Author Archives: fxpoet

Overrun

Posted on by

We’ve not even gone through a week
Yet Trump, so much havoc did wreak
This poet will claim
That in this ballgame
It’s top first, one down, so to speak
 
The impact of what has been done
Is widespread and hits everyone
So, please understand
Whatever you’ve planned
May, by events, be overrun

 

Venezuela continues to be the primary discussion point in both the media and the markets.  Mostly along political lines there are calls that the weekend’s action was illegal or not, and as Brent Donnelly, a very good follow on X (@donnelly_brent), explained after reading voluminous material, the raid was either all about the oil or had nothing to do with the oil. I feel like that sums things up pretty well.

While this poet has views on the ongoing issues, they are set from afar with no inside knowledge so keep that in mind.  But ultimately, my take is the opportunity for real change has come to Venezuela, something that did not exist while Maduro was still there.  If nothing else, the ability for the US to exfiltrate him must have made a strong impression on acting president Rodriguez and the generals overseeing the army and police forces there and ought push decision making in a positive direction, at least for a while.  What seems abundantly clear, however, is that most of the population is ecstatic at his removal and have hope for a future, something missing for decades.

As to the oil, it is heavy, sour crude, something Gulf coast refineries are tuned to use, but the infrastructure there is a disaster.  My take is the one thing that is underestimated is just how remarkable the technology of oil exploration and production has become, and its ability to solve problems in efficiency to reduce the cost of extraction.  I will take the under on the time it takes to increase production there, although a key bottleneck is the electric grid which must be addressed as well.  Nonetheless, despite the rise in oil prices during yesterday’s session, I maintain my view that the trend is lower.

Other than domestic political news there seems little else to discuss but market activity, so let’s go there.  A strong session in the US yesterday was followed by plenty of strength in Asia with Japan (+1.3%), China (+1.6%) and HK (+1.4%) all having excellent outcomes.  Too, Korea (+1.7%) and Taiwan (+1.6%) had strong showings with many more gainers than losers in the region.  The one market that has not partaken in the early year rally is India (-0.4%), which I can only ascribe to the fact they may be losing a source of cheap oil.  Or perhaps, more accurately, all the buyers of sanctioned oil may find themselves in more difficult straits, paying full price, as the dark fleet of tankers is suddenly having more trouble making the rounds.

On this note, one other place to watch is Iran, where it appears that the regime may be set to collapse as protests grow and some cities may have been completely taken over by the protesters.  If the theocracy falls, I would expect that, too, will pressure oil prices lower, as sanctions could be swiftly lifted.

Turning to Europe, does anybody really care anymore?  No, seriously, markets there are mixed this morning with France (-0.4%) lagging while the UK (+0.7%) is gaining on the back of BP and Shell and the general euphoria about the oil majors now.  Meanwhile, other major markets have seen modest gains (Italy +0.4%, Spain +0.3%, Germany +0.2%) but there is one outlier, Denmark (+2.1%) which, given all the talk of the US seeking to take control of Greenland, seems odd to me.  I can find no specific news either for the economy or any companies (Novo Nordisk being the only one of note), but something is going on.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:50) they are little changed.

Turning to the bond market, the below chart of the 10-year offers a great picture of what it means when traders say nothing is going on.  Since early September, the bond has been trading within a 20 basis point range despite all the huffing and puffing of the punditry and the FOMC’s rate cuts.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

If bond investors are the “smart” money, I would argue that right now they have no opinion, or perhaps their opinion is that the economy is going to continue to tick along at a decent rate, with limited extra inflationary pressure.  To that last point, an article in the WSJ this morning explained that several recent studies, one by the SF Fed, demonstrated that tariffs have virtually no inflationary impact.  That probably doesn’t help Powell’s talking points.  While I continue to be concerned that inflation will maintain a 3+% level, I also believe the Fed is going to suppress interest rates going forward, net, bonds don’t seem that exciting.  As to the overnight price action, Treasury yields backed up 2bps, while European sovereigns slipped between -1bp and -2bps.  I couldn’t help but also notice that yesterday saw a massive issuance of USD bonds by non-US corporates, over $60 billion, an indication to me, at least, that calls for the death of the dollar are somewhat premature.

Commodities continue to be where all the action is, or perhaps more accurately, metals markets.  After massive rallies yesterday, we are seeing follow through with gold (+0.4%), silver (+2.4%), copper (+1.0%) and platinum (+3.2%) all strong again.  Unlike the bond market, and truly FX, which is also dull and boring, the below chart shows just how much things in the metals space have changed over time. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My take is that investors are still trying to figure out the implications of the fact that old relationships like the dollar falling when metals rise, or metals falling when real interest rates rise, are broken and what that implies for the future.  The reality is that other than gold, which is the calmest of them all, these metals are indicating actual shortages for users.  Consider that, according to Grok, the typical catalytic converter uses between 0.1 and 0.25 troy ounces of platinum, so at today’s price, between $230 and $575.  Given the average price of a new car is ~$50K, paying up for platinum is not going to change the equation that much, certainly relative to not having the platinum and therefore not being able to complete and sell the vehicle.  I suspect that metals, while likely to be volatile in their price action, have much further to run higher.

Lastly, the dollar…is still there.  Using the DXY as my proxy this morning, you can look at the chart below for the past year and see, it has basically not moved since it stopped declining in late April 2025.  It is hard to get excited about things right now.  However, I maintain that the US will remain the cleanest dirty shirt and benefit accordingly over time.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, Services (exp 52.9) and Composite (53.0) PMI are released this morning with both expected lower than last month, but still in expansion territory.  We also hear from Richmond Fed governor Barkin, but it seems the Fed has taken a back seat to Venezuela lately, at least with respect to what is driving markets.  As of this morning, there is just a 16% probability of a rate cut priced in for the end of the month with a 53% probability priced for the March meeting.  But two more cuts are seen as a certainty by September, although if GDP continues to perform like it has, I imagine that will change.  According to the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model, Q4 is forecast at 2.7%.  We shall see how that evolves over time.

Summing it all up, the dollar is an afterthought in markets right now and seems unlikely to move very much in the near term.  Metals remain the place to be, and nothing indicates those trends have ended.

Good luck

Adf

Much Ado

Posted on by

The market response to the raid
In Vene has so far been staid
The black, sticky goo
Despite much ado
Shows traders have not yet been swayed
 
And frankly, that seems to make sense
‘Cause years will pass ere they commence
To pump much more oil
But that shouldn’t spoil
The truth their reserves are immense

 

As of 9:00 last night, oil futures are essentially unchanged from Friday’s, pre-Venezuelan news, close.  As you can see from the chart below, while there was an early blip higher of about 50¢, that quickly retraced.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But, stepping back a bit, a look at the chart for the past year shows a very steady decline in the price and at this point, there seems to be little that will change that result.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I have consistently made the case that oil supply exists all over the world, and that politics has been the chokepoint.  Arguably, a new government in Venezuela has just removed one of those chokepoints, although from everything I can gather, given the decrepit state of the oil infrastructure in Venezuela after nearly 20 years of Socialist neglect, it will take quite a while to hit the market.  But Guyana and Argentina are going to be growing their output considerably going forward, so, a slower rate of production here ought to not matter much.

One other thing I did read was that a key driver of the weekend’s events was growing concern by the US military that the Chinese were going to monopolize rare earth mining and processing from areas of southern Venezuela and that was too great a concern.  Even if the timeline is long, it appears, at this stage, that the future of Venezuela’s oil production should start to trend higher, and that will simply add to pressures on prices.  After all, we know that markets are forward looking.

One last thing to note is that acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez, has called for “cooperation” with the US going forward, a very different tone than her initial comments of outrage.  Perhaps she has figured out that this is a sweet deal for her, or perhaps she is simply afraid that she is not safe if she doesn’t cooperate.  Whatever the reason, I suspect that things will progress positively from here.

In the meantime, let us try to turn our attention elsewhere, although it will be difficult as this action will clearly have many widespread, and at this point unforeseeable, impacts on markets other than oil.  But try we must.  With that in mind, let’s review markets overnight and see how the initial price action has evolved, and perhaps what it implies for the future.

Starting with equities, you’re hard pressed to find a market anywhere in the world that is suffering this morning despite the alleged increase in uncertainty.  In fact, it appears that investors are pretty certain that today is a better day than Friday was given the new world order that is developing.  Starting in Asia, the only market that fell overnight was India (-0.4%) seemingly on the idea that one source of their cheap oil may have been stopped.  But elsewhere, Japan (+3.0%), China (+1.9%), Korea (+3.4%) and Taiwan (+2.6%) all had extremely strong sessions with HK, Australia and other smaller exchanges showing little to no gains.  My only surprise here is China, which has invested significantly in Venezuela, lent them large sums of money and also had their advanced radar systems shown to be useless against US military aircraft.  But in the end, fear was not on the agenda in Asia.

What about Europe?  Well, here things are less excitable, with Germany (+0.65%) and Italy (+0.6%) the leaders as defense firms in both nations have performed well this morning.  But otherwise, Europe is a nonevent this morning, which given their increasing global irrelevance, should be no surprise.  The UK, France, and Spain have all barely moved and surprisingly, Switzerland (-0.7%) has fallen, although perhaps neutrality is not such a benefit anymore.  US futures, though, are continuing their ride higher with the NASDAQ (+0.8%) leading the way in a sea of green.    The net result here is, risk is still in vogue.

