Tag Archives: #china

Tariff’s Predations

Posted on by

The White House said seventy nations
Are seeking to have conversations
With President Trump
Avoiding the thump
That comes amid tariff’s predations


But China is not on the list
As Xi claims that he’ll raise his fist
To “fight to the end”
And try to defend
His nation from being dismissed

Last week, risk was anathema to one and all.  President Trump’s tariffs were upending the world economy, recession was coming to the US, and possibly the world.  I couldn’t help but be reminded of this classic on the potential outcomes.  

Leading up to the tariff announcements, nations around the world were puffing out their metaphorical chests and claiming all the things they would do to respond.  But the reality is that as I have repeatedly said, the US is the consumer of last resort, and most nations cannot afford to lose access without significantly damaging their own economies.  As such, it is not that surprising that such a long list of nations has reached out immediately, indicating a willingness to change their own policies in order to prevent these tariffs.  Arguably, China is the one outlier here, with President Xi claiming they will “fight to the end” in this trade war.

Already, a number of nations have promised to reduce their tariffs on US goods to 0.0% if that is what is required, although thus far, the President has not accepted those deals.  It is a fair question to ask what he is seeking, since apparently, it is not simply free access.  Granted, there are also numerous non-tariff barriers that are in play, and perhaps he is focused on those as well.  Or perhaps he really is looking at tariffs as a key revenue source and doesn’t want to give up that revenue opportunity.  Or perhaps he is simply waiting for enough nations to bend the knee before one large announcement when all these deals are accepted.  The latter idea would be in keeping with the idea that he is trying to isolate China.

These are just three possibilities of the many, and nobody other than President Trump himself knows how this will end up.  I find it encouraging that Treasury Secretary Bessent is leading the discussions with Japan, a key ally and trade partner, as I have great faith in his understanding and abilities.  However, in the end, it is the President’s decision so…who knows?

Of course, the end of last week brought mayhem to risk markets with equities around the world falling sharply in price.  While there had been numerous voices explaining that equity valuations in the US were far too high and unsustainable, many of those same voices were screaming the loudest at the repricing.  But, as I said yesterday, markets have a great deal of trouble trading in that manner for too long as traders and investors simply get tired and stop trading at all.  

But what was interesting was that US markets turned around after the incredibly weak opening in futures markets Sunday night, and closed mixed on the day, with the NASDAQ actually managing a tiny gain.  I’m not sure exactly what to ascribe as the cause of that reversal, maybe bargain hunters, maybe short covering, or maybe much of the forced selling from margin calls had been completed.  In the morning, there was a rumor that Trump would delay the imposition of tariffs by 90 days, but that was squelched very quickly.  You can see that price action on the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The bounce, though, is continuing and we saw substantial rebounds overnight throughout Asia as well as in Europe this morning and with US futures pointing higher as well.  As much fear as was felt on Friday, it seems just the opposite today.  Interestingly, the Fear & Greed Index is still sitting at its all-time lows of just 4 as of this morning.  Perhaps that is the indicator driving the buying.

Source: cnn.com

To recap, many nations are offering to change their tariff policies with the US, although none of those offers have yet been accepted.  Tariffs are due to be enacted starting tomorrow, and there is still a great deal of concern around, but equity markets worldwide are rebounding from their worst levels.  For anyone who thought markets made sense, I dare you to put this puzzle together!

But let’s see how big the bounces were.  Tokyo (+6.0%) exploded higher, recouping much of Friday’s losses, although still down net since this began.  Surprisingly, China (+1.7%) and Hong Kong (+1.5%) showed much less bounce, although they didn’t fall as sharply either.  However, I have to assume that President Xi cannot be very happy as the Chinese plunge protection team was active last night, buying more than $5.7 billion in ETF’s to support the market and there was verbal support as well from the government.  Too, the yuan is sliding more aggressively but we will cover that below.  As to the rest of Asia, the picture was mixed with Taiwan, Vietnam, Thailand and Singapore falling sharply while India, Australia and New Zealand all had nice bounces.  

In Europe, there is a rebound as well, albeit not so dramatic with the FTSE 100 (+1.9%) leading the way and the DAX (+1.4%) and CAC (+1.3%) having solid sessions.  One of the offers was from the EU, saying they will take the tariffs on manufactured goods to 0.0% if the US would reciprocate, although that offer was not accepted, at least not yet.  US futures are all firmer this morning, up between 1.25% and 2.0% at this hour (7:15).  I think the message here is that nobody really knows anything else yet, and short-term trading is the driver.

In the bond market, there was a massive reversal yesterday with Treasury yields spiking more than 30bps from bottom to top during the session and closing near the highs. (see below)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

We saw similar price action throughout European sovereigns as well, although the rise was not quite as dramatic, a bit more than 20bps in German bunds although 30bps in UK gilts.  This morning, however, after all that price movement, yields are within 1bp of yesterday’s closing levels as traders and investors try to figure out what to do next.  JGB yields did rally 16bps yesterday, which given their level, was commensurate with the Treasury movement.  Arguably, looking at the chart above, what we have seen is a reset to pre-tariff levels.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.25%) managed to close above $60/bbl, although the trend there remains lower in my eyes.  I have had a bearish overall view on oil for more than a year as I explained back in January 2024 that there was plenty of oil around, and  it was political decisions that was restricting its availability, not physical ones.  As such, it is no surprise to me that the trend here is lower, especially with President Trump’s energy policy to drill, baby, drill, and OPEC increasing production as well.  It is hard to get excited about major price rises here.  Meanwhile, gold (+1.0%) and silver (+1.0%) are rebounding, with gold back above the $3000/oz level after its short profit taking foray below that key psychological level.  Copper is still under pressure as the growth story remains uncertain, at best, for now.

Finally, the dollar is a bit softer this morning, but with some notable exceptions.  While G7 currencies are all firmer, ranging from NZD (+1.1%) down to NOK (+0.1%) and everything in between, in the EMG bloc, CNY (-0.25%) is back to the weakest levels (dollar strength) since early January and prior to that since September 2023.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Xi is now caught in a tough spot as given the US tariffs, which total to about 104% on Chinese imports, the natural response is to allow the yuan to depreciate.  However, he has made a big deal about the yuan being a stable store of value, so if he lets it slide, that will undermine that argument.  My money is on a weaker CNY going forward.  Elsewhere in Asia, KRW (-0.6%) and INR (-0.4%) led the way lower.

On the data front, the NFIB Small Business Optimism Index was released at a softer than expected 97.4 this morning, but there is nothing else on the calendar other than an afternoon speech by SF Fed president Daly.  

It cannot be a surprise that we had a rebound from last week’s dramatic declines.  The question, of course, is have we now seen the bottom.  My take is that is not the case, and while we may hold tight for a few sessions, further declines are still in the offing.  At least absent a major change where Mr Trump announces that he has accepted the reduction in tariffs elsewhere around the world.  Remember, even after the declines, US equities are still richly valued.  As to the dollar, that is a much harder question, and I sense that there will be much more idiosyncratic movement rather than bloc dollar movement going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Miffed

Posted on by

By now, each of you is aware
More tariffs, the Prez did declare
Some nations will scream
While others will scheme
To Trump, though, in war all is fair
 
The market reaction was swift
With equities in a downshift
While Treasuries rallied
Pure gold, lower, sallied
And everyone worldwide’s quite miffed

 

Once again, President Trump did exactly what he told us he was going to do from the start.  He applied reciprocal tariffs on virtually every nation in the world, although at a rate claimed to be ~50% of their tariffs on the US, (as calculated by the White House and which included quotas and non-tariff barriers as well.)  In addition to Israel, which pledged to reduce tariffs to 0% on US goods if the US would do the same, it appears Canada has also agreed that deal.  I expect that we will hear different responses from nations all around the world, but remember, the one thing the president has made clear is that retaliation by other nations will be met with a significantly higher response from the US.  I expect that smaller nations may find themselves in very difficult straits, although larger ones have more potential to respond.  But, in the end, the US remains the consumer of last resort, and every nation on the list realizes that losing the US market will not help their economies.

The market response was immediate with US equity futures plummeting on the open of the evening session and sharp declines in Asian equities as well.  Treasury yields fell along with the dollar, while gold after an initial rally, reversed course and is now lower on the day as well.

