Tag Archives: federal-reserve

Basically Fictive

Posted on by

For Fedniks it must be addictive
To say rates are “somewhat restrictive”
It seems like a show
As how can they know
Since R-star is basically fictive
 
Investors, though, lap up this stuff
In fact, they just can’t get enough
Of comments that hint
There is a blueprint
For policy, though that’s a bluff

 

Yesterday, both Richmond Fed president Barkin and Governor Jefferson explained that current Fed policy is “somewhat restrictive”.  This takes to seven the number of FOMC members who have used this phrase with Powell, Kugler, Hammack, Schmid and Collins all having used it before, as did Jefferson two weeks ago.  And they are all referring to the concept of R-star, the mythical rate at which policy is neither restrictive nor accommodative.  In fact, R-star has become the Fed’s north star, with the key difference being, we can actually see the north star while R-star, even they will admit, is unobservable.  Of course, that hasn’t stopped them from basing policy decisions on the variable.

I highlight this because the tone of virtually every one of these speeches has been one of caution, with the implication being they are very close to their nirvana so the last steps will be small.  However, we cannot forget that though the last steps may be small, there is still confidence amongst the entire body that the direction of travel is toward lower rates. certainly, as you can see from the aggregated meeting probabilities from the Fed funds futures market below, there is zero expectation that rates will rise anytime during the next two years and a decent chance of another 100bps of cuts over that time.

Source: cmegroup.com

I might contend that is a pretty negative outlook on the US economy by the Fed.  Given the Fed’s models assume that a key to lower inflation is slowing economic growth, the idea that rates are going to fall implies slower growth to help them achieve the inflation portion of their mandate.  But that seems out of step with both the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow forecast shown below and currently sitting at 4.1% annualized for Q3 and with earnings forecasts in the equity markets.

Asking Grok, the average current earnings growth forecasts for 2026 for the S&P 500 is somewhere in the 13% – 14% range with revenue growth running at ~6.9%, which is typically in line with nominal GDP growth.  (I understand that current forward PE ratios are extremely high at 23x, so be careful that companies hit their targets while their share prices fall anyway.)  But if nominal GDP is going to run at nearly 7%, and let’s assume inflation is at 3.5%, which I think is a reasonable possibility, then the math tells us that GDP is growing at 3.5% on a real basis.  With Fed funds currently at 4.0%, why would they need to decline further?

Looking back at the Fed’s September Summary of Economic Projections, it appears that the Fed sees a very different economy than the markets see.  In fact, you can see that they believe nominal GDP in the long run is going to average <4.0% (sum of longer run GDP and PCE in the table below).  

That is a really big difference, one that is the type that can lead to massive policy errors.  Now, if those 17 people cloistered in the Marriner Eccles building have a better handle on the economy than everybody else, I can understand why they believe rates need to fall further.  But is that the case?  

Here’s something else to ponder, I asked Grok about the relationship between nominal GDP and Fed funds and the below table is what it produced:

It is patently obvious how the Fed has developed its models and because of that, why they have been so wrong.  In fact, look at the SEP above and compare it to the period from 2001 – 2019, they are essentially identical.  But I would argue, and I’m not alone, that the economy from the dot.com crash up to the pandemic is no longer the reality on the ground.  The Fed’s backward-looking models seem set to make yet more errors going forward.

And with those cheery thoughts, let’s look at what happened overnight.  Yesterday’s continuation of the US stock decline seems to be finding a bottom, at least temporarily as Asian markets were mixed (Nikkei -0.3%, Hang Seng -0.4%, CSI 300 +0.4%) with the rest of the region showing a similar mixture of gainers (India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines) and losers (Korea, Taiwan, Australia) as it appears the entire world is awaiting Nvidia’s earnings after the US close today.

Similarly, European bourses are edging higher this morning with the rout seemingly over for now.  This morning Spain (+0.5%) is leading the way higher followed by Germany (+0.3%) with the rest of the markets little changed overall, although leaning higher.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:30) they are pushing higher by about 0.4%.

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning, still sitting right around that 4.10% level while European sovereigns have seen demand with yields slipping -2bps to -3bps across the continent.  The UK is the outlier here, with yields unchanged after releasing inflation data that was bang on expectations, and below last month’s readings, though remains well above their 2.0% target.  I guess if I look at the chart below, I might be able to make the case that core UK CPI is trending lower, but similarly to the Fed, the last time they were at their target was July 2021.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that JGB yields have moved higher by 3bps, pushing their decade long highs further along as concerns grow over the Japanese fiscal situation.

Oil prices (-2.4%) are falling this morning, slipping to the low side of $60/bbl after API inventories showed a surprise build of 4.4 million barrels.  However, I would contend that there is very little new here.  Perhaps the dinner last night where President Trump hosted Saudi Prince MbS has some thinking OPEC will increase production more aggressively going forward.  In the metals markets, they are all shining this morning led by silver (+3.1%) and platinum (+3.0%) with gold (+1.3%) and copper (+1.3%) lagging, although remember the latter two are much larger markets so need more interest to rise as quickly.

Finally, the dollar continues to find support, despite the precious metals gains, and this morning we see the DXY (+0.15%) pushing back toward that psychological 100.00 level.  JPY (-0.5%) has traded through 156 and certainly seems like it wants to push back to its YTYD highs of 158.80.  Interestingly, there was no Japanese commentary of note last night, but I presume if this continues, the MOF will be out warning of potential future action.  Another interesting fact is that while the dollar is firmer against virtually all G10 currencies, the EMG bloc is holding its own this morning led by HUF (+0.6%), PLN (+0.25%) and ZAR (+0.15%) with the rand obviously benefitting from gold’s rally.  The forint has benefitted from the central bank maintaining policy on hold at 6.5%, one of the highest available rates in Europe and that has helped drag the zloty along for the ride.

On the data front, this morning we see the August Trade Balance (exp -$61.0B) and then the EIA oil inventories where a small draw is expected.  We also get the FOMC Minutes at 2:00pm and hear from NY Fed president Williams this afternoon.

I cannot help but look at the difference between the Fed’s very clear view and the markets expectations and feel like the Fed is on the wrong side of the trade.  It is for this reason I fear higher inflation and ultimately, a much lower likelihood of further rate cuts.  If that is the case, the dollar will find even more support.  Interesting times.

