Tag Archives: finance

Overrun

Posted on by

We’ve not even gone through a week
Yet Trump, so much havoc did wreak
This poet will claim
That in this ballgame
It’s top first, one down, so to speak
 
The impact of what has been done
Is widespread and hits everyone
So, please understand
Whatever you’ve planned
May, by events, be overrun

 

Venezuela continues to be the primary discussion point in both the media and the markets.  Mostly along political lines there are calls that the weekend’s action was illegal or not, and as Brent Donnelly, a very good follow on X (@donnelly_brent), explained after reading voluminous material, the raid was either all about the oil or had nothing to do with the oil. I feel like that sums things up pretty well.

While this poet has views on the ongoing issues, they are set from afar with no inside knowledge so keep that in mind.  But ultimately, my take is the opportunity for real change has come to Venezuela, something that did not exist while Maduro was still there.  If nothing else, the ability for the US to exfiltrate him must have made a strong impression on acting president Rodriguez and the generals overseeing the army and police forces there and ought push decision making in a positive direction, at least for a while.  What seems abundantly clear, however, is that most of the population is ecstatic at his removal and have hope for a future, something missing for decades.

As to the oil, it is heavy, sour crude, something Gulf coast refineries are tuned to use, but the infrastructure there is a disaster.  My take is the one thing that is underestimated is just how remarkable the technology of oil exploration and production has become, and its ability to solve problems in efficiency to reduce the cost of extraction.  I will take the under on the time it takes to increase production there, although a key bottleneck is the electric grid which must be addressed as well.  Nonetheless, despite the rise in oil prices during yesterday’s session, I maintain my view that the trend is lower.

Other than domestic political news there seems little else to discuss but market activity, so let’s go there.  A strong session in the US yesterday was followed by plenty of strength in Asia with Japan (+1.3%), China (+1.6%) and HK (+1.4%) all having excellent outcomes.  Too, Korea (+1.7%) and Taiwan (+1.6%) had strong showings with many more gainers than losers in the region.  The one market that has not partaken in the early year rally is India (-0.4%), which I can only ascribe to the fact they may be losing a source of cheap oil.  Or perhaps, more accurately, all the buyers of sanctioned oil may find themselves in more difficult straits, paying full price, as the dark fleet of tankers is suddenly having more trouble making the rounds.

On this note, one other place to watch is Iran, where it appears that the regime may be set to collapse as protests grow and some cities may have been completely taken over by the protesters.  If the theocracy falls, I would expect that, too, will pressure oil prices lower, as sanctions could be swiftly lifted.

Turning to Europe, does anybody really care anymore?  No, seriously, markets there are mixed this morning with France (-0.4%) lagging while the UK (+0.7%) is gaining on the back of BP and Shell and the general euphoria about the oil majors now.  Meanwhile, other major markets have seen modest gains (Italy +0.4%, Spain +0.3%, Germany +0.2%) but there is one outlier, Denmark (+2.1%) which, given all the talk of the US seeking to take control of Greenland, seems odd to me.  I can find no specific news either for the economy or any companies (Novo Nordisk being the only one of note), but something is going on.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:50) they are little changed.

Turning to the bond market, the below chart of the 10-year offers a great picture of what it means when traders say nothing is going on.  Since early September, the bond has been trading within a 20 basis point range despite all the huffing and puffing of the punditry and the FOMC’s rate cuts.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

If bond investors are the “smart” money, I would argue that right now they have no opinion, or perhaps their opinion is that the economy is going to continue to tick along at a decent rate, with limited extra inflationary pressure.  To that last point, an article in the WSJ this morning explained that several recent studies, one by the SF Fed, demonstrated that tariffs have virtually no inflationary impact.  That probably doesn’t help Powell’s talking points.  While I continue to be concerned that inflation will maintain a 3+% level, I also believe the Fed is going to suppress interest rates going forward, net, bonds don’t seem that exciting.  As to the overnight price action, Treasury yields backed up 2bps, while European sovereigns slipped between -1bp and -2bps.  I couldn’t help but also notice that yesterday saw a massive issuance of USD bonds by non-US corporates, over $60 billion, an indication to me, at least, that calls for the death of the dollar are somewhat premature.

Commodities continue to be where all the action is, or perhaps more accurately, metals markets.  After massive rallies yesterday, we are seeing follow through with gold (+0.4%), silver (+2.4%), copper (+1.0%) and platinum (+3.2%) all strong again.  Unlike the bond market, and truly FX, which is also dull and boring, the below chart shows just how much things in the metals space have changed over time. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My take is that investors are still trying to figure out the implications of the fact that old relationships like the dollar falling when metals rise, or metals falling when real interest rates rise, are broken and what that implies for the future.  The reality is that other than gold, which is the calmest of them all, these metals are indicating actual shortages for users.  Consider that, according to Grok, the typical catalytic converter uses between 0.1 and 0.25 troy ounces of platinum, so at today’s price, between $230 and $575.  Given the average price of a new car is ~$50K, paying up for platinum is not going to change the equation that much, certainly relative to not having the platinum and therefore not being able to complete and sell the vehicle.  I suspect that metals, while likely to be volatile in their price action, have much further to run higher.

Lastly, the dollar…is still there.  Using the DXY as my proxy this morning, you can look at the chart below for the past year and see, it has basically not moved since it stopped declining in late April 2025.  It is hard to get excited about things right now.  However, I maintain that the US will remain the cleanest dirty shirt and benefit accordingly over time.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, Services (exp 52.9) and Composite (53.0) PMI are released this morning with both expected lower than last month, but still in expansion territory.  We also hear from Richmond Fed governor Barkin, but it seems the Fed has taken a back seat to Venezuela lately, at least with respect to what is driving markets.  As of this morning, there is just a 16% probability of a rate cut priced in for the end of the month with a 53% probability priced for the March meeting.  But two more cuts are seen as a certainty by September, although if GDP continues to perform like it has, I imagine that will change.  According to the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model, Q4 is forecast at 2.7%.  We shall see how that evolves over time.

Summing it all up, the dollar is an afterthought in markets right now and seems unlikely to move very much in the near term.  Metals remain the place to be, and nothing indicates those trends have ended.

Good luck

Adf

A Vision For ‘Twenty-Six

Posted on by

(With apologies to Clement Clarke Moore)

Tis the first day of trading in Ought Twenty-Six
With too much attention on raw politics
At home, eyes have turned to the mid-term elections
To see if results will force mid-course corrections
In Europe, they’re going all-in on Ukraine
With more billions promised, though that seems insane
Meanwhile, Mr Xi is convinced he can fix
The problems at home with his policy mix
And this, my friends, just skims the surface of things
As pols everywhere suffer arrows and slings
Remember, though, markets are what I’m about
And while I could err, I am never in doubt.

Let’s start at the top with Growth here in the States
Which likely will show more than marginal rates
In fact, Four percent seems a viable goal
As inward investment and tax cuts take hold
Remember, for Trump, if there’s one thing he’s not
It’s timid, and so he’ll demand, “Run it hot!”
Thus, growth will expand, though inflation might gain
And for the elections, that could be a pain
The problem is Jay, and whoever comes next
Have come to believe two percent’s just subtext
The greatest unknown is on government spending
And whether it grows or, at last, starts descending

The punditry’s certain the government fisc
Is going to increase inflation’ry risk
If true, CPI of near Four percent’s apt
If not, then Inflation ‘neath Three, could be capped

And what about elsewhere, in Europe? Japan?
In markets, emerging, do they have a plan?
Will they grow their ‘conomies, drawing investment?
Or will we soon witness a large reassessment?

