zero carbon energy production, appears to be reaching the end of the line.  While the US can still borrow as needed, (assuming the debt ceiling is raised), the reality is that the US gross national debt outstanding is greater than $36,000,000,000,000 relative to GDP that is a touch under $28,000,000,000,000.  On a global basis, total (not just government) debt is in excess of $300,000,000,000,000 while global GDP clocks in somewhere just north of $100,000,000,000,000.  Arguably, on a credit metric basis, the world is BB- or B+, a clear indication that all that debt is unlikely to be repaid.

If we consider things considering this information, perhaps the RBO had outlived its usefulness.  Arguably, the loudest complaints are coming from those who benefitted most greatly and are quite unhappy to see things change against them.  But as evidenced by the polls taken after President Trump’s speech last Tuesday evening, the bulk of the American public is still strongly supporting this agenda.  The idea that the president and his Treasury secretary are seeking to engineer a short-term recession early, blame it on fixing Biden’s mess, and having things revert to stronger growth in time for the 2026 mid-term elections is not crazy.  In fact, there have been several comments from both men that short-term pain would be necessary to achieve a stabler, long-term gain.

So, what does this mean for the markets?  You have no doubt already recognized that volatility is the main event in every market, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.  But some of the themes that follow this agenda would be for US equities to suffer relative to other markets, as the last decade plus of American exceptionalism, led by massive deficit spending and borrowing, would reverse under this new thesis.  Add to this the sudden realization that other nations are going to be investing significantly more in their own defense, and money will be flowing out of the US into Europe, Japan and emerging markets around the world.

Bonds are a tougher call as a weaker economy would ordinarily mean lower yields, but the question of tariff impacts on prices, as well as reshoring, which, by definition, will raise prices, could mean we see the yield curve steepen with the Fed cutting rates more aggressively than currently priced, but 10-year and 30-year yields staying right where they are now.

I believe this will be a strong period for commodities as all that foreign capex will be a driver, as will the fact that, as I will discuss shortly, the dollar is likely to underperform significantly.  Gold will retain its haven characteristics as well as remain in demand for foreign central banks, while industrial metals should hold their own.  As to oil, my take is lower initially, as OPEC returns its production and slowing GDP weighs on demand, at least for a while, although eventually, I suspect it will rebound along with economic activity.

Finally, the dollar will remain under significant pressure across the board.  Clearly, Trump is seeking a weaker dollar to help the export industries, as well as discourage imports.  Add to this the potential for lower yields, lower short-term rates, and an exit of equity investors as US stocks underperform, and you have the making of at least another 15% decline in the greenback this year.

With this as backdrop, we need to touch on three key stories this morning.  First, Friday’s NFP report was pretty much in line with expectations at the headline level but seemed a bit weaker in some of the underlying bits, specifically in the Household Survey where a total of 588K jobs were lost and there was a large increase in the number of part-time workers doing so for economic reasons.  Basically, that means they wanted full-time work but couldn’t find a job.  Markets gyrated after the release, with yields initially sliding but then rebounding to close higher on the day.  Equities, too, closed higher on the day although that had the earmarks of a relief rally after a lousy week overall.  The thing about this report is that it did not include any of the government changes that have been in the press, so next month may offer more information regarding the impact of DOGE and their cuts.

The second story comes from north of the border where Mark Carney, former BOC and BOE head, was elected to lead the Labour Party in Canada and replace Justin Trudeau.  As is always the case, when there is new leadership, there is excitement and he said he will call for a general election in the next several weeks, ostensibly to take advantage of this new momentum.  It seems that President Trump’s derision of not only Trudeau, but Canada as well in many Canadian’s eyes, will play a large role with the two lead candidates, Carney and Poilievre, fighting to explain that they are each better placed to go toe-to-toe with Trump on critical issues.

Here’s the thing, though.  Despite much angst about the US-Canada relationship on the Canadian side of the border, the market viewpoint is nothing has really changed.  a look at the chart below shows that after a bout of weakness for the Loonie in the wake of the US election and leading up to Trump’s tariff announcements, USDCAD is basically unchanged since mid-December, with one day showing a spike and reversal in early February.  My point is that the market has not, at least not yet, determined that the Canadian PM matters very much.

Source: tradingecoomics.com

The last story to discuss is Chinese inflation data which was released Saturday evening in the US and showed deflation in February (-0.7% Y/Y) for CPI and continuing deflation in PPI (-2.2%).  In fact, as you can see from the below chart, PPI in China has been in deflation for several years now.  Recently there have been several articles explaining this offers President Xi a great opportunity for significant stimulus because no matter how much the government spends and how much debt they monetize, inflation won’t be a problem for a long time to come.  I would counter that given deflation has been the norm for several years, they have had this opportunity for quite a while and done nothing with it.  Why will this time be different?  Ultimately, the default result in China is when things are not looking like they will achieve the targeted growth of “about 5%”, you can be sure there will be more investment to build things up adding still more downward pressure on prices as production facilities increase.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The renminbi’s response to this news has been modest, at best, with a tiny decline overnight of -0.25%.  And a look at the chart there shows it is remarkably similar to the CAD, with steady weakness through December and then no real movement since then.  Given the dollar’s recent weakness overall, this seems unusual.  Although, we also know that China prefers a weaker currency to help support their export industries, so perhaps this in not unusual at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, this note is already overly long, so will end it here.  We do have important data later this week with both CPI and Retail Sales coming.  As well, the consensus from the Fedspeak is that they are pretty happy right here and not planning to do anything for a while.

The big picture is best summarized, I believe, by the idea that we are at the beginnings of a regime change in markets as discussed above.  Volatility continues to be the driving force, so hedging remains crucial for those with natural exposures.

Good luckAdf

Inundated

Posted on by

Investors have been inundated
By news that has been unabated
There’s tariffs and war
Plus rate cuts and more
With stocks and bonds depreciated
 
Now looking ahead to today
The payroll report’s on its way
As well, later on
With nothing foregone
We’ll hear from our own Chairman Jay

 

It has certainly been an interesting week in both markets and the world writ large.  So much has happened and yet so much is still unclear as to how things may evolve going forward.  Through it all, volatility is the only constant.  To me, what has become abundantly clear is the post WWII order is being dismantled, and every nation is trying to determine its place in the future.  This is a grave threat to those who benefitted from flowery words and limited action, which covers a wide swath of government leaders around the world.  I’m not sure if this is the 4th Turning, or if this is merely the prelude, with the impacts of all these changes what brings the 4thTurning about.  Regardless, history is clearly in the making.

