Tag Archives: #FOMC

What Havoc it Wreaks

Posted on by

Today, for the first time in weeks
Comes news that will thrill data geeks
It’s CPI Day
So, what will it say?
We’ll soon see what havoc it wreaks
 
The forecast is zero point three
Too high, almost all would agree
But Jay and the Fed
When looking ahead
Will cut rates despite what they see

 

Spare a thought for the ‘essential’ BLS employees who were called back to the office during the shutdown so that they could prepare this month’s CPI report.  The importance of this particular report is it helps define the COLA adjustments to Social Security for 2026, so they wanted a real number, not merely the interpolation that would have otherwise been used.  Expectations for the outcome are Headline (0.4% M/M, 3.1% Y/Y) and Core (0.3% M/M, 3.1% Y/Y) with both still well above the Fed’s 2% target.  As an aside, we are also due Michigan Sentiment (55.0), but I suspect that will have far less impact on markets.

If we consider the Fed and its stable prices mandate, one could fairly make the case that they have not done a very good job, on their own terms, when looking at the chart below which shows that the last time Core CPI was at or below their self-defined target of 2.0% was four and one-half years ago in March 2021.  And it’s not happening this month either.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, when we consider the Fed and its toolkit, the primary monetary policy tool it uses is the adjustment of short-term interest rates.  The FOMC meets next Tuesday and Wednesday and will release its latest statement Wednesday afternoon followed by Chairman Powell’s press conference.  A quick look at the Fed funds futures market pricing shows us that despite the Fed’s singular inability to push inflation back toward its own target using its favorite tool, it is going to continue to cut interest rates and by the end of this year, Fed funds seem highly likely to be 50bps lower than their current level.

Source: cmegroup.com

The other tool that the Fed utilizes to address its monetary policy goals is the size of its balance sheet, as ever since the GFC and the first wave of ‘emergency’ QE, buying (policy ease) and selling (policy tightening) bonds has been a key part of their activities.  As you can see from the chart below, despite the 125bps of interest rate cuts since September of 2024 designed to ease policy, they continue to shrink the balance sheet (tighten policy) which may be why they have had net only a modest impact on things in the economy.  Driving with one foot on the gas and one on the brake tends to impede progress.

But now, the word is the Fed will completely stop balance sheet shrinkage by the end of the year, something we are likely to hear next Wednesday, as there has been much discussion amongst the pointy-head set about whether the Fed’s balance sheet now contains merely “ample” reserves rather than the previous description of “abundant” reserves.  And this is where it is important to understand Fedspeak, because on the surface, those two words seem awfully similar.  As I sought an official definition of each, I couldn’t help but notice that they both are synonyms of plentiful.

These are the sorts of things that, I believe, reduces the Fed’s credibility.  They sound far more like Humpty Dumpty (“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”) than like a group that analyses data to help in decision making.  

At any rate, no matter today’s result, it is pretty clear that Fed funds rates are going lower.  The thing is, the market has already priced for that outcome, so we will need to see some significant data surprises, either much weaker or stronger, to change views in interest rate sensitive markets like bonds and FX.

As to the shutdown, there is no indication that it is going to end anytime soon.  The irony is that the continuing resolution passed by the House was due to expire on November 21st.  it strikes me that even if they come back on Monday, they won’t have time to do the things that the CR was supposed to allow.  

Ok, let’s look at what happened overnight.  Yesterday’s rally in the US was followed by strength in Japan (+1.35%) after PM Takaichi indicated that they would spend more money but didn’t need to borrow any more (not sure how that works) while both China (+1.2%) and HK (+0.7%) also rallied on the confirmation that Presidents Trump and Xi will be meeting next week.  Elsewhere, Korea and Thailand had strong sessions while India, Taiwan and Australia all closed in the red.  And red is the color in Europe this morning with the CAC (-0.6%) the main laggard after weaker than forecast PMI data, while the rest of Europe and the UK all suffer very modest losses, around -0.1%.  US futures, though, are higher by 0.35% at this hour (7:20).

In the bond market, Treasury yields edged higher again overnight, up 1bp while European sovereigns have had a rougher go of things with yields climbing between 3bps and 4bps across the board.  While the French PMI data was weak, Germany and the rest of the continent showed resilience which, while it hasn’t seemed to help equities, has hurt bonds a bit.  Interestingly, despite the Takaichi comments about more spending, JGB yields slipped -1bp.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.7%) continues its rebound from the lows at the beginning of the week as the sanctions against the Russian oil majors clearly have the market nervous.  Of course, despite the sharp rally this week, oil remains in the middle of its trading range, and at about $62/bbl, cannot be considered rich.  Meanwhile, metals markets continue their recent extraordinary volatility, with pretty sharp declines (Au -1.7%, Ag -0.9%, Pt -2.1%) after sharp rallies yesterday.  There seems to be quite the battle ongoing here with positions being flushed out and delivery questions being raised for both futures and ETFs.  Nothing has changed my long-term view that fiat currencies will suffer vs. precious metals, but the trip can be quite volatile in the short run.

Finally, the dollar continues to creep higher vs. its fiat compatriots, with JPY (-.25%) pushing back toward recent lows (dollar highs) after the Takaichi spending plan announcements.  But, again, while the broad trend is clear, the largest movement is in PLN (-0.4%) hardly the sign of a major move.

And that’s all there is today.  We await the data and then go from there.  Even if the numbers are right at expectations, 0.3% annualizes to about 3.6%, far above the Fed’s target and much higher than we had all become accustomed to in the period between the GFC and Covid.  But remember, central bankers, almost to a wo(man) tend toward the dovish side, so I think we all need to be prepared for higher prices and weaker fiat currencies, although still, the dollar feels like the best of a bad lot.

There will be no poetry Monday as I will be heading to the AFP conference in Boston to present about a systematic way to more effectively utilize FX collars as a hedging tool.  But things will resume on Tuesday.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Ere Recession Arose

Posted on by

There once was a Fed Chair named Jay
Who fought ‘gainst the prez every day
He tried to explain
That tariffs brought pain
So higher rates needed to stay
 
But data turned out to expose
The job market, which had no clothes
So, he and his friends
Were forced, in the end
To cut ere recession arose

 

The Fed cut 25bps yesterday, as widely expected (although I went out on a limb and called for 50bps) and markets, after all was said and done by Chair Powell, saw equities mixed with the DJIA rising 0.6% while the S&P 500 and NASDAQ both slipped slightly.  Treasury yields rose 5bps which felt much more like some profit taking after a month-long rally, than the beginning of a new trend as per the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Gold rallied instantaneously on the cut news, trading above $3700/oz, but slipped back nearly 2% as Powell started speaking and the dollar fell sharply on the news but rebounded to close higher on the day as per the below chart from tradingeconomics.com.  See if you can determine when the statement was released and when Powell started to speak.

Did we learn very much from this meeting?  I think we learned two things, one which is a positive and one which is not.  On the positive side, there is clearly a very robust discussion ongoing at the Fed with respect to how FOMC members see the future evolving.  This was made clear in the dot plot as even the rest of 2025 sees a major split in expected outcomes.  But more importantly, looking into the future, there is certainly no groupthink ongoing, which is a wonderful thing.  Simply look at the dispersion of the dots for each year.

Source: federalreserve.gov

The negative, though, is that Chairman Powell is very keen to spin a narrative that seems at odds with the data that they released in the SEP.  In other words, the flip side of the idea that there is a robust discussion is that nobody there has a clue about what is happening in the economy, or at least Powell is not willing to admit to their forecasts, and that is a problem given their role in policy making.

It was a little surprising that only newly seated Governor Miran voted for 50bps with last meeting’s dissenters happy to go with 25bps.  But I have a feeling that the commentary going forward, which starts on Monday of next week, is going to offer a variety of stories.  If guidance from Fed speakers contradicts one another, exactly where is it guiding us?  (Please know I have always thought that forward guidance was one of the worst policy implementations in the Fed’s history.)

