Tag Archives: interest-rates

Squealed Like Stuck Pigs

Posted on by

What many just don’t comprehend
Is tariffs are not near the end
Of policy changes
As Trump rearranges
The world into foe and to friend
 
And while Wall Street squealed like stuck pigs
Trump’s boosters just don’t give two figs
They’re willing to try
The Trump calculi
If they see it hurts the bigwigs

 

I’m old enough to remember when Nonfarm Payrolls were the most important thing to market participants regardless of the asset class.  Ahh, those were the days.  It is remarkable that across major business headlines, I haven’t seen anything discussing the release for later this morning.  Don’t misunderstand me, I’m not upset about that fact, I think there has been far too much focus on that data point for far too long, but I am surprised.  This may be the best indicator that we are in a new regime for finance and economics.  It appears that most of the things the analyst community used to consider important are now merely afterthoughts.

I thought the WSJ had the most consequential article in this morning’s ‘paper’ asking, who is going to buy the $400 billion of stuff that China makes that will no longer be price competitive in the US?  They weren’t mentioned explicitly, but I imagine that Temu and Shein are both going to find their business models significantly impaired.  But will other “free trading’ nations allow all that stuff across their borders tariff free?  The Chinese mercantilist model was built with the idea that if they could produce stuff more cheaply than other nations, whether through subsidy or efficiency, other nations would welcome that stuff.  It remains to be seen how well that model holds up given the changes wrought by President Trump.

On a different note, I have read many comparisons of yesterday’s market declines to the March 2020 Covid panic, but my take is it is far more akin to the September 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse, at least from the tone of the market.  Covid was an exogenous event while Lehman and the tariffs were home-made.  The issue with the GFC and the current time was/is that they are systemic alterations which means that things will be different going forward in finance and economics.  Covid clearly changed our lives based on the government response, but it didn’t change the way markets behaved.  

At this point, there is no indication that President Trump is going to change his tune, and why would he? Again, amongst the key financial market goals he and Secretary Bessent have touted were a reduction in 10-year yields, lower by 75bps since inauguration, (✔️), a reduction in the price of oil, lower by $14/bbl or 18%,  (✔️) and a lower dollar relative to other currencies lower by 6.5%,(✔️).  Ask yourself, do you really think they are unhappy with the current situation?

I have no idea how things will play out from here, and in reality, neither does anybody else.  Reliance on models that were built with past assumptions does not inspire confidence.  As well, we have barely seen the response to these tariffs, although just moments ago China indicated they would be imposing 34% tariffs on all US goods entering their country.  But anybody who believes they know the end game is delusional.  This is the beginning of the change, and there will be much more to come across many different aspects of the economy and markets as the year progresses.  Interesting times indeed.

With that in mind, let’s see how day two of the new world order is playing out (and to think, there were all those conspiracy theories about a new world order before, but this was not what they had in mind.)  Green is a hard color to find on screens again today as after yesterday’s rout in US markets, the follow-through in Asia was almost complete.  Indonesia (+0.6%) managed a gain somehow, but every other major market declined, some quite substantially.  Singapore (-3.0%), Thailand (-3.6%) and Tokyo (-3.1%) were the biggest losers, but shares everywhere fell with most declining more than -1.0% on the session.  Interestingly, European shares are having a much worse session today than yesterday with Italy’s FTSE MIB (-7.1%) leading the way although Spain’s IBEX (-5.5%), the DAX (-4.5%), CAC (-3.8%) and FTSE 100 (-3.5%) are not exactly loving life today either.  As to US futures, they are pointing much lower again today, -3.0% or so for all the major indices.

Bonds, however, are in great demand with yields virtually collapsing as investors seek anyplace that is not equities to find shelter from this storm.  Treasury yields have fallen a further 15bps this morning and you can see in the chart below, just how large this decline has been.  In fact, yields have almost retraced to the level just before the Fed started cutting rates last September!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But bonds everywhere in the world are in demand with yields on European sovereigns lower by between -7bps (Italy and Greece) and -15bps (Germany) as credit quality has also entered the picture there.  Finally, JGB yields have also tumbled, down -18bps overnight, as Japanese investors flee global markets and bring their money home.

Arguably, though, the biggest move has been in oil (-6.9%) which is now down to levels not seen since it was rebounding from Covid inspired lows back in 2022.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I would contend this is almost entirely a recession fear, lack of forward demand story, although I believe OPEC+ is still planning on reducing its production cuts as the year progresses.  I imagine the latter is subject to change based on the economic outcomes.  In the metals markets, gold (+0.15%) after a sell-off yesterday, is consolidating for now.  Given the amount of leverage that abounds and given that when margin calls come, folks sell what they can, not what they want to, I suspect much of gold’s selling yesterday was forced rather than based on fear.  Rather, I suspect gold will outperform as it maintains its ultimate haven status.  The same, though, is not true for other metals with silver (-1.5%) and copper (-4.2%) both sharply lower this morning.  Certainly, in copper’s case, given the increased recession fears, it can be no surprise that its price is declining.

Finally, turning to the dollar, after a sharp decline yesterday, largely across the board, this morning the picture is a bit more mixed with a rebound against some currencies (AUD -3.0%, NZD -2.5%, SEK -1.7%, NOK (-2.1% although also inspired by oil’s precipitous decline.). However, both the yen (+1.0%) and Swiss franc (+1.25%) are continuing to display their haven attributes, while the euro (-0.1%) seems caught in the middle.  In the EMG bloc, though, the dollar is quite solid this morning with MXN (-1.9%), ZAR (-1.7%) and CLP (-1.0%) all falling.  Of note, CNY (0.0%) has barely moved throughout the entire process.

As I mentioned above, today we do see the NFP report, although my take is a strong report will be ignored as old regime, while a weak report will be ‘proof positive’ a recession is near.  Here are the expectations as of this morning:

Nonfarm Payrolls135K
Private Payrolls127K
Manufacturing Payrolls4K
Unemployment Rate4.1%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.4%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Will the data really matter?  I don’t think so, at least not to policy makers as they realize (I hope) the world today is different than when this data was collected.  At this point, the market is now pricing in a full 75bps of rate cuts by year end from the Fed with a ~30% probability of a cut early next month.  But Powell and company don’t have any idea how this will play out either.  I fear that we are in a market situation where volatility is the dominant theme, in both directions.  Remember, Donald Trump is best thought of as the avatar of volatility.  He has earned that nickname.  This is why I harp on maintaining hedges, the world is a tricky place.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Stress and Dismay

Posted on by

The only discussion today
Is how badly tariffs will weigh
On stocks and on growth
As certainly both
Will feel some more stress and dismay
 
But hopefully, once they’re in force
It will change the pundits’ discourse
‘Cause I’m sick and tired
That it’s now required
We all, tariffs, hate or endorse

 

A funny thing happened on the way to the market collapsing yesterday, especially given the early morning portents, and that is the market didn’t collapse at all.  Equities opened lower and rallied all day with the Dow even having a quite respectable 1% gain when all was said and done.  I think the lesson that needs to be taken from this is markets have a tendency to get ahead of the news and reversals are pretty frequent.  In fact, this is a perfect example of ordinary market behavior, a sharp move in one direction is suddenly reversed for no obvious reason.  Certainly, there was nothing said or done yesterday that seemed a specific catalyst for a short-term rebound.  That, my friends, is simply how markets work.

However, for now, with tomorrow being President Trump’s “liberation day” when tariffs will be announced, they remain the major story across both financial markets and political narratives.  As I sit here in the cheap seats, observing the back and forth, what has become abundantly clear is that the politicization of economic actions is the true reality.  Yesterday I highlighted the difference between Democrat and Republican views on future inflation.  Reading through the commentary on X, as well as stories in Bloomberg and the WSJ, I think this is the same situation, with Democrats certain tariffs will be the downfall of the economy and lead to rampant inflation, while Republicans believe they will help the nation recapture lost manufacturing capacity.  Personally, I’m just looking forward to moving on to a different story as we have been discussing tariffs for more than two months straight and it is tiresome.

