Tag Archives: investing

Quite Miffed

Posted on by

By now, each of you is aware
More tariffs, the Prez did declare
Some nations will scream
While others will scheme
To Trump, though, in war all is fair
 
The market reaction was swift
With equities in a downshift
While Treasuries rallied
Pure gold, lower, sallied
And everyone worldwide’s quite miffed

 

Once again, President Trump did exactly what he told us he was going to do from the start.  He applied reciprocal tariffs on virtually every nation in the world, although at a rate claimed to be ~50% of their tariffs on the US, (as calculated by the White House and which included quotas and non-tariff barriers as well.)  In addition to Israel, which pledged to reduce tariffs to 0% on US goods if the US would do the same, it appears Canada has also agreed that deal.  I expect that we will hear different responses from nations all around the world, but remember, the one thing the president has made clear is that retaliation by other nations will be met with a significantly higher response from the US.  I expect that smaller nations may find themselves in very difficult straits, although larger ones have more potential to respond.  But, in the end, the US remains the consumer of last resort, and every nation on the list realizes that losing the US market will not help their economies.

The market response was immediate with US equity futures plummeting on the open of the evening session and sharp declines in Asian equities as well.  Treasury yields fell along with the dollar, while gold after an initial rally, reversed course and is now lower on the day as well.

Analysts around the world are out with early forecasts of the “likely” impacts of these tariffs although I would take them with a grain of salt.  Remember, analyst macro models have been pretty useless for a while, ever since the underlying conditions changed as I described earlier this week, so it is not clear to me that applying broken models to a new event is likely to offer accurate estimates of future activity.  However, there is a pretty clear consensus, which is that inflation is going to rise while economic activity is going to decline, probably into a recession.  Personally, I am confused by this analysis as every one of these analysts continues to believe that a recession drives prices lower and reduces inflation, but I’m just reporting on what I have seen.

If pressed, I expect that we will see several nations reduce their tariff structures in response to this, similar to Canada and Israel, and US tariffs will decline there as well.  Other nations will dig in their heels and trade activity between the US and those nations will decline.  But I will not even hazard a guess as to which nations will do what.  Political pain is a funny thing, and different leaders respond differently.

My sincere hope is that now that the tariffs have been imposed, we can move on with our lives and discuss other issues because frankly, I am really tired of this topic.

Masked by the tariff mania was news that the US Senate has moved forward on its budget resolution bill which if passed and combined with the House, will allow the process to start to legislate for fiscal year 2026.  Both versions maintain the 2017 tax cuts, both seek unspecified spending reductions and while each has a different price tag, my take is this process will be completed before too long.  It would truly be miraculous if Congress actually submitted department spending bills on a timely basis, rather than the omnibus bills that have been the norm for quite a while.  That would be true progress in how the government works.

Anyway, let’s see where things stand this morning.  The one thing we know is that despite President Trump’s constant discussion on tariffs, market participants were not prepared.  Ironically, yesterday saw modest gains in US equity indices but as of now (6:40) US futures are sharply lower (NASDAQ -3.8%, SPX -3.6%, DJIA -2.6%).  Of course, the damage has been significant everywhere with equities lower worldwide.

In Asia, Vietnam (-7.2%) was the worst hit index, actually the worst in the world, as tariffs there rose to 46%.  Given Vietnam has been a way station for exports from China to the US, I expect that we will see some swift action by the government there to address the situation.  But elsewhere in Asia, while the losses were universal, they were not as bad as might be expected.  Tokyo (-2.6%) led the way lower with Chinese shares (Hang Seng -1.5%, CSI 300 -0.6%) also falling, but not collapsing.  Korea (-0.8%) and India (-0.4%) fell but were also not devastated.

In Europe, though, the pain is more consistent and larger, net, than Asia as per the below snapshot from Bloomberg.  This will be the most interesting thing to watch as there has been a great deal of huffing and puffing about a response, but will European nations, who sell a great deal into the US, risk a worse outcome, or will they reduce their own tariffs?

Something else that has declined sharply is bond yields around the world.  Treasury yields are lower by a further -6bps, and that is the basic decline seen across Europe as well.  Asia saw even greater drops in yields with JGB’s (-12bps) breaking the trendline that had been in place since the BOJ first started hiking rates last year and Governor Ueda made clear his intention to continue to do so.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It appears that investors are anticipating a global recession, at least based on the movements in government bond yields around the world.

In the commodity space, oil (-4.7%) has reversed much of its recent gains as the recession narrative has eclipsed the Iran war/sanctions narrative.  However, despite the sharp decline, oil remains nearly $3/bbl above the lows seen at the beginning of March, just one month ago.  In the metals market, gold, which initially traded to new highs on the tariff announcement reversed course about lunchtime in Asia and is now down by more than -2.0%.  My take is this is a short-term impact as investors sell liquid assets with gains to cover margin calls, rather than any negative feelings about gold in the wake of the news.  Instead, I suspect that the barbarous relic will regain its footing shortly as the ultimate haven asset in difficult times, and clearly many now see difficult times ahead.  Silver (-3.9%) and copper (-0.4%) are also softer, much more on the economic concerns than the risk concerns.

Finally, the dollar, shockingly, is broadly lower this morning.  While we have been consistently informed that a very clear response to the US imposing tariffs would be other currencies weakening vs. the dollar to offset the impact, apparently that model is also broken.  Versus it’s G10 counterparts, the dollar is under severe pressure today.  EUR (+1.75%), JPY (+1.7%), CHF (+2.1%), SEK (+2.1%) and even NOK (+1.1%) despite the collapse in oil prices, have all moved to within 1% of the dollar’s lows seen last September.  But to keep things in perspective, I don’t know that I would call the dollar “weak” here.  The below chart of DXY shows that even over the past 20 years, the dollar has been MUCH lower and only spent a relatively small amount of time above current levels.  

Source: Koyfin.com

Interestingly, other than the CE4, which track the euro closely, most EMG currencies have not seen the same boost vs. the dollar, although most are somewhat higher.  MXN (+0.6%), KRW (+0.6%) and INR (+0.5%) have all gained modestly.  ZAR (0.0%) and CNY (-0.2%) are the only currencies that have bucked the trend and followed the economic theory.  

Turning to the data, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims as well as the Trade Balance (-$123.5B) at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see ISM Services (53.0).  The thing about this data is it ought to have no impact whatsoever as last night’s tariff announcements completely changed the playing field.  So whatever things were, they are not representative of the future, at least the near future.  There are also a couple of Fed speakers, but again, there is no way they can determine how they will react until the real economic effects of these tariffs start to play out.

There have been many analysts who continue to believe that President Trump will not be able to tolerate a substantial decline in the equity market despite the fact that he has not discussed it at all, and he, along with Treasury Secretary Bessent have consistently said their goal is a lower yield on 10-year Treasuries.  Well, they are getting their wish right now, regardless of the reason.  

The president has done virtually everything he said he was going to do regarding the border, government efficiency and now tariffs.  There are many skeptics who believe that he is out to force economic change on the backs of the bottom 90% of earners to benefit himself and others in the top 1%.  But he has consistently said his goal is to help the middle class.  His view of reindustrialization and more self-sufficiency while reduced international adventures continues to be the driving force of his policies.  There is no reason to believe he is going to change that view.  Do not look for a reversal of what he has done simply because the S&P 500 declines.  I think the trend is going to be for the dollar to continue to decline along with interest rates, while commodities rally.  Equity markets are going to be a tale of two markets, likely with previous highflyers suffering and previously overlooked companies benefitting.  

The world is changing a lot, so the best thing you can do is maintain your hedges to mitigate the impact.

Good luck

Adf

Nobody Knows

Posted on by

The punditry’s now out in force
As they hope, their views, we’ll endorse
When tariffs arrive
On Wednesday they’ll strive
To claim they were right, but of course
 
The problem is nobody knows
Exactly what Trump will propose
So, models will fail
While Trump haters wail
More chaos is all that he sows

 

Well, folks, it’s month and quarter end today and many are decrying that President Trump’s policies have derailed the bull market in risk assets.  And they are almost certainly correct.  Yet, at the same time, there has been a broad recognition across a wide spectrum of analysts and politicians that the situation he inherited was unsustainable.  Whether the 7% budget deficits, the $36+ trillion in government debt or the ongoing inflationary pressures, the only people who were happy were those who saw their equity portfolios rise against all odds.  (I guess the gold holders have been pretty happy too, in fairness.)

However, the underlying reality of a situation is rarely enough to alter a good story, or a story that somebody wants to tell.  For instance, the Michigan Consumer Survey was released on Friday, and it fell more than expected to a reading of 57.0, its lowest reading since July 2022, when inflation was peaking.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But the story that has been getting all the press is the extraordinary rise in inflation expectations.  As you can see below, both 1-year (blue line) and 5-year (grey line) have risen sharply in 2025.  Conveniently for the mainstream media this has been blamed on President Trump’s policies given their efforts to discredit everything the president does.

