Tag Archives: investing

Not Be Sublime

Posted on by 
Investors are starting to shun
The riskiest things one-by-one
So, stocks feel the pain
And bonds, too, feel strain
The dollar, though’s, on quite a run

It’s nearly two weeks since this started
And so far, no ending’s been charted
The impact o’er time
Will not be sublime
Thus, trading’s not for the faint-hearted

Another day and there is no end in sight for the ongoing military action in Iran.  US strikes continue apace and Iranian retaliation also continues, albeit at a lesser rate it seems.  However, the information from the war zone remains difficult to trust as all of it is spun for various audiences with no sense of objective truth.  As such, it is difficult to have an opinion on how long this will continue.

With that in mind, all we can do is observe market behavior and see what we can glean.  Starting with equity markets around the world, the below screenshot from Bloomberg.com this morning shows that risk is clearly off, although not catastrophically so, at least not yet.

So, weakness in the US yesterday was followed by weakness overnight in the major markets in Asia as well as in other regional markets (Korea -1.7%, India -1.9%, Indonesia -3.1%) with the rest having declined by lesser amounts.  It is important to see that all the Asian markets (and European and US markets) have fallen in the past month, but remain higher, in some cases substantially so, since this time last year.  The point is that this move can still rightly be considered corrective, rather than a dramatic change in opinion.

European bourses are demonstrating similar behavior although US futures at this hour (6:45) are slightly higher, about +0.15% across the board.  Thinking about equity markets overall, one of the main features of the US market was that it maintained a relatively high P/E ratio, no matter whether measured on a forward looking or historical basis.  Thus, a correction in equity prices, even absent the war, would not have been that surprising.  The same could not be said about European or Asian markets, which trade at much lower valuations, but then, in Europe especially, prospects for growth remain hampered by individual national domestic policies along with EU wide policies, notably in the energy sector.    Under the rubric a picture is worth 1000 words, it is not hard to understand why US equity markets dominate global markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Germany has averaged -0.3% GDP growth over the past 3 years, and the EU is just above it at +0.4%.  Meanwhile, this morning’s UK GDP data showed weaker than expected outcomes, with Y/Y of 0.8% after a stagnant January.  Are US markets richly priced?  Sure, but what prospects do you have elsewhere?

Turning to bond markets, the traditional safe haven appeal of bonds, especially Treasuries and Bunds, is MIA.  While this morning, Treasuries (-1bp) and most European sovereigns (-1bp across the board) have seen prices stop declining, the picture over the past two weeks has not been encouraging.  The chart below shows the price action in both Treasuries and Bunds and, as you can see, both have seen yields rise sharply since the beginning of the month/war.  Given the ongoing stress in oil markets, and the implications that has for inflation worldwide going forward, it should not be a surprise that bonds don’t appear to offer their ordinary haven characteristics.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The big question here, and around the world truthfully, is how will central banks respond to the rise in energy prices and subsequent rise in headline inflation?  If they try to address price pressures by raising rates in this scenario, it will almost certainly lead to recessions everywhere.  But will their models allow them to hold their policies if inflation starts to rise sharply?  It’s funny, I have been remarking how central bank policies have lost their luster recently, having been overwhelmed by fiscal policies, but suddenly, monetary policy is back in the limelight.  We shall see how they perform.

In the commodity markets, WTI (-1.3%) rallied sharply yesterday but is giving back a bit this morning.  The big headline yesterday was that Brent crude closed above $100/bbl for the first time since 2022 in the wake of Russia’s invasion into Ukraine.  Of course, that was more about the big, round number feature, than the percentage rise.  After all, is there really a difference of $98/bbl or $100/bbl in the broad scheme of things?  Oil continues to be THE driving factor in all markets right now and that is not likely to change anytime soon.  As long as the Strait remains closed to traffic, this pressure will continue to build. 

In the metals markets, both gold and silver continue to consolidate around their recent levels ($5100 in gold, $85 in silver) and it appears we are going to need another catalyst of note to get that to change.  I see no change in supply metrics, that’s for sure, but if there is a recession, silver demand may well be reduced given its industrial uses.

Finally, the dollar is king of all it surveys, at least in the FX markets.  The euro is below 1.15 (it seems like only last week that pundits were talking about the consequences of the euro trading above 1.25.  The DXY has broken above 100, although we will need to see an extension of this move to be convinced that it is going to head much higher, and USDJPY is now pushing near 160 again, which brought out comments from Katayma-san, the Japanese FinMin, about closely monitoring the yen’s value.  Of course, given the broad-based rise in the dollar, the current yen weakness cannot be seen as that troubling.

But what is a bit more interesting to me, and more definitive proof that the dollar is not about to collapse, is the coincident moves higher in the dollar vs. a number of other currencies.  Look at the chart below of ZAR (-0.15%), SEK (-0.3%) and MXN (0.0%).  Each demonstrates virtually identical trade patterns, and all of them reached their respective peaks (dollar’s nadir) on January 29th.  You may recall that was the day president Trump named Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair, and we saw a major reversal in stocks, gold, silver and other markets.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My best estimate is that FX markets are pricing in a tighter Fed at this point, which. Based on Fed funds futures, showing just one cut potentially this year in December, makes a lot of sense.  I guess it remains to be seen how other central banks will respond to the ructions in markets caused by the war, but this is the first order consequence.

Source: cmegroup.com

Turning to this morning’s data, we see a bunch as follows: 

Q4 GDP (2nd estimate)1.4%
Personal Income0.5%
Personal Spending0.3%
Durable Goods1.2%
-ex Transport0.5%
PCE0.3% (2.9% Y/Y)
Cpore PCE0.4% (3.1% Y/Y)
JOLTs Job Openings6.7M
Michigan Sentiment55.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As with Wednesday’s CPI data, the PCE data does not include the war, so will be dismissed.  My take is the Income and Spending numbers, and the JOLTs number will be the most impactful if they are a long way from estimates.  

And that’s where we stand.  Markets are still unsure of what to believe regarding the war, and when it comes to war, things happen that are unexpected all the time, the so-called unknown unknowns.  In the end, it is hard to bet against the dollar for right now, but that could change in an instant based on the next headline.

Good luck and good weekend

adf

Designed to Ease Nerves

Posted on by 
The IEA, last night, proposed
That since, Hormuz Strait, has been closed
Strategic reserves
Designed to ease nerves
Ought be released and not opposed

But so far, it’s not been approved
Despite the fact it is behooved
So, oil is higher
As every supplier
Embraces their, margins, improved

It is somewhat ironic that the biggest story of the evening, the IEA’s recommendation that nations around the world release between 300 million and 400 million barrels of strategic petroleum reserves has not helped mitigate the rise in oil prices.  After falling sharply yesterday, this morning, WTI (+4.5%) is rebounding sharply again.  A look at the chart below reminds me of silver from late January, and certainly, as the following chart demonstrates, daily volatility in that market has made a significant step higher from its pre runup levels.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

One need only look at the size of the daily candles to understand that movement each day has increased substantially since then.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of course, the countervailing news that is driving oil higher is that Iran has begun to mine the Strait of Hormuz, which will make resuming transit more difficult when hostilities cease.  In fact, that appears to be the newest front in the war, with the US attacking the small boats Iran is using to try to lay mines.  It seems this is similar to the drug boat attacks the US carried out in the Caribbean late last year prior to the exfiltration of Venezuelan President Maduro.

Again, the interesting thing to me about Iran’s actions is that by closing the Strait, they cut off 90% of their own revenue, and as they are actively fighting a war, that seems a major hindrance.  After all, Iran is nowhere near self-sufficient in anything a nation needs to continue its existence.