In Europe, they claim they’ll be building more guns
To help them defend all their daughters and sons
As well, they’re committed to helping Ukraine
Continue to fight, despite so many slain
They’re planning to borrow a cool 90 Bill
But energy costs, these grand plans could well kill
Meanwhile, M Lagarde claims that rates are just right
And given growth there’s One Percent, I won’t fight
So, weak growth and low rates and energy blues
Lead me to believe that come year-end, the news
Will be that the Euro is failing to thrive
Do not be surprised when it hits One oh-Five

In England and Scotland and all the UK
Just like in the EU, they can’t make much hay
The budget’s a wreck yet they want to raise taxes
Though history shows growth will wane ere it waxes
As well, they continue their crack down on speech
While crimping their energy industry’s reach
So, power is costly, and billionaires flee
From here, ‘cross the pond, this is what I foresee
A ‘conomy heading right into stagflation
As long as Kier Starmer is leading the nation
For markets, the Pound will lose all its allure
With One-Ten the Boxing Day screen price du jour

A turn to the East where the Sun Also Rises
Will teach us that, really, there are no surprises
To date you’ve heard much ‘bout the rise in yen rates
With pundits opining the Carry Trades’ fates
This year, so they say, look for much stronger yen
As local investors buy yen bonds again
Thus, all the hedge funds who’ve been funding their trades
By borrowing yen, and they’ve done so in spades,
Will need to buy back all that Japanese Money
The outcome, for yen shorts, will not be so sunny
But what if this idea of yen heading home
Is wrong?  This implies quite a different syndrome

At this point there’s no sign the government there
Is ready, more spending and debt, to forswear
Instead, what seems likely is more of the same
More government spending in all but its name
So, debt will continue to rise without end
And up to One-Eighty the buck will ascend

As well as Japan, in the continent vast
Of Asia, it’s China we come to at last
“Poor” President Xi has a problem at home
Consumption is not in the Chinese genome
For decades, the model’s been, build and export
Which helps explain why local usage falls short
But lately the rest of the world’s of a mind
That Chinese imports are a troublesome kind
So, Xi needs his people to learn how to spend
Else all that production may come to an end
But if they consume, what will that do to growth?
Its rate will decline, something for which Xi’s loath

Thus, GDP 5 means a weaker yuan
Well above Seven you can depend on
But if, against odds, Xi gets Chinese to spend
Six-Fifty is where yuan will be at year end.

Let’s shift our perspective to Treasury debt
A market of critical import, and yet
A market that’s been in a range for a while
So, what must occur for a change in profile?
The popular view is that deficit spending
Will drive an outcome of, high yields, never-ending
But Trump and his team are, quite hard, pushing back
Explaining that policy’s on the right track
Twixt tariffs and growth, tax receipts have been flying
While RIFs in the government are underlying
The idea that deficits soon will be shrinking
In truth, this is not what the punditry’s thinking
But one thing is clear that will keep yields from climbing
QE, which is back, is designed for pump-priming
So, Jay and his heir will keep buying and buying
And 10-Years at Four Percent seems satisfying

It’s not just the government, though, that’s in debt
Those corporates who borrowed at ZIRP, have not yet
Refinanced the trillions they owe, to this day
And now they’re competing with Bessent and Jay
While Scott will find buyers, if not least the Fed
For corporates that path may be flashing bright red
If credit spreads widen will companies fail?
And will that unravel the stock markets’ tale?
Right now, spreads for IG sit near one percent
And Junk’s above eight with investors content
However, the biggest risk this year could be
The absence of corporate debt liquidity
If IG spreads widen 200 bps more
The outcome could be a GFC encore

This takes us to stocks, both at home and abroad
Which last year saw rallies we all did applaud
But will this year bring us some more of the same?
Or have things been altered?  Is there a new game?
If my crystal ball is in any way clear
The outcome could well be a frightening year
Remember, the driver of last year’s returns
Was government spending which lacked all concerns
Thus, Cantillon nailed it with where cash would go
And stocks were the winner, of that much we know
But this year the mountain of debt coming due
Could well force decisions of what will ensue
And too, don’t forget if the deficit shrinks
It’s likely to be a great stock market jinx
So, don’t be surprised if December this year
A 10% fall ‘cross all stocks does appear

And what of that black, sticky stuff that they drill
Which powers the global economy still
When its price increases, it causes much pain
For most everyone, it can be quite the bane
Consumers, instead, like those prices to sink
But drillers, in that case, cause output to shrink
So, which will it be, will Trump’s mantra come true
Or will, new production, most drillers eschew
I think what is missed is technology’s traction
And how costs per barrel will tend toward contraction
As well, nations worldwide, at last understand
That Carbon Dioxide just cannot be banned
Come Christmas, next, we will see growth in supply
With Fifty per barrel the price we’ll espy

The last place to look is at bright things that shine
Which saw prices move in a vertical line
While gold was the starter, by year end t’was clear
That silver and platinum said, wait, hold my beer
The latter two rising thrice fifty percent
With neither responding to any event
Which brings us to this year, can these trends maintain?
Or are we now set up for infinite pain?
It seems to me that til the summer at least
All three will continue to rise, as with yeast
But when we reach solstice do not be surprised
If views on their future become bastardized
In other words, look for corrections in price
With early year gains given back in a trice
But still, by the end of the year I believe
Five Thousand in Gold is what we will perceive
For Silver, One Hundred could well be the spot
And Platinum, Three Grand, would not be too hot.

To all of my readers and friends, please forgive
My musings if they got too ruminative
This year will see change across many degrees
And some will be painful, while others will please

In sum, I think President Trump can succeed
In changing behavior, though not corporate greed
Reducing the number of government staff
As well as with regs, he can cut those in half
Inward investment will focus on stuff
Instead of on stocks, for the markets that’s rough
Dollars will still be in greater demand
While Treasury yields will be stuck in the sand
IG and Junk are unlikely to win
As rising expenses cut margins quite thin
And still, through it all, precious metals will gain
Though G7 central banks all will abstain
Come Christmas next, nothing will look quite the same
And maybe my views can help you build a frame.

Thank you all for tolerating my punditry and I hope that you all have a wonderful, healthy and successful year ahead.

Adf

Talk of the Town

Posted on by

Two things have been talk of the town
First, silver ne’er seems to go down
But also, of late
The Dow’s in a state
Where it wears the daily stock crown
 
But if we dig deeper, we find
Industrials, as they’re defined
Don’t build many things
Instead, they pull strings
As finance and tech are combined

 

Before I start, this will be the last poetry of 2025.  I want to thank all my readers for continuing to read and I certainly hope I both amused you and highlighted one view of what is driving the zeitgeist in markets these days.  FX poetry will return on January 5th with my annual long-form poetic prognostications.  Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukkah and Happy New Year to you all.

So, I was reading my friend JJ’s evening wrap up from yesterday and he highlighted the fact that the DJIA (+1.3%) made a new all-time high in trading and it was led by…Goldman Sachs.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, I have nothing against Goldman Sachs, per se, but it struck me as odd that Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, was a member of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  It’s not that I wasn’t aware of the fact, but for some reason, this mention stuck out.  So, I thought I might look at the current membership of the Dow and see just how industrial it is.

While you will likely not be surprised that it has several non-industrial, service-based companies in the index, you might be surprised by just how many.  For instance, aside from Goldman, JPMorgan, American Express and Visa are in there as well as United Health and Travelers from the insurance space.  There are major retailers like Walmart, Home Depot, Amazon and McDonalds, along with tech and telecom/media names like Microsoft, Salesforce, Disney and Verizon.  

This is not to say that these are misplaced with respect to their relative importance in the US economy, clearly all are major corporations with long histories of profitability.  But it seems odd to list them as industrial.  I would contend that nothing explains the financialization of the US economy better than the fact that 14 out of the 30 members of the DJIA are service companies rather than producers of stuff.  Maybe they should rename it the Dow Jones Major Corporate Index.

To conclude the equity portion of our discussion, yesterday saw the NASDAQ (-0.25%) decline in the face of a broad overall equity rally as there appears to be a rotation of investors from AI into other things like financials (as hopes of another Fed rate cut spring eternal) and power producers as the power needs of AI keep getting estimated ever higher.  This rally was followed pretty much everywhere around the world as regardless of one’s religion, it appears investors are all counting on Santa to deliver higher prices.  In Asia, Tokyo (+1.4%). HK (+1.75%), China (+0.6%), Australia (+1.2%), Korea (+1.4%) and virtually every other market rallied.  The only data of note here was Japanese IP which came in a tick higher than its preliminary forecast, but to counter that, Nikkei reported that the BOJ, when they meet next week, are definitely going to raise the base rate by 25bps to 0.75%, the highest level since 1994.  That doesn’t seem that bullish, but then, I’m not Japanese.

In Europe, the gains are also universal, albeit less impressive with Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.5%) leading the way and Germany and the UK both only marginally higher.  The most interesting news here is about the EU’s efforts to confiscatethe Russian assets that have been frozen since they invaded Ukraine, but which are being blocked by Belgium where they reside under SWIFT.  And as I type (7:45) US futures are mixed with the Dow (+0.2%) still in favor while NASDAQ (-0.5%) continues to lag.