I do not have the bandwidth to continuously follow the tariff story, although yesterday’s news was there will be more delays for both Canada and Mexico.  China received no such relief and at their National People’s Congress they seemed resolute in their pushback and highlighted their own achievements.  The data from China, though, tells me that their goals for more domestic consumption remain far in the distance.  Last night they reported their Trade Balance for the January/February period (they always combine because of the Lunar New year disruptions) and it jumped to $170.5B, far greater than anticipated.  While exports underperformed slightly, growing only 2.3% compared to a 5% estimate, it was the imports that really tells the story.  Imports fell -8.4%, a significant shortfall from both last year and consensus estimates, and an indication that the Chinese consumer is not yet the type of force that President Xi would like to see.  

In fact, a look at the chart below showing imports for the past 10 years demonstrates that very little has changed on this front.  As I wrote yesterday, converting a mercantilist economy into a consumer-focused one is a huge lift, and one that the CCP has not yet figured out.  It is not clear that they ever will.  Meanwhile, the obvious explanation for the huge jump in the trade balance was companies pre-ordering things to get ahead of the tariffs.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Moving on to the Ukraine situation, while yesterday’s news was of the “whatever it takes” moment for defending Europe, this morning it seems there are some caveats attached.  Of course, the first caveat is the changing of the German constitution to allow them to spend all that money.  The second seems to be that not every European nation is on board for the massive spending increase and continuation of the war.  There are many political and financial hurdles to overcome in this story in Europe, and this morning’s European equity markets are indicative of the idea that this is not a straight-line higher.  In fact, every equity market in Europe is lower this morning, led by the DAX (-1.5%) although with solid declines elsewhere as well (CAC -1.0%, FTSE 100 -0.5%).  This, too, is a story with no clear end in sight.  One unconfirmed story I saw was that the group convened by the UK last weekend has not been able to agree terms for additional support.

Meanwhile, yesterday the ECB cut their short-term rates by 25bps, as widely expected, with the Deposit Rate now down to 2.50%.  The funny thing is nobody really noticed.  This is of a piece with my observation that central bankers just don’t have that much sway on market activity these days, it is all about politics and statecraft, not monetary policy.  This morning, Eurozone GDP for Q4 was released at 0.2%, a tick higher than forecast but still lower than Q3’s 0.4%.  There is no doubt the financial mandarins of Europe are keen to get this defense spending going, because otherwise they will continue to preside over a stagnant economy.  

But here’s an interesting thing to consider.  Germany has made a big deal about this new willingness to spend €500 billion outside the bounds of their budget framework on defense.  However, they continue with their Energiewende policy which has been the Achilles Heel of the German economy and will prevent them from actually producing armaments if they seek to continuously reduce fossil fuel powered energy for renewables.  It is almost as if this is theater, rather than policy, but that may just be my cynicism speaking.

Moving on to the US, this morning brings the Payroll Report with the following current median estimates:

Nonfarm Payrolls160K
Private Payrolls111K
Manufacturing Payrolls5K
Unemployment Rate4.0%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (4.1% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.6%

Source: tradingeconomics.com          

As well, we hear from Chairman Powell at 12:30pm, along with Bowman, Williams and Kugler in the hours leading up to that.  But again, I ask, do they matter to the markets right now?  Certainly, there is much discussion that the US economic data is starting to show more weakness, and there are many who are saying that long-anticipated recession is going to become evident.  If that is the case, we could certainly see the Fed cut rates, but again, my take is markets are far more attuned to 10-year yields than Fed funds.  And remember, while 10-year yields are clearly quite inflation sensitive, what we also know that questions over budget deficits and supply are critical to their pricing as well.  This was made evident yesterday in Germany.

I have glossed over market activity overnight so will give a really short update here.  Yesterday’s weakness in the US was followed by broad weakness throughout Asia, with most markets there lower on the day, notably Japan (-2.2%), but declines almost everywhere.  We have already discussed European bourses and at this hour (7:30) US futures are basically unchanged ahead of the data.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are slipping back -3bps this morning and we are seeing similar price action across most of Europe although Spain (+1bp) is bucking the trend on some domestic issues.  It is easy to believe that the Germany story was a bit overblown, and remember, if they cannot change the constitution, I expect a rally in Bunds (lower yields) along with a selloff in the DAX and the euro.

Speaking of the euro, it is continuing its sharp ascent, up another 0.6% this morning.  however, something to keep in mind regarding all the huffing and puffing about the euro is that with this sharp move higher in the past week, it is merely back to the middle of its 3-year trading range.  So, is this as big a deal as some are saying?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But the overall currency picture is more mixed with both AUD (-0.6%) and NZD (-0.5%) lower along with CAD (-0.2%).  There are other gainers (GBP +0.2%, SEK +0.7%) and other laggards (ZAR -0.2%) although I would say the broad direction is still for dollar weakness.  

Finally, oil (+1.5%) is bouncing this morning, although this could well be a trading bounce as I have seen no new news on the subject.  I guess the delay on Canadian tariffs probably played a role as well.  Gold (+0.4%) is also firmer although both silver (-0.4%) and copper (-1.2%) are lagging.  In fairness, the latter two have had significant up weeks so are likely seeing some profit taking.

Once again, I will remark that for those who have real flows and exposures, the current market situation is why hedging is critical to maintain financial performance.  Nobody really knows where anything is going to go, but right now, it feels like the one thing we know is prices will not remain where they currently are for very long.

Good luck and good weekendAdf

Things Are Creaking

Posted on by

Before Mr Trump started speaking
The Chinese explained things are creaking
As growth there is slow
So now they will blow
More funds to achieve what they’re seeking

 

The Chinese government has outlined a very active agenda for 2025 as the current pace of growth in their economy remains sluggish at best.  They continue to focus on a 5% headline GDP target and have promised to increase the budget deficit by a similar amount, so the idea of organic growth seems to be dead.  They reiterated their plan to recapitalize the big banks with CNY 500 billion and are looking to raise defense spending by 7.2%.  Long term debt issuance will increase with CNY 1.3 trillion planned for this year and they talk about adding 12 million urban jobs.  It all sounds fantastic.
 
