Tag Archives: economy

Huge Fluctuations

Posted on by

There once was a war between nations
That led to some huge fluctuations
In markets worldwide
As pundits all cried
The world’s shaken to its foundations
 
In secret, though, pundits all cheered
‘Cause they all hate Trump, and thus steered
The narrative toward
This Damocles’ sword
That hung o’er the world and was feared
 
But now, twixt the US and China
There is just a bit less angina
Both sides, tariffs, slashed
And quite unabashed
These pundits said things were just fine-a

 

The wonderful thing about controlling the narrative is that it doesn’t matter if you are right or wrong at any particular time, because if you are wrong, you simply change the narrative.  At least that’s my impression looking here from the cheap seats.  At any rate, the news this weekend brought the end to the trade war, or at least a 90-day cease fire, as both the US and China slashed their announced tariffs dramatically, with US tariffs falling to 30% on Chinese goods and Chinese tariffs falling to 10% on US goods.  Between now and August, Treasury Secretary Bessent will be leading trade talks with Chinese Vice Premier He to try to come up with a more permanent solution.

In the interim, it will be interesting to see how the narrative evolves.  Certainly, I got tired of the different articles I saw explaining that there were no ships crossing the Pacific from China to the US and that store shelves would be empty by summer.  I wonder if we will see any of those claims retracted. (I’m not holding my breath).  I also wonder why that is the case simply from a mathematic perspective.  After all, annual US GDP is ~$28 trillion and imports from China in the twelve months from April 2024 through March 2025 were ~$444 billion, according to the FRED database.  So, does that mean that the other $27.56 trillion in economic activity was all services?  A look at the charts below created from FRED data shows that not only has the amount of imports from China not been growing lately, as a percentage of GDP, they have been shrinking.  I am not saying Chinese activity is unimportant to the US, just that the reduction in relative trade has been happening far longer than President Trump has been in office this time.

While certainly, low priced items could become a bit scarcer, it strikes me that there was more than a bit of hyperbole involved in those claims.  Of course, the next question is, will those ships start sailing again?  I guess we shall find out soon enough.

But stepping back a bit, I think it is critical to remember that prior to President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcements, it’s not as though the world trade system was all peaches and cream.  In fact, this weekend I listened to an excellent Monetarymatters podcast with guest George Magnus discussing the trade situation and why it was untenable in its current form before President Trump tried to change things.  He is far more eloquent and knowledgeable than a mere poet like me, and it is worth listening.  In the end, as others have also said, the status quo was unsustainable as both US government spending needs to be cut and the US reliance on China (or any other nation) for things of national security importance could not continue without grave results for our nation.  

I contend there is no easy way to change a system that has evolved over 80 years with goals changing during that period.  I also contend that the idea that a proverbial scalpel would have been a better method to do things, as it would not have created the market ructions we have all felt for the past few months, would never have worked.  Just like in changing the way the federal government works, the inertia in the trade system is far too great to be adjusted by tweaks here and there.  To make a lasting change, major disruptions are needed and that is what President Trump has been doing, disrupting things majorly.  Whether or not he will ultimately be successful is hard to say, but the odds of a change are greater now than before he started.  And almost everybody agreed that things were unsustainable.

One last thing you are sure to hear, especially now that the negotiations have begun is that the only reason is because President Trump “blinked” and couldn’t stand the pain of the market and the slings and arrows of the punditry.  However, it remains very difficult for me to look at the data that has been released of late, with Chinese growth slowing rapidly and Chinese stimulus unable to solve the problem and believe that President Xi hasn’t felt enormous pressure to speed up the economy.  It is clearly in both sides interest to come to a resolution, and that is what we should focus on going forward.

So, how did markets take the news?  Well, it should be no surprise that Chinese (+1.2%) and Hong Kong (+3.0%) shares both rallied sharply given they are the direct beneficiaries of the story.  Taiwan (+1.0%) and Korea (+1.2%) also fared well in the euphoria, but perhaps the biggest news in Asia was the ceasefire between India and Pakistan that was brokered by the US.  That saw Indian shares (+3.8%) and Pakistani shares (+9.0%) both explode higher.  It is certainly better that the explosions are in the relevant stock markets than on the ground!  As to the rest of Asia, markets were generally higher but not nearly as ebullient. Meanwhile, in Europe, screens are green (Germany +0.9%, France +1.35%, UK +0.4%) but the gains pale compared to some of the Asian price action.  US futures, though, are soaring at this hour (6:50) with gains between 2.4% (DJIA) and 4.0% (NASDAQ).

In the bond market, yields are soaring everywhere with Treasuries (+7bps) rising a similar amount to all European sovereigns (Bunds +7bps, OATs +6bps, Gilts +8bps) and JGBs (+8bps).  It appears that with money flowing rapidly back into the equity markets now that the trade war has ended RISK IS ON baby!!!  Either that or the only way to generate this new growth is by spending lots of government money which will require even more issuance.  I’ll take the first for now.

But that risk on trade is clear in commodities with oil (+3.6%) soaring higher to its highest level in three weeks and despite the idea that OPEC+ is going to increase production.  In fact, there are many things ongoing in the oil market that are far too detailed for this commentary, but in a nutshell, from what I understand, OPEC’s changes are simply catching up to the reality of what members have already been pumping and the market is now focusing on the renewed growth enthusiasm with the trade war on hold.  As well, if risk is no longer a concern, you don’t need to hold gold, and the barbarous relic is under huge pressure this morning, tumbling -3.5% and taking silver (-2.1%) with it.  Copper (+0.4%), however, is higher on the growth story.

Finally, the dollar is flying this morning.  on the one hand, given risk is in such demand, that doesn’t make much sense as historically, risk on markets tend to see the dollar weaken.  But my take is that all the stories about the end of American exceptionalism, with respect to US equity markets, got destroyed by the truce in the trade war, and now folks are buying dollars to buy US equities.  So, the euro (-1.4%) is under major pressure along with the pound (-1.1%) and the yen (-2.0%) is in more dire straits, as is CHF (-1.8%).  Other G10 currencies have also fallen, albeit not as far.  In the Emerging markets, only two currencies are rallying this morning, both benefitting from truces; INR (+0.7%) which is obviously benefitting from the military ceasefire and CNY (+0.6%) which is benefitting from the trade ceasefire.  As to the rest of the bloc, all currencies are lower between -0.6% and -1.6%.

On the data front, we see the following this week:

TuesdayCPI0.3% (2.4% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (2.8% Y/Y)
ThursdayInitial Claims230K
 Continuing Claims1890K
 Retail Sales0.0%
 -ex autos0.3%
 PPI0.2% (2.5% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (3.1% Y/Y)
 Empire State Manufacturing-10.0
 Philly Fed Manufacturing-12.5
 IP0.2%
 Capacity Utilization77.9%
FridayHousing Starts1.37M
 Building Permits1.45M
 Michigan Sentiment53.1

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As well as all the data, we hear from six Fed speakers, including Chairman Powell on Thursday morning.  I cannot help but think that things are a bit overdone this morning but perhaps not.  It is certainly positive that the US and China are speaking about trade, but it remains to be seen what can be agreed.  In the end, while this week is starting off well, I suggest not getting too excited yet.  As to the dollar, certainly this is positive news, but I have not changed my view that eventually it will slide.

Good luck

Adf

Heartburned

Posted on by

There’s no one surprised that the Fed
Did nothing, and here’s what Jay said
We’re not in a hurry
To cut, but don’t worry
If things change, we can cut ahead
 
The narrative now has returned
To Trump, which has many concerned
That in the short run
The things that he’s done
Will leave many traders heartburned

 

As universally expected, the Fed left policy unchanged yesterday.  Everything we had heard from FOMC members prior to the quiet period indicated they had to be patient to see how things played out regarding the impact of tariffs.  Apparently, Chairman Powell used the term “wait” or some version of that idea 22 times in the press conference.  Tomorrow, the Fed speakers hit the circuit again, but absent some change in data, which will take at least another month or two, I don’t see that the Fed is relevant again for a while.  

I will note that the market is currently pricing only about a 17% chance of a cut at the June 18 meeting though they are still pricing in 3 cuts for the year.  It appears that the idea of a H2 recession is gaining ground amongst both the punditry and the futures market.

