Tag Archives: #riskoff

Not Be Sublime

Posted on by 
Investors are starting to shun
The riskiest things one-by-one
So, stocks feel the pain
And bonds, too, feel strain
The dollar, though’s, on quite a run

It’s nearly two weeks since this started
And so far, no ending’s been charted
The impact o’er time
Will not be sublime
Thus, trading’s not for the faint-hearted

Another day and there is no end in sight for the ongoing military action in Iran.  US strikes continue apace and Iranian retaliation also continues, albeit at a lesser rate it seems.  However, the information from the war zone remains difficult to trust as all of it is spun for various audiences with no sense of objective truth.  As such, it is difficult to have an opinion on how long this will continue.

With that in mind, all we can do is observe market behavior and see what we can glean.  Starting with equity markets around the world, the below screenshot from Bloomberg.com this morning shows that risk is clearly off, although not catastrophically so, at least not yet.

So, weakness in the US yesterday was followed by weakness overnight in the major markets in Asia as well as in other regional markets (Korea -1.7%, India -1.9%, Indonesia -3.1%) with the rest having declined by lesser amounts.  It is important to see that all the Asian markets (and European and US markets) have fallen in the past month, but remain higher, in some cases substantially so, since this time last year.  The point is that this move can still rightly be considered corrective, rather than a dramatic change in opinion.

European bourses are demonstrating similar behavior although US futures at this hour (6:45) are slightly higher, about +0.15% across the board.  Thinking about equity markets overall, one of the main features of the US market was that it maintained a relatively high P/E ratio, no matter whether measured on a forward looking or historical basis.  Thus, a correction in equity prices, even absent the war, would not have been that surprising.  The same could not be said about European or Asian markets, which trade at much lower valuations, but then, in Europe especially, prospects for growth remain hampered by individual national domestic policies along with EU wide policies, notably in the energy sector.    Under the rubric a picture is worth 1000 words, it is not hard to understand why US equity markets dominate global markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Germany has averaged -0.3% GDP growth over the past 3 years, and the EU is just above it at +0.4%.  Meanwhile, this morning’s UK GDP data showed weaker than expected outcomes, with Y/Y of 0.8% after a stagnant January.  Are US markets richly priced?  Sure, but what prospects do you have elsewhere?

Turning to bond markets, the traditional safe haven appeal of bonds, especially Treasuries and Bunds, is MIA.  While this morning, Treasuries (-1bp) and most European sovereigns (-1bp across the board) have seen prices stop declining, the picture over the past two weeks has not been encouraging.  The chart below shows the price action in both Treasuries and Bunds and, as you can see, both have seen yields rise sharply since the beginning of the month/war.  Given the ongoing stress in oil markets, and the implications that has for inflation worldwide going forward, it should not be a surprise that bonds don’t appear to offer their ordinary haven characteristics.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The big question here, and around the world truthfully, is how will central banks respond to the rise in energy prices and subsequent rise in headline inflation?  If they try to address price pressures by raising rates in this scenario, it will almost certainly lead to recessions everywhere.  But will their models allow them to hold their policies if inflation starts to rise sharply?  It’s funny, I have been remarking how central bank policies have lost their luster recently, having been overwhelmed by fiscal policies, but suddenly, monetary policy is back in the limelight.  We shall see how they perform.

In the commodity markets, WTI (-1.3%) rallied sharply yesterday but is giving back a bit this morning.  The big headline yesterday was that Brent crude closed above $100/bbl for the first time since 2022 in the wake of Russia’s invasion into Ukraine.  Of course, that was more about the big, round number feature, than the percentage rise.  After all, is there really a difference of $98/bbl or $100/bbl in the broad scheme of things?  Oil continues to be THE driving factor in all markets right now and that is not likely to change anytime soon.  As long as the Strait remains closed to traffic, this pressure will continue to build. 

In the metals markets, both gold and silver continue to consolidate around their recent levels ($5100 in gold, $85 in silver) and it appears we are going to need another catalyst of note to get that to change.  I see no change in supply metrics, that’s for sure, but if there is a recession, silver demand may well be reduced given its industrial uses.

Finally, the dollar is king of all it surveys, at least in the FX markets.  The euro is below 1.15 (it seems like only last week that pundits were talking about the consequences of the euro trading above 1.25.  The DXY has broken above 100, although we will need to see an extension of this move to be convinced that it is going to head much higher, and USDJPY is now pushing near 160 again, which brought out comments from Katayma-san, the Japanese FinMin, about closely monitoring the yen’s value.  Of course, given the broad-based rise in the dollar, the current yen weakness cannot be seen as that troubling.

But what is a bit more interesting to me, and more definitive proof that the dollar is not about to collapse, is the coincident moves higher in the dollar vs. a number of other currencies.  Look at the chart below of ZAR (-0.15%), SEK (-0.3%) and MXN (0.0%).  Each demonstrates virtually identical trade patterns, and all of them reached their respective peaks (dollar’s nadir) on January 29th.  You may recall that was the day president Trump named Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair, and we saw a major reversal in stocks, gold, silver and other markets.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My best estimate is that FX markets are pricing in a tighter Fed at this point, which. Based on Fed funds futures, showing just one cut potentially this year in December, makes a lot of sense.  I guess it remains to be seen how other central banks will respond to the ructions in markets caused by the war, but this is the first order consequence.

Source: cmegroup.com

Turning to this morning’s data, we see a bunch as follows: 

Q4 GDP (2nd estimate)1.4%
Personal Income0.5%
Personal Spending0.3%
Durable Goods1.2%
-ex Transport0.5%
PCE0.3% (2.9% Y/Y)
Cpore PCE0.4% (3.1% Y/Y)
JOLTs Job Openings6.7M
Michigan Sentiment55.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As with Wednesday’s CPI data, the PCE data does not include the war, so will be dismissed.  My take is the Income and Spending numbers, and the JOLTs number will be the most impactful if they are a long way from estimates.  

And that’s where we stand.  Markets are still unsure of what to believe regarding the war, and when it comes to war, things happen that are unexpected all the time, the so-called unknown unknowns.  In the end, it is hard to bet against the dollar for right now, but that could change in an instant based on the next headline.

Good luck and good weekend

adf

How Long Can This Stand?

Posted on by 
The weekend saw fighting expand
And so, it’s supply, not demand
That’s driving up prices
In this oil crisis
The question, how long can this stand?

As such the G7 has mooted
An idea that, if executed
Could help reduce nerves
By drawing reserves
Thus, price pressures could be diluted

Oil gapped higher last night when futures markets opened as the war in Iran widened its scope.  There were more attacks on refineries in Iran, and there has still been limited transit through the Strait of Hormuz (although I read of a ship that turned off its locator beacon and made it through safely).  As you can see from the chart below, though, the initial panic has subsided somewhat.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It seems that the key decline came after French President Macron, the current head of the G7, suggested a joint release of oil reserves across the group in an effort to stabilize prices.  It seems to me that while the G7 may have difficulty reaching some decisions, this one is pretty easy, and I expect that we will hear of this joint release shortly.

At the same time, Iran announced that the former Ayatollah’s son, Mojtaba, has been named the new Supreme Leader, and many assume this means they are hunkering down for a long fight. 

I am no military strategist, so take this for what it’s worth, but from what I have gleaned across numerous commentators, the Iranian strategy is to outlast the US and Israeli munitions which many have said are limited.  As well, they believe that by closing the Strait of Hormuz, they can inflict so much economic pain that the US will have to stop the fight.  Funnily enough, I have seen no commentary on the fact that by closing the Strait, Iran has essentially cut off all its own revenues as >90% of its oil sales transit the Strait.  The one thing we know is that the US will not run out of money.

The other thing at which I marvel is the incredibly low number of casualties on both sides of this war.  While there has been significant destruction of physical assets, even the Iranian propaganda has only claimed 1000-1500 dead, and in the US and Israel, the number is 20 total, I believe.

This feels to me like it is going to be pushed as hard as it can for a while longer and then one side is going to completely capitulate.  Whether that is the new Iranian regime crumbling or the US stopping the bombardment, I have no idea.  

