Tag Archives: #trump

Throw in the Towel

Posted on by

All eyes are on Chairman Jay Powell
And if he will throw in the towel
Or will he still fight
Inflation? Oh, right
He caved as the hawks all cried foul!
 
So, twenty-five’s baked in the cake
While fifty would be a mistake
If fighting inflation
Is his obligation
Though half may, Trump’s thirst, somewhat slake

 

Well, it’s Frabjous Fed Day and there will be a great deal of commentary on what may happen and what it all means.  Of course, none of us really knows at this point, but I assure you by this afternoon, almost all pundits will explain they had it right.  

At any rate, my take is as follows, FWIW.  I believe the huge revision to NFP data has got the FOMC quite concerned.  Prior to that, they were smug in their contention that patience was a virtue and their caution because of the uncertain price impact of tariffs was warranted given the underlying strength in the jobs market.  Now, not only has that underlying strength been shown to be a mirage, but the import price data released yesterday, showing that Y/Y, import prices are flat, is further evidence that tariffs have not been a significant driver of inflation.  If you look at the chart below of Y/Y import prices for the past 5 years, you can see that since April’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariff announcements, they have not risen at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With that in mind, if you are the Fed, and you are data dependent, as they claim to be, and the data shows weakening employment and stable prices in the area you had been highlighting, you have no choice but to cut.  The question then becomes, 25bps or 50bps?  While the market is pricing just a 6% probability of a 50bp cut, given there are almost certainly three Governor votes for 50bps (Waller, Bowman and Miran) and the underlying central bank tendency is toward dovishness, I am going to go out on a limb and call for 50bps.  Powell and the Fed have already been proven wrong, and the only thing worse for them than seeming to cave to pressure from the White House would be standing pat and being blamed for causing a recession.  

With that in mind, my prognostications for market responses are as follows:

  • The dollar will weaken pretty much across the board with a move as much as -1% possible
  • Precious metals will rally sharply, making new highs for the move as this will be proof positive that the Fed has tacitly raised its inflation target from the previous 2%.  In fact, my take is 3% is the new 2%, at least until we spend a long time at 4%.
  • Equity markets will take the news well, at least initially, as the algos will be programmed to buy, but the concern will have to grow that slowing economic activity will impair earnings going forward, and multiples will suffer with higher inflation.  I continue to fear a correction here.
  • Bonds are tricky here as they have been rallying aggressively for the past six weeks and that could well have been ‘buying the rumor’ ahead of the meeting.  So, it is not hard to make the case that bonds sell off, and long end yields rise in response to 50bps.

On the other hand, if they cut 25bps, and sound hawkish in the statement or Powell’s presser, I don’t imagine there will be much movement of note.   I guess we’ll see in a while.

Until then, let’s look at the overnight price action.  Yesterday’s modest declines in US equities looked far more like consolidation after strong runs higher than like the beginning of the end.  The follow on in Asia was mixed with Tokyo (-0.25%) after export data was weak, especially in the auto sector, while HK (+1.8%) and China (+0.6%) both rallied on the prospect of reduced trade tensions between the US and China based on the upcoming meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi.  Elsewhere in the region, Korea, Taiwan and Australia fell while India, Malaysia and Indonesia all rallied, the latter on the back of a surprise 25bp rate cut by Bank Indonesia.

In Europe, the picture is also mixed with Germany (-0.2%), France (-0.4%) and Italy (-1.2%) all under pressure, with Italy noticeably feeling the pain of potential domestic moves that will hurt bank profitability with increased taxes there to offset tax cuts for individuals.  Spain is flat and the UK (+0.25%) slightly firmer after inflation data there showed 3.8% Y/Y headline, and 3.6% Y/Y core, as expected and still far higher than the BOE’s 2.0% target.  While the BOE meets tomorrow, and no policy change is expected, if the Fed cuts 50bps, do not be surprised to see 25bps from the Old Lady.  US futures at this hour (7:30) are essentially unchanged.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to creep lower ahead of the meeting, slipping another 2bps this morning and now trading at 4.01%, the lowest level since Liberation Day and the initial fears of economic disaster in the US.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

You can see the trend for the past six months remains lower and appears to be accelerating right now. Meanwhile, as is often the case, European sovereign yields are following Treasury yields and they are lower by between -1bp and -2bps across the board.  Nothing to see here.

Commodity markets have seen the most movement overnight with oil (-0.7%) topping a bit while gold (-0.65%), silver (-2.5%) and copper (-1.8%) have all seen some profit taking ahead of the FOMC meeting.  Now, there are plenty of profits to take given the 10% rallies we have seen in gold and silver in the past month.  In fact, I lightened up some of my gold position yesterday as well!

Finally, the dollar, which fell pretty sharply yesterday is bouncing a bit this morning.  Using the DXY as proxy, it came close to the lows seen back on July 1st, as you can see in the chart below. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But remember, as you step away from the day-to-day, the dollar is hardly weak.  Rather, it is much closer to the middle of its long-term price action as evidenced by the longer view below.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

There is a lot of discussion on FinX (nee FinTwit) about whether we are about to bounce or if the dollar is going to collapse.  But it is hard to look at the chart directly above and get the feeling that things are out of hand in either direction.  Now, relative to some other currencies, there are trends in place that don’t impact the DXY, but matter.  Notably, CNY and MXN have both been strengthening slowly for the bulk of the year and are now at levels not seen for several years.  given the importance of both these nations with respect to trade with the US, this is where Mr Trump must be happiest as it clearly is weighing on their export statistics.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ahead of the FOMC meeting, we do get a few data points, with Housing Starts (exp 1.37M) and Building Permits (1.37M) leading off at 8:30.  Then at 9:45 the BOC interest rate decision comes, with a 25bp cut expected and finally the Fed at 2:00.  Housing will not have any impact on the market in my view but the BOC, if they surprise, could matter, especially if they pre-emptively cut 50bps as that will get the juices flowing for the Fed to follow suit.  But otherwise, we will have to wait for Powell and friends for the next steps.

Good luck

Adf

More Drear

Posted on by

While many, last night, were dismayed
By Jensens’s results as displayed
Most markets worldwide
Absorbed them in stride
As buyers keep up their crusade
 
Meanwhile, Europeans still fear
That things won’t get better this year
The war in Ukraine
Is at it again
While sentiment points to more drear

 

Please understand, I only write about Nvidia because it is topic number one in the markets overall, albeit not very important in FX for now.  So, briefly, despite record revenues and earnings, the numbers were slightly below expectations, and the immediate result was for the share price to decline about 3% or so.  As I type this morning, though, it has already begun to recoup some of those losses and while there are many commentators claiming this was a disaster and forecasts are unrealistic, my sense is the company is going to continue to churn out chips and profits.  I read that their gross margins are 72%, a remarkably high number.  In the end, it is hard for me to look at these results and think the end is nigh.  So, let’s move on.

A moment, first, to remember the tragedy in Minneapolis where two children were killed in a church shooting on the first day of school there as well as the increase in hostilities in Ukraine where last night Russia launched a massive aerial attack on Kyiv, sending 629 missiles and drones of which 40 got through and 14 were killed along with 38 injured.  At this time, it certainly doesn’t look like hostilities in Ukraine are about to end and I think it is fair to say that the only one seeking that result is President Trump.  Clearly Putin is determined to conquer Ukraine, clearly Zelenskiy is determined to resist and apparently the entire EU wants to continue the fight regardless of the costs.

