Tag Archives: #inflation

Japanese Tao

Posted on by

Japanese prices
Are rising ever higher
Probably nothing!
 
Meanwhile Ueda
Explained QE can still be
The Japanese Tao

 

Japanese inflation data was released last night, and the picture was not very pretty.  In fact, let me show you.  The first chart shows the monthly readings of annual inflation for the past 5 years.  Last night’s 4.0% reading was not the highest in that period, (that distinction belongs to Feb 2023 at 4.3%), but it is pretty clear that any sense of declining inflation is beginning to dissipate and has been doing so for the past year.  PS, remember, Japanese interest rates range from 0.5% in the overnight to 1.425% in the 10-year, so real rates remain highly negative regardless of your timeframe.

The second picture takes a longer-term perspective to help us better understand the long history of inflation in Japan.  While a decade ago, inflation showed an uptick of nearly the recent magnitude, that was driven specifically by the government raising the GST (goods and services tax) which was Japan’s answer to a VAT.  It was highly controversial at the time but was also understood to have a truly transitory impact as it was a one-off rise in prices.  However, beyond that period, the Japanese have been living with inflation somewhere between -2.2% in the wake of the GFC and 2.0% since the turn of the century.  In fact, going back to the 1990’s, inflation didn’t reach current levels, and one must head back to 1981 to see significant inflation in Japan.  This means there are two generations of people who have basically never seen prices rise in the current manner.

So, what do you think the central bank is considering?  Let me give you Ueda-san’s own words, [emphasis added] “In exceptional cases where long-term interest rates rise sharply in a way somewhat different from normal movements, we will flexibly increase purchases of government bonds to promote stable formation of interest rates in the market.”  You read that correctly inflation is rising sharply, JGB yields are rising in sync and the BOJ’s response is to BUY MORE BONDS!!!  You cannot make this stuff up.  I guess old habits die hard.

The market response to this was as you might expect.  JGB yields dipped 2bps, Japanese equities managed a modest rally (+0.3%) as they seem caught between lower rates and higher inflation, and the yen ( -0.5%) weakened.  In essence, it appears the combination of a strengthening yen and rising interest rates has the potential to wreck the Japanese government’s budget, and the BOJ went back to form and discussed more QE as a response.  This is simply more proof that there isn’t a central bank in the world that truly cares about inflation.  While stable inflation may be a mandate, it is the last of their concerns.

Inflation is, however, not the last of our concerns, at least as we try to live day to day.  This is what has me concerned about Chairman Powell and his minions at the Fed, they continue to believe that the current interest rate structure is restrictive and despite the fact there is virtually no evidence prices are ever going to get back to their target of 2.0%, let alone true stability, still see cuts as the way forward.  Perhaps I am mistaken to believe that the Fed will see the light and maintain current policy levels or even tighten as inflation rebounds.  If that is the case, my entire dollar thesis is going to come under a lot of pressure!

Ok, away from the Japanese antics overnight, a brief word about China.  Last night, Premier Li Qiang explained that China will look to “vigorously” improve the services sector of the economy, specifically education, health care, culture and sports, as they once again try to adjust the balance of economic activity to a more domestic focus rather than their historical mercantilist process.  Earlier this week the PBOC reiterated their support for the property market, although for both these efforts, this is not the first time they have been discussed, and the evidence thus far is all their efforts have been fruitless.  But for one day, at least, these comments have been embraced as the Hang Seng (+4.0%) and CSI 300 (+1.3%) both rallied sharply on the news of more domestic support for the Chinese economy.  The Chinese are set to hold a key economic confab as they try to plan how to shake things up a bit, and these comments, as well as a seeming promise the PBOC is going to cut rates again, are all of a piece.  Maybe they will be successful this time, but I am not holding my breath.

Otherwise, the only other noteworthy economic news came from the Flash PMI’s across Europe which were soggy at best, certainly not indicative of significant growth coming soon.  With that in mind, let’s look at the rest of the markets’ overnight performance.  The rest of Asia’s equity markets were mixed with Taiwan’s the best performer and several modest declines elsewhere including India, Australia and New Zealand.  In Europe, though, despite those modest PMI outcomes, most markets are higher led by the CAC (+0.5%).  Perhaps, the view is the ongoing weakness will force the ECB to cut rates more quickly, and we have heard several ECB members indicate further cuts are coming.  However, counter to that, Isabel Schnabel, one of the more hawkish members, mentioned this morning that she believed they were already at neutral, and more cuts may not be necessary.  While that is not the consensus view yet, it is worth remembering.  As to the US futures market, at this hour (7:00), all three major indices are basically unchanged.

In the bond market, yields have fallen across the board with Treasuries, after sliding yesterday, down another 2bps this morning and back below 4.50% for the first time in a week.  In a Bloomberg interview yesterday, Secretary Bessent explained that although his goal is to reduce the issuance of T-bills and term out debt, given the situation which he inherited from the previous administration, that process will take longer than some had considered previously.  In other words, there won’t be a large increase in 10-year issuance any time soon. European sovereign yields are also much softer, down between -3bps and -5bps on those further rate cut hopes, or perhaps the lackluster PMI data.

In the commodity markets, oil (-0.8%) is backing off its recent rally highs, but remains quiet overall and well within its ever-tightening trading range.  It seems traders don’t know how to handicap the constant discussions from the Trump administration and whether Russian sanctions will end or not, as well as how quickly OPEC may ramp up production and what is happening to demand.  While none of these things are ever certain, right now they seem particularly fraught.  In the metals space, gold (-0.4%) is backing off from yesterday’s latest all-time highs, and taking both silver and copper with it, but the uptrend in all three of these metals remains quite strong.

Finally, the dollar is higher this morning gaining ground against all its G10 counterparts with the yen being the worst performer, but also against all its EMG counterparts with HUF (-1.0%) the true laggard although the entire CE4 are under pressure, arguably responding to the mayhem over how the Ukraine situation plays out.  After all, they are the closest in proximity and likely to be the most impacted.

On the data front, this morning brings Flash PMI data (exp manufacturing 51.5. Services 53.0), Existing Home Sales 4.12M) and Michigan Sentiment (67.8).  We also hear from two more Fed speakers, Jefferson and Daly, but again, caution and stasis are the story until further notice, and that notice is not coming from Mary Daly but rather from Jay Powell.

Perhaps the most interesting thing happening right now is that although tariffs remain a major economic force and are clearly on the table, they are not even the 4th most important topic in the market.  Back to my earlier comments, I sincerely hope that the BOJ’s overwhelming dovish stance is not a harbinger of things to come here in the States.  Right now, I don’t think so, but I am far less confident than I was earlier this week.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Positioned Quite Well

Posted on by

The Fed is positioned quite well
To leave rates alone for a spell
Employment is stable
Which means they are able
To try, high inflation, to quell

 

“In discussing the outlook for monetary policy, participants observed that the Committee was well positioned to take time to assess the evolving outlook for economic activity, the labor market, and inflation, with the vast majority pointing to a still-restrictive policy stance. Participants indicated that, provided the economy remained near maximum employment, they would want to see further progress on inflation before making additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate.”

I would say that this paragraph effectively summarizes the Fed’s views during the January FOMC meeting and based on the comments we have heard since, nothing has really changed much.  If anything, there appeared to be more concern over the upside risks to inflation than worries over a much weaker employment picture.  As well, there was some discussion regarding the potential of tariffs impacting prices and economic activity, although they would never be so crass as to actually use the word.

I would argue we don’t know anything more about their views now than we did prior to the Minutes.  Interestingly, they continue to believe that the current policy rate is restrictive even though Unemployment has been sliding, inflation is sticky on the high side and equity and other financial markets continue to make record highs.  Personally, I would have thought the appropriate view would be policy is slightly easy, but then I’m no PhD economist, just a poet.  If we learned anything it is that they are not about to change the way they view the world.  This merely tells me they have the opportunity to double down on previous mistakes.

It’s almost as if
Japanese markets now see
Future yen glory

Meanwhile, away from the machinations and procrastinations of the Fed, if we turn East, we can see that last night the yen, for a brief moment, traded through the key 150 psychological level, although it has since edged back higher.  This is the strongest the yen has been in more than two months and, in a way, is somewhat surprising given the strong belief that tariffs imposed against a nation will result in that nation’s currency declining.  But that is not the case right now, where despite mooted tariffs on steel, autos and semiconductors, three things the Japanese export to the US, the yen is climbing again.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One of the interesting things about the interest rate market’s response to the FOMC Minutes is that there continues to be an expectation of 39bps of rate cuts this year in the US.  But then, I read the Minutes as somewhat hawkish, obviously a misconception right now.  Meanwhile, in Tokyo, we continue to hear comments from former BOJ members that further rate hikes are coming and the futures market there is pricing 36bps of rate hikes by the end of this year.  So, for now, the direction of travel is diametrically opposed between the Fed and the BOJ.  Last night also saw JGB yields edge higher by another 1bp, to 1.43% and another new high level for this move.  Add it all up and the rate movements are sufficient to be the current FX drivers.

