Tag Archives: stocks

Spinning More Heads

Posted on by

The speed of the change underway
In global relations today
Is spinning more heads
And tearing more threads
Than ever before, one might say
 
For markets, the question of note
Is how will investors all vote
Are bulls still in charge
Or bears now at large
Who seek, excess profits, to smote

 

It is becoming increasingly difficult to focus only on market activity given the extraordinary breadth of important, non-market activities that are ongoing.  When I think back to previous periods of significant market volatility and uncertainty, it was almost always driven by something endogenous to finance and the economy.  Going back to Black Monday in 1987, or the Thai baht crisis in 1997 or the Russia Default in 1998, the dot-com crash in 2000, and the GFC in the wake of the housing bubble (blown by the Fed) in 2008-09, all these periods of significant market volatility were inward looking.

But not today.  Trump 47 has become the most significant presidency since Ronald Reagan with respect to changing both domestic and international realities.  The key difference is that Mr Reagan worked within the then consensus view of international relations, merely pushing them to the limit while Mr Trump sees those views as constrictions needing to be removed.

In fairness, the world was a very different place in the 1980’s, notably for the fact that China was not a major player in any sphere of economic activity and was essentially ignored.  That is no longer the situation, and the entry of another power player has complicated things.  Arguably, this is why the president sees the old rules as obsolete, they were built for a different time with a different cast of characters.  Regardless, for those of us paying attention to markets, it is imperative to widen our view to include international relations as well as international finance.

With that as preamble, a look at today’s headlines reminds us that keeping up with the news is not for the faint of heart.  Starting with Venezuela and the impact on oil (+1.6%), news sources are littered with articles explaining why the US acted as we did and the potential implications for energy markets and energy producing countries.  From what I can tell, Venezuela recognizes that they are completely beholden to US demands at this point with respect to their oil industry (mining as well I presume although that gets less press).  And you can be sure that means they will be expected to pump more, with US corporate help, and direct their sales to the US, as opposed to Cuba, China and Iran.

Despite today’s rally, it remains my strong opinion that the price of oil has further to decline.  The trend continues to be sharply lower, as per the below chart, and the domestic political demand of reducing gasoline prices is going to keep this particular trend intact, I believe.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

News overnight indicated that two more shadow fleet tankers have been apprehended which is simply all part of the same plan, bring Venezuela back online legitimately with a focus to sell to the US.  The other global issue that is going to weigh on the price of oil are the ongoing protests in Iran which if ultimately successful at overthrowing the Ayatollah’s theocracy, will almost certainly bring Iran back into the brotherhood of nations, and see the end of sanctions on Iranian oil.  While that is bad news for China (and India) who buy a lot of cheap sanctioned oil, it will increase production and weigh on market prices.

The other sector of the commodity markets, metals, have been their own roller coaster of late, with far more volatility than any other product, cryptocurrencies included.  It cannot be a surprise that we are seeing prices retrace after the extraordinary price action over the past several months.  The silver (-4.4%) chart below is the very definition of a parabolic move and history has shown that moves of this nature tend to see, at the very least, short-term sharp reversals, even if the ultimate trend is going to continue.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The underlying features in these markets remain supply shortages, meaning that there is more industrial demand for utilization than there is new supply that comes to market each year.  In silver, the number apparently is ~100 million ounces, and deliveries of physical metal remain the norm these days.  That is a telling feature of the market as historically, cash settlement was sufficient.  Given the recent run, it is no surprise that gold (-0.8%) and platinum (-6.5%) are also declining sharply, but nothing has changed my view that these will trend higher this year.  One last thing about silver (h/t Alyosha), the Bloomberg commodity index (BCOM) is rebalancing next week and given the huge moves in precious metals, along with the lack of change in percentage allocation, there will be significant selling over the course of the next week, upwards of 70 million ounces of silver, which will go a long way to satisfying the shortage this year.  It will be interesting to see if demand remains intact. 

If we turn to the dollar, rumors of its death remain exaggerated.  Certainly, the price action thus far this year, and even over the past six months, points to gradual strength (see chart below from tradingeconomics.com).

Again, I have a hard time understanding the argument that the dollar will decline this year based on the fact that the US economy continues to outperform the rest of the G10, there are substantial inward investment promises that are beginning to be seen (shipbuilding, semiconductors, steel) and the US interest rate structure remains higher than the rest of the G10.  While I understand markets look forward, it is becoming increasingly difficult for me to see the benefits of European monetary policy as a driver for owning the euro, and given their industrial/energy policies are disastrous, I don’t see the rationale.  The same can be said for the pound, I believe.

In today’s session, while the movement is mostly marginal (EUR 0.0%, GBP -0.1%, SEK -0.3%, AUD -0.4%), the trend remains intact and the movement is broad with almost all G10 and EMG currencies slipping a bit further.  Money goes where it is best treated, and I am hard pressed to find other nations that treat money better.  Although…

The equity markets are a bit shakier this morning after two presidential tweets yesterday regarding institutional ownership of housing (he wants to end that for single family homes) and defense company spending priorities (he wants defense companies to end stock buybacks and dividends and invest in R&D and production).  It is not clear to me whether he can successfully force these actions, but his bully pulpit is significant.  These resulted in sharp declines in directly impacted companies, but regarding defense, he also came out of a meeting with Congressional leaders and said he wants to budget there to grow to $1.5 trillion.  

The upshot is confusion here which was evidenced by more weakness than strength in the US session and similarly, declines in Asia (Japan -1.6%, China -0.8%, HK -1.2%).  Elsewhere in the region, India (-0.9%) continues to be the laggard, but there was more red than green overall.  In Europe, red is also today’s color, albeit not as bright as in Asia.  The DAX (-0.2%), CAC (-0.25%) and FTSE 100 (-0.3%) are emblematic of the situation as investors dismissed better than expected German Factory Order data (+5.6%) although the rest of the data released was mostly at expectations.  I guess the question is does Europe treat money better than the US?  I would argue not, but that’s just my view.  Meanwhile, at this hour (7:55), US futures are down slightly, about -0.1% across the board.

Finally, the bond market remains an afterthought almost everywhere.  Perhaps the most amazing thing President Trump has accomplished is to remove the focus on the latest tick in the 10-year bond as a key metric for the economy.  So, this morning, its 1bp rise just leaves it right in that 4.0% – 4.2% range that has existed for months.  Most European sovereign yields edged higher by about 3bps with Germany (+7bps) the outlier here after that strong Factory Orders data.  Also worth noting is that JGB yields slipped -5bps overnight as the market prepares for the first 30-year JGB auction of the year.  Recent 10-year auctions have been received quite well, hence the anticipation of something good here.

On the data front, Initial (exp 210K) and Continuing (1900K) Claims lead the way along with the Trade Balance (-$58.9B) and then Consumer Credit ($10.0B) this afternoon.  Yesterday’s ADP data was a touch softer than expected but the JOLTS data was much worse, showing a decline in job openings of 300K and falling well short of expectations of 7.6M.  At this point, though, to the extent that people are paying attention to the data, tomorrow’s NFP is of far more import I believe.  

The hardest thing about these markets is the White House bingo card and its surprises that can change working assumptions.  Absent something new there, I see the dollar drifting higher helped by both its recent trend and the short-term pullback in metals.  

Good luck

Adf

Talk of the Town

Posted on by

Two things have been talk of the town
First, silver ne’er seems to go down
But also, of late
The Dow’s in a state
Where it wears the daily stock crown
 
But if we dig deeper, we find
Industrials, as they’re defined
Don’t build many things
Instead, they pull strings
As finance and tech are combined

 

Before I start, this will be the last poetry of 2025.  I want to thank all my readers for continuing to read and I certainly hope I both amused you and highlighted one view of what is driving the zeitgeist in markets these days.  FX poetry will return on January 5th with my annual long-form poetic prognostications.  Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukkah and Happy New Year to you all.

So, I was reading my friend JJ’s evening wrap up from yesterday and he highlighted the fact that the DJIA (+1.3%) made a new all-time high in trading and it was led by…Goldman Sachs.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, I have nothing against Goldman Sachs, per se, but it struck me as odd that Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, was a member of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  It’s not that I wasn’t aware of the fact, but for some reason, this mention stuck out.  So, I thought I might look at the current membership of the Dow and see just how industrial it is.