Analysts around the world are out with early forecasts of the “likely” impacts of these tariffs although I would take them with a grain of salt.  Remember, analyst macro models have been pretty useless for a while, ever since the underlying conditions changed as I described earlier this week, so it is not clear to me that applying broken models to a new event is likely to offer accurate estimates of future activity.  However, there is a pretty clear consensus, which is that inflation is going to rise while economic activity is going to decline, probably into a recession.  Personally, I am confused by this analysis as every one of these analysts continues to believe that a recession drives prices lower and reduces inflation, but I’m just reporting on what I have seen.

If pressed, I expect that we will see several nations reduce their tariff structures in response to this, similar to Canada and Israel, and US tariffs will decline there as well.  Other nations will dig in their heels and trade activity between the US and those nations will decline.  But I will not even hazard a guess as to which nations will do what.  Political pain is a funny thing, and different leaders respond differently.

My sincere hope is that now that the tariffs have been imposed, we can move on with our lives and discuss other issues because frankly, I am really tired of this topic.

Masked by the tariff mania was news that the US Senate has moved forward on its budget resolution bill which if passed and combined with the House, will allow the process to start to legislate for fiscal year 2026.  Both versions maintain the 2017 tax cuts, both seek unspecified spending reductions and while each has a different price tag, my take is this process will be completed before too long.  It would truly be miraculous if Congress actually submitted department spending bills on a timely basis, rather than the omnibus bills that have been the norm for quite a while.  That would be true progress in how the government works.

Anyway, let’s see where things stand this morning.  The one thing we know is that despite President Trump’s constant discussion on tariffs, market participants were not prepared.  Ironically, yesterday saw modest gains in US equity indices but as of now (6:40) US futures are sharply lower (NASDAQ -3.8%, SPX -3.6%, DJIA -2.6%).  Of course, the damage has been significant everywhere with equities lower worldwide.

In Asia, Vietnam (-7.2%) was the worst hit index, actually the worst in the world, as tariffs there rose to 46%.  Given Vietnam has been a way station for exports from China to the US, I expect that we will see some swift action by the government there to address the situation.  But elsewhere in Asia, while the losses were universal, they were not as bad as might be expected.  Tokyo (-2.6%) led the way lower with Chinese shares (Hang Seng -1.5%, CSI 300 -0.6%) also falling, but not collapsing.  Korea (-0.8%) and India (-0.4%) fell but were also not devastated.

In Europe, though, the pain is more consistent and larger, net, than Asia as per the below snapshot from Bloomberg.  This will be the most interesting thing to watch as there has been a great deal of huffing and puffing about a response, but will European nations, who sell a great deal into the US, risk a worse outcome, or will they reduce their own tariffs?

Something else that has declined sharply is bond yields around the world.  Treasury yields are lower by a further -6bps, and that is the basic decline seen across Europe as well.  Asia saw even greater drops in yields with JGB’s (-12bps) breaking the trendline that had been in place since the BOJ first started hiking rates last year and Governor Ueda made clear his intention to continue to do so.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It appears that investors are anticipating a global recession, at least based on the movements in government bond yields around the world.

In the commodity space, oil (-4.7%) has reversed much of its recent gains as the recession narrative has eclipsed the Iran war/sanctions narrative.  However, despite the sharp decline, oil remains nearly $3/bbl above the lows seen at the beginning of March, just one month ago.  In the metals market, gold, which initially traded to new highs on the tariff announcement reversed course about lunchtime in Asia and is now down by more than -2.0%.  My take is this is a short-term impact as investors sell liquid assets with gains to cover margin calls, rather than any negative feelings about gold in the wake of the news.  Instead, I suspect that the barbarous relic will regain its footing shortly as the ultimate haven asset in difficult times, and clearly many now see difficult times ahead.  Silver (-3.9%) and copper (-0.4%) are also softer, much more on the economic concerns than the risk concerns.

Finally, the dollar, shockingly, is broadly lower this morning.  While we have been consistently informed that a very clear response to the US imposing tariffs would be other currencies weakening vs. the dollar to offset the impact, apparently that model is also broken.  Versus it’s G10 counterparts, the dollar is under severe pressure today.  EUR (+1.75%), JPY (+1.7%), CHF (+2.1%), SEK (+2.1%) and even NOK (+1.1%) despite the collapse in oil prices, have all moved to within 1% of the dollar’s lows seen last September.  But to keep things in perspective, I don’t know that I would call the dollar “weak” here.  The below chart of DXY shows that even over the past 20 years, the dollar has been MUCH lower and only spent a relatively small amount of time above current levels.  

Source: Koyfin.com

Interestingly, other than the CE4, which track the euro closely, most EMG currencies have not seen the same boost vs. the dollar, although most are somewhat higher.  MXN (+0.6%), KRW (+0.6%) and INR (+0.5%) have all gained modestly.  ZAR (0.0%) and CNY (-0.2%) are the only currencies that have bucked the trend and followed the economic theory.  

Turning to the data, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims as well as the Trade Balance (-$123.5B) at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see ISM Services (53.0).  The thing about this data is it ought to have no impact whatsoever as last night’s tariff announcements completely changed the playing field.  So whatever things were, they are not representative of the future, at least the near future.  There are also a couple of Fed speakers, but again, there is no way they can determine how they will react until the real economic effects of these tariffs start to play out.

There have been many analysts who continue to believe that President Trump will not be able to tolerate a substantial decline in the equity market despite the fact that he has not discussed it at all, and he, along with Treasury Secretary Bessent have consistently said their goal is a lower yield on 10-year Treasuries.  Well, they are getting their wish right now, regardless of the reason.  

The president has done virtually everything he said he was going to do regarding the border, government efficiency and now tariffs.  There are many skeptics who believe that he is out to force economic change on the backs of the bottom 90% of earners to benefit himself and others in the top 1%.  But he has consistently said his goal is to help the middle class.  His view of reindustrialization and more self-sufficiency while reduced international adventures continues to be the driving force of his policies.  There is no reason to believe he is going to change that view.  Do not look for a reversal of what he has done simply because the S&P 500 declines.  I think the trend is going to be for the dollar to continue to decline along with interest rates, while commodities rally.  Equity markets are going to be a tale of two markets, likely with previous highflyers suffering and previously overlooked companies benefitting.  

The world is changing a lot, so the best thing you can do is maintain your hedges to mitigate the impact.

Good luck

Adf

Fast or Slow Death?

Posted on by

As markets all take a deep breath
Concerns are that, just like Macbeth
The President will
The ‘conomy kill
The question is, fast or slow death?

 

Personally, I am hopeful that we can stop discussing tariffs after today.  It’s not that they will decrease in importance, but they will no longer be the primary topic.  Instead, they will be a secondary explanation for anything that anybody decides is wrong with the economy, or the country or the world.  Recession? Tariffs are the cause.  Inflation? Tariffs are the cause.  War? Tariffs are the cause.  Duke loses in the semis?  Tariffs are the cause.  

FWIW, which is probably not that much, my view is the market has absorbed this conversation and the correction we have seen over the past weeks in the equity market is the result of growing expectations of much slower growth or a recession.  Arguably, the biggest concern should be that US equity markets continue to trade at historically rich valuations and any negative catalyst can serve to both depress future expectations and compress multiples, and that’s how you get large equity market declines.

The thing about the tariff story is that while later today we will all find out the details, the actual impacts will take months, at least, to be determined.  For instance, the story that Israel has just decided to drop all tariffs on US made products, thus avoiding them on Israeli products is something I suspect we may see more frequently than now assumed.  Perhaps there would be no greater irony for all the naysayers than if this ‘end of free trade’ moment actually inspired a significant reduction in tariffs around the world as nations seek to retain access to the US.  I’m not saying this will be the case, but given the US is the consumer of last resort, running a nearly $1 trillion trade deficit, pretty much every other nation relies on the US as a market for some portion of their production.