Now, as per my opening discussion regarding the Fed, while I believe that the next move should be a hike, and that gained support from a WSJ article this morning telling us to expect higher rent prices ahead which implies that the shelter portion of US inflation is not going to decline anytime soon, perhaps this is another reason to consider that the dollar may decline.  After all, the textbooks all explain that a high inflation economy results in a weaker currency.  If the Fed is truly going to continue to try to ‘normalize’ rates lower despite rising inflation, that will change my broad view of the dollar, and I suspect it will weaken dramatically.  While the yen is the first place to watch this given the opposing actions by the Fed and BOJ, it could easily spread.

Too, it is important to remember that while we have lately become accustomed to the yen trading in the 140-160 range vs. the dollar, for many years USDJPY traded between 100 and 120 as per the below chart.  While the world has certainly changed, it doesn’t mean that we cannot head back to those levels and spend another decade at 110 give or take a bit.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, with that in mind, let’s take a look at how markets have handled the new information.  Clearly US equity markets are not concerned about a Fed volte-face as they closed at yet new record highs yesterday, albeit with very modest gains of about 0.2%.  Asian markets, however, were not so sanguine with red the dominant color as the Nikkei (-1.25%) suffered amid that strengthening yen while both the Hang Seng (-1.6%) and mainland (CSI 300 -0.3%) fell despite PBOC promises of more support for the economy and the property market.  If I’m not mistaken, this is the third time the PBOC has said they will be increasing support for property markets and prices there continue to decline.  In fact, every major index in Asia fell overnight, mostly impacted by tariff fears.

Meanwhile, European bourses are all modestly firmer save the UK (-0.4%) as we see a rebound after yesterday’s declines and earnings data from Europe continues to show decent outcomes.  While there is much talk and angst over the Ukraine situation and tariffs, right now given the uncertainty of the timing of any tariffs, as well as the possibility that they may be delayed further or deals may be struck, investors seem to be laying low.  Remember, though, that European equity markets have been outperforming US markets for the past several months, although that could well be because their valuations had become so cheap, we are seeing a rotation into them for now.  As to the US markets, futures are pointing slightly lower at this hour (7:15) down about -0.25%.

In the bond market, yesterday saw Treasury yields cede their early gains and slip 2bps on the session and this morning they have fallen a further 2bps.  Meanwhile, European sovereign yields, after jumping yesterday across the board, are falling back slightly with declines on the order of -1bp or -2bps.

In the commodity market, the one constant is that the price of gold (+0.4%) continues to climb.  Whether it is because of growing global uncertainty, concerns over rising inflation, or technical questions regarding deliveries in NY, it is not clear.  Price action is not volatile, rather it has been a steady climb for more than a year.  just look at the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the other metals, both silver and copper are also continuing their climb and higher by 1.0% this morning.  Oil (+0.2%) is also edging higher which seems a bit odd given the fundamental news I keep reading.  First, OPEC+ is going to begin increasing production later this year, second, the prospects of a peace deal with Russia seems likely to result in Russian oil coming back on the market sans sanctions, and third, despite talk of Chinese economic stimulus, demand from the Middle Kingdom has not been growing.  Add to this the fact that supply is expected to grow by upwards of 1mm bpd from Guyana, Brazil and Canada, and it seems a recipe for falling prices.  Just goes to show that markets are perverse.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure across the board this morning with the yen (+0.95%) leading the way but commodity currencies (AUD +0.5%, NZD +0.5%, ZAR +0.4%) also showing strength.  In fact, virtually every currency has strengthened vs. the greenback this morning.  Looking at the charts, there is a strong similarity across almost all currencies vs. the dollar and that is the dollar put in a peak back in early January and has been gradually declining since then.  This is true across disparate currencies as seen below and may well represent the market deciding that President Trump would like to see the dollar decline and will enact policies to achieve that end.  (I used USDDKK as a proxy for EURUSD since the two are linked quite closely with a correlation of about 0.99.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com 

As I wrote above, my strong dollar thesis is based on the Fed continuing to fight inflation.  If they abandon that fight, then the dollar will certainly decline!

On the data front, this morning brings Initial (exp 215K) and Continuing (1870K) Claims as well as the Philly Fed (20.0).  In addition to the Minutes yesterday we saw Housing Starts tumble although Permits were solid.  However, there is clearly some concern over the housing market writ large, with fewer first-time buyers able to afford a new home, hence the rent story above.  We have 3 more Fed speakers today but again, I ask, are they going to change their tune?  I don’t think so.  I find it hard to believe that the Fed will allow inflation to rebound sharply, but if they remain focused on rate cuts while inflation continues to creep higher, I fear that will be the outcome.  And that, as I said above, will be a large dollar negative.  We shall see.

Good luck

Adf

Hard to Kill

Posted on by

Inflation just won’t go away
As evidenced by the UK
This year started out
Removing all doubt
The Old Lady’s work’s gone astray
 
And elsewhere, the problem is still
Inflation is quite hard to kill
Though central banks want
More rate cuts to flaunt
Those goals are quite hard to fulfill

 

While most eyes remain on President Trump with his ongoing efforts to reduce the size of the US government, as well as his tariff discussions and efforts to negotiate a lasting peace in Ukraine, we cannot ignore the other things that go on around the world.  One of the big issues, which has almost universally been acclaimed a problem, is that inflation is higher than most of the world had become accustomed to pre-Covid.  As well, the virtual universal central bank goal remains the local inflation rate, however calculated, to be at 2.0%.  Alas for the central bankers in their seats today, that remains quite a difficult reach.  A quick look at the most recent headline CPI readings across the G20 shows that only 5 nations (counting the Eurozone as a bloc since they have only one monetary policy) are at or below that magic level as per the below table.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of those nations who are below, two, China and Switzerland, are actually quite concerned about the lack of price pressure and seeking to raise the inflation rate, and the other three (Canada, Singapore and Saudi Arabia) are right on the number, with core inflation readings tending higher than the headline reported here.

Perhaps a better way to highlight the problem is to look at the 10-year bonds of most countries and see how they have been behaving of late as an indication of whether investors are comfortable with the inflation fighting efforts by each nation.  While it is not universal, you can look at the column on the far right of the below table and see that 10-year yields have been rising for the past year.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I only bring this up because, despite the fact that I have been downplaying central bank, especially the Fed’s, impact on markets, ultimately, every nation tasks their central bank to manage inflation.  That seems reasonable since inflation, as Milton Friedman explained to us in 1963, is “always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.”  But perhaps you don’t believe that and are schooled in the idea that faster growth leads to higher wages and therefore higher inflation.  Certainly, Paul Samuelson’s iconic textbook (as an aside, Dr Samuelson was my Economics 101 professor in college) made clear that was the pathway.  Alas, as my good friend, @inflation_guy Mike Ashton, wrote yesterday, there is no evidence that is the case.  Read the article, it is well worth it and can help you start looking elsewhere for causes of inflation, like perhaps the growth in the money supply!

Of course, the reason that we continue to come back to inflation in our discussions is because it is critical to the outcomes in financial markets.  And that is our true focus.  It is the reason there is so much discussion regarding President Trump’s mooted tariffs and how inflationary they will be.  It is the reason that parties out of power continue to highlight any prices that have risen substantially in an effort to disparage the parties in power.  And it is the reason that central banks remain central to the plot of all financial markets, at least based on the current configuration of the global economy.  If there was only one financial lesson from the pandemic response, it is that Magical Money Tree Modern Monetary Theory is a failed concept of how to run policy.  This poet’s fervent hope is that Treasury Secretary Bessent is smart enough to understand that and will address fiscal issues in other manners.  I believe that to be the case.