While you will likely not be surprised that it has several non-industrial, service-based companies in the index, you might be surprised by just how many.  For instance, aside from Goldman, JPMorgan, American Express and Visa are in there as well as United Health and Travelers from the insurance space.  There are major retailers like Walmart, Home Depot, Amazon and McDonalds, along with tech and telecom/media names like Microsoft, Salesforce, Disney and Verizon.  

This is not to say that these are misplaced with respect to their relative importance in the US economy, clearly all are major corporations with long histories of profitability.  But it seems odd to list them as industrial.  I would contend that nothing explains the financialization of the US economy better than the fact that 14 out of the 30 members of the DJIA are service companies rather than producers of stuff.  Maybe they should rename it the Dow Jones Major Corporate Index.

To conclude the equity portion of our discussion, yesterday saw the NASDAQ (-0.25%) decline in the face of a broad overall equity rally as there appears to be a rotation of investors from AI into other things like financials (as hopes of another Fed rate cut spring eternal) and power producers as the power needs of AI keep getting estimated ever higher.  This rally was followed pretty much everywhere around the world as regardless of one’s religion, it appears investors are all counting on Santa to deliver higher prices.  In Asia, Tokyo (+1.4%). HK (+1.75%), China (+0.6%), Australia (+1.2%), Korea (+1.4%) and virtually every other market rallied.  The only data of note here was Japanese IP which came in a tick higher than its preliminary forecast, but to counter that, Nikkei reported that the BOJ, when they meet next week, are definitely going to raise the base rate by 25bps to 0.75%, the highest level since 1994.  That doesn’t seem that bullish, but then, I’m not Japanese.

In Europe, the gains are also universal, albeit less impressive with Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.5%) leading the way and Germany and the UK both only marginally higher.  The most interesting news here is about the EU’s efforts to confiscatethe Russian assets that have been frozen since they invaded Ukraine, but which are being blocked by Belgium where they reside under SWIFT.  And as I type (7:45) US futures are mixed with the Dow (+0.2%) still in favor while NASDAQ (-0.5%) continues to lag.

But the other story that is getting press, and arguably more press, is precious metals.  Silver (+0.9% today, +10% this week, +122% this year) is the leader and is now trading above $64/oz.  This is the very definition of a parabolic move, which is obvious when you look at the silver chart for the past 5 years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Referring back to JJ’s note, it is important to understand he is a commodity trader of long standing (remarkably even longer than my time in FX) and he discussed silver from an insider’s perspective.  The essence of the issue here is that there are quite a few paper short positions that have existed for a long time.  The rumor has long been that JPMorgan has been preventing silver from rising by playing in futures markets.  But now, real demand, between industrial users (solar panels and electronics) and Asian retail demand from both India and China is far higher than new supply or recovery from scrap, to the tune of 120 million oz/year, and those shorts cannot find the metal to deliver.  The last time there was a squeeze, when the Hunt’s tried to corner the market in 1980, people lined up at stores to sell their silver tea services, bringing metal to the market.  But those are all gone.  I’m not sure what will change this in the short run, but it cannot go up forever.  With that in mind, though, I think precious metals have much further to run as the ongoing debasement of fiat currencies simply adds further to demand.  

Silver managed to drag gold (+1.1% today, +3.0% this week, +65% this year) and platinum (+3.6% today, +7.2% this week, +98% this year) along for the ride and I expect this will continue across the board.  Meanwhile oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning but has fallen -4.0% this week.  The news that the US boarded a Venezuelan oil tanker and took control in an effort to pressure Maduro didn’t seem to concern anyone in the market.  This trend remains clear.  

As to the bond market, this morning yields are higher by 2bps, pretty much across the board of Treasuries and all European sovereigns.  But with that in mind, the 10-year Treasury is still yielding 4.18%, below its worst level immediately following the FOMC meeting, and as I mentioned above, there appears to be a growing belief that Powell’s concern about the labor market will result in more cuts sooner rather than later.  While that is not really playing out in the futures market yet, as you can see below with the next cut priced for April with a 76% probability, that is the narrative that is being promulgated in FinX.  

Source: cmegroup.com

Next week we will get the November NFP report (exp 35K) and all the data we missed in October.  I can assure you if that comes in weak, the idea of a rate cut will explode onto the scene once again.  Too, on Wednesday evening, the WSJpublished an article indicating that Chairman Powell is concerned the employment data is overstating things because of the flaws in the birth/death model.  The point is he may be far more inclined to cut if next Tuesday’s report is weak.

Finally, the dollar is…still here.  It sold off after the Fed, and as I showed yesterday, has fallen back to the middle of its trading range of the past 6 months.  I keep reading how the dollar is the key, but quite frankly, I’m not certain what that key will unlock.  We need out of consensus activities to change the current situation.  After all, the underlying demand for dollars because of the trillions of dollars of debt outstanding outside of the US makes it difficult to get too bearish without a major reason.  If the Fed cut 50bps intermeeting, that would do it, but I’m not holding my breath.

And that’s really it my friends.  There is no data today although we do hear from three Fed speakers.  Given the dissent on the FOMC, I expect that we are going to be need to keep score as to views for a while when these folks speak. 

In the meantime, as I said above, have a wonderful holiday all

Adf

Crazier Still

Posted on by

There once was a time when the Fed
When meeting, and looking ahead
All seemed to agree
The future they’d see
And wrote banal statements, when read
 
But this time is different, it’s true
Though those words most folks should eschew
‘Cause nobody knows
Which way the wind blows
As true data’s hard to construe
 
So, rather than voting as one
Three members, the Chairman, did shun
But crazier still
The dot plot did kill
The idea much more can be done

 

I think it is appropriate to start this morning’s discussion with the dot plot, which as I, and many others, expected showed virtually no consensus as to what the future holds with respect to Federal Reserve monetary policy.  For 2026, the range of estimates by the 19 FOMC members is 175 basis points, the widest range I have ever seen.  Three members see a 25bp hike in 2026 and one member (likely Governor Miran) sees 150bps of cuts.  They can’t all be right!  But even if we look out to the longer run, the range of estimates is 125bps wide.

Personally, I am thrilled at this outcome as it indicates that instead of the Chairman browbeating everyone into agreeing with his/her view, which had been the history for the past 40 years, FOMC members have demonstrated they are willing to express a personal view.

Now, generally markets hate uncertainty of this nature, and one might have thought that equity markets, especially, would be negatively impacted by this outcome.  But, since the unwritten mandate of the Fed is to ensure that stock markets never decline, they were able to paper over the lack of consensus by explaining they will be buying $40 billion/month of T-bills to make sure that bank reserves are “ample”.  QT has ended, and while they will continue to go out of their way to explain this is not QE, and perhaps technically it is not, they are still promising to pump nearly $500 billion /year into the economy by expanding their balance sheet.  One cannot be surprised that initially, much of that money is going to head into financial markets, hence today’s rally.

However, if you want to see just how out of touch the Fed is with reality, a quick look at their economic projections helps disabuse you of the notion that there is really much independent thought in the Marriner Eccles Building.  As you can see below, they continue to believe that inflation will gradually head back to their target, that growth will slow, unemployment will slip and that Fed funds have room to decline from here.

I have frequently railed against the Fed and their models, highlighting time and again that their models are not fit for purpose.  It is abundantly clear that every member has a neo-Keynesian model that was calibrated in the wake of the Dot com bubble bursting when interest rates in the US first were pushed down to 0.0% while consumer inflation remained quiescent as all the funds went into financial assets.  One would think that the experience of 2022-23, when inflation soared forcing them to hike rates in the most aggressive manner in history, would have resulted in some second thoughts.  But I cannot look at the table above and draw that conclusion.  Perhaps this will help you understand the growth in the meme, end the fed.

To sum it all up, FOMC members have no consensus on how to behave going forward but they decided that expanding the balance sheet was the right thing to do.  Perhaps they do have an idea, but given inflation is showing no signs of heading back to their target, they decided that the esoterica of the balance sheet will hide their activities more effectively than interest rate announcements.

One of the key talking points this morning revolves around the dollar in the FX markets and how now that the Fed has cut rates again, while the ECB is set to leave them on hold, and the BOJ looks likely to raise them next week, that the greenback will fall further.  Much continues to be made of the fact that the dollar fell about 12% during the first 6 months of 2025, although a decline of that magnitude during a 6-month time span is hardly unique, it was the first such decline that happened during the first 6 months of the year, in 50 years or so.  In other words, much ado about nothing.  