However, the Michigan Survey, while having a long pedigree, isn’t that large a survey.  As such, it is possible that non-economic factors may be impacting the results.  For instance, when the survey is taken, the respondents’ political leanings are asked as well.  Now, take a look at the data when split by political views as per the below.  Perhaps, we need to take this survey with a grain or two of salt as it appears the question may be seen as a way to express one’s opinion about the current administration rather than unbiased views of future inflation.

This is especially true when we look at other measures of expected inflation, like the NY Fed’s Consumer inflation survey shown below with the green line compared to that Michigan survey in red.

Source: zerohedge.com

My point is, we need to be careful to notice the non-economic factors that enter into things like expectations surveys.  As well, the idea that inflation expectations are a critical driver of future inflation, although a staple of current central bank thinking, does not have much empirical backing.  For instance, my friend Mike Ashton, the Inflation Guy™, explained in this article way back in 2015, that inflation expectations do not have much empirical proof of effectively forecasting future inflation.  But perhaps, if you don’t believe him, you will consider a scholarly paper by a Fed economist, Jeremy Rudd, written in 2021 that is pretty damning with respect to the idea that the Fed relies on this data as part of their policy toolkit.  

In the end, the one truism of which I am highly confident is that pretty much all the models that have been utilized for the past twenty plus years are no longer reflective of the reality on the ground today.  Not just for inflation, but for growth and trade and every other aspect.  President Trump has not merely upset the applecart; he has broken it into pieces and burned them all to cinders.  All the fiscal problems mentioned above are still extant, but President Trump appears set on changing them in the direction desired by almost all mainstream economists.  They don’t like his methods, but it’s not clear how changes of this magnitude can be made smoothly.  So, perhaps the proper question is just how rough things are going to be.  If the overnight session is any indication, they could get pretty rough.

The dominant feature today
Is fear is what’s now holding sway
As markets decline
More pundits consign
The blame on Trumps tariff pathway

Investors have risk indigestion this morning, as their appetite to own equities anywhere in the world has significantly diminished.  After a rough week ending session on Friday in the US, equity markets in Asia have almost universally declined led by Tokyo (-4.05%) but with sharp declines seen in Korea (-3.0%), Taiwan (-4.2%), Australia (-1.75%), Malaysia (-1.45%) and Thailand (-1.5%).  Chinese (-0.7%) and Hong Kong (-1.3%) shares also fell, although perhaps not quite as far as others.  The entire conversation today is about President trump’s promise to impose tariffs around the world on Wednesday, with many analysts trying to estimate what damage will occur despite no clarity on the size and breadth of the tariffs.  But investors have decided that havens are a better place to hide for now.

European bourses are also sharply lower, although more in the -1.7% to -2.0% range, with every major index in Germany, France, Spain and Italy down by those amounts.  There continues to be a great deal of discussion amongst the European leadership about how they will respond to the mooted tariffs, but of course, like everybody else, they have no idea exactly what they will be.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:45) the picture is grim with declines between -0.6% (DJIA) and -1.3% (NASDAQ).  Right now, the only people who are happy are those holding puts.

Of course, in this risk-off environment, it should be no surprise that bond yields have slipped a bit as, at the margin, investors are flocking to own Treasuries (-5bps) and European sovereigns (Bunds -3bps, OATs -2bps, Gilts -4bps).  Even JGBs (-5bps) saw yields decline last night with any thoughts of the BOJ hiking rates in the near term fading away completely.  

On the other hand, commodities are finding a lot more interest this morning with gold (+1.15%) leading the way higher and proving itself to continue to be one of the most consistent safe havens available.  Interestingly, oil (+0.5%) is rallying this morning despite a number of Wall Street analysts upping their estimate of the probability of a US recession.  However, offsetting the potential future demand weakness is the news that President Trump is “pissed off” at Vladimir Putin for his ongoing aggression in Ukraine and seeming unwillingness to move to a ceasefire.  This has raised the specter of further sanctions on Russian oil output, potentially reducing supply.  As well, the Trump administration continues to tighten the noose on both Iranian and Venezuelan oil sales, so potentially reducing supply even further.  I guess this morning, the supply story is bigger than the demand story.

Finally, as we turn to the currency markets, the dollar is generally firmer this morning, although by widely varying amounts depending on the currency.  For instance, in the G10, NOK (-0.75%) is the laggard despite oil’s gains, followed by AUD (-0.6%) and NZD (-0.55%), with all three of these being major commodity producers at a time when commodities are doing well.  As to the rest of this bloc, JPY (+0.35%) is off its best levels, but behaving as a haven, and the others are just marginally changed from Friday’s closing levels.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (+0.25%) is the exception this morning, clearly benefitting from gold’s ongoing run to new all-time high prices, but otherwise, most of these currencies are modestly softer (MXN -0.2%, PLN -0.2%, KRW -0.25%).

Speaking of currencies, though, there is an article on this morning’s Bloomberg website that is worth reading, I believe, for everyone involved in the FX market.  The gist of the article is something that I have been discussing for the past several years, the fact that market liquidity here, despite the extraordinary volumes that trade on average each day (currently estimated by the BIS at $7.5 trillion across all FX products) is not nearly as deep as might be anticipated.  

My observation from my time on bank desks was that while there was a great deal of electronic flow, likely driven by HFT firms seeking to extract the last tenth of a pip out of thousands of transactions, when a real client, generally a corporate, had a need to do something specific to address a business need, and that amounted to more than $100 million equivalent, the liquidity situation was far more suspect. 

My personal theory was as follows: bank consolidation reduced the net amount of risk-taking appetite as larger banks did not increase their risk-taking commensurate with the reduction that occurred by small banks being gobbled up.  Combining this with the introduction of high-frequency trading firms in the business, who had no underlying client base to whom they owed a price, and therefore, could turn off their machines in a difficult market, further reducing liquidity, led to a situation where liquidity was a mile wide and an inch deep.  My point is for all the corporates out there who have significant transactions to execute, you must carefully consider the best way to approach the situation to avoid a potentially significant increase in execution costs.

Turning to the data, before we look at this week, which ends with NFP, a quick word on Friday’s core PCE data, which came in at a hotter than expected 0.4% taking the YY number to 2.8%.  The Fed cannot be happy with this outcome as a quick look at the recent readings makes it hard to accept inflation is continuing its decline from the 2022 highs.  Rather a look at the below chart, at least to my eye, shows me a stability in Core PCE of somewhere between 2.5% and 3.0%, well above the Fed’s target range, and hardly a cause to cut rates further.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As this note has already gotten a bit longer than I like, I will list the week’s data tomorrow but note that Chicago PMI (exp 45.4) is the only noteworthy data point to be released today.  

Absent a complete reversal of Trump’s tariff plans, I see nothing positive on the horizon for risk assets, and expect that equities will maintain, and probably extend the overnight losses while gold and bonds both rally, at least for now.  As to the dollar, my take is it will not benefit universally in this risk-off scenario, although there are currencies that will clearly suffer.  Remarkably, despite the performance of Aussie and Kiwi overnight, I do believe the commodity bloc has the best prospects for now.

Good luck

Adf

I Am Your Savior

Posted on by

Investors are showing concern
‘Bout tariffs and Trump, so they spurn
The riskiest stuff
But that’s not enough
To help generate a return
 
Seems most of the holdings in favor
Are no longer risk takers’ flavor
How long before Jay
Will finally say
QE is here, I am your savior

 

Have you bailed out on your risk exposures yet?  Because if not, it certainly seems you are behind the curve!  At least, that’s what it feels like this morning as trepidation underlies every player’s market activity.  Based on the commentary, as well as the Fear & Greed Index, you might think we are in a depression!

Source: cnn.com

But are things really that bad?  I know that the past week has seen a modest drawdown in equity prices, but after all, on February 20th, they reached yet another new all-time high, at least as per the S&P 500.  Since then, as you can see below, the decline has been less than 5%.  And while the market has traded below its 50-day moving average (blue line), a key technical indicator, it remains well above both the 200-day version of the same (purple line) and the longer-term trend line.  My point is it feels like the narrative is overstating the magnitude of the move thus far.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Is this the beginning of the end?  While you can never rule that out, as major corrections can occur at any time, I have no reason to believe this will be the case.  Much has been made of yesterday’s Initial Claims print at 242K, much higher than forecast as a harbinger of future economic weakness.  However, looking at the past 3 years of weekly data here, while certainly in the upper levels of readings, it is not nearly the only occurrence and not nearly the highest reading.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One data point does not make a trend and to my eye, looking at this chart, there is no discernible trend in either direction.  Yet part of the narrative evolution is that the DOGE cuts in government jobs, along with all the headline spending cuts, is setting the economy up for much slower growth in the short run.