Back to the UK, where CPI printed at 3.0%, 2 ticks higher than the median forecast, while core CPI printed at 3.7%.  This cannot be comforting for the BOE as most of the MPC remain committed to helping PM Starmer’s government find growth somehow and are keen to cut rates in support.  The problem they have is that inflation will not fade despite extremely lackluster GDP growth.  Recall, last week, even though the Q/Q GDP print of 0.1% beat forecasts, it was still just 0.1%.  Not falling into recession hardly seems a resounding victory for policy in the UK, especially since stagnation, or is it now stagflation, is the end result.  It should be no surprise that market participants have sold off the pound (-0.3%), Gilts (+5bps) and UK equities (-0.4%) and it is hard to find a positive way to spin any of this.  Again, while I have adjusted my views on Japan, the UK falls squarely in the camp of in trouble and likely to see a weaker currency.

Ok, let’s look elsewhere to see how things behaved overnight.  After a very modest rise in US equity indices yesterday, the Asian markets were mixed with the Nikkei (-0.3%) and Hang Seng (-0.15%) slacking off a bit although the CSI 300 (+0.7%) managed to find buyers after President Xi met with business leaders and the expectation is for further government stimulus, as well as a reduction in regulations, to help support the economy.  Australia (-0.7%) is still under pressure despite yesterday’s RBA rate cut as the post-meeting statement was quite hawkish, indicating caution is their approach for now given still sticky inflation.  (Where have we heard that before?)

In Europe, the only color on the screen is red with declines of between -0.4% and -0.9% as investors seem to be taking some profits after a solid run in most of these markets.  I guess the fact that European governments have been shown to be powerless in the world has not helped investor sentiment either as it appears these nations may be subject to more outside forces than they will be able to address adequately.  Lastly, US futures are unchanged at this hour (7:40).

In the bond market, as per the table above, yields are higher across the board with Treasuries (+2bps) the best performer as virtually all European sovereign issues have seen yields rise between 5bps and 7bps.  It simply appears that confidence in the Eurozone is slipping and demand for Eurozone assets is falling alongside that.

In the commodity markets, it should be no surprise that gold (+0.1%) continues to edge higher.  The barbarous relic continues to find price support despite the fact that interest in gold, at least in Western economies, remains lackluster at best.  There is much discussion now about an audit of the US’s gold reserves at Fort Knox and in the NY Fed, something that has not been performed since 1953.  Not surprisingly, there are rumors that there is much less gold in storage than officially claimed (a little over 8 tons) and rumors that there is much more which has not been reported but was obtained via seizures throughout history.  This story has legs as despite the lack of institutional interest in the US, it is picking up a retail following and we are seeing the punditry increasingly raise their price forecasts for the coming years.  As to oil (+0.8%) it is higher again this morning but remains in a tight trading range with market technicians looking at the $70/bbl level as a key support to hold.  A break there could well see a quick $5/bbl decline.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer this morning against most of its counterparts with most G10 currencies showing declines similar to the pound’s -0.2%, although the yen (+0.15%) is bucking that trend.  However, versus its EMG counterparts, the dollar is having a much better day, rising vs. PLN (-0.9%), ZAR (-0.7%) and BRL (-0.5%) on various idiosyncratic stories.  The zloty seems to be suffering from its proximity to Ukraine and the uncertainty with the future regarding a potential peace effort.  The rand is falling after the FinMin delayed the budget speech as internal squabbling in the governing coalition seems to be preventing a coherent message while the real is under pressure as inflation remains above target and the central bank’s tighter policy has been negatively impacting growth in the economy.

On the data front, this morning brings Housing Starts (exp 1.4M) and Building Permits (1.46M) and then this afternoon we see the FOMC Minutes from the January meeting.  That will be intensely parsed for a better understanding of what the committee is thinking.  We do hear from Governor Jefferson after the market closes, but generally, the cautious stance remains the most popular commentary.

Has anything really changed?  The market remains uncertain over Trump’s moves, the Fed remains on hold and cautious, and data shows that the economy continues to tick along nicely with price pressures unwilling to dissipate.  I see no reason to abandon the dollar at this point.

Good luck

Adf

A Fifth Wheel

Posted on by

Confusion is clearly what reigns
As even the punditry strains
To understand whether
Investors will tether
Their future to stocks or take gains

 

As there was no activity in the US financial markets yesterday, it seems there was time for analysts to consider the current situation and make pronouncements as to investor behavior.  Ironically, we saw completely opposite conclusions from two major players.  On the one hand, BofA posted the following chart showing that investors’ cash holdings are at 15-year lows, implying they remain fully invested and quite bullish.

Meanwhile, the WSJ this morning has a lead article on how bearish investors are, claiming they are the most bearish since November 2023 according to the American Association of Individual Investors.  Apparently, 47.3% of investors surveyed believe stock prices will fall over the next 6 months.

So, which is it?  Are investors bullish or bearish?  To me this is a perfect description of the current situation.  Everyone is overloaded with information, much of which is contradictory, and so having a coherent view has become extremely difficult.  This is part and parcel of my view that the only thing we can clearly expect going forward is an increase in volatility.  In fact, someone said that Donald Trump is the avatar of volatility, and I think that is such an apt description.  Wherever he goes, mayhem follows.  Now, I also believe that people knew what they were voting for as change was in demand.  But for those of us who pay close attention to financial markets, it will take quite the effort to keep up with all the twists and turns.

Fed speakers are starting to feel
Like they have become a fifth wheel
So, let’s get prepared
For Fed speaking squared
As they work, their views, to reveal

Away from the conundrum above, the other noteworthy thing is that FOMC members are starting to feel left out of the conversation.  Prior to President Trump’s inauguration, market practitioners hung on their every word, and they apparently loved the power that came with that setting.  However, now virtually every story is about the President and his policies with monetary policy falling to a distant issue on almost all scorecards.  Clearly, for a group that had grown accustomed to moving markets with their words, this situation has been deemed unacceptable.  The solution, naturally, is to speak even more frequently, and I fear believe this is what we are going to see (or hear) going forward.  

Yesterday was a perfect example, where not only, on a holiday, did we have multiple speakers, but they actually proffered different messages.  From the hawkish side of the spectrum, Governor Michelle Bowman, the lone dissenter to the initial 50bp rate cut back in September, explained caution was the watchword when it comes to acting alongside President Trump’s mooted tariff and other policies, “It will be very important to have a better sense of these policies, how they will be implemented, and establish greater confidence about how the economy will respond in the coming weeks and months.”  That does not sound like someone ready to cut rates anytime soon.

Interestingly, from the dovish side of the spectrum, Governor Christopher Waller, an erstwhile hawk, explained in a speech in Australia (on the day the RBA cut rates by 25bps for their first cut of the cycle and ending an 18 month period of stable rates) that, “If this wintertime lull in progress [on inflation] is temporary, as it was last year, then further policy easing will be appropriate.”  I find it quite interesting that Governor Waller suddenly sounds so dovish as many had ascribed to him the intellectual heft amongst the governors.  This is especially so given that is not the message that Chairman Powell articulated either after the last meeting or at his Humphrey-Hawkins testimony recently.  

So, which is it?  Is the Fed staying hawkish or are they set for a turn?  That will be the crux of many decision-making processes going forward, not just in markets but also in businesses.  We will keep tabs going forward.

Ok, on to the market’s overnight performances.  Lacking a US equity market to follow, everybody was on their own last night which showed with the mixed results.  Japan (+0.25%) showed modest gains while the Hang Seng (+1.6%) rocketed higher on the belief that President Xi is going to be helping the economy, notably the tech firms in China, many of which are listed in Hong Kong.  Alas, the CSI 300 (-0.9%) didn’t get that memo with investors apparently still concerned over the Trump tariff situation.  Elsewhere in the region, Korea and Taiwan rallied while Australia lagged despite the rate cut.  In Europe, unchanged is the story of the day with most bourses just +/-0.1% different than yesterday’s close.  Right now, in Europe, the politicians are trying to figure out how to respond to the recent indication that the US is far less interested in Europe than in the past, and not paying close attention to financial issues.  As to the US, futures at this hour (7:25) are pointing higher with the NASDAQ leading the way, +0.5%.

In the bond market, yields are climbing led by Treasuries (+4bps) with most of Europe seeing yields edge higher by 1bp or 2bps as well.  Remember, yesterday European sovereign yields rose smartly across the board.  Also, I must note JGB yields (+4bps) which have made further new highs for the move and continue to rise.  It appears last night’s catalyst was a former BOJ member, Hiroshi Nakaso, explained he felt more rate hikes were coming with the terminal rate likely to be well above 1.0%.  While I believe the Fed will be cautious going forward, I still think they are focused on rate cuts for now.  With that in mind and the ongoing change in Japanese policy, I am increasingly comfortable with my new stance on the yen.

