Monthly Archives: March 2025

Nobody Knows

Posted on by

The punditry’s now out in force
As they hope, their views, we’ll endorse
When tariffs arrive
On Wednesday they’ll strive
To claim they were right, but of course
 
The problem is nobody knows
Exactly what Trump will propose
So, models will fail
While Trump haters wail
More chaos is all that he sows

 

Well, folks, it’s month and quarter end today and many are decrying that President Trump’s policies have derailed the bull market in risk assets.  And they are almost certainly correct.  Yet, at the same time, there has been a broad recognition across a wide spectrum of analysts and politicians that the situation he inherited was unsustainable.  Whether the 7% budget deficits, the $36+ trillion in government debt or the ongoing inflationary pressures, the only people who were happy were those who saw their equity portfolios rise against all odds.  (I guess the gold holders have been pretty happy too, in fairness.)

However, the underlying reality of a situation is rarely enough to alter a good story, or a story that somebody wants to tell.  For instance, the Michigan Consumer Survey was released on Friday, and it fell more than expected to a reading of 57.0, its lowest reading since July 2022, when inflation was peaking.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But the story that has been getting all the press is the extraordinary rise in inflation expectations.  As you can see below, both 1-year (blue line) and 5-year (grey line) have risen sharply in 2025.  Conveniently for the mainstream media this has been blamed on President Trump’s policies given their efforts to discredit everything the president does.

However, the Michigan Survey, while having a long pedigree, isn’t that large a survey.  As such, it is possible that non-economic factors may be impacting the results.  For instance, when the survey is taken, the respondents’ political leanings are asked as well.  Now, take a look at the data when split by political views as per the below.  Perhaps, we need to take this survey with a grain or two of salt as it appears the question may be seen as a way to express one’s opinion about the current administration rather than unbiased views of future inflation.

This is especially true when we look at other measures of expected inflation, like the NY Fed’s Consumer inflation survey shown below with the green line compared to that Michigan survey in red.

Source: zerohedge.com

My point is, we need to be careful to notice the non-economic factors that enter into things like expectations surveys.  As well, the idea that inflation expectations are a critical driver of future inflation, although a staple of current central bank thinking, does not have much empirical backing.  For instance, my friend Mike Ashton, the Inflation Guy™, explained in this article way back in 2015, that inflation expectations do not have much empirical proof of effectively forecasting future inflation.  But perhaps, if you don’t believe him, you will consider a scholarly paper by a Fed economist, Jeremy Rudd, written in 2021 that is pretty damning with respect to the idea that the Fed relies on this data as part of their policy toolkit.  

In the end, the one truism of which I am highly confident is that pretty much all the models that have been utilized for the past twenty plus years are no longer reflective of the reality on the ground today.  Not just for inflation, but for growth and trade and every other aspect.  President Trump has not merely upset the applecart; he has broken it into pieces and burned them all to cinders.  All the fiscal problems mentioned above are still extant, but President Trump appears set on changing them in the direction desired by almost all mainstream economists.  They don’t like his methods, but it’s not clear how changes of this magnitude can be made smoothly.  So, perhaps the proper question is just how rough things are going to be.  If the overnight session is any indication, they could get pretty rough.

The dominant feature today
Is fear is what’s now holding sway
As markets decline
More pundits consign
The blame on Trumps tariff pathway

Investors have risk indigestion this morning, as their appetite to own equities anywhere in the world has significantly diminished.  After a rough week ending session on Friday in the US, equity markets in Asia have almost universally declined led by Tokyo (-4.05%) but with sharp declines seen in Korea (-3.0%), Taiwan (-4.2%), Australia (-1.75%), Malaysia (-1.45%) and Thailand (-1.5%).  Chinese (-0.7%) and Hong Kong (-1.3%) shares also fell, although perhaps not quite as far as others.  The entire conversation today is about President trump’s promise to impose tariffs around the world on Wednesday, with many analysts trying to estimate what damage will occur despite no clarity on the size and breadth of the tariffs.  But investors have decided that havens are a better place to hide for now.

European bourses are also sharply lower, although more in the -1.7% to -2.0% range, with every major index in Germany, France, Spain and Italy down by those amounts.  There continues to be a great deal of discussion amongst the European leadership about how they will respond to the mooted tariffs, but of course, like everybody else, they have no idea exactly what they will be.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:45) the picture is grim with declines between -0.6% (DJIA) and -1.3% (NASDAQ).  Right now, the only people who are happy are those holding puts.

Of course, in this risk-off environment, it should be no surprise that bond yields have slipped a bit as, at the margin, investors are flocking to own Treasuries (-5bps) and European sovereigns (Bunds -3bps, OATs -2bps, Gilts -4bps).  Even JGBs (-5bps) saw yields decline last night with any thoughts of the BOJ hiking rates in the near term fading away completely.  

On the other hand, commodities are finding a lot more interest this morning with gold (+1.15%) leading the way higher and proving itself to continue to be one of the most consistent safe havens available.  Interestingly, oil (+0.5%) is rallying this morning despite a number of Wall Street analysts upping their estimate of the probability of a US recession.  However, offsetting the potential future demand weakness is the news that President Trump is “pissed off” at Vladimir Putin for his ongoing aggression in Ukraine and seeming unwillingness to move to a ceasefire.  This has raised the specter of further sanctions on Russian oil output, potentially reducing supply.  As well, the Trump administration continues to tighten the noose on both Iranian and Venezuelan oil sales, so potentially reducing supply even further.  I guess this morning, the supply story is bigger than the demand story.

Finally, as we turn to the currency markets, the dollar is generally firmer this morning, although by widely varying amounts depending on the currency.  For instance, in the G10, NOK (-0.75%) is the laggard despite oil’s gains, followed by AUD (-0.6%) and NZD (-0.55%), with all three of these being major commodity producers at a time when commodities are doing well.  As to the rest of this bloc, JPY (+0.35%) is off its best levels, but behaving as a haven, and the others are just marginally changed from Friday’s closing levels.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (+0.25%) is the exception this morning, clearly benefitting from gold’s ongoing run to new all-time high prices, but otherwise, most of these currencies are modestly softer (MXN -0.2%, PLN -0.2%, KRW -0.25%).

Speaking of currencies, though, there is an article on this morning’s Bloomberg website that is worth reading, I believe, for everyone involved in the FX market.  The gist of the article is something that I have been discussing for the past several years, the fact that market liquidity here, despite the extraordinary volumes that trade on average each day (currently estimated by the BIS at $7.5 trillion across all FX products) is not nearly as deep as might be anticipated.  

My observation from my time on bank desks was that while there was a great deal of electronic flow, likely driven by HFT firms seeking to extract the last tenth of a pip out of thousands of transactions, when a real client, generally a corporate, had a need to do something specific to address a business need, and that amounted to more than $100 million equivalent, the liquidity situation was far more suspect. 

My personal theory was as follows: bank consolidation reduced the net amount of risk-taking appetite as larger banks did not increase their risk-taking commensurate with the reduction that occurred by small banks being gobbled up.  Combining this with the introduction of high-frequency trading firms in the business, who had no underlying client base to whom they owed a price, and therefore, could turn off their machines in a difficult market, further reducing liquidity, led to a situation where liquidity was a mile wide and an inch deep.  My point is for all the corporates out there who have significant transactions to execute, you must carefully consider the best way to approach the situation to avoid a potentially significant increase in execution costs.

Turning to the data, before we look at this week, which ends with NFP, a quick word on Friday’s core PCE data, which came in at a hotter than expected 0.4% taking the YY number to 2.8%.  The Fed cannot be happy with this outcome as a quick look at the recent readings makes it hard to accept inflation is continuing its decline from the 2022 highs.  Rather a look at the below chart, at least to my eye, shows me a stability in Core PCE of somewhere between 2.5% and 3.0%, well above the Fed’s target range, and hardly a cause to cut rates further.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As this note has already gotten a bit longer than I like, I will list the week’s data tomorrow but note that Chicago PMI (exp 45.4) is the only noteworthy data point to be released today.  

Absent a complete reversal of Trump’s tariff plans, I see nothing positive on the horizon for risk assets, and expect that equities will maintain, and probably extend the overnight losses while gold and bonds both rally, at least for now.  As to the dollar, my take is it will not benefit universally in this risk-off scenario, although there are currencies that will clearly suffer.  Remarkably, despite the performance of Aussie and Kiwi overnight, I do believe the commodity bloc has the best prospects for now.

