Tag Archives: #lowerdollar

Full Schmooze

Posted on by

The temperature’s starting to fall
With Israel and Iran’s brawl
On hold for the moment
Though either could foment
Resumption, and break protocol
 
But that truce combined with the news
That Trump’s team are pushing full schmooze
On trade, has the markets
Increasing their bull bets
While skeptics are singing the blues

 

President Trump is having a pretty remarkable week.  The successful attack and destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities combined with the news that the US and China have agreed the details of the trade framework that was outlined in Geneva and followed up in London has market participants feeling a lot better about the world this morning.  Add to that the news that a particularly onerous part of the BBB, Section 899, which was nicknamed the Revenge clause for its tax targeting anybody from nations that imposed excess taxes on US companies internationally, being stripped after negotiations with European leaders, and the fact that NATO has gone all-in on increasing their spending, and Mr Trump must be feeling pretty good this morning.  Certainly, most markets are feeling that, except those that thrive on chaos and fear, like precious metals.

In fact, this morning it seems that the entire discussion is a rehash of what has occurred all week with very little new added to the mix.  Data from the US yesterday was mixed, with Claims a bit softer and Durable Goods quite strong while the third look at Q1 GDP was revised lower on more trade data showing imports were greater than first measured while Consumer Spending and Final Sales were a bit weaker than expected.  Net, there was not enough to push a view of either substantial strength or weakness in the economy, so investors and their algorithms continue to buy shares.

The other story that continues to get airplay is the pressure on Chairman Powell and questions about whether at the July meeting Fed governors are going to vote against the Chairman.  Apparently, it has been 32 years since that has occurred (and you thought they were actual votes!) and the punditry is ascribing the dissent to politics, not economics.  It should, of course, be no surprise that there is a political angle as there is a political angle to every story these days, but the press is particularly keen to point out that the two most vocal Fed governors discussing rate cuts were appointed by Trump.

However, despite all the talk, the futures market does not appear to have adjusted its opinion all that much as evidenced by the CME chart of probabilities below.  In fact, over the past month, the probability of a cut has declined slightly.  Rather, I would contend that on a slow news Friday, the punditry is looking for a story to get clicks.

The last story of note is about the dollar and its ongoing weakness.  This is an extension of the Fed story as there is alleged concern that if the Fed is perceived to lose some of its independence, that will be a negative for the dollar in its own right, as well as the fact that the loss of independence would be confirmed by a rate cut when one is not necessary (sort of like last autumn prior to the election.  Interestingly, I don’t recall much discussion about the Fed’s loss of independence then.)

But, in fairness, the dollar has continued to decline with the euro trading to its highest level, above 1.17, in nearly four years.  It is hard to look at the story in Europe and think, damn, what a place to invest with high energy costs and massive regulatory impediments, so it is reasonable to accept that what had been a very long dollar position is getting unwound.  But look at the next two charts (source: tradingeconomics.com) of the euro, showing price action for one year and for five years, and more importantly notice the trend lines that the system has drawn.  There is no doubt the dollar is under pressure right now, but I am not in the camp that believes this is the beginning of the end of the dollar’s global status.  Remember, too, that President Trump would like to see the dollar soften to help the export competitiveness of the US, and so I would not expect to hear anything from the Treasury on the matter.

However, while these medium and long-term trends are clear, the overnight session was far less exciting with the largest move in any major currency the ZAR (+0.5%) which is despite the decline in gold and platinum prices.  Otherwise, today’s movement is basically +/- 0.2% across both G10 and EMG currencies.

Speaking of the metals, though, they are taking it on the chin this morning as we approach month end and futures roll action.  Gold (-1.3%), silver (-1.7%), copper (-0.9%) and platinum (-4.4%) are all under pressure, although all remain significantly higher YTD.  However, to the extent that they represent a haven and the fact that havens seem a little less necessary this morning seems to be the narrative driver adding to the month end positioning.  Meanwhile, oil (+0.5%) continues to bounce ever so slowly off the lows seen immediately in the wake of the bombing attacks.

Circling back to equity markets, after a nice day in the US yesterday, with gains across the board approaching 1% and the S&P 500 pushing to within points of a new all-time high, Japan (+1.4%) followed suit as did much of the region (India, Taiwan, New Zealand, Indonesia) but China (-0.6%) and Hong Kong (-0.2%) didn’t play along.  Europe, though, is having a positive session with gains ranging from 0.65% (DAX) to 1.3% (CAC) and everything in between.  It seems that the NATO spending news continues to support European arms manufacturers and the cooling of tensions in the Middle East has lessened energy concerns.  US futures are also bright this morning, up about 0.5% at this hour (7:40).

Finally, bond markets are selling off slightly after a further rally yesterday and yields since the close have risen basically 3bps in both Treasury and European sovereign markets.  There is still no indication that any government is going to stop spending, rather more increases are on the horizon, but there is also no indication that central banks are going to stop supporting this action.  No central bank is going to allow their nation’s bond market to become unglued, regardless of the theories of what they can do and what they control.  Ultimately, they control the entire yield curve.

On the data front, this morning brings Personal Income (exp 0.3%), Personal Spending (0.1%) the PCE data (Core 0.1%, 2.6% Y/Y; Headline 0.1%, 2.3% Y/Y) and at 10:00 Michigan Consumer Sentiment (60.5) and Inflation Expectations (1yr 5.1%, 5yr 4.1%).  There are several more Fed speakers, including Governor Cook, a Biden appointee who is a very clear dove, but has not yet agreed that rate cuts make sense.  It will be interesting to see what she has to say.

It is a summer Friday toward the end of the month.  Unless the data is dramatically different than forecast, I expect that the dollar will continue to slide slowly for now, although I do expect the metals complex to find a bottom and turn.  As to equities, apparently there is no reason not to buy them!

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

He’s the Worst

Posted on by

The talking points have been disbursed
With narrative writers well-versed
The dollar is falling
‘Cause Trump is now calling
For Powell to leave, “He’s the worst!”
 
The idea is Trump will soon name
The next Fed Chair, turning Jay lame
This shadow Fed Chair
Will have to beware
Since he’ll, for bad outcomes, get blame

 

The dollar is weaker this morning and if we use the Dollar Index as a proxy, it has fallen to its lowest level since February 2022.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While certainly a part of this movement has been the fact that US yields continue to slide lately, it also seems there is a new narrative that has been distributed to journalists, the dollar is falling because President Trump is considering naming a new Fed Chair much earlier than usual in an effort to undermine Chairman Powell.  We have all heard about the rants the President has had regarding Powell’s unwillingness to cut rates even though inflation readings have been declining for the past two months, and are, on a Y/Y basis back to their lowest level since March 2021 whether measured as CPI (grey line) or Core PCE (blue line).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But in an exclusive (!) article in the WSJ, which was repeated in Bloomberg, that is the story du jour.  While Bloomberg’s take cannot be a surprise given Mayor Mike’s intense hatred of Trump (after all Trump is the NY billionaire that became president, not Bloomberg), and editorial direction clearly comes from the top, it is more interesting that the Journal is pushing this theme.  Of course, given the Fed whisperer is the article’s writer, it is more than possible that he is simply airing Powell’s views and trying to explain how any move like this would result in chaos, so it’s not Powell’s fault if things go pear-shaped.

Nonetheless, that is today’s story.  In concert with this story, though is another, somewhat more interesting feature, where a really smart analyst, Marko Papic, has broken down the dollar’s movements across different time zones during 2025.  The chart below shows that the dollar selling has been emanating from Asia mostly with Europe having a lesser impact and no substantive change in the NY session.  The implication is that Asian holders of dollars, which tend to be sovereigns rather than other users like investors or corporates, are the ones bailing out.

This activity first became noticeable in early April, right around “Liberation Day” and does fit with the idea that higher US tariffs will result in a smaller US trade deficit.  But as I consider that concept, it strikes me that a smaller US trade deficit will result in fewer dollars around the rest of the world, a reduction in supply, and that would arguably increase the dollar’s value ceteris paribus.  Perhaps this reflects investors selling US assets and converting them to Europe, which has been another theme this year as European companies are set to benefit from a major increase in defense spending by NATO.  However, that doesn’t really sync with the fact that US equities continue to trade near all-time highs.  At this point, I think this is an interesting observation, but am not sure of its meaning.  I’m open to suggestions.