In fact, this issue goes back to one about which I wrote several days ago here regarding the impact of government spending on actual economic activity.  The current view of economic activity includes government spending.  If President Trump’s goal is to reduce that spending, regardless of the net long-term benefits of such actions, GDP readings are going to decline initially.  Yes, there will be more productive use of capital with less regulation and less government, but that will take some time to become evident.  In the meantime, weaker economic activity is likely to be the outcome.

I have frequently written that there has not been a market clearing event since, arguably, October 1987, when equity markets plunged and erased significant excess and speculation.  Alas, newly minted (at the time) Fed Chair Greenspan stepped in and promised to support markets with ample liquidity the next day which opened the way for far more Fed intervention in markets leading up to Ben Bernanke and the first QE programs in the wake of the GFC in 2009 and every QE version since then.  While the movement so far does not remotely indicate the end of the world, based on the Fed’s history, once equity markets correct about 20%, they tend to become far more active in supporting the markets economy.  Will this time be different?  Given the Fed’s seeming underlying desperation to cut rates to begin with, my take is if the correction reaches 15% – 20%, we will see just that.

To sum things up, risk assets are under pressure on the basis of 1) excessive valuations, 2) the Trump efforts to reduce wasteful spending (which while wasteful is still spending and counted as economic activity), and 3) the idea that Trump’s imposition of tariffs is going to dramatically raise inflation and slow growth further.  Given the mainstream media’s inherent hatred of the president, they will certainly be playing up this theme for as long as they can as they try to force Trump to change tack.  But Trump, and Treasury Secretary Bessent, have been clear that their concern is 10-year bond yields, and getting them to lower levels.  A natural corollary of the current risk-off sentiment is that bond yields tend to decline.   Look at the chart below which shows that since Trump’s inauguration, 10-year yields are down nearly 40bps.  I would argue that Trump and Bessent are perfectly comfortable with the market right now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, let’s move on to the overnight activity.  Sticking to the bond theme, while Treasuries, this morning, are unchanged, they did decline all yesterday afternoon and this morning European sovereigns are all lower by -2bps.  As well, JGB yields have also slipped by -3bps as we are seeing risk aversion evident all around the world.  Of course, the problem with all G10 nations (Germany excepted) is that they all have very high debt/GDP ratios and in Europe, especially, this is a problem as they have begun to realize they need to spend a great deal more on defense than they have in the past.  And all that spending is going to be funded by more borrowing.  The tension between additional issuance driving yields higher and risk aversion driving yields lower is going to be the theme of European bond markets for a while.

In the equity world, it is not a pretty picture anywhere in the world.  After yesterday’s US rout, with the NASDAQ (-2.8%) leading the way lower, Asian bourses were all in the red.  Japan (-2.9%), Hong Kong (-3.3%), China (-2.0%), Korea (-3.4%), India (-1.9%)… the list goes on across the entire region with only New Zealand (+0.5%) bucking the trend on some better than expected local earnings and consumer confidence data.  European markets, though, are in a bit better shape as they suffered yesterday and are consolidating those losses this morning with most markets trading +/- 0.3% on the session.  We have seen a lot of European inflation data this morning, most of it lower than forecast which has encouraged the view that the ECB will be cutting rates more aggressively going forward.  US futures, too, are higher at this hour (7:00), on the order of 0.5% as they bounce from yesterday’s, and truly the past week’s, declines.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.25%) is back under pressure and back under $70/bbl.  The latest fear is that slowing economic activity around the world will reduce demand for the black sticky stuff and drive prices lower still.  Remember this, oil supply is restricted not by geology, but by politics.  As nations determine that cheaper energy is critical to their future, expect to see more effort to produce more oil.  Meanwhile, metals markets are also under pressure with gold (-0.5%) still falling despite its ostensible risk profile.  However, the barbarous relic remains well above $2800/oz and I continue to believe that this correction is just that, and not the reversal of a trend.  Too many things are happening around the world to induce more fear and in that scenario, gold is the oldest store of value around.  The rest of the metals complex is also under pressure with copper (-1.2%) slipping back a bit.  It is important to remember, though, that despite the recent declines, all the major metals are still nicely higher on the month.  

Finally, the dollar is a bit firmer again this morning after a rally yesterday as well.  In classic risk-off fashion, investors flocked to the dollar, arguably to buy Treasuries.  So, we are seeing weakness in NZD (-0.6%), JPY (-0.4%) and CHF (-0.3%) in the G10 and weakness in KRW (-0.5%), ZAR (-0.2%) amongst others in the EMG bloc.  Here the story remains the impacts of Trump’s tariffs and how they will be applied, if they will be applied, as well as a general fear factor which tends to help the dollar.  Consider, too, ideas that the ECB is going to cut rates will not help the single currency.

On the data front, this morning brings Personal Income (exp +0.3%), Personal Spending (0.1%), and the PCE data where Headline (0.3%, 2.5% Y/Y) and Core (0.3%, 2.6% Y/Y) will be the most important data points.  As well, we will see Chicago PMI (40.6) which has been below 50.0 in every month but one since August 2022.  

There is no question that the economic data has been softening lately.  We saw that with the Citi Surprise Index as well as the continuous stream of commentary by the economic bears who point to underlying pieces of data that point in that direction (whether housing or employment indicators and the recent weak PMI data).  

Consider this, an early recession in Trump’s term can be blamed on the Biden administration as well as set things up for future growth, certainly in time for the mid-term elections.  As well, it will likely help reduce the yield on the 10-year, an explicit goal.  This scenario likely means short-term weakness with an eye to longer term growth.  The dollar is likely to benefit early on, at least until the Fed steps in.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Hard to Kill

Posted on by

Inflation just won’t go away
As evidenced by the UK
This year started out
Removing all doubt
The Old Lady’s work’s gone astray
 
And elsewhere, the problem is still
Inflation is quite hard to kill
Though central banks want
More rate cuts to flaunt
Those goals are quite hard to fulfill

 

While most eyes remain on President Trump with his ongoing efforts to reduce the size of the US government, as well as his tariff discussions and efforts to negotiate a lasting peace in Ukraine, we cannot ignore the other things that go on around the world.  One of the big issues, which has almost universally been acclaimed a problem, is that inflation is higher than most of the world had become accustomed to pre-Covid.  As well, the virtual universal central bank goal remains the local inflation rate, however calculated, to be at 2.0%.  Alas for the central bankers in their seats today, that remains quite a difficult reach.  A quick look at the most recent headline CPI readings across the G20 shows that only 5 nations (counting the Eurozone as a bloc since they have only one monetary policy) are at or below that magic level as per the below table.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of those nations who are below, two, China and Switzerland, are actually quite concerned about the lack of price pressure and seeking to raise the inflation rate, and the other three (Canada, Singapore and Saudi Arabia) are right on the number, with core inflation readings tending higher than the headline reported here.

Perhaps a better way to highlight the problem is to look at the 10-year bonds of most countries and see how they have been behaving of late as an indication of whether investors are comfortable with the inflation fighting efforts by each nation.  While it is not universal, you can look at the column on the far right of the below table and see that 10-year yields have been rising for the past year.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I only bring this up because, despite the fact that I have been downplaying central bank, especially the Fed’s, impact on markets, ultimately, every nation tasks their central bank to manage inflation.  That seems reasonable since inflation, as Milton Friedman explained to us in 1963, is “always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.”  But perhaps you don’t believe that and are schooled in the idea that faster growth leads to higher wages and therefore higher inflation.  Certainly, Paul Samuelson’s iconic textbook (as an aside, Dr Samuelson was my Economics 101 professor in college) made clear that was the pathway.  Alas, as my good friend, @inflation_guy Mike Ashton, wrote yesterday, there is no evidence that is the case.  Read the article, it is well worth it and can help you start looking elsewhere for causes of inflation, like perhaps the growth in the money supply!

Of course, the reason that we continue to come back to inflation in our discussions is because it is critical to the outcomes in financial markets.  And that is our true focus.  It is the reason there is so much discussion regarding President Trump’s mooted tariffs and how inflationary they will be.  It is the reason that parties out of power continue to highlight any prices that have risen substantially in an effort to disparage the parties in power.  And it is the reason that central banks remain central to the plot of all financial markets, at least based on the current configuration of the global economy.  If there was only one financial lesson from the pandemic response, it is that Magical Money Tree Modern Monetary Theory is a failed concept of how to run policy.  This poet’s fervent hope is that Treasury Secretary Bessent is smart enough to understand that and will address fiscal issues in other manners.  I believe that to be the case.

Back to the UK, where CPI printed at 3.0%, 2 ticks higher than the median forecast, while core CPI printed at 3.7%.  This cannot be comforting for the BOE as most of the MPC remain committed to helping PM Starmer’s government find growth somehow and are keen to cut rates in support.  The problem they have is that inflation will not fade despite extremely lackluster GDP growth.  Recall, last week, even though the Q/Q GDP print of 0.1% beat forecasts, it was still just 0.1%.  Not falling into recession hardly seems a resounding victory for policy in the UK, especially since stagnation, or is it now stagflation, is the end result.  It should be no surprise that market participants have sold off the pound (-0.3%), Gilts (+5bps) and UK equities (-0.4%) and it is hard to find a positive way to spin any of this.  Again, while I have adjusted my views on Japan, the UK falls squarely in the camp of in trouble and likely to see a weaker currency.

