Tag Archives: investing

More Pain

Posted on by

The data from China reflected
That tariffs have hurt, as expected
It’s likely more pain,
On China, will rain
As both nations are so connected
 
Meanwhile, in a German surprise
Herr Merz failed to get his allies
To name him to lead
Which seemed guaranteed
Could this presage his quick demise?

In the battle being waged between the US and China via tariffs, the first data indications have shown that the US is faring a bit better.  Yesterday’s ISM Services data was stronger than expected, remaining well above the 50 level although arguably slightly below the recent average reading.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Meanwhile, last night, the Chinese Caixin Services PMI fell to 50.7, missing expectations and continuing its drift lower over time.  

Source: tradingeconmics.com

Are things really worse in China than the US, at least from the perspective of data releases?  I think both nations will suffer during this period as the impacts of the tariffs and reduced trade bleed into the data over the next months, but so far, it seems the US is holding its own.  One of the problems with analyzing the issue is that as the WSJ pointed out yesterday, when the data in China gets bad, they simply stop releasing it, so it may be difficult to see.

Now, last night, Chinese shares did manage a nice rally with the CSI 300 higher by 1.0% but that follows six consecutive down sessions, albeit of modest size.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the renminbi, after a 1% gain last Friday, it has done little and remains very much in line with its levels of the past year.  The thing about China is that nothing there moves quickly, so absent a policy announcement of some type, I expect this activity will continue to gradually adjust to the realities as they become clear to the market.  If President Trump reduces tariffs, as he implied he would eventually, things could work better, but again, given the time lags of moving products across the Pacific, we have a lot of time between now and whatever the new normal turns out to be.

But the more interesting story to me overnight was that Friedrich Merz, the ostensible winner of the German elections last month failed to achieve the votes to be named Chancellor despite his coalition having a 12-seat majority in the Bundestag.  As it was a secret ballot, nobody knows who didn’t support him, but this outcome certainly calls into question both his ability to lead Germany effectively, and correspondingly, Germany’s ability to lead Europe in the new world order.

Recall, Germany remains keen to support Ukraine in its ongoing war with Russia and even destroyed their once sacrosanct fiscal responsibility in order to be able to pay for that support.  But if they do not have an effective leader, one who can command their parliament to enact his policies, it is not clear why other European nations would follow their lead on anything.  It should not be surprising that the DAX (-1.3%) fell sharply when the news was released, and that has helped drag most European shares lower (CAC -0.7%, IBEX -0.3%, Poland -3.3%).  As to the euro, you can see from the below chart that the response, when the news was announced, that it slipped about 0.5%, basically wiping out the gains it had achieved prior to the vote.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Will this matter in the long run?  I believe that a weakened Germany, which is likely the outcome of this situation, will simply undermine the euro’s value.  As such, while I still believe the dollar has further to decline, the euro will probably not be a major winner.  Look for other currencies to outperform the euro going forward.

Ok, I think those are the real stories as we head into today’s session with most market participants remaining tentative in the face of the ongoing confusion over policies, counter policies and macroeconomic data.  Remember, too, we have the Fed tomorrow and the BOE on Thursday, so despite the fact that fiscal policy has been the driver, the Fed’s opinions still carry weight amongst the fixed income community, at the very least.

Looking at the price action overnight, the Nikkei (+1.0%) gained on some solid earnings data from Japanese companies as well as increased hopes that the US-Japan trade talks will be successfully completed by June.  Apparently, there is also some faith that the US and China will begin talking soon on this subject.  Hong Kong (+0.7%) also benefitted from these discussions, but the rest of the region showed very little movement overall, with gains or losses on the order of 0.3% or less.  As we have already discussed Europe, a look at US futures shows they are pointing lower by about -0.5% at this hour (7:10).

Bond markets remain very dull these days with Treasury yields edging higher by 1bp this morning after climbing 3bps yesterday.  European sovereign yields are also higher. By 1bp to 2bps although there is neither data nor a story that seems to have had much impact.  The Services PMI data that was released this morning was very much in line with expectations and continues to hover around 50.0 for the continent as a whole.  Meanwhile, JGB yields were unchanged last night and sit at 1.25%, well below the levels seen back in late March and having really gone nowhere for the past month.  It strikes me that JGB yields will respond to any trade deals but are likely to be quiet in the interim.

Commodity prices are rallying this morning with oil (+2.2%) rebounding from its level yesterday which happen to come quite close to touching the lows from April 9th.  It should be no surprise that there are up days in this market, but if the Saudis and OPEC are going to continue increasing production, I expect that prices have further to fall.  In the metals markets, gold (+1.4%) is having another blockbuster day, now having gained $150/oz in the past three sessions and bouncing off the correction lows.  Demand for the barbarous relic continues to come from Asia mostly with all signs showing that US investors are not interested in this trade.  As to silver (+1.7%) and copper (+0.6%), they are both still along for the ride.

It should be no surprise with the commodity markets showing strength that the dollar is under pressure this morning.  while we’ve discussed the euro already, the pound (+0.5%) is looking quite solid as it continues its rally from the lows seen in mid-January.  But the yen (+0.5%), SEK (+0.45%) and NOK (+0.35%) are all gaining today as well.  Interestingly, the impact in emerging markets is far less noticeable with none of the major EMG currencies moving even 0.2% this morning.

On the data front, there is very little hard data this week although we do have the Fed on Wednesday and then a whole bunch of Fed speakers on Friday.

TodayTrade Balance-$137.0B
WednesdayFOMC Rate Decision4.50% (unchanged)
 Consumer Credit$9.5B
ThursdayBOE Rate Decision4.25% (-0.25%)
 Initial Claims230K
 Continuing Claims1890K
 Nonfarm Productivity-0.7%
 Unit Labor Costs5.1%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Today’s trade data is for March, prior to the tariff impositions, so will reflect significant tariff front-running.  But really, it’s about the Fed this week, and since they have lost much of their cachet lately, I think the market is really going to continue to look to the White House for trade news and react to that.  Net, I continue to believe that the dollar’s FX rate will be part of many trade discussions, like we saw with Taiwan (which by the way did reverse 3% of yesterday’s gain overnight) and that means further weakness is in our future.

Good luck

Adf

Too Much Debt

Posted on by

In Spain, electricity failed
In Canada, Carney prevailed
But markets don’t care
As movement’s quite spare
It seems many traders have bailed
 
But problems, worldwide, still abound
Though right now, they’re in the background
There’s far too much debt
And still a real threat
That no true solutions are found

 

The two biggest stories of the past twenty-four hours were clearly the national scale blackout in Spain and Portugal yesterday, and the slim victory for Mark Carney in Canada, where the Liberal Party appears to have a plurality, but not a majority, and will oversee a minority government.

Touching on the second story first, in truth there is not much to discuss.  Much has been made of the vote being an anti-Trump statement with the idea that Carney is better placed to defend Canada from President Trump’s (imagined) predations.  However, given the lack of a majority government, it is not clear how effective this line of reasoning will prove.  As there is no futures market for the TSX, we really don’t have a sense yet of how the Canadian equity market will greet the news.  Yesterday’s modest gains of 0.35% amid a general atmosphere of modest gains doesn’t really tell much of a tale.  As to CAD (-0.1% today), a quick look at the past week shows it has done nothing even in the wake of the news. (see below).  My take is this is a nothingburger event, a perfect description for Mark Carney, a nothingburger of a politician.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the story about Spain’s electricity, I think it may be more instructive on two levels.  The first is as a warning to the risks inherent of powering your electric grid with more than 25% – 30% intermittent, renewable energy sources like wind and solar.  It is somewhat ironic that just twelve days prior to the blackout, Spain’s entire electricity requirement was met by solar, wind and hydro power, the Green dream.  Alas, here we are now and while no answers have yet been forthcoming, and I assume the media will downplay any blame on too much renewable power, virtually every engineering study has shown that once a grid has more than that 25% renewables, it tends towards instability.  This issue will be argued by both sides for a while, although as always, physics will be the final arbiter.  

But I have to wonder if the sudden failure of the electric grid is an omen of sorts, for what may be happening in global markets.  If we analogize global supply chains to the electrical grid, over the course of the past 50 years, we have seen the world create a massively complex web of trade with raw materials, intermediate goods and final products all crisscrossing the world.  There have been myriad benefits to all involved with real per capita economic benefits abounding, and for everybody reading this note, the ability to essentially buy whatever you want/need with limited interference and trouble.  Certainly, the availability of everyday necessities like food and clothing is widespread.