But the other story that is getting press, and arguably more press, is precious metals.  Silver (+0.9% today, +10% this week, +122% this year) is the leader and is now trading above $64/oz.  This is the very definition of a parabolic move, which is obvious when you look at the silver chart for the past 5 years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Referring back to JJ’s note, it is important to understand he is a commodity trader of long standing (remarkably even longer than my time in FX) and he discussed silver from an insider’s perspective.  The essence of the issue here is that there are quite a few paper short positions that have existed for a long time.  The rumor has long been that JPMorgan has been preventing silver from rising by playing in futures markets.  But now, real demand, between industrial users (solar panels and electronics) and Asian retail demand from both India and China is far higher than new supply or recovery from scrap, to the tune of 120 million oz/year, and those shorts cannot find the metal to deliver.  The last time there was a squeeze, when the Hunt’s tried to corner the market in 1980, people lined up at stores to sell their silver tea services, bringing metal to the market.  But those are all gone.  I’m not sure what will change this in the short run, but it cannot go up forever.  With that in mind, though, I think precious metals have much further to run as the ongoing debasement of fiat currencies simply adds further to demand.  

Silver managed to drag gold (+1.1% today, +3.0% this week, +65% this year) and platinum (+3.6% today, +7.2% this week, +98% this year) along for the ride and I expect this will continue across the board.  Meanwhile oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning but has fallen -4.0% this week.  The news that the US boarded a Venezuelan oil tanker and took control in an effort to pressure Maduro didn’t seem to concern anyone in the market.  This trend remains clear.  

As to the bond market, this morning yields are higher by 2bps, pretty much across the board of Treasuries and all European sovereigns.  But with that in mind, the 10-year Treasury is still yielding 4.18%, below its worst level immediately following the FOMC meeting, and as I mentioned above, there appears to be a growing belief that Powell’s concern about the labor market will result in more cuts sooner rather than later.  While that is not really playing out in the futures market yet, as you can see below with the next cut priced for April with a 76% probability, that is the narrative that is being promulgated in FinX.  

Source: cmegroup.com

Next week we will get the November NFP report (exp 35K) and all the data we missed in October.  I can assure you if that comes in weak, the idea of a rate cut will explode onto the scene once again.  Too, on Wednesday evening, the WSJpublished an article indicating that Chairman Powell is concerned the employment data is overstating things because of the flaws in the birth/death model.  The point is he may be far more inclined to cut if next Tuesday’s report is weak.

Finally, the dollar is…still here.  It sold off after the Fed, and as I showed yesterday, has fallen back to the middle of its trading range of the past 6 months.  I keep reading how the dollar is the key, but quite frankly, I’m not certain what that key will unlock.  We need out of consensus activities to change the current situation.  After all, the underlying demand for dollars because of the trillions of dollars of debt outstanding outside of the US makes it difficult to get too bearish without a major reason.  If the Fed cut 50bps intermeeting, that would do it, but I’m not holding my breath.

And that’s really it my friends.  There is no data today although we do hear from three Fed speakers.  Given the dissent on the FOMC, I expect that we are going to be need to keep score as to views for a while when these folks speak. 

In the meantime, as I said above, have a wonderful holiday all

Adf

Crazier Still

Posted on by

There once was a time when the Fed
When meeting, and looking ahead
All seemed to agree
The future they’d see
And wrote banal statements, when read
 
But this time is different, it’s true
Though those words most folks should eschew
‘Cause nobody knows
Which way the wind blows
As true data’s hard to construe
 
So, rather than voting as one
Three members, the Chairman, did shun
But crazier still
The dot plot did kill
The idea much more can be done

 

I think it is appropriate to start this morning’s discussion with the dot plot, which as I, and many others, expected showed virtually no consensus as to what the future holds with respect to Federal Reserve monetary policy.  For 2026, the range of estimates by the 19 FOMC members is 175 basis points, the widest range I have ever seen.  Three members see a 25bp hike in 2026 and one member (likely Governor Miran) sees 150bps of cuts.  They can’t all be right!  But even if we look out to the longer run, the range of estimates is 125bps wide.

Personally, I am thrilled at this outcome as it indicates that instead of the Chairman browbeating everyone into agreeing with his/her view, which had been the history for the past 40 years, FOMC members have demonstrated they are willing to express a personal view.

Now, generally markets hate uncertainty of this nature, and one might have thought that equity markets, especially, would be negatively impacted by this outcome.  But, since the unwritten mandate of the Fed is to ensure that stock markets never decline, they were able to paper over the lack of consensus by explaining they will be buying $40 billion/month of T-bills to make sure that bank reserves are “ample”.  QT has ended, and while they will continue to go out of their way to explain this is not QE, and perhaps technically it is not, they are still promising to pump nearly $500 billion /year into the economy by expanding their balance sheet.  One cannot be surprised that initially, much of that money is going to head into financial markets, hence today’s rally.

However, if you want to see just how out of touch the Fed is with reality, a quick look at their economic projections helps disabuse you of the notion that there is really much independent thought in the Marriner Eccles Building.  As you can see below, they continue to believe that inflation will gradually head back to their target, that growth will slow, unemployment will slip and that Fed funds have room to decline from here.

I have frequently railed against the Fed and their models, highlighting time and again that their models are not fit for purpose.  It is abundantly clear that every member has a neo-Keynesian model that was calibrated in the wake of the Dot com bubble bursting when interest rates in the US first were pushed down to 0.0% while consumer inflation remained quiescent as all the funds went into financial assets.  One would think that the experience of 2022-23, when inflation soared forcing them to hike rates in the most aggressive manner in history, would have resulted in some second thoughts.  But I cannot look at the table above and draw that conclusion.  Perhaps this will help you understand the growth in the meme, end the fed.

To sum it all up, FOMC members have no consensus on how to behave going forward but they decided that expanding the balance sheet was the right thing to do.  Perhaps they do have an idea, but given inflation is showing no signs of heading back to their target, they decided that the esoterica of the balance sheet will hide their activities more effectively than interest rate announcements.

One of the key talking points this morning revolves around the dollar in the FX markets and how now that the Fed has cut rates again, while the ECB is set to leave them on hold, and the BOJ looks likely to raise them next week, that the greenback will fall further.  Much continues to be made of the fact that the dollar fell about 12% during the first 6 months of 2025, although a decline of that magnitude during a 6-month time span is hardly unique, it was the first such decline that happened during the first 6 months of the year, in 50 years or so.  In other words, much ado about nothing.  

The latest spin, though, is look for the dollar to decline sharply after the rate cut.  I have a hard time with this concept for a few reasons.  First, given the obvious uncertainty of future Fed activity, as per the dot plot, it is unclear the Fed is going to aggressively cut rates from this level anytime soon.  And second, a look at the history of the dollar in relation to Fed activity doesn’t really paint that picture.  The below chart of the euro over the past five years shows that the single currency fell during the initial stages of the Fed’s panic rate hikes in 2022 then rallied back sharply as they continued.  Meanwhile, during the latter half of 2024, the dollar rallied as the Fed cut rates and then declined as they remained on hold.   My point is, the recent history is ambiguous at best regarding the dollar’s response to a given Fed move.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I have maintained that if the Fed cuts aggressively, it will undermine the dollar.  However, nothing about yesterday’s FOMC meeting tells me they are about to embark on an aggressive rate cutting binge.

The other noteworthy story this morning is the outcome from China’s Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC).  I have described several times that the President Xi’s government claims they are keen to help support domestic consumption and the housing market despite neither of those things having occurred during the past several years.  Well, Bloomberg was nice enough to create a table highlighting the CEWC’s statements this year and compare them to the past two years.  I have attached it below.

In a testament to the fact that bureaucrats speak the same language, no matter their native tongue, a look at the changes in Fiscal Policy or Top Priority Task, or even Real Estate shows that nothing has changed but the order of the words.  The very fact that they need to keep repeating themselves can readily be explained by the fact that the previous year’s efforts failed.  Why will this time be different?

Ok, a quick tour of markets.   Apparently, Asia was not enamored of the FOMC outcome with Tokyo (-0.9%) and China (-0.9%) both sliding although HK managed to stay put.  Elsewhere in the region, both Korea (-0.6%) and Taiwan (-1.3%) were also under pressure as most markets here were in the red.  The exceptions were India, Malaysia and the Philippines, all of which managed gains of 0.5% or so.  

In Europe, things are a little brighter with modest gains the order of the day led by Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.4%) although both Germany and the UK are barely higher at this hour.  There was no data released in Europe this morning although the SNB did meet and leave rates on hold at 0.0% as universally expected.  There has been a little bit of ECB speak, with several members highlighting that ECB policy is independent of Fed policy but that if Fed cuts force the dollar lower, they may feel the need to respond as a higher euro would reduce inflation.  Alas for the stock market bulls in the US, futures this morning are pointing lower led by the NASDAQ (-0.7%) although that is on the back of weaker than expected Oracle earnings results last night.  Perhaps promising to spend $5 trillion on AI is beginning to be seen as unrealistic, although I doubt that is the case 🤔.

