Tag Archives: stocks

Doomsters to Press

Posted on by 
The Payrolls report was a mess
But job losses added no stress
And so, once again
We’re back to the yen
As reason for doomsters to press

The claims being made are dramatic
Describing T-bonds as asthmatic
Explaining that Scott
Has now lost the plot
While calling his viewpoint erratic

So, what’s really happening here?
Is it true the end point is near?
I’m happy to say
Those fears I’d allay
At least through the end of next year

Once upon a time, a very smart economist, Larry Kantor, explained to me that the best signal for the economy to follow over time was the Unemployment Rate.  When it was falling, it was a strong indication that economic activity was increasing and vice versa.  But I think that is a world which no longer exists.  I make that point because Friday’s NFP report showed that the Unemployment Rate fell to 4.1% despite the fact the payrolls shrank.  Below is a chart of the Unemployment Rate since 1947 along with the average (5.7%) during that period.  The data comes from FRED although I calculated the average

Arguably, the first thing you notice is that the current Unemployment Rate is quite low relative to history, in fact it is in the bottom quintile.  But Mr Kantor’s observation was based on the then prevailing, and historical thesis of steady population growth, a thesis that has been called into question lately.  Between the aging of the population and the significant changes in immigration activity (i.e. the 2 million or so deportations recently), it is not clear that a declining Unemployment Rate is indicative of strong economic activity.  It could simply be a signal that the population is falling more quickly than job growth.

But looking at the report as a whole, it was quite confusing.  While Payrolls decline by -23K, Private Payrolls rose 30K and Manufacturing Payrolls rose 5k.  A shrinkage in government jobs seems quite positive to me.  However, Earnings data was a bit soft falling to 3.2% Y/Y, lower than the inflation rate.  Net, it is hard to draw many conclusions from the report although we did see the Fed fund futures market reduce the probability of a September hike to 56% from 66% prior.  Certainly, on the surface it hardly strikes that this is encouraging a rate hike.  And the stock market was non-plussed, rallying across the board.

Which takes us to the other story that continues to garner huge amounts of attention, the yen and the rationale behind the US joining Japan to intervene as well as what that will mean going forward.

I will try to boil this down.  The angst is attached to the carry trade, which, neatly defined, is borrowing JPY and paying a very low interest rate, converting the yen into another currency, typically USD, although AUD, MXN and BRL are also popular, and then earning the higher interest rate in those currencies.  It can be a highly profitable trade when currency volatility is low as the trader simply earns the difference between the interest rates each day.  The risk is there is a sudden move in the FX rate which can wipe out weeks or months of carry.  Hence the concern over intervention when we see the FX rate move 5% in a day like the end of July.

Estimates of its size run from $500 billion to $1.5 trillion, although nobody really knows.  I would err on the high side.  But there is another piece that is rarely discussed but I think must be considered in this conversation, and that is the outward investment flows from Japanese investors around the world, again largely to the US, but elsewhere as well.  I asked Grok to create a chart of net investment outflows from Japan from 2000 to present and got this:

Other than 2022, when the Fed started hiking rates aggressively and bond prices fell sharply, it has been pretty consistent.  The net amount of outflow over this time period is approximately ¥347.5 Trillion (again according to Grok) which at the average FX rate over the period of 112.40 works out to about $3.1 Trillion, arguably much more than the ‘pure’ carry trade.  But I don’t believe you can ignore that as if the Japanese are going to bring money home, it will be there as well.

Of course, there is no indication that is what they are doing at this point, despite all the hypotheticals about that being the major risk.  The Fiscal situation in both the US and Japan is awful, with both nations running huge budget deficits and showing no signs of changing that.  Inflation has been rising in both nations and a key prescription by many is that both central banks should be raising interest rates.  Of course, if the Fed raises and the BOJ waits, that widens the differential and will theoretically put more pressure on the yen.

The key concern and the favored story as to why the US helped Japan is that they didn’t want the BOJ to have to sell Treasuries to fund their USD sales.  Much has been made of the fact that the US sold EUR, not USD, but that is because the Treasury doesn’t keep USD in the Exchange Stabilization Fund, just EUR and JPY and a bit of some others like GBP, so they sold what they had.

The big fear is that the US cannot afford for Treasury yields to go higher (although it seems these same folks are clamoring for the Fed to hike rates) and so will do all they can to prevent that.  Now, the funny thing is that if you are Japanese and you own USD assets, you are thrilled with the weak yen as it enhances your return.  While Takaichi-san doesn’t like the weak yen as it exacerbates inflation, I don’t think Japan’s asset holders are clamoring for a strong yen. Remember this, too, that the long-term average yield on US 10-year Treasuries is 5.81%, more than 100bps above where we are today.  It is fair to say that recent lower yields are the exception, not the rule.

To my eye, the harder needle to thread in this process is for Japan, which really doesn’t want to see its massive foreign investment decline in value, although they are concerned about inflation.  For the US, while the fiscal situation is a major problem, it remains a problem for the future.  I’m pretty confident everybody in the world will still accept dollars for payment if they are offered.  The dollar is not going to collapse, nor is the bond market.  While pressure continues to build over time, it is going to take a LONG time.  Mark my words.  The end is not nigh!

In the meantime, JPY (-0.7%) looks like it is repeating the pattern after the last intervention attempts as per the below chart.  As I have maintained, unless there are policy changes, a strong yen is not coming soon.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Speaking of the FX market writ large, this morning has seen very little net movement across almost all counterparts with KRW (-0.7%) the only other currency moving more than 0.1% in either direction.  We have discussed the won several times recently and while the alleged proximate cause for this decline is increased uncertainty over the Strait of Hormuz, given the huge gains seen in the past 6 weeks, this is nothing more than a blip in a strong trend.

In fact, lack of movement aptly describes the bond market as well with yields on Treasuries and across all European sovereigns within 1bp of Friday’s closing levels.  Apparently, fears of the apocalypse have been put on hold for the moment.

In the equity market, Friday’s US rally has seen a general follow-on by both Asia and Europe.  Overnight saw modest gains in almost every Asian market (Tokyo +2.1%, China +0.2%, HK +1.1%, Korea +0.7%, Taiwan +1.6%, etc.) although Australia (-0.3%) managed to buck the trend.  Given the resource focus of the Australian economy, and the recent gains in metals prices, that is a bit of a surprise.  As to Europe, Germany (+0.4%) is the leader of the pack with both France and Spain basically unchanged while the UK (-0.3%) lags slightly, albeit lacking any new news.  US futures are essentially unchanged at this hour (6:45).

Finally, oil prices (+1.4%) are firmer this morning as the ongoing saga over the Strait remains cluttered with confusion as to if a deal is coming close, or not and what role, if any, the US is going to play.  Personally, I’m ready for the US to exit the area, but they don’t ask me.  As to the metals markets, gold (-0.1%) is consolidating after a very strong performance last week, rising 7%, and silver (+0.8%) is continuing last week’s gains.  But to me, copper (+0.5%) is the metal with the most upside as the supply/demand characteristics of the market, (not enough is mined to satisfy annual needs and the timeline to bring a new mine up to speed exceeds a decade), imply higher prices still despite the fact we are already at record levels.

And that’s all.  We have no data today although CPI comes Wednesday.  I will look at data tomorrow as I have already gone too long this morning.

Good luck

Adf

Investors Are Troth

Posted on by 
The doom mongers are up in arms
As though they raise many alarms
Investors don’t care
And add risk with flair
Ignoring the much-mooted harms

So, war is no longer concerning
And though hyperscalers are burning
Through all of their cash
Amid much backlash
Investors, their shares, are still yearning

And what about data and growth?
Investors care naught about both
Concerns about yen?
Not that trope again!
To stocks most investors are troth

As I read through my X feeds in the morning, as well as the WSJ and Bloomberg, the overriding theme appears to be the end is nigh.  Whether discussing Iran and the oil price and the future of the Strait of Hormuz, AI and the bubble or the potential for massive job losses and the creation of Skynet, the economic data and the incipient recession coming because people cannot afford to continue their consumption habits, or the idea that we are on the precipice of a Treasury bond market collapse because the Japanese yen is weak, the dominant theme is disaster is around the corner.  It is really tiresome, I have to say.