However, underpinning that bounty were two networks.  The first being the obvious one, the supply chains which since Covid have been much discussed by the punditry.  But the second, which gets far less notice is the network of debt that is issued around the world by governments and companies, as well as taken on by individuals, and that has grown to be more than 3x the entire global economic output.  While we most often read about the US government debt which is quickly approaching $37 trillion, total global debt is much greater than that.  In fact, at this point, the debt market is not about issuing new debt to fund new investment, rather it is almost entirely a refinancing mechanism.  

It is this latter issue that should concern us all.  What happens if, one day, the ability to refinance some of that debt, whether US Treasuries, German bunds or Chinese government bonds, has a hiccup of some sort?  A failed US Treasury auction, where the Fed is required to purchase bonds, or a power outage in a key financial center that prevents trades from being confirmed/settled and moneys not moving as expected, or some other force majeure type event that disrupts the current smooth functioning of global debt markets.  

Frankly, the combination of the changes being wrought by President Trump to the global economy, where globalization is giving way to mercantilism, and the significant weight of global debt that hangs over the global economy and is given very little thought seems a potentially volatile mix.

Ironically, as much as I have lately been describing how the Fed’s role seems to have diminished, in the event that something upsets this apple cart, the Fed will be the only game in town.  While this is not a today event, it is something we must not forget.

I apologize for my little diatribe, but with so little ongoing in markets, and the parallel to the Spanish electrical grid, it seemed timely.  Let’s look at markets.  Asian equity markets were mixed with the main markets very quiet but a couple of 1% gainers (Australia, Taiwan and Korea) although the rest of the region was +/- 0.3% or less.  Too, volumes were quite lethargic.  In Europe, it should be no surprise that Spain (-0.8%) is the laggard today as the first economists’ to opine on the impact of the blackout said it could be a hit of as much as 0.5% of GDP.  Germany (+0.6%) is the other side of the coin after the GfK Consumer Confidence reading came out at a better than expected -20.6.  Now, maybe it’s just me, but if I look at the past 5 years’ worth of this index, it is difficult to get excited about German economic prospects.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Yes, this was a better reading, but either the people of Germany are manic depressive, or the index is indicative of major structural problems in the country.  Maybe a bit of both.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:10) they are basically unchanged after being basically unchanged yesterday.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have bounced 2bps this morning after touching their lowest level in 3 weeks yesterday.  European sovereign yields, though, are all softer by 1bp to 2bps this morning as comments from ECB members seem to highlight more rate cuts as Europe achieves their inflation target and are now getting concerned they will fall below the 2.0% rate.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.7%) is under pressure this morning ostensibly on a combination of concerns over slowing growth and little movement in the US-China trade talks as well as a report that Kazakhstan is pushing up output and other OPEC+ members are talking about increasing production further when they meet next week.  Meanwhile, gold (-0.75%), which rallied back to unchanged in NY yesterday is once again finding sellers at its recent trading pivot of $3340ish (H/T Alyosha).  However, gold’s slide has not impacted either silver (+0.4%) or copper (+0.9%) at least so far in the session.

Finally, the dollar is firmer, largely across the board, this morning.  The euro (-0.3%), pound (-0.4%), JPY (-0.4%) and CHF (-0.6%) are all under some pressure, perhaps profit taking.  But in truth, other than INR (+0.15%) the rest of the major currencies, both G10 and EMG, are all softer vs. the greenback.  I guess the dollar’s demise will need to wait at least one more day.

On the data front, the Goods Trade Balance (exp -$146B), Case Shiller Home Prices (4.7%) and JOLTs Job Openings (7.48M) are the main numbers, although we also see Consumer Confidence (87.5).  But with no Fed discussions much more crucial data on Thursday (GDP, PCE) and Friday (NFP) it seems that today is setting up for not much excitement.

In fact, lack of excitement seems the best description of markets right now.  I don’t know what the next catalyst will be to change things, but absent peace in one of the wars, kinetic or trade, or another force majeure event, it feels like range trading is the order of the day for a while.  My big picture view of a slowly declining dollar is still intact, but day-to-day, it’s hard to see much right now.

Good luck

Adf

That Man is Our Bane

Posted on by

Apparently, back in the day
Investors and CEOs say
The future was clear
But now they all fear
Uncertainty is in their way
 
So, they will now clearly explain
When earnings and profits do wane
That they’re not to blame
Instead, they now claim
It’s Trump’s fault, that man is our bane

 

I’m having some difficulty understanding a number of the concerns about which I read every day as more and more corporate executives and investment managers have suddenly found a new scapegoat, uncertainty.  Apparently, I missed the time when the future was certain, as I have no recollection of that at all.  Perhaps you remember.  If so, could you remind me please?

For instance, I remember the certitude of the comments from the RBA back in April 2021 that interest rates would remain lower for longer, and that it would be at least three years before they would need to raise interest rates.  I also remember, as the graph below demonstrates, that certainty was misplaced as less than two months after those comments, the RBA started raising interest rates despite the clear directive they would not need to do so for years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While this is just one example, in my experience, certainty is not part of the mix when running a business or a portfolio of assets or a position in any financial market.  So imagine my surprise when reading Bloomberg this morning and finding that suddenly, the world is awash in uncertainty.  Has it ever not been the case?  Pretty much once you get beyond the laws of physics or mathematics, it strikes me that certainty in the future just doesn’t exist. (Even at 4Imprint).  Nonetheless, uncertainty because of President Trump’s trade policies is the latest rationale for every problem at every company right now.  In truth, I suspect that many executives are quite happy with this as the Covid excuse was wearing thin.

In the markets, too, uncertainty is the favored excuse for underperformance as how can anyone manage money with tape bombs constantly appearing.  Powell is a loser one day to I’m not going to fire Powell the next.  Tariffs are forever to a 90-day pause.  And of course, there are many other political stories that have limited impact on markets but seem to change regularly.  While this gets back to my view that President Trump is the avatar of volatility, I seem to recall long before President Trump that there were numerous presidential statements that had major market impacts.  My point is, nothing has really changed folks, other than the media dislikes this president more than any other in my lifetime so amplifies anything they think makes him look bad.

However, the one thing about which we cannot be surprised is that trading activity is waning, at least compared to what we saw since Trump’s inauguration.  Volumes of activity on the exchanges are sliding (see chart of S&P 500 volume below from ycharts.com) which makes perfect sense in a volatile and uncertain market.  

Now, as per the above, I would contend that the future is always uncertain.  Rather the real culprit here is volatility.  My take is that the future is going to continue to be volatile which implies, to me at least, that trading activity is going to remain on the low side and with it, liquidity for those who have significant real flows to transact.  It’s funny, volatility begets lower volumes, and lower volumes beget volatility due to reduced liquidity.  I’m not sure what it will take to break us from this cycle, but I have a sense that it will be with us for a while.

With that in mind, let’s see what happened overnight.  Yesterday’s strength in the US was followed by strength in Tokyo (+1.9%) although both China (+0.1%) and Hong Kong (+0.3%) didn’t really participate.  Interestingly, this morning I read that China was exempting a number of imports from the US from tariffs as apparently, it was hurting their businesses so severely it could cause closures.  Elsewhere in Asia, the picture was mixed although there were more gainers (Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, Thailand) than laggards (India, Singapore).  I do believe the tariff story is impacting these markets more than any as they are directly in the line of fire.

Meanwhile, in Europe, most markets are firmer this morning (DAX +0.6%, CAC +0.4%, IBEX +0.9%) but the UK (-0.1%) is lagging despite much stronger than expected Retail Sales data there this morning.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are pointing lower by about -0.35%.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to slide, down another -3bps this morning although Europe is moving in the opposite direction, with yields climbing between 2bps and 3bps in the session.  It’s odd because I continue to hear about European growth forecasts being cut and the ECB preparing for more rate cuts while the talk around the markets is that the US is going to see inflation from the tariffs.  Today’s bond moves don’t really speak to those narratives, but it is just one day.  I need to mention JGB yields, which rose 3bps overnight after Tokyo CPI came in 2 ticks hotter than forecast at both headline and core levels.  

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.2%) is slipping again and has consistently demonstrated it is unable to make any dent in the major price gap above the market.  To close that gap, WTI will need to rally more than $8/bbl from current levels, something I just don’t see happening in the current environment.  That would require a war in Iran I think.  As to metals, yesterday’s gold rally has been reversed (-1.5%) and today it is impacting both silver (-0.75%) and copper (-2.1%) as is the stronger dollar it seems.