However, contra to that message, the bigger news of the day is that President Trump will be announcing, at 10am, the first trade deal in the new era, this one with the UK.  It strikes me that this should be the easiest of trade deals to negotiate since both economies produce the same types of things.  Neither has a labor cost advantage, and there is great commonality between them with respect to the overall culture.  Arguably, the biggest advantage the US has is its energy sector has not been destroyed by the government, something PM Starmer is working hard to accomplish on his end.  Realistically, the trade deal here is going to be more about services than goods I suspect, given that’s what drives both economies.  I guess we will learn later today.

In a modest surprise, UK equities (FTSE 100 +0.4%) do not seem to see the benefits of such a deal, as they lag most of the rest of Europe.  Too, the BOE is expected to cut its base rate by 25bps this morning, which in isolation would ordinarily be seen as a positive for stock markets.  Perhaps, this is why the UK is the first to say yes, things there may be worse than meet the eye.  After all, the stock market there is higher by just 2% in the past year, hardly a breathtaking performance.  In fact, as you can see below, the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 have had very similar performances this year, tracking each other closely, although despite all the angst about recent volatility in US markets, the S&P is still 8% higher in the past year, decently outperforming the UK.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Stepping back for a moment from individual markets, my take is the following: President Trump is keen to sign a number of key trade deals in this 90-day window.  If they agree deals with the UK, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Mexico, all of which seem quite possible, it will reduce the uncertainty and accompanying stress in markets.  If, as well, Congress can get the ‘big, beautiful budget bill’ passed, thoughts of recession will quickly dissipate.  Obviously, the China trade talks will still be outstanding, but both sides need to find a solution here.  While the punditry in the US will continue to harp on how those tariffs are going to kill the US economy, China has already shown they are having problems and need to come to an agreement.  It is quite possible that Mr Trump can be successful in his aims to reorder the nature of world trade such that the US reduces its deficits without destroying the world.  I think I am going to take the over on this question.

In the meantime, let’s see how markets have behaved overnight.  Yesterday saw US equity markets rally modestly after the Fed and that followed through in Asia, with modest gains being the best description.  The Nikkei (+0.4%), Hang Seng (+0.4%) and CSI 300 (+0.5%) all seemed to benefit from the US and hopes for a reduction in trade anxiety.  Of note in Asia was India (-0.5%) and perhaps more tellingly Pakistan (-6.0%) as the escalation in military conflict between those two nations has grown even hotter.  I expect that market impact will remain more isolated as neither market is a key destination of foreign capital, at least if the actual military conflict doesn’t spread into other areas.

Turning to Europe, both Germany (+1.1%) and France (+1.0%) are having very good days with both markets ostensibly responding to the news of the impending UK trade deal and perhaps some hopes there will be one with the EU.  As well, German IP data was released at a much better level than expected (3.0% vs. 0.8% expected), an indication that companies there are gearing up for all that mooted military spending.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are all higher by at least 1.0% with the NASDAQ higher by 1.6%.  

In the bond market, Treasury yields are higher by 4bps this morning, having recouped the declines yesterday.  But still, the 10-year hovers either side of 4.30% and has done for the past month as you can see in the chart below.  If anything, it appears that the trend remains toward modestly lower rates.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In Europe, sovereign yields are also climbing slightly, higher by between 2bps and 3bps this morning and we saw similar movement in JGB markets overnight.  Frankly, bond markets have not been very exciting lately.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.6%) is continuing its recent bounce from the lows seen Sunday night, but WTI remains below $60/bbl.  There is growing talk that at current prices, capex is going to decline and supply along with that, but you cannot look at what is happening in Guyana, for instance, as they seek to exploit the massive new oilfield discovered in their coastal waters last year and think that oil supply is going to shrink.  As well, OPEC+ looks set to produce all out.  I do not see a good case for higher oil prices in the near term.  Meanwhile, gold (-1.0%) is giving back some of its recent rebound gains, but nothing about the recent price action indicates to me that the bigger picture trend higher is over.  However, today, it is weighing on both silver (-0.2%) and copper (-0.8%).  

As aside about copper.  The red metal has been nicknamed Dr Copper given its importance in industrial activity.  Hence, when demand is strong, it foretells strong economic activity and vice-versa.  With that in mind, what does the below chart of copper tell you about economic activity?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

What it tells me is that this, too, is a former economic signal that had been reliable in the old world view but has lost its way as a signpost of future activity in the new world view.

Finally, the dollar is modestly stronger this morning, most notably vs. the yen (-0.6%) and INR (-0.8%). The latter is clearly suffering on the impacts of some negative military news, having lost several fighter jets and drones, while the former seems to be responding to the story that Mr Trump will not lower tariffs with China ahead of the first meetings that are upcoming this weekend, and that had been demanded requested by the Chinese to start talking.  Too, NZD (-0.6%) is softer but elsewhere, there is far less of interest overall with the euro unchanged and the pound edging higher by 0.25% after the BOE cut rates 25bps, as expected, but the vote was 7-2, with two MPC members voting for no change, a slightly more hawkish outcome than expected.

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 230K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims data as well as Nonfarm Productivity (-0.7%) and Unit Labor Costs (5.1%).  Yesterday’s EIA oil inventory data showed modest draws, as expected and didn’t seem to matter much to the market.  It is difficult to get too excited about much these days as the landscape remains highly uncertain.  If, and it’s a big if, President Trump can come to agreement on trade deals with a number of countries, I suspect that we will see uncertainty wane and markets continue higher.  But the Fed won’t be cutting rates in that scenario.  Ultimately, though, I do believe that a lower dollar will be part of many of these deals, and for now, a lower dollar still seems the most likely outcome.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Excited

Posted on by

The market is now quite excited
As trade talks have been expedited
With Bessent and He
Now speaking, we’ll see
If buyers last night were farsighted
 
However, do not ignore gold
Whose price is a thing to behold
The past several days
There’s been quite a craze
As sellers now rue what they’ve sold

 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t often lead with a chart, but I think it is worthwhile this morning.  I grabbed this picture at 7:00pm last night, shortly after the news hit that Treasury Secretary Bessent and Trade Representative Greer were heading to Switzerland later this week to sit down with He Lifeng, the Chinese Vice Premier and trade negotiator and begin trade talks.  Prior to that announcement, the barbarous relic had rallied more than $200/oz over the past four sessions, a pretty impressive move for something that has maintained a low overall volatility.  The first explanation of the reversal, which coincided with a sharp gain in equity futures (see chart below) is that all the fear of the world ending with corresponding equity weakness and a need to hold gold, has ended!  Hooray!!!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Alas, just as I never believed the world was ending before, neither do I believe that everything is suddenly better.  Seemingly, this is all part of the process.  The idea that China could simply accept much of the stuff they produce would not be able to find a home in the US was never going to be the case.  I have no idea how things will work out, and they certainly will take a lot of time to come to some agreement, but it is very positive that the dialog has begun.

On the subject of which side blinked, which is a favorite for the punditry, especially those who despise dislike President Trump and believe this shows weakness on his part, I would note that the Chinese are the ones who have recently reported weaker economic data and last night the PBOC cut their 1-week reverse repo rate by 0.1% and reduced their Reserve Requirement Ratio by 50 basis points, both monetary easing measures to address the ongoing weakness in China.  Neither side benefits from this process in the short-term, but we will need to see the results of the talks, which will take many months I presume, before we know if goals have been achieved.

Away from the story on trade
The Fed story must be portrayed
Alas, it’s quite dull
As Jay and friends mull
The idea rate cuts be delayed

The only other story of note today is the FOMC meeting where they will release their policy statement at 2:00 this afternoon revealing no change in policy, and very likely almost no change in the wording, and then Chairman Powell will face the press at 2:30.  However, given the low probability of any changes, and given nothing regarding trade policy has really changed since they entered their quiet period, it seems unlikely that we will learn anything of consequence from Powell.  Today will be a complete non-event.

However, I cannot help but consider why the futures market appears so convinced that there are going to be rate cuts going forward this year.  As of this morning, the Fed funds futures are pricing a total of 78 basis points of cuts for the rest of this year, so three 25bp cuts as per the below chart from the CME.