Turning to the bond market, only JGB yields (+6bps) are rising after PM Takaichi reiterated her call for more spending.  Yes, this is a new 29-year high in 10-year JGB yields, but I suspect they have further to go.  After all, as you can see from the below chart, yield suppression has been the game there for decades, so unwinding it will take some time.

Source: investing.com

But elsewhere in the fixed income world, yields are slipping across the board.  Treasury yields (-3bps) are leading the way with all of Europe seeing declines between -2bps and -3bps.  I might suggest this is a response to the prospect of declining oil and energy prices going forward, even though it will take time to see the increases in production.

As to commodities, as of this morning at 7:30, oil has bumped up 0.5%, although as you can see in the above chart, remains in a longer-term downtrend that shows no signs of breaking soon.  Metals, meanwhile, remain the story of stories with the entire periodic table looking good (Au +1.9%, Ag +3.3%, Cu +2.9%, Pt +2.5%).  I continue to read about reasons as to why this rally in metals is going to end soon, with most focused on the speed of the ascent last year.  But the difference in this market vs. any paper financial market is, physical supplies matter here, and by all accounts, Ag, Cu and Pt are all in short supply for their industrial uses (think catalytic converters for Pt) and as industrial users recognize the shortage, they continue to bid up the price.  While I expect all these markets to remain volatile this year, I suspect that the trend higher has a lot of runway yet.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning, despite the rally in metals.  The euro (-0.3%) is the laggard in the G10 space as the EU was shown to be completely powerless, useless and irrelevant over the weekend.  However, they did issue a carefully considered statement to cement the idea that they are powerless, useless and irrelevant as seen below.

I know I feel safer now!  In addition to this demonstration, the timeline for a digital euro seems to be speeding up, a decision that will further undermine the single currency in my view.  Nothing has changed my opinion, except perhaps strengthening it, that the world is going to bifurcate into USD stablecoins and digital CNY over the next few years, with most of Europe opting for USD.  Elsewhere in the G10, movement has been less pronounced, +/-0.2% or less with nothing of note to mention.  In the EMG bloc, most of the currencies here are a bit weaker, -0.3% or so, with two key exceptions, ZAR (+0.1%) and CLP (+0.2%), both benefitting from the large gain in the metals complex.  Interestingly, MXN (-0.35%) is amongst the worst performers as the natural thought process seems to be, is President Sheinbaum next unless she effectively shuts down the cartels.  I keep searching for reasons to understand bearishness on the dollar but have yet to find any that make sense.  One other thing to note, there has been a resurgence in the discussion of how the dollar is losing its traction amongst central banks with respect to reserves held.  Many are highlighting that the percentage of reserves in USD has fallen to its lowest level since the mid 1990’s.  but a look at the chart below shows that while the recent trend has declined, it remains far above its lows, and far below its highs over time.  In fact, one might say it’s right in the middle of the range.

Turning to the data this week, with the government having been back in action for a while, we are back to a full slate of data for the first week of a month.

TodayISM Manufacturing48.3
 ISM Prices Paid59.0
TuesdayPMI Services52.9
 PMI Composite53.0
WednesdayADP Employment45K
 ISM Services52.3
 JOLYs Job Openings7.64M
 Factory Orders-1.2%
 -ex Transport-0.3%
ThursdayInitial Claims216K
 Continuing Claims1851K
 Trade Balance -$58.4B
 Nonfarm Productivity3.0%
 Unit Labor Costs1.0%
 Consumer Credit$10.2B
FridayNonfarm Payrolls55K
 Private Payrolls60K
 Manufacturing Payrolls-5K
 Unemployment Rate4.5%
 Average Weekly Hours34.3
 Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.6% Y/Y)
 Participation Rate62.6%
 Housing Starts (Sept)1.31M
 Building Permits (Sept)1.35M
 Michigan Sentiment53.2

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While some data remains stale (housing), the jobs data is December’s and will get a great deal of attention.  One thing to remember here is that if the deportation numbers discussed by the government are correct (~500K actual deportations and ~2.0MM self-deportations), then the economy doesn’t need to create that many new jobs to keep things ticking along.  I have seen estimates of somewhere between 0 and 20K jobs each month being sufficient to keep the Unemployment Rate steady to declining.  I am sure, however, this issue will be the subject of much discussion by the economics community going forward, but as I have said time and again, the models in use today do not seem to reasonably represent the reality today.  Expect a lot of huffing and puffing about this data, largely along political lines.

And that’s really it.  Obviously, Venezuela has changed a lot of calculations about many markets, but in the end, while I remain concerned over an eventual risk-off outcome, I don’t see that as an immediate threat.  Remember, too, the OBBB has taken effect and tax situations are going to be changing now, something that will undoubtedly help the economic data going forward.

Good luck

Adf

First Black Swan

Posted on by

‘Ought Twenty-Six barely got started
And Trump has already departed
From previous norms
Of post-Cold War forms
Now socialists are broken-hearted
 
Their man in Caracas is gone
With outrage from Beijing to Bonn
But folks on the street
Believe it’s a treat
Please welcome this year’s first black swan

 

I certainly didn’t have the exfiltration of Venezuelan strongman Nicholas Maduro from his palace in the middle of the night on my bingo card, did you?  But that is what we all woke up to Saturday morning.  In a way, we cannot be surprised as President Trump indicated several weeks ago that he spoke with Maduro, told him if he left, he could have safe passage, and be left alone, but ostensibly Maduro turned him down.  I’m guessing old Nick is questioning that decision right now.

As this all took place Saturday morning, no financial markets, other than cryptocurrencies, are open and based on Bitcoin’s movement of 0.1% as I type, it appears the issue is not seen as a major concern.  There is much discussion regarding what will happen to the price of oil, as unquestionably, Venezuelan oil was part of the decision equation.  But the Venezuelans have been producing less than 1 million bpd, far below their pre-socialist levels, and given they sit on the largest known oil reserves on the planet, far below what their ultimate capabilities can be.  If you’re Chevron’s CEO, you must be thrilled this morning, as they are already operating in country there.

Too, remember that Venezuelan crude is heavy and sour, which is what most Gulf Coast refineries are tuned to utilise to distill diesel, gasoline and other products.  It is too early to know what will happen to oil prices in the short run, but I would suggest that the longer-term view has to be lower prices going forward.  Consider that the US already is the largest producer of oil and oil equivalents (about 20mm bpd) in the world.  I would expect that Venezuela will be exiting OPEC under a new administration there, and with US oil expertise, will be seeking to expand that sector as rapidly as possible.  In fact, achieving 10mm bpd within a few years does not seem unrealistic. 

Now consider that by the end of the decade, the Western hemisphere could well be producing half the world’s oil supply, as already, despite degradation of capabilities in both Venezuela and Mexico, it produces more than one-third of the oil pumped.  That would certainly put a crimp in Russia’s war machine as the price seems far more likely to head toward $50/bbl than $80/bbl or higher, and by all accounts, that would be hard on Russia’s budget.

Too, consider the geopolitical ramifications if China were suddenly paying full price rather than whatever discounts they currently get for sanctioned oil purchases.  As well, what does a lower price do to the Iranian regime’s finances?  Probably not very helpful.

It is way too early to know how things will evolve, but between growth in production in Guyana and Argentina, and the prospects for significant growth in Venezuela going forward, it should become cheaper to fill up your tank going forward.

We will see how markets open Sunday night, and I would not be surprised to see oil rally at the start, but I would contend the politics points to lower prices not higher ones.  

Source: visualcapitalist.com

Note that neither Venezuela nor Argentina make this list individually.   I would wager that by 2027, both will be prominent producers, along with Guyana.

Welcome to 2026!  It is going to be an interesting year.

Good luck

Adf

A Vision For ‘Twenty-Six

Posted on by

(With apologies to Clement Clarke Moore)

Tis the first day of trading in Ought Twenty-Six
With too much attention on raw politics
At home, eyes have turned to the mid-term elections
To see if results will force mid-course corrections
In Europe, they’re going all-in on Ukraine
With more billions promised, though that seems insane
Meanwhile, Mr Xi is convinced he can fix
The problems at home with his policy mix
And this, my friends, just skims the surface of things
As pols everywhere suffer arrows and slings
Remember, though, markets are what I’m about
And while I could err, I am never in doubt.

Let’s start at the top with Growth here in the States
Which likely will show more than marginal rates
In fact, Four percent seems a viable goal
As inward investment and tax cuts take hold
Remember, for Trump, if there’s one thing he’s not
It’s timid, and so he’ll demand, “Run it hot!”
Thus, growth will expand, though inflation might gain
And for the elections, that could be a pain
The problem is Jay, and whoever comes next
Have come to believe two percent’s just subtext
The greatest unknown is on government spending
And whether it grows or, at last, starts descending

The punditry’s certain the government fisc
Is going to increase inflation’ry risk
If true, CPI of near Four percent’s apt
If not, then Inflation ‘neath Three, could be capped

And what about elsewhere, in Europe? Japan?
In markets, emerging, do they have a plan?
Will they grow their ‘conomies, drawing investment?
Or will we soon witness a large reassessment?