Good luck

Adf

Aren’t Just Rumors

Posted on by

Give plaudits to President Xi
Who’s trying to show it is he
That’s offering deals
To help grease the wheels
Of trade, which he claims will be free
 
The problem is Chinese consumers
Have not been in very good humors
And history shows
The Chinese impose
Restrictions that are aren’t just rumors

 

Market activity can well be described as lackluster, with equity indices generally slipping lower while bond markets wobble and the dollar retraces some of its recent losses.  In fact, the only markets really showing a trend right now are gold (+0.4%), silver (-0.1%) and copper (-0.2%), all of which have rallied sharply over the past month and year.  Obviously, the major discussion point is President Trump’s tariff policy and how that will impact economies around the world.  Recent focus has been on how other nations will respond with a variety of poses taken by different leaders, from conciliatory to combative.

So, it is with great interest that we see another impact of the Trump administration, the sight of China’s communist party leader, Xi Jinping, trying to convince foreign company CEO’s that investing in China is a good deal.  A lead article in Bloomberg this morning describes a large gathering in China where President Xi hosted CEO’s of numerous companies from around the world in an effort to portray China’s policies as investment friendly.

This makes sense given the trend in foreign direct investment toward China over the past years.  As can be seen in the chart below from the Bloomberg article, it has not been a pretty sight.  And remember, this all occurred before President Trump was elected.  Clearly, there were concerns prior to Mr Trump escalating the trade conflicts with the US.  

I find it somewhat ironic, though, that Xi is trying to promote Chinese policy as an island of stability in the world.  Consider how he has capriciously destroyed the private education market, or even the tech market until reversing course after the DeepSeek announcement, all while the housing market continues to implode.  Given the rest of the world has lost patience with China’s mercantilist policies and the flood of cheap goods they produce with government support, I am at a loss to understand the appeal of investing in China.  Using it as an export base is a nonstarter, and history has shown that nearly every foreign company that looked at China’s population as a great untapped market for their products has been hugely disappointed.  The exceptions are the luxury goods makers, where the global brand and cachet were too strong for domestic competitors to overcome.  But that is a small segment of the market.  

Instead, the usual outcome is forced technology transfer which results in a state-supported competitor for their products around the rest of the world.  I am confident there will be companies that choose to invest, if for no other reason than to curry favor with Xi and open the doors to further potential sales, but the trend of late is not promising.  Ultimately, property laws and their enforcement are the keystone for inward investment into any nation and China has no history of treating foreign companies fairly, or domestic ones for that matter.

But really, the flow of direct market news and economic data has been secondary with far more political news leading conversations.  The impact of tariffs on economic activity and inflation, as well as on market performance remains unclear with arguments being made on both sides as to potential benefits or detriments.  FWIW, which is probably not much, my take is the impacts will be very unevenly spread, and how that impacts broad based numbers is unknowable at this time.  I fear we will all need to be reactive for now, although for those with outstanding exposures, there is no better argument for maintaining robust hedge ratios given the overall uncertainty.

Ok, let’s take a look at the overnight action in markets.  After yesterday’s US declines, we saw much of Asia follow suit with Tokyo (-1.8%) particularly hard hit as PM Ishiba thought that he was making headway with President Trump but found out that Japanese auto manufacturers were going to be subject to those tariffs as well.  Adding to the pressure were the “Minutes” from the last BOJ meeting which implied further rate hikes are on the horizon. Both Hong Kong (-0.65%) and China (-0.45%) also slipped and, in fact, almost every major market in Asia (Korea, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand) also fell, some quite sharply.  Apparently, Xi’s efforts at creating that stability haven’t yet been successful.  

In Europe, red is also the dominant color with most continental bourses lower by around -0.6%, also on the tariff story.  The one exception here is the UK, which released a passel of data showing growth was modestly firmer than expected at 1.5% led by Retail Sales growing 1.0%, rather than declining by -0.3% as expected.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15) they are pointing slightly lower, about -0.2%.

In the bond market, yields are backing off around the world with Treasuries (-3bps) lagging European price action where sovereigns have seen yields decline between -4bps and -6bps.  Even JGB yields have slipped -4bps.  In Europe, inflation data from France and Spain came in softer than expected which has encouraged the move there, and we even heard arch ECB hawk, Robert Holzmann, explain that funding defense spending via bond purchases (i.e. QE) was viable.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.2%) which rallied yesterday to touch the elusive $70/bbl level is slipping back a bit, but the trend remains clearly higher as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, in the currency markets, the dollar is firmer once again with modest rallies vs. the euro (-0.3%) and pound (-0.2%) as well as strength against the Scandies (SEK -0.6%, NOK -0.3%).  However, the picture in the EMG bloc is more mixed with ZAR (+0.35%) showing strength alongside gold’s rally, and INR (+0.2%) bucking the trend after having agreed to reduce tariffs on US products.  Throughout the rest of the bloc, there has been generally little change.

Turning to the data this morning, there is plenty that will be keenly watched.  Personal Income (exp 0.4%), Personal Spending (0.5%) and the PCE data (headline 0.3%, 2.5% Y/Y and core 0.3%, 2.7% Y/Y) all get released at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see Michigan Sentiment (57.9) and you can be sure people will be talking about the Inflation Expectations piece (1yr 4.9%, 5yr 3.9%), especially if it syncs with their narrative.  There are two more Fed speakers, Governor Barr and Atlanta Fed president Bostic, but nothing any Fed speaker has uttered has mattered at all, maybe since Trump was inaugurated.

My read on overall sentiment is that investors are wary of the future, but not yet ready to abandon the stocks only go up narrative.  Regarding the dollar, the recent trend remains modestly lower, as per the below, but it is hard to get excited about large moves, at least for today.  Again, Trump clearly wants it lower and seems likely to get his way, at least to some extent.  The one thing I truly do like is commodities, which I believe will remain well bid overall.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

The Fools

Posted on by

In April, it starts with the Fools
But two days thereafter the rules
For importing cars
To where Stars and Bars
Fly will change with tariffs as tools
 
For Europe, the pain will be keen
At least that’s what most have foreseen
And poor crypto bros
Will find their Lambos
May soon cost a price quite obscene

 

While the political set continues to harp on the “Signal” story, markets really don’t care about political infighting between the parties.  Rather, their focus is keenly attuned to President Trump’s confirmation that starting on April 3rd, there will be a 25% tariff imposed on all imported autos from everywhere in the world.  This is particularly difficult for European auto manufacturers as they produce a far smaller proportion (VW 21%, BMW 36%, Mercedes 41%) of their vehicles in the US than do the Japanese (Honda 73%, Toyota 50%, Nissan 52%), although the Koreans will be impacted as well (Hyundai/Kia 33%).  Ironically, according to Grok, where I got all this information, GM only produces about 54% of their vehicles sold in the US, in the US, with the rest coming from Canada and Mexico.  As an aside, Tesla produces all their vehicles in the US.

Particularly hard hit are the specialty manufacturers like Porsche, Ferrari and Lamborghini, which produce none of their vehicles in the US.  Of course, given the price points of these vehicles, my sense is it may not really hurt their sales as if you are spending $250k on a car, you can likely afford to spend $312.5k as well.  In fact, in a funny way, these tariffs may enhance the Veblen effect where people will brag about paying the higher price as it puts it out of reach of more people.

Nonetheless, the action merely confirms that President Trump is very serious with respect to changing the world’s trading model.  I saw something interesting this morning in that Paul Krugman, who made his name, and won his Nobel Prize, based on work regarding international trade and was the prototypical free trader, has adjusted his views after recognizing that nations need to maintain some manufacturing capabilities for security reasons.  I assure you, if Krugman, who has been a vocal liberal critic of every Republican idea for the past twenty years, agrees with this policy, it will be very difficult for anyone to reject it.

In a perfect world (globo economicus?) free trade accrues benefits to all.  But we don’t live in that world and national priorities often supersede these issues.  The pandemic highlighted the weaknesses that the US had developed in its ability to manufacture key items necessary for its continued economic and defense survival. And remember this, for the world at large, their idea of free trade is they should be able to sell whatever they grow/manufacture into the US with no barriers, but US manufacturers need to be subject to barriers in order to protect other nations’ favored industries and companies.  That world is now history with new rules being written every day and most of them by Donald Trump.