Turning to the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps overnight after falling -5bps yesterday.  Similar price action has been seen elsewhere with European sovereign yields slipping slightly and even JGB yields down -2bps overnight.  Personally, I am a bit confused by this as I have been assured that the Fed cutting rates in this economy would result in a steeper yield curve with long-dated rates rising even though the front end falls.  Perhaps I am reading the data wrong.

In the commodity markets, the one truth is that there are no sellers in the silver market.  It is higher by another 0.5% this morning and above $62/oz as whatever games had been played in the past to cap its price seem to have fallen apart.  Physical demand for the stuff outstrips new supply by about 120 million oz /year, and new mines are scarce on the ground.  This feels like there is further room to run.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the space, gold (-0.2%) which had a nice day yesterday is consolidating, as is copper.  Turning to oil (-1.1%) it continues to drift lower, dragging gasoline along for the ride, something that must make the president quite happy.  You know my views here.

As to the dollar writ large, while it sold off a bit yesterday, as you can see from the below DXY (-0.3%) chart, it is hardly making new ground, rather it is back to the middle of its 6-month range.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This morning more currencies are a bit stronger but in the G10, CHF (+0.45%) is the leader with everything else far less impactful.  And on the flip side, INR (-0.7%) has traded to yet another historic low (USD high) as the new RBI governor has decided not to waste too much money on intervention.  Oh yeah, JPY (+0.2%) has gotten some tongues wagging as now that the Fed cut and the BOJ is ostensibly getting set to hike, there is more concern about the unwind of the carry trade.  My view is, don’t worry unless the BOJ hikes 50bps and promises a lot more on the way.  After all, if the Fed has finished cutting, something that cannot be ruled out, this entire thesis will be destroyed.

On the data front, Initial (exp 220K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims are coming as well as the Trade Balance (-$63.3B).  There are no Fed speakers on the docket, but I imagine we will hear from some anyway, as they cannot seem to shut up.  

It would not surprise me to see the dollar head toward the bottom of this trading range, but I think we need a much stronger catalyst than uncertainty from the Fed to break the range.

Good luck

Adf

All But Assured

Posted on by

A cut has been all but assured
Though since last time we have endured
Some fears Jay’s a hawk
So, when he does talk
Will this cut, at last, be secured?
 
And now there’s a narrative view
Though rates will fall, what he will do
Is try to convey
Now it’s out the way
Another one may not come through

 

Good morning all and welcome to Fed Day.  The question, of course, is will this be a frabjous day?  As I write this morning, the Fed funds futures market continues to price a roughly 90% probability of a 25bp cut this afternoon, but the prospects for future rate cuts have greatly diminished as you can see in the table below from the CME.

It wasn’t long ago when the market was pricing 100bps more of rate cuts by the end of 2026, meaning a Fed funds rate of 2.50% – 2.75%.  However, the narrative has shifted over the past several weeks after very mixed signals from FOMC speakers and data releases that have indicated the economy is not cratering (e.g. yesterday’s JOLTS data printing at 7.658M, >400K higher than expected).  You may recall that shortly after the last FOMC meeting at the end of October, the probability of today’s rate cut had fallen to just 30%.

It appears that the new discussion point is this will be a hawkish cut, an idiom similar to jumbo shrimp.  At this point, the bulk of the discussion has been around how many dissents will be recorded with the subtext being, what will Chairman Powell have to promise potential dissenters in order to bring them along to his side of the ledger.  My take is if you thought the last press conference was hawkish, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.  In fact, I would not be surprised to see a virtually categoric call to this being the end of the cutting cycle for the foreseeable future.

Remember, we also will see the new dot plots and SEP which will help us understand the broad picture of where FOMC members currently stand on the matter.  Personally, I expect to see a wide disparity between the ends of the distribution, and it wouldn’t surprise me to see some expectations of no rate changes for 2026 with other calls for 150bps of cuts and no consensus view at all. 

At this point, all we can do is wait.  However, the market discussion has centered on the fact that 10-year Treasury yields (+1bp) have been climbing lately, and that this morning they have touched 4.20% again while, at the same time, 2-year Treasury yields (no change) have been slipping as per the below chart I created from FRED data.

The steepening yield curve, which now appears to be turning into a bear steepener (when long dated yields rise more quickly than short-dated yields) is ringing alarm bells in some quarters.  The narrative is that there are growing concerns over both the quantity of debt outstanding and its rate of growth as well as the fact rate cuts will engender future inflation.

A key part of the discussion is the fact that what had been a synchronous system of global central bank policy easing is now starting to split up.  While we have known the BOJ is in a hiking cycle, albeit a slow one, today, the BOC is not only expected to leave rates on hold but explain they have bottomed.  We have heard that, as well, from the RBA earlier this week, and the commentary from the ECB may be coming along those lines.  So, is the US the outlier now?  And will that weaken the dollar?  Those are the key questions we will need to address going forward.

But before we move on, there is one market I must discuss, silver, which exploded to new historic highs yesterday, trading through $60/oz and is higher again this morning by 0.6% and trading at $61/oz.  someone made the point yesterday that for the second time in history, you need just 1 ounce of silver to buy one barrel of WTI.  The first time was back during the silver squeeze in January 1980, but that was quite short-lived (see chart below from macrotrends.com).  This one appears to have legs.  

I don’t know that I can find another indicator that better expresses my views of fiat currency debasement alongside an expanding availability of oil.  To my mind, both these trends remain quite strong, and this is the embodiment of them both combined.

Ok, so as we await the FOMC, let’s see if anybody is doing anything in financial markets of note.  As testament to the fact that virtually everybody is awaiting the Fed this afternoon, US equity markets barely moved yesterday, and Asian markets were similarly quiet, with only Taiwan (+0.8%) moving more than 0.4% in either direction.  The large markets were +/- 0.2% overall.  In Europe, the movement has been slightly larger, but still not impressive with Germany (-0.4%) the laggard of note while the UK (+0.3%) is the leader.  A smattering of data released from the continent doesn’t seem to be having any real impact, nor did comments by Madame Lagarde claiming the rates are in a good place and displaying some optimism on future GDP growth.  Of much greater concern is the headlong rush to a digital euro CBDC, where they are seeking to exert control over the citizenry.  If for no other reason, I would be leery of expecting great things from the Eurozone going forward.  Not surprisingly, at this hour (7:30) US futures are little changed ahead of the meeting.

In the bond market, yields are creeping higher all around the world with European sovereign yields higher between 2bps and 4bps this morning.  Perhaps investors are taking Madame Lagarde’s views to heart.  Or perhaps the fallout from the recently released US National Security Strategy, where the US basically dismisses Europe as strategic, has investors concerned that European governments are going to be spending that much more on defense without having the financial wherewithal to do so effectively, thus will be borrowing a lot and driving yields higher.  At this point, European sovereign yields have risen to levels not seen since the Eurozone bond crisis in 2011, but it feels like they have further to climb (see French 10-year OAT yields below from Marketwatch.com).

In the commodity market, oil (+0.5%) cannot get out of its own way.  While it is a touch higher this morning, it sits at $58.50/bbl, and that long-term trend remains lower.  We’ve already discussed silver and gold (-0.25%) continues to trade either side of $4200 these days, biding its time for its next move (higher I believe).  Copper (+1.4%) is looking good today, although it is hard to find economic news that is driving today’s price action.

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, about 0.1% in the DXY as well as virtually every major currency in the G10.  Interestingly, today’s outlier is SEK (+0.4%) which is rallying despite data showing GDP (-0.3%) slipping on the month while IP (-6.6%) fell sharply.  As to the EMG bloc, there is very little movement of note with the biggest news this evening’s Central Bank of Brazil meeting where they are expected to leave their overnight SELIC rate at 15.0% as inflation there, released this morning at a remarkably precise 4.46% continues to run at the top of their target range of 3.0% +/- 1.5%.

Ahead of the FOMC, we only see the Employment Cost Index (exp 0.9%), a number the Fed watches more closely than the market, and we hear from the BOC who are universally expected to leave Canadian rates on hold at 2.25%.