In the commodity markets, last Friday’s sell-off in the metals markets is just a bad memory with gold (+0.5%) rallying again and up more than 1% since Friday’s close.  I continue to believe those moves were positional and not fundamental.  Too, we are seeing gains in silver (+0.2%) and copper (+0.6%) to complete the triad.  Meanwhile, oil (-0.25%) continues to lag, holding above its recent lows but having a great deal of difficulty finding any buying impulse.  Whether that is due to a potential peace in Ukraine and the end of sanctions on Russian oil, or concerns over demand growth going forward is not clear to me, but the trend, as seen in the chart below, is clearly downward and has been so for the past year.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, in the FX markets, the dollar is firmer this morning rising against all its G10 counterparts with NZD (-0.6%) the laggard.  But losses of -0.2% are the norm this morning.  In the EMG bloc, we are seeing similar price behavior in most markets although MXN (+0.2%) is bucking the trend, seemingly benefitting from what appears to be a hawkish stance by Banxico and the still highly elevated interest rate differential in the peso’s favor.

On the data front, Empire State Manufacturing (exp -1.0) is the only data point although we will hear from two more Fed speakers, Daly and Barr.  I cannot believe that they have really changed their tune and expect that caution will remain their guiding principle for now, although I expect to hear that repeated ad nauseum as they try to regain their place in the spotlight.

Aside from my yen view, I still find it hard to be excited about many other currencies for now.  There is still no indication the Fed is going to move anytime soon, and other central banks are clearly in easing mode.  That bodes well for the dollar going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Shattered His Dreams

Posted on by

The data was hot yesterday
And that put the pressure on Jay
It shattered his dreams
‘Bout all of his schemes
To help keep inflation at bay

 

By now, I am sure you are aware that the CPI data was higher than forecast, and certainly higher than would have made Chairman Powell comfortable.  The outcome, showing Headline rising to 3.0% and core rising to 3.3% with correspondingly higher monthly rises was sufficient to alter the narrative at least a little bit.  Chair Powell even mentioned it in his House testimony, noting, “We are close, but not there on inflation…. So, we want to keep policy restrictive for now.”  Essentially, the data makes clear that the Fed is not going to be cutting the Fed funds rate anytime soon.  The futures market got the message as it is now pricing just 29bps of cuts this year, with December the likely date.

It will be no surprise that the stock market’s initial response was to sell off substantially, but as per the chart below, it spent the rest of the day clawing back the losses and wound up little changed on the day.  This morning, it remains basically unchanged as well.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Treasury bonds, though, had a less fruitful session, falling (yields rising) sharply on the print, but never really regaining their footing with yields jumping almost 15bps at one point although finishing the day about 10bps higher and have given back 2bps more this morning.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, we all know that the Fed doesn’t target CPI, but rather PCE.  However, after this morning’s PPI data release, most economists (although not poets) will be able to reasonably accurately estimate that data point for later this month, as will the Fed.  And that number is not going to be moving closer to their 2.0% target.  What seems very clear at this point is that every Fed speaker for the time being is going to be harping on the caution with which they are going to move forward.

If we look at this from a political perspective, something which is unavoidable these days, it is important to remember that Treasury Secretary Bessent has made clear that he and the president are far more focused on the 10-year yield than on the Fed funds rate.  To that end and given the fact that all this data was from a time preceding President Trump’s inauguration, I don’t think they are too worried.  I would look for the President to continue his drive to reduce waste and fraud in the government and attack that deficit.  Certainly, the news to date is there is a great deal of both waste and fraud to reduce, and if the president is successful, I believe that will play out in significantly lower 10-year yields, if for no other reason than the deficit is reduced or closed.  This story is just beginning to be written.

Now, Putin and Trump had a call
As Trump tries to end Russia’s brawl
They’re slated to meet
So, they can complete
A treaty with Europe awol

Under any interpretation, I believe the news that Presidents Trump and Putin are going to meet in an effort to hammer out an end to the Russia/Ukraine war is good news.  Beyond the simple fact that less war is an unadulterated good, I think it is very clear that this particular war has had significant market impacts, hence our interest here.  Obviously, energy prices have been impacted, as both oil and NatGas prices are higher than they would otherwise be given the removal of some portion of Russia’s exports from the global markets and economy.  As such, the end of this conflict, with one likely consequence being Western Europe reopening themselves to Russian energy imports, is likely to see prices decline.  

This matters for more reasons than the fact it will be cheaper to fill up your tank at the gas (petrol) station, it is very likely to have a very positive impact on inflation writ large.  As you can see from the chart below, there is a very strong correlation between the price of oil and US inflation expectations.  Declining oil prices are very likely to help people perceive a less inflationary future and will reduce the rate of inflation by definition.  

Source: ISABELNET

Inflation is an insidious process, and once entrenched is very hard to reduce, just ask Chairman Powell.  I also know that there has been much scoffing at President Trump’s claims he will reduce inflation, especially with his imposition of tariffs all over the place. (It is important to understand that tariffs are not necessarily inflationary by themselves as well explained by my friend the Inflation guy in this article.). However, between his strong start on reducing government expenditures and the potential for an end to the Russia/Ukraine war leading to lower energy prices, these are longer term effects that may do just that.

Ok, let’s move on to the market activities in the wake of yesterday’s CPI and ahead of this morning’s PPI data.  As discussed above, yesterday’s US markets rebounded from their worst levels of the morning and closed modestly lower with the NASDAQ actually unchanged.  In Asia, Japanese shares (+1.3%) had a solid day as the weak yen helped things along although Chinese shares (HK -0.2%, CSI 300 -0.4%) did not fare as well on the day with tariffs still top of mind.  Elsewhere in the region, other than Korea (+1.4%) movement was mixed and modest.  In Europe, the possibility of peace breaking out in Ukraine has clearly got investors excited as both Germany (+1.5%) and France (+1.2%) are seeing strong inflows. The UK (-0.7%) however, continues to suffer from economic underperformance with no discernible benefits shown from the governments weak efforts to right the ship.  GDP was released this morning and while they avoided recession, it’s very hard to get excited over 0.1% Q/Q growth.  As to the US futures market, at this hour (7:20), they are essentially unchanged.

In the bond market, we’ve already discussed Treasury yields, but another benefit of the prospects for a Ukrainian peace is that sovereign yields have fallen substantially, between -5bps and -8bps, throughout the continent.  Once again, the impact of that phone call between Trump and Putin has been quite significant.  Consider that not only are energy prices likely to slide, but the required government spending to prosecute the war is likely to diminish as well.

In the commodity markets, it should be no surprise that oil (-1.3%) prices are sliding as are NatGas prices in Europe (TTF -7.5%) as the opportunity for cheap Russian gas to flow to Europe is once again in view.  To highlight the impact that this has had on Europe, prior to the Ukraine war and the halting of gas flows, the TTF contract hovered between €5 and €25 per MWh.  Since the war broke out, even after the initial shock, it has been between €25 and €55 per MWh.  This is all you need to know about why Europe, and Germany especially, is deindustrializing.  As to the metals markets, after a few days of consolidation, gold (+0.4%) is on the move again although it has not yet recaptured the highs seen early Tuesday morning.  Give it time.  Copper (+0.6%), too, is back on the move and indicating that economic activity is set to continue to grow.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning, although arguably a touch softer overall, as the Russia news has traders looking for less negativity in Europe.  So modest gains in the euro and pound, about 0.15% each is offsetting larger losses in AUD (-0.3%) and NZD (-0.6%), although given the much smaller market size of the latter two, they matter much less.  JPY (+0.4%) is rebounding after yesterday’s sharp decline on the back of the jump in Treasury yields, and it is noteworthy that CHF (+0.65%) is gaining after its CPI data showed a decline in prices last month.  In the EMG bloc, CLP (+0.7%) is stronger on that copper rally, while ZAR (+0.1%) seems to be edging higher as gold continues to perform well. MXN (-0.4%) though is still struggling with the potential negative impact of tariffs and otherwise, there is not much to report.

This morning brings PPI (exp 0.3%. 3.3% Y/Y headline; 0.3%, 3.5% Y/Y core) as well as the weekly Initial (215K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims data.  There are no Fed speakers on the docket, but at this point, I expect the Fed will be fading into the background since they are clearly on hold and President Trump commands the spotlight.  Unless the data starts to veer dramatically away from what we have seen, it appears that the market is going to continue to respond to Trumpian headlines, which of course are impossible to predict.  But remember, most of the rest of the world is still in cutting mode so the dollar should continue to hold its own.