But will it work?  Of course, there is no way to know yet, but if history is any guide, the mercantilist structure of the Chinese economy remains extremely difficult to overcome and replace with a more consumer-focused economy.  The property market there remains in terrible shape and that continues to be a drag on the overall economy as individuals, who had been encouraged to invest in property as a means of creating a retirement nest egg find themselves with much less disposable income and an illiquid and depreciating asset.
 
President Trump’s tariffs are not going to help them at all, but it is unclear if they will be significantly detrimental.  While I would not bet against China reporting 5% GDP growth in 2025, given the questionable reliability of their data, it is not clear it will be reflective of the state of the nation.
 
My take on market impacts are as follows: Chinese yields will climb as more debt is issued while growth will allegedly increase, Chinese equities should benefit If they are successful at getting things moving, but the yuan will have a harder time in my view, as capital flows to the nation remain stunted.  Of course, much will also depend on the evolution of US policy, which has been erratic, to say the least.

Said Trump, It’s a “new golden age”
As finally, we turn the page
On four years of waste
And so, we’ll make haste
With changes despite Dem outrage

Of course, the other big news was last night’s speech by President Trump to a joint session of Congress where he outlined both the many things he has accomplished in the first 6 weeks of his presidency, but also his plans for the rest of the time.  While many are still reeling from the speed with which changes are being made, there was no indication that his pace is going to slow.

Mr Trump did acknowledge that there may be some short-term pain as the economy adjusts to the changes he has wrought, but he remains focused on the long-term and how to achieve a strong economy with a far better balance sheet and a smaller government.  The implication is that he is still the avatar of volatility, and that aspect will not be changing.

Let us, though, take a step back and look at a much bigger picture.  For the past seventeen years, the US economy was the clear leader in global growth with massive government spending and budget deficits incurred to drive the process.  Meanwhile, while most of the rest of the world exited the pandemic with a burst of reopening growth, they have all lagged the US.  The chart below shows the ratio of the MSCI US index / MSCI World index and demonstrates that investment into the US, following that leading growth profile, has been historic in its effects.

Source: longtermtrends.net

But that situation seems to be changing.  President Trump is openly seeking to reduce the size of the US government and withdraw spending on many foreign adventures while the rest of the world is doing the opposite.  As per the above, China has just announced significant new stimulus.  As well, Europe, now that they need to become more responsible for their own defense, has also announced a major spending plan to rearm themselves.  This is the real sea change, I think, and the one that is going to have the biggest medium and long-term impacts on markets everywhere.  Changes in the level of capital flows and changes in trade patterns are going to significantly impact the value of the dollar as well as stocks, bonds and commodities.  It is a brave new world, so attention must be paid.

In the meantime, let’s see the markets’ initial response to the recent spate of news.  The tariff news has served to undermine US equities for the past two sessions and is still dragging on some markets, but the new spending promises are the new drivers.  So, in Asia, while the Nikkei (+0.2%) managed only a modest rally, the Hang Seng (+2.8%) exploded higher on the Chinese stimulus story although surprisingly, the CSI 300 (+0.5%) did not do nearly as well.  But elsewhere in the region, it was mostly large gains with Korea, India, Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all rallying more than 1%.  The laggards were Australia and New Zealand, which seemed to focus on the negatives of tariffs.

In Europe, Germany’s DAX (+3.4%) is the beneficiary of most of the mooted defense spending as not only are there quite a few defense focused firms, but rumors are that the government is going to coopt the auto manufacturers into building defense equipment (shades of WWII).  As well, the rest of the continent is flying (CAC +1.9%, IBEX +1.6%) and even the UK (+0.45%) is benefitting although there is growing concern that the BOE is not going to be aggressively cutting rates to support the economy because of still sticky inflation.  As to US futures, they are bouncing this morning and higher by 0.4% at this hour (7:00).

In the bond market, while Treasury yields rebounded from their recent lows yesterday, gaining 9bps on the day, this morning they are unchanged.  However, a look at European sovereigns tells the story of investors anticipation of a big uptick in new issuance to fund that defense spending.  The picture below is that of German yields, as an example, showing its 20bp rise this morning, but the entire continent has seen yields rise by at least 16bps!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The market clearly believes the Europeans are going to move forward!

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.6%) remains under pressure as despite the mooted fiscal stimulus, there continues to be more concern over excess supply than newly created demand.  The below chart is quite interesting as a history of long-term price activity in oil with the interpretation that if we are near the supply destruction level, the future for prices is likely to be bullish.  Something to keep in mind. (as an aside, Josh_Young_1 is an excellent follow on X for oil ideas and information.)

As to the metals markets, gold is little changed but copper (+4.7%) has clearly gotten excited over the Chinese stimulus as well as the European defense spending, where copper will be an important piece of the puzzle.

Finally, the dollar is under substantial pressure this morning vs. both G10 and EMG currencies.  Given the yield changes, and my view that 10-year yields have become the FX driver, rather than short-term rates, it should be no surprise that the euro (+0.6%) is rallying to levels not seen since November.  The pound (+0.3%) is following suit, also making 5-month highs.  But the really impressive moves are in the peripheral European currencies with SEK (+1.1%) and PLN (+1.1%) both trading back to levels not seen since September.  On the tariff front, both MXN (+0.25%) and CAD (+0.1%) are lagging the main move but still managing a very modest rally v. the greenback.

In this brave new world, where the US is not the fiscal profligacy leader, but that role is assumed by others, my sense is that the dollar may well have topped for a much longer-term period.  While at the beginning of the year I was confident that the dollar would outperform, the policy changes we have seen since then have altered my views.  While volatility will still be rampant, I believe the broad direction will be a lower dollar going forward.

On the data front, this morning brings ADP Employment (exp 140K) as well as ISM Services (52.6) and Factory Orders (1.6%).  Then we see the EIA oil inventories where a small draw is expected and at 2:00pm, the Fed’s Beige book.  Perhaps the best thing about the changing world order is that central banks are losing some of their market power.  As I wrote yesterday, perhaps US rates are destined to fall as both the president and Chair Powell are keen to see that happen.

At this point, I think the dollar may have seen its highs for quite a while.  Remember, FX trends tend to be very long-term in nature.  For those of you who are payables hedgers, keep that in mind going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Recession in Sight

Posted on by

There once was a policy view
That tariffs, we all should eschew
But President Trump
Explained on the stump
To this idea, he wouldn’t hew
 
And so, as the clock struck midnight
Trump’s tariffs once more saw the light
Most analysts say
The tariffs will weigh
On growth, with recession in sight

 

By now you are all aware that as of 12:01 EST this morning, 25% tariffs have been imposed on all imports from both Canada and Mexico except energy products, which have seen 10% tariffs imposed.  As well, all Chinese imports have been hit with an additional 10% tariff.  Once again, President Trump has proven to be a man of his word, promising these tariffs during his election campaign and imposing them now.