Good luck

Adf

We All Will Be Fucted

Posted on by

The Fed PhD’s have constructed
Their models, from which they’ve deducted
The future will be
Like post-GFC
In which case, we all will be fucted
 
Instead, perhaps what’s really needed
And for which Steve Miran has pleaded
Is changing impressions
In future Fed sessions
Accepting the past has receded

 

While we all know that things change over time, human nature tends to drive most of us, when facing a new situation, to call on our experience and analogize the new situation to what we have experienced in the past.  But sometimes, the differences are so great that there are no viable analogies.  For the past several years I have made the point in this commentary that the Fed’s models are broken.  Consider, as an example, how wrong they were regarding the alleged transitory nature of inflation in 2022 which led to policy adjustments that not only were far too late to address the issue, but in reality, only had a marginal impact anyway.

On a different, and topical subject, consider the issue with tariffs.  Economists explained that the imposition of tariffs would be devastating to the US consumer, raise prices dramatically and strengthen the dollar as FX markets adjusted to reflect the new trade policy.  But none of that happened, at least not yet.  In fact, the dollar continued to fall in the wake of the Liberation Day tariff announcements, while CPI since then has, granted, edged higher, but remains in its recent range for now and well below the 2022 levels (see below chart from tradingeconomics.com).

And a more important question regarding inflation is, have the tariffs been the driver, or has it been other parts of the price index, housing and core services for instance, that have been the key issue, neither of which would be directly impacted by tariffs.

All of this is to highlight the fact that the world has changed and that the evidence of the past several years, at least, is that the Fed’s econometric models are no longer fit for purpose.  I raise this issue because a look at so many previous market relationships show that many are breaking down.  We have seen gold rise alongside rising real interest rates and the dollar rise alongside gold, two things that are 180o from previous history.  Too, think back to 2022 when both stocks and bonds fell sharply at the same time, breaking the decades-long history of bonds behaving in a manner to offset declines in equity markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This contemplation was brought on by a tweet which led me to a very interesting article (just a 5 minute read) by DL Jacobs of the Platypus Affiliated Society, regarding Fed Governor Miran and his recognition that the world has changed and that the Fed needs to change too.  Here is the second paragraph, and I think it explains the issue beautifully [emphasis added]:

He [Miran] used the moment to challenge the foundations of United States monetary policy. “I think it’s important to take these models seriously, not literally,” he said. He warned that models do not take into account the scale and speed of policy changes in light of the Trump administration’s re-election. The problem with the Fed isn’t wrong technique or bad data, he suggested, but rather that the very structure of its models is embedded in the economic and political assumptions of a bygone era. The world the forecasts are trying to measure no longer exists.

(At this point, I have to explain that the Platypus Society is a left-wing organization trying to explain why Marxism failed and recreate it, but that doesn’t make this article any less worthwhile.  I believe they see it as a step in the destruction of capitalism, which appears to be their goal.)

To me, this is just another point indicating that we’re not in Kansas anymore.  Policies need to change, and the Trump administration is working hard to do so.  One of the key points Miran makes is that the Fed and Treasury ought to be considered as a single entity, with the idea of Fed independence an anachronism from a bygone age.  The upshot is the Trump administration is going to continue to run things hot, or as macro analyst Lynn Alden has been saying, “Nothing stops this train”.  

This means that the Fed is going to run relatively easy monetary policy while the government, via the Treasury, is going to ensure there is ample liquidity available for everything, real economic activity and market activity.  The downside of these policies, alas, is that the idea inflation is going to decline in any meaningful way is simply wrong. It’s not.  Keep this in mind as we go forward.

As it happens, there was very little news of note overnight, at least market news, so let’s see how things behaved.  Friday’s mixed session in the US was followed by Chinese weakness with HK (-0.7%) and China (-0.7%) both under pressure.  Tokyo (-0.1%) was not nearly as impacted and the regional exchanges were actually broadly higher (Korea, India, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand).  The big news in Asia is the increasing verbal jousting by China and Japan at each other after PM Takaichi said, out loud, that if China attacked Taiwan, it would impact Japan.  Given the proximity, that is, of course, true, but apparently it was a taboo item in the diplomatic dance in the past.  I don’t see this having a long-term impact on anything.

In Europe, though, bourses are lower this morning led by Spain (-0.8%) although weakness is widespread (Germany -0.5%, France -0.4%. UK -0.1%).  There has been no data of note to drive this movement and it seems as though we are seeing the beginning of some longer-term profit taking after strong YTD gains by most bourses on the continent.  US futures at this hour (6:45) are pointing a bit higher, 0.43% or so.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -3bps this morning despite (because of?) the market pricing a December rate cut as a virtual coin toss.  This is a huge change over the past month as can be seen at the bottom of the chart below from cmegroup.com

Recent Fedspeak has highlighted the Fed’s uncertainty, especially absent data, and the belief that waiting is a better choice than acting incorrectly (what if waiting is the incorrect move?).  At any rate, we are going to be inundated with both Fedspeak (14 speeches this week!) as well as the beginnings of the delayed data so there will be lots of headlines.  Right now, I think it is fair to say that nobody is confident in the current direction of travel in the economy.  But perhaps, a more hawkish tone at the front of the curve has investors believing that inflation will, once again, become the Fed’s focus.  Alas, I don’t think so.  Looking elsewhere, European sovereign yields have followed Treasury yields lower, slipping between -2bps and -3bps this morning.  Perhaps more interesting is Japan, where JGB yields (+3bps) have risen to a new 17-year high as a prominent LDP member put forth a massive new spending bill to be passed.

In the commodity space, oil remains pinned to the $60/bbl level with lots of huffing and puffing about Russian sanctions and oil gluts and IEA changes of opinion but in the end, WTI has been either side of $60 for the past month+ and continues to trend slowly lower.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Metals remain the most volatile segment of the entire market complex although this morning, movement has not been so dramatic (Au -0.1%, Ag +0.9%, Cu -0.4%, Pt -0.1%).  All the metals remain substantially higher than where they began the year and all have seemingly run into levels at which more consolidation is needed before any further substantial gains can be made.  I don’t think the supply/demand story has changed here, just the price action.

Finally, the dollar is a touch firmer this morning, with the DXY (+0.1%) a good representation of the entire space.  The only two currencies that have moved more than 0.2% today are KRW (-0.9%) which reversed Friday’s price action and is explained as continued capital outflows to the US for investment.  On the flip side, CLP (+1.1%) is benefitting from the first round of Presidential elections in Chile, where the right-wing candidate came out ahead and is expected to consolidate the vote and win an absolute majority in the second round.  Jose Antonio Kast, if he wins, is expected to proffer more market-friendly policies than the current socialist president, Gabriel Boric.  It seems the people in Chile have had enough of socialism for now.  But other than those two currencies, this market remains quiet.

