Tag Archives: #oil

Not Existential

Posted on by

The story that has the most traction
Continues to be the reaction
To stories AI
Will force firms to try
To profit from worker subtraction
 
The tech nerds see naught but potential
For robots plus, workers, essential
But history’s shown
Employment has grown
And new tech’s threat’s not existential

Block, the payments processing company announced during its earnings call that it would be laying off 4000 employees, nearly half its workforce, by the end of Q1 this year.  This was not a response to weak performance, but rather the founder, Jack Dorsey’s, belief that AI has reached the point where his company can be more effective with much fewer staff.  Of course, this is the entire AI argument compressed into a single event.

Recall Monday’s note and market response to the Citrini Research article that explained one scenario from AI adoption would be massive layoffs, a recession and a major stock market decline by 2028 as companies eliminated people from their processes.  This brought about a tremendous amount of back and forth with economists and historians explaining that every major technology creation (e.g. electricity, the automobile, the internet) was both disruptive but instrumental in expanding economic activity.  This morning’s WSJ had a nice summation by Greg Ip of the entire discussion.

It strikes me that this discussion is only beginning and we are going to hear from proponents of both sides for many months to come, although I imagine it will not be the top story every day.  As I consider the issue, I think back to John Maynard Keynes forecast in 1930 that the rapid advancement of technology would lead to a 15-hour workweek as all our needs could be met with much less effort.  Obviously, that was not his best forecast.  Rather, Jevon’s Paradox comes to mind, which states that as technology increases the efficiency with which a resource is used, the total consumption of that resource increases, it doesn’t decrease.  In this discussion, that resource is human labor.

FWIW, my view is AI is a remarkable tool for certain things but is neither sentient nor capable of breakthroughs on its own.  It is a wonderful research tool, and a wonderful computer programming tool, but as my experience taught me, people like to deal with people, not with machines, even when there are machines available to do the job.  Economic dislocation in certain areas is likely going forward, but not collapse, at least not because of greater usage of AI tools.

I highlight this because, while Block’s stock price rallied sharply in the aftermarket, up more than 20%, US futures are lower this morning by -0.5% or so as there continue to be fears about the dystopian outcome.  Remember, Nvidia had terrific earnings and the stock fell as well.  Of course, this could also be a response to the fact that the price of many equities is extremely rich on a P/E basis or a P/S basis, and we are simply seeing a little reversion to the mean.  

At any rate, as no war in Iran has begun and there have been no other changes on the geopolitical map, let’s tour markets to see how things look as we head into the weekend and month end.

Yesterday’s desultory equity performance in the US was followed by a mixed picture in Asia with the Nikkei (+0.2%) and Hang Seng (+1.0%) closing the month higher, but China (-0.3%), Korea (-1.0%) and India (-1.2%) all falling.  Malaysia (-1.4%), too, stands out for a poor session but the rest of the region was mixed with much smaller moves.  Given the tech heavy makeup of most of these nations’ bourses, I suspect that volatility will be the main feature going forward.  As to Europe, it’s a sleeper with continental bourses all +/- 0.2% or less while the UK (+0.35%) managed a modest rally after a by-election resulted in PM Starmer’s Labour party coming in 3rd place in a seat they have held for 100 years.  This appears to be adding pressure on Starmer to do something, or on Labour to remove him, but a key concern is they will move further left, something which I doubt will help the UK economy or stock market.

Turning to the bond market, yields are declining all around the world with Treasuries slipping -5bps yesterday and another -2bps this morning, now below the 4.00% level.  In fact, a look at the chart below shows a pretty strong trend lower in yields.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But we saw European sovereign yields slide yesterday and continue lower by another -1bp to -2bps this morning and last night, JGB yields fell -4bps and showing a very similar trend to Treasury yields as per the below.  It seems that concerns over too much debt issuance driving yields higher have been put on the back burner for now.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity space, it appears that Iran fears are making a comeback as oil (+2.1%) has rebounded sharply from the levels seen in the wake of the massive inventory build I described yesterday morning. It sure looks like somebody bought a lot of oil yesterday morning at around 9:45am, although I have no guess as to who it would have been.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Interestingly, the news from Geneva is that the talks are going to continue next week, so while both sides are disputing the other’s version of things, the fact they are still speaking is a huge positive.  I fear given the military buildup, some type of action will occur, but we can be hopeful. 

Meanwhile, in the metals space, gold (+0.1%) is little changed for the past several sessions, consolidating just below the $5200/oz level.  Whatever the narrative may be here, regarding central bank buying and the end of the dollar system, this tells me that the market is tired and needs some R&R before moving forward.  I remain bullish, but not today.

Source: tradingeconmics.com

Silver (+1.7%) is showing very similar price action to gold, albeit with a bit more daily volatility.  The story here about a short squeeze for COMEX delivery is fading from the FinTwit feeds, but the structure remains not enough of the stuff for industrial usage going forward.

Finally, the dollar, this morning is, net, doing very little.  But there are two stories to note.  The first is CNY (-0.2%) where the PBOC changed its risk reserve rules for foreign exchange holdings for Chinese banks, reducing the required reserve to 0% from 20%.  In practice, this means that Chinese banks can run forward positions without a capital charge and allows them to be more competitive pricing forward sales of CNY for local hedging counterparts.  Obviously, this is a huge adjustment and speaks to the fact that they must be getting a bit uncomfortable with the speed with which the renminbi has been rising over recent months.  Ironically, there was a Bloomberg article highlighting how options traders were paying up for 6.50 CNY calls/USD puts anticipating further CNY strength.  Perhaps the PBOC didn’t like that!

The other story is from Hong Kong, where the currency is usually not an issue as it is pegged in a very tight band to the USD, allowed to trade between 7.75 and 7.85.  The HKMA (HK’s central bank) is committed to buying and selling HKD as necessary to maintain that band.  This has been a key feature of Hong Kong’s financial attractiveness for the past decades.  The way this operates is there is an exchange fund that is designed to be used only for FX intervention, and it has ~HKD 4 trillion in balances (~$510 billion) which, given their GDP is only $400 billion or so, seems like plenty.  Well, as always seems to be the case, the government there is proposing taking some of that money to use for financing a government project, a technology hub being built, and since they don’t want to raise taxes, they thought raiding that fund would be the answer.  The concern is the precedent it sets as if that goes through, what is the next project that will be determined to need the funding.  If we know one thing about governments it is that if they find a pot of money they can tap to spend more without raising taxes, they are going to do it!  The amount in question is a small fraction, just $19 billion, so would not likely impact the HKD peg.  But this is something to watch as it will not be a positive if we see this a second time.

Otherwise, NOK (+0.5%) is gaining on oil’s gains while KRW (-0.5%) is slipping on the equity market decline and foreign sales.  Beyond that, nothing.

On the data front, this morning brings headline PPI (exp 0.3%,2.6% Y/Y) and core (0.3%, 3.0% Y/Y) as well as Chicago PMI (52.8).  Regarding the last, a look at the chart below shows that last month’s reading was the highest since November 2023 and is arguably a good sign that we are seeing increased industrial activity in the middle of the country.  Recall, the Chicago number is often seen as a precursor for the economy as a whole.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And that’s it.  Given equity market performance this month has been flat to slightly negative, it seems unlikely there will be large rebalancing flows.  I continue to look for quiet markets although the trend in bonds does seem like it is building up some steam.

Good luck

Adf

No Desire

Posted on by

Some days markets have no desire
To move, lacking seller or buyer
But don’t be concerned
The one thing we’ve learned
Is narratives always point higher

While it is clearly not summer as I look out my window and see a snow-covered yard, the doldrums seem to be the best description of markets right now.  A dearth of data, and in truth, a lack of commentary by all the usual players, at least new commentary, has both investors and traders looking elsewhere for signals.

Now, this is not to claim that there is nothing happening in the world, but right now, it all seems to be on hold.  With the SOTU behind us, we have had nothing new from the White House regarding virtually anything, tariffs, taxes, Iran, you name it.  Nvidia earnings last night beat expectations, but apparently not by enough to get people excited.  And virtually every other story is a warmed-over version of things we already know.

I think the most interesting market related news that I saw this morning was that the most hawkish member of the BOJ, Hajime Takata, said the BOJ needed to raise rates to fight Japan’s “heated” inflation.  This seemed a response to Takaichi-san appointing two doves to the board there.  However, the market response was essentially nil, as it should be, with the yen (+0.2%) edging higher while JGB yields (+2bps) also edged higher.  