Here’s the one thing of which I am confident, however, and that is nobody has any idea what the impacts will ultimately be on either markets or the economy.  I maintain that pretty much every model that has been in use for the past two decades, all of which were developed based on data during a period of low inflation and declining interest rates as well as significant increases in central bank provided liquidity, no longer work.  After all, those underlying conditions no longer exist.  Inflation remains much higher than during the pre-pandemic decades;

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Interest rates are much higher;

Source: fred.stlouisfed.org

And central banks have been reducing net liquidity for some time now (think QT). 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, if all the underlying conditions have changed, it seems unlikely that the models based on those conditions will add much value.  After all, nobody really knows how elastic prices are for any given goods directly, nor how willing companies will be to sacrifice margin to maintain sales.  As such, forecasting short-term movements is a mugs’ game here.  In fact, yesterday’s price action is a perfect example of how things are not necessarily how they appear.

With that in mind, let’s see how yesterday’s risk reversal in US equity markets fed into the rest of the world.  Asian equities saw a wide range of price action overnight.  While Japan, Hong Kong and China were all tantamount to unchanged, Korea (+1.6%) and Taiwan (+2.8%) saw significant bounces while India (-1.8%) fell after concerns that President Trump’s mooted additional sanctions on any nation that buys Russian oil hit home as India buys, I read, 44% of their oil from Russia.  Meanwhile, in Europe, screens are green this morning with gains across the board of between 0.7% and 1.0%.  This is despite weaker PMI data, with every nation in Europe reporting a sub 50 manufacturing number.  However, inflation fell a tick more than expected with Core falling to 2.4% and headline down to 2.2% and this has encouraged traders to believe that the ECB will be cutting again later this month despite some commentary to the contrary from several ECB members.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15) they are pointing lower by about -0.4% across the board.  

In the bond market, 10-year yields continue to slide around the world with Treasuries (-5bps) falling back to their lowest level in a month and prior to that since early December.  Too, European sovereigns are seeing yields fall sharply, with declines of between -6bps and -10bps as the combination of slowing inflation and weak PMI data has overwhelmed the previous concerns about German defense spending.  In fact, that is a story we have not heard in a while, eh?  Last week, that was the end of European bond markets, today it is ancient history!

Turning to commodities, oil (+0.1%) is consolidating after a sharp $2/bbl rise yesterday that was fomented by Trump’s threats to both Russia and Iran (he threatened to bomb them if they didn’t renounce their nuclear ambitions).  The thing about oil’s price action is since late 2022, it has remained in a trading range of $65/$80 more or less, so despite the large move yesterday, I would argue no new ground has been covered.  Certainly Trump’s efforts to open up more area for drilling is likely to weigh on prices over time, but over what timeframe remains to be seen.  As it is a day ending in “y”, gold is higher again, this morning by 0.3%, but there is no indication this trend is running out of steam.  The remarkable thing is the steadiness of the move.  However, the other two major metals, silver (-0.35%) and copper (-0.3%) have slipped a bit this morning.

Finally, the dollar remains confused.  Versus the euro (-0.25%) it is stronger, but versus the CHF (+0.25%) and JPY (+0.5%) it is weaker.  Now, you might say that is a sign of a risk-off trade, but equity markets are rallying in Europe along with bonds.  So, is this a move to havens or risk?  The biggest mover this morning is CLP (-0.9%) but it has been one of the biggest gainers YTD, so with copper soft, this looks a lot like some profit taking.  Otherwise, movements of +/- 0.2% are the order of the day.

Here’s a crazy theory, perhaps President Trump is seeking to drive the economy weaker in order to force the Fed to cut rates.  After all, that appears to be the Fed’s bias, but recent inflation data has made them uncomfortable to do so.  If Trump can drive up Unemployment, maybe it does the trick!

Ok, let’s see the data the rest of the week as yesterday’s Chicago PMI (47.6) while modestly better than expected really didn’t seem to matter that much.

TodayISM Manufacturing49.5
 ISM Prices Paid65.0
 JOLTS Job Openings7.63M
WednesdayADP Employment105K
 Factory Orders0.5%
 -ex Transport0.7%
ThursdayInitial Claims225K
 Continuing Claims1860K
 Trade Balance-$123.0B
 ISM Services53.0
FridayNonfarm Payrolls128K
 Private Payrolls110K
 Manufacturing Payrolls1K
 Unemployment Rate4.2%
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.9% Y/Y)
 Average Weekly Hours34.2
 Participation Rate62.4%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to all this, we hear from six Fed speakers including Chairman Powell Friday morning at 11:30am.  For today and tomorrow, tariffs will be the primary story, although it is not clear it is the primary driver.  However, once they are announced, I expect we will move onto the next big thing, although I have no idea what that will be.  But the one thing on which we can count regarding President Trump is there will be another big thing.  Stay hedged is all the advice I can give because uncertainty is extremely high.

Good luck

Adf

Nobody Knows

Posted on by

The punditry’s now out in force
As they hope, their views, we’ll endorse
When tariffs arrive
On Wednesday they’ll strive
To claim they were right, but of course
 
The problem is nobody knows
Exactly what Trump will propose
So, models will fail
While Trump haters wail
More chaos is all that he sows

 

Well, folks, it’s month and quarter end today and many are decrying that President Trump’s policies have derailed the bull market in risk assets.  And they are almost certainly correct.  Yet, at the same time, there has been a broad recognition across a wide spectrum of analysts and politicians that the situation he inherited was unsustainable.  Whether the 7% budget deficits, the $36+ trillion in government debt or the ongoing inflationary pressures, the only people who were happy were those who saw their equity portfolios rise against all odds.  (I guess the gold holders have been pretty happy too, in fairness.)

However, the underlying reality of a situation is rarely enough to alter a good story, or a story that somebody wants to tell.  For instance, the Michigan Consumer Survey was released on Friday, and it fell more than expected to a reading of 57.0, its lowest reading since July 2022, when inflation was peaking.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But the story that has been getting all the press is the extraordinary rise in inflation expectations.  As you can see below, both 1-year (blue line) and 5-year (grey line) have risen sharply in 2025.  Conveniently for the mainstream media this has been blamed on President Trump’s policies given their efforts to discredit everything the president does.

However, the Michigan Survey, while having a long pedigree, isn’t that large a survey.  As such, it is possible that non-economic factors may be impacting the results.  For instance, when the survey is taken, the respondents’ political leanings are asked as well.  Now, take a look at the data when split by political views as per the below.  Perhaps, we need to take this survey with a grain or two of salt as it appears the question may be seen as a way to express one’s opinion about the current administration rather than unbiased views of future inflation.

This is especially true when we look at other measures of expected inflation, like the NY Fed’s Consumer inflation survey shown below with the green line compared to that Michigan survey in red.

Source: zerohedge.com

My point is, we need to be careful to notice the non-economic factors that enter into things like expectations surveys.  As well, the idea that inflation expectations are a critical driver of future inflation, although a staple of current central bank thinking, does not have much empirical backing.  For instance, my friend Mike Ashton, the Inflation Guy™, explained in this article way back in 2015, that inflation expectations do not have much empirical proof of effectively forecasting future inflation.  But perhaps, if you don’t believe him, you will consider a scholarly paper by a Fed economist, Jeremy Rudd, written in 2021 that is pretty damning with respect to the idea that the Fed relies on this data as part of their policy toolkit.  

In the end, the one truism of which I am highly confident is that pretty much all the models that have been utilized for the past twenty plus years are no longer reflective of the reality on the ground today.  Not just for inflation, but for growth and trade and every other aspect.  President Trump has not merely upset the applecart; he has broken it into pieces and burned them all to cinders.  All the fiscal problems mentioned above are still extant, but President Trump appears set on changing them in the direction desired by almost all mainstream economists.  They don’t like his methods, but it’s not clear how changes of this magnitude can be made smoothly.  So, perhaps the proper question is just how rough things are going to be.  If the overnight session is any indication, they could get pretty rough.

The dominant feature today
Is fear is what’s now holding sway
As markets decline
More pundits consign
The blame on Trumps tariff pathway

Investors have risk indigestion this morning, as their appetite to own equities anywhere in the world has significantly diminished.  After a rough week ending session on Friday in the US, equity markets in Asia have almost universally declined led by Tokyo (-4.05%) but with sharp declines seen in Korea (-3.0%), Taiwan (-4.2%), Australia (-1.75%), Malaysia (-1.45%) and Thailand (-1.5%).  Chinese (-0.7%) and Hong Kong (-1.3%) shares also fell, although perhaps not quite as far as others.  The entire conversation today is about President trump’s promise to impose tariffs around the world on Wednesday, with many analysts trying to estimate what damage will occur despite no clarity on the size and breadth of the tariffs.  But investors have decided that havens are a better place to hide for now.