So how have markets responded to this tariff confirmation?  Not terribly well.  Yesterday’s US equity selloff was pretty significant led by the NASDAQ’s -2.0% decline.  In Asia, the Nikkei (-0.6%) also sold off as did Korea (-1.4%), Taiwan (-1.4%) and Australia (-0.4%).  On the other hand, both China (+0.3%) and Hong Kong (+0.4%) managed a better session, seemingly as a rebound against declines in the previous session with the only news showing that Chinese industrial profits fell by -0.3% compared to a Y/Y decline of -3.3% in December.  However, a quick look at a chart of this data for the past five years tells me they need to seasonally adjust it in order to get something meaningful, so I don’t think it really impacted markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to European shares, it should be no surprise that the tariff announcements have negatively impacted shares there with declines of between -0.2% (Spain) and -0.7% (Germany).  US futures though, at this hour (7:00) are little changed on the session.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to creep higher, up another 3bps this morning and back to levels last seen a month ago.  This cannot be helping Secretary Bessent’s blood pressure, although he very clearly has a plan in mind.  There is much stagflation discussion in the markets by the punditry as they assume tariffs will slow growth and raise prices and bonds are not the favored investment in that scenario.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields are all sliding this morning, largely down -2bps, amid growth concerns on the back of the tariff announcements.  The one exception here is UK Gilts (+7bps) as the UK Budget announcement indicated slightly more gilt issuance would be necessary to fund the government’s spending plans.  However, there is a growing concern over the financial management of the Starmer government overall.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.35%) is slipping from yesterday’s closing levels and continues to flirt with the $70/bbl level but has not been able to breech it since late February.  Apparently, there are questions as to whether the auto tariffs will reduce demand.  Personally, I would think it is the opposite as more older, less fuel efficient cars will remain on the road here.  As to gold (+1.0%) after a several day pause, it appears that it is resuming its very strong trend higher.  You know what we haven’t heard about lately?  Ft Knox auditing.  I wonder if that is getting arranged or is now so old a story nobody cares.  Silver (+1.0%) is along for the ride although copper (-0.4%) is taking a breather after a breathtaking run to new all-time highs this year.  Look at the slope of the copper chart and you can see why it is pausing, at the very least.

Source: tradingeconomics.com’

Finally, the dollar is broadly softer this morning, with the euro, pound and Aussie all gaining on the order of 0.3%.  As well, NOK (+0.3%) is firmer after the Norgesbank surprised some and left rates on hold with a relatively hawkish message about the future.  But there is weakness vs. the greenback around with JPY (-0.3%), MXN (-0.3%) and INR (-0.2%) all leaning the other way.  Another tariff related story is that India is planning to cut its tariffs in half for the US, a very clear victory for President Trump. 

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims data as well as the third and final look at Q4 GDP (2.3%).  Part of the GDP data is Real Final Sales (4.2%) which is a key indicator for what happens here given consumption represents ~70% of the economy.  We do hear from Richmond Fed president Barkin this afternoon, but right now, Fed speakers are speaking into the void.

International statecraft continues to be the underlying thesis of global relations and President Trump’s goals of reshoring significant amounts of manufacturing and jobs along with it is still the primary driver.  There has been far less talk of the Mar-a-Lago Accord as that seems to be losing its luster.  If countries adjust their trade policies, Trump will continue in this direction.  While that may include short-term economic weakness and some pain, for both the economy and the stock markets, there is no indication, yet, he is anywhere near blinking.  One thing to keep in mind is that an overvalued stock market can correct by prices falling sharply, but also by prices stagnating for a long time while earnings catch up and multiples compress.  We may very well be looking at the latter scenario, so no large gains nor losses, just choppy markets going forward.  As to the dollar, lower still seems the direction of travel overall from current levels, but probably in a very gradual manner.

Good luck

Adf

Demoralizing

Posted on by

Complaints among traders are rising
That markets are demoralizing
Liquidity’s shrinking
And now they are thinking
They might need to alter trade sizing
 
But can anyone be surprised
That markets are not immunized
From ongoing impacts
Of tariffs and new tax
Which President Trump advertised?

 

While headlines around the world have focused on the ongoing trade war negotiations, and peace talks between Russia and Ukraine and all of the political machinations in the US as President Trump continues to fight both the courts and Democrats to implement his agenda, markets are generally at a loss as to what to do.  Is the news bullish for stocks?  Bearish? What about bonds or the dollar or oil?  I cannot remember a time when there was so little clarity on expected future outcomes.  Well, I can actually, but it was a very long time ago.  Prior to the Black Monday stock market crash in the US in October 1987, the reality was there were many views fighting to be heard, but rarely consensus as to what would happen in markets.  Successful traders were those with trading intuition and positions were sized much smaller because you never knew when you might need to reverse course.

Since then, however, we have seen a steady diet of central bank intervention every time there is an indication that growth may be slowing, or markets may be having a bad day.  This process went into overdrive in the wake of the GFC (which, BTW, was a product of that central bank intervention warping markets) when QE was implemented in the US and then elsewhere throughout the G10.  In fact, then Chairman Bernanke was explicit that this was his goal.  He called it the portfolio rebalance channel and the idea was the Fed would buy all the Treasuries, driving yields lower and promise to keep rates very low for a long time thus forcing encouraging investors to move up the risk scale to corporate debt, high-yield debt and equities.  As well, QE pumped enormous amounts of liquidity into the financial system.  This combination of actions led to a huge expansion of risk taking and the creation of strategies like risk parity which were designed to lever up assets to increase returns.

It was all great as long as the Fed and other central banks kept expanding the available liquidity.  Alas, trees don’t grow to the sky and when the Fed, in 2018/19 tried to finally reduce the balance sheet and initiated their first QT program, things got hairy in September and halted them in their tracks.  It turns out that markets had become addicted to liquidity continually increasing and like any addict, responded negatively to the loss of its fix.

Of course, Covid ensued and the next gusher of liquidity, this time both fiscal and monetary, was initiated by governments and central banks around the world, so any idea that investors and traders were chastised by the events of 2019 were quickly forgotten and position sizes ramped up again along with market performance.

But there is a new sheriff in town, as has been mentioned by many in the Trump administration, and the old rules are not likely to work in the new environment.  As the US government has taken hold of virtually all the market’s bandwidth, relegating the Fed to a sideshow, traders and investors are suddenly finding that the old ways of doing things, buy the dip and lever up, are no longer the best way to get along.  With the ongoing efforts by the Trump administration to shrink the government and reduce flows to financial markets, the lessons of the post-GFC financial market are losing their validity.  

This was perfectly expressed in a Bloomberg article this morning where traders were complaining that when they wanted to adjust a position they had to “wait longer to execute an order until there’s better liquidity in certain instances.”  Of course, we all know how difficult it is to wait so I’m sure that you are just as sympathetic towards these traders as I am.  There was an interesting chart in the article (below) showing that futures liquidity in S&P 500 contracts had fallen to the lowest in two years and was clearly at the lower end of the recent spectrum.  Doesn’t your heart just bleed?

I have been clear that President Trump is the virtual avatar of volatility and one of the key characteristics of a volatile market is that liquidity dries up.  While prices may not move much on a particular day, trends disappear and when moves occur, they tend to be large, and often discontinuous.  This is true in all markets, so be prepared as we go forward.

As it happens, yesterday was a day with very little net movement, although some decent gyrations intraday in some markets.  For instance, in the bond market, yields, which opened the day much higher fell sharply after weaker than anticipated data then rebounded throughout the day finishing little changed from Monday’s levels.  The chart below shows the 7bp range resulting in zero movement net.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Too, US equity markets traded both sides of unchanged all day, with some choppiness but no net directional movement.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My point is that this is likely a portent of the future.  There are too many known unknowns for traders and investors to have confidence in taking a side.  Now, we are only two months into the new administration, and they have been working hard to get things done quickly.  It is possible that the fight drags on for the rest of the year or longer, with no clear outcomes on key issues regarding extending the tax cuts and a finalized tariff policy.  In this case, I would anticipate market activity to continue to be lower volumes and choppy price action with a lack of direction.  Or perhaps, lower risk asset prices as investors get scared.  The lesson is the processes that had become normalized in the post GFC world are clearly no longer in play.  Hedge accordingly.

So, as we look at overnight activity, yesterday’s US market activity didn’t inspire much movement in Asia where we saw some gainers (Nikkei +0.65%, Hang Seng +0.6%) and laggards (CSI 300 -0.3%, India -0.9%) but no consistency at all.  The PBOC is subtly altering their monetary policy toolkit which some are seeing as a modest ease, but clearly equity markets didn’t get that message.  Meanwhile, comments from the newest BOJ member, Koeda, explained she was not sure her previous analysis of the economy leaving the zero-rate world is valid now that rates are all the way up to 0.50%!

European shares are softer on the continent, down about -0.5% in most places but UK shares have gained slightly, +0.2%, after inflation data was released a tick lower than expected across both headline and core measures.  While the BOE stood pat last week, as expected, this has encouraged some traders to believe that a cut could come sooner than previously thought.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:45), they are basically unchanged.