The mainstream view is that these tariffs are a disaster and will send the economy into a recession.  In fact, the International Chamber of Commerce said a depression was likely.  As well, there is much concern that inflation will rise during the recession, which for Keynesians must be a very difficult concept to grasp given their strongly held belief that a recession will result in declining inflation.

Now remember, I am just a poet, so please take that into account when I offer my views here.  First, we have no idea how things will play out.  The one thing about which I am extremely confident is that there will be numerous behavioral changes by everyone because of these tariffs.  The first question is who will absorb the cost of the tariffs.  Remember, essentially the definition of a recession is that demand is declining.  Will companies be able to pass through the higher costs?  In some instances, they likely will, but in others probably not.  Anecdotally, there was a story in the WSJ that Chipotle will see its costs rise because of the tariff on avocados from Mexico but will not change their prices to account for that.  I’m confident they are not the only company who will absorb those costs.

However, there will certainly be companies that believe they can raise prices and maintain their sales and will try to do that.  My point is each company will evaluate the environment under which they operate and respond in the profit-maximizing manner, but each company’s scenario will be different.

Second, let’s consider the reason that President Trump is such a strong believer in tariffs.  He sees them as the stick to achieve his goals.  I would argue there are two goals in sight.  With Canada and Mexico, he is still unsatisfied with their efforts on the border and with fentanyl smuggling and is very keen to push that to completion.  However, the broader goal is to return manufacturing to America from its decampment overseas, mostly to Southeast Asia, during the past forty years.  And remember, he is seeking to implement a carrot as well, looking to cut corporate taxes to 15% going forward, which would put the US in the lowest quartile of corporate tax rates in the world.  While this morning the headlines are all about the tariffs and their potential destruction, just yesterday, Taiwan Semiconductor announced they would be investing $100 billion to build new fabrication plants in Arizona.  That is exactly the response Trump is seeking.

We all recognize that the world today is very different than it was even two months ago as President Trump has taken an extraordinary number of steps to implement the ideas upon which he was elected.  Interestingly, a large majority of the public remains strongly in his camp with approval ratings for many of his policies well above 60% and as high as 80%.  While markets are clearly unhappy as they have no idea how things will play out, and companies are now faced with far more uncertainty as they attempt to plan for their future, there is no reason to believe this process is going to change anytime soon.  

Keep one other thing in mind, unlike Trump’s first term in office, where he was constantly touting the strength of the stock market as a vote of confidence, this time around he and Treasury Secretary Bessent have been entirely focused on the 10-year yield and getting that rate down.  After a 7bp decline yesterday, he has been successful there. (see chart below) I would be surprised if Trump speaks about the stock market much at all for a while.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With that in mind, let’s see how markets have been handling the tariff imposition.  After yesterday’s rout in the US, where a higher open morphed into a sharply lower close on the day, we saw red throughout Asia (Nikkei -1.2%, Hang Seng -0.3%, CSI 300 -0.1%) and Europe (DAX -2.1%, CAC -1.2%, IBEX -2.3%).  In fact, it is far harder to find a market that has rallied at all, although US futures at this hour (6:40) are pointing slightly higher.  However, after the sharp declines, an early bounce is not uncommon though not necessarily a harbinger of activity for the day.  All of this makes sense as public companies are likely going to see impacts on their profitability either because of reduced sales or reduced margins, or both, with tariffs now in place.  (Well, private companies are going to feel the same pressures, but there are no markets for them to worry about.). The worry for investors is given the extremely high price multiples that currently exist across so many companies, margin pressures can be problematic for stock prices.  For the near term, it is easy to make the case that equities have further to fall.

In the bond market, after yesterday’s Treasury yield decline, there has been a modest 1bp bounce, although as per the above chart, the trend remains lower.  In Europe, the news just hit the tape that the Eurozone is creating a plan to rearm the continent allowing for European countries to exceed debt restrictions to enable them to borrow and spend the money on this task.  The mooted amount is €800 billion, meaning that markets can expect that much new debt issuance across the continent in the coming months and years.  However, it appears investors are viewing the situation overall and are far more concerned with potential slowing growth than on increased issuance as yields have slipped one or two basis points across all nations in Europe.  Perhaps that is a signal that there is little belief in the likelihood of this new plan coming to fruition.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.4%) continues its slide as a combination of worries over future growth due to the US tariffs and the OPEC+ announcement that they would start to bring production back online beginning in April (just 138K bbl/day, but the signal is quite clear that more is on the way) has traders unnerved.  Certainly, this is part of what President Trump is seeking, lower oil prices to help keep a lid on inflation, and there is no doubt he has pressured OPEC+ on the issue.  Remember, too, that if gasoline prices fall at the pump, that is a key driver of inflation perceptions for everyone.  As to the metals markets, we are seeing a split this morning with precious (Au +1.0%, Ag +0.65%) rallying on uncertainty and fear while copper (-1.2%) seems to be suffering on recession fears.

Finally, the dollar is lower again this morning with the DXY breaking back below 106 for the first time since early December as a signal of the broad trend.  This is interesting as the textbooks claim that if the US imposes tariffs, the dollar will strengthen, or more accurately other currencies will weaken, to offset those tariffs, and yet this morning CNY (+0.55%) and CAD (+0.45%) are bucking that trend although MXN (-0.2%) is behaving as most would expect.  But the dollar’s weakness is broad based, and my take is given the movement in interest rates, which are suddenly declining far more rapidly than anticipated just a week ago (Fed funds futures are now pricing in 75bps of cuts this year with a 11% probability of a cut in March, up from 2% last week) the dollar bull case is under real pressure.  I have maintained all along that if the Fed reignited their easing policy, the dollar would suffer.  Funnily enough, despite any angst between Chairman Powell (remember him?) and President Trump, they both may see lower rates as their preferred outcome.  In that case, the dollar has further to fall.

There is no hard data set to be released today although we do hear from NY Fed President Williams this afternoon.  This could be the first hint that the Fed’s caution is abating, and further rate cuts are in store.  Of course, with Powell on the calendar for Friday, if there is a change in tone, most market participants will be waiting to hear it from him.