My sense is the problem for Europe is that it is a theoretical construct, not a nation.  As such, it cannot make decisions on a timely basis as a group.  So, while some want to rearm and fight, others are reluctant to do so and would rather free ride.  This lack of cohesion makes the EU a very unstable partner and will hinder their efforts to do more than continue to shovel money to Zelenskiy and Ukraine.  The war has been ongoing for more than three years and I have become of the opinion that it will not end until one side runs out of resources.  Ukraine’s attacks on Russia’s oil infrastructure are starting to have an impact, but it remains to be seen if they can keep those up while Russia continues to bombard population centers.

With that as backdrop, perhaps we should not be surprised that the data released this morning from the Eurozone showed Confidence and Sentiment indicators for both businesses and consumers falling compared to last month and relative to expectations.  Looking at the data from tradingeconomics.com, you can see that the August results were worse for everything with confidence falling but concerns over inflation rising.

                                                                                                             Actual          Previous            Estimate

While these numbers are not devastating in themselves, the trend is not positive.  Selecting just one, Consumer Confidence in this case, you can see that while not the worst it has been over the past 5 years (the initial invasion of Ukraine marked the nadir), the trend is not very friendly.  And pretty much all the charts are the same, not the worst but trending the wrong way.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I make these points because I continue to read about negative sentiment regarding US assets and the dollar, and yet I cannot help but look at the Eurozone and see a negative situation.  I agree that if the Fed starts to get aggressive cutting rates, which seems unlikely as long as Powell remains Chair, the dollar will fall, but is Europe really where you want to be?  I’m not convinced.

Away from that, not much else has been happening (it is the last week of August, and it appears almost everyone is on holiday) so let’s look at overnight price action.  Leading up to the Nvidia earnings, equities in the US rallied, and despite the Nvidia disappointment, futures are currently (7:15) unchanged across the board.  Last night in Asia, China (+1.8%) was the leader, reversing yesterday’s declines with the talk of the town still AI and China’s new AI Plus strategy.  Meanwhile, the Hang Seng (-0.8%) disagreed with the mainland although there was no separate news.  Tokyo (+0.7%) was solid, but elsewhere in the region there were more laggards (India, Taiwan, Philippines) than winners (Korea, Australia) with the winners just barely so.

With that Eurozone data, you will not be surprised that European shares are generally softer, with the major bourses lower by between -0.2% and -0.4% and only the CAC (+0.1%) bucking the trend.  Perhaps this is because the French FinMin, Eric Lombard, claimed France would be able to pay its bills although it seems clear the current government is going to fall when the confidence vote is held on September 8th.

In the bond market, 10-year Treasury yields are unchanged this morning and edging toward the lower end of their recent trading range, with no indication that there is a funding problem for the US.  However, it is worth noting that the yield curve is steepening in the US (and everywhere else) as the 2yr-30yr spread is now 128bps and as you can see from the chart below, that spread has been widening all since July. (30yr yields are in green and the LHS Y-axis).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

When the yield curve inverted back in 2020, there was much talk of its prowess as a prognosticator of coming recessions.  However, we are still awaiting that recession.  In fact, I believe history shows it is when the curve steepens sharply that more problems occur.  It is easy to look at this and see the market is expecting inflation to continue to rise especially given the Fed seems to have put inflation in the back seat of their mandate.  Beware!

In commodities, oil (-0.1%) is stabilizing after a solid rally yesterday as the EIA data was a somewhat larger draw on inventories than expected and perhaps Ukraine’s recent successes regarding attacks on Russian oil infrastructure has some folks concerned.  However, as my friend JJ who writes Market Vibes notes, open interest is declining fast, and activity remains very slow in the space.  At the same time, gold (+0.3%) rallied all day yesterday and is continuing this morning and dragging silver (+1.1%) along for the ride.  Spot gold is back above $3400/oz, a level that had seemed toppish for quite a while.  Perhaps this is the long-awaited break higher the gold bugs have been talking about, but I think we need to see another $100/oz to make that commitment and that likely would entail a much weaker dollar, something that has not yet been happening.

Turning to the dollar, while it is a touch softer this morning, -0.3% as per the DXY, if you look at the chart below (which resembles so many charts these days) since the post-Liberation Day volatility, it is hard to get excited about a move in either direction.  We will need a new out of the box catalyst and I just don’t know what that will be.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While the dollar’s weakness this morning is universal, the biggest mover overnight was KRW (+0.6%) which rallied after BOK governor Rhee defended their intervention, even indicating it is part of the trade deal with the US.  Otherwise, 0.1% to 0.3% describes the entire slate of currency gains vs. the greenback.

We get some real data this morning as follows: Initial (exp 230K) and Continuing (1970K) Claims; Q2 GDP (3.1%); Q2 Real Consumer Spending (1.4%); and Q2 GDP Sales (6.3%), although this is the second look at all these numbers.  Tomorrow’s Personal Income and Spending as well as PCE data will be far more interesting.  We hear from Governor Waller as well, but we already know his views are to cut right away.

It is difficult to get too excited about much these days and there are valid arguments for movement in most markets in both directions (remember the idea that the goods and services economies are out of sync).  Net, until it is clear the Fed is going to cut aggressively, assuming that happens, the dollar is likely to drift.

Good luck

Adf

The Zeitgeist Could Shatter

Posted on by

While crime throughout DC has dropped
And Trump’s Fed demands haven’t stopped
The story today
That really holds sway
Is whether Nvidia’s topped
 
The war in Ukraine doesn’t matter
Nor does if the yield curve is flatter
‘Cause stonks must go higher
And that does require
Good news, or the zeitgeist could shatter

 

Some mornings things just are not that interesting in markets despite the ongoing events happening around the world.  Arguably, the biggest headlines revolve around the remarkable decline in crime in Washington DC, which while most of the mainstream media decried the President’s actions at first, has grown in popularity, even amongst his foes.  From a market perspective, the number of stories and editorials written about President Trump’s efforts to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook has risen exponentially, with many still trying to explain the Fed will lose its independence if Trump is successful.  (Given they have not been independent since 1987, I would take this with a grain of salt).  The other noteworthy story is that the EU is going to fast-track legislation to remove all tariffs throughout the EU on US industrial good imports, one of the results of the trade negotiations.

But, while those may be of passing interest, the thing in markets that really has tongues wagging is the fact that Nvidia is set to release their Q2 earnings this afternoon after the equity markets in the US close.  I must admit, thinking back to the tech bubble in 2000-01, I do not remember any single company garnering the amount of attention that Nvidia gets these days.  Perhaps Cisco Systems is the closest analogy, but it was nowhere near this level of interest and excitement.  While this is an imperfect analysis, I think it is worth looking at the charts of both Nvidia and Cisco (from finance.yahoo.com) to help you see the magnitude of the rise in each case.  It is certainly not hard to draw the conclusion that Nvidia may be peaking.  After all, if it declines by 75%, it will still have a market cap > $1 trillion!

NVDA

CSCO

I think it is reasonable to ask whether AI is a bubble.  I also think it is reasonable to ask whether the so-called hyperscalers, Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon, are spending too much on building out their AI platforms.  This would be the case if the promised revenues never materialize.  Certainly, other than for Nvidia, those revenues are paltry at best so far.  But these are all observations from a poet who doesn’t follow the stock closely and simply cannot avoid some of the story because it is so prevalent everywhere.  FWIW, which is probably not very much, my take is that history has shown that new innovations, e.g. the automobile, electricity, the internet, can have remarkably wide-ranging implications but usually take far longer to achieve those ends than equity investors assume.  In other words, the idea that the megacap companies are overvalued seems pretty compelling.