Speaking of the dollar, Monday’s narrative that the dollar was about to collapse will need at least another day to come to fruition as it is modestly higher again this morning.  looking at the DXY as a proxy, it is trading just below 100, a level that many are watching closely.  A quick look at the chart below shows this is the third time in the past two years it has traded to this level, although the first of those times it broke through.  Of course, it was much lower just a couple years earlier.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Today’s dollar strength is modest but broad-based with only CLP (+0.6%) higher this morning which makes absolutely no sense given copper’s slide today.  The worst performer is SEK (-0.8%) but given it has been the best performer YTD amongst the G10, perhaps this is just corrective.  Otherwise, we are looking at movements on the order of 0.25% to 0.45% across the board.

The only data this morning is Michigan Sentiment (exp 50.8).  We continue to see a dichotomy between the ‘hard’ data, Claims, NFP, CPI, Factory Orders, and the ‘soft’ data, Michigan Sentiment, PMI, inflation expectations with the former holding in well while the latter weakens.  Many analysts believe that recession is coming our way by summer, but these same analysts have been predicting the recession for the past 3 years.  The one thing about the US economy is that it is extraordinarily resilient despite all the things governments try to do to disrupt it.  I understand the concern, at least if you watch/read the news, but I have a sense that many people across the nation do not really do that.  While I believe that equity valuations remain too high to be sustainable, it is not clear to me that the economy is heading into a recession at this time.  As to the dollar, I wouldn’t write its obituary just yet, although I do think it will soften further over time.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Very Near Future

Posted on by

The “very near future” is when
The US and China, again
Will restart their talks
Assuming no balks
By either of these august men
 
That’s all that the market required
For buyers to get so inspired
Can this idea last?
Or will it have passed
Ere market resolve has expired

 

While all and sundry have been very confident that President Trump’s attempt to alter the structure of the global economy and world trade to a more beneficial one, in his view for the US, will fail dismally and that we are doomed to stagflation as prices rise and the economy sinks, it seems these same economic analysts have forgotten that there are two sides to the supply/demand equation.  I have written before that despite all the slings and arrows that have been aimed at Trump, the US has a very strong hand in the trade game given it is THE CONSUMER OF LAST RESORT.  Virtually every nation in the world has built an economy designed to be able to manufacture stuff cheaply and sell it into the largest economy in the world.

And US consumers are remarkable in their ability to continue to consume at high levels despite what appear to be significant headwinds, whether high financing costs, limited savings or slowing economic activity.  But a funny thing is happening on the way to this mooted US stagflation, it’s not happening yet.  In fact, as described by economist Daniel Lacalle in his most recent post, it seems that the biggest problem is not that Americans cannot find what they want to buy, it is that they only bought all this stuff because it was cheap.  They will not accept significant price rises and so inventory is building up at factories while ships are stuck with containers full of stuff nobody wants, at the price.  Could it be that President Trump read the room better than the economists?

I use this as preamble to yesterday’s massive equity rebound which was, ostensibly, triggered by comments from Treasury Secretary Bessent that substantive trade talks with China would begin in the “very near future.”  Subsequent soothing comments by the President indicated that the days of 125% tariffs were numbered but there would be tariffs in place.  As well, Mr Trump explicitly said he has no intention to fire Fed Chair Powell, despite his recent diatribe that Powell is always late to the party and should cut rates.  Certainly, I agree the Fed is, and will always be, late to the party as long as they use a data driven approach.  After all, by the time economic change is reflected in the data, whatever is going to change has already done so.  However, I don’t yet see the rationale for cutting rates given the current economic data and the fact that inflation remains a problem.

As of this morning, following significant equity rallies around the world, one might come to believe that all the world’s problems have been successfully addressed.  The fact that one would be wrong in that belief is the best example of ‘the market is not the economy’.  But, hey, let’s take the rallies when they come!

From a market perspective, that was really the big story yesterday and continuing into today.  Flash PMI data is not that exciting, and all the other headlines revolve around the ongoing immigration/deportation issues plus RFK Jr’s edict to remove petroleum-based food coloring from foods.  So, let’s look at the markets and recap the action.

The 2.5% to 3.0% gains in the US were followed by Tokyo (+1.9%) and Hong Kong (+2.4%) performing well but nothing like Taiwan (+4.5%).  The laggard last night was China (+0.1%) with other regional exchanges showing gains between 0.5% and 1.5%.  Net, I suppose everybody was happy.  In Europe this morning, the screens are green as well, with Germany (+2.6%) leading the way followed by France (+2.2%) and the UK (+1.3%).  Again, the trade story appears to be the leading driver.  And, adding to the joy, US futures are also higher between 2.0% (DJIA) and 3.0% (NASDAQ) this morning as of 6:50.  And to think, just two days ago I was assured that the end was nigh.  A quick look at the S&P 500 chart below does give a flavor for just how much volatility we have seen on a day-to-day basis and how narrative changes continue to have huge impacts.

Source: tradingecomics.com

At the same time, Treasury yields have been retracing, lower by -8bps this morning with UK gilts (-6bps) also performing well, although continental European sovereigns are not seeing the same demand with bunds (+3bps) the laggard despite the weakest PMI readings with both Manufacturing and Services below 50.0, lower than last month and far lower than forecasts.  The narrative of money leaving the US and heading back to Europe is certainly appealing, and seems quite reasonable as a long-term metric, but it is not clear to me that it will be driving daily price action in any market.

In commodities, oil (+1.0%) continues to edge higher although it has not yet come close to filling that massive gap lower from the beginning of the month.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

From a fundamental perspective, fears of a US recession, which remain high, as well as the IMF recently reducing their global growth forecast seem to be undermining the demand side of the equation.  Meanwhile, the opportunity for significant new supply (Iran deal, Russia peace) seems quite real.  I’m no oil trader but it strikes me the risk-reward here is for a further drop in prices.  As to the metals markets, gold (-0.4%) fell more than $100/oz yesterday, so perhaps my view that the parabolic move was too much was correct.  However, I believe this is a short-term, and much needed, correction with the long-term story fully intact.  Meanwhile, silver (+1.4%) and copper (+0.4%) are modestly higher after quiet sessions yesterday.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning against most of its counterparts, but this is not a universal situation.  While both the euro and pound have fallen -0.25%, AUD (+0.6%) is showing some oomph as it figures to be one of the key beneficiaries of a trade agreement between the US and China, no matter how far in the future.  Other key gainers are KRW (+0.6%) and CNY (+0.3%), with both clearly benefitting from that same trade story.  But otherwise, the dollar is mostly ascendent.  

An aside here on the yen (-0.4%) which just two days ago traded below the key psychological level of 140 and this morning is back above 142.  It strikes me that this is the first currency that will be reactive to any trade deal.  As you can see from the below, long-term chart of the yen, it has spent the bulk of its time at far higher (dollar lower) levels.  I suspect that any trade deal will include an effort to revalue the yen higher vs. the dollar, perhaps to its longer-term average of around 120.

Moving on to today’s data, we have New Home Sales (exp 680K) and then the Fed’s Beige Book at 2:00pm. I’m not sure when the surveys were taken for the Beige Book, but you can be sure they will express a great deal of uncertainty and discuss how it will reduce economic activity.  You can also be sure that this will be hyped in the press.  But now that everything is better (just look at the stock market) is this old news?

If we try to look past the daily gyrations to the bigger picture, I would contend the following is the case.  Equity markets remain overvalued and are likely to weaken, the dollar is likely to slide as well as foreign investors slowly reallocate funds away from the US.  Quite frankly, the Treasury story is much harder as the interplay between inflation and potential reduced government expenditure is highly uncertain right now, although one will eventually dominate.  Finally, commodities remain far more important than their current relative weight in the global asset basket and I believe they have much further to climb in price.  One poet’s views.

Good luck

Adf

This is the End

Posted on by

Apparently, this is the end
So says every article penned
The markets are tanking
But nobody’s banking
On help to arrest the downtrend
 
The pundits’ unanimous line
Is things before Trump were just fine
Yes, debt was insane
But that gravy train
Allowed them to drink the best wine

 

Every financial website lead this morning is how President Trump’s policies are causing the worst slide in equity prices in forever, with my favorite today in the WSJ describing this as the worst performance in April since 1932!  Much has been made about how President Trump is undermining the Fed’s credibility, as though the Fed has that much credibility to undermine.  This is the group that declared stable prices to be an increase in their favored indicator, core PCE, of 2.0% annually, and complained vociferously when inflation was slightly below that level for a decade.  In order to adjust things, they changed their target to an average of 2.0% over time, then watched their metrics, in the wake of the Covid fiscal response, explode higher.  Now, after more than four years of their target metric above their target, they are concerned they are losing their credibility because of President Trump.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Certainly, if they had been achieving their goals any time during the past four years, this argument might have had some force.  However, given the history, I am suspect.

