Tag Archives: #inflation

Heartburned

Posted on by

There’s no one surprised that the Fed
Did nothing, and here’s what Jay said
We’re not in a hurry
To cut, but don’t worry
If things change, we can cut ahead
 
The narrative now has returned
To Trump, which has many concerned
That in the short run
The things that he’s done
Will leave many traders heartburned

 

As universally expected, the Fed left policy unchanged yesterday.  Everything we had heard from FOMC members prior to the quiet period indicated they had to be patient to see how things played out regarding the impact of tariffs.  Apparently, Chairman Powell used the term “wait” or some version of that idea 22 times in the press conference.  Tomorrow, the Fed speakers hit the circuit again, but absent some change in data, which will take at least another month or two, I don’t see that the Fed is relevant again for a while.  

I will note that the market is currently pricing only about a 17% chance of a cut at the June 18 meeting though they are still pricing in 3 cuts for the year.  It appears that the idea of a H2 recession is gaining ground amongst both the punditry and the futures market.

However, contra to that message, the bigger news of the day is that President Trump will be announcing, at 10am, the first trade deal in the new era, this one with the UK.  It strikes me that this should be the easiest of trade deals to negotiate since both economies produce the same types of things.  Neither has a labor cost advantage, and there is great commonality between them with respect to the overall culture.  Arguably, the biggest advantage the US has is its energy sector has not been destroyed by the government, something PM Starmer is working hard to accomplish on his end.  Realistically, the trade deal here is going to be more about services than goods I suspect, given that’s what drives both economies.  I guess we will learn later today.

In a modest surprise, UK equities (FTSE 100 +0.4%) do not seem to see the benefits of such a deal, as they lag most of the rest of Europe.  Too, the BOE is expected to cut its base rate by 25bps this morning, which in isolation would ordinarily be seen as a positive for stock markets.  Perhaps, this is why the UK is the first to say yes, things there may be worse than meet the eye.  After all, the stock market there is higher by just 2% in the past year, hardly a breathtaking performance.  In fact, as you can see below, the FTSE 100 and S&P 500 have had very similar performances this year, tracking each other closely, although despite all the angst about recent volatility in US markets, the S&P is still 8% higher in the past year, decently outperforming the UK.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Stepping back for a moment from individual markets, my take is the following: President Trump is keen to sign a number of key trade deals in this 90-day window.  If they agree deals with the UK, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Mexico, all of which seem quite possible, it will reduce the uncertainty and accompanying stress in markets.  If, as well, Congress can get the ‘big, beautiful budget bill’ passed, thoughts of recession will quickly dissipate.  Obviously, the China trade talks will still be outstanding, but both sides need to find a solution here.  While the punditry in the US will continue to harp on how those tariffs are going to kill the US economy, China has already shown they are having problems and need to come to an agreement.  It is quite possible that Mr Trump can be successful in his aims to reorder the nature of world trade such that the US reduces its deficits without destroying the world.  I think I am going to take the over on this question.

In the meantime, let’s see how markets have behaved overnight.  Yesterday saw US equity markets rally modestly after the Fed and that followed through in Asia, with modest gains being the best description.  The Nikkei (+0.4%), Hang Seng (+0.4%) and CSI 300 (+0.5%) all seemed to benefit from the US and hopes for a reduction in trade anxiety.  Of note in Asia was India (-0.5%) and perhaps more tellingly Pakistan (-6.0%) as the escalation in military conflict between those two nations has grown even hotter.  I expect that market impact will remain more isolated as neither market is a key destination of foreign capital, at least if the actual military conflict doesn’t spread into other areas.

Turning to Europe, both Germany (+1.1%) and France (+1.0%) are having very good days with both markets ostensibly responding to the news of the impending UK trade deal and perhaps some hopes there will be one with the EU.  As well, German IP data was released at a much better level than expected (3.0% vs. 0.8% expected), an indication that companies there are gearing up for all that mooted military spending.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are all higher by at least 1.0% with the NASDAQ higher by 1.6%.  

In the bond market, Treasury yields are higher by 4bps this morning, having recouped the declines yesterday.  But still, the 10-year hovers either side of 4.30% and has done for the past month as you can see in the chart below.  If anything, it appears that the trend remains toward modestly lower rates.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In Europe, sovereign yields are also climbing slightly, higher by between 2bps and 3bps this morning and we saw similar movement in JGB markets overnight.  Frankly, bond markets have not been very exciting lately.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.6%) is continuing its recent bounce from the lows seen Sunday night, but WTI remains below $60/bbl.  There is growing talk that at current prices, capex is going to decline and supply along with that, but you cannot look at what is happening in Guyana, for instance, as they seek to exploit the massive new oilfield discovered in their coastal waters last year and think that oil supply is going to shrink.  As well, OPEC+ looks set to produce all out.  I do not see a good case for higher oil prices in the near term.  Meanwhile, gold (-1.0%) is giving back some of its recent rebound gains, but nothing about the recent price action indicates to me that the bigger picture trend higher is over.  However, today, it is weighing on both silver (-0.2%) and copper (-0.8%).  

As aside about copper.  The red metal has been nicknamed Dr Copper given its importance in industrial activity.  Hence, when demand is strong, it foretells strong economic activity and vice-versa.  With that in mind, what does the below chart of copper tell you about economic activity?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

What it tells me is that this, too, is a former economic signal that had been reliable in the old world view but has lost its way as a signpost of future activity in the new world view.

Finally, the dollar is modestly stronger this morning, most notably vs. the yen (-0.6%) and INR (-0.8%). The latter is clearly suffering on the impacts of some negative military news, having lost several fighter jets and drones, while the former seems to be responding to the story that Mr Trump will not lower tariffs with China ahead of the first meetings that are upcoming this weekend, and that had been demanded requested by the Chinese to start talking.  Too, NZD (-0.6%) is softer but elsewhere, there is far less of interest overall with the euro unchanged and the pound edging higher by 0.25% after the BOE cut rates 25bps, as expected, but the vote was 7-2, with two MPC members voting for no change, a slightly more hawkish outcome than expected.

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 230K) and Continuing (1890K) Claims data as well as Nonfarm Productivity (-0.7%) and Unit Labor Costs (5.1%).  Yesterday’s EIA oil inventory data showed modest draws, as expected and didn’t seem to matter much to the market.  It is difficult to get too excited about much these days as the landscape remains highly uncertain.  If, and it’s a big if, President Trump can come to agreement on trade deals with a number of countries, I suspect that we will see uncertainty wane and markets continue higher.  But the Fed won’t be cutting rates in that scenario.  Ultimately, though, I do believe that a lower dollar will be part of many of these deals, and for now, a lower dollar still seems the most likely outcome.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Excited

Posted on by

The market is now quite excited
As trade talks have been expedited
With Bessent and He
Now speaking, we’ll see
If buyers last night were farsighted
 
However, do not ignore gold
Whose price is a thing to behold
The past several days
There’s been quite a craze
As sellers now rue what they’ve sold

 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t often lead with a chart, but I think it is worthwhile this morning.  I grabbed this picture at 7:00pm last night, shortly after the news hit that Treasury Secretary Bessent and Trade Representative Greer were heading to Switzerland later this week to sit down with He Lifeng, the Chinese Vice Premier and trade negotiator and begin trade talks.  Prior to that announcement, the barbarous relic had rallied more than $200/oz over the past four sessions, a pretty impressive move for something that has maintained a low overall volatility.  The first explanation of the reversal, which coincided with a sharp gain in equity futures (see chart below) is that all the fear of the world ending with corresponding equity weakness and a need to hold gold, has ended!  Hooray!!!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Alas, just as I never believed the world was ending before, neither do I believe that everything is suddenly better.  Seemingly, this is all part of the process.  The idea that China could simply accept much of the stuff they produce would not be able to find a home in the US was never going to be the case.  I have no idea how things will work out, and they certainly will take a lot of time to come to some agreement, but it is very positive that the dialog has begun.

On the subject of which side blinked, which is a favorite for the punditry, especially those who despise dislike President Trump and believe this shows weakness on his part, I would note that the Chinese are the ones who have recently reported weaker economic data and last night the PBOC cut their 1-week reverse repo rate by 0.1% and reduced their Reserve Requirement Ratio by 50 basis points, both monetary easing measures to address the ongoing weakness in China.  Neither side benefits from this process in the short-term, but we will need to see the results of the talks, which will take many months I presume, before we know if goals have been achieved.