Enough of my amateur equity analysis, and I’m sorry, but that is all that seems to be of interest today.  So, let’s look at how markets have behaved overnight ahead of the news this afternoon.  After modest afternoon rallies resulted in higher closes in the US yesterday, Japan (+0.3%) followed suit as did Australia (+0.3%), but both China (-1.5%) and Hong Kong (-1.3%) fell sharply, reversing some of their recent gains as Chinese industrial profits fell -1.7%, a worse than expected outcome, and it seemed to have triggered some profit taking.  With that in mind, I have read a number of analysts who have become of the opinion that Chinese equities are setting up for a much larger move higher based on additional stimulus as well as the fact that Chinese interest rates are the lowest in the world right now (ex-Switzerland).  Elsewhere in the region, India (-1.0%) lagged alongside China and most of the others had much less movement in either direction.

In Europe, the picture is mixed with the CAC (+0.4%) the leading gainer which looks very much like a reaction to the past two sessions’ sharp declines.  Spain (-0.4%) is lagging, although there is no particular news, and Germany (-0.15%) is also softer after the GfK Consumer Confidence report was released at a weaker than expected -23.6.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:25) they are ever so slightly higher.

In the bond market, despite all the anxiety over the Fed and Trump’s attempt to remove Governor Cook, 10-year yields are higher by 1bp after falling 3bps yesterday.  European sovereign yields are lower by -1bp across the board and JGB yields are unchanged.  In other words, while the media’s hair is on fire, clearly the market’s is not.

In the commodity space, oil (-0.1%) is little changed this morning, maintaining yesterday’s declines which appear to have been a result of Russia seeking to export more crude after Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries have slowed output.  Gold (-0.6%) which saw a strong rally yesterday is falling back a bit, but remains in that tight range I showed yesterday, although both silver (-0.9%) and copper (-1.3%) are under more pressure this morning, likely on the back of a stronger dollar.

Speaking of the dollar, it is firmer across the board this morning, rising 0.5% vs. the euro, yen and Aussie, with slightly smaller gains vs. the other G10 currencies.  In emerging markets, ZAR (-0.85%) is the laggard, not surprisingly on the back of weaker precious metals prices, but PLN (-0.75%) is also under pressure on a combination of the weak euro and concerns over the lack of progress in the Russia/Ukraine war.  Even CNY (-0.15%) is weaker despite a renewed belief that China is going to allow the yuan to strengthen as part of any trade deal.

There is no front-line data to be released today, with only EIA oil inventories expecting a modest net draw.  Richmond Fed president Barking speaks at 12:45 but given he just explained his views yesterday, that he didn’t foresee much change in rates at all given the current state of the economy, I cannot imagine he will have changed that view.

And that’s all we have today.  I anticipate a lackluster session in all markets as traders await the Nvidia numbers later.  Of course, President Trump could surprise us all with an announcement on Russia, the Fed, or any of a number of other situations, but those are outside my ability to anticipate.  The market is still pricing an 87% chance of a September cut and an 80% chance of two cuts by December.  If the Fed gets aggressive, for whatever reason, the dollar will suffer.  But that is not yet the case, so range trading seems the best bet.

Good luck

Adf

Political War

Posted on by

In Washington, Cook feels the heat
As Trump wants a change in her seat
In Paris, the sitch
For Macron’s a bitch
As confidence there’s in retreat
 
These two stories plus so much more
Explain that we’re in, Turning, Four
So, all that we knew
Seems no longer true
Instead, there’s political war

 

The dichotomy between the general lack of price volatility in markets and the increase in political volatility over policy choices and requirements around the world is truly remarkable.  However, just like so much else that many have assumed as a baseline process for so long, this relationship appears to be changing as well.  These changes have historical precedence, as documented by Neil Howe and William Strauss back in 1997 in their seminal book, The Fourth Turning.  

Perhaps this is the best definition of what the Fourth Turning is all about [emphaisis added]:

“In the recurring loop of modern history, a final, perilous era arrives once each lifetime.  It is marked by civic upheaval and national mobilization, both traumatic and transformative.  That era, reshaping the social and political landscape, is unfolding now.”

Now, read that and tell me it is not a perfect description of what we are seeing daily, not just in the US, but around the world.  If you wondered why all the models that had been built about many things, whether financial, economic or governmental are no longer offering accurate forecasts, I would point to this as the underlying premises are going through the throes of change.

For instance, consider President Trump and his relationship with the Fed.  We already know that he and Chairman Powell are at odds and have been so for months over Powell’s reluctance to cut rates.  But his attacks on the Fed are unceasing, and last night he ‘fired’ Governor Lisa Cook for cause.  That cause being the allegations that she committed mortgage fraud, which if true is certainly a concern for a Federal Reserve Board Governor.  But this has never been attempted before so will involve legal wrangling which we will watch over the next many months.

Now, some of you may remember the last time there was a scandal at the FOMC, where two different regional Fed presidents, Dallas’s Robert Kaplan and Boston’s Eric Rosengren, were trading S&P 500 futures in their personal accounts prior to FOMC announcements of which they had inside knowledge.  Both did step down and allegedly the Fed has tightened its controls on that issue as they tried to sweep it under the rug, but let’s face it, Fed members are no angels.

I have no idea how this will play out, although I suspect that Governor Cook will eventually resign as the one thing at which President Trump excels is applying public pressure.  While Powell is an experienced public figure, Ms Cook was a professor at Michigan State, not exactly a spot where you feel the withering heat of a Trumpian attack on a regular basis.  Of course, if she did lie on her mortgage applications, that is a tough look for someone charged with overseeing the financial system.

But that is just the latest issue in the US, at least involving financial markets.  This Fourth Turning is coming alive all around the Western World, perhaps no place more than Paris this morning.  There, PM Bayrou has called for a confidence vote in order to gain the power to pass an austerity budget that cuts €44 billion from spending.  While at this point, it seems long ago, his predecessor PM, Michel Barnier, lasted just 99 days with his minority government and was ousted last December.  While Bayrou has made it for 9 months, it appears his odds of making it for a full year are greatly diminished now as all the opposition parties have promised to vote against him.  Recall, he leads a minority government and if he loses the vote, there will be yet another set of elections in France.

Again, this is emblematic of a Fourth Turning, where systems and institutions that have been operating for decades are suddenly coming apart.  From our perspective, the impact is more direct here with French equity markets (CAC -1.5%) falling sharply (see below) while French government bond yields soar.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, French 10-year yields now trade above almost all other EU nations including Greece and Spain, although Italian yields are still a touch higher.  Consider that during the European bond crisis of 2011-12, France was considered one of the stronger nations.  Oh, how the mighty have fallen!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Again, my point is that much of what we thought we understood about how markets behave on both an absolute and relative basis is changing because the institutions underlying the Western economy are undergoing massive changes.  This is not merely a US phenomenon with President Trump, but we are seeing a growing nationalist fervor throughout the West as populations throughout Europe, and even Japan, increasingly reject the culmination of what has been described as the globalist agenda.  As John Steinbeck has been widely quoted, things can change gradually…and then suddenly.