But the fog of war is just that, a situation that prevents clear understanding of all that is ongoing in the area.  As we sit, fortunately, thousands of miles away from the action, and everything we read is spun by whoever is writing it, it remains extremely difficult to get a good understanding of the situation in Iran, either tactically or strategically.  All we have is the market price action as an indicator.  

But before we look at markets, it is worth mentioning that CPI is released this morning with the following expectations: Headline (0.3% M/M, 2.4% Y/Y) and Core (0.2% M/M, 2.5% Y/Y).  The problem with this data is twofold.  First, it continues to be polluted by the impact of the government shutdown last autumn, but more importantly, it is for February, and the Iranian action has been entirely in March, so there will be no impact from the dramatic rise in oil prices in the data.  Ultimately, in this case, the data is almost certainly going to be ignored by the Fed, to the extent they even look at CPI rather than PCE.  Of course, the PCE data will have the same problems.

So, let’s turn to markets now.  Yesterday’s nondescript price action in the US was followed by a more positive tone in Asia, arguably on the IEA news.  While there were some laggards (India -1.7%, Indonesia -0.7%, HK -0.25%), the bulk of the region did just fine with Tokyo (+1.4%) and China (+0.6%) both nicely in positive territory, although that was nothing compared to Taiwan (+4.1%).  Otherwise, the rest of the region was positive somewhere between +0.5% and 1.0%.  Europe, however, is having a less positive morning with most major bourses lower on the day (Germany -0.7%, France -0.3%, UK -0.6%, Italy -0.3%) with only Spain (+0.3%) managing a gain in the session.  Energy continues to be the biggest concern here although as I type at 7:25 this morning, we are getting the first word of SPR releases from several nations including Germany and Japan.  Perhaps there won’t be a coordinated release after all.  Meanwhile, US futures at this hour are basically unchanged.

In the bond market, yields rose yesterday afternoon in the US and have edged another 1bp higher this morning while European sovereign yields all catch up to yesterday’s US move with gains of between 5bps and 8bps on the continent.  It is important to remember that there is a strong correlation between oil prices and 10-year yields, as would be expected based on the direct connection between oil prices and inflation.  The chart below shows the past week’s movement in the two markets.  The long-term correlation averages +0.61% with a range of +0.5% to +0.7% according to Grok.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Again, referring back to today’s CPI, we can expect that CPI next month is going to be higher than this month, even if the war ends today.

In the metals markets, weakness is the order of the day although gold (-0.1%) is just barely so.  However, those metals with industrial uses are faring worse this morning led by platinum (-2.4%) but both silver (-1.75%) and copper (-1.7%) are under pressure.  A potential explanation here is that continued high oil prices will weaken economic activity and therefore demand for these metals.  The counter argument is that war is inflationary at all times, and metals tend to do well in those periods.

Finally, the dollar is slightly firmer across the board, but movement has been de minimis overall.  The noteworthy exception is AUD (+0.6%) which has been rallying recently on concerns (hopes?) that the RBA is getting set to raise rates at their meeting on Monday (Sunday night here).  In fact, the Aussie has traded to its highest level in almost four years, although I have a hard time understanding the attraction given the softened state of economic activity there (recent GDP reading of 0.8% Y/Y) and an energy policy only the Europeans could love as they continue to prohibit nuclear power and shut down coal despite having abundant resources in both.  But, in the FX world, relative interest rates mean a lot, and the perception of a hawkish central bank is apparently enough to overcome bad fiscal and energy policy.

And that’s really all for today.  We do see the EIA oil inventory data, with a small net draw expected and Fed Governor Bowman speaks, although it is at the ABA’s Summit on Regulation, so there will likely be no monetary policy discussion as this is the quiet period.

Where do we go from here?  Your guess is as good as mine.  We are already seeing oil prices slip a bit with the announcement of the SPR releases, although they remain higher on the day.  The war continues to drive all the narratives so if you are trading, keep abreast of that news.  If you are not trading, though, avoid it at all costs, it will make for much happier days!

Good luck

Adf

A Bad Dream

Posted on by 
While yesterday’s moves were extreme
It seems like t’was all a bad dream
This morning there’s calm
And nary a qualm
Though things may not be what they seem

For now, oil’s price has retreated
And stocks, a round trip, have completed
As Trump has implied
Though not verified
Iran soon will have been defeated

One must be impressed with the price action yesterday, if nothing else.  It is a very rare occasion when the price of anything in a public market behaves like we saw oil behave yesterday.  From Friday’s closing price in the futures market of $90.71/bbl, we saw a $28.70 (31.6%) rally and a subsequent $34.35 (37.9%) decline in the first 24 hours of trading.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

With oil back to Friday morning’s, still elevated, prices, it’s almost as if nothing happened yesterday.  The two stories that appear to have driven the remarkable reversal early Monday morning were first, the discussion about the G7 potentially coordinating a release of strategic reserves, with that meeting slated for this morning.  The other catalyst apparently was a comment from President Trump that, having made significant progress on their objectives, the war could be over “very soon”.  Obviously, that would be a great outcome for all involved, although it remains to be seen if that will be the case.  

The upshot is that while oil saw the most dramatic price movement across markets, prices everywhere synchronized such that those that had declined (stocks, bonds and metals) rebounded, while the dollar, which rose, retreated.  And that’s where we are this morning.

As I read across news sources, there remains no agreement on any aspect of the ongoing war with each side of the argument maintaining their views.  There is a contingent that insists Iran is about to start a major retaliatory campaign that will devastate Israel and Gulf neighbors and a side that insists Iran’s military infrastructure has been so compromised they have nothing left but drones to fire.  As I’m not on the ground (thankfully) nor in any situation room on any side, I am completely in the dark like essentially all of us.  In fact, arguably, market price action is one of the best indicators we have, because institutions don’t invest on hope, but on the best information they have.  This tells me that the worst-case scenario has been priced out for now, meaning a prolonged conflict, but frankly, neither I nor anyone else really knows.

So, let us embrace our ignorance on the issue and simply observe market behavior to see what we can glean.  Starting with equity markets, the below chart shows the S&P 500 futures from Sunday night’s opening through this morning.  While the opening is obvious on the left, the huge green bar on the right at 3:15pm is the other major feature.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The interesting thing to me is that Trump’s comment about the war ending soon were not made until 5:45pm.  This tells me that there was a major buy order that went through the market shortly before the close, a feature that we have seen more frequently of late.  My point is there is still much more to the markets than just the Iran conflict.  In fact, the cynical view is that the algorithms continue to control things completely and that there is a major effort to prevent a significant decline in equity markets overall, at least US equity markets.  That’s a little conspiratorial, but one cannot ignore the evidence.

At any rate, after positive closes in the US yesterday on the order of +1.0%, we saw gains across the board in both Asia (Japan +2.9%, HK +2.2%, China +1.3%, Korea +5.4%, Taiwan +2.1%,  India +0.8%, Australia +1.1%) as only New Zealand lagged, essentially unchanged on the day, amid concerns of rising inflation and a tighter RBNZ going forward.  Europe, too, is enjoying the session with strong gains across the board reversing yesterday’s declines as Spain (+2.9%) leads the way, but there is strength everywhere (Germany +2.4%, France +1.9%, UK +1.6%).  At this hour (7:10), US futures are also pointing higher, but just by 0.2% or so across the board.

Bonds also reversed yesterday, albeit not quite as dramatically.  So, in a picture remarkably similar to both oil and stocks, the yield on the 10-year gapped higher Sunday night and fell sharply enough to close lower yesterday as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com 

Much of that retracement came after Europe closed, though, and so while this morning, 10-year Treasury yields have edged back up by 2bps, European sovereign yields are lower across the board with Italian BTPs (-6bps) leading the continent although UK Gilts (-7bps) have rallied further.  Other nations have seen a mix between -4bps and -5bps although Germany (unchanged) seems to be suffering on a relative basis after its Trade Surplus grew to €21.2B on the back of a substantial decline in imports.  Throughout all this, JGB yields (-1bp) have been the least impacted and show no signs of running away at this point despite much doomsaying for the nation.