In Europe, they claim they’ll be building more guns
To help them defend all their daughters and sons
As well, they’re committed to helping Ukraine
Continue to fight, despite so many slain
They’re planning to borrow a cool 90 Bill
But energy costs, these grand plans could well kill
Meanwhile, M Lagarde claims that rates are just right
And given growth there’s One Percent, I won’t fight
So, weak growth and low rates and energy blues
Lead me to believe that come year-end, the news
Will be that the Euro is failing to thrive
Do not be surprised when it hits One oh-Five

In England and Scotland and all the UK
Just like in the EU, they can’t make much hay
The budget’s a wreck yet they want to raise taxes
Though history shows growth will wane ere it waxes
As well, they continue their crack down on speech
While crimping their energy industry’s reach
So, power is costly, and billionaires flee
From here, ‘cross the pond, this is what I foresee
A ‘conomy heading right into stagflation
As long as Kier Starmer is leading the nation
For markets, the Pound will lose all its allure
With One-Ten the Boxing Day screen price du jour

A turn to the East where the Sun Also Rises
Will teach us that, really, there are no surprises
To date you’ve heard much ‘bout the rise in yen rates
With pundits opining the Carry Trades’ fates
This year, so they say, look for much stronger yen
As local investors buy yen bonds again
Thus, all the hedge funds who’ve been funding their trades
By borrowing yen, and they’ve done so in spades,
Will need to buy back all that Japanese Money
The outcome, for yen shorts, will not be so sunny
But what if this idea of yen heading home
Is wrong?  This implies quite a different syndrome

At this point there’s no sign the government there
Is ready, more spending and debt, to forswear
Instead, what seems likely is more of the same
More government spending in all but its name
So, debt will continue to rise without end
And up to One-Eighty the buck will ascend

As well as Japan, in the continent vast
Of Asia, it’s China we come to at last
“Poor” President Xi has a problem at home
Consumption is not in the Chinese genome
For decades, the model’s been, build and export
Which helps explain why local usage falls short
But lately the rest of the world’s of a mind
That Chinese imports are a troublesome kind
So, Xi needs his people to learn how to spend
Else all that production may come to an end
But if they consume, what will that do to growth?
Its rate will decline, something for which Xi’s loath

Thus, GDP 5 means a weaker yuan
Well above Seven you can depend on
But if, against odds, Xi gets Chinese to spend
Six-Fifty is where yuan will be at year end.

Let’s shift our perspective to Treasury debt
A market of critical import, and yet
A market that’s been in a range for a while
So, what must occur for a change in profile?
The popular view is that deficit spending
Will drive an outcome of, high yields, never-ending
But Trump and his team are, quite hard, pushing back
Explaining that policy’s on the right track
Twixt tariffs and growth, tax receipts have been flying
While RIFs in the government are underlying
The idea that deficits soon will be shrinking
In truth, this is not what the punditry’s thinking
But one thing is clear that will keep yields from climbing
QE, which is back, is designed for pump-priming
So, Jay and his heir will keep buying and buying
And 10-Years at Four Percent seems satisfying

It’s not just the government, though, that’s in debt
Those corporates who borrowed at ZIRP, have not yet
Refinanced the trillions they owe, to this day
And now they’re competing with Bessent and Jay
While Scott will find buyers, if not least the Fed
For corporates that path may be flashing bright red
If credit spreads widen will companies fail?
And will that unravel the stock markets’ tale?
Right now, spreads for IG sit near one percent
And Junk’s above eight with investors content
However, the biggest risk this year could be
The absence of corporate debt liquidity
If IG spreads widen 200 bps more
The outcome could be a GFC encore

This takes us to stocks, both at home and abroad
Which last year saw rallies we all did applaud
But will this year bring us some more of the same?
Or have things been altered?  Is there a new game?
If my crystal ball is in any way clear
The outcome could well be a frightening year
Remember, the driver of last year’s returns
Was government spending which lacked all concerns
Thus, Cantillon nailed it with where cash would go
And stocks were the winner, of that much we know
But this year the mountain of debt coming due
Could well force decisions of what will ensue
And too, don’t forget if the deficit shrinks
It’s likely to be a great stock market jinx
So, don’t be surprised if December this year
A 10% fall ‘cross all stocks does appear

And what of that black, sticky stuff that they drill
Which powers the global economy still
When its price increases, it causes much pain
For most everyone, it can be quite the bane
Consumers, instead, like those prices to sink
But drillers, in that case, cause output to shrink
So, which will it be, will Trump’s mantra come true
Or will, new production, most drillers eschew
I think what is missed is technology’s traction
And how costs per barrel will tend toward contraction
As well, nations worldwide, at last understand
That Carbon Dioxide just cannot be banned
Come Christmas, next, we will see growth in supply
With Fifty per barrel the price we’ll espy

The last place to look is at bright things that shine
Which saw prices move in a vertical line
While gold was the starter, by year end t’was clear
That silver and platinum said, wait, hold my beer
The latter two rising thrice fifty percent
With neither responding to any event
Which brings us to this year, can these trends maintain?
Or are we now set up for infinite pain?
It seems to me that til the summer at least
All three will continue to rise, as with yeast
But when we reach solstice do not be surprised
If views on their future become bastardized
In other words, look for corrections in price
With early year gains given back in a trice
But still, by the end of the year I believe
Five Thousand in Gold is what we will perceive
For Silver, One Hundred could well be the spot
And Platinum, Three Grand, would not be too hot.

To all of my readers and friends, please forgive
My musings if they got too ruminative
This year will see change across many degrees
And some will be painful, while others will please

In sum, I think President Trump can succeed
In changing behavior, though not corporate greed
Reducing the number of government staff
As well as with regs, he can cut those in half
Inward investment will focus on stuff
Instead of on stocks, for the markets that’s rough
Dollars will still be in greater demand
While Treasury yields will be stuck in the sand
IG and Junk are unlikely to win
As rising expenses cut margins quite thin
And still, through it all, precious metals will gain
Though G7 central banks all will abstain
Come Christmas next, nothing will look quite the same
And maybe my views can help you build a frame.

Thank you all for tolerating my punditry and I hope that you all have a wonderful, healthy and successful year ahead.

Adf

Constitutional Repercussions

Posted on by

There once was a time when elections
Were focused on changing directions
But lately it seems
Both sides offer schemes
Designed to uphold pols protections
 
Perhaps it is time to adjust
The candidates that we entrust
To fight for our rights
And suffer the slights
But who, when it counts, blows will thrust

 

 

Reading Market Vibes this morning, I was taken by this video JJ included and it reminded me of a short story I wrote many years ago, in the wake of the governator’s election to governor of California in 2003.  

Watch the video clip then read the story and let me know what you thought.

Constitutional Repercussions

Foreigners Can Be President!  So screamed the headlines following the news that the 28th Amendment had been ratified.  The punditry was immediate in naming it the Arnold Amendment, enacted so as to allow persons born on foreign soil, who have been citizens of the US for at least 20 years, to become President of the United States.  The debate centered on the rationale of the founding fathers to include, in the constitution, the clause that only native-born citizens could be president.   

On one side were the strict traditionalists, decrying the change in the law, and declaring that if it was good enough for Washington and Jefferson, it should be good enough for us.  They conveniently forgot the fact that the clause was designed to prevent what was then perceived as the threat of an Englishman becoming president and trying to convert the great experiment known as the United States of America back to a British colony.  Their mantra was “As it is written, so it must be.”  In many ways, they resembled the creationists, who see the Bible as literally true, and believe the earth was created 6000 years ago.  In fact, many of them were the same people. 

On the other side were the more liberal modernists.  Their argument was that being born in the US didn’t necessarily make you a good person or uniquely qualify you for the job.  In fact, most naturalized citizens are far more patriotic. They are familiar with other countries and the lack of freedoms and opportunities that exist elsewhere.  

They revere rights that most native-born Americans take for granted. 

In the end, the liberals won the war.  The battle took place so that the erstwhile governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, former movie star and real estate mogul, could run for the White House.  Of course, things are never that simple.  What was so intriguing was the reaction of other nations around the world.  Strange things were about to take place on the third planet from the sun. 

Many of us remember the schoolyard taunt, “my dad can beat up your dad.”  In college some even expounded on the idea that, rather than nations going to war, countries should have their leaders fight for what they believe is right.  This would save lives and solve problems far more quickly and in a far less costly manner.  Of course, nobody ever believed that anything like that would happen.  Leaders of countries are serious men and women, with a vision for the future and political skills to persuade their countrymen to follow that vision.  Why put someone in that role whose qualifications are merely strength of body, not mind?  Well, let me tell you the story of what went on after Ah-nold was elected president of the United States in 2012. 

 After a landslide victory, the Austrian bodybuilder turned American success story, started to use the bully pulpit more effectively than any president since Teddy Roosevelt.  Arnold was a man who had a finely tuned ear for the public’s feelings.  He was a man who preached common sense rather than political ideology.  In short, he was a man who could look you in the eye, describe his beliefs and persuade you of their merit because of the sincerity in his story.  He was born to lead, and now he was in the role of a lifetime. 