Treasury yields, after yesterday’s choppiness, are creeping higher today (+3bps) but that is not following through in Europe, where sovereign yields are all flat to slightly lower today.  It seems difficult for investors to get excited about Germany’s rearming plan if the overall economy remains in the doldrums.  As well, tariff tensions have investors uncertain what to do, so doing nothing is the default.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.9%) is higher from the close yesterday, but yesterday’s close was slightly softer than when I last wrote.  As such, we have still not quite made it to $70/bbl.  There are many crosscurrents in this market between tariffs, sanctions, potential Ukraine peace and Trump’s goal of drill, baby, drill.  As to metals, the star of the show continues to be copper (+1.5% today, +15% in the past month) which is now trading at all-time highs across the entire curve.  This has helped support both gold (+0.3%) and silver (+0.3%) although the former doesn’t need that much help, I think.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning, with the pound (-0.3%) lagging on the idea that the BOE may ease again sooner than previously thought, while AUD (+0.3%), CAD (+0.2%) and CLP (+0.3%) are all firmer on the commodity market strength.  Here, too, I expect that liquidity will diminish and trends will be hard to find until there is more clarity on policy outcomes in the US.

On the data front, this morning brings Durable Goods (exp -1.0%, +0.2% ex Transport) and then the EIA oil inventory data with a small build expected.  We also hear from two more Fed speakers, but they are just not driving markets right now.  Choppiness is the rule here, with short-term direction very difficult to discern.  I am still on board my ultimate lower dollar, higher commodity train, but that is subject to change if policies change as well.

Good luck

Adf

Another Broadside

Posted on by

Investors don’t know where to hide
As Trump lands another broadside
Last night he did roil
All those who buy oil
From Vene, with tariffs applied
 
But yesterday, too, he amended
How tariffs would soon be extended
The lesson to learn
Is you’ll ne’er discern
His methods, so don’t be offended

 

Once again, the tariff game changed yesterday, although this time in two directions.  The first, and newest idea is that the US will impose “secondary” tariffs on all nations that buy oil from Venezuela.  The idea is to pressure Venezuela to concede to US demands by reducing the market for their one exportable commodity, at least the only one in demand (Tren de Aragua gang members, while a key export, have limited demand it seems).  This decision is being described as a new tool of statecraft, but it strikes me this is no different than previous international efforts like the apartheid movement, by isolating a nation for its behaviors.  Regardless, this was seen as bullish for oil prices.  The reason, as eloquently explained by Ole Hanson, Saxo Bank’s Head of Commodity Strategy, as per the below, is that Venezuelan and Iranian oil production has risen significantly over the past 4 years, offsetting the production cuts of the rest of OPEC+.  Take that oil out, and the demand/supply balance tips toward more demand.

It remains to be seen how this impacts specific countries, but apparently, China is the largest importer of sanctioned crude, so obviously, not a positive for President Xi.  Alas for Chevron, the deal they cut with the Biden administration to restart activity in Venezuela is looking shakier by the day.

But that is only one of the tariff stories.  The other was that there may be changes to previously expected actions come April 2nd, with imposition of tariffs being a bit more gradual nor as widespread as initially feared.  Recall, the idea of the reciprocal tariffs was almost every other nation charges higher tariffs on US goods than the US charges on their goods, so simply raising US tariffs to their levels would be effective.  The next step was focusing on the so-called “Dirty 15” nations that run the major trade surpluses with the US, but now he has indicated that some nations will get breaks.  I particularly loved this comment, “I may give a lot of countries breaks. They’ve charged us so much that I’m embarrassed to charge them what they’ve charged us, but it’ll be substantial, and you’ll be hearing about that on April 2.”

In any event, Trump’s specialty is his ability to think outside the box, or perhaps more accurately, break the box and move to a different container.  There is much consternation amongst business managers, and understandably, since planning is much more difficult in this environment.  However, as I have repeatedly written, the one thing on which we can count is continued higher volatility across all markets.  That condition requires a robust hedging plan for all those who have exposures, that is your only realistic protection.

Other than the tariff story, though, we have not seen much new information so let’s take a look at how markets have handled the latest tariff saga.  Yesterday’s broad US equity rally, on the back of a reduced tariff outlook, was followed by less positive price action in Asia.  While the Nikkei (+0.5%) rallied, potentially on the yen’s recent weakness, Hong Kong (-2.4%) was under great pressure on a weaker tech sector as earnings there were disappointing last quarter.  However, the CSI 300 (0.0%) which has far less tech in its makeup, didn’t budge.  As to the rest of the region, there were more gainers (Taiwan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Indonesia) than losers (Korea, Philippines, Thailand), so arguably the US rally and tariff story helped a bit.

In Europe, though, things are looking solid this morning with green everywhere on the screen and generally substantially so.  The DAX (+0.9%), CAC (+1.2%) and IBEX (+1.1%) are all having solid sessions after German Ifo Expectations data was released a touch better than expected at 87.7, but as importantly, 2 points better than last month.  However, a look at the history of this index shows that while recent data has turned mildly positive, compared to its long-term history, things in Germany remain in lousy shape.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to US futures, at this hour (7:10), they are little changed on the day as traders await the next pronouncements with great uncertainty.

In the bond market, though, yields have been climbing everywhere with Treasury yields higher by 2bps this morning after jumping 5bps yesterday.  In fact, we are back at the highest levels in a month, although still well below the peaks seen in early January or last spring.  But this move has dragged European sovereign yields along for the ride with across-the-board gains of 4bps-5bps and similar movement in JGBs overnight.  One of the alleged reasons for this bond weakness were hawkish comments from two ECB members, Slovakia’s Kazimir and Estonia’s Müller.  However, dovish comments from Greece’s Stournaras and Italy’s Cipollone would have seemed to offset that, and did so in the FX markets, but not in the bond market.

Turning to commodities, oil (+0.4%) continues to climb and is once again approaching $70/bbl.  In fact, since that fateful day, March 11th, it has rallied consistently as can be seen below.  I still don’t understand why that date seemed to offer a change of view, but there you go.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the metals markets, this morning is once again seeing a bullish tone with both precious and industrial metals in demand.  Gold (+0.5%) continues to be one of the best performing assets around, although so far this year silver (+1.5%) and copper (+1.15%) have been amongst the few things to beat it.  I believe this trend has legs.

Finally, the dollar is softer this morning, falling against both its G10 and EMG counterparts almost universally.  SEK (+0.9%) is the leader in the clubhouse, although we have seen solid gains from AUD (+0.5%) and NZD (+0.6%) with both the euro (+0.2%) and pound (+0.2%) lagging the pace but in the same direction.  JPY (+0.4%) which has suffered a bit lately, is following the broad dollar move this morning.  in the EMG bloc, the CE4 (+0.4% across all of them) is setting the tone with ZAR (+0.4%) right there.  Otherwise, the movement has been a bit more modest (MXN +0.2%, KRW +0.15%), but still putting pressure on the dollar.

Turning to the data, as I never got to show the week ahead, here we go:

TodayCase-Shiller Home Prices4.8%
 Consumer Confidence94
 New Home Sales680K
WednesdayDurable Goods-1.0%
 -ex Transport0.2%
ThursdayInitial Claims225K
 Continuing Claims1890K
 GDP Q4 Final2.3%
 GDP Final Sales Q43.2%
 Goods Trade Balance-$134.6B
FridayPersonal Income0.4%
 Personal Spending0.5%
 PCE0.3% (2.5% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.3% (2.7% Y/Y)
 Michigan Sentiment57.9

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, the PCE data Friday will be the most interesting piece of data released, although we cannot ignore Case-Shiller today.  I keep looking at prices rising there at nearly 5% and wondering why economists expect inflation to fall.  If home prices are rising 5% per year, and they represent one-third of the CPI, it doesn’t leave much room for other prices to rise to achieve 2.0%.  Just sayin’.  In addition, we hear from seven different Fed speakers this week.  Now, I have been making a big deal about how Fedspeak doesn’t seem to matter as much anymore.  Perhaps this week, given the overall uncertainty across markets, it will matter.  However, the Fed funds futures market continues to price a bit more than two rate cuts for the rest of the year, which has not changed very much at all in the past month.  I still don’t think the Fed speakers matter right now.