Away from the story on trade
The Fed story must be portrayed
Alas, it’s quite dull
As Jay and friends mull
The idea rate cuts be delayed

The only other story of note today is the FOMC meeting where they will release their policy statement at 2:00 this afternoon revealing no change in policy, and very likely almost no change in the wording, and then Chairman Powell will face the press at 2:30.  However, given the low probability of any changes, and given nothing regarding trade policy has really changed since they entered their quiet period, it seems unlikely that we will learn anything of consequence from Powell.  Today will be a complete non-event.

However, I cannot help but consider why the futures market appears so convinced that there are going to be rate cuts going forward this year.  As of this morning, the Fed funds futures are pricing a total of 78 basis points of cuts for the rest of this year, so three 25bp cuts as per the below chart from the CME.

Certainly, the data released thus far this year have not indicated the economy is heading into a tailspin.  Of course, there are many analysts calling for a recession to start in Q2 or Q3 as the tariff impacts ostensibly undermine the economy.  It is important to note, however, that these are the same analysts who have been calling for a recession for the past three years.  The boldest calls are for a period of stagflation, with the tariffs simultaneously killing growth and raising prices.

It is entirely possible that we see a recession this year, especially if government spending decreases given its role in supporting recent growth data.  (According to the BEA, Federal government spending in Q1 declined -5.1% while investment in the economy expanded more than 2%.). If this is the path forward, the long-term benefits will be substantial, but they must be maintained.  As well, if this is the path forward, total economic activity in the US will expand substantially and it is not clear that rate cuts will need to be part of that mix. 

Regardless, it seems that today’s activity is less likely to be impacted by the Fed than by any random headlines regarding trade or other administration maneuvers.  So, let’s see how markets have responded to the US-China trade talk news.

The China news came long after the close yesterday so the US markets closed lower on the session, approaching 1% declines, but US futures are currently higher by around 0.7% at 7:15.  In Asia, however, we did see some modest gains although the Nikkei (-0.15%) faded a bit, both China (0.6%) and Hong Kong (+0.15%) managed to rally.  As to the rest of the region, most markets were modestly higher although in a seeming sympathy move on the China news.  In Europe, bourses are softer this morning with the CAC (-0.7%) leading the way and other key indices falling less.  The data releases show Construction PMI softening on the continent as well as weak Eurozone Retail Sales (-0.1%), so I imagine that is weighing on investors’ minds today.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are 2bps firmer this morning but have been trading either side of 4.30% for the past several sessions as traders try to estimate the next big thing.  I see just as many stories about how yields are going to 10% as I do about how they are headed to 2% amid the depression coming, so my take is, we are going to range trade for a while yet.  In Europe, sovereign yields are lower by between -3bps (Germany) and -5bps (Italy) as that softer data is encouraging investors to believe that inflation will continue to decline and the ECB will cut further.

The commodity market has been where the real action is of late with oil (+0.9% today after +2.0% yesterday) rising after comments by two US oil companies that they will not be drilling any more if oil prices stay at these levels.  What I don’t understand is, what will they be doing as they are oil companies?  At any rate, this will be the tension in markets, who can afford to drill and sell oil at lower prices.  I expect we will hear from companies and pundits on both sides of this equation.  I discussed gold above, which has bounced slightly from its lowest levels overnight and I don’t believe anything will derail this train for a while yet.  However, both silver (-0.75%) and copper (-2.6%) are softer this morning, partly based on gold’s slide and partly on the weaker economy story.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer this morning, at least against its G10 counterparts with JPY (-0.6%) the weakest of the bunch, followed by SEK (-0.5%) and AUD (-0.3%).  The euro and pound are little changed and NOK (+0.15%) has gained on the back of oil’s strength.  In the EMG block, KRW (-1.1%) and TWD (-1.1%) have both rebounded some from their recent highs (dollar lows) in what seems more like a trading reaction than a change in policies.  Elsewhere in this bloc, though, MXN (+0.2%) is a touch stronger while ZAR (-0.5%) is a touch weaker and CNY is little changed.  There is a story making the rounds today that a well-known currency analyst, Steven Jen, is claiming that there could be as much as $2.5 trillion of excess currency reserves held by Asian nations that they may no longer need.  If this is true and these reserves were sold quickly, it would certainly drive the dollar much lower.  However, it strikes me that given the enormous amount of USD debt that has been issued by Asian companies and countries, and given these countries do not have access to Fed swap lines in emergencies, there is no reason to sell the dollars.  Rather they will simply have a ready supply without having to chase them when repayment and rollovers come due.  I would take this story with a large grain of salt.

Other than the Fed, we see EIA oil inventory data where some drawdowns are anticipated and that is really the day.  We are all awaiting the trade negotiation outcomes and I would say nobody has an inside track there.  Bigger picture, though, I do think the dollar has further to slide.

Good luck

Adf

Too Much Debt

Posted on by

In Spain, electricity failed
In Canada, Carney prevailed
But markets don’t care
As movement’s quite spare
It seems many traders have bailed
 
But problems, worldwide, still abound
Though right now, they’re in the background
There’s far too much debt
And still a real threat
That no true solutions are found

 

The two biggest stories of the past twenty-four hours were clearly the national scale blackout in Spain and Portugal yesterday, and the slim victory for Mark Carney in Canada, where the Liberal Party appears to have a plurality, but not a majority, and will oversee a minority government.

Touching on the second story first, in truth there is not much to discuss.  Much has been made of the vote being an anti-Trump statement with the idea that Carney is better placed to defend Canada from President Trump’s (imagined) predations.  However, given the lack of a majority government, it is not clear how effective this line of reasoning will prove.  As there is no futures market for the TSX, we really don’t have a sense yet of how the Canadian equity market will greet the news.  Yesterday’s modest gains of 0.35% amid a general atmosphere of modest gains doesn’t really tell much of a tale.  As to CAD (-0.1% today), a quick look at the past week shows it has done nothing even in the wake of the news. (see below).  My take is this is a nothingburger event, a perfect description for Mark Carney, a nothingburger of a politician.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the story about Spain’s electricity, I think it may be more instructive on two levels.  The first is as a warning to the risks inherent of powering your electric grid with more than 25% – 30% intermittent, renewable energy sources like wind and solar.  It is somewhat ironic that just twelve days prior to the blackout, Spain’s entire electricity requirement was met by solar, wind and hydro power, the Green dream.  Alas, here we are now and while no answers have yet been forthcoming, and I assume the media will downplay any blame on too much renewable power, virtually every engineering study has shown that once a grid has more than that 25% renewables, it tends towards instability.  This issue will be argued by both sides for a while, although as always, physics will be the final arbiter.  

But I have to wonder if the sudden failure of the electric grid is an omen of sorts, for what may be happening in global markets.  If we analogize global supply chains to the electrical grid, over the course of the past 50 years, we have seen the world create a massively complex web of trade with raw materials, intermediate goods and final products all crisscrossing the world.  There have been myriad benefits to all involved with real per capita economic benefits abounding, and for everybody reading this note, the ability to essentially buy whatever you want/need with limited interference and trouble.  Certainly, the availability of everyday necessities like food and clothing is widespread.

However, underpinning that bounty were two networks.  The first being the obvious one, the supply chains which since Covid have been much discussed by the punditry.  But the second, which gets far less notice is the network of debt that is issued around the world by governments and companies, as well as taken on by individuals, and that has grown to be more than 3x the entire global economic output.  While we most often read about the US government debt which is quickly approaching $37 trillion, total global debt is much greater than that.  In fact, at this point, the debt market is not about issuing new debt to fund new investment, rather it is almost entirely a refinancing mechanism.  

It is this latter issue that should concern us all.  What happens if, one day, the ability to refinance some of that debt, whether US Treasuries, German bunds or Chinese government bonds, has a hiccup of some sort?  A failed US Treasury auction, where the Fed is required to purchase bonds, or a power outage in a key financial center that prevents trades from being confirmed/settled and moneys not moving as expected, or some other force majeure type event that disrupts the current smooth functioning of global debt markets.  

Frankly, the combination of the changes being wrought by President Trump to the global economy, where globalization is giving way to mercantilism, and the significant weight of global debt that hangs over the global economy and is given very little thought seems a potentially volatile mix.