Along these lines, I must ask, why is it that other nations, who apply tariffs and other non-tariff barriers like quotas or regulatory restrictions, to US products do so if tariffs are such a great evil?  Apparently when the French, for example, seek to protect their industries and farmers, it is healthy for the economy, but when the US does, it is world-ending.  Just sayin’

So, is the dip now to be bought?
Or are things still overly fraught?
The overnight session
Did naught for that question
As no one knows what Trump has wrought

Since there are literally no other stories to discuss regarding finance and markets right now, let’s turn to the overnight and see how markets are behaving in the runup to the Liberation Day announcement.  Yesterday’s mixed, but mildly positive, session in the US led to a mixed session in Asia with no real trend.  Even within a nation (Nikkei +0.3%, TOPIX -0.4%) there was no clarity.  Chinese shares were basically flat, Korea and Singapore fell while India and Malaysia rallied.  No movements approached even 1.0% so it is probably fair to say we didn’t learn anything.  However, European bourses are under pressure across the board this morning led by the DAX (-1.3%) and FTSE 100 (-0.9%).  Clearly, there is significant concern that the US tariffs, which are set to come into force immediately upon their announcement, will have a significant negative impact on European companies.  Certainly, German auto makers, who rely greatly on the US market, are likely to be negatively impacted, but as I said, it remains to be seen what actually occurs.  I guess considering that European shares have been performing well of late, with gains on the order of 10% or more YTD, some investors have decided to take their money and run.  

source: tradingeconomics.com

Meanwhile, US futures are pointing lower at this hour (7:10) down about -0.5% across the board.

In the bond market, while there is a lot of huffing and puffing that tariffs will be inflationary, yields are sliding this morning with Treasury yields (-2bps) declining to their lowest levels since last October, and a similar amount to most European sovereigns.  I suppose bond investors are more concerned over the mooted recession than the inflationary impact of tariffs.  Too, JGB yields slid -3bps, back to their lowest level in a month as questions remain about the BOJ’s future path as well as Japanese growth prospects in the new trade regime.

Turning to commodities, oil (-0.35%) has slipped a bit further but remains well up on the week as a story regarding the US moving more military assets toward the Middle East from Asia makes the rounds.  We cannot forget that President Trump has already initiated secondary sanctions on Venezuelan crude, and threatened to do so on Russian crude if Putin doesn’t agree to the ceasefire.  Meanwhile, Iran is always in Trump’s crosshairs while they remain a perceived threat to go nuclear.  As to the metals markets, gold (+0.1%) continues to edge higher with any pullbacks both short term and modest.  One look at the chart below shows how many more green days there have been than red ones over the past 6 months.  I see nothing to stop this trend.  As to the other metals, they are higher this morning and continue to trade well overall.  I believe the case can be made that going forward, commodity markets, and the shares of companies in the space, are set for some real outperformance in the new world order.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is mixed as well, with some widely disparate movements seen.  For instance, NZD (+0.9%) is having a good day, perhaps because direct trade with the US is di minimus, or perhaps because it has been weakening so much for the past 6 months, down nearly 10% even after today’s rally, over that period, that it is a simple bounce.  At the same time, ZAR (-1.0%) is sliding despite the ongoing gold rally, although there are growing concerns over the outcome of the budget there and how it will be funded and impact the economy.  But in truth, as I look across the board, there are probably more currency gainers than losers this morning, which ironically is exactly the opposite of the forecast impact of tariffs by the US.  Just remember, as Yogi Berra allegedly explained, “in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is.” Detailed market outcomes based on economic theories rarely hold up.

On the data front, this morning brings ADP Employment (exp 105K) and Factory Orders (0.5%, 0.7% ex-Transport) as well as the EIA oil inventories.  Yesterday afternoon’s API inventories showed a large build, but expectations are for draws today.  We also hear from Adriana Kugler, Fed governor, but ironically, all the Fed talk is now about tariffs and not about monetary policy.

Today is a crapshoot, with no way to even guess how things will evolve.  Also, beware the initial reaction as it may not represent a new view, but rather the unwinding of current positions.  Until further notice, though, I still think the dollar has a slow decline in its future.

Good luck

Adf

Aren’t Just Rumors

Posted on by

Give plaudits to President Xi
Who’s trying to show it is he
That’s offering deals
To help grease the wheels
Of trade, which he claims will be free
 
The problem is Chinese consumers
Have not been in very good humors
And history shows
The Chinese impose
Restrictions that are aren’t just rumors

 

Market activity can well be described as lackluster, with equity indices generally slipping lower while bond markets wobble and the dollar retraces some of its recent losses.  In fact, the only markets really showing a trend right now are gold (+0.4%), silver (-0.1%) and copper (-0.2%), all of which have rallied sharply over the past month and year.  Obviously, the major discussion point is President Trump’s tariff policy and how that will impact economies around the world.  Recent focus has been on how other nations will respond with a variety of poses taken by different leaders, from conciliatory to combative.

So, it is with great interest that we see another impact of the Trump administration, the sight of China’s communist party leader, Xi Jinping, trying to convince foreign company CEO’s that investing in China is a good deal.  A lead article in Bloomberg this morning describes a large gathering in China where President Xi hosted CEO’s of numerous companies from around the world in an effort to portray China’s policies as investment friendly.

This makes sense given the trend in foreign direct investment toward China over the past years.  As can be seen in the chart below from the Bloomberg article, it has not been a pretty sight.  And remember, this all occurred before President Trump was elected.  Clearly, there were concerns prior to Mr Trump escalating the trade conflicts with the US.  

I find it somewhat ironic, though, that Xi is trying to promote Chinese policy as an island of stability in the world.  Consider how he has capriciously destroyed the private education market, or even the tech market until reversing course after the DeepSeek announcement, all while the housing market continues to implode.  Given the rest of the world has lost patience with China’s mercantilist policies and the flood of cheap goods they produce with government support, I am at a loss to understand the appeal of investing in China.  Using it as an export base is a nonstarter, and history has shown that nearly every foreign company that looked at China’s population as a great untapped market for their products has been hugely disappointed.  The exceptions are the luxury goods makers, where the global brand and cachet were too strong for domestic competitors to overcome.  But that is a small segment of the market.  

Instead, the usual outcome is forced technology transfer which results in a state-supported competitor for their products around the rest of the world.  I am confident there will be companies that choose to invest, if for no other reason than to curry favor with Xi and open the doors to further potential sales, but the trend of late is not promising.  Ultimately, property laws and their enforcement are the keystone for inward investment into any nation and China has no history of treating foreign companies fairly, or domestic ones for that matter.

But really, the flow of direct market news and economic data has been secondary with far more political news leading conversations.  The impact of tariffs on economic activity and inflation, as well as on market performance remains unclear with arguments being made on both sides as to potential benefits or detriments.  FWIW, which is probably not much, my take is the impacts will be very unevenly spread, and how that impacts broad based numbers is unknowable at this time.  I fear we will all need to be reactive for now, although for those with outstanding exposures, there is no better argument for maintaining robust hedge ratios given the overall uncertainty.

Ok, let’s take a look at the overnight action in markets.  After yesterday’s US declines, we saw much of Asia follow suit with Tokyo (-1.8%) particularly hard hit as PM Ishiba thought that he was making headway with President Trump but found out that Japanese auto manufacturers were going to be subject to those tariffs as well.  Adding to the pressure were the “Minutes” from the last BOJ meeting which implied further rate hikes are on the horizon. Both Hong Kong (-0.65%) and China (-0.45%) also slipped and, in fact, almost every major market in Asia (Korea, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand) also fell, some quite sharply.  Apparently, Xi’s efforts at creating that stability haven’t yet been successful.  

In Europe, red is also the dominant color with most continental bourses lower by around -0.6%, also on the tariff story.  The one exception here is the UK, which released a passel of data showing growth was modestly firmer than expected at 1.5% led by Retail Sales growing 1.0%, rather than declining by -0.3% as expected.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15) they are pointing slightly lower, about -0.2%.

In the bond market, yields are backing off around the world with Treasuries (-3bps) lagging European price action where sovereigns have seen yields decline between -4bps and -6bps.  Even JGB yields have slipped -4bps.  In Europe, inflation data from France and Spain came in softer than expected which has encouraged the move there, and we even heard arch ECB hawk, Robert Holzmann, explain that funding defense spending via bond purchases (i.e. QE) was viable.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.2%) which rallied yesterday to touch the elusive $70/bbl level is slipping back a bit, but the trend remains clearly higher as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, in the currency markets, the dollar is firmer once again with modest rallies vs. the euro (-0.3%) and pound (-0.2%) as well as strength against the Scandies (SEK -0.6%, NOK -0.3%).  However, the picture in the EMG bloc is more mixed with ZAR (+0.35%) showing strength alongside gold’s rally, and INR (+0.2%) bucking the trend after having agreed to reduce tariffs on US products.  Throughout the rest of the bloc, there has been generally little change.