Metals markets have reversed their decline from yesterday and are higher across the board (Au +0.9%, Ag +1.6%, Cu +1.0%, Pt +1.9%).  This is all part of the same story with price action virtually identical, although again, not quite as dramatic, as that of oil.

Finally, the dollar, which had significant support yesterday is giving back some of those gains as well.  But let’s face it, if we take a look at the dollar over the past year vs. the euro, it has largely traded withing a 1.1500 / 1.1900 range and doesn’t appear to be making a break in either direction.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The very messy chart below shows four key EMG currencies to demonstrate that there is no trend there either.  While CNY and MXN have both strengthened during the year, INR and KRW have both fallen.  All I’m saying is that the idea that the dollar is either collapsing or exploding higher is simply not true.  Different currencies have different drivers, and while sometimes there is a key dollar issue that impacts virtually everything, many times, you need to watch the currency in question.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Turning to the data, this morning we just saw NFIB Business Optimism print a bit soft at 98.8, exp 99.7, and we are awaiting Existing Home Sales (exp 3.89M).  Tomorrow’s CPI will garner more attention, I think.  Too, the Fed is in their quiet period as they meet next Wednesday, so even though they have been drowned out by events lately, the FOMC meeting will still get a lot of attention.

But that is where we stand.  As has been the case since President Trump’s election, White House bingo remains the biggest risk to markets since one never knows what may come out.  The backdrop of the war continues to be front of mind for all market participants, so new stories will have market impacts.  With that in mind, short term forecasts are even more of a waste of time than they usually are.  The questions I am pondering are about the long-term implications when the military activity ends.  Certainly, any result where Iran gives up its terrorist interests would not only be welcome on the global stage but would open the door for much more oil flow around the world and lower prices across the board.  Of course, a more entrenched Iranian regime would likely see even stricter sanctions there with the need for other sources to help satisfy global demand.  I guess we shall see.

Good luck

Adf

Sometime Soon Become Miffed

Posted on by 
At this point, I think we’d agree
It’s oil that seems to be key
As it keeps on rising
It’s not that surprising
That markets elsewhere lack much glee

So, how might the narrative shift?
One way is a noteworthy rift
Twixt Trump and our friends
Who seek different ends
And might, sometime soon, become miffed

The war continues to be the only story that matters to markets right now, although this morning we will be seeing the payroll report.  And no matter the information we receive from ordinary news sources, all of which have their own biases, the one thing that rings true is market prices.  People can say whatever they like, but when it comes to money, the truth will out.

With that in mind, a look at the oil market this morning is not very optimistic as the black, sticky stuff is sharply higher once again, up by 5.25% as I type at 6:45.  I have highlighted this week that thus far, the rise had not been excessive, but as we look at the chart this morning, that claim may no longer be correct.  While we remain far below the levels seen shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the price has risen 25% this week.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As others have highlighted, while the price of crude gets all the market press, for the man on the street, it is really the price of gasoline that matters, and that has risen some 17% this week.  Arguably, markets are beginning to price the idea that this war will continue longer than initial thoughts, and that the key chokepoint, the Strait of Hormuz, will remain closed for longer than initially expected.  I have seen several models that indicate the impact on measured inflation if gasoline continues to rise in price, which indicate that we should expect CPI to be jumping in the next few months.  The upshot there is that do not be surprised if inflation is suddenly running above the Fed funds rate by the summer, a forecast that I don’t believe was on any bingo card at the beginning of the year.

Remember, though, the narrative prior to the onset of this military action that there was an oil glut.  Remember, too, there is a significant amount of oil in storage around the world, and as I continue to say, the Western Hemisphere is pumping as fast as they can.  (As an aside, I saw this morning that the US is going to restart diplomatic relations with Venezuela, an indication that things there are working far better than the critics implied.)  Clearly, fear is rampant in the oil markets right now, but that is subject to change in a heartbeat.

In the meantime, let’s see how markets have responded to the latest rise in oil prices.  Stocks cannot make up their mind, it seems, as the below chart of the S&P 500 shows the price action over the past week, since this started.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I am hard pressed to discern a trend here, with the movement more akin to a sine wave than anything else.  Interestingly, yesterday’s weakness in the US was followed by a mix of strength and weakness in Asia with Tokyo (+0.6%), China (+0.3%) and HK (+1.7%) all gaining although there were declines in India (-1.4%), Australia (-1.0%) and Indonesia (-1.6%).  Not surprisingly, each nation in Asia is impacted by the war differently, although higher oil prices would seem to me to be quite a negative for the big 3 markets given how reliant each one is on imported oil, and how much of it transits the Strait of Hormuz.

As to Europe, this morning is all red, with losses between -0.1% (UK) and -0.5% (Spain) and everywhere in between.  I read a charming article in Bloomberg about how recent unseasonably mild and sunny weather in Germany has resulted in solar power generating more than 40GW of electricity for the 5th consecutive day this week, helping to keep prices in check despite the rise in energy prices elsewhere.  I hope, for the Germans’ sake, the weather stays more like Phoenix than Frankfurt going forward.  But reality is going to be a problem for them going forward, and high energy prices not only hurt consumers, but they are destroying what’s left of Europe’s industry.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15) they are lower by -0.6% across the board.

Bonds continue to shun their safe haven role in this conflict with yields continuing to climb.  Treasuries are higher by a further 3bps this morning and approaching the 4.20% level that had been the top of the trading range.  European sovereign yields are all higher by between 3bps and 6bps as inflation concerns percolate amid higher energy prices.  Alas for Europe, this morning they released Eurozone GDP growth for Q4 at a softer than expected 1.2%.  I expect we will begin to hear more about stagflation there if the war continues.

In the metals markets, both gold (+0.1%) and silver (+0.1%) are marginally higher this morning although both suffered yesterday.  My friend JJ who writes the Market Vibes Substack made a very prescient statement last evening, “However, when the shit is hitting the fan, you don’t want safe assets, you want safe prices.”  Thus far, gold has not proven to have safe prices, as evidenced by the daily chop you see below, but my belief remains that it will continue to maintain its value over time, especially in a situation like this.

Source: tradingeconomcis.com

Finally, rumors of the dollar’s death continue to be exaggerated.  This morning, it is stronger vs. virtually all its counterparts in both the G10 and EMG blocs, even the traditional havens of CHF (-0.2%) and JPY (-0.3%).  As I have repeatedly written, I don’t believe you can look at the global energy equation without recognizing that the US combination of extraordinary resources and the willingness to exploit them is an unbeatable combination.  After all, despite 25% of global LNG shipping stopped due to the closure of Hormuz, natural gas prices in the US are just over $3.00/MMBtu, certainly above their levels from two years ago, but incredibly cost competitive on a global basis.  Just look at the chart below with European, UK and US gas prices and see how they have behaved.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Back to the dollar, both the euro (-0.4%) and the pound (-0.3%) have slipped to their lowest levels vs. the dollar since late November 2025.  I believe that is a combination of both fear and the energy situation as it is aggravated by the war.  There are two currencies holding up this morning, NOK (+0.15%) and CAD (+0.15%) with the similarity that both are major oil exporters.  Oil continues to be the story driving everything.  Quite frankly, as long as the war continues, I find it hard to devise a scenario where the dollar declines in any meaningful way.