Nonetheless, this is today’s narrative, that equity markets are falling sharply because of Trump.  It has nothing to do with the fact that US equity markets have been overvalued by nearly every measure since November 2012, (the last time the S&P 500 P/E ratio was at its mean of 16.14 vs today’s still very high 25.64).  This is not to say that the president’s tactics have necessarily been the best possible, but we have all long known that a catalyst would come along and adjust prices to a more sustainable level.  

Source: multpl.com

Once again, I will highlight that President Trump was elected with a mandate to make substantial changes to the way things work in the US, both the economy and other issues like immigration.  Remember, too, that many of his supporters are not heavily invested in equity markets, so this is not really a problem for them.  I believe he can tolerate a lot more downside in equity prices before feeling it necessary to address them.  And if he is successful in signing some trade deals during his 90-day time frame, I expect that things will calm down quite quickly.

But right now, investors are very unhappy, and since virtually everyone in the media is an investor, we are going to hear a lot more on this topic, especially since they almost certainly didn’t vote for President Trump.

Here’s the thing about markets, overvaluations correct over time.  In fact, often they result in under valuations as markets tend to overshoot in both directions.  However, you have probably heard of the Buffett Indicator, which is Warren Buffett’s shorthand way of determining stock valuations.  He simply divides the total market capitlaization of US equities by GDP.  His view is that when that ratio is between 110% and 130%, equity markets are fairly valued.  Below that, things are cheap, and it is a good time to buy stocks.  Above that, like today, and good values are hard to find.  You are also probably aware that Berkshire Hathaway is currently holding its largest cash position ever, a sign that he still thinks things are overvalued.  One need only look at the below chart to see that while the recent decline in stocks has brought the indicator lower, its current level of 173% remains extremely overvalued.

Source: buffettindicator.net

All I am trying to do is offer some perspective on the recent movement.  Risk appetite was over extended while the US ran 7% budget deficits and issued a massive amount of debt to fund it.  Much of that funding went into risk assets.  That situation has clearly changed, or at least that is the goal of the Trump administration.  It is a painful transition, but likely one that we need to absorb for longer term fiscal and economic health.

Ok, let’s see how market behaved overnight, after a rout in the US yesterday, now that everybody is back at their desks.  Major Asian markets were very quiet, with limited movement in Japan, China, Korea, Australia and India, although we did see sharp declines in Taiwan (-1.6%) and New Zealand (-2.25%) with the latter seeming to be one of the few markets tracking the US directly.  The only news there was a larger than expected trade surplus, which doesn’t seem the type of thing to cause a sell-off.  Meanwhile, in Europe, there is also little net movement with a couple of modest gainers (Spain, UK) and a couple of modest laggards (France Germany) with everything trading less than 0.5% different than their last closes.  Interestingly, US futures are all higher by about 1.0% at this hour (7:05).

In the bond market, this morning is quiet everywhere with movements of +/-1bp the norm although yesterday did see Treasury yields climb 6bps in the session.  Something that is starting to move in fixed income markets are credit spreads, which have been abnormally tight for a long time and may be starting to widen out to previous historical levels.  If spreads start to widen, that will not help equity markets at all, and that could be the signal that policy adjustments are coming, both from the administration and the Fed.  We will keep an eye here.

In the commodity markets, nothing is stopping the gold train, up another 0.7% this morning to another new high.  This movement is parabolic and that cannot last very long.  Beware of a correction.  

source: tradingeconomics.com

In the meantime, silver (-0.2%) and copper (+0.5%) are still hanging around, but without the same panache as gold.  In the oil market, WTI (+1.3%) has rebounded from yesterday’s decline as the latest stories are that capex by the oil majors is going to decline and with it, we will see a reduction in supply, hence higher prices.  On the flip side, if a deal with Iran is signed and their oil comes back on the market freely, that will weigh on prices for at least a while.

Finally, the dollar, which along with equities, has been sold aggressively of late, is bouncing slightly this morning.  This story remains perfectly logical as one of the reasons the dollar had been so strong was foreign investors bought dollars to buy the Mag7 and US equities in general.  With US equities weakening, these foreigners are likely to start to sell more and take their money home, or elsewhere, but nonetheless, they don’t need those dollars.  Certainly nothing has changed my bearish view here with today’s gains a modest correction.  There are two outliers this morning, with MXN (+0.6%) and ZAR (+0.5%) the only currencies of note rallying against the greenback, both seemingly following the commodity rally.

On the data front, there is nothing noteworthy this morning, but a bit of data later in the week.

WednesdayFlash Manufacturing PMI49.4
 Flash Services PMI52.8
 New Home Sales680K
 Fed’s Beige Book 
ThursdayInitial Claims221K
 Continuing Claims1880K
 Durable Goods2.0%
 -ex Transport0.2%
 Existing Home Sales4.13M
FridayMichigan Sentiment50.8
 Michigan Inflation Expected6.7%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, we have 7 Fed speakers over 8 venues this week, with four of them today.  However, it is not clear that they have much impact these days.  Expectations for a cut next month are down to 9% although the market is pricing 90bps of cuts this year.  But, once President Trump started implementing his policies, the Fed slipped into the shadows.  It is interesting that there are questions about the Fed’s credibility as lately, nobody has listened to them anyway.  I don’t expect anything other than patience from them for now as they await the “inevitable” decline in the economy.  However, until the data really starts to show something, and there is nothing forecast in this week’s releases, that points to economic weakness of note, they are on the sidelines.

Overall, I expect more volatility in risk assets, and I do believe the trend for foreign investors to reduce their exposure to the US will continue.  That, too, will weigh on the dollar.  Maybe not today, but another 10% this year is quite viable.

Good luck

Adf

Squealed Like Stuck Pigs

Posted on by

What many just don’t comprehend
Is tariffs are not near the end
Of policy changes
As Trump rearranges
The world into foe and to friend
 
And while Wall Street squealed like stuck pigs
Trump’s boosters just don’t give two figs
They’re willing to try
The Trump calculi
If they see it hurts the bigwigs

 

I’m old enough to remember when Nonfarm Payrolls were the most important thing to market participants regardless of the asset class.  Ahh, those were the days.  It is remarkable that across major business headlines, I haven’t seen anything discussing the release for later this morning.  Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not upset about that fact, I think there has been far too much focus on that data point for far too long, but I am surprised.  This may be the best indicator that we are in a new regime for finance and economics.  It appears that most of the things the analyst community used to consider important are now merely afterthoughts.

I thought the WSJ had the most consequential article in this morning’s ‘paper’ asking, who is going to buy the $400 billion of stuff that China makes that will no longer be price competitive in the US?  They weren’t mentioned explicitly, but I imagine that Temu and Shein are both going to find their business models significantly impaired.  But will other “free trading’ nations allow all that stuff across their borders tariff free?  The Chinese mercantilist model was built with the idea that if they could produce stuff more cheaply than other nations, whether through subsidy or efficiency, other nations would welcome that stuff.  It remains to be seen how well that model holds up given the changes wrought by President Trump.

On a different note, I have read many comparisons of yesterday’s market declines to the March 2020 Covid panic, but my take is it is far more akin to the September 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse, at least from the tone of the market.  Covid was an exogenous event while Lehman and the tariffs were home-made.  The issue with the GFC and the current time was/is that they are systemic alterations which means that things will be different going forward in finance and economics.  Covid clearly changed our lives based on the government response, but it didn’t change the way markets behaved.  

At this point, there is no indication that President Trump is going to change his tune, and why would he? Again, amongst the key financial market goals he and Secretary Bessent have touted were a reduction in 10-year yields, lower by 75bps since inauguration, (✔️), a reduction in the price of oil, lower by $14/bbl or 18%,  (✔️) and a lower dollar relative to other currencies lower by 6.5%,(✔️).  Ask yourself, do you really think they are unhappy with the current situation?

I have no idea how things will play out from here, and in reality, neither does anybody else.  Reliance on models that were built with past assumptions does not inspire confidence.  As well, we have barely seen the response to these tariffs, although just moments ago China indicated they would be imposing 34% tariffs on all US goods entering their country.  But anybody who believes they know the end game is delusional.  This is the beginning of the change, and there will be much more to come across many different aspects of the economy and markets as the year progresses.  Interesting times indeed.