European bourses are also sharply lower, although more in the -1.7% to -2.0% range, with every major index in Germany, France, Spain and Italy down by those amounts.  There continues to be a great deal of discussion amongst the European leadership about how they will respond to the mooted tariffs, but of course, like everybody else, they have no idea exactly what they will be.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:45) the picture is grim with declines between -0.6% (DJIA) and -1.3% (NASDAQ).  Right now, the only people who are happy are those holding puts.

Of course, in this risk-off environment, it should be no surprise that bond yields have slipped a bit as, at the margin, investors are flocking to own Treasuries (-5bps) and European sovereigns (Bunds -3bps, OATs -2bps, Gilts -4bps).  Even JGBs (-5bps) saw yields decline last night with any thoughts of the BOJ hiking rates in the near term fading away completely.  

On the other hand, commodities are finding a lot more interest this morning with gold (+1.15%) leading the way higher and proving itself to continue to be one of the most consistent safe havens available.  Interestingly, oil (+0.5%) is rallying this morning despite a number of Wall Street analysts upping their estimate of the probability of a US recession.  However, offsetting the potential future demand weakness is the news that President Trump is “pissed off” at Vladimir Putin for his ongoing aggression in Ukraine and seeming unwillingness to move to a ceasefire.  This has raised the specter of further sanctions on Russian oil output, potentially reducing supply.  As well, the Trump administration continues to tighten the noose on both Iranian and Venezuelan oil sales, so potentially reducing supply even further.  I guess this morning, the supply story is bigger than the demand story.

Finally, as we turn to the currency markets, the dollar is generally firmer this morning, although by widely varying amounts depending on the currency.  For instance, in the G10, NOK (-0.75%) is the laggard despite oil’s gains, followed by AUD (-0.6%) and NZD (-0.55%), with all three of these being major commodity producers at a time when commodities are doing well.  As to the rest of this bloc, JPY (+0.35%) is off its best levels, but behaving as a haven, and the others are just marginally changed from Friday’s closing levels.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (+0.25%) is the exception this morning, clearly benefitting from gold’s ongoing run to new all-time high prices, but otherwise, most of these currencies are modestly softer (MXN -0.2%, PLN -0.2%, KRW -0.25%).

Speaking of currencies, though, there is an article on this morning’s Bloomberg website that is worth reading, I believe, for everyone involved in the FX market.  The gist of the article is something that I have been discussing for the past several years, the fact that market liquidity here, despite the extraordinary volumes that trade on average each day (currently estimated by the BIS at $7.5 trillion across all FX products) is not nearly as deep as might be anticipated.  

My observation from my time on bank desks was that while there was a great deal of electronic flow, likely driven by HFT firms seeking to extract the last tenth of a pip out of thousands of transactions, when a real client, generally a corporate, had a need to do something specific to address a business need, and that amounted to more than $100 million equivalent, the liquidity situation was far more suspect. 

My personal theory was as follows: bank consolidation reduced the net amount of risk-taking appetite as larger banks did not increase their risk-taking commensurate with the reduction that occurred by small banks being gobbled up.  Combining this with the introduction of high-frequency trading firms in the business, who had no underlying client base to whom they owed a price, and therefore, could turn off their machines in a difficult market, further reducing liquidity, led to a situation where liquidity was a mile wide and an inch deep.  My point is for all the corporates out there who have significant transactions to execute, you must carefully consider the best way to approach the situation to avoid a potentially significant increase in execution costs.

Turning to the data, before we look at this week, which ends with NFP, a quick word on Friday’s core PCE data, which came in at a hotter than expected 0.4% taking the YY number to 2.8%.  The Fed cannot be happy with this outcome as a quick look at the recent readings makes it hard to accept inflation is continuing its decline from the 2022 highs.  Rather a look at the below chart, at least to my eye, shows me a stability in Core PCE of somewhere between 2.5% and 3.0%, well above the Fed’s target range, and hardly a cause to cut rates further.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As this note has already gotten a bit longer than I like, I will list the week’s data tomorrow but note that Chicago PMI (exp 45.4) is the only noteworthy data point to be released today.  

Absent a complete reversal of Trump’s tariff plans, I see nothing positive on the horizon for risk assets, and expect that equities will maintain, and probably extend the overnight losses while gold and bonds both rally, at least for now.  As to the dollar, my take is it will not benefit universally in this risk-off scenario, although there are currencies that will clearly suffer.  Remarkably, despite the performance of Aussie and Kiwi overnight, I do believe the commodity bloc has the best prospects for now.

Good luck

Adf

Just a Mistake

Posted on by

It wasn’t all that long ago
That folks really wanted to know
What Jay and the Fed
Implied was ahead
And if more cuts were apropos
 
But later today when they break
Their words are unlikely to shake
The narrative theme
That whate’er they deem
Important, is just a mistake

 

Presidents Trump and Putin spoke at length yesterday, but no solution was achieved so the Ukraine War will continue unabated for now. While talks are better than not, certainly this is a disappointment to some.  As well, the astronauts who have been stranded in space for the past 8 months are safely back on earth.  I mention these things because they are seemingly far more important than central banks these days, and today, that is all we have to discuss regarding financial markets.

To begin, last night the BOJ left rates on hold as universally anticipated.  The initial market response was for the yen to weaken through 150 briefly, but then Ueda-san spoke and discussed the expected wage increases and how the economy was doing fine, and the new market assessment is that the BOJ will hike rates by 25bps in May at their next meeting.  The market response was to buy back the yen, at least for a little while, although right now, USDJPY seems to be attracted to the 150 level overall.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It is worth understanding, though, that the last time short-term interest rates were that high in Japan was back in July 2008.  And they have not been above that level since August 1995.  The below chart from FRED database speaks volumes about just how low interest rates have been in Japan over time, and as an adjunct, just how long the opportunity for shorting JPY on the carry trade has been around.  That dotted line is the Fed funds rate compared to the Japanese overnight rate.  

Along the central bank thesis, Bank Indonesia, too, met last night and left policy on hold with their policy rate at 5.75%.  Governor Warjiyo explained that he felt falling inflation and improving growth would help prevent rupiah weakness despite the fact that the currency has been the worst performing Asian currency this year and is trading at historic lows.

But on to the FOMC meeting which will conclude at 2:00 this afternoon with the policy statement (no change expected although some tweaking of the verbiage is likely) and the release of the latest dot plot.  You have probably forgotten that at the December meeting, the FOMC reduced the median expectation of rate cuts for 2025 from 4 prior to the election to just 2.  In the interim we have seen Fed funds futures trade to where barely one rate cut was priced in, although we are now back to three cuts, seemingly on the idea that tariffs will cause significant economic weakness, and the Fed will need to respond.  At least that’s what the punditry maintains.

Here is the last dot plot for information purposes and it will be interesting to see just how much things have changed.  will longer run rates continue to move higher?  Will 2 rate cuts still be the median outcome for 2025?  All this we get to learn at 2:00.

Source: federalreserve.gov

But arguably, of far more import will be Chairman Powell’s press conference beginning at 2:30.  Prior to the Fed’s quiet period, the broad assessment was that patience in future rate moves was appropriate and they were happy with the current situation.  However, I am confident there will be numerous questions regarding the potential impact of tariffs on monetary policy responses, as well as other things like DOGE and an audit of the Fed.  Will any of it matter?  Maybe at the margin, but for most markets, I suspect that fiscal issues will remain dominant.  The one exception is the FX market, where unalloyed hawkishness could change views on the dollar’s recent weakness (although it is firmer this morning) while a dovish tone will almost certainly undermine the greenback.  So, with no other data of note to be released beforehand, it is clearly the day’s major event.

Ahead of that event, let’s see how markets have behaved overnight.  Following a weak session in the US, where all three major indices were lower by about -1.0% on average, Asia had a mixed picture.  The Nikkei (-0.25%) found no love from Ueda-san and drifted lower.  Both Hong Kong (+0.1%) and China (+0.1%) edged higher but continue to doubt the benefits of the mooted Chinese stimulus program while the rest of the region was mixed with some gainers (Indonesia, Korea, India) and some laggards (Taiwan, Australia, Malaysia).  In Europe, too, the picture is mixed with the DAX (-0.4%) lagging while the CAC (+0.5%) is gaining.  In Germany, the historic breech of the debt brake is not having the positive impact anticipated, or perhaps this is just selling the news.  Overall, though, shares in Europe seem to be awaiting the Fed’s actions, or comments, rather than focusing on anything else.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30), they are pointing slightly higher, about 0.25% across the board.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have edged up 1bp this morning but continue to hang around 4.30%.  European sovereign debt has seen yields slip -1bp to -2bps, arguably on the Eurozone inflation data released 0.1% lower than forecast at 2.3%.  This continues the idea that the ECB will be cutting rates again at their next meeting.  As to JGBs, they are unchanged yet again, seemingly affixed at 1.50%.