Now, you might say that I simply follow the wrong people, and that may be true, but my feed hasn’t changed, and I never look at the algorithm’s selections for me, I only look at my followings.  So, I cannot tell if people have become that much more bearish on the overall situation, or if they simply write these things because they believe they will get more engagement.  I fear it is the latter, but that simply devalues anything useful they may have to say.  Mostly, it’s frustrating to try to get an unbiased sense of what is happening in the world these days.  After all, while I understand that governments put out propaganda constantly, I thought the idea behind X and Substack was you could avoid that.  I think I am going to go back to reading books!

So, as we await this morning’s payroll report, I’ll try to touch on the key issues I believe matter.  Starting with the yen, which continues to garner attention, or more accurately, the joint intervention garners attention, I first have to laugh at the following Bloomberg headline, “Yen Surrenders Nearly Half Its Gains From US-Japan Intervention”.  This was written by Mia Glass, and I don’t know anything about her except her grasp of arithmetic is tenuous.  Here is the chart of USDJPY and while the yen has been weakening steadily since the intervention last week, half?  Even taking the spike low into account, we are nowhere near a 50% retracement and on a closing basis, it is a ridiculous claim.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There continues to be much fodder made about Secretary Bessent trying to prevent a meltdown in the Treasury market but Occam’s Razor tells me that it is far more likely that a too-weak yen is bad for Japan because of its inflationary impact and the US because it impedes US exports so joint intervention made sense.  And as I have maintained all along, unless underlying fiscal and monetary policies change, the yen is going to continue to weaken.

Turning to Hormuz, the press continues to write with glee about President Trump’s miscalculation and the US losing the war and whether Iran and Oman are going to come to some agreement on the Strait, but oil prices, while they rallied a bit yesterday, are lower this morning by -0.6% and -9.25% in the past week.  Looking at the chart below, despite all the discussion of inventory depletion, which are real, but obviously not as important to the price as many previously believed, the trend remains downward and we are well below the trend.  Frankly, at $75/bbl, it appears the world works fairly well.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Look, I would rather pay less for my diesel, and I know you would all like to pay less for your gasoline, but here’s a 20-year history of the RBOB (NYMEX gasoline) contract.  We are hardly in unprecedented territory having spent a lot of time around here from 2011 through 2015 as well as the beginning of the Russia/Ukraine war.

I have no idea how things will end up in Iran, nor does any other commentator.  I know I am happier if Iran does not have a nuclear weapon and ballistic missiles that can reach Europe, let alone the US.  But I would say the market has almost lost interest in the war.

As to the hyperscalers and the AI bubble, in truth, it seems much of the animosity has been turned toward SpaceX as everyone loves to hate Elon almost as much as they love to hate Trump.  But it appears by many metrics that equity markets continue to benefit across the board from strong earnings results, with ~85% of companies (depending on your source) beating estimates which is well above the average of 77%.  So, the economy continues to grow pretty strongly, and companies continue to make money, and investors continue to want to buy shares.  The hyperscalers aren’t leading the pack anymore, but they have not collapsed either.  There are many who continue to explain this cannot go on forever and there will be a reckoning, and they may well be correct, but in this case, being early and being wrong are the same thing.

Ok, enough of that.  Let’s see if anything noteworthy has happened overnight.  The truth is, not especially.  Asian shares were mixed with Chinese shares doing well after solid trade data, but the rest of the region drifted lower.  European shares are firmer across the board after broadly positive data (German IP and Trade, French Trade) although the French Unemployment Rate ticked higher to 8.3%.  And US futures are higher this morning as well ahead of the NFP report.  Despite the doom and gloom, equity markets are doing fine.

Bond markets have barely moved overnight, although we did see Treasury yields back up 5bps yesterday.  That appears to have been on the back of the oil price rise, although as I look at probabilities of central bank rate hikes, there is a growing belief that the Fed, ECB and BOJ are all going to raise rates next month as hiking rates into an energy shock seems to be their MO.

Source: rateprobability.com

We discussed oil but gold (+2.0%) and silver (+4.1%) are the real story in commodities as both are extending their recent rallies from the consolidation lows.  For instance, silver is higher by 11% this week and $9/oz since July 17th.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar, despite all the anxiety about the yen, remains quiet overall.  The DXY is below 100, back in its range and showing no inclination to move in either direction.  This morning ZAR (+0.7%) is the king of the hill on the rally in gold while MXN (+0.3%) is a touch higher after Banxico left rates on hold.  But remember, peso rates are still high and economic growth continues apace so investment opportunities abound.  The peso has strengthened more than 17% since the beginning of 2025, shaking off any tariff concerns easily.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the data, here are consensus forecasts:

Nonfarm Payrolls80K
Private Payrolls78K
Manufacturing Payrolls4K
Unemployment Rate4.2%
Average Hourly Earnings 0.3% (3.5% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.3
Participation Rate61.6%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

We also see Canadian employment data (exp 6.5% Unemployment Rate) and hear from Thomas Barkin, the Richmond Fed president.  But it is a summer Friday and typically, about an hour after the NFP release, traders are gone for the weekend so don’t expect too much today.

The world is not ending, the dollar is not collapsing, the Treasury market is not collapsing, and equity markets are not about to implode.  My take is the big stories from the past months have lost their luster and I suspect after a lull, we are going to start to focus on the politics of the midterm elections in November.  But until then, have a cold one and relax.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Why People Screech

Posted on by 
Investors enamored with risk
Are active, some might e’en say brisk
In buying up stocks
In very large blocks
And feeling, right now, very frisk-y

But this simply highlights the breach
Twixt markets and why people screech
The ‘conomy’s ailing
And policy’s failing
To help, so for more, they beseech

If you ever wanted to see the definition of the K-shaped economy, there is no more accurate representation than the fact that equity markets are making all-time highs at the same time Socialists are winning elections.  Now, I don’t know many voters in Michigan, but I’m pretty sure the ones who have an equity portfolio are not voting for the candidate who wants to abolish the Senate, the Supreme court and the Presidency as well as the police and the Department of War.  But here we are, with both the DJIA and the S&P 500 trading to another new all-time high yesterday, although as you can see in the chart below, the NASDAQ is still a few percentage points away from its recent highs and the DSA candidate poised to win the Democratic primary election for US Senator in Michigan.  Strange times indeed.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While there is no doubt that earnings continue to be quite strong, and that is the proximate cause for the equity market rally, earnings are a function of economic activity, so it is highly unlikely they would be so strong without underlying economic strength.  The upshot is that we continue to ‘reap’ the benefits of the original Portfolio Balance channel defined by then Fed Chair Ben Bernanke as he began the process of inflating the Fed’s balance sheet and all that liquidity spilled into financial markets rather than the real economy.  At this point, we have seen money moving back toward production (I saw that a new steel mill was being built in California, the first new mill there in over 50 years) but it remains the case that more money flows to markets than to production. And that, I would argue, is the crux of the dichotomy that we are currently observing, fabulous wealth being created but an extremely uneven distribution.

Can it, or will it change?  It took a long time to create the problem, and I fear it will take a long time to unwind it, although I believe that politicians on both sides of the aisle recognize the problem.  And this is the classic case where they have very different solutions.  Arguably, the fate of the nation rests on which solutions are implemented, reshoring American industrial capacity, or a state takeover of the means of production and redistribution.  You know which side I’m hoping wins out.