On the data front, there is so much data to be released, but the calendar for much of it has not yet been finalized.  One thing that is finalized is the September employment situation which is due for release Thursday morning at 8:30. This morning we see Empire State Manufacturing (exp 6.0) and Construction Spending (-0.1%) and hopefully, the calendar will fill in as the week passes.

While equity markets remain very near their all-time highs, the Fear and Greed Index is firmly in Fear territory as per the below from cnn.com.

Historically, this has been seen as an inverse indicator for stock markets although it has been down here for more than a month.  Uncertainty breeds fear and the lack of data has many people uncertain about the current state of the US economy since the only information they get is either from the cacophony of social media, the bias of mainstream media or their own two eyes.  But even if you trust your own eyes, they just don’t see that much, likely not enough to come to a broad conclusion. 

FWIW, which is probably not much, my take is things are slower than they have been earlier in the year, but nowhere near recession.  I think it is the correct decision for the Fed to hold next month rather than cut because the drivers of inflation remain extant.  But Jay doesn’t ask me.  Whether Miran is correct in his prescriptions for the economy, I am gratified that he is questioning the underlying structure.  In the meantime, run it hot remains the name of the game and that means any risk-off period is likely to be short.

Good luck

Adf

Far From It

Posted on by

Ahead of the FOMC
The pundits were sure they would see
A cut come December
As every Fed member
Saw joblessness to some degree
 
But turns out, dissent did abound
And Jay, to the press, did expound
December’s not destined
“Far from it”, when pressed, and
The bond market fell to the ground

 

The Fed cut the 25bps that were priced and they said they would end QT, the balance sheet runoff beginning December 1st.  As well, they indicated that as MBS matured, they would be replaced with T-bills.  So far, all pretty much as expected.  But…the vote was 7-2 for the cut.  One dissent was Stephen Miran, once again looking for 50bps but the real shocker was KC Fed president Jeffrey Schmid, who wanted to stand pat!  During the press conference, Powell explained [emphasis added], “there were strongly different views about how to proceed in December.  A further reduction in the policy rate at the December meeting is not a foregone conclusion.  Far from it!”

The Fed funds futures market jumped on that comment and as of this morning, the December probability fell from 92% to 70% with only a 3/4 probability of another cut after that by April, down from a near certainty by March previously.  

You won’t be surprised by the fact that the bond market sold off hard, with yields rising 10bps on the day, with seven of those coming in the wake of the press conference.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Stocks struggled, with the DJIA under modest pressure and the S&P 500 unchanged although the NASDAQ managed to rise yet again to a new high, as NVDA doesn’t pay attention to gravity.

So much has been written about this that I don’t think it is worth going into more detail.  FWIW, my view is the Fed is still going to cut in December, and that will become clearer as the government reopens (which I think happens by the end of the week) and data starts to trickle out again.  The employment situation remains their main focus, and it just doesn’t seem that positive right now.  I suspect next year, when the OBBB policies begin to be implemented and we see the fruits of the dramatic increase in foreign investment in the US, that situation can change, but things feel slow for now.  

In effect, that is why they are going to run the economy as hot as they can to try to prevent any recession and hopefully make it to the point where the government can back off and the private sector picks up the slack.  At least, that’s my read for now.  For the dollar, that means more support.  For stocks, the same.  And the inflation prospects will keep the precious metals supported.  Bonds feel like the worst place to be.

In other central bank news, the Bank of Canada cut 25bps, as expected, and in their commentary explained rates were now “at about the right level” for the economy based on their projections.  The market demonstrated they cared about this story for about 3 hours, as the initial move was modest CAD strength that evaporated as soon as Powell started speaking.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The BOJ also met last night and left rates on hold, as widely expected, with the same two votes for a rate hike as the last meeting.  During the press conference, Ueda-san explained, “We held today as we want to see more data on domestic wage-setting behaviors, while uncertainty remains high in overseas economies. If we’re convinced, we’ll adjust rates regardless of the political situation.”  The yen (-0.6%) fared somewhat poorly, responding to Ueda-san’s comments regarding the relative lack of strength in the Japanese economy.  Ultimately, as you can see in the below chart, the yen fell to its weakest point since last February, although I suspect if I am correct regarding the Fed continuing its policy ease, that weakness will abate somewhat.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While Spinal Tap got to eleven
Said Trump, t’was a twelve, not a seven
The deal that he struck
To get things unstuck
With China, it’s manna from heaven

The last big story was the long-awaited meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi last night, where the two sat down and agreed to cool the temperature regarding trade.  Key aspects include the US reducing tariffs on China, especially those regarding fentanyl, as well as rolling back the broad restrictions on Chinese companies, while China will purchase “tremendous amounts” of soybeans and pause their restrictions on the sale of rare earth minerals.  Tiktok came up, and that will be settled and overall, it appears that a great deal of progress was made.  This was confirmed by the Chinese as they announced the same things.
 
Clearly, this is an unalloyed positive for the global economy and while the situation is not back to its pre-Trump days, it offers the hope of some stability for the time being.  But the surprising thing about these announcements was how little they seemed to help financial markets.  For instance, both the Hang Seng (-0.25%) and CSI 300 (-0.8%) slipped during the session, as did India (-0.7%) and Australia (-0.5%) with the rest of the region basically unchanged.  That is a disappointing performance for what appears to be a very positive outcome.  I suppose it could be a ‘sell the news’ response, but in today’s markets, especially with the ongoing influx of central bank liquidity, I would have expected more positivity.
 
Turning to European markets, they are lower across the board led by Spain (-1.1%) and France (-0.6%) as the US-China trade deal had little impact, and investors responded to a plethora of data on GDP and inflation.  The odd thing about this is that the Q/Q GDP data was better than expected across the board (France 0.5%, Netherlands 0.4%, Germany 0.0%, Eurozone 0.2%) which was confirmed by positive confidence data and modest inflation.  While those growth numbers are hardly dramatic, at least they are not recessionary.  You just can’t please some people!  Meanwhile, at this hour (6:30) US futures are little changed to slightly softer.
 
If we turn to the bond markets, yesterday’s dramatic rise in Treasury yields is consolidating with the 10-year slipping -1bp this morning.  In Europe, sovereign yields are higher by 3bps across the board as they catch up to yesterday’s Treasury move.  At this hour, though, bond markets are doing little as investors and traders await Madame Lagarde’s announcements at 9:15 EDT although there is no expectation for any rate move.  In fact, looking at the ECB’s own website, there is currently a 5% probability of a rate hike!  (That ain’t gonna happen, trust me.)
 