The latest spin, though, is look for the dollar to decline sharply after the rate cut.  I have a hard time with this concept for a few reasons.  First, given the obvious uncertainty of future Fed activity, as per the dot plot, it is unclear the Fed is going to aggressively cut rates from this level anytime soon.  And second, a look at the history of the dollar in relation to Fed activity doesn’t really paint that picture.  The below chart of the euro over the past five years shows that the single currency fell during the initial stages of the Fed’s panic rate hikes in 2022 then rallied back sharply as they continued.  Meanwhile, during the latter half of 2024, the dollar rallied as the Fed cut rates and then declined as they remained on hold.   My point is, the recent history is ambiguous at best regarding the dollar’s response to a given Fed move.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I have maintained that if the Fed cuts aggressively, it will undermine the dollar.  However, nothing about yesterday’s FOMC meeting tells me they are about to embark on an aggressive rate cutting binge.

The other noteworthy story this morning is the outcome from China’s Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC).  I have described several times that the President Xi’s government claims they are keen to help support domestic consumption and the housing market despite neither of those things having occurred during the past several years.  Well, Bloomberg was nice enough to create a table highlighting the CEWC’s statements this year and compare them to the past two years.  I have attached it below.

In a testament to the fact that bureaucrats speak the same language, no matter their native tongue, a look at the changes in Fiscal Policy or Top Priority Task, or even Real Estate shows that nothing has changed but the order of the words.  The very fact that they need to keep repeating themselves can readily be explained by the fact that the previous year’s efforts failed.  Why will this time be different?

Ok, a quick tour of markets.   Apparently, Asia was not enamored of the FOMC outcome with Tokyo (-0.9%) and China (-0.9%) both sliding although HK managed to stay put.  Elsewhere in the region, both Korea (-0.6%) and Taiwan (-1.3%) were also under pressure as most markets here were in the red.  The exceptions were India, Malaysia and the Philippines, all of which managed gains of 0.5% or so.  

In Europe, things are a little brighter with modest gains the order of the day led by Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.4%) although both Germany and the UK are barely higher at this hour.  There was no data released in Europe this morning although the SNB did meet and leave rates on hold at 0.0% as universally expected.  There has been a little bit of ECB speak, with several members highlighting that ECB policy is independent of Fed policy but that if Fed cuts force the dollar lower, they may feel the need to respond as a higher euro would reduce inflation.  Alas for the stock market bulls in the US, futures this morning are pointing lower led by the NASDAQ (-0.7%) although that is on the back of weaker than expected Oracle earnings results last night.  Perhaps promising to spend $5 trillion on AI is beginning to be seen as unrealistic, although I doubt that is the case 🤔.

Turning to the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps overnight after falling -5bps yesterday.  Similar price action has been seen elsewhere with European sovereign yields slipping slightly and even JGB yields down -2bps overnight.  Personally, I am a bit confused by this as I have been assured that the Fed cutting rates in this economy would result in a steeper yield curve with long-dated rates rising even though the front end falls.  Perhaps I am reading the data wrong.

In the commodity markets, the one truth is that there are no sellers in the silver market.  It is higher by another 0.5% this morning and above $62/oz as whatever games had been played in the past to cap its price seem to have fallen apart.  Physical demand for the stuff outstrips new supply by about 120 million oz /year, and new mines are scarce on the ground.  This feels like there is further room to run.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the space, gold (-0.2%) which had a nice day yesterday is consolidating, as is copper.  Turning to oil (-1.1%) it continues to drift lower, dragging gasoline along for the ride, something that must make the president quite happy.  You know my views here.

As to the dollar writ large, while it sold off a bit yesterday, as you can see from the below DXY (-0.3%) chart, it is hardly making new ground, rather it is back to the middle of its 6-month range.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This morning more currencies are a bit stronger but in the G10, CHF (+0.45%) is the leader with everything else far less impactful.  And on the flip side, INR (-0.7%) has traded to yet another historic low (USD high) as the new RBI governor has decided not to waste too much money on intervention.  Oh yeah, JPY (+0.2%) has gotten some tongues wagging as now that the Fed cut and the BOJ is ostensibly getting set to hike, there is more concern about the unwind of the carry trade.  My view is, don’t worry unless the BOJ hikes 50bps and promises a lot more on the way.  After all, if the Fed has finished cutting, something that cannot be ruled out, this entire thesis will be destroyed.

On the data front, Initial (exp 220K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims are coming as well as the Trade Balance (-$63.3B).  There are no Fed speakers on the docket, but I imagine we will hear from some anyway, as they cannot seem to shut up.  

It would not surprise me to see the dollar head toward the bottom of this trading range, but I think we need a much stronger catalyst than uncertainty from the Fed to break the range.

Good luck

Adf

It Won’t End Well

Posted on by

From Europe, we’re hearing some squawks
They’ve not been included in talks
‘Bout war and Ukraine
So, to inflict pain
They’ve threatened a US detox
 
It seems they believe if they sell
All Treasuries held we would yell
Please stop, it’s too much
And lighten our touch
Methinks, for them, it won’t end well

 

Markets continue to be dull these days.  While we are clearly not in the summer (it is 15° here in NJ this morning), doldrums certainly seem to be descriptive of the current situation.  Equities bounce back and forth each day, neither trading to new highs, nor falling sharply.  The same is true with the dollar, with oil, with gold of late and even, on a slightly longer-term view, of Treasury bonds.  I guess that could be the exception, depending on your horizon, but as you can see from the chart below, it has been several months since 10-year yields have traded outside the 4.0% – 4.2% range.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, much digital ink has been spilled trying to explain that the latest 15bp rise in yields is a signal that the US economy is about to collapse under the weight of its $38+ trillion in debt, but I sense that is more about reporters trying to get clicks on their articles than a reflection of reality.

However, this morning I saw a story that I think is worth discussing, even though it is only a hypothetical.  Making the rounds is the story that Europe and the UK are extremely unhappy with President Trump’s approach to obtaining a peace in Ukraine and so have threatened their so-called ‘nuclear option’ of selling all their Treasury holdings to crash the US bond market and the US economy alongside it.  From what I have seen, if you sum up all the holdings in Europe and the UK it totals $2.3 trillion or so, although it is not clear if that is controlled by the governments, or there are private holdings included.  My strong suspicion is the latter, although I have not yet been able to confirm that.

But let’s assume those holdings are completely under the control of European central banks and governments and they decide that’s what they want to do.  What do you think will happen?  Arguably, much depends on how they go about selling them.  After all, it’s not as though there is anybody, other than the Fed, who can step up and show a bid on the full amount.  So how can they do this?  I figure there are only two viable options:

  1. They can sell them slowly and steadily over time, perhaps $200 billion/day (FYI daily Treasury market volume averages about $900 billion).  That would clearly put significant downward pressure on prices and push yields higher but would likely encourage the hedge fund community to double up on the bond basis trade thus slowing the decline.  However, if they did that for 11 days, US yields would undoubtedly be higher.  Too, remember that if the market started to get unstable, the Fed would step in and absorb whatever amount they deemed necessary to prevent things from getting out of hand.
  • Perhaps, since their ostensible goal is to destabilize the US bond market, they would literally all coordinate their timing and try to sell them all at once.  At that point, since nothing happens in the bond market without the Fed being aware, it would likely have an even smaller impact as the Fed would certainly step in and take down the entire lot.  After all, through QT, their balance sheet has shrunk about $2.3 trillion over the past 18 months, so they have plenty of capacity.

My point is, I believe this is an empty threat, as it seems most European threats tend to be.  Consider that the Eurodollar market remains the major source of funding throughout Europe, and it requires collateral (i.e. Treasury bills and bonds) in order to function.  If Europe no longer had that collateral, it feels like they might have a lot more problems funding anything on the continent.  

Another issue is that if we assume they successfully sell all their Treasuries, that means they will be holding $2.3 trillion in cash.  Exactly what are they going to do with that?  If they convert it into euros and pounds, the dollar will certainly fall sharply, meaning both the euro and pound will rise sharply.  Please explain how that will help their economies and their exporters.  They are getting killed right now because their energy policies have made manufacturing ridiculously expensive.  See how many cars VW or Mercedes sells overseas if the euro rallies 15%.

Now, the article linked above is from the Daily Express, not a website I trust, but they reference a WSJ article.  However, despite searching the Journal, and asking Grok to do the same, I can find no actual article that mentions this idea.  Ostensibly, if you want to search, it came out on December 1st, although if that is the case, why is it only getting press now?