Turning to the data this morning, there is plenty that will be keenly watched.  Personal Income (exp 0.4%), Personal Spending (0.5%) and the PCE data (headline 0.3%, 2.5% Y/Y and core 0.3%, 2.7% Y/Y) all get released at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see Michigan Sentiment (57.9) and you can be sure people will be talking about the Inflation Expectations piece (1yr 4.9%, 5yr 3.9%), especially if it syncs with their narrative.  There are two more Fed speakers, Governor Barr and Atlanta Fed president Bostic, but nothing any Fed speaker has uttered has mattered at all, maybe since Trump was inaugurated.

My read on overall sentiment is that investors are wary of the future, but not yet ready to abandon the stocks only go up narrative.  Regarding the dollar, the recent trend remains modestly lower, as per the below, but it is hard to get excited about large moves, at least for today.  Again, Trump clearly wants it lower and seems likely to get his way, at least to some extent.  The one thing I truly do like is commodities, which I believe will remain well bid overall.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

The Fools

Posted on by

In April, it starts with the Fools
But two days thereafter the rules
For importing cars
To where Stars and Bars
Fly will change with tariffs as tools
 
For Europe, the pain will be keen
At least that’s what most have foreseen
And poor crypto bros
Will find their Lambos
May soon cost a price quite obscene

 

While the political set continues to harp on the “Signal” story, markets really don’t care about political infighting between the parties.  Rather, their focus is keenly attuned to President Trump’s confirmation that starting on April 3rd, there will be a 25% tariff imposed on all imported autos from everywhere in the world.  This is particularly difficult for European auto manufacturers as they produce a far smaller proportion (VW 21%, BMW 36%, Mercedes 41%) of their vehicles in the US than do the Japanese (Honda 73%, Toyota 50%, Nissan 52%), although the Koreans will be impacted as well (Hyundai/Kia 33%).  Ironically, according to Grok, where I got all this information, GM only produces about 54% of their vehicles sold in the US, in the US, with the rest coming from Canada and Mexico.  As an aside, Tesla produces all their vehicles in the US.

Particularly hard hit are the specialty manufacturers like Porsche, Ferrari and Lamborghini, which produce none of their vehicles in the US.  Of course, given the price points of these vehicles, my sense is it may not really hurt their sales as if you are spending $250k on a car, you can likely afford to spend $312.5k as well.  In fact, in a funny way, these tariffs may enhance the Veblen effect where people will brag about paying the higher price as it puts it out of reach of more people.

Nonetheless, the action merely confirms that President Trump is very serious with respect to changing the world’s trading model.  I saw something interesting this morning in that Paul Krugman, who made his name, and won his Nobel Prize, based on work regarding international trade and was the prototypical free trader, has adjusted his views after recognizing that nations need to maintain some manufacturing capabilities for security reasons.  I assure you, if Krugman, who has been a vocal liberal critic of every Republican idea for the past twenty years, agrees with this policy, it will be very difficult for anyone to reject it.

In a perfect world (globo economicus?) free trade accrues benefits to all.  But we don’t live in that world and national priorities often supersede these issues.  The pandemic highlighted the weaknesses that the US had developed in its ability to manufacture key items necessary for its continued economic and defense survival. And remember this, for the world at large, their idea of free trade is they should be able to sell whatever they grow/manufacture into the US with no barriers, but US manufacturers need to be subject to barriers in order to protect other nations’ favored industries and companies.  That world is now history with new rules being written every day and most of them by Donald Trump.

So how have markets responded to this tariff confirmation?  Not terribly well.  Yesterday’s US equity selloff was pretty significant led by the NASDAQ’s -2.0% decline.  In Asia, the Nikkei (-0.6%) also sold off as did Korea (-1.4%), Taiwan (-1.4%) and Australia (-0.4%).  On the other hand, both China (+0.3%) and Hong Kong (+0.4%) managed a better session, seemingly as a rebound against declines in the previous session with the only news showing that Chinese industrial profits fell by -0.3% compared to a Y/Y decline of -3.3% in December.  However, a quick look at a chart of this data for the past five years tells me they need to seasonally adjust it in order to get something meaningful, so I don’t think it really impacted markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to European shares, it should be no surprise that the tariff announcements have negatively impacted shares there with declines of between -0.2% (Spain) and -0.7% (Germany).  US futures though, at this hour (7:00) are little changed on the session.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to creep higher, up another 3bps this morning and back to levels last seen a month ago.  This cannot be helping Secretary Bessent’s blood pressure, although he very clearly has a plan in mind.  There is much stagflation discussion in the markets by the punditry as they assume tariffs will slow growth and raise prices and bonds are not the favored investment in that scenario.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields are all sliding this morning, largely down -2bps, amid growth concerns on the back of the tariff announcements.  The one exception here is UK Gilts (+7bps) as the UK Budget announcement indicated slightly more gilt issuance would be necessary to fund the government’s spending plans.  However, there is a growing concern over the financial management of the Starmer government overall.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.35%) is slipping from yesterday’s closing levels and continues to flirt with the $70/bbl level but has not been able to breech it since late February.  Apparently, there are questions as to whether the auto tariffs will reduce demand.  Personally, I would think it is the opposite as more older, less fuel efficient cars will remain on the road here.  As to gold (+1.0%) after a several day pause, it appears that it is resuming its very strong trend higher.  You know what we haven’t heard about lately?  Ft Knox auditing.  I wonder if that is getting arranged or is now so old a story nobody cares.  Silver (+1.0%) is along for the ride although copper (-0.4%) is taking a breather after a breathtaking run to new all-time highs this year.  Look at the slope of the copper chart and you can see why it is pausing, at the very least.

Source: tradingeconomics.com’

Finally, the dollar is broadly softer this morning, with the euro, pound and Aussie all gaining on the order of 0.3%.  As well, NOK (+0.3%) is firmer after the Norgesbank surprised some and left rates on hold with a relatively hawkish message about the future.  But there is weakness vs. the greenback around with JPY (-0.3%), MXN (-0.3%) and INR (-0.2%) all leaning the other way.  Another tariff related story is that India is planning to cut its tariffs in half for the US, a very clear victory for President Trump. 

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims data as well as the third and final look at Q4 GDP (2.3%).  Part of the GDP data is Real Final Sales (4.2%) which is a key indicator for what happens here given consumption represents ~70% of the economy.  We do hear from Richmond Fed president Barkin this afternoon, but right now, Fed speakers are speaking into the void.

International statecraft continues to be the underlying thesis of global relations and President Trump’s goals of reshoring significant amounts of manufacturing and jobs along with it is still the primary driver.  There has been far less talk of the Mar-a-Lago Accord as that seems to be losing its luster.  If countries adjust their trade policies, Trump will continue in this direction.  While that may include short-term economic weakness and some pain, for both the economy and the stock markets, there is no indication, yet, he is anywhere near blinking.  One thing to keep in mind is that an overvalued stock market can correct by prices falling sharply, but also by prices stagnating for a long time while earnings catch up and multiples compress.  We may very well be looking at the latter scenario, so no large gains nor losses, just choppy markets going forward.  As to the dollar, lower still seems the direction of travel overall from current levels, but probably in a very gradual manner.

Good luck

Adf

Not Worried

Posted on by

‘Bout markets, Scott Bessent’s not worried
As favor with specs can’t be curried
Instead, what he seeks
Is policy tweaks
To help growth, though folks want that hurried
 
Meanwhile, Chairman Jay and his team
Continue their policy theme
Inflation’s still falling
Although they are calling
For patience, as bulls start to scream

 

“I’ve been in the investment business for 35 years, and I can tell you that corrections are healthy, they are normal,” Bessent said Sunday on NBC’s Meet The Press. “I‘m not worried about the markets. Over the long term, if we put good tax policy in place, deregulation and energy security, the markets will do great.”

The above comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent yesterday morning (quote courtesy of Bloomberg.com) have garnered a remarkable amount of commentary amidst both the political and market punditry.  My first comment is I must be much older than Mr Bessent, since I have been in the investment business for 43 years.  However, as I have written numerous times over the course of the past years, the market has not cleared for a very long time.  Since the 1987 stock market crash, when then Fed Chair Greenspan started pumping liquidity into the financial markets to stabilize things, and realized he could do that to prevent serious downturns, we have seen two significant downdrafts, the tech bubble and the housing market crash, both of which were immediately met with massive liquidity injections, extremely low interest rates and for the latter, the advent of QE.

All of that liquidity has resulted in market excesses across many markets and has been a key driver in the stock market’s exceptional rise since the Covid blip.  Adding to that was the massive fiscal spending (remember those 7% budget deficits?) which has helped to insure that not only did markets rise, but so did retail prices.