At a staff meeting in the early days of his presidency, Arnold realized that the budget situation was getting out of hand.  His advisors, to a man, focused only on the non-defense aspects of the budget, but he realized that defense spending represented nearly 20% of the total, and that a major reduction there could solve many great problems in a single act. This was exactly the sort of thing Arnold had become famous for during his governorship of California. 

 And so he floated the suggestion… “What if I offered to fight the leader of a foreign country when we had a fundamental disagreement?  No guns, no knives, no armies, just me and him in the ring until there was just one of us left standing!” 

 His aides were shocked at the idea, but Arnold was on a roll.  “Think of what we could accomplish.  We could end war as we know it, disband the armed forces around the world and address grievances quickly.  Think of the ratings on TV!!  It would be the biggest draw in history.”  Arnold was starting to get excited now.  “What a spectacle this could be.  I would take on Rafarrin, or the Ayatollah in Iran, or anybody.” 

 His staff was adamantly opposed to the whole thing, but once again it was Arnold who had his finger on the pulse of the nation, and really of the whole world.  He recognized that ordinary citizens everywhere were tired of the state of war that had existed around the world for the past decade or more.  He was the first to truly understand that the vast majority of the Earth’s population was far more concerned with their individual security and ability to lead a productive life rather than the geopolitical issues that were constantly in the news.  Most Americans couldn’t care less about what was going on in Russia or Saudi Arabia or the Ivory Coast.  And most Russians and Saudis couldn’t care less about what went on in the United States.  All they heard was partisan bickering on TV and in the newspapers, and an increasing stream of bad news from some far corner of the globe.  American soldiers dying, a health epidemic or revolution or civil war beginning.  These seemed to be the only thing on the news recently.  Arnold, it turned out, had hit upon the key to move the global political situation to the next level.  Two months later, June 15, 2013, to be exact, Arnold Schwarzenegger stood in front of a special joint session of Congress and on global TV made the following announcement: 

 “My fellow Americans and good citizens of the world.  I come to you this evening with an idea.  It’s a simple idea, yet one so profound as to change the way the United States will handle conflict in the future.  I believe it can change the way that mankind handles all conflicts in the future. 

 I think we can all agree that given our choice, the vast majority of us would seek a peaceful life, and that if I presented an idea that was able to solve two seemingly intractable problems simultaneously, that you would give it serious thought.  In fact, the idea that I will present can do just that, I believe.  If, after hearing this, you agree, I want you all to contact your local representation and urge them to join in and embrace this idea.  For those of you watching who are not American, it will apply equally to each one of your nations and I believe you, too, will see its beauty and effectiveness. 

 The modern world has become a place where individuals all seek what’s best for themselves, without regard to what’s best for the nation as a whole.  In fact, this attitude has mutated into ‘I want what’s best for me and if I don’t get it, it must be somebody else’s fault.’  What has been the result of this attitude?  We have reached a time in society where entitlements have become the driving force behind many people’s lives.  There seems to be a belief that merely being born an American, or Englishman or Frenchman or any nationality, means that you are automatically deserving of a certain, cushy lifestyle.  And if something happens so that you do not get everything you want, you sue, or cause trouble.  This has led to several serious consequences.  First, government spending is out of control, and not just in America, but all around the world.  Taxes are rising, spending is rising special interests are happy because they are getting more money, but the average citizen is being worn down with nothing to show for it.  Demands for energy and commodities has resulted in a transfer of power to nations that have little or no experience in working effectively within the global nation-state system.  This leads to the second consequence…war.  It’s been more than 10 years since there was a semblance of peace in the world.  It’s been more than 10 years since a full month has passed without American soldiers dying in some far-off land; Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Zimbabwe, or some other place.  You name it and we’ve lost our brave young men and women there.  And for what? I ask.  So that the complainers in this country get their way?  More oil, cheap imports, export markets?  It seems that if you complain long enough and loud enough, that in this country we will send in a brigade on your behalf! 

 Well, no more!!  That stops right now if you listen to my idea, and we make it the law of the land. 

 I propose that disagreements between nations be settled in a manner that requires no armies, no navies, no air forces, nothing but this.  It requires merely that the leader of the aggrieved nations meet in an arena and join in combat until one concedes the issue.  These matches would be televised globally and would have no referees.  The only rule would be no weapons of any kind, just man against man.  Each issue would be decided in a single match and the outcome would be final and binding for at least 10 years.  But the key is that the leaders of nations must fight.  There would be no nomination of a champion in his or her stead. 

 Think about this.  Armed forces currently utilize upwards of 40% of some nations’ budgets.  How much better off would we all be if we spent that money on other, more peaceful things?  How much better off would we all be if we allowed you, the citizens of the world, to keep a larger proportion of earnings to save or spend as you saw fit as an individual?  This would not only save money and lives, but it would promote that other key for successful society, responsibility.  No more would people be rewarded for complaining loudly, for complaining often or both.   

You, the citizens of all nations, would need to learn to handle adversity.  You, the citizens of all nations, would learn that there is no birthright to material items, merely to the opportunity to obtain those things by lawful means.  I will not fight the King of Saudi Arabia just so that you can drive a bigger car.  It is not worth it.  You must learn to accept that gasoline could cost more or change your driving habits accordingly.   

But here is what I will do.  I will defend the right of this nation and its people to continue to practice business in accordance with the current laws.  I will defend the right of this nation to allow its citizens to worship any god of their choosing.  In short, I will defend the Constitutional rights of all citizens as deemed necessary in the global order.” 

It was truly a once in a lifetime experience.  Arnold was proposing to change the very fabric of international diplomacy, through this simple yet compelling idea.  Sides were quickly taken with the old school dismissing this concept as mere claptrap, something to be expected from an uneducated man like Arnold.  But the citizens of the world had a different idea.  They grabbed hold of the idea tightly, and within months there were referendums held in every remotely democratic country on the planet.  Of the 146 referendums held, every one passed on the first vote, most by a landslide.  There was no ambiguity, the global population had spoken, and it had done so with a single clear voice.  Arnold became a hero to not only his fans in the United States, but to the subsistence farmers in Zambia and Eritrea as well.  And life, as we know it, changed forever. 

The first situation addressed by President Schwarzenegger under the new code of defense was the war on terror.  The firebrands of the Middle East, those Imams who preached not just Islam but death to the Infidels, found themselves on the wrong side of world opinion.  Even the French, who resisted American power at every turn could think of no excuse to prevent Arnold from facing off against the current head of Iran, Ayatollah ShahyAr Farshid, who for the past several years had done nothing but encourage violence against all things Western.  But the people of Iran, tired of isolation from the community of nations, and wanting the opportunity to partake in the fruits of their own labor, rose up and forced ShahyAr to take on Arnold.  The Iranian stakes were the end of terrorist support, to be proven by the dismantling, under UN supervision by UN personnel, of the weapons systems that Iran had either built or obtained.  The US risked the dismantling of the CIA, and the surveillance that went with clandestine operations.  The stage was the coliseum in Rome, with a worldwide audience.   

It was just before midnight when Arnold entered the arena to a wildly enthusiastic crowd.  After all, here was the man who had single-handedly changed the political equation on the planet.  Here was the man who had initiated the first truly new idea for achieving world peace since Jesus.  He was dressed, as one would expect, in the garb of an ancient Roman gladiator, a simple white toga, a brown belt and sandals.  He radiated confidence.  Despite recently celebrating his 66thbirthday, he didn’t look a day over 45.  His muscles were bulging, and his skin glistened with sweat.  Moments later, ShahyAr entered the arena from the opposite side.  Dressed in the traditional Bisht of the Arab street, he was a wiry man, just 42 years old, with a medium length beard and long hair beneath his Ghutra.  Sweat was visible on his brow and upper lip.  His eyes betrayed his fear.  As a leader of a militant mosque, he was used to having his underlings do his dirty work.  ShahyAr had never been in a position where he had to fend for himself.  There had always been someone else to support him, and now he was scared.   

At the stroke of midnight, there was a loud chime and the two men started to circle warily.  Despite Arnold’s obvious physical advantage, he recognized that his opponent was a much younger man and may be concealing something beneath his robe.  The crowd began to chant, at least two-thirds screaming for Arnold and the balance chanting ShahyAr’s name.  The intensity increased as the two warriors edged closer and closer to one another.  As the screaming reached a fevered pitch, Arnold made his move.  He was deceptively quick for one his age, and before ShahyAr knew what happened, he was on his back with Schwarzenegger’s massive hand around his throat, and his arms pinned beneath Schwarzenegger’s knees.  ShahyAr struggled to reach the knife illegally concealed beneath his robes, but Arnold’s grip was akin to a vice.  There was no escape from this position, and ShahyAr knew it.  He was about to lose, in moments, what he had worked the past 20 years to achieve, a position of power and respect amongst his followers.  But there would be no respect after losing, and his life’s aims would be dashed.  Certainly, the people of Iran would opt for another in his stead, someone who could defend the country’s honor and way of life.   