Commodity prices show oil (-0.2%) continuing yesterday’s decline.  From the time I wrote to the end of the session, WTI fell $2/bbl, perhaps on the idea that the Putin/Trump phone call was bringing the war closer to an end.  Regardless, if economic activity is slowing, that will lessen demand everywhere, a clear price negative.  As to gold (+0.25%) it continues to trade higher undaunted by any news on any front.  While silver is little changed this morning, copper (+0.7%) has now crested $5.00/lb and is pushing to the all-time highs seen back in May 2024.

Finally, the dollar is rallying this morning, higher against all its G10 counterparts by between 0.2% and 0.4%.  This looks to me like a trading correction, not a new trend.  The same price action is true in the EMG bloc with one real outlier, TRY (-4.2%) which actually traded down by as much as -10% earlier in the session (see chart below) on the news that President Erdogan had his key political rival, Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, arrested on charges of fraud and terror, while his university diploma was revoked, seemingly in an effort to prevent him from running for president in the future.  Thank goodness we never have things like that happen in this country!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no data released today other than EIA oil inventories where a modest net build across products is currently expected.  So, until the Fed, I would anticipate very little net movement.  After that, it all depends.  However, Powell will need to by extremely hawkish to shake any of my view that the dollar is headed lower overall.

Good luck

Adf

Hard to Kill

Posted on by

Inflation just won’t go away
As evidenced by the UK
This year started out
Removing all doubt
The Old Lady’s work’s gone astray
 
And elsewhere, the problem is still
Inflation is quite hard to kill
Though central banks want
More rate cuts to flaunt
Those goals are quite hard to fulfill

 

While most eyes remain on President Trump with his ongoing efforts to reduce the size of the US government, as well as his tariff discussions and efforts to negotiate a lasting peace in Ukraine, we cannot ignore the other things that go on around the world.  One of the big issues, which has almost universally been acclaimed a problem, is that inflation is higher than most of the world had become accustomed to pre-Covid.  As well, the virtual universal central bank goal remains the local inflation rate, however calculated, to be at 2.0%.  Alas for the central bankers in their seats today, that remains quite a difficult reach.  A quick look at the most recent headline CPI readings across the G20 shows that only 5 nations (counting the Eurozone as a bloc since they have only one monetary policy) are at or below that magic level as per the below table.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of those nations who are below, two, China and Switzerland, are actually quite concerned about the lack of price pressure and seeking to raise the inflation rate, and the other three (Canada, Singapore and Saudi Arabia) are right on the number, with core inflation readings tending higher than the headline reported here.

Perhaps a better way to highlight the problem is to look at the 10-year bonds of most countries and see how they have been behaving of late as an indication of whether investors are comfortable with the inflation fighting efforts by each nation.  While it is not universal, you can look at the column on the far right of the below table and see that 10-year yields have been rising for the past year.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I only bring this up because, despite the fact that I have been downplaying central bank, especially the Fed’s, impact on markets, ultimately, every nation tasks their central bank to manage inflation.  That seems reasonable since inflation, as Milton Friedman explained to us in 1963, is “always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.”  But perhaps you don’t believe that and are schooled in the idea that faster growth leads to higher wages and therefore higher inflation.  Certainly, Paul Samuelson’s iconic textbook (as an aside, Dr Samuelson was my Economics 101 professor in college) made clear that was the pathway.  Alas, as my good friend, @inflation_guy Mike Ashton, wrote yesterday, there is no evidence that is the case.  Read the article, it is well worth it and can help you start looking elsewhere for causes of inflation, like perhaps the growth in the money supply!

Of course, the reason that we continue to come back to inflation in our discussions is because it is critical to the outcomes in financial markets.  And that is our true focus.  It is the reason there is so much discussion regarding President Trump’s mooted tariffs and how inflationary they will be.  It is the reason that parties out of power continue to highlight any prices that have risen substantially in an effort to disparage the parties in power.  And it is the reason that central banks remain central to the plot of all financial markets, at least based on the current configuration of the global economy.  If there was only one financial lesson from the pandemic response, it is that Magical Money Tree Modern Monetary Theory is a failed concept of how to run policy.  This poet’s fervent hope is that Treasury Secretary Bessent is smart enough to understand that and will address fiscal issues in other manners.  I believe that to be the case.

Back to the UK, where CPI printed at 3.0%, 2 ticks higher than the median forecast, while core CPI printed at 3.7%.  This cannot be comforting for the BOE as most of the MPC remain committed to helping PM Starmer’s government find growth somehow and are keen to cut rates in support.  The problem they have is that inflation will not fade despite extremely lackluster GDP growth.  Recall, last week, even though the Q/Q GDP print of 0.1% beat forecasts, it was still just 0.1%.  Not falling into recession hardly seems a resounding victory for policy in the UK, especially since stagnation, or is it now stagflation, is the end result.  It should be no surprise that market participants have sold off the pound (-0.3%), Gilts (+5bps) and UK equities (-0.4%) and it is hard to find a positive way to spin any of this.  Again, while I have adjusted my views on Japan, the UK falls squarely in the camp of in trouble and likely to see a weaker currency.

Ok, let’s look elsewhere to see how things behaved overnight.  After a very modest rise in US equity indices yesterday, the Asian markets were mixed with the Nikkei (-0.3%) and Hang Seng (-0.15%) slacking off a bit although the CSI 300 (+0.7%) managed to find buyers after President Xi met with business leaders and the expectation is for further government stimulus, as well as a reduction in regulations, to help support the economy.  Australia (-0.7%) is still under pressure despite yesterday’s RBA rate cut as the post-meeting statement was quite hawkish, indicating caution is their approach for now given still sticky inflation.  (Where have we heard that before?)

In Europe, the only color on the screen is red with declines of between -0.4% and -0.9% as investors seem to be taking some profits after a solid run in most of these markets.  I guess the fact that European governments have been shown to be powerless in the world has not helped investor sentiment either as it appears these nations may be subject to more outside forces than they will be able to address adequately.  Lastly, US futures are unchanged at this hour (7:40).

In the bond market, as per the table above, yields are higher across the board with Treasuries (+2bps) the best performer as virtually all European sovereign issues have seen yields rise between 5bps and 7bps.  It simply appears that confidence in the Eurozone is slipping and demand for Eurozone assets is falling alongside that.

In the commodity markets, it should be no surprise that gold (+0.1%) continues to edge higher.  The barbarous relic continues to find price support despite the fact that interest in gold, at least in Western economies, remains lackluster at best.  There is much discussion now about an audit of the US’s gold reserves at Fort Knox and in the NY Fed, something that has not been performed since 1953.  Not surprisingly, there are rumors that there is much less gold in storage than officially claimed (a little over 8 tons) and rumors that there is much more which has not been reported but was obtained via seizures throughout history.  This story has legs as despite the lack of institutional interest in the US, it is picking up a retail following and we are seeing the punditry increasingly raise their price forecasts for the coming years.  As to oil (+0.8%) it is higher again this morning but remains in a tight trading range with market technicians looking at the $70/bbl level as a key support to hold.  A break there could well see a quick $5/bbl decline.

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer this morning against most of its counterparts with most G10 currencies showing declines similar to the pound’s -0.2%, although the yen (+0.15%) is bucking that trend.  However, versus its EMG counterparts, the dollar is having a much better day, rising vs. PLN (-0.9%), ZAR (-0.7%) and BRL (-0.5%) on various idiosyncratic stories.  The zloty seems to be suffering from its proximity to Ukraine and the uncertainty with the future regarding a potential peace effort.  The rand is falling after the FinMin delayed the budget speech as internal squabbling in the governing coalition seems to be preventing a coherent message while the real is under pressure as inflation remains above target and the central bank’s tighter policy has been negatively impacting growth in the economy.

On the data front, this morning brings Housing Starts (exp 1.4M) and Building Permits (1.46M) and then this afternoon we see the FOMC Minutes from the January meeting.  That will be intensely parsed for a better understanding of what the committee is thinking.  We do hear from Governor Jefferson after the market closes, but generally, the cautious stance remains the most popular commentary.