But in the meantime, equity markets here are strong as is economic activity, at least as measured by the government, and that has been sufficient to drive market behavior.  And that, my friends, is why Wall Street is happy.  Well, that and the following headline:

Wall Street bankers’ bonuses set for significant rise

With that in mind, let’s see how markets are behaving.  That US strength was followed almost universally in Asia with every major market rallying except Singapore (-0.55%) and Thailand (-0.5%).  Otherwise, the gains ranged from +3.7% (Tokyo and Korea) down to +0.25% (HK) with more strong gains above 1.0% than below that level.  Tech stocks remain the story and that has been helped along by the latest Hormuz story that indicates a deal is coming soon.  Frankly, writing about Hormuz at this point seems absurd given the numerous claims and counterclaims with very little ability for most of us to discern truth from propaganda.

The interesting thing about a tech-led rally is how completely it ignores European bourses with France, Germany and the UK all unchanged on the day, although Spain has managed a modest gain of 0.4%.  But I think that gain is a function of the better-than-expected PMI Services number from Spain, 58.3, which is its highest reading in more than 3 years while the rest of Europe managed to basically meet expectations at lower levels.  As to US futures, as we await the ISM Services data today (exp 54.5) you will not be surprised that they are higher at this hour (7:45).

Perhaps the bigger story has been bond yields as they have slipped -13bps in the past two sessions and are down -1bp this morning as per the chart below.  European sovereign yields have also backed off a bit although this morning they are basically unchanged while JGB yields (-3bps) continue to trade near their recent multi-decade highs.  So far, the US-Japanese joint yen intervention has not been enough to change that story.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity space, it is the metals markets that are the most interesting this morning with gold (+2.7%) and silver (+4.1%) leading the way as hopes for the Hormuz reopening and the end of the Iran conflict percolate.  Either that or people have begun to realize that the demand for metals remains impervious to other stories.  Now, I am not a market technician, but frankly, the fact that the gold price is breaking above its 50-day moving average as per the below chart, and the general price action is telling me that we have put in a bottom and seem poised to break higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Copper (+0.4%) continues to trade near its all-time highs and I suspect a move higher in gold and silver will take it along for the ride.  As to oil (+0.4%), the fact remains it is lower by -10.0% this week, which has been a key driver of sentiment in markets overall.

Finally, the dollar is a bit softer this morning, but not too much.  The euro and pound are both firmer by 0.2% while the yen is little changed along with CHF, CAD and AUD.  NZD (-0.4%) is an outlier after weaker than expected jobs data undermined the idea of another rate hike by the RBNZ.  In the EMG bloc, most currencies are a bit stronger as well, 0.1% to 0.3% or so with KRW (+0.4%) and CLP (+0.8%) the outliers, with the former continuing its recent trend as you can see from the chart below, while the latter is benefitting from the overall strength of copper.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And that’s really it for the day.  In addition to the ISM data, we do see EIA oil inventories later this morning and we get the Treasury Refunding Announcement at 8:30, although there is no expectation for a massive change in the current issuance schedule.  Late this afternoon, the central bank of Brazil is expected to cut the SELIC rate by 25bps to 14.0%, which is arguably why BRL has been such a strong performer all year, very high real interest rates.

As to the dollar writ large, it is on its heels right now and I don’t think Secretary Bessent minds that very much.  Using the DXY as the proxy, do not be surprised to see it trade to 97 by the end of summer.

Good luck

Adf

Far From Dead

Posted on by 
Tomorrow we’ll hear from the Fed
With pundits not sure where they’ll tread
Some call for a hike
So, Warsh can out psych
Inflation that seems far from dead

But others claim hikes he will thwart
Awaiting the task force report
With oil retreating, 
Though some call it fleeting,
The hawks he will likely abort

The one thing we cannot forget
Is all of the outstanding debt
A hike may create
A weaker growth rate
An outcome he’ll surely regret

Let us turn out attention to the FOMC meeting which begins today and culminates in tomorrow’s policy statement and then the press conference that ensues.  On the whole, I would say that Chairman Warsh has already achieved a key objective, market uncertainty about the outcome.  A point I have been making for a very long time is that uncertainty is what creates an anti-fragile market as positioning is inevitably reduced, and more importantly, so is leverage.  And this is true in every market.  While there may have been value in forward guidance at the onset of the GFC such that the Fed wanted to calm markets down, that time is long past.  

Interestingly, perhaps the one individual who is unhappiest is Nick Timiraos at the WSJ, the former Fed whisperer.  He exhibited great power in the market because he was seen as former Chairman Powell’s mouthpiece when Powell wanted to convey information without being directly attributed.  However, it appears that there will be no Fed whisperer in a Warsh Fed, although I suspect even if there is someone, it will not be Powell’s man to whom Warsh turns.  So Timiraos is on the outs anyway.  But you can tell how unhappy he is by the tone of his recent articles like the one last night trying to insinuate that Warsh will not get his way.

At the same time, Bloomberg has an article this morning explaining how Citadel Securities’ chief economist is expecting a hike.  In my opinion, this is how it should be.  Wall Street economists and analysts make enough money that they should be able to do the work themselves and have their own opinions, not merely regurgitate what they hear from the Fed speakers.  (After all, I make no money and have opinions!)

Reiterating my view quickly, I do not see a hike for the following reasons:

  1. Recent data releases point to cooling inflation offering a respite on concerns of runaway prices
  2. Delaying any action until the task forces complete their work and help reset the way the Fed approaches things feels like the goal
  3. The Federal government cannot afford a rate hike as they migrate more and more issuance to the short end of the curve that will directly be impacted.

The counter view basically revolves around the idea that Warsh can ‘earn’ market credibility by hiking now, whether or not it is a policy error.  I don’t think he is concerned about losing credibility at this stage and has set the table, via the task forces, to show he means business when it comes to changing the Fed.  We all find out tomorrow.

As traders await all the news
On earnings, it seems there are views
That AI is losing
Its luster and cruising
Toward outcomes where stocks sing the blues

In my discussion about parabolic markets yesterday, I mentioned the Korean KOSPI index but after last night’s price action, I think a picture is in order.  This from wolfstreet.com.

As I explained, parabolic moves do not end in a range, they fall like the chart above with pullbacks greater than 50% the norm.  This implies that the KOSPI is not done yet, and given the KOSPI is basically two stocks, Samsung and SK Hynix, both of which are major semiconductor manufacturers, it doesn’t speak well to the semiconductor space in the US either.  Tomorrow, we hear from MSFT and META and then Thursday we get AAPL and AMZN earnings reports.  My take is much is riding on these earnings reports as any indication that growth is starting to slip will feed into my discussion yesterday regarding the second derivative and how that is the driver.  In fact, we saw the announcement yesterday by Nvidia that they were guaranteeing $250 billion of debt for OpenAI to build a new datacenter in Ohio.  At cycle ends, the pace of activity tends to increase as the players want to get things done before the collapse.  I fear that is what we are watching.

Ok, let’s look at markets.  As I’ve already touched on the KOSPI, which fell -10.8% last night, it is not surprising that most of the rest of Asia had a rough go as well.  Tokyo (-4.0%), Taiwan (-4.65%) and China (-2.8%) were the biggest losers overnight although HK (+0.4%) managed to eke out some gains.  In fact, looking across the region, away from the big three mentioned above, it was a more mixed picture.  Indonesia (-0.9%) is having its own problems as the central bank governor resigned and there have been numerous scandals and other cabinet resignations lately undermining both the rupiah (-0.1% and back to multidecade lows) and the stock market there.

As to Europe, given they have no tech sector and the tech sector is the area under the most pressure, I guess we should not be surprised that bourses there are modestly higher this morning, mostly up around +0.3% across the board.  A very pleasant experience compared to the gyrations seen elsewhere.  And US futures at this hour (7:10) are mixed with NASDAQ (-1.1%) suffering while the DJIA (+0.5%) is fine and the SPX is caught in the middle, basically unchanged.

In the bond market, yields continue to edge lower, with Treasuries (-3bps) leading the way and European sovereign yields all lower between -1bp and -2bps. UK gilts (-3bps) are also performing well as the market awaits the BOE’s policy decision on Thursday.  Then JGB yields (-2bps) have slipped in concert as the market awaits the BOJ decision Friday.  At this point, consensus across the board is for no movement, although there has been a discussion regarding the BOJ with some analysts believing a hike is possible.