Other than that, seriously, I cannot find a single thing that seems to matter to markets.  And it’s not like we have that much to look forward to today in the US, with Initial Claims the only data, so there is no reason to go on too long.

Here is a recap of the overnight session.  As I touched on JGB’s above, I will start with the rest of the government bond markets. What we see is that yields are literally unchanged this morning from yesterday’s closing levels.  All of them!  I am hard-pressed to describe a less exciting market than this.

Turning to equities, yesterday’s solid US performance was followed by mixed outcomes in Asia (Tokyo +0.3%, HK -1.4%, China -0.2%) in the major markets while most other regional bourses saw modest gains or losses with no driving stories.  The exception to this was Korea (+3.7%) which has been on an amazing tear lately, as the two largest market cap stocks there, Samsung and SK Hynix, continue to explode higher on demand for memory chips.  In fact, I think it is worthwhile to visualize this move as it is rare for equity markets to go parabolic like this.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Of course, remember what happens to parabolic markets.  We just saw that in silver one month ago as per the below, so traders beware!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Turning to Europe, France (+0.9%) is rallying on some earnings data from key companies, but the rest of the continent, and the UK, are doing little (Germany +0.4%, Spain -0.2%, UK +0.1%).  Fittingly, US futures are also unchanged at this hour (7:00).

In the commodity space, oil (-1.7%) has softened substantially this morning as the absence of a war in Iran weighs on long positions, but more importantly, I believe, yesterday’s EIA data showed a massive build of inventories of 16mm barrels, far higher than expected and the largest build since February 2023.  Back then, it appeared to be the residual response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine as there was a scramble for barrels.  Perhaps this is a signal that in the event of a war, there is supply around.  If you look at the inventory chart below, we have certainly seen a net build over the past three years.  Again, it is hard for me to look at things like this and see significantly higher prices in the future.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the metals markets, gold is unchanged this morning, though trading well above the $5000/oz level and seems like it is consolidating before moving higher.  Silver (-2.5%) is sliding as there continues to be a discussion regarding deliveries into COMEX contracts with the first notice day for the March contracts tomorrow.  There are many pundits who claim there is insufficient silver available to handle the likely deliveries which, if true, would likely cause a significant short squeeze.  However, I have no insight into how this will play out.  My longer-term view remains that there is a structural shortage of the stuff for industrial applications and the price trend will continue higher, but we have learned how volatile it can be.

Finally, the dollar is modestly stronger this morning with the yen’s rise the exception in the G10 space (EUR -0.1%, GBP -0.2%, AUD -0.2%, CHF -0.3%, NOK -0.3%).  In the EMG bloc, we are seeing similar modest weakness across the board (PLN -0.2%, ZAR -0.3%, MXN -0.2%) with the outlier here being CNY (+0.2%).  Regarding the renminbi, the Chinese have been marching it slowly higher for the past year, as per the below chart.  My take is President Xi is very focused on convincing others the CNY is a viable reserve currency candidate despite all the capital flow restrictions.  I’m not sure how that would work, but that is the best I can come up with.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And that’s all we have in markets this morning.  On the data front, Initial (exp 215K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims are the only releases and we hear from Fed governor Bowman, although to the best of my knowledge, nobody is listening to Fedspeak right now.  The market continues to price just one 25bp cut for 2026 at this point, although that seems likely to change once we get a better idea as to what Mr Warsh would like to do when he gets the Chair.

My guess is that if there is going to be an attack on Iran, it will happen this weekend, so until then, given the absence of data, I think we drift in all markets and wait for Monday.  Today, and tomorrow, ought to be quiet.

Good luck

Adf

Far Too Extreme

Posted on by

Said Roberts and five more Supremes
Those tariffs, are far too extreme
They don’t pass the test
And so, we request
You find a new revenue scheme
 
Said Trump, while I think you are wrong
Your actions won’t stop me for long
We have many laws
That give me good cause
For tariffs, that help make us strong

For whatever reason, this is what first popped into my head upon hearing the tariff ruling on Friday.  I guess I confused love for law, but whatever.  At any rate, I’m sure you have seen far too much on this subject already so I will be brief.  The Supreme Court ruled against President Trump’s use of the IEEEA law to enable the imposition of tariffs on foreign nations.  They did not discuss what to do about the ~$200 billion that has already been collected under that law.  The companies that sued want the money rebated, but that was not part of the decision, and of course, the logistics of that would be extraordinarily complex.

But in the end, President Trump simply imposed a sweeping 15% tariff across the board under a different law, which to my understanding can remain in place for 150 days.  The equity market shook off the news, rallying across the board on Friday (DJIA +0.5%, S&P 500 +0.7%, NASDAQ +0.9%), so it didn’t seem to be that big a deal.  But then when Asia opened Sunday night, risk was in a much less desired state.  Early returns show equities softer across the board (-0.75% at 10:00pm), the dollar (DXY -0.4%) under pressure and gold (+1.25%) and silver (6.25%) seeing significant haven demand.

One of the things that appeared to be in question was whether countries that had signed trade deals accepting tariffs and promising investments as part of the deal, would renege, but thus far, that has not happened.

My take is the tariff discussion is no longer a concern to investors.  Playing the lead role once again is Iran, as concerns over a potential US military strike rise, with a new actor joining the cast, Mexico, which appears to be suffering significant chaos after the elimination of a cartel leader, “El Mencho” has resulted in fire fights throughout the country there.  Obviously, given the proximity to the US, this has the potential to be quite significant, although since the border with Mexico has been effectively sealed, my take is all the action will stay in country there.

Historically, when there’s a war
The first move is stocks to the floor
But generally speaking
Post first mover freaking
The buyers step up to the fore

So, if tariffs are not going to be the primary topic of discussion, and I sincerely hope that is the case, after we finish congratulating the US men’s ice hockey team for the thrilling Olympic victory this weekend, what’s next on the agenda? Iran.

The US continues to amass forces in the Middle East and from various sources, including MSM and X and Substack, the growing consensus is that some type of military action is going to occur.  The question now seems to be whether it will be an attempt to decapitate the regime, or just to impede its ongoing buildup of armaments, notably ballistic missiles.

Negotiations are set to resume this week in Geneva and given the stakes, especially for the Ayatollah, it remains unclear as to his willingness to cede to American demands of essential disarmament and the end of terrorist support.  For President Trump, the risk is that any military action does not work as quickly and smoothly as either the first attacks on the nuclear sites, or the exfiltration of erstwhile Venezuelan president Maduro.  If there is something quick and relatively clean that achieves a clear objective, I think it can be a huge boon for the President, but if anything drags on, it will have numerous ramifications for both the mid-term election and the markets.  Let’s focus on the latter.

Below is a long-term chart of the S&P 500 which shows both the extraordinary recent performance relative to its previous history, as well as helps highlight some of the downturns seen during that time.  Of course, the noteworthy feature is that the downturns don’t last very long.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

If we move from right to left on the chart (these are monthly candles), the first spike down is Liberation Day in April 2025, when President Trump first announced his tariff plans.  Obviously, that is long past investors’ concerns now, especially given the events on Friday.  The next major decline took place in February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine.  But remember what also happened around that time, the Fed began its aggressive rate hiking when it figured out that inflation may not be transitory after all.  You probably remember that 2022 was one of the worst market performances for both stocks and bonds.  It is a worthwhile question to ask how much of that was the Russia/Ukraine situation and how much was the Fed.  My money is on the Fed.  Moving left, we see the Covid spike lower in Q1 2020 and then a baby dip during the repo shock of late 2018, when the Fed lost control of the Fed funds rate.  After that, we go back to the GFC in 2008-09 and the bursting of the dot com bubble in 2000 – 2003.  Sure, in 2003, the US invaded Iraq, but I don’t think that was the market driver.

My point here is that any impact from military action is likely to be very short-lived in equity markets.  The other market that will certainly be impacted is the oil market.  A look at the long-term story there shows that, here too, there are many things that have a major impact on oil other than war.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

The huge decline on the left was the GFC and ensuing recession.  The drop in 2014 was the realization that shale oil was going to add an enormous amount of supply to the market.  You can see the Covid spike to negative prices and then the run up in prices in the wake of the Russian invasion in 2022, which was relatively short-lived, and we have been declining ever since.