Certainly, the data released thus far this year have not indicated the economy is heading into a tailspin.  Of course, there are many analysts calling for a recession to start in Q2 or Q3 as the tariff impacts ostensibly undermine the economy.  It is important to note, however, that these are the same analysts who have been calling for a recession for the past three years.  The boldest calls are for a period of stagflation, with the tariffs simultaneously killing growth and raising prices.

It is entirely possible that we see a recession this year, especially if government spending decreases given its role in supporting recent growth data.  (According to the BEA, Federal government spending in Q1 declined -5.1% while investment in the economy expanded more than 2%.). If this is the path forward, the long-term benefits will be substantial, but they must be maintained.  As well, if this is the path forward, total economic activity in the US will expand substantially and it is not clear that rate cuts will need to be part of that mix. 

Regardless, it seems that today’s activity is less likely to be impacted by the Fed than by any random headlines regarding trade or other administration maneuvers.  So, let’s see how markets have responded to the US-China trade talk news.

The China news came long after the close yesterday so the US markets closed lower on the session, approaching 1% declines, but US futures are currently higher by around 0.7% at 7:15.  In Asia, however, we did see some modest gains although the Nikkei (-0.15%) faded a bit, both China (0.6%) and Hong Kong (+0.15%) managed to rally.  As to the rest of the region, most markets were modestly higher although in a seeming sympathy move on the China news.  In Europe, bourses are softer this morning with the CAC (-0.7%) leading the way and other key indices falling less.  The data releases show Construction PMI softening on the continent as well as weak Eurozone Retail Sales (-0.1%), so I imagine that is weighing on investors’ minds today.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are 2bps firmer this morning but have been trading either side of 4.30% for the past several sessions as traders try to estimate the next big thing.  I see just as many stories about how yields are going to 10% as I do about how they are headed to 2% amid the depression coming, so my take is, we are going to range trade for a while yet.  In Europe, sovereign yields are lower by between -3bps (Germany) and -5bps (Italy) as that softer data is encouraging investors to believe that inflation will continue to decline and the ECB will cut further.

The commodity market has been where the real action is of late with oil (+0.9% today after +2.0% yesterday) rising after comments by two US oil companies that they will not be drilling any more if oil prices stay at these levels.  What I don’t understand is, what will they be doing as they are oil companies?  At any rate, this will be the tension in markets, who can afford to drill and sell oil at lower prices.  I expect we will hear from companies and pundits on both sides of this equation.  I discussed gold above, which has bounced slightly from its lowest levels overnight and I don’t believe anything will derail this train for a while yet.  However, both silver (-0.75%) and copper (-2.6%) are softer this morning, partly based on gold’s slide and partly on the weaker economy story.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer this morning, at least against its G10 counterparts with JPY (-0.6%) the weakest of the bunch, followed by SEK (-0.5%) and AUD (-0.3%).  The euro and pound are little changed and NOK (+0.15%) has gained on the back of oil’s strength.  In the EMG block, KRW (-1.1%) and TWD (-1.1%) have both rebounded some from their recent highs (dollar lows) in what seems more like a trading reaction than a change in policies.  Elsewhere in this bloc, though, MXN (+0.2%) is a touch stronger while ZAR (-0.5%) is a touch weaker and CNY is little changed.  There is a story making the rounds today that a well-known currency analyst, Steven Jen, is claiming that there could be as much as $2.5 trillion of excess currency reserves held by Asian nations that they may no longer need.  If this is true and these reserves were sold quickly, it would certainly drive the dollar much lower.  However, it strikes me that given the enormous amount of USD debt that has been issued by Asian companies and countries, and given these countries do not have access to Fed swap lines in emergencies, there is no reason to sell the dollars.  Rather they will simply have a ready supply without having to chase them when repayment and rollovers come due.  I would take this story with a large grain of salt.

Other than the Fed, we see EIA oil inventory data where some drawdowns are anticipated and that is really the day.  We are all awaiting the trade negotiation outcomes and I would say nobody has an inside track there.  Bigger picture, though, I do think the dollar has further to slide.

Good luck

Adf

More Pain

Posted on by

The data from China reflected
That tariffs have hurt, as expected
It’s likely more pain,
On China, will rain
As both nations are so connected
 
Meanwhile, in a German surprise
Herr Merz failed to get his allies
To name him to lead
Which seemed guaranteed
Could this presage his quick demise?

In the battle being waged between the US and China via tariffs, the first data indications have shown that the US is faring a bit better.  Yesterday’s ISM Services data was stronger than expected, remaining well above the 50 level although arguably slightly below the recent average reading.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Meanwhile, last night, the Chinese Caixin Services PMI fell to 50.7, missing expectations and continuing its drift lower over time.  

Source: tradingeconmics.com

Are things really worse in China than the US, at least from the perspective of data releases?  I think both nations will suffer during this period as the impacts of the tariffs and reduced trade bleed into the data over the next months, but so far, it seems the US is holding its own.  One of the problems with analyzing the issue is that as the WSJ pointed out yesterday, when the data in China gets bad, they simply stop releasing it, so it may be difficult to see.

Now, last night, Chinese shares did manage a nice rally with the CSI 300 higher by 1.0% but that follows six consecutive down sessions, albeit of modest size.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the renminbi, after a 1% gain last Friday, it has done little and remains very much in line with its levels of the past year.  The thing about China is that nothing there moves quickly, so absent a policy announcement of some type, I expect this activity will continue to gradually adjust to the realities as they become clear to the market.  If President Trump reduces tariffs, as he implied he would eventually, things could work better, but again, given the time lags of moving products across the Pacific, we have a lot of time between now and whatever the new normal turns out to be.

But the more interesting story to me overnight was that Friedrich Merz, the ostensible winner of the German elections last month failed to achieve the votes to be named Chancellor despite his coalition having a 12-seat majority in the Bundestag.  As it was a secret ballot, nobody knows who didn’t support him, but this outcome certainly calls into question both his ability to lead Germany effectively, and correspondingly, Germany’s ability to lead Europe in the new world order.

Recall, Germany remains keen to support Ukraine in its ongoing war with Russia and even destroyed their once sacrosanct fiscal responsibility in order to be able to pay for that support.  But if they do not have an effective leader, one who can command their parliament to enact his policies, it is not clear why other European nations would follow their lead on anything.  It should not be surprising that the DAX (-1.3%) fell sharply when the news was released, and that has helped drag most European shares lower (CAC -0.7%, IBEX -0.3%, Poland -3.3%).  As to the euro, you can see from the below chart that the response, when the news was announced, that it slipped about 0.5%, basically wiping out the gains it had achieved prior to the vote.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Will this matter in the long run?  I believe that a weakened Germany, which is likely the outcome of this situation, will simply undermine the euro’s value.  As such, while I still believe the dollar has further to decline, the euro will probably not be a major winner.  Look for other currencies to outperform the euro going forward.

Ok, I think those are the real stories as we head into today’s session with most market participants remaining tentative in the face of the ongoing confusion over policies, counter policies and macroeconomic data.  Remember, too, we have the Fed tomorrow and the BOE on Thursday, so despite the fact that fiscal policy has been the driver, the Fed’s opinions still carry weight amongst the fixed income community, at the very least.

Looking at the price action overnight, the Nikkei (+1.0%) gained on some solid earnings data from Japanese companies as well as increased hopes that the US-Japan trade talks will be successfully completed by June.  Apparently, there is also some faith that the US and China will begin talking soon on this subject.  Hong Kong (+0.7%) also benefitted from these discussions, but the rest of the region showed very little movement overall, with gains or losses on the order of 0.3% or less.  As we have already discussed Europe, a look at US futures shows they are pointing lower by about -0.5% at this hour (7:10).

Bond markets remain very dull these days with Treasury yields edging higher by 1bp this morning after climbing 3bps yesterday.  European sovereign yields are also higher. By 1bp to 2bps although there is neither data nor a story that seems to have had much impact.  The Services PMI data that was released this morning was very much in line with expectations and continues to hover around 50.0 for the continent as a whole.  Meanwhile, JGB yields were unchanged last night and sit at 1.25%, well below the levels seen back in late March and having really gone nowhere for the past month.  It strikes me that JGB yields will respond to any trade deals but are likely to be quiet in the interim.