Markets are highly attuned to whatever Trump says about tariffs.  Absent a new war, and maybe even if one starts, I suspect traders (or algos) will focus on that exclusively.  But despite all this, nothing has altered my longer-term view that the dollar will weaken, and commodities remain strong going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Tripping Off Tongues

Posted on by

Recession is tripping off tongues
And pundits ain’t twiddling their thumbs
Political shades
Are driving tirades
And screams at the top of their lungs
 
But are we that likely to see
A minus in our ‘conomy?
We certainly could
And probably should
But life doesn’t always agree

 

The major discussion point over the weekend has been recession, and how likely we are to see one in the US in the coming months.  Of course, this matters to the punditry not because of any concern over the negative impacts a recession has on the population, but ‘more importantly’ because recessions tend to result in sharp declines in equity values.  And let’s face it, do you honestly believe that the editors of the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal are remotely interested in the condition of the majority of the population?  Me neither. 

However, if they can call out something that they believe can impede President Trump, or detract from his current high ratings, they will play that over and over and over.  Funnily enough, when I went to Google Trends, I looked up “recession” over the past 90 days with the result below:

That peak was on March 11 although there was no data of note that day compared to a reading of 9 today. Looking at the news of that day, even CNN had a hard time finding bad news with the four top stories being 1) the Continuing Resolution vote in the House being passed, 2) the Department of Education announcing a 50% RIF, 3) 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum being imposed and 4) Ukraine accepting terms for a 30-day ceasefire.  From an economic perspective, the tariffs clearly will have an impact, but it seems a leap that the average American can go from 25% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to recession in one step.  And based on the positive responses that continue to be seen regarding President Trump’s efforts to reduce the size of government, I doubt the DOE cuts were seen as the beginning of the end of the economy.  

And yet, recession was the talk of the punditry this weekend.  To try to better understand why this is the case, I created the following table of several major economic indicators and their evolution since December, prior to President Trump’s inauguration.

Key indicatorsDecJanFeb
NFP323125151
Unemployment Rate4.10%4.00%4.10%
CPI2.90%3.00%2.80%
Core CPI3.20%3.30%3.10%
PCE2.60%2.50% 
Core PCE2.90%2.60% 
IP1.10%0.30%0.70%
Capacity Utilization77.60%77.70%78.10%
ISM Mfg49.250.950.3
ISM Services5452.853.5
Retail Sales0.70%-1.20%0.20%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Once again, while I am certainly no PhD economist, this table doesn’t strike me as one demonstrating a clear trend in worsening data, certainly not on an across-the-board basis.  Rather, while you might say January was soft, the February data has largely rebounded.  My point is that despite ABC, NBC, Bloomberg, the BBC and CNN all publishing articles or interviews on the topic this weekend, I’m not yet convinced that is the obvious outcome.

My good friend the Inflation Guy™, Mike Ashton, made an excellent point in a recent podcast of his that is very well worth remembering.   The breadth of the US economy is extraordinarily wide and covers areas from manufacturing to agriculture to finance to energy and technology along with the necessary housing markets as well as the entire population consuming both goods and services.  Added to the private sector, the government sector is also huge, although President Trump and Elon Musk are trying hard to shrink it.  But the point is that it is not merely possible, but likely, that while some areas of the economy may go through weak patches, that doesn’t mean the entire economy is going to sink into the abyss.

If we think back to the last two recessions, the most recent was Covid inspired, which resulted from the government literally shutting down the economy for a period of several months, while giving out money.  Net, things weakened, but even then, there were stronger parts and weaker parts.  Go back to the GFC and the housing bubble popped and dragged banks along with it.  That was the problem because banking weakness inhibits the free flow of money and that will impact everyone.

The question to be asked now, I would suggest is, are we likely to see another catalyst that will have such widespread impacts?  Higher tariffs are not going to do the trick.  Shrinking government, although I believe it is critical for a better long-term trajectory for the economy, will have a short-term impact, but it is not clear to me that it will negatively impact the economy writ large.  Certainly, the Washington DC area, but will it impact the Rocky Mountain area?  Or Texas and Florida?  

Now, a recession could well be on the way.  Running 7% budget deficits was capable of papering over many holes in the economy and pumping lots of liquidity into it as well.  If those deficits shrink, meaning spending shrinks, the pace of activity will slow.  But negative?  It seems a stretch to me, at least based on what we have seen so far.  One last thing here, is how might this potential weakening economic growth impact inflation? Now, we all ‘know’ that a recession causes inflation to decline, don’t we?  Hmmm. While that makes intuitive sense, and we hear it a lot, perhaps the Inflation Guy™ can help here as well.  Back in February he wrote a very good explanation about how that is not really the case at all, at least based on the macroeconomic data.  The truth is economic growth and inflation have very little correlation at all.

Of course, perhaps the most critical issue for the punditry is, will a recession drive stock prices lower?  Here the news is far less sanguine if you are a shareholder and believe there is going to be a recession.  As you can see from the below chart of the S&P 500, pretty much every recession for the last 100 years has resulted in a decline in stock market indices.

Source: macrotrends.net

This is a log chart so some of those dips don’t seem that large, but the average downturn during a recession is about 30%, although that number can vary widely.  To sum it up, while the data doesn’t scream recession to me, it cannot be ruled out.  As well, both President Trump and Secretary Bessent have indicated that weakness is likely going to be a result of their early actions, although the idea is to pave the way for a more stable economic performance ahead.  As I have written repeatedly, volatility is likely the only thing of which we can be certain as all these changes occur.  Hedge your exposures!

Ok, let’s look at the overnight activity.

The rumor is Trump may delay
His tariffs as he tries to weigh
How much he should charge
And how much, writ large,
These nations are going to pay

Equity futures in the US are higher this morning as the big story is that President Trump is considering narrowing the scope of nations who will have tariffs imposed on April 2nd.  Apparently, his administration has identified the “dirty fifteen” nations with the largest bilateral imbalances and they will be first addressed.  The telling comment in the WSJ article I read was when Trump said, “Once you give exemptions for one company, you have to do that for all. The word flexibility is an important word. Sometimes there’s flexibility, there’ll be flexibility.”  To my ear, the final plans are not in place, but my sense is he will impose then remove tariffs, rather than avoid them initially.  Interestingly, that story was written last night, yet Asian equity markets were not that ebullient.  Japan (-0.2%) saw no benefit although Chinese shares (HK +0.9%, CSI 300 +0.5%) fared better. Things elsewhere in the region were mixed with both gainers (India, Thailand) and laggards (Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia) with many bourses little changed overall.

In Europe, green is the predominant color this morning but movement is modest with Spain’s IBEX (+0.4%) the leader and lesser gains elsewhere.  While US futures are all higher by about 1% or more at this hour (6:45) apparently the Europeans aren’t as excited at the tariff delay process.

In the bond market, yields have backed up virtually across the board with Treasuries (+4bps) leading the way higher and most European sovereigns showing yields rising by 1bp or 2bps.  It’s interesting, while there has been much discussion regarding German yields having traded substantially higher in the wake of the effective end of the debt brake and anticipation of much further issuance, a look at the chart below tells me that after that gap higher on the news, concerns over German finances have not deteriorated at all.  And after all, the difference is about 25bps higher, hardly the end of the world.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.7%) is continuing its gradual rebound from the lows seen on, ironically, March 11th.  Arguably, what this tells us is that despite the weekend barrage of recession focused articles, the market doesn’t really see that outcome.  In the metals, strength is the word, again, with copper (+1.25%) making new all-time highs on the back of China’s stated goals of growing its strategic stockpile.  Not surprisingly, both gold (+0.2%) and silver (+0.6%) are also climbing this morning alongside copper as commodities remain in greater demand than a recession would indicate.

Finally, the dollar is a bit softer despite rising Treasury yields with both the euro (+0.3%) and pound (+0.4%) bouncing after last week’s modest declines.  And this is despite lackluster Flash PMI readings this morning out of Europe.  The biggest winner is NOK (+0.6%) which given the dollar’s broad weakness and oil’s rebound makes perfect sense.  Otherwise, while the dollar’s weakness is broad, it is no deeper than the aforementioned currencies.

Given the length of this note already (my apologies) and the dearth of data to be released, with only the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (exp +0.08), I will cover data tomorrow as we do end the week with GDP and PCE data.

Headline bingo remains the key concern for all market participants, but ultimately, my altered view of a softer dollar and higher commodities remains intact.

Good luck

Adf

No Retreating

Posted on by

The virtue of patience remains
The key to our policy gains
Though tariffs and trade
May one day, soon, fade
It’s still ‘nuff to scramble our brains

 

In a bit of a surprise, Chairman Powell resurrected the term ‘transitory’ in his press conference yesterday with respect to the potential impact on prices from President Trump’s tariff policies.  He explained, “We now have inflation coming in from an exogenous source, but the underlying inflationary picture before that was basically 2½% inflation, 2% growth and 4% unemployment.”  In addition, he said, “It’s still the truth if there’s an inflationary impulse that’s going to go away on its own, it’s not the right policy to tighten policy because by the time you have your effect, you’re in effect, by design, you are lowering economic activity and employment.”  It is this mindset that returned ‘transitory’ to the discussion.  Now, while mainstream economics would agree to that characterization, with the idea being it is a one-off price rise, not the beginning of a trend, given the Fed’s history of using the word to describe the impact of monetary and fiscal policies in the wake of the pandemic, it caught most observers off guard.