Has anything really changed?  The market remains uncertain over Trump’s moves, the Fed remains on hold and cautious, and data shows that the economy continues to tick along nicely with price pressures unwilling to dissipate.  I see no reason to abandon the dollar at this point.

Good luck

Adf

Not in a Rush

Posted on by

Said Powell, we’re not in a rush
To cut rates as we try to crush
Remaining inflation
And feel the sensation
Of drawing an inside straight flush
 
Up next is the CPI data
Though not one on which we fixate-a
The surveys explain
That people remain
Quite certain that we’re doing great-a

 

Chairman Powell testified to the Senate Banking Committee yesterday and the key comments were as follows, “Inflation has eased significantly over the past two years but remains somewhat elevated relative to our 2 percent longer-run goal. Total personal consumption expenditures (PCE) prices rose 2.6 percent over the 12 months ending in December, and, excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE prices rose 2.8 percent. Longer-term inflation expectations appear to remain well anchored, as reflected in a broad range of surveys of households, businesses, and forecasters, as well as measures from financial markets.” [Emphasis added.] He followed up, “With our policy stance now significantly less restrictive than it had been and the economy remaining strong, we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust our policy stance.  We know that reducing policy restraint too fast or too much could hinder progress on inflation.”  This is largely what was expected as virtually every Fed speaker since the last FOMC meeting has said the same thing, there is no rush to further cut rates. Powell did admit that the neutral rate had risen compared to where it was before inflation took off in 2022 but maintains that current policy is still restrictive. 

However, let’s examine the highlighted comment above a little more closely.  Two things belie that statement as wishful thinking rather than an accurate representation of the current situation.  The first is that the most recent survey released from Friday’s Michigan Sentiment surveys, shows that inflation expectations for the next year jumped dramatically, one full percent to 4.3% as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Looking over the past 10 years of data, that is a pretty disturbing spike, taking us right back to the 2022-23 period when inflation was roaring.  In addition to that little jump, it is worth looking at those market measures that Powell frequently mentions.  Typically, they are either the 5-year or 10-year breakeven rate.  That rate is the difference between the 5-year Treasury yield and the 5-year TIPS yield (or correspondingly the 10-year yields).  A quick look at the chart below shows that since the Fed first cut rates in September 2024, the 5-year breakeven rate has risen 78bps to 2.64%.  Certainly, looking at the chart, the idea of ‘well anchored’ isn’t the first description I would apply.  Perhaps, rocketing higher?

At any rate, it appears quite clear that the Fed is on hold for a while yet as they await both the evolution of the economy and further clarity on President Trump’s policies on tariffs.  While there is no doubt that we will continue to hear from various Fed speakers going forward, I maintain that the Fed is not seen as the primary driver in markets right now, rather that is President Trump.

Of course, data will still play a role, just a lesser one I believe, but we cannot ignore the CPI report due this morning.  First, remember, the Fed doesn’t focus on CPI, but rather on PCE which is typically released at the end of the month and calculated by the Commerce Department, not the BLS.  But the rest of us basically live in CPI land, so we all care.  If nothing else, it gives us something to complain about as we look incredulously at the declining numbers despite what we see with our own eyes every time we go shopping.

As it is, here are this morning’s median expectations for the data, headline CPI (+0.3% M/M, 2.9% Y/Y) and core CPI (+0.3% M/M, 3.1% Y/Y).  Once again, I believe there is value in taking a longer view of this data for two reasons; first to show that we are not remotely approaching the levels to which we became accustomed prior to the Covid pandemic and government response, and second to highlight that if your null hypothesis is CPI continues to decline, that may not be an appropriate view as we have spent the past 8 months in largely the same place as per the below chart.  Too, note the similarity between the Michigan Survey chart above and this one.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

OK, those are really the stories of the day since there have not, yet, been any new tariffs imposed by President Trump, and traders need to focus on something.  Let’s take a look at how things behaved overnight.

After a mixed US equity session, the strength was in Hong Kong (+2.6%) and China (+1.0%), seemingly on the back of several stories.  First is that China is looking at new ways to address the property bubble’s implosion, potentially allocating more support there, as well as this being a reflexive bounce from yesterday’s decline and the story that President’s Xi and Trump have spoken with the hope that things will not get out of hand there.  As to Japan, the Nikkei (+0.4%) has edged higher as the yen (-0.7%), despite a lot of talk about higher rates in Japan and the currency being massively undervalued, continues to weaken.  In Europe, once again there is limited movement overall with very tiny gains of less than 0.2% the norm although Spain’s IBEX (+0.7%) is the big winner today on some positive earnings results.  US futures are little changed at this hour (7:15).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning, retaining the 4bps they added yesterday, and in Europe, sovereign yields are also little changed with German Bunds (+2bps) the biggest mover in the session.  JGB yields did rise 3bps overnight, but that seems to be following US yields as there was precious little new news there.

In the commodity markets, yesterday’s metal market declines are mostly continuing this morning with gold (-0.6%) down again, although still hanging around $2900/oz.  Silver has slipped although copper (+0.3%) has arrested its decline.  Oil (-1.1%) is giving back some of yesterday’s gains and continues to trade in the middle of its trading range with no real direction.  One thing I haven’t highlighted lately is European TTF NatGas prices, which while softer this morning (-1.9%) have risen 15% in the past month as storage levels in Europe are declining to concerning levels and global warming has not resulted in enough warm days for the winter.

Finally, the dollar is mixed away from the yen’s sharp decline with the euro (+0.1%) and CHF (+0.2%) offsetting the AUD (-0.3%) and NOK (-0.5%).  It is interesting that many of the financial and trading accounts that I follow on X (nee Twitter) continue to point to JPY and CAD as critical and are anticipating strength in both those currencies imminently.  And yet, neither one is showing much tendency to strengthen, at least for the past month or two.  I guess we shall see, but if the Fed is going to remain on hold, and especially if more tariffs are coming, I suspect the default direction of the dollar will be higher.  As to the EMG bloc, there is virtually nothing happening here, with a mix of gainers and laggards, none of which have moved 0.2% in either direction.

Other than the CPI data, Chairman Powell testifies to the House Financial Services Committee, and we will see EIA oil inventories with a modest build anticipated.  We also hear from two other Fed speakers, but again, with Powell in the spotlight, they just don’t matter.

Markets overall are pretty quiet, seemingly waiting for the next shoe to drop.  My money is on that shoe coming from the Oval Office, not data or Powell, which means we have no idea what will happen.  Stay hedged, but until further notice, I still don’t see a strong case for the dollar to decline.

Good luck

Adf

Loathing and Fear

Posted on by

On Friday, the jobs situation
Explained there was little causation
For loathing or fear
That later this year
Recession would soon drive deflation
 
Meanwhile, in the Super Bowl’s wake
The president’s set to forsake
Economists’ warning
That tariffs are scorning
Their views, and are quite a mistake

 

Let’s start with a brief recap of Friday’s employment report which was surprising on several outcomes.  While the headline was a touch softer than forecast, at 143K, revisions higher to the prior two months of >100K assuaged concerns and implied that the job market was still doing well.  You may recall that there were rumors of a much higher Unemployment Rate coming because of the annual BLS revisions regarding total jobs and population, but in fact, Unemployment fell to 4.0% despite an increase in the employed population of >2 million.  Generally, that must be seen as good news all around, even for the Fed because the fact that they have paused their rate cutting cycle doesn’t seem to be having any negative impacts.

Alas for Powell and friends, although a real positive for the rest of us, the Earnings data was much stronger than expected, up 0.5% on the month taking the annual result to a 4.1% increase.  Recall, one of Powell’s key concerns is non-core services inflation, and that is where wages have a big impact.  After this data, it becomes much harder to anticipate much in the way of rate cuts soon by the Fed.  This was made clear by the Fed funds futures market which is now pricing only an 8.5% probability of a rate cut in March, down from 14% prior to the data, and only 36bps of cuts all year, which is down about 12bps from before.

Securities markets didn’t love the data with both stocks and bonds declining in price, although commodities markets continue to rally alongside the dollar, a somewhat unusual outcome, but one that makes sense if you consider the issues.  Inflation is not yet dead, hurting bonds, while the fact the Fed is likely to remain on hold for longer supports the dollar.  Stocks, meanwhile, need to see more economic growth because lower rates won’t support them while commodities are seen as that inflation fighting haven.