It is a sign of the absence of market news that this is a story at all.  With market participants inhaling deeply so they may hold their breath until 2:00 tomorrow afternoon when the FOMC statement is released, they need something to do.  I guess this was today’s distraction.  As I said above, this is clickbait, not reality.

Ok, let’s tour markets. US equity market slipped a bit yesterday and Asian markets were dull as well with modest gains and losses almost everywhere.  The exception was HK (-1.3%) which suffered based on concern the FOMC will provide a ‘hawkish’ cut tomorrow and that will be the end of the road.  But China (-0.5%) was also soft despite hopes that when the Politburo meets in the next weeks, they will focus on more domestic stimulus (🤣🤣) just like they have been saying for the past three years.  Australia (-0.5%) slipped as the RBA left rates on hold and sounded more hawkish, indicating there were no cuts in the offing.

European bourses are mixed, although starting to lean lower.  The CAC (-0.6%) is the laggard here although Italy and Spain are also softer while Germany (+0.2%) leads the gainers after a slightly better than expected Trade Balance was reported this morning.  The hiccup here is that the balance improved because imports fell (-1.2%) so much more than exports rose (0.1%).  Hardly the sign of economic strength.

We’ve discussed bonds on a big picture basis, and recall, yields rose yesterday in both the US and Europe.  This morning, though, yields are little changed in the US and in Europe, with sovereign yields, if anything slightly lower.  JGB yields also slipped -1bp last night and the big mover was Australia after the RBA, with yields climbing 5bps.

In the commodity markets, while the trend remains slightly lower in oil (+0.3%), as you can see from the chart below, $60/bbl is home.  As I have written before, absent an invasion of Venezuela or peace in Ukraine, it is hard to see what changes this for now.  I guess if China stops filling up its SPR, demand could shrink and that would accelerate the decline.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the metals markets, $4200/oz has become gold’s (+0.3%) home lately while silver (+0.9%) has found comfort between $58/oz and $59/oz.  Neither is seeing much in the way of volatility or new interest, but both trends remain strongly higher. 

Finally, the dollar, which rallied a bit yesterday, is little changed this morning.  USDJPY is interesting as it has traded back above 156 this morning, contradicting all that talk of a Japanese repatriation trade.  Again, it is difficult for me to look at the yen chart below and conclude the dollar has peaked.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Elsewhere in the space, this is one of those days where 0.2% is a major move.  Historically, December is not a time when FX traders are active.

On the data front, the NFIB report rose to 99.0 this morning, its highest reading in three months and the underlying comments showed a modest increase in optimism with many businesses looking to hire more people but having trouble finding qualified candidates.  This is quite a juxtaposition with the narrative that small businesses are firing workers that I have read in several different places and is backed by things like the recent Challenger Gray survey which indicated that US businesses have fired more than 1.1 million workers so far this year.  This lack of clarity is not going to help the FOMC make decisions, that’s for sure.  As to the rest, the ADP Weekly Survey is due to be released as well as JOLTS Job Openings (7.2M) and Leading Indicators (-0.3%) at 10:00.

The very fact that the biggest story I could find was a hypothetical is indicative of the idea that there is nothing going on.  Look for a quiet one as market participants await Powell and friends tomorrow.

Good luck

Adf

Remarkable Fragility

Posted on by

JGB yields have
Risen to multi-year heights
Is this why stocks fell?

 

Yesterday I highlighted that 10-year JGB yields had risen to their highest level since 2008.  As you can see below, the same is true for 30-year JGBs and essentially the entire curve there.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ostensibly, this move was triggered by comments from BOJ Governor Ueda indicating that a rate hike was coming this month.  However, the thing I find more interesting is that this move in JGB yields has become the bête noire of markets, now being blamed for every negative thing that happened yesterday.  

For instance, Treasury yields yesterday rose 7bps despite ISM data indicating that manufacturing activity remains sluggish at best.  In fact, the initial response to that data was that it confirmed the Fed will be cutting rates next week.  But the narrative seems to be that Japanese investors are now willing to repatriate funds, selling Treasuries to buy JGBs, in order to invest locally because they are finally getting paid to do so.  Certainly, looking at the chart above shows that Japanese yields had been tantamount to zero for a long time prior to 2024, and even then, have only started to show any real value in the most recent few months.  Of course, real 10-year yields in Japan remain significantly negative based on the latest inflation reading of 3.0%.  The upshot is, rising JGB yields are deemed the cause of Treasury market weakness.

Turning to risk assets, the story is the same for both stocks (which saw US equities decline across the board yesterday) and cryptocurrencies, notably Bitcoin.  Ostensibly, the rise in yields, and the prospect of a rate hike by the BOJ (to just 0.75% mind you) has been cited as the driver of an unwinding in leveraged trades as hedge funds seek to get ahead of having their funding costs rise thus crimping their margins.  

There is no doubt in my mind that the yen has been a critical funding currency for a wide array of carry trades, that is true.  In fact, that has been the case for several decades.  But is 25 basis points really enough to destroy all the strategies that rely on that process?  If so, it demonstrates a remarkable fragility in markets, and one that portends much worse outcomes going forward.  

If we look at the relationship between Bitcoin and 10-year JGBs, it appears that there has been a significant change in tone.  For the past two months, while JGB yields have continued to climb, BTC has broken its correlation with JGBs and has fallen dramatically instead. (see below chart from tradingeconomics.com). When it comes to crypto, I am confident that leverage levels are higher than anywhere else, in fact that seems part of the attraction, so it should not be as surprising to see something of this nature.  But again, it speaks to a very fragile market situation given there was no discernible change in the Japanese yield trend to drive a Bitcoin adjustment.

The upshot here, too, is that rising JGB yields are claimed to be the reason Bitcoin is declining.  In fact, nearly all the commentary of late seems to be focusing on JGBs as the driver of everything.  While I concede that Japanese yields are an important part of the USDJPY discussion, it is difficult for me to assign them blame for everything else.  I have seen numerous commentators explaining that the Japanese have been selling Treasuries because they don’t trust the US, and this has been ongoing for years.  I have also seen commentators explain that because Japanese surpluses had been invested internationally for years and funding so much of the world’s activity, now that they can invest at home, liquidity everywhere will dry up, and asset prices will fall.  

Responding to the first issue, especially with new PM Sanae Takaichi, I do not believe that is a concern at all.  If anything, I expect that the relationship between the US and Japan will deepen.  As to the second issue, that may have more import but the one thing of which we can be sure is that central banks around the world will not allow liquidity to dry up in any meaningful fashion.  Remember, the Fed ended QT yesterday and it won’t be long before the balance sheet starts to grow again, adding liquidity to the system.  One thing I have learned in my many years observing and trading in markets is, there doesn’t need to be a catalyst for markets to move in an unexpected direction.  Certainly not a big picture catalyst.

And with that, let’s look at how markets responded overnight to yesterday’s risk-off session in the US.  Looking at the bond market first, yesterday’s rise in yields was nearly universal with European sovereigns all following the Treasury market’s lead.  And this morning, across the board sovereigns are higher by 1bp, the same as Treasury yields.  While JGB yields didn’t budge overnight, we did see Australia and other regional yields catch up to yesterday’s rise.  I fear bond investors are stuck as they see the potential for inflation, but they also see weakening economic activity as a moderator there.  As an example, the OECD just reduced its US GDP forecast for 2026 to 2.9% this morning, from 3.2%.  Personally, I don’t think anything has changed the run it hot scenario.

In the equity markets, Asian bourses were mixed with Korea (+1.9%) and Taiwan (+0.8%) the notable gainers while elsewhere movement was much less substantial (Japan 0.0%, HK +0.2%, China -0.4%).  There was no single story driving things there.  As to Europe, things are brighter this morning led by Spain (+1.0%) and Italy (+0.5%) although there is no single driving issue here either.  US futures are edging higher at this hour as well, +0.2%, so perhaps yesterday was more like a little profit taking after last week’s strong rally, than anything else.

In the commodity sector, oil (-0.3%) is slipping after yesterday’s rally.  I suppose the potential peace in Ukraine is bearish, but that story has been dragging on for a while so I’m not sure when it will come to fruition.  In the metals markets, after a gangbusters rally yesterday, with silver trading to $59/oz, we are seeing a modest retracement this morning across the board (Au -0.6%, Ag -1.2%, Pt -2.0%) although copper (+0.4%) is holding its gains.  Nothing indicates that these metals have topped.