In the commodity markets, oil (-0.5%) is softer this morning but is still right around $60/bbl with yesterday’s EIA inventory data showing a larger draw on inventories than expected.  That is what helped yesterday’s modest gains, but those have since been reversed.  In the metals markets, price action remains quite choppy, but this morning sees gold (+1.3%), silver (+1.0%) and platinum (+0.35%) all bouncing although copper (-0.2%) is a touch softer.  Nothing has changed my longer-term views here, but it does appear that there is a lot more choppiness that we will need to work through before the trend reasserts itself.
 
Finally, the dollar, which rose yesterday on the relatively hawkish Fed commentary is mixed this morning as it shows strength vs. the yen (now -0.8%), ZAR (-0.4%), KRW (-0.35%), and INR (-0.4%) with even CNY (-0.2%) following suit, although the rest of the currency universe has moved only +/-0.1% from yesterday’s closes.  Again, my view is the dollar is confined to a range, has been so for many months, and we will need to see some policy changes to break out in either direction.  Right now, those policy changes don’t seem to be imminent.
 
With data still MIA, the only things to which we can look forward are the ECB and the first post-meeting Fed speak with Governor Bowman and Dallas Fed president Logan up today.  I would have thought risk assets would be in greater demand this morning, but that is clearly not the case.  Perhaps, as we approach month-end, we are seeing some window dressing, but despite the ostensible hawkish outcome from yesterday’s FOMC, I don’t think anything has changed with their future path of more rate cuts no matter what.  As equity markets had a broadly positive October, rebalancing flows would indicate sales, but come Monday, I think the rally continues.  As to the dollar, there is still no reason to sell that I can discern.
 
Good luck
Adf
 
 
 

What Havoc it Wreaks

Posted on by

Today, for the first time in weeks
Comes news that will thrill data geeks
It’s CPI Day
So, what will it say?
We’ll soon see what havoc it wreaks
 
The forecast is zero point three
Too high, almost all would agree
But Jay and the Fed
When looking ahead
Will cut rates despite what they see

 

Spare a thought for the ‘essential’ BLS employees who were called back to the office during the shutdown so that they could prepare this month’s CPI report.  The importance of this particular report is it helps define the COLA adjustments to Social Security for 2026, so they wanted a real number, not merely the interpolation that would have otherwise been used.  Expectations for the outcome are Headline (0.4% M/M, 3.1% Y/Y) and Core (0.3% M/M, 3.1% Y/Y) with both still well above the Fed’s 2% target.  As an aside, we are also due Michigan Sentiment (55.0), but I suspect that will have far less impact on markets.

If we consider the Fed and its stable prices mandate, one could fairly make the case that they have not done a very good job, on their own terms, when looking at the chart below which shows that the last time Core CPI was at or below their self-defined target of 2.0% was four and one-half years ago in March 2021.  And it’s not happening this month either.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, when we consider the Fed and its toolkit, the primary monetary policy tool it uses is the adjustment of short-term interest rates.  The FOMC meets next Tuesday and Wednesday and will release its latest statement Wednesday afternoon followed by Chairman Powell’s press conference.  A quick look at the Fed funds futures market pricing shows us that despite the Fed’s singular inability to push inflation back toward its own target using its favorite tool, it is going to continue to cut interest rates and by the end of this year, Fed funds seem highly likely to be 50bps lower than their current level.

Source: cmegroup.com

The other tool that the Fed utilizes to address its monetary policy goals is the size of its balance sheet, as ever since the GFC and the first wave of ‘emergency’ QE, buying (policy ease) and selling (policy tightening) bonds has been a key part of their activities.  As you can see from the chart below, despite the 125bps of interest rate cuts since September of 2024 designed to ease policy, they continue to shrink the balance sheet (tighten policy) which may be why they have had net only a modest impact on things in the economy.  Driving with one foot on the gas and one on the brake tends to impede progress.

But now, the word is the Fed will completely stop balance sheet shrinkage by the end of the year, something we are likely to hear next Wednesday, as there has been much discussion amongst the pointy-head set about whether the Fed’s balance sheet now contains merely “ample” reserves rather than the previous description of “abundant” reserves.  And this is where it is important to understand Fedspeak, because on the surface, those two words seem awfully similar.  As I sought an official definition of each, I couldn’t help but notice that they both are synonyms of plentiful.

These are the sorts of things that, I believe, reduces the Fed’s credibility.  They sound far more like Humpty Dumpty (“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”) than like a group that analyses data to help in decision making.  

At any rate, no matter today’s result, it is pretty clear that Fed funds rates are going lower.  The thing is, the market has already priced for that outcome, so we will need to see some significant data surprises, either much weaker or stronger, to change views in interest rate sensitive markets like bonds and FX.

As to the shutdown, there is no indication that it is going to end anytime soon.  The irony is that the continuing resolution passed by the House was due to expire on November 21st.  it strikes me that even if they come back on Monday, they won’t have time to do the things that the CR was supposed to allow.  

Ok, let’s look at what happened overnight.  Yesterday’s rally in the US was followed by strength in Japan (+1.35%) after PM Takaichi indicated that they would spend more money but didn’t need to borrow any more (not sure how that works) while both China (+1.2%) and HK (+0.7%) also rallied on the confirmation that Presidents Trump and Xi will be meeting next week.  Elsewhere, Korea and Thailand had strong sessions while India, Taiwan and Australia all closed in the red.  And red is the color in Europe this morning with the CAC (-0.6%) the main laggard after weaker than forecast PMI data, while the rest of Europe and the UK all suffer very modest losses, around -0.1%.  US futures, though, are higher by 0.35% at this hour (7:20).

In the bond market, Treasury yields edged higher again overnight, up 1bp while European sovereigns have had a rougher go of things with yields climbing between 3bps and 4bps across the board.  While the French PMI data was weak, Germany and the rest of the continent showed resilience which, while it hasn’t seemed to help equities, has hurt bonds a bit.  Interestingly, despite the Takaichi comments about more spending, JGB yields slipped -1bp.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.7%) continues its rebound from the lows at the beginning of the week as the sanctions against the Russian oil majors clearly have the market nervous.  Of course, despite the sharp rally this week, oil remains in the middle of its trading range, and at about $62/bbl, cannot be considered rich.  Meanwhile, metals markets continue their recent extraordinary volatility, with pretty sharp declines (Au -1.7%, Ag -0.9%, Pt -2.1%) after sharp rallies yesterday.  There seems to be quite the battle ongoing here with positions being flushed out and delivery questions being raised for both futures and ETFs.  Nothing has changed my long-term view that fiat currencies will suffer vs. precious metals, but the trip can be quite volatile in the short run.