Moving on, the other central banks that have announced have done exactly as expected with both Canada and Norway cutting 25bps.  Shortly, the BOE will announce their decision with market expectations for a 7-2 vote to leave rates on hold, especially after yesterday’s 3.8% CPI reading.  Then, all eyes will turn to Tokyo tonight where the BOJ seems highly likely to leave rates on hold there as well.

If you think about it, it is remarkable that equity markets around the world continue to rally broadly at a time when central banks around the world are cutting rates because they are concerned that economic activity is slowing and they seek to prevent a recession.  Something about that sequence seems out of sorts, but then, I freely admit that markets move for many reasons that seem beyond logic.

Ok, having reviewed the immediate market response to the Fed, let’s see how things are shaping up this morning.  Asian equity markets had both winners (Tokyo +1.15%, Korea +1.4%, Taiwan +1.3%, India +0.4%) and laggards, (China -1.2%, HK 1.4%, Australia -0.8%, Malaysia -0.8%) with the rest of the region seeing more laggards than gainers.  The China/HK story seems to be profit taking related while the gainers all alleged that the prospect of another 50bps of cuts from the Fed this year is bullish.  Meanwhile, in Europe, while the UK (+0.2%) is biding its time ahead of the BOE announcement, there has been real strength in Germany (+1.2%), France (+1.15%) and Italy (+0.85%) while Spain (+0.25%) is only modestly firmer.  While there was no data of note released, we did hear from ECB VP de Guindos who said the ECB may not be done cutting rates.  Clearly that got some investors excited.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:55), they are solidly higher, on the order of 0.8% or more.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are backing off the highs seen yesterday and have slipped -4bps, hovering just above 4.0% on the 10-year.  European sovereign yields are essentially unchanged this morning as were JGB yields overnight.  It seems investors were completely prepared for the central bank actions and had it all priced in.  I guess the real question is are those investors prepared for the fact that the Fed is no longer that concerned about inflation and will allow it to rise further?  My guess there is they are not, but then, that’s where QE/YCC comes into play.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.25%) is slightly lower this morning despite Ukraine attacking two more Russian refineries last night.  What makes that particularly interesting is that the EIA inventory data showed a massive net draw of oil and products last week of more than 11 million barrels, seemingly a bullish signal.  But hey, I’m an FX guy so maybe supply and demand in oil markets works differently!  In metals, gold (+0.2%) and silver (+0.4%) continue to rebound from their short-term lows from yesterday.  It is abundantly clear that there is growing demand for alternatives to fiat currencies.

Speaking of which, in the fiat world, rumors of the dollar’s demise remain greatly exaggerated.  After yesterday afternoon’s gyrations discussed above, it is largely unchanged this morning with some outlier moves in smaller currencies, NZD (-0.5%), ZAR (+0.3%), KRW (-0.3%) while amongst the true majors, only JPY (-0.25%) has moved any distance at all.  

***BOE Leaves rates on hold, as expected, with 7-2 vote, as expected.***

Turning to this morning’s data, we see the weekly Initial (exp 240K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims as well as Philly Fed (2.3), then at 10:00 we get Leading Indicators (-0.2%).  Something I read was that last week’s Initial Claims number of 263K was caused by a data glitch in Texas, implying it was overstated.  I imagine we will find out more on that this morning.  

Recapping all we learned yesterday and overnight, the Fed seems reasonably likely to cut at both of their last two meetings this year, but expect only one cut in 2026, which is at least 50bps less of cuts than had been expected prior to the meeting.  Meanwhile, equity markets don’t seem to care and continue to rally while bond investors remain under a spell, believing the Fed will fight inflation effectively.  Gold is under no such spell, and the dollar is the outlet for all of it, toing and froing on the back of various theories of the day.  If forced to guess, I do believe there is a bit more weakness in the dollar in the near-term, but do not look for a collapse.  In fact, I suspect that as investment flows into the US pick up, we will see a reversal of note by the middle of next year.

Good luck

Adf

Throw in the Towel

Posted on by

All eyes are on Chairman Jay Powell
And if he will throw in the towel
Or will he still fight
Inflation? Oh, right
He caved as the hawks all cried foul!
 
So, twenty-five’s baked in the cake
While fifty would be a mistake
If fighting inflation
Is his obligation
Though half may, Trump’s thirst, somewhat slake

 

Well, it’s Frabjous Fed Day and there will be a great deal of commentary on what may happen and what it all means.  Of course, none of us really knows at this point, but I assure you by this afternoon, almost all pundits will explain they had it right.  

At any rate, my take is as follows, FWIW.  I believe the huge revision to NFP data has got the FOMC quite concerned.  Prior to that, they were smug in their contention that patience was a virtue and their caution because of the uncertain price impact of tariffs was warranted given the underlying strength in the jobs market.  Now, not only has that underlying strength been shown to be a mirage, but the import price data released yesterday, showing that Y/Y, import prices are flat, is further evidence that tariffs have not been a significant driver of inflation.  If you look at the chart below of Y/Y import prices for the past 5 years, you can see that since April’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariff announcements, they have not risen at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With that in mind, if you are the Fed, and you are data dependent, as they claim to be, and the data shows weakening employment and stable prices in the area you had been highlighting, you have no choice but to cut.  The question then becomes, 25bps or 50bps?  While the market is pricing just a 6% probability of a 50bp cut, given there are almost certainly three Governor votes for 50bps (Waller, Bowman and Miran) and the underlying central bank tendency is toward dovishness, I am going to go out on a limb and call for 50bps.  Powell and the Fed have already been proven wrong, and the only thing worse for them than seeming to cave to pressure from the White House would be standing pat and being blamed for causing a recession.  

With that in mind, my prognostications for market responses are as follows:

  • The dollar will weaken pretty much across the board with a move as much as -1% possible
  • Precious metals will rally sharply, making new highs for the move as this will be proof positive that the Fed has tacitly raised its inflation target from the previous 2%.  In fact, my take is 3% is the new 2%, at least until we spend a long time at 4%.
  • Equity markets will take the news well, at least initially, as the algos will be programmed to buy, but the concern will have to grow that slowing economic activity will impair earnings going forward, and multiples will suffer with higher inflation.  I continue to fear a correction here.
  • Bonds are tricky here as they have been rallying aggressively for the past six weeks and that could well have been ‘buying the rumor’ ahead of the meeting.  So, it is not hard to make the case that bonds sell off, and long end yields rise in response to 50bps.

On the other hand, if they cut 25bps, and sound hawkish in the statement or Powell’s presser, I don’t imagine there will be much movement of note.   I guess we’ll see in a while.

Until then, let’s look at the overnight price action.  Yesterday’s modest declines in US equities looked far more like consolidation after strong runs higher than like the beginning of the end.  The follow on in Asia was mixed with Tokyo (-0.25%) after export data was weak, especially in the auto sector, while HK (+1.8%) and China (+0.6%) both rallied on the prospect of reduced trade tensions between the US and China based on the upcoming meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi.  Elsewhere in the region, Korea, Taiwan and Australia fell while India, Malaysia and Indonesia all rallied, the latter on the back of a surprise 25bp rate cut by Bank Indonesia.

In Europe, the picture is also mixed with Germany (-0.2%), France (-0.4%) and Italy (-1.2%) all under pressure, with Italy noticeably feeling the pain of potential domestic moves that will hurt bank profitability with increased taxes there to offset tax cuts for individuals.  Spain is flat and the UK (+0.25%) slightly firmer after inflation data there showed 3.8% Y/Y headline, and 3.6% Y/Y core, as expected and still far higher than the BOE’s 2.0% target.  While the BOE meets tomorrow, and no policy change is expected, if the Fed cuts 50bps, do not be surprised to see 25bps from the Old Lady.  US futures at this hour (7:30) are essentially unchanged.