Commodity prices are rallying this morning with oil (+2.2%) rebounding from its level yesterday which happen to come quite close to touching the lows from April 9th.  It should be no surprise that there are up days in this market, but if the Saudis and OPEC are going to continue increasing production, I expect that prices have further to fall.  In the metals markets, gold (+1.4%) is having another blockbuster day, now having gained $150/oz in the past three sessions and bouncing off the correction lows.  Demand for the barbarous relic continues to come from Asia mostly with all signs showing that US investors are not interested in this trade.  As to silver (+1.7%) and copper (+0.6%), they are both still along for the ride.

It should be no surprise with the commodity markets showing strength that the dollar is under pressure this morning.  while we’ve discussed the euro already, the pound (+0.5%) is looking quite solid as it continues its rally from the lows seen in mid-January.  But the yen (+0.5%), SEK (+0.45%) and NOK (+0.35%) are all gaining today as well.  Interestingly, the impact in emerging markets is far less noticeable with none of the major EMG currencies moving even 0.2% this morning.

On the data front, there is very little hard data this week although we do have the Fed on Wednesday and then a whole bunch of Fed speakers on Friday.

TodayTrade Balance-$137.0B
WednesdayFOMC Rate Decision4.50% (unchanged)
 Consumer Credit$9.5B
ThursdayBOE Rate Decision4.25% (-0.25%)
 Initial Claims230K
 Continuing Claims1890K
 Nonfarm Productivity-0.7%
 Unit Labor Costs5.1%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Today’s trade data is for March, prior to the tariff impositions, so will reflect significant tariff front-running.  But really, it’s about the Fed this week, and since they have lost much of their cachet lately, I think the market is really going to continue to look to the White House for trade news and react to that.  Net, I continue to believe that the dollar’s FX rate will be part of many trade discussions, like we saw with Taiwan (which by the way did reverse 3% of yesterday’s gain overnight) and that means further weakness is in our future.

Good luck

Adf

The Future As Fraught

Posted on by

Though I’ve been away near a week
From what I read things are still bleak
Two months have gone by
Since stocks touched the sky
And traders all want a new peak
 
Meanwhile, GDP fell ‘neath nought
And lots see the future as fraught
The popular claim
Is Trump is to blame
And rue all the things he has wrought

 

I worked hard not to pay close attention to markets while I was away last week in an effort to get some true relaxation.  And now that I’m back at my desk, I can see that I didn’t miss anything at all.  The narratives remain the same, the split between those who believe everything the president says/does is a disaster and those who believe everything he says/does is brilliant has not changed at all.  In other words, life continues as do all the arguments.

A review of the data last week showed two key outcomes, the labor market remains far more resilient than the recessionistas will accept and jobs continue to be created.  For some reason, that seems like good news to me, but then I am not a highly paid economist with a narrative to stoke.  On the other hand, Q1 GDP printed at -0.3%, the first negative print in 3 years, but also one that is easily explained by the rush of imports that occurred prior to the imposition of tariffs in early April.  Remember, imports subtract from Gross DomesticProduct.  However, a look under the hood of this number shows that the positive news was government activity declined while private sector investment exploded higher.  It strikes me that this is the best possible direction for the US economy going forward.

In China, it seems Xi’s decided
That data has been too one-sided
So, henceforth they’ll furnish
Just data to burnish
The views Xi and friends have provided

Turning to the more recent stories, though, the WSJ had a very interesting take on the fact that China’s statistical output is shrinking quite rapidly as data that has been trending lower suddenly stops being produced.  The below chart from the article on National Land Sales is an excellent depiction of things, and likely an indication that land sales, which are critical to local government finances, have become even a bigger problem over the past three years than when the property market first started melting down in early 2021.

It is worth noting that in this trade war between the US and China, while much of the punditry continues to insist that China has the upper hand as the stuff they sell to the US is more critical and less replaceable than the stuff the US sells to them, I have maintained things are not necessarily that easy.  The US is facing a supply shock, and will need time to work it through, but the US economy is the most dynamic in the world, and these issues will be resolved.  China faces a demand shock, which in economic theory should be easier to address, but which in China’s reality has not proven to be the case.  Consider that Xi and the CCP have been creating fiscal stimulus plans since Covid without any serious success.  In fact, the Chinese have openly stated that they are seeking to shift the production/consumption mix of the nation closer to Western standards of 60%-70% consumption from their current 45%-50% level.  It hasn’t worked yet, and I see no reason to believe that is going to change.  We must never forget the US is the consumer of last resort, and if China doesn’t have access to this market, it is a major problem for them.

I have no inside knowledge of how things are evolving on this issue, but here’s my take; while Xi doesn’t need to worry about being elected, he still needs to ensure that China’s economy grows sufficiently to increase the well-being of his population.  Whatever the official statistics have shown, it is clear that things in China are not what they would have the rest of the world believe and that is a problem for Xi.  Meanwhile, Trump will not face another election and was elected with a pretty broad mandate.  I believe given the timing of the mid-term elections, he has another 9-12 months to get things done and will play hardball with China to do so.  In fact, I have a feeling that Trump may have the upper hand.  This will be settled by the autumn is my view.

Ok, let’s turn to markets and what happened in the overnight session.  Looking first at currencies for a change, I couldn’t help but notice the following chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I also couldn’t help but notice the following comment from the Taiwanese central bank in response to a question about whether the FX rate is on the table in the trade negotiations.  (As an aside, @PIQSuite is an excellent follow on X.  Key market headlines on a real-time basis with other things available as well.)

The question of whether FX rates would be part of the trade talks seems to have been answered, and the answer is yes.  Perhaps there will not need to be a Mar-a-Lago accord after all regarding revaluing gold and terming out bonds.  Instead, the pressures will be relieved on a country-by-country basis with each trade deal.  

While the TWD revaluation of 10% over the past 2 sessions is the most dramatic, the dollar is generally lower this morning against both G10 and EMG currencies.  In the G10, AUD (+0.85%) leads the way but JPY (+0.7%), NOK (+0.6%) and CHF (+0.5%) are all pushing higher.  This must be music to President Trump’s ears.  As to the emerging markets, KRW (+2.5%), is the next biggest mover although they admitted that FX rates were part of the trade discussions.  SGD (+0.8%) has also seen a relatively large move and INR (+0.4%) is moving in that direction.  It seems clear that Asia is the focus of both the administration and the markets this morning.  The rest of the EMG bloc has seen much smaller gains, between +0.25% and +0.5%, with CNY (+0.15%) really doing very little.

Turning to the equity markets, last week clearly finished on a strong note and, in fact, since I last wrote, the S&P 500 has rallied a bit more than 2% and is higher by more than 14% since April 8th.  Apparently, the world has not yet ended, but there hasn’t been a new high in the stock market in more than 3 months, and people are edgy!  As to the overnight session, the Nikkei (+1.0%) rallied along with the Hang Seng (+1.75%) although Mainland shares (CSI 300 -0.1%) showed little life.  Elsewhere in the region, Taiwan (-1.25%) and Australia (-1.0%) felt the most pressure and the rest were mixed with much smaller movements.  In Europe, indices are mixed as earnings data from each country are the drivers amid a lack of broad-based news.  So, the UK (+1.2%) and Germany (+0.6%) are firmer while France (-0.6%) is lagging on the back of some weaker earnings numbers.  As to the US, futures are pointing lower by about -0.7% across the board at this hour (7:15).

In the bond market, last week saw Treasury yields jump sharply after the better-than-expected payroll report, finishing the day 9bps higher, although still within the middle of the trading range since February and lower on the year.  This morning, they are basically unchanged while European sovereign yields have slipped by about -2bps across the board. The picture there continues to focus on the uptick in fiscal spending that is expected and the borrowing that will be needed to pay for it.  However, there is still a strong view that the ECB will be cutting rates going forward.