Much of the commentary regarding Iran right now revolves around their ability to close the Strait of Hormuz and how that would cut 20% of the world’s oil supply from reaching the market.  (It would cut almost all of Iran’s oil off from the market as they have virtually no pipeline network).  But even here, the evidence is that a price spike will be relatively short-lived.

I raise these issues because while war is inflationary, that is generally not because of the impact on oil prices, but rather because of the increased government spending that accompanies war (remember LBJ’s guns AND butter policies leading to the inflation of the 1960’s and 70’s.). 

Summing the discussion up, while in the immediacy, there will be market responses to military actions, I do not believe they will have long-term impacts.

Ok, I went on way too long, so let’s do a hyper quick tour of markets this morning and I will leave the weekly data until tomorrow.

Equities – mainland China is still closed, (they open tomorrow) but the rest of Asia mostly ignored the war drums.  HK (+2.5%), Korea (+0.65%), India (+0.6%) and Taiwan (+0.5%) all showed strength although Australia (-0.6%) seems to have suffered on the tariff story.  Tokyo, too, was closed last night.  In Europe, despite slightly better than expected German Ifo data, the DAX (-0.45%) is today’s laggard while the IBEX (+1.0%) and FTSE MIB (+1.0%) both have seen strong support, ignoring any uncertainty regarding the US tariff situation and benefitting from positive earnings results. The UK and France have done little.  As to the US futures market, at this hour (7:15) they have risen from their early evening lows but are still softer by -0.35% across the board.

Bonds – the bond market remains the enigma, in my mind, as it is basically locked in place and has been for months.  Treasury yields (-1bp) have edged lower and European sovereign yields are essentially unchanged, as are JGB yields.  It continues to baffle me that bond markets, which typically sense fear first, do not seem to care about all that is ongoing in the world right now, whether war, government spending, or commodity prices.

Commodities – this morning, oil (0.0%) is ignoring Iran, which is maybe the most surprising thing of all.  Perhaps this is telling us that concerns over a closure of the Strait of Hormuz are overblown, or perhaps if that does happen, we will see a dramatic spike higher.  Again, like the bond market, something feels amiss.  In the metals markets, while both gold (+0.8%) and silver (+2.25%) are higher than Friday’s closing levels, they are well below last night’s opening levels.  I guess fear is abating, at least for now.

FX – As to the dollar, it’s early decline has largely been erased with both the euro and pound unchanged, AUD (-0.4%) sliding and the rest of the G10 under pressure.  In the EMG space, MXN (-0.5%) is feeling a little stress from the increased violence that has begun and there seems to be some sympathy in that move with CLP (-0.3%) and BRL (-0.2%). On the flip side, CZK (+0.5%) is the biggest gainer as the market continues to respond to recent central bank hawkishness.

In the US today we see the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (exp 0.3 in January) and Factory Orders (-0.5% from Dec).  But remember this, as per the below, don’t look for that much activity in NY as this is the picture out my backyard this morning, I’m estimating 10” of snow, so skeleton staffs will be the rule.

Good luck

Adf

Chock Full of Crises

Posted on by

Their mandate includes stable prices
And that they should use all devices
To work to achieve
That goal lest they leave
A legacy chock full of crises

“Most participants, however, cautioned that progress toward the Committee’s 2 percent objective might be slower and more uneven than generally expected and judged that the risk

of inflation running persistently above the Committee’s objective was meaningful.”

These words [emphasis added] are from the FOMC Minutes released yesterday afternoon.  To set the stage, the Fed left rates on hold then, although there were two votes for another cut.  However, a full reading of the Minutes shows there were those who would have considered a hike as well.   Now, I am just a guy in a room who observes market behavior through the lens of too many years involved on a daily basis, and my resources are virtually nil, especially compared to the Federal Reserve.  I don’t have a PhD in economics (although I believe that is a benefit in this context, if not every context).  However, the bolded part of the comment seems a tad disingenuous to me based on the below chart which shows the history of their inflation metric, Core PCE prices.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It has been exactly 5 years since their metric was at or below their 2% target by which they defined stable prices.  The idea that they are claiming the risk of inflation running hot was a meaningful risk is perhaps the worst gaslighting comments they have made.  It is very difficult to believe that the Fed, in its current incarnation, is going to ever address the inflation issue appropriately.  Perhaps a Chairman Warsh, if he is successful at reconfiguring their operating procedures will be able to drive positive changes.  I am hopeful but not confident.  The one thing we know is that changing government institutions requires a mammoth effort.  And let’s face it, he will only have two plus years of leeway for sure depending on whoever becomes president in 2028.

I continue to believe that the market is going to increasingly focus only on Warsh’s comments going forward as the direction he has expressed is very different than the current FOMC membership mindset.  We shall see how this all evolves.  In the meantime, I expect that Fed funds are not going anywhere before Warsh is confirmed.  As to bond yields, that is a very different question and will depend on both the macroeconomic outcomes and the risk perception of investors around the world.  For now, that trading range of 4.00%. – 4.20% seems likely to hold absent a major economic data miss in one direction or the other.  But as long as we continue to get mixed data, this market will remain on the backburner.

The fear that is growing each day
Trump’s policy might go astray
Regarding Iran
Although not Japan
Thus, oil’s up, up and away

Texas tea (+1.5%) is following yesterday’s 4.6% rise with another strong session and as you can see in the chart below, is showing a very clear trend higher since December.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This movement is very clearly a response to the ongoing buildup of US military assets in proximity to Iran, with two aircraft carriers, and somewhere above 200 military aircraft as well as the carrier group tenders with Tomahawk missiles in tow.  While negotiations are ostensibly ongoing, the one thing that seems clear is that absent a complete capitulation by the Iranian government, something big is going to happen here.  Of course, the question is, how much, and for how long, will it impact oil supplies?

Obviously, nobody knows the answer to that question, but the recent history has shown that every time there was an event in the Middle East, whether the 12-day war several months ago, the killing of Suleimani, the attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure, or others, prices retraced pretty quickly as per the below.  

Even the Ukraine invasion in February 2022 saw prices retrace 50% within a few months.  Other issues lasted less time than that.  This recent history implies that fading the rally is the right trade, but boy, that is hard to do.  And of course, in the event that the Iranian government falls, the chaos could result in a significant degradation of Iranian oil production.  Given they pump about 5 mm bpd, ~5% of global supply, that would matter a lot at the margin.  Certainly, the oil glut narrative would disappear in a hurry.  This is a very large risk to both markets and the economy, and one which needs to be hedged, if possible.  This will certainly be the focus of markets for the next few weeks, at least, so be prepared.  Personally, I do own some stuff here, but I like the drillers generally, as they are going to be employed no matter what!

Ok, let’s see what else is happening.  After a solid US session yesterday, Asia saw some major positive price action with Korea (+3.1%) the leader although Tokyo (+1.1%) also had a solid session, as did Taiwan, New Zealand, Singapore and Australia.  The exception to this rule was India (-1.5%) which suffered after a three-day positive run as traders and investors fled worrying about oil, the Fed, and the future of India’s relationship with Russia after the seizure of more ‘dark fleet’ oil tankers trying to avoid sanctions on Russian oil.  Europe, meanwhile, is uniformly lower this morning, with all the major indices slipping -0.8% or so.  The narrative is pointing to the escalation in Iran as the cause du jour.  US futures are also slipping at this hour (7:20), -0.25% or so across the board.

I touched on bonds briefly above, but today’s price action shows yields edging higher by 1bp in Treasury markets and between 1bp and 2bps across European sovereign markets.  There has been no data of note to alter views, and the only ECB news is that Spain has thrown their hat into the ring to have the next ECB president.

In the metals markets, yesterday’s gains are being followed by a mixed picture with gold (+0.2%) and silver (+0.3%) edging higher while copper (-1.6%) and platinum (-1.8%) cede those gains.  However, as I highlighted yesterday, this all still feels like consolidation.  FYI, there is much talk in the markets about silver and how there is not enough physical silver in the COMEX vaults to cover open interest, and how that could result in a major squeeze, but my take is most of it will roll forward as the fundamental supply/demand equation does not appeared to have changed.