Ok, while that is the narrative this morning, let’s look at how markets are behaving.  Yesterday’s lackluster activity in the US, with the S&P 500 almost exactly unchanged and the other two main indices +/- 0.3% was followed by a burst higher in Tokyo (Nikkei +1.6%) but lagging activity in HK (-0.6%) and China (-0.4%).  The rest of the region couldn’t decide on much with a couple of solid performances (India, Indonesia) and one laggard of note (South Korea).  In Europe, Germany (+0.6%) is leading the way higher across the board, as NATO countries have promised to spend upward of 5% of GDP on total defense (including nonlethal investments), with as much as possible going to European based companies.  That is a lot of money, well over $1.5 trillion.  Meanwhile, US futures are all higher at this hour (7:15), up by about 0.4% or so.

In the bond market, Treasury yields (-2bps) continue to slip and are now back to their lowest level since early May.  Perhaps more interestingly, European sovereign yields are sliding today as well, led by Italian BTPs (-4bps) but lower across the board.  This is interesting given the promises of more borrowing based on the NATO announcement.  But net, bond yields have not really done very much lately at all.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.5%) is continuing to slowly bounce from the initial lows in the wake of the Iran/Israel ceasefire.  This market still feels quite heavy to me and absent a major change on the ground in the Middle East, if war were to resume and oil facilities be attacked, I still think lower is the way.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.25%) which tried to sell off yesterday continues to find bids below the market, likely central bank support.  But silver (+0.9%) and copper (+2.3% and above $5.00/lb) are looking good although nowhere near as impressive as platinum (+3.4%) which has now risen above $!400/oz and is going parabolic here.  There is much talk here about a supply shortage (it is used for catalytic converters) and significant Chinese demand.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar, as mentioned, is under pressure across the board, although the magnitude of this morning’s movement has not been that large.  The largest movement has been in Asia with IDR (+0.6%), JPY (+0.4%) and KRW (+0.35%) while European and LATAM movements have been generally 0.2% or less.  So, the direction is clear, but it has not been impressive.

On the data front, there is plenty today starting with the weekly Initial (exp 245K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims, the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (-0.1), the last look at Q1 GDP (-0.2%), and Durable Goods (8.5%, 0.0% ex-Transports).  We also hear from four more Fed speakers, but Powell just repeated yesterday that they are happy where they are and unlikely to move soon unless something really changes rapidly.  However, despite Powell’s claims of nothing to come, the Fed funds futures market is pricing a 25% probability of a cut at the July 30 meeting.  There is a lot of time between now and then for that to change.

I keep trying to figure out what actually matters to markets anymore as responses to different potential catalysts seem confused.  People do seem to be coalescing around the dollar is falling theme, something I have believed for a while, and if the Fed does lean to a cut next month, I do believe there is further for it to fall.  One thing to remember, though, is with Mr Trump as president, things are still a tweet away from a dramatic change.  If I were in charge of hedging risk, I would adhere to guidelines closely.  There is too great an opportunity for a sudden major reversal in the current environment.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Dreary

Posted on by

While pundits expected inflation
Would rise with Trump as the causation
The data has not
Shown prices are hot
Since tariffs joined the conversation
 
In fact, there’s a budding new theory
That’s made dollar bulls somewhat leery
If Powell cuts rates
While Christine, she waits
The dollar might soon look quite dreary

 

Well, it turns out measured inflation wasn’t quite as high as many had forecast, even if we ignore those whose views are completely political.  Yesterday’s readings of 0.1% for both headline and core were lower despite all the tariff anxiety.  The immediate response has been, just wait until next month, that’s when the tariff impact will kick in, you’ll see.  Maybe that will be the case, but right now, for a sober look, the Inflation_Guy™, Mike Ashton, offers a solid description of what happened and some thoughts about how things may be going forward.  Spoiler alert, tariffs are not likely the problem, let’s start thinking about money supply growth.

However, the market, as always, is seeking to create a narrative to drive things (or does the narrative follow the market?  Kind of a chicken and egg question) and there is a new one forming regarding the dollar.  Now, with inflation appearing to slow in the US, this is an opening for Chair Powell to cut rates again, despite the fact that inflation on every reading remains above their target.  Meanwhile, the uncertainty that US policy is having on economies elsewhere, notably in Europe as the tariff situation is not resolved, means Madame Lagarde is set to pause, (if not halt), ECB rate cuts for a while and voilà, we have the makings of a dollar bearish story.  

That seems likely to have been the driver of today’s move in the euro (+1.0%) which has taken the single currency back to its highest level since November 2021.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, if you are President Trump and are seeking to reduce the trade deficit while bringing manufacturing capacity back to the US, this seems like a pretty big win.  Lower inflation and a lower dollar both work towards those goals.  Not surprisingly, the president immediately called for the Fed to cut rates by 100 basis points after the release.  As much as FOMC members seem to love the sound of their own voices, perhaps this is one time where they are happy to be in the quiet period as no response need be given!

At any rate, the softer inflation data has had a significant impact on the dollar writ large, with the greenback sliding against all its G10 counterparts, with SEK (+1.3%) leading the way, although CHF (+1.1%), NOK (+0.9%) and JPY (+0.8%) have also been quite strong.  However, the biggest winner was KRW (+1.3%) as not only has there been dollar weakness, but new president, Lee Jae-myung, has proposed tax cuts on dividends to help support Korean equity markets and that encouraged some inflows.  Other EMG currencies have gained as well, although those gains are more muted (CNY +0.3%, PLN +0.6%) and some have even slipped a bit (ZAR -0.5%, MXN -0.1%).  Net, however, the dollar is down.

Yesterday, I, and quite a few other analysts, were looking for more heat in the inflation story.  Clearly, if that is to come, it is a story for another day.  With this in mind, we shouldn’t be surprised that government bond yields have also fallen around the world with Treasuries (-5bps) showing the way for most of Europe (Bunds -6bps, OATs -5bps, Gilts -6bps) and even JGBs (-2bps) are in on the action.  

Earlier this week, the tone of commentary was that inflation was coming back, and a US stagflation was inevitable.  This morning, that narrative has disappeared.    Interestingly, I would have thought the combination of the cooler CPI and the trade truce between the US and China would have the bulls feeling a bit better.  Alas, the equity markets have not responded in that manner at all.  Despite the soft inflation readings, US equity markets yesterday edged lower, albeit not by very much.  But that weakness was followed in Asia (Nikkei -0.65%, Hang Seng -0.4%, CSI 300 -0.1%) with India, Taiwan and Australia all under pressure although Korea (+0.45%) bucked the trend on that dividend tax story.  And Europe, this morning, is also unhappy with the DAX (-1.1%) leading the way lower followed by the IBEX (-.9%) and CAC (-0.7%).  The FTSE 100 (-0.1%) is faring a bit better as, ironically, weaker than expected GDP data this morning (-0.3% in April) has reawakened hope that the BOE will get more aggressive cutting rates.  US futures are in the red as well this morning, -0.5% across the board.  Perhaps this is the beginning of the long-awaited decline from overbought levels.  Or perhaps, this is just a modest correction after a strong performance over the past two months.  After all, the bounce in the wake of the Liberation Day pause has been impressive.  A little selling cannot be a surprise.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Lastly, we turn to commodities where the one consistency is that gold (+0.5%) has no shortage of demand, at least in Asia.  It seems that despite a 29% rise year-to-date in the barbarous relic, US investors are not that interested.  Those gains dwarf everything other than Bitcoin, and yet they have not caught the fancy of the individual investor in the US.  However, I believe that demand represents an important measure of the diminishing trust in the US dollar, at least for the time being.  The other metals are less interesting today.  As to oil (-1.9%), it has rallied despite alleged production increases from OPEC and weakening demand regarding economic activity.  Some part of this story doesn’t make any sense, although I don’t know which part yet.