Lastly, in the commodity markets, oil (-1.15%) is sliding again as OPEC+ has promised to continue to increase production.  There are two takes on this activity, both of which probably have some truth.  First is the idea that President Trump has made a deal with MBS in Saudi Arabia to increase production and drive prices lower. Remember, lower energy prices are a boon to the US (and the world).  But added to that is the idea that MBS agreed so he can help force fracking production to pull back and regain market share for OPEC+.  However, regardless of the rationale, nothing has changed my view that oil prices are heading lower, and I still like the $50/bbl level as a target.  As to the metals, gold (+2.3%) which has been under pressure for several weeks in a correction, seems to have found support below $3300/oz and could well be setting up for another leg higher. This has taken silver (+1.3%) and copper (+.8%) along for the ride.  If the dollar is going to continue lower, metals prices should remain quite firm.

On the data front, today only brings ISM Services (exp 50.6), but really, all eyes will be on the FOMC meeting on Wednesday.  I will highlight the rest of the week’s data tomorrow morning.

The past month has seen significant volatility in markets as participants did not correctly estimate the potential moves in trade policy.  At this point, it seems those questions are being answered, with President Trump even hinting some deals could be finalized this week.  I believe we are going to see trade announcements that include new FX goals, and they will be pushing the dollar lower across the board.  While I don’t see a collapse coming, that is the trend for now.

Good luck

Adf

Too Much Debt

Posted on by

In Spain, electricity failed
In Canada, Carney prevailed
But markets don’t care
As movement’s quite spare
It seems many traders have bailed
 
But problems, worldwide, still abound
Though right now, they’re in the background
There’s far too much debt
And still a real threat
That no true solutions are found

 

The two biggest stories of the past twenty-four hours were clearly the national scale blackout in Spain and Portugal yesterday, and the slim victory for Mark Carney in Canada, where the Liberal Party appears to have a plurality, but not a majority, and will oversee a minority government.

Touching on the second story first, in truth there is not much to discuss.  Much has been made of the vote being an anti-Trump statement with the idea that Carney is better placed to defend Canada from President Trump’s (imagined) predations.  However, given the lack of a majority government, it is not clear how effective this line of reasoning will prove.  As there is no futures market for the TSX, we really don’t have a sense yet of how the Canadian equity market will greet the news.  Yesterday’s modest gains of 0.35% amid a general atmosphere of modest gains doesn’t really tell much of a tale.  As to CAD (-0.1% today), a quick look at the past week shows it has done nothing even in the wake of the news. (see below).  My take is this is a nothingburger event, a perfect description for Mark Carney, a nothingburger of a politician.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the story about Spain’s electricity, I think it may be more instructive on two levels.  The first is as a warning to the risks inherent of powering your electric grid with more than 25% – 30% intermittent, renewable energy sources like wind and solar.  It is somewhat ironic that just twelve days prior to the blackout, Spain’s entire electricity requirement was met by solar, wind and hydro power, the Green dream.  Alas, here we are now and while no answers have yet been forthcoming, and I assume the media will downplay any blame on too much renewable power, virtually every engineering study has shown that once a grid has more than that 25% renewables, it tends towards instability.  This issue will be argued by both sides for a while, although as always, physics will be the final arbiter.  

But I have to wonder if the sudden failure of the electric grid is an omen of sorts, for what may be happening in global markets.  If we analogize global supply chains to the electrical grid, over the course of the past 50 years, we have seen the world create a massively complex web of trade with raw materials, intermediate goods and final products all crisscrossing the world.  There have been myriad benefits to all involved with real per capita economic benefits abounding, and for everybody reading this note, the ability to essentially buy whatever you want/need with limited interference and trouble.  Certainly, the availability of everyday necessities like food and clothing is widespread.

However, underpinning that bounty were two networks.  The first being the obvious one, the supply chains which since Covid have been much discussed by the punditry.  But the second, which gets far less notice is the network of debt that is issued around the world by governments and companies, as well as taken on by individuals, and that has grown to be more than 3x the entire global economic output.  While we most often read about the US government debt which is quickly approaching $37 trillion, total global debt is much greater than that.  In fact, at this point, the debt market is not about issuing new debt to fund new investment, rather it is almost entirely a refinancing mechanism.  

It is this latter issue that should concern us all.  What happens if, one day, the ability to refinance some of that debt, whether US Treasuries, German bunds or Chinese government bonds, has a hiccup of some sort?  A failed US Treasury auction, where the Fed is required to purchase bonds, or a power outage in a key financial center that prevents trades from being confirmed/settled and moneys not moving as expected, or some other force majeure type event that disrupts the current smooth functioning of global debt markets.  

Frankly, the combination of the changes being wrought by President Trump to the global economy, where globalization is giving way to mercantilism, and the significant weight of global debt that hangs over the global economy and is given very little thought seems a potentially volatile mix.

Ironically, as much as I have lately been describing how the Fed’s role seems to have diminished, in the event that something upsets this apple cart, the Fed will be the only game in town.  While this is not a today event, it is something we must not forget.

I apologize for my little diatribe, but with so little ongoing in markets, and the parallel to the Spanish electrical grid, it seemed timely.  Let’s look at markets.  Asian equity markets were mixed with the main markets very quiet but a couple of 1% gainers (Australia, Taiwan and Korea) although the rest of the region was +/- 0.3% or less.  Too, volumes were quite lethargic.  In Europe, it should be no surprise that Spain (-0.8%) is the laggard today as the first economists’ to opine on the impact of the blackout said it could be a hit of as much as 0.5% of GDP.  Germany (+0.6%) is the other side of the coin after the GfK Consumer Confidence reading came out at a better than expected -20.6.  Now, maybe it’s just me, but if I look at the past 5 years’ worth of this index, it is difficult to get excited about German economic prospects.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Yes, this was a better reading, but either the people of Germany are manic depressive, or the index is indicative of major structural problems in the country.  Maybe a bit of both.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:10) they are basically unchanged after being basically unchanged yesterday.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have bounced 2bps this morning after touching their lowest level in 3 weeks yesterday.  European sovereign yields, though, are all softer by 1bp to 2bps this morning as comments from ECB members seem to highlight more rate cuts as Europe achieves their inflation target and are now getting concerned they will fall below the 2.0% rate.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.7%) is under pressure this morning ostensibly on a combination of concerns over slowing growth and little movement in the US-China trade talks as well as a report that Kazakhstan is pushing up output and other OPEC+ members are talking about increasing production further when they meet next week.  Meanwhile, gold (-0.75%), which rallied back to unchanged in NY yesterday is once again finding sellers at its recent trading pivot of $3340ish (H/T Alyosha).  However, gold’s slide has not impacted either silver (+0.4%) or copper (+0.9%) at least so far in the session.

Finally, the dollar is firmer, largely across the board, this morning.  The euro (-0.3%), pound (-0.4%), JPY (-0.4%) and CHF (-0.6%) are all under some pressure, perhaps profit taking.  But in truth, other than INR (+0.15%) the rest of the major currencies, both G10 and EMG, are all softer vs. the greenback.  I guess the dollar’s demise will need to wait at least one more day.

On the data front, the Goods Trade Balance (exp -$146B), Case Shiller Home Prices (4.7%) and JOLTs Job Openings (7.48M) are the main numbers, although we also see Consumer Confidence (87.5).  But with no Fed discussions much more crucial data on Thursday (GDP, PCE) and Friday (NFP) it seems that today is setting up for not much excitement.

In fact, lack of excitement seems the best description of markets right now.  I don’t know what the next catalyst will be to change things, but absent peace in one of the wars, kinetic or trade, or another force majeure event, it feels like range trading is the order of the day for a while.  My big picture view of a slowly declining dollar is still intact, but day-to-day, it’s hard to see much right now.

Good luck

Adf

Be Quite Scared

Posted on by

The pundits have now all declared
That everyone should be quite scared
It will be a bummer
When shelves, come this summer
Are empty, so please be prepared
 
As well, a recession’s in view
Although, that seems like déjà vu
For three years at least
The pundits increased
The odds that this bill would come due

 

Apparently, the only thing you need to know this morning is that by summertime, shelves across the country will be barren as imports from China halt.  The upshot, at least according to the sources that I have read, is that you should blame President Trump and join the media chorus in hating the man and his policies.

Now, I am no logistics expert, but the concern stems from the significant decline in shipping as evidenced by port activity in both China and the US.  As you can see from the chart below, there has certainly been a significant decline in the number of ships leaving China on their way to the US.