In the bond market, Treasury yields continue to creep lower ahead of the meeting, slipping another 2bps this morning and now trading at 4.01%, the lowest level since Liberation Day and the initial fears of economic disaster in the US.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

You can see the trend for the past six months remains lower and appears to be accelerating right now. Meanwhile, as is often the case, European sovereign yields are following Treasury yields and they are lower by between -1bp and -2bps across the board.  Nothing to see here.

Commodity markets have seen the most movement overnight with oil (-0.7%) topping a bit while gold (-0.65%), silver (-2.5%) and copper (-1.8%) have all seen some profit taking ahead of the FOMC meeting.  Now, there are plenty of profits to take given the 10% rallies we have seen in gold and silver in the past month.  In fact, I lightened up some of my gold position yesterday as well!

Finally, the dollar, which fell pretty sharply yesterday is bouncing a bit this morning.  Using the DXY as proxy, it came close to the lows seen back on July 1st, as you can see in the chart below. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But remember, as you step away from the day-to-day, the dollar is hardly weak.  Rather, it is much closer to the middle of its long-term price action as evidenced by the longer view below.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

There is a lot of discussion on FinX (nee FinTwit) about whether we are about to bounce or if the dollar is going to collapse.  But it is hard to look at the chart directly above and get the feeling that things are out of hand in either direction.  Now, relative to some other currencies, there are trends in place that don’t impact the DXY, but matter.  Notably, CNY and MXN have both been strengthening slowly for the bulk of the year and are now at levels not seen for several years.  given the importance of both these nations with respect to trade with the US, this is where Mr Trump must be happiest as it clearly is weighing on their export statistics.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ahead of the FOMC meeting, we do get a few data points, with Housing Starts (exp 1.37M) and Building Permits (1.37M) leading off at 8:30.  Then at 9:45 the BOC interest rate decision comes, with a 25bp cut expected and finally the Fed at 2:00.  Housing will not have any impact on the market in my view but the BOC, if they surprise, could matter, especially if they pre-emptively cut 50bps as that will get the juices flowing for the Fed to follow suit.  But otherwise, we will have to wait for Powell and friends for the next steps.

Good luck

Adf

A Third Fed Mandate

Posted on by

As Jay and his minions convene
A new man is making the scene
Now, Stephen Miran
A man with a plan
Will help restart Jay’s cash machine
 
But something that’s happened of late
Is talk of a third Fed mandate
Yes, jobs and inflation
Have been the fixation
But long-term yields need be sedate

 

As the FOMC begins their six-weekly meeting this morning, most market participants focus on the so-called ‘dual mandate’ of promoting the goals maximum employment and stable prices.  This, of course, is why everybody focuses on the tension between the inflation and unemployment rates and why the recent revisions to the NFP numbers have convinced one and all that a rate cut is coming tomorrow with the only question being its size.  But there is a third mandate as is clear from the below text of the Federal Reserve Act, which I have copied directly from federalreserve.gov [emphasis added]:

“Section 2A. Monetary policy objectives

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy’s long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.

[12 USC 225a. As added by act of November 16, 1977 (91 Stat. 1387) and amended by acts of October 27, 1978 (92 Stat. 1897); Aug. 23, 1988 (102 Stat. 1375); and Dec. 27, 2000 (114 Stat. 3028).]”

One of the things we have heard consistently from Treasury Secretary Bessent is that he is highly focused on ensuring that longer-term yields do not get too high.  Lately, the market has been working to his advantage with both 10-year, and 30-year yields having declined by more than 25bps in the past month.  And more than 40bps since mid-July.  (Look at the yields listed on the top of the chart below to see their recent peaks, not just the line.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, with President Trump’s head of the CEA, Stephen Miran getting voted onto the board to fill the seat that had been held by Governor Adriana Kugler, but heretofore vacant, one would think that the tone of the conversation is going to turn more dovish.  What makes this so odd is that, by their nature, central bankers are doves and seemingly love to print money, so there should be no hesitation to cut rates further.  But…that third mandate opens an entirely different can of worms and brings into play the idea of yield curve control as a way to ensure the Fed “promote(s)…moderate long-term interest rates.”

It was Ben Bernanke, as Chair, who instigated QE during the GFC although he indicated it was an emergency measure.  It was Janet Yellen, as Chair, who normalized QE as one of the tools in the toolbox for the Fed to address its dual mandate.  I believe the case can be made that newly appointed Governor Miran will begin to bang the drum for the Fed to act to ensure moderate long-term interest rates, and there is no better policy to do that than QE/YCC.  Actually, there is a better policy, reduced government spending and less regulation that allows productivity to increase and balances the production-consumption equation, but that is out of the Fed’s hands.

At any rate, we cannot ignore that there could be a subtle change in focus to the statement and perhaps Chairman Powell will discuss this at the press conference.  If this has any validity, a big IF, the market impacts would be significant.  The dollar would start another leg lower, equities would rise sharply, and commodity prices would rise as well.  Bonds, of course, would be held in check regardless of the inflationary consequences.  Just something to keep on your bingo card!

Ok, let’s check out the overnight activity.  While it was quiet in the US yesterday, we did manage to make more new highs in the S&P 500 as all three major indices were higher.  As to Asia, Tokyo (+0.3%) had the same type of session, with modest gains as it takes aim at a new big, round number of 45,000.  China (-0.2%) and HK (0.0%) did little although there was a lot of positivity elsewhere in the region with Korea (+1.2%), India, (+0.7%) and Taiwan (+1.1%) leading the way amidst almost all markets, large and small, showing gains.  Europe, though, is a different story with red today’s color of the day, as Spain (-0.8%) and Germany (-0.6%) leading the down move despite better-than-expected German ZEW data (37.3 vs. 26.3 expected).  One of the things I read this morning was that German auto manufacturers have laid off 125,000 workers in the past 6 weeks.  That is a devastating number and bodes ill for German economic activity in the future.  As to other European bourses, -0.1% to -0.4% covers the lot.  US futures, though, continue to point higher, up 0.3% at this hour (7:30).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning while European sovereign yields have edged higher by between 1bp and 2bps.  It doesn’t feel like investors there are thinking of better growth, but we did hear from several ECB members that while cuts are not impossible during the rest of the year, they are not certain.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.7%) is back in a modest upswing but still has shown no inclination to move outside that trading range of $60/$65.  It has been more than a month since that range has been broken and absent a major change in the Russia sanctions situation, where Europe actually stops buying Russian oil (as if!) I see no short-term catalyst on the horizon to change this situation.  Clearly, producers are happy enough to produce and sell at this level and demand remains robust.

Turning to the metals markets, I discuss gold (+0.4%) a lot, and given it is making historic highs, that makes sense, but silver (+0.4%) has been outperforming gold for the past month and looks ever more like it is going to make a run for its all-time highs of $49.95 set back in January 1980.  The more recent peak, set in 2011, of $48.50 looks like it is just days away based on the recent rate of climb.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning, with the euro (+0.4%) trading above 1.18 again for the first time since July 1st and there is a great deal of discussion as to how it is going to trade back to, and through, 1.20 soon, a level not seen since 2021.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The narrative is now that the Fed is set to begin cutting rates and the ECB is going to stand pat, the euro will rise.  This is true for GBP (+0.3%) as wel, with the Sterling chart largely the same as the euro one above.  Here’s the thing.  I understand the weak dollar thesis if the Fed gets aggressive, I discussed it above. However, if German manufacturing is contracting that aggressively, and the layoffs numbers are eye opening, can the ECB really stand pat?  Similarly, PM Starmer is under enormous, and growing, pressure to resign with the Labour party in the throes of looking to oust him for numerous reasons, not least of which is the economy is struggling.  So, please tell me why investors will flock to those currencies.  I see the dollar declining, just not as far as most.

Data this morning brings Retail Sales (exp 0.2%, 0.4% -ex autos) along with IP (-0.1%) and Capacity Utilization (77.4%).  However, it is not clear to me that markets will give this data much consideration given the imminence of the FOMC outcome tomorrow.  The current futures pricing has just a 4% probability of a 50bp cut.  I am waiting for the Timiraos article to see if that changes.  Look for it this afternoon.