In the meantime, let’s briefly discuss Friday’s payroll report, which was pretty awful, and then see how markets are behaving this morning.  By now, I am sure you have either heard or read about the NFP report which showed a headline loss of -92K, the largely offsetting January’s surprising gains.  As you can see from the chart below, no matter the details of any particular report, the trend over the past five years has been clear.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

If memory serves, the previous job losses shown here are the result of revisions to the original release and it has been more than six years (covid) since the headline number was negative in its own right.  Obviously, this is not the type of outcome the administration wants to see, but it is also important to remember the two significant changes we have seen over the past year: net outmigration along with deportations and a significant reduction in Federal government jobs.  Certainly, the latter is a net benefit in my eyes.  As to the former, it is exactly what President Trump promised in his campaign, so it cannot be a surprise.  Regarding its impact on the economy, I guess we will need to compare per capita outcomes to the total gross numbers to determine if the population is comfortable with the new reality.

But ultimately, financial markets did not like the data Friday, as we also saw fairly weak Retail Sales data.  Adding weak data to the war situation and rising oil prices led to weak equity markets in the US, and then the escalation over the weekend, saw equity markets around the world under pressure.  Once again, I believe a screen shot of things this morning is self-explanatory.  Those US prices are Friday’s closes.

Source: Bloomberg.com

As to US futures, at this hour (7:00), they are all lower by -1.25% or so, but as you can see from the chart below of the S&P 500 futures, they are well off the worst levels of the evening, essentially showing the same response to the G7 story as oil.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While those Asian markets showed just Japan, China and Australia, the smaller regional exchanges had a very rough time, with declines between -2.0% (India) and -6.0% (Korea) and everywhere in between.

In the bond market, the oil price move has inflation back on everybody’s mind and that can be seen as yields around the world are higher across the board.  While Treasury yields are higher by 4bps this morning, you can see much worse outcomes elsewhere in the world in the Bloomberg screenshot below:

I think this is directly related to Natural Gas prices as while they are higher in the US this morning, by 5.75%, that is nothing compared to the gains in Europe (+17.5%) and the UK (+16.75%), which has simply widened the gap between US and European prices further.  In addition, the US remains an exporter of LNG, so there will be no supply questions at all, while Europe, with the Strait of Hormuz shut down and Qatar offline, has real problems sourcing gas, especially because they are trying to end supplies from Russia.  Good thing they shut down their nuclear plants as well, that will certainly help their energy situation!

Meanwhile, the metals markets are under some pressure this morning (Au -1.25%, Ag -0.95%, Cu -0.7%), with the former continuing to underperform in a risk-off scenario as I believe that margin calls are resulting in sales of the one thing that investors had with gains.  Copper, though, is probably starting to feel some strain regarding future economic activity as if oil prices do remain at these levels, global economic growth is going to be sharply impacted.  We will need to watch this carefully.

Finally, the dollar remains king.  CAD (+0.2%) is the only currency that is showing any support and that is, naturally, because they are a major oil exporter.  Interestingly, NOK (-0.7%) is under pressure this morning despite oil’s massive jump.  As to the rest of the G10, EUR (-0.5%) and GBP (-0.4%) are suffering as are JPY (-0.35%) and CHF (-0.3%) the erstwhile havens.  I imagine both of those are suffering given their entire reliance on imported energy.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (-1.2%) and HUF (-1.3%) are the laggards, although CLP (-1.0%) is falling on copper’s decline as well.  ZAR clearly suffering from gold’s underperformance while HUF seems to be feeling some extra strain from expectations of central bank policy ease.  Remember, Hungary gets about 80% of its energy, both oil and gas, from Russia, which has been a key political issue in the EU.  Elsewhere, both APAC (KRW -0.5%, INR -0.6%, CNY -0.2%) and LATAM (BRL -0.65%, MXN -0.4%) currencies are suffering along with the rest of the world.  However, I would have thought both those last two should do better as both are oil producers and far from the action.  But right now, emerging markets are persona non grata to investors, so I expect that is the driver.

On the data front, there is nothing today, but we do get a few things this week:

TuesdayNFIB Small Business Optimism99.7
 Existing Home Sales3.90M
WednesdayCPI0.3% (2.4% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.2% (2.5% Y/Y)
ThursdayInitial Claims215K
 Continuing Claims1850K
 Housing Starts1.35M
 Building Permits1.41M
 Trade Balance-$68.0B
FridayPersonal Income0.4%
 Personal Spending0.3%
 PCE0.3% (2.8%)
 -ex food & energy 0.4% (3.0%)
 Q4 GDP (2nd est)1.4%
 Durable Goods0.8%
 -ex Transport0.5%
 JOLTs Job Openings6.70M
 Michigan Confidence55.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In a very rare outcome, we get both CPI and PCE in the same week as the hangover from the government shutdown continues to wreak havoc with the schedule.  It remains an open question as to whether the data will matter as the war continues to hog the headlines.  But if nothing changes there, then watch the inflation data.  After the weak employment report, if we see calm inflation data, tongues will start to wag about a Fed cut, although if oil is still above $100/bbl, that will be tough optics.

Net, things are still quite confusing.  My take is that there were many underlying aspects of the economy that were under pressure before the war and they may become more evident with oil putting pressure on everything, well, everything except the dollar, which probably will continue to track higher for now.

Good luck

Adf

Far Too Extreme

Posted on by

Said Roberts and five more Supremes
Those tariffs, are far too extreme
They don’t pass the test
And so, we request
You find a new revenue scheme
 
Said Trump, while I think you are wrong
Your actions won’t stop me for long
We have many laws
That give me good cause
For tariffs, that help make us strong

For whatever reason, this is what first popped into my head upon hearing the tariff ruling on Friday.  I guess I confused love for law, but whatever.  At any rate, I’m sure you have seen far too much on this subject already so I will be brief.  The Supreme Court ruled against President Trump’s use of the IEEEA law to enable the imposition of tariffs on foreign nations.  They did not discuss what to do about the ~$200 billion that has already been collected under that law.  The companies that sued want the money rebated, but that was not part of the decision, and of course, the logistics of that would be extraordinarily complex.

But in the end, President Trump simply imposed a sweeping 15% tariff across the board under a different law, which to my understanding can remain in place for 150 days.  The equity market shook off the news, rallying across the board on Friday (DJIA +0.5%, S&P 500 +0.7%, NASDAQ +0.9%), so it didn’t seem to be that big a deal.  But then when Asia opened Sunday night, risk was in a much less desired state.  Early returns show equities softer across the board (-0.75% at 10:00pm), the dollar (DXY -0.4%) under pressure and gold (+1.25%) and silver (6.25%) seeing significant haven demand.

One of the things that appeared to be in question was whether countries that had signed trade deals accepting tariffs and promising investments as part of the deal, would renege, but thus far, that has not happened.

My take is the tariff discussion is no longer a concern to investors.  Playing the lead role once again is Iran, as concerns over a potential US military strike rise, with a new actor joining the cast, Mexico, which appears to be suffering significant chaos after the elimination of a cartel leader, “El Mencho” has resulted in fire fights throughout the country there.  Obviously, given the proximity to the US, this has the potential to be quite significant, although since the border with Mexico has been effectively sealed, my take is all the action will stay in country there.

Historically, when there’s a war
The first move is stocks to the floor
But generally speaking
Post first mover freaking
The buyers step up to the fore

So, if tariffs are not going to be the primary topic of discussion, and I sincerely hope that is the case, after we finish congratulating the US men’s ice hockey team for the thrilling Olympic victory this weekend, what’s next on the agenda? Iran.

The US continues to amass forces in the Middle East and from various sources, including MSM and X and Substack, the growing consensus is that some type of military action is going to occur.  The question now seems to be whether it will be an attempt to decapitate the regime, or just to impede its ongoing buildup of armaments, notably ballistic missiles.

Negotiations are set to resume this week in Geneva and given the stakes, especially for the Ayatollah, it remains unclear as to his willingness to cede to American demands of essential disarmament and the end of terrorist support.  For President Trump, the risk is that any military action does not work as quickly and smoothly as either the first attacks on the nuclear sites, or the exfiltration of erstwhile Venezuelan president Maduro.  If there is something quick and relatively clean that achieves a clear objective, I think it can be a huge boon for the President, but if anything drags on, it will have numerous ramifications for both the mid-term election and the markets.  Let’s focus on the latter.