And that’s really it.  I wouldn’t look for much movement ahead of the 2pm statement release and then the fireworks at 2:30 when Powell speaks can drive things anywhere.  The most compelling story will be the number of dissents on the vote, as there will almost certainly be several.  According to Kalshi, 3 is the majority estimate.  With President Trump continuing to discuss the next Fed chair, I have a feeling there will be 4 and that will be a negative for bonds (higher yields) and a short-term negative for the dollar.  In fact, it is just another reason to hold precious metals.

Good luck

Adf

It Won’t End Well

Posted on by

From Europe, we’re hearing some squawks
They’ve not been included in talks
‘Bout war and Ukraine
So, to inflict pain
They’ve threatened a US detox
 
It seems they believe if they sell
All Treasuries held we would yell
Please stop, it’s too much
And lighten our touch
Methinks, for them, it won’t end well

 

Markets continue to be dull these days.  While we are clearly not in the summer (it is 15° here in NJ this morning), doldrums certainly seem to be descriptive of the current situation.  Equities bounce back and forth each day, neither trading to new highs, nor falling sharply.  The same is true with the dollar, with oil, with gold of late and even, on a slightly longer-term view, of Treasury bonds.  I guess that could be the exception, depending on your horizon, but as you can see from the chart below, it has been several months since 10-year yields have traded outside the 4.0% – 4.2% range.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, much digital ink has been spilled trying to explain that the latest 15bp rise in yields is a signal that the US economy is about to collapse under the weight of its $38+ trillion in debt, but I sense that is more about reporters trying to get clicks on their articles than a reflection of reality.

However, this morning I saw a story that I think is worth discussing, even though it is only a hypothetical.  Making the rounds is the story that Europe and the UK are extremely unhappy with President Trump’s approach to obtaining a peace in Ukraine and so have threatened their so-called ‘nuclear option’ of selling all their Treasury holdings to crash the US bond market and the US economy alongside it.  From what I have seen, if you sum up all the holdings in Europe and the UK it totals $2.3 trillion or so, although it is not clear if that is controlled by the governments, or there are private holdings included.  My strong suspicion is the latter, although I have not yet been able to confirm that.

But let’s assume those holdings are completely under the control of European central banks and governments and they decide that’s what they want to do.  What do you think will happen?  Arguably, much depends on how they go about selling them.  After all, it’s not as though there is anybody, other than the Fed, who can step up and show a bid on the full amount.  So how can they do this?  I figure there are only two viable options:

  1. They can sell them slowly and steadily over time, perhaps $200 billion/day (FYI daily Treasury market volume averages about $900 billion).  That would clearly put significant downward pressure on prices and push yields higher but would likely encourage the hedge fund community to double up on the bond basis trade thus slowing the decline.  However, if they did that for 11 days, US yields would undoubtedly be higher.  Too, remember that if the market started to get unstable, the Fed would step in and absorb whatever amount they deemed necessary to prevent things from getting out of hand.
  • Perhaps, since their ostensible goal is to destabilize the US bond market, they would literally all coordinate their timing and try to sell them all at once.  At that point, since nothing happens in the bond market without the Fed being aware, it would likely have an even smaller impact as the Fed would certainly step in and take down the entire lot.  After all, through QT, their balance sheet has shrunk about $2.3 trillion over the past 18 months, so they have plenty of capacity.

My point is, I believe this is an empty threat, as it seems most European threats tend to be.  Consider that the Eurodollar market remains the major source of funding throughout Europe, and it requires collateral (i.e. Treasury bills and bonds) in order to function.  If Europe no longer had that collateral, it feels like they might have a lot more problems funding anything on the continent.  

Another issue is that if we assume they successfully sell all their Treasuries, that means they will be holding $2.3 trillion in cash.  Exactly what are they going to do with that?  If they convert it into euros and pounds, the dollar will certainly fall sharply, meaning both the euro and pound will rise sharply.  Please explain how that will help their economies and their exporters.  They are getting killed right now because their energy policies have made manufacturing ridiculously expensive.  See how many cars VW or Mercedes sells overseas if the euro rallies 15%.

Now, the article linked above is from the Daily Express, not a website I trust, but they reference a WSJ article.  However, despite searching the Journal, and asking Grok to do the same, I can find no actual article that mentions this idea.  Ostensibly, if you want to search, it came out on December 1st, although if that is the case, why is it only getting press now?

It is a sign of the absence of market news that this is a story at all.  With market participants inhaling deeply so they may hold their breath until 2:00 tomorrow afternoon when the FOMC statement is released, they need something to do.  I guess this was today’s distraction.  As I said above, this is clickbait, not reality.

Ok, let’s tour markets. US equity market slipped a bit yesterday and Asian markets were dull as well with modest gains and losses almost everywhere.  The exception was HK (-1.3%) which suffered based on concern the FOMC will provide a ‘hawkish’ cut tomorrow and that will be the end of the road.  But China (-0.5%) was also soft despite hopes that when the Politburo meets in the next weeks, they will focus on more domestic stimulus (🤣🤣) just like they have been saying for the past three years.  Australia (-0.5%) slipped as the RBA left rates on hold and sounded more hawkish, indicating there were no cuts in the offing.

European bourses are mixed, although starting to lean lower.  The CAC (-0.6%) is the laggard here although Italy and Spain are also softer while Germany (+0.2%) leads the gainers after a slightly better than expected Trade Balance was reported this morning.  The hiccup here is that the balance improved because imports fell (-1.2%) so much more than exports rose (0.1%).  Hardly the sign of economic strength.

We’ve discussed bonds on a big picture basis, and recall, yields rose yesterday in both the US and Europe.  This morning, though, yields are little changed in the US and in Europe, with sovereign yields, if anything slightly lower.  JGB yields also slipped -1bp last night and the big mover was Australia after the RBA, with yields climbing 5bps.

In the commodity markets, while the trend remains slightly lower in oil (+0.3%), as you can see from the chart below, $60/bbl is home.  As I have written before, absent an invasion of Venezuela or peace in Ukraine, it is hard to see what changes this for now.  I guess if China stops filling up its SPR, demand could shrink and that would accelerate the decline.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the metals markets, $4200/oz has become gold’s (+0.3%) home lately while silver (+0.9%) has found comfort between $58/oz and $59/oz.  Neither is seeing much in the way of volatility or new interest, but both trends remain strongly higher. 

Finally, the dollar, which rallied a bit yesterday, is little changed this morning.  USDJPY is interesting as it has traded back above 156 this morning, contradicting all that talk of a Japanese repatriation trade.  Again, it is difficult for me to look at the yen chart below and conclude the dollar has peaked.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Elsewhere in the space, this is one of those days where 0.2% is a major move.  Historically, December is not a time when FX traders are active.

On the data front, the NFIB report rose to 99.0 this morning, its highest reading in three months and the underlying comments showed a modest increase in optimism with many businesses looking to hire more people but having trouble finding qualified candidates.  This is quite a juxtaposition with the narrative that small businesses are firing workers that I have read in several different places and is backed by things like the recent Challenger Gray survey which indicated that US businesses have fired more than 1.1 million workers so far this year.  This lack of clarity is not going to help the FOMC make decisions, that’s for sure.  As to the rest, the ADP Weekly Survey is due to be released as well as JOLTS Job Openings (7.2M) and Leading Indicators (-0.3%) at 10:00.

The very fact that the biggest story I could find was a hypothetical is indicative of the idea that there is nothing going on.  Look for a quiet one as market participants await Powell and friends tomorrow.

Good luck

Adf

Nothing is Clear

Posted on by

Though next week the Fed will cut rates
The bond market’s in dire straits
‘Cause nothing is clear
‘Bout growth, and Jay’s fear
Is he’ll miss on both his mandates

 

In the past week, 10-year Treasury yields have risen 13bps, as per the below chart, even though market pricing of a Fed rate cut continues to hover around 88%.  Much to both the Fed’s and the President’s chagrin, it appears the bond market is less concerned with the level of short-term rates than they are of the macroeconomics of deficit spending, and total debt, as well as the potential for future inflation.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t think it is appropriate to describe the current bond market as being run by the bond vigilantes, at least not in the US (Japan may be another story) but it is unquestionable that there is a growing level of discomfort in the administration.  This morning, we will see the September PCE data (exp 0.3%, 2.8% Y/Y headline; 0.2% 2.9% Y/Y Core) which will do nothing to comfort those FOMC members who quaintly still believe that inflation matters.

It’s funny, while the President consistently touts how great things are in the economy, both he and Secretary Bessent continue to push hard for lower interest rates, which historically had been a sign of a weak economy.