Good luck

Adf

Not in a Rush

Posted on by

Said Powell, we’re not in a rush
To cut rates as we try to crush
Remaining inflation
And feel the sensation
Of drawing an inside straight flush
 
Up next is the CPI data
Though not one on which we fixate-a
The surveys explain
That people remain
Quite certain that we’re doing great-a

 

Chairman Powell testified to the Senate Banking Committee yesterday and the key comments were as follows, “Inflation has eased significantly over the past two years but remains somewhat elevated relative to our 2 percent longer-run goal. Total personal consumption expenditures (PCE) prices rose 2.6 percent over the 12 months ending in December, and, excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE prices rose 2.8 percent. Longer-term inflation expectations appear to remain well anchored, as reflected in a broad range of surveys of households, businesses, and forecasters, as well as measures from financial markets.” [Emphasis added.] He followed up, “With our policy stance now significantly less restrictive than it had been and the economy remaining strong, we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust our policy stance.  We know that reducing policy restraint too fast or too much could hinder progress on inflation.”  This is largely what was expected as virtually every Fed speaker since the last FOMC meeting has said the same thing, there is no rush to further cut rates. Powell did admit that the neutral rate had risen compared to where it was before inflation took off in 2022 but maintains that current policy is still restrictive. 

However, let’s examine the highlighted comment above a little more closely.  Two things belie that statement as wishful thinking rather than an accurate representation of the current situation.  The first is that the most recent survey released from Friday’s Michigan Sentiment surveys, shows that inflation expectations for the next year jumped dramatically, one full percent to 4.3% as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Looking over the past 10 years of data, that is a pretty disturbing spike, taking us right back to the 2022-23 period when inflation was roaring.  In addition to that little jump, it is worth looking at those market measures that Powell frequently mentions.  Typically, they are either the 5-year or 10-year breakeven rate.  That rate is the difference between the 5-year Treasury yield and the 5-year TIPS yield (or correspondingly the 10-year yields).  A quick look at the chart below shows that since the Fed first cut rates in September 2024, the 5-year breakeven rate has risen 78bps to 2.64%.  Certainly, looking at the chart, the idea of ‘well anchored’ isn’t the first description I would apply.  Perhaps, rocketing higher?

At any rate, it appears quite clear that the Fed is on hold for a while yet as they await both the evolution of the economy and further clarity on President Trump’s policies on tariffs.  While there is no doubt that we will continue to hear from various Fed speakers going forward, I maintain that the Fed is not seen as the primary driver in markets right now, rather that is President Trump.

Of course, data will still play a role, just a lesser one I believe, but we cannot ignore the CPI report due this morning.  First, remember, the Fed doesn’t focus on CPI, but rather on PCE which is typically released at the end of the month and calculated by the Commerce Department, not the BLS.  But the rest of us basically live in CPI land, so we all care.  If nothing else, it gives us something to complain about as we look incredulously at the declining numbers despite what we see with our own eyes every time we go shopping.

As it is, here are this morning’s median expectations for the data, headline CPI (+0.3% M/M, 2.9% Y/Y) and core CPI (+0.3% M/M, 3.1% Y/Y).  Once again, I believe there is value in taking a longer view of this data for two reasons; first to show that we are not remotely approaching the levels to which we became accustomed prior to the Covid pandemic and government response, and second to highlight that if your null hypothesis is CPI continues to decline, that may not be an appropriate view as we have spent the past 8 months in largely the same place as per the below chart.  Too, note the similarity between the Michigan Survey chart above and this one.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

OK, those are really the stories of the day since there have not, yet, been any new tariffs imposed by President Trump, and traders need to focus on something.  Let’s take a look at how things behaved overnight.

After a mixed US equity session, the strength was in Hong Kong (+2.6%) and China (+1.0%), seemingly on the back of several stories.  First is that China is looking at new ways to address the property bubble’s implosion, potentially allocating more support there, as well as this being a reflexive bounce from yesterday’s decline and the story that President’s Xi and Trump have spoken with the hope that things will not get out of hand there.  As to Japan, the Nikkei (+0.4%) has edged higher as the yen (-0.7%), despite a lot of talk about higher rates in Japan and the currency being massively undervalued, continues to weaken.  In Europe, once again there is limited movement overall with very tiny gains of less than 0.2% the norm although Spain’s IBEX (+0.7%) is the big winner today on some positive earnings results.  US futures are little changed at this hour (7:15).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning, retaining the 4bps they added yesterday, and in Europe, sovereign yields are also little changed with German Bunds (+2bps) the biggest mover in the session.  JGB yields did rise 3bps overnight, but that seems to be following US yields as there was precious little new news there.

In the commodity markets, yesterday’s metal market declines are mostly continuing this morning with gold (-0.6%) down again, although still hanging around $2900/oz.  Silver has slipped although copper (+0.3%) has arrested its decline.  Oil (-1.1%) is giving back some of yesterday’s gains and continues to trade in the middle of its trading range with no real direction.  One thing I haven’t highlighted lately is European TTF NatGas prices, which while softer this morning (-1.9%) have risen 15% in the past month as storage levels in Europe are declining to concerning levels and global warming has not resulted in enough warm days for the winter.

Finally, the dollar is mixed away from the yen’s sharp decline with the euro (+0.1%) and CHF (+0.2%) offsetting the AUD (-0.3%) and NOK (-0.5%).  It is interesting that many of the financial and trading accounts that I follow on X (nee Twitter) continue to point to JPY and CAD as critical and are anticipating strength in both those currencies imminently.  And yet, neither one is showing much tendency to strengthen, at least for the past month or two.  I guess we shall see, but if the Fed is going to remain on hold, and especially if more tariffs are coming, I suspect the default direction of the dollar will be higher.  As to the EMG bloc, there is virtually nothing happening here, with a mix of gainers and laggards, none of which have moved 0.2% in either direction.

Other than the CPI data, Chairman Powell testifies to the House Financial Services Committee, and we will see EIA oil inventories with a modest build anticipated.  We also hear from two other Fed speakers, but again, with Powell in the spotlight, they just don’t matter.

Markets overall are pretty quiet, seemingly waiting for the next shoe to drop.  My money is on that shoe coming from the Oval Office, not data or Powell, which means we have no idea what will happen.  Stay hedged, but until further notice, I still don’t see a strong case for the dollar to decline.

Good luck

Adf

Loathing and Fear

Posted on by

On Friday, the jobs situation
Explained there was little causation
For loathing or fear
That later this year
Recession would soon drive deflation
 
Meanwhile, in the Super Bowl’s wake
The president’s set to forsake
Economists’ warning
That tariffs are scorning
Their views, and are quite a mistake

 

Let’s start with a brief recap of Friday’s employment report which was surprising on several outcomes.  While the headline was a touch softer than forecast, at 143K, revisions higher to the prior two months of >100K assuaged concerns and implied that the job market was still doing well.  You may recall that there were rumors of a much higher Unemployment Rate coming because of the annual BLS revisions regarding total jobs and population, but in fact, Unemployment fell to 4.0% despite an increase in the employed population of >2 million.  Generally, that must be seen as good news all around, even for the Fed because the fact that they have paused their rate cutting cycle doesn’t seem to be having any negative impacts.

Alas for Powell and friends, although a real positive for the rest of us, the Earnings data was much stronger than expected, up 0.5% on the month taking the annual result to a 4.1% increase.  Recall, one of Powell’s key concerns is non-core services inflation, and that is where wages have a big impact.  After this data, it becomes much harder to anticipate much in the way of rate cuts soon by the Fed.  This was made clear by the Fed funds futures market which is now pricing only an 8.5% probability of a rate cut in March, down from 14% prior to the data, and only 36bps of cuts all year, which is down about 12bps from before.

Securities markets didn’t love the data with both stocks and bonds declining in price, although commodities markets continue to rally alongside the dollar, a somewhat unusual outcome, but one that makes sense if you consider the issues.  Inflation is not yet dead, hurting bonds, while the fact the Fed is likely to remain on hold for longer supports the dollar.  Stocks, meanwhile, need to see more economic growth because lower rates won’t support them while commodities are seen as that inflation fighting haven.

Of course, it wouldn’t be a day ending in Y if we didn’t have another discussion on tariffs during this administration.  The word is that the president has two things in mind, first, reciprocal tariffs, meaning the US will simply match the tariff levels of other countries rather than maintaining their current, generally lower, tariff rates.  As an example, I believe the EU imposes a 10% tariff on US automobile imports, while the US only imposes a 2.5% tariff on European imports.  The latter will now rise to 10%.  It will be very interesting to see how the Europeans complain over the US enacting tariffs that are identical to their own.  