I guess the question is just how much of what is on store shelves comes from China?  Much will depend on what kind of store one considers.  Certainly, toy stores seem likely to have less inventory, as will Best Buy with electronics potentially suffering, although as I recall President Trump exempted electronics initially.  Arguably, clothing shelves and racks may be sparser as well.  But based on official data, Chinese imports (~$463B) accounted for approximately 1.7% of the US’s $26.9T GDP in 2024.  This may be an overreaction.

Potentially a bigger issue will be the impact on intermediate goods that are imported from China and elsewhere and incorporated into products finalized in the US.  However, I cannot calculate that, nor have I seen any data of this issue, although I have read many stories about the end of this particular world as well.

One of the things to remember about the punditry is that they make their living describing the worst possible outcome because that gets them recognition.  However, I’m confident we all remember that a recession was forecast for 2022, 2023 and 2024 by much of the punditry and yet one was never officially declared by the NBER.  In fact, you may recall that in Q1 and Q2 of 2022, US Real GDP growth was -0.2% for both quarters, thus two consecutive quarters of negative growth.  Historically, that has defined a recession.  However, subsequent data revisions did remove that as you can see below with Q2 revised higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The one thing I do know is that there is a group of analysts/economists who have been forecasting the next recession consistently for several years.  They point to data like changes in the housing market, the JOLTs Quits rate shrinking and various other secondary and tertiary data points and sources, all of which have been pointing in that direction for several years.  And I grant, reading that ~40% of GenZ is using BNPL to buy their groceries, and then run late on payments, is a frightening statistic (although perhaps one that highlights financial illiteracy more than economic reality).

In the end, what you need to know is you should be terrified because the punditry is almost certain that this time, they have it right.  But our concern is how will this scenario impact markets.

Basically, despite all this huffing and puffing, it appears markets are whistling past this particular graveyard.  Friday’s US equity rally was followed by general strength in Asia and strength this morning in Europe.  Last night, Tokyo (+0.4%), Mumbai (+1.3%), Taiwan (+0.8%) and Australia (+0.4%) all had solid performances although neither Hong Kong (-0.1%) nor China (-0.15%) could find any real buying support.  A less reported story is that China is exempting a number of US imports from its 125% tariffs on the US as clearly, this trading relationship is deep and complex.

As to Europe, all markets are ahead this morning, with the UK (+0.4%) the laggard and most of the continent higher by between 0.7% and 0.8%.  There are headlines around as to how the ECB is preparing to cut rates further on the assumption that global economic activity is going to slow and thus hurt Europe, while the consistent message is that US tariffs will be deflationary in Europe, so less concerns about their inflation mandate.  Finally, US futures are pointing slightly softer (-0.2%) at this hour (6:45).

In the bond market, 10-year Treasury yields have fallen 30bps in the past two and one-half weeks, sliding 5bps on Friday before bouncing 3bps overnight. However, the recent trend does seem lower.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But yields are climbing in Europe as well today, higher by 5bps across the board on the continent, although UK Gilts have only edged higher by 2bps.  It’s funny, despite all the doom and gloom regarding the economy because of US tariffs, as well as growing expectations of an ECB rate cut at the early June meeting, investors appear to be growing concerned about something.  Perhaps they have pivoted back to the promised fiscal spending increases as their driver today.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.35%) continues to trade in its recent $60 – $63/bbl range with limited signs that this will soon change.  Peace in Ukraine does not seem at hand yet and reports are that the initial discussions between the US and Iran, while constructive, still have a ways to go before completion.  Both of those seem likely to weigh on oil prices if completed.  However, the more unusual thing to me is that with the rising chorus of recession calls, oil’s price has not fallen further.  To date, markets have not yet agreed with the economists’ view that recession is imminent.  In the metals markets, gold (-1.0%) is continuing its rough week, although remains nicely higher on the month.  You may recall my view a week ago Friday that the move seemed parabolic and due for a correction.  Recent price action is exactly that, corrective, as I believe the underlying thesis to own the barbarous relic remains intact.  The other main metals are a touch softer this morning, but really nothing to discuss.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning with modest strength against the euro (-0.15%) but softness vs. the pound (+0.15%) and those size moves are representative of most of the price action across both G10 and EMG currencies this morning. The outlier is KRW (-0.4%), which seems to be suffering from comments that no trade deal will be completed before June’s election there.

Overall, despite ongoing doom and gloom by much of the punditry, it is not obvious to me that investors are anticipating major changes.  Perhaps they are wrong, and the pundits are correct.  But as yet, there is no evidence to support that conclusion.

Ok, let’s turn to the data this week, which starts slowly but ends on NFP.

TuesdayGoods Trade Balance-$146.0B
 Case-Shiller Home Prices4.8%
 JOLTs Job Openings7.5M
WednesdayADP Employment108K
 Q1 GDP0.4%
 Q1 Employment Cost Index0.9%
 Chicago PMI45.5
 Personal Income0.4%
 Personal Spending0.6%
 PCE0.0% (2.2% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.1% (2.6% Y/Y)
ThursdayInitial Claims225K
 Continuing Claims1860K
 ISM Manufacturing48.0
 ISM Prices Paid70.2
FridayNonfarm Payrolls135K
 Private Payrolls127K
 Manufacturing Payrolls-5K
 Unemployment Rate4.2%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.2
 Participation Rate62.5%
 Factory Orders4.5%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As well as NFP, we get the PCE data, which looks like it has changed to a 10:00am release from its traditional 8:30am time.  The Fed is in its quiet period, but nobody has been listening to them anyway.  Secretary Bessent, along with President Trump, has been the most important voice lately.  Again, for now, the data has not indicated recession, although Q1 GDP is slated to be soft.  Markets, too, have been unwilling to get behind the recession call completely. 

Ultimately, the one thing we know is that the nature of the global economy has changed since President Trump’s election.  Globalization is in retreat and mercantilism is the new normal.  It is not clear to me that existing econometric models will accurately portray how that works, so I need to see more data before recognizing the end of times.  In the meantime, these myriad views are a sign that hedging for risk managers remains the only path forward.

Good luck

Adf

That Man is Our Bane

Posted on by

Apparently, back in the day
Investors and CEOs say
The future was clear
But now they all fear
Uncertainty is in their way
 
So, they will now clearly explain
When earnings and profits do wane
That they’re not to blame
Instead, they now claim
It’s Trump’s fault, that man is our bane

 

I’m having some difficulty understanding a number of the concerns about which I read every day as more and more corporate executives and investment managers have suddenly found a new scapegoat, uncertainty.  Apparently, I missed the time when the future was certain, as I have no recollection of that at all.  Perhaps you remember.  If so, could you remind me please?

For instance, I remember the certitude of the comments from the RBA back in April 2021 that interest rates would remain lower for longer, and that it would be at least three years before they would need to raise interest rates.  I also remember, as the graph below demonstrates, that certainty was misplaced as less than two months after those comments, the RBA started raising interest rates despite the clear directive they would not need to do so for years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While this is just one example, in my experience, certainty is not part of the mix when running a business or a portfolio of assets or a position in any financial market.  So imagine my surprise when reading Bloomberg this morning and finding that suddenly, the world is awash in uncertainty.  Has it ever not been the case?  Pretty much once you get beyond the laws of physics or mathematics, it strikes me that certainty in the future just doesn’t exist. (Even at 4Imprint).  Nonetheless, uncertainty because of President Trump’s trade policies is the latest rationale for every problem at every company right now.  In truth, I suspect that many executives are quite happy with this as the Covid excuse was wearing thin.

In the markets, too, uncertainty is the favored excuse for underperformance as how can anyone manage money with tape bombs constantly appearing.  Powell is a loser one day to I’m not going to fire Powell the next.  Tariffs are forever to a 90-day pause.  And of course, there are many other political stories that have limited impact on markets but seem to change regularly.  While this gets back to my view that President Trump is the avatar of volatility, I seem to recall long before President Trump that there were numerous presidential statements that had major market impacts.  My point is, nothing has really changed folks, other than the media dislikes this president more than any other in my lifetime so amplifies anything they think makes him look bad.