But as I have highlighted before, the data is so disparate, every analyst can find something to support their pet theory.  For instance, on the employment front, the weak ADP reading on Wednesday indicated that small businesses were under pressure, yet the Initial Claims data yesterday printed at a remarkably low 191K, which on the surface indicates strong labor demand.  Arguably, that print was impacted by the Thanksgiving holiday so some states didn’t get their data in on time, and we will likely see revisions next week.  But revisions are not nearly as impactful as initial headlines.  Nonetheless, for those pushing economic strength, yesterday’s Claims number was catnip.

So, which is it?  Is the economy strong or weak?  My amateur observation is that we no longer have an ‘economy’ but rather we have multiple industrial and business sectors, each with its own dynamics and cycles, some of which are related but others which are independent.  And so, similar to the idea that the inflation rate that is reported is an average of subcomponents, each of which can have very different trajectories than the others (as illustrated in the chart below), the economy writ large is exactly the same.  So, an analogy might be that AI is akin to Hospital Services in the below chart while heavy industry is better represented by the TV’s line.

But, when we look at the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow forecast below, it continues to show a much stronger economic impulse than the pundits expect.

And quite frankly, if 3.8% is the real growth rate, that is quite strong, certainly relative to the last two decades in the US as evidenced by the below chart I created from FRED data.  The orange line represents 4% and you can see that other than the Covid reopening, we haven’t been at that level for quite a while.

What is the reality?  Everybody has their own reality, just like everybody has their own personal inflation rate.  However, markets have been inclined to believe that the future is bright, which given my ongoing view of every nation ‘running it hot’ makes sense, so keep that in mind regardless of your personal situation.

Ok, let’s look at how markets behaved overnight.  Yesterday’s nondescript day in the US was followed by a mixed Asian session with Tokyo (-1.0%) slipping on concerns that the BOJ is going to raise rates.  I’m not sure why that is news suddenly, but there you go.  However, China (+0.8%), HK (+0.6%), Korea (+1.8%), India (+0.5%) and Taiwan (+0.7%) all continued their recent rallies.  The RBI did cut rates by 25bps, as expected, but that doesn’t seem to have been the driver.  Just good vibes for now.

In Europe, screens are also green this morning, albeit not dramatically so.  Frankfurt (+0.6%) leads the way but Paris (+0.3%), Madrid (+0.2%) and London (+0.1%) are all on the right side of the ledger.  Eurozone growth in Q3 was revised up to 0.3% on the quarter, although that translated into an annual rate of 1.4%, lower than Q2, but the positive revision was enough to get the blood flowing.  That and the idea that European defense companies are going to come back into vogue soon.  And as has been their wont, US futures are higher by 0.2% at this hour (7:35).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are higher by 2bps this morning and European sovereign yields are getting dragged along for the ride, up 1bp to 2bps across the board.  JGB yields also continue to climb and show no sign of stopping at any maturity.  A BOJ rate hike of 25bps is not going to be enough to stop the train of spending and borrowing in Japan, so I imagine there is much further to go here.

In the commodity space, silver (+1.8%) has been getting a lot more press than gold lately as there are ongoing stories about big banks, notably JPM, having large short futures positions that were designed to keep a lid on prices there, but the structural shortage of the metal has started to cause delivery questions on the exchanges all around the world.  So, while it has not yet breached $60/oz, my take is that is the direction and beyond.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Gold’s (+0.4%) story has been told so many times, it is not nearly as interesting now, central bank buying and broader fiat debasement concerns continue to be the key here.  Copper (+1.8%) is also trading at new highs in London and the demand story here knows no bounds, at least not as long as AI and electrification are part of the mix.  As to oil (-0.25%), it is a dull and boring market and will need to see something of note (regime change in Venezuela or peace in Ukraine seem the most likely stories) to wake it up.

Finally, the dollar is still there.  The DXY is trading at 99, below its recent highs but hardly collapsing.  Looking for any outliers today ZAR (+0.4%) is benefitting from the gold rally (platinum rallying too) but otherwise there is nothing of note.  INR (-0.2%) continues to trade around its new big figure of 90.00, but has stopped falling for now, and everything else is dull.

As well as the PCE data, we get September Personal Income (exp 0.3%), Personal Spending (0.3%) and Michigan Sentiment (52.0) with only the Michigan number current.  We are approaching the end of the year and while with this administration, one can never rule out a black swan, my take is positions are being lightened up starting now, and when the December futures contracts mature, we may see very little of interest until the new year.  In the meantime, nothing has changed my big picture view.  For now, absent a very aggressive FOMC cutting rates, the dollar is still the best of a bad bunch.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Splitting More Hairs

Posted on by

The data continues to be
Uncertain, and so what we see
Is both bulls and bears
Just splitting more hairs
Til markets reach their apogee
 
Meanwhile, throughout Europe concern
Is building, that no one did learn
Their energy dreams
Are nought but grift schemes
And growth’s in a long-term downturn

 

Once again, macroeconomic stories are light on the ground with no overarching theme atop the headlines.  As data continues to be released in the US post the government shutdown, we are seeing a similar pattern as before the shutdown, namely lots of conflicting data.  Yesterday was a perfect example as ADP Employment data was far weaker than expected printing at -32K (exp +10K) and indicative of a slowing economy.  At the same time, ISM Services showed unexpected strength, printing 52.6 with every sub indicator printing higher than last month except prices, which slipped 5 points.  While there was September IP and Capacity Utilization data, given it was so old, it just didn’t seem relevant.  

Depending on your underlying view, it was once again easy to point to recent data and make either the bull case on the economy and stocks or the bear case.  But there’s more.  A look at the last 5 years of ADP data shows a very distinct downward trend in employment as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But as with so many things in the economy lately, it is fair to ask if the data we have known in the past is reflective of the current economic situation.  After all, if the Trump administration has deported 500K individuals, and another 1.5 million have self-deported, as the administration claims, it ought not be surprising that employment numbers are declining.  The implication is that population is declining, which would make sense.  So, I ask, does the declining ADP data signal what it did 5 years ago or 10 years ago?  I don’t believe the answer is that straightforward.

One of the things that has concerned me lately is the measurement of GDP.  My thesis has been that counting government spending in Keynes’s equation Y = C + I + G + (X-M) is double counting because, after all, if the government spends money, it goes into the economy and is recorded by the people/companies who receive it.  But perhaps my queasiness over the GDP idea is caused by something else instead, the fact that GDP measures credit creation, not economic activity.  This article by Alasdair Macleod, a pretty well-known economic analyst with a long career observing markets and economies, does an excellent job of identifying some really interesting problems that get accepted and assumed by many in their analysis of the current situation.  

For a while we have all seen, and probably felt, there is a disconnect between the data published and the feeling we get with respect to the current situation.  I highlighted the cost-of-living problem last week with the Michael Green articles.  This is another arrow in the quiver of things are not what they appear and that’s why so many people are so unhappy (even taking away TDS).

For me, where I try to synthesize a market view based on the information available, it is a very difficult time because of all the inconsistencies relative to what I have known in the past.  As well, I am being forced to reconfigure my mental models as the world has changed.  I suggest everyone do the same, as there is no going back to pre-Covid, let alone pre-GFC.

But the US is relatively well-off compared to most of the rest of the G10 as evidenced by this morning’s Eurozone data where Construction PMIs were, in a word, dreadful as can be seen below:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

No matter how you slice it, the fact that every reading is below 50 is a telling statement on the economic situation in Europe.  Adding to this problem is the fact that it appears, the EU, under the guidance(?) of President Ursula von der Leyen, is getting set to force the appropriation of Russian assets that were frozen at the outset of the Ukraine war, an act that Russia has indicated would, itself, be an act of war and they would respond in kind.  The US has unequivocally said they will not defend Europe if that is their decision, although we will continue to sell them weapons.  

For 80 years, NATO has been the defense umbrella allowing Europe to spend their money on butter, not guns.  Despite all the plans of rearmament, if Europe goes down this road, I suspect that there is nothing they can do to defend themselves without the US.  Once again, it is difficult to look at fiat currencies around the world, especially in Europe, and think they have more staying power than the dollar.  