This morning’s data brings Initial (exp 240K) and Continuing (1910K) Claims as well as PPI (0.2%, 2.6% Y/Y headline; 0.3%, 3.1% core).  While there are no Fed speakers, there is much prognostication as to how the CPI data is going to alter their DOT plot and SEP information next week at the Fed meeting.  

Finally, the situation in LA does not appear to have improved very much and it is spreading to other cities with substantial protests ostensibly planned for this weekend.  However, market participants have moved on as nothing there is going to change macroeconomic views, at least not yet.  If inflation is quiescent, the Fed doesn’t have to cut to have the tone of the conversation change.  That is what we are seeing this morning and this can continue quite easily.  When I altered my view on the strong dollar several months ago, I suggested a decline of 10% to 15% was quite viable.  Certainly, another 5% from here seems possible over the next several months absent a significant change in the inflation tone.

Good luck

Adf

PS – having grown up in the 60’s I was a huge Beach Boys fan and mourn, with so many others, the passing of Brian Wilson.  In fact, I wanted to write this morning’s rhyme as new lyrics to one of his songs, either “Fun, Fun, Fun” or “Surfin’ USA” two of my favorites.  But I realise that I have become too curmudgeonly as both of those are wonderfully upbeat and I just couldn’t get skeptical words to work.

Gnashing and Wailing

Posted on by

The narrative writers are failing
To keep their perspectives prevailing
They want to blame Trump
But if there’s no slump
They’ll find themselves gnashing and wailing
 
Economists have the same trouble
‘Cause most of their models are rubble
The change that’s been wrought
Requires more thought
Than counting on one more Fed bubble

 

Investors seem to be growing unhappier by the day as so many traditional signals regarding market movement no longer appear to work.  Nothing describes this better, I think, than the fact that forecasts for 10-year Treasury yields by major banks are so widely disparate.  While JPMorgan is calling for 5.00% by the end of the year, Morgan Stanley sees 2.75% by then.  What’s the right position to take advantage of that type of knowledge and foresight?

One of the most confusing things over the past months, has been the growing dichotomy between soft, survey data and hard numbers.  But even here, it is worth calling into question what we are learning.  For instance, this week we will see the NFP data along with the overall employment report.  That data comes from the establishment survey.  It seems that just 10 years ago, more than 60% of companies reported their hiring data.  Now, that is down to ~43%.  Does that number have the same predictive or explanatory power that it once did?  It doesn’t seem so.

Too, if we consider the Michigan Sentiment data, it has become completely corrupted by the political angle, with the current situation being Democrats answering the survey anticipate high inflation and weak growth while Republicans see the opposite.  Is that actually telling us anything useful from an economic perspective let alone a market perspective?  (see charts below from sca.isr.unmich.edu)

But this phenomenon is not merely a survey issue, it is an analysis issue.  At this point, I would contend there are essentially zero analysts of the US economy (poets included) who do not have a political bias built into their analysis and forecasts.  Consider that if you are in a good mood generally, then your own perspective on things tends to be brighter than if you are in a bad mood.  Well, expand that on a political basis to, if you are a Democrat, President Trump has been defined as the essence of evil and therefore your viewpoint will see all potential outcomes as bad.  If you’re a Republican, you will see much better potential.  It is who we are and has always been the case, but it appears a combination of President Trump and social media has pushed this issue to heretofore unseen extremes.

There are two problems with this.  First, for most consumers of financial information, the decision matrix is opaque.  Who should you believe?  But perhaps more concerningly, as evidenced by the decline in the response rate to hard data, for policymakers like the Fed and Treasury, what should they believe?  Are they receiving accurate readings of the economic realities on the ground?  Is the job market as strong (or weak) as currently portrayed?  Is the uncertainty in ISM data a result of political bias?  And if politics is an issue in these situations, who is to say that answers to questions will be fact-based rather than crafted to present a political viewpoint?

I would contend that the reason the narrative is breaking down everywhere is that the willingness of investors, as well as the proverbial man on the street, to listen to pronouncements from on high has diminished greatly.  After all, the mainstream media, which had always been the purveyor of the narrative, or at least its main amplifier, has lost its luster.  Or perhaps, they have lost all their credibility.  Independent media, whether on X, Substack or simply blogs that are posted all over the internet, have demonstrated far more clarity and accuracy of situations than anything coming from the NYT, WSJ, BBG or WaPo, let alone the TV “news” programs.

We are on our own to determine what is actually happening in the world, and that is true of how markets will perform going forward.  I have frequently written that volatility is going to be higher going forward across all markets.  President Trump is the avatar of volatility.  As someone whose formative years in trading were in the mid 80’s, when inflation was high, and Paul Volcker never said a word to anyone about what the Fed was doing (and even better, nobody even knew who the other FOMC members were), the best way to thrive is to maintain modest positions with limited leverage.  The time of ZIRP and NIRP will be seen as the aberration it was.  As it fades, so, too, will the ability to maintain highly levered positions because any large move can be existential.

With that cheery opening, let’s take a look at what has happened overnight.  Friday’s US session was not very noteworthy with mixed data leading to mixed results but no real movement.  Alas, things have taken a turn lower since then.  Asian markets were weaker overnight (Nikkei -1.3%, Hang Seng -0.6%, CSI 300 -0.5%) with most other regional markets having a rough go of things as well.  Concerns over further tariffs by the US (steel tariffs have been raised to 50%) and claims by both sides of the US – China trade debate claiming the other side has already breached the temporary truce have weighed on sentiment overall.  Meanwhile, PMI data from the region was less than inspiring with China, Korea, Japan and Indonesia all showing sub 50 readings for Manufacturing surveys.

In Europe, equity markets are also generally softer (DAX -0.5%, CAC -0.7%) although the FTSE 100 (0.0%) has managed to buck the trend after data this morning showed Housing Prices firmed along side Credit growth.  As investors await the US ISM/PMI data, futures are pointing lower across the board, currently down around -0.4% at 7:15.

In the bond market, yields all around the world are backing up with Treasuries (+3bps) bouncing off the lows seen on Friday, although remaining below 4.50%, while European sovereigns have climbed between 3bps and 4bps across the board.  JGB’s overnight (+2bps) also rose, although the back end of that curve saw yields slip a few bps.  It seems the world isn’t ending quite yet, although there does not seem to be any cure for government spending and debt issuance anywhere in the world.

Commodity prices, though, are on the move as it appears investors are interested in acquiring stuff that hurts if you drop it on your foot.  Gold (+1.85%), silver (+0.9%) and copper (+3.6%) are all in demand this morning, the latter ostensibly benefitting from fears that the US will impose more tariffs on other metals thus driving prices higher.  But the real beneficiary overnight has been oil (+4.0%) which rose on the back of an intensification of the Russia – Ukraine war as well as the idea that OPEC+ ‘only’ raised production by 411K barrels/day, less than the whisper numbers of twice that amount.  As I watch the situation in Ukraine, it appears to have the hallmarks of an imminent peace process as both sides are pulling out all the stops to gain whatever advantage they can ahead of the ceasefire and both recognizing that the ceasefire is going to come soon.  But despite the big jump in the price of WTI, you cannot look at the chart below and expect a breakout in either direction.  If I were trading this, I would be more likely to fade the rally than jump on board the rise.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is under the gun this morning, falling against pretty much all its major counterparts.  Both the euro (+0.7%) and pound (+0.6%) are having strong sessions although JPY (+1.0%) and NOK (+1.3%) are leading the way in the G10.  NOK is obviously benefitting from oil’s rally, while there remains an underlying belief that Japanese investors are slowing their international investments and bringing money home.  Now, the ECB meets this week and is widely anticipated to be cutting rates 25bps, but my take is, today is a dollar hatred day, not a euro love day.  As to the EMG bloc, gains are evident across regions with CZK and HUF (both +1.0%) demonstrating their beta to the euro although PLN (+0.5%) is lagging after the presidential election there disappointed the elites with the Right leaning candidate winning the job and likely frustrating Brussels in their attempts to widen the war in Ukraine.  In Asia, CNY (+0.1%) was relatively quiet but KRW (+0.5%), IDR (+0.8%) and THB (+0.9%) all benefitted from that broad dollar weakness.  So, too, did MXN (+0.65%) although BRL has not participated.