Turning to commodities, oil (-1.6%) is not the center of attention today for once, and is pushing back toward $80/bbl.  The ongoing decline appears to be based on comments that diplomacy is once again being tried to resolve the Iran situation and the Strait of Hormuz.  Perhaps more surprisingly the metals markets are also falling this morning (Au -1.3%, Ag -2.2%, Cu -1.1%) as their inverse relationship with oil is being tested.  

Finally, the dollar is ever so slightly firmer this morning, but mostly on the order of 0.1% or 0.2%.  AUD (-0.4%) is the worst performer in either G10 or EMG blocs as central bank comments led to a reduction in the probability of a rate hike there next month.  One other thing to note is USDJPY, where, as I type, the market is trading at 163.92, a scant 8 pips from the next big, round number at 164.00, a level almost touched last Thursday (163.99 was the high) but when it trades, it will almost certainly be hailed as an important milestone regarding potential intervention.  I don’t agree with that assessment.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Again, a key feature of BOJ intervention has been an effort to address a volatile market, but as you can see below, while the direction of travel has been consistent, the only volatility has come from BOJ interventions.  Everything else is a slow, steady deterioration of the yen.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, there is plenty upcoming this week in addition to the Fed, including PCE on Thursday.

TodayGoods Trade Balance-$100.0B
 Case-Shiller Home Prices1.3%
 Consumer Confidence92.3
WednesdayFOMC Decision3.75% (unchanged)
ThursdayBOE Rate Decision3.75% (unchanged)
 Initial Claims200K
 Continuing Claims1800K
 Q2 GDP2.1%
 Personal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.3%
 PCE-0.1% (3.7% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% (3.3% Y/Y)
FridayBOJ Rate Decision1.0% (unchanged)
 Employment Cost Index0.8%
 Chicago PMI56.0
 Michigan Sentiment 54.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Obviously, the FOMC meeting will be the big story along with the earnings data, although I imagine that the PCE data may garner some interest for now, at least until we learn what measures of inflation the Fed is going to use going forward.  My fear is the equity market can crack, for now, and that will drive overall trading activity.  As to the dollar, I see no reason for a large move in either direction until we see new policies.

Good luck

Adf

Quite Spicey

Posted on by 
Though Friday things looked pretty dicey
With tech stocks then seen as quite pricey
New word that the bombing
Has ended was calming
And stock markets opened quite spicey

Of course, it can be no surprise
That oil’s now well off its highs
The dollar is slipping
Though yields are just dripping
As bond traders still agonize

President Trump changed his mind about continuing the recent bombing campaign against Iran over the weekend amid questions about alleged US munitions supplies.  But whatever the reason, this was music to the risk markets with oil (opening -6.4%) falling sharply while equity futures (NASDAQ opening +1.25%) rebound from last week’s declines.  Once again, headline risk remains the biggest risk there is in markets.  Note the huge gap lower in the oil market early Sunday evening in the chart below from tradingeconomics.com

At this point, it is a fool’s errand to try to estimate where oil prices are heading going forward as the next headline is likely to be the key driver, and that is a complete unknown.

So, let’s turn our attention to some more fundamental questions that have been brewing in the background and are pretty complex.  I want to start with a remarkable Substack piece I read this weekend which had a completely different perspective on the AI investment thesis than anything that I have seen anywhere else.  And it is quite a persuasive piece.  While I have linked it above, it is quite a long read, so the highlights are as follows:

  • The AI boom is not a tech boom; it is a credit driven real estate cycle
  • This is virtually identical to the run-up to the subprime housing crisis and GFC
  • The key to understand is the second derivative of growth, acceleration.
  • GroundBreaker’s (the author) thesis is that the second derivative on AI valuation has already rolled over and the future for AI stocks is pretty bleak, at least in the medium term.

Below are two charts from his Substack to help describe the issue:

This is a basic description of the movements of the underlying (blue line), its velocity (growth rate, yellow line) and its acceleration (the change in its growth rate, red line).  As you can seem growth can still be increasing, but at a slower rate, and that’s the problem he highlights.  

Below is a chart of OpenAI’s valuation metrics (remember it’s private so the values are episodic, not continuous, but the point is if the change in the rate of growth of the valuation metric starts declining, that is the break where things become a problem, i.e. they may not be able to finance their projected growth going forward.  

And as you can see, it is already heading lower.  This does not speak well to the future for OpenAI, and I would argue, the entire space, as many have made the case this is all Ponzi finance, meaning the funding cannot be repaid on cashflows, only on increasing valuations.  

Now consider the subprime crisis where the problems started when the rate of housing price increases rolled over and all those 2-year teaser rates could no longer be financed at higher valuations.  That’s when they all went bust!  Here’s the thing; the 2nd derivative rolled over in late 2006, the first hiccups didn’t happen until mid-2007 with SocGen closing some funds, Lehman didn’t go bust until September 2008 and the equity market didn’t bottom until March 2009.  It can take a long time for this to play out, but beware the cycle, it could well repeat in AI linked investments.

So, there’s that to consider.

The other thing that I’ve been pondering is gold and its meaning within the financial markets.  Unlike the AI discussion above, I want to discuss two very real sides to this story.  On the one hand, the ongoing destruction of the value of fiat currencies by all major central banks’ policies is real.  Money continues to get printed and inflation continues to rise debasing those fiat currencies.  Adding to the problem is the massive government debt issuance which, if history holds, will be sopped up by those very same central banks, adding to the debasement.  The search for a neutral reserve asset to replace US treasuries is real, but the transition will take a very long time, in my view.  However, all this speaks to increased demand for the barbarous relic, and when that is priced in declining fiat currencies, a higher price.  I think it’s a very strong argument and has been made by many, including this poet.  After all, gold is often thought of as the ultimate inflation hedge.

So, what is the flipside?  As I have written frequently regarding oil prices, we cannot ignore the market pricing and what it is telling us.  Understand that I have been a gold bull for a long time and strongly believe in the long-term debasement concern.  But as a long-time trader and market participant, it is very difficult for me to look at the below, long-term chart of gold and not think that there is a much further decline on the cards.  Parabolic moves, historically, do not resolve by trading sideways for extended periods of time, they fall back… a lot!

While we have recently seen several parabolic moves in market prices, notably the NASDAQ and KOSPI, I want to highlight the last time the NASDAQ had a parabolic move, during the tech bubble in 1999-2000.  The chart below is a logarithmic chart of the QQQ ETF.  As you can see back in 2000 – 2002, it fell a very long way after the bubble burst, some 88%, a much larger move than during the GFC!  

There is one other trading market, that while many may dismiss its meaning, I would contend is very representative of the way markets behave across all asset classes, Bitcoin.  The below chart shows it from its beginning, and you can see a number of essentially parabolic moves higher, each resolving with a decline of at least 50% and at times more than 70%.

Source: coinmarketcap.com

My point is that gold shows all the signs of having peaked for a while, and it has ‘only’ fallen some 25% from its highs.  From a trading history perspective, there is nothing that would seem to prevent a move down to $2800/oz or so, a 50% retracement from the high.  

So, which is it?  As I remain long gold in the personal portfolio, I have been a beneficiary of the long climb higher and would love to see it continue.  And there is much to be said for the debasement theory.  But both sides of this argument can be correct with the time frame the key differentiator. We could see a further short-term decline before a renewed upward move of significant magnitude.  Much will depend on how global macroeconomics and economic statecraft plays out over the coming months/years.  And this is why trading is hard!  One last thing describing just how much things have changed regarding gold and sentiment around it, this headline in Bloomberg this morning is remarkable, Gold Climbs as Pause in Mideast Fighting Curbs Inflation Risk.  