Now, along comes a Treasury Secretary who hasn’t married himself to higher stock markets on a day-to-day basis and instead is focused on the long-term.  What I find most interesting is that the same pundits who are screaming about Bessent and Trump destroying the economy, were all-in on the discussion of how the US debt was going to ultimately cause a collapse.  Yet as the administration explicitly tries to address that issue (you may disagree with their methods, but that is their clear goal) suddenly, the fact that stock prices are falling is a tragedy of biblical proportions.  Here’s the thing, the worst performer, the NASDAQ, is down about -12% since its peak last month as per the below chart.  I might argue that is hardly a collapse.  In fact, a healthy correction doesn’t seem to be a bad description.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no doubt that uncertainty about the near-term direction of the economy has grown, and there is no doubt that President Trump’s mercurial tendencies make long-term planning difficult.  However, I would contend we are a long way from the apocalypse or even a stockopalypse.  But once again, I highlight that volatility remains the key metric for now, and that hedging exposures remains very important.

With that as backdrop, the FOMC meets on Wednesday and while there is no expectation of any rate move, the market continues to price three rate cuts for the rest of the year, pretty much one each quarter.  A key unknown is just how hawkish or dovish Fed members currently find themselves given the recent market gyrations.  As well, while inflation had seemingly been the primary focus, with all the concern over a significant slowdown in the US economy, there are now many who believe we will see a rising Unemployment Rate despite a lack of evidence from the weekly Claims data.  These same pundits are also certain that Trump’s tariff policy will lead to rising inflation, really putting the Fed in a bind with a stagflationary outcome.  And maybe that is what will happen.

But I would contend it is far too early to assume that is our future.  First off, on the inflationary front, energy prices have fallen, a key inflation component, and as far as the tariffs are concerned, if they reduce demand, that is likely to cap prices. If on the other hand, demand is not reduced, I don’t see slowing growth as the likely outcome.  

In the end, if the economy is adjusting from one with far more government spending support, to one with more organic private sector economic activity, the transition may be bumpy, but the outcome will be far stronger.  We shall see if that is how things evolve.

In the meantime, let’s look at how the world has responded to the latest stories.  Friday’s US equity rebound was welcomed everywhere, although the key narrative remains the end of American exceptionalism, at least as regards equity markets.  Friday also saw the exiting German Bundestag agree to eliminate the debt brake for infrastructure and defense, with Chancellor-to-be Merz agreeing to waste spend €100 billion on climate related projects to convince the Green Party, which is out of the new government, to vote in the rule change before the new government is seated.  It is not clear to me how spending that money on net-zero ideas will defend Germany, but then I am just a poet, not a German policymaker.

As to Asian markets, other than mainland China (-0.25%) green was the predominant color on screens overnight with Japan (+0.9%), Australia (+0.8%) and Hong Kong (+0.8%) all following the US.  One of the remarkable things, though, is that Chinese data overnight showing IP (5.9%), Retail Sales (4.0%) and Fixed Asset Investment (4.1%) was generally solid.  Of course, Unemployment (5.4%) rose 2 ticks, an unwelcome outcome, and House prices (-4.8%) continue to decline, albeit at a slowing rate, but neither of those speak to a rebound in the Chinese economy.  The end of the Chinese NPC offered more platitudes about supporting the consumer, but it is not clear where the money is coming from.  And recall, more than 60% of Chinese household wealth remains tied up in housing investment, which continues to decline in value.  The Chinese have a long way to go in my view.

Quickly, European bourses are all modestly higher this morning, on the order of 0.3% or so, as hope springs eternal that the rearming of Europe will drive profit margins higher.  Unfortunately, at this hour (7:15), US futures are pointing lower, about -0.25% across the board, although that is up from earlier session lows.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps this morning, but are really just trading around in their new trading range of 4.20% to 4.35% as investors try to get a handle on which of the big themes are going to drive markets going forward.  European sovereigns are all seeing rallies, with yields slipping -5bps to -6ps which seems out of step with the news about the end of the German debt brake.  Perhaps bond investors don’t believe the legislation will pass, or perhaps that they won’t spend the money after all.  As to JGB yields, the edged lower by -1bp in the 10yr, although longer dated paper has seen yields rise with 40-year bonds touching 3.0% for the first time in their relatively short history.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.4%) is continuing to bounce of its lows from last week but remains well below levels seen at the beginning of the month.  The US attack on the Houthis is being called the beginning of an escalation in the Middle East by some, and perhaps that has traders concerned.  On the flip side, ostensibly, Presidents Trump and Putin are to speak tomorrow in an effort to get peace talks moving along, potentially a bearish oil signal.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.6%) remains in great demand having crested the $3000/oz level last week and rising from there.  This has helped both silver and copper, with the latter, despite concerns over slowing economic activity, pushing closer to $5.00/lb.  There is much talk of shortages in the market driving the price action.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning with every G10 currency firmer led by NZD (+0.6%) and AUD (+0.4%) although gains elsewhere are on the order of +0.25%.  This story seems to go hand-in-hand with the German defense spending and the end of US exceptionalism.  As to the EMG bloc, most of these currencies are also stronger this morning, but the magnitude of these moves is generally less than the G10 bloc.  Recall, Trump wants a lower dollar, and my default is that is where we are headed at this point.

On the data front, we have an action-packed week ahead starting this morning.

TodayRetail Sales0.6%
 -ex autos0.4%
 Empire State Manufacturing-0.75
TuesdayHousing Starts1.375M
 Building Permits1.45M
 IP0.2%
 Capacity Utilization77.8%
WednesdayFOMC Rate Decision4.50% (unchanged)
ThursdayInitial Claims224K
 Continuing Claims1880K
 Philly Fed12.1
 Existing Home Sales3.92M
 Leading Indicators-0.2%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As we have seen over the past many months, I suspect that this week’s data will be likely to give analysts on both sides of the economy is stronger/weaker argument new fodder.  While the Fed won’t be doing anything, and despite their relative decline in importance, I suspect that Chairman Powell’s press conference will still get a lot of attention.

While we don’t know what the future will bring for sure, I remain convinced that the dollar will slide, and commodities will rally.  As to stocks and bonds, well your guess is as good as mine.

Good luck

Adf

In a Trice

Posted on by

The calendar’s not e’en turned twice
Since Trump, with JD as his Vice
Have taken the reins
And beat up on Keynes
While weeding out waste in a trice
 
For markets, the problem, it seems
Is rallies are now merely dreams
So, equity buyers
Are putting out fires
While thinking up pump and dump schemes
 
For bondholders, it’s not so clear
If salvation truly is near
But one thing seems sure
The buck will endure
Much weakness throughout this whole year

 

We have not even reached 50 days of a Trump presidency as of this morning and nobody would fault you if you estimated we had three years of policies enacted to date.  The pace of changes has been blistering and clearly most politicians, let alone investors, have not been prepared for all that has occurred.

One of the things that I read regularly is that Trump is destroying the Rules Based Order (RBO) which was underpinned by the Pax Americana of the US essentially being the world’s policeman.  This is cast as a distinct negative under the premise that things were going great and now, he is upsetting the applecart for his own personal reasons.  Of course, market participants had grown quite accustomed to this framework, had built all sorts of models to profit from it and with the Fed’s help of monetization of debt, were able to gain significantly at the expense of those without market linked assets.  Hence, the K-shaped recovery.

But while that is a lovely narrative, is it really an accurate representation of the way of the world?  If the US was truly the world’s policeman, and we certainly spend enough on defense to earn that title, perhaps it was time for the US to be fired from that role anyway.  After all, there is currently raging military conflict in Ukraine, Lebanon, Syria, Congo, Sudan and the ongoing tensions in Gaza.  That’s a pretty long list of wars to claim that things were going great.

Secondly, the question of financing all this conflagration, as well as other economic goals, notably the alleged transition to net zero carbon energy production, appears to be reaching the end of the line.  While the US can still borrow as needed, (assuming the debt ceiling is raised), the reality is that the US gross national debt outstanding is greater than $36,000,000,000,000 relative to GDP that is a touch under $28,000,000,000,000.  On a global basis, total (not just government) debt is in excess of $300,000,000,000,000 while global GDP clocks in somewhere just north of $100,000,000,000,000.  Arguably, on a credit metric basis, the world is BB- or B+, a clear indication that all that debt is unlikely to be repaid.