Ok, let’s look elsewhere to see how things behaved overnight.  After a very modest rise in US equity indices yesterday, the Asian markets were mixed with the Nikkei (-0.3%) and Hang Seng (-0.15%) slacking off a bit although the CSI 300 (+0.7%) managed to find buyers after President Xi met with business leaders and the expectation is for further government stimulus, as well as a reduction in regulations, to help support the economy.  Australia (-0.7%) is still under pressure despite yesterday’s RBA rate cut as the post-meeting statement was quite hawkish, indicating caution is their approach for now given still sticky inflation.  (Where have we heard that before?)

In Europe, the only color on the screen is red with declines of between -0.4% and -0.9% as investors seem to be taking some profits after a solid run in most of these markets.  I guess the fact that European governments have been shown to be powerless in the world has not helped investor sentiment either as it appears these nations may be subject to more outside forces than they will be able to address adequately.  Lastly, US futures are unchanged at this hour (7:40).

In the bond market, as per the table above, yields are higher across the board with Treasuries (+2bps) the best performer as virtually all European sovereign issues have seen yields rise between 5bps and 7bps.  It simply appears that confidence in the Eurozone is slipping and demand for Eurozone assets is falling alongside that.

In the commodity markets, it should be no surprise that gold (+0.1%) continues to edge higher.  The barbarous relic continues to find price support despite the fact that interest in gold, at least in Western economies, remains lackluster at best.  There is much discussion now about an audit of the US’s gold reserves at Fort Knox and in the NY Fed, something that has not been performed since 1953.  Not surprisingly, there are rumors that there is much less gold in storage than officially claimed (a little over 8 tons) and rumors that there is much more which has not been reported but was obtained via seizures throughout history.  This story has legs as despite the lack of institutional interest in the US, it is picking up a retail following and we are seeing the punditry increasingly raise their price forecasts for the coming years.  As to oil (+0.8%) it is higher again this morning but remains in a tight trading range with market technicians looking at the $70/bbl level as a key support to hold.  A break there could well see a quick $5/bbl decline.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer this morning against most of its counterparts with most G10 currencies showing declines similar to the pound’s -0.2%, although the yen (+0.15%) is bucking that trend.  However, versus its EMG counterparts, the dollar is having a much better day, rising vs. PLN (-0.9%), ZAR (-0.7%) and BRL (-0.5%) on various idiosyncratic stories.  The zloty seems to be suffering from its proximity to Ukraine and the uncertainty with the future regarding a potential peace effort.  The rand is falling after the FinMin delayed the budget speech as internal squabbling in the governing coalition seems to be preventing a coherent message while the real is under pressure as inflation remains above target and the central bank’s tighter policy has been negatively impacting growth in the economy.

On the data front, this morning brings Housing Starts (exp 1.4M) and Building Permits (1.46M) and then this afternoon we see the FOMC Minutes from the January meeting.  That will be intensely parsed for a better understanding of what the committee is thinking.  We do hear from Governor Jefferson after the market closes, but generally, the cautious stance remains the most popular commentary.

Has anything really changed?  The market remains uncertain over Trump’s moves, the Fed remains on hold and cautious, and data shows that the economy continues to tick along nicely with price pressures unwilling to dissipate.  I see no reason to abandon the dollar at this point.

Good luck

Adf

A Fifth Wheel

Posted on by

Confusion is clearly what reigns
As even the punditry strains
To understand whether
Investors will tether
Their future to stocks or take gains

 

As there was no activity in the US financial markets yesterday, it seems there was time for analysts to consider the current situation and make pronouncements as to investor behavior.  Ironically, we saw completely opposite conclusions from two major players.  On the one hand, BofA posted the following chart showing that investors’ cash holdings are at 15-year lows, implying they remain fully invested and quite bullish.

Meanwhile, the WSJ this morning has a lead article on how bearish investors are, claiming they are the most bearish since November 2023 according to the American Association of Individual Investors.  Apparently, 47.3% of investors surveyed believe stock prices will fall over the next 6 months.

So, which is it?  Are investors bullish or bearish?  To me this is a perfect description of the current situation.  Everyone is overloaded with information, much of which is contradictory, and so having a coherent view has become extremely difficult.  This is part and parcel of my view that the only thing we can clearly expect going forward is an increase in volatility.  In fact, someone said that Donald Trump is the avatar of volatility, and I think that is such an apt description.  Wherever he goes, mayhem follows.  Now, I also believe that people knew what they were voting for as change was in demand.  But for those of us who pay close attention to financial markets, it will take quite the effort to keep up with all the twists and turns.

Fed speakers are starting to feel
Like they have become a fifth wheel
So, let’s get prepared
For Fed speaking squared
As they work, their views, to reveal

Away from the conundrum above, the other noteworthy thing is that FOMC members are starting to feel left out of the conversation.  Prior to President Trump’s inauguration, market practitioners hung on their every word, and they apparently loved the power that came with that setting.  However, now virtually every story is about the President and his policies with monetary policy falling to a distant issue on almost all scorecards.  Clearly, for a group that had grown accustomed to moving markets with their words, this situation has been deemed unacceptable.  The solution, naturally, is to speak even more frequently, and I fear believe this is what we are going to see (or hear) going forward.  

Yesterday was a perfect example, where not only, on a holiday, did we have multiple speakers, but they actually proffered different messages.  From the hawkish side of the spectrum, Governor Michelle Bowman, the lone dissenter to the initial 50bp rate cut back in September, explained caution was the watchword when it comes to acting alongside President Trump’s mooted tariff and other policies, “It will be very important to have a better sense of these policies, how they will be implemented, and establish greater confidence about how the economy will respond in the coming weeks and months.”  That does not sound like someone ready to cut rates anytime soon.

Interestingly, from the dovish side of the spectrum, Governor Christopher Waller, an erstwhile hawk, explained in a speech in Australia (on the day the RBA cut rates by 25bps for their first cut of the cycle and ending an 18 month period of stable rates) that, “If this wintertime lull in progress [on inflation] is temporary, as it was last year, then further policy easing will be appropriate.”  I find it quite interesting that Governor Waller suddenly sounds so dovish as many had ascribed to him the intellectual heft amongst the governors.  This is especially so given that is not the message that Chairman Powell articulated either after the last meeting or at his Humphrey-Hawkins testimony recently.  

So, which is it?  Is the Fed staying hawkish or are they set for a turn?  That will be the crux of many decision-making processes going forward, not just in markets but also in businesses.  We will keep tabs going forward.

Ok, on to the market’s overnight performances.  Lacking a US equity market to follow, everybody was on their own last night which showed with the mixed results.  Japan (+0.25%) showed modest gains while the Hang Seng (+1.6%) rocketed higher on the belief that President Xi is going to be helping the economy, notably the tech firms in China, many of which are listed in Hong Kong.  Alas, the CSI 300 (-0.9%) didn’t get that memo with investors apparently still concerned over the Trump tariff situation.  Elsewhere in the region, Korea and Taiwan rallied while Australia lagged despite the rate cut.  In Europe, unchanged is the story of the day with most bourses just +/-0.1% different than yesterday’s close.  Right now, in Europe, the politicians are trying to figure out how to respond to the recent indication that the US is far less interested in Europe than in the past, and not paying close attention to financial issues.  As to the US, futures at this hour (7:25) are pointing higher with the NASDAQ leading the way, +0.5%.

In the bond market, yields are climbing led by Treasuries (+4bps) with most of Europe seeing yields edge higher by 1bp or 2bps as well.  Remember, yesterday European sovereign yields rose smartly across the board.  Also, I must note JGB yields (+4bps) which have made further new highs for the move and continue to rise.  It appears last night’s catalyst was a former BOJ member, Hiroshi Nakaso, explained he felt more rate hikes were coming with the terminal rate likely to be well above 1.0%.  While I believe the Fed will be cautious going forward, I still think they are focused on rate cuts for now.  With that in mind and the ongoing change in Japanese policy, I am increasingly comfortable with my new stance on the yen.

In the commodity markets, last Friday’s sell-off in the metals markets is just a bad memory with gold (+0.5%) rallying again and up more than 1% since Friday’s close.  I continue to believe those moves were positional and not fundamental.  Too, we are seeing gains in silver (+0.2%) and copper (+0.6%) to complete the triad.  Meanwhile, oil (-0.25%) continues to lag, holding above its recent lows but having a great deal of difficulty finding any buying impulse.  Whether that is due to a potential peace in Ukraine and the end of sanctions on Russian oil, or concerns over demand growth going forward is not clear to me, but the trend, as seen in the chart below, is clearly downward and has been so for the past year.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, in the FX markets, the dollar is firmer this morning rising against all its G10 counterparts with NZD (-0.6%) the laggard.  But losses of -0.2% are the norm this morning.  In the EMG bloc, we are seeing similar price behavior in most markets although MXN (+0.2%) is bucking the trend, seemingly benefitting from what appears to be a hawkish stance by Banxico and the still highly elevated interest rate differential in the peso’s favor.