Ironically, as much as I have lately been describing how the Fed’s role seems to have diminished, in the event that something upsets this apple cart, the Fed will be the only game in town.  While this is not a today event, it is something we must not forget.

I apologize for my little diatribe, but with so little ongoing in markets, and the parallel to the Spanish electrical grid, it seemed timely.  Let’s look at markets.  Asian equity markets were mixed with the main markets very quiet but a couple of 1% gainers (Australia, Taiwan and Korea) although the rest of the region was +/- 0.3% or less.  Too, volumes were quite lethargic.  In Europe, it should be no surprise that Spain (-0.8%) is the laggard today as the first economists’ to opine on the impact of the blackout said it could be a hit of as much as 0.5% of GDP.  Germany (+0.6%) is the other side of the coin after the GfK Consumer Confidence reading came out at a better than expected -20.6.  Now, maybe it’s just me, but if I look at the past 5 years’ worth of this index, it is difficult to get excited about German economic prospects.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Yes, this was a better reading, but either the people of Germany are manic depressive, or the index is indicative of major structural problems in the country.  Maybe a bit of both.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:10) they are basically unchanged after being basically unchanged yesterday.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have bounced 2bps this morning after touching their lowest level in 3 weeks yesterday.  European sovereign yields, though, are all softer by 1bp to 2bps this morning as comments from ECB members seem to highlight more rate cuts as Europe achieves their inflation target and are now getting concerned they will fall below the 2.0% rate.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.7%) is under pressure this morning ostensibly on a combination of concerns over slowing growth and little movement in the US-China trade talks as well as a report that Kazakhstan is pushing up output and other OPEC+ members are talking about increasing production further when they meet next week.  Meanwhile, gold (-0.75%), which rallied back to unchanged in NY yesterday is once again finding sellers at its recent trading pivot of $3340ish (H/T Alyosha).  However, gold’s slide has not impacted either silver (+0.4%) or copper (+0.9%) at least so far in the session.

Finally, the dollar is firmer, largely across the board, this morning.  The euro (-0.3%), pound (-0.4%), JPY (-0.4%) and CHF (-0.6%) are all under some pressure, perhaps profit taking.  But in truth, other than INR (+0.15%) the rest of the major currencies, both G10 and EMG, are all softer vs. the greenback.  I guess the dollar’s demise will need to wait at least one more day.

On the data front, the Goods Trade Balance (exp -$146B), Case Shiller Home Prices (4.7%) and JOLTs Job Openings (7.48M) are the main numbers, although we also see Consumer Confidence (87.5).  But with no Fed discussions much more crucial data on Thursday (GDP, PCE) and Friday (NFP) it seems that today is setting up for not much excitement.

In fact, lack of excitement seems the best description of markets right now.  I don’t know what the next catalyst will be to change things, but absent peace in one of the wars, kinetic or trade, or another force majeure event, it feels like range trading is the order of the day for a while.  My big picture view of a slowly declining dollar is still intact, but day-to-day, it’s hard to see much right now.

Good luck

Adf

Be Quite Scared

Posted on by

The pundits have now all declared
That everyone should be quite scared
It will be a bummer
When shelves, come this summer
Are empty, so please be prepared
 
As well, a recession’s in view
Although, that seems like déjà vu
For three years at least
The pundits increased
The odds that this bill would come due

 

Apparently, the only thing you need to know this morning is that by summertime, shelves across the country will be barren as imports from China halt.  The upshot, at least according to the sources that I have read, is that you should blame President Trump and join the media chorus in hating the man and his policies.

Now, I am no logistics expert, but the concern stems from the significant decline in shipping as evidenced by port activity in both China and the US.  As you can see from the chart below, there has certainly been a significant decline in the number of ships leaving China on their way to the US.

I guess the question is just how much of what is on store shelves comes from China?  Much will depend on what kind of store one considers.  Certainly, toy stores seem likely to have less inventory, as will Best Buy with electronics potentially suffering, although as I recall President Trump exempted electronics initially.  Arguably, clothing shelves and racks may be sparser as well.  But based on official data, Chinese imports (~$463B) accounted for approximately 1.7% of the US’s $26.9T GDP in 2024.  This may be an overreaction.

Potentially a bigger issue will be the impact on intermediate goods that are imported from China and elsewhere and incorporated into products finalized in the US.  However, I cannot calculate that, nor have I seen any data of this issue, although I have read many stories about the end of this particular world as well.

One of the things to remember about the punditry is that they make their living describing the worst possible outcome because that gets them recognition.  However, I’m confident we all remember that a recession was forecast for 2022, 2023 and 2024 by much of the punditry and yet one was never officially declared by the NBER.  In fact, you may recall that in Q1 and Q2 of 2022, US Real GDP growth was -0.2% for both quarters, thus two consecutive quarters of negative growth.  Historically, that has defined a recession.  However, subsequent data revisions did remove that as you can see below with Q2 revised higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The one thing I do know is that there is a group of analysts/economists who have been forecasting the next recession consistently for several years.  They point to data like changes in the housing market, the JOLTs Quits rate shrinking and various other secondary and tertiary data points and sources, all of which have been pointing in that direction for several years.  And I grant, reading that ~40% of GenZ is using BNPL to buy their groceries, and then run late on payments, is a frightening statistic (although perhaps one that highlights financial illiteracy more than economic reality).

In the end, what you need to know is you should be terrified because the punditry is almost certain that this time, they have it right.  But our concern is how will this scenario impact markets.

Basically, despite all this huffing and puffing, it appears markets are whistling past this particular graveyard.  Friday’s US equity rally was followed by general strength in Asia and strength this morning in Europe.  Last night, Tokyo (+0.4%), Mumbai (+1.3%), Taiwan (+0.8%) and Australia (+0.4%) all had solid performances although neither Hong Kong (-0.1%) nor China (-0.15%) could find any real buying support.  A less reported story is that China is exempting a number of US imports from its 125% tariffs on the US as clearly, this trading relationship is deep and complex.

As to Europe, all markets are ahead this morning, with the UK (+0.4%) the laggard and most of the continent higher by between 0.7% and 0.8%.  There are headlines around as to how the ECB is preparing to cut rates further on the assumption that global economic activity is going to slow and thus hurt Europe, while the consistent message is that US tariffs will be deflationary in Europe, so less concerns about their inflation mandate.  Finally, US futures are pointing slightly softer (-0.2%) at this hour (6:45).

In the bond market, 10-year Treasury yields have fallen 30bps in the past two and one-half weeks, sliding 5bps on Friday before bouncing 3bps overnight. However, the recent trend does seem lower.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But yields are climbing in Europe as well today, higher by 5bps across the board on the continent, although UK Gilts have only edged higher by 2bps.  It’s funny, despite all the doom and gloom regarding the economy because of US tariffs, as well as growing expectations of an ECB rate cut at the early June meeting, investors appear to be growing concerned about something.  Perhaps they have pivoted back to the promised fiscal spending increases as their driver today.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.35%) continues to trade in its recent $60 – $63/bbl range with limited signs that this will soon change.  Peace in Ukraine does not seem at hand yet and reports are that the initial discussions between the US and Iran, while constructive, still have a ways to go before completion.  Both of those seem likely to weigh on oil prices if completed.  However, the more unusual thing to me is that with the rising chorus of recession calls, oil’s price has not fallen further.  To date, markets have not yet agreed with the economists’ view that recession is imminent.  In the metals markets, gold (-1.0%) is continuing its rough week, although remains nicely higher on the month.  You may recall my view a week ago Friday that the move seemed parabolic and due for a correction.  Recent price action is exactly that, corrective, as I believe the underlying thesis to own the barbarous relic remains intact.  The other main metals are a touch softer this morning, but really nothing to discuss.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning with modest strength against the euro (-0.15%) but softness vs. the pound (+0.15%) and those size moves are representative of most of the price action across both G10 and EMG currencies this morning. The outlier is KRW (-0.4%), which seems to be suffering from comments that no trade deal will be completed before June’s election there.

Overall, despite ongoing doom and gloom by much of the punditry, it is not obvious to me that investors are anticipating major changes.  Perhaps they are wrong, and the pundits are correct.  But as yet, there is no evidence to support that conclusion.

Ok, let’s turn to the data this week, which starts slowly but ends on NFP.