ShahyAr was having difficulty concentrating as the airflow to his brain was restricted by Schwarzenegger’s death grip.  He was sure he would meet Allah now, especially as he will have died fighting the Infidel, and he would be a martyr for his people.  They would rise against this ridiculous idea of leaders fighting leaders, and things would return to normal, leaders sending armies to fight their battles.  As he lost consciousness, ShahyAr prepared to meet Allah. 

But Arnold was smarter than that.  He had no intention of creating a martyr during the first attempt at a new world order.  As ShahyAr passed out, Arnold released his grip and let him live.  In fact, this would be a much better solution.  ShahyAr was now disgraced by his loss but had no opportunity to achieve martyrdom.  He was merely a weak leader of a country about to get weaker through the loss of key weapons systems.   ShahyAr was the laughingstock of the Arab world, losing a battle to a much older man, and letting down his people. 

In fact, the impact was much greater than just that in Iran.  Leaders around the world took stock in the situation and had to weigh the possibility of having to literally fight for what they believed in, versus the very real risk of losing the fight and being killed, or worse, like ShahyAr, disgraced.  The change in attitude around the world was remarkably rapid. Oppressed people everywhere were clamouring for someone to fight their oppressors.  Oppressors everywhere were looking for a place to hide from the global media’s spotlight.  The subjugation of ethnic groups became a very dangerous practice for erstwhile dictators.  Now they could get called on the carpet and must answer for their crimes directly.  Less power suddenly seemed a better option than total control.  

Total control was likely to be challenged.  Power sharing was not. 

And so it came to pass, that a man, born in Austria, emigrated to the United States with nothing but a dream and the determination to see it through, became the single most powerful force in the world.  He affected more lives positively than Christ, Muhammed and the Buddha combined.  He caused the creation of a new geopolitical order, and fostered peace on earth.  All because the 28th Amendment was passed into law. Stranger things may have happened, but I dare you to show me one. 

thanks

adf

Talk of the Town

Posted on by

Two things have been talk of the town
First, silver ne’er seems to go down
But also, of late
The Dow’s in a state
Where it wears the daily stock crown
 
But if we dig deeper, we find
Industrials, as they’re defined
Don’t build many things
Instead, they pull strings
As finance and tech are combined

 

Before I start, this will be the last poetry of 2025.  I want to thank all my readers for continuing to read and I certainly hope I both amused you and highlighted one view of what is driving the zeitgeist in markets these days.  FX poetry will return on January 5th with my annual long-form poetic prognostications.  Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukkah and Happy New Year to you all.

So, I was reading my friend JJ’s evening wrap up from yesterday and he highlighted the fact that the DJIA (+1.3%) made a new all-time high in trading and it was led by…Goldman Sachs.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, I have nothing against Goldman Sachs, per se, but it struck me as odd that Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, was a member of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  It’s not that I wasn’t aware of the fact, but for some reason, this mention stuck out.  So, I thought I might look at the current membership of the Dow and see just how industrial it is.

While you will likely not be surprised that it has several non-industrial, service-based companies in the index, you might be surprised by just how many.  For instance, aside from Goldman, JPMorgan, American Express and Visa are in there as well as United Health and Travelers from the insurance space.  There are major retailers like Walmart, Home Depot, Amazon and McDonalds, along with tech and telecom/media names like Microsoft, Salesforce, Disney and Verizon.  

This is not to say that these are misplaced with respect to their relative importance in the US economy, clearly all are major corporations with long histories of profitability.  But it seems odd to list them as industrial.  I would contend that nothing explains the financialization of the US economy better than the fact that 14 out of the 30 members of the DJIA are service companies rather than producers of stuff.  Maybe they should rename it the Dow Jones Major Corporate Index.

To conclude the equity portion of our discussion, yesterday saw the NASDAQ (-0.25%) decline in the face of a broad overall equity rally as there appears to be a rotation of investors from AI into other things like financials (as hopes of another Fed rate cut spring eternal) and power producers as the power needs of AI keep getting estimated ever higher.  This rally was followed pretty much everywhere around the world as regardless of one’s religion, it appears investors are all counting on Santa to deliver higher prices.  In Asia, Tokyo (+1.4%). HK (+1.75%), China (+0.6%), Australia (+1.2%), Korea (+1.4%) and virtually every other market rallied.  The only data of note here was Japanese IP which came in a tick higher than its preliminary forecast, but to counter that, Nikkei reported that the BOJ, when they meet next week, are definitely going to raise the base rate by 25bps to 0.75%, the highest level since 1994.  That doesn’t seem that bullish, but then, I’m not Japanese.

In Europe, the gains are also universal, albeit less impressive with Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.5%) leading the way and Germany and the UK both only marginally higher.  The most interesting news here is about the EU’s efforts to confiscatethe Russian assets that have been frozen since they invaded Ukraine, but which are being blocked by Belgium where they reside under SWIFT.  And as I type (7:45) US futures are mixed with the Dow (+0.2%) still in favor while NASDAQ (-0.5%) continues to lag.

But the other story that is getting press, and arguably more press, is precious metals.  Silver (+0.9% today, +10% this week, +122% this year) is the leader and is now trading above $64/oz.  This is the very definition of a parabolic move, which is obvious when you look at the silver chart for the past 5 years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Referring back to JJ’s note, it is important to understand he is a commodity trader of long standing (remarkably even longer than my time in FX) and he discussed silver from an insider’s perspective.  The essence of the issue here is that there are quite a few paper short positions that have existed for a long time.  The rumor has long been that JPMorgan has been preventing silver from rising by playing in futures markets.  But now, real demand, between industrial users (solar panels and electronics) and Asian retail demand from both India and China is far higher than new supply or recovery from scrap, to the tune of 120 million oz/year, and those shorts cannot find the metal to deliver.  The last time there was a squeeze, when the Hunt’s tried to corner the market in 1980, people lined up at stores to sell their silver tea services, bringing metal to the market.  But those are all gone.  I’m not sure what will change this in the short run, but it cannot go up forever.  With that in mind, though, I think precious metals have much further to run as the ongoing debasement of fiat currencies simply adds further to demand.  

Silver managed to drag gold (+1.1% today, +3.0% this week, +65% this year) and platinum (+3.6% today, +7.2% this week, +98% this year) along for the ride and I expect this will continue across the board.  Meanwhile oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning but has fallen -4.0% this week.  The news that the US boarded a Venezuelan oil tanker and took control in an effort to pressure Maduro didn’t seem to concern anyone in the market.  This trend remains clear.  

As to the bond market, this morning yields are higher by 2bps, pretty much across the board of Treasuries and all European sovereigns.  But with that in mind, the 10-year Treasury is still yielding 4.18%, below its worst level immediately following the FOMC meeting, and as I mentioned above, there appears to be a growing belief that Powell’s concern about the labor market will result in more cuts sooner rather than later.  While that is not really playing out in the futures market yet, as you can see below with the next cut priced for April with a 76% probability, that is the narrative that is being promulgated in FinX.  

Source: cmegroup.com

Next week we will get the November NFP report (exp 35K) and all the data we missed in October.  I can assure you if that comes in weak, the idea of a rate cut will explode onto the scene once again.  Too, on Wednesday evening, the WSJpublished an article indicating that Chairman Powell is concerned the employment data is overstating things because of the flaws in the birth/death model.  The point is he may be far more inclined to cut if next Tuesday’s report is weak.

Finally, the dollar is…still here.  It sold off after the Fed, and as I showed yesterday, has fallen back to the middle of its trading range of the past 6 months.  I keep reading how the dollar is the key, but quite frankly, I’m not certain what that key will unlock.  We need out of consensus activities to change the current situation.  After all, the underlying demand for dollars because of the trillions of dollars of debt outstanding outside of the US makes it difficult to get too bearish without a major reason.  If the Fed cut 50bps intermeeting, that would do it, but I’m not holding my breath.

And that’s really it my friends.  There is no data today although we do hear from three Fed speakers.  Given the dissent on the FOMC, I expect that we are going to be need to keep score as to views for a while when these folks speak. 

In the meantime, as I said above, have a wonderful holiday all

Adf

Crazier Still

Posted on by

There once was a time when the Fed
When meeting, and looking ahead
All seemed to agree
The future they’d see
And wrote banal statements, when read
 
But this time is different, it’s true
Though those words most folks should eschew
‘Cause nobody knows
Which way the wind blows
As true data’s hard to construe
 
So, rather than voting as one
Three members, the Chairman, did shun
But crazier still
The dot plot did kill
The idea much more can be done

 

I think it is appropriate to start this morning’s discussion with the dot plot, which as I, and many others, expected showed virtually no consensus as to what the future holds with respect to Federal Reserve monetary policy.  For 2026, the range of estimates by the 19 FOMC members is 175 basis points, the widest range I have ever seen.  Three members see a 25bp hike in 2026 and one member (likely Governor Miran) sees 150bps of cuts.  They can’t all be right!  But even if we look out to the longer run, the range of estimates is 125bps wide.

Personally, I am thrilled at this outcome as it indicates that instead of the Chairman browbeating everyone into agreeing with his/her view, which had been the history for the past 40 years, FOMC members have demonstrated they are willing to express a personal view.