But in the end, the Fed’s only policy change was a reduction in the pace of runoff of Treasuries from the Balance Sheet on a temporary basis.  Previously, they had been allowing $25B per month to run off without being replaced and starting April 1, that will be reduced to $5B per month.  The runoff of Mortgage-backed assets will continue as before.  This has been a widely discussed idea as the Fed approaches their target of “ample” reserves on the balance sheet, an amount they still characterize as “abundant”.

As to changes in the dot plot and SEP forecasts, they were, at the margin, modest, with the median dot plot ‘forecast’ continuing to call for 2 rate cuts this year.  Fed fund futures are now pricing in 65bps of cuts, so marginally tighter than the 75bps seen last week.  The SEP also showed slightly different forecasts for growth, inflation and unemployment, but just a tick or two different, hardly enough about which to get excited.  

Certainly, Mr Powell said nothing to upset equity markets as the response was a continuation of the modest rally that began in the morning.  As well, bond yields slid almost 9bps from their level just before the Statement was released.  Net, I expect the only people who are unhappy with the Fed’s performance are the hundreds of millions of Americans who have seen the inflation rate remain above the 2.0% target for the past 48 months (see chart below), but then Powell doesn’t really respond to them directly, now does he?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Oh yeah, President Trump also published a little note on Truth Social that Powell should cut rates, but I don’t think that had any impact at all.  For now, Trump’s attention is elsewhere, and if 10-year yields continue to slide, I suspect he will be fine, certainly Secretary Bessent will be.

In Europe, the leaders are meeting
Again, as they keep on repeating
They need to spend more
To maintain the war
In Ukraine, ‘cause there’s no retreating

Back in the real world, the diverging points of view between President Trump, and his attempts to end the Ukraine War, and the EU, which seems hell-bent on continuing it ad infinitum were highlighted again today as yet another summit meeting is being held in Brussels to discuss the process and progress on rearming the continent as well as how they envision the future of Ukraine.  This matters to markets as the continuous calls for more fiscal military spending is going to be a driver of equity prices in Europe, and given it is going to be funded by issuing more debt, on both a national and supranational basis, yields are likely to rise as well over time.  

There has been much talk lately of the end of US exceptionalism, and certainly there has been a shift of investment into European shares, especially defense firms, and out of US tech shares.  This has helped support the single currency, which while it has slipped the past two days, remains higher by 4.5% since the beginning of the month.  Ex ante, there is no way to know how this situation will evolve, but if history is a guide at all, the US continues to hold all the defense cards in the deck, and so even with European protests, I suspect the war will come to an end.

But here’s a thought, perhaps even if the war ends, the pre-war energy flows may not resume.  This would not be because Europe doesn’t want cheap Russian gas, but perhaps because Russia doesn’t want to sell it to those who will use it to build armaments that can be used against Russia.  The world has moved to a different place both politically and economically, than where it was pre-Covid.  My sense is many old models may no longer work as proxies for reality, which takes me back to my favorite theme, the one thing on which we can count is more volatility!

Ok, let’s take a turn through markets overnight.  After the US rally, Asia was far more mixed with the Nikkei (-0.25%) slipping a bit and both China (-0.9%) and Hong Kong (-2.2%) falling more substantially on fears that US tariffs could slow growth there more than previously feared.  But elsewhere in the region there were far more gains (Korea, Australia, India, Taiwan) than losses (Malaysia, Thailand). 

Europe, though, is having a tougher session with losses across the board.  The continent is particularly hard hit (Germany -1.7%, France -1.2%, Spain -1.2%) although the UK (-0.3%) is holding up better after decent employment data was released.  We did see the Swiss National Bank cut its base rate by 25bps, as expected, while Sweden’s Riksbank left rates on hold, also as expected.  In fairness, European stocks have had quite a good run, so a pullback should not be a surprise, but it is disappointing, nonetheless.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:10), they are pointing lower by -0.5% or so.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are lower by a further -4bps this morning and down to 4.20%, still well within the recent trading range (see chart below).  As to European sovereigns, they too are lower by between -3bps and -5bps, as despite concerns over potential new issuance, fear seems to be today’s theme.  Oh yeah, JGB yields are still pegged at 1.50%.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity bloc, oil is little changed this morning, and net, on the week little changed as well.  It is difficult to see short-term drivers although I continue to believe we will see it drift lower over time as supply continues apace while demand, especially in a slowing growth scenario, is likely to ebb.  Gold (-0.6%) is having its worst day in more than a week, but the trend remains strongly higher.  Arguably a bit of profit taking is visible today.  This is dragging silver (-1.8%) along for the ride although copper (+0.1%) is sitting this move out.

Finally, the dollar is firmer again this morning, higher by 0.5% according to the DXY, with the biggest currency laggards the AUD (-1.1%), SEK (-0.8%) and ZAR (-0.75%).  But the dollar’s strength is universal this morning.  One possibility is that traders have decided Powell is not going to cut rates, hence more pressure on US equities, and more support for the dollar.  I don’t agree with that thesis, as I believe Powell really wants to cut rates, but for now, the other argument has the votes.

On the data front, we get the weekly Initial (exp 224K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims as well as the Philly Fed (8.5) all at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see Existing Home Sales (3.95M) and Leading Indicators (-0.2%).  Also, at 8:00 we will get the BOE rate decision, with no change expected.  However, as I have been explaining, central bank stories are just not that important, I believe.  Investors in the UK are far more worried about the Starmer fiscal disaster than the BOE.

There are no Fed speakers on the schedule today, so, I suspect it will be headline bingo.  While the dollar has outperformed for the past two sessions, I continue to believe the trend is lower for the buck and higher for commodities.  Perhaps today is a good day to take advantage of some dollar strength for payables hedgers.

Good luck

Adf

Just a Mistake

Posted on by

It wasn’t all that long ago
That folks really wanted to know
What Jay and the Fed
Implied was ahead
And if more cuts were apropos
 
But later today when they break
Their words are unlikely to shake
The narrative theme
That whate’er they deem
Important, is just a mistake

 

Presidents Trump and Putin spoke at length yesterday, but no solution was achieved so the Ukraine War will continue unabated for now. While talks are better than not, certainly this is a disappointment to some.  As well, the astronauts who have been stranded in space for the past 8 months are safely back on earth.  I mention these things because they are seemingly far more important than central banks these days, and today, that is all we have to discuss regarding financial markets.

To begin, last night the BOJ left rates on hold as universally anticipated.  The initial market response was for the yen to weaken through 150 briefly, but then Ueda-san spoke and discussed the expected wage increases and how the economy was doing fine, and the new market assessment is that the BOJ will hike rates by 25bps in May at their next meeting.  The market response was to buy back the yen, at least for a little while, although right now, USDJPY seems to be attracted to the 150 level overall.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It is worth understanding, though, that the last time short-term interest rates were that high in Japan was back in July 2008.  And they have not been above that level since August 1995.  The below chart from FRED database speaks volumes about just how low interest rates have been in Japan over time, and as an adjunct, just how long the opportunity for shorting JPY on the carry trade has been around.  That dotted line is the Fed funds rate compared to the Japanese overnight rate.  

Along the central bank thesis, Bank Indonesia, too, met last night and left policy on hold with their policy rate at 5.75%.  Governor Warjiyo explained that he felt falling inflation and improving growth would help prevent rupiah weakness despite the fact that the currency has been the worst performing Asian currency this year and is trading at historic lows.

But on to the FOMC meeting which will conclude at 2:00 this afternoon with the policy statement (no change expected although some tweaking of the verbiage is likely) and the release of the latest dot plot.  You have probably forgotten that at the December meeting, the FOMC reduced the median expectation of rate cuts for 2025 from 4 prior to the election to just 2.  In the interim we have seen Fed funds futures trade to where barely one rate cut was priced in, although we are now back to three cuts, seemingly on the idea that tariffs will cause significant economic weakness, and the Fed will need to respond.  At least that’s what the punditry maintains.

Here is the last dot plot for information purposes and it will be interesting to see just how much things have changed.  will longer run rates continue to move higher?  Will 2 rate cuts still be the median outcome for 2025?  All this we get to learn at 2:00.