Below is a long-term chart of the S&P 500 which shows both the extraordinary recent performance relative to its previous history, as well as helps highlight some of the downturns seen during that time.  Of course, the noteworthy feature is that the downturns don’t last very long.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

If we move from right to left on the chart (these are monthly candles), the first spike down is Liberation Day in April 2025, when President Trump first announced his tariff plans.  Obviously, that is long past investors’ concerns now, especially given the events on Friday.  The next major decline took place in February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine.  But remember what also happened around that time, the Fed began its aggressive rate hiking when it figured out that inflation may not be transitory after all.  You probably remember that 2022 was one of the worst market performances for both stocks and bonds.  It is a worthwhile question to ask how much of that was the Russia/Ukraine situation and how much was the Fed.  My money is on the Fed.  Moving left, we see the Covid spike lower in Q1 2020 and then a baby dip during the repo shock of late 2018, when the Fed lost control of the Fed funds rate.  After that, we go back to the GFC in 2008-09 and the bursting of the dot com bubble in 2000 – 2003.  Sure, in 2003, the US invaded Iraq, but I don’t think that was the market driver.

My point here is that any impact from military action is likely to be very short-lived in equity markets.  The other market that will certainly be impacted is the oil market.  A look at the long-term story there shows that, here too, there are many things that have a major impact on oil other than war.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

The huge decline on the left was the GFC and ensuing recession.  The drop in 2014 was the realization that shale oil was going to add an enormous amount of supply to the market.  You can see the Covid spike to negative prices and then the run up in prices in the wake of the Russian invasion in 2022, which was relatively short-lived, and we have been declining ever since.

Much of the commentary regarding Iran right now revolves around their ability to close the Strait of Hormuz and how that would cut 20% of the world’s oil supply from reaching the market.  (It would cut almost all of Iran’s oil off from the market as they have virtually no pipeline network).  But even here, the evidence is that a price spike will be relatively short-lived.

I raise these issues because while war is inflationary, that is generally not because of the impact on oil prices, but rather because of the increased government spending that accompanies war (remember LBJ’s guns AND butter policies leading to the inflation of the 1960’s and 70’s.). 

Summing the discussion up, while in the immediacy, there will be market responses to military actions, I do not believe they will have long-term impacts.

Ok, I went on way too long, so let’s do a hyper quick tour of markets this morning and I will leave the weekly data until tomorrow.

Equities – mainland China is still closed, (they open tomorrow) but the rest of Asia mostly ignored the war drums.  HK (+2.5%), Korea (+0.65%), India (+0.6%) and Taiwan (+0.5%) all showed strength although Australia (-0.6%) seems to have suffered on the tariff story.  Tokyo, too, was closed last night.  In Europe, despite slightly better than expected German Ifo data, the DAX (-0.45%) is today’s laggard while the IBEX (+1.0%) and FTSE MIB (+1.0%) both have seen strong support, ignoring any uncertainty regarding the US tariff situation and benefitting from positive earnings results. The UK and France have done little.  As to the US futures market, at this hour (7:15) they have risen from their early evening lows but are still softer by -0.35% across the board.

Bonds – the bond market remains the enigma, in my mind, as it is basically locked in place and has been for months.  Treasury yields (-1bp) have edged lower and European sovereign yields are essentially unchanged, as are JGB yields.  It continues to baffle me that bond markets, which typically sense fear first, do not seem to care about all that is ongoing in the world right now, whether war, government spending, or commodity prices.

Commodities – this morning, oil (0.0%) is ignoring Iran, which is maybe the most surprising thing of all.  Perhaps this is telling us that concerns over a closure of the Strait of Hormuz are overblown, or perhaps if that does happen, we will see a dramatic spike higher.  Again, like the bond market, something feels amiss.  In the metals markets, while both gold (+0.8%) and silver (+2.25%) are higher than Friday’s closing levels, they are well below last night’s opening levels.  I guess fear is abating, at least for now.

FX – As to the dollar, it’s early decline has largely been erased with both the euro and pound unchanged, AUD (-0.4%) sliding and the rest of the G10 under pressure.  In the EMG space, MXN (-0.5%) is feeling a little stress from the increased violence that has begun and there seems to be some sympathy in that move with CLP (-0.3%) and BRL (-0.2%). On the flip side, CZK (+0.5%) is the biggest gainer as the market continues to respond to recent central bank hawkishness.

In the US today we see the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (exp 0.3 in January) and Factory Orders (-0.5% from Dec).  But remember this, as per the below, don’t look for that much activity in NY as this is the picture out my backyard this morning, I’m estimating 10” of snow, so skeleton staffs will be the rule.

Good luck

Adf

Not All in Sync

Posted on by

The story that’s tripping off lips
Is whether the buildup in ships
And aircraft we’ve seen
Is likely to mean
A war with Iran’s in the scripts
 
But markets are not all in sync
As equities clearly don’t think
That war would be trouble
While bond traders’ double
Their bets war will drive stocks to drink

Economic data is clearly not a key driver of market movement these days, arguably because we continue to get mixed outcomes, with some things looking good (Initial Claims, Philly Fed) while others are less positive (Trade Balance, Leading Indicators), although granted, it is not clear to me what the Leading Indicators purpose is anymore.  My point, though, is that we have not seen unambiguous strength or weakness across the data set for several months.  This allows every pundit to frame the economic situation through their own personal lens, whether bullish or bearish.  A perfect example is the dichotomy between the strength of US corporate balance sheets, as per Torsten Slok and seen below, 

and the rise in corporate bankruptcies as per this X post from The Kobeissi Letter (a great follow on X) which shows the following chart.

So, which is it? Are things good or bad?  My understanding is that strong balance sheets and a high number of bankruptcies are not typically correlated, but I could be wrong.  

Given the lack of direction, markets have turned their focus to other things, with most headlines currently garnered by the ongoing buildup of US military power in the Middle East as President Trump tries to pressure Iran into ceding its nuclear and missile programs.  (Of course, the announcement that all information on UAP’s (fka UFO’s) has many excited, and of course, the Epstein files continue to garner attention, as does the SAVE Act, but none of those are even remotely related to financial markets.)

But even here, we are seeing very different responses by the financial markets.  For instance, equity markets continue to perform pretty well, even though Tokyo and Australia sank a bit last night.  Look at the monthly and YTD returns in Europe, Japan and Australia below:

                                           Daily   Weekly   Monthly   YTD

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It strikes me that if war was a major concern, investors wouldn’t be stocking up on risk assets.  Rather, havens would be in more demand, which we are also seeing with gold (+0.4%) and silver (+3.3%) rising overnight as despite extreme volatility in the precious metals space, there is clearly underlying demand for these havens.

Bond yields over the past month have declined, indicating that despite ongoing deficit spending, investors are seeking their perceived safety whether in Treasuries, Bunds or JGBs as per the below chart of all three.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar, despite frequent calls for its death, has been edging higher in a classic risk-off response as no matter how much some may hate the dollar philosophically, when bad things happen, its massive legal and liquidity advantages outweigh virtually everything else.  Once again, the DXY has moved back to the middle of its trading range, just below 98.00 this morning, and to my eyes, shows no signs of an imminent collapse.  Rather, if hostilities do break out in Iran, I expect the greenback to rally to at least the top of this trading range at 100, and depending on the situation, it could easily go higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

All this is to point out that nobody knows nothing.  Narrative writers continue to try to keep up with the action, and it is increasingly difficult to do so as things change on the ground so rapidly.  Let me be clear when I say I have zero inside information regarding any of this, I am merely an observer.  However, my observations are that there will be some type of military action in Iran as to build up this much fire power in a concentrated area and not use it would be remarkable and I can see no way in which the Ayatollah can accept the terms being offered as it would end his leadership if he does.  I guess we will find out soon enough as President Trump has put a 10-day timeline on things.

Arguably, the only market I didn’t mention here was oil (-0.5%) which is consolidating after a 20% rise in the past two months.  Remember, if military activity is directed at oil production or transport, we could see a sharp spike here and that will not help equities or economic data, although both gold and the dollar are likely to benefit.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t think there is anything else to discuss market wise so let’s turn to the data.  This morning brings a bunch of important stuff as follows:

Personal Income0.3%
Personal Spending0.4%
PCE0.3% (2.8% Y/Y)
-ex food & energy0.3% (2.9% Y/Y)
Q4 GDP3.0%
Flash Manufacturing PMI52.6
Flash Services PMI53.0
Michigan Sentiment57.3
New Home Sales730K

Source: tradingecomomics.com

We also hear from two more Fed speakers, but at this point, they are all singing from the same hymnal explaining policy is in a good place and unless there are major changes in the data, there is no reason to change.

Arguably, the PCE data is the key for markets here as if it continues to run hotter than target, hopes for further rate cuts will continue to dissipate.  In fact, the next cut is now priced in for July with a second for October.  