With that in mind, let’s see how day two of the new world order is playing out (and to think, there were all those conspiracy theories about a new world order before, but this was not what they had in mind.)  Green is a hard color to find on screens again today as after yesterday’s rout in US markets, the follow-through in Asia was almost complete.  Indonesia (+0.6%) managed a gain somehow, but every other major market declined, some quite substantially.  Singapore (-3.0%), Thailand (-3.6%) and Tokyo (-3.1%) were the biggest losers, but shares everywhere fell with most declining more than -1.0% on the session.  Interestingly, European shares are having a much worse session today than yesterday with Italy’s FTSE MIB (-7.1%) leading the way although Spain’s IBEX (-5.5%), the DAX (-4.5%), CAC (-3.8%) and FTSE 100 (-3.5%) are not exactly loving life today either.  As to US futures, they are pointing much lower again today, -3.0% or so for all the major indices.

Bonds, however, are in great demand with yields virtually collapsing as investors seek anyplace that is not equities to find shelter from this storm.  Treasury yields have fallen a further 15bps this morning and you can see in the chart below, just how large this decline has been.  In fact, yields have almost retraced to the level just before the Fed started cutting rates last September!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But bonds everywhere in the world are in demand with yields on European sovereigns lower by between -7bps (Italy and Greece) and -15bps (Germany) as credit quality has also entered the picture there.  Finally, JGB yields have also tumbled, down -18bps overnight, as Japanese investors flee global markets and bring their money home.

Arguably, though, the biggest move has been in oil (-6.9%) which is now down to levels not seen since it was rebounding from Covid inspired lows back in 2022.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I would contend this is almost entirely a recession fear, lack of forward demand story, although I believe OPEC+ is still planning on reducing its production cuts as the year progresses.  I imagine the latter is subject to change based on the economic outcomes.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.15%) after a sell-off yesterday, is consolidating for now.  Given the amount of leverage that abounds and given that when margin calls come, folks sell what they can, not what they want to, I suspect much of gold’s selling yesterday was forced rather than based on fear.  Rather, I suspect gold will outperform as it maintains its ultimate haven status.  The same, though, is not true for other metals with silver (-1.5%) and copper (-4.2%) both sharply lower this morning.  Certainly, in copper’s case, given the increased recession fears, it can be no surprise that its price is declining.

Finally, turning to the dollar, after a sharp decline yesterday, largely across the board, this morning the picture is a bit more mixed with a rebound against some currencies (AUD -3.0%, NZD -2.5%, SEK -1.7%, NOK (-2.1% although also inspired by oil’s precipitous decline.). However, both the yen (+1.0%) and Swiss franc (+1.25%) are continuing to display their haven attributes, while the euro (-0.1%) seems caught in the middle.  In the EMG bloc, though, the dollar is quite solid this morning with MXN (-1.9%), ZAR (-1.7%) and CLP (-1.0%) all falling.  Of note, CNY (0.0%) has barely moved throughout the entire process.

As I mentioned above, today we do see the NFP report, although my take is a strong report will be ignored as old regime, while a weak report will be ‘proof positive’ a recession is near.  Here are the expectations as of this morning:

Nonfarm Payrolls135K
Private Payrolls127K
Manufacturing Payrolls4K
Unemployment Rate4.1%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.4%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Will the data really matter?  I don’t think so, at least not to policy makers as they realize (I hope) the world today is different than when this data was collected.  At this point, the market is now pricing in a full 75bps of rate cuts by year end from the Fed with a ~30% probability of a cut early next month.  But Powell and company don’t have any idea how this will play out either.  I fear that we are in a market situation where volatility is the dominant theme, in both directions.  Remember, Donald Trump is best thought of as the avatar of volatility.  He has earned that nickname.  This is why I harp on maintaining hedges, the world is a tricky place.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Quite Miffed

Posted on by

By now, each of you is aware
More tariffs, the Prez did declare
Some nations will scream
While others will scheme
To Trump, though, in war all is fair
 
The market reaction was swift
With equities in a downshift
While Treasuries rallied
Pure gold, lower, sallied
And everyone worldwide’s quite miffed

 

Once again, President Trump did exactly what he told us he was going to do from the start.  He applied reciprocal tariffs on virtually every nation in the world, although at a rate claimed to be ~50% of their tariffs on the US, (as calculated by the White House and which included quotas and non-tariff barriers as well.)  In addition to Israel, which pledged to reduce tariffs to 0% on US goods if the US would do the same, it appears Canada has also agreed that deal.  I expect that we will hear different responses from nations all around the world, but remember, the one thing the president has made clear is that retaliation by other nations will be met with a significantly higher response from the US.  I expect that smaller nations may find themselves in very difficult straits, although larger ones have more potential to respond.  But, in the end, the US remains the consumer of last resort, and every nation on the list realizes that losing the US market will not help their economies.

The market response was immediate with US equity futures plummeting on the open of the evening session and sharp declines in Asian equities as well.  Treasury yields fell along with the dollar, while gold after an initial rally, reversed course and is now lower on the day as well.

Analysts around the world are out with early forecasts of the “likely” impacts of these tariffs although I would take them with a grain of salt.  Remember, analyst macro models have been pretty useless for a while, ever since the underlying conditions changed as I described earlier this week, so it is not clear to me that applying broken models to a new event is likely to offer accurate estimates of future activity.  However, there is a pretty clear consensus, which is that inflation is going to rise while economic activity is going to decline, probably into a recession.  Personally, I am confused by this analysis as every one of these analysts continues to believe that a recession drives prices lower and reduces inflation, but I’m just reporting on what I have seen.

If pressed, I expect that we will see several nations reduce their tariff structures in response to this, similar to Canada and Israel, and US tariffs will decline there as well.  Other nations will dig in their heels and trade activity between the US and those nations will decline.  But I will not even hazard a guess as to which nations will do what.  Political pain is a funny thing, and different leaders respond differently.

My sincere hope is that now that the tariffs have been imposed, we can move on with our lives and discuss other issues because frankly, I am really tired of this topic.

Masked by the tariff mania was news that the US Senate has moved forward on its budget resolution bill which if passed and combined with the House, will allow the process to start to legislate for fiscal year 2026.  Both versions maintain the 2017 tax cuts, both seek unspecified spending reductions and while each has a different price tag, my take is this process will be completed before too long.  It would truly be miraculous if Congress actually submitted department spending bills on a timely basis, rather than the omnibus bills that have been the norm for quite a while.  That would be true progress in how the government works.

Anyway, let’s see where things stand this morning.  The one thing we know is that despite President Trump’s constant discussion on tariffs, market participants were not prepared.  Ironically, yesterday saw modest gains in US equity indices but as of now (6:40) US futures are sharply lower (NASDAQ -3.8%, SPX -3.6%, DJIA -2.6%).  Of course, the damage has been significant everywhere with equities lower worldwide.

In Asia, Vietnam (-7.2%) was the worst hit index, actually the worst in the world, as tariffs there rose to 46%.  Given Vietnam has been a way station for exports from China to the US, I expect that we will see some swift action by the government there to address the situation.  But elsewhere in Asia, while the losses were universal, they were not as bad as might be expected.  Tokyo (-2.6%) led the way lower with Chinese shares (Hang Seng -1.5%, CSI 300 -0.6%) also falling, but not collapsing.  Korea (-0.8%) and India (-0.4%) fell but were also not devastated.

In Europe, though, the pain is more consistent and larger, net, than Asia as per the below snapshot from Bloomberg.  This will be the most interesting thing to watch as there has been a great deal of huffing and puffing about a response, but will European nations, who sell a great deal into the US, risk a worse outcome, or will they reduce their own tariffs?

Something else that has declined sharply is bond yields around the world.  Treasury yields are lower by a further -6bps, and that is the basic decline seen across Europe as well.  Asia saw even greater drops in yields with JGB’s (-12bps) breaking the trendline that had been in place since the BOJ first started hiking rates last year and Governor Ueda made clear his intention to continue to do so.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It appears that investors are anticipating a global recession, at least based on the movements in government bond yields around the world.

In the commodity space, oil (-4.7%) has reversed much of its recent gains as the recession narrative has eclipsed the Iran war/sanctions narrative.  However, despite the sharp decline, oil remains nearly $3/bbl above the lows seen at the beginning of March, just one month ago.  In the metals market, gold, which initially traded to new highs on the tariff announcement reversed course about lunchtime in Asia and is now down by more than -2.0%.  My take is this is a short-term impact as investors sell liquid assets with gains to cover margin calls, rather than any negative feelings about gold in the wake of the news.  Instead, I suspect that the barbarous relic will regain its footing shortly as the ultimate haven asset in difficult times, and clearly many now see difficult times ahead.  Silver (-3.9%) and copper (-0.4%) are also softer, much more on the economic concerns than the risk concerns.