The watchword has shifted from caution to uncertainty.  The tariffs have thrown sand into the gears of the economy and markets.  It remains to be seen how much impact they will have, but for now, fear is rising although the dollar is not following suit.  I think Trump must be happy, but I’m not sure how many in the markets are.

Good luck

Adf

As It’s Been Wrote

Posted on by

Though China would have you believe
Their goals, they are set to achieve
Their banks are in trouble
From their housing bubble
So capital, now, they’ll receive
 
Meanwhile, with Ukraine there’s a deal
For mineral wealth that’s a steal
This will help the peace
If war there does cease
And so, it has broader appeal
 
But really, the thing to denote
Is everything is anecdote
The data don’t matter
Unless it can flatter
The narrative as it’s been wrote

 

Confusion continues to be the watchword in financial markets as it is very difficult to keep up with the constant changes in the narrative and announcements on any number of subjects.  And traders are at a loss to make sense of the situation.  This is evidenced by the breakdown in previously strong correlations between different markets and ostensibly critical data for those markets.  

For example, inflation expectations continue to rise, at least as per the University of Michigan surveys, with last week’s result coming in at 4.3% for one year and 3.5% for 5 years.  And yet, Treasury yields continue to fall in the back end of the curve, with 10-year Treasury yields lower by nearly 15bps since that report was released on Friday.  So, which is it?  Is the data a better reflection of things?  Or is market pricing foretelling the future?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

At the same time, the Fed funds futures market is now pricing in 55bps of cuts this year, up from just 29bps a few weeks ago.  Is this reflective of concerns over economic growth?  And how does this jibe with the rising inflation expectations?  

Source: cmegroup.com

If risk is a concern, why is the price of gold declining?  

Source: cnn.com

My point is right now, at least, many of the relationships that markets and investors have relied upon in the past seem to be broken.  They could revert to form, or perhaps this is a new paradigm.  In fact, that is the point, there is no clear pathway.

Sometimes a better way to view these things is to look at policy actions at the country level as they reflect a government’s major concerns.  I couldn’t help but notice in Bloomberg this morning the story that the Chinese government is going to be injecting at least $55 billion of equity into their large banks.  Now, government capital injections are hardly a sign of a strong industry, regardless of the spin.  This highlights the fact that Chinese banks remain in difficult straits from the ongoing property market woes and so, are clearly not lending to industry in the manner that the government would like to see.  I’m not sure how injecting capital into large banks that lend to SOE’s is helping the consumer in China, which allegedly has been one of their goals, but regardless, actions speak louder than words.  Clearly the Chinese remain concerned over the health of their economy and are doing more things to support it.  As it happens, this helped equity markets there last night with the Hang Seng (+3.3%) ripping higher with mainland shares (+0.9%) following along as well.  Will it last?  Great question.

Another interesting story that seems at odds with what the narrative, or at least quite a few headlines, proclaimed, is that the US and Ukraine have reached a deal for the US to have access to Ukrainian rare earth minerals once the fighting stops.  The terms of this deal are unclear, but despite President Zelensky’s constant protests that he will not partake in peace talks, it appears that this is one of the steps necessary for the US to let him into the conversation.  Now, is peace a benefit for the markets?  Arguably, it is beneficial for lowering inflation as the one thing we know about war is it is inflationary.  If peace is coming soon, how much will that help the Eurozone economy, which remains in the doldrums, and the euro?  Will it lower energy prices as sanctions on Russian oil and gas disappear?  Or will keeping the peace become a huge expense for Europe and not allow them to focus on their domestic issues?

Again, my point is that there are far more things happening that add little clarity to market narratives, and in some cases, result in price action that is not consistent with previous relationships.  With this I return to my preaching that the only thing we can truly anticipate is increased volatility across markets.

With that in mind, let’s consider what happened overnight.  First, US markets had another weak session, with the NASDAQ particularly under pressure.  (I half expect the Fed to put forth an emergency rate cut to support the stock market.)  As to Asian markets, that Chinese news was well received almost everywhere except Japan (Nikkei -0.25%) as most other markets gained on the idea that Chinese stimulus would help their economies.  As such, we saw gains virtually across the board in Asia.  Similarly, European bourses are all feeling terrific this morning with the UK (+0.6%) the laggard and virtually every continental exchange higher by more than 1%.  Apparently, the Ukraine/US mineral rights deal has traders and investors bidding up shares for the peace dividend.  Too, US futures are higher at this hour, about 0.5% or so across the board.

As to bond yields, after a sharp decline in Treasury yields over the past two sessions, this morning, the 10-year is higher by 1bp, consolidating that move.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields are all slipping between -2bps and -4bps as the peace dividend gets priced in there as well.  While European governments may be miffed they have not been part of the peace talks, clearly investors are happy.  Also, JGB yields, which didn’t move overnight, need to be noted as having fallen nearly 10bps in the past week as the narrative of ever tighter BOJ policy starts to slip a bit.  While the yen has held its own, and USDJPY remains just below 150, it appears that for now, the market is taking a respite.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.25% today, -2.0% yesterday) has convincingly broken below the $70/bbl level as this market clearly expects more Russian oil to freely be available.  OPEC+ had discussed reducing their cuts in H2 this year, but if the price of oil continues to slide, I expect that will be changed as well.  Certainly, declining oil prices will be a driver for lower inflation, arguably one of the reasons that Treasury yields are falling.  So, some things still make some sense.  As to the metals markets, gold (-0.2%) still has a hangover from yesterday’s sharp sell-off, although there have been myriad reasons put forth for that movement.  Less global risk with Ukraine peace or falling inflation on the back of oil prices or suddenly less concern over the status of the gold in Ft Knox, pick your poison.  Silver is little changed this morning but copper, which had been following gold closely, has jumped 2.7% this morning after President Trump turned his attention to the red metal for tariff treatment.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning, recouping most of yesterday’s losses.  G10 currencies are lower by between -0.1% (GBP) and -0.5% (AUD) with the entire bloc under pressure.  In the EMG space, only CLP (+0.45%) is managing any strength based on its tight correlation to the copper price.  But otherwise, most of these currencies have slipped in the -0.1% to -0.3% range.

On the data front, New Home Sales (exp 680K) is the only hard data although we do see the EIA oil inventory numbers with a small build expected.  Richmond Fed president Barkin speaks again, but as we have seen lately, the Fed’s comments have ceased to be market moving.  President Trump’s policy announcements are clearly the primary market mover these days.