A side story that I recall from a G-20 meeting during Trump’s first term was that he offered to cut tariffs to 0% for France if they reciprocated and President Macron refused.  The point is that while there is a great deal of huffing and puffing about free trade and that Trump is wrecking the world’s trading relationships, the reality appears far different.  If I had to summarize most of the world’s view on trade it is, the US should never put tariffs on any other country so they can sell with reckless abandon, while the rest of the world can put any tariffs they want on US stuff to protect their home industries.  This is not to say tariffs are necessarily good or bad, just that perspective matters.

The other Trump tariffs to be announced are on steel and aluminum imports amounting to 25% of the value. This will be impactful for all manufacturing industries in the US, at least initially, so we will see how things progress.  Interestingly, the dollar has not responded much here because these are not country specific, so a broad rise in the dollar may not be an effective mitigant.

Ultimately, as I have been writing for a while, volatility is the one true change in things now compared to the previous administration.  Now, with that as backdrop, and as we look ahead to not only CPI data on Wednesday, but Chair Powell’s semi-annual congressional testimony on Tuesday at the Senate and Wednesday at the House, let’s look at how markets have responded to things.

As mentioned above, US equity markets fell about -1.0% on Friday after digesting the Unemployment data. However, the picture elsewhere, especially after these tariff discussions, was more mixed.  In Asia, Japanese shares were essentially unchanged although Hong Kong (+1.8%) was the big winner in the region.  But Chinese shares (+0.2%) did little, especially after news that the number of marriages in China fell to their lowest since at least 1986, another sign of the demographic decline in the nation.  Elsewhere in the region, there was more red (India, Taiwan, Australia) than green (Singapore).  European shares, though, are holding up well, with modest gains of about 0.2% – 0.4% across the board despite no real news.  US futures are also ticking higher at this hour (7:10), about 0.5% across the board.

In the bond market, Friday saw Treasury yields jump 6bps with smaller gains seen in Europe.  This morning, though, the market is far quieter with Treasury yields unchanged and European sovereigns similarly situated, with prices between -1bp and +1bp compared to Friday’s closing levels.  Of note, JGB yields have edged higher by 1bp and now sit at 1.31%, their highest level since April 2010.  With that in mind, though, perhaps a little bit of longer-term perspective is in order.  A look at the chart below shows 10-year JGB yields and USDJPY since 1970.  Two things to note are that they have largely moved in sync and that both spent many years above their current levels.  While it has been 15 years since JGB yields were this high, they are still remarkably low, even compared to their own history.  I know that many things have changed over that time driving fundamentals, but nonetheless, this cannot be ignored.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Sticking with the dollar, it has begun to edge higher since I started writing this morning and sits about 0.2% stronger than Friday’s close.  USDJPY (+0.5%) is once again the leader in the G10, although weakness is widespread in that bloc.  In the EMG bloc, there were a few gainers overnight (INR +0.3%, KRW +0.3%) although the rest of the world is mostly struggling.  One interesting note is ZAR (0.0%) which appears to be caught between the massive rally in gold (to be discussed below) and the increased rhetoric about sanctions by the US in the wake of the ruling party’s ostensible call for a genocide of white South Africans to take over their property.  This has not been getting much mainstream media press, but it is clear that Mr Trump is aware, especially given that Elon Musk is South African by birth.  However, there is no confusion in the South African government bond market, which, as you can see below, has seen yields explode higher in the past week since this story started getting any press at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the commodity markets continue to show significant movement, especially the metals markets.  Gold (+1.6%) is now over $2900/oz, another new all-time high and calling into question if this is just an arbitrage between London and New York deliveries.  Silver (+1.4%) continues to be along for the ride as is copper (+0.6%) which is the biggest gainer of the past week, up more than 7%.  Ironically, aluminum, the only metal where tariffs are involved, is actually a touch softer this morning.  As to oil (+1.2%) while the recent trend remains lower, it does appear to be bottoming, at least if we look at the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Turning to the data this week, it will be quite important as CPI headlines, but we also see Retail Sales and other stuff and have lots of Fedspeak.

TuesdayNFIB Small Biz Optimism104.6
 Powell Testimony to Senate 
WednesdayCPI0.3% (2.9% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (3.1% Y/Y)
 Powell Testimony to House 
ThursdayPPI0.3% (3.4% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (3.3% Y/Y)
 Initial Claims216K
 Continuing Claims1875K
FridayRetail Sales-0.1%
 -ex autos0.3%
 IP0.2%
 Capacity Utilization77.7%

Source: tradingeconmics.com

In addition to Powell, we will hear from five more Fed speakers, although with Powell speaking, I imagine their words will largely be ignored.  Overall, the world continues to try to figure out how to deal with Trump and his dramatic policy changes from the last administration.  One thing to keep in mind is that so far, polls show a large majority of the nation remains in support of his actions so it would be a mistake to think that his policy set is going to be altered.  Net, the market continues to believe this will support the dollar, as will the fact that the Fed seems less and less likely to start cutting rates soon.  Keep that in mind as you consider your hedges going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Positioning’s Fraught

Posted on by

The wonderful thing about Trump
Is traders no longer can pump
A market so high
That it can defy
Reality ere it goes bump
 
Since policies can change so fast
A long-term view just cannot last
So, Fed put or not
Positioning’s fraught
And larger ones won’t be amassed

 

As we await the NFP report this morning, I couldn’t help but ponder the uptick in complaints and concerns by traders that increased volatility in markets on the back of President Trump’s mercurial announcements has changed the trading game dramatically.  Let me say up front that I think this is a much healthier place to be and explain why.

Pretty much since the GFC and, more importantly, then Chairman Bernanke’s first utilization of QE and forward guidance, the nature of financial markets had evolved into hugely leveraged one-sided views based on whatever the Fed was guiding.  So, the initial idea behind QE and forward guidance was to assure all the traders and investors that make up the market that even though interest rates reached 0.0%, the Fed would continue to ease policy and would do so for as far out in time as you can imagine.  Lower for longer became the mantra and every time there was a hiccup in the market, the Fed rushed in, added yet more liquidity to calm things down, and put the market back on track for further gains.  This was true for both stocks and bonds, despite the fact that the Fed has no business or mandate involving the equity market.

This activity led to the ever-increasing size of trading firms as leverage was cheap and steadily rising securities prices led to lower volatility, both implied and real, in the markets.  Risk managers were comfortable allowing these positions to grow as the calculated risks were minimized by the low vol.  In fact, entire trading strategies were developed to take advantage of the situation with Risk Parity being a favorite.  

However, a negative result of these actions by the Fed was that investors no longer considered the fundamentals or macroeconomics behind an investment, only the Fed’s stance.  The only way to outperform was to take on more leverage than your competitors, and that was great while rates stayed at 0.0%.  Alas, this persisted for so long that many, if not most, traders who learned the business prior to the GFC wound up retiring or leaving the market, and the next generation of traders and investors lived by two credos, number go up and BTFD.

The Fed remained complicit in this process as FOMC members evolved from background players to a constant presence in our daily lives, virtually preening on screens and in front of audiences and reiterating the Fed’s views of what they were going to do, implicitly telling traders that taking large, leveraged bets would be fine because the Fed had their back.

Of course, the pandemic upset that apple cart as the combination of Fed and government response imbued the economy with significantly more inflation than expected and forced the Fed to change their tune.  The market was not prepared for that, hence the outcome in 2022 when both stocks and bonds fell sharply.  But the Fed would not be denied and calmed things down and created a coherent enough message so that markets recovered the past two years.  This has, naturally, led to increased position sizing and more leverage because that’s what this generation of traders understands and has worked.

Enter Donald J Trump as president, elected on a populist manifesto and despite his personal wealth, seemingly focused on Main Street, not Wall Street.  The thing about President Trump is if an idea he proffers doesn’t work, he will drop it in a heartbeat and move on.  As well, by wielding the full power of the United States when dealing in international situations, other nations can quickly find themselves in a difficult spot and, so far, have been willing to bend their knee.  As well, his focus on tariffs as a primary weapon, with little regard for the impact on markets, and the way with which he uses them, threatening to impose them, and holding off at the last minute when other nations alter their policy, has kept markets off-balance.