Finally, the dollar continues to creep higher vs. its fiat compatriots, with JPY (-.25%) pushing back toward recent lows (dollar highs) after the Takaichi spending plan announcements.  But, again, while the broad trend is clear, the largest movement is in PLN (-0.4%) hardly the sign of a major move.

And that’s all there is today.  We await the data and then go from there.  Even if the numbers are right at expectations, 0.3% annualizes to about 3.6%, far above the Fed’s target and much higher than we had all become accustomed to in the period between the GFC and Covid.  But remember, central bankers, almost to a wo(man) tend toward the dovish side, so I think we all need to be prepared for higher prices and weaker fiat currencies, although still, the dollar feels like the best of a bad lot.

There will be no poetry Monday as I will be heading to the AFP conference in Boston to present about a systematic way to more effectively utilize FX collars as a hedging tool.  But things will resume on Tuesday.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Tariff Redux

Posted on by

While many have called for stagflation
The ‘stag’ story’s lost its foundation
Q2 turned out great
With growth, three point eight
While ‘flation showed some dissipation
 
Meanwhile, Mr Trump’s on a roll
As he strives to still reach his goal
It’s tariff redux
On drugs and on trucks
While ‘conomists tally the toll

 

Analysts worldwide have decried President Trump’s policies as setting up to lead the US to stagflation with the result being the dollar would ultimately lose its status as the world’s reserve currency while the economy’s growth fades and prices rise.  “Everyone” knew that tariffs were the enemy of sane fiscal and trade policy and would slow growth leading to higher unemployment and inflation while the Fed would be forced to choose which issue to address.  In fact, when Q1 GDP was released at -05%, there was virtual glee from the analyst community as they were preening over how prescient they were.

But yesterday, we learned that things may not be as bad as widely hoped proclaimed by the analyst community after all.  Q2 GDP was revised up to +3.8% annualized growth, substantially higher than even the first estimate of 3.0% back in July.  Not only that, Durable Goods Orders rose 2.9% with the ex-Transport piece rising 0.4% while the BEA’s inflation calculations, also confusingly called PCE rose 2.1%.  Initial Claims rose only 218K, well below estimates and indicative that the labor market, while not hot, is not collapsing.  Finally, the Goods Trade Balance deficit was a less than expected -$85.5B, certainly not great, but moving in President Trump’s preferred direction.

In truth, that was a pretty strong set of economic data, better than expectations across the entire set of releases, and clearly not helping those trying to write the stagflation narrative.  Now, Trump is never one to sit around and so promptly imposed new tariffs on medicines, heavy trucks and kitchen cabinets to try to bring the manufacture of those items back into the US.  Whatever your opinion of Trump, you must admit he is consistent in seeking to achieve his goal of returning manufacturing prowess to the US.

Meanwhile, down in Atlanta, their GDPNow Q3 estimate is currently at 3.3%, certainly not indicating a slowing economy.  

In fact, if that pans out, it would be only the 14th time this century that there were two consecutive quarters of GDP growth of at least 3.3%, of which 4 of those were in the recovery from the Covid shutdown.

It would be very easy to make the case that the US economy seems to be doing pretty well, at least based on the data releases.  I recognize that there is a great deal of angst about, and I have highlighted the asynchronous nature of the economy lately, but what this is telling me is that things may be syncing up in a positive manner.

So, what does this mean for markets?  Perhaps the first place to look is the Fed funds futures market as so much stock continues to be put into the Fed’s next move.  Not surprisingly, earlier exuberance over further rate cuts has faded a bit, with the probability of an October cut slipping to 85%, down about 10 points in the wake of the data, and a total of less than 40bps now priced in for the rest of the year.  Recall, it was not that long ago that people were considering 100bps in the last three meetings of the year.

Source: cmegroup.com

The next place to look is at the foreign exchange markets, where the dollar’s demise has been widely forecast amid changing global politics with many pundits highlighting the idea that the BRICS nations would be moving their business away from dollars.  For a long time, I have highlighted that the dollar is currently within a few percent of its long-term average price, neither particularly strong nor weak, and that fears of a collapse were unwarranted.  However, I have also recognized that a dovish Fed could easily weaken the dollar for a period of time.  Short dollar positions remain large as the leveraged community continues to bet on that outcome, although I have to believe it is getting expensive given they are paying the points to maintain that view.

But if we look at how the dollar has performed over the past several sessions, using the DXY as our proxy, we can see that despite a very modest -0.1% decline overnight, it appears that the dollar may be breaking its medium-term trend line lower as per the chart below from tradingeconomics.com

Again, my point is that the idea that the US is facing a catastrophic outcome with a recession due and a collapsing dollar is just not supported by the data or the markets.  And here’s an interesting thought from a very smart guy, Mike Nicoletos (@mnicoletos on X) regarding some of the key drivers of the current orthodoxy regarding the dollar, notably the debt and deficit.  What if, given the dollar’s overwhelming importance to the world economy, we should be comparing those things to its global scale, not just the domestic scale.  If using that framework, as he describes here, the debt ratio falls to 58% and the budget deficit is down to 2.9%, much less worrying and perhaps why markets and analysts are out of sync.

Markets are going to go where they will, but having a solid framework as to how the economy impacts them is a very helpful tool when managing money and risk.  Perhaps this needs to be considered overall.

Ok, a really quick tour.  Yesterday was the third consecutive down day in the US, although all told, the decline has been less than -2%, so hardly devastating.  Asia mostly fell overnight as concerns over both tariffs and a Fed less likely to cut rates weighed on equities there with Japan (-0.9%), China (-1.0%) and HK (-1.35%) all under pressure.  The story was worse for other regional bourses with Korea (-2.5%), India (-0.9%) and Taiwan (-1.7%) indicative of the price action.

However, Europe has taken a different route with modest gains across the board (DAX +0.3%, CAC +0.45%, IBEX +0.6%) as investors seem to be looking through the tariff concerns.  US futures are also edging higher at this hour (7:45).

In the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -1bp this morning, and while they remain above the levels seen immediately in the wake of the FOMC last week, they appear to be finding a home at current levels of 4.15% +/-.  European sovereigns are all seeing yields slip -3bps this morning as today’s story is focusing on how most developed nations are reducing the amount of long-dated paper they are selling to restrict supply and keep yields down.  This has been decried by many since then Treasury Secretary Yellen started this process, but as with most government actions, the expedience of the short-term benefit far outweighs the potential long-term consequences and so everybody jumps on board.