Now, generally markets hate uncertainty of this nature, and one might have thought that equity markets, especially, would be negatively impacted by this outcome.  But, since the unwritten mandate of the Fed is to ensure that stock markets never decline, they were able to paper over the lack of consensus by explaining they will be buying $40 billion/month of T-bills to make sure that bank reserves are “ample”.  QT has ended, and while they will continue to go out of their way to explain this is not QE, and perhaps technically it is not, they are still promising to pump nearly $500 billion /year into the economy by expanding their balance sheet.  One cannot be surprised that initially, much of that money is going to head into financial markets, hence today’s rally.

However, if you want to see just how out of touch the Fed is with reality, a quick look at their economic projections helps disabuse you of the notion that there is really much independent thought in the Marriner Eccles Building.  As you can see below, they continue to believe that inflation will gradually head back to their target, that growth will slow, unemployment will slip and that Fed funds have room to decline from here.

I have frequently railed against the Fed and their models, highlighting time and again that their models are not fit for purpose.  It is abundantly clear that every member has a neo-Keynesian model that was calibrated in the wake of the Dot com bubble bursting when interest rates in the US first were pushed down to 0.0% while consumer inflation remained quiescent as all the funds went into financial assets.  One would think that the experience of 2022-23, when inflation soared forcing them to hike rates in the most aggressive manner in history, would have resulted in some second thoughts.  But I cannot look at the table above and draw that conclusion.  Perhaps this will help you understand the growth in the meme, end the fed.

To sum it all up, FOMC members have no consensus on how to behave going forward but they decided that expanding the balance sheet was the right thing to do.  Perhaps they do have an idea, but given inflation is showing no signs of heading back to their target, they decided that the esoterica of the balance sheet will hide their activities more effectively than interest rate announcements.

One of the key talking points this morning revolves around the dollar in the FX markets and how now that the Fed has cut rates again, while the ECB is set to leave them on hold, and the BOJ looks likely to raise them next week, that the greenback will fall further.  Much continues to be made of the fact that the dollar fell about 12% during the first 6 months of 2025, although a decline of that magnitude during a 6-month time span is hardly unique, it was the first such decline that happened during the first 6 months of the year, in 50 years or so.  In other words, much ado about nothing.  

The latest spin, though, is look for the dollar to decline sharply after the rate cut.  I have a hard time with this concept for a few reasons.  First, given the obvious uncertainty of future Fed activity, as per the dot plot, it is unclear the Fed is going to aggressively cut rates from this level anytime soon.  And second, a look at the history of the dollar in relation to Fed activity doesn’t really paint that picture.  The below chart of the euro over the past five years shows that the single currency fell during the initial stages of the Fed’s panic rate hikes in 2022 then rallied back sharply as they continued.  Meanwhile, during the latter half of 2024, the dollar rallied as the Fed cut rates and then declined as they remained on hold.   My point is, the recent history is ambiguous at best regarding the dollar’s response to a given Fed move.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I have maintained that if the Fed cuts aggressively, it will undermine the dollar.  However, nothing about yesterday’s FOMC meeting tells me they are about to embark on an aggressive rate cutting binge.

The other noteworthy story this morning is the outcome from China’s Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC).  I have described several times that the President Xi’s government claims they are keen to help support domestic consumption and the housing market despite neither of those things having occurred during the past several years.  Well, Bloomberg was nice enough to create a table highlighting the CEWC’s statements this year and compare them to the past two years.  I have attached it below.

In a testament to the fact that bureaucrats speak the same language, no matter their native tongue, a look at the changes in Fiscal Policy or Top Priority Task, or even Real Estate shows that nothing has changed but the order of the words.  The very fact that they need to keep repeating themselves can readily be explained by the fact that the previous year’s efforts failed.  Why will this time be different?

Ok, a quick tour of markets.   Apparently, Asia was not enamored of the FOMC outcome with Tokyo (-0.9%) and China (-0.9%) both sliding although HK managed to stay put.  Elsewhere in the region, both Korea (-0.6%) and Taiwan (-1.3%) were also under pressure as most markets here were in the red.  The exceptions were India, Malaysia and the Philippines, all of which managed gains of 0.5% or so.  

In Europe, things are a little brighter with modest gains the order of the day led by Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.4%) although both Germany and the UK are barely higher at this hour.  There was no data released in Europe this morning although the SNB did meet and leave rates on hold at 0.0% as universally expected.  There has been a little bit of ECB speak, with several members highlighting that ECB policy is independent of Fed policy but that if Fed cuts force the dollar lower, they may feel the need to respond as a higher euro would reduce inflation.  Alas for the stock market bulls in the US, futures this morning are pointing lower led by the NASDAQ (-0.7%) although that is on the back of weaker than expected Oracle earnings results last night.  Perhaps promising to spend $5 trillion on AI is beginning to be seen as unrealistic, although I doubt that is the case 🤔.

Turning to the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps overnight after falling -5bps yesterday.  Similar price action has been seen elsewhere with European sovereign yields slipping slightly and even JGB yields down -2bps overnight.  Personally, I am a bit confused by this as I have been assured that the Fed cutting rates in this economy would result in a steeper yield curve with long-dated rates rising even though the front end falls.  Perhaps I am reading the data wrong.

In the commodity markets, the one truth is that there are no sellers in the silver market.  It is higher by another 0.5% this morning and above $62/oz as whatever games had been played in the past to cap its price seem to have fallen apart.  Physical demand for the stuff outstrips new supply by about 120 million oz /year, and new mines are scarce on the ground.  This feels like there is further room to run.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the space, gold (-0.2%) which had a nice day yesterday is consolidating, as is copper.  Turning to oil (-1.1%) it continues to drift lower, dragging gasoline along for the ride, something that must make the president quite happy.  You know my views here.

As to the dollar writ large, while it sold off a bit yesterday, as you can see from the below DXY (-0.3%) chart, it is hardly making new ground, rather it is back to the middle of its 6-month range.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This morning more currencies are a bit stronger but in the G10, CHF (+0.45%) is the leader with everything else far less impactful.  And on the flip side, INR (-0.7%) has traded to yet another historic low (USD high) as the new RBI governor has decided not to waste too much money on intervention.  Oh yeah, JPY (+0.2%) has gotten some tongues wagging as now that the Fed cut and the BOJ is ostensibly getting set to hike, there is more concern about the unwind of the carry trade.  My view is, don’t worry unless the BOJ hikes 50bps and promises a lot more on the way.  After all, if the Fed has finished cutting, something that cannot be ruled out, this entire thesis will be destroyed.

On the data front, Initial (exp 220K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims are coming as well as the Trade Balance (-$63.3B).  There are no Fed speakers on the docket, but I imagine we will hear from some anyway, as they cannot seem to shut up.  

It would not surprise me to see the dollar head toward the bottom of this trading range, but I think we need a much stronger catalyst than uncertainty from the Fed to break the range.

Good luck

Adf

All But Assured

Posted on by

A cut has been all but assured
Though since last time we have endured
Some fears Jay’s a hawk
So, when he does talk
Will this cut, at last, be secured?
 
And now there’s a narrative view
Though rates will fall, what he will do
Is try to convey
Now it’s out the way
Another one may not come through

 

Good morning all and welcome to Fed Day.  The question, of course, is will this be a frabjous day?  As I write this morning, the Fed funds futures market continues to price a roughly 90% probability of a 25bp cut this afternoon, but the prospects for future rate cuts have greatly diminished as you can see in the table below from the CME.

It wasn’t long ago when the market was pricing 100bps more of rate cuts by the end of 2026, meaning a Fed funds rate of 2.50% – 2.75%.  However, the narrative has shifted over the past several weeks after very mixed signals from FOMC speakers and data releases that have indicated the economy is not cratering (e.g. yesterday’s JOLTS data printing at 7.658M, >400K higher than expected).  You may recall that shortly after the last FOMC meeting at the end of October, the probability of today’s rate cut had fallen to just 30%.

It appears that the new discussion point is this will be a hawkish cut, an idiom similar to jumbo shrimp.  At this point, the bulk of the discussion has been around how many dissents will be recorded with the subtext being, what will Chairman Powell have to promise potential dissenters in order to bring them along to his side of the ledger.  My take is if you thought the last press conference was hawkish, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.  In fact, I would not be surprised to see a virtually categoric call to this being the end of the cutting cycle for the foreseeable future.

Remember, we also will see the new dot plots and SEP which will help us understand the broad picture of where FOMC members currently stand on the matter.  Personally, I expect to see a wide disparity between the ends of the distribution, and it wouldn’t surprise me to see some expectations of no rate changes for 2026 with other calls for 150bps of cuts and no consensus view at all. 

At this point, all we can do is wait.  However, the market discussion has centered on the fact that 10-year Treasury yields (+1bp) have been climbing lately, and that this morning they have touched 4.20% again while, at the same time, 2-year Treasury yields (no change) have been slipping as per the below chart I created from FRED data.

The steepening yield curve, which now appears to be turning into a bear steepener (when long dated yields rise more quickly than short-dated yields) is ringing alarm bells in some quarters.  The narrative is that there are growing concerns over both the quantity of debt outstanding and its rate of growth as well as the fact rate cuts will engender future inflation.