Source: cmegroup.com

Remember, too, at that point it will be Kevin Warsh’s Fed, not Jay Powell’s, and Warsh has a very different idea about the way things need to be done.  Interestingly, as this 4th Turning proceeds and old institutions come under increasing pressure, their efforts to fight back and maintain the status quo is no longer behind the scenes as evidenced by this Bloomberg article this morning.

As I have written before, President Trump is the avatar of the 4th Turning and the institutions that are going to change are desperate to maintain the status quo.  This is, truly, the big fight that will continue through the end of the decade in my view.  Every institution that has been overseeing the global situation, whether politically, financially or militarily, is coming under pressure as income and wealth inequality have driven an ever wider disparity of outcomes.  As much power as the rich have, there are a lot more people who are not rich.  Ask Louis XVI how much being rich helped him.

On a lighter note, I watched the gold medal skating performance of Alysa Liu and it was truly magical.  A much better thought for the weekend!

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Chock Full of Crises

Posted on by

Their mandate includes stable prices
And that they should use all devices
To work to achieve
That goal lest they leave
A legacy chock full of crises

“Most participants, however, cautioned that progress toward the Committee’s 2 percent objective might be slower and more uneven than generally expected and judged that the risk

of inflation running persistently above the Committee’s objective was meaningful.”

These words [emphasis added] are from the FOMC Minutes released yesterday afternoon.  To set the stage, the Fed left rates on hold then, although there were two votes for another cut.  However, a full reading of the Minutes shows there were those who would have considered a hike as well.   Now, I am just a guy in a room who observes market behavior through the lens of too many years involved on a daily basis, and my resources are virtually nil, especially compared to the Federal Reserve.  I don’t have a PhD in economics (although I believe that is a benefit in this context, if not every context).  However, the bolded part of the comment seems a tad disingenuous to me based on the below chart which shows the history of their inflation metric, Core PCE prices.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It has been exactly 5 years since their metric was at or below their 2% target by which they defined stable prices.  The idea that they are claiming the risk of inflation running hot was a meaningful risk is perhaps the worst gaslighting comments they have made.  It is very difficult to believe that the Fed, in its current incarnation, is going to ever address the inflation issue appropriately.  Perhaps a Chairman Warsh, if he is successful at reconfiguring their operating procedures will be able to drive positive changes.  I am hopeful but not confident.  The one thing we know is that changing government institutions requires a mammoth effort.  And let’s face it, he will only have two plus years of leeway for sure depending on whoever becomes president in 2028.

I continue to believe that the market is going to increasingly focus only on Warsh’s comments going forward as the direction he has expressed is very different than the current FOMC membership mindset.  We shall see how this all evolves.  In the meantime, I expect that Fed funds are not going anywhere before Warsh is confirmed.  As to bond yields, that is a very different question and will depend on both the macroeconomic outcomes and the risk perception of investors around the world.  For now, that trading range of 4.00%. – 4.20% seems likely to hold absent a major economic data miss in one direction or the other.  But as long as we continue to get mixed data, this market will remain on the backburner.

The fear that is growing each day
Trump’s policy might go astray
Regarding Iran
Although not Japan
Thus, oil’s up, up and away

Texas tea (+1.5%) is following yesterday’s 4.6% rise with another strong session and as you can see in the chart below, is showing a very clear trend higher since December.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This movement is very clearly a response to the ongoing buildup of US military assets in proximity to Iran, with two aircraft carriers, and somewhere above 200 military aircraft as well as the carrier group tenders with Tomahawk missiles in tow.  While negotiations are ostensibly ongoing, the one thing that seems clear is that absent a complete capitulation by the Iranian government, something big is going to happen here.  Of course, the question is, how much, and for how long, will it impact oil supplies?

Obviously, nobody knows the answer to that question, but the recent history has shown that every time there was an event in the Middle East, whether the 12-day war several months ago, the killing of Suleimani, the attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure, or others, prices retraced pretty quickly as per the below.  

Even the Ukraine invasion in February 2022 saw prices retrace 50% within a few months.  Other issues lasted less time than that.  This recent history implies that fading the rally is the right trade, but boy, that is hard to do.  And of course, in the event that the Iranian government falls, the chaos could result in a significant degradation of Iranian oil production.  Given they pump about 5 mm bpd, ~5% of global supply, that would matter a lot at the margin.  Certainly, the oil glut narrative would disappear in a hurry.  This is a very large risk to both markets and the economy, and one which needs to be hedged, if possible.  This will certainly be the focus of markets for the next few weeks, at least, so be prepared.  Personally, I do own some stuff here, but I like the drillers generally, as they are going to be employed no matter what!

Ok, let’s see what else is happening.  After a solid US session yesterday, Asia saw some major positive price action with Korea (+3.1%) the leader although Tokyo (+1.1%) also had a solid session, as did Taiwan, New Zealand, Singapore and Australia.  The exception to this rule was India (-1.5%) which suffered after a three-day positive run as traders and investors fled worrying about oil, the Fed, and the future of India’s relationship with Russia after the seizure of more ‘dark fleet’ oil tankers trying to avoid sanctions on Russian oil.  Europe, meanwhile, is uniformly lower this morning, with all the major indices slipping -0.8% or so.  The narrative is pointing to the escalation in Iran as the cause du jour.  US futures are also slipping at this hour (7:20), -0.25% or so across the board.

I touched on bonds briefly above, but today’s price action shows yields edging higher by 1bp in Treasury markets and between 1bp and 2bps across European sovereign markets.  There has been no data of note to alter views, and the only ECB news is that Spain has thrown their hat into the ring to have the next ECB president.

In the metals markets, yesterday’s gains are being followed by a mixed picture with gold (+0.2%) and silver (+0.3%) edging higher while copper (-1.6%) and platinum (-1.8%) cede those gains.  However, as I highlighted yesterday, this all still feels like consolidation.  FYI, there is much talk in the markets about silver and how there is not enough physical silver in the COMEX vaults to cover open interest, and how that could result in a major squeeze, but my take is most of it will roll forward as the fundamental supply/demand equation does not appeared to have changed.

Finally, the dollar had a strong session yesterday, rising 0.6% as measured by the DXY, and making gains vs. almost all currencies.  This morning, those trends are continuing with SEK (-0.4%) and GBP (-0.2%) leading the way lower in the G10 space while ZAR (-0.85%), INR (-0.4%) and KRW (-0.4%) are dragging down the EMG bloc.  Again, data has been scarce, so I see this as a more traditional risk-off sentiment than some new macro story.

Data yesterday was generally stronger than forecast, notably IP and Capacity Utilization, which showed solid outcomes that were ascribed to AI infrastructure building as well utilities activity.  It strikes me this is exactly what the Trump administration is trying to achieve with their reshoring goals.  I guess the question is how productive this investment will be and how will it impact inflation readings.  This morning, we see the weekly Initial (exp 225K) and Continuing (1860K) claims, as well as the Trade Balance (-$55.5B), Philly Fed (8.5) and Leading Indicators (0.0%).  The interesting thing about the Leading Indicators number is that a flat result would be the highest in 4 years.  A look at the Conference Board’s chart below shows an interesting thing about this number, and to me, anyway, calls its value into question.  Leading Indicators have been declining for four years while coincident indicators (and economic growth) have been moving along just fine.  I’m trying to figure out what these indicators lead.

And that’s really it for today.  We do see oil inventories as well, with a slight build expected and we will hear from Minneapolis Fed president Kashkari, but I cannot remember the last time he said anything interesting.  To me, the concern today, and tomorrow and next week, is that we see an escalation in rhetoric regarding Iran, at the very least, if not an actual military strike.  That feels like it would be bad for stocks, good for bonds, the dollar and gold.  Hopefully I am wrong there.

Good luck

Adf

Yesterday’s Trauma

Posted on by

The story is yesterday’s trauma
As risk assets traded with drama
For stocks, it was news
AI could abuse
More sectors, that triggered the bomb-a
 
For gold and the metals, however,
It seemed an alternative lever
A bear raid, perhaps
Or filling chart gaps
No matter, twas quite the endeavor
 
Which leads to today’s CPI
Where narratives that with AI
Deflation is coming
As all jobs but plumbing
We’ll no longer need to apply

Let’s start with this morning’s CPI data as in some ways, I feel like that is a key part of the overall market discussion regarding yesterday’s dramatic declines.  Expectations are for both Core and Headline prints of 0.3% M/M and 2.5% Y/Y.  If we feed those numbers into the current narrative, the implication might be that the Fed is continuing to see a slowdown here and it would open the door to further rate cuts.  Remember, despite the comments of two Fed speakers earlier this week, Logan and Hammack, the most recent information we have is that the neutral rate is believed to be 3.0%, a full 75bps lower than the current Fed funds rate.  Interestingly, if we look at the Fed funds futures market, it shows that even after yesterday’s abysmal Existing Home Sales data (-8.4%), the probability of 3 cuts doesn’t hit 50% until the end of 2027!