On the data front, this morning brings the payroll report with the following expectations:

Nonfarm Payrolls59K
Private Payrolls65K
Manufacturing Payrolls3K
Unemployment Rate4.3%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.7% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.3
Participation Rate62.5%
Retail Sales-0.3%
-ex Autos0.0%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Yesterday’s Initial Claims data was in line and the productivity data was better than expected.  Wednesday’s ADP Employment Data was better than expected.  While there continues to be a lot of discussion about the economy setting to crack, at this point the data does not show that to be the case.  Remember, the tax impacts of the OBBB are starting to be felt, and that is a huge stimulus.  Remember, too, last month’s NFP was much stronger than expected.  A strong number will certainly support the dollar, although it will probably support oil prices as if the economy remains strong, it will encourage President Trump that he can continue in Iran for a longer time.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

A Different Scapegoat

Posted on by 
The war in Iran rages on
But markets are starting to yawn
Initial concern
Led traders to spurn
Risk assets each dusk until dawn

But now, just a few days have passed
And fear mongers all seem downcast
Most stocks have rebounded
And that has confounded
The bears who, gross shorts, had amassed

In fact, today’s story of note
Is China’s decision to float
A lower growth rate
To be their new fate
As Xi seeks a different scapegoat

This morning is the sixth day of the military action in Iran and depending on the source, the US is either kicking ass or setting up for the greatest collapse of all time.  Perhaps the most interesting statistic of this war is the number of casualties reported thus far, which when summed across all the theaters, appears to be somewhere between 1000 and 1200.  It seems to me that given the ferocity of the attacks on both sides, that is a remarkably low number.  I certainly hope it stays low, for everyone’s sake.

In the meantime, market participants have absorbed the ongoing information and much of the initial FUD has been ameliorated.  I only say this because yesterday and overnight, equity markets are almost universally higher, and in some cases, by substantial amounts.  Arguably, this is a bigger disaster for the Iranians than almost anything else.  If financial markets continue to motor along despite the war, it removes a potential pressure point on President Trump to deescalate.  In fact, the only market that is continuing to demonstrate any price concerns is the oil market, where WTI (+2.6%) and Brent (+2.2%) are both back close to the highest levels seen in the first days.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The Strait of Hormuz continues to be effectively closed, and that remains a problem for both Europe and Asia, especially China.  In fact, this morning I read that China has ceased exporting refined products amid concerns of how long this war will continue.  

Now, permanently higher oil prices would definitely have severe negative consequences for the global economy if that were to be the outcome.  But I don’t see that as the outcome.  Rather, the world is awash in oil as the US and Canada and Venezuela and Brazil and Argentina continue to pump like crazy.  As well, Saudi Arabia has two major pipelines that ship oil to the Red Sea rather than require transit of the Strait, so I am not hugely concerned about a much higher price.  All of the fears of $100/bbl or higher oil in the event of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz have not come to pass, at least not yet, and I see no reason for that to be the case going forward.

But away from oil, things are remarkably ordinary in markets, so much so that the real story of the day, I believe, is that China has targeted GDP growth of ‘just’ 4.5%. – 5.0% for this year.  The WSJ had a very nice graph of the trajectory of Chinese GDP since 1985 showing a 4.5% outcome would be the lowest (excluding Covid) since 1991.

For a good explanation of things regarding the Chinese economy, it is always worthwhile to turn to @michaelxpettis on X and he didn’t disappoint this morning.  In a nutshell, his point is that while the statement claims they will be focusing more on domestic consumption in their effort to rebalance the economy, that has been the stated aim for at least 5 years, and we know that hasn’t happened.  President Xi’s problem is that if that goal were to be achieved, it would result in GDP growth somewhere on the order of 2%, and that is not acceptable.  For my money, nothing has changed there.  Chinese companies will still over produce, prices in China will still be pressured lower and the Chinese trade surplus will remain well in excess of $1 trillion.

And that’s really what we have today.  I am not a war correspondent, so will not be highlighting anything there.  Rather, let’s turn to the markets and see what happened overnight.  under the guise of a picture is worth 1000 words, I give you major equity market performance in the past 24 hours below from Bloomberg.

Of course, this doesn’t consider Korea (+9.6%) which was the biggest winner overnight, and recouped most of the previous day’s losses as per the below.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

But virtually every market in Asia rallied overnight with Taiwan, Indonesia and Thailand all higher by 2% or more.  As to Europe, the euphoria is not as high, but still fear is not evident and at this hour (7:10), US futures are flat to -0.15%, so basically unchanged.

The bond market is having a tougher time around the world with Treasury yields rising yesterday by 4bps and up another 2bps this morning.  European sovereign yields are all higher by between 6bps and 8bps as inflation fears start to get built into investment theses.  Remember, Europe is probably the worst hit regarding the oil/LNG supply disruptions and prices there are likely to climb further than in the US or Western Hemisphere.  Too, JGBs (+4bps) are feeling a little strain, despite (because of?) Ueda-san and his cronies expressing concern over the war’s impact on inflation in Japan and maintaining that a rate hike in April is still a possibility.

Speaking of inflation, the Fed’s Beige Book was released yesterday as well as a NY Fed survey on prices in their region and both pointed to much more underlying inflation than the CPI data currently implies.  Wolf Richter had an excellent write-up here, and the numbers are eye opening.

In the metals markets, gold (+0.6%) really has a remarkable amount of support under all conditions.  Whether I look at a mechanically drawn trend line or the 50-day moving average, the barbarous relic remains in demand and shows no signs of breaking lower.  I continue to believe that the recent volatility and liquidations were the result of leveraged traders in other products needing to sell something to make margin calls, and gold was available for the job.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the other metals, silver (+1.1%) and platinum (+0.9%) are both modestly firmer while copper (-1.3%) is bucking the trend, although I see no good reason for it to decline.  One interesting thing to note is that silver in the COMEX vaults continues to decline which many see as a potential point of supply issues going forward.  Nothing has changed that story.

Finally, the FX markets are once again hewing toward dollars with the DXY (+0.15%) back around 99.00.  The worst performer today is CLP (-1.1%) which is feeling the pressure from copper’s struggles, but ZAR (-0.9%) is also under pressure despite gold’s rebound.  Interestingly, NOK (-0.2%) cannot seem to gain any ground despite oil’s rally, although arguably, the dollar itself has become a major petrocurrency with a positive correlation to oil.  This space is not that interesting right now.

On the data front, I neglected to mention ADP Employment yesterday, which wound up at a better-than-expected 63K.  Too, oil inventories in the US rose again last week.  This morning, Initial (exp 215K) and Continuing (1850K) Claims are due as well as Nonfarm Productivity for Q4 (1.9%) and Unit Labor Costs (2.0%).  But does the data really matter right now?  Perhaps tomorrow’s NFP will have impact, but with the war and higher oil prices, it is very difficult for me to see a scenario where the Fed will impose itself here, not where the market will care that much, at least not the stock market. Bonds would react I suppose.  But it ain’t gonna happen, so don’t worry about it.

Absent a change in the war’s current trajectory, I think investors are going to focus on trying to estimate how long oil prices will remain elevated as that is really the big question for most markets.  I can only hope it doesn’t take that much longer for a conclusion.

Good luck

Adf

To Excess

Posted on by

The State of the Union Address
Was, as is Trump’s wont, to excess
He touted his claims
And handed out blames
While focusing on his success
 
The market responded, it seems
Like Trump answered all of its dreams
Stocks round the world rose
Which shows, I suppose
The world does approve of his schemes

As I look at my screen this morning, literally every major equity market is higher, as per the below screenshot, as are US futures.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, if you ignore Russia, which hasn’t really been relevant since the Ukraine invasion-imposed sanctions, every market is higher over the last year, and US markets are the true laggards as seen by their monthly performance.  But you cannot look at this picture and determine that anything President Trump said last night was negative for the global economy.  I guess it’s full speed ahead now.