There is plenty of data this week culminating in the payroll report on Friday.

TodayISM Manufacturing49.5
 ISM Prices Paid70.2
 Construction Spending0.3%
TuesdayJOLTS Job Openings7.1M
 Factory Orders-3.0%
 -ex Transport0.2%
WednesdayADP Employment115K
 BOC Rate Decision2.75% (current 2.75%)
 ISM Services52.0
 Fed’s Beige Book 
ThursdayECB Rate Decision2.00% (current -2.25%)
 Initial Claims235K
 Continuing Claims1910K
 Trade Balance-$94.0B
 Nonfarm Productivity-0.7%
 Unit Labor Costs5.7%
FridayNonfarm Payrolls130K
 Private Payrolls120K
 Manufacturing Payrolls-1K
 Unemployment Rate4.2%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.7% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.3
 Participation Rate62.6%
 Consumer Credit$10.85B

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, we hear from four more Fed speakers over five venues.  The thing about this is they continue to discuss patience as the driving force, except for Governor Waller, who explained overnight that he could see rate cuts if inflation stays low almost regardless of the other data.

The trade story remains the topic of most importance in most eyes it seems, although it remains a mystery where things will wind up.  The narrative is lost for all the reasons above, but I will say that it appears risk aversion is today’s theme.  The new part is that the dollar is considered a risk asset.  

Good luck

Adf

Need Some Revising

Posted on by

The punditry fears that the bond
Is starting to move far beyond
A level at which
The US can stitch
Together a plan to respond
 
Meanwhile, though yields broadly are rising
The dollar, it’s somewhat surprising
Continues to sink
Which makes some folks think
Their models now need some revising

 

Perspective is an important thing to maintain when looking at markets as it is far too easy to get wrapped up in the short-term blips within a trend and accord them more importance than they’re due.  It is with that in mind that I offer the below chart of the 10-year US Treasury yield for the past 40 years.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Lately, much has been made of the fact that 10-year yields have risen all the way back to where they were on…January 1st of this year.  But the long history of the bond market is that yields at 4.5% or so, which is their current level, is the norm, not the exception.  As you can see, in fact they were far higher for a long time.  Now, I grant that the amount of debt outstanding is an important piece of the puzzle when analyzing the risk in bonds, and the current situation is significant.  After all, even Moody’s finally figured out that the US’s debt metrics were lousy.  And under no circumstances am I suggesting that the fiscal situation in the US is optimal. 

But I also know that, as I wrote yesterday, the Fed is not going to allow the bond market to collapse no matter their view of President Trump.  Neither is the US going to default on its debt (beyond the slow pain of higher inflation) during any of our lifetimes.  I continue to read that the just-passed ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ is going to result in deficits of 7% or more for the next decade, at least according to the CBO.  Alas, predicting the future is hard, and no one knows that better than the CBO.  Their track record is less than stellar on both sides of the equation, revenues and expenditures.  This is not to blame them, I’m sure they are doing their best, it is just an impossible task to create an accurate forecast of something with so many moving parts that additionally relies on human responses.

My point is that one needs to look at these forecasts with at least a few grains of salt.  While the current narrative is convinced that deficits are going to blow out and the nation’s finances are going to fall over the edge of the abyss, while the trend is in the wrong direction, my take is the end is a long way off.  In fact, the most likely outcome will be debt monetization around the world, as every government has borrowed more than they are capable of repaying without monetizing the debt.  The real question we need to answer is which nations will be able to do the best job of managing the situation on a relative basis.  And that, my friends, despite everything you read and hear about, is still likely to be the US.  This is not to say that US assets will not fall out of favor for a while relative to their recent behaviors, just that in the long run, no other nation has the resources and capabilities to thrive regardless of the future state of the world.

I guess the one caveat here would be that the entire global framework changes as the fourth turning evolves and old institutions die while new ones are formed.  So, the end of the IMF and World Bank, the end of SDR’s and even organizations like the UN cannot be ruled out.  And I have no idea what will replace them.  Regional accords may become the norm, CBDC’s may become the new money, and AI may run large swaths of both governments and the economy.  But in the end, at least nominally, government debt will be repaid in every G10 nation, of that I am confident.

One of the reasons I have waxed philosophical again is that market activity, despite all the chattering of the punditry, remains pretty dull.  For instance, in the bond market, despite all the talk, Treasury yields, after slipping a few bps yesterday, are unchanged today.  The same is true across Europe, with no sovereign bond having seen yields move by more than 1 basis point in either direction.  JGB’s overnight, despite CPI coming in a tick hotter than forecast, saw yields slip -4bps, following the US market from yesterday.  If the end is nigh, the bond market doesn’t see it yet.

In equities, yesterday’s lackluster session in the US was followed by a lackluster session in Asia (Nikkei +0.5%, CSI 300 -0.8%, Hang Seng +0.25%) with no overall direction and this morning in Europe, the movement has been even less interesting (CAC -0.5%, DAX +0.2%, FTSE 100 0.0%). Too, US futures are little changed at this hour (7:00).

In the commodity markets, gold (+0.9%) continues to chop around within a range that it entered back in early April.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

To me, this is the perfect encapsulation of all markets, hovering near recent highs, but unable to find a catalyst to either reject those highs, or leave them behind in a new paradigm.  You won’t be surprised that other metals are also a touch higher this morning (Ag +0.2%, Cu +0.7%), nor that oil (+0.3%) is also edging higher.  It strikes me that today’s commodity profile may be attributed to the dollar’s weakness.

So lastly, turning to the dollar, it is softer against virtually all its major counterparts this morning, with the euro (+0.6%) and pound (+0.6%) both having a good day.  In fact, the pound has touched 1.35 for the first time in three years.  But the dollar’s softness is widespread in both blocks; G10 (AUD +0.85%, NZD +1.0%, SEK +1.0%. NOK +1.0%, JPY +0.5% and even CAD +0.35%), and EMG (ZAR +0.7%, PLN +0.6%, KRW +1.0%, SGD +0.5% and CNY +0.35%).  The fact that SGD moved 0.5% is remarkable given its inherently low volatility.  But I assure you, Secretary Bessent is not upset with this outcome.

The only data this morning is New Home Sales (exp 692K) and we hear from yet another Fed speaker this afternoon, Governor Cook.  Chairman Powell will be speaking on Sunday afternoon, so that may set things up for next week, although with the holiday weekend, whatever he says is likely to be diluted by the time US markets get back to their desks on Tuesday.

In the end, the message is the end is not nigh, markets are adjusting to the changing realities of trade and fiscal policies, and monetary policies remain on a steady state.  The ECB is going to cut again, as will the BOE.  The BOJ is likely to hike again, and the Fed is going to sit on its hands for as long as possible.  The futures market is still pricing in two rate cuts this year, but I still don’t see that happening.  In fact, if the tax bill is enacted, I suspect that it will have a significantly positive impact on the economy, as well as on expectations for the economy, and interest rates are unlikely to fall much at all.  As well, absent a concerted international effort to weaken the dollar (those pesky Mar-a-Lago accords again), while the short-term direction of the dollar is lower, I’m not sure how long that will continue.  

Good luck and have a great holiday weekend

Adf

Struggling…Juggling

Posted on by

For users of Bloomberg worldwide
This morning, the service has died
So, traders are struggling
As it’s like they’re juggling
With one hand, behind their back, tied

 

While market activity continues, it seems that the single issue receiving the most attention today is that the Bloomberg professional service is not working almost anywhere in the world.  From what I have seen so far, there is no explanation other than technical problems, and on the Bloomberg website that I reference (the professional service is way too expensive for poets) the only mention has been oblique in the news that auctions in the UK and Europe have been extended in time until the service is operational again.  However, on X, the memes are wonderful.  I’m sure they will fix things shortly, and the financial world will go back to worrying about things like interest rates and equity valuations, but right now, this is the story!