Finally, the dollar had a strong session yesterday, rising 0.6% as measured by the DXY, and making gains vs. almost all currencies.  This morning, those trends are continuing with SEK (-0.4%) and GBP (-0.2%) leading the way lower in the G10 space while ZAR (-0.85%), INR (-0.4%) and KRW (-0.4%) are dragging down the EMG bloc.  Again, data has been scarce, so I see this as a more traditional risk-off sentiment than some new macro story.

Data yesterday was generally stronger than forecast, notably IP and Capacity Utilization, which showed solid outcomes that were ascribed to AI infrastructure building as well utilities activity.  It strikes me this is exactly what the Trump administration is trying to achieve with their reshoring goals.  I guess the question is how productive this investment will be and how will it impact inflation readings.  This morning, we see the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1860K) claims, as well as the Trade Balance (-$55.5B), Philly Fed (8.5) and Leading Indicators (0.0%).  The interesting thing about the Leading Indicators number is that a flat result would be the highest in 4 years.  A look at the Conference Board’s chart below shows an interesting thing about this number, and to me, anyway, calls its value into question.  Leading Indicators have been declining for four years while coincident indicators (and economic growth) have been moving along just fine.  I’m trying to figure out what these indicators lead.

And that’s really it for today.  We do see oil inventories as well, with a slight build expected and we will hear from Minneapolis Fed president Kashkari, but I cannot remember the last time he said anything interesting.  To me, the concern today, and tomorrow and next week, is that we see an escalation in rhetoric regarding Iran, at the very least, if not an actual military strike.  That feels like it would be bad for stocks, good for bonds, the dollar and gold.  Hopefully I am wrong there.

Good luck

Adf

Yesterday’s Trauma

Posted on by

The story is yesterday’s trauma
As risk assets traded with drama
For stocks, it was news
AI could abuse
More sectors, that triggered the bomb-a
 
For gold and the metals, however,
It seemed an alternative lever
A bear raid, perhaps
Or filling chart gaps
No matter, twas quite the endeavor
 
Which leads to today’s CPI
Where narratives that with AI
Deflation is coming
As all jobs but plumbing
We’ll no longer need to apply

Let’s start with this morning’s CPI data as in some ways, I feel like that is a key part of the overall market discussion regarding yesterday’s dramatic declines.  Expectations are for both Core and Headline prints of 0.3% M/M and 2.5% Y/Y.  If we feed those numbers into the current narrative, the implication might be that the Fed is continuing to see a slowdown here and it would open the door to further rate cuts.  Remember, despite the comments of two Fed speakers earlier this week, Logan and Hammack, the most recent information we have is that the neutral rate is believed to be 3.0%, a full 75bps lower than the current Fed funds rate.  Interestingly, if we look at the Fed funds futures market, it shows that even after yesterday’s abysmal Existing Home Sales data (-8.4%), the probability of 3 cuts doesn’t hit 50% until the end of 2027!

Source: cmegroup.com

Remember, too, that the payroll report was strong on Wednesday, but that major annual revisions took much of the shine off that.  And of course, we cannot forget that since everything is political these days, certain FOMC members who dislike the President may be against rate cuts simply because the President wants them.  The point here is that the appearance of pretty solid economic activity combined with gradually decreasing inflation could argue for rate cuts but could also argue to leave things as they are since they seem to be working.  And let’s face it, the Fed doesn’t really know anyway, nor do any of us.

Which takes us to the broader narrative about what is driving stock market activity and why we saw such dramatic declines in the US yesterday, and pretty much everywhere else overnight.  It appears the proximate cause is the idea that recent AI announcements have indicated that there are entire service industries that may be destroyed because AI will serve as an effective replacement for their customers.  We have seen it for law firms, accountants and consultants and now logistics and software companies are under the gun.

Adding to the narrative is Elon Musk, who continuously claims that AI and robots will replace virtually all human labor and create enormous wealth for us all while driving prices ever lower.  The flip side of that claim is that throughout history, every major technological advance, while initially destroying jobs in the areas it was used, resulted in more, and better paying, jobs to help advance the overall economic situation.  Of course, historically, these changes took at least a generation, if not several to play out, while things appear to be happening a bit faster this time.

I have not done a deep dive on AI so take this for what it’s worth.  I use Grok as it is convenient for me given I have X open on my computer all the time.  I use it for quick research as it responds to my poorly worded questions with the information I seek and, happily, cites its sources.  But I am looking for data questions (e.g. the GDP of China or the size of European holdings of Treasuries) and I have never even considered using it to write my poetry.  Is it ready to make intuitive leaps in thought?  Maybe, but that seems a stretch.  As with all computers, its advantage over the human brain is its ability to ‘brute force’ a solution by making so many calculations in such a short time that no human can match.  However, my take is breakthroughs have come from intuitive leaps from one topic to another, not from simply doing more math on the same topic.  And it is not clear to me that AI programs, as they currently exist, are intuitive.

Of course, for our purposes, it doesn’t really matter right now if AI is that capable or not, it only matters if investors and traders believe that to be the case and invest accordingly.  That was yesterday’s story, as well as well as the story at the beginning of last week, at least based on the way the NASDAQ traded as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

We had six different significant drawdowns within a given hour since the end of January, and virtually all were described as a consequence of some industry sector being decimated by AI.  The thing is, valuations are pretty high in the tech sector (the area most likely to be hit) and it may simply be that investors have decided to sell the rich stuff and buy cheap stuff instead, like defensives and materials companies.  Just a thought.  But be prepared for a lot more of this narrative about AI eating some other company’s/industry’s lunch as we go forward.

Ok, let’s look at the overnight now.  First, remember, China is going on holiday all next week, and we will see much less activity from Asia accordingly.  But last night, Asia basically followed the US lower with Japan (-1.2%), HK (-1.7%), China (-1.25%) and Australia (-1.4%) headlining.  India (-1.25%) and Singapore (-1.6%) also suffered and you are hard pressed to find any markets that rose there.  As this was very tech focused, it should be no surprise.  (PS India is also suffering on AI as much of the business that had been outsourced to India could well be replaced by AI.)

In Europe, too, red is today’s color, and not simply because they lean more communist every day.  While tech is not a major part of the markets there, watching Italy (-1.5%), Spain (-1.0%), Norway (-1.1%) and Greece (-2.1%) all slide sharply tells the story, I think.  As it happens, France (-0.35%) and Germany (-0.1%) are the continental leaders and the UK (+0.1%) is the only market of note showing gains at all.  As to US futures, ahead of the data at this hour (7:30) they are softer by -0.2% across the board.

In the bond market, yesterday saw Treasury yields slip -4bps after the Housing data and this morning, they have recouped just 1bp.  European sovereign yields are all lower by between -1bp and -2bps as data releases continue to show a ‘muddle-through’ economy rather than one either growing strongly or falling sharply.  We did hear from ECB member Kazaks, telling us that the euro’s strength over the past year could have a negative impact on the economy there, implying the ECB may need to ease further.  Meanwhile, JGB yields (-2bps) continue to demonstrate virtually no concern about PM Takaichi’s plans for unfunded fiscal expansion.

Metals markets were the other noteworthy place yesterday with some very dramatic declines happening simultaneously in both gold and silver just after 11:00am.  (see below) My friend JJ who writes Market Vibes, explained last evening that the timing was impeccable as London had closed and the US is the least liquid metals market around, so if a large speculator was seeking to drive prices lower, that was when to do it.  And somebody did!  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But that was then, and this is now.  As you can see from the chart, the market is already rebounding with gold (+1.0%) and silver (+3.2%) simply demonstrating that they remain incredibly volatile.  In truth, this was the best take I saw on the subject yesterday.

Turning to oil, President Trump indicated that talks with Iran may go on for weeks, so it is unlikely that things will combust there for a while.  At the same time, the IEA continues to try to convince everyone that peak oil is here and there is a huge glut, but net, Texas Tea slipped -2.8% yesterday and is lower by another -0.35% this morning.

Finally, the dollar…well nothing has changed.  the DXY (+0.1%) is clinging to 97 with no impetus to move in either direction.  JPY (-0.4%) may be softer this morning but is far enough away from 160, the perceived intervention level, that nobody cares.  AUD (-0.6%) slipped on the weak commodities pricing, although remains near its highest levels in three years as the RBA turned hawkish last week.  We are also seeing weakness in the EMG bloc (KRW -0.4%, ZAR -0.5%, CLP -0.6%) with yesterday’s tech and metals sell-offs the proximate drivers.  The narrative remains that the dollar is set to collapse, but I still don’t see it.  Maybe I’m just blind.  I cannot get past the economic growth outperformance and inward investment plans, as well as the need for dollars to continue the global USD debt flywheel as the key demand points.