Quite frankly, it is very difficult to observe the ongoing situation and have a strong market view in either direction.  There are too many variables or perhaps, as Donald Rumsfeld once explained, too many unknown unknowns.  Who can say what Trump’s next target will be and how that will impact any particular market.  In fact, this points back to my strong support for consistent hedging programs to help reduce volatility in one’s financial reporting.

Good luck

Adf

Confusion

Posted on by

Confusion continues to reign
O’er markets though pundits will feign
That they understand
The movements at hand
Despite a quite rocky terrain
 
The speed with which Trump changes views
Can even, the algos, confuse
The pluses, I think
Are traders must shrink
Positions, elsewise pay high dues

 

For the longest time I believed that the algos were going to usurp all trading activity as their ability to respond to news was so much faster than any human.  Certainly, this has been the key to success for major trading firms like Citadel and Virtu Financial.  And they have been very successful.  I think part of their success has been that we have been in an environment where both implied and actual volatility has declined in a secular manner, so not only could they respond quickly, but they could lever up their positions with impunity as the probability of a large reversal was relatively less.

However, I believe that the algos and their owners may have met their match in Donald Trump.  Never before has someone been so powerful and yet so chaotic in his approach to very important things.  Many pundits complain that even he doesn’t have a plan when he announces a new policy.  But I think that’s his secret, keep everyone else off balance and then he has free reign.  Chaos is the goal.

The market impact of this is that basically, for the past three months since shortly after his election, the major asset classes of stocks, bonds and the dollar, have chopped around a lot, but not moved anywhere at all.  How can they as nobody seems willing to believe that the end game he has explained; reduced deficits, reduced trade balance, lower inflation and a strong military presence throughout the Western Hemisphere, is going to result from his actions.  And in fairness, some of the actions do have a random quality to them.  But if we have learned nothing from President Trump’s time in office, including his first term, it is that he is very willing to tell us what he is going to do.  It just seems that most folks don’t believe he can do it so don’t take it seriously.

So, let’s look at how markets have behaved in the past three months.  The noteworthy result is that the net movement over that period has been virtually nil.  Look at the charts below from tradingeconomics.com:

S&P 500

10-Year Treasury

EUR/USD

While all these markets have moved higher and lower in the intervening period, they have not gone anywhere at all.  The biggest mover over this time is the euro, which has rallied 0.54% with the other major markets showing far less movement than that.

One interesting phenomenon of this price action is that despite significant uncertainty over policy actions by the President and the implications they may have on markets, and even though recent price action can best be described as choppy rather than trend like, the VIX Index remains in the lowest quartile of its long-term range. Certainly, it has risen slightly over the past few weeks, but to my eye, it looks like it is underpricing the chaos yet to come.  

Source Bloomberg.com

While I have no clearer idea how things will unfold than anyone else, other than I have a certain amount of faith that the President will achieve many of his goals in one way or another, I am definitely of the belief that volatility is going to be the coin of the realm for quite a while going forward.  We have spent the past many years with numerous strategies created to enhance returns via selling volatility, either shorting options or levering up, and that is the trend that seems likely to change going forward.  The implication for hedgers is that maintaining hedge ratios while having a plan in place is going to be more important than any time in the past decade or more.

Ok, let’s take a look at how markets did move overnight.  Yesterday’s net negative session in the US was followed by similar price action in Asia.  Tokyo (-1.4%), Hong Kong (-1.35) and China (-1.1%) all suffered on stories about tariffs and extra efforts by the Trump administration to tighten up export controls on semiconductors.  It should be no surprise that virtually every index in Asia followed suit with losses between -0.3% (Singapore) and -2.4% (Indonesia) and everywhere in between.  Meanwhile, in Europe, the picture is not as dour as there are a few winners (Spain +0.9% and Italy +0.5%) although the rest of the continent is struggling to break even.  The data point that is receiving the most press is Eurozone Negotiated Wage Growth (+4.12%) which rose less than in Q3 and has encouraged many to believe the ECB will be cutting rates next week.  Interestingly, Joachim Nagel, Bundesbank president was on the tape telling the rest of the ECB to shut up about their expectations of future rate moves as there is still far too much uncertainty and decisions need to be made on a meeting-by-meeting basis.  Apparently, oversharing is a general central bank affliction, not merely a Fed problem.  As to US stocks, at this hour (6:50) they are little changed.

In the bond market, yields continue to slide, at least in the US, with Treasury yields down -6bps this morning and back to levels last seen in December.  Apparently, some investors are beginning to believe Secretary Bessent regarding his goal to drive yields lower.  As well, he has reconfirmed that there will be no major increase in the issuance of long-dated paper for now.  European sovereigns, though, are little changed this morning with only UK gilts (-3bps) showing any movement after the CBI Trades report printed at -23, a bit less bad than expected.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.15%) is little changed this morning after a very modest rally yesterday.  But the reality here is that oil, like other markets, has been in a trading range rather than trending, although my take is that the longer-term view could be a bit lower.  Gold (-0.35%), though lower this morning, is the one market that has shown a trend since Trump’s election, and truthfully since well before that as you can see in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, with both the euro and pound rising 0.3% alongside the CHF (+0.3%) and JPY (+0.2%). Commodity currencies, though, are less robust with very minor losses seen in MXN, ZAR and CLP.  Given the decline in 10-year yields, I am not that surprised at the dollar’s weakness although it is in opposition to the gut reaction that tariffs mean a higher dollar.  This is of interest because yesterday President Trump confirmed that the 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico were going into effect next week.  As I explained above, it is very difficult to get a sense of short-term price action here although given the clear intent of the president to improve the competitiveness of US exporters, he would certainly like to see the dollar decline further.  

It is very interesting to watch this president reduce the power of the Fed with words and not even have to attack the Chairman like he did in his first term.  It will be very interesting to see how Chair Powell responds to the ongoing machinations.

On the data front, this morning brings only the Case-Shiller Home Price Index (exp +4.4%) and Consumer Confidence (102.5).  We do hear from two Fed speakers, Barr and Barkin, but as I keep explaining, their words matter less each day. (It must be driving them crazy!)

It is hard to get excited about markets here.  There is no directional bias right now and the lack of critical data adds to the lack of information.  As well, given the mercurial nature of President Trump’s activities, we are always one tape bomb away from a complete reversal.  While I don’t see the dollar collapsing, perhaps the next short-term wave is for further dollar weakness.  

Good luck

Adf

Japanese Tao

Posted on by

Japanese prices
Are rising ever higher
Probably nothing!
 