A key part of the discussion is the fact that what had been a synchronous system of global central bank policy easing is now starting to split up.  While we have known the BOJ is in a hiking cycle, albeit a slow one, today, the BOC is not only expected to leave rates on hold but explain they have bottomed.  We have heard that, as well, from the RBA earlier this week, and the commentary from the ECB may be coming along those lines.  So, is the US the outlier now?  And will that weaken the dollar?  Those are the key questions we will need to address going forward.

But before we move on, there is one market I must discuss, silver, which exploded to new historic highs yesterday, trading through $60/oz and is higher again this morning by 0.6% and trading at $61/oz.  someone made the point yesterday that for the second time in history, you need just 1 ounce of silver to buy one barrel of WTI.  The first time was back during the silver squeeze in January 1980, but that was quite short-lived (see chart below from macrotrends.com).  This one appears to have legs.  

I don’t know that I can find another indicator that better expresses my views of fiat currency debasement alongside an expanding availability of oil.  To my mind, both these trends remain quite strong, and this is the embodiment of them both combined.

Ok, so as we await the FOMC, let’s see if anybody is doing anything in financial markets of note.  As testament to the fact that virtually everybody is awaiting the Fed this afternoon, US equity markets barely moved yesterday, and Asian markets were similarly quiet, with only Taiwan (+0.8%) moving more than 0.4% in either direction.  The large markets were +/- 0.2% overall.  In Europe, the movement has been slightly larger, but still not impressive with Germany (-0.4%) the laggard of note while the UK (+0.3%) is the leader.  A smattering of data released from the continent doesn’t seem to be having any real impact, nor did comments by Madame Lagarde claiming the rates are in a good place and displaying some optimism on future GDP growth.  Of much greater concern is the headlong rush to a digital euro CBDC, where they are seeking to exert control over the citizenry.  If for no other reason, I would be leery of expecting great things from the Eurozone going forward.  Not surprisingly, at this hour (7:30) US futures are little changed ahead of the meeting.

In the bond market, yields are creeping higher all around the world with European sovereign yields higher between 2bps and 4bps this morning.  Perhaps investors are taking Madame Lagarde’s views to heart.  Or perhaps the fallout from the recently released US National Security Strategy, where the US basically dismisses Europe as strategic, has investors concerned that European governments are going to be spending that much more on defense without having the financial wherewithal to do so effectively, thus will be borrowing a lot and driving yields higher.  At this point, European sovereign yields have risen to levels not seen since the Eurozone bond crisis in 2011, but it feels like they have further to climb (see French 10-year OAT yields below from Marketwatch.com).

In the commodity market, oil (+0.5%) cannot get out of its own way.  While it is a touch higher this morning, it sits at $58.50/bbl, and that long-term trend remains lower.  We’ve already discussed silver and gold (-0.25%) continues to trade either side of $4200 these days, biding its time for its next move (higher I believe).  Copper (+1.4%) is looking good today, although it is hard to find economic news that is driving today’s price action.

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, about 0.1% in the DXY as well as virtually every major currency in the G10.  Interestingly, today’s outlier is SEK (+0.4%) which is rallying despite data showing GDP (-0.3%) slipping on the month while IP (-6.6%) fell sharply.  As to the EMG bloc, there is very little movement of note with the biggest news this evening’s Central Bank of Brazil meeting where they are expected to leave their overnight SELIC rate at 15.0% as inflation there, released this morning at a remarkably precise 4.46% continues to run at the top of their target range of 3.0% +/- 1.5%.

Ahead of the FOMC, we only see the Employment Cost Index (exp 0.9%), a number the Fed watches more closely than the market, and we hear from the BOC who are universally expected to leave Canadian rates on hold at 2.25%.

And that’s really it.  I wouldn’t look for much movement ahead of the 2pm statement release and then the fireworks at 2:30 when Powell speaks can drive things anywhere.  The most compelling story will be the number of dissents on the vote, as there will almost certainly be several.  According to Kalshi, 3 is the majority estimate.  With President Trump continuing to discuss the next Fed chair, I have a feeling there will be 4 and that will be a negative for bonds (higher yields) and a short-term negative for the dollar.  In fact, it is just another reason to hold precious metals.

Good luck

Adf

It Won’t End Well

Posted on by

From Europe, we’re hearing some squawks
They’ve not been included in talks
‘Bout war and Ukraine
So, to inflict pain
They’ve threatened a US detox
 
It seems they believe if they sell
All Treasuries held we would yell
Please stop, it’s too much
And lighten our touch
Methinks, for them, it won’t end well

 

Markets continue to be dull these days.  While we are clearly not in the summer (it is 15° here in NJ this morning), doldrums certainly seem to be descriptive of the current situation.  Equities bounce back and forth each day, neither trading to new highs, nor falling sharply.  The same is true with the dollar, with oil, with gold of late and even, on a slightly longer-term view, of Treasury bonds.  I guess that could be the exception, depending on your horizon, but as you can see from the chart below, it has been several months since 10-year yields have traded outside the 4.0% – 4.2% range.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, much digital ink has been spilled trying to explain that the latest 15bp rise in yields is a signal that the US economy is about to collapse under the weight of its $38+ trillion in debt, but I sense that is more about reporters trying to get clicks on their articles than a reflection of reality.

However, this morning I saw a story that I think is worth discussing, even though it is only a hypothetical.  Making the rounds is the story that Europe and the UK are extremely unhappy with President Trump’s approach to obtaining a peace in Ukraine and so have threatened their so-called ‘nuclear option’ of selling all their Treasury holdings to crash the US bond market and the US economy alongside it.  From what I have seen, if you sum up all the holdings in Europe and the UK it totals $2.3 trillion or so, although it is not clear if that is controlled by the governments, or there are private holdings included.  My strong suspicion is the latter, although I have not yet been able to confirm that.

But let’s assume those holdings are completely under the control of European central banks and governments and they decide that’s what they want to do.  What do you think will happen?  Arguably, much depends on how they go about selling them.  After all, it’s not as though there is anybody, other than the Fed, who can step up and show a bid on the full amount.  So how can they do this?  I figure there are only two viable options:

  1. They can sell them slowly and steadily over time, perhaps $200 billion/day (FYI daily Treasury market volume averages about $900 billion).  That would clearly put significant downward pressure on prices and push yields higher but would likely encourage the hedge fund community to double up on the bond basis trade thus slowing the decline.  However, if they did that for 11 days, US yields would undoubtedly be higher.  Too, remember that if the market started to get unstable, the Fed would step in and absorb whatever amount they deemed necessary to prevent things from getting out of hand.
  • Perhaps, since their ostensible goal is to destabilize the US bond market, they would literally all coordinate their timing and try to sell them all at once.  At that point, since nothing happens in the bond market without the Fed being aware, it would likely have an even smaller impact as the Fed would certainly step in and take down the entire lot.  After all, through QT, their balance sheet has shrunk about $2.3 trillion over the past 18 months, so they have plenty of capacity.

My point is, I believe this is an empty threat, as it seems most European threats tend to be.  Consider that the Eurodollar market remains the major source of funding throughout Europe, and it requires collateral (i.e. Treasury bills and bonds) in order to function.  If Europe no longer had that collateral, it feels like they might have a lot more problems funding anything on the continent.  

Another issue is that if we assume they successfully sell all their Treasuries, that means they will be holding $2.3 trillion in cash.  Exactly what are they going to do with that?  If they convert it into euros and pounds, the dollar will certainly fall sharply, meaning both the euro and pound will rise sharply.  Please explain how that will help their economies and their exporters.  They are getting killed right now because their energy policies have made manufacturing ridiculously expensive.  See how many cars VW or Mercedes sells overseas if the euro rallies 15%.

Now, the article linked above is from the Daily Express, not a website I trust, but they reference a WSJ article.  However, despite searching the Journal, and asking Grok to do the same, I can find no actual article that mentions this idea.  Ostensibly, if you want to search, it came out on December 1st, although if that is the case, why is it only getting press now?

It is a sign of the absence of market news that this is a story at all.  With market participants inhaling deeply so they may hold their breath until 2:00 tomorrow afternoon when the FOMC statement is released, they need something to do.  I guess this was today’s distraction.  As I said above, this is clickbait, not reality.

Ok, let’s tour markets. US equity market slipped a bit yesterday and Asian markets were dull as well with modest gains and losses almost everywhere.  The exception was HK (-1.3%) which suffered based on concern the FOMC will provide a ‘hawkish’ cut tomorrow and that will be the end of the road.  But China (-0.5%) was also soft despite hopes that when the Politburo meets in the next weeks, they will focus on more domestic stimulus (🤣🤣) just like they have been saying for the past three years.  Australia (-0.5%) slipped as the RBA left rates on hold and sounded more hawkish, indicating there were no cuts in the offing.

European bourses are mixed, although starting to lean lower.  The CAC (-0.6%) is the laggard here although Italy and Spain are also softer while Germany (+0.2%) leads the gainers after a slightly better than expected Trade Balance was reported this morning.  The hiccup here is that the balance improved because imports fell (-1.2%) so much more than exports rose (0.1%).  Hardly the sign of economic strength.