So, let’s look at how other markets behaved overnight following the weakness in US equity markets yesterday.  Asian markets followed suit lower (Tokyo -1.0%, Hong Kong -1.2%, China -0.4%, Korea -1.0%, India -1.0%) with essentially the entire region in the red.  Europe, too, is under pressure this morning and while France leads the way, Germany (-0.4%), Spain (-0.8%) and the UK (-0.6%) are all declining in sync.  However, at this hour (7:10) US futures are essentially unchanged, so perhaps things will stabilize.

Those yields I picture above represent modest declines from yesterday’s levels, although that is only because European yields yesterday mostly climbed between 5bps and 7bps across the board.  As to Treasury yields, they are higher by 2bps this morning, but remain below 4.30%, so are showing no signs of a problem.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.8%) is giving back all its gains from yesterday and a little bit more, but in the broad scheme of things, continues to trade in its recent range.  The one thing to watch here is Ukraine’s increasing ability to interrupt Russian production and shipment of oil via long-range drone strikes, as if they continue to be successful, it may well start to push prices above their recent cap at $70/bbl.  That is, however, a big if.  It is getting pretty boring describing metals markets as gold (+0.3%) has been trading in an increasingly narrow range as per the below chart.  This has been ongoing since April and feels like it could last another 5 months without a problem.  Silver’s chart is similar, albeit not quite as narrow a range.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, slipping against the euro (+0.3%), pound (+0.2%), and yen (+0.2%) with most of the rest of the G10 having moved less than that.  NOK (-0.3%) is the outlier following oil lower.  In the EMG bloc, +/- 0.3% is the range for the entire bloc today, so it appears that traders like other G10 currencies today for some reason I cannot fathom.

On the data front, we see Durable Goods (exp -4.0%, +0.2% ex Transport) as well as Case Shiller Home Prices (2.1%) and then Consumer Confidence (96.2).  Speaking of Consumer Confidence, in France this morning the latest reading was released at 87.0, three points lower than forecast and clearly trending down.  Perhaps the government’s problems are feeding into the national psyche.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It is difficult to get excited by markets during the last week of August, and if we add the time of year, when vacations are rife, to the ongoing White House bingo outcomes, the best position seems to be no position at all.  As to the dollar, if the Fed does start to ease policy at this time, with inflation still sticky, I do foresee a decline.  However, it is very difficult to look around the world and think, damn, I want to own THAT currency, whatever currency that might be.  Perhaps the one exception would be the Swiss franc, where they really do work to have sane monetary policies.

Good luck

Adf

A Final Bronx Cheer

Posted on by

Though markets are desperate for Jay
To cut, there is fear that he’ll say
It’s not yet the time
In this paradigm
As tariffs have caused disarray
 
But truly, Chair Jay’s greatest fear
Is that ere October this year
The Prez will have chosen
A new Chair and frozen
Him out with a final Bronx cheer

 

Yesterday saw the first substantial equity market move in nearly 3 weeks, with the NASDAQ declining 1.5% as concerns arose that the current extremely high valuations would have a more difficult time being maintained if the Fed does not ease policy as widely expected next month.  This resulted in all the Mag7 declining, which given they have been the driving force higher in the market, necessarily resulted in overall index declines.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of course, the question is, what made yesterday any different than previous sessions.  There were no earnings results of note, and arguably, the biggest tech news was the story about the US government taking a stake in Intel, something that seems likely to have been a positive.  However, there has been an increase in chatter about what Chair Powell is going to say on Friday at his Jackson Hole speech.  Notably, in the SOFR options market, there are a large, and still increasing, number of bets being placed that Powell will indicate 50bps is on the table in September.  But Wall St analysts continue to side with the patience crowd, explaining that while the current policy settings may be slightly restrictive, they are hardly suffocating for the economy.

While Powell has repeatedly blamed an uncertain impact of tariffs on his decision to maintain current policy settings, just like everything else, this is becoming extremely political.  Trump’s allies are lining up behind him and calling for immediate rate cuts to help support the economy.  At the same time, Trump’s political foes remain focused on preventing any Fed action that might help Trump, although they couch their arguments in terms of maintaining Fed ‘independence’.

However, last night was instructive in that two central banks, New Zealand and Indonesia, cut rates further while Sweden’s Riksbank, though standing pat, explained that more cuts are possible, if not likely, later this year.  While the PBOC did not cut rates, the pressure there is building as the economic situation is very clearly slowing down, as discussed last week after their data releases.  So, with most of the world cutting rates (Japan being the notable exception), pressure continues to mount on Powell and the Fed to pick up where they left off last December.

Hanging over both Powell’s speech and the September rate decision is the fact that Treasury Secretary Bessent explained yesterday that interviews for the next Fed chair would begin around Labor Day, just two weeks from now, and nearly eight months before Powell’s term ends.  This will almost certainly weaken Powell as other FOMC members and the market will look to whomever is selected for their views, with Powell serving out his term as a lame duck.  In fact, it is for this reason that my take is Powell’s speech at Jackson Hole will be less about policy and more an attempt to burnish his legacy.

And that’s where things stand.  With no data of note today, and yesterday’s housing data being mildly positive, but not enough to change macroeconomic opinions, the narrative writers are looking for something to say and Powell’s speech is where they have landed.  Absent a run of declining days, I put no stock in a change in the market temperature at this point.  So, let’s see how things behaved overnight.

In Asia, the Nikkei (-1.5%) had a rough night in a direct response to the US tech-led selloff.  Given that US markets have stabilized this morning, with futures unchanged at this hour (7:25), we need to see a continuation here before expecting a significant further decline there.  China (+1.1%), however, bucked that weaker trend, ostensibly on hopes that the ongoing trade talks with the US will prove fruitful.  Elsewhere in the region, Korea (-0.7%) and Taiwan (-3.0%) were both hit on the tech selloff blues but other markets, with less exposure to that sector were fine.  In Europe, it is a mixed picture with the DAX (-0.4%) the laggard after weaker than expected PPI indicated that current ECB policy needs to be more accommodative to help the country but may not be coming soon.  However, the rest of the continent is little changed.  surprisingly, UK stocks (+0.3%) are holding up well despite higher-than-expected CPI data which has adjusted analysts’ thoughts on whether the BOE will be able to cut again at their next meeting.

In the bond market, Treasury yields (-1bp) continue to trade in the middle of that band I showed yesterday, while European sovereign yields have also slipped between -1bp and -2bps this morning after the softer German price data.  The UK (-4bps) is a surprise as I would not have expected lower yields after a higher inflation reading.  Perhaps this is an indication that investors are expecting a much worse economic outcome from the UK going forward.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.3%) is bouncing, but it remains in a well-defined downtrend for now as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

To change this trajectory, we will need to see something alter the production schedule, which with peace on the table in Ukraine seems likely to bring more oil to market not less, or we will need to see a significantly better economic outlook that drives a substantial increase in demand, something which right now seems unlikely as well.  I cannot get on board the higher oil price bandwagon at this time.  One other thing weighing on oil is the fact that NatGas has been trending lower for the past 6 months and is now at levels not seen since last November.  In fact, those two charts look remarkably similar!

Source: tradingeconomcis.com

There is a real substitution effect here and currently oil is trading at a price that is about 4X the energy price of NatGas.  Until that arbitrage closes, and it will eventually, oil will have difficulty rallying in my view. 

In the metals markets, gold (+0.4%) which sold off a few dollars yesterday is rebounding although both silver and copper are soft this morning.  These markets are just not that interesting right now.

Finally, the dollar is little changed this morning with one real outlier, NZD (-1.2%) which responded to the dovish tones of the RBNZ last night and is pricing in more interest rate cuts now.  KRW (-0.4%) also fell on concerns over trade and the semiconductor results but otherwise, there is very little ongoing here.