TuesdayGoods Trade Balance-$146.0B
 Case-Shiller Home Prices4.8%
 JOLTs Job Openings7.5M
WednesdayADP Employment108K
 Q1 GDP0.4%
 Q1 Employment Cost Index0.9%
 Chicago PMI45.5
 Personal Income0.4%
 Personal Spending0.6%
 PCE0.0% (2.2% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.1% (2.6% Y/Y)
ThursdayInitial Claims225K
 Continuing Claims1860K
 ISM Manufacturing48.0
 ISM Prices Paid70.2
FridayNonfarm Payrolls135K
 Private Payrolls127K
 Manufacturing Payrolls-5K
 Unemployment Rate4.2%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.2
 Participation Rate62.5%
 Factory Orders4.5%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As well as NFP, we get the PCE data, which looks like it has changed to a 10:00am release from its traditional 8:30am time.  The Fed is in its quiet period, but nobody has been listening to them anyway.  Secretary Bessent, along with President Trump, has been the most important voice lately.  Again, for now, the data has not indicated recession, although Q1 GDP is slated to be soft.  Markets, too, have been unwilling to get behind the recession call completely. 

Ultimately, the one thing we know is that the nature of the global economy has changed since President Trump’s election.  Globalization is in retreat and mercantilism is the new normal.  It is not clear to me that existing econometric models will accurately portray how that works, so I need to see more data before recognizing the end of times.  In the meantime, these myriad views are a sign that hedging for risk managers remains the only path forward.

Good luck

Adf

Downward, Crawling

Posted on by

The trends in the market of late
Continue, and there’s no debate
The dollar keeps falling
With stocks, downward, crawling
While gold never has looked so great
 
The latest concerns are that Trump
Chair Powell, is looking to dump
The narrative shows
That if Powell goes
That Treasuries clearly will slump

 

Europe remains closed today for its Easter Monday holiday, as was Hong Kong last night, but the rest of Asia and the US are open.  With that in mind, though, I’m guessing there are many who would prefer markets to remain closed given the price action.  At least those who remain invested in the US as equity futures are pointing lower, yet again, this morning, with all three major indices down by about -1.0% at this hour (6:00).  But really, the market story that is atop the headlines today is the dollar and its continued weakening.  Since President Trump’s inauguration, so basically in the past three months, the euro (+1.3% today) has climbed about 11% as you can see in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While that is not an unprecedented move, it is certainly swift in the world of foreign exchange.  Of course, it is important to remember that the current level, and higher levels, were extant for more than a year (July 2020 – November 2021) not all that long ago.  My point is perspective is key, and while the dollar has been declining sharply of late, this is not unexplored territory.  In fact, stepping back a bit, as I’ve shown before, the euro remains in the lowest quartile of its value over the past twenty years.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

One of the interesting ways in which the narrative has changed has been that prior to the imposition of tariffs by President Trump, when they were only threatened, the economic intelligentsia were convinced that the only outcome would be other currencies declining in value sufficiently to offset the tariff, thus a stronger dollar with the end result that US exports would no longer be competitive.  Now those same analysts are explaining that the weaker dollar is a problem because imports will be more expensive, thus raising the inflation rate.  

However, the lesson I have learned throughout my career is that movement in the dollar, while important on a very micro level for businesses and foreign earnings calculations, is rarely a driver of any macroeconomic trend.  In fact, it is a response.  Other things happen and the dollar adjusts based on the flows that occur. While theoretically, at the margin, a weaker dollar will tend to result in higher import prices, and ceteris paribus, that would feed through to the inflation rate, no ceteris is paribus these days.  For one thing, oil prices are lower by nearly 18% since the inauguration and oil prices have a far larger impact on inflation than does the value of the dollar.  My point is that neither the dollar’s level nor the fact that it is declining is a sign of the end of times.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of more concern to many is the Treasury bond market as that is a true Achilles heel for the US.  Given the massive amount of debt outstanding, and the fact that there is so much to roll over this year, and the fact that the budget is still running a massive deficit, the need to refinance is the biggest issue facing the US economy in my view.  Of course, the US will be able to refinance, the question is the price.  

Since we’ve been measuring things from Trump’s inauguration, a look at 10-year Treasury yields shows they have declined a modest 28bps as of this morning’s pricing.  There has also been some volatility, but again, hardly unprecedented volatility.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

For instance, a widely followed measure of bond market volatility is the MOVE Index, currently produced by BofA.  At Friday’s close, it sat at 114.64.  A quick look at this chart shows the index, and by extension bond market volatility, is in the upper one-third of its range since inflation kicked off in 2022.  Again, it has spent a lot of time at higher levels and a lot of time at lower levels.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

There are numerous stories being written these days about reduced liquidity in the bond market, and there are many stories being written about how the Chinese, or the Japanese, or Europeans are selling Treasury bonds as a signal that all is not well.  First, we know all is not well, so that should not be a surprise.  Second, there has been no indication that Treasury auctions are failing, in fact the opposite, with the most recent 10-year and 30-year auctions showing substantial foreign demand.  

The funny thing about the bond market is to many it is a Rorschach test as people see what they want to see. To some, it is entirely about inflation and inflation expectations, so rising yields portend inflation on the horizon.  To others, it is a recession/growth indicator, which for most people is a coincident indicator, higher growth leads to higher inflation in that view.  But these days, much ink is spilled discussing how it is now and indicator of confidence in the US, especially with the growing antagonism between President Trump and Chairman Powell.  The same folks who lambasted Powell for keeping rates too high, now seem to be cheering him on to keep rates “too” high as a sign of his independence.

There is no doubt that despite the fact that the Fed’s press has diminished, and the market’s focus on the Fed has waned, their actions remain important to the US economy.  But is Jay Powell the last bastion of confidence in the US?  That, too, seems a stretch.

Trying to summarize, things in the US are quite messy right now.  For many investors, and hedgers, the previous status quo was so comfortable, and actions were easy to take.  However, Donald Trump’s election back in November was a very clear signal that things were going to change.  And they are changing.  In situations like this, investors tend to bring their money as close to home as possible.  This process has only just begun.  Since March, I have maintained that I see the dollar lower, and for a long time that the equity market was overvalued.  While the recent speed of movement is unlikely to be maintained, I expect the direction is pretty clear.

Ok, a really quick tour of markets overnight.  In Tokyo (-1.3%) equity markets slumped further as the yen strengthened and the status of the trade talks with the US remains unclear.  Chinese shares (+0.3%) edged higher and the rest of Asia that was open was mixed.  With all of Europe closed today, all eyes will be on the States where things are pointing to a lower opening.

Treasury yields have risen 4bps this morning and European sovereign markets are all closed.  Last night, JGB yields edged higher by 1bp, but the narrative of Japanese interest rates rising closer to other national levels has not had much press lately.

The commodity markets have been where all the action is, with oil (-2.5%) lower this morning as I have seen comments that the US-Iran talks are making progress.  As well, it appears that the Russia / Ukraine peace talks are reaching a denouement.  Successful conclusions in either, or both, of these discussions would very likely point to a lot more available crude on the market, and lower prices ahead.  I still think $50/bbl is in the cards.  But gold (+1.9%) is the story of the day here as the barbarous relic makes yet another new all-time high vs. the dollar dragging silver (+1.3%) and copper (+3.9%) along for the ride.  Not only are foreign central banks continuing to buy, as well as populations in China, India and elsewhere in Asia, but it appears that US retail is waking up to the fact that gold has been the best performing asset for the past year (+45%).  I continue to see the metals complex benefitting from the current macro environment.

Finally, we have already discussed the dollar which is lower this morning against virtually all its counterpart currencies in Europe and Asia.  As it happens, LATAM currencies are gaining the least and BRL (-0.1%) has even managed a slight decline on the opening.  But overall, this is a dollar selling day.

On the data front, today brings Leading Indicators (exp -0.5%) at 10:00 and that is all that is on the calendar.  It is a quiet week, and I will outline the rest tomorrow.

It should be a quiet market given Europe’s absence, and given how far the dollar has fallen leading into the open, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a modest bounce, but the trend, as I explained, remains clearly for a lower dollar going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Not Persuaded

Posted on by

As tariff concerns are digested
By markets, Chair Powell’s been tested
Is cutting the move
They need to improve?
Or are they, to tightness, still vested
 
It sounds as though he’s not persuaded
A rate cut will soon be paraded
But markets still price
He’ll be cutting thrice
It could be that view should be fade

 

Perusing the WSJ this morning, I stumbled across the following article, “What the Weak Dollar Means for the Global Economy” and couldn’t help but chuckle.  It was not that long ago when the punditry was complaining about the strong dollar as a problem for the global economy.  The current thesis is that the weakening dollar will make foreign exports to the US more expensive, on top of the tariffs, and will reduce the number of US tourists traveling abroad.  Foreign companies will also suffer as they translate their US sales into their respective local currencies, negatively impacting their earnings.  A moment as I shed a tear.