Finally, the dollar, shockingly, is broadly lower this morning.  While we have been consistently informed that a very clear response to the US imposing tariffs would be other currencies weakening vs. the dollar to offset the impact, apparently that model is also broken.  Versus it’s G10 counterparts, the dollar is under severe pressure today.  EUR (+1.75%), JPY (+1.7%), CHF (+2.1%), SEK (+2.1%) and even NOK (+1.1%) despite the collapse in oil prices, have all moved to within 1% of the dollar’s lows seen last September.  But to keep things in perspective, I don’t know that I would call the dollar “weak” here.  The below chart of DXY shows that even over the past 20 years, the dollar has been MUCH lower and only spent a relatively small amount of time above current levels.  

Source: Koyfin.com

Interestingly, other than the CE4, which track the euro closely, most EMG currencies have not seen the same boost vs. the dollar, although most are somewhat higher.  MXN (+0.6%), KRW (+0.6%) and INR (+0.5%) have all gained modestly.  ZAR (0.0%) and CNY (-0.2%) are the only currencies that have bucked the trend and followed the economic theory.  

Turning to the data, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims as well as the Trade Balance (-$123.5B) at 8:30.  Then at 10:00 we see ISM Services (53.0).  The thing about this data is it ought to have no impact whatsoever as last night’s tariff announcements completely changed the playing field.  So whatever things were, they are not representative of the future, at least the near future.  There are also a couple of Fed speakers, but again, there is no way they can determine how they will react until the real economic effects of these tariffs start to play out.

There have been many analysts who continue to believe that President Trump will not be able to tolerate a substantial decline in the equity market despite the fact that he has not discussed it at all, and he, along with Treasury Secretary Bessent have consistently said their goal is a lower yield on 10-year Treasuries.  Well, they are getting their wish right now, regardless of the reason.  

The president has done virtually everything he said he was going to do regarding the border, government efficiency and now tariffs.  There are many skeptics who believe that he is out to force economic change on the backs of the bottom 90% of earners to benefit himself and others in the top 1%.  But he has consistently said his goal is to help the middle class.  His view of reindustrialization and more self-sufficiency while reduced international adventures continues to be the driving force of his policies.  There is no reason to believe he is going to change that view.  Do not look for a reversal of what he has done simply because the S&P 500 declines.  I think the trend is going to be for the dollar to continue to decline along with interest rates, while commodities rally.  Equity markets are going to be a tale of two markets, likely with previous highflyers suffering and previously overlooked companies benefitting.  

The world is changing a lot, so the best thing you can do is maintain your hedges to mitigate the impact.

Good luck

Adf

Nobody Knows

Posted on by

The punditry’s now out in force
As they hope, their views, we’ll endorse
When tariffs arrive
On Wednesday they’ll strive
To claim they were right, but of course
 
The problem is nobody knows
Exactly what Trump will propose
So, models will fail
While Trump haters wail
More chaos is all that he sows

 

Well, folks, it’s month and quarter end today and many are decrying that President Trump’s policies have derailed the bull market in risk assets.  And they are almost certainly correct.  Yet, at the same time, there has been a broad recognition across a wide spectrum of analysts and politicians that the situation he inherited was unsustainable.  Whether the 7% budget deficits, the $36+ trillion in government debt or the ongoing inflationary pressures, the only people who were happy were those who saw their equity portfolios rise against all odds.  (I guess the gold holders have been pretty happy too, in fairness.)

However, the underlying reality of a situation is rarely enough to alter a good story, or a story that somebody wants to tell.  For instance, the Michigan Consumer Survey was released on Friday, and it fell more than expected to a reading of 57.0, its lowest reading since July 2022, when inflation was peaking.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But the story that has been getting all the press is the extraordinary rise in inflation expectations.  As you can see below, both 1-year (blue line) and 5-year (grey line) have risen sharply in 2025.  Conveniently for the mainstream media this has been blamed on President Trump’s policies given their efforts to discredit everything the president does.

However, the Michigan Survey, while having a long pedigree, isn’t that large a survey.  As such, it is possible that non-economic factors may be impacting the results.  For instance, when the survey is taken, the respondents’ political leanings are asked as well.  Now, take a look at the data when split by political views as per the below.  Perhaps, we need to take this survey with a grain or two of salt as it appears the question may be seen as a way to express one’s opinion about the current administration rather than unbiased views of future inflation.

This is especially true when we look at other measures of expected inflation, like the NY Fed’s Consumer inflation survey shown below with the green line compared to that Michigan survey in red.

Source: zerohedge.com

My point is, we need to be careful to notice the non-economic factors that enter into things like expectations surveys.  As well, the idea that inflation expectations are a critical driver of future inflation, although a staple of current central bank thinking, does not have much empirical backing.  For instance, my friend Mike Ashton, the Inflation Guy™, explained in this article way back in 2015, that inflation expectations do not have much empirical proof of effectively forecasting future inflation.  But perhaps, if you don’t believe him, you will consider a scholarly paper by a Fed economist, Jeremy Rudd, written in 2021 that is pretty damning with respect to the idea that the Fed relies on this data as part of their policy toolkit.  

In the end, the one truism of which I am highly confident is that pretty much all the models that have been utilized for the past twenty plus years are no longer reflective of the reality on the ground today.  Not just for inflation, but for growth and trade and every other aspect.  President Trump has not merely upset the applecart; he has broken it into pieces and burned them all to cinders.  All the fiscal problems mentioned above are still extant, but President Trump appears set on changing them in the direction desired by almost all mainstream economists.  They don’t like his methods, but it’s not clear how changes of this magnitude can be made smoothly.  So, perhaps the proper question is just how rough things are going to be.  If the overnight session is any indication, they could get pretty rough.

The dominant feature today
Is fear is what’s now holding sway
As markets decline
More pundits consign
The blame on Trumps tariff pathway

Investors have risk indigestion this morning, as their appetite to own equities anywhere in the world has significantly diminished.  After a rough week ending session on Friday in the US, equity markets in Asia have almost universally declined led by Tokyo (-4.05%) but with sharp declines seen in Korea (-3.0%), Taiwan (-4.2%), Australia (-1.75%), Malaysia (-1.45%) and Thailand (-1.5%).  Chinese (-0.7%) and Hong Kong (-1.3%) shares also fell, although perhaps not quite as far as others.  The entire conversation today is about President trump’s promise to impose tariffs around the world on Wednesday, with many analysts trying to estimate what damage will occur despite no clarity on the size and breadth of the tariffs.  But investors have decided that havens are a better place to hide for now.

European bourses are also sharply lower, although more in the -1.7% to -2.0% range, with every major index in Germany, France, Spain and Italy down by those amounts.  There continues to be a great deal of discussion amongst the European leadership about how they will respond to the mooted tariffs, but of course, like everybody else, they have no idea exactly what they will be.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:45) the picture is grim with declines between -0.6% (DJIA) and -1.3% (NASDAQ).  Right now, the only people who are happy are those holding puts.

Of course, in this risk-off environment, it should be no surprise that bond yields have slipped a bit as, at the margin, investors are flocking to own Treasuries (-5bps) and European sovereigns (Bunds -3bps, OATs -2bps, Gilts -4bps).  Even JGBs (-5bps) saw yields decline last night with any thoughts of the BOJ hiking rates in the near term fading away completely.  

On the other hand, commodities are finding a lot more interest this morning with gold (+1.15%) leading the way higher and proving itself to continue to be one of the most consistent safe havens available.  Interestingly, oil (+0.5%) is rallying this morning despite a number of Wall Street analysts upping their estimate of the probability of a US recession.  However, offsetting the potential future demand weakness is the news that President Trump is “pissed off” at Vladimir Putin for his ongoing aggression in Ukraine and seeming unwillingness to move to a ceasefire.  This has raised the specter of further sanctions on Russian oil output, potentially reducing supply.  As well, the Trump administration continues to tighten the noose on both Iranian and Venezuelan oil sales, so potentially reducing supply even further.  I guess this morning, the supply story is bigger than the demand story.