On the data front, Empire State Manufacturing (exp -1.0) is the only data point although we will hear from two more Fed speakers, Daly and Barr.  I cannot believe that they have really changed their tune and expect that caution will remain their guiding principle for now, although I expect to hear that repeated ad nauseum as they try to regain their place in the spotlight.

Aside from my yen view, I still find it hard to be excited about many other currencies for now.  There is still no indication the Fed is going to move anytime soon, and other central banks are clearly in easing mode.  That bodes well for the dollar going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Shattered His Dreams

Posted on by

The data was hot yesterday
And that put the pressure on Jay
It shattered his dreams
‘Bout all of his schemes
To help keep inflation at bay

 

By now, I am sure you are aware that the CPI data was higher than forecast, and certainly higher than would have made Chairman Powell comfortable.  The outcome, showing Headline rising to 3.0% and core rising to 3.3% with correspondingly higher monthly rises was sufficient to alter the narrative at least a little bit.  Chair Powell even mentioned it in his House testimony, noting, “We are close, but not there on inflation…. So, we want to keep policy restrictive for now.”  Essentially, the data makes clear that the Fed is not going to be cutting the Fed funds rate anytime soon.  The futures market got the message as it is now pricing just 29bps of cuts this year, with December the likely date.

It will be no surprise that the stock market’s initial response was to sell off substantially, but as per the chart below, it spent the rest of the day clawing back the losses and wound up little changed on the day.  This morning, it remains basically unchanged as well.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Treasury bonds, though, had a less fruitful session, falling (yields rising) sharply on the print, but never really regaining their footing with yields jumping almost 15bps at one point although finishing the day about 10bps higher and have given back 2bps more this morning.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, we all know that the Fed doesn’t target CPI, but rather PCE.  However, after this morning’s PPI data release, most economists (although not poets) will be able to reasonably accurately estimate that data point for later this month, as will the Fed.  And that number is not going to be moving closer to their 2.0% target.  What seems very clear at this point is that every Fed speaker for the time being is going to be harping on the caution with which they are going to move forward.

If we look at this from a political perspective, something which is unavoidable these days, it is important to remember that Treasury Secretary Bessent has made clear that he and the president are far more focused on the 10-year yield than on the Fed funds rate.  To that end and given the fact that all this data was from a time preceding President Trump’s inauguration, I don’t think they are too worried.  I would look for the President to continue his drive to reduce waste and fraud in the government and attack that deficit.  Certainly, the news to date is there is a great deal of both waste and fraud to reduce, and if the president is successful, I believe that will play out in significantly lower 10-year yields, if for no other reason than the deficit is reduced or closed.  This story is just beginning to be written.

Now, Putin and Trump had a call
As Trump tries to end Russia’s brawl
They’re slated to meet
So, they can complete
A treaty with Europe awol

Under any interpretation, I believe the news that Presidents Trump and Putin are going to meet in an effort to hammer out an end to the Russia/Ukraine war is good news.  Beyond the simple fact that less war is an unadulterated good, I think it is very clear that this particular war has had significant market impacts, hence our interest here.  Obviously, energy prices have been impacted, as both oil and NatGas prices are higher than they would otherwise be given the removal of some portion of Russia’s exports from the global markets and economy.  As such, the end of this conflict, with one likely consequence being Western Europe reopening themselves to Russian energy imports, is likely to see prices decline.  

This matters for more reasons than the fact it will be cheaper to fill up your tank at the gas (petrol) station, it is very likely to have a very positive impact on inflation writ large.  As you can see from the chart below, there is a very strong correlation between the price of oil and US inflation expectations.  Declining oil prices are very likely to help people perceive a less inflationary future and will reduce the rate of inflation by definition.  

Source: ISABELNET

Inflation is an insidious process, and once entrenched is very hard to reduce, just ask Chairman Powell.  I also know that there has been much scoffing at President Trump’s claims he will reduce inflation, especially with his imposition of tariffs all over the place. (It is important to understand that tariffs are not necessarily inflationary by themselves as well explained by my friend the Inflation guy in this article.). However, between his strong start on reducing government expenditures and the potential for an end to the Russia/Ukraine war leading to lower energy prices, these are longer term effects that may do just that.

Ok, let’s move on to the market activities in the wake of yesterday’s CPI and ahead of this morning’s PPI data.  As discussed above, yesterday’s US markets rebounded from their worst levels of the morning and closed modestly lower with the NASDAQ actually unchanged.  In Asia, Japanese shares (+1.3%) had a solid day as the weak yen helped things along although Chinese shares (HK -0.2%, CSI 300 -0.4%) did not fare as well on the day with tariffs still top of mind.  Elsewhere in the region, other than Korea (+1.4%) movement was mixed and modest.  In Europe, the possibility of peace breaking out in Ukraine has clearly got investors excited as both Germany (+1.5%) and France (+1.2%) are seeing strong inflows. The UK (-0.7%) however, continues to suffer from economic underperformance with no discernible benefits shown from the governments weak efforts to right the ship.  GDP was released this morning and while they avoided recession, it’s very hard to get excited over 0.1% Q/Q growth.  As to the US futures market, at this hour (7:20), they are essentially unchanged.

In the bond market, we’ve already discussed Treasury yields, but another benefit of the prospects for a Ukrainian peace is that sovereign yields have fallen substantially, between -5bps and -8bps, throughout the continent.  Once again, the impact of that phone call between Trump and Putin has been quite significant.  Consider that not only are energy prices likely to slide, but the required government spending to prosecute the war is likely to diminish as well.

In the commodity markets, it should be no surprise that oil (-1.3%) prices are sliding as are NatGas prices in Europe (TTF -7.5%) as the opportunity for cheap Russian gas to flow to Europe is once again in view.  To highlight the impact that this has had on Europe, prior to the Ukraine war and the halting of gas flows, the TTF contract hovered between €5 and €25 per MWh.  Since the war broke out, even after the initial shock, it has been between €25 and €55 per MWh.  This is all you need to know about why Europe, and Germany especially, is deindustrializing.  As to the metals markets, after a few days of consolidation, gold (+0.4%) is on the move again although it has not yet recaptured the highs seen early Tuesday morning.  Give it time.  Copper (+0.6%), too, is back on the move and indicating that economic activity is set to continue to grow.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning, although arguably a touch softer overall, as the Russia news has traders looking for less negativity in Europe.  So modest gains in the euro and pound, about 0.15% each is offsetting larger losses in AUD (-0.3%) and NZD (-0.6%), although given the much smaller market size of the latter two, they matter much less.  JPY (+0.4%) is rebounding after yesterday’s sharp decline on the back of the jump in Treasury yields, and it is noteworthy that CHF (+0.65%) is gaining after its CPI data showed a decline in prices last month.  In the EMG bloc, CLP (+0.7%) is stronger on that copper rally, while ZAR (+0.1%) seems to be edging higher as gold continues to perform well. MXN (-0.4%) though is still struggling with the potential negative impact of tariffs and otherwise, there is not much to report.

This morning brings PPI (exp 0.3%. 3.3% Y/Y headline; 0.3%, 3.5% Y/Y core) as well as the weekly Initial (215K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims data.  There are no Fed speakers on the docket, but at this point, I expect the Fed will be fading into the background since they are clearly on hold and President Trump commands the spotlight.  Unless the data starts to veer dramatically away from what we have seen, it appears that the market is going to continue to respond to Trumpian headlines, which of course are impossible to predict.  But remember, most of the rest of the world is still in cutting mode so the dollar should continue to hold its own.

Good luck

Adf

Much Havoc

Posted on by

Colombia tried to prevent
Deportees, who homeward were sent
But Trump’s strong response
Meant that in a nonce
Gustavo, his knee quickly bent
 
Meanwhile, all the talk of AI
This weekend has pundits awry
The Chinese DeepSeek
Could very well wreak
Much havoc in stocks priced sky-high

 

If there was any doubt that things were going to be different under a Trump administration than virtually any previous administration, even his first term, they were dispelled this weekend.  By now you will all have heard the story of the Colombian president, Gustavo Petro (he of the 26% local approval rating) and his refusal to allow two US C-17 military transports filled with Colombian deportees, land in Bogota.  Apparently, when Trump was informed while playing golf, after birdieing the 3rd hole, he tweeted that the US would immediately impose 25% tariffs on everything Colombia exports to the US, rising to 50% in one week if this policy was not changed.  By the time he finished the 6th hole, President Petro reversed his policy and even offered the Colombian presidential plane to come and pick up the deportees.