Source: cmegroup.com

Remember, too, that the payroll report was strong on Wednesday, but that major annual revisions took much of the shine off that.  And of course, we cannot forget that since everything is political these days, certain FOMC members who dislike the President may be against rate cuts simply because the President wants them.  The point here is that the appearance of pretty solid economic activity combined with gradually decreasing inflation could argue for rate cuts but could also argue to leave things as they are since they seem to be working.  And let’s face it, the Fed doesn’t really know anyway, nor do any of us.

Which takes us to the broader narrative about what is driving stock market activity and why we saw such dramatic declines in the US yesterday, and pretty much everywhere else overnight.  It appears the proximate cause is the idea that recent AI announcements have indicated that there are entire service industries that may be destroyed because AI will serve as an effective replacement for their customers.  We have seen it for law firms, accountants and consultants and now logistics and software companies are under the gun.

Adding to the narrative is Elon Musk, who continuously claims that AI and robots will replace virtually all human labor and create enormous wealth for us all while driving prices ever lower.  The flip side of that claim is that throughout history, every major technological advance, while initially destroying jobs in the areas it was used, resulted in more, and better paying, jobs to help advance the overall economic situation.  Of course, historically, these changes took at least a generation, if not several to play out, while things appear to be happening a bit faster this time.

I have not done a deep dive on AI so take this for what it’s worth.  I use Grok as it is convenient for me given I have X open on my computer all the time.  I use it for quick research as it responds to my poorly worded questions with the information I seek and, happily, cites its sources.  But I am looking for data questions (e.g. the GDP of China or the size of European holdings of Treasuries) and I have never even considered using it to write my poetry.  Is it ready to make intuitive leaps in thought?  Maybe, but that seems a stretch.  As with all computers, its advantage over the human brain is its ability to ‘brute force’ a solution by making so many calculations in such a short time that no human can match.  However, my take is breakthroughs have come from intuitive leaps from one topic to another, not from simply doing more math on the same topic.  And it is not clear to me that AI programs, as they currently exist, are intuitive.

Of course, for our purposes, it doesn’t really matter right now if AI is that capable or not, it only matters if investors and traders believe that to be the case and invest accordingly.  That was yesterday’s story, as well as well as the story at the beginning of last week, at least based on the way the NASDAQ traded as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

We had six different significant drawdowns within a given hour since the end of January, and virtually all were described as a consequence of some industry sector being decimated by AI.  The thing is, valuations are pretty high in the tech sector (the area most likely to be hit) and it may simply be that investors have decided to sell the rich stuff and buy cheap stuff instead, like defensives and materials companies.  Just a thought.  But be prepared for a lot more of this narrative about AI eating some other company’s/industry’s lunch as we go forward.

Ok, let’s look at the overnight now.  First, remember, China is going on holiday all next week, and we will see much less activity from Asia accordingly.  But last night, Asia basically followed the US lower with Japan (-1.2%), HK (-1.7%), China (-1.25%) and Australia (-1.4%) headlining.  India (-1.25%) and Singapore (-1.6%) also suffered and you are hard pressed to find any markets that rose there.  As this was very tech focused, it should be no surprise.  (PS India is also suffering on AI as much of the business that had been outsourced to India could well be replaced by AI.)

In Europe, too, red is today’s color, and not simply because they lean more communist every day.  While tech is not a major part of the markets there, watching Italy (-1.5%), Spain (-1.0%), Norway (-1.1%) and Greece (-2.1%) all slide sharply tells the story, I think.  As it happens, France (-0.35%) and Germany (-0.1%) are the continental leaders and the UK (+0.1%) is the only market of note showing gains at all.  As to US futures, ahead of the data at this hour (7:30) they are softer by -0.2% across the board.

In the bond market, yesterday saw Treasury yields slip -4bps after the Housing data and this morning, they have recouped just 1bp.  European sovereign yields are all lower by between -1bp and -2bps as data releases continue to show a ‘muddle-through’ economy rather than one either growing strongly or falling sharply.  We did hear from ECB member Kazaks, telling us that the euro’s strength over the past year could have a negative impact on the economy there, implying the ECB may need to ease further.  Meanwhile, JGB yields (-2bps) continue to demonstrate virtually no concern about PM Takaichi’s plans for unfunded fiscal expansion.

Metals markets were the other noteworthy place yesterday with some very dramatic declines happening simultaneously in both gold and silver just after 11:00am.  (see below) My friend JJ who writes Market Vibes, explained last evening that the timing was impeccable as London had closed and the US is the least liquid metals market around, so if a large speculator was seeking to drive prices lower, that was when to do it.  And somebody did!  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But that was then, and this is now.  As you can see from the chart, the market is already rebounding with gold (+1.0%) and silver (+3.2%) simply demonstrating that they remain incredibly volatile.  In truth, this was the best take I saw on the subject yesterday.

Turning to oil, President Trump indicated that talks with Iran may go on for weeks, so it is unlikely that things will combust there for a while.  At the same time, the IEA continues to try to convince everyone that peak oil is here and there is a huge glut, but net, Texas Tea slipped -2.8% yesterday and is lower by another -0.35% this morning.

Finally, the dollar…well nothing has changed.  the DXY (+0.1%) is clinging to 97 with no impetus to move in either direction.  JPY (-0.4%) may be softer this morning but is far enough away from 160, the perceived intervention level, that nobody cares.  AUD (-0.6%) slipped on the weak commodities pricing, although remains near its highest levels in three years as the RBA turned hawkish last week.  We are also seeing weakness in the EMG bloc (KRW -0.4%, ZAR -0.5%, CLP -0.6%) with yesterday’s tech and metals sell-offs the proximate drivers.  The narrative remains that the dollar is set to collapse, but I still don’t see it.  Maybe I’m just blind.  I cannot get past the economic growth outperformance and inward investment plans, as well as the need for dollars to continue the global USD debt flywheel as the key demand points.

And that’s really it.  Volatility is with us and likely to stay for a while.  This is a global regime change with respect to economic statecraft rather than the previous rules-based order, and frankly, nobody really knows how it’s going to ultimately play out.  This is why gold remains in demand, because history has shown it has maintained its value on a purchasing power basis for millennia, whatever the terms of the relevant currency may be.  But in the fiat world, I’m waiting for someone to make a better argument for something other than the dollar over time.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Gone Astray

Posted on by

Though Friday will lack NFP
We still will have something to see
The States and Iran
Will meet in Oman
To talk about nuke strategy
 
But til they, in fact, do sit down
Be careful as crude moves around
And what if talks fail
To find holy grail
Beware oil shorts and their frowns
 
With that as the background today
The narrative has gone astray
’Cause all kinds of tech
Resemble a wreck
While metals are fading away

Sometimes it’s hard to determine which stories are really driving markets as there are so many that have potential conflicts between them.  With that in mind, I will start with oil this morning, which has seen a bit of choppiness during the past week on the back of on-again, off-again, on-again talks due to be held between the US and Iran.  See if you can guess where the worries about a US military strike gained ground, were quashed by news of potential talks, saw a military skirmish in the Strait of Hormuz and then when talks were reconfirmed.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Net, there is still an underlying concern about the situation, which is why, I believe, the price of crude (-1.1%) is still above $64/bbl.  Remember, it was not that long ago when it had seemed to find a comfort zone below $60/bbl.  It strikes me that if some type of accommodation is reached at these talks, where Iran gives up its nuclear weapon dreams and stops funding terrorism (I believe these are the administration’s goals) then there is plenty of room for oil prices to slide back below $60/bbl and continue what had been a longer term down trend as per the below chart.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

After all, given the fact that Venezuelan oil is going to be returning to the market, the continued expansion of production in Guyana, Brazil and Argentina, and now the idea of welcoming Iran back into the good graces of nations, that is a lot of potential supply that is currently not available.  My concern is if Iran agrees to those terms, it may be an existential threat to the theocracy, so I guess they need to weigh that risk vs. the risk that the US does escalate militarily, which could also be an existential risk to the theocracy.  Net, choppiness seems to be the likely road ahead.