Finally, as we turn to the currency markets, the dollar is generally firmer this morning, although by widely varying amounts depending on the currency.  For instance, in the G10, NOK (-0.75%) is the laggard despite oil’s gains, followed by AUD (-0.6%) and NZD (-0.55%), with all three of these being major commodity producers at a time when commodities are doing well.  As to the rest of this bloc, JPY (+0.35%) is off its best levels, but behaving as a haven, and the others are just marginally changed from Friday’s closing levels.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (+0.25%) is the exception this morning, clearly benefitting from gold’s ongoing run to new all-time high prices, but otherwise, most of these currencies are modestly softer (MXN -0.2%, PLN -0.2%, KRW -0.25%).

Speaking of currencies, though, there is an article on this morning’s Bloomberg website that is worth reading, I believe, for everyone involved in the FX market.  The gist of the article is something that I have been discussing for the past several years, the fact that market liquidity here, despite the extraordinary volumes that trade on average each day (currently estimated by the BIS at $7.5 trillion across all FX products) is not nearly as deep as might be anticipated.  

My observation from my time on bank desks was that while there was a great deal of electronic flow, likely driven by HFT firms seeking to extract the last tenth of a pip out of thousands of transactions, when a real client, generally a corporate, had a need to do something specific to address a business need, and that amounted to more than $100 million equivalent, the liquidity situation was far more suspect. 

My personal theory was as follows: bank consolidation reduced the net amount of risk-taking appetite as larger banks did not increase their risk-taking commensurate with the reduction that occurred by small banks being gobbled up.  Combining this with the introduction of high-frequency trading firms in the business, who had no underlying client base to whom they owed a price, and therefore, could turn off their machines in a difficult market, further reducing liquidity, led to a situation where liquidity was a mile wide and an inch deep.  My point is for all the corporates out there who have significant transactions to execute, you must carefully consider the best way to approach the situation to avoid a potentially significant increase in execution costs.

Turning to the data, before we look at this week, which ends with NFP, a quick word on Friday’s core PCE data, which came in at a hotter than expected 0.4% taking the YY number to 2.8%.  The Fed cannot be happy with this outcome as a quick look at the recent readings makes it hard to accept inflation is continuing its decline from the 2022 highs.  Rather a look at the below chart, at least to my eye, shows me a stability in Core PCE of somewhere between 2.5% and 3.0%, well above the Fed’s target range, and hardly a cause to cut rates further.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As this note has already gotten a bit longer than I like, I will list the week’s data tomorrow but note that Chicago PMI (exp 45.4) is the only noteworthy data point to be released today.  

Absent a complete reversal of Trump’s tariff plans, I see nothing positive on the horizon for risk assets, and expect that equities will maintain, and probably extend the overnight losses while gold and bonds both rally, at least for now.  As to the dollar, my take is it will not benefit universally in this risk-off scenario, although there are currencies that will clearly suffer.  Remarkably, despite the performance of Aussie and Kiwi overnight, I do believe the commodity bloc has the best prospects for now.

Good luck

Adf

I Am Your Savior

Posted on by

Investors are showing concern
‘Bout tariffs and Trump, so they spurn
The riskiest stuff
But that’s not enough
To help generate a return
 
Seems most of the holdings in favor
Are no longer risk takers’ flavor
How long before Jay
Will finally say
QE is here, I am your savior

 

Have you bailed out on your risk exposures yet?  Because if not, it certainly seems you are behind the curve!  At least, that’s what it feels like this morning as trepidation underlies every player’s market activity.  Based on the commentary, as well as the Fear & Greed Index, you might think we are in a depression!

Source: cnn.com

But are things really that bad?  I know that the past week has seen a modest drawdown in equity prices, but after all, on February 20th, they reached yet another new all-time high, at least as per the S&P 500.  Since then, as you can see below, the decline has been less than 5%.  And while the market has traded below its 50-day moving average (blue line), a key technical indicator, it remains well above both the 200-day version of the same (purple line) and the longer-term trend line.  My point is it feels like the narrative is overstating the magnitude of the move thus far.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Is this the beginning of the end?  While you can never rule that out, as major corrections can occur at any time, I have no reason to believe this will be the case.  Much has been made of yesterday’s Initial Claims print at 242K, much higher than forecast as a harbinger of future economic weakness.  However, looking at the past 3 years of weekly data here, while certainly in the upper levels of readings, it is not nearly the only occurrence and not nearly the highest reading.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One data point does not make a trend and to my eye, looking at this chart, there is no discernible trend in either direction.  Yet part of the narrative evolution is that the DOGE cuts in government jobs, along with all the headline spending cuts, is setting the economy up for much slower growth in the short run.

In fact, this issue goes back to one about which I wrote several days ago here regarding the impact of government spending on actual economic activity.  The current view of economic activity includes government spending.  If President Trump’s goal is to reduce that spending, regardless of the net long-term benefits of such actions, GDP readings are going to decline initially.  Yes, there will be more productive use of capital with less regulation and less government, but that will take some time to become evident.  In the meantime, weaker economic activity is likely to be the outcome.

I have frequently written that there has not been a market clearing event since, arguably, October 1987, when equity markets plunged and erased significant excess and speculation.  Alas, newly minted (at the time) Fed Chair Greenspan stepped in and promised to support markets with ample liquidity the next day which opened the way for far more Fed intervention in markets leading up to Ben Bernanke and the first QE programs in the wake of the GFC in 2009 and every QE version since then.  While the movement so far does not remotely indicate the end of the world, based on the Fed’s history, once equity markets correct about 20%, they tend to become far more active in supporting the markets economy.  Will this time be different?  Given the Fed’s seeming underlying desperation to cut rates to begin with, my take is if the correction reaches 15% – 20%, we will see just that.

To sum things up, risk assets are under pressure on the basis of 1) excessive valuations, 2) the Trump efforts to reduce wasteful spending (which while wasteful is still spending and counted as economic activity), and 3) the idea that Trump’s imposition of tariffs is going to dramatically raise inflation and slow growth further.  Given the mainstream media’s inherent hatred of the president, they will certainly be playing up this theme for as long as they can as they try to force Trump to change tack.  But Trump, and Treasury Secretary Bessent, have been clear that their concern is 10-year bond yields, and getting them to lower levels.  A natural corollary of the current risk-off sentiment is that bond yields tend to decline.   Look at the chart below which shows that since Trump’s inauguration, 10-year yields are down nearly 40bps.  I would argue that Trump and Bessent are perfectly comfortable with the market right now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, let’s move on to the overnight activity.  Sticking to the bond theme, while Treasuries, this morning, are unchanged, they did decline all yesterday afternoon and this morning European sovereigns are all lower by -2bps.  As well, JGB yields have also slipped by -3bps as we are seeing risk aversion evident all around the world.  Of course, the problem with all G10 nations (Germany excepted) is that they all have very high debt/GDP ratios and in Europe, especially, this is a problem as they have begun to realize they need to spend a great deal more on defense than they have in the past.  And all that spending is going to be funded by more borrowing.  The tension between additional issuance driving yields higher and risk aversion driving yields lower is going to be the theme of European bond markets for a while.

In the equity world, it is not a pretty picture anywhere in the world.  After yesterday’s US rout, with the NASDAQ (-2.8%) leading the way lower, Asian bourses were all in the red.  Japan (-2.9%), Hong Kong (-3.3%), China (-2.0%), Korea (-3.4%), India (-1.9%)… the list goes on across the entire region with only New Zealand (+0.5%) bucking the trend on some better than expected local earnings and consumer confidence data.  European markets, though, are in a bit better shape as they suffered yesterday and are consolidating those losses this morning with most markets trading +/- 0.3% on the session.  We have seen a lot of European inflation data this morning, most of it lower than forecast which has encouraged the view that the ECB will be cutting rates more aggressively going forward.  US futures, too, are higher at this hour (7:00), on the order of 0.5% as they bounce from yesterday’s, and truly the past week’s, declines.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.25%) is back under pressure and back under $70/bbl.  The latest fear is that slowing economic activity around the world will reduce demand for the black sticky stuff and drive prices lower still.  Remember this, oil supply is restricted not by geology, but by politics.  As nations determine that cheaper energy is critical to their future, expect to see more effort to produce more oil.  Meanwhile, metals markets are also under pressure with gold (-0.5%) still falling despite its ostensible risk profile.  However, the barbarous relic remains well above $2800/oz and I continue to believe that this correction is just that, and not the reversal of a trend.  Too many things are happening around the world to induce more fear and in that scenario, gold is the oldest store of value around.  The rest of the metals complex is also under pressure with copper (-1.2%) slipping back a bit.  It is important to remember, though, that despite the recent declines, all the major metals are still nicely higher on the month.  