Turning to commodities, oil (-0.1%) is still trading below the top of its range and while it has traded bottom to top this week, there is no sign of a breakout yet.  I read yet another explanation yesterday as to why peak oil demand is going to be seen this year, or next year, or soon, which will drive prices lower.  While I do think prices eventually slide lower, I take the other side of that supply-demand idea and believe it will come from increased supply (Argentina, Guyana, Brazil, Alaska) rather than reduced demand.  In the metals markets, yesterday saw silver (-0.2%) jump nearly 3% to yet another new high for the move as traders set their sights on $50/oz.  Meanwhile gold (0.0%) continues to grind higher in a far less flashy manner than either silver or platinum (+10% this week) as regardless of my explanation of relative dollar strength vs. other fiat currencies, against stuff, all fiat remains under pressure.

And finally, the dollar after a nice rally yesterday, is consolidating this morning.  The currency I really want to watch is the yen, where CPI last night was released at 2.5%, lower than expected and which must be giving Ueda-san pause with respect to the next rate hike.  Most analysts are still convinced they will hike in October, but if inflation has stopped rising, will they?  I would not be surprised to see USDJPY head well above 150, a level it is fast approaching, over the next month.

On the data front, this morning’s BLS version of PCE (exp 0.3%, 2.7% Y/Y) and Core PCE (0.2%, 2.9% Y/Y) is released at 8:30 along with Personal Income (0.3%) and Personal Spending (0.5%).  Then at 10:00, Michigan Sentiment (55.4) is released and somehow, I have a feeling that could be better than forecast.  We hear from a bunch more Fed speakers as well although a pattern is emerging that indicates they are ready to cut again next month, at least until they see data that screams stop.

The world is not ending and in fact, may be doing just fine, at least economically. Meanwhile, the dollar is finding its legs so absent a spate of very weak data, I think we may see another 2% or so rebound in the greenback over the next several weeks.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

No Reprieve

Posted on by

The barbarous relic is soaring
As Stephen Miran is imploring
That Fed funds should be
At 2, don’t you see
An idea that Trump is adoring
 
But what else would happen if Steve
Is Fed Chair, when Powell does leave?
At first stocks would rally
Though bonds well could valley
And ‘flation? There’d be no reprieve

 

Arguably, the most interesting news in the past twenty-four hours has been the speech given by the newest FOMC member, Stephen Miran, where he explained his rationale for interest rates going forward.  There is no point going into the details of the argument here, but the upshot is he believes that 2.0% is the proper current setting for Fed funds based on his interpretation of the Taylor Rule.  That number is significantly lower than any other estimate I have seen from other economists, but then, the track record of most economists hasn’t been that stellar either.  Who am I to say he is right or wrong?

Well, actually, I guess that’s what I do, comment from the cheap seats, and FWIW, I suspect that number is far too low.  But forgetting economists’ views, perhaps the best arbiter of those views is the market, and in this case, the gold market.  With that in mind, I offer the following chart from tradingeconomics.com:

Those are weekly bars in the chart which shows us that the price of gold has risen for the past five weeks consecutively, during which time it has gained more than 14% on an already elevated price given the rally that began back in the beginning of 2024. Today’s 1% rise is just another step toward what appears to be much higher levels going forward.  

Why, you may ask, is gold rallying like this?  The thought process, which Miran defined for us all yesterday, is that he is in line to be the next Fed chair when Powell leaves, and so his effort will be to cut rates as quickly as possible to that 2% level.  Of course, the risk is inflation readings will continue to rise while the Fed is cutting.  If that occurs, and I suspect it is quite likely, then fears about a weaker dollar are well founded (that has been my view all along, aggressive rate cuts by the Fed will undermine the dollar in the short-run, longer term is different) and gold and other commodities will benefit greatly.  As to bonds…well here the picture is likely to be pretty ugly, with yields rising.  In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised to see 10-year Treasury yields head back toward 5.0% at which point the Treasury and the Fed, working hand in hand, will cap them via some combination of QE and YCC.

Of course, this is just one hypothesis based on what we know today and won’t happen until Q2 or Q3 next year.  Gold is merely sniffing out the probability of this outcome.  Remember, too, that the Trump administration has been quite unpredictable in its policy moves, and so none of this is a sure thing.

As an aside, given the inherent dovishness of the current make up of Fed governors, it would seem that a Miran chairmanship with a distinctly dovish bent will not have much problem getting the rest of the FOMC to go along, except perhaps for a few regional presidents.  And that doesn’t even assume that Governor Cook is forced out.  After all, she is a raging dove, just a political one that doesn’t want to give President Trump what he wants.

And before I start in on the overnight activity, here is another question I have.  Generally, economists are much more in favor of consumption taxes (that’s why they love a VAT) rather than income taxes and it makes sense, in that consumption taxes offer folks the choice to pay the tax by consuming or not.  If that is the case, why are these same economists’ hair all on fire about the tariffs, which they plainly argue is a consumption tax?  I read that the US is set to generate $400 billion in tariff revenue this year which would seem to go a long way to offsetting no tax on tips and other tax cuts from the OBBB.  I would expect that if starting from scratch, an honest economist, with no political bias (if such a person were to exist) would much rather see lower income tax rates and higher consumption tax rates.  Alas, that feels like a conversation we will never be able to have.

Anyway, on to markets where yesterday saw yet another set of new all-time highs in the US across all the major indices with futures this morning slightly higher yet again.  Japan was closed for Autumnal Equinox Day, while the rest of the region had a mixed performance.  China (-0.1%) and HK (-0.7%) suffered on continuing concerns over the Chinese economy with news that banks which are still dealing with property loan problems are now beginning to see consumer loan defaults as well.  Elsewhere Korea and Taiwan both rallied nicely, following the tech-led US while India suffered a bit on the H1-B visa story with the rupee falling to yet another historic low (dollar high) now pushing 89.00.  There were some other laggards as well (Thailand, Philippines) but most of the rest were modestly higher.  

In Europe, green is the theme with the CAC (+0.7%) leading the way while the DAX (+0.2%) and IBEX (+0.3%) are not as positive.  Ironically, Flash PMI data showed that French activity was lagging the most, with both manufacturing (48.1) and services (48.9) below the 50.0 breakeven level and much worse than expected.  It seems the fiscal issues in France are starting to feed into the private sector.  As to the UK, weaker Flash PMI data there has resulted in no change in the FTSE 100 as it appears caught between inflation worries and growth worries.