Finishing commodities, precious metals have reversed the reversal and are down sharply this morning (Au -1.7%, Ag -11.0%, Pt -4.4%).  Volatility remains extremely high and given the competing narratives of a) it was a bubble, and b) the fundamentals remain in place, I expect we will continue to see price action like this for a while yet.  Although remember my strong belief that markets can only maintain volatility of this nature for a few weeks as at some point, all the participants simply become too tired to trade.  There was a very interesting chart I saw on X this morning that showed the price action in gold during the German hyperinflation of the Weimar Republic a bit over 100 years ago.  

I’m not implying we are heading to a hyperinflation, just that gold (and silver and platinum) prices can move very far in short order, as we’ve seen.  In the end, nothing has changed the fundamentals with demand for gold still price insensitive, demand for silver still greater than mining supply with the same true for platinum.  But it will be a rough ride for a little while yet.

So, let’s turn to the equity markets, where there are far more plugged-in analysts than me, but I want to take a higher-level look.  While yesterday’s price action was mixed (NASDAQ and S&P lower, DJIA higher) it seems to indicate that there is an ongoing rotation out of tech stocks into other areas, amongst them consumer staples, energy and defensives.  What I find so interesting about this, though, is that if I look at a chart of the three major US indices, they are all the same chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Granted, the NASDAQ had the highest high back in November, but, in reality, they all move very much in sync.  This begs the question, what can we expect going forward?  At the end of the day, I still believe that stocks represent the value created in the economy.  As such, if the Trump administration’s plans to reduce regulations and encourage banks to lend more to the real economy, rather than purchase financial assets, can be implemented effectively, that is a very real positive for equity markets over time.  However, that probably means a much less steady climb, especially if the Fed is not explicitly supporting assets as the new Chair, Warsh, tries to shrink the balance sheet.  It is going to be messy and there are going to be a lot of cross narratives and claims, so at any given time, the only reality will be increased volatility.  But at least there’s a plan.

As to the rest of the world’s equity markets, it does appear as the bifurcation between those nations that are willing to work closely with the US and those working closely with China is likely to continue.  It remains to be seen which bloc will outperform, although I like the US odds given the legal structure and the demographics.  

With all that in mind, let’s look at the overnight price action.  Asia had a tough go of it given the high proportion of tech names there.  While Tokyo (-0.9%) slipped along with China (-0.6%) the real laggards were Korea (-3.9%) and Taiwan (-1.5%) and there were far more laggards (India, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia) than gainers (Singapore, HK).  This is the tech story writ large.  In Europe, even though they largely lack tech, weakness is the norm (Spain -1.1%, Germany -0.2%, UK -0.3%) although the French (+0.3%) have managed to buck the trend.  It is not clear why Spain is lagging so badly, although perhaps PM Sanchez’s efforts to import 500K new people while unemployment remains at 10%, the highest in the EU, has some concerned.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:15), they are pointing higher by about 0.2%.

In the bond market, once again there is nothing going on.  Treasury yields are almost exactly unchanged since early Friday morning, although we did see a dip and rebound after the Warsh announcement.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The US yield curve is steepening as 30-year yields edge higher although those remain below 5.0%, a level that many are watching closely as a signal of a bondmageddon.  On the continent, European sovereign yields have edged higher by 1bp to 2bps, but activity is muted ahead of the ECB meeting announcement (exp no change) scheduled later this morning.  UK yields have edged lower by -1bp after the BOE left rates on hold, as expected, with a 5/4 vote, the 4 looking for a cut.  I continue to believe that the odds are for the ECB to cut rates again far sooner than the market is pricing.  And JGB yields slipped -2bps overnight as market participants await Sunday’s election results.  Given PM Takaichi is forecast to win with an increased majority, it is hard for me to believe that if she does, JGB’s will sell off sharply on the idea she has promised more unfunded spending, they already know that.

Lastly, the dollar is firmer this morning, continuing to defy all the calls for its demise.  The pound (-0.8%) is the laggard after the BOE sounded a bit more dovish than expected, but we are seeing losses across the entire G10 bloc.  As to the EMG bloc, ZAR (-0.7%) is the laggard, but given the dramatic reversal in precious metals, that is no surprise.  Otherwise, losses on the order of -0.3% or so are the norm.

On the data front, Initial (exp 212K) and Continuing (1850K) Claims lead the way and later we see the JOLTs Job Openings Report (7.2M).  The word is that the NFP report will be released next Wednesday with CPI next Friday.  Atlanta Fed president Bostic speaks later this morning, but I continue to believe that until we hear from Mr Warsh, the Fed’s words have very little impact.  Arguably, the neutering of the Fed is why the bond market remains so quiet.  Traders have lost their cues.

Risk attitudes are getting revisited around the world as the seeming permanence of increased risk appetite is starting to be called into question.  There is no better signal of this than Bitcoin, which has broken back below $70K this morning to its lowest level since October 2024.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It was January 2024 when the ETF, IBIT, started trading and BTC was about $43K at that time.  As BTC is a pure risk asset/vehicle, it’s recent decline may well be the biggest signal that risk-off is coming.  That could well impede the Trump efforts to rebuild the US manufacturing base, but perhaps, it could also encourage it, as business risks are easier to understand than market risks.  The volatility is not over.

Good luck

Adf

Most Enthralling

Posted on by

Some fractures are starting to show
In markets, as Trump’s blow by blow
Attack on the Danes
And friends, really strains
The view ‘Twenty-Six will lack woe
 
So, equities worldwide are falling
While bond yields, much higher, are crawling
The buck’s in a rut
While oil’s a glut
Thus, gold is the thing, most enthralling

 

“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”  So said Marcellus, when Shakespeare introduced him to the world in 1603(ish) in one of his most brilliant works, Hamlet, and it seems true today, 423 years later.  By now, you are likely aware that President Trump has imposed 10% tariffs, to begin on February 1st, on Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK as he presses his case for US ownership of Greenland.  This is not the venue to discuss the relative merits or pitfalls of the strategy, so I won’t bore you with my views on the subject.  

Rather, this is a venue to discuss the market impacts and how they may evolve, in one poet’s eyes, going forward given the new starting condition.  As I type this morning, investors around the world are extremely unhappy, at least holding paper claims on either assets or governments.  However, holding real assets, notably gold (+1.15% and at new all-time highs), silver (+0.9% and at new all-time highs) and platinum (+1.45%, not quite at new highs yet) are feeling much better.

It is interesting to me that the WEF is meeting this week, and likely no coincidence that President Trump escalated things ahead of the meeting where he is scheduled to speak tomorrow.  It seems that the protagonists in this latest drama are set to meet while in Davos as well, so all these views are subject to change at a moment’s notice.  But for now, since there really is no other story that matters, let’s look at how markets have (mis)behaved since we last saw them here in the US on Friday.

As you can see from the chart below combining the Nikkei 225, the DAX and the S&P 500 futures, the move has been consistent since the close in NY on Friday, with all three main indices lower by between -1.75% (Japan) and -3.1% (Germany), with the US (-2.1%) in the middle.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, that price action has been widespread across the rest of the G10 markets and many EMG markets as well. Only China (-0.2% since Friday) has bucked the trend and remains little changed.  Of course, that makes sense given this spat has nothing to do with China, on the surface.  At this point, I expect that all equity markets are going to remain under pressure until there is some resolution.  While Europe has threatened to invoke its Anti-Coercion Instrument on the US if those tariffs come into being, one must wonder will that do more damage to the US or Europe?  FWIW, I expect some type of resolution to be achieved before the Feb 1 deadline but could easily be wrong about that.  One last thing about tariffs; remember last week when expectations were high that the Supreme Court was going to rule on the legality of the ones already imposed?  That has suddenly gone very quiet.  My take there is the longer we don’t hear anything, the more likely they are not going to stop them.

Perhaps, though, the bond market is the more interesting place to look this morning with government bonds around the world getting sold aggressively.  While all eyes have been focused on the US (+6bps and well above the top of the previous range) and Europe (Germany +5bps, UK +7bps, France +6bps) perhaps the real activity is happening in Japan (+9bps).  In fact, Japanese 30yr yields have exploded higher by 40 basis points since Friday’s close, and I’m confident that has nothing to do with Greenland!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, it appears that JGB holders are getting increasingly concerned that PM Takaichi is going to really run it hot, with more unfunded fiscal stimulus and are responding accordingly.  The latest Takaichi proposal for the upcoming election is that they are going to remove the GST (VAT tax) on food for 2 years to help alleviate inflation problems.  I certainly like that better than capping prices, but fiscally, it’s a tough road to follow.  