Finally, the dollar is little changed as I write, giving back some early modest strength.  JPY (-0.3%) continues to be amongst the worst performers, and although it has bounced from its recent lows, remains within a few percent of those levels.  My take here is we will need to see both a more aggressive Fed and a more aggressive BOJ to get USDJPY back to 150 even, let alone further than that.  If we look at the DXY, it is sitting at 99.45, and still well within its trading range for the past 6+ months as per the below.  For now, the dollar remains a secondary story.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, here’s what comes the rest of this week:

WednesdayADP Employment 10K
 IP0.1%
 Capacity Utilization77.3%
 ISM Services52.1
ThursdayInitial Claims220K
 Continuing Claims1960K
 Trade Balance -$65.5B
FridayPersonal Income (Sep)0.4%
 Personal Spending (Sep)0.4%
 PCE (Sep)0.3% (2.8% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.2% (2.9% Y/Y)
 Michigan Expectations51.2
 Consumer Credit$10.5B

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As the Fed is in its quiet period, there are no Fed speakers until Powell at the presser next week.  Given the age of the PCE data, I don’t see it having much impact.  Rather, ADP and ISM are likely the things that matter most for now.

Ultimately, I believe more liquidity is going to come to the market via central banks around the world, and that will support risk assets, as well as prices for the things we buy.  Nothing has changed in my view of the dollar either.

Good luck

Adf

The Whisperer’s Roar

Posted on by

Most focus is still on the Fed
And what every Fed speaker said
But do not ignore
The Whisperer’s roar
That Jay’s got the votes, rates to shred
 
And this is why markets are soaring
While bond vigilantes are snoring
But, too, it’s why gold
Is bought and not sold
The question is, whose ox Jay’s goring?

 

One thing that is very clear right now, the demand for lower interest rates is extremely widespread, regardless of one’s political persuasion.  People may despise everything that President Trump has done or claims he will do, but those same folks are desperate for him to be able to force the Fed to cut rates further.  At least that’s my observation.  

But putting that aside, the narrative around next month’s FOMC meeting seems to be coming to a clearer point; a cut is in the cards, but a potentially long delay in the next move will follow.  While there were no Fed speakers on the calendar, at least the calendar I use, yesterday, we did hear from two more, the presidents of San Francisco and Boston, and though the former, renowned dove Mary Daly, was far more forthright in her views a cut was appropriate, the latter, centrist Susan Collins, clearly was amenable to the idea, though not forcefully so.  But we know that Chair Powell cares since the Fed Whisperer, Nick Timiraos, got top billing in this morning’s WSJ with the following article, “Fed Chair Powell’s Allies Provide Opening for December Rate Cut.”  

As this story was coming into view yesterday, we saw equity markets rise sharply in the US, or at least the tech portion (the DJIA managed only a 0.4% gain compared to the NASDAQ’s 2.7% jump).  We also have seen the Fed funds futures market up the pricing of a rate cut to 81% as of this morning, with the concerns last week about Powell’s hawkishness quickly forgotten.  One other thing of note was the strong rally in precious metals, with gold (0.0% this morning, +1.8% yesterday) and silver (-0.3% this morning, +2.6% yesterday) responding to the imminent further debasement of the dollar.  While both remain somewhat below their October highs, nothing indicates that their trends higher have ended.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There continues to be a lot of discussion on two fronts, the state of the economy and the rationale for further equity market gains, and interestingly, they are completely independent discussions.  For the former, the dribs and drabs of data that have been released since the end of the government shutdown have been inconclusive as to what is going on, at least officially.  Yesterday brought nothing new, although this morning we are due to see September data on Retail Sales (exp 0.3%, 0.3% ex autos), PPI (2.7% for both headline and core) and House Prices (+1.4% Case Shiller) along with November Consumer Confidence (93.5, down slightly from last month).  It hardly seems this will change any views

But the market conversation is completely different.  Between talk of a Santa rally, the popping of the AI bubble (assuming there is such a thing) and growing certainty that a Fed cut will help goose the stock market, that economic uncertainty means nothing.  There remains a large swath of investors who are certain the Fed will not allow equity markets to fall in any meaningful fashion and who are prepared to continue to buy the dip.  

Interestingly, the place where these two issues meet, earnings forecasts, shows that while fixed income investors may feel uncertain about the economy’s future, 2026 earnings estimates of 14% growth have equity investors in a very different place.  While I don’t know which side is correct, I suspect that the ‘run it hot’ philosophy which has been driving everything this administration does will favor equities over bonds.  While a correction is still likely in my mind, there is still nothing to stop this train!  

Ok, let’s turn to market performance overnight.  Japan (+0.1%) didn’t love the US tech story, which is somewhat surprising, although that may be because there continues to be growing concern regarding the JGB market and the spat with China.  China (+1.0%) and HK (+0.7%) however, both rallied on the US rate cut plus tech rally story.  Taiwan (+1.5%) and Thailand (+1.3%) also liked that story, but the rest of Asia was nonplussed, and more exchanges saw weakness than strength.  As to Europe, nobody there has a strong view this morning with every major bourse +/- 0.15% or less.  The only data was German GDP, which rose to…0.0% for Q3 and clocked in at +0.3% Y/Y! Look at the history of German economic activity over the past 3 years below and ask yourself if this is the powerhouse of Europe, why would anyone want to own any European assets?

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As well, the increased focus on a potential peace in Ukraine may be a negative for the continent.  While it has the potential to help them on the energy side, much of the rally seen across these nations was predicated on the military buildup that was coming.  However, if there is peace, I sense it will be difficult for a group of nations that are massively in debt to convince their populations to borrow more to defend themselves since the threat has abated.  After all, I’m willing to wager there isn’t a single person in the EU who if given the choice between defense spending for a potential future threat or an increased pension will opt for the former.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:25) they are unchanged.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning after slipping another few basis points yesterday and are sitting at 4.03%.  Either the market is sanguine about the ongoing federal deficit spending or…everybody assumes the Fed is going to restart QE in some form or another if things start to deteriorate.  European sovereign yields are slipping this morning, down between -1bp and -3bps, with the UK on the larger end despite (because of?) tomorrow’s Budget announcement.  

While you may think the US has a fiscal problem, and it does, at least it has the global reserve currency and with it, the ability to live beyond its means for a long time.  The UK, however, simply has the first part, a fiscal problem, which they have exacerbated by adopting the most idiotic energy policies in the world (who would ever have thought that solar power made sense in the UK given the fact it rains, on average, 50% of the days in the year.)  It is unclear to me what the UK can do to right the ship with the current government and its stated priorities.  I suppose that we will see new regulations requiring UK financial institutions to hold more Gilts as otherwise nobody will buy them.  Before I leave this asset class, I cannot ignore the JGB market where back-end yields continue to climb.  As you can see from the below chart, the 10-, 30-, and 40-year yields are all at record highs and show no signs of stopping their multi-year rise.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I had a long conversation with Charlie Garcia on Substack, someone you should all follow as he has very sharp ideas, on the causes, ramifications and potential outcomes of this unprecedented rise in yields there.  Needless to say, the end game will not be very good for anyone, but the timing remains in question.  As Keynes warned us all, markets can remain wrong longer than you can remain solvent.  But Japan has its own, unique fiscal problems along with every other nation in the world.

Turning to commodities, oil (-0.3%) continues to be the least interesting thing around, drifting slowly lower, but at an increasingly leisurely pace.  The glut narrative has calmed down, but I think there is more concern over the weakening economic story.  Hard for me to say from the outside, but lower is the direction of travel here.  The opposite is true for NatGas (-3.3%) which despite today’s decline is up 55% since October 16th!

Finally, the dollar is under modest pressure today with both the euro and pound stronger by 0.2%, a move that describes almost the entire G10.  One outlier here is NOK (-0.2%) which is clearly suffering on oil’s ongoing weakness.  In the EMG bloc, though, there has been more substantial movement with KRW (+0.7%) rising as traders position for the BOK to remain on hold while the Fed gets ready to cut, thus reversing some of the recent 7% decline in the won over the past quarter.  The CE3 have also rallied nicely, on the order of 0.5%, as they continue to demonstrate their excessive beta with the euro and even CNY (+0.3%) is moving this morning on the back of a potential thaw in relations between the US and China after Presidents Xi and Trump spoke by phone yesterday.  While my long-term perspective on the dollar remains positive, if the Fed does get aggressive, the greenback can certainly come under short-term pressure.