In true Trumpian fashion, the president remains incredibly optimistic about the future for the US and the Western world and perhaps that is what is reflected here this morning.  However, there were precious few new initiatives announced so it is unclear to me that this is going to be a topic of discussion in the financial markets going forward, although you can be sure that the political narrative is going to be very active.

So, let’s move on to things that matter for markets.

Is she hawk or dove?
Takaichi hates China,
Not easy money

As you can see in the above table, Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose sharply, nearly 4%, but that had nothing to do with the SOTU.  Rather, her administration named two new BOJ governors (it was simply time to rotate some) and both were seen as quite dovish.  In fact, one, Toichiro Asada, is known for his belief in the benefits of MMT (you remember the magical money tree idea that governments that print their own currency don’t need to worry about overborrowing).  The upshot is that while Japanese stocks raced to yet more new highs, as per the below chart, JGB yields reversed their recent declines and rose (10yr +5bps, 30yr +10bps) and the yen (-0.6%) continued its recent slide, although remains well above (dollar below) the 160.00 level, which many see as the BOJ’s line in the sand regarding intervention.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But other than this story, it is much harder to find things that have been market drivers.  To my eye, we continue to see market participants laying back in most places as they are still recuperating from the raucous first six weeks of the year.

So, let’s go to the tape.  We’ve already seen the equity performance around the world, with the narratives forming that the US tariff situation is now a reduced stress on global trade as they have been reduced to 10% globally.  As well, there have been an increasing number of rebuttals to the AI piece I mentioned on Monday, with this one, I think, the most succinct takedown of the idea that AI is going to eat the world and drive us into a recession with no jobs left for people.  As such, Monday’s narrative of all stocks being worthless has changed.  Elsewhere, the tariff story and tech rally have been the key discussion points across markets.

In the bond market, yields are a touch higher with Treasuries (+2bps) edging up on what seems like ordinary trading.  The short-term trend here is lower yields, as per the chart below, but we know that nothing moves in a straight line.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to European sovereign yields, they, too, are mostly a few ticks higher this morning although, this also appears to be simple trading activity rather than a new narrative.  It is interesting that there are more stories today about ECB President Lagarde stepping down early, which is diametrically opposed to what she said when asked the question recently.  As I said before, I think she steps down and is going to run for President of France.

The commodity markets continue to be the place with the most price action and this morning is a continuation of that recent trend.  Gold (+0.9%), silver (+3.7%) and platinum (+5.5%) are all continuing their rebound from the extreme declines seen back on January 29th.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I do not have any inside track as to the driver of those moves, but I continue to read and hear about significant intervention designed to burst those bubbles (and they were clearly bubbles) and allow key institutions to cover short positions at better prices.  The problem with these stories is that we have heard for years about the manipulation of the prices of both gold and silver by large banks, and the purveyors of those stories have neither great reputations nor track records, so it is always a tough sell in my mind.  There is no question that when markets go parabolic, as the precious metals did through January, the reversals have always been dramatic.  However, I cannot speculate on the driver as often times, there doesn’t need to be one.  This cartoon from Kaltoons demonstrates it perfectly.

Turning to oil (+0.8%), Iran remains a key narrative and continues to support the front month pricing.  However, it appears that several futures spreads are falling sharply, indicating a potential glut in physical supplies has developed, at least for now.  As I look at the front contracts in the futures curve, we are still in backwardation, which implies a shortage, although I suppose that is the Iran effect.  

Source: barchart.com

I understand the short-term concerns here regarding potential military escalation there, but nothing has changed my view that the long-term energy situation is one of abundance and maintaining much higher oil prices will be very difficult for the long-term.  After all, look at Venezuela, which has already increased production back above 1mm barrels per day with contracts being signed for more activity.  Too, Argentina’s Vaca Muerta shale production is at new record levels, also ~1 mmm bpd and we continue to see growth offshore Brazil and Guyana.  Longer term, there is plenty around, I think.

Finally, the dollar is mixed this morning as the yen’s weakness is being offset by modest strength in the euro (+0.1%) and pound (+0.2%).  However, the big movers today are KRW (+0.9%) which has benefitted from inward equity flows and hopes for tariff relief, as well as ZAR (+0.5%) on the back of the precious metals rally and CLP (+0.4%) on copper’s strength.  Remember, the US is not overly concerned about USD weakness in the FX markets as it suits the administration’s goals of reducing the trade deficit and encouraging onshoring of production.  But even with that, looking at the DXY, it is just below 98.00 and remains right in the middle of its trading range for the past 9 months.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no major data out this morning with only the EIA oil inventories where a very modest build is anticipated.  

Big picture, I don’t think anything has changed.  Fiat currencies continue to lose value relative to ‘stuff’.  Equity markets continue to benefit from the global ‘run it hot’ policy and there is no clarity regarding the outbreak of a war in Iran.  With this in mind, it is hard to see a large move in the dollar in the near future.

Good luck

Adf

A Future, Dystopic

Posted on by

On Monday, an analyst wrote
His thoughts how AI might promote
A future, dystopic
Though somewhat myopic
And offering no antidote
 
Although prior views had explained
That once AI’s suitably trained
Most labor would suffer
And lacking a buffer
Folks’ politics would be quite strained

This is the research report that got tongues wagging on Wall Street yesterday and the fear it allegedly engendered was impressive.  In essence, it said that by 2028, AI would replace vast swaths of the labor force, notably white-collar workers, and that it would lead to a massive recession, and more importantly to the Street, a significant decline in stock prices.  The back and forth on X was amusing all day as there were those who hyperventilated over the coming tragedy, and those who fought back.

It is important to understand this was not a prediction, per se, but one of the scenarios they came up with, although clearly the most dramatic one.  It certainly gained a lot of clicks and notoriety, and let’s face it, isn’t that the idea these days?

Given that the tariff story has now become too complex for anyone to truly understand, and while we all await the denouement in Iran, this appeared to be the best thing to occupy time amongst the trading community.  Personally, I spent the entire morning shoveling snow, but then, I’m no longer a trader.

The upshot is that the major indices all fell more than 1% while gold and silver rallied and bond yields fell.  Fear was palpable.  But will it last?

Last month’s yen rate checks
Came not from Ueda-san
But Bessent, himself

The other story of note was almost an aside, although it helps outline recent movement in USDJPY.  We all remember last month when the yen rallied very sharply during a Friday session in NY as word got out the Fed was “checking rates”.  As a reminder, this is when the Fed calls out to bank FX desks and asks for prices, although doesn’t actually deal.  However, the signal is strong as all the banks recognize the opportunity for intervention, and the news quickly spreads through the market with the effect you can see in the chart below.  During the next three sessions, the yen rallied 4.5%.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

During my career, I had never heard of this activity driven by anyone other than the BOJ, as they were always the most concerned with the yen’s value.  Certainly, they may have been responding to US pressure, but it was always their call.  Now the news comes out that Treasury Secretary Bessent did this on his own last month, a clear indication that the administration is not happy with an over weak yen.  This sets an interesting precedent regarding who controls any given currency.  Now, I doubt we will see this type of thing frequently, but we need to keep it in the back of our mind.  Meanwhile…

Seems Takaichi
Told Ueda, higher rates
Are not helping her

Last night, in a surprise to many in the market, news of a meeting between PM Takaichi and BOJ Governor Ueda resulted in Takaichi-san imploring Ueda-san to leave rates alone, rather than continue raising them.  Higher rates are not helping her growth agenda, and I imagine her belief set is that if the yen weakens too far, she can always intervene, and now that we know about Bessent’s actions, she can count on the US to help.  But I cannot observe this and think anything other than the market is going to test 160 and do so before long.  One poet’s opinion.