Ok, sorry for my rants, but a brief tour of markets show things are exactly as you would expect based on the reduction of tensions in Iran. Equity markets are higher around the world as per the below tradingeconomics.com screen shot, and don’t be fooled by Brazil, it hasn’t opened yet and there are no futures, so that was Friday’s performance.

As to bond yields, they too, are lower across the board as per the below Bloomberg.com screenshot.  Canada, Mexico and Brazil markets are not yet opened, hence the lack of movement.

Oil has fallen further than when I started writing last evening with WTI (-8.2%) and Brent (-9.7%) both sharply lower.  Regarding Brent, apparently there has been a resumption of flows through Kazakhstan which is helping even more there.  Metals are higher (Au +1.1%, Ag +2.2%, Cu +0.9%), which is keeping with the latest theme.  And finally, the dollar is broadly softer, as also would be expected given the movement in other markets.  The two key exceptions here are NOK (-0.7%) which is clearly a reaction to the movement in oil prices and KRW (-0.8%) which actually started the session much stronger but has reversed.  While I read a rationale about concerns over a Fed rate hike, given the movement in oil and yields, that doesn’t seem right.  Rather, after a more than 6% appreciation over the course of the past 3 weeks, it seems more like a reflexive bounce in the dollar.

Source: tradingeconmomics.com

On the data front today, this morning brings Durable Goods (exp 2.5%, 0.8% ex-Transport) but that is all.  I will go deeper tomorrow, and remember, the FOMC meets this week with the current pricing 33% for a hike, even after the decline in oil prices today.  I remain in the no move camp but will discuss tomorrow.

And that’s more than enough.

Good luck

Adf

Out in the Cold

Posted on by 
So, suddenly, silver and gold
Are both getting bought and not sold
But oil’s still rising
So, what are folks prizing?
Perhaps risk’s now out in the cold

At least, here at home that’s the case
As AI stocks sell off apace
And what of the buck?
It’s basically stuck
While bonds are just standing in place

Arguably, the biggest change in market relations in the past two sessions is that the metals markets have rallied alongside the price of oil.  Since basically the beginning of this conflict, this has been one of the conundrums in markets.  Gold, which has a long history as a safe haven, started selling off (granted from a parabolic move) shortly before the US attacked Iran.  In fact, many ascribed the sell off to the naming of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair given the view he was the most hawkish of the potential candidates.  But once the fighting started, gold continued to decline, falling some 27% from its initial burst higher at the beginning to its recent low, below $4000/oz.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Of course, the oil story is quite different as there were far more twists and turns in the price action as the military activity ebbed and flowed and as comments about ceasefires and peace talks were made and denied on a regular basis.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But certainly, the impression from the recent price action was that when oil rallied, gold sold off and vice versa.  The ostensible rationale was that higher oil prices would drive inflation higher and interest rates would follow thus reducing the attractiveness of holding gold.  And perhaps that was true, at least to some extent.  However, that was never a satisfying explanation to me.  And, throughout the conflict I have maintained that the medium and long-term views for the metals was quite positive.

However, something seemed to have happened yesterday, and I see no indication of exactly what that was, but we saw oil, gold and silver all rally nicely on the day.  The oil story is clear as the latest issue is the Houthis now blocking Saudi ships from traversing the Bab-al-Mandeb at the southern tip of the Red Sea and reducing flows.  But the metals story remains a mystery.  Granted, this has only been ongoing for a bit more than twenty-four hours, but the magnitude of the metals moves (Au +3.0%, Ag +5.7%) in the past two sessions is pretty substantial for markets that had been doing very little but sliding for months.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t believe this has been short covering, as in reality, both markets had lost speculative interest given the lack of volatility over the past months, and so short sellers were not involved.  There were far too many other, juicier targets for them.  As to the dollar, which has long had a negative correlation to the precious metals, as it has traded in a 1% range for the past month, as per the below chart, it is hard to ascribe much causality there.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

However, I sense that we are beginning to see some changes to the relationships that have held for the past several months, so we need to be alert for other seeming anomalies.

Turning to the other markets, and continuing with FX, while generically today, it is doing very little as per the below screenshot,

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It is worth discussing the yen, which yesterday traded below (dollar above) the 163 level for the first time since 1986.  Not surprisingly, we heard from FinMin Katayama as follows: “The situation involving the US and Iran has taken a sudden turn for the worse — a deterioration that the world did not foresee — creating a very difficult environment. Our policy remains completely unchanged: We will take appropriate and bold action at any time, should the need arise.”  However, as I have maintained, given the incredibly slow pace of the decline of the currency and given that speed of decline and the volatility in markets has always been an important part of the MOF’s decision matrix regarding intervention, it seems we are not near that step.  One need only compare the JPY to KRW, a currency with low historic volatility, to see that the yen has not been very active.  In fact, the biggest movements have been caused by the MOF in their intervention and comments.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

There has been an increase in market discussion regarding whether the BOJ is going to hike rates again at the end of this month, which is not the market forecast, nor would it be considered the norm given they hiked rates last month.  Most analysts expect the pace of rate hikes to be every six months as they gradually tighten policy.  Of course, they could change that, but again, the yen’s weakness has many fundamental drivers with rates being only one of the issues.  Personally, I don’t see a hike next week, but I guess anything is possible.

Which leaves us with bonds where yields around the world are creeping higher on a regular basis, Treasuries +1bp, European sovereigns +3bps today, and equities.  Yesterday was a solid day in the stock market in the US with tech stocks leading the way higher.  And while Europe is following suit this morning (UK +1.2%, France +0.8%, Spain +1.0%, Germany +0.3%), last night’s Asian markets were less buoyant.  Tokyo (-0.2%), China (-0.5%) and HK (-1.0%) led the charge lower although there were some bright spots, notably Singapore (+1.2%), Taiwan (+1.3%) and Korea (+0.7%).  I guess overall it was a mixed session.  As to US futures this morning, as I type at 8:05 they are pointing lower led by NASDAQ futures (-1.5%).  

Net, some of the relationships with which we had become familiar seem to be breaking up a bit.  I think no matter how you slice the equity market, it is trading at rich levels, so a correction of some sort seems realistic.  I presume that if the tech earnings next week disappoint, we will see a pretty big downdraft.  As to oil, while there is still plenty around, the war drums are beating louder and that is not helping things.  But bonds and the dollar are sitting this move out, at least for now.

There is no data released today and the Fed is in its quiet period, so we remain beholden to headlines from Iran, the White House and other earnings outcomes.  I have a sense of uneasiness about the day, but nothing to put my finger on.

Good luck

Adf

Young Turks? Or Warhorses?

Posted on by 
Stories about yen
Have multiplied like rabbits
Is it really news?

You know it has been a slow session when the yen’s movement, as seen in the chart below, was enough to draw 4 headline stories in Bloomberg.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And here is a screenshot of the 4 headlines on Bloomberg.com

While it may look dramatic on the screen, that almost one yen move represents less than 0.6%, and as you can see, about half of it has already retraced.  The underlying premise is that FinMin Katayama, in a regular speech about general things, suggested that the GPIF (Japan’s national pension fund) ought to consider investing more assets in Japan and JGBs rather than internationally.  The idea is that if the GPIF changes its investment mix, so will many other Japanese institutional funds, and they do have a lot of money there, upwards of $2 trillion equivalent.  This is not to say that they are going to invest all their money back home, just that the mix could change somewhat.

Now, if they were to do this, it would certainly have an impact on both the FX and global bond markets, with the yen likely to strengthen along with JGB prices (hence JGB yields declining) and potentially Treasury yields rising as a key buyer of US debt would reduce its appetite.  

But this is just a suggestion, and one that has been made numerous times in the past with no further action.  At the same time, yesterday’s US 30-year Treasury auction was extremely well-received with more than 77% indirect bidders.  That statistic is generally seen as foreign investors and central banks.  With the yield coming at 5.058%, it is not surprising that foreign bidders, especially the Japanese, would have significant interest.  After all, their currency continues under pressure, so if the GPIF holds Treasuries, in yen terms they look better almost every day.