The only data this morning is EIA oil inventories with a small draw anticipated.  The FOMC Minutes come at 2:00 and there will be a lot of digging to see if other members seemed to agree with Bowman and Waller in their dissents at the last meeting.  Bowman spoke yesterday, but was focused on her role as chief regulator, not monetary policy, although we hear from Waller this morning.

A down day in equities is not the end of the world despite much gnashing of teeth.  It remains difficult to get excited about markets right now.  Perhaps Mr Powell will shake things up on Friday, but my sense is we will need to wait for the next NFP data to get some action.

Good luck

Adf

PS. A reader explained to me that in Australia, black swans are the norm, not the remarkable case as here in the US.  I guess we will need to find a new term to discuss an unexpected surprise.

What Would You Choose?

Posted on by

As summer meanders along
No market is weak, nor’s it strong
But traders keep trading
With hope masquerading
As knowledge, though they know they’re wrong
 
The question is what sort of news
Can catalyze changes in views?
Seems rate cuts will not
And peace had its shot
Dear readers, just what would you choose?

 

My friend JJ (he writes the Market Vibes note) made a profound comment that described the current situation so well, I think it is worth repeating: 

“It is not that the news and fundamentals are uninteresting or unimportant. They are. But vol control has anesthetized every future, ETF, equity, and FX market, and the managers of it are making trillions on it. Therefore, it is likely this narcolepsy won’t end for a while.”

A point he has been making of late, and one with which I cannot argue, is that everything that is not algorithmic is dumb money as the algos drive it all.  And it is a fair point.  Market activity has ground to a halt, and while I have no proof, I would estimate it is even quieter than the typical year’s summer doldrums.  That seems remarkable given the panoply of news stories that exist and in other times would have had a major market impact.  Consider, war and peace in Ukraine, massive changes in federal regulations and administration priorities, and remarkable electoral shifts around the world, yet none of it matters.  Consider this chart of the US 10-year Treasury:

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The yield, which most afficionados agree is critical to not just US, but global, financial markets and activity, has largely traded between 4.0% and 4.5% since well before Mr Trump was elected.  The one thing that cannot be said is that the Trump administration has been boring.  More has happened on the fiscal front in the past six months than in entire presidential terms and yet yields are essentially unchanged since November 5th when Trump was elected.

JJ’s view is the massive increase in the use of options by retail traders has become the driving force.  Retail buys options, paying premium which decays away and that value accrues to the market making algorithms. The amounts of premium are huge, in the $trillions, and it is a straightforward business model that reaps huge rewards, so a lack of movement is the goal.  I cannot argue with that either.

However, the one thing I have learned over my too many years in the market is that no matter how smart you are, no matter how well you have considered the potential outcomes, reality will be different, and at some point, there will be a tipping point to change the market dynamic.  After all, Covid was not expected, nor even more importantly, the government responses to it which is what drove the market volatility.  I am pretty sure there is another true black swan out there, something nobody is discussing as it currently seems irrelevant or impossible, but which will alter the game.

I spent my trading career learning to manage risks while running a global FX options business, trying to profit, but more importantly preventing the huge drawdowns that end careers.  I spent my sales career trying to help my clients understand their FX risks and learn to mitigate them in the most cost-effective manner possible.  What I learned over that 40+ years is that while risks sometimes seem unimportant, or unimaginable, they exist.  Do not mistake the current state for the future state.  Things will change, although how I cannot currently imagine.

With that as preamble, let’s look at just how little things are moving.  Stocks did nothing in the US yesterday and movement overnight in Asia was lackluster as well (Nikkei -0.4%, Hang Seng -0.2%, CSI 300 -0.4%).  As I wrote above, there is just not that much that is exciting investors right now.  Europe, however, seems to be taking a positive stance on the Oval Office meeting with many of their leaders as perhaps peace in Ukraine, if it is coming, will be helpful for the continent.  Ostensibly, Presidents Trump and Putin discussed a closer economic relationship between the US and Russia, which if that came to pass, would undoubtedly rearrange some things in markets, largely to the benefit of Europe.  As to US futures, they are unchanged this morning, again.

Bond markets in Europe are exactly unchanged across the board, so much so that you would expect it was a holiday there.  Treasury yields have edged lower by -1bp, but as I explained above, are simply range trading.

I would argue the commodity markets are where there is the most potential for movement going forward as any type of US-Russian economic détente would almost certainly reduce oil prices substantially.  And, coincidentally, WTI (-1.25%) is falling this morning as hopes for a direct meeting between Putin and Zelensky, and with it the end of the war, are increasing.  Weirdly, gold (+0.35%) is not declining on that news, despite the idea that gold represents a haven against war.  Perhaps gold represents a haven against money supply growth, which if there is an economic détente, you can be sure will increase.  As to the other metals, very little movement there either.  In the vein of the lack of activity, perhaps the below gold chart is even a better descriptor of just how little activity has been going on since spring.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, but it, too, remains rangebound.  While much has been made of its weakness in the first half of the year, as though that calendar period had some special significance (it doesn’t), here too, things have simply ground to a halt.  Using the dollar index (DXY) as our proxy, you can see that this market, too, has done nothing for months.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Whether it’s G10 or EMG currencies, the movement remains desultory at best, and catatonic may be a better description.

So, let’s look at the data this week that will precede Chairman Powell’s speech Friday morning.

TodayHousing Starts1.30M
 Building Permits1.39M
WednesdayFOMC Minutes 
ThursdayInitial Claims226K
 Continuing Claims1960K
 Philly Fed6.0
 Flash Manufacturing PMI49.5
 Flash Services PMI53.7
 Existing Home Sales3.91M
 Leading Indicators-0.1%
FridayPowell Speech 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I think it is worthwhile to consider why we look at the Leading Indicators.  The original design was that it tracked a series of indicators that historically had presaged economic activity.  Ahead of recessions, these indicators turned lower and so it seemed a pretty good fit.  However, as you can see from the below chart from conference-board.org, the creators of the index, since 2021, when the index turned lower, it has been completely out of sync with the economy’s outcome.

As I have repeatedly written, models that were created pre-Covid, and many pre-GFC, simply no longer have any relevance to today’s reality.

On the whole, the most likely outcome today, like every day lately, is limited movement in either direction.  While I am sure a black swan exists, he is currently hibernating.

Good luck

Adf

Widely Decried

Posted on by

While tariffs are widely decried
By analysts, they are worldwide
But Trump’s latest scheme
To some, seems extreme
As license fees are codified
 
So, tech names, who’ve, taxes, deflected
Are now likely to be subjected
To payment of fees
To sell overseas
And revenues will be collected

 

One thing you can never say about President Trump is that he lacks innovative ideas.  Consider one of the biggest complaints over the past decades regarding US corporations; the fact that the tech companies (and drug companies) have been so effective at avoiding paying taxes based on the way they have gamed utilized the tax code and international treaties.  And this was not a partisan complaint as both sides of the aisle were constantly frustrated by large companies’ ability to not pay their “fair share” as it is often described.

It appears that President Trump has come up with a solution for this, charging a licensing fee for companies to sell overseas.  The big news over the weekend was that Nvidia and AMD are both going to pay a licensing fee of 15% of REVENUE on sales of chips to China.  In the case of Nvidia, that is anticipated to be some $2.5 billion with somewhat smaller numbers for AMD.  This is an excellent description of the process by @Kobeissiletter on X. 