JGB markets
Are garnering far more press
Than Ueda wants

 

Yesterday’s story about JGB yields continues to be a key market issue this morning, and likely will be so for some time to come.  Yields there continue to climb and as we all know, the fiscal situation in Japan has been tenuous at best.  The Japanese government debt/GDP ratio is somewhere around 263%.  Consider that when the US has been deemed the height of fiscal irresponsibility with a number half that high.  Granted, Japan is a net creditor nation, which is why they have been able to maintain this situation for so long, but as with every other situation where trends seem to go on forever, at some point they simply stop. 

Sourve: tradingeconomics.com

The thing that seemed to allow Japan to continue for so long was the fact that inflation there had remained quiescent, for decades.  It has been more than twenty years since official Japanese policy was to raise inflation.  Alas, to paraphrase HL Mencken, be careful what you wish for, you just may get it good and hard.  It appears that the good people of Japan are beginning to feel what it is like when a government achieves a policy goal after twenty years.  Notably, the key issue is that inflation, after literally decades of negative or near zero outcomes, has risen back to levels not seen since the early 1990’s, arguably two generations ago.  (The blip in 2014 was the result of the rise in Japan’s GST, their version of VAT, to 10%, which was a one-off impact on prices that dissipated within 12 months.)

This lack of inflation was deemed the fatal flaw in the Japanese economy, despite the fact that things there seem to work pretty well.  The infrastructure is continuously modernized and works well and while my understanding is that a part of the population was frustrated because their nominal incomes weren’t rising, with inflation averaging 0.0% or less for 20 years, they weren’t falling behind.  However, the broad macroeconomic view from policy analysts around the world was that Japan, a nation with an actual shrinking population, needed to do everything they could to push inflation higher in order to better the lives of its citizens.  Well, they have done so with inflation there now higher than the most recent readings in the US.  I fear that the good people of Japan are going to be asking many more questions about why the government thought this was a good idea as prices continue to rise.  It is already apparent in the approval numbers of the current government with readings on the order of 27%.

So, now we must ask, how will different markets interpret the ongoing rise in inflation.  We are already seeing what is happening in long-dated JGB markets, with the 30yr and 40yr yields rising to record levels, albeit below, and barely at current inflation readings respectively.  But, as I mentioned yesterday, the broader market question will be at what point will Japanese investors, who are one of the key sources of global capital, decide that the yield at home is sufficient to bring assets back from around the world, notably the US.  That level has not yet been reached although I suspect we are beginning to see the first signs of that.  

In the event this occurs, and I believe it will do so, what will be the impact on markets?  The first, and most obvious outcome will be a significant rise in the JPY (+0.6%).  As you can see below, while the yen has strengthened compared to levels seen in mid and late 2024, it remains far weaker than levels seen over the past 30+ years, where the average has been 112.62, more than 20% stronger than the current levels.

As to Treasury markets, Japan remains the largest non-US holder of Treasuries and while I doubt they will sell them aggressively, it would certainly be realistic to see them allow current positions to mature and not buy new ones but rather bring those funds home (stronger yen) while removing a key bid for the market (Kind of like their version of QT!).  Higher US yields are a real possibility here.  As to equities, these will likely be sold, although the Japanese proportion of holdings is not as large relative to others, but with rising yields and a falling dollar, it doesn’t feel like a good environment for equities.

Of course, all of this is dependent on the status quo in US policy remaining like it is today.  If President Trump can get Congress to implement his policies and they are successful at reinvigorating the US domestic economy, two big Ifs, these views will be subject to change.  The key to remember about markets, especially currency markets, is that there are two sides to every story, and expecting a particular outcome because one side of the equation moves may be quite disappointing if the other side moves and was unanticipated.

Ok, I spent far too long there, but not that much else is exciting.  The other story with some press has been driving oil markets higher (WTI +0.85%) with a gap up on news that Israel was considering a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.  Naturally, this has been denied, and oil’s price has retreated from the early highs seen below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Sticking with commodities, gold (+0.5%) continues to rally, perhaps on fears of that Israeli news, or perhaps simply because more and more investors around the world want to own something they can hold onto and has maintained its value for millennia.

In the equity markets, yesterday’s modest US declines were followed by weakness in Japan (-0.6%) but strength in China (+0.5%) and Hong Kong (+0.6%).  As to the rest of the region, there were many more gainers (Korea, India, Taiwan, Australia) than laggards (Malaysia, Thailand) so a net positive tone.  In Europe, though, modest declines are the order of the day with the CAC (-0.5%) the worst performer and the FTSE 100 (-0.1%) the best.  US futures are also pointing lower at this hour (7:50) down on the order of -0.5% across the board.

Treasury yields (+4bps) have moved higher again this morning and have taken the entire government bond complex along with them as all European sovereign yields are higher by between 4bps (Germany, Netherlands) and 6bps (Switzerland, UK).  We have already discussed JGB yields where 10yr yields have moved higher by 2bps.

Finally, the dollar is softer across the board this morning with the DXY (-0.45%) a good proxy of what is happening.  The outliers are KRW (+1.2%) and NOK (+1.1%) with the latter an obvious beneficiary of oil’s rise while the former seems to be climbing in anticipation of something coming out of the G10 FinMin meeting in Canada this week.  Otherwise, that 0.45% move is a good proxy for most things.

On the data front, we have another day sans anything important although EIA oil inventories will be released with a solid draw expected.  Fed speakers were pretty consistent yesterday explaining that patience remains a virtue in a world where they have no idea what is going on.  Fed funds futures markets have pushed the probability of a June cut down to 5% and only 50bps are priced in for all of 2025.  (Personally, I see no reason that a cut is coming.)

The dollar remains on its back foot, and I expect that the combination of pressure from the Trump administration to keep it that way is all that is going to be necessary to see things continue with this trend.  Of course, an Israeli strike on Iran would change things dramatically in terms of risk perception and likely support the dollar, but absent that, right now, lower is still the call.

Good luck

Adf

Set Cash On Fire

Posted on by

On Friday, the Moody’s brain trust
At last said it’s time to adjust
America’s debt
As we start to fret
That it’s too large and might combust
 
So, Treasury yields are now higher
As pundits explain things are dire
But elsewhere, as well
Seems bonds are a sell
As governments set cash on fire

 

Arguably, the biggest story of the weekend happened late Friday evening as Moody’s became the third, and final, ratings agency to downgrade US government debt to Aa1 from Aaa.  S&P did the deed back in 2011 and Fitch in 2023.  The weekend was filled with analyses of the two prior incidents and how markets responded to both of those while trying to analogize those moves to today.  In a nutshell, the first move in both 2011 and 2023 was for stocks to fall and bonds to rally with the dollar falling. However, in both of those instances, those initial moves reversed over the course of the ensuing months such that within a year, markets had pretty much reversed those moves, and in some cases significantly outperformed, the situation prior to the downgrade.  

Looking at Moody’s press release, they were careful to blame this on successive US administrations, so not putting the entire blame on President Trump, but in the end, it is hard to ignore that the nation’s fiscal statistics regarding debt/GDP and debt coverage are substantially worse than that of other nations that maintain a Aaa rating.  As well, their underlying assumption is that there will be no changes in the current trajectory of deficits and so no reason to believe things can change.