And that’s really all there is today.  With Thanksgiving coming, I expect that volumes will begin to decline so keep that in mind when trying to execute any trades.

Good luck

Adf

Divergent Views

Posted on by

This morning, we all must feel blessed
Nvidia is still the best
Its’s earnings were great
Which opened the gate
For buyers, much more, to invest
 
But contra to that piece of news
The Minutes showed divergent views
On whether to slash
Next month, rates for cash
Or else wait for more weakness clues

 

Whatever your view of AI and the entire discussion, one must be impressed with Nvidia’s performance as a company, and as an equity.  Last night’s earnings release was clearly better than expected as CEO Jensen Huang indicated that revenues for Q1 should grow to ~$65 billion as there is still significant demand for the buildout of data centers.  He also pushed back on the idea that AI was a bubble.  Of course, he would do that given he is at the center of the discussion.  Nonetheless, after modest gains in US equities yesterday, despite much more hawkish than expected FOMC Minutes (discussed below), US futures are rising sharply this morning, with NASDAQ futures currently higher by 1.6% (6:15) and taking all the indices with it.  Life is good!

Which takes us to the FOMC Minutes and our first look at dissention in the Eccles building.  I think the following paragraph, directly from the Minutes [emphasis added], does a good job in describing the wide range of views that currently exist around the table at the Fed, and make no mistake, I am hugely in favor of a wide range of views as I would contend it has been the groupthink in the past that led us to the current, unfavorable situation.

“In considering the outlook for monetary policy, participants expressed a range of views about the degree to which the current stance of monetary policy was restrictive. Some participants assessed that the Committee’s policy stance would be restrictive even after a potential 1/4 percentage point reduction in the policy rate at this meeting. By contrast, some participants pointed to the resilience of economic activity, supportive financial conditions, or estimates of short-term real interest rates as indicating that the stance of monetary policy was not clearly restrictive. In discussing the near-term course of monetary policy, participants expressed strongly differing views about what policy decision would most likely be appropriate at the Committee’s December meeting.”

Below I have copied the dot plot from the September meeting, which contra to most previous versions shows a particularly wide range of views regarding the future level of Fed funds.  I have to wonder, though, after reading the Minutes, if those dots will be stretched even wider apart from top to bottom in the December report.

Of course, our interest is how did the market respond to this release?  Well, it can be no surprise that the Fed funds futures market repriced further and is now showing just a 32% probability for a cut next month and 78% probability of the next cut coming in January.  That said, the market remains convinced that rates must go lower over time, something that does not appear in sync with equity market growth expectations and seems to be completely ignoring the announced inward investment flows to the US from around the world.

Source: cmegroup.com

As to the equity market response, the two vertical lines show the release of the Minutes and then the release of Nvidia earnings.  You can see for yourself which matters more to the market.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Between the GDPNow data, which continues to show growth remains robust, and more announcements of inward investment on the back of trade deals, with the Saudis ostensibly promising $1 trillion after the recent White House dinner, I will take the over on future economic activity.  Remember, too, the government is actively supporting mining, drilling and manufacturing and all of that is going to feed into economic growth here.  My view is the Fed funds futures market is completely wrong, and we will not see rates back at the 3.0% level anytime in the next few years.  I’m not suggesting we won’t see an equity market correction, just that the end is not nigh.

Each day the yen slides
Intervention creeps closer
Yen traders beware

Turning to the dollar, it continues to strengthen across the board with the DXY trading back above 100 this morning, and now that the Fed seems more hawkish, looking like it may have legs.  But let us focus on the yen, quite beleaguered of late, as it appears to be accelerating its downfall.  Not only is this evident on the chart below, but we also have heard concerns for the third time, as per the following quotes from Minoru Kihara, the chief cabinet secretary:

“The yen is experiencing sudden, one-way movements that are concerning and which require close monitoring.  Excessive fluctuations and disorderly movements in exchange rates must be monitored with vigilance.  We are concerned about the recent one-way and sudden movements in the foreign exchange market. It’s important for exchange rates to remain stable, reflecting fundamentals.”

In the past six months, the yen has fallen >10% vs. the dollar and is lower by nearly 4% in the past month.  At the same time, JGB yields are starting to accelerate higher, trading to yet another 20-year high at 1.82% and the price action there is remarkably similar to that of USDJPY as per the below chart.  The problem for the JGB market is the BOJ already owns more than 50% of the outstanding debt, so buying more doesn’t seem to be a solution, whereas buying JPY in the FX market will have an impact, albeit short-term if they don’t change policies.   

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The upshot of all this is the world is awash in debt, with global debt/GDP exceeding 3x.  The lesson is that not all this debt will be repaid, in fact probably not that much at all.  Be careful as to what you hold.

Ok, let’s briefly tour the markets I have not yet touched.  Tokyo equities (+2.65%) loved the Nvidia earnings as did Korea (+1.9%), Taiwan (+3.2%) and most of Asia although China (-0.5%) and HK (0.0%) didn’t play along last night.  I guess the ongoing restrictions on sales of Nvidia chips to China is still a negative there, as are recurring concerns over the property market as there is talk of yet another attempt to fix things by the government.  Europe, too, is firmer this morning, although clearly not on tech bullishness given the lack of tech on which to be bullish.  But there is talk of a Russia/Ukraine peace deal which may be a benefit.  At any rate, gains are widespread on the order of +0.6% or so across the board.

In the bond market, Treasury yields rose a couple of ticks yesterday and are higher by 1 more basis point this morning, but still at just 4.14%.  The front of the curve rose by more on the back of the Minutes.  European yields are also higher this morning, between 2bps and 3bps with UK gilts the outlier, unchanged on the day, as softer inflation has traders expecting a rate cut at the next BOE meeting on December 18th.

Oil (+1.0%) has rebounded off its recent lows and is trading back at…$60/bbl, the level at which it is clearly most comfortable these days.  Meanwhile, gold (0.0%) gave back yesterday’s overnight rally to close mostly unchanged with the same true across the other metals although this morning silver (-0.7%) is slipping a bit further.

Finally, other currency movements beyond the yen (-0.3% today) are of a similar size across both the G10 and EMG blocs.  Using the DXY as proxy, this is the third test above 100 since August 1st with many analysts are calling for a breakout at last.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Perhaps this is true given the word is the Russia/Ukraine peace deal was negotiated entirely between the US and Russia without either Ukraine or Europe involved, demonstrating how insignificant Europe, and by extension the euro, have become.  Just a thought.

On the data front, the big news is the September employment report is going to be released this morning along with some other data:

Nonfarm Payrolls50K
Private Payrolls62K
Manufacturing Payrolls-8K
Unemployment Rate4.3%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.7% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.2
Participation Rate62.3%
Philly Fed-3.1
Existing Home Sales4.08M

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the one hand, the data is stale.  On the other hand, it is all we have, so it will likely have greater importance than it deserves.  I have a hard time looking at the economy and seeing substantial weakness, whether because of corporate earnings, inward investment announcements or the Fed’s growing concern over higher inflation.  All that tells me the dollar is going to be in demand going forward.

Good luck

Adf

Quelling the Strains

Posted on by

The government shutdown remains
In place, as the House is at pains
To summon the will
For them to fulfill
Their mandate, while quelling the strains
 
Meanwhile, banks in China are lending
Out cash, though in fact, they’re pretending
But quotas from Xi
Mean he wants to see
More loans to encourage more spending

 

While the Senate has passed a CR that will fund government completely through January 30th and includes full year funding for Veterans Affairs, the Department of Agriculture and legislative activities (they paid themselves), with the rest yet to be completed, the House is meeting today to vote on the measure, at which point, assuming it passes, it will then be sent to President Trump for his signature.  It should be completed today, but this being Congress, with numerous members seeking to preen to their TikTok viewers, until it is done, we cannot be certain.

Now, get ready to hear a lot about how much the shutdown cost as we will get many estimates from various economists and analysts, and you can be sure that they will reflect the political bias of the estimator.  I have seen estimates ranging from 0.2% of GDP to 0.6% of GDP for the quarter, with appropriate annualizations.  My personal view is the damage will be lesser, not greater, as all federal employees will be receiving back wages and most spending will have been delayed rather than destroyed.  We shall see.