The result is large leveraged positions are very difficult to hold and manage when markets can move up and down 2% in a day, every day (like the NASDAQ 100 chart below), depending on the headlines.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The natural response is to reduce position size and leverage, and that, my friends, is a healthy turn in markets.  This is not to say that there are not still many significant imbalances, just that as they continue to blow up, whether Nvidia, or FX or metals, my take is the next set of positions will be smaller as nimble is more important than large.  It doesn’t matter how smart an algorithm is if there is no liquidity to adjust a position when the world changes.  This poet’s opinion is this is a much healthier place for markets to live.

Ok, let’s see what happened overnight ahead of today’s data.  Mixed is the best description as yesterday’s US closes saw a mixed outcome and overnight the Nikkei (-0.7%) fell while both Hong Kong (+1.2%) and China (+1.3%) gained ground.  Korea and India slid, Taiwan rose, the picture was one of uncertainty about the future.  That also describes Europe, where only Germany and Norway have managed any modest gains at all while the rest of the continent and the UK are all slightly lower.  Apparently, yesterday’s BOE rate cut has not comforted investors in the UK, nor has the talk of more rate cuts by the ECB bolstered attitudes in Europe.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are basically unchanged.

In the bond market, the biggest mover overnight was in Japan where JGB yields rose 3bps, once again touching that recent 30-year high.  While some BOJ comments indicated inflation remained well-behaved, the market is clearly of the view that Ueda-san is getting set to hike rates further.  In Europe, yields are basically lower by 1bp across the board and Treasury yields are unchanged on the session as investors and traders continue to focus on Treasury Secretary Bessent’s conversation that he cares about 10-year yields, not Fed funds.  Perhaps the Fed will cut rates to recapture the spotlight they have grown to love.

Oil (+0.5%) prices continue to drift lower overall, although this morning they are bouncing from yesterday’s closing levels.  Questions about sanctions policy on Iran, on Russia’s shadow fleet and about the state of the global economy and therefore oil demand remain unanswered.  However, the fact that oil has been sliding tells me that there is some belief that President Trump may get his way regarding a desire for lower oil prices.  In the metals markets, copper (+1.1%) is flying higher again, and seems to be telling us that the economy is in decent shape.  Either that or there is a major supply shortage, although if that is the case, I have not seen any reporting on the subject.  Both gold and silver are very modestly higher this morning after small declines yesterday as the London – NY arbitrage continues to be the hot topic and financing rates for both metals have gone parabolic.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning, perhaps slightly firmer as JPY (-0.5%) is actually the worst performer around, despite the rise in JGB yields.  There is a lot of chatter on how the yen is due to trade much higher, and it has rallied over the past month, but it is certainly not a straight line move.  As to the rest of the space, virtually every other currency is +/-0.2% from yesterday’s close with CLP (+0.5%) the lone exception as the Chilean peso benefits from copper’s huge rally.

On the data front, here are the latest expectations for this morning’s employment report:

Nonfarm Payrolls170K
Private Payrolls141K
Manufacturing Payrolls-2K
Unemployment Rate4.1%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.8% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.3
Participation Rate62.5%
Michigan Sentiment71.1

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Remember, though, the ADP number on Wednesday was much better than expected at 183K (exp 150K) with a major revision higher by 54K to the previous month).  As well, this month brings the BLS adjustments for 2024 which will not be broken down, just lumped into the data.  Recall, there are rumors of a significant reduction in the number of jobs created in 2024 as well as a significant increase in the population estimates with more complete immigration data, and that has led some pundits to call for a much higher Unemployment Rate.  I have no insight into how those adjustments will play out although the idea they will be large seems highly plausible.

Ahead of the number, nothing will happen.  If the number is strong, so NFP >200K, I expect that bonds will suffer, and the dollar will find some support.  A weak number should bring the opposite, but the revisions are a wild card.  As I stated this morning, the best idea is to maintain the smallest exposures possible for the time being, as volatility is the one thing on which we can count.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Three-Three-Three

Posted on by

Said Bessent, when speaking of rates
The 10-year yield’s what dominates
Our focus and goals
As that’s what controls
Most mortgages here in the States
 
Remember, our goal’s three-three-three
With job one on deficits key
So, that’s why we’ll slash
The wasting of cash
With tax cuts set permanently

 

There is a new voice in Washington that matters to Wall Street, that of the new Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.  Yesterday in his first significant comments since his swearing-in, he made very clear that he and the president were far more focused on the 10-year Treasury yield, and driving that lower, than they were concerned over the Fed funds rate.  Talk about a different focus than the last administration!  At any rate, he expounded on his views as to how that can be achieved, namely lower energy prices and a reduced budget deficit alongside deregulation.  Recall, his three-three-three plan is 3% budget deficit, 3mm barrels of oil/day additional supply and 3% GDP growth.  Clearly, this is a tall order given the starting point, but he has not shied away from these goals and insists they are achievable.

Yesterday also brought the Quarterly Refunding Announcement, the Treasury’s announced borrowing schedule for the current quarter.  Under then-Secretary Yellen, the US shifted its borrowing to a much greater percentage of short-term T-bills (<1-year maturity) while avoiding the sale of longer date notes and bonds.  This is something which Bessent has consistently explained his predecessor screwed up given her unwillingness to term out more debt when the entire interest rate structure was much lower.  After all, homeowners were smart enough to refinance down to 3% fixed rate mortgages, but the Treasury secretary thought it was a better idea to stay short.  

Of course, changing the current treasury mix is one of the impediments to lower 10-year yields because changing it would require an increase in the sale of longer dated paper which would depress the price and raise those yields.  Bessent has his work cut out for him.  However, my take is this is a goal, but one that will be achieved gradually.  He even commented that until the debt ceiling is raised, there will be no changes in the debt mix.  Arguably, if the administration can make real progress on reducing the budget deficit, that is what will allow for the gradual adjustment of the debt mix without a dramatic rise in long-term yields.

Perhaps it is still the honeymoon period, but the market is showing some deference to Mr Bessent as 10-year yields have fallen steadily in the past two weeks, dropping from a high of 4.81% the week before the inauguration to their current level at 4.44%.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While we cannot attribute the entire move to Bessent, certainly investors are showing at least a little love at this stage.  I believe the 10-year yield will grow in importance for all markets as movement there will be seen as the report card for Bessent and this administration’s goals.

Meanwhile, in the UK, stagflation
Is now the Old Lady’s vexation
But cut rates, they will
Lest growth they do kill
As prices continue dilation

The BOE is currently meeting, and expectations are nearly universal that they will cut their base rate by 25bps to 4.50% with 8 of the 9 MPC members set to vote that way.  The only hawk on the committee, Catherine Mann, is expected to vote for no change.  The problem they have (well the problem regarding monetary policy, there are many problems extant in the UK right now) is that core inflation continues to run above 3.0% while GDP is growing at approximately 0.0% in recent quarters and at 1.0% in the past year.  A quick look at the monthly GDP readings below shows that things have not been moving along very well, certainly not since PM Starmer’s election in July.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In stagflationary environments, the most successful central bank responses have been to kill the inflation and suffer the consequences of the inevitable recession first, allowing growth to resume under better circumstances.  Of course, Paul Volcker is most famous for this model, which he derived after numerous other countries, notably the UK, failed to effectively solve the problem in the mid 1970’s in the wake of the first oil price shocks.  Now, the UK has created its own energy price supply shock via its insane efforts to wean itself from fossil fuels without adequate alternate supplies of energy, and stagflation is the natural result.  However, addressing inflation does not appear to be the primary focus of the Bank of England right now.  I am skeptical that they will be successful in achieving their goals which is one of the key reasons I dislike the pound over time.

Ok, let’s turn to market activity overnight.  The party continues on Wall Street with yesterday’s equity gains attributed to many things, perhaps Bessent’s comments being amongst the drivers.  Certainly, a reduced budget deficit and reduced 10-year yields are likely to help the market overall.  That attitude has been uniform overnight and through the morning session with every major Asian market (Japan, +0.6%, Hong Kong +1.4%, China +1.3%) and European market (Germany +0.8%, France +0.8%, UK +1.45%) higher on the session.  As it happens, the BOE did cut rates by 25bps as expected and now we await Governor Bailey’s comments.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:25) they are little changed on the session.