In the bond market, Treasury yields which rose 2bps yesterday have slipped by -1bp this morning while continental sovereigns are all essentially unchanged.  The one outlier here is the UK where gilts (-3bps) are rallying on hopes that the PMI data will lead to easier monetary policy.

Elsewhere in the commodity markets, oil (+1.1%) is bouncing from its recent lows but has not made much of a case to breech its recent $61.50/$65.50 trading range as per the below.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The other precious metals are rocking alongside gold (Ag +0.7%, Pt +2.6%) with silver having outperformed gold since the beginning of the year by nearly 10 percentage points.  Oh, and platinum has risen even more, more than 63% YTD!

Finally, the dollar is basically unchanged this morning, with marginal movement against most of its counterparties.  There are only two outliers, SEK (+0.5%) which rallied despite (because of?) the Riksbank cutting their base rate by 25bps in a surprise move.  However, the commentary indicated they are done cutting for this cycle, so perhaps that is the support.  On the other side of the coin, INR (-0.5%) has been weakening steadily with the H1-B visa story just the latest chink in the armor there.  PM Modi is walking a very narrow tight rope to appease President Trump while not upsetting Presidents Putin and Xi.  His problem is that he needs both cheap oil and the US market for the economy to continue its growth, and there is a great deal of tension in his access to both simultaneously.  But away from those currencies, +/- 0.1% describes the session.

On the data front, today brings the Flash PMI data (exp 52.0 Manufacturing, 54.0 Services) and the Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index (-5.0).  remember, the Philly Fed Index registered a much higher than expected 23.2 last week, so the manufacturing story is clearly not dead yet.

Arguably, though, of far more importance than those numbers will be Chairman Powell’s speech at 12:35 this afternoon on the Economic Outlook in Providence, RI.  All eyes and ears will be on his current views regarding the employment situation and inflation, especially in light of Miran’s speech yesterday.

While the gold market is implying our future is inflationary and fiat currencies will weaken, the FX market has not yet taken that idea to extremes.  Any dovishness by Powell, which given the lack of data since we heard from him last week would be a surprise, will have an immediate impact.  However, I suspect he will maintain the relatively hawkish tone of the press conference and not impact markets much at all.

Good luck

Adf

Many Ructions

Posted on by

Just two days before Halloween
When Jay and his minions convene
With great joie de vivre
Investors believe
A quarter-point cut will be seen
 
But what if the model that Jay
Consults might have led him astray
Then Fed fund reductions
May cause many ructions
In markets, and too, the beltway

 

I have often discussed the fact that the models the Fed uses no longer seem to work very effectively as evidenced by the tardiness of their reaction function and the results that occur after the fact.  Consider, the Fed was uniformly convinced that inflation was transitory in 2021 and 2022, right up until it hit 7% when it finally dawned on them that it wasn’t.  I would argue that part of the problem is they continue to utilize a Keynesian framework, which has not proven to be very effective for monetary policy (although it’s great for politicians as a fiscal policy excuse to spend more money.)

But I am just a poet and my voice is not so loud in financial markets.  However, John Mauldin is someone with much greater reach and his letter this week highlighted that exact issue. (For those of you who are not familiar with John, his weekly letter, “Thoughts from the Frontline” is usually an excellent read and completely free, you should sign up.)  At any rate, he reprinted a chart originally in the WSJ that I think does an excellent job of demonstrating the flaws in models developed pre-Covid.

It is quite apparent how this particular model, which appears to use the type of inputs that most econometric models utilize, had done a pretty good job, even throughout the GFC, of anticipating changes in consumer sentiment right up until Covid.  However, it is also clear that since then, it has a terrible track record.  

And this is the problem.  I would wager that every one of the models built by the hundreds of PhD’s at the Fed has a similar problem, things that used to drive economic decision making no longer do.  I guess when people get used to the government supporting them completely, many are willing to sit back and do nothing.  And when that support stops, it appears that people aren’t very happy about that situation.  Go figure!

The bigger picture here is that I believe it is time for the Fed to question its own modeling prowess.  Consider the situation that with interest rates at their current levels of 4% +/- a bit depending on the tenor, many people, especially retirees, were quite content to clip coupons and were spending those funds supporting the economy.  At the same time, interest expense for small companies never really fell that far, so current rates are not deathly. 

But you know who benefits from low interest rates?  The government and large corporations who have access to capital markets and pay the lowest rates.  And even there, companies like Apple, Google and Microsoft have so much cash on hand that they are net earning interest with higher rates.

All this begs the question, what is the purpose of the Fed cutting rates?  A key risk is that inflation will return with a vengeance.  It has been 55 months since core PCE was at or below the Fed’s target level of 2.0% as you can see in the below chart, and I feel confident in saying that when the data is released this Friday, it will not be changing that trend.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, savers will suffer as their income will be reduced, the risk of rising inflation will increase as easier monetary policy typically precedes that type of movement, and long-term yields, which have rebounded recently, run the risk of starting higher again.  Remember what happened last year when the Fed cut, 10-year Treasury yields rose 100bps. (see chart below)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It is far too early to claim the outcome will be the same this time, but it is a real risk.  After all, bond yields have a strong relationship with inflation, running at a long-term correlation of 0.36 and as can be seen in the chart below I prepared from FRED data.

Concluding, the current batch of economic models utilized by analysts and the Fed appear to have limited ability to describe the economy, whether it is because of the asynchronous nature of the current state of the world, or because the unprecedented government responses around the world to the Covid pandemic have changed the way everything works.  The market is pricing a 93% probability of another rate cut in October, and it appears Chairman Powell believes that to be the case.  But is it the right move at this time?  I feel like that is not the question being asked, but it needs to be by people more powerful than this poet.

Ok, I’ll step down from my soapbox to survey the market activity overnight.  Friday’s US closes at yet more all-time highs were followed by a more mixed session in Asia.  While Japanese investors got the joke, with the Nikkei rising 1.0%, Hong Kong (-0.8%) and India (-0.6%) were both under pressure with the former suffering from a strengthening currency and concern about a major typhoon about to hit the island nation, while India is suffering from the backlash of the Trump policy change on H1-b visas, now charging $100,000 for them.  It turns out Indian firms were the largest user of those visas and there is concern over a serious economic impact there.  Otherwise, the region saw a mixture of green (China, Taiwan, Australia, Malaysia) and red (New Zealand, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand).