Of course, it wouldn’t be a day ending in Y if we didn’t have another discussion on tariffs during this administration.  The word is that the president has two things in mind, first, reciprocal tariffs, meaning the US will simply match the tariff levels of other countries rather than maintaining their current, generally lower, tariff rates.  As an example, I believe the EU imposes a 10% tariff on US automobile imports, while the US only imposes a 2.5% tariff on European imports.  The latter will now rise to 10%.  It will be very interesting to see how the Europeans complain over the US enacting tariffs that are identical to their own.  

A side story that I recall from a G-20 meeting during Trump’s first term was that he offered to cut tariffs to 0% for France if they reciprocated and President Macron refused.  The point is that while there is a great deal of huffing and puffing about free trade and that Trump is wrecking the world’s trading relationships, the reality appears far different.  If I had to summarize most of the world’s view on trade it is, the US should never put tariffs on any other country so they can sell with reckless abandon, while the rest of the world can put any tariffs they want on US stuff to protect their home industries.  This is not to say tariffs are necessarily good or bad, just that perspective matters.

The other Trump tariffs to be announced are on steel and aluminum imports amounting to 25% of the value. This will be impactful for all manufacturing industries in the US, at least initially, so we will see how things progress.  Interestingly, the dollar has not responded much here because these are not country specific, so a broad rise in the dollar may not be an effective mitigant.

Ultimately, as I have been writing for a while, volatility is the one true change in things now compared to the previous administration.  Now, with that as backdrop, and as we look ahead to not only CPI data on Wednesday, but Chair Powell’s semi-annual congressional testimony on Tuesday at the Senate and Wednesday at the House, let’s look at how markets have responded to things.

As mentioned above, US equity markets fell about -1.0% on Friday after digesting the Unemployment data. However, the picture elsewhere, especially after these tariff discussions, was more mixed.  In Asia, Japanese shares were essentially unchanged although Hong Kong (+1.8%) was the big winner in the region.  But Chinese shares (+0.2%) did little, especially after news that the number of marriages in China fell to their lowest since at least 1986, another sign of the demographic decline in the nation.  Elsewhere in the region, there was more red (India, Taiwan, Australia) than green (Singapore).  European shares, though, are holding up well, with modest gains of about 0.2% – 0.4% across the board despite no real news.  US futures are also ticking higher at this hour (7:10), about 0.5% across the board.

In the bond market, Friday saw Treasury yields jump 6bps with smaller gains seen in Europe.  This morning, though, the market is far quieter with Treasury yields unchanged and European sovereigns similarly situated, with prices between -1bp and +1bp compared to Friday’s closing levels.  Of note, JGB yields have edged higher by 1bp and now sit at 1.31%, their highest level since April 2010.  With that in mind, though, perhaps a little bit of longer-term perspective is in order.  A look at the chart below shows 10-year JGB yields and USDJPY since 1970.  Two things to note are that they have largely moved in sync and that both spent many years above their current levels.  While it has been 15 years since JGB yields were this high, they are still remarkably low, even compared to their own history.  I know that many things have changed over that time driving fundamentals, but nonetheless, this cannot be ignored.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Sticking with the dollar, it has begun to edge higher since I started writing this morning and sits about 0.2% stronger than Friday’s close.  USDJPY (+0.5%) is once again the leader in the G10, although weakness is widespread in that bloc.  In the EMG bloc, there were a few gainers overnight (INR +0.3%, KRW +0.3%) although the rest of the world is mostly struggling.  One interesting note is ZAR (0.0%) which appears to be caught between the massive rally in gold (to be discussed below) and the increased rhetoric about sanctions by the US in the wake of the ruling party’s ostensible call for a genocide of white South Africans to take over their property.  This has not been getting much mainstream media press, but it is clear that Mr Trump is aware, especially given that Elon Musk is South African by birth.  However, there is no confusion in the South African government bond market, which, as you can see below, has seen yields explode higher in the past week since this story started getting any press at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the commodity markets continue to show significant movement, especially the metals markets.  Gold (+1.6%) is now over $2900/oz, another new all-time high and calling into question if this is just an arbitrage between London and New York deliveries.  Silver (+1.4%) continues to be along for the ride as is copper (+0.6%) which is the biggest gainer of the past week, up more than 7%.  Ironically, aluminum, the only metal where tariffs are involved, is actually a touch softer this morning.  As to oil (+1.2%) while the recent trend remains lower, it does appear to be bottoming, at least if we look at the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Turning to the data this week, it will be quite important as CPI headlines, but we also see Retail Sales and other stuff and have lots of Fedspeak.

TuesdayNFIB Small Biz Optimism104.6
 Powell Testimony to Senate 
WednesdayCPI0.3% (2.9% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (3.1% Y/Y)
 Powell Testimony to House 
ThursdayPPI0.3% (3.4% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (3.3% Y/Y)
 Initial Claims216K
 Continuing Claims1875K
FridayRetail Sales-0.1%
 -ex autos0.3%
 IP0.2%
 Capacity Utilization77.7%

Source: tradingeconmics.com

In addition to Powell, we will hear from five more Fed speakers, although with Powell speaking, I imagine their words will largely be ignored.  Overall, the world continues to try to figure out how to deal with Trump and his dramatic policy changes from the last administration.  One thing to keep in mind is that so far, polls show a large majority of the nation remains in support of his actions so it would be a mistake to think that his policy set is going to be altered.  Net, the market continues to believe this will support the dollar, as will the fact that the Fed seems less and less likely to start cutting rates soon.  Keep that in mind as you consider your hedges going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Positioning’s Fraught

Posted on by

The wonderful thing about Trump
Is traders no longer can pump
A market so high
That it can defy
Reality ere it goes bump
 
Since policies can change so fast
A long-term view just cannot last
So, Fed put or not
Positioning’s fraught
And larger ones won’t be amassed

 

As we await the NFP report this morning, I couldn’t help but ponder the uptick in complaints and concerns by traders that increased volatility in markets on the back of President Trump’s mercurial announcements has changed the trading game dramatically.  Let me say up front that I think this is a much healthier place to be and explain why.

Pretty much since the GFC and, more importantly, then Chairman Bernanke’s first utilization of QE and forward guidance, the nature of financial markets had evolved into hugely leveraged one-sided views based on whatever the Fed was guiding.  So, the initial idea behind QE and forward guidance was to assure all the traders and investors that make up the market that even though interest rates reached 0.0%, the Fed would continue to ease policy and would do so for as far out in time as you can imagine.  Lower for longer became the mantra and every time there was a hiccup in the market, the Fed rushed in, added yet more liquidity to calm things down, and put the market back on track for further gains.  This was true for both stocks and bonds, despite the fact that the Fed has no business or mandate involving the equity market.

This activity led to the ever-increasing size of trading firms as leverage was cheap and steadily rising securities prices led to lower volatility, both implied and real, in the markets.  Risk managers were comfortable allowing these positions to grow as the calculated risks were minimized by the low vol.  In fact, entire trading strategies were developed to take advantage of the situation with Risk Parity being a favorite.  

However, a negative result of these actions by the Fed was that investors no longer considered the fundamentals or macroeconomics behind an investment, only the Fed’s stance.  The only way to outperform was to take on more leverage than your competitors, and that was great while rates stayed at 0.0%.  Alas, this persisted for so long that many, if not most, traders who learned the business prior to the GFC wound up retiring or leaving the market, and the next generation of traders and investors lived by two credos, number go up and BTFD.

The Fed remained complicit in this process as FOMC members evolved from background players to a constant presence in our daily lives, virtually preening on screens and in front of audiences and reiterating the Fed’s views of what they were going to do, implicitly telling traders that taking large, leveraged bets would be fine because the Fed had their back.

Of course, the pandemic upset that apple cart as the combination of Fed and government response imbued the economy with significantly more inflation than expected and forced the Fed to change their tune.  The market was not prepared for that, hence the outcome in 2022 when both stocks and bonds fell sharply.  But the Fed would not be denied and calmed things down and created a coherent enough message so that markets recovered the past two years.  This has, naturally, led to increased position sizing and more leverage because that’s what this generation of traders understands and has worked.

Enter Donald J Trump as president, elected on a populist manifesto and despite his personal wealth, seemingly focused on Main Street, not Wall Street.  The thing about President Trump is if an idea he proffers doesn’t work, he will drop it in a heartbeat and move on.  As well, by wielding the full power of the United States when dealing in international situations, other nations can quickly find themselves in a difficult spot and, so far, have been willing to bend their knee.  As well, his focus on tariffs as a primary weapon, with little regard for the impact on markets, and the way with which he uses them, threatening to impose them, and holding off at the last minute when other nations alter their policy, has kept markets off-balance.