However, the one thing about which we cannot be surprised is that trading activity is waning, at least compared to what we saw since Trump’s inauguration.  Volumes of activity on the exchanges are sliding (see chart of S&P 500 volume below from ycharts.com) which makes perfect sense in a volatile and uncertain market.  

Now, as per the above, I would contend that the future is always uncertain.  Rather the real culprit here is volatility.  My take is that the future is going to continue to be volatile which implies, to me at least, that trading activity is going to remain on the low side and with it, liquidity for those who have significant real flows to transact.  It’s funny, volatility begets lower volumes, and lower volumes beget volatility due to reduced liquidity.  I’m not sure what it will take to break us from this cycle, but I have a sense that it will be with us for a while.

With that in mind, let’s see what happened overnight.  Yesterday’s strength in the US was followed by strength in Tokyo (+1.9%) although both China (+0.1%) and Hong Kong (+0.3%) didn’t really participate.  Interestingly, this morning I read that China was exempting a number of imports from the US from tariffs as apparently, it was hurting their businesses so severely it could cause closures.  Elsewhere in Asia, the picture was mixed although there were more gainers (Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, Thailand) than laggards (India, Singapore).  I do believe the tariff story is impacting these markets more than any as they are directly in the line of fire.

Meanwhile, in Europe, most markets are firmer this morning (DAX +0.6%, CAC +0.4%, IBEX +0.9%) but the UK (-0.1%) is lagging despite much stronger than expected Retail Sales data there this morning.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are pointing lower by about -0.35%.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to slide, down another -3bps this morning although Europe is moving in the opposite direction, with yields climbing between 2bps and 3bps in the session.  It’s odd because I continue to hear about European growth forecasts being cut and the ECB preparing for more rate cuts while the talk around the markets is that the US is going to see inflation from the tariffs.  Today’s bond moves don’t really speak to those narratives, but it is just one day.  I need to mention JGB yields, which rose 3bps overnight after Tokyo CPI came in 2 ticks hotter than forecast at both headline and core levels.  

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.2%) is slipping again and has consistently demonstrated it is unable to make any dent in the major price gap above the market.  To close that gap, WTI will need to rally more than $8/bbl from current levels, something I just don’t see happening in the current environment.  That would require a war in Iran I think.  As to metals, yesterday’s gold rally has been reversed (-1.5%) and today it is impacting both silver (-0.75%) and copper (-2.1%) as is the stronger dollar it seems.

Speaking of the dollar, Monday’s narrative that the dollar was about to collapse will need at least another day to come to fruition as it is modestly higher again this morning.  looking at the DXY as a proxy, it is trading just below 100, a level that many are watching closely.  A quick look at the chart below shows this is the third time in the past two years it has traded to this level, although the first of those times it broke through.  Of course, it was much lower just a couple years earlier.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Today’s dollar strength is modest but broad-based with only CLP (+0.6%) higher this morning which makes absolutely no sense given copper’s slide today.  The worst performer is SEK (-0.8%) but given it has been the best performer YTD amongst the G10, perhaps this is just corrective.  Otherwise, we are looking at movements on the order of 0.25% to 0.45% across the board.

The only data this morning is Michigan Sentiment (exp 50.8).  We continue to see a dichotomy between the ‘hard’ data, Claims, NFP, CPI, Factory Orders, and the ‘soft’ data, Michigan Sentiment, PMI, inflation expectations with the former holding in well while the latter weakens.  Many analysts believe that recession is coming our way by summer, but these same analysts have been predicting the recession for the past 3 years.  The one thing about the US economy is that it is extraordinarily resilient despite all the things governments try to do to disrupt it.  I understand the concern, at least if you watch/read the news, but I have a sense that many people across the nation do not really do that.  While I believe that equity valuations remain too high to be sustainable, it is not clear to me that the economy is heading into a recession at this time.  As to the dollar, I wouldn’t write its obituary just yet, although I do think it will soften further over time.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

They Will Get Burned

Posted on by

In Europe, the corporate elite
Have started, their worries, to bleat
They’re now quite concerned
That they will get burned
If dollar sales start to retreat
 
For years, when the dollar was rising
Weak unit sales, it was disguising
But now the buck’s falling
Which they find appalling
As earnings forecasts, they’re downsizing
 

Markets are very interesting constructs.  Not only do they help find a clearing price for supply and demand of something, but they also tend to take on anthropomorphic characteristics in many eyes as some type of creature beyond anyone’s control, but with a tinge of malevolence.  Part of that latter feeling comes from markets’ ability to make every pundit seem like a fool.  After all, it was just 3 days ago when I was reliably informed by the punditry that equity values were set to collapse as the US economy entered a depression.  It seems we may have to wait a few more days for that situation to play out.  And, in fact, they have now changed their tune.  While ascribing the rebound to President Trump’s reversal on some issues, the overall doom and gloom story has moved to the background.  But if there is one thing I have continuously discussed since Trump’s election is that volatility was very likely to increase, and that has certainly been the case. 

Shifting our focus to the FX markets, though, I couldn’t help but chuckle at a Bloomberg article this morning titled, The Dollar’s Slide is Raising Red Flags for Corporate Earnings.  As I am based in the US, the fact that this was a front-page article had me somewhat confused.  A long career in speaking with corporate accounts on FX made it clear that a weak dollar was the best thing for earnings of US multinationals.  Generally, when the dollar was strong, CFOs would ascribe any earnings problems to that issue as a catch-all excuse, but when the dollar declined, outperformance by a company was the result of brilliant execution.

So, you can understand my initial confusion.  But upon reading the article, it turns out they were talking about European corporates, who for the first time in three years find that hedging their US dollar sales is critical.  Not only that, but they have also been quick to highlight that all new hedges will be at worse rates and therefore future earnings are already sure to be impacted.  Now, a quick look at the chart below does show that the euro has risen to its highest level in three years.  But it also shows that compared to the past 20 years, the euro is nowhere near high levels. In fact, it sits well below the median price (somewhere in the 40th percentile actually).  Perhaps European corporate Treasurers have simply forgotten their history.  Or more likely, just like US corporate Treasurers when the dollar is rising, they are seeking a scapegoat.

I cannot emphasize enough that the FX rate is not the driver, but the release valve for all the things that happen in the global economy.  Other actions take place, whether interest rate changes, policy or market, economic adjustments, policy or market, or exogenous events, and the FX rate is the place where equilibria are found.  In fact, arguably, that is the biggest flaw in the Trump administration’s idea that if they weaken the dollar, it will solve policy problems.  The dollar is the tail to the economy’s dog.

In the meantime, the reason one runs a hedge program with consistency is to mitigate the big moves in FX and their impacts on earnings.  But remember, even the best hedge programs lag large secular moves.

Ok, I’ll step down off my high horse and let’s look at how markets behaved overnight.  After yesterday’s second consecutive rally in the US, the picture elsewhere in the world is more mixed.  In Asia, the Nikkei (+0.5%) continued its rebound but the Hang Seng (-0.75%) and CSI 300 (-0.1%) saw no benefit overnight.  Elsewhere in the region winners and losers were pretty evenly split and nobody saw a movement of more than 0.8% in either direction.  In Europe, red is today’s color, but it’s a pale red with losses across the board of the 0.1% to 0.25% variety.  The only news overnight was German Ifo data, which showed a bit of a surprising uptick in the current business climate as well as expectations.  Perhaps the promise of more German fiscal largesse is outweighing concerns over tariffs.  As to US futures, they, too, are lower by about -0.15% at this hour (7:20).