Ok, let’s see how markets traded overnight.  First off, last night was the first that all of Asia was back at work so overall liquidity was improved.  However, the results were mixed with Tokyo (+0.9%) ignoring the AI driven US rout while the Hang Seng (-1.8%) fell right alongside the US.  China (+1.0%) rallied in its first day back but consider that simply offset the decline of their last session and, like most other markets, it remains relatively unchanged over the period.  Meanwhile, the tech sense was strong with Korea (+2.1%) and Taiwan (+2.75%) both up nicely while India (-1.3%) suffered under the AI fear umbrella.  Elsewhere in the region, there was no pattern of note with both gainers and losers.

In Europe, the largest markets (UK, Germany and France) are basically unchanged this morning while both Spain (-0.7%) and Italy (-0.4%) are under some pressure.  There is talk of tariff issues, but I’m not sure why only those two markets are taking the heat.  As to the US, at this hour (7:00), all three major indices are higher by about 0.2%.

In the bond market, after a -4bp decline in Treasury yields yesterday they are unchanged this morning while European sovereigns are seeing yields slip -1bp across the board.  Too, JGB yields (-2bps) have continued their slow descent as it appears investors have acclimatized to the risks of Takaichi-nomics.  I think we will have to see inflation figures there to get a better sense.  Regarding Treasury yields, I’m not sure I can explain why I feel this way, but given how bearish sentiment is for bonds, (leveraged players are short >1 million futures contracts), it feels to me like we could see a short-term continuation of the recent rally with yields heading back to test the 3.8% level at least.  I understand both the fiscal argument and the technical argument (see long-term chart below) but neither rules out a short-term rally to inflict pain.  After all, that is what markets do best!  (full transparency, I bought some June TLT call spreads yesterday, so I am talking my book!)

Source: finance.yahoo.com

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.3%) continues to hold its recent Iran inspired gains as the world awaits the outcome of Friday’s meetings between the US and Iran.  I have no insight as to the potential outcome here other than what I read, but it does seem like there will be some type of military action as I do not see Iran ceding anything.  As to the precious metals, gold (-1.0%) is giving back yesterday’s gains but remains in its recent uptrend after the end-January crash, although it has yet to regain the old highs.  I imagine this will take more time, but it also seems quite likely to happen. This is still a quite bullish chart in my view.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Interestingly, silver is little changed this morning as there continues to be much talk of delivery questions at the COMEX given the apparent lack of available ounces relative to outstanding contracts.  My take is things will get rolled as they usually do, but if not, beware a major spike higher on Friday!

Finally, the dollar continues to be the least interesting space there is with today’s JPY (-0.8%) move the exception that proves the rule.  Having already touched on that situation, there is literally nothing else to describe in either G10 or EMG currencies as +/-0.15% describes the entire session.

As to data this week, here’s what we have coming:

TodayCase Shiller Home Prices1.4%
 Consumer Confidence87.0
ThursdayInitial Claims216K
 Continuing Claims1872K
FridayPPI0.3% (2.6% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (3.0% Y/Y)
 Chicago PMI52.5

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to this bit, we hear from seven more Fed speakers across nine venues, but I still don’t think anybody cares.  The market has priced out any rate cuts before Powell leaves, although there is still one cut priced for the year, expected in October.  

Frankly, it is not surprising that markets have calmed down so much given how much activity we saw in January.  As I wrote then, markets have a great deal of difficulty maintaining high volatility as traders and investors simply get tired and tune out.  We will need a new catalyst to get things going, either an attack on Iran or some new China news in my view.  Tariffs are no longer interesting, and frankly I think Iran and AI have both lost some pizzazz.  Maybe the UFO releases will get things going again!

Good luck

Adf

Chock Full of Crises

Posted on by

Their mandate includes stable prices
And that they should use all devices
To work to achieve
That goal lest they leave
A legacy chock full of crises

“Most participants, however, cautioned that progress toward the Committee’s 2 percent objective might be slower and more uneven than generally expected and judged that the risk

of inflation running persistently above the Committee’s objective was meaningful.”

These words [emphasis added] are from the FOMC Minutes released yesterday afternoon.  To set the stage, the Fed left rates on hold then, although there were two votes for another cut.  However, a full reading of the Minutes shows there were those who would have considered a hike as well.   Now, I am just a guy in a room who observes market behavior through the lens of too many years involved on a daily basis, and my resources are virtually nil, especially compared to the Federal Reserve.  I don’t have a PhD in economics (although I believe that is a benefit in this context, if not every context).  However, the bolded part of the comment seems a tad disingenuous to me based on the below chart which shows the history of their inflation metric, Core PCE prices.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It has been exactly 5 years since their metric was at or below their 2% target by which they defined stable prices.  The idea that they are claiming the risk of inflation running hot was a meaningful risk is perhaps the worst gaslighting comments they have made.  It is very difficult to believe that the Fed, in its current incarnation, is going to ever address the inflation issue appropriately.  Perhaps a Chairman Warsh, if he is successful at reconfiguring their operating procedures will be able to drive positive changes.  I am hopeful but not confident.  The one thing we know is that changing government institutions requires a mammoth effort.  And let’s face it, he will only have two plus years of leeway for sure depending on whoever becomes president in 2028.

I continue to believe that the market is going to increasingly focus only on Warsh’s comments going forward as the direction he has expressed is very different than the current FOMC membership mindset.  We shall see how this all evolves.  In the meantime, I expect that Fed funds are not going anywhere before Warsh is confirmed.  As to bond yields, that is a very different question and will depend on both the macroeconomic outcomes and the risk perception of investors around the world.  For now, that trading range of 4.00%. – 4.20% seems likely to hold absent a major economic data miss in one direction or the other.  But as long as we continue to get mixed data, this market will remain on the backburner.

The fear that is growing each day
Trump’s policy might go astray
Regarding Iran
Although not Japan
Thus, oil’s up, up and away

Texas tea (+1.5%) is following yesterday’s 4.6% rise with another strong session and as you can see in the chart below, is showing a very clear trend higher since December.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This movement is very clearly a response to the ongoing buildup of US military assets in proximity to Iran, with two aircraft carriers, and somewhere above 200 military aircraft as well as the carrier group tenders with Tomahawk missiles in tow.  While negotiations are ostensibly ongoing, the one thing that seems clear is that absent a complete capitulation by the Iranian government, something big is going to happen here.  Of course, the question is, how much, and for how long, will it impact oil supplies?

Obviously, nobody knows the answer to that question, but the recent history has shown that every time there was an event in the Middle East, whether the 12-day war several months ago, the killing of Suleimani, the attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure, or others, prices retraced pretty quickly as per the below.  

Even the Ukraine invasion in February 2022 saw prices retrace 50% within a few months.  Other issues lasted less time than that.  This recent history implies that fading the rally is the right trade, but boy, that is hard to do.  And of course, in the event that the Iranian government falls, the chaos could result in a significant degradation of Iranian oil production.  Given they pump about 5 mm bpd, ~5% of global supply, that would matter a lot at the margin.  Certainly, the oil glut narrative would disappear in a hurry.  This is a very large risk to both markets and the economy, and one which needs to be hedged, if possible.  This will certainly be the focus of markets for the next few weeks, at least, so be prepared.  Personally, I do own some stuff here, but I like the drillers generally, as they are going to be employed no matter what!