If we consider things considering this information, perhaps the RBO had outlived its usefulness.  Arguably, the loudest complaints are coming from those who benefitted most greatly and are quite unhappy to see things change against them.  But as evidenced by the polls taken after President Trump’s speech last Tuesday evening, the bulk of the American public is still strongly supporting this agenda.  The idea that the president and his Treasury secretary are seeking to engineer a short-term recession early, blame it on fixing Biden’s mess, and having things revert to stronger growth in time for the 2026 mid-term elections is not crazy.  In fact, there have been several comments from both men that short-term pain would be necessary to achieve a stabler, long-term gain.

So, what does this mean for the markets?  You have no doubt already recognized that volatility is the main event in every market, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.  But some of the themes that follow this agenda would be for US equities to suffer relative to other markets, as the last decade plus of American exceptionalism, led by massive deficit spending and borrowing, would reverse under this new thesis.  Add to this the sudden realization that other nations are going to be investing significantly more in their own defense, and money will be flowing out of the US into Europe, Japan and emerging markets around the world.

Bonds are a tougher call as a weaker economy would ordinarily mean lower yields, but the question of tariff impacts on prices, as well as reshoring, which, by definition, will raise prices, could mean we see the yield curve steepen with the Fed cutting rates more aggressively than currently priced, but 10-year and 30-year yields staying right where they are now.

I believe this will be a strong period for commodities as all that foreign capex will be a driver, as will the fact that, as I will discuss shortly, the dollar is likely to underperform significantly.  Gold will retain its haven characteristics as well as remain in demand for foreign central banks, while industrial metals should hold their own.  As to oil, my take is lower initially, as OPEC returns its production and slowing GDP weighs on demand, at least for a while, although eventually, I suspect it will rebound along with economic activity.

Finally, the dollar will remain under significant pressure across the board.  Clearly, Trump is seeking a weaker dollar to help the export industries, as well as discourage imports.  Add to this the potential for lower yields, lower short-term rates, and an exit of equity investors as US stocks underperform, and you have the making of at least another 15% decline in the greenback this year.

With this as backdrop, we need to touch on three key stories this morning.  First, Friday’s NFP report was pretty much in line with expectations at the headline level but seemed a bit weaker in some of the underlying bits, specifically in the Household Survey where a total of 588K jobs were lost and there was a large increase in the number of part-time workers doing so for economic reasons.  Basically, that means they wanted full-time work but couldn’t find a job.  Markets gyrated after the release, with yields initially sliding but then rebounding to close higher on the day.  Equities, too, closed higher on the day although that had the earmarks of a relief rally after a lousy week overall.  The thing about this report is that it did not include any of the government changes that have been in the press, so next month may offer more information regarding the impact of DOGE and their cuts.

The second story comes from north of the border where Mark Carney, former BOC and BOE head, was elected to lead the Labour Party in Canada and replace Justin Trudeau.  As is always the case, when there is new leadership, there is excitement and he said he will call for a general election in the next several weeks, ostensibly to take advantage of this new momentum.  It seems that President Trump’s derision of not only Trudeau, but Canada as well in many Canadian’s eyes, will play a large role with the two lead candidates, Carney and Poilievre, fighting to explain that they are each better placed to go toe-to-toe with Trump on critical issues.

Here’s the thing, though.  Despite much angst about the US-Canada relationship on the Canadian side of the border, the market viewpoint is nothing has really changed.  a look at the chart below shows that after a bout of weakness for the Loonie in the wake of the US election and leading up to Trump’s tariff announcements, USDCAD is basically unchanged since mid-December, with one day showing a spike and reversal in early February.  My point is that the market has not, at least not yet, determined that the Canadian PM matters very much.

Source: tradingecoomics.com

The last story to discuss is Chinese inflation data which was released Saturday evening in the US and showed deflation in February (-0.7% Y/Y) for CPI and continuing deflation in PPI (-2.2%).  In fact, as you can see from the below chart, PPI in China has been in deflation for several years now.  Recently there have been several articles explaining this offers President Xi a great opportunity for significant stimulus because no matter how much the government spends and how much debt they monetize, inflation won’t be a problem for a long time to come.  I would counter that given deflation has been the norm for several years, they have had this opportunity for quite a while and done nothing with it.  Why will this time be different?  Ultimately, the default result in China is when things are not looking like they will achieve the targeted growth of “about 5%”, you can be sure there will be more investment to build things up adding still more downward pressure on prices as production facilities increase.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The renminbi’s response to this news has been modest, at best, with a tiny decline overnight of -0.25%.  And a look at the chart there shows it is remarkably similar to the CAD, with steady weakness through December and then no real movement since then.  Given the dollar’s recent weakness overall, this seems unusual.  Although, we also know that China prefers a weaker currency to help support their export industries, so perhaps this in not unusual at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, this note is already overly long, so will end it here.  We do have important data later this week with both CPI and Retail Sales coming.  As well, the consensus from the Fedspeak is that they are pretty happy right here and not planning to do anything for a while.

The big picture is best summarized, I believe, by the idea that we are at the beginnings of a regime change in markets as discussed above.  Volatility continues to be the driving force, so hedging remains crucial for those with natural exposures.

Good luckAdf

Inundated

Posted on by

Investors have been inundated
By news that has been unabated
There’s tariffs and war
Plus rate cuts and more
With stocks and bonds depreciated
 
Now looking ahead to today
The payroll report’s on its way
As well, later on
With nothing foregone
We’ll hear from our own Chairman Jay

 

It has certainly been an interesting week in both markets and the world writ large.  So much has happened and yet so much is still unclear as to how things may evolve going forward.  Through it all, volatility is the only constant.  To me, what has become abundantly clear is the post WWII order is being dismantled, and every nation is trying to determine its place in the future.  This is a grave threat to those who benefitted from flowery words and limited action, which covers a wide swath of government leaders around the world.  I’m not sure if this is the 4th Turning, or if this is merely the prelude, with the impacts of all these changes what brings the 4thTurning about.  Regardless, history is clearly in the making.

I do not have the bandwidth to continuously follow the tariff story, although yesterday’s news was there will be more delays for both Canada and Mexico.  China received no such relief and at their National People’s Congress they seemed resolute in their pushback and highlighted their own achievements.  The data from China, though, tells me that their goals for more domestic consumption remain far in the distance.  Last night they reported their Trade Balance for the January/February period (they always combine because of the Lunar New year disruptions) and it jumped to $170.5B, far greater than anticipated.  While exports underperformed slightly, growing only 2.3% compared to a 5% estimate, it was the imports that really tells the story.  Imports fell -8.4%, a significant shortfall from both last year and consensus estimates, and an indication that the Chinese consumer is not yet the type of force that President Xi would like to see.  

In fact, a look at the chart below showing imports for the past 10 years demonstrates that very little has changed on this front.  As I wrote yesterday, converting a mercantilist economy into a consumer-focused one is a huge lift, and one that the CCP has not yet figured out.  It is not clear that they ever will.  Meanwhile, the obvious explanation for the huge jump in the trade balance was companies pre-ordering things to get ahead of the tariffs.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Moving on to the Ukraine situation, while yesterday’s news was of the “whatever it takes” moment for defending Europe, this morning it seems there are some caveats attached.  Of course, the first caveat is the changing of the German constitution to allow them to spend all that money.  The second seems to be that not every European nation is on board for the massive spending increase and continuation of the war.  There are many political and financial hurdles to overcome in this story in Europe, and this morning’s European equity markets are indicative of the idea that this is not a straight-line higher.  In fact, every equity market in Europe is lower this morning, led by the DAX (-1.5%) although with solid declines elsewhere as well (CAC -1.0%, FTSE 100 -0.5%).  This, too, is a story with no clear end in sight.  One unconfirmed story I saw was that the group convened by the UK last weekend has not been able to agree terms for additional support.

Meanwhile, yesterday the ECB cut their short-term rates by 25bps, as widely expected, with the Deposit Rate now down to 2.50%.  The funny thing is nobody really noticed.  This is of a piece with my observation that central bankers just don’t have that much sway on market activity these days, it is all about politics and statecraft, not monetary policy.  This morning, Eurozone GDP for Q4 was released at 0.2%, a tick higher than forecast but still lower than Q3’s 0.4%.  There is no doubt the financial mandarins of Europe are keen to get this defense spending going, because otherwise they will continue to preside over a stagnant economy.  