Regarding the US economy, as we missed the first reading of Q3 GDP due to the shutdown, it seems we will be getting our first look at the end of this month.  Now, the Atlanta Fed did not stop working and their GDPNow estimate for Q3 remains quite robust at 4.0% as per the below chart from their website, atlantafed.org, but the damage, of course, will fall in Q4, so we won’t really know until sometime in January with the first look at that data.

However, it is important to understand that an increasing number of analysts are explaining that the economy is slowing rapidly.  Their latest ‘proof’ is from yesterday’s ADP weekly data, an entirely new statistic with a track record of exactly…2 weeks, but which showed that 11,250 jobs were lost last week.  I am no econometrician (thankfully), but it seems to me that building your case on a statistic with 2 data points is weak sauce.  Ultimately, I think the main reason that there is so much uncertainty amongst analysts is the concept of the K-shaped economy, where the wealthy are doing fine, basking in the glow of their equity returns, while those less well-off are struggling with ongoing inflation and a less robust job market.

In fact, the Fed is having the same problem, looking at the economy with no consistency as there appears to be a pretty significant rift between the hawks and doves right now.  We got further proof of this (as if the two dissents at the last meeting, one for a bigger cut and one for no move wasn’t enough proof) in this morning’s WSJ where the Fed whisperer, Nick Timiraos, published an article explaining exactly that.  There are two camps, one focused on weakening employment and wanting to cut and one still focused on inflation (allegedly) and wanting to pause.  The Fed funds futures market has reduced the probability of a December cut to 65% as of this morning, but is a lock for that cut by January with a small probability of two more cuts by then.

Nothing has changed my view that they cut next month because I believe that they are essentially unconcerned about inflation at this point, believing 3% is close enough to 2% for government work, and remain entirely focused on the job market.

Turning to the most fascinating international story, it appears that Chinese banks have started to make “phantom” loans, or at least that’s what they are being called, as President Xi is very keen to goose economic activity and the large, state-owned banks have quotas to reach.  So, apparently, what they are doing is going to their best customers, begging them to take out a loan they don’t need, and then having the loans repaid within one month.  The banks are even going so far as to pay the interest so there is no actual impact on anything other than bank loan volume.  Of course, that is the quota being met, so I imagine this will continue.

But it makes you wonder, exactly how bad are things in China that banks are resorting to these games?  Perusing the Chinese data from the past month, things are clearly slowing as per the below from tradingeconomics.com:

Too, the PMI data was soft and Foreign Direct Investment is collapsing, falling -10.4% in September. Again, if you want to understand why President Xi was willing to agree a deal with President Trump, the answer is that the Chinese economy remains under intense pressure, and while the currency doesn’t reflect anything about the economy, the fact that Chinese yields are amongst the lowest in the world is a strong signal that things are not great.

Ok, let’s turn to the overnight activity and see how things behaved.  While the US had a mixed performance (NASDAQ fell although the other indices rallied), we continue to see more positive than negative outcomes in Asia on the back of the ongoing tech rally and the end of the shutdown.  Thus, Japan (+0.4%), HK (+0.8%), Korea (+1.1%), India (+0.7% despite a terrorist attack) and Taiwan (+0.6%) all continued their recent rallies.  China (-0.1%) had a much less impressive day. But these markets continue to benefit from the tech story, and I expect that to continue if the tech story continues to be positive.  As to Europe, bourses there are also benefitting from the imminent end of the US shutdown with gains across the board on the continent (DAX +1.2%, CAC +1.1%, IBEX +1.1%) although the UK (-0.15%) is struggling as concerns grow over the nation’s ability to come up with a viable budget that pays for services without raising taxes to a crippling rate.  As to US futures this morning, at this hour (7:30), they are nicely higher, 0.5% or more.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -4bps, ostensibly on that weak ADP number which has more investors expecting a much weaker economy here.  Europe though, has seen yields tick higher by 1bp across the board, with the UK the exception (+3bps) as concerns over UK finances continue apace.

In the commodity markets, oil (-1.1%) which rallied yesterday on growing concerns over the latest US sanctions on Lukoil and Rosneft, have given back those gains and are once again hovering around $60/bbl.  The IEA released their report on the future of energy use, specifically fossil fuels, and in another sign the climate crisis is ending (or at least that it is no longer a concern), they explained that fossil fuel use would now peak in 2050 under current policies, rather than prior to the end of this decade under stated policies.  The FT was kind enough to put together a little graphic showing the two different views, but we all know that stated policies are wishful thinking.

In a nutshell, more oil demand will drive more oil supply, count on it!  Turning to metals, the rally continues this morning with gold (+0.2%) and silver (+1.1%) pushing back toward the highs seen on October 20th.  I strongly believe these markets will continue to rally as the ‘run it hot’ philosophy will be enacted in as many places around the world as can get away with it.  

Finally, the dollar is a touch firmer this morning, with DXY (+0.1%) on the back of continued weakness in the pound (-0.3%) and the yen (-0.4%).  Elsewhere, the picture is mixed with the euro little changed while the rand (+0.5%) continues to benefit from the gold rally.  Otherwise, the dollar remains a back burner issue for most investors right now, although I have read that people are talking about the carry trade again, funding investments with short yen positions.  Certainly, the yen has been quite weak overall as evidenced by its trend over the past six months below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There is no data this morning although we will get bombarded with five Fed speakers, three of whom are confirmed doves (Miran, Williams and Waller) while the other two seem more middle of the road (Bostic, Paulson).  At this point, there is no consensus on the economy’s strength or direction and that is evident at the Fed as well as in the analyst community.  The only consensus seems to be that stocks and gold should both continue to rally.  As to the buck, what’s not to like?

Good luck

Adf

A Day to Give Thanks

Posted on by

Today is a day to give thanks
To those who flew planes and drove tanks
In multiple wars
And too many tours
No matter which service or ranks
 
Now, turning to markets at hand
The bulls, yesterday, had command
So, risk assets rose
While pundits compose
A narrative, things are just grand

 

It was certainly a positive day in markets yesterday, with equities and commodities rising sharply while bonds sat in the corner with the dollar, neither one trying to rain on the parade.  The imminent end of the government shutdown had everyone feeling euphoric.  But that is so yesterday. It appears that reopening the US government is not enough to keep global markets rallying.

And the thing is, there is just not that much new of note to discuss this morning.  As it is Veteran’s Day here in the US, banks and the bond market are closed, although equities and commodities markets are open.  But the news cycle overnight was led by the fact that Softbank sold their NVDA stake for a $5.8 billion profit.  And that’s pretty thin gruel for someone who writes about market activities.  Everything else is about who won/lost regarding the shutdown and frankly, that is something markets tend to ignore.

With that in mind, and given the absence of any substantive data, let’s go right into market activity overnight.  Asian equity markets were mixed although I would say there was more red (Japan, China, Taiwan, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines) than green (HK, Singapore, Malaysia, Korea, India) but it appears most of the activity had limited volumes and there are few stories of note as drivers.  

In Europe, though, things are looking better with all the major bourses higher this morning, led by the UK (+0.8%) where bad news was good for stocks as the Unemployment Rate ticked higher, to 5.0%, which has markets now pricing an 80% probability of a rate cut by the BOE next month.  This has been enough to help most European markets higher (CAC +0.65%, IBEX +0.5%) except for the DAX (0.0%) which is lagging after the ZEW Sentiment Index was released at a weaker than forecast 38.5, which was also down from last month’s reading.  

I think it might be worthwhile, though, to take a longer-term perspective on this sentiment survey.  As you can see from the chart below (data from ZEW.de), the current level is very middle of the pack.  In fact, the long-term average reading is 21.3, but of course, that includes numerous negative readings during recessions.  I might argue that things in Germany are not collapsing, but nowhere near robust.  My concern, if I were a German policymaker, is that it appears the survey has peaked at a much lower level than history, an indication that the best they can hope for is still mediocre.

Finally, US futures are pointing slightly lower, -0.2% or so, at this hour (7:50), arguably a little hangover from yesterday.

In the bond market, of course, Treasury yields aren’t trading, but European sovereigns are essentially unchanged as well, except for UK Gilts, which have seen yields slip -7bps on that higher Unemployment data driving rate cut expectations.  Given the ongoing fiscal issues in the UK, where they cannot seem to come up with a budget and all signs point to a worsening debt position, I’m not sure why yields there would decline, but that’s what’s happening.