Ok, let’s see what else is happening.  After a solid US session yesterday, Asia saw some major positive price action with Korea (+3.1%) the leader although Tokyo (+1.1%) also had a solid session, as did Taiwan, New Zealand, Singapore and Australia.  The exception to this rule was India (-1.5%) which suffered after a three-day positive run as traders and investors fled worrying about oil, the Fed, and the future of India’s relationship with Russia after the seizure of more ‘dark fleet’ oil tankers trying to avoid sanctions on Russian oil.  Europe, meanwhile, is uniformly lower this morning, with all the major indices slipping -0.8% or so.  The narrative is pointing to the escalation in Iran as the cause du jour.  US futures are also slipping at this hour (7:20), -0.25% or so across the board.

I touched on bonds briefly above, but today’s price action shows yields edging higher by 1bp in Treasury markets and between 1bp and 2bps across European sovereign markets.  There has been no data of note to alter views, and the only ECB news is that Spain has thrown their hat into the ring to have the next ECB president.

In the metals markets, yesterday’s gains are being followed by a mixed picture with gold (+0.2%) and silver (+0.3%) edging higher while copper (-1.6%) and platinum (-1.8%) cede those gains.  However, as I highlighted yesterday, this all still feels like consolidation.  FYI, there is much talk in the markets about silver and how there is not enough physical silver in the COMEX vaults to cover open interest, and how that could result in a major squeeze, but my take is most of it will roll forward as the fundamental supply/demand equation does not appeared to have changed.

Finally, the dollar had a strong session yesterday, rising 0.6% as measured by the DXY, and making gains vs. almost all currencies.  This morning, those trends are continuing with SEK (-0.4%) and GBP (-0.2%) leading the way lower in the G10 space while ZAR (-0.85%), INR (-0.4%) and KRW (-0.4%) are dragging down the EMG bloc.  Again, data has been scarce, so I see this as a more traditional risk-off sentiment than some new macro story.

Data yesterday was generally stronger than forecast, notably IP and Capacity Utilization, which showed solid outcomes that were ascribed to AI infrastructure building as well utilities activity.  It strikes me this is exactly what the Trump administration is trying to achieve with their reshoring goals.  I guess the question is how productive this investment will be and how will it impact inflation readings.  This morning, we see the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1860K) claims, as well as the Trade Balance (-$55.5B), Philly Fed (8.5) and Leading Indicators (0.0%).  The interesting thing about the Leading Indicators number is that a flat result would be the highest in 4 years.  A look at the Conference Board’s chart below shows an interesting thing about this number, and to me, anyway, calls its value into question.  Leading Indicators have been declining for four years while coincident indicators (and economic growth) have been moving along just fine.  I’m trying to figure out what these indicators lead.

And that’s really it for today.  We do see oil inventories as well, with a slight build expected and we will hear from Minneapolis Fed president Kashkari, but I cannot remember the last time he said anything interesting.  To me, the concern today, and tomorrow and next week, is that we see an escalation in rhetoric regarding Iran, at the very least, if not an actual military strike.  That feels like it would be bad for stocks, good for bonds, the dollar and gold.  Hopefully I am wrong there.

Good luck

Adf

Venting Spleen

Posted on by

It used to be data was seen
As noncontroversial and clean
But politics, lately
Has damaged it greatly
With both D’s and R’s venting spleen
 
So, it ought not be a surprise
That yesterday’s NFP rise
Was claimed by the left
To lack any heft
While R’s crowed out loud to the skies

By now, you are well aware that the NFP number was released much higher than the forecasts, printing at 130K vs a consensus forecast of 70K.  The previous two months were revised lower by 17K, so still a huge number, and it was the main topic of conversation in the markets all day. 

To me, the big news was that private sector jobs rose 172K, while government jobs declined by 42K.  In fact, the Federal civilian workforce is back to its smallest count since 1966!  That is an unalloyed positive in my view.  Too, manufacturing jobs increased by 5K, which is the first time we have seen a rise since November 2024.  In fact, if you look at the chart below of manufacturing jobs for the past 5 years, it is easy to see what President Trump is trying to achieve.  One month does not indicate success, but it’s a start.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The last positive was that the Unemployment Rate fell to 4.3%, so overall, this seems like a pretty good report.  But as with everything these days, it depends on the lens through which you view it.  As with most national data in an economy as large and varied as the US, there were real and perceived negatives.  The BLS made their annual benchmark revisions to the data which removed 403K jobs from 2025’s numbers.  These revisions come as they adjust their birth-death model as well as get updated population statistics.  But for those who seek bad news for this administration, that reduction of 403K jobs is proof that the president’s policies are failing.  Another complaint has been that the bulk of the increase in NFP was in the health care sector, although given the ongoing aging of the population, that cannot be very surprising.

Nonetheless, just like every other piece of data these days, NFP was a Rorschach test of your underlying political beliefs and not so much a description of the economy.  My question is, if the employed population is ~159 million, is an adjustment of 400K really meaningful?  After all. It’s about 0.25% of the working population in a measurement of a dynamic statistic amid people changing jobs and the economy growing.  Perhaps the politics are the signal, and the data is the noise.

Given that there were two very different takes on the data, it ought be no surprise that the S&P 500 finished the day exactly unchanged which is a pretty rare occurrence, happening less than 2% of the time in the past 10 years.  In fact, that lack of movement was the norm with both the NASDAQ and DJIA slipping -0.1%.  Net, I don’t think we learned much new and now markets and the algorithms will focus on tomorrow’s CPI data.

However, the narrative writers had their work cut out for them.  All those who were seeking to pan the government had to change their tune and now they are focused on the fact that there don’t need to be rate cuts if the employment situation is better.  Again, through a political lens this is good if you are anti-Trump because it prevents him getting the rate cuts he has been demanding.  I guess we cannot be surprised that Stephen Miran, in comments yesterday, continues to explain rate cuts make sense, which simply confirms the view that everything is political these days.

So, do we know anything new this morning?  Alas, I don’t think we learned anything to change the big picture yesterday, so let’s see how the data was received around the world.  Tokyo followed the S&P’s lead and was unchanged overnight with China (+0.1%) also doing little.  HK (-0.9%) lagged as traders prepare for the Chinese New Year holiday that runs all next week and took profits.  Korea (+3.1%) continues to perform well while India (-0.7%) continues to waver as the trade deal with the US impacts different parts of the economy very differently there.  Net, a mixed session.  In Europe, Germany (+1.3%) is the leader this morning on the strength of solid earnings reports by key companies as there has been no data released.  France (+0.75%) too is having a good day on earnings although Spain (-0.2%) is lagging.  The UK (+0.1%) is the only place where data made an appearance and it showed that GDP growth has fallen to 1.0% Y/Y there, another problem for the embattled PM Starmer.  It appears his time in office will be ending soon as literally every policy decision he has made has had a negative outcome.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are firmer by about 0.3%.

Bond markets saw the biggest move yesterday, with Treasury yields rising 4bps, although they have slipped back -1bp this morning and continue to trade in their range of 4.0% – 4.2%.  while we did spend some time above that range, it appears that fears of a bond market meltdown, or that China was going to sell their bonds or something else have faded somewhat.  In fact, globally, 10-year yields this morning are essentially unchanged.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity space, the Iran situation continues to be top of mind for oil traders although WTI (-0.3%) is not really moving much this morning.  There was no announcement from the White House regarding the meeting between President Trump and Israeli PM Netanyahu which indicates, to me at least, that nothing was decided.  While a second US aircraft carrier steams toward the Persian Gulf, we are all on tenterhooks as to how this plays out.  Right now, it doesn’t appear that discussions between the US and Iran are leading anywhere.  Meanwhile, metals (Au -0.4%, Ag -1.6%, Pt -1.3%) are giving back some of yesterday’s strong gains with gold firmly back above the $5000/oz level again.  There is much talk of a major shortage on the COMEX for deliveries for March, but we shall see how that plays out.  Certainly, there has been no change in the demand structure for silver, but we just don’t know how much silverware has been sold for scrap to help alleviate the shortage at this point.  