The other spate of stories this morning was about the carry trade, and how Goldman Sachs has just explained to its clients that the carry trade, notably shorting yen to hold dollars, amongst other things, is an excellent risk reward trade right now.  I’m guessing Katayama-san didn’t really want to hear that.

My larger point, though, is that despite the yen (+0.4%) having moved a relatively modest amount, it certainly garnered a lot of attention.  In other words, there’s not much else to discuss.

Since Warsh and his minions last met
The question was who they would vet
To lead the task forces
Young Turks? Or warhorses?
Alas, tis the latter quintet

The other moment of excitement yesterday came from the Fed when they released the names of the leaders of each of Chairman Warsh’s five task forces.  The list is linked here.  It certainly did engender a lot of discussion with different analysts taking different views, and while I have some opinions, mine are no more useful than anybody else’s as they are not going to change things.  My observation, though, is that there is an awful lot of old school thinking represented by the list, which is somewhat disappointing for those of us who were looking for a new direction from the Fed.  As an example, Mervyn King, ex-BOE governor, and active participant in forward guidance, seems unlikely to offer many new views on communications.  But that is what we have.  Hopefully some new thinking will come about.

And that’s all there is regarding news, I think so let’s turn to market activity.  Under the theme, you can’t keep tech stocks down, yesterday’s US equity rally was followed by more strength (Tokyo +1.2%, HK +0.6%, Korea +2.5%, India +1.1% and Australia +0.5%) than weakness (China -2.0%, Taiwan -0.8%) in Asia.  The rest of the smaller regional exchanges were largely higher as well.  Arguably, the fact that whatever is happening in the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices have no strong bid, is part of that investment thesis.  As to Europe, other than Spain (+0.5%), the rest of the continent and the UK are all +/-0.1%.  And US futures at this hour (7:15) are showing softness in the NASDAQ (-0.5%) but otherwise not much movement.

Bond yields, though, are uniformly lower, backing off their recent test of 4.60% in 10-year Treasuries, as now that the auctions have passed, I think a lot of the short positioning into those auctions has been covered.  If oil continues to trade either side of $70/bbl, it is hard to make the case inflation will be running away.  So, Treasuries (-2bps) continue to back off while European sovereign yields have slipped by a similar amount.  The outlier was the JGB market (-13bps) which as you can see in the below chart has really changed vs. its following of Treasury yields, entirely on the GPIF story.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity space, oil (+0.3%) continues to erase the gains seen Tuesday after the increase in military activity in the Strait.  Even though that seems to be ongoing, the markets just don’t care.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the metals, yesterday’s gains are being moderated with both gold (-0.4%) and silver (-0.7%) slightly softer while copper is unchanged on the day.

Finally, the FX market, away from the yen, remains generally uninteresting.  Three weeks ago, much was made of the DXY’s break higher from a longer-term range as it traded through 100.50, almost reaching 102.00.  but as you can see in the chart below, for now, that excitement seems to be fading with a nice little downtrend developing since June 24th.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In these dog days of summer, it is hard to get too excited.  Generically, while I remain in the camp that the Fed will not adjust rates this year, and so the market will need to reduce the current 33bps of rate hikes priced into the Fed funds futures curve as you can see below, I also think that ongoing inward investment into the US is going to underpin the dollar over the medium term.

There is no data to be released today, and yesterday’s numbers saw a marginally better Initial Claims number (215K vs 218K expected) and a slightly worse than forecast Existing Home Sales number.  As well, we heard from NY Fed president Williams who said his new main concern is that demand for AI infrastructure is going to drive inflation higher and he is wary of that.  Of course, that is exactly at odds with Chairman Warsh’s view that AI is going to reduce inflationary pressures.  Next week, Chairman Warsh will be testifying to Congress and there are four other Fed speakers, but my take is that over time, we will hear less and less from the rest of the Committee. (Or maybe that is just wishful thinking on my part!)

At any rate, it is shaping up to be a quiet one, so close up early and take a long weekend, you’ve earned it!

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Really Vexed

Posted on by 
Said Warsh, when I think of what’s next
For prices, I’m not really vexed
The narrative’s starting,
A new view, imparting
That lower, is what it expects

While futures have yet to adjust
The more this idea gets discussed
The more it’s presumed
The hike story’s doomed
While negative vibes turn to dust

Fed Chair Warsh was in Sintra, Portugal yesterday on a panel with Madame Lagarde, BOE Governor Bailey and BOC Governor Macklem answering questions about monetary policy, forward guidance, and the future of economies as they are impacted by AI.  Now, despite Mr Warsh’s adamant explanation at the last FOMC presser that forward guidance was dead, that didn’t stop the interviewer from asking about the Fed’s likely future moves repeatedly.  This is getting tiresome.  

Nonetheless, here is the comment I believe was most important. “Expectations of future inflation [over the last four weeks] have come down. Inflation risks have come down,” and anyone expecting the Fed would tolerate inflation running above its 2% goal “would be disappointed,” he added.

So, the first thing I did was look at the CME’s probability matrix based on its Fed funds futures contract, and there is no evidence to support Warsh’s comments there.  As you can see from the below table, it looks virtually identical to what we have seen over the past week, a hike in October and a 40% chance of a second one in December.

Now, I will cut him some slack because, while I agree with him and expect that we will see lower inflation readings this month, simply on the back of the decline in energy prices, the rate hike narrative has been building for a while and has many adherents.  My take is that the above table will not change very much until we have seen the two key data points this month, today’s NFP and CPI which is due to be released on Bastille Day.

While I’m on the subject, here is the current view of today’s median expectations according to tradingeconomics.com

Nonfarm Payrolls110K
Private Payrolls110K
Manufacturing Payrolls3K
Unemployment Rate4.3%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.5% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.3
Participation Rate61.7%
Initial Claims220K
Continuing Claims1810K
Factory Orders-1.8%
-ex Transport0.4%

Yesterday saw a slightly softer than expected ADP employment number, 98K vs. the 113K expected and 122K last month, but as you can see from the chart below, comparing ADP to NFP, while the trend remains similar in both, there are an awful lot of wiggles in any given month.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As things currently stand, the market’s strong Keynesian belief is if NFP is strong, that will be inflationary although it is quite clear that Chairman Warsh does not adhere strictly to that viewpoint (another reason I like him) as he anticipates significant productivity enhancements going forward on the back of AI adoption.  But my point is, if we see a strong print this morning, I would look for the market to price more aggressively for a rate hike.  I guess we’ll find out shortly.

In the meantime, let’s see what happened overnight.  Starting with commodity markets, oil (-1.5%) continues to slide regardless of the group of doomporners who insist that we are about to run out of oil, or that Iran now controls the Strait of Hormuz and will kill the global economy.  In fact, from a technical perspective, we have filled the gap that opened back on March 2nd, the first day markets were open after the conflict began.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

My question for all those who remain certain that we have merely delayed oilmageddon is, how low will prices need to fall before they are willing to admit they misread the reality of the global oil market?  And, with oil sliding, precious metals (Au +0.8%, Ag +1.1%) are finding support.  It seems to me there is a lot of wood left to chop in the PM market, but I maintain my longer-term bullish outlook.

Turning to the bond market, yields rose again yesterday in the US (10-year +6bps) and have edged higher again this morning by 1bp.  My sense is this is based on the idea that Warsh’s final comment from above about tolerating above-target inflation has the hawks all bulled up.  Perhaps, Sintra helped the hawkish case elsewhere as well as European sovereign yields are all higher this morning by between 4bps and 5bps and JGB yields overnight jumped 8bps.