Ok, let’s tour markets.  A solid day in the US was followed by strength virtually across the board in Asia (Japan +2.3%, HK +0.7%, China +0.3%) with the rest of the region +/- 0.3%, so not overwhelmingly positive or negative.  The Japanese outlier was based on news about Fanuc signing a deal with Nvidia to make AI industrial robots and that took the whole tech sector in Tokyo higher.  In Europe, green is also today’s theme as despite the weak data shown above, we started to get the first hints that the ECB may consider rate cuts after all.  While Madame Lagarde has been on her high horse saying there is no need to adjust rates, Piero Cipollone, a board member has highlighted concerns over further potential economic weakness going forward.  I look for others to come to the same conclusion and talk of an ECB cut to start to increase although swaps markets do not yet reflect any changes.  And at this hour (7:40) US futures are pointing slightly higher, 0.15% or so.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are reversing some of yesterday’s modest decline, rising 2bps this morning and that has helped pull European sovereign yields higher by similar amounts across the board.  The one exception here is UK gilts, which given the ongoing weak data seem to be anticipating a greater chance of a BOE cut than before.  in Asia, JGB yields rose 4bps and now sit at 1.93%, a new high for the move, but there is no indication we are near a top.  There is growing confidence the BOJ will hike rates later this month, although I would expect that should help slow the rise as at least it will have a modest impact on inflation readings going forward.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.5%) continues to chop back and forth making no new ground in either direction.  Stories about peace in Ukraine don’t seem to matter much, nor do stories about a US invasion of Venezuela.  In fact, nothing seems to matter too much to this market other than actual supply and demand, and that seems pretty balanced, at least as evidenced by  the fact that for the past 2+ months, we have gyrated either side of $60/bbl with no impetus in either direction.  (see below)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Metals markets are slipping a bit this morning (Au -0.25%, Ag -1.8%, Cu -0.6%) but that is simply part of the recent consolidation.  After all, metals have rallied forcefully all year, so taking a breather is no surprise. 

Finally, the dollar is a nonevent today with the most noteworthy story the news that the PBOC fixing last night was 160 pips higher (weaker CNY) than forecast by the market.  As well, there have been several stories that Chinese state-owned banks are buying dollars in the market to help slow down the yuan’s recent appreciation.  I discussed the yuan yesterday so this should be no surprise.  The tension on China to maintain a weak enough currency to support their export industries is huge, so a quick appreciation would be extremely negative for the nation’s trade balance and economic activity.

On the data front, Initial (exp 220K) and Continuing (1960K) Claims lead us off and then Factory Orders from September (0.5%) come at 10:00.  There are still no Fed speakers, so markets remain subject to headline risk, notably from the White House.  As we are in December, my sense is that things will become increasingly uninteresting from a market perspective absent a major new event.  While price action will likely remain choppy, it is hard to see a major directional move until next year.

Good luck

Adf

Remarkable Fragility

Posted on by

JGB yields have
Risen to multi-year heights
Is this why stocks fell?

 

Yesterday I highlighted that 10-year JGB yields had risen to their highest level since 2008.  As you can see below, the same is true for 30-year JGBs and essentially the entire curve there.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ostensibly, this move was triggered by comments from BOJ Governor Ueda indicating that a rate hike was coming this month.  However, the thing I find more interesting is that this move in JGB yields has become the bête noire of markets, now being blamed for every negative thing that happened yesterday.  

For instance, Treasury yields yesterday rose 7bps despite ISM data indicating that manufacturing activity remains sluggish at best.  In fact, the initial response to that data was that it confirmed the Fed will be cutting rates next week.  But the narrative seems to be that Japanese investors are now willing to repatriate funds, selling Treasuries to buy JGBs, in order to invest locally because they are finally getting paid to do so.  Certainly, looking at the chart above shows that Japanese yields had been tantamount to zero for a long time prior to 2024, and even then, have only started to show any real value in the most recent few months.  Of course, real 10-year yields in Japan remain significantly negative based on the latest inflation reading of 3.0%.  The upshot is, rising JGB yields are deemed the cause of Treasury market weakness.

Turning to risk assets, the story is the same for both stocks (which saw US equities decline across the board yesterday) and cryptocurrencies, notably Bitcoin.  Ostensibly, the rise in yields, and the prospect of a rate hike by the BOJ (to just 0.75% mind you) has been cited as the driver of an unwinding in leveraged trades as hedge funds seek to get ahead of having their funding costs rise thus crimping their margins.  

There is no doubt in my mind that the yen has been a critical funding currency for a wide array of carry trades, that is true.  In fact, that has been the case for several decades.  But is 25 basis points really enough to destroy all the strategies that rely on that process?  If so, it demonstrates a remarkable fragility in markets, and one that portends much worse outcomes going forward.  

If we look at the relationship between Bitcoin and 10-year JGBs, it appears that there has been a significant change in tone.  For the past two months, while JGB yields have continued to climb, BTC has broken its correlation with JGBs and has fallen dramatically instead. (see below chart from tradingeconomics.com). When it comes to crypto, I am confident that leverage levels are higher than anywhere else, in fact that seems part of the attraction, so it should not be as surprising to see something of this nature.  But again, it speaks to a very fragile market situation given there was no discernible change in the Japanese yield trend to drive a Bitcoin adjustment.

The upshot here, too, is that rising JGB yields are claimed to be the reason Bitcoin is declining.  In fact, nearly all the commentary of late seems to be focusing on JGBs as the driver of everything.  While I concede that Japanese yields are an important part of the USDJPY discussion, it is difficult for me to assign them blame for everything else.  I have seen numerous commentators explaining that the Japanese have been selling Treasuries because they don’t trust the US, and this has been ongoing for years.  I have also seen commentators explain that because Japanese surpluses had been invested internationally for years and funding so much of the world’s activity, now that they can invest at home, liquidity everywhere will dry up, and asset prices will fall.  

Responding to the first issue, especially with new PM Sanae Takaichi, I do not believe that is a concern at all.  If anything, I expect that the relationship between the US and Japan will deepen.  As to the second issue, that may have more import but the one thing of which we can be sure is that central banks around the world will not allow liquidity to dry up in any meaningful fashion.  Remember, the Fed ended QT yesterday and it won’t be long before the balance sheet starts to grow again, adding liquidity to the system.  One thing I have learned in my many years observing and trading in markets is, there doesn’t need to be a catalyst for markets to move in an unexpected direction.  Certainly not a big picture catalyst.

And with that, let’s look at how markets responded overnight to yesterday’s risk-off session in the US.  Looking at the bond market first, yesterday’s rise in yields was nearly universal with European sovereigns all following the Treasury market’s lead.  And this morning, across the board sovereigns are higher by 1bp, the same as Treasury yields.  While JGB yields didn’t budge overnight, we did see Australia and other regional yields catch up to yesterday’s rise.  I fear bond investors are stuck as they see the potential for inflation, but they also see weakening economic activity as a moderator there.  As an example, the OECD just reduced its US GDP forecast for 2026 to 2.9% this morning, from 3.2%.  Personally, I don’t think anything has changed the run it hot scenario.

In the equity markets, Asian bourses were mixed with Korea (+1.9%) and Taiwan (+0.8%) the notable gainers while elsewhere movement was much less substantial (Japan 0.0%, HK +0.2%, China -0.4%).  There was no single story driving things there.  As to Europe, things are brighter this morning led by Spain (+1.0%) and Italy (+0.5%) although there is no single driving issue here either.  US futures are edging higher at this hour as well, +0.2%, so perhaps yesterday was more like a little profit taking after last week’s strong rally, than anything else.

In the commodity sector, oil (-0.3%) is slipping after yesterday’s rally.  I suppose the potential peace in Ukraine is bearish, but that story has been dragging on for a while so I’m not sure when it will come to fruition.  In the metals markets, after a gangbusters rally yesterday, with silver trading to $59/oz, we are seeing a modest retracement this morning across the board (Au -0.6%, Ag -1.2%, Pt -2.0%) although copper (+0.4%) is holding its gains.  Nothing indicates that these metals have topped.

Finally, the dollar is little changed as I write, giving back some early modest strength.  JPY (-0.3%) continues to be amongst the worst performers, and although it has bounced from its recent lows, remains within a few percent of those levels.  My take here is we will need to see both a more aggressive Fed and a more aggressive BOJ to get USDJPY back to 150 even, let alone further than that.  If we look at the DXY, it is sitting at 99.45, and still well within its trading range for the past 6+ months as per the below.  For now, the dollar remains a secondary story.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, here’s what comes the rest of this week:

WednesdayADP Employment 10K
 IP0.1%
 Capacity Utilization77.3%
 ISM Services52.1
ThursdayInitial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1960K
 Trade Balance -$65.5B
FridayPersonal Income (Sep)0.4%
 Personal Spending (Sep)0.4%
 PCE (Sep)0.3% (2.8% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.2% (2.9% Y/Y)
 Michigan Expectations51.2
 Consumer Credit$10.5B

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As the Fed is in its quiet period, there are no Fed speakers until Powell at the presser next week.  Given the age of the PCE data, I don’t see it having much impact.  Rather, ADP and ISM are likely the things that matter most for now.