The result is large leveraged positions are very difficult to hold and manage when markets can move up and down 2% in a day, every day (like the NASDAQ 100 chart below), depending on the headlines.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The natural response is to reduce position size and leverage, and that, my friends, is a healthy turn in markets.  This is not to say that there are not still many significant imbalances, just that as they continue to blow up, whether Nvidia, or FX or metals, my take is the next set of positions will be smaller as nimble is more important than large.  It doesn’t matter how smart an algorithm is if there is no liquidity to adjust a position when the world changes.  This poet’s opinion is this is a much healthier place for markets to live.

Ok, let’s see what happened overnight ahead of today’s data.  Mixed is the best description as yesterday’s US closes saw a mixed outcome and overnight the Nikkei (-0.7%) fell while both Hong Kong (+1.2%) and China (+1.3%) gained ground.  Korea and India slid, Taiwan rose, the picture was one of uncertainty about the future.  That also describes Europe, where only Germany and Norway have managed any modest gains at all while the rest of the continent and the UK are all slightly lower.  Apparently, yesterday’s BOE rate cut has not comforted investors in the UK, nor has the talk of more rate cuts by the ECB bolstered attitudes in Europe.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are basically unchanged.

In the bond market, the biggest mover overnight was in Japan where JGB yields rose 3bps, once again touching that recent 30-year high.  While some BOJ comments indicated inflation remained well-behaved, the market is clearly of the view that Ueda-san is getting set to hike rates further.  In Europe, yields are basically lower by 1bp across the board and Treasury yields are unchanged on the session as investors and traders continue to focus on Treasury Secretary Bessent’s conversation that he cares about 10-year yields, not Fed funds.  Perhaps the Fed will cut rates to recapture the spotlight they have grown to love.

Oil (+0.5%) prices continue to drift lower overall, although this morning they are bouncing from yesterday’s closing levels.  Questions about sanctions policy on Iran, on Russia’s shadow fleet and about the state of the global economy and therefore oil demand remain unanswered.  However, the fact that oil has been sliding tells me that there is some belief that President Trump may get his way regarding a desire for lower oil prices.  In the metals markets, copper (+1.1%) is flying higher again, and seems to be telling us that the economy is in decent shape.  Either that or there is a major supply shortage, although if that is the case, I have not seen any reporting on the subject.  Both gold and silver are very modestly higher this morning after small declines yesterday as the London – NY arbitrage continues to be the hot topic and financing rates for both metals have gone parabolic.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning, perhaps slightly firmer as JPY (-0.5%) is actually the worst performer around, despite the rise in JGB yields.  There is a lot of chatter on how the yen is due to trade much higher, and it has rallied over the past month, but it is certainly not a straight line move.  As to the rest of the space, virtually every other currency is +/-0.2% from yesterday’s close with CLP (+0.5%) the lone exception as the Chilean peso benefits from copper’s huge rally.

On the data front, here are the latest expectations for this morning’s employment report:

Nonfarm Payrolls170K
Private Payrolls141K
Manufacturing Payrolls-2K
Unemployment Rate4.1%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.8% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.3
Participation Rate62.5%
Michigan Sentiment71.1

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Remember, though, the ADP number on Wednesday was much better than expected at 183K (exp 150K) with a major revision higher by 54K to the previous month).  As well, this month brings the BLS adjustments for 2024 which will not be broken down, just lumped into the data.  Recall, there are rumors of a significant reduction in the number of jobs created in 2024 as well as a significant increase in the population estimates with more complete immigration data, and that has led some pundits to call for a much higher Unemployment Rate.  I have no insight into how those adjustments will play out although the idea they will be large seems highly plausible.

Ahead of the number, nothing will happen.  If the number is strong, so NFP >200K, I expect that bonds will suffer, and the dollar will find some support.  A weak number should bring the opposite, but the revisions are a wild card.  As I stated this morning, the best idea is to maintain the smallest exposures possible for the time being, as volatility is the one thing on which we can count.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Three-Three-Three

Posted on by

Said Bessent, when speaking of rates
The 10-year yield’s what dominates
Our focus and goals
As that’s what controls
Most mortgages here in the States
 
Remember, our goal’s three-three-three
With job one on deficits key
So, that’s why we’ll slash
The wasting of cash
With tax cuts set permanently

 

There is a new voice in Washington that matters to Wall Street, that of the new Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.  Yesterday in his first significant comments since his swearing-in, he made very clear that he and the president were far more focused on the 10-year Treasury yield, and driving that lower, than they were concerned over the Fed funds rate.  Talk about a different focus than the last administration!  At any rate, he expounded on his views as to how that can be achieved, namely lower energy prices and a reduced budget deficit alongside deregulation.  Recall, his three-three-three plan is 3% budget deficit, 3mm barrels of oil/day additional supply and 3% GDP growth.  Clearly, this is a tall order given the starting point, but he has not shied away from these goals and insists they are achievable.

Yesterday also brought the Quarterly Refunding Announcement, the Treasury’s announced borrowing schedule for the current quarter.  Under then-Secretary Yellen, the US shifted its borrowing to a much greater percentage of short-term T-bills (<1-year maturity) while avoiding the sale of longer date notes and bonds.  This is something which Bessent has consistently explained his predecessor screwed up given her unwillingness to term out more debt when the entire interest rate structure was much lower.  After all, homeowners were smart enough to refinance down to 3% fixed rate mortgages, but the Treasury secretary thought it was a better idea to stay short.  

Of course, changing the current treasury mix is one of the impediments to lower 10-year yields because changing it would require an increase in the sale of longer dated paper which would depress the price and raise those yields.  Bessent has his work cut out for him.  However, my take is this is a goal, but one that will be achieved gradually.  He even commented that until the debt ceiling is raised, there will be no changes in the debt mix.  Arguably, if the administration can make real progress on reducing the budget deficit, that is what will allow for the gradual adjustment of the debt mix without a dramatic rise in long-term yields.

Perhaps it is still the honeymoon period, but the market is showing some deference to Mr Bessent as 10-year yields have fallen steadily in the past two weeks, dropping from a high of 4.81% the week before the inauguration to their current level at 4.44%.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While we cannot attribute the entire move to Bessent, certainly investors are showing at least a little love at this stage.  I believe the 10-year yield will grow in importance for all markets as movement there will be seen as the report card for Bessent and this administration’s goals.

Meanwhile, in the UK, stagflation
Is now the Old Lady’s vexation
But cut rates, they will
Lest growth they do kill
As prices continue dilation

The BOE is currently meeting, and expectations are nearly universal that they will cut their base rate by 25bps to 4.50% with 8 of the 9 MPC members set to vote that way.  The only hawk on the committee, Catherine Mann, is expected to vote for no change.  The problem they have (well the problem regarding monetary policy, there are many problems extant in the UK right now) is that core inflation continues to run above 3.0% while GDP is growing at approximately 0.0% in recent quarters and at 1.0% in the past year.  A quick look at the monthly GDP readings below shows that things have not been moving along very well, certainly not since PM Starmer’s election in July.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In stagflationary environments, the most successful central bank responses have been to kill the inflation and suffer the consequences of the inevitable recession first, allowing growth to resume under better circumstances.  Of course, Paul Volcker is most famous for this model, which he derived after numerous other countries, notably the UK, failed to effectively solve the problem in the mid 1970’s in the wake of the first oil price shocks.  Now, the UK has created its own energy price supply shock via its insane efforts to wean itself from fossil fuels without adequate alternate supplies of energy, and stagflation is the natural result.  However, addressing inflation does not appear to be the primary focus of the Bank of England right now.  I am skeptical that they will be successful in achieving their goals which is one of the key reasons I dislike the pound over time.

Ok, let’s turn to market activity overnight.  The party continues on Wall Street with yesterday’s equity gains attributed to many things, perhaps Bessent’s comments being amongst the drivers.  Certainly, a reduced budget deficit and reduced 10-year yields are likely to help the market overall.  That attitude has been uniform overnight and through the morning session with every major Asian market (Japan, +0.6%, Hong Kong +1.4%, China +1.3%) and European market (Germany +0.8%, France +0.8%, UK +1.45%) higher on the session.  As it happens, the BOE did cut rates by 25bps as expected and now we await Governor Bailey’s comments.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:25) they are little changed on the session.