And that’s really it.  Volatility is with us and likely to stay for a while.  This is a global regime change with respect to economic statecraft rather than the previous rules-based order, and frankly, nobody really knows how it’s going to ultimately play out.  This is why gold remains in demand, because history has shown it has maintained its value on a purchasing power basis for millennia, whatever the terms of the relevant currency may be.  But in the fiat world, I’m waiting for someone to make a better argument for something other than the dollar over time.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Venting Spleen

Posted on by

It used to be data was seen
As noncontroversial and clean
But politics, lately
Has damaged it greatly
With both D’s and R’s venting spleen
 
So, it ought not be a surprise
That yesterday’s NFP rise
Was claimed by the left
To lack any heft
While R’s crowed out loud to the skies

By now, you are well aware that the NFP number was released much higher than the forecasts, printing at 130K vs a consensus forecast of 70K.  The previous two months were revised lower by 17K, so still a huge number, and it was the main topic of conversation in the markets all day. 

To me, the big news was that private sector jobs rose 172K, while government jobs declined by 42K.  In fact, the Federal civilian workforce is back to its smallest count since 1966!  That is an unalloyed positive in my view.  Too, manufacturing jobs increased by 5K, which is the first time we have seen a rise since November 2024.  In fact, if you look at the chart below of manufacturing jobs for the past 5 years, it is easy to see what President Trump is trying to achieve.  One month does not indicate success, but it’s a start.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The last positive was that the Unemployment Rate fell to 4.3%, so overall, this seems like a pretty good report.  But as with everything these days, it depends on the lens through which you view it.  As with most national data in an economy as large and varied as the US, there were real and perceived negatives.  The BLS made their annual benchmark revisions to the data which removed 403K jobs from 2025’s numbers.  These revisions come as they adjust their birth-death model as well as get updated population statistics.  But for those who seek bad news for this administration, that reduction of 403K jobs is proof that the president’s policies are failing.  Another complaint has been that the bulk of the increase in NFP was in the health care sector, although given the ongoing aging of the population, that cannot be very surprising.

Nonetheless, just like every other piece of data these days, NFP was a Rorschach test of your underlying political beliefs and not so much a description of the economy.  My question is, if the employed population is ~159 million, is an adjustment of 400K really meaningful?  After all. It’s about 0.25% of the working population in a measurement of a dynamic statistic amid people changing jobs and the economy growing.  Perhaps the politics are the signal, and the data is the noise.

Given that there were two very different takes on the data, it ought be no surprise that the S&P 500 finished the day exactly unchanged which is a pretty rare occurrence, happening less than 2% of the time in the past 10 years.  In fact, that lack of movement was the norm with both the NASDAQ and DJIA slipping -0.1%.  Net, I don’t think we learned much new and now markets and the algorithms will focus on tomorrow’s CPI data.

However, the narrative writers had their work cut out for them.  All those who were seeking to pan the government had to change their tune and now they are focused on the fact that there don’t need to be rate cuts if the employment situation is better.  Again, through a political lens this is good if you are anti-Trump because it prevents him getting the rate cuts he has been demanding.  I guess we cannot be surprised that Stephen Miran, in comments yesterday, continues to explain rate cuts make sense, which simply confirms the view that everything is political these days.

So, do we know anything new this morning?  Alas, I don’t think we learned anything to change the big picture yesterday, so let’s see how the data was received around the world.  Tokyo followed the S&P’s lead and was unchanged overnight with China (+0.1%) also doing little.  HK (-0.9%) lagged as traders prepare for the Chinese New Year holiday that runs all next week and took profits.  Korea (+3.1%) continues to perform well while India (-0.7%) continues to waver as the trade deal with the US impacts different parts of the economy very differently there.  Net, a mixed session.  In Europe, Germany (+1.3%) is the leader this morning on the strength of solid earnings reports by key companies as there has been no data released.  France (+0.75%) too is having a good day on earnings although Spain (-0.2%) is lagging.  The UK (+0.1%) is the only place where data made an appearance and it showed that GDP growth has fallen to 1.0% Y/Y there, another problem for the embattled PM Starmer.  It appears his time in office will be ending soon as literally every policy decision he has made has had a negative outcome.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are firmer by about 0.3%.

Bond markets saw the biggest move yesterday, with Treasury yields rising 4bps, although they have slipped back -1bp this morning and continue to trade in their range of 4.0% – 4.2%.  while we did spend some time above that range, it appears that fears of a bond market meltdown, or that China was going to sell their bonds or something else have faded somewhat.  In fact, globally, 10-year yields this morning are essentially unchanged.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity space, the Iran situation continues to be top of mind for oil traders although WTI (-0.3%) is not really moving much this morning.  There was no announcement from the White House regarding the meeting between President Trump and Israeli PM Netanyahu which indicates, to me at least, that nothing was decided.  While a second US aircraft carrier steams toward the Persian Gulf, we are all on tenterhooks as to how this plays out.  Right now, it doesn’t appear that discussions between the US and Iran are leading anywhere.  Meanwhile, metals (Au -0.4%, Ag -1.6%, Pt -1.3%) are giving back some of yesterday’s strong gains with gold firmly back above the $5000/oz level again.  There is much talk of a major shortage on the COMEX for deliveries for March, but we shall see how that plays out.  Certainly, there has been no change in the demand structure for silver, but we just don’t know how much silverware has been sold for scrap to help alleviate the shortage at this point.  

Finally, the dollar is little changed vs most major counterparts with the two outliers KRW (+0.6%) on the back of strong equity market inflows and CHF (+0.4%) which appears to be the one haven that is behaving like one this morning.  JPY (-0.2%) has strengthened several percent over the past week, and comments from the latest Mr Yen, Atsushi Mimura, make clear they continue to watch the market closely, but for right now, there seems little concern, or likelihood, that intervention is coming soon.

One thing the NFP data did achieve was to alter the Fed funds futures market which now is pricing just a 6% probability of a rate cut at the March meeting with two cuts priced for the year.  I have to say that based on the comments from Logan and Hammack, as well as the NFP data, it certainly doesn’t appear likely that the Fed is going to cut again soon.  Tomorrow’s CPI data may change some opinions there, but we will have to wait to find out.

But riddle me this, if the Fed has finished its loosening cycle, and Kevin Warsh is seen as someone who is keen to reduce the size of the Fed’s balance sheet, why would we think the dollar is going to decline sharply from here?  For now, the buck remains rangebound, but as I watch what is going on elsewhere around the world regarding economic activity, the US continues to lead the way.  I still don’t see the dollar collapse theory making sense, although frankly, I think the administration would be fine with it.  Let me leave you with the entire history of the EURUSD exchange rate since its inception in 1999 and you tell me if you think the dollar is exceptionally weak or strong here.  Remember, a weak dollar is a strong euro, so higher numbers.  Frankly, it feels like we are close to the middle of the range, or if anything, stronger rather than weaker.

Source: data FRED, graph @fx_poet

Good luck

Adf

Havoc He’s Wreaking

Posted on by

The focus has turned to the data
And whether it’s good or it’s bad-a
We all want to see
Today’s NFP
Then listen to punditry chat-a
 
It’s funny, cause generally speaking
Most pundits are strongly critiquing
The numbers released
Declaring they’re greased
To help Trump and havoc he’s wreaking

It’s NFP day today, which given it is Wednesday is a bit odd, but that’s what happens when the government shuts down for a few days.  At any rate, this is the biggest data week we’ve had in a while as not only did we see Retail Sales yesterday, which disappointed at 0.0% despite showing the largest actual jump, $80 billion, ever between November and December, although that was completely removed by the largest seasonal adjustment ever, (Read about it here at WolfStreet.com) we also get CPI on Friday.  For good order’s sake, here are the current consensus forecasts for NFP:

Nonfarm Payrolls70K
Private Payrolls70K
Manufacturing Payrolls-5K
Unemployment Rate4.4%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.6% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.3%

Source: tradingeconmomics.com

As the market continues to adjust to the recent gyrations, there is hope that the data will lead to unequivocal conclusions about the economy, which could drive Fed decisions and then coalesce around a clear direction of travel.  I’m not holding my breath.  