Of course, when the dollar was strong, the concern for the global economy was that it was increasingly expensive in local currency terms to obtain the dollars necessary to service the massive amounts of USD debt that foreign companies and nations have issued, thus reducing their ability to spend money on other things to drive their domestic economy.

As they say, you can’t have it both ways.  While there is no doubt the dollar’s decline this year has been swift, it is important to remember we are nowhere near an extremely weak dollar.  As you can see from the below chart, the euro was trading near 1.60 back in 2008 and as high as 1.38 even in 2014.  When looking at today’s price of 1.1375, it is hard to feel overly concerned.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

As it happens, this morning the single currency has slipped back -0.3% from yesterday’s levels.  The dollar’s future remains highly uncertain given the potential policy changes that may unfold as the tariff situation becomes clearer.  Which leads us to the Fed.

For the first time in many weeks, the Fed became a topic of conversation for the market when Chairman Powell spoke to the Economic Club of Chicago.  “Our obligation is to keep longer-term inflation expectations well anchored and to make certain that a one-time increase in the price level does not become an ongoing inflation problem,” Powell explained.  “We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario in which our dual-mandate goals are in tension. If that were to occur, we would consider how far the economy is from each goal, and the potentially different time horizons over which those respective gaps would be anticipated to close.”  

Let me start by saying, the Fed’s track record in anticipating economic outcomes is not stellar.  Equity markets were not encouraged by these comments and sold off during the discussion, although they retraced some of those losses before the end of the session.  At the same time, the Fed funds futures market, while having reduced the probability of a rate cut next month to just 15%, continues to price 88bps of cuts into the market by the December meeting.  Assuming there is no cut in May, that leaves five meetings for between three and four cuts.  Based on Powell’s comments, that seems like aggressive market pricing.

It appears that there is a growing belief that a recession is on its way and that will both reduce inflationary pressures and force allow the Fed to start to reduce rates further.  Of course, there are those, Powell included, who seem to believe that stagflation is a strong possibility.  If that were the case, especially given Powell’s new-found belief that price stability matters, and his clear distaste for the president, my sense is they will focus on inflation not growth if financial conditions (aka bond markets) remain in good shape.  Will the dollar continue to decline under that scenario?  That is a very tough call as a US recession would almost certainly spread globally, and other central banks will likely ease policy.  If the Fed stands pat amidst a global reduction in interest rates, I don’t see the dollar declining.  If for no other reason, the cost of carrying short dollar positions would become too prohibitive.

As usual, the future remains quite cloudy.  Cases can be made for Fed cuts, and against them.  Cases can be made for dollar weakness and dollar strength.  Arguably, the biggest unknown is how the trade talks are going to resolve.  Yesterday, President Trump explained that “big progress” has been made on the Japanese tariff talks.  If Trump is successful in creating a coalition of nations that have closer trade relations with lower tariffs, I expect that would be taken quite positively by the markets.  On the other hand, if those talks fall apart, I expect equity markets to start the next leg lower, and that is a global phenomenon, while the dollar sinks further.  There is much yet to come.

Ok, let’s see how things played out overnight.  After yesterday’s US rout, Trump’s comments on trade talks with Japan clearly helped the market there as the Nikkei (+1.35%) rallied nicely as did the Hang Seng (+1.6%).  In fact, gains were widespread with Korea, India and Australia, to name three, all rising nicely.  Alas, Chinese shares did not participate, and Taiwan actually slipped a bit.  In Europe, investors await the ECB’s outcome this morning, where a 25bp cut is the median forecast, but there are those hinting at a 50bp cut to help moderate strength in the euro as well as support the economy given the tariff situation.  Remember, we have heard from a number of ECB members that they are confident inflation is heading back to their target.  Ahead of the news, shares are softer across the board with declines on the order of -0.5% to -0.8% throughout the continent and the UK.  Remember, too, their tariff talks are after Japan.  Interestingly, US futures are mixed with DJIA (-1.3%) the laggard while the other two are both higher about 0.5%.  It seems United Health shares have fallen enough to take the DJIA down with it.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have regained the 3bps they fell during yesterday’s US session, so are unchanged over two days.  We have also seen European sovereign yields climb between 2bps and 4bps, rising alongside Treasuries and JGB yields jumped 5bps, responding to confidence that the US-Japan trade dialog will be successful and support Japanese risk.

Despite all the reasons for oil to decline, including recession fears and continued pumping by pariahs like Iran and Venezuela, the black sticky stuff is higher by 1.1% this morning, its highest level in two weeks.  But as you can see in the chart below, there remains a huge gap to be filled more than $8/bbl higher than current prices.  It is difficult to see a significant rally on the horizon absent a major change in the supply situation.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the metals markets, gold (-0.6%) blasted higher to another new high yesterday, above $3300/oz, and while it is backing off a bit today, shows no signs of stopping for now.  Both silver and copper rallied yesterday as well, and both are also falling back this morning (Ag -1.4%, Cu -2.1%).

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer across the board this morning, with the DXY seeming to find 99.50 as a key trading pivot level.  In the G10, JPY (-0.45%) is the laggard along with CHF (-0.4%) while other currencies in the bloc have fallen around -0.2%.  The exception here is NOK (+0.3%) as it benefits from oil’s rebound.  In the EMG bloc, the dollar is mostly firmer, but most of the movement has been of the 0.3% variety, so especially given the overall decline in the dollar, this looks an awful lot like position adjustments ahead of the long weekend with no new trend to discern.

On the data front, yesterday’s Retail Sales was stronger than expected, and not just goods that were bought ahead of tariffs, but also services and dining out, which would seem less impacted.  This morning, we see a bunch of stuff as follows: Housing Starts (exp 1.42M), Building Permits (1.45M), Philly Fed (2.0), Initial Claims (225K) and Continuing Claims (1870K).  As long as the employment data continues to hold up, my take is the Fed will sit on the sidelines.  If that is the case, I sense we have found a new range for the dollar, 99/101 in the DXY and we will need a headline of note to break that.

As tomorrow is Good Friday and markets are essentially closed throughout Europe, as well as US exchanges, there will be no poetry.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

The Tariff Watusi

Posted on by

Undoubtedly, most are confused
And many portfolios bruised
The problem I fear
Is throughout this year
Both bulls and bears will be contused


Right now, it’s the tariff Watusi
With rules that seem quite loosey-goosey
So, traders are scared
While pundits declared
The president’s just too obtuse-y


But will volatility reign
All year with the requisite pain?
Or will, as Trump said
When looking ahead
The outcome be growth once again?

(Before I start, “Ball of Confusion” is brilliant and timeless.  But isn’t Billy Joel’s “We Didn’t Start the Fire” covered and updated by Fall Out Boy, really the same song for a different generation?) Now, back to our regular programming.

  • Tariffs are a tax.  So, say seemingly all the most credentialed analysts and economists around.  
  • Tariffs are inflationary.  So, say many of these same analysts and economists.  
  • Ergo, taxes are inflationary.  So, say…well none of the credentialed analysts and economists.  (H/T to Alyosha for highlighting this idea last week.)  

But it is important to recognize this dichotomy as we listen to the many pundits and analysts who are now telling us that a recession is coming, if not already here, and the world is ending.  It seems to me if you cannot recognize this connection then your views may be colored by something other than strict logic.

We are experiencing a complete regime change in both financial markets and economic outcomes around the world and as old as I am, the last time something like this occurred was long before I was born.  I am very wary of any analyst who demonstrates any certitude in their views at this point.  Frankly, I am more inclined to listen to historians than economists, as they have potentially studied previous regime changes.  Alas, I have not so I am reliant on those who I read.

The current confusion remains over tariffs, their implementation and their impact.  To me, the key point that is missing in most of the tariff discussions is the elasticity of demand for any given product.  If something is highly inelastic and tariffs are added, then the price of that item is very likely to rise.  However, if something has very elastic demand, then a tariff will do one of two things, either the producer will absorb the cost or the volume of sales will drop dramatically, but any price rise will be constrained.