I have often expressed the view that corporate taxation, if we are going to have it, ought not be on profits but on revenue.  Corporations are expert at reducing taxable income, maintaining a staff of lawyers and accountants to do just that.  But gaming top line revenues is much harder.  This gambit by President Trump is moving things in that direction.  And remarkably, given these license fees are for exports, it ought to be outside the consumer price chain in the US completely.

There is an article in the WSJ this morning titled, “The US Marches Toward State Capitalism With American Characteristics,” which outlines, and mildly complains, about the changes in the way the US government is dealing with the private sector under President Trump.  It discusses the purchase of 15% of MP Materials, the only US based miner/processor of rare earth minerals, and it discusses these license fees all under the guise of implying this is a bad direction.  And I completely understand that idea as governments tend to be terrible stewards of capital.  However, 25 years of Chinese unfettered access to Western markets while they have skirted the rules codified by the WTO have resulted in some significant national security challenges that can no longer be ignored.  Full marks to President Trump for creative methods to address these challenges, despite the wailing and teeth gnashing of economists.

But other than that story, as well as the ongoing back and forth regarding potential peace talks in the Russia-Ukraine war, not all that much has happened overnight.  For a change, markets are behaving like it is the summer doldrums, so perhaps we should be thankful for the respite.  As such, let’s take a look at how things have done and what we can anticipate this week with CPI and Retail Sales set to be released.

Friday’s US equity rally combined with the news that Nvidia and AMD will be able to export some chips to China saw modest gains there (+0.4%) and in Hong Kong (+0.2%) even though another major property company in China, China South City Holdings Ltd., is being forced into liquidation.  The property situation in China will continue to weigh on the economy there and given property investment was long seen as most Chinese families’ retirement nest egg, will undermine consumption for years.  Elsewhere in the region, there were more gainers (India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan) than laggards (Thailand, Philippines) with Japan closed for Mountain Day, a relatively new holiday, and other markets little changed.  

In Europe, though, screens are modestly red with losses on the order of -0.35% across the CAC, DAX and IBEX amid general uncertainties regarding the future economic direction and a lack of earnings positives.  At this hour (7:00), US futures are slightly higher, by 0.2%.

In the bond market, after last week’s auctions have been absorbed, Treasury yields have edged lower this morning, down -2bps, despite Fed funds futures’ probability of that September rate cut slipping to 88% from Friday’s 93%.  In fact, Fed Governor Bowman reiterated over the weekend that she would be voting for a cut at each of the three meetings left this year.  European sovereigns though are little changed, with some having seen yields edge higher by 1bp, as this appears to be a truly lackluster summer day.

Commodities are the only market that is seeing any movement of note, and it is not oil (+0.2%) which has been trading either side of unchanged since last night.  Rather, gold (-1.2%) is suffering this morning as you can see on the chart below as the promise of a potential peace in Ukraine seems to be removing some need for its haven status.  Of course, the thing to really note about the gold market is just how choppy trading has been as conflicting narratives continue to impinge on price movement.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This decline has pulled down both silver (-1.4%) and copper (-0.95%) with all this happening despite virtually no movement in the FX markets.

Turning to the dollar, one is hard pressed to find any substantial movement in either G10 or EMG currencies. The true outlier this morning is NOK (+0.4%) but otherwise, +/- 0.1% or less is the best description of the price action.  This is what a summer market really looks like!

On the data front, we do get some important information as follows:

TuesdayRBA Rate Decision3.60% (current 3.85%)
 CPI0.2% (2.8% Y/Y)
 Ex food & energy0.3% (3.0% Y/Y)
 Monthly Budget Statement-$140B
ThursdayPPI0.2% (2.5% Y/Y)
 Ex food & energy0.2% (2.9% Y/Y)
 Initial Claims226K
 Continuing Claims1960K
FridayRetail Sales0.5%
 Ex Autos0.3%
 IP0.0%
 Capacity Utilization77.6%
 Michigan Sentiment62.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With all the hoopla about the firing of Ms McEnterfar at BLS, you can be sure that there will be lots of discussion on the CPI data regardless of the outcome.  However, as the Inflation Guy pointed out last week, imputing the bottom 30% of items in the basket, which represent something on the order of 2.5% of the total price impact, is likely to have no impact whatsoever.  We also hear from a bunch of Fed speakers, four to be exact, although Richmond Fed President Barkin will regale us twice.  Now that there are more calls for a September cut, it will be interesting to see who remains patient and who is ready to move.

And that’s all there is today.  It is hard to get excited about too much movement given the lack of obvious catalysts.  Of course, one never knows what will emanate from the White House but look for a quiet one, I think.

Good luck

Adf

You Need to Squint

Posted on by

While data continues to print
It doesn’t give much of a hint
To where things are going
Unless you’re all-knowing
And even then, you need to squint
 
The reason for this situation
Is passive flows constant inflation
No matter the news
Or anyone’s views
The target funds need their proration

 

The hardest thing about macroeconomic analysis is trying to discern whether it has any impact on market movement.  For the bulk of my career, my observation was that while there were always periods when flows dominated fundamentals, they were short-lived periods and eventually those fundamentals returned to dominance in price action.  This was true in equity markets, where earnings were the long-term driver, outlasting short-term bouts or particular manias and this was true in FX markets, where economic performance and the ensuing interest rate differentials were the key long-term driver of exchange rates.  Bond markets were virtually always a reflection of inflation expectations, at least government bond markets and commodities were simple products of supply and demand of the physical stuff.

Alas, since the GFC, and more importantly, the global central bank response to the GFC, flooding financial markets with massive amounts of liquidity, G10 economies have become increasingly finanicialized to the point where the underlying fundamentals have less and less impact and funds flows are the driving force.  The below chart I have created from FRED data shows the ratio of M2 relative to GDP.  For decades, this ratio hovered between 53% and 60%, chopping back and forth with the ebbs and flows of the economy during recessions and expansions.  But the GFC changed things dramatically and then the pandemic and its ensuing response put financialization on steroids.

By 2011, this ratio hit 60% for the first time since 1965, and it has never looked back.  The result is that there is ever more money sloshing around the economy looking for a home with the best return.  This is part and parcel as to why we have seen both massive asset price inflation as well as consumer price inflation, too much money chasing too few goods.  And this is the underlying facet in why funds flows, whether between asset classes or between nations, are the new driving force of market price action.  Michael Green (@profplum99 on X) has done the most, and most impressive, work on the rise of passive investing, which is a direct consequence of this financialization.  The upshot is, as long as money comes into the system (your semi-monthly 401K flows are the largest) they continue to buy stocks regardless of anything fundamental.  And as almost all of it is capitalization weighted, they buy the Mag7 and maybe some other bits and bobs.  It doesn’t matter about fundamentals; it only matters how much they have to buy.

So, with that caveat as to why fundamental macro analysis has been doing so poorly lately, a look at the data tells us…nothing really.  As I wrote yesterday, the two main blocs of the economy, goods production and services production, are out of sync, with marginal strength in services outweighing marginal weakness in goods production and resulting in slow growth.  Whether you look at the employment situation, the ISM data or the inflation data, none of it points in a consistent and strong direction.

For instance, yesterday’s productivity and Labor cost data were better than expected, far better than last quarter’s and pointing to an improved growth outcome.  However, if we look at the past five years of this data, we can see that labor costs have grown dramatically faster than productivity as per the below chart (ULC in grey, Productivity in blue).