Source: federalreserve.gov

But arguably, of far more import will be Chairman Powell’s press conference beginning at 2:30.  Prior to the Fed’s quiet period, the broad assessment was that patience in future rate moves was appropriate and they were happy with the current situation.  However, I am confident there will be numerous questions regarding the potential impact of tariffs on monetary policy responses, as well as other things like DOGE and an audit of the Fed.  Will any of it matter?  Maybe at the margin, but for most markets, I suspect that fiscal issues will remain dominant.  The one exception is the FX market, where unalloyed hawkishness could change views on the dollar’s recent weakness (although it is firmer this morning) while a dovish tone will almost certainly undermine the greenback.  So, with no other data of note to be released beforehand, it is clearly the day’s major event.

Ahead of that event, let’s see how markets have behaved overnight.  Following a weak session in the US, where all three major indices were lower by about -1.0% on average, Asia had a mixed picture.  The Nikkei (-0.25%) found no love from Ueda-san and drifted lower.  Both Hong Kong (+0.1%) and China (+0.1%) edged higher but continue to doubt the benefits of the mooted Chinese stimulus program while the rest of the region was mixed with some gainers (Indonesia, Korea, India) and some laggards (Taiwan, Australia, Malaysia).  In Europe, too, the picture is mixed with the DAX (-0.4%) lagging while the CAC (+0.5%) is gaining.  In Germany, the historic breech of the debt brake is not having the positive impact anticipated, or perhaps this is just selling the news.  Overall, though, shares in Europe seem to be awaiting the Fed’s actions, or comments, rather than focusing on anything else.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30), they are pointing slightly higher, about 0.25% across the board.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have edged up 1bp this morning but continue to hang around 4.30%.  European sovereign debt has seen yields slip -1bp to -2bps, arguably on the Eurozone inflation data released 0.1% lower than forecast at 2.3%.  This continues the idea that the ECB will be cutting rates again at their next meeting.  As to JGBs, they are unchanged yet again, seemingly affixed at 1.50%.

Commodity prices show oil (-0.2%) continuing yesterday’s decline.  From the time I wrote to the end of the session, WTI fell $2/bbl, perhaps on the idea that the Putin/Trump phone call was bringing the war closer to an end.  Regardless, if economic activity is slowing, that will lessen demand everywhere, a clear price negative.  As to gold (+0.25%) it continues to trade higher undaunted by any news on any front.  While silver is little changed this morning, copper (+0.7%) has now crested $5.00/lb and is pushing to the all-time highs seen back in May 2024.

Finally, the dollar is rallying this morning, higher against all its G10 counterparts by between 0.2% and 0.4%.  This looks to me like a trading correction, not a new trend.  The same price action is true in the EMG bloc with one real outlier, TRY (-4.2%) which actually traded down by as much as -10% earlier in the session (see chart below) on the news that President Erdogan had his key political rival, Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, arrested on charges of fraud and terror, while his university diploma was revoked, seemingly in an effort to prevent him from running for president in the future.  Thank goodness we never have things like that happen in this country!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no data released today other than EIA oil inventories where a modest net build across products is currently expected.  So, until the Fed, I would anticipate very little net movement.  After that, it all depends.  However, Powell will need to by extremely hawkish to shake any of my view that the dollar is headed lower overall.

Good luck

Adf

Not Fraught

Posted on by

The Retail Sales data did nought
To clarify anyone’s thought
‘Bout growth or inflation
While anticipation
Of Jay, for a change, is not fraught
 
Meanwhile, tariffs are, once again
A question of how much, not when
Just two weeks from now
The president’s vow
For more, has disturbed market zen

 

In a remarkable situation, at least these days, there is precious little new news impacting financial markets.  Perhaps that is why equities around the world are rallying, the absence of bad news is seen as good.  Here in the States, the biggest story continues to be the controversy over the deportation of several hundred Venezuelan and Salvadorean gang members that some claim ignored a judge’s order.  I’m confident this will get top billing for at least another day, but after that, we will move on.  However, market related stories are sparser.

For instance, we can look at yesterday’s Retail Sales data, which was not terrible, but not great, as the headline number rose a less than expected 0.2%, but that still translated into 3.1% growth Y/Y.  One of the things weighing on the data was the fact that gasoline prices fell, thus despite modest growth in volume, total dollar sales declined.  The same was true with autos, where allegedly prices declined though volumes remained solid.  (Remember, Retail Sales measures the dollar value of sales, not the quantity of items sold.). At any rate, investors absorbed the data and decided that the recent market declines, to the extent they are a reflection of concerns over rapidly slowing economic activity, were overdone.  The result, happily, is that equities rallied most of the day yesterday and that has followed through around the world overnight.

Alas, the other string of stories in headlines today is the Trump administration’s efforts to determine exactly how they want to implement the promised reciprocal tariffs which are due to be put in place on April 2.  It seems the fact the US trades with over 180 nations, each with their own tariff schedules, makes the details of the proposal difficult to shape and implement.  However, my take is, absent some major shifts by other nations, these tariffs will be imposed.

Ultimately, given the US is the ‘buyer of last resort’ for pretty much every other nation on earth with regards to any of their exports, I expect that there will be a number of nations that choose to adjust their own schedules rather than have diminished access to the US market.  But ex ante, there is no way to determine which nations will blink.

As a testament to just how much things have changed in the market, and just as importantly, the market narrative, the fact that three major central banks are meeting this week with the potential to adjust policy, is basically a footnote.  The FOMC starts their meeting today and tomorrow afternoon they will announce rates are unchanged.  Some attention will be paid to the dot plot, to try to see if the recent discussions of patience translate into higher long-term rate expectations, but quite frankly, it is not clear to me that Chairman Powell can say anything that is going to move markets absent a surprise rate adjustment.  The Fed funds futures market continues to price in basically one rate cut each quarter for the rest of the year at this point.

But before that, this evening the BOJ will announce their latest policy updates and, not surprisingly, there is no anticipation of a move there either.  While there has been much discussion in Japan of how companies will be, on average, increasing pay by 5.46% this year, that has not resulted in any expectations for the BOJ to adjust policy in response.  And in fairness to Ueda-san and his crew, the fact that the yen (-0.3% today) has been relatively stable of late, having rebounded from its dramatic lows last summer and held a good portion of those gains, concerns over a much weaker yen have diminished.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Looking at the chart above, while I am no market technician, there seem to be several overhead resistance levels starting with that recent trend line.  The absence of concern over a declining yen (rising dollar) will leave the BOJ on hold for a while I think.

And let us not forget Thursday morning, where the BOE will convene, also with no policy changes expected. While GDP remains desultory there, printing at 1.0% Y/Y last week for Q4, inflation refuses to fall to their 2% target and so Governor Bailey is caught between that proverbial rock and hard place.  In such a scenario, no action is the most likely outcome.

Ok, let’s turn to the overnight market activity, which has all investors excited given the fact that markets everywhere are embracing risk today.  A solid day in the US was followed by strong gains throughout Asia (Nikkei +1.2%, Hang Seng +2.5%, CSI 300 +0.3%) with the mainland a little disappointing.  There has been more discussion recently that despite some splashy headlines about more Chinese stimulus, it is less than meets the eye.  That is a view with which I agree.  The exception to this rule was Indonesia (-3.9%) which fell after concerns over slowing growth and a widening budget deficit spooked foreign investors.  In Europe, things are also bright with all markets firmly higher led by Germany (+1.2%) as continued belief in the end of the debt brake has investors anxious to take advantage of all the government spending set to come.  We shall see how that works out, but if the US is the template, it probably has some room to run.  However, all these bourses are higher this morning in a general risk-on mood.  The crimp in the story is US indices are all slightly softer this morning ahead of Housing data.

In the bond market, yields are climbing with Treasury yields up by 1bp and European sovereign yields all higher by 3bps.  Again, this seems to be focused on the mooted extra government spending which is coming down the pike, although yields have backed off the levels seen after the initial announcements as per the below.  In fact, I read a forecast this morning about German bund yields rising to 4% by the end of next year after all the borrowing.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity bloc, gold (+0.9%) is unstoppable for now, and taking silver (+1.1%) and copper (+0.4%) along for the ride.  Whatever else is ongoing, it appears that more and more investors have decided that having some portion of their portfolios in the barbarous relic is the right trade. After all, it is higher by more than 15% just since the beginning of the year and more than 40% over the past twelve months.  Oil (+1.1%) is also managing to hold above its recent lows but continues to run into resistance below $70/bbl.  The biggest news today is that Saudi Aramco has seen its stock price falling to 5-year lows, down 50% from its highs of 2022 after cutting dividends earlier this month.