I highlight this because the weekend’s ostensible pause in tariffs on electronic goods from China is the latest discussion point.  It strikes me that under the thesis tariffs are inflationary, then inflation forecasts and expectations should now be declining.  But I haven’t seen that yet.  In the end, though, I don’t believe anybody really knows how things will evolve from here, although I believe the end goal is becoming clearer.  

It appears that President Trump’s goal is seeking to isolate China from much of the developed world.  He wants to create a situation where nations declare they are either with the US or against the US when it comes to economic relations.  I read this morning that 75 nations are in negotiations with the US regarding tariff reductions.  Given that, by themselves, the G10 represent nearly 50% of global GDP, even not knowing which nations are negotiating, the group almost certainly represents upwards of 70% or more of the global economy.  

I would contend it is still very early days with respect to the results of President Trump’s actions.  There is no question he has unleashed a certain amount of chaos in the government and in markets, but I don’t believe he is greatly concerned by that, and in fact he may welcome the process.  Regime changes are always messy, and this one is no different.  Be nimble.

Ok, let’s look at how things behaved overnight.  Friday’s US equity rally was followed by strength throughout most of Asia (Japan +1.2%, Hong Kong +2.4%, China +0.2%, Korea +1.0%, India +1.8%) with Taiwan (-0.1%) the true laggard in the region.  Clearly the tariff reprieve, even if temporary, was welcomed.  In Europe, too, the gains are strong and widespread with the DAX (+2.3%) leading the way but the rest of the Continent and the UK all up at least 1.8%.  And at this hour (6:30) US futures are higher by around 1.0% as well.

But let’s keep things in perspective.  The below chart of the S&P 500 over the past 20 years can help you understand the magnitude (or lack thereof) of the recent decline.  Yes, the index is lower by about 12% from the all-time highs set in February, and yes, uncertainty is rife.  But if you ever wanted to understand what has happened since the Fed’s response to the GFC led to the financialization of the entire economy, the latest minor dip is being described as catastrophic by the punditry.  It’s not!

Source: multpl.com

Next, the Treasury bond market has been the focus of a great deal of angst lately.  Once again, these same analysts and economists claim the world is ending because yields have risen over the past week.  I grant the movement has been sharp, but my experience tells me that when a market as liquid as 10-year Treasuries moves this sharply, it is a position liquidation that is driving the move.  In fact, both the 10-year and 30-year auctions last week seemed to have gone quite well, with strong demand.  So, I am not of the opinion the bond market is about to collapse, nor do I believe that China is liquidating their Treasury holdings.  Rather, hedge funds carrying significant leverage and being forced to unwind seems the most likely culprit here.  Too, remember that 10-year yields are right in the middle of their range for the past six months at 4.43% (-6bps today).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, European sovereign yields are also retreating this morning led by Italy and Greece (-9bps) with German bunds (-4bps) the laggard of the session.  With equity markets around the world rallying, it doesn’t appear this is safe haven buying.  However, I do believe that there are many investors who are pushing at least some of their equity portfolios into fixed income amidst overall uncertainty.

Turning to commodities, oil (+1.25%) seems to have found a bottom, at least in the short-term, just below $60/bbl.  While a recession doesn’t necessarily drive inflation lower, I am very comfortable with the idea that it reduces demand for energy and oil prices can slip.  Is the recent move a harbinger of recession?  I think there is too much noise to discern the signals the market is giving us right now, although a recession, which has been long awaited by many analysts, certainly seems possible.  

As to the metals markets, while both gold (-0.7%) and silver (-0.3%) are a bit softer this morning, one need only look at their performance in the past week (both higher by more than 7%) to recognize that there is a great deal of growing demand for precious metals.  Dr Copper (+0.9%), like oil today, is not indicating that a recession is coming as it, too, rose 7% last week and is higher by 15% YTD.  Again, there is a lot of noise to get through to find the signal.

Finally, the dollar, is lower again today and is back at levels last seen…in September 2024.  And before that in July 2023 and March 2022.  In fact, if you look at the chart of the DXY below, I challenge you to show me that this decline was more dramatic than any of the three other major declines we have lived through in the past 3 years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Net the dollar has declined by about 10% since its recent peak in February, not insubstantial, but not unprecedented by any stretch.  In fact, over the long-term, the dollar is within spitting distance of its long-term average, which as measured by the DXY is about 104.  Looking at individual currencies, there is a strange grouping of currencies that have fallen vs. the greenback this morning, BRL (-0.85%), TRY (-0.5%), CHF (-0.5%) and CNY (-0.4%).  Given the pause in tariffs on Chinese electronic goods, CNY is confusing, as is CHF, which might imply havens are out of favor (but then why is JPY stronger?).  TRY is its own case and BRL is quite confusing.  Commodity prices have held their own or risen lately, and BRL is nothing, if not a commodity currency.  I need to search further here.  Perhaps we are seeing some carry trades being unwound.

I apologize as once again my Monday missive has grown too long for comfort.  I will highlight the data tomorrow with Retail Sales on Wednesday as the most important data release this week and the BOC and ECB meetings on Wednesday and Thursday respectively with the market looking for no change and a 25bp cut respectively.

The world is a messy place right now, with armed conflict now being joined by economic conflict.  Opinions are hardening along political lines, and I don’t see how this changes in the short run.  If you are managing risk, maintain your hedges, even if they seem expensive.  There are too many opportunities for large movements that can be costly.

Good luck

Adf

Their Own Ego Trip

Posted on by

The talk of the town is the “Pause”
Which led to much market applause
Though naysayers still
Say Trump’s actions will
Result in bad outcomes…because


But yesterday saw markets rip
And all those who did buy the dip
Are feeling quite smart
When viewing the chart
Of prices, their own ego trip

 

See if you can guess when President Trump posted that there would be a 90-day pause on tariffs for everyone but China.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

By now, you are almost certainly aware that equity markets in the US rebounded massively in the US, with one of the biggest gains on record as the S&P 500 rose 9.5% and the NASDAQ 12.2%.  Of course, that merely retraced the bulk of the losses seen since the beginning of the month.  In fact, the S&P 500 is still lower by about 200 points since then.  Regardless, moods are much brighter today than they were yesterday at this hour.  And those equity gains are global.

I’ve seen several interpretations of the sequence of events and like virtually everything these days, it appears to have a partisan bias to people’s views.  There are those who claim President Trump could not stand the pressure of a declining stock market and “blinked” in the game of chicken he was playing.  There are also those who claim this was part of the strategy all along, essentially moving the Overton Window substantially in his preferred direction and now he is ready to reap the benefits of this move.  

Arguably, there is evidence for both sides of this argument and I suggest we will never really know. Remember, Trump is quite comfortable making outlandish pronouncements as he level sets for a negotiation.  But he is also quite the realist and while I do not believe he was concerned with his personal or family fortune, recognized that the speed of the pain inflicted could be damaging overall.  In the end, it is not clear the rationale matters, the action stands on its own merits.  

But remember this, equity valuations were very high before the decline last week, and were still quite high, although obviously less so, after the decline.  The rebound put them back in very high territory, especially with equity analysts revising profit forecasts lower on the back of the still 10% tariffs being imposed.  A truism is that the biggest rallies in the stock market occur during bear markets.  Keep that in mind as you assess risk going forward.

But let us turn our attention to a player who is not getting much attention these days, the Fed.  Many questioned the Fed’s rate cuts back in Q4 and attributed the moves to a partisan effort to help VP Harris get elected.  Certainly, there is no love lost between Chairman Powell and President Trump.  Of late, though, the commentary has focused on patience regarding any further policy ease as the impacts of Trump’s tariff policies are unknown at this stage.  Yet, it is not hard to read these comments and get a sense that the Fed is going to work at cross purposes to Mr Trump.  

For instance, yesterday, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari released an essay with the following comments, “Given the paramount importance of keeping long-run inflation expectations anchored and thelikely boost to near-term inflation from tariffs, the bar for cutting rates even in the face of a weakening economyand potentially increased unemployment is higher.  The hurdle to change the federal funds rate one way or theother has increased due to tariffs.”  While the words here don’t appear partisan per se, Mr Kashkari is one of the most dovish FOMC members and dismissed inflation concerns regularly for a long time.  This sudden change is interesting, at the least.  