One other bond market story that is making the rounds is the idea that Europeans would attack the US by simultaneously unloading their US Treasury holdings.  We have heard this story before with respect to China, and if you look across all of Europe, between central banks and private investors, there are likely upwards of $2 trillion held there.  But the question I ask every time I hear something of this nature is…what will they do with the proceeds if they were somehow able to coordinate the sales?  First, in the worst case, the Fed would buy them to prevent the market from collapsing.  And second, now they would have a whole lot of dollars that need to be invested elsewhere.  Which markets can absorb that amount of flow?  US equities?  Sure, but would that achieve their goals?  I think not.  If they converted them into euros, a one-way flow of $2 trillion into euros in short order would pretty much render all European manufacturing uncompetitive right away as the euro rose to 1.50 or 1.60 or higher.  Gold?  Think $10k/oz or higher.  Ain’t gonna happen.

Let’s hit the dollar next, which is under pressure across the board.  As I type (7:20), the DXY has fallen -1.0% this morning, a very large move for that index, but remains within the trading range that we have seen since October.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The sell-off in the dollar is almost universal, although interestingly, ZAR (-0.5%), MXN (-0.3%) and CLP (-0.3%) are all bucking that trend.  I understand the nervousness, but it strikes me that none of this conversation is a positive for Europe, excepting the idea they sell all their Treasuries and convert the dollars into euros and pounds, an idea I tried to squash above.  

Finally, let’s look at commodities where the metals, as discussed above are soaring while oil (+0.8%) is picking back up off its end of week lows and currently sits just below $60/bbl.  The Iran situation remains murky, at best, and my sense is we have not heard the last of the situation there, although from what I have seen on X, the rioting has been quelled to some extent.  However, I think there is still enormous pressure on the government there and would not be surprised to see some type of US intrusion. 

But I’m confident the one thing almost all of you are feeling this morning is the bitter cold that has enveloped most of the US as per the weather.com map below.

Given natural gas is the most common fuel for heating homes, we cannot be surprised that its price has skyrocketed today, jumping 24% in the session so far, although it is now simply back to where it was this time last year.  however, a key issue in this market is Europe, which since they virtually shut off Russian gas, is now highly reliant on US LNG to heat their homes.  It turns out that their storage has fallen to slightly less than 50% of capacity, well below their average storage level for this date of 60% – 65%.  European TTF gas, on a like for like basis, currently costs ~$12.25/MMBtu compared to $3.85/MMBtu in the US, even after the massive jump.  Again, Europe has some issues going forward.

On the data front, there is really nothing today or tomorrow of note although Thursday brings GDP amongst other things.  I will review them tomorrow because, after all, markets right now are far more beholden to President Trump and Europe than to data.

Fear is growing more widespread and will likely continue to do so until there is some type of resolution over Greenland.  But then, it will dissipate quickly as consider, two weeks ago we were all Venezuela experts and today, nobody even cares about that nation anymore!

As to the dollar, I expect that when the resolution arrives, the dollar will make up lost ground, but given we are in the midst of a White House bingo game, one needs to play things close to the vest.  Hedges are crucial here.

Good luck

Adf

The Temperature’s Rising

Posted on by

This morning the temperature’s rising
With Trump and his allies devising
An alternate way
For him to axe Jay
But this move is quite polarizing
 
The market response has been clear
It’s given the move a Bronx Cheer
Both stocks and the dollar
Are feeling a choler
But gold, everybody holds dear

 

The financial world is aghast this morning as last night, Chairman Powell revealed that the Fed has been served with grand jury subpoenas threatening criminal indictment regarding Chairman Powell’s testimony to the Senate Banking Committee last June.  The issue at hand is ostensibly the ongoing renovations at the Marriner Eccles Building, including their cost, and how that differs from Chairman Powell’s testimony.

Chairman Powell offered a video response last night explaining he will not be cowed into cutting rates because the President wants lower rates, but will continue their work of setting policy based on their assessments of the economy.  One cannot be surprised that this has raised an entirely new round of screaming about President Trump’s tactics, although what I did see this morning was that Florida House Representative Anna Paulina Luna took credit for referring the case to the DOJ.

While I have strong opinions on Chairman Powell’s effectiveness, or lack thereof, this is certainly a new level of pressure.  In fact, if you listen to the video above (it’s just 2 minutes) Powell explicitly claims that this is entirely about the Fed not cutting rates further.  But I am not going to discuss the legality, or tactics here, our focus is on the market’s response.

Starting with the dollar in the FX markets, it has fallen almost universally, and while it hasn’t collapsed, we are looking at a 0.3% to 0.5% decline pretty much everywhere.  Using the euro (+0.4%) as our proxy, you can see from the chart below that in the context of the past year’s price activity, this move is indistinguishable from any other move.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This is not to imply that the Administration’s actions are insignificant, just that despite the rending of garments by the punditry, the market hasn’t determined it matters that much, at least not yet.  I have maintained my view that the dollar remains the best of a bad bunch of fiat currencies given the prospects for US economic activity compared to the rest of the world.  However, it is quite possible that foreign investors will view this action as far too detrimental to the structure of US financial markets and seek to exit, thus driving the dollar much lower.  I did not have this on my bingo card at the beginning of the year, so my views of dollar strength are somewhat tempered at this point.  It will certainly be interesting to see as we go forward.

One other thing to note is that CPI is released this week (exp 2.7% for both headline and core) and Truflation came out last week at 1.8%.  Now, I don’t put great stock in Truflation but there are many who do.  For that contingent, I assume they are aligned with President Trump in his views that Fed funds are too high.  After all, with Fed funds at 3.75%, that is nearly 200bps above the Truflation number.  I have always understood the “appropriate” relation to be closer to 75bps to 100bps above inflation, which if you believe Truflation, means you are looking for cuts.  (PS, this is not my personal view, I am simply highlighting part of the market thought process.)

At any rate, the dollar is under pressure this morning but remains well within its recent trading range.  Turning to commodities, though, that is where the real price action is, with precious metals exploding higher on this news.  We are looking at record highs for gold (+1.6%), silver (+4.6%) with platinum (+3.2%) also much richer, although not back to all-time highs.  If we look at a chart of both gold and silver below, we can see the parabolic nature of silver’s recent move, a situation which should make everyone uncomfortable as parabolic moves frequently signal the end of the line. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But perhaps what makes this more interesting is that there is a substantial amount of supply in both gold and silver due to enter the market as the BCOM index rebalancing began last Friday and continues through Thursday.  Given the dramatic rallies in both metals last year, there is a significant amount to be sold by those funds that track the index.  Estimates are for a total of nearly $7 billion of gold and silver to be sold for the rebalancing, and many expected the metals markets to decline under that pressure.  And perhaps they still will, but today’s moves are the clearest signal that there are many investors who are uncomfortable with the Fed situation.

Remarkably, Venezuela and oil markets have basically disappeared from the conversation at this point.  However, this morning WTI (-0.9%) is giving back some of last week’s gains, and remains well within its recent downtrend, but shows no signs of a sharp break in either direction.

Turning to the other risk spot, equity markets, while US futures are all lower by -0.5% to -0.6% at this hour (7:10), the Fed news has had a mixed impact elsewhere around the world.  For instance, Japan (+1.6%), HK (+1.4%) and China (+0.65%) all had solid sessions with that being the case throughout the region.  Even India (+0.4%) finally managed to go green last night.  And all of this occurred after the Fed news.  One possible explanation is that foreign investors are running home, hence bidding up local shares.  Of course, it is also possible that they don’t believe there is much there, there, and are simply ignoring the news.

In Europe, the situation is different with weakness the general trend as Spain (-0.4%), France (-0.3%) and Italy (-0.15%) all slipping although Germany (+0.3%) has managed to buck the trend absent any specific macro catalyst.  German defense stocks are modestly higher this morning and perhaps threats by President Trump to aid the fomenting Iranian revolution have investors looking for more gains there.  As I often say, markets can be quite perverse for no apparent reason at all.

Finally, bond markets are not really responding to the news in any substantial manner.  Treasury yields have backed up 3bps this morning, but at 4.19%, remain within that long-term trading range and are not signaling flight.  European sovereigns have seen yields edge lower by -1bp across the board, so while modestly better, hardly the sign of massive buying.  And JGB yields were unchanged overnight.  Bonds remain the least interesting space there is of all the markets.