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Looking at this, it is no surprise that price inflation has risen so much, given labor’s impact on prices.  But, again, this is merely another impact of the massive flow of money into the economy over the past 15 years. 

Virtually every piece of data we get has been significantly impacted by this financialization which is one reason that previous econometric models, built prior to the GFC, no longer offer effective analysis.  The system is very different.  I continue to believe that over time, fundamentals will reassert themselves, but that belief structure is under increased pressure.  Perhaps YOLO and BTFD are the future, at least until our AI overlords come into their own and enslave the human population.

In the meantime, let’s look at what happened overnight.  Yesterday’s mixed, and relatively dull, US session was followed by a mixed session in Asia with Tokyo (+1.85%) soaring on news that there were going to be adjustments, in Japan’s favor as well as rebates, to the tariff schedule.  However, both the Hang Seng (-0.9%) and CSI 300 (-0.3%) saw no such love from either the Trump administration or investors.  As to the rest of the region, red (Korea, Australia, India, Thailand, Singapore) was more common than green (Malaysia).  Apparently, tariff adjustments are not universal.  In Europe, both Spain (+0.8%) and Italy (+0.8%) are having solid sessions but they are alone in that with the other major bourses (DAX 0.0%, FTSE 100 0.0%, CAC +0.2%) not taking part in the fun.  US futures, at this hour (7:30) are higher by about 0.4%.

Bond markets, meanwhile, are sleeping through the final day of the week, with Treasury yields unchanged on the day and European sovereign yields having edged higher by just 1bp across the board.  It seems, nobody cares right now.  After all, it is August and most of Europe is on vacation anyway.

Commodity markets are showing oil (+0.6%) bouncing off its recent lows, but this seems more about trading activity than fundamental changes.  Perhaps there will be a Russia-Ukraine peace, but it is certainly not clear.  Trump’s tariffs on India for continuing to buy Russian oil are also having an impact, but as I showed yesterday, I believe the trend remains modestly lower.  Gold (-0.3%) is currently lower but has been extremely choppy as you can see from the 5-minute chart below

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This is a market where supply and demand dynamics have been impacted by both tariffs and the interplay between financialized markets (i.e. paper gold or futures) and the actual metal.  There are many theories as to different players trying to manipulate the price either higher (the Trump administration in order to revalue Ft Knox holdings) or lower (the ‘cabal’ of banks that have ostensibly been preventing the price from rising according to the gold bug conspiracy theorists).  Recently, there has apparently been less central bank demand, but that can return at any time based on political decisions.  I continue to believe that it is an important part of any portfolio, but it should be tucked away and forgotten in that vein.  As to the other metals, they are little changed this morning.

Finally, the dollar is stronger this morning, as the euro (-0.3%) and yen (-0.65%) are both under pressure and leading the way.  In fact, virtually every G10 currency is weaker (CAD is unchanged) and yet the DXY seems to be weaker as well. Something is amiss there.  Meanwhile, EMG currencies are mostly down on the session with KRW (-0.5%) the laggard, but weakness in INR (-0.2%), PLN (-0.25%) and CZK (-0.25%). 

On the data front, there is none today.  Yesterday, Atlanta Fed president Bostic explained his view that only one rate cut was likely this year, which is not what we have been hearing from other FOMC members.  Obviously, there is still uncertainty at the Fed, but they also have more than a month to decide.  Today, we hear from KC Fed president Alberto Musalem, one of the more hawkish members, so it will be interesting to see if he has changed his tune.

I would contend that confusion is the driving force in markets because data markers are not pointing in one direction nor are Fed speakers.  But it is a Friday in August so I suspect it will be a quieter day as traders look to escape to the beach for the weekend.  This morning’s trends, a higher dollar and higher stock prices, seem likely to prevail for the day.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

A Bevy of Doves

Posted on by

The Fed has a bevy of doves
Whose world view was given some shoves
When Trump was elected
As they were subjected
To boxing, though without the gloves
 
But suddenly, they’ve found their voice
And rate cuts are now a real choice
So, bad news is good
And traders all should
Buy stocks every day and rejoice

 

Apparently, the signal has been given from on high at the Marriner Eccles building that discussing rate cuts is permitted.  Patience is no longer the virtue it was just last week.  In the past two days, three different FOMC members, Daly, Cook and Goolsbee, have returned to form and are quite open to cutting rates sooner after the recent employment data.  I would contend that rate cuts are their natural stance, but they were discouraged from expressing that view because it would put them in sync with the president, something that they very clearly have worked to avoid.  Regardless of the history, the Fed funds futures market is now pricing in a 93.2% probability of a cut next month as you can see below.  Perhaps more interesting is the fact this probability has risen from 37.7% in just the past week.  My how quickly things can change.

Source: cmegroup.com

I’m sure you recall that one of the key reasons Chairman Powell and his acolytes described the need to remain patient was the potential impact of tariffs on inflation.  This was even though the universal view was tariffs, a new tax, would be a one-off price increase, so would have no long-term impact, and that higher interest rates would do nothing to fight this particular cause of inflation, just like the price of food doesn’t respond to interest rates.  However, I want to highlight a piece from the WSJ this morning that asks a very good question, why wasn’t Powell concerned about all the tax increases from the previous administration, or for that matter, the tax increase that would have occurred had the BBB not been enacted.  Again, all the discussion that the Fed is apolitical is simply not true and never has been.

Moving on, I wanted to follow up on yesterday’s discussion as I, along with many market observers, have been trying to come to grips with the inconsistency in the data.  Some is strong, other parts are weak, and it is difficult to arrive at a broad conclusion.  My good friend, the Inflation_Guy™ put out a podcast the other day and made an excellent point, historically, there was a synchronicity between activity in the goods sector and the services sector, so when things in either sector started to decline (or rise) it took the other sector along with it.  But that is not currently the case.  

Instead, what we have seen is asynchronous behavior with the correlation between prices in the two sectors essentially independent of each other over the past five years, rather than tracking each other as they had done for the previous 30 years.  Extending the price action to overall activity, which seems a reasonable concept as prices follow the activity, depending on the data you observe, you may see strength or weakness, rather than everything heading in the same direction.  However, it is worthwhile to remember that systems in nature eventually do synchronize (see this fantastic clip) and so eventually, I suspect that both sectors will do so and a full blown recession (or expansion) will materialize.  Just not this week!

Which takes us to markets and how they have been responding to all the tariff news.  I think you can make one of the following two arguments regarding equity investors; either they have absorbed the tariff information and ensuing changes in trade behavior and have decided that earnings will continue to grow apace, or, they have no idea that there is a cliff ahead and like the lemmings they are, they are rushing toward the abyss.  Perhaps it is simply that President Trump has discussed tariffs so much that they have become the norm in any analysis thought process, and so modest adjustments don’t matter.  But whatever the reason, we continue to see strength pretty much across the board here.

The rally in the US yesterday was followed by strength across almost all of Asia with gains in Tokyo (+0.7%) and Hong Kong (+0.7%) as well as Korea, India and almost all regional bourses.  China, however, was unchanged on the session after their trade balance rose a less than expected $98.2B, as imports rose more than expected.  However, as this X post makes clear, it should be no surprise given the renminbi’s real exchange rate continues to fall, hence their exports remain quite competitive, tariffs or not.  As to Europe, strength is the word here as well (DAX +1.5%, CAC +1.2%, IBEX +0.5%) although the FTSE 100 (-0.5%) is lagging ahead of this morning’s expected BOE rate cut.  And don’t worry, US futures are higher across the board as well.