While the golf portion of the story is amusing, the lesson to the rest of the world is that President Trump is very serious about his electoral promises, and he will utilize the entire might of the US government to achieve his goals.  For smaller nations with little power and leverage, it means that toeing the line is the only solution.  For larger nations, it certainly is a wakeup call to the idea that the US attitude toward international relations has dramatically changed.  As Machiavelli explained, it is better to be feared than loved, and it seems abundantly clear that President Trump understands that.

Perhaps the biggest takeaway from this situation, though, is that the US government is no longer the slow-moving behemoth to which it had evolved over the past decades.  The rest of the world is going to find itself needing to respond very quickly to things that in the past were sent to committees for study and review but now are decided instantly.  If you want to understand why I believe volatility is set to increase across all asset classes, this is the crux of the issue.

Turning to the tech world, the buzz is all about DeepSeek, which is a Chinese AI model that allegedly outperforms OpenAI’s top model, or performs just as well, although it costs a fraction of what OpenAI and others (Microsoft, Google, etc.) spent to train the model and it uses far less advanced chips which are also much less expensive and less power hungry.  Because this is all a new story, it remains unclear if DeepSeek will be an effective replacement for the others, or if it excels in only one or two areas and still lags elsewhere.  

But the market impact has been instantaneous and dramatic.  At this hour (6:00am), the NASDAQ (-4.5%) is leading US equity markets lower with the S&P (-2.4%) along for the ride.  Nvidia (-10.6% in premarket trading) is leading the way, but I suspect that this news will be negative for the entire US tech sector.  After all, it was certainly priced at premium levels.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the short term, I expect we are going to hear a lot more analysis of why this is a game changing event and how the future that was so clear just last week is now cloudy.  However, while this will almost certainly take the shine off the megacap tech companies for a while, I think it would be a mistake to dismiss their futures because of this.  Two things in their favor are they still have virtually infinite resources, and they have dramatically large installed networks which means that changing things will be very difficult.  While their equity prices can decline a lot, it doesn’t mean their businesses are going to collapse.

PS, spare a thought for the impact on the energy sector here as well.  One of the narratives that has been fed lately is that all this AI will require gobs of power that will need a lot more power production.  It was a key feature of the Uranium story as nuclear is seen as one of the few sources capable of delivering the reliable power necessary.  I suspect that this part of the narrative will need to adjust as well if the AI story has actually changed.  But keep in mind that with efficiency comes more demand, so perhaps this is just a temporary downdraft.  Again, volatility is the name of the game.

Ok, let’s see how these stories have impacted the rest of the world.  With all the news over the weekend, you may not recall that US equity markets edged lower on Friday.  Well, Asian markets were mixed overnight with the Nikkei (-0.9%) following the US, although also reacting to the fact that the yen (+1.3%) rallied sharply as well.  Meanwhile, Hong Kong (+0.7%) managed to gain while mainland Chinese shares (-0.4%) certainly showed no benefit from the changing attitudes in tech.  Elsewhere in the region, Korea (+0.9%) and Taiwan (+1.0%) rallied while India (-1.1%) and Indonesia (-0.9%) fell and the rest of the region batted back and forth. In Europe, red is the dominant color, likely on the generally weak US performance although there are no European tech companies of note (perhaps ASML).  But the DAX (-1.2%) is leading the way down followed by the CAC (-0.9%) and the bulk of the rest of the continent and the UK.  Let’s just say that equities are not in favor this morning.

However, what we are seeing is a major bond market rally as Treasury yields (-12bps) tumble as risk is very definitely off.  European sovereign yields are also lower, by between -5bps and -7bps, and JGB yields (-2bps) also slipped, although relative to the rest of the world, they held up pretty well.  Interestingly, with all the talk about DeepSeek and the impact on the tech community, there has been virtually no discussion about the myriad central bank meetings this week, including, of course, the Fed on Wednesday where the market still sees no chance of a rate cut.

Commodity markets are relatively calm this morning as oil (-0.6%) is a touch lower although there has been no news of note.  The background story is that President Trump and Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed bin Salman are talking about increasing production to drive oil prices lower, but that remains more rumor than anything else.  As the polar vortex has passed, and forecasts are for warmer weather, NatGas (-6.2%) is sliding.  In the metals markets, very little movement is ongoing as traders try to determine what all the new news means.

Finally, the dollar is under some pressure this morning despite the risk off attitude that prevails.  I suppose it is because one of the recent drivers of the dollar’s strength has been the insatiable demand for the megacap tech stocks.  It seems that for now, that demand has been satiated.  So, the yen is behaving in its traditional safe haven role, as is the CHF (+0.85%) but the euro (+0.15%) and pound (+0.15%) are both a touch higher.  That said, we are definitely seeing emerging market currencies under pressure as they have nothing to do with tech and everything to do with the very obvious change in attitude regarding how the US is going to deal with smaller nations that don’t accede to US demands, especially regarding immigration.  So, MXN (-1.0%), COP (-1.1%), ZAR (-1.4%) and BRL (-0.6%) are all under significant pressure.  CE4 currencies, though, are not in the line of fire, so are little changed this morning.  

On the data front, remarkably, it almost seems an afterthought given what we just saw this weekend, but along with the Fed, BOC and ECB, we get PCE on Friday.

TodayNew Home Sales670K
TuesdayConsumer Confidence106.0
WednesdayBank of Canada Rate Decision3.0% (current 3.25%)
 FOMC Rate Decision4..5% (current 4.5%)
ThursdayECB Rate Decision2.75% (current 3.0%)
 Initial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1885K
 Q4 GDP2.8%
FridayPersonal Income0.4%
 Personal Spending0.5%
 PCE0.3% (2.6% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% (2.8% Y/Y)
 Chicago PMI40.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

At this point, the central bank story is background noise, not the major theme, but by Wednesday I expect that all eyes will be on Chairman Powell as he describes the Fed’s thoughts at the press conference.  Of course, that assumes that there are no other political earthquakes, which may not be a very good assumption these days.  I think we are in a seismic zone for now.  

As to the dollar, if DeepSeek really is an Nvidia killer, then it is not hard to derive a scenario that says, US equity markets are going to decline, along with growth expectations.  The Fed will cut more aggressively, and the dollar will start to really fall as well.  I’m not forecasting that, just highlighting a possible, if not likely, scenario in the event the world believes the AI story is not going to be as expensive and profitable for the Mag7 as they thought last week.  Once again, the key is to hedge your risks, because as you learned this weekend, things change, and they can change quickly!

Good luck

Adf

More Than a Tweet

Posted on by

In Davos, the global elite
Were treated to more than a Tweet
The president spoke
And in one broad stroke
Explained that he won’t be discreet
 
For oil, he wants prices falling
For Europe, he said it’s appalling
That nations don’t pay
Enough to defray
The costs of the war they’re forestalling

 

If, prior to yesterday, European leaders weren’t sure how things were going to play out now that Mr Trump is back in office, they have a whole lot better understanding now.  I imagine that all their fears were realized when Trump spoke via video at the WEF meeting in Davos, Switzerland.  It’s funny, Argentine president Javier Milei has been calling out the globalist agenda since his election last year and Europe didn’t care and didn’t change their behavior.  I guess that makes sense because the European press would never allow the narrative to change for a minor player like that.  Alas, for the European narrative now, the US, one of their largest trading partners and the nation that insures their safety via NATO membership, is calling them out for their behaviors, whether it is the rarely discussed tariffs they impose on US imports, or the lack of funding for a war they claim is critical to continue in Ukraine, and they are suddenly aware they better reconsider their positions. 

It will be very interesting to watch if things change in Europe (I think they will) and how quickly these changes will come (that could take more time).  Arguably, the biggest problem the current  European leaders have is that there are already large segments of their populations that are unhappy and have been voting accordingly, whether for AfD in Germany, or the RN in France to name two.  Trump’s comments are going to only foment more support for those positions.  I suspect the elections upcoming in Europe are going to see a further rightward swing, or perhaps simply a further swing against the incumbents given what appears to be a significant amount of dissatisfaction amongst the electorate.  No matter your view of Trump’s policies, we all must recognize he is a remarkable political force!

Fifty basis points
Is now Japan’s new baseline
Can it go higher?

As widely expected, the BOJ hiked its base rate by 25bps last night to 0.50%, the highest levels since October 2008.  The immediate market response, as you can see in the chart below, was for the yen to rally (dollar decline) almost one full percent despite interest rate markets having fully priced in the hike.  However, as you can also see, the yen has given back virtually all those gains in the wake of Ueda-san’s press conference where he explained the BOJ was not “seriously behind the curve” which was taken as meaning that it will be a while before they move again.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While JGB yields did perk up 2bps on the session, it hardly seems like the start of a rout.  And, as I highlighted yesterday, the interest rate differential does not seem likely to have changed enough to alter investor plans. Going forward, I expect the yen to be entirely beholden to the dollar’s broad movement.  If, as I suspect, the market starts to price in a more hawkish Fed, USDJPY is likely to go back and test its highs from last summer.