The first thing to remember is that the data is revised virtually every month, and when the economy is at an inflection point, or even when it is showing more pronounced activity in one sector than another, those revisions can tell a very different story than the original print.  But even beyond that, while the algorithms are clearly programmed to respond to the data, longer term investors have a much tougher time discerning what is happening.  All that is a long way of saying, nobody still has any idea where things are headed!

While I dismiss the FOMC speaking circuit, yesterday’s two speakers, Logan and Hammack, who are both voting members this year, said that they felt the current rate is at neutral.  Remember, right now Fed funds are 3.75%, which is a far cry from the Longer run neutral rate they have been feeding us in the Dot Plot!

In fact, their median expectation is 3.0%, so the fact that two voting members think 3.75% is neutral is somewhat confusing especially as both indicated they expected inflation to continue to decline and exhibited concern over the employment situation.  My views of where things are headed don’t matter nearly as much as theirs do, but there seems to be a little inconsistency involved here.  As it happens, the current Fed funds futures market pricing shows that there is a 22% probability of a rate cut in March and then it’s 50:50 in April as per the below chart fromcmegroup.com.

At this point, I suspect we will need to see negative NFP numbers along with continuing declines in CPI/PCE for the Fed to cut as I think Chairman Powell is so miffed at President Trump, he doesn’t want to do anything that Trump wants.  It would also not surprise me if that attitude has suffused the bulk of the FOMC.  The irony remains that Governors Cook and Jefferson are raging doves but would rather keep policy tight to stymy Trump rather than act as they otherwise would.  At least that’s my take.

Anyway, that’s what we have to look forward to this morning.  So, how have things behaved overnight?  Let’s look.  Tokyo (+2.3%) continues to be the star of the show, continuing to rally on excitement and optimism that PM Takaichi is going to solve Japan’s problems.  Maybe she will, but they have a lot of them, so it will take time.  But the tech story is strong there and it appears that foreign buying is picking up, which has been one of the drivers of the JPY (+0.5%) lately.  In fact, this week, the yen is leading all currencies having gained more than 2.3% so far.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of Asia, China (-0.2%) and HK (+0.3%) did little although the tech-based Korean (+1.0%) and Taiwanese (+1.6%) exchanges did well, as did Australia (+1.6%) on the back of stronger metals prices.  One other interesting note is Indonesia (+2.0%) where the government just restricted mining of Nickel (+1.7%) in order to raise the price of their largest export!

Europe is a lot less interesting with the continent under some pressure (France -0.2%, Spain -0.3%, Germany -0.2%) although the UK (+0.7%) is performing well on the back of strength in mining and natural resource shares.  US futures at this hour (7:35) are pointing slightly higher, about 0.15%.

In the bond market, things have gone back to sleep with 10-year yields lower by -1bp pretty much throughout the US and Europe.  JGB yields also did nothing last night, and it appears that despite the massive debt that continues to grow around the world, bond investors are comfortable right now.  Perhaps they see deflation in our future, but that doesn’t feel right to me.

Turning to the markets that continue to show the most volatility, commodities, let’s start with oil (+2.1%) which is demonstrating concern over re-escalating tensions regarding Iran, the negotiations and the potential for military activity there.  There are reports that the US may intercept Iranian tankers and if you look at the chart below, a pretty good uptrend has developed over the past two months.  You won’t be surprised that NOK (+0.6%) has benefitted from today’s move either.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the precious metals, after yesterday’s modest decline, we are back on the rise with gold (+0.85%), silver (+5.5%), copper (+2.1%) and platinum (+3.3%) all nicely higher.  The silver story is about declining inventories in Shanghai, which was the last place that can afford it since both the COMEX and London are already light on available ounces.  While we saw a dramatic decline nearly two weeks ago, I have to say things appear to be shaping up to recoup all those losses and then some!

Finally, the dollar is back under pressure this morning across the board.  I’ve already mentioned the two biggest movers and AUD (+0.5%) joins the list on the back of commodity strength.  Otherwise, the movements are not terribly large here, with the euro (+0.1%), pound (+0.3%), KRW (+0.3%), and ZAR (+0.2%) indicative of the situation.  I expect that the dollar will be responsive to today’s NFP data with a strong print helping the dollar and a weak one pushing it down a bit further.  However, remember that it remains within its trading range, albeit nearer the bottom than the top of that range as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And that’s really it for today.  The NFP should drive the first movement and after that, there is still White House bingo for fun and surprises.  While the dollar is soft, I don’t see a collapse coming, and in the end, the more I read about EU energy policy, I can only expect that any collapse will be that of the euro, not the dollar.  But that is a ways into the future I think.

Good luck

Adf

Changing Fast

Posted on by

At this point most traders are thrilled
It’s Friday, ‘cause throughout that guild
Exhaustion is rife
From bulls’ and bears’ strife
O’er whether their dreams be fulfilled
 
As well, all the narrative writers
Are stuck pulling college all-nighters
With facts changing fast
Their latest forecasts
Do naught but encourage backbiters

It has certainly been an interesting week in financial markets, at least most of them, with significant moves throughout the commodity, equity and cryptocurrency spaces.  We even saw a jump in bond prices yesterday after a really lousy JOLTS Jobs number (6.54M compared to 7.2M expected) and a higher-than-expected Initial Claims number of 231K.  Suddenly, questions about the labor market are front of mind, and prospects for a March Fed Funds cut rose to 23% for a time, although have slipped back to 17% as of this morning.  But one need only look at a few charts (all from tradingeconomics.com) showing the daily movement in some popular trading vehicles to understand why traders are thankful the week is ending.  For instance, 

Silver (+4.75%), which had a 34% range last Friday and has fallen 39% since its high 8 days ago:

Gold (+2.1%), which showed the same pattern, albeit not quite as dramatically:

Natural Gas (+3.4%), which rose $2.65 and reversed $2.00 on a $3.00 base over the past two weeks:

And Bitcoin (+5.8%), which has fallen nearly 50% since its highs in early October and 22% in the past week:

Now, it must be remembered that Bitcoin has a long history of massive drawdowns, with a 50% drawdown in spring of 2021 and a 75% drawdown from November 2021 through October 2022. We shouldn’t be surprised as Bitcoin is essentially a pure risk asset, so is completely narrative driven.  And as the narrative writers try to keep up with the facts on the ground, they are trying to figure out how to sell the story that Bitcoin, which was ostensibly designed to be an alternative to the fiat currency system, has become so tightly linked to the fiat financial system.

In the end, though, the commodity markets are beholden to the marginal demand/supply of the last molecule available.  I have not seen anything change with respect to demand for power to drive the economy, the demand for silver to build out electronics or the demand for gold by central banks.  To me, while prices for these commodities can whipsaw aggressively as the global regime changes, ultimately, I remain confident demand will continue to be the story.  (Bitcoin is an entirely different beast and one I will not discuss in depth other than to highlight its volatility along with the rest of these markets.)

Anyway, you can understand why traders are exhausted.  In fact, my forecast for next week is that we are highly unlikely to see the same size movements, although choppiness will still be the rule.

You may have noticed I missed oil (-0.4%) which has also seen some volatility as per the below chart, but not quite at the same level as the others.  Part of that is the oil market is much larger and more liquid and part of that is that the whole Iran/US discussions question has provided fodder for both bulls and bears in short intervals resulting in no net movement over the past week.

From what I can piece together, the situation in Iran is coming to a head regarding the regime there.  The talks today are ongoing, but there is other information that appears to indicate preparations are being made for a transitional government, and the State Department just warned all US citizens to leave Iran.  Something is up which will certainly drive more oil volatility.

If we look at bonds, Treasury yields fell -8bps yesterday and have rebounded by 2bps this morning.  That was the largest single day move we’ve seen since October, and basically took the market right back to that 4.20% level that had been home for weeks.

There continues to be a lot of confusing data and information regarding the economy as yesterday’s weak jobs data conflict with the broader idea that the hyperscalers are spending 2% of GDP on capex this year and forecasts for the budget deficit continue to run around 2%.  It seems like it will be difficult for a recession to come about with that much new spending in the economy, but as we have seen over the past decades, the beneficiaries of that spending are not necessarily the population cohort that is currently upset.  I guess the question is, is economic growth real if the population doesn’t feel it?  That will certainly be the political question come November.