Ultimately, I believe more liquidity is going to come to the market via central banks around the world, and that will support risk assets, as well as prices for the things we buy.  Nothing has changed in my view of the dollar either.

Good luck

Adf

A Latent Grim Reaper

Posted on by

The zeitgeist, of late, has been leaning
Toward welcoming gov intervening
Because costs have soared
So, folks once abhorred
Like Socialists, seem more well-meaning
 
Perhaps, though, the story’s much deeper
And points to a latent grim reaper
Elites on one side
Claim Trump’s only lied
While Populists serve as gatekeeper

 

Quite frankly, I feel like markets have become very secondary to an understanding of what is happening in the economy, and while there is intrigue over who may be the next Fed Chair, and correspondingly, if Mr Powell will resign from the FOMC when his chairmanship is up, I believe that pales in comparison to much larger macroeconomic issues with which we all have to deal on a daily basis.  Once again, my weekend reading has highlighted two key pieces that I believe do an excellent job of explaining much of what is going on, not just in the economy, but in the streets.

Last week, I highlighted Michael Green’s piece regarding a new estimate of what the poverty line looks like, putting paid to the idea that the official government level of $31,500 is appropriate, and that in suburban NJ (Caldwell to be exact) it is more like $140K.  Now, you will not be surprised that his piece garnered a great deal of attention given its premise, but I will not go into that.  However, he did write a follow-up piece which is worth reading and where he discusses the reaction.  In brief, whatever number is correct, it is clear that $31.5K is laughably low.   Ultimately, I believe this work has quantified the concept of the “vibecession” which has been making the rounds for a while.  People are allegedly making a decent living and yet are living paycheck to paycheck because the cost of living (not inflation) has risen so remarkably over time and priced many folks out of previously ordinary levels of attainment.

Which brings me to the second key piece I read this weekend, this from Dr Pippa Malmgren, which does a remarkable job explaining how the nation (and not just in the US, but we are more familiar here) has (d)evolved into two groups; Elites and Populists.  The former are the old guard politicians (both Democrats and Republicans), the global organizations like the World Bank, IMF, UN and WEF, and more perniciously in my mind, the so-called deep state.  The latter are personified by President Trump, but include NYC Mayor-elect Mamdani, AfD in Germany, Marine LePen in France and Victor Orban in Hungary, and their followers, to name a few.

The frightening conclusion Dr Malmgren drew was that there is no ability for a nation to continue to operate successfully if the population is split in this manner, and that eventually, one side is going to wind up victorious.  I would say this is the very definition of the 4th Turning and we are living through it.

So, we must ask, what are the potential ramifications from a financial markets perspective with this backdrop?  I have repeatedly highlighted that the Trump administration is going to “run it hot” going forward, meaning the goal will be to increase nominal GDP fast enough to outweigh the inevitable rise in prices.  The idea is if incomes rise quickly enough, people will be able to tolerate rising prices more easily.  

But the one thing of which I am increasingly confident is that prices and their rate of change are going to rise under this scenario.  As central banks leave policy easy, or ease further in an effort to support their respective economies, that is going to be the outcome.  A look at the chart below from the FRED data base of the St Louis Fed shows there is a very strong relationship between CPI and nominal GDP.  In fact, I ran the numbers and the correlation for the past 75 years has been 0.975!  Prices are going to rise friends, alongside M2.

What does this mean?  It means that the debasement of fiat currency is going to continue apace and so commodities, notably precious metals, but also base metals and property are going to be recognized as better stores of wealth.  If you wonder why gold (+0.9%) and silver (+2.2%) are continuing to rocket higher, look no further than this.  What about equities?  For now, I expect they will continue to perform well as all that liquidity will be looking for a home although this morning, not so much as US futures are lower by -0.5% across the board.  Bonds?  This is a tougher call, and I suspect that the yield curve will steepen further as central banks press short rates lower, but inflation undermines long duration fixed income assets.  Finally, the dollar remains, in my view, one of the best of the fiat currencies, but like all of them, will continue to degrade vs. gold and hard assets.

Keeping that in mind, there are two other stories of note this morning, only one of which is impacting markets.  The non-impactful one is that apparently President Trump has selected Kevin Hassett, currently the White House Economic Council Director, as the man to succeed Jay Powell in the chair.  He is a long-time political operative with deep ties in Washington and I presume will get through the vetting and be confirmed on a timely basis.  As I wrote above, it is not clear to me the Fed matters as much as other things in the current environment, although we will continue to hear about it.  In this light, the Fed funds futures market is currently pricing an 87.5% probability of a 25bp cut next week and is back to a 58% probability of a total of 100bps of cuts by the end of 2026 as per the below from the CME.

The other story of note, this one definitely impacting markets, is the news that Ueda-san hinted more definitively at a Japanese rate hike later this month, with Japanese swaps market raising the probability of that hike to 80% from about 60% last week.  The knock-on effects were that 10-year JGB yields jumped 7bps, to 1.86%, their highest level since 2008 and as you can see from the chart below, continue to trend strongly higher.  Of course, given that inflation in Japan remains well above target, it is not that surprising that yields are climbing.  

Too, the other outcome here has been the yen (+0.7%) gaining a little ground, as per the below chart from tradingeconomics.com, and perhaps we have seen a short-term low in the currency.  Certainly, the increasing probability of US rate cuts is weighing on the dollar overall, so that is part of the story, but it remains to be seen if there are going to be wholesale changes in investment allocations that would be necessary to completely reverse the yen’s remarkable weakness over the past nearly four years.

The move in JGB yields has been blamed for the rise in yields around the world with Treasury and European Sovereign yields uniformly higher by 3bps this morning while some other regional Asian yields climbed between 4bps and 6bps.  In the end, inflation remains a problem almost everywhere in the world and I think that is what we are witnessing here.

As well, the JGB move was seen as the cause for Japanese equities’ (-1.9%) very weak performance which also dragged down some other regional markets (Taiwan, Australia, Philippines) but was not enough to undermine the rest of the region.  The flip side of that weakness was China (+1.1%) and HK (+0.7%) where it appears that hopes for a Fed rate cut more than offset weaker than forecast PMI data from China.  Another interesting story from the mainland was that the monthly Housing price data that was compiled by two key private companies was squashed by the Chinese government after China Vanke, one of the largest Chinese property companies, explained they would be late on an interest rate payment.  One can only imagine what that data looked like!

Meanwhile, in Europe, red is the color led by Germany’s DAX (-1.5%) although with weakness across the board (CAC -0.8%, IBEX -0.6%, FTSE MIB -0.9%).  Apparently, the story that progress has been made regarding peace talks in Ukraine is not seen as a positive there.  After all, if there is peace, will European governments still be so keen to build out their military, spending billions of euros at local defense and manufacturing firms?  It seems after a very strong close to the month in November, there is a bit of profit taking underway this morning.

In the commodity space, oil (+1.3%) is bouncing back to its trend line after OPEC confirmed it will not be increasing production in Q1 next year at a meeting yesterday.  I would expect that a real peace deal would be negative for this market as some part of that would be the relaxation of sanctions, I would assume.  But maybe I’m wrong there.  However, I continue to believe the trend is modestly lower going forward as there is far more supply available.  As to the other metals, both copper (+0.6%) and platinum (+1.5%) are continuing their runs higher with no end currently in sight.

Finally, the dollar is softer overall this morning, and while the yen (+0.7%) is the leader, the euro (+0.3%), SEK (+0.3%) and CHF (+0.25%) are also nicely up on the day with the rest of the G10 little changed.  The real movement, though, has been in the EMG bloc with CZK (+0.75%), HUF (+0.5%), PLN (+0.5%), and CLP (+0.4%) all benefitting from the Fed rate cut story as well as Chile’s benefits from copper’s rally.  While a cut seems highly likely, I suspect the real dollar story will be about the dot plot and SEP as well as Powell’s presser next week.

I’ve already run too long so will just mention that ISM Manufacturing (exp 48.9) is due this morning and I will review the week’s data expectations tomorrow.  

The world is changing and I expect that we will continue to see volatility across markets as investors come to grips with those changes, whether simple central bank rate decisions or more complex social movements and electoral outcomes that lead to major policy changes.  Be careful out there.

Good luck

Adf