We’ve discussed bonds on a big picture basis, and recall, yields rose yesterday in both the US and Europe.  This morning, though, yields are little changed in the US and in Europe, with sovereign yields, if anything slightly lower.  JGB yields also slipped -1bp last night and the big mover was Australia after the RBA, with yields climbing 5bps.

In the commodity markets, while the trend remains slightly lower in oil (+0.3%), as you can see from the chart below, $60/bbl is home.  As I have written before, absent an invasion of Venezuela or peace in Ukraine, it is hard to see what changes this for now.  I guess if China stops filling up its SPR, demand could shrink and that would accelerate the decline.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the metals markets, $4200/oz has become gold’s (+0.3%) home lately while silver (+0.9%) has found comfort between $58/oz and $59/oz.  Neither is seeing much in the way of volatility or new interest, but both trends remain strongly higher. 

Finally, the dollar, which rallied a bit yesterday, is little changed this morning.  USDJPY is interesting as it has traded back above 156 this morning, contradicting all that talk of a Japanese repatriation trade.  Again, it is difficult for me to look at the yen chart below and conclude the dollar has peaked.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Elsewhere in the space, this is one of those days where 0.2% is a major move.  Historically, December is not a time when FX traders are active.

On the data front, the NFIB report rose to 99.0 this morning, its highest reading in three months and the underlying comments showed a modest increase in optimism with many businesses looking to hire more people but having trouble finding qualified candidates.  This is quite a juxtaposition with the narrative that small businesses are firing workers that I have read in several different places and is backed by things like the recent Challenger Gray survey which indicated that US businesses have fired more than 1.1 million workers so far this year.  This lack of clarity is not going to help the FOMC make decisions, that’s for sure.  As to the rest, the ADP Weekly Survey is due to be released as well as JOLTS Job Openings (7.2M) and Leading Indicators (-0.3%) at 10:00.

The very fact that the biggest story I could find was a hypothetical is indicative of the idea that there is nothing going on.  Look for a quiet one as market participants await Powell and friends tomorrow.

Good luck

Adf

Cold Growth

Posted on by

Winter approaches
Both cold weather and cold growth
Plague Japan’s future

 

It’s not a pretty picture, that’s for sure.  A raft of Japanese data was released early Sunday evening with GDP revised lower (-0.6% Q/Q, -2.6% Y/Y) and as you can see from the Q/Q chart below, it is hard to get excited about prospects there.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of course, this is what makes it so difficult to estimate how Ueda-san will act in a little less than two weeks’ time.  On the one hand, inflation remains a problem, currently running at 3.0% and showing no signs of declining.  Recall, the BOJ has a firm 2.0% target, so they are way off base here.  Add to that the fact that inflation in Japan had been virtually zero for the prior 15 years and the population is starting to get antsy.  However, if growth is retreating, how can Ueda-san justify raising rates?

In the meantime, the punditry is having a field day discussing the yen and its broad weakness, although for the past three weeks, it has rebounded some 2% in a steady manner as per the below chart,

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As well, much digital ink has been spilled regarding the 30-year JGB yield which has traded to historic highs as per the below chart from cnbc.com.

There are many pundits who have the view that the Japanese situation is getting out of control.  They cite the massive public debt (240% of GDP), the fact that the BOJ holds 50% of the JGB market, the fact that the yen has declined to its lowest level (highest dollar value) since a brief spike in 1990 and before that since 1986 when it was falling in the wake of the Plaza Accord.

Source: cnbc.com

Add in weakening economic growth and growing tensions with China and you have the makings of a crisis, right?  But ask yourself this, what if this isn’t a crisis, but part of a plan.  Remember, the carry trade remains extant and is unlikely to disappear just because the BOJ raises rates to 0.75% in two weeks.  This means that Japanese investors are still enamored of US assets, notably Treasuries, but also stocks and real estate, as a weakening yen flatters their holdings.  Too, it helps Japanese companies compete more effectively with Chinese competitors who benefit from a too weak renminbi as part of China’s mercantilist model.  Michael Nicoletos, one of the many very smart Substack writers, wrote a very interesting piece on this subject, and I think it is well worth a read.  In the end, none of us know exactly what’s happening but it is not hard to accept that some portion of this theory is correct as well.  The one thing of which I am confident is the end is not nigh.  There is still a long time before things really become problematic.

And the yen?  In the medium term I still think it weakens further, but if the Fed gets very aggressive cutting rates, that will likely result in a short-term rally.  But much lower than USDJPY at 145-150 is hard for me to foresee.

Turning to the other noteworthy news of the evening, the Chinese trade surplus has risen above $1 trillion so far in 2025, with one month left to go in the year.  This is a new record and highlights the fact that despite much talk about the Chinese focusing more on domestic consumption, their entire economic model is mercantilist and so they continue to double down on this feature.  While Chinese exports to the US fell by 29% in November, and about 19% year-to-date, they are still $426 billion.  However, China’s exports to the rest of the world have grown dramatically as follows: Africa 26%, Southeast Asia 14% and Latin America 7.1%.  Too, French president Emanuel Macron just returned from a trip to Beijing, meeting with President Xi, and called out the Chinese for their export policies, indicating that Europe needed to take actions (raise tariffs or restrict access) before European manufacturing completely disappears.  (And you thought only President Trump would suggest such things!)

So, how did markets respond to this?  Well, the CSI 300 rose 0.8% (although HK fell -1.2%) and the renminbi was unchanged.  But I think it is worth looking at the renminbi’s performance vs. other currencies, notably the euro, to understand Monsieur Macron’s concerns.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It turns out that the CNY has weakened by nearly 7.5% vs. the euro this year, a key driver of the growing Chinese trade surplus with Europe (and now you better understand the Japanese comfort with a weaker JPY).  My observation is that the pressure on Chinese exports is going to continue to grow going forward, especially from the other G10 nations.  Expect to hear more about this through 2026.  It is also why I see the eventual split of a USD/CNY world.

Ok, let’s look around elsewhere to see what happened overnight.  Elsewhere in Asia, things were mixed with Tokyo (+0.2%) up small, Korea (+1.3%) having a solid session along with Taiwan (+1.2%) although India (-0.7%) went the other way.  As to the smaller, regional exchanges, they were mixed with small gains and losses.  In Europe, it is hard to get excited this morning with minimal movement, less than +/- 0.2% across the board.  And at this hour (7:25) US futures are little changed.

In the bond market, yields are continuing to rise around the world.  Treasury yields (+2bps) are actually lagging as Europe (+4bps to +6bps on the continent and the UK) and Japan (+3bps) are all on the way up this morning.  This is Fed week, so perhaps that is part of the story, although the cut is baked in (90% probability).  Perhaps this is a global investor revolt at the fact that there is exactly zero evidence that any government is going to do anything other than spend as much money as they can to ensure that GDP continues to grow.  QE will be making another appearance sooner rather than later, in my view, and on a worldwide basis.

When we see that, commodity prices seem likely to rise even further, at least metals prices will and this morning that is true across the precious metals space (Au +0.3%, Ag +0.3%, Pt +1.2%) although copper is unchanged on the day.  Oil (-1.2%) though is not feeling the love this morning despite growing concerns of a US invasion of Venezuela, ongoing Ukrainian strikes against Russian oil infrastructure and the prospects of central bank rate cuts to stimulate economic activity.  One thing to note in the oil market is that China has been a major buyer lately, filling its own SPR to the brim, so buying far more than they consume.  If that facility is full, then perhaps a key supporter of prices is gone.  I maintain my view that there is plenty of oil around and prices will continue to trend lower as they have been all year as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, nobody really cares about the FX markets this morning with the DXY exactly unchanged and all major markets, other than KRW (+0.5%) within 0.2% of Friday’s closing levels.  There is a lot of central bank activity upcoming, and I suppose traders are waiting for any sense that things may change.  It is worth noting that a second ECB member, traditional hawk Olli Rehn, was out this morning discussing the potential need for lower rates as Eurozone growth slows further and he becomes less concerned about inflation.  Expect to hear more ECB members say the same thing going forward.

On the data front, things are still messed up from the government shutdown, but here we go:

TuesdayRBA Rate Decision3.6% (unchanged)
 NFIB Small Biz Optimism98.4
 JOLTS Job Openings (Sept)7.2M
WednesdayEmployment Cost Index (Q3)0.9%
 Bank of Canada Rate Decision2.25% (unchanged)
 FOMC Rate Decision3.75% (-25bps)
ThursdayTrade Balance (Sept)-$61.5B
 Initial Claims221K
 Continuing Claims1943K

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is still a tremendous amount of data that has not been compiled and released and has no date yet to do so.  Of course, once the FOMC meeting is done on Wednesday, we will start to hear from Fed speakers again, and Friday there are three scheduled (Paulson, Hammack and Goolsbee).

As we start a new week, I expect things will be relatively quiet until the Fed on Wednesday and then, if necessary, a new narrative will be created.  Remember, the continuing resolution only goes until late January, so we will need to see some movement by Congress if we are not going to have that crop up again.  In the meantime, there is lots of talk of a Santa rally in stocks and if I am right and ‘run it hot’ is the process going forward, that has legs.  It should help the dollar too.

Good luck

Adf