Finally, the dollar is a bit firmer again this morning after a rally yesterday as well.  In classic risk-off fashion, investors flocked to the dollar, arguably to buy Treasuries.  So, we are seeing weakness in NZD (-0.6%), JPY (-0.4%) and CHF (-0.3%) in the G10 and weakness in KRW (-0.5%), ZAR (-0.2%) amongst others in the EMG bloc.  Here the story remains the impacts of Trump’s tariffs and how they will be applied, if they will be applied, as well as a general fear factor which tends to help the dollar.  Consider, too, ideas that the ECB is going to cut rates will not help the single currency.

On the data front, this morning brings Personal Income (exp +0.3%), Personal Spending (0.1%), and the PCE data where Headline (0.3%, 2.5% Y/Y) and Core (0.3%, 2.6% Y/Y) will be the most important data points.  As well, we will see Chicago PMI (40.6) which has been below 50.0 in every month but one since August 2022.  

There is no question that the economic data has been softening lately.  We saw that with the Citi Surprise Index as well as the continuous stream of commentary by the economic bears who point to underlying pieces of data that point in that direction (whether housing or employment indicators and the recent weak PMI data).  

Consider this, an early recession in Trump’s term can be blamed on the Biden administration as well as set things up for future growth, certainly in time for the mid-term elections.  As well, it will likely help reduce the yield on the 10-year, an explicit goal.  This scenario likely means short-term weakness with an eye to longer term growth.  The dollar is likely to benefit early on, at least until the Fed steps in.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Hard to Kill

Posted on by

Inflation just won’t go away
As evidenced by the UK
This year started out
Removing all doubt
The Old Lady’s work’s gone astray
 
And elsewhere, the problem is still
Inflation is quite hard to kill
Though central banks want
More rate cuts to flaunt
Those goals are quite hard to fulfill

 

While most eyes remain on President Trump with his ongoing efforts to reduce the size of the US government, as well as his tariff discussions and efforts to negotiate a lasting peace in Ukraine, we cannot ignore the other things that go on around the world.  One of the big issues, which has almost universally been acclaimed a problem, is that inflation is higher than most of the world had become accustomed to pre-Covid.  As well, the virtual universal central bank goal remains the local inflation rate, however calculated, to be at 2.0%.  Alas for the central bankers in their seats today, that remains quite a difficult reach.  A quick look at the most recent headline CPI readings across the G20 shows that only 5 nations (counting the Eurozone as a bloc since they have only one monetary policy) are at or below that magic level as per the below table.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of those nations who are below, two, China and Switzerland, are actually quite concerned about the lack of price pressure and seeking to raise the inflation rate, and the other three (Canada, Singapore and Saudi Arabia) are right on the number, with core inflation readings tending higher than the headline reported here.

Perhaps a better way to highlight the problem is to look at the 10-year bonds of most countries and see how they have been behaving of late as an indication of whether investors are comfortable with the inflation fighting efforts by each nation.  While it is not universal, you can look at the column on the far right of the below table and see that 10-year yields have been rising for the past year.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I only bring this up because, despite the fact that I have been downplaying central bank, especially the Fed’s, impact on markets, ultimately, every nation tasks their central bank to manage inflation.  That seems reasonable since inflation, as Milton Friedman explained to us in 1963, is “always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.”  But perhaps you don’t believe that and are schooled in the idea that faster growth leads to higher wages and therefore higher inflation.  Certainly, Paul Samuelson’s iconic textbook (as an aside, Dr Samuelson was my Economics 101 professor in college) made clear that was the pathway.  Alas, as my good friend, @inflation_guy Mike Ashton, wrote yesterday, there is no evidence that is the case.  Read the article, it is well worth it and can help you start looking elsewhere for causes of inflation, like perhaps the growth in the money supply!

Of course, the reason that we continue to come back to inflation in our discussions is because it is critical to the outcomes in financial markets.  And that is our true focus.  It is the reason there is so much discussion regarding President Trump’s mooted tariffs and how inflationary they will be.  It is the reason that parties out of power continue to highlight any prices that have risen substantially in an effort to disparage the parties in power.  And it is the reason that central banks remain central to the plot of all financial markets, at least based on the current configuration of the global economy.  If there was only one financial lesson from the pandemic response, it is that Magical Money Tree Modern Monetary Theory is a failed concept of how to run policy.  This poet’s fervent hope is that Treasury Secretary Bessent is smart enough to understand that and will address fiscal issues in other manners.  I believe that to be the case.

Back to the UK, where CPI printed at 3.0%, 2 ticks higher than the median forecast, while core CPI printed at 3.7%.  This cannot be comforting for the BOE as most of the MPC remain committed to helping PM Starmer’s government find growth somehow and are keen to cut rates in support.  The problem they have is that inflation will not fade despite extremely lackluster GDP growth.  Recall, last week, even though the Q/Q GDP print of 0.1% beat forecasts, it was still just 0.1%.  Not falling into recession hardly seems a resounding victory for policy in the UK, especially since stagnation, or is it now stagflation, is the end result.  It should be no surprise that market participants have sold off the pound (-0.3%), Gilts (+5bps) and UK equities (-0.4%) and it is hard to find a positive way to spin any of this.  Again, while I have adjusted my views on Japan, the UK falls squarely in the camp of in trouble and likely to see a weaker currency.

Ok, let’s look elsewhere to see how things behaved overnight.  After a very modest rise in US equity indices yesterday, the Asian markets were mixed with the Nikkei (-0.3%) and Hang Seng (-0.15%) slacking off a bit although the CSI 300 (+0.7%) managed to find buyers after President Xi met with business leaders and the expectation is for further government stimulus, as well as a reduction in regulations, to help support the economy.  Australia (-0.7%) is still under pressure despite yesterday’s RBA rate cut as the post-meeting statement was quite hawkish, indicating caution is their approach for now given still sticky inflation.  (Where have we heard that before?)

In Europe, the only color on the screen is red with declines of between -0.4% and -0.9% as investors seem to be taking some profits after a solid run in most of these markets.  I guess the fact that European governments have been shown to be powerless in the world has not helped investor sentiment either as it appears these nations may be subject to more outside forces than they will be able to address adequately.  Lastly, US futures are unchanged at this hour (7:40).

In the bond market, as per the table above, yields are higher across the board with Treasuries (+2bps) the best performer as virtually all European sovereign issues have seen yields rise between 5bps and 7bps.  It simply appears that confidence in the Eurozone is slipping and demand for Eurozone assets is falling alongside that.

In the commodity markets, it should be no surprise that gold (+0.1%) continues to edge higher.  The barbarous relic continues to find price support despite the fact that interest in gold, at least in Western economies, remains lackluster at best.  There is much discussion now about an audit of the US’s gold reserves at Fort Knox and in the NY Fed, something that has not been performed since 1953.  Not surprisingly, there are rumors that there is much less gold in storage than officially claimed (a little over 8 tons) and rumors that there is much more which has not been reported but was obtained via seizures throughout history.  This story has legs as despite the lack of institutional interest in the US, it is picking up a retail following and we are seeing the punditry increasingly raise their price forecasts for the coming years.  As to oil (+0.8%) it is higher again this morning but remains in a tight trading range with market technicians looking at the $70/bbl level as a key support to hold.  A break there could well see a quick $5/bbl decline.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer this morning against most of its counterparts with most G10 currencies showing declines similar to the pound’s -0.2%, although the yen (+0.15%) is bucking that trend.  However, versus its EMG counterparts, the dollar is having a much better day, rising vs. PLN (-0.9%), ZAR (-0.7%) and BRL (-0.5%) on various idiosyncratic stories.  The zloty seems to be suffering from its proximity to Ukraine and the uncertainty with the future regarding a potential peace effort.  The rand is falling after the FinMin delayed the budget speech as internal squabbling in the governing coalition seems to be preventing a coherent message while the real is under pressure as inflation remains above target and the central bank’s tighter policy has been negatively impacting growth in the economy.

On the data front, this morning brings Housing Starts (exp 1.4M) and Building Permits (1.46M) and then this afternoon we see the FOMC Minutes from the January meeting.  That will be intensely parsed for a better understanding of what the committee is thinking.  We do hear from Governor Jefferson after the market closes, but generally, the cautious stance remains the most popular commentary.

Has anything really changed?  The market remains uncertain over Trump’s moves, the Fed remains on hold and cautious, and data shows that the economy continues to tick along nicely with price pressures unwilling to dissipate.  I see no reason to abandon the dollar at this point.

Good luck

Adf