But there is a kink in the narrative now as despite this perceived hawkishness in the bond market, the FX market clearly heard a different tune.  This is clearest in USDJPY, my favorite recent discussion, as you can see in the chart below.  The yen jumped 0.7% ostensibly on the idea that Warsh’s comments about reduced inflation expectations implied a less hawkish Fed, despite the bond market reading the comment about unwillingness to tolerate inflation as a more hawkish Fed.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But it’s not just the yen.  The dollar is lower vs. virtually all its counterparts in both G10 and EMG spaces.  So, the question you need to ask yourself is, who do you believe?  Bond traders or FX traders?  Historically, observers call bond investors/traders the ‘smart’ money, but they have made plenty of mistakes in the past.  And the thing about FX traders is they seem to be far nimbler.  Of course, you know I am an FX guy, and as it happens, I think this is the market that has it right.

Finally, equity markets had a mixed performance in Asia (Japan -2.5%, China -3.0%, Korea -7.9%) as tech stocks have been feeling some pain, but we did see gains in HK (+0.8%), India (+0.8%) and Singapore (+1.1%) as a counterbalance.  That Korean number was impressive, but mostly what we are seeing there is serious volatility as the KOSPI is even more concentrated than the NASDAQ with just two companies, Samsung and SK Hynix, representing about 40% of the index.  If they have a bad day, the index does as well.

In Europe, though, things are brighter this morning with gains across the board (Germany +0.9%, Spain +0.9%, France +0.8%, UK +0.5%) although there is no obvious catalyst for the move.  There was no data of note (Eurozone Unemployment fell to 6.2% but that seems unlikely to be the driver) so perhaps the very fact there are no tech companies in Europe and tech is what is currently under pressure makes Europe seem a bargain.  As to US futures, ahead of all the data this morning, they are little changed.

And that’s really it for today.  As tomorrow is a holiday, there will be no poetry, so I wish you all a wonderful holiday weekend.  3 Cheers for the USMNT after their Round of 32 victory last night (alas it was on way too late for me to watch, but we will all be cheering on Monday night.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

What’s Next To Be Feared?

Posted on by 
For Holmes, when the dog didn’t bark
He recognized that was the spark
To solving the case
And so, we must brace
For narrative changes quite stark

This morning, no headline appeared
Regarding Iran, which is weird
Have markets moved past
This problem, at last?
And if so, what’s next to be feared?

So, perusing the WSJ on-line this morning, the notable absence was any story on Iran and the current situation regarding the ongoing peace talks.  There was a throwaway article about Trump and what he has said about Iran, but nothing of substance.  Part of me is amazed that this is the case as the conflict would still seem to be the most important issue in the markets given the impact on oil prices and inflation, as well as its general geopolitical impact.  But part of me cannot be surprised at all.  It’s not just traders who have the attention span of a fruit fly, apparently so does the general public.

I made the point several weeks ago that this conflict would fade into history quickly when it was ending based on the fact that the Venezuela incursion, back in January, fell from headlines within about three days.  Given the generic MO for most publications of, if it bleeds, it leads, the fact that bombs are no longer falling, and peace talks are ongoing is no longer that interesting.  Add to that the generic TDS of most of the media, where they loved to play up rising oil prices as a major policy failure for Trump, now that those prices have been falling for the past 11 weeks and have slipped >30% in that period, and quite frankly, have further to fall, most editors have moved on.  If they cannot tar Trump with a policy failure, they would rather not discuss the subject at all.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, here we are this morning with the market now turning its focus to an ostensibly hawkish Fed despite the recent analysis by the BLS indicating that more than 60% of the recent uptick in inflation was driven by the rise in energy costs.  So, with energy costs reversing course dramatically, what does that say about their impact on inflation and exactly how hawkish does the Fed need to be in that case.

Right now, equity markets are under some pressure as some of the euphoria associated with the rising tech sector’s stock prices and the ongoing AI mania, is wearing a little thin.  And let’s face it, things certainly seemed a bit bubblicious.  But the combination of ongoing fiscal support from the OBBB and tax cuts and declining energy prices is likely to help support things going forward.  No matter the timeline you observe, we have seen a remarkable rally in tech stocks, as evidenced by the NASDAQ’s chart below.  A correction to the 50-day moving average would hardly be surprising, nor would it be damaging to the overall market structure, I think, although it would almost certainly result in ‘end of days’ headlines!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, while futures this morning are lower across the board (NASDAQ -2.9%, SPX -1.4%, DJIA -0.6%) as of 6:40am, and we could easily see some weakness for a few more days/weeks as positions shake out, I am not in the camp of things are about to collapse.

Speaking of equity markets, the overnight session was filled with red ink led by the KOSPI (-10.0%) in South Korea, although there was weakness pretty much everywhere (Nikkei -3.6%, CSI 300 -2.8%, Hang Seng -1.8%) with India and Taiwan also slipping more than -1.0% although Australia, NZ and Singapore had more muted declines.  Tech was clearly under pressure.  Of course, we cannot be surprised that European shares are also lower in a generally weak risk scenario, but given the lack of tech companies headquartered there, the declines have been far less significant (DAX -1.0%, CAC -0.6%, IBEX -0.2%, FTSE 100 -0.2%) although the Netherlands (-1.3%) home to ASML, the only tech name of note on the continent, is underperforming as well.

Meanwhile, the bond market has peeked at the oil market and decided, perhaps inflation is not a chronic condition, or at least not as bad as previously feared.  Yields are lower across the board with Treasuries (-3bps) leading the way while European sovereigns are all lower by between -3bps and -4bps.  Overnight, though, JGB yields could make no headway lower as the yen continues to be under enormous pressure.

Speaking of the yen, it continues to slowly weaken despite prominent statements by Japanese FinMin Katayama about her discussions with Treasury Secretary Bessent and their agreement to have the US coordinate with Japan in the event it is decided something needs to be done in the markets.  But so far, no signs of actual intervention.  A look at the chart below shows a very slow and steady climb in the dollar, and frankly, I do not see what will change this trajectory.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While interest rates aren’t the only driver, they still have a key impact, and they are the one thing that can be changed quickly.  In fact, the best hope for the yen, in my view, is the fact that at some point soon, the market is going to understand the Fed is not about to raise rates again, and the next move will likely be lower, albeit not until later in the year.  but that change in tone will change a lot of opinions on how the yen should behave, and a move back toward 155 amid modest overall dollar weakness could easily be seen.  But right now, everybody is of the opinion that the FOMC is going to hike this year, and Japan cannot afford to be aggressive in that context, hence the yen’s weakness.

Here is a forecast I do not make lightly, Fed funds will finish the year lower than they are now, probably 3.25%-3.50%.  And the current Fed funds futures market has bottomed (rates peaked) as per the CME table below.

As to the rest of the FX world, the dollar reigns supreme this morning as the euro (-0.3%) is below 1.1400 this morning, its weakest in more than a year as the Flash PMI data did it no favors, but the new hawkish Fed, higher US rates strong dollar narrative has been the driver.  We have seen the same type of movement elsewhere, except where the dollar has moved further, with AUD (-0.8%) the worst performer in the G10 although HUF (-1.0%) is actually the biggest laggard.  However, given the overall decline in commodity prices, those currencies that benefit from rising commodities are also under pressure (NOK (-0.7%, ZAR -0.5%, SEK -0.8%, MXN -0.7%) and we already discussed AUD.

Lastly, the metals markets are also under serious pressure with gold (-1.6%), silver (-4.5%) and copper (-3.3%) all tumbling on the same new view of higher rates and a stronger dollar.  The thing about the commodities story is the fundamentals still seem positive to my eyes, and this seems like the last of the fluff getting taken out.