Meanwhile Ueda
Explained QE can still be
The Japanese Tao

 

Japanese inflation data was released last night, and the picture was not very pretty.  In fact, let me show you.  The first chart shows the monthly readings of annual inflation for the past 5 years.  Last night’s 4.0% reading was not the highest in that period, (that distinction belongs to Feb 2023 at 4.3%), but it is pretty clear that any sense of declining inflation is beginning to dissipate and has been doing so for the past year.  PS, remember, Japanese interest rates range from 0.5% in the overnight to 1.425% in the 10-year, so real rates remain highly negative regardless of your timeframe.

The second picture takes a longer-term perspective to help us better understand the long history of inflation in Japan.  While a decade ago, inflation showed an uptick of nearly the recent magnitude, that was driven specifically by the government raising the GST (goods and services tax) which was Japan’s answer to a VAT.  It was highly controversial at the time but was also understood to have a truly transitory impact as it was a one-off rise in prices.  However, beyond that period, the Japanese have been living with inflation somewhere between -2.2% in the wake of the GFC and 2.0% since the turn of the century.  In fact, going back to the 1990’s, inflation didn’t reach current levels, and one must head back to 1981 to see significant inflation in Japan.  This means there are two generations of people who have basically never seen prices rise in the current manner.

So, what do you think the central bank is considering?  Let me give you Ueda-san’s own words, [emphasis added] “In exceptional cases where long-term interest rates rise sharply in a way somewhat different from normal movements, we will flexibly increase purchases of government bonds to promote stable formation of interest rates in the market.”  You read that correctly inflation is rising sharply, JGB yields are rising in sync and the BOJ’s response is to BUY MORE BONDS!!!  You cannot make this stuff up.  I guess old habits die hard.

The market response to this was as you might expect.  JGB yields dipped 2bps, Japanese equities managed a modest rally (+0.3%) as they seem caught between lower rates and higher inflation, and the yen ( -0.5%) weakened.  In essence, it appears the combination of a strengthening yen and rising interest rates has the potential to wreck the Japanese government’s budget, and the BOJ went back to form and discussed more QE as a response.  This is simply more proof that there isn’t a central bank in the world that truly cares about inflation.  While stable inflation may be a mandate, it is the last of their concerns.

Inflation is, however, not the last of our concerns, at least as we try to live day to day.  This is what has me concerned about Chairman Powell and his minions at the Fed, they continue to believe that the current interest rate structure is restrictive and despite the fact there is virtually no evidence prices are ever going to get back to their target of 2.0%, let alone true stability, still see cuts as the way forward.  Perhaps I am mistaken to believe that the Fed will see the light and maintain current policy levels or even tighten as inflation rebounds.  If that is the case, my entire dollar thesis is going to come under a lot of pressure!

Ok, away from the Japanese antics overnight, a brief word about China.  Last night, Premier Li Qiang explained that China will look to “vigorously” improve the services sector of the economy, specifically education, health care, culture and sports, as they once again try to adjust the balance of economic activity to a more domestic focus rather than their historical mercantilist process.  Earlier this week the PBOC reiterated their support for the property market, although for both these efforts, this is not the first time they have been discussed, and the evidence thus far is all their efforts have been fruitless.  But for one day, at least, these comments have been embraced as the Hang Seng (+4.0%) and CSI 300 (+1.3%) both rallied sharply on the news of more domestic support for the Chinese economy.  The Chinese are set to hold a key economic confab as they try to plan how to shake things up a bit, and these comments, as well as a seeming promise the PBOC is going to cut rates again, are all of a piece.  Maybe they will be successful this time, but I am not holding my breath.

Otherwise, the only other noteworthy economic news came from the Flash PMI’s across Europe which were soggy at best, certainly not indicative of significant growth coming soon.  With that in mind, let’s look at the rest of the markets’ overnight performance.  The rest of Asia’s equity markets were mixed with Taiwan’s the best performer and several modest declines elsewhere including India, Australia and New Zealand.  In Europe, though, despite those modest PMI outcomes, most markets are higher led by the CAC (+0.5%).  Perhaps, the view is the ongoing weakness will force the ECB to cut rates more quickly, and we have heard several ECB members indicate further cuts are coming.  However, counter to that, Isabel Schnabel, one of the more hawkish members, mentioned this morning that she believed they were already at neutral, and more cuts may not be necessary.  While that is not the consensus view yet, it is worth remembering.  As to the US futures market, at this hour (7:00), all three major indices are basically unchanged.

In the bond market, yields have fallen across the board with Treasuries, after sliding yesterday, down another 2bps this morning and back below 4.50% for the first time in a week.  In a Bloomberg interview yesterday, Secretary Bessent explained that although his goal is to reduce the issuance of T-bills and term out debt, given the situation which he inherited from the previous administration, that process will take longer than some had considered previously.  In other words, there won’t be a large increase in 10-year issuance any time soon. European sovereign yields are also much softer, down between -3bps and -5bps on those further rate cut hopes, or perhaps the lackluster PMI data.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.8%) is backing off its recent rally highs, but remains quiet overall and well within its ever-tightening trading range.  It seems traders don’t know how to handicap the constant discussions from the Trump administration and whether Russian sanctions will end or not, as well as how quickly OPEC may ramp up production and what is happening to demand.  While none of these things are ever certain, right now they seem particularly fraught.  In the metals space, gold (-0.4%) is backing off from yesterday’s latest all-time highs, and taking both silver and copper with it, but the uptrend in all three of these metals remains quite strong.

Finally, the dollar is higher this morning gaining ground against all its G10 counterparts with the yen being the worst performer, but also against all its EMG counterparts with HUF (-1.0%) the true laggard although the entire CE4 are under pressure, arguably responding to the mayhem over how the Ukraine situation plays out.  After all, they are the closest in proximity and likely to be the most impacted.

On the data front, this morning brings Flash PMI data (exp manufacturing 51.5. Services 53.0), Existing Home Sales 4.12M) and Michigan Sentiment (67.8).  We also hear from two more Fed speakers, Jefferson and Daly, but again, caution and stasis are the story until further notice, and that notice is not coming from Mary Daly but rather from Jay Powell.