But here’s an interesting thing to consider.  Germany has made a big deal about this new willingness to spend €500 billion outside the bounds of their budget framework on defense.  However, they continue with their Energiewende policy which has been the Achilles Heel of the German economy and will prevent them from actually producing armaments if they seek to continuously reduce fossil fuel powered energy for renewables.  It is almost as if this is theater, rather than policy, but that may just be my cynicism speaking.

Moving on to the US, this morning brings the Payroll Report with the following current median estimates:

Nonfarm Payrolls160K
Private Payrolls111K
Manufacturing Payrolls5K
Unemployment Rate4.0%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (4.1% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.6%

Source: tradingeconomics.com          

As well, we hear from Chairman Powell at 12:30pm, along with Bowman, Williams and Kugler in the hours leading up to that.  But again, I ask, do they matter to the markets right now?  Certainly, there is much discussion that the US economic data is starting to show more weakness, and there are many who are saying that long-anticipated recession is going to become evident.  If that is the case, we could certainly see the Fed cut rates, but again, my take is markets are far more attuned to 10-year yields than Fed funds.  And remember, while 10-year yields are clearly quite inflation sensitive, what we also know that questions over budget deficits and supply are critical to their pricing as well.  This was made evident yesterday in Germany.

I have glossed over market activity overnight so will give a really short update here.  Yesterday’s weakness in the US was followed by broad weakness throughout Asia, with most markets there lower on the day, notably Japan (-2.2%), but declines almost everywhere.  We have already discussed European bourses and at this hour (7:30) US futures are basically unchanged ahead of the data.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are slipping back -3bps this morning and we are seeing similar price action across most of Europe although Spain (+1bp) is bucking the trend on some domestic issues.  It is easy to believe that the Germany story was a bit overblown, and remember, if they cannot change the constitution, I expect a rally in Bunds (lower yields) along with a selloff in the DAX and the euro.

Speaking of the euro, it is continuing its sharp ascent, up another 0.6% this morning.  however, something to keep in mind regarding all the huffing and puffing about the euro is that with this sharp move higher in the past week, it is merely back to the middle of its 3-year trading range.  So, is this as big a deal as some are saying?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But the overall currency picture is more mixed with both AUD (-0.6%) and NZD (-0.5%) lower along with CAD (-0.2%).  There are other gainers (GBP +0.2%, SEK +0.7%) and other laggards (ZAR -0.2%) although I would say the broad direction is still for dollar weakness.  

Finally, oil (+1.5%) is bouncing this morning, although this could well be a trading bounce as I have seen no new news on the subject.  I guess the delay on Canadian tariffs probably played a role as well.  Gold (+0.4%) is also firmer although both silver (-0.4%) and copper (-1.2%) are lagging.  In fairness, the latter two have had significant up weeks so are likely seeing some profit taking.

Once again, I will remark that for those who have real flows and exposures, the current market situation is why hedging is critical to maintain financial performance.  Nobody really knows where anything is going to go, but right now, it feels like the one thing we know is prices will not remain where they currently are for very long.

Good luck and good weekendAdf

Things Are Creaking

Posted on by

Before Mr Trump started speaking
The Chinese explained things are creaking
As growth there is slow
So now they will blow
More funds to achieve what they’re seeking

 

The Chinese government has outlined a very active agenda for 2025 as the current pace of growth in their economy remains sluggish at best.  They continue to focus on a 5% headline GDP target and have promised to increase the budget deficit by a similar amount, so the idea of organic growth seems to be dead.  They reiterated their plan to recapitalize the big banks with CNY 500 billion and are looking to raise defense spending by 7.2%.  Long term debt issuance will increase with CNY 1.3 trillion planned for this year and they talk about adding 12 million urban jobs.  It all sounds fantastic.
 
But will it work?  Of course, there is no way to know yet, but if history is any guide, the mercantilist structure of the Chinese economy remains extremely difficult to overcome and replace with a more consumer-focused economy.  The property market there remains in terrible shape and that continues to be a drag on the overall economy as individuals, who had been encouraged to invest in property as a means of creating a retirement nest egg find themselves with much less disposable income and an illiquid and depreciating asset.
 
President Trump’s tariffs are not going to help them at all, but it is unclear if they will be significantly detrimental.  While I would not bet against China reporting 5% GDP growth in 2025, given the questionable reliability of their data, it is not clear it will be reflective of the state of the nation.
 
My take on market impacts are as follows: Chinese yields will climb as more debt is issued while growth will allegedly increase, Chinese equities should benefit If they are successful at getting things moving, but the yuan will have a harder time in my view, as capital flows to the nation remain stunted.  Of course, much will also depend on the evolution of US policy, which has been erratic, to say the least.

Said Trump, It’s a “new golden age”
As finally, we turn the page
On four years of waste
And so, we’ll make haste
With changes despite Dem outrage

Of course, the other big news was last night’s speech by President Trump to a joint session of Congress where he outlined both the many things he has accomplished in the first 6 weeks of his presidency, but also his plans for the rest of the time.  While many are still reeling from the speed with which changes are being made, there was no indication that his pace is going to slow.

Mr Trump did acknowledge that there may be some short-term pain as the economy adjusts to the changes he has wrought, but he remains focused on the long-term and how to achieve a strong economy with a far better balance sheet and a smaller government.  The implication is that he is still the avatar of volatility, and that aspect will not be changing.

Let us, though, take a step back and look at a much bigger picture.  For the past seventeen years, the US economy was the clear leader in global growth with massive government spending and budget deficits incurred to drive the process.  Meanwhile, while most of the rest of the world exited the pandemic with a burst of reopening growth, they have all lagged the US.  The chart below shows the ratio of the MSCI US index / MSCI World index and demonstrates that investment into the US, following that leading growth profile, has been historic in its effects.

Source: longtermtrends.net

But that situation seems to be changing.  President Trump is openly seeking to reduce the size of the US government and withdraw spending on many foreign adventures while the rest of the world is doing the opposite.  As per the above, China has just announced significant new stimulus.  As well, Europe, now that they need to become more responsible for their own defense, has also announced a major spending plan to rearm themselves.  This is the real sea change, I think, and the one that is going to have the biggest medium and long-term impacts on markets everywhere.  Changes in the level of capital flows and changes in trade patterns are going to significantly impact the value of the dollar as well as stocks, bonds and commodities.  It is a brave new world, so attention must be paid.

In the meantime, let’s see the markets’ initial response to the recent spate of news.  The tariff news has served to undermine US equities for the past two sessions and is still dragging on some markets, but the new spending promises are the new drivers.  So, in Asia, while the Nikkei (+0.2%) managed only a modest rally, the Hang Seng (+2.8%) exploded higher on the Chinese stimulus story although surprisingly, the CSI 300 (+0.5%) did not do nearly as well.  But elsewhere in the region, it was mostly large gains with Korea, India, Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all rallying more than 1%.  The laggards were Australia and New Zealand, which seemed to focus on the negatives of tariffs.

In Europe, Germany’s DAX (+3.4%) is the beneficiary of most of the mooted defense spending as not only are there quite a few defense focused firms, but rumors are that the government is going to coopt the auto manufacturers into building defense equipment (shades of WWII).  As well, the rest of the continent is flying (CAC +1.9%, IBEX +1.6%) and even the UK (+0.45%) is benefitting although there is growing concern that the BOE is not going to be aggressively cutting rates to support the economy because of still sticky inflation.  As to US futures, they are bouncing this morning and higher by 0.4% at this hour (7:00).

In the bond market, while Treasury yields rebounded from their recent lows yesterday, gaining 9bps on the day, this morning they are unchanged.  However, a look at European sovereigns tells the story of investors anticipation of a big uptick in new issuance to fund that defense spending.  The picture below is that of German yields, as an example, showing its 20bp rise this morning, but the entire continent has seen yields rise by at least 16bps!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The market clearly believes the Europeans are going to move forward!

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.6%) remains under pressure as despite the mooted fiscal stimulus, there continues to be more concern over excess supply than newly created demand.  The below chart is quite interesting as a history of long-term price activity in oil with the interpretation that if we are near the supply destruction level, the future for prices is likely to be bullish.  Something to keep in mind. (as an aside, Josh_Young_1 is an excellent follow on X for oil ideas and information.)

As to the metals markets, gold is little changed but copper (+4.7%) has clearly gotten excited over the Chinese stimulus as well as the European defense spending, where copper will be an important piece of the puzzle.