The most popular weekend game was to try to estimate how things would play out this time although given the starting conditions are so different in the economy, I would contend past performance is no guarantee of future outcomes.  In this poet’s eyes, it is not clear to me that it will have a long-term material impact on any market.  We have already been hearing a great deal about how Treasuries are no longer the safe haven they were in the past.  I guarantee you that institutions looking for a haven were not relying solely on Moody’s Aaa rating for comfort.  In addition, given a key demand for Treasuries is as collateral in the financial markets, and the Aa1 rating is just as effective as a Aaa rating from a regulatory risk perspective, I see no changes coming

As to equities, I see no substantive impact on the horizon.  The equity market remains over richly valued and if it were to decline, I don’t think fingers could point to this action.  Finally, the dollar has been declining since the beginning of the year and remains in a downtrend.  Using the DXY as our proxy, if the dollar falls further, should we really be surprised?

source tradingeconomics.com

To summarize, expect lots more hyperbole on the subject, especially as many analysts and pundits will try to paint this as a failure of the Trump administration.  And while bond yields may rise further, as they are this morning, given the fact that yields are rising everywhere around the world, despite no other nations being downgraded, this is clearly not the only driver.

In fact, one could make the case that bond yields are rising around the world because, like the US, nations all over are talking about adding fiscal stimulus to their policy mix.  After all, have we not been assured that Europe is going to borrow €1 trillion or more to rearm themselves?  That is not coming out of tax revenue, that is a pure addition to the debt load.  As well, is not a key part of the ‘US will suffer more than China in the tariff wars’ story based on the idea that China will stimulate the domestic economy and increase consumption (more on that below)?  That, too, will be increased borrowing.  I might go so far as to say that the increased borrowing globally to increase fiscal stimulus will lead to higher nominal GDP growth everywhere along with higher inflation.  I guess we will all learn how things play out together. 

Ok, so now that we have a sense of THE big story, let’s see how markets behaved elsewhere.  I thought that today, particularly, it would be useful to see how bond markets around the world have behaved in the wake of the Moody’s news.  Below is a screenshot from Bloomberg this morning.  note that every major market that is open has seen bonds sell off and I’m pretty confident that Canada’s at the very least, will do so when they wake up.  Ironically, the European commission came out this morning and reduced their forecasts for GDP growth and inflation this year and next and still European sovereign yields are higher.  I have a feeling that this news is not as impactful as some would have you believe.

Turning to equity markets, Friday’s US rally is ancient history given the change in the narrative.  And as you can see below from the tradingeconomics.com page, every major market is softer this morning (those are US futures) with only Russia’s MOEX rising, hardly a major market.  Again, it appears the fallout from the ratings cut is either far more widespread, or not a part of the picture at all.  It seems you could make the case that if European growth is going to underperform previous expectations, equity markets there should underperform as well.  The other two green arrows are Canada and Mexico, neither of which is open as of 6:30 this morning.

Commodity markets are the ones that make the most sense this morning as oil (-1.3%) is under pressure, arguably on a weaker demand picture after softer Chinese data was released overnight.  While the timing of the impacts of the trade war is unsettled, there is certainly no evidence that China is aggressively stimulating its economy.  This was very clear from the decline in Retail Sales, Fixed Asset Investment and IP, although the latter at least beat expectations.  But the idea that China is changing the nature of their economy to a more consumption focused one is not yet evident.  Meanwhile, metals markets are all firmer this morning with gold (+1.2%) leading the way, arguably as a response to the ratings downgrade.  This has dragged both silver (+0.9%) and copper (+1.0%) along for the ride.  It is not hard to imagine that sovereign investors see the merit in owning storable commodities like metals in lieu of Treasuries, at least at the margin.  But also, given the dollar’s weakness, a rally in metals is not surprise.

Speaking of the dollar’s weakness, that is the strong theme of the day along with higher yields across the board.  Right now, the euro (+1.0%) and SEK (+1.0%) are leading the way higher although the pound (+0.9%) is also doing well.  Perhaps this has to do with the trade agreement signed between the UK and EU reversing some of the Brexit outcomes at least regarding food and fishing, although not regarding regulations or immigration.  JPY (+0.6%) is also rallying as is KRW (+0.75%) and THB (+0.9%) as there is a continuing narrative that stronger Asian currencies will be part of the trade negotiations.  Finally, Eastern European currencies are having a good day (RON +2.3%, HUF +1.8%, CZK +1.2%, PLN +1.0%) after the Romanians finally elected a president that was approved by the EU.  Yes, they had to nullify the first election and then ban that candidate from running again, but this is how democracy works!

On the data front, there is very little hard data to be released this week, although it appears every member of the FOMC will be on the tape ahead of the Memorial Day weekend.  Perhaps they are starting to feel ignored and want to get their message out more aggressively.

TodayLeading Indicators-0.9%
ThursdayInitial Claims230K
 Continuing Claims1890K
 Flash Manufacturing PMI50.5
 Flash Services PMI51.5
 Existing Home Sales4.1M
FridayNew Home Sales690K

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Actually, as I count, there are three members, Barr, Bowman and Waller who will not be speaking this week, although Chairman Powell doesn’t speak until next Sunday afternoon.  In the end, the narrative is going to focus on the ratings cut for a little while, at least for as long as equity markets are under pressure along with the dollar.  However, when that turns, and I am sure it will, there will be a search for the next big thing.  I have not forgotten about the potential large-scale changes I discussed on Friday, and I am still trying to work potential scenarios out there, but for now, that is not the markets’ focus.  Certainly, for now, I see no reason for the dollar to gain much strength.

Good luck

Adf

Everyone’s Bitching

Posted on by

With President Trump on the road
The market has heard a boatload
Of ideas and plans
Including Iran’s
Return to a more normal mode
 
There’s talk of a nuclear deal
Audacious, if it’s truly real
Instead of enriching
While everyone’s bitching
A partnership deal they would seal

 

One is never disappointed with the tone of the overnight news when President Trump is traveling.  Between his flair for the dramatic and his desire to conclude deals, it seems like there is always something surprising when we awake each morning.  This morning is no different.  

While the mainstream media has been harping on the audacity of Qatar gifting a “flying palace” to the US for President Trump to use as Boeing’s delivery of the newest Air Force One is something like 10 years behind schedule, Mr Trump has indicated he is quite keen to make a deal with Iran that would bring them back into the fold of good neighbor nations.  Ostensibly, Iran has suggested that they work with the Saudis, Emiratis and the US to enrich uranium together in order to develop nuclear power in the Middle East.  As the Saudis and Emiratis have already expressed interest in building more nuclear power plants, it is not a stretch for them.  But bringing Iran into the fold, so that enrichment activities are done jointly, and therefore can be closely overseen by the US and Saudi Arabia, would be a remarkable outcome.

The JCPOA deal signed by President Obama was a nullifying deal, one that was designed to prevent an activity, the enrichment of uranium to the required concentrations sufficient to build a bomb.  But this is an encompassing deal, one that would join erstwhile enemies into a partnership to jointly produce uranium sufficiently enriched for nuclear power, without pushing toward weapons grade material.  Now, this would be a remarkable change in attitude in Tehran as the theocracy there has basically made the end of the US and Israel their motto ever since 1979 and the revolution that brought them to power.  But things are tough in Iran right now and the funny thing about power is that those who hold it are really reluctant to let go.  It would not be unprecedented for a nation’s leadership to reverse course completely in order to maintain their grip, and it is also not hard to believe that a softer tone would be welcome in Iran by the populace.

Regardless, this is a bold and audacious idea, but one that could just work.  Now, we should all care not simply because anything that could lead to less terrorism and destruction is an unalloyed good, but because the impact on the global economy would be significant, namely, the price of oil is likely to decline further.  A deal like this is likely to include the end of restrictions on Iranian oil sales, or at least a dramatic reduction in those restrictions.  While Iran has been producing and selling oil all along this would change the tone of the oil market with another major player now actively looking to expand production and sales.  (After all, the Iranian economy is desperate and the ability to generate more revenue without restrictions would be an extraordinary carrot for the mullahs.)

With this in mind, it should be no surprise that the price of oil (-3.65%) has fallen sharply today, and the real question is just how low it can go.  A look at the chart shows that the trend has been lower for the past year although it seems to have found a temporary bottom just above $56/bbl. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I have maintained for the past year and a half that the ‘peak cheap oil’ thesis has been faulty and that there is plenty of the stuff around with political, not geological restrictions the driving force toward higher prices.  This is Exhibit A on the political restriction case.  President Trump is quite keen to see oil prices lower as it suits both the inflation story in the US as well as offers a significant advantage to US manufacturing facilities with access to cheap energy.  I would guess this was not on anyone’s bingo card before today but must now be taken seriously as a potential outcome.  While I’m not an oil trader, I suspect we will test, and break, through those lows just above $56 in the coming weeks and find a new home closer to $50/bbl.