Perhaps the most interesting thing happening right now is that although tariffs remain a major economic force and are clearly on the table, they are not even the 4th most important topic in the market.  Back to my earlier comments, I sincerely hope that the BOJ’s overwhelming dovish stance is not a harbinger of things to come here in the States.  Right now, I don’t think so, but I am far less confident than I was earlier this week.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Norms to Eschew

Posted on by

For market practitioners, Trump
Is more than a modest speed bump
His willingness to
Most norms to eschew
Can force long-term views to go bump
 
Meanwhile, as the markets prepare
For Powell to sit in his chair
In front of the Senate
A popular tenet
Is more rate cuts he will foreswear

 

It is very difficult to keep up with the news these days as President Trump really does address so many disparate issues in such short order, it is hard to know which ones will potentially impact markets and which will simply be headline fodder.  Obviously, the tariff discussions remain front and center, but even those plans seem to be evolving at a very fast pace, and while yesterday he did invoke 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, that has literally become old news already.  The next question is what will occur with the latest idea of reciprocal tariffs, where the US will charge the same tariff on imports from other nations as those nations charge on imports from the US.

Generally speaking, US tariffs are the lowest overall around the world, which arguably is exactly what Trump wants to address.  I am not going to argue the merits or detractions of tariffs, that is pointless.  The only thing to consider is if they are implemented, what are the potential impacts.  One of the key things to remember about the effectiveness of tariffs is the price elasticity of the products being tariffed.  If, for instance, a product has substantial competition and is easily replaced, the nation being tariffed is likely going to absorb the bulk of the pain.  Consider Colombia and how quickly they caved regarding the deportations.  While I am not a coffee drinker, and I am sure there are those who believe Colombian coffee is the best, coffee also comes from Brazil, Vietnam, Hawaii and Indonesia, and as none of those nations (and obviously Hawaii) were subject to tariffs, Colombia would have paid the freight had they been implemented.

But, for a product like solar panels, where there are few suppliers other than the Chinese, to the extent the demand remained in place, the purchaser would see higher prices.  Turning to steel and aluminum, the below graphic shows the top 10 global steel producing nations and how much they produced in 2024.  This graphic says all you need to know about why President Trump is unhappy with China and their trade policies.  (well, this and the next one)

Source: worldsteel.org

And while this is not an exact apples-to-apples comparison, the below chart shows forecasts for steed demand in 2023 and 2024.  The mismatches are clear as China, South Korea and Japan have a significant surplus to export while the US and India need imports.

Source: mrssteel.com.vn

The point is President Trump is seeking to address that imbalance and is of the mind that the US would be better off if we make our own steel.  In fact, this is simply part of his entire philosophy to reshore US manufacturing capabilities.

Now, steel is a traded commodity, although in financial markets, not so much.  But changes in the flows of imports and exports will have an impact on FX markets, while tariffs could well also impact investment flows. In fact, it is not hard to see why Nippon Steel wants to buy US Steel.  if they own a steel manufacturer in the US, they can increase production with no concerns over tariffs.

Remember, too, this issue is merely a microcosm of the potential chaos that will be seen across industries and nations, both of which will impact financial markets.  Once again, I harp on the idea that a robust hedging program is a necessity these days.

Turning to today’s activities, Chairman Powell will be testifying before the Senate Banking Committee this morning.  On the one hand, I wonder if he is upset by the fact that virtually nobody is concerned about what he says these days as Trump continues to dominate every conversation.  For someone who has become quite accustomed to being the center of attention with respect to markets, this may well be a blow to his vanity and ego.  On the other hand, it is also quite possible that maintaining a low profile is precisely his strategy here, and if that is the case, I expect we will not learn anything new at all.  The Fed mantra is currently that they will be cautious before implementing any further rate cuts.  Remember, CPI is released tomorrow as well, so when he goes before the House, they will have that information in hand.  But to Powell’s benefit, Treasury Secretary Bessent made clear he and President Trump are far more concerned about the 10-year yield than Fed funds.  This may be the most amazing transformation of all, a Fed chair who becomes a wallflower!

Ok, after yesterday’s US equity rally, the story in Asia was far less positive.  Japan and Australia were unchanged while the Hang Seng (-1.1%) and CSI 300 (-0.5%) both suffered, perhaps on the tariff impositions.  Elsewhere in the region, Taiwan and South Korea both had solid sessions while weakness was evident in Indonesia, India and the Philippines.  In fact, all three of those markets have been declining steadily since October, with declines between 15% and 20% as prospects in those economies seem concerning, especially with Trump’s tariff mania.  In Europe, virtually every market is unchanged this morning as the EU quickly explained they would retaliate against any US tariffs.  Of course, that is what makes Trump’s reciprocal tariff structure so interesting.  How can Europe complain that other nations impose the same level of tariffs they do?  Meanwhile, at this hour (7:05), US futures are pointing slightly lower, about -0.25%.

In the bond market, yields are climbing with Treasuries higher by 3bps, now 12bps above the lows seen early last week, while in Europe, yields are substantially higher, with France (+10bps) leading the way, but the rest of the continent showing rises of between 4bps and 6bps.  Part of this move on the continent is driven by a catch up to yesterday afternoon’s US yield rally.  As to the French, seemingly their Unemployment Report, which showed a much better than expected 7.3%, may have investors concerned about quickening growth and inflation.  That feels like a lot, but there are no real explanations I have seen.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.5%) is continuing to rebound off its recent lows, although still looks like it is in the middle of its trading range.  Gold (-0.7%) and silver (-1.2%) are both finally retracing some of the extraordinary rally that we have been witnessing for the past two months.  Copper (-2.7%), too, is under pressure this morning, unwinding some of its recent spectacular gains.

Finally, the dollar is very modestly softer, but not universally so.  For instance, the euro (+0.2%) and yen (-0.2%) seem to offset each other while most other G10 currencies have moved even less.  In the EMG bloc, though, INR (+0.9%) is the biggest gainer as the RBI has been intervening to address what had been an acceleration in the rupees decline in the past few weeks (see below).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Elsewhere in the space, gains are less impressive, with moves on the order of +0.4% (PLN and HUF) or smaller.

On the data front, the NFIB Small Business Optimism Index was released at a softer than expected 102.8 as it seems the Trumpian chaos is having an effect for now.  Otherwise, the only thing is Powell and three other Fed speakers, but again, given the relative lack of discussion regarding Powell, the other three will get even less press in my view.

It is difficult to claim nothing has changed lately, but perhaps more accurately, there is no clear directional change at this point.  We need to start seeing some consistency in the policy impacts and that is likely to take months.  Until then, volatility is the watchword across all markets.

Good luck

Adf