Ok, let’s move on to the overnight market action.  Once again, US equities rallied yesterday, although at this hour (7:10), futures are essentially unchanged.  In Asia, Japanese shares shed early gains after the BOJ rate hike and Ueda presser and closed unchanged on the day.  However, both Hong Kong (+1.9%) and China (+0.8%) rallied on the news that Trump and Xi had a “friendly” conversation as traders and investors took that to mean that tariffs on Chinese goods were not coming right away.  As to the rest of Asia, once again there were both gainers (Korea, Taiwan, Australia) and laggards (India, Indonesia, Philippines) with the rest showing little net movement.  

In Europe, the picture is also mixed as the CAC (+0.9%) is leading the way higher as investors want to believe that Trump’s call for lower interest rates as well as lower oil prices will help the European economy, especially the luxury sector in France.  But elsewhere in Europe we see Germany (+0.3%) a bit higher while Spain (-0.4%) and the UK (-0.4%) are lagging with the former suffering from rising energy prices while the ongoing political mess in the UK has investors steering clear of the Kingdom for now.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning, holding the recent 10bp bounce from the lows seen last week.  European sovereign yields are higher by 1bp to 2bps across the board, with activity quiet and we’ve already discussed JGBs.  

Ironically, after Trump’s call for lower oil prices, they are firmer this morning, up 0.6%, although in the broad scheme of things, relative to the recent price action, that is tantamount to unchanged.  Here is something to consider though, which is a little bit outside the box.  The Biden EO that cited the OCSLA of 1953 prohibited drilling across a series of areas including the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans as well as the Gulf of Mexico.  Now, what is one of the first things that Trump said?  He is renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.  Does that nullify the EO?  (h/t Alyosha).  I’m sure that is a legal battle to be had, but it would be right in line with Trump’s MO.  It would also allow drilling to continue unabated there, which to my understanding, has the most fruitful potential new sites.

Meanwhile, in the metals markets, they are all rallying nicely this morning with gold (+0.85%) now just about 1% below the all-time high seen in October of $2826/oz.  There are many market technicians (and gold bugs) calling for a breakout to new highs, but there is a case to be made this remains a technical short squeeze into NY delivery next week.  However, gold has dragged both silver (+0.9%) and copper (+0.9%) along for the ride.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning with the DXY (-0.5%) falling to its lowest level since mid-December.  Ironically, while the G10 weakness is widespread (EUR +0.7%, GBP +0.5%, AUD +0.5%) the yen, after the rate hike, is the massive underperformer.  In the EMG bloc, one of the biggest movers is CNY (+0.5%) which is clearly benefitting from that phone call, while SGD (+0.5%) is benefitting despite the MAS having eased monetary policy.  This is an indication of just how much of a dollar selling move this is this morning.  In fact, other than the yen’s modest decline, every other major counterpart currency is higher vs. the dollar today. 

On the data front, Flash PMI (exp 49.6 Manufacturing, 56.5 Services) leads off at 9:45 then at 10:00 we see Existing Home Sales (4.19M) and Michigan Sentiment (73.2).  With the Fed meeting next Tuesday and Wednesday, there are still no speakers.  Perhaps of more interest is the fact that we have not seen a single article from the Fed whisperer lately.  As the data is third tier this morning, I wouldn’t expect anything today either.  Too, next week there is limited data of note before the meeting so unless we see a narrative shift of substance, I imagine the Fed will do nothing next week and Powell will dodge any questions regarding the future.

For now, it is all Trump and his actions, comments and EOs.  And you can’t plan how to trade those.  Once again, this is why hedging is so important.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Trump’s Whirlwind

Posted on by

Markets have embraced
Trump’s whirlwind. Thus, Ueda
Is free to hike rates

 

Tonight, the BOJ is apparently set to hike rates by 25bps.  The market probability is essentially 100% and the key clue is that the Nikkei news organization wrote an article about it that was published after the first day of the BOJ’s two-day meeting.  At the December BOJ meeting, Ueda-san explained that if inflation remained at or above their 2.0% target (it has) and if there were no major ructions in markets after President Trump’s inauguration (there haven’t been), then the BOJ was likely to continue to move their policy rate toward what they believe is a neutral stance.  Currently, that neutral stance is mooted at 1.00%, so a 25bp hike tonight takes the overnight rate to 0.50%, somewhat closer.

With all this widely anticipated and markets pricing in the result, the key question is how what Ueda-san will say during his press conference that follows the meeting.  There are many who are looking for a so-called ‘dovish’ hike, where there is no indication of the timing of any further rate hikes and a benign view of the future.  Certainly, a look at the FX market, where the yen (unchanged today, -0.8% in the past week) doesn’t indicate a great deal of fear over a much tighter policy.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There has been a background narrative that explains the BOJ’s ongoing tightening is going to reach a point where Japanese investors are going to repatriate much of their overseas investment, driving a forceful upward move in the yen and having major negative impacts on risk assets around the world as liquidity retreats.  This is based on the idea that the Japanese are the largest exporters of capital in the world which is one of the key reasons equity markets are rallying everywhere, so if they bring that money home, that means they will sell their foreign equity holdings and buy yen.  While I believe this is a neatly wrapped idea, I would contend Japanese investment prospects are not yet near the same as in the US, so this idea may be premature.  In fact, a look at the chart below showing 10-year US Treasury and JGB yields overlaid with USDJPY indicates that the rate differential is nowhere near where it might need to be in order to encourage that type of behavior.  My take is absent some type of multilateral agreement to weaken the dollar, this will not happen organically.

Source: FRED database

In China, though communists rule
They favor the capital tool
Of equity bourses
And so, Xi endorses
A government stock buying pool

Elsewhere in the world, as we try to get outside the maelstrom that is Donald Trump, I couldn’t help but notice that, once again, Xi Jinping has called on his finance minions to do something, anything, to support the stock market.  And I cannot help but be struck by the irony of the Chinese Communist Party being so concerned about the situation in the most capitalistic institution of all.  The WSJ had an article discussing the latest measures that are on the board, including forcing encouraging insurance companies to increase the local equity portion of their portfolios and utilizing 30% of premium income to buy stocks.  This is on top of the PBOC reducing interest rates last year for companies that want to repurchase shares.

It continues to be very difficult for me to accept the idea that the Chinese are playing 4-D chess with long-term goals in mind while the US is playing checkers.  If that is the case, then the Chinese, or at least President Xi, is a really bad player.  His economy is under dramatic pressure because the property bubble he inflated has been shrinking for the past three years, undermining both the population’s wealth (property was their store of value) and confidence, while he ramps up more beggar thy neighbor trade policies at the same time the US has just elected a president whose middle name is Tariff.  Their population is shrinking because of the ‘foresight’ of their leadership to impose a one-child policy for two generations and while millions of people will risk their lives to immigrate to the US, people are looking to leave China.  Once again, I cannot look at this situation and conclude anything other than the CNY (-0.15%) is going to gradually decline all year long, and maybe not so gradually if pressure really builds.

Ok, let’s take a look at how markets are handling the latest set of Trumpian pronouncements and reactions by targets of his ire.  After yet another rally in the US, albeit on declining volumes so not as exciting as it might otherwise have been, Japanese shares rallied (+0.8%) as investors seem to believe that the interest rate hike tonight will be accompanied by a more dovish stance at the press conference.  Mainland Chinese shares (CSI 300 +0.2%) eked out a gain after the latest news discussed above, although Hong Kong shares (-0.4%) did not follow suit.  After all, the focus is on mainland shares.  The rest of the region was widely dispersed with gainers (Taiwan, Singapore, Philippines) and laggards (Korea, Australia, Thailand), many of these moves in excess of 1%.  It appears investors don’t know which way to turn yet given the speed of changes emanating from Washington.

In Europe, most bourses are modestly firmer (DAX +0.3%, CAC +0.5%) as we continue to hear more from ECB speakers that not only are rates going to be cut, but they are increasingly certain that they will achieve their inflation target.  Maybe they will.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are mixed to slightly softer with the NASDAQ (-0.4%) the laggard.

In the bond market, the decline in yields appears to be over, at least for now, as Treasuries (+3bps) continue to bounce from their recent lows at 4.54%.  As is almost always the case, this has carried European sovereign yields higher as well, by between 1bp and 3bps across the continent and UK and we saw JGB yields gain 1bp overnight.  I would contend there is still a great deal of uncertainty as to how the Trump administration is going to handle the conundrum of reducing inflation while expanding growth.  Outside of declining energy prices, which may be coming, it will be a tall task, and inquiring minds want to know.

Speaking of energy prices, oil (+0.35%) is edging higher after a lackluster session yesterday.  As with most markets, uncertainty is rife right now although this is clearly an area where Mr Trump is focused on expanding output.  NatGas (-0.3%) is a touch softer as forecasts for the end of the current Polar Vortex keep getting moved up. Metals markets are under some pressure this morning, with gold (-0.3%) backing away from that all-time high level and both silver and copper fading as well.  However, volumes remain light here implying not much interest overall.