In the bond market, yields have been edging higher with Treasury yields up 2bps after yesterday’s 10-year auction was not as well received as had been hoped, but then, yields were 25 basis points lower than just a week ago, so demand was a little bit tepid.  European sovereign yields are also edging higher, mostly higher by 1bp and we saw the same thing overnight in JGBs, a 2bp rise.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.6%) has found a short-term bottom, but is just below $65/bbl, which seems like a trading pivot of late as can be seen by the chart below from tradingeconomics.com.  As my personal bias is that the price is likely to decline going forward, the 6-month trend line heading down does appeal to me, but for now, choppy is the future.

Meanwhile, metals markets are in fine fettle this morning (Au +0.4%, Ag +1.4%, Cu +0.15%) as the dollar’s recent weakness seems to be having the expected effect on this segment of the market.

Speaking of the dollar, as more tariffs get agreed, I am confused by its weakness since I was assured that the response to higher US tariffs would be a stronger dollar.  But arguably, the fact that the Fed is suddenly appearing much more dovish is the driver right now, and while the euro is little changed this morning, we are seeing the pound (+0.4%), Aussie (+0.3%) and Kiwi (+0.4%) all move up, although the rest of the G10 space is higher by scant basis points.  In the EMG bloc, movement, while mostly higher in these currencies, is also measured in mere basis points, with INR (+0.25%) the largest mover by far.  Arguably, it is fair to say the dollar is little changed.

On the data front, the BOE did cut rates 25bps as expected, although the vote was 5/4, a bit more hawkish than forecast which is arguably why the pound is holding up so well.  US data brings Initial (exp 221K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims as well as Nonfarm Productivity (2.0%) and Unit Labor Costs (1.5%).  This is a much better mix of this data than what we saw in Q1 with productivity falling -1.5% while ULC rose 6.6%.  That was a stagflationary outcome.  In addition, we hear from two more Fed speakers, Bostic and Musalem, as the Fed gets back in gear this week.  It will be interesting to see if they are more dovish as neither would be considered a dove ex ante.

Apparently, we are back on board the bad news is good for stocks train, and it is hard to fight absent a collapse in earnings or some other catalyst.  As such, with visions of Fed cuts dancing in traders’ heads, I suspect the dollar will remain under pressure for a while.

Good luck

Adf

Typically Dumb

Posted on by

On Friday, the market was sure
The end was nigh, and we’d be poor
The dollar was sold
And stocks mem’ry-holed
While bonds sashayed like haute couture
 
But somehow, the end did not come
As markets around the world hum
Perhaps we should learn
That markets do churn
And pundits are typically dumb

 

I admit to being confused this morning as by Friday evening, the entire narrative was that the recession was here, equity markets had peaked, and the dollar was set to collapse.  All the negative outcomes that have been prognosticated by doom pornsters were arriving and Friday was merely the first step.

And yet, here we are this morning, and not only did the sun rise in the East again, but equity markets throughout Asia also saw far more winners (China +0.4%, Hong Kong +0.9%, Korea +0.9%, India +0.5%, Singapore +1.0%, Thailand +1.25%, Philippines +0.7%) than laggards (Taiwan -0.2%, Malaysia -0.4%, Indonesia -1.0%, New Zealand -0.35%).  As to Europe, it is universally green (DAX +1.25%, CAC +0.8%, IBEX +1.4%, FTSE 100 +0.3%) and US futures, at this hour (6:35) are higher by 0.7% or so.  

Meanwhile, the dollar is higher against the euro (-0.15%), yen (-0.2%) and Swiss franc (-0.5%), although we have seen modest gains in some G10 currencies (GBP +0.15%, AUD +0.15%).  And if we look across the EMG bloc, while KRW (+0.4%) has rallied along with CNY (+0.2%), those are the outliers with the rest of the space softer by about -0.2% or so.  In other words, there has not yet been a wholesale rejection of the dollar on global foreign exchanges.

As to bond yields, after Friday’s dramatic decline, falling 15bps in the hour after the NFP report, they have largely stagnated, rising 1bp this morning.  European sovereign yields have slipped about 3bps on average as they continue the Friday move having closed before all the fun was finished.  In fact, while I have chosen the EURUSD exchange rate as a graph to depict the movement, basically every chart looks the same as this with a dislocation at the 8:30 mark on Friday and then a new range quickly established.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I highlight this because so frequently, the narrative gets ahead of itself, and Friday was one of those days.  Yes, as I explained last night, the NFP data was weak, albeit still positive regardless of the fireworks surrounding the firing of the BLS Commissioner.  And remember, the idea that President Trump fired McEntarfar because the data displeased him does not mean she was not incompetent.  Certainly, nothing in her career demonstrates keen economic insights.  But that is still the talking point du jour.

However, that is a tired story at this point.  In fact, arguably, the reason it is getting so much press is that there is precious little else new to discuss amid the summer doldrums.  After all, the Russia Ukraine war continues apace with no end in sight, although it seems the rhetoric has increased with ex-president Medvedev seeming to threaten nuclear war and the US moving attack submarines closer to Russia.  

Texas Democratic state legislators have fled the state to avoid a special session where redistricting is due to be completed, so that has a lot of headlines, but seems likely to end like the last time this occurred, with the redistricting being completed, and Fed Governor Adriana Kugler stepped down a few months earlier than her term ends which opens another seat on the Fed for Mr Trump to fill.  

Of these stories, while our antenna should be raised given the Russia nuclear war scenario, it still seems a very low probability event, while Texas may matter in the midterm elections if they successfully redistrict as it is supposed to ensure another 5 Republican seats in the House.  But a new Fed governor, perhaps a precursor to the next Chair will have tongues wagging in the market until the seat is filled, and then until Powell is gone.

So, take your pick as to what is important.  Personally, I think the actual payroll data is the most important issue as we continue to see significant gyrations within the numbers.  Less government hiring (I read that 154,000 federal employees took the buyout) is an unalloyed good for the nation.  After all, if nothing else, given the average federal government employee salary is $106,382 (according to Grok) then that is about $16.4 billion less expenditure by the Federal government.  Every little bit helps.  In fact, all the data we have seen of late shows that the private sector continues to grow while the public sector is shrinking.  Over time, that is undoubtedly a better situation for the US and will reflect in the value of US assets.

But that’s really all there is to discuss, so let’s look at the data upcoming this week:

TodayFactory Orders-4.9%
 -ex Transport0.1%
TuesdayTrade Balance-$61.6B
 ISM Services51.5
ThursdayBOE Rate Decision4.00% (-0.25%)
 Initial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1947K
 Nonfarm Productivity1.9%
 Unit Labor Costs1.6%
 Mexican Rate Decision7.75% (-0.25%)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In other words, while we will hear from two more central banks as they cut rates (compared to a Fed that remains on hold, for now) it is hard to get that negative on the dollar.  Fed funds futures are pricing an 87% chance of a rate cut in September and now a 56% chance of three cuts this year, one at each meeting left, so that will weigh on the buck a bit, but if the US is cutting because recession is arriving, the economic situation elsewhere will be more dire.  After all, the US remains the consumer of last resort, and if the US pulls back, everyone else will feel it.

The big picture remains that the broader dollar trend is lower, but it is starting to make a case that trend is ending.  The data this week is largely second tier, and we need to wait until next week for CPI.  I have a feeling we will see very little net movement until then.

Good luck

Adf