Finally, the dollar is little changed at this hour (7:45), rebounding from modest weakness earlier in the session.  The euro and pound are unchanged, and the yen remains slightly softer.  However, MXN (-0.5%) and KRW (-0.5%) are both feeling the heat of the tariff story.  In the opposite camp, CL (+0.6%) continues to benefit from the rally in copper prices.  The big picture here remains unchanged, with the dollar likely to remain on its back foot as capital flows toward Europe’s government spending bonanza and away from the US, which appears to be pushing for fiscal tightness. 

On the data front, this morning we see Housing Starts (exp 1.38M) and Building Permits (1.45M) at 8:30 then at 9:15 we get IP (0.2%) and Capacity Utilization (77.8%).  With the Fed meeting ongoing, the only headlines will come from the White House, and those are virtually random these days.  Tight fiscal and loose monetary policy tends to weaken a currency and given that is the best description of the US these days, it remains my default position.

Good luck

Adf

Not Worried

Posted on by

‘Bout markets, Scott Bessent’s not worried
As favor with specs can’t be curried
Instead, what he seeks
Is policy tweaks
To help growth, though folks want that hurried
 
Meanwhile, Chairman Jay and his team
Continue their policy theme
Inflation’s still falling
Although they are calling
For patience, as bulls start to scream

 

“I’ve been in the investment business for 35 years, and I can tell you that corrections are healthy, they are normal,” Bessent said Sunday on NBC’s Meet The Press. “I‘m not worried about the markets. Over the long term, if we put good tax policy in place, deregulation and energy security, the markets will do great.”

The above comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent yesterday morning (quote courtesy of Bloomberg.com) have garnered a remarkable amount of commentary amidst both the political and market punditry.  My first comment is I must be much older than Mr Bessent, since I have been in the investment business for 43 years.  However, as I have written numerous times over the course of the past years, the market has not cleared for a very long time.  Since the 1987 stock market crash, when then Fed Chair Greenspan started pumping liquidity into the financial markets to stabilize things, and realized he could do that to prevent serious downturns, we have seen two significant downdrafts, the tech bubble and the housing market crash, both of which were immediately met with massive liquidity injections, extremely low interest rates and for the latter, the advent of QE.

All of that liquidity has resulted in market excesses across many markets and has been a key driver in the stock market’s exceptional rise since the Covid blip.  Adding to that was the massive fiscal spending (remember those 7% budget deficits?) which has helped to insure that not only did markets rise, but so did retail prices.

Now, along comes a Treasury Secretary who hasn’t married himself to higher stock markets on a day-to-day basis and instead is focused on the long-term.  What I find most interesting is that the same pundits who are screaming about Bessent and Trump destroying the economy, were all-in on the discussion of how the US debt was going to ultimately cause a collapse.  Yet as the administration explicitly tries to address that issue (you may disagree with their methods, but that is their clear goal) suddenly, the fact that stock prices are falling is a tragedy of biblical proportions.  Here’s the thing, the worst performer, the NASDAQ, is down about -12% since its peak last month as per the below chart.  I might argue that is hardly a collapse.  In fact, a healthy correction doesn’t seem to be a bad description.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no doubt that uncertainty about the near-term direction of the economy has grown, and there is no doubt that President Trump’s mercurial tendencies make long-term planning difficult.  However, I would contend we are a long way from the apocalypse or even a stockopalypse.  But once again, I highlight that volatility remains the key metric for now, and that hedging exposures remains very important.

With that as backdrop, the FOMC meets on Wednesday and while there is no expectation of any rate move, the market continues to price three rate cuts for the rest of the year, pretty much one each quarter.  A key unknown is just how hawkish or dovish Fed members currently find themselves given the recent market gyrations.  As well, while inflation had seemingly been the primary focus, with all the concern over a significant slowdown in the US economy, there are now many who believe we will see a rising Unemployment Rate despite a lack of evidence from the weekly Claims data.  These same pundits are also certain that Trump’s tariff policy will lead to rising inflation, really putting the Fed in a bind with a stagflationary outcome.  And maybe that is what will happen.

But I would contend it is far too early to assume that is our future.  First off, on the inflationary front, energy prices have fallen, a key inflation component, and as far as the tariffs are concerned, if they reduce demand, that is likely to cap prices. If on the other hand, demand is not reduced, I don’t see slowing growth as the likely outcome.  

In the end, if the economy is adjusting from one with far more government spending support, to one with more organic private sector economic activity, the transition may be bumpy, but the outcome will be far stronger.  We shall see if that is how things evolve.

In the meantime, let’s look at how the world has responded to the latest stories.  Friday’s US equity rebound was welcomed everywhere, although the key narrative remains the end of American exceptionalism, at least as regards equity markets.  Friday also saw the exiting German Bundestag agree to eliminate the debt brake for infrastructure and defense, with Chancellor-to-be Merz agreeing to waste spend €100 billion on climate related projects to convince the Green Party, which is out of the new government, to vote in the rule change before the new government is seated.  It is not clear to me how spending that money on net-zero ideas will defend Germany, but then I am just a poet, not a German policymaker.

As to Asian markets, other than mainland China (-0.25%) green was the predominant color on screens overnight with Japan (+0.9%), Australia (+0.8%) and Hong Kong (+0.8%) all following the US.  One of the remarkable things, though, is that Chinese data overnight showing IP (5.9%), Retail Sales (4.0%) and Fixed Asset Investment (4.1%) was generally solid.  Of course, Unemployment (5.4%) rose 2 ticks, an unwelcome outcome, and House prices (-4.8%) continue to decline, albeit at a slowing rate, but neither of those speak to a rebound in the Chinese economy.  The end of the Chinese NPC offered more platitudes about supporting the consumer, but it is not clear where the money is coming from.  And recall, more than 60% of Chinese household wealth remains tied up in housing investment, which continues to decline in value.  The Chinese have a long way to go in my view.

Quickly, European bourses are all modestly higher this morning, on the order of 0.3% or so, as hope springs eternal that the rearming of Europe will drive profit margins higher.  Unfortunately, at this hour (7:15), US futures are pointing lower, about -0.25% across the board, although that is up from earlier session lows.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps this morning, but are really just trading around in their new trading range of 4.20% to 4.35% as investors try to get a handle on which of the big themes are going to drive markets going forward.  European sovereigns are all seeing rallies, with yields slipping -5bps to -6ps which seems out of step with the news about the end of the German debt brake.  Perhaps bond investors don’t believe the legislation will pass, or perhaps that they won’t spend the money after all.  As to JGB yields, the edged lower by -1bp in the 10yr, although longer dated paper has seen yields rise with 40-year bonds touching 3.0% for the first time in their relatively short history.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.4%) is continuing to bounce of its lows from last week but remains well below levels seen at the beginning of the month.  The US attack on the Houthis is being called the beginning of an escalation in the Middle East by some, and perhaps that has traders concerned.  On the flip side, ostensibly, Presidents Trump and Putin are to speak tomorrow in an effort to get peace talks moving along, potentially a bearish oil signal.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.6%) remains in great demand having crested the $3000/oz level last week and rising from there.  This has helped both silver and copper, with the latter, despite concerns over slowing economic activity, pushing closer to $5.00/lb.  There is much talk of shortages in the market driving the price action.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning with every G10 currency firmer led by NZD (+0.6%) and AUD (+0.4%) although gains elsewhere are on the order of +0.25%.  This story seems to go hand-in-hand with the German defense spending and the end of US exceptionalism.  As to the EMG bloc, most of these currencies are also stronger this morning, but the magnitude of these moves is generally less than the G10 bloc.  Recall, Trump wants a lower dollar, and my default is that is where we are headed at this point.

On the data front, we have an action-packed week ahead starting this morning.

TodayRetail Sales0.6%
 -ex autos0.4%
 Empire State Manufacturing-0.75
TuesdayHousing Starts1.375M
 Building Permits1.45M
 IP0.2%
 Capacity Utilization77.8%
WednesdayFOMC Rate Decision4.50% (unchanged)
ThursdayInitial Claims224K
 Continuing Claims1880K
 Philly Fed12.1
 Existing Home Sales3.92M
 Leading Indicators-0.2%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As we have seen over the past many months, I suspect that this week’s data will be likely to give analysts on both sides of the economy is stronger/weaker argument new fodder.  While the Fed won’t be doing anything, and despite their relative decline in importance, I suspect that Chairman Powell’s press conference will still get a lot of attention.

While we don’t know what the future will bring for sure, I remain convinced that the dollar will slide, and commodities will rally.  As to stocks and bonds, well your guess is as good as mine.

Good luck

Adf