This is such an extraordinary story, I could not ignore it.  But as an aside, President Trump also mentioned that India has allegedly offered to cut their tariff rates on US goods to 0.0%!  I don’t know if that would be reciprocal, and that has not yet been verified by India, but again, it demonstrates that many of the things we believed to be true regarding international relations are not carved in stone.

Ok, let’s look at how markets are absorbing these latest surprises.  Yesterday’s price action could best be described as dull, with US equity markets doing little all day, although the NASDAQ managed to edge higher into the close.  In Asia overnight, the major markets (Japan -0.9%, China -0.9% and Hong Kong -0.8%) all came under pressure although there doesn’t appear to have been a particular story.  There were no new trade related comments, so I sense that the recent uptick just saw some profit-taking.  Elsewhere in Asia, the biggest winner was India (+1.5%) and then it was a mixed bag.  In Europe, equity markets have done very little overall after Eurozone data showed GDP activity was more disappointing than first reported with Q1’s second estimate down to 0.3%.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:10), they are pointing lower by about -0.4% or so across the board.

In the bond market, Treasury yields, which have been climbing relentlessly all month as per the below chart, have backed off -2bps this morning, but 10-year yields are still above 4.50%, a level Mr Bessent is clearly unhappy with.  But today’s price action has also seen European sovereign yields slide a similar amount, with the softer Eurozone growth one of the reasons here as well.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Turning to the metals markets, the shine is off gold (-0.2%) which has fallen more than 4% in the past week, although remains well above $3100/oz.  It seems that much of the fear that drove the price higher is being removed from the markets by the constant updates of trade and peace deals that we hear regularly.  It remains to be seen if this lasts, and how the Fed will ultimately behave, but for now, fear is fading.

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer overall, but not universally so.  In the G10, the euro (+0.2%) and pound (+0.2%) are both edging higher with UK data looking a tad better compared to that modest weakness in Eurozone data.  But the yen (+0.6%) and CHF (+0.5%) are both nicely higher as there continues to be a strong belief that President Trump is seeking the dollar to decline in value.  In the EMG bloc KRW (+0.7%) and ZAR (+0.8%) are the leaders with most of the rest of the bloc making very modest gains on the order of 0.2% or less.  It appears that the dollar has decoupled from the US rate picture for the time being.  I wonder if it is presaging lower US rates, or if this relationship is going to change for a longer time going forward.  We will need to watch this closely.

On the data front, there is a bunch this morning as well as comments from Chairman Powell at 8:40.  

Initial Claims229K
Continuing Claims1890K
Retail Sales0.0%
-ex autos0.3%
PPI0.2% (2.5% Y/Y)
-ex food & energy0.3% (3.1% Y/Y)
Empire State Manufacturing-10
Philly Fed Manufacturing-11
IP0.2%
Capacity Utilization77.8%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t see PPI as having much impact, but Retail Sales will get some discussion as will the manufacturing indices as weakness there will help the negative narrative that some are trying to portray.  Net, though, the story seems likely to continue to be the announcements of deals as they come in.  It is not clear to me that they will all be net positives, and I believe that much positivity has already been absorbed so we will need to see data that backs up the narrative and that could take a few quarters.  In the meantime, my lower dollar thesis seems to fit better today.  That’s my story and I’m sticking to it!

Good luck

Adf

As Though It Had Fleas

Posted on by

Well, CPI wasn’t as hot
As most of the punditry thought
But bonds don’t believe
The Fed will achieve
Low ‘flation, so they weren’t bought
 
But maybe, the biggest response
Has been that the buck, at the nonce
Has lost devotees
As though it had fleas
The end of the Trump renaissance?

 

Yesterday’s CPI data was released a touch softer than market expectations with both headline and core monthly numbers printing at 0.2%.  If you dig a bit deeper, and look out another decimal place, apparently the miss was just 0.03%, but I don’t think that really matters.  As always, when it comes to inflation issues, I rely on @inflation_guy for the scoop, and he provided it here.  The essence of the result is that while inflation is not as high as it had been post Covid, it also doesn’t appear likely that it is going to decline much further.  I think we all need to be ready for 3.5% inflation as the reality going forward.

Interestingly, different markets seemed to have taken different messages from the report.  For instance, Treasury yields did not see the outcome as particularly positive at all.  While yields have edged lower by -2bps this morning, as you can see from the below chart, they remain near their highest level in the past month.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There are two potential drivers of this price action, I believe, either bond investors don’t believe the headline data is representative of the future, akin to my views of inflation finding a home higher than current readings, or bond investors are losing faith in the full faith and credit of the US.  Certainly, the latter would be a much worse scenario for the US, and arguably the world, as the repudiation of the global risk-free asset of long-standing choice will result in a wild scramble to find a replacement.  I continue to see comments on X about how that is the case, and that US yields are destined to climb to 6% or 10% over the next couple of years as the dollar declines in importance in the global trading system.  However, when I look at the world, especially given my views on inflation, I find that to be a lot of doomporn clickbait and not so much analysis.  Alas, higher inflation is not a great outcome either.

Interestingly, while bond investors did not believe in the idea of lower yields, FX traders took the softer inflation figure as a reason to sell dollars.  This is a little baffling to me as there was virtually no change in Fed funds futures expectations with only an 8% probability of a cut next month and only 2 cuts priced for the year.  So, if long-dated yields didn’t decline, and short-dated yields didn’t decline, (and equity prices didn’t decline), I wonder what drove the dollar lower.  

Yet here we are this morning with the greenback softer against all its G10 counterparts (JPY +1.0%, NOK +0.6%, EUR +0.5%, CHF +0.5%) and almost all its EMG counterparts (KRW +1.5%, MXN +0.3%, ZAR +0.3%, CLP +0.6%, CZK +0.5%).  In fact, the only currency bucking the trend is INR (-0.25%) but given the gyrations driven by the Pakistan issues, that may simply be the market adjusting positions.

From a technical perspective, we are going to hear a lot about how the dollar failed on its break above the 50-day moving average that was widely touted just two days ago. (see DXY chart below).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But let’s think about the fundamentals for a bit.  First, we know that the Trump administration would prefer a weaker dollar as it helps the competitiveness of US exporters and that is a clear focus.  Second, the fact that US yields remain higher than elsewhere in the world is old news, that hasn’t changed since the Fed stopped its brief cutting spree ahead of the election last year while other nations (except Japan) have been cutting rates consistently.  What about trade and tariffs?  While it is possible that the idea of a reduction in trade will reduce the demand for dollars, arguably, all I have read is that during this 90-day ‘truce’, companies are ordering as much as they can to lock in low tariffs.  That sounds like more dollars will be flowing, not less.

As I ponder this question, the first thing to remember is that markets don’t necessarily trade in what appears to be a logical or consistent fashion.  I often remark that markets are simply perverse.  But going back to the first point regarding President Trump’s desire for a weaker dollar, there was a story overnight that a stronger KRW was part of the trade discussion between the US and South Korea and I have a feeling that is going to be part of the discussion throughout Asia, especially with Japan.  As of now, I continue to see more downward pressure on the dollar than upward given the Administration’s desires.  I don’t think the Fed is going to do anything, nor should they, but I also don’t foresee a change in the recession narrative in the near future.  While that has not been the lead story today, it remains clear that concern about an impending recession is everywhere except, perhaps, the Marriner Eccles Building.  My view has been a lower dollar, and perhaps today’s price action is a good example of why that is the case.

Ok, let’s touch on other markets quickly.  After yesterday’s mixed session in the US, Asia saw much more positivity with China (+1.2%) and Hong Kong (+2.3%) leading the way higher with most regional markets having good sessions and only Japan (-0.15%) missing the boat.  In Europe, though, the picture is not as bright with both the CAC (-0.6%) and DAX (-0.5%) under some pressure this morning despite benign German inflation data and no French data.  Perhaps the euro’s strength is weighing on these markets.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:45), they are basically unchanged.