As to European yields, they all followed Treasuries lower, especially after the BOE 5-4 vote to leave rates on hold offered a much more dovish signal than anticipated, and the ECB harped on the strength of the euro and how that could bring down their inflation forecasts, hinting at lower rates going forward.

In the equity markets, yesterday saw a tough day in the US as the tech/AI story continues to get beaten up right now, and that was more than enough to offset strength in things like defensives and staples.  But this morning, US futures are higher by about 0.5% as I type (8:00).  In Asia, Japan (+0.8%) bucked the US trend on the back of excitement about the upcoming election where Takaichi-san is expected to gain a mandate.  However, China (-0.6%), HK (-1.2%), Korea (-1.4%) and Australia (-2.0%) all had the same fate as the US.  Given the weight of technology companies in Asian indices, I suspect we are going to see more volatility here as different narratives come about on AI and investment and the social/political impacts.  As to Europe, modest gains are the story with the DAX (+0.5%) and IBEX (+0.9%) leading the way higher with the former benefitting from yesterday’s surge in Factory orders as well as a better-than-expected trade balance today.  As to Spain, it has been trending higher and nothing has come out to change that view for now.

Finally, the dollar is giving back some of yesterday’s gains but remains within that longer term trading range.  Using the dollar index (DXY) as our proxy, you can see just how little things have changed.  All the talk last week of the breakdown in the dollar has been forgotten for now, although I continue to read about China building a digital currency backed by gold.  I discussed that earlier this week and why I continue to believe that is unrealistic at this time.

But the weird thing about the DXY is it doesn’t seem to reflect what is happening in individual currencies.  For instance, AUD (+0.85%), GBP (+0.45%) and NOK (+0.9%) are all much stronger although the euro (+0.15%) and JPY (0.0%) not so much.  In the EMG bloc, MXN (+0.8%), ZAR (+1.1%), HUF (+0.8%) and KRW (+0.3%) are all having a very good session despite no specific news that would seem to drive that.  Historically, I never paid attention to the DXY because nobody who actually trades FX pays it any mind.  However, as a trading vehicle, it has gained many adherents which is why I mention it.  So, as we look across the currency universe, the dollar is having a tough day.

On the data front, we only see Michigan Sentiment (exp 55.0) and Consumer Credit ($8.0B).  We also hear from Governor Jefferson, but nobody seems to be listening to any Fed speakers right now, Secretary Bessent is a far more important voice for the markets.

We have seen massive moves across many markets lately, with excessive moves correcting, but I remain stubbornly of the view that while things got ahead of themselves, the underlying trends are still in place, at least in commodities.  As to the dollar, it’s not dead yet, but its future will depend on the administration’s ability to achieve their goals regarding the economic adjustments and inward investment.  

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Gone Astray

Posted on by

Though Friday will lack NFP
We still will have something to see
The States and Iran
Will meet in Oman
To talk about nuke strategy
 
But til they, in fact, do sit down
Be careful as crude moves around
And what if talks fail
To find holy grail
Beware oil shorts and their frowns
 
With that as the background today
The narrative has gone astray
’Cause all kinds of tech
Resemble a wreck
While metals are fading away

Sometimes it’s hard to determine which stories are really driving markets as there are so many that have potential conflicts between them.  With that in mind, I will start with oil this morning, which has seen a bit of choppiness during the past week on the back of on-again, off-again, on-again talks due to be held between the US and Iran.  See if you can guess where the worries about a US military strike gained ground, were quashed by news of potential talks, saw a military skirmish in the Strait of Hormuz and then when talks were reconfirmed.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Net, there is still an underlying concern about the situation, which is why, I believe, the price of crude (-1.1%) is still above $64/bbl.  Remember, it was not that long ago when it had seemed to find a comfort zone below $60/bbl.  It strikes me that if some type of accommodation is reached at these talks, where Iran gives up its nuclear weapon dreams and stops funding terrorism (I believe these are the administration’s goals) then there is plenty of room for oil prices to slide back below $60/bbl and continue what had been a longer term down trend as per the below chart.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

After all, given the fact that Venezuelan oil is going to be returning to the market, the continued expansion of production in Guyana, Brazil and Argentina, and now the idea of welcoming Iran back into the good graces of nations, that is a lot of potential supply that is currently not available.  My concern is if Iran agrees to those terms, it may be an existential threat to the theocracy, so I guess they need to weigh that risk vs. the risk that the US does escalate militarily, which could also be an existential risk to the theocracy.  Net, choppiness seems to be the likely road ahead.

Finishing commodities, precious metals have reversed the reversal and are down sharply this morning (Au -1.7%, Ag -11.0%, Pt -4.4%).  Volatility remains extremely high and given the competing narratives of a) it was a bubble, and b) the fundamentals remain in place, I expect we will continue to see price action like this for a while yet.  Although remember my strong belief that markets can only maintain volatility of this nature for a few weeks as at some point, all the participants simply become too tired to trade.  There was a very interesting chart I saw on X this morning that showed the price action in gold during the German hyperinflation of the Weimar Republic a bit over 100 years ago.  

I’m not implying we are heading to a hyperinflation, just that gold (and silver and platinum) prices can move very far in short order, as we’ve seen.  In the end, nothing has changed the fundamentals with demand for gold still price insensitive, demand for silver still greater than mining supply with the same true for platinum.  But it will be a rough ride for a little while yet.

So, let’s turn to the equity markets, where there are far more plugged-in analysts than me, but I want to take a higher-level look.  While yesterday’s price action was mixed (NASDAQ and S&P lower, DJIA higher) it seems to indicate that there is an ongoing rotation out of tech stocks into other areas, amongst them consumer staples, energy and defensives.  What I find so interesting about this, though, is that if I look at a chart of the three major US indices, they are all the same chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Granted, the NASDAQ had the highest high back in November, but, in reality, they all move very much in sync.  This begs the question, what can we expect going forward?  At the end of the day, I still believe that stocks represent the value created in the economy.  As such, if the Trump administration’s plans to reduce regulations and encourage banks to lend more to the real economy, rather than purchase financial assets, can be implemented effectively, that is a very real positive for equity markets over time.  However, that probably means a much less steady climb, especially if the Fed is not explicitly supporting assets as the new Chair, Warsh, tries to shrink the balance sheet.  It is going to be messy and there are going to be a lot of cross narratives and claims, so at any given time, the only reality will be increased volatility.  But at least there’s a plan.

As to the rest of the world’s equity markets, it does appear as the bifurcation between those nations that are willing to work closely with the US and those working closely with China is likely to continue.  It remains to be seen which bloc will outperform, although I like the US odds given the legal structure and the demographics.  

With all that in mind, let’s look at the overnight price action.  Asia had a tough go of it given the high proportion of tech names there.  While Tokyo (-0.9%) slipped along with China (-0.6%) the real laggards were Korea (-3.9%) and Taiwan (-1.5%) and there were far more laggards (India, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia) than gainers (Singapore, HK).  This is the tech story writ large.  In Europe, even though they largely lack tech, weakness is the norm (Spain -1.1%, Germany -0.2%, UK -0.3%) although the French (+0.3%) have managed to buck the trend.  It is not clear why Spain is lagging so badly, although perhaps PM Sanchez’s efforts to import 500K new people while unemployment remains at 10%, the highest in the EU, has some concerned.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are pointing higher by about 0.2%.

In the bond market, once again there is nothing going on.  Treasury yields are almost exactly unchanged since early Friday morning, although we did see a dip and rebound after the Warsh announcement.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The US yield curve is steepening as 30-year yields edge higher although those remain below 5.0%, a level that many are watching closely as a signal of a bondmageddon.  On the continent, European sovereign yields have edged higher by 1bp to 2bps, but activity is muted ahead of the ECB meeting announcement (exp no change) scheduled later this morning.  UK yields have edged lower by -1bp after the BOE left rates on hold, as expected, with a 5/4 vote, the 4 looking for a cut.  I continue to believe that the odds are for the ECB to cut rates again far sooner than the market is pricing.  And JGB yields slipped -2bps overnight as market participants await Sunday’s election results.  Given PM Takaichi is forecast to win with an increased majority, it is hard for me to believe that if she does, JGB’s will sell off sharply on the idea she has promised more unfunded spending, they already know that.