Good luck

Adf

Falling Fast

Posted on by

His swords were words he wielded well
He spoke his truths, but would not yell
His followers enrapt
His enemies then snapped
And undeservedly he fell
 
RIP Charlie Kirk
 
A score plus four of years have passed
Since thousands died, we were aghast
No logic could be found
For those at, zero, ground
Society is falling fast


 
A generation after the horrific events of September 11, 2001, it appears that memories have faded.  Personally, having observed those events from one block away, it is indelibly imprinted on my brain.  But now, in the course of a week we have seen several senseless murders make the news as whatever decorum may have existed at the turn of the century is long gone.  Messrs. Howe and Strauss were always quite clear that the 4thTurning involved chaos and the destruction of institutions.  I fear the process is accelerating.  I also fear that it must play out to get through to the other side.  Civil war feels excessive as a description, but as I have forecast for the past year or two, one of the major political parties was likely to explode.  Right now, it feels like the Democrats are on that path.  I don’t know what will replace it, but something must, and it would behoove us all if there is some coherence in their policies when it appears.  I remain confident that Socialists are not the answer, nor will they be embraced across the nation. 
 
The reason I discuss this, which seems outside the bounds of my market perspective, is that it is going to impact markets even more than it already has.  The ongoing politicization of the media, businesses and entertainment does not lead to kumbaya, but rather volatility and distress.  If you wonder why gold continues to perform well, look no further.  Whatever the data, whatever the Fed does, whatever Trump and his administration do, or what Congress tries to do, gold has a history of maintaining value for the past 5 millennia.  Everything else is new and prices are all relative to gold.  Remember that as you approach your day job and your investments, whether you hedge for a living, or simply are trying to make a living.
 
There are now two things on the docket
That could lead risk assets to rocket
First, CPI comes
The Jay and his bums
Decide what gets put in our pocket

Considering these very serious issues, it seems almost ridiculous to discuss markets, but they will continue to trade and the ability to keep your eye on that particular ball is still critical to financial outcomes.  So, let us turn to the two stories (well, maybe two and a half stories) that have the potential to change some viewpoints.  The first is today’s CPI, then next week’s FOMC meeting with a half nod given to today’s ECB meeting.

Regarding the least important, the ECB is almost certainly going to leave policy unchanged.  The only opportunity for anything new will come from Madame Lagarde’s press conference and if she displays a new tone, whether hawkish (I doubt) or perhaps more dovish as European data continues to ebb.

But let’s move on to CPI.  After yesterday’s much lower than expected PPI data, where the M/M numbers for both headline and core were -0.1% compared to +0.3% expected, there has been some talk on the margins that we could see much softer CPI data.  However, it is worth knowing that for the inflation cognoscenti (e.g., @inflation_guy) PPI data is seen as a random number generator with very little direct impact on the consumer data.  (In fact, after my look at NFP data, aren’t all the data points random?)  With that in mind, current median expectations remain as they were earlier in the week (0.3% M/M for both headline and Core with the Y/Y numbers expected at 2.9% and 3.1% respectively).  

Given the market is currently pricing a full 25bp cut with an 8% probability of 50bps, my take is the only way to change things would be for CPI to also print like the PPI data as negative numbers.  If that were to be the case, and I do not anticipate that outcome by any stretch, it would give Chairman Powell ample opportunity to cut 50bps with the market welcoming the outcome along with President Trump.  On the flip side, I don’t think CPI can print a high enough number to remove the 25bp cut.  As a reminder, below are the cumulative probabilities for future Fed funds rates based on the CME’s futures contract.  A total of 75bps remains the default view for the rest of 2025.

We will learn about the outcome at 8:30 this morning and I have no particular insight into whether those median forecasts are high, low or on the money.  This is a wait and see situation.

As to the FOMC meeting, it has the opportunity to be far more impactful.  While 25bps is currently baked in the cake, I remain of the opinion that 50bps is a very viable outcome.  Recall, the most recent Fed discussions were about the importance of the employment portion of their mandate as opposed to the inflation portion.  With the newly revised reduction in NFP over the past twelve months, characterizing the employment situation as solid or strong seems unreasonable.  Weakening would seem a more apt description and should have the discussion be between 25bps or 50bps.  We already know there are at least two governors, Bowman and Waller, who wanted to start cutting last time, and it appears that Stephen Miran, Trump’s current head of the CEA, is going to get approved by the Senate in time to sit in the meeting next week.  One would assume that is a vote for easier policy.   

ITC Markets has a very nice table on the perceived hawkishness/dovishness of FOMC members, and it shows that the governors, as a whole, live in the dovish camp with only a few regional presidents as known hawks.  In fact, one of the remarkable things about the entire Lisa Cook affair is that she was always one of the more dovish members of the board and the fact that she was not pushing for cuts never made any sense.  At least based on her background and history.  However, if you take politics into account, and the idea that she didn’t want to cut because President Trump wanted a cut, it begins to become clearer.  At any rate, it strikes me that based on this table, which feels reasonable, 50bps is in play.

With all that in mind, let’s take a quick turn around the markets to see what is happening ahead of this morning’s data.  As seemingly always, equity markets rallied in the US yesterday, well mostly.  The DJIA slipped, but the other indices managed to continue their hot streaks.  It is very hard to link economic activity to equity market outcome these days, at least to my eyes.

But on to Asia, where Japan (+1.2%) had a solid session on the back of the remarkable rise in Oracle shares and the idea that Japanese tech companies will benefit.  China (+2.3%) was the beneficiary of the story that President Xi is now looking to have banks prop up local governments that have stopped paying contractors now that their property sale gravy train has derailed.  It seems that they have figured out if you don’t pay people, they don’t consume anything.  So, upwards of CNY 1 trillion will be injected into local government coffers specifically to pay these late bills and try to kickstart consumption.  But, as I look through the rest of the region, it was a much more mixed picture with some gainers (Korea, Indonesia, Thailand), some laggards (HK, Malaysia, Australia) and many markets that barely moved.

In Europe, all the major markets are green this morning led by the CAC (+0.85%) and UK (+0.5%) with the others showing much smaller gains (DAX +0.2%, IBEX +0.25%).  There is no obvious reason for the gains as expectations for the ECB remain static and there has been no data of note released.  Meanwhile, US futures are higher by 0.25% at this hour (7:30).

Bond markets remain frozen as Treasury yields have edged higher by just 1bp and European sovereign yields are +/-1bp from yesterday’s close.  As you can see from the chart below, the range on 10-year Treasuries has been fairly narrow for the past week.  Perhaps today’s CPI will shake things up.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity space, oil (-1.25%) is giving back the gains it saw earlier in the week but basically remains unchanged overall.  If fears grow that a recession is upon us, I could see a rationale for oil to decline, but it is hard to get excited about the market right now.  Gold (-0.6%) is backing off its most recent all-time high, but is still firmly above $3600/oz.  Given the recent run, it is no surprise it takes a breather here and there is no reason to believe that precious metals are topping out.  In fact, a look at the charts tells me that there is plenty of upside left across the space.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is a bit firmer this morning, probably one reason the precious metals are under some pressure, but here too, if we use the DXY as our proxy, the range is pretty clear.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

JPY, INR and ZAR are the largest movers this morning, each declining -0.4%, while the rest of the world is mostly softer by -0.1% to -0.2%.  Broad based dollar strength but no depth whatsoever.  We shall see how things behave after the CPI release.

And that’s really it.  For now, the big picture remains the same, where the prospects of an easier Fed will weigh on the dollar and support commodities.  Equities will like that for now, at least until inflation picks back up, and bonds feel subject to manipulation so I’m just not sure.