Finally, the dollar is under substantial pressure this morning vs. both G10 and EMG currencies.  Given the yield changes, and my view that 10-year yields have become the FX driver, rather than short-term rates, it should be no surprise that the euro (+0.6%) is rallying to levels not seen since November.  The pound (+0.3%) is following suit, also making 5-month highs.  But the really impressive moves are in the peripheral European currencies with SEK (+1.1%) and PLN (+1.1%) both trading back to levels not seen since September.  On the tariff front, both MXN (+0.25%) and CAD (+0.1%) are lagging the main move but still managing a very modest rally v. the greenback.

In this brave new world, where the US is not the fiscal profligacy leader, but that role is assumed by others, my sense is that the dollar may well have topped for a much longer-term period.  While at the beginning of the year I was confident that the dollar would outperform, the policy changes we have seen since then have altered my views.  While volatility will still be rampant, I believe the broad direction will be a lower dollar going forward.

On the data front, this morning brings ADP Employment (exp 140K) as well as ISM Services (52.6) and Factory Orders (1.6%).  Then we see the EIA oil inventories where a small draw is expected and at 2:00pm, the Fed’s Beige book.  Perhaps the best thing about the changing world order is that central banks are losing some of their market power.  As I wrote yesterday, perhaps US rates are destined to fall as both the president and Chair Powell are keen to see that happen.

At this point, I think the dollar may have seen its highs for quite a while.  Remember, FX trends tend to be very long-term in nature.  For those of you who are payables hedgers, keep that in mind going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Recession in Sight

Posted on by

There once was a policy view
That tariffs, we all should eschew
But President Trump
Explained on the stump
To this idea, he wouldn’t hew
 
And so, as the clock struck midnight
Trump’s tariffs once more saw the light
Most analysts say
The tariffs will weigh
On growth, with recession in sight

 

By now you are all aware that as of 12:01 EST this morning, 25% tariffs have been imposed on all imports from both Canada and Mexico except energy products, which have seen 10% tariffs imposed.  As well, all Chinese imports have been hit with an additional 10% tariff.  Once again, President Trump has proven to be a man of his word, promising these tariffs during his election campaign and imposing them now.

The mainstream view is that these tariffs are a disaster and will send the economy into a recession.  In fact, the International Chamber of Commerce said a depression was likely.  As well, there is much concern that inflation will rise during the recession, which for Keynesians must be a very difficult concept to grasp given their strongly held belief that a recession will result in declining inflation.

Now remember, I am just a poet, so please take that into account when I offer my views here.  First, we have no idea how things will play out.  The one thing about which I am extremely confident is that there will be numerous behavioral changes by everyone because of these tariffs.  The first question is who will absorb the cost of the tariffs.  Remember, essentially the definition of a recession is that demand is declining.  Will companies be able to pass through the higher costs?  In some instances, they likely will, but in others probably not.  Anecdotally, there was a story in the WSJ that Chipotle will see its costs rise because of the tariff on avocados from Mexico but will not change their prices to account for that.  I’m confident they are not the only company who will absorb those costs.

However, there will certainly be companies that believe they can raise prices and maintain their sales and will try to do that.  My point is each company will evaluate the environment under which they operate and respond in the profit-maximizing manner, but each company’s scenario will be different.

Second, let’s consider the reason that President Trump is such a strong believer in tariffs.  He sees them as the stick to achieve his goals.  I would argue there are two goals in sight.  With Canada and Mexico, he is still unsatisfied with their efforts on the border and with fentanyl smuggling and is very keen to push that to completion.  However, the broader goal is to return manufacturing to America from its decampment overseas, mostly to Southeast Asia, during the past forty years.  And remember, he is seeking to implement a carrot as well, looking to cut corporate taxes to 15% going forward, which would put the US in the lowest quartile of corporate tax rates in the world.  While this morning the headlines are all about the tariffs and their potential destruction, just yesterday, Taiwan Semiconductor announced they would be investing $100 billion to build new fabrication plants in Arizona.  That is exactly the response Trump is seeking.

We all recognize that the world today is very different than it was even two months ago as President Trump has taken an extraordinary number of steps to implement the ideas upon which he was elected.  Interestingly, a large majority of the public remains strongly in his camp with approval ratings for many of his policies well above 60% and as high as 80%.  While markets are clearly unhappy as they have no idea how things will play out, and companies are now faced with far more uncertainty as they attempt to plan for their future, there is no reason to believe this process is going to change anytime soon.  

Keep one other thing in mind, unlike Trump’s first term in office, where he was constantly touting the strength of the stock market as a vote of confidence, this time around he and Treasury Secretary Bessent have been entirely focused on the 10-year yield and getting that rate down.  After a 7bp decline yesterday, he has been successful there. (see chart below) I would be surprised if Trump speaks about the stock market much at all for a while.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With that in mind, let’s see how markets have been handling the tariff imposition.  After yesterday’s rout in the US, where a higher open morphed into a sharply lower close on the day, we saw red throughout Asia (Nikkei -1.2%, Hang Seng -0.3%, CSI 300 -0.1%) and Europe (DAX -2.1%, CAC -1.2%, IBEX -2.3%).  In fact, it is far harder to find a market that has rallied at all, although US futures at this hour (6:40) are pointing slightly higher.  However, after the sharp declines, an early bounce is not uncommon though not necessarily a harbinger of activity for the day.  All of this makes sense as public companies are likely going to see impacts on their profitability either because of reduced sales or reduced margins, or both, with tariffs now in place.  (Well, private companies are going to feel the same pressures, but there are no markets for them to worry about.). The worry for investors is given the extremely high price multiples that currently exist across so many companies, margin pressures can be problematic for stock prices.  For the near term, it is easy to make the case that equities have further to fall.

In the bond market, after yesterday’s Treasury yield decline, there has been a modest 1bp bounce, although as per the above chart, the trend remains lower.  In Europe, the news just hit the tape that the Eurozone is creating a plan to rearm the continent allowing for European countries to exceed debt restrictions to enable them to borrow and spend the money on this task.  The mooted amount is €800 billion, meaning that markets can expect that much new debt issuance across the continent in the coming months and years.  However, it appears investors are viewing the situation overall and are far more concerned with potential slowing growth than on increased issuance as yields have slipped one or two basis points across all nations in Europe.  Perhaps that is a signal that there is little belief in the likelihood of this new plan coming to fruition.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.4%) continues its slide as a combination of worries over future growth due to the US tariffs and the OPEC+ announcement that they would start to bring production back online beginning in April (just 138K bbl/day, but the signal is quite clear that more is on the way) has traders unnerved.  Certainly, this is part of what President Trump is seeking, lower oil prices to help keep a lid on inflation, and there is no doubt he has pressured OPEC+ on the issue.  Remember, too, that if gasoline prices fall at the pump, that is a key driver of inflation perceptions for everyone.  As to the metals markets, we are seeing a split this morning with precious (Au +1.0%, Ag +0.65%) rallying on uncertainty and fear while copper (-1.2%) seems to be suffering on recession fears.

Finally, the dollar is lower again this morning with the DXY breaking back below 106 for the first time since early December as a signal of the broad trend.  This is interesting as the textbooks claim that if the US imposes tariffs, the dollar will strengthen, or more accurately other currencies will weaken, to offset those tariffs, and yet this morning CNY (+0.55%) and CAD (+0.45%) are bucking that trend although MXN (-0.2%) is behaving as most would expect.  But the dollar’s weakness is broad based, and my take is given the movement in interest rates, which are suddenly declining far more rapidly than anticipated just a week ago (Fed funds futures are now pricing in 75bps of cuts this year with a 11% probability of a cut in March, up from 2% last week) the dollar bull case is under real pressure.  I have maintained all along that if the Fed reignited their easing policy, the dollar would suffer.  Funnily enough, despite any angst between Chairman Powell (remember him?) and President Trump, they both may see lower rates as their preferred outcome.  In that case, the dollar has further to fall.

There is no hard data set to be released today although we do hear from NY Fed President Williams this afternoon.  This could be the first hint that the Fed’s caution is abating, and further rate cuts are in store.  Of course, with Powell on the calendar for Friday, if there is a change in tone, most market participants will be waiting to hear it from him.

The watchword has shifted from caution to uncertainty.  The tariffs have thrown sand into the gears of the economy and markets.  It remains to be seen how much impact they will have, but for now, fear is rising although the dollar is not following suit.  I think Trump must be happy, but I’m not sure how many in the markets are.

Good luck

Adf