Which takes us to the data this week.

TuesdayNFIB Small Biz Optimism99.5
 CPI0.3% (2.7% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (2.7% Y/Y)
 New Home Sales710K
WednesdayRetail Sales0.4%
 -ex Autos0.3%
 Existing Home Sales4.2M
 Fed’s Beige Book 
ThursdayInitial Claims219K
 Continuing Claims1918K
 Empire State Mfg1.0
 Philly Fed-2.0
FridayIP0.1%
 Capacity Utilization76.0%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition, we get PPI data on Wednesday, but it is all old data, for October and November and, as such, I don’t think it will matter very much at all.  We also hear from 10 different Fed speakers, some several times, over the course of the week.  It will be very interesting to hear how they address the major news overnight regarding the subpoenas, or if they even touch on them.  I expect there will be oblique references to Fed independence at most.

And remember, none of this even considers the ongoing revolution in Iran, which appears to be gaining strength in its third week.  If the theocracy in Iran falls, that will have a very different impact on oil markets than the Venezuela situation.  First, they are currently producing far more oil.  Second, the removal of sanctions there would seemingly reduce the amount of ultra cheap oil that China can import, adding pressure to the Chinese economy, as well as help pressure oil prices lower in general, which would negatively impact Putin’s war chest.  (If Iranian oil is no longer black market, it raises China’s cost, but lower overall prices will reduce further Russia’s sanctioned sale prices).

As to the dollar on the FX markets, this move certainly gives me pause regarding my bullish view, but there seems to be a long way to go before anything really comes of it.  As well, grand jury testimony is secret, so we won’t know about anything that is said anytime soon.  Ultimately, nothing may come of this, no charges of any sort.  Remember, this is a Washington DC grand jury, and so many there disagree with everything that President Trump does, they may not indict for that reason alone.

I’m not willing to make a sweeping statement at this time, but caution in positioning seems like a sensible view.

Good luck

Adf

Remarkable Fragility

Posted on by

JGB yields have
Risen to multi-year heights
Is this why stocks fell?

 

Yesterday I highlighted that 10-year JGB yields had risen to their highest level since 2008.  As you can see below, the same is true for 30-year JGBs and essentially the entire curve there.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ostensibly, this move was triggered by comments from BOJ Governor Ueda indicating that a rate hike was coming this month.  However, the thing I find more interesting is that this move in JGB yields has become the bête noire of markets, now being blamed for every negative thing that happened yesterday.  

For instance, Treasury yields yesterday rose 7bps despite ISM data indicating that manufacturing activity remains sluggish at best.  In fact, the initial response to that data was that it confirmed the Fed will be cutting rates next week.  But the narrative seems to be that Japanese investors are now willing to repatriate funds, selling Treasuries to buy JGBs, in order to invest locally because they are finally getting paid to do so.  Certainly, looking at the chart above shows that Japanese yields had been tantamount to zero for a long time prior to 2024, and even then, have only started to show any real value in the most recent few months.  Of course, real 10-year yields in Japan remain significantly negative based on the latest inflation reading of 3.0%.  The upshot is, rising JGB yields are deemed the cause of Treasury market weakness.

Turning to risk assets, the story is the same for both stocks (which saw US equities decline across the board yesterday) and cryptocurrencies, notably Bitcoin.  Ostensibly, the rise in yields, and the prospect of a rate hike by the BOJ (to just 0.75% mind you) has been cited as the driver of an unwinding in leveraged trades as hedge funds seek to get ahead of having their funding costs rise thus crimping their margins.  

There is no doubt in my mind that the yen has been a critical funding currency for a wide array of carry trades, that is true.  In fact, that has been the case for several decades.  But is 25 basis points really enough to destroy all the strategies that rely on that process?  If so, it demonstrates a remarkable fragility in markets, and one that portends much worse outcomes going forward.  

If we look at the relationship between Bitcoin and 10-year JGBs, it appears that there has been a significant change in tone.  For the past two months, while JGB yields have continued to climb, BTC has broken its correlation with JGBs and has fallen dramatically instead. (see below chart from tradingeconomics.com). When it comes to crypto, I am confident that leverage levels are higher than anywhere else, in fact that seems part of the attraction, so it should not be as surprising to see something of this nature.  But again, it speaks to a very fragile market situation given there was no discernible change in the Japanese yield trend to drive a Bitcoin adjustment.

The upshot here, too, is that rising JGB yields are claimed to be the reason Bitcoin is declining.  In fact, nearly all the commentary of late seems to be focusing on JGBs as the driver of everything.  While I concede that Japanese yields are an important part of the USDJPY discussion, it is difficult for me to assign them blame for everything else.  I have seen numerous commentators explaining that the Japanese have been selling Treasuries because they don’t trust the US, and this has been ongoing for years.  I have also seen commentators explain that because Japanese surpluses had been invested internationally for years and funding so much of the world’s activity, now that they can invest at home, liquidity everywhere will dry up, and asset prices will fall.  

Responding to the first issue, especially with new PM Sanae Takaichi, I do not believe that is a concern at all.  If anything, I expect that the relationship between the US and Japan will deepen.  As to the second issue, that may have more import but the one thing of which we can be sure is that central banks around the world will not allow liquidity to dry up in any meaningful fashion.  Remember, the Fed ended QT yesterday and it won’t be long before the balance sheet starts to grow again, adding liquidity to the system.  One thing I have learned in my many years observing and trading in markets is, there doesn’t need to be a catalyst for markets to move in an unexpected direction.  Certainly not a big picture catalyst.

And with that, let’s look at how markets responded overnight to yesterday’s risk-off session in the US.  Looking at the bond market first, yesterday’s rise in yields was nearly universal with European sovereigns all following the Treasury market’s lead.  And this morning, across the board sovereigns are higher by 1bp, the same as Treasury yields.  While JGB yields didn’t budge overnight, we did see Australia and other regional yields catch up to yesterday’s rise.  I fear bond investors are stuck as they see the potential for inflation, but they also see weakening economic activity as a moderator there.  As an example, the OECD just reduced its US GDP forecast for 2026 to 2.9% this morning, from 3.2%.  Personally, I don’t think anything has changed the run it hot scenario.

In the equity markets, Asian bourses were mixed with Korea (+1.9%) and Taiwan (+0.8%) the notable gainers while elsewhere movement was much less substantial (Japan 0.0%, HK +0.2%, China -0.4%).  There was no single story driving things there.  As to Europe, things are brighter this morning led by Spain (+1.0%) and Italy (+0.5%) although there is no single driving issue here either.  US futures are edging higher at this hour as well, +0.2%, so perhaps yesterday was more like a little profit taking after last week’s strong rally, than anything else.

In the commodity sector, oil (-0.3%) is slipping after yesterday’s rally.  I suppose the potential peace in Ukraine is bearish, but that story has been dragging on for a while so I’m not sure when it will come to fruition.  In the metals markets, after a gangbusters rally yesterday, with silver trading to $59/oz, we are seeing a modest retracement this morning across the board (Au -0.6%, Ag -1.2%, Pt -2.0%) although copper (+0.4%) is holding its gains.  Nothing indicates that these metals have topped.

Finally, the dollar is little changed as I write, giving back some early modest strength.  JPY (-0.3%) continues to be amongst the worst performers, and although it has bounced from its recent lows, remains within a few percent of those levels.  My take here is we will need to see both a more aggressive Fed and a more aggressive BOJ to get USDJPY back to 150 even, let alone further than that.  If we look at the DXY, it is sitting at 99.45, and still well within its trading range for the past 6+ months as per the below.  For now, the dollar remains a secondary story.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, here’s what comes the rest of this week:

WednesdayADP Employment 10K
 IP0.1%
 Capacity Utilization77.3%
 ISM Services52.1
ThursdayInitial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1960K
 Trade Balance -$65.5B
FridayPersonal Income (Sep)0.4%
 Personal Spending (Sep)0.4%
 PCE (Sep)0.3% (2.8% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.2% (2.9% Y/Y)
 Michigan Expectations51.2
 Consumer Credit$10.5B

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As the Fed is in its quiet period, there are no Fed speakers until Powell at the presser next week.  Given the age of the PCE data, I don’t see it having much impact.  Rather, ADP and ISM are likely the things that matter most for now.

Ultimately, I believe more liquidity is going to come to the market via central banks around the world, and that will support risk assets, as well as prices for the things we buy.  Nothing has changed in my view of the dollar either.

Good luck

Adf