Good luck

Adf

Just a Bad Dream

Posted on by

Before yesterday traders whined
‘Bout how much that vol had declined
But President Trump
Caused copper to dump
And still, Chairman Powell, maligned
 
So, chaos is now the new theme
Though most hope it’s just a bad dream
And ere the week ends
Based on recent trends
We could see, results, more extreme

 

It isn’t often that copper is the talk of the town, but this is a new world in which we live, and as I’ve repeatedly explained, all that we think we knew about the way things work, or have worked in the past, is generically wrong.  It is with this in mind that I lead with a chart of the copper price, which after having rallied dramatically back in April, after Liberation Day, and again in July, both times on the back of tariff announcements, collapsed yesterday when President Trump altered the conversation by explaining that tariffs on copper would not be on the raw metal itself, but rather on refined products instead.  As you can see from the chart, this resulted in a massive decline, nearly 23% in the past twenty-four hours. 

Source: WSJ.com

Essentially, the US price, as traded on the COMEX, returned to be in line with the ROW price, as traded on the LME.  That doesn’t make the move any less dramatic, but the question of how long those price differentials could be maintained was always an open one.  At any rate, that was the biggest mover of the day yesterday and naturally, it had knock-on effects elsewhere with the entire metals complex falling sharply (Au -1.85%, Ag -3.0%, Pt -9.7%) as well as some currencies that are linked to those metals like CLP (-1.5%) and ZAR (-1.4%).  Remember how much complaining there was because market activity had slowed so much?  I bet most folks are looking wistfully at that pace this morning!

Turning to the other key focus of yesterday, the FOMC meeting, the FOMC statement was exactly as expected, with continued focus on “solid” labor market conditions and moderate economic activity acting as the rationale to leave rates on hold.  As widely expected, both Governors Bowman and Waller dissented, each calling for a 25 basis point cut.  The two schools of thought continue to be 1) headline data releases have been masking underlying economic weakness (declining home sales, declining air travel and restaurant activity); and 2) while those issues may be real at the margin, the fact that financial markets continue to rise, with significant speculative activity in things like meme coins and cryptocurrency in general, as well as Private Credit, indicate there is ample liquidity in the market and no reason to adjust policy.

This poet, while not a PhD economist (thankfully!), comes down on the side of number 2 above.  There has been talk by numerous, quite smart analysts, about the underlying weakness in the economy and how the data would be demonstrating it very soon.  Whether it is the makeup of the employment situation, the housing market showing a huge imbalance of homes for sale vs. buyers (at least at current prices) or the added uncertainty of tariffs and how they will impact the economy, this story has been ongoing for more than three years without any proof.  In fact, yesterday’s GDP reading for Q2 was a much higher than expected 3.0%, once again undermining the thesis that the economy is already in a recession.  If so, it is the fastest economic growth ever seen in a recession.

In fact, I do not understand the rationale for so many that a rate cut is necessary.  I realize the market continues to price a 60% probability of a cut in September and about 35bps of cuts by year end, but it makes no sense to me.  In fact, the market is pricing for 110 basis points of cuts through 2026.  Now, either market participants are anticipating a significant slowdown in inflation, which given all the tariff talk seems unlikely, or they see that recession on the horizon.  At this point, I have come to believe it is nothing more than wishful thinking because there is such a strong belief that Fed funds rate cuts lead to higher equity prices, and after all, isn’t that the goal?

Chairman Powell, despite all the pressure he receives from the White House, has not budged.  In this instance, I believe he is correct.  After all, if the data suddenly implodes, the Fed can cut far more substantially and do so on an intermeeting basis if necessary.  Remember, ahead of the election, he cut rates 50bps for no discernible reason based on the data.  Unemployment had risen from 3.9% to 4.2% over the prior three months and that was enough to scare him (although there was clearly a political motive as well).  If the Unemployment Rate rises to 4.5% on September 5th, they could cut that day if they thought things were really unraveling.  If the Fed is truly data dependent, then the data does not yet point to a major economic problem.  And the one thing we know about the Trump administration’s policies is they are going to try to run the economy as hot as possible.  That does not speak to lower interest rates.

Ok, let’s look at how markets around the world absorbed these changes, and how they are preparing for today’s PCE and tomorrow’s NFP data.  Despite all the noise, the DJIA was the worst performer yesterday, sliding just -0.4%, while the NASDAQ actually rallied at the margin, +0.15%.  And this morning, futures are pointing much higher (NASDAQ +1.4%, SPU +1.1%) as both Meta and Microsoft beat estimates handily.

Overnight, while Japanese shares (+1.0%) rallied nicely, China (-1.8%) and Hong Kong (-1.6%) significantly underperformed as weaker than expected PMI data put a damper on the idea that stimulus was going to solve Chinese problems.  A greater surprise is that Korea (-0.3%) didn’t perform better given the announcement that they had agreed a trade deal with the US with 15% baseline tariffs, although that may have been announced after the markets there closed.  But the rest of Asia had a rough session with most key regional exchanges (Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia) all declining about -1.0% with only Taiwan (+0.35%) on the other side of the ledger.  However, if we continue to see strength in the US tech sector, and trade deals keep getting inked, I suspect these markets will be able to rebound.

In Europe, the picture is also mixed, with the CAC and DAX essentially unchanged after in-line inflation readings, while Spain’s IBEX (+0.5%) reacted positively to Current Account data while the FTSE 100 (+0.5%) rallied on strong earnings data from Rolls Royce and Shell Oil.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of yesterday was how the bond market sat out the chaos.  Treasury yields edged higher by 2bps yesterday and this morning they have fallen back by -1bp.  European sovereign yields this morning are essentially unchanged, although a few nations have seen yields slip -1bp.  In many ways, I feel that this is confirmation that despite a lot of noise, not much has really changed.

Oil (-0.5%), is giving back some of yesterday’s $2.00/bbl surge which was based on more sanctions talk from President Trump on Russia and reviving the discussion on 100% secondary sanctions on nations that import oil from Russia.  While EIA data showed a major inventory build, the talk was more than enough to spook traders.

Finally, currency markets, which have seen dollar strength for the past several sessions, are relatively calm this morning, at least in the G10, where the DXY is unchanged, although at its highest level since just before Memorial Day.  In that bloc, JPY (-0.5%) is the laggard after the BOJ left policy on hold, as expected, and while the yen has not been the market’s focus lately, it is back to 150.00 this morning for the first time since March.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Remember all the talk about the end of the carry trade and how the yen was going to explode higher?  Me neither!  As to the EMG bloc, other than the aforementioned metals focused currencies, there has not been much movement in this space either.  However, overall, while the longer-term trend has clearly been lower, this bounce looks more and more like it is gaining strength.  The DXY is a solid 2% through the trendline and a move to 102 seems well within reason in the near term.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, this morning brings Initial (exp 224K) and Continuing (1960K) Claims, Personal Income (0.2%) and Spending (0.4%) and PCE (0.3%, 2.5% Y/Y headline, 0.3%, 2.7% Y/Y Core) all at 8:30.  Then at 9:45 we see Chicago PMI (42.0).  There are no Fed speakers and assuming today’s data is in line, I expect that all eyes will turn to earnings from Apple and Amazon after the close and then NFP tomorrow.  So, despite yesterday’s volatility, I see a respite for the day.

Good luck

Adf

Qualm(s)

Posted on by

As all of us wait for the Fed
And try to absorb what’s been said
Investors are calm
Though pundits have qualm(s)
Their warnings of problems are dead
 
While no move is likely today
So many continue to pray say
A rate cut is coming
To keep markets humming
So, shorts best get out of the way

 

Markets have been in wait and see mode, at least equity markets have, for the past week as investors, traders and algorithms seek something new to discuss.  In fact, a look at the chart below shows that the S&P 500 has moved the grand total of 9 points over the past week!

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Yes, there have been some earnings announcements, with a couple of key ones this afternoon (MSFT and META), but there continues to be an increasing focus on the FOMC which will announce their policy decision (no change) this afternoon.  The focus is really on what Chair Powell will hint at in the ensuing press conference.  At this point, I would say it is baked in the cake that two governors, Waller and Bowman, are going to dissent seeking a 25bp rate cut.