Lastly, the dollar is firmer this morning, continuing to defy all the calls for its demise.  The pound (-0.8%) is the laggard after the BOE sounded a bit more dovish than expected, but we are seeing losses across the entire G10 bloc.  As to the EMG bloc, ZAR (-0.7%) is the laggard, but given the dramatic reversal in precious metals, that is no surprise.  Otherwise, losses on the order of -0.3% or so are the norm.

On the data front, Initial (exp 212K) and Continuing (1850K) Claims lead the way and later we see the JOLTs Job Openings Report (7.2M).  The word is that the NFP report will be released next Wednesday with CPI next Friday.  Atlanta Fed president Bostic speaks later this morning, but I continue to believe that until we hear from Mr Warsh, the Fed’s words have very little impact.  Arguably, the neutering of the Fed is why the bond market remains so quiet.  Traders have lost their cues.

Risk attitudes are getting revisited around the world as the seeming permanence of increased risk appetite is starting to be called into question.  There is no better signal of this than Bitcoin, which has broken back below $70K this morning to its lowest level since October 2024.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It was January 2024 when the ETF, IBIT, started trading and BTC was about $43K at that time.  As BTC is a pure risk asset/vehicle, it’s recent decline may well be the biggest signal that risk-off is coming.  That could well impede the Trump efforts to rebuild the US manufacturing base, but perhaps, it could also encourage it, as business risks are easier to understand than market risks.  The volatility is not over.

Good luck

Adf

Dissension

Posted on by

It seems that there’s still quite some tension
As metals and stocks show dissension
Though Friday both puked
Of late, metals juked
Much higher, to stocks contravention
 
So, what can we learn from this split?
That tech stocks all now trade like sh*t
While silver and gold
Are what folks will hold
And bonds? No one just gives a whit

It seems the government shutdown has ended, just as quickly as it began and the only people impacted are traders who were looking forward to the NFP data on Friday.  Given the shutdown was only for a few days, and that apparently, all the data was already collected, it was the compilation that was being delayed, I presume we will get the numbers next week.  Of course, this is a government bureaucracy, so it may take a bit longer.  Nonetheless, this morning we see the ADP Employment number (exp 48K) and analysts will have to work from that, plus the reports like the ISM hiring data, to give their views of the economy.  It really all does seem like theater, I must admit.

Anyway, away from that, the only other news of note that is impacting markets has been an increase in tensions in Iran after the US shot down an Iranian drone heading toward the US aircraft carrier, Abraham Lincoln.  However, it appears that talks are still scheduled for Friday, so oil (+0.2% today, +1.4% since yesterday morning) is creeping back higher, although remains well below the levels seen last week when concerns over a US attack there were mounting.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Which takes us to markets and what appear to be the key internal drivers.  Starting today with stocks, the narrative revolves around concern that AI is going to destroy software companies and SaaS models since their user base will no longer need those companies.  As well, there are the lingering concerns about the AI investment bubble and the circular dealing between Nvidia and its customers being an indication of the end of the era.  This is akin to what happened during the tech bubble in 2000-01 and has been highlighted by numerous analysts for several months, although is gaining more traction of late.  Finally, the Business Development Companies (BDC’s) and PE firms are under increasing pressure as their portfolio of loans and positions, many of which are being hurt by AI, are starting to hemorrhage cash.  This trifecta has been weighing on the NASDAQ, preventing any significant strength, although other sectors, notably energy and materials, have been doing pretty well.

The funny thing is, while the NASDAQ (-1.4%) fell yesterday amid widespread US equity weakness, if I look at the chart (below from tradingeconomics.com) it doesn’t seem that negative, rather it seems to be consolidating ahead of another leg higher.  But then, I am no technician, so don’t pay attention to me.

However, the narrative is strong here that the world is about to end because Nvidia hasn’t made a new high in the past three months.  I am no tech stock expert, but my take from the cheap seats is that future equity market outcomes are going to continue to be reliant on the success of the Trump administration’s plans regarding reshoring and changing the nature of trade.  It is likely to be bumpy, especially if the Fed does not cut rates to support equity markets, especially since that has been the MO for the past 40 years.  But I remain positive overall.

Looking around the rest of the world, last night saw a mixed picture, although definitely more green than red.  While Tokyo (-0.8%) slid along with Malaysia and the Philippines, the rest of the region had a nice session led by Korea (+1.6%), China (+0.8%) and Australia (+0.8%).  It appears the tech fears were less concerning there, either that or PE and BDC companies aren’t yet so prevalent.  In Europe, meanwhile, despite mixed PMI Services data, there are more gainers than laggards led by the UK (+1.0%), which does have miners, benefitting from the rebound in metals prices.  But France (+0.9%) and Spain (+0.15%) are also higher although Germany (-0.2%) is lagging after a modest miss in the PMI data. As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are pointing higher by about 0.25%.

Back to metals, which continue to be THE story these days, gold (+2.0%) has reclaimed the $5000/oz level and while it is lower in the past week, remains nearly 17% higher YTD.  Silver (+6.0%) is also rebounding nicely along with platinum (+3.8%) as more and more discussions have ascribed last Friday’s rout to month end delivery and position issues amongst a few very large players who were able to prevent some major damage to their own balance sheets.  However, as I have maintained all along, the fundamentals are unchanged; there is a shortage of silver for industrial use and has been for several years.  As to gold, there is no indication that central banks have stopped buying.  These continue to be long-term plays and will likely drag the entire metals sector along for the ride.

What about bonds, you may ask?  Well actually, nobody is asking about bonds!  They remain mired in a tight range with dueling narratives about the long-term view.  On the one hand, there are those who continue to look at the US debt load, and the expectation of fiscal deficits as far as the eye (or the CBO) can see, and expect supply issues to dominate, forcing the government to seek inflation to create the soft default necessary to pay back the debt.  They will point to the long-term trend, which saw yields decline for 40 years and then reverse back in 2020 (see chart below from finance.yahoo.com) as evidence that yields are going to trend higher for the next decades.

On the other side, you have those who believe the future is deflationary, with AI driving massive increases in productivity and driving down prices, while focusing on Truflation’s recent readings of 1.0% and claiming that is the way.  Personally, I have more sympathy for the former view than the latter, as it is increasingly difficult for me to understand the view that AI will be able to achieve all its currently stated desires without sufficient energy and materials, whose increasing prices are going to limit any downside in inflation.  As well, while a Warsh Fed chairmanship may strive to change the current central bank model of QE whenever needed, there is zero evidence any other central banks are going to follow suit.  

In the meantime, the tension between those two views has kept yields in a very tight range for a while, and we need an exogenous catalyst to break that range.  Peace in Ukraine?  War in Iran?  I’m not sure.

Finally, the dollar is a touch firmer this morning, notably against the yen (-0.6%), which continues to give back its gains from two Friday’s ago when the Fed ‘checked rates’ in the NY session as seen in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

However, the point was made this morning, and it is a good one, that while Japanese 10-year yields are at 2.24%, 10-year yields, 10-years forward are about 4.10%, which would be a devastating yield for the Japanese government given its debt/GDP ratio remains above 230%.  It is difficult to get excited about owning the yen with that backdrop, especially given the demographic implosion of population that is ongoing there.  As to the rest of the currency market, Zzzzz.  Aside from the narrative of the dollar is dead, which gets recycled by somebody every day, it is very hard to look at recent price action and think something remarkable is going to happen.  We will need major monetary and fiscal policy changes, which while they may arrive, are going to take quite some time to get here.

And that’s really it this morning.  Aside from ADP, we get the ISM Services (exp 53.5) and we get the Quarterly Treasury refunding announcement, which will garner a great deal of attention only if Secretary Bessent explains he is going to issue more bonds and less bills, which seems unlikely.  Monday’s ISM data was quite strong.  Strength today could well portend that the US economy has a bright future ahead, in the near term, and that should support stocks and the dollar, while commodities will benefit from the increased demand.  Bonds?  Well, we’ll see which side of that argument is correct.  And what happens if the deficits are smaller than expected?  That is the question nobody is asking because the ‘smart’ folks don’t believe it is possible.  Remember, the dollar is still king.

Good luck

Adf