On the data front, Thursday’s PCE data is the big day and here’s what we have overall:

TodayFlash Manufacturing PMI54.8
 Flash Services PMI51.0
WednesdayNew Home Sales640K
ThursdayInitial Claims225K
 Continuing Claims1800K
 Q1 GDP Final1.6%
 Personal Income0.4%
 Personal Spending0.6%
 PCE0.5% (4.0% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.3% (3.4% Y/Y)
 Durable Goods-4.3%
 -ex Transport0.7%
FridayMichigan Sentiment50.3

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to the data, we start to hear from some of the FOMC members, although I am confident Chairman Warsh won’t be out and about.  Some analysts claim that Warsh’s view of less communication is going to weaken him as others will get to make their point and he won’t be able to counter it.  But I think that Warsh has a plan, and if we continue to see oil prices decline, which seems the likely outcome, then all the inflation fears are going to dissipate and by the time the next meeting rolls around, it will be far harder to make the case that tighter policy is necessary.  Historically, hiking into an energy price shock has been a central banking mistake, and I think Warsh knows this and is keen not to repeat it.

Net, for now, everybody loves the dollar and hates risk on this new hawkish Fed narrative.  But going forward, I like the dollar on the back of a better economy and better investments and expect that the hawkish Fed narrative is going to fade away.  But I’m just an FX poet.

Good luck

Adf

Many Malign

Posted on by 
Said Trump, come next Friday I’ll sign
A deal, and though many malign
The war with Iran
It’s all gone to plan
As they’ve lost their arms and their spine

Thus, oil has fallen in price
While gold and stocks rose in a trice
With bears in retreat
For Trump’s next great feat
Some midterm success would be nice

This is a look at the major energy futures markets according to tradingeconomics.com at 5:15 this morning

Sharp declines on the session in the wake of the announcement, confirmed by the Iranians, that a deal had been struck and that the Strait of Hormuz would be reopening by Friday after the mines are cleared.  And while there has been much discussion over the past week, as you can see in the far-right column, energy prices are still largely higher year-to-date with only NatGas the exception.

To my mind, the question becomes, just how quickly prices continue to decline, and can gasoline prices, the one that matters most to the US consumer, slide back to the $2.00/gallon level that we saw prior to the war?

As you can see from that chart below, it still has a long way to fall, but if the Strait remains open, I suspect it will round trip by the end of the summer, just in time for people to start considering their voting habits.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Remember this, as well, how much have you heard about Venezuela lately?  Back in January, less than six months ago, the US captured and remanded Nicholas Maduro into custody and the world was up in arms.  I would wager that most people don’t even remember it happened!  Memories are very short for global events like this (consider the fact that the Russia – Ukraine war continues and it never even makes the proverbial papers anymore).  For President Trump, the outcome of this situation will be a massively degraded Iranian military with pretty much the rest of the GCC aligned against everything they stood for, an economy that continues to demonstrate remarkable resilience, high stock prices and the likelihood that inflation, as oil prices slide, will be heading back closer to the theoretical 2% target.

There once was a time central banks
Were saviors, and we would give thanks
For all of their aid
When, problems, they slayed
And bankers, they all would close ranks

But last week the ECB raised
Tonight, Ueda-san will be praised
For hiking rates too
So, what will Warsh do?
On Wednesday when his trail is blazed?


Meanwhile, we are in the midst of the monthly central bank onslaught as last week, Madame Lagarde and the ECB raised their base rate by 25 basis points, blaming the ongoing rise in oil prices for leading to inflation.  Of course, 96 hours later, with the announcement by both sides of a deal to end the Iran conflict, this is likely to be seen as an error, the full Trichet as it were.

Tonight, the BOJ meets and all signs are that they, too, are going to be hiking rates by 25bps tonight, to 1.00%, which you will have heard is the highest in more than 30 years.  It’s funny, the official inflation data from Japan is showing a reading of 1.4%, below their target, and now that the prospect of oil prices falling more sharply has increased, it feels like they may be on the cusp of an error here as well.  Consider that of all the governments around, the Japanese with a debt/GDP ratio of about 250% is the nation least able to absorb higher interest rates.  

Which takes us to Wednesday’s FOMC meeting, the first under Chairman Warsh.  There is a long Nick Timiraos article this morning in the WSJ ostensibly explaining that Warsh would like to see less Fed communication, including killing the dot plot, and have the cacophony of Fed speakers shut up.  First, Timiraos has real skin in this game because while he was Powell’s go to, I doubt he will be Warsh’s, thus Timiraos’s status is about to be hit hard.  In fact, the article read as though Powell was writing it to make it seem as though Warsh’s ideas are all wrong.

Personally, I am in favor of less communication by the Fed as policy uncertainty will result in significantly reduced positioning in the speculative community and that is a net benefit for the rest of the market.  Plus, if there is a hiccup, there is less reason for a bailout.  We shall see.  It seems highly unlikely that they move on Wednesday, but we should at least get an inkling of how things may evolve going forward.

So, let’s turn to the markets.  It is no surprise that risk is on everywhere this morning after the Trump announcement so briefly, here is a screenshot from 6:40 this morning showing equity futures markets higher across the board.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While these are just the major markets, the reality is that markets are higher everywhere except Oslo, as the decline in oil prices hits the Norwegian stock market.  But otherwise, it is universal.

Bond yields are lower across the board as well, with Treasuries (-4bps) leading the way and all of Europe seeing sovereign yields decline by between -4bps and -6bps as the inflation story follows oil lower.  JGBs, too, slipped -4bps overnight and are down -17bps in the past week!

But oil remains the story because its movement is what is driving the narrative.  And, interestingly, there is still strong support from one side of the argument that we are close to hitting tank bottoms and prices are going to shoot higher.  We have heard from both Chevron and Exxon that it is a dangerous situation and even the reopening of the Strait may not happen in time to stop it.  But consider if you are Exxon or Chevron, high oil prices are what you need as you sell your inventory rich and drilling is much more profitable.  And one thing they have is a lot of inventory in their refinery systems.  It hardly seems likely they would be out touting the deal as great and talking prices down.  We have heard throughout the conflict that in a few weeks, prices would spike higher as shortages developed, but that has never happened.  I go back to my view that ignoring market prices in favor of the narrative is a mistake.  At this point, with WTI at $80/bbl, I will argue we will see $50 long before we ever see $100 again.

As to metals markets, based on recent price action, it should be no surprise that gold (+2.75%), silver (+4.3%) and copper. (+0.7%) are all rallying on the lower inflation => lower interest rates => increased commodity demand.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure generally as the DXY (-0.25%) is a pretty good proxy for most things.  In truth, we are seeing some larger movements (INR +0.7%, SEK +0.8%, ZAR +0.6%, CHF +0.6%) all responding to the lower oil price, and in the case of the rand, the higher gold price.  However, there are two outliers here.  NOK (0.0%) is, not surprisingly, unable to show any traction, as like the Norwegian stock market, declining oil prices are a drag here, and JPY (+0.1% and still above 160.00).  The latter must really be concerning to Ueda-san as in a broad dollar decline, if the yen can’t gain traction, that is a real problem.

On the data front, there is a bunch of stuff, but other than Retail Sales on Wednesday, all of it is second tier.

TodayEmpire State Manufacturing14.0
 IP0.3%
 Capacity Utilization76.2%
TuesdayRBA rate decision4.35% (unchanged)
 Housing Starts1.44M
 Building Permits1.41M
WednesdayRetail Sales0.5%
 -ex autos0.5%
 FOMC rate decision3.75% (unchanged)
ThursdayInitial Claims232K
 Continuing Claims1790K
 Philly Fed10.0
 Leading Indicators0.1%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In addition to all that, the G7 meets this week, starting this evening in Evian, France with French President Macron leading the group.  

As always there is a great deal of naysaying out there as the joint announcement of a deal between the US and Iran has upset the applecart for many narrative writers, and they are committed to their positions.  Personally, I am very happy to see the deal, although it was early as I had anticipated a July 4th outcome, but in this case, a much better result.  I guess it will take some time before it is clear if things are truly operating more normally again, but market pricing is demonstrating a willingness to believe.

With this in mind, the dollar should remain under some pressure for now, as prospects for a Fed rate hike are going to fade, although they haven’t yet according to the futures market, but if anything, that will simply mean that the US will suck in more global capital as the US economy continues to outperform elsewhere.  Ultimately, that will benefit the greenback.

Good luck

Adf