Ironically, if markets are looking for a catalyst from this FOMC meeting, I believe they are looking in the wrong place.  Chairman Powell will do everything he can to not answer any question about anything whatsoever, whether on the likely trajectory of future policy decisions or whether he will resign or be fired.  And so, we will need to look elsewhere for market moving catalysts.

Of course, there is always the White House, which has proven to be a rich source of uncertainty, and then there is the data onslaught starting today through Friday, which if it comes in differently than forecast, will have the opportunity to move markets.  Regarding the former, I will not even attempt to guess what the next story will be.  However, the latter is a potentially rich vein to be mined for insight.

To set the table, a look at yesterday’s outcomes is worthwhile.  The Goods Trade Balance fell to -$86B, substantially less than forecast, on the back of a significant decline in consumer goods imports.  While the data still shows a deficit, I imagine Mr Trump is pleased with the direction.  Certainly, compared to the trend prior to his election (as well as the front-running of tariffs early this year) it seems a modest improvement, or at least a reduction. (see chart below)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Otherwise, Home Prices rose less than forecast and continue to slow their pace of increase and job openings were withing spitting distance of forecast at 7.44M, although somewhat lower than last month.  Finally, Consumer Confidence continues to rebound.  While equity markets were nonplussed, with US markets slipping a bit on the day, Treasury bonds rallied nicely with 10-year yields sliding -8bps on the day.  The bulk of that rally was based on a very positive 7-year auction, with the bid-to-cover ratio rising to 2.79, and dealers only getting 4% of the issue, the lowest level recorded since 2004.  In other words, investors took in virtually the entire $44 billion.  This morning, we will also learn about Treasury’s planned quarterly issuance, although estimates are there will be no increase in long-term bonds, with T-bills continuing to be the main financing vehicle for now.

Too, this morning we will get the ADP Employment report (exp 75K) and the first look at Q2 GDP (2.4% after -0.5% in Q1).  While all of that could have an impact, my sense is that tomorrow’s PCE data and Friday’s NFP will be of much more import.  A final though this morning is that the BOC is going to complete their policy meeting, but no change is expected there.

If we consider this information, absent a new surprise from the White House on your bingo card, it seems to me Friday is the most likely timing for any substantive movement in equities or bonds.  And with that in mind, let’s look at how other markets have been responding to things.

Yesterday’s modest declines in the US were followed by a mixed picture in Asia with both Japan and China little changed on the day although Hong Kong (-1.4%) was under pressure as the US-China trade talks stumbled for now.  But much of the rest of the region had a solid session with Australia (+0.6%) rallying after better-than-expected inflation data encouraged traders to price in a rate cut by the RBA at their next meeting.  But there were gains in Korea, India and Taiwan as well with only Indonesia really lagging.  In Europe, it is a mixed session with the CAC (+0.45%) leading the way higher while both the IBEX (-0.2%) and FTSE 100 (-0.3%) are lagging as Eurozone data was mixed with inflation edging higher in Spain although Eurozone GDP came in a tick better than forecast.  However, the big discussion there continues to revolve around the details of the trade deal.  As to US futures, they are a touch higher at this hour (7:40), about 0.25%.

In the bond market, after yesterday’s rally, US yields are unchanged on the day, trading at the low end of their recent range, while European sovereign yields are all lower by -2bps (Gilts are -5bps) as the US move came later in the day and Europe didn’t really participate yesterday.  Overnight, JGB yields slipped -1bp, but Australian govies fell -7bs as thoughts of rate cuts danced in traders’ heads.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.65%) is giving back some of its gains that were catalyzed by President Trump’s threats to Russia if they don’t sit down in the next 10 days, rather than the original 50-day window.  As to metals markets, gold is unchanged this morning, still trading in the middle of its range, although we have seen some weakness in both silver (-0.9%) and copper (-0.8%) but it seems more in line with ordinary trading than with any new news.

Finally, the dollar is continuing its rebound as the euro (-0.2%) retreats further from its recent highs and is now lower by more than -2% in the past week.  In fact, the DXY has traded back above 99.0 for the first time since early June as the bottoming formation that I have highlighted over the past several days continues to prove prescient.  In fact, some might say the dollar is starting to accelerate higher!  Once again, I would highlight that the descriptions of the dollar’s demise were greatly exaggerated.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And that’s pretty much all there is to discuss.  We are firmly in the middle of the summer doldrums where market activity remains subdued at best.  Given the prominence of algorithms in trading most markets, it will require something new and unexpected to get things going.  Of course, perhaps this evening’s earnings data will start some movement, but I’m still focused on Friday.

Good luck

Adf

A Scold

Posted on by

The market’s convinced that Chair Jay
Is going far out of his way
To keep rates on hold
‘Cause Trump’s been a scold
And strength’s what Jay wants to portray
 
But ask yourself why should rates fall?
With stocks at new highs, after all
And crypto’s exploded
Which clearly eroded
The storied liquidity fall

 

Yesterday’s market activity was benign with modest market movements in both equity and bond markets although the dollar did rally sharply, on the back of the EU trade deal.  Of course, economic theory predicts just that, when tariffs on a nation (or bloc of nations) are raised, that currency will decline in value to offset the tariffs.  Recall, this was the expectation in the beginning of 2025 when President Trump was just coming into office and calling himself ‘Tariff Man’ as he explained he would be imposing tariffs on virtually all US trading partners.  However, back then, the theory didn’t work out very well and the dollar declined throughout the first six months of the year as can be seen below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, analysts quickly moved on and were virtually gleeful that the dollar’s decline of roughly 13% was the largest decline during the first six months of the year since the 1980’s.  Personally, I’m not sure why classifying the decline in terms of the time of year is relevant, but that was a key talking point in the narrative that described the end of American exceptionalism.  Other parts of that narrative were the end of the dollar as the global reserve currency (gold was going to take over) and the onset of other currencies as payment rails for trade.  

None of that ever made sense nor do current proclamations that the euro’s status has changed in any significant way.  There are still very significant long euro positions outstanding as the dollar decline theory has many adherents, but being long euros, aside from being expensive, just got a bit uglier after yesterday’s and this morning’s declines totaling about -1.5%.  

Remember, a key portion of the short dollar thesis is that the Fed is going to cut rates more than other central banks going forward.  And now that the FOMC’s meeting is starting this morning, let’s discuss that idea.  We all know that President Trump has been a vocal advocate for significant rate cuts immediately.  However, let’s look at some evidence.  On the one hand, equity markets are at historic highs in terms of prices as well as readings like the Buffett ratio (market cap/GDP) and P/E and P/S ratios as well.  Crypto currencies, arguably the most speculative of assets, have been flying, especially things like meme coins, which are literally a play on the greater fool paying someone more than they paid for a token with no intrinsic value whatsoever.  Credit spreads, especially for weak credits, are pushing historic lows as per the below chart.  All these things point to not merely ample liquidity and policy being appropriate, but excess liquidity and policy being easy.  

And yet the other side of that coin is a look at 2-year Treasury yields, which have a long history of accurately forecasting future Fed Funds levels.  Right now, as you can see in the below chart, they are trading at a 50 basis point discount to Fed Funds, an indication that the market is quite convinced the Fed is going to cut rates.  Ironically, I believe that Chairman Powell, a PE guy by background, is a strong believer in lower interest rates and I’m sure all his colleagues from his time at Carlyle Group are also pressing for lower interest rates, but he doesn’t want to seem cowed by Trump.

The market is pricing just a 3% probability of a cut tomorrow, but a 65% probability of a cut in September and then another cut in December.  It strikes me that we will need to see a major reversal in the economic situation in the US, with Unemployment rising and growth rapidly declining in order to bring about a situation where there is a real case to be made for a cut.  But we also know that politics plays an enormous role in this story, and while expectations are that we are going to see two dissents at tomorrow’s meeting, that will not change the outcome of no movement.