Turning to the commodity markets, oil (+0.5%) continues to trade either side of $60/bbl, making no headway in either direction.  I listened to an excellent podcast yesterday with Doomberg, who once again highlighted his view that the long-term direction of the price of oil is lower.  The case he makes is that on an energy basis, NatGas, even though it is up 48% in the past year, remains significantly cheaper than oil, one-quarter the price, and that the arbitrage will close driving the price of oil lower and the price of NatGas higher.  Remember, politics is far more impactful on oil drilling than geology.  Ask yourself what will happen to the price of oil if Venezuela’s government falls and is replaced by a pro-US government allowing the oil majors in to help tap the largest oil reserves on the planet.  I assure you that is not bullish for the price of oil.

As to the metals markets, after yesterday’s very impressive moves, they are continuing higher this morning, at least the precious metals are with gold (+0.5%), silver (+0.8% and now over $50/oz) and platinum (+0.75%) all extending their gains.  These are the same charts in the metals, and my take is we had a blowoff run which has now corrected, and we could easily see another leg higher of serious magnitude.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar is mostly drifting lower this morning, although not universally so.  While the euro (+0.15%), CHF (+0.6%) and Scandies (NOK +0.6%, SEK +0.4%) are all firmer, the pound (-0.2%) and Aussie (-0.2%) are suffering a bit.  Yen is unchanged along with CAD.  In the EMG bloc, it is also a mixed bag with INR (+0.25%) and PLN (+0.25%) having solid sessions although KRW (-0.6%) is going the other way and the rest of the bloc is +/- 0.1% or so different.  Again, the dollar is just not that exciting in its own right.

There is a new data point coming out, ADP Weekly Employment change, seemingly in an effort to fill in gaps until the BLS gets back to work.  However, given its newness, it is not clear what value it will have to markets.  There is also a speech by Governor Barr but tomorrow is when the Fedspeak really hits.

It is shaping up to be a quiet day, and I suspect absent a major equity move, or some White House bingo, FX markets are going to drift nowhere of note.

Good luck

adf

Like a Fable

Posted on by

It seems there’s a deal on the table
To end the shut down and enable
The chattering classes
To force feed the masses
A story that’s quite like a fable
 
Both sides will claim they have achieved
Their goals, though they were ill-conceived
But markets will love
The outcome above
All else, and we’ll all be relieved

 

While the shutdown is not technically over as the House of Representatives need to reconvene (they have been out of session since September 19th when they passed the continuing resolution) and adjust the bill so that it matches the one the Senate agreed last night and can be voted on in the House, it certainly appears that the momentum, plus President Trump’s imprimatur, is going to get it completed sometime this week. 

The nature of the deal is unimportant for our purposes here and both sides will continue to claim that they were in the right side of history, but the essence is that there appeared to be some movement on health care funding so, hurray!

As you can see in the chart below, while the story broke late yesterday afternoon and futures responded on the open in the evening session, the reality is the market sniffed out something was coming around noon on Friday.  In fact, the S&P 500 has rallied 2.4% since noon Friday.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, everything is now right with the world, right?  After all, this has been the major topic of conversation, not just by the talking heads on TV, but also in markets as analysts were trying to determine how much damage the shutdown was doing to the economy.  While I have no doubt that there were many people who felt the impact, my take is there were many, many more who felt nothing.  After all, the two main features were air travel and then SNAP benefits.  Let’s face it, on average (according to Grok) about 2.9 million people board airplanes in the US, well less than 1% of the population, although SNAP benefits, remarkably, go to 42 million people.  However, those have only been impacted for the past week, not the entire shutdown.

I’m not trying to make light of the inconveniences that occurred, just point out that from a macroeconomic perspective, despite the fact that the shutdown lasted 6 weeks, it probably didn’t have much of an impact on the statistics as all the money that wasn’t spent last month will be spent next month.  Different analyst estimates claim it will reduce Q4 GDP by between 0.2% and 0.5% with a concurrent impact on the annual result.  I am willing to wager it is much less.  However, it appears it will have ended by the end of the week and so markets are back to focusing on other things like AI, unemployment and QE.

Now, those three things are clearly important to markets, but I don’t think there is anything new to discuss there today.  Rather, I would like to focus on two other issues, one more immediate and one down the road, which may impact the way things evolve going forward.

In the near term, as winter approaches, meteorologists are forecasting a much colder winter in the Northern Hemisphere across both North America and Europe, something that is going to have a direct impact on NatGas.  Bloomberg had a long article on the topic this morning with the upshot being that the Polar Vortex may break further south early this year and bring a lot of cold weather along for the ride.  This is clearly not new news to the NatGas market, as evidenced by the fact that its price has exploded (no pun intended) higher by 43% in the past month!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While oil prices have remained stuck in a narrow range, trading either side of $60/bbl for the past 6 weeks amid a longer-term drift lower as you can see in the below chart, oil is only utilized by ~4% of homeowners for heating with 46% using NatGas.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ultimately, I suspect that we are going to see this feed through to inflation as not only are there the direct costs of heating homes, but NatGas is also the major source of generating electricity, with 43% of the nation’s electricity using that as its source.  We have already seen electricity prices rise pretty sharply over the past months (I’m sure you have all felt that pain) and if NatGas prices continue to climb, that will continue.  Remember, the current price ~$4.45/MMBtu is nowhere near significant highs like those seen just 3 years ago when it traded as high as $10/MMBtu.  With all this price pressure, will the Fed continue down their path of rate cuts?  Alas, I believe they will, but that doesn’t make our lives any better.

Which takes me to the second, longer term issue I wanted to mention, European legislation that is seeking to effectively outlaw the utilization of cash euros.  This substack article regarding recent Eurozone legislation is eye-opening as the ECB and Europe try to combat the coming irrelevance of the euro.  For everyone who either lives in Europe or does business there, I cannot recommend reading this highly enough.  There are many changes occurring in financial architecture, and by extension financial markets.  Keep informed!

Ok, enough of that, let’s see how markets have responded to the Senate deal.  Apparently, US politics matters to the entire global equity market.  Green is today’s color with Japan (+1.25%), HK (+1.55%) and China (+0.35%) all performing well, although not as well as Korea (+3.0%) which really had a good session.  Pretty much all the other regional markets were also higher.  In Europe, the deal has everyone excited as well with gains across the board (Germany +1.8%, France +1.4%, Spain +1.4%, UK +1.0%).  As to US futures, at this hour (7:45) they are higher by about 1% across the board.

I guess with that much excitement about more government spending, we cannot be surprised the yields have edged higher.  This morning Treasury yields are up by 3bps, which is what we saw from JGB markets last night as well, although European sovereign yields are little changed on the day.  I suspect, though, if equities continue to rally, we will see yields there edge higher.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.5%) continues to trade in its recent range.  The most interesting thing I saw here was that the IEA is set to come out with their latest annual assessment of the oil market and for the first time in more than a decade they are not going to claim that peak fossil fuel demand is here or coming soon.  The climate grift is truly breaking down.  But the commodity story of the day is precious metals which are massively higher (Au +2.5%, Ag +3.3%, Pt +2.6%) with copper (+1.6%) coming along for the ride.  The narrative here is that with the government shutdown due to end soon, President Trump talking about $2000 tariff rebate checks and the Fed likely to cut rates in December (65% probability), debasement is with us and metals is the place to be!

Interestingly, the dollar is not suffering much at all despite the precious metals story.  While AUD (+0.6%), ZAR (+0.6%) and NOK (+0.6%) are all stronger on the commodity story, the euro is unchanged, JPY (-0.4%) continues to decline and the rest of the G10 is not doing enough to matter.  In truth, if I look across the board, there are more currencies strengthening than weakening vs. the greenback, but overall, at least per the DXY, the dollar is little changed.

There is still no data at this point, although it will start up again when the government gets back to work.  Actually, there has been much talk of the weakness in Consumer sentiment based on Friday’s Michigan Index which fell to 50.3, the second lowest in the history of the series with several subindices weakening substantially.  However, that was before the news about the end of the shutdown, so my take is people will regain confidence soon.  As well, we hear from 9 Fed speakers this week, with 5 of them on Wednesday!  Both dissenters from the October meeting will speak, so perhaps things have changed in their eyes, but I doubt it.

At this point, all is right with the world as investors anticipate the US government getting back to work while the Fed will continue to support markets by easing policy further.  In truth, the dollar should not benefit here, but I have a feeling that any weakness will be short-lived at best.  Longer term, I continue to believe the dollar is the place to be.

Good luck

Adf