In the bond market, yields are sliding around the world with Treasuries (-3bps) continuing to back away from their recent highs while European sovereigns see yields decline between -3bps and -4bps.  Even JGB yields slipped -1bp overnight.  My take is some of the fear has ebbed away from the market.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.1%) remains in its recent trading range, with a still very large gap above the market in price terms.  The demand story seems fixed at weakening demand because of either slowing growth, or the electrification of everything or something like that, while the supply story is starting to see hints that oil companies are going to back off production with prices at current levels.  The latter feels like the larger short-term risk, although nothing has changed my longer-term view of lower prices here.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.7%) is rebounding after a difficult two days, arguably some real profit taking was seen.  Meanwhile silver (-0.5%) which actually outperformed gold for the past two sessions is giving some of those gains back and copper (+0.8%) is continuing its rebound after a dramatic decline from the all-time highs seen just one month ago.  Talk about a V-shaped recovery!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is softer this morning, giving back about half of yesterday’s 1% gains.  In the G10, SEK and NOK (both +1.1%) are leading the way although the euro (+0.6%) is having a good day, as is the yen (+0.75%). The pound (+0.5%) is a bit of a laggard but after seeing this interview of Ed Miliband (UK Secretary of Energy and Climate Change), and his either inability to understand the implications of his policy, or his willingness to lie about it, I cannot believe the pound will continue to track the euro.  The UK’s energy policy appears designed to destroy the UK economy.  Consider that solar power is a key pillar of their future efforts to achieve net zero carbon emissions, and the UK is the nation that gets the least solar coverage in the world.  After all, it rains there half the time.  Meanwhile, the government is keen to end all other sources of energy.  No matter what you think of President Trump’s policies, they are not nationally suicidal like the UK’s.

Turning to the EMG bloc, gains are the norm, but not universal.  The CE4 are doing well but ZAR (-0.2%) and KRW (-0.6%) with the latter suffering from weaker than expected GDP growth in Q1 while the former, after a strong run since early in April, appears to merely be taking a breather.

We finally see some notable data this morning with Initial (exp 222K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims, Durable Goods (2.0%, 0.3% ex-Transport) and the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (0.11) all at 8:30, then at 10:00 we get Existing Home Sales (4.13M).  Yesterday saw New Home Sales pick up more than expected and the Beige Book indicate that economic activity was unchanged from the past, but uncertainty had risen.

Here’s what we know; the world is not ending but it is continuing to change from the structures created in the post WWII period.  This process is just beginning and anybody who claims to know where things are headed is lying.  I continue to believe in my bigger picture views, but day to day, there is no rhyme or reason, especially given the importance of headline bingo.

Good luck

Adf

Very Near Future

Posted on by

The “very near future” is when
The US and China, again
Will restart their talks
Assuming no balks
By either of these august men
 
That’s all that the market required
For buyers to get so inspired
Can this idea last?
Or will it have passed
Ere market resolve has expired

 

While all and sundry have been very confident that President Trump’s attempt to alter the structure of the global economy and world trade to a more beneficial one, in his view for the US, will fail dismally and that we are doomed to stagflation as prices rise and the economy sinks, it seems these same economic analysts have forgotten that there are two sides to the supply/demand equation.  I have written before that despite all the slings and arrows that have been aimed at Trump, the US has a very strong hand in the trade game given it is THE CONSUMER OF LAST RESORT.  Virtually every nation in the world has built an economy designed to be able to manufacture stuff cheaply and sell it into the largest economy in the world.

And US consumers are remarkable in their ability to continue to consume at high levels despite what appear to be significant headwinds, whether high financing costs, limited savings or slowing economic activity.  But a funny thing is happening on the way to this mooted US stagflation, it’s not happening yet.  In fact, as described by economist Daniel Lacalle in his most recent post, it seems that the biggest problem is not that Americans cannot find what they want to buy, it is that they only bought all this stuff because it was cheap.  They will not accept significant price rises and so inventory is building up at factories while ships are stuck with containers full of stuff nobody wants, at the price.  Could it be that President Trump read the room better than the economists?

I use this as preamble to yesterday’s massive equity rebound which was, ostensibly, triggered by comments from Treasury Secretary Bessent that substantive trade talks with China would begin in the “very near future.”  Subsequent soothing comments by the President indicated that the days of 125% tariffs were numbered but there would be tariffs in place.  As well, Mr Trump explicitly said he has no intention to fire Fed Chair Powell, despite his recent diatribe that Powell is always late to the party and should cut rates.  Certainly, I agree the Fed is, and will always be, late to the party as long as they use a data driven approach.  After all, by the time economic change is reflected in the data, whatever is going to change has already done so.  However, I don’t yet see the rationale for cutting rates given the current economic data and the fact that inflation remains a problem.

As of this morning, following significant equity rallies around the world, one might come to believe that all the world’s problems have been successfully addressed.  The fact that one would be wrong in that belief is the best example of ‘the market is not the economy’.  But, hey, let’s take the rallies when they come!

From a market perspective, that was really the big story yesterday and continuing into today.  Flash PMI data is not that exciting, and all the other headlines revolve around the ongoing immigration/deportation issues plus RFK Jr’s edict to remove petroleum-based food coloring from foods.  So, let’s look at the markets and recap the action.

The 2.5% to 3.0% gains in the US were followed by Tokyo (+1.9%) and Hong Kong (+2.4%) performing well but nothing like Taiwan (+4.5%).  The laggard last night was China (+0.1%) with other regional exchanges showing gains between 0.5% and 1.5%.  Net, I suppose everybody was happy.  In Europe this morning, the screens are green as well, with Germany (+2.6%) leading the way followed by France (+2.2%) and the UK (+1.3%).  Again, the trade story appears to be the leading driver.  And, adding to the joy, US futures are also higher between 2.0% (DJIA) and 3.0% (NASDAQ) this morning as of 6:50.  And to think, just two days ago I was assured that the end was nigh.  A quick look at the S&P 500 chart below does give a flavor for just how much volatility we have seen on a day-to-day basis and how narrative changes continue to have huge impacts.

Source: tradingecomics.com

At the same time, Treasury yields have been retracing, lower by -8bps this morning with UK gilts (-6bps) also performing well, although continental European sovereigns are not seeing the same demand with bunds (+3bps) the laggard despite the weakest PMI readings with both Manufacturing and Services below 50.0, lower than last month and far lower than forecasts.  The narrative of money leaving the US and heading back to Europe is certainly appealing, and seems quite reasonable as a long-term metric, but it is not clear to me that it will be driving daily price action in any market.

In commodities, oil (+1.0%) continues to edge higher although it has not yet come close to filling that massive gap lower from the beginning of the month.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

From a fundamental perspective, fears of a US recession, which remain high, as well as the IMF recently reducing their global growth forecast seem to be undermining the demand side of the equation.  Meanwhile, the opportunity for significant new supply (Iran deal, Russia peace) seems quite real.  I’m no oil trader but it strikes me the risk-reward here is for a further drop in prices.  As to the metals markets, gold (-0.4%) fell more than $100/oz yesterday, so perhaps my view that the parabolic move was too much was correct.  However, I believe this is a short-term, and much needed, correction with the long-term story fully intact.  Meanwhile, silver (+1.4%) and copper (+0.4%) are modestly higher after quiet sessions yesterday.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning against most of its counterparts, but this is not a universal situation.  While both the euro and pound have fallen -0.25%, AUD (+0.6%) is showing some oomph as it figures to be one of the key beneficiaries of a trade agreement between the US and China, no matter how far in the future.  Other key gainers are KRW (+0.6%) and CNY (+0.3%), with both clearly benefitting from that same trade story.  But otherwise, the dollar is mostly ascendent.  

An aside here on the yen (-0.4%) which just two days ago traded below the key psychological level of 140 and this morning is back above 142.  It strikes me that this is the first currency that will be reactive to any trade deal.  As you can see from the below, long-term chart of the yen, it has spent the bulk of its time at far higher (dollar lower) levels.  I suspect that any trade deal will include an effort to revalue the yen higher vs. the dollar, perhaps to its longer-term average of around 120.

Moving on to today’s data, we have New Home Sales (exp 680K) and then the Fed’s Beige Book at 2:00pm. I’m not sure when the surveys were taken for the Beige Book, but you can be sure they will express a great deal of uncertainty and discuss how it will reduce economic activity.  You can also be sure that this will be hyped in the press.  But now that everything is better (just look at the stock market) is this old news?

If we try to look past the daily gyrations to the bigger picture, I would contend the following is the case.  Equity markets remain overvalued and are likely to weaken, the dollar is likely to slide as well as foreign investors slowly reallocate funds away from the US.  Quite frankly, the Treasury story is much harder as the interplay between inflation and potential reduced government expenditure is highly uncertain right now, although one will eventually dominate.  Finally, commodities remain far more important than their current relative weight in the global asset basket and I believe they have much further to climb in price.  One poet’s views.

Good luck

Adf