At any rate, the market, which had been pricing a 50% probability of a rate cut next month just a few days ago and a total of at least 4 cuts this year, is back down to a <20% probability of a cut in May and about 3 cuts this year.  Truly the pause that refreshes.

So, let’s look at how other markets responded to the pause.  Markets everywhere, including China, rallied last night and this morning, with Tokyo (+9.1%) and Taiwan (+9.2%) leading the way in Asia although gains were universal.  Hong Kong (+2.1%) and China (+1.3%) were the laggards with gains between 2.5% and 5.0% the norm.  In Europe, too, equities are flying this morning as the threat of much higher tariffs is removed, at least temporarily, with the UK (+4.6%) the laggard and gains between 5.0% and 6.5% the story there.  Alas, futures this morning, at 7:00am, are pointing lower by -2.0% or so.  Is that profit taking or a harbinger of the day to come?

In the bond market, which has expressly been Trump and Bessent’s main concern, yields are a bit lower this morning, -3bps in 10-year Treasuries.  But the story in Europe is confusing to me, or perhaps not.  German bunds (+6bps) have seen the largest rise while UK Gilts (-10bps) have seen a sharp decline.  Too, Italy (-4bps and Greece (-2bps) have seen yields decline.  Could this be an illustration that bunds are a better safe haven than Treasuries? And now that haven status seems less important today, they are being sold off?  JGB yields (+9bps) are also rising, perhaps on the same notion.  The corroborating evidence is that nobody thinks Gilts are a good investment, so with risk back on, they are in demand given their highest yield in the G10.

In the commodity markets, oil rebounded sharply alongside equities yesterday although it has slipped 2.4% this morning.  I have altered the Y-axis on the chart below to percentages to give an idea of the magnitude of these moves in the past days, especially relative to the past 6 months.  Despite being the most liquid commodity market around (both figuratively and literally), it is far less liquid than bonds or FX or even stocks, so as commodities are wont to do, sometimes the moves are breathtaking.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the metals markets, gold (+1.0%) continues its march higher, recovering more than 5% from the lows Tuesday morning.  I maintain that much of that selling was margin based, with positions liquidated to cover margin calls in other markets.  Now that the panic has passed, demand is likely increased given the new uncertainties.  However, both silver (-0.5%) and copper (-1.3%), which rallied sharply yesterday, have slipped back a bit.  These are different stories.

Finally, the dollar is lower this morning, having yo-yoed like every other market on the tariff news.  CHF (+1.9%) and JPY (+1.4%) are the big gainers in the G10 although the euro (+1.2%) is having a day as well.  However, there are currencies with less pizzazz this morning, notably ZAR (-0.9%), KRW (-0.6%) and MXN (-0.5%), as it remains difficult to know how to proceed going forward.  JPMorgan has a global volatility index which is a useful barometer of how things are going.  As you can see below, it is not surprising that volatility in this space has also risen sharply.

Once again, I return to the idea that President Trump is the avatar of volatility, and you must always remember that volatility can happen in both directions.  While financial assets tend to collapse (yesterday being the exception) when things get out of hand, commodities go the other way as supply interruptions are the big risk. Writ large, volatility simply means a lot of movement.

We finally get some meaningful data this morning with headline CPI (exp 0.1%, 2.6% Y/Y) and Core (0.3%, 3.0% Y/Y) along with the weekly Claims data (Initial 223K, Continuing 1880K).  Given all the focus on the tariffs, though, it is not clear to me what this data will imply on a forward-looking basis.  As we have seen with the Fed getting sidelined by Mr Trump, his tariff policies have also served to overshadow economic data, at least for now.  There are a couple of more Fed speakers and a 30-year bond auction as well.  Interestingly, I expect that auction may be the most important outcome of the day.  Will there be real demand or are investors shying away?

I expect that over the next few months, tariffs will be discussed on a nation-by-nation basis as new deals are struck.  But that will impede any medium-term views on the economy as until we have a much better sense of the end results, it will be difficult to assess things.  The upshot is, we may be entering a period where we chop up and down, but don’t go anywhere until the global trade situation is clearer.  Volatility with no direction is great for traders, less so for investors.  Headline bingo is still the game we are playing.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Squealed Like Stuck Pigs

Posted on by

What many just don’t comprehend
Is tariffs are not near the end
Of policy changes
As Trump rearranges
The world into foe and to friend
 
And while Wall Street squealed like stuck pigs
Trump’s boosters just don’t give two figs
They’re willing to try
The Trump calculi
If they see it hurts the bigwigs

 

I’m old enough to remember when Nonfarm Payrolls were the most important thing to market participants regardless of the asset class.  Ahh, those were the days.  It is remarkable that across major business headlines, I haven’t seen anything discussing the release for later this morning.  Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not upset about that fact, I think there has been far too much focus on that data point for far too long, but I am surprised.  This may be the best indicator that we are in a new regime for finance and economics.  It appears that most of the things the analyst community used to consider important are now merely afterthoughts.

I thought the WSJ had the most consequential article in this morning’s ‘paper’ asking, who is going to buy the $400 billion of stuff that China makes that will no longer be price competitive in the US?  They weren’t mentioned explicitly, but I imagine that Temu and Shein are both going to find their business models significantly impaired.  But will other “free trading’ nations allow all that stuff across their borders tariff free?  The Chinese mercantilist model was built with the idea that if they could produce stuff more cheaply than other nations, whether through subsidy or efficiency, other nations would welcome that stuff.  It remains to be seen how well that model holds up given the changes wrought by President Trump.

On a different note, I have read many comparisons of yesterday’s market declines to the March 2020 Covid panic, but my take is it is far more akin to the September 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse, at least from the tone of the market.  Covid was an exogenous event while Lehman and the tariffs were home-made.  The issue with the GFC and the current time was/is that they are systemic alterations which means that things will be different going forward in finance and economics.  Covid clearly changed our lives based on the government response, but it didn’t change the way markets behaved.  

At this point, there is no indication that President Trump is going to change his tune, and why would he? Again, amongst the key financial market goals he and Secretary Bessent have touted were a reduction in 10-year yields, lower by 75bps since inauguration, (✔️), a reduction in the price of oil, lower by $14/bbl or 18%,  (✔️) and a lower dollar relative to other currencies lower by 6.5%,(✔️).  Ask yourself, do you really think they are unhappy with the current situation?

I have no idea how things will play out from here, and in reality, neither does anybody else.  Reliance on models that were built with past assumptions does not inspire confidence.  As well, we have barely seen the response to these tariffs, although just moments ago China indicated they would be imposing 34% tariffs on all US goods entering their country.  But anybody who believes they know the end game is delusional.  This is the beginning of the change, and there will be much more to come across many different aspects of the economy and markets as the year progresses.  Interesting times indeed.

With that in mind, let’s see how day two of the new world order is playing out (and to think, there were all those conspiracy theories about a new world order before, but this was not what they had in mind.)  Green is a hard color to find on screens again today as after yesterday’s rout in US markets, the follow-through in Asia was almost complete.  Indonesia (+0.6%) managed a gain somehow, but every other major market declined, some quite substantially.  Singapore (-3.0%), Thailand (-3.6%) and Tokyo (-3.1%) were the biggest losers, but shares everywhere fell with most declining more than -1.0% on the session.  Interestingly, European shares are having a much worse session today than yesterday with Italy’s FTSE MIB (-7.1%) leading the way although Spain’s IBEX (-5.5%), the DAX (-4.5%), CAC (-3.8%) and FTSE 100 (-3.5%) are not exactly loving life today either.  As to US futures, they are pointing much lower again today, -3.0% or so for all the major indices.

Bonds, however, are in great demand with yields virtually collapsing as investors seek anyplace that is not equities to find shelter from this storm.  Treasury yields have fallen a further 15bps this morning and you can see in the chart below, just how large this decline has been.  In fact, yields have almost retraced to the level just before the Fed started cutting rates last September!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But bonds everywhere in the world are in demand with yields on European sovereigns lower by between -7bps (Italy and Greece) and -15bps (Germany) as credit quality has also entered the picture there.  Finally, JGB yields have also tumbled, down -18bps overnight, as Japanese investors flee global markets and bring their money home.