In the bond market, the ongoing rally has stalled for now with Treasury yields higher by 2bps this morning while most European sovereign yields are little changed on the day.  A key piece of information that is set to be released tomorrow comes from the ECB as their economists are going to report the ECB’s estimate of where the neutral rate lies in Europe.  With the deposit rate there down to 2.75%, many pundits, and ECB speakers, are targeting 2.0% as the proper level implying more rate cuts to come.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.65%) is bouncing off its recent trading lows but in truth, a look at the chart and one is hard-pressed to discern an overall direction.  More choppiness seems likely as the market tries to absorb the latest information from the Trump administration and its plans.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the metals markets, gold, which had a strong rally yesterday and made further new all-time highs, is unchanged this morning while silver (-0.75%) consolidates its recent gains and copper (+0.6%) adds to its gains.  The thing about copper is it is, allegedly, a good prognosticator of economic activity as it is so widely used in industry and construction, and it has been rallying sharply for the past month.  That does seem to bode well for future activity.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning, recouping some of its recent losses although I would contend we have merely been consolidating after a sharp move higher during the past three months.  The pound (-1.0%) is today’s laggard after the rate cut but we are seeing weakness almost everywhere in both G10 and EMG currencies.  One exception is the yen (+0.2%) which seems to be benefitting from comments by former BOJ Governor Kuroda that the BOJ is likely to raise rates above 1.0% during the coming year.  Interestingly, he explained that given the recent economic trajectory, it was only natural that the BOJ would seek to normalize rates.  However, given that interest rates in Japan have been 0.5% or below for the past 30 years, wouldn’t that be considered normal these days?  Just sayin’!

On the data front, with the BOE out of the way, we now get the weekly Initial (exp 213K) and Continuing (1870K) Claims data as well as Nonfarm Productivity (1.4%) and Unit Labor Costs (3.4%).  Yesterday’s ADP Employment data was much stronger than expected with a revision higher to last month as well, certainly a positive for the job outlook.  As well, this afternoon we hear from three more Fed speakers, but so far this week, the word caution has been the most frequently used noun in their vocabulary.  Of course, with Mr Bessent now starting to make his views known, perhaps more focus will turn there and away from the Fed for a while.

Market participants are clearly feeling pretty good right now, especially about the recent activity in the US.  I think you have to like US assets, both stocks and bonds, while expecting the dollar to continue to hold its ground.  This sounds like a recipe for weaker commodity prices, notably gold, but so far, that has not been the case.

Good luck

Adf

Stardom is Fleeting

Posted on by

Remarkably few people care
That Jay and the Fed will soon share
Their latest impressions
On growth and recessions
An outcome, of late, that’s quite rare
 
Does this mean that ere the next meeting
There will be an increase in bleating
By every Fed speaker
Each one a fame seeker
As they realize stardom is fleeting?

 

I wonder how the atmosphere in the meeting room at the Marriner Eccles building has changed today vs. what it has been for the past decade at least.  Usually, the FOMC meets, and financial markets are riveted by the potential and then everything comes to a virtual standstill as traders and investors await the wisdom of the Fed Chair to help determine where markets are likely to go.  I am reminded of the crop report scene in Trading Places, where the entire pit stops to watch the news and then springs back into action. 

One of the consequences of this evolution is that every member of the FOMC feels it is their duty to reiterate their views as frequently as possible, whether they are changing or not, because they are trying to increase their profile to ensure a lucrative future gig want to make sure that the American people understand just how much the Fed is doing to help them and the nation.  This is why for the first four weeks after a Fed meeting, virtually every day we have at least one if not two or three FOMC members repeating themselves ad nauseum.

But suddenly, they have real competition for airtime.  President Trump, no shrinking violet he, is incredibly adept at forcing all the world’s attention on himself, to the exclusion of formerly important voices like Alberto Musalem or Lisa Cook.  Now, the fact that you can probably not remember who those two people are is exactly my point.  FOMC members speak constantly, but it is the office, not the voice, to which people are listening.  And right now, fewer and fewer people are listening to the Fed because President Trump is commanding all the attention.  In fact, to the extent the Fed is discussed, it is generally in relation to how they are going to respond to Trump’s next moves.

But, in an effort to maintain our focus on markets and not politics, to the extent that is possible right now, the Fed still has a role to play in both expectations of how things are going to evolve as well as actual pricing.  A quick summation of where we have been with Powell and friends is that last year, starting in September they cut rates for the first time in nearly two years and have since reduced the Fed funds rate by 100bps.  A key issue here is the fact that the economy is showing no signs of slowing down, unemployment remains modest at best, and inflation has been, at best, bottoming well above their 2.0% target, if not rising again.  Hence, there have been many questions as to why they cut rates at all.

At this point, though, the Fed’s narrative prior to the quiet period, was one of increased caution that further rate cuts may not be necessary, or certainly not imminent, given the ongoing positivity in the economic situation.  As such, there is no expectation for a rate cut today, and according to the Fed funds futures market, only a 30% probability of a March cut, with basically two full cuts priced in for all of 2025.  I would argue that based on the data we have seen, it is not clear why there would be any further cuts, and, in fact, believe that by mid-year, we are likely to start to hear talk of a rate hike before the end of the year.  This will be dependent on the data, but if inflation continues to remain sticky (see chart of Core PCE below), the bar for cuts will move higher still.  Certainly, to my non-PhD trained eye, it doesn’t really look like their key metric is declining anymore.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Perhaps the most remarkable thing about this Fed meeting is that I have seen virtually nothing regarding expectations of how the statement may change or forecasts may change.  FWIW, which is probably not much, my take is the statement will be virtually identical given no real changes in the data trends, and that Chairman Powell will go out of his way to say absolutely nothing at the presser, especially when asked about President Trump and his policies.  Of course, this will not prevent the cacophony of Fedspeak that will come between now and the next meeting, but there may be fewer folks paying attention.

Ok, let’s turn to markets.  While Monday was a tech stock rout, yesterday was the reverse with the NASDAQ shaking off the DeepSeek fears or actually embracing them based on Jevon’s Paradox (the idea that the more efficient something becomes, the greater the need/desire for it and therefore the increase in its price) leading to the new narrative that Nvidia’s chips will be in more demand.  But regardless, everybody was happier!  Asian markets responded with the Nikkei (+1.0%) regaining some luster on the tech story as well as the weaker JPY, which saw the dollar rally a full yen on the session, although it is little changed overnight.  While not universal, there was a lot more green than red in Asia, although Chinese shares (-0.4%) did not participate.

In Europe, most bourses are showing gains this morning although the CAC (-0.3%) is lagging after luxury goods makers saw weaker growth than expected.  But the DAX (+0.75%) and IBEX (+1.0%) are both stronger as is the FTSE 100 (+0.3%) as Chancellor Reeves continues to try to explain that growth is Labour’s goal despite all their policies that seem to point in the other direction.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are higher led by the NASDAQ (+0.5%).

In the bond market, the fear from Monday is gone although the bounce in yields was modest yesterday and this morning Treasury yields are unchanged on the session.  I suspect that there is some waiting for the Fed involved here.  European sovereign yields, though, are all a bit lower, down between -2bps and -3bps, as investors anticipate tomorrow’s ECB rate cut and are looking for a dovish message going forward.

In the commodity space, yesterday modest rebound in oil (-0.6%) is being reversed this morning while NatGas (0.0%) is consolidating after a dramatic decline in the past week of more than 20% given the latest weather models are now calling for much warmer temperatures in the northern hemisphere.  In the metals markets, gold (-0.2%) is consolidating yesterday’s gains as is silver (+0.2%) and copper (-0.1%).  For now, these are not all that interesting.

Finally, in the FX markets, the dollar continues to regain momentum higher with the euro (-0.3%) sliding back below 1.04 this morning and the DXY (+0.2%) back above 108.00.  However, looking across both the G10 and EMG blocs, while the dollar’s strength is widespread, it is not dramatic, with AUD (-0.5%) and PLN (-0.5%) the biggest movers of the session.  It should be no surprise that there is confusion here given the uncertainty sown by President Trump and his tariff discussions.

On the data front, the only numbers today, aside from the FOMC meeting and the BOC meeting (expected 25bp cut) is the Goods Trade Balance (exp -$105.4B).  We also get the EIA oil data with inventory builds anticipated.  But really, despite the seeming lack of interest leading up to today’s FOMC meeting, it is the only game in town.  To me, the risk is something more dovish as that part of the narrative seems to be ebbing lately, so will be a real surprise.  If that is the case, then I suspect the dollar will suffer somewhat.

Good luck

Adf