Adding this all up I conclude that the weak dollar thesis is largely predicated on the idea that the Fed is going to ease monetary policy going forward, catching down to what most other central banks have already done.  And I agree, if the Fed does cut rates, the dollar will fall.  But every day I watch market behavior and continue to see economic data that appears to be holding up pretty well despite a great deal of angst from the analyst community, and I find it harder and harder to come up with a reason to cut rates.  

Consider the story about the new effort by the Trump administration to remove 100,000 regulations by July 4th2026.  Estimates of the value that will unlock are upwards of $1.5 trillion and that assumes no policy changes.  That’s more than 5% of GDP.  I cannot help but believe that President Trump is going to be successful in completely changing the way the US economy works by changing the way (i.e. reducing) the government’s intrusions in the economy.  And if that is successful, it is not clear why interest rates need to decline.  Remember, too, there is an enormous amount of data compressed into this week, so by Friday afternoon, we will have much more information.

Ok, a quick turn round markets shows that after a mixed session in the US yesterday, Japan (-0.8%) slipped on concerns over the nature of the trade deal, while China (+0.4%) edged higher as trade talks continue in Stockholm between the US and China.  Elsewhere in the region both Korea and India rose a bit, spurred by hopes for trade deals there, and the rest of the area was mixed with no large movement.  In Europe, green is today’s color as investors have taken the avoidance of a trade war as a positive and added the euro’s weakness as a positive as well, helping European exporters.  So, gains are strong (DAX 1.3%, CAC 1.4%, FTSE 100 0.7%) and things are generally bright despite grumbling by some nations that the trade deal is going to hurt them.  And at this hour (7:30), US futures are higher by 0.3% or so.

In the bond market, yields are edging lower this morning (Treasuries -2bps, Gilts -1bp, Bunds unchanged) as investors remain either comfortable with the current situation or uncertain what to do to change things at current yields.  I vote for uncertainty.

In the commodity markets, neither oil nor metals markets are moving much at all this morning with daily fluctuations less than 0.2% in all of them.  This has all the feel of a consolidation ahead of tomorrow’s Fed and the rest of the week’s data including GDP, PCE and NFP.

Finally, the dollar is firmer again today vs. almost all its counterparts with gains on the order of 0.2% to 0.3% in most G10 and EMG currencies.  However, two CE4 currencies (PLN -0.6% and HUF -0.9%) are under pressure with the former complaining that the trade deal will cost them > €2 billion, while the latter is suffering from poor economic data heading into an election where President Orban is on shakier ground that normal.  But net, expect to hear about some more dollar strength in the wake of higher tariffs.

On the data front this morning, we see the Goods Trade Balance (exp -$98.4B), Case Shiller Home Prices (3.0%), JOLTS Job Openings (7.55M) and Consumer Confidence (95.8).  With so much focus on trade lately, I suspect that number could matter, but really the JOLTS number will be of more interest, especially for the bond market, as any weakness in the labor market will encourage the lower rates story.

And that’s really all for today.  Until we hear from Powell, it is hard to make a dollar call in the short-term, and the medium term is dependent on the Fed’s actions.

Good luck

Adf

Trump’s Latest Ire

Posted on by

The Minutes explained that in June
The Fed felt no need to impugn
Their previous view
Of nothing to do
Though two sang an alternate tune

 

Yesterday’s release of the FOMC Minutes from their June meeting confirmed what we have learned in the interim.  Governors Waller and Bowman have been clear that they see tariffs as a one-off impact on the rate of inflation, and not something on which to base policy.  If you think about it, tariffs are like food and energy, something that cannot be addressed effectively by monetary policy and which the Fed explicitly excludes from their decision-making process.  (For a really good read on the inflationary impact on tariffs, @inflation_guy published this yesterday).  To me, the salient comments from the Minutes are below:

“While a few participants noted that tariffs would lead to a one-time increase in prices and would not affect longer-term inflation expectations, most participants noted the risk that tariffs could have more persistent effects on inflation.”

“Participants agreed that although uncertainty about inflation and the economic outlook had decreased, it remained appropriate to take a careful approach in adjusting monetary policy.” 

In fact, it is not hard to conclude that the Fed’s intransigence on this issue is politically motivated as well since we have already established that the Fed is clearly political (and partisan).  I would estimate part of the reason they do not want to cut rates here is because they don’t want to be seen as caving into President Trump’s demands.  But whatever the reason, even the futures market is reducing the probability of a cut with the July probability having fallen from more than 20% two weeks ago to 6.7% as I type this morning.  We will need to see some seriously weak economic data to get the Fed to move, I believe, although I expect we will see Governors Waller and Bowman dissent at the July 30th meeting.

However, I would contend that the market has already sussed this out and there will be limited impact on any financial markets after the meeting absent a surprise cut.  So, let’s move on.

The target of Trump’s latest ire
Brazil, has now come under fire
The issue’s not trade
Instead, Trump was swayed
By lawfare ‘gainst one he admire(s)

The other news from yesterday (and there has been precious little overnight) was President Trump’s threat of 50% tariffs on all of Brazil’s exports to the US.  Now, the US runs a trade surplus with Brazil of about $10 billion, so clearly trade is not the issue here.  Rather, it seems that Mr Trump is seeking to help is friend, former Brazilian president Joao Bolsonaro, who is also a right-leaning populist and who is on trial for leading an insurrection after he lost the last election.  It is not hard to understand Mr Trump’s concern over the issue given the history in the US and the previous administration’s efforts to imprison Trump himself.  

However, this seems, at least to me, a bit over the top.  Brazil had been slated to get the minimum 10% tariff prior to yesterday’s outburst.  As well, the US is Brazil’s second largest trading partner, so this will have a significant impact on the country if these tariffs are imposed.  As such, it is no surprise that the market responded immediately.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As you can see from the chart above, the announcement at 1:30 yesterday afternoon had an immediate impact with the real falling -2.5% with minutes of the news.  Too, the IBOVESPA stock index fell more than -1.3% yesterday with Embraer, the airplane manufacturer down nearly 10%.  Right now, this is a threat, and the immediate Brazilian response was to say they would not be cowed by this action and will continue with their internal legal activities.  There is no way I will opine on how this will end, but if these tariffs are put in place, it will be a distinct negative for Brazil’s economy, and I would expect that the real could quickly head back toward 6.00 from its current levels.

Away from those two stories, though, issues impacting financial markets are sparse.  With that in mind, let’s see how markets behaved overnight.  Yesterday’s US equity rally was followed by a mixed picture in Asia with Japan (-0.4%) slipping a bit but gains in both China (+0.5%) and Hong Kong (+0.6%) after rumors came out that the Chinese government was getting set to add more support to the still-imploding Chinese property market.  Other regional bourses saw some gains (Korea, Taiwan, Australia) and some losses (India, Thailand, Philippines).  At this point, all eyes remain on the tariff story for most of these nations.  Meanwhile, in Europe, the FTSE 100 (+1.1%) is today’s leader on the strength of its mining sector which responded positively to President Trump’s mooted 50% tariffs on copper.  Elsewhere, though, things have been less robust with the CAC (+0.7%) having a nice day, the DAX (+0.2%) edging higher after inflation data was released as expected at 2.0% while the IBEX (-0.6%) is moving in the other direction absent a major catalyst.  However, remember it has been performing well, so this could just be some profit taking.  US futures are essentially unchanged at this hour (7:00).