In the bond market, the ongoing rally has stalled for now with Treasury yields higher by 2bps this morning while most European sovereign yields are little changed on the day.  A key piece of information that is set to be released tomorrow comes from the ECB as their economists are going to report the ECB’s estimate of where the neutral rate lies in Europe.  With the deposit rate there down to 2.75%, many pundits, and ECB speakers, are targeting 2.0% as the proper level implying more rate cuts to come.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.65%) is bouncing off its recent trading lows but in truth, a look at the chart and one is hard-pressed to discern an overall direction.  More choppiness seems likely as the market tries to absorb the latest information from the Trump administration and its plans.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the metals markets, gold, which had a strong rally yesterday and made further new all-time highs, is unchanged this morning while silver (-0.75%) consolidates its recent gains and copper (+0.6%) adds to its gains.  The thing about copper is it is, allegedly, a good prognosticator of economic activity as it is so widely used in industry and construction, and it has been rallying sharply for the past month.  That does seem to bode well for future activity.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning, recouping some of its recent losses although I would contend we have merely been consolidating after a sharp move higher during the past three months.  The pound (-1.0%) is today’s laggard after the rate cut but we are seeing weakness almost everywhere in both G10 and EMG currencies.  One exception is the yen (+0.2%) which seems to be benefitting from comments by former BOJ Governor Kuroda that the BOJ is likely to raise rates above 1.0% during the coming year.  Interestingly, he explained that given the recent economic trajectory, it was only natural that the BOJ would seek to normalize rates.  However, given that interest rates in Japan have been 0.5% or below for the past 30 years, wouldn’t that be considered normal these days?  Just sayin’!

On the data front, with the BOE out of the way, we now get the weekly Initial (exp 213K) and Continuing (1870K) Claims data as well as Nonfarm Productivity (1.4%) and Unit Labor Costs (3.4%).  Yesterday’s ADP Employment data was much stronger than expected with a revision higher to last month as well, certainly a positive for the job outlook.  As well, this afternoon we hear from three more Fed speakers, but so far this week, the word caution has been the most frequently used noun in their vocabulary.  Of course, with Mr Bessent now starting to make his views known, perhaps more focus will turn there and away from the Fed for a while.

Market participants are clearly feeling pretty good right now, especially about the recent activity in the US.  I think you have to like US assets, both stocks and bonds, while expecting the dollar to continue to hold its ground.  This sounds like a recipe for weaker commodity prices, notably gold, but so far, that has not been the case.

Good luck

Adf

Is Past Prologue?

Posted on by

The Japanese tale
Now sees brighter times ahead
Yen buyers rejoice

 

While its movement has been somewhat choppy, for the past month, the yen has been the best performing currency in the G10, gaining more than 3.0% during that time.  This strength seems to have been built on several different themes including a more hawkish BOJ, better growth prospects based on PMI data, rising wages, and some underlying risk aversion.  A quick look at the chart shows that the trend is clearly lower and there have been far more down days for the dollar than up days during this period.

Source: tradingeconomics.com 

Of course, as I regularly remind myself, and you my good readers, perspective is an important thing to keep in mind, especially when making statements about longer term prospects of a currency.  When looking at USDJPY over a longer term, say the past 5 years where long-term trends have been entrenched based on broad macroeconomic issues as well as the day-to-day vagaries of trading, the picture looks quite different.  In fact, as you can see from the below chart, the past month’s movement barely registers.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My point is that we must be careful regarding the relative importance of information and news and keep in mind that short-term movements may very well be just that, short-term, rather than major changes in long-term trends.  The latter require very significant macro changes regarding interest rate policy and economic activity, at least when it comes to currencies, not simply a single central bank policy move.

So, the question at hand is, are we at the beginning of a major set of policy shifts that will change the long-term trajectory of the yen?  Or is the yen’s recent strength merely normal noise?

While almost everybody has their own opinion on how the Fed is going to proceed going forward, I think it is instructive to look at the Fed funds futures market and the pricing for future rate activity.  For instance, a look at the current market, especially when compared where these probabilities were one month ago tells us that expectations for Fed rate cuts have diminished pretty substantially, arguably implying that there is more reason to hold dollars.

Source: CME.org

You can see in the lower right-hand corner of the chart that the probability of a rate cut has fallen from nearly 44% to just 16.5% over the past month.  However, during that same period, the BOJ has not only raised interest rates by 25bps, but they have made clear that further rate hikes are coming based on wage settlements and sticky inflationary readings.  One potential way to incorporate this relative movement is to look at the change in forecast interest rates, which in the US have risen by ~7bps (27% *25bps) while Japanese interest rates have risen by 25bps with expectations for another 25bps coming soon.  That is a powerful incentive to be long yen or at least less short yen, than previous positioning.  And we have seen that play out as the yen has strengthened as per the above.

The real question is, can we expect this to continue?  Or have we seen the bulk of the movement?   Here, much will depend on the future of the Fed’s actions as the market is seeing a bifurcation between those who believe rates are destined to fall further once inflation starts to ease again, vs. those, like this poet, who believe that inflation is showing no signs of easing, and therefore the Fed will be hard-pressed to justify further rate cuts.  While I am not the last word on the BOJ, from every source I see, expecting their base rate to be raised above 1.00% anytime in the next several years is aggressive.  Just look at the below chart showing the history of the BOJ base rate.  The last time the rate was above 0.50%, its current level, was September 1995.  That is not to say they cannot raise it, just that as you can see, several times in the intervening years they tried to do so and were forced to reverse course as the economy fell back into the doldrums with inflation quickly falling as well.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Is past prologue?  Personally, my take is above 1.0% is highly unlikely any time in the next several years.  Meanwhile, if inflation remains the problem it is in the US, Fed cuts will be much harder to justify.  This is not to say that the yen cannot strengthen somewhat further, but I am not of the opinion we have had a sea change in the long-term trend.

Ok, after spending way too much time on the yen, given that there hasn’t even been any tariff discussion on Japanese products, let’s look elsewhere to see how things moved overnight.

Yesterday saw further relief by equity investors that tariffs are a key Trump negotiating tactic rather than an effort to raise revenue and US markets all gained, especially the NASDAQ.  However, the movement in Asia was more muted with the Nikkei (+0.1%) barely higher while both Hong Kong (-0.9%) and China (-0.6%) fell amid the Chinese tariffs remaining in place.  As to the regional markets, there were some notably gainers (Korea and Taiwan), but away from those two a more mixed picture with less absolute movement was the order of the day.  In Europe, Spain’s IBEX (+1.0%) is the standout performer after the PMI data showed only a modest slowing, and a much better result than the rest of the continent.  Perhaps this explains why the rest of the continent is +/- 0.2% on the session.  As to US futures, they are lower at this hour (7:30) on the back of weaker earnings data from Google after the close last night.

In the bond market, yields have fallen across the board (except in Japan where JGB yields made a run at 1.30%) with Treasury yields lower by 4bps this morning and 12bps from the highs seen yesterday morning.  European sovereign yields are all lower as well, between -4bps and -7bps, as the weaker PMI data has traders convinced that the ECB is going to respond to weakening growth rather than sticky inflation and are now pricing in 100bps of cuts this year with the first 25bps coming tomorrow.

In the commodity space, gold (+1.0%) is the god of commodities right now, rallying more than $100/oz over the past five sessions.  There continue to be questions as to whether this is a major short squeeze as COMEX contracts come up for delivery, but it is not hard to write a narrative that there is increased uncertainty in the world and gold is still seen as the ultimate safe haven.  This gold rally continues to pull other metals higher (Ag +0.8%, Cu +0.2%) although I have to believe this is going to come to a halt soon.  Meanwhile, energy prices have fallen again (oil -1.0%, NatGas -1.5%) as fears over supply issues have dissipated completely.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure overall, certainly one of the reasons the yen (+1.0%) has performed so well overnight, but elsewhere in the G10, we are seeing the euro, pound and Aussie all gain 0.4% or so.  In the EMG bloc, CLP (+1.0%) is gaining on that renewed copper strength while ZAR (+0.5%) is shaking off the Trump threats regarding recent legislative changes and benefitting from gold’s massive rally.  The one outlier is MXN (-0.4%) which seems to be caught between the benefits of stronger silver prices (Mexico is a major exporter of silver) and weaker oil prices.

On the data front today, we start with ADP Employment (exp 150K) then the Trade Balance (-$96.6B) and get ISM Services (54.3) at 10:00.  We also see the EIA oil inventory data with a modest build anticipated across all products.  Four more Fed speakers are on the docket but as we continue to hear from more and more of the FOMC, the word of the moment is caution, as in, the Fed needs to move with caution regarding any further rate cuts.

I don’t blame the Fed for being cautious as President Trump has the ability to completely change perspectives with a single announcement.  While yesterday was focused on Gaza, not really a financial market concern, who knows what today will bring?  It is for this reason that I repeatedly remind one and all, hedging is the best way to moderate changes in cash flows and earnings, and consistent programs, regardless of the situation on a particular day, are very valuable.

Good luck

Adf