Finally, the dollar is little changed vs most major counterparts with the two outliers KRW (+0.6%) on the back of strong equity market inflows and CHF (+0.4%) which appears to be the one haven that is behaving like one this morning.  JPY (-0.2%) has strengthened several percent over the past week, and comments from the latest Mr Yen, Atsushi Mimura, make clear they continue to watch the market closely, but for right now, there seems little concern, or likelihood, that intervention is coming soon.

One thing the NFP data did achieve was to alter the Fed funds futures market which now is pricing just a 6% probability of a rate cut at the March meeting with two cuts priced for the year.  I have to say that based on the comments from Logan and Hammack, as well as the NFP data, it certainly doesn’t appear likely that the Fed is going to cut again soon.  Tomorrow’s CPI data may change some opinions there, but we will have to wait to find out.

But riddle me this, if the Fed has finished its loosening cycle, and Kevin Warsh is seen as someone who is keen to reduce the size of the Fed’s balance sheet, why would we think the dollar is going to decline sharply from here?  For now, the buck remains rangebound, but as I watch what is going on elsewhere around the world regarding economic activity, the US continues to lead the way.  I still don’t see the dollar collapse theory making sense, although frankly, I think the administration would be fine with it.  Let me leave you with the entire history of the EURUSD exchange rate since its inception in 1999 and you tell me if you think the dollar is exceptionally weak or strong here.  Remember, a weak dollar is a strong euro, so higher numbers.  Frankly, it feels like we are close to the middle of the range, or if anything, stronger rather than weaker.

Source: data FRED, graph @fx_poet

Good luck

Adf

Up and Down

Posted on by

The only things that really matter
Are stock prices frequently shatter
Their previous high
And rise to the sky
Like too much yeast got in the batter
 
And though prices move up and down
While traders both grin and they frown
The long term has shown
The ‘conomy’s grown
Though lately, tis gold’s worn the crown

As I wrote last week, markets have a difficult time maintaining excessively high levels of volatility for any extended period of time as traders simply get tired and effectively check out.  Now, we have had some impressive volatility lately, whether in stocks, silver or natural gas, to name three and as can be seen in the chart below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But a closer look at the chart tells an interesting story, despite a huge amount of movement in the past month, the net movement for the S&P 500, Silver, Natural Gas and the 10-year Treasury, has been essentially zero.  If you dig through this chart, the only net movement has been the dollar’s roughly 2% decline.

That is an interesting tale, I think.  Perhaps Macbeth said it best though, “It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”  What exactly is the significance of the remarkable volatility we have seen over the past month across numerous markets?

If we review the past month’s activities, the most notable market event was the announcement of Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair, and the initial assumption that he is much more hawkish than market participants had previously anticipated.  It remains to be seen if that is the case, especially since we are still months away from any confirmation hearings and his eventual swearing in, but that was certainly the initial narrative.  It was blamed for a sharp decline in equities as well as precious metals, although both are essentially unchanged over the past 30 days. 

At least NatGas made sense given the significant cold and winter storms that hit much of the US and northern Europe, but those, too, have passed, and prices are back to where they were prior to the more extreme weather.

Maybe the most interesting thing is that bond yields are basically unchanged despite the Warsh announcement.  It would not have been surprising to see a significant move there given Warsh’s ostensible hawkishness, but that was not the case.

My point is that markets move for many reasons.  Occasionally, there is a clear catalyst (Japan’s Nikkei responding positively to PM Takaichi’s landslide victory comes to mind), but more often than not, the narrative writers seek to explain price action after the fact while covering up their previous forecasting mistakes.  I, too, am guilty of this at times, which is the reason I try to step back and take a broader, longer-term view of market movement to get underlying causes.  As I no longer sit on a trading desk, I am not privy to the day-to-day tick activity, and frankly, even then, unless it was happening at my bank, I would still be in the dark.

To conclude, the strongest trends, which remain the precious metals, continue, although prices are back closer to the long-term trend than the parabolic heights seen 10 days ago as you can see in the below chart.  In fact, I don’t think we have had any changes in the underlying story, but the extreme market volatility is likely to be done for a while going forward.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Which takes us to overnight market behavior.  While Tokyo (+2.3%) is still ripping higher on the Takaichi election news, only Taiwan (+2.1%) and the Philippines (+2.0%) are keeping pace with the rest of the region much less impressed, (China +0.1%, HK +0.6%, Australia 0.0%).  To my point, nothing has changed.  In Europe, too, price activity is fairly muted (France +0.4%, Germany +0.1%, Spain +0.2%, UK -0.2%) as there has been no news of note either economically or politically.  The most interesting data point was Norwegian inflation which came in much hotter than expected at 3.6% and has traders thinking the Norgesbank may be set to tighten again.  This has helped NOK (+0.6%) which is the leading gainer in the FX markets this morning.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:20), they are very modestly higher, just 0.15% or so across the board.

In the bond market, yields are backing off everywhere, with Treasury yields lower by -3bps, and European sovereigns lower by -1bp to -2bps across the board.  The exception, of course, is Norway (+8bps).  Perhaps, more interestingly JGB yields (-5bps) are slipping despite (because of?) Takaichi’s landslide victory.  Recall, heading into the election, expectations were for aggressive fiscal expansion and borrowing to pay for it.  However, Katayama-san, the FinMin has been explicit that they were going to be borrowing at the short end of the market, 1yr to 5yrs, so perhaps it is no surprise that the 10yr yield is slipping.  With that in mind, though 5yr JGB yields also fell last night, down -3bps, although shorter dated paper was unchanged.  I have not read of any analysts complaining that Japan is turning into an emerging market because they are funding themselves with short-dated paper, although when the US does it, apparently it is the end of the world.

Turning to commodities, oil (0.0%) continues to get tossed around on the Iran story, with no certainty as to whether a deal will be done or the US will attack.  Apparently, Israeli PM Netanyahu is meeting with President Trump tomorrow to register his opinions on the subject.  The interesting thing in this market is that the ‘peak oil demand’ narrative, which has been pushed by the climate set as occurring in the next year or two, has been pushed back to 2050 by the IEA as they take reality into account.  That may encourage more drilling, but that’s just my guess and as I’m an FX guy, what do I really know?

As to the precious metals, after a couple of days rebounding, this morning, the sector is modestly softer (Au -0.3%, Ag -1.6%, Pt -1.2%) although as per the chart above, the trend remains higher across all these metals.

Finally, the dollar, which has fallen the past two days, has stabilized and is mostly higher (save for NOK mentioned above) with most currencies softer by about -0.15 or -0.2%.  The other exception of note here is JPY (+0.5%) as there has been a lot of jawboning by the MOF there to prevent a rash of weakness.  However, it is difficult for me to look at the JPY chart below and discern a major reversal is coming.  I believe that the MOF wants to keep that 160 level as a dollar ceiling without spending any money if they can, but the problem with jawboning is that it loses its efficacy fairly quickly.  However, if they drive yields higher on shorter dated paper, perhaps that will attract more inflows, although given how low they currently are (2yr 1.29%, 5yr 1.69%) I think they have a long way to go before they become attractive to international investors.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, NFIB Small Business Optimism fell to 99.3, a bit disappointing, and now we await the following: Retail Sales (exp 0.4%, 0.3% -ex autos) and the Employment Cost Index (0.8%).  We also hear from two more Fed speakers, Logan and Hammack, but I don’t see the Fed, other than Warsh, being that critical right now.  

And that’s really it for today.  My take is we are unlikely to see dramatic movement in any market so hedgers should take advantage of the reduced price volatility.  But otherwise, sometimes, there is just not that much to do.

Good luck

Adf