Away from Treasury markets, European sovereign yields have all slipped either -1bp or -2bps on the day with very little to discuss overall here.

Finally, in the true surprise, commodity prices are under pressure this morning across the board despite the weak dollar.  Oil (-1.1%) is slipping, with the proximate cause allegedly being API oil inventory data showed a surprising gain of >4 million barrels.  However, given the courteousness of the meeting between President Trump and Saudi Prince MBS, I would not be surprised to hear of an agreement to see prices lower overall.  I believe that is Trump’s goal for many reasons, notably to put more pressure on Russia’s finances, as well as Iran’s and to help the inflation story in the US.  As to the metals complex, they are all lower this morning with gold (-0.7%) leading the way but both silver (-0.3%) and copper (-0.5%) lagging as well.

On the data front, there is no front-line data to be released, although we do see EIA oil inventories with modest declines expected.  However, it is worth noting that Chinese monetary data was released this morning and it showed a significant decline in New Yuan Loans and Total Social Financing, exactly the opposite of what you would expect if the Chinese were seeking to stimulate their economy.  It is difficult for me to look at the chart below of New Bank Loans and see any trend of note.  I would not hold my breath for the Chinese bazooka of stimulus that so many seem to be counting on.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Overall, it appears to me the market is becoming inured to the volatility which is Donald Trump.  As I have written before, after a while, traders simply get tired and stop chasing things.  My take is we will need something truly new, a resolution of the Chinese trade situation, or an Iran deal of some kind, to get things moving again.  But until then, choppy trading going nowhere is my call.

Good luck

Adf

They Will Get Burned

Posted on by

In Europe, the corporate elite
Have started, their worries, to bleat
They’re now quite concerned
That they will get burned
If dollar sales start to retreat
 
For years, when the dollar was rising
Weak unit sales, it was disguising
But now the buck’s falling
Which they find appalling
As earnings forecasts, they’re downsizing
 

Markets are very interesting constructs.  Not only do they help find a clearing price for supply and demand of something, but they also tend to take on anthropomorphic characteristics in many eyes as some type of creature beyond anyone’s control, but with a tinge of malevolence.  Part of that latter feeling comes from markets’ ability to make every pundit seem like a fool.  After all, it was just 3 days ago when I was reliably informed by the punditry that equity values were set to collapse as the US economy entered a depression.  It seems we may have to wait a few more days for that situation to play out.  And, in fact, they have now changed their tune.  While ascribing the rebound to President Trump’s reversal on some issues, the overall doom and gloom story has moved to the background.  But if there is one thing I have continuously discussed since Trump’s election is that volatility was very likely to increase, and that has certainly been the case. 

Shifting our focus to the FX markets, though, I couldn’t help but chuckle at a Bloomberg article this morning titled, The Dollar’s Slide is Raising Red Flags for Corporate Earnings.  As I am based in the US, the fact that this was a front-page article had me somewhat confused.  A long career in speaking with corporate accounts on FX made it clear that a weak dollar was the best thing for earnings of US multinationals.  Generally, when the dollar was strong, CFOs would ascribe any earnings problems to that issue as a catch-all excuse, but when the dollar declined, outperformance by a company was the result of brilliant execution.

So, you can understand my initial confusion.  But upon reading the article, it turns out they were talking about European corporates, who for the first time in three years find that hedging their US dollar sales is critical.  Not only that, but they have also been quick to highlight that all new hedges will be at worse rates and therefore future earnings are already sure to be impacted.  Now, a quick look at the chart below does show that the euro has risen to its highest level in three years.  But it also shows that compared to the past 20 years, the euro is nowhere near high levels. In fact, it sits well below the median price (somewhere in the 40th percentile actually).  Perhaps European corporate Treasurers have simply forgotten their history.  Or more likely, just like US corporate Treasurers when the dollar is rising, they are seeking a scapegoat.

I cannot emphasize enough that the FX rate is not the driver, but the release valve for all the things that happen in the global economy.  Other actions take place, whether interest rate changes, policy or market, economic adjustments, policy or market, or exogenous events, and the FX rate is the place where equilibria are found.  In fact, arguably, that is the biggest flaw in the Trump administration’s idea that if they weaken the dollar, it will solve policy problems.  The dollar is the tail to the economy’s dog.

In the meantime, the reason one runs a hedge program with consistency is to mitigate the big moves in FX and their impacts on earnings.  But remember, even the best hedge programs lag large secular moves.

Ok, I’ll step down off my high horse and let’s look at how markets behaved overnight.  After yesterday’s second consecutive rally in the US, the picture elsewhere in the world is more mixed.  In Asia, the Nikkei (+0.5%) continued its rebound but the Hang Seng (-0.75%) and CSI 300 (-0.1%) saw no benefit overnight.  Elsewhere in the region winners and losers were pretty evenly split and nobody saw a movement of more than 0.8% in either direction.  In Europe, red is today’s color, but it’s a pale red with losses across the board of the 0.1% to 0.25% variety.  The only news overnight was German Ifo data, which showed a bit of a surprising uptick in the current business climate as well as expectations.  Perhaps the promise of more German fiscal largesse is outweighing concerns over tariffs.  As to US futures, they, too, are lower by about -0.15% at this hour (7:20).

In the bond market, yields are sliding around the world with Treasuries (-3bps) continuing to back away from their recent highs while European sovereigns see yields decline between -3bps and -4bps.  Even JGB yields slipped -1bp overnight.  My take is some of the fear has ebbed away from the market.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.1%) remains in its recent trading range, with a still very large gap above the market in price terms.  The demand story seems fixed at weakening demand because of either slowing growth, or the electrification of everything or something like that, while the supply story is starting to see hints that oil companies are going to back off production with prices at current levels.  The latter feels like the larger short-term risk, although nothing has changed my longer-term view of lower prices here.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.7%) is rebounding after a difficult two days, arguably some real profit taking was seen.  Meanwhile silver (-0.5%) which actually outperformed gold for the past two sessions is giving some of those gains back and copper (+0.8%) is continuing its rebound after a dramatic decline from the all-time highs seen just one month ago.  Talk about a V-shaped recovery!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is softer this morning, giving back about half of yesterday’s 1% gains.  In the G10, SEK and NOK (both +1.1%) are leading the way although the euro (+0.6%) is having a good day, as is the yen (+0.75%). The pound (+0.5%) is a bit of a laggard but after seeing this interview of Ed Miliband (UK Secretary of Energy and Climate Change), and his either inability to understand the implications of his policy, or his willingness to lie about it, I cannot believe the pound will continue to track the euro.  The UK’s energy policy appears designed to destroy the UK economy.  Consider that solar power is a key pillar of their future efforts to achieve net zero carbon emissions, and the UK is the nation that gets the least solar coverage in the world.  After all, it rains there half the time.  Meanwhile, the government is keen to end all other sources of energy.  No matter what you think of President Trump’s policies, they are not nationally suicidal like the UK’s.

Turning to the EMG bloc, gains are the norm, but not universal.  The CE4 are doing well but ZAR (-0.2%) and KRW (-0.6%) with the latter suffering from weaker than expected GDP growth in Q1 while the former, after a strong run since early in April, appears to merely be taking a breather.

We finally see some notable data this morning with Initial (exp 222K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims, Durable Goods (2.0%, 0.3% ex-Transport) and the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (0.11) all at 8:30, then at 10:00 we get Existing Home Sales (4.13M).  Yesterday saw New Home Sales pick up more than expected and the Beige Book indicate that economic activity was unchanged from the past, but uncertainty had risen.

Here’s what we know; the world is not ending but it is continuing to change from the structures created in the post WWII period.  This process is just beginning and anybody who claims to know where things are headed is lying.  I continue to believe in my bigger picture views, but day to day, there is no rhyme or reason, especially given the importance of headline bingo.

Good luck

Adf