Finally, the dollar is a touch stronger this morning, but there are few large movers in either the G10 or EMG blocs.  In fact, every G10 currency is within 0.2% of yesterday’s closing levels and none of them are at extremes.  The biggest loser today is ZAR (-0.6%) which seems to be responding to the precious metals complex backing off a bit overnight.  It remains very difficult to get a read on the dollar with all the other things ongoing.  As it happens, this is one market that has not received any Trumpian attention at all…yet.

We finally have a smattering of data this morning with the weekly Initial (exp 220K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims to be followed by the EIA’s oil inventory data where it appears a modest net build across products is forecast.  With the Fed quiet, and very little focus on Powell and company right now, today looks to be shaping up as another equity focused day with the dollar likely taking its cues there.  While we never know what will hit the tape these days, absent a new surprise vector, there is no reason to look for significant movement today at all.

Good luck

Adf

Trump 2.0

Posted on by

Today begins Trump 2.0
And pundits are trying to show
Their ideas are sound
As how he’ll redound
On policies he will bestow
 
But this poet can’t comprehend
How anyone thinks what they’ve penned
Is likely to be,
To any degree,
Correct. ‘Stead, let’s look at the trend

 

As Donald Trump prepares to take the oath of office today, there has been a non-stop barrage of pundits putting forth their views as to how policy proposals that were made during the campaign, and even since the election, are going to impact the economy as well as equity, bond and FX markets.  But I would take exception to all these as, if we learned nothing else from Trump’s first term in office, we have no idea how he may try to do the things he says he is going to do.  Are tariffs a funding process?  Are they negotiating tactics?  Are they punishment?  Since we have no idea at this point (all three of those ideas have been floated by “insiders” and pundits), how can we meaningfully forecast the impact tariffs may have going forward?  So, I won’t even try.

Rather, I think there is much to be learned from looking at the long-term trends in markets and perhaps trying to come up with reasons that these trends may be changing, or not, going forward.  As such, take a look at the charts below, all from tradingeconomics.com, where I have tried to highlight the long-term trend in the dollar (EURUSD), the S&P 500, 10-Year Treasury Notes, oil and gold.

My first observation is that over the past twenty-five years, oil has traded both higher and lower with no discernible direction.  Certainly, we are higher now than 25 years ago, but we have been both much higher and lower in the interim.  Now, if Trump is successful at freeing up more drilling opportunities, removing the offshore drilling ban that Biden imposed last week, and reducing the regulatory structure such that the cost of drilling declines, my take is increased supply will result in some downward pressure.  As well, if he is successful at bringing an end to the Ukraine war, it seems probable that Russian oil may no longer be sanctioned, and that, too, would pressure prices lower.  But will he impose tariffs on Canada, a key source of sour crude used to refine diesel?  That could easily pressure prices higher.  And what of Venezuela?  As I said, no way to know.  In the end, my take is that the most likely outcome is that oil will continue to demonstrate its inherent price volatility given its price inelasticity.  I think you can equally make the case for $50 oil as well as $100 oil based on many idiosyncratic issues that have nothing to do with Trump.

The only noteworthy change we have seen is in 10-Year Treasury yields, which after a 40-year downtrend following the back-to-back recessions in 1980-1982 and Fed Chair Volcker’s policy tightening, look very clearly to have reversed course.  I am not the first to notice this but believe that it is an important feature of markets going forward.  There are virtually two generations of traders and investors who have only ever seen interest rates decline and have created their mental investment models on that underlying thesis.  If the future is going to bring about higher interest rates over time (and given my view that inflation is not going to disappear and that will be a key driving force), then investment models in a higher inflation, higher yield environment are going to be different than what we have seen up through 2022.  

One of the keys is that the idea behind the 60/40 portfolio, where declines in stock prices were offset by rises in bond prices, turns out to only really be true in a low inflation environment, sub 2.5%.  If inflation is going to run at 3.5% – 4.5% going forward, then all the strategies that incorporated that 60/40 basis are going to have an awfully difficult time, again, regardless of what Trump does.  The one caveat here is if he is successful in driving inflation back to that <2.0% level, but that seems highly unlikely in the near term given how sticky inflation has proven to be even without any new policies.

Now, if we look at the dollar, that trend has been very consistent and remains in place with the dollar seemingly set to continue to appreciate.  Given Trump’s stated desire to reshore American manufacturing and reduce the trade deficit, he almost certainly would like to see the dollar decline.  However, at this point, it’s not clear what policies are going to drive that.  Historically, loose monetary and tight fiscal policy will weaken a currency, and that could well be what we see, except that is likely to create a burst of inflation before the tight fiscal policy reins that in.  And you know as well as I that Trump will be very displeased with that outcome.

It is certainly possible that the Treasury could intervene to weaken the dollar, but that is also something that is exceedingly rare in this country.  Perhaps the most likely situation here would be a Mar-a Lago (?) Accord, or something like that akin to the Plaza Accord of 1985, where the G7 at the time all agreed that the dollar needed to decline.  Now, on the one hand, given the weakness in the other G10 economies currently when compared to the US, my take is those nations are pretty happy to have weak currencies to help support their domestic industries.  On the other hand, I suspect the EMG bloc who have funded themselves in USD are really interested in seeing a weaker dollar to help them get easier access to dollars to service and repay their debt.  My take is that until there is a definitive policy pronouncement, and this will require something like that as quiet policy adjustments are likely to be missed by the FX market, this trend will remain intact.

Finally, a look at both equities and gold shows basically the same chart, with both showing accelerating price increases and both now significantly above their long-term trend lines.  The question, of course, is can this continue?  Keynes was reputed to have told us that markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent, implying just because market pricing doesn’t make fundamental sense doesn’t mean it cannot continue further.  But in the end, trees don’t grow to the sky, and corrections in these markets seem somewhat overdue.  Consider the S&P 500 chart, where we see the sharp decline in 2022.  Many remember that as the worst market since the GFC crash, and yet on the chart, it looks like a modest correction.  Consider also, that if the market were to decline to the trend line I have drawn, it would be nearly a 50% correction, and that just puts it back on trend!  Again, volatility seems the watchword going forward, but until we see something that is going to change opinions, the trend in both stocks and gold seems higher.

OK, as we await the official change in presidency here, let’s review the overnight price action, which was generally positive following Friday’s US equity rally.  Remember, too, it is MLK Day, and markets are closed in the US.

Asian markets saw broad gains with the Nikkei (+1.2%) and Hang Seng (+1.75%) leading the way while mainland shares (+0.45%) lagged but were still in the green.  Away from the major markets, there were far more gainers than laggards, but the biggest moves were on the order of 0.4%, nothing of real note.  Positive Japanese data was the driver in Tokyo (Machinery Orders +3.4%) while HK and Chinese shares benefitted from the news that Presidents Trump and Xi spoke, hopefully in a prelude to less tension.  In Europe, markets are essentially unchanged across the board this morning as it seems investors cannot discern whether Mr Trump will be beneficial for the continent or not.  Certainly, I continue to read about a number of European leaders who are unhappy at the prospects of a Trump presidency (specifically PM Starmer who has ostensibly said the US-UK relationship is destined to diminish).  While that may be true, my take is it will not help the UK very much.  And, while US markets are closed today, US futures are pointing modestly higher this morning.

In the bond market, yields are edging higher in Europe, up between 1bp and 2bps on the continent while UK Gilt yields are higher by 3bps.  Overnight saw JGB yields slip 1bp and, of course, with banks closed in the US, Treasury yields are unchanged in the cash market.  However, bond futures are pointing to a 1bp rise as well.

In the commodity markets, oil is little changed on the day while NatGas (-4.4% after a -6.0% decline on Friday) is falling on news that weather models, which had been calling for another cold spell in February, have changed and are now saying temperatures will be milder then.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.3%) is edging higher while both silver (-0.3%) and copper (-0.4%) are slipping a touch, but given their inherent volatility, arguably these are unchanged on the day.

Finally, the dollar is under some pressure this morning with then euro (+0.5%) leading the G10 higher although similar sized gains are seen across the board with only JPY (0.0%) failing to go along for the ride.  EMG currencies are also picking up led by HUF (+2.0%) as it seems there is excitement in Hungary regarding the inauguration as PM Orban seems to share many of President Trump’s views on various geopolitical issues.  But CZK (+0.9%) and PLN (+0.6%) are also rallying alongside KRW (+0.5%), although MXN (-0.3%) seems to be showing concerns regarding how that relationship will evolve.  Certainly, as I mentioned above, President Trump will not be unhappy to see the dollar slide a little, but I don’t see this as the beginning of a new trend.

With no data today, and a light week in general, and given how long this missive has already become, I will lay out the data releases tomorrow.  Today, all eyes will be on the ~200 Executive Orders President Trump will sign and I expect it will take a little time to digest it all, so we will see how things really begin tomorrow.

Good luck

Adf