Arguably, though, the biggest move has been in oil (-6.9%) which is now down to levels not seen since it was rebounding from Covid inspired lows back in 2022.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I would contend this is almost entirely a recession fear, lack of forward demand story, although I believe OPEC+ is still planning on reducing its production cuts as the year progresses.  I imagine the latter is subject to change based on the economic outcomes.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.15%) after a sell-off yesterday, is consolidating for now.  Given the amount of leverage that abounds and given that when margin calls come, folks sell what they can, not what they want to, I suspect much of gold’s selling yesterday was forced rather than based on fear.  Rather, I suspect gold will outperform as it maintains its ultimate haven status.  The same, though, is not true for other metals with silver (-1.5%) and copper (-4.2%) both sharply lower this morning.  Certainly, in copper’s case, given the increased recession fears, it can be no surprise that its price is declining.

Finally, turning to the dollar, after a sharp decline yesterday, largely across the board, this morning the picture is a bit more mixed with a rebound against some currencies (AUD -3.0%, NZD -2.5%, SEK -1.7%, NOK (-2.1% although also inspired by oil’s precipitous decline.). However, both the yen (+1.0%) and Swiss franc (+1.25%) are continuing to display their haven attributes, while the euro (-0.1%) seems caught in the middle.  In the EMG bloc, though, the dollar is quite solid this morning with MXN (-1.9%), ZAR (-1.7%) and CLP (-1.0%) all falling.  Of note, CNY (0.0%) has barely moved throughout the entire process.

As I mentioned above, today we do see the NFP report, although my take is a strong report will be ignored as old regime, while a weak report will be ‘proof positive’ a recession is near.  Here are the expectations as of this morning:

Nonfarm Payrolls135K
Private Payrolls127K
Manufacturing Payrolls4K
Unemployment Rate4.1%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.4%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Will the data really matter?  I don’t think so, at least not to policy makers as they realize (I hope) the world today is different than when this data was collected.  At this point, the market is now pricing in a full 75bps of rate cuts by year end from the Fed with a ~30% probability of a cut early next month.  But Powell and company don’t have any idea how this will play out either.  I fear that we are in a market situation where volatility is the dominant theme, in both directions.  Remember, Donald Trump is best thought of as the avatar of volatility.  He has earned that nickname.  This is why I harp on maintaining hedges, the world is a tricky place.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Stress and Dismay

Posted on by

The only discussion today
Is how badly tariffs will weigh
On stocks and on growth
As certainly both
Will feel some more stress and dismay
 
But hopefully, once they’re in force
It will change the pundits’ discourse
‘Cause I’m sick and tired
That it’s now required
We all, tariffs, hate or endorse

 

A funny thing happened on the way to the market collapsing yesterday, especially given the early morning portents, and that is the market didn’t collapse at all.  Equities opened lower and rallied all day with the Dow even having a quite respectable 1% gain when all was said and done.  I think the lesson that needs to be taken from this is markets have a tendency to get ahead of the news and reversals are pretty frequent.  In fact, this is a perfect example of ordinary market behavior, a sharp move in one direction is suddenly reversed for no obvious reason.  Certainly, there was nothing said or done yesterday that seemed a specific catalyst for a short-term rebound.  That, my friends, is simply how markets work.

However, for now, with tomorrow being President Trump’s “liberation day” when tariffs will be announced, they remain the major story across both financial markets and political narratives.  As I sit here in the cheap seats, observing the back and forth, what has become abundantly clear is that the politicization of economic actions is the true reality.  Yesterday I highlighted the difference between Democrat and Republican views on future inflation.  Reading through the commentary on X, as well as stories in Bloomberg and the WSJ, I think this is the same situation, with Democrats certain tariffs will be the downfall of the economy and lead to rampant inflation, while Republicans believe they will help the nation recapture lost manufacturing capacity.  Personally, I’m just looking forward to moving on to a different story as we have been discussing tariffs for more than two months straight and it is tiresome.

Here’s the one thing of which I am confident, however, and that is nobody has any idea what the impacts will ultimately be on either markets or the economy.  I maintain that pretty much every model that has been in use for the past two decades, all of which were developed based on data during a period of low inflation and declining interest rates as well as significant increases in central bank provided liquidity, no longer work.  After all, those underlying conditions no longer exist.  Inflation remains much higher than during the pre-pandemic decades;

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Interest rates are much higher;

Source: fred.stlouisfed.org

And central banks have been reducing net liquidity for some time now (think QT). 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, if all the underlying conditions have changed, it seems unlikely that the models based on those conditions will add much value.  After all, nobody really knows how elastic prices are for any given goods directly, nor how willing companies will be to sacrifice margin to maintain sales.  As such, forecasting short-term movements is a mugs’ game here.  In fact, yesterday’s price action is a perfect example of how things are not necessarily how they appear.

With that in mind, let’s see how yesterday’s risk reversal in US equity markets fed into the rest of the world.  Asian equities saw a wide range of price action overnight.  While Japan, Hong Kong and China were all tantamount to unchanged, Korea (+1.6%) and Taiwan (+2.8%) saw significant bounces while India (-1.8%) fell after concerns that President Trump’s mooted additional sanctions on any nation that buys Russian oil hit home as India buys, I read, 44% of their oil from Russia.  Meanwhile, in Europe, screens are green this morning with gains across the board of between 0.7% and 1.0%.  This is despite weaker PMI data, with every nation in Europe reporting a sub 50 manufacturing number.  However, inflation fell a tick more than expected with Core falling to 2.4% and headline down to 2.2% and this has encouraged traders to believe that the ECB will be cutting again later this month despite some commentary to the contrary from several ECB members.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15) they are pointing lower by about -0.4% across the board.  

In the bond market, 10-year yields continue to slide around the world with Treasuries (-5bps) falling back to their lowest level in a month and prior to that since early December.  Too, European sovereigns are seeing yields fall sharply, with declines of between -6bps and -10bps as the combination of slowing inflation and weak PMI data has overwhelmed the previous concerns about German defense spending.  In fact, that is a story we have not heard in a while, eh?  Last week, that was the end of European bond markets, today it is ancient history!

Turning to commodities, oil (+0.1%) is consolidating after a sharp $2/bbl rise yesterday that was fomented by Trump’s threats to both Russia and Iran (he threatened to bomb them if they didn’t renounce their nuclear ambitions).  The thing about oil’s price action is since late 2022, it has remained in a trading range of $65/$80 more or less, so despite the large move yesterday, I would argue no new ground has been covered.  Certainly Trump’s efforts to open up more area for drilling is likely to weigh on prices over time, but over what timeframe remains to be seen.  As it is a day ending in “y”, gold is higher again, this morning by 0.3%, but there is no indication this trend is running out of steam.  The remarkable thing is the steadiness of the move.  However, the other two major metals, silver (-0.35%) and copper (-0.3%) have slipped a bit this morning.

Finally, the dollar remains confused.  Versus the euro (-0.25%) it is stronger, but versus the CHF (+0.25%) and JPY (+0.5%) it is weaker.  Now, you might say that is a sign of a risk-off trade, but equity markets are rallying in Europe along with bonds.  So, is this a move to havens or risk?  The biggest mover this morning is CLP (-0.9%) but it has been one of the biggest gainers YTD, so with copper soft, this looks a lot like some profit taking.  Otherwise, movements of +/- 0.2% are the order of the day.

Here’s a crazy theory, perhaps President Trump is seeking to drive the economy weaker in order to force the Fed to cut rates.  After all, that appears to be the Fed’s bias, but recent inflation data has made them uncomfortable to do so.  If Trump can drive up Unemployment, maybe it does the trick!

Ok, let’s see the data the rest of the week as yesterday’s Chicago PMI (47.6) while modestly better than expected really didn’t seem to matter that much.

TodayISM Manufacturing49.5
 ISM Prices Paid65.0
 JOLTS Job Openings7.63M
WednesdayADP Employment105K
 Factory Orders0.5%
 -ex Transport0.7%
ThursdayInitial Claims225K
 Continuing Claims1860K
 Trade Balance-$123.0B
 ISM Services53.0
FridayNonfarm Payrolls128K
 Private Payrolls110K
 Manufacturing Payrolls1K
 Unemployment Rate4.2%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.2
 Participation Rate62.4%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to all this, we hear from six Fed speakers including Chairman Powell Friday morning at 11:30am.  For today and tomorrow, tariffs will be the primary story, although it is not clear it is the primary driver.  However, once they are announced, I expect we will move onto the next big thing, although I have no idea what that will be.  But the one thing on which we can count regarding President Trump is there will be another big thing.  Stay hedged is all the advice I can give because uncertainty is extremely high.

Good luck

Adf