In the bond market, yesterday’s 10-year auction went well with no tail and yields ultimately slipped 6bps during the session.  This morning, that yield has edged back higher by just 1bp.  As to European sovereigns, they are +/- 1bp this morning, showing no direction or new views on anything.  Readings from Europe this morning have confirmed that the rate of inflation is quiet and near the ECB’s target so there is little reason for investors to worry.  As well, the word is that a trade deal between the US and EU is getting close, which will almost certainly be seen as a benefit for markets on the continent.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.6%) is softer this morning but continues to hug the $68/bbl level despite EIA inventory data showing a net large build of nearly 4 mm barrels.  It appears that there is both ample supply and production and there continues to be concern over slowing economic activity, yet oil is in demand.  As I often say, sometimes markets are simply perverse.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.5%) continues to trade either side of $3350/oz and has done so since mid-April.  I continue to read about central banks buying the relic and replacing US Treasuries with gold in their reserve portfolios, but there is obviously enough supply to prevent further price appreciation for now.  But gold is leading gains across the entire metals complex (although copper is getting a boost from the tariff talk.)

Finally, in the FX markets, there is no direction this morning.  both the euro and pound are slightly softer, but AUD (+0.4%) and NZD (+0.35%) are firmer with the yen and CAD little changed.  ZAR (+0.4%) is also having a good day, arguably on the strength in the precious metals markets but otherwise, it is hard to find anything exciting to note.

Turning to this morning’s data, we get the weekly Initial (exp 235K) and Continuing (1980K) Claims and that’s it.  We do hear from three Fed speakers, Musalem, Daly and Waller, but since we already know Waller’s views, it will be far more interesting to hear the other two.  I do find it interesting that Ms Daly, one of the most dovish FOMC members, is not in the rate cut camp, a situation I attribute entirely to her political views.

And that’s what we’ve got today.  Nothing has changed any trends, and it seems highly unlikely that today’s data will.  However, if we hear dovish signals from both Daly and Musalem, that may indicate a turn at the Fed and perhaps we will see that narrative change.  I am confident the one thing Chairman Powell does not want is to have a 5-4 vote to leave rates unchanged.  I would contend that is the most intriguing thing on the horizon right now.

Good luck

Adf

Not Yet Foregone

Posted on by

The US has not yet been drawn
To war, though it’s not yet foregone
That won’t be the case
While Persians now brace
For busters of bunkers at dawn
 
But until such time as we learn
That outcome, the current concern
Is Jay and the Fed
And what will be said
At two o’clock when they adjourn

 

So, every top headline this morning discusses the idea that President Trump is considering whether to initiate US military action in Iran, specifically to drop the so-called bunker buster bombs to destroy Iran’s nuclear enrichment and bomb-making facilities.  There is certainly a lively discussion on both sides of the argument with the best description of the problem that I’ve seen being a poll showing that 74% approve Trump’s position that Iran must not get nuclear weapons, but 60% oppose US involvement in the war.  I’m glad I don’t have to thread that needle!

Obviously, there are market implications if the US does get involved but given the complete lack of clarity on the situation at this point, I do not believe I can add much to the discussion.  The only thing I will say is that the longer-term trends for both oil (lower) and metals (higher) are still intact, but we are likely to see some significant volatility along the way.

Which takes us to the next most important market discussion, the FOMC meeting that ends today and the potential market impacts.  It is universally assumed that there will be no policy change at the meeting, either interest rates or QT, which means that now the punditry is focused on the arcana of Fed policy.  As this is a quarter end meeting, the Fed will release its latest SEP (summary of economic projections) and dot plot, and with nothing else to discuss until the war in Iran either ends or intensifies, those are the key discussion points in the market.  

I have long maintained that one of the greatest blunders of the Bernanke era was the institution of forward guidance.  While it may have served its purpose initially, it has now become a major distraction.  Far too much attention is paid to the dot plot, where if one member adjusts their view by 25bps, it can impact markets which have built algorithms to respond to the median outcome.

Below is the March dot plot which showed a median “expectation” of Fed funds for the end of 2025 at 3.875%, or 50 basis points lower than the current level.  However, if two more FOMC members (out of 17) thought there was only going to be one cut, that would have shifted the median “expectation” as well as the narrative.

As such, the importance of the dot plot feels overstated compared to its actual value.  After all, no FOMC member has an impressive track record with respect to their analysis of the economy and its future outcomes, let alone what the appropriate rate structure should be at any given time.  In fact, nobody has that, which is the argument for restricting the Fed’s duties to be lender of last resort and allow markets to determine the proper level of interest rates based on the supply and demand of money.  But this is the world in which we live.  My one observation is that the post GFC era has greatly distorted views on the economy and appropriate monetary policy.  It is hard not to look at the below history of Fed funds and see the anomaly that occurred during the initial QE phase.  

Concluding, regardless of my, or anyone not on the FOMC’s, views on appropriate policy, it doesn’t matter one whit.  They are going to do what they deem appropriate, and while I don’t doubt their sincerity, I do doubt they have the tools for the mission.  Perhaps the most interesting thing that could come from this meeting is further information on their assessment of the current Fed process, including their communication policy.  I remain strongly in favor of them all shutting up and letting markets do their job although that seems unlikely.  But perhaps they will get rid of the dots which seem to have outlived any value they may have had initially.

Before we go to markets, I have to highlight one other market discussion this morning with Bloomberg publishing two different articles, here and here,  on the end of the dollar’s hegemony.  The first highlights a speech by PBOC governor Pan Gongsheng and his vision of a multicurrency world which, of course, includes the renminbi as a major part of the process.  I will believe that is a possibility as soon as China opens its capital accounts completely and allows flows into and out of the country with no restrictions.  (I’m not holding my breath.)  The second takes the Michael Bloomberg Trump hatred in the direction of the president is destroying the dollar’s reign because of his policies and to highlight the dollar has fallen 10% already this year!  But let us look at a long-term chart of the dollar, using the DXY as a proxy, and you tell me if you can see the recent move as being outsized in any sense of the word.  In fact, the dollar’s recent price action is indistinguishable from anywhere in its history, and it is not anywhere near to its historic lows.  In fact, it is just a few percent below its long-term average.

Ok, now let’s look at markets.  Yesterday’s selloff in equities seemed to be based on concerns over the escalation in Iran, but as that drags out, traders don’t know what to do.  They are certainly not pushing things much further.  In fact, overnight saw the Nikkei (+0.9%) have a solid gain although HK (-1.1%) followed the US lower.  Elsewhere in the region, South Korea and Taiwan performed well, while India and Indonesia lagged and the rest were +/-20bps or less.  Europe, though, is softer this morning with declines on the order of -0.4% on the continent across the board.  I think investors here are also waiting on the potential events in Iran.  But US futures are actually pointing slightly higher at this hour (7:30).

In the bond market, yields around the world are slipping with Treasuries falling -2bps and most of Europe seeing declines between -1bp and -3bps.  This is after a few basis point decline yesterday as well.  I guess the fear of too much US debt is in abeyance this morning.

In commodity markets, oil, which rallied sharply yesterday on fears of the US entering the war, is little changed on the day after that climb as while there has been lots of talk, oil continues to flow through the Strait of Hormuz, and everybody is pumping nonstop to take advantage of the current relatively high prices.  Gold is unchanged although the other metals (Ag +0.25%, Cu +0.7%, Pt +2.4%) continue to see significant support.  In fact, platinum this morning has broken above the top of an 11-year range and many now see an opportunity for a significant rally from here.

Finally, the dollar is somewhat softer this morning, slipping about 0.2% against the pound, euro and yen, with similar declines against most other currencies.  The exceptions to this are the KRW (+0.45%) which seems to be benefitting from a growing hope that a trade deal will be completed between the US and Korea shortly, and ZAR (-0.5%) as CPI data release there this morning shows inflation under control and no reason for SARB to consider tightening policy further.

On the data front, because of tomorrow’s Juneteenth holiday, we see Initial (exp 245K) and Continuing (1940K) Claims as well as Housing Starts (1.36M) and Building Permits (1.43M).  And of course, at 2:00 it’s the Fed.  My sense is absent a US escalation in Iran, it will be quiet until the Fed, and probably thereafter as well given the lack of reason for any policy changes.  After all, there is no certainty as to either war or trade policy right now, so why would they do anything.

If I had to opine, I would say the dollar is likely to decline over the next year, but that in the longer run, it will be firmer than today.  

Good luck

Adf