European bourses, though, are having a tougher time this morning with the continental exchanges all under pressure (DAX -0.7%, CAC -0.3%, IBEX -1.0%, FTSE MIB -1.0%) as concerns rise over the Flash PMI data to be released tomorrow and the idea it may show a much weaker economy than previously considered.  As well, USD futures are softer at this hour (6:40), with all three major indices showing declines on the order of -0.25%.  However, we must keep in mind that the trend in equity markets has been strongly higher so a modest pullback would not be a surprise and perhaps should be welcomed.

In the bond market, yields having moved higher on Friday, are quite stable this morning with Treasury yields unchanged and most of Europe seeing a -1bp decline.  The only outlier here is Japan, where JGB yields topped 1.65%, a new high for the move and the highest level since 2008 as per the below chart from marketwatch.com.  Ueda-san has to start getting worried soon, I think.

In the commodity space, oil (-0.7%) is continuing its recent decline but remains within the trading range and doesn’t appear to have much impetus in the short term in either direction.  However, I continue to look for an eventual decline here.  As to gold (+1.15%) and silver (+1.6%), nothing is going to stop this train.  Well, certainly there is no indication that policy changes are coming anywhere in the world that would force investors to rethink the idea of continuous depreciation of fiat currencies, and let’s face it, that’s all this represents.  I continue to see analysts raise their target price for the barbarous relic and I agree there is plenty of room to run as interest has been modest, at best, by Western investors.

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning with both the euro (+0.25%) and pound (+0.25%) leading the way in the G10, although the yen is basically unchanged.  There was an interesting story in Bloombergdiscussing how volatility in the FX markets has been declining rapidly with many attributing this to the rise of algorithmic trading.  As well, all over X this morning are stories about how the dollar’s decline this year (about -14% vs. the euro) is unprecedented.  It’s not at all which is one of the reasons you need be careful about what people put up there.  It seems that some analysts are putting undue emphasis on the starting point being January 1st, rather than when the market tops.  But saying the dollar is declining in an unprecedented manner is absurd and picayune.  Meanwhile, EMG currencies are all over the place with gainers (KRW +0.4%, ZAR +0.4%) and laggards (MXN -0.5%, INR -0.25%) and everything in between.  

On the data front, PCE is Friday’s offering, but before then there is some stuff and more interestingly, there is lots of Fed speak.

TodayChicago Fed National Activity-0.17
TuesdayFlash Manufacturing PMI52.0
 Flash Services PMI53.9
WednesdayNew Home Sales650K
ThursdayDurable Goods-0.5%
 -ex transport-0.2%
 GDP (Q2)3.3%
 Initial Claims235K
 Continuing Claims1930K
 Existing Home Sales3.96M
FridayPCE0.3% (2.7% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% (2.9% Y/Y)
 Personal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.5%
 Michigan Sentiment55.4

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On top of the data, we hear from…wait for it…ten different Fed speakers, including Chair Powell tomorrow, across 16 different events.  I expected to hear from a lot as there is clearly no real consensus at this point in time there.

People love to hate the dollar, and if the Fed is going to ease more aggressively, I understand that, but longer term, I think the story is different.  Just be careful.

Good luck

Adf

A Third Fed Mandate

Posted on by

As Jay and his minions convene
A new man is making the scene
Now, Stephen Miran
A man with a plan
Will help restart Jay’s cash machine
 
But something that’s happened of late
Is talk of a third Fed mandate
Yes, jobs and inflation
Have been the fixation
But long-term yields need be sedate

 

As the FOMC begins their six-weekly meeting this morning, most market participants focus on the so-called ‘dual mandate’ of promoting the goals maximum employment and stable prices.  This, of course, is why everybody focuses on the tension between the inflation and unemployment rates and why the recent revisions to the NFP numbers have convinced one and all that a rate cut is coming tomorrow with the only question being its size.  But there is a third mandate as is clear from the below text of the Federal Reserve Act, which I have copied directly from federalreserve.gov [emphasis added]:

“Section 2A. Monetary policy objectives

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy’s long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.

[12 USC 225a. As added by act of November 16, 1977 (91 Stat. 1387) and amended by acts of October 27, 1978 (92 Stat. 1897); Aug. 23, 1988 (102 Stat. 1375); and Dec. 27, 2000 (114 Stat. 3028).]”

One of the things we have heard consistently from Treasury Secretary Bessent is that he is highly focused on ensuring that longer-term yields do not get too high.  Lately, the market has been working to his advantage with both 10-year, and 30-year yields having declined by more than 25bps in the past month.  And more than 40bps since mid-July.  (Look at the yields listed on the top of the chart below to see their recent peaks, not just the line.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, with President Trump’s head of the CEA, Stephen Miran getting voted onto the board to fill the seat that had been held by Governor Adriana Kugler, but heretofore vacant, one would think that the tone of the conversation is going to turn more dovish.  What makes this so odd is that, by their nature, central bankers are doves and seemingly love to print money, so there should be no hesitation to cut rates further.  But…that third mandate opens an entirely different can of worms and brings into play the idea of yield curve control as a way to ensure the Fed “promote(s)…moderate long-term interest rates.”

It was Ben Bernanke, as Chair, who instigated QE during the GFC although he indicated it was an emergency measure.  It was Janet Yellen, as Chair, who normalized QE as one of the tools in the toolbox for the Fed to address its dual mandate.  I believe the case can be made that newly appointed Governor Miran will begin to bang the drum for the Fed to act to ensure moderate long-term interest rates, and there is no better policy to do that than QE/YCC.  Actually, there is a better policy, reduced government spending and less regulation that allows productivity to increase and balances the production-consumption equation, but that is out of the Fed’s hands.

At any rate, we cannot ignore that there could be a subtle change in focus to the statement and perhaps Chairman Powell will discuss this at the press conference.  If this has any validity, a big IF, the market impacts would be significant.  The dollar would start another leg lower, equities would rise sharply, and commodity prices would rise as well.  Bonds, of course, would be held in check regardless of the inflationary consequences.  Just something to keep on your bingo card!

Ok, let’s check out the overnight activity.  While it was quiet in the US yesterday, we did manage to make more new highs in the S&P 500 as all three major indices were higher.  As to Asia, Tokyo (+0.3%) had the same type of session, with modest gains as it takes aim at a new big, round number of 45,000.  China (-0.2%) and HK (0.0%) did little although there was a lot of positivity elsewhere in the region with Korea (+1.2%), India, (+0.7%) and Taiwan (+1.1%) leading the way amidst almost all markets, large and small, showing gains.  Europe, though, is a different story with red today’s color of the day, as Spain (-0.8%) and Germany (-0.6%) leading the down move despite better-than-expected German ZEW data (37.3 vs. 26.3 expected).  One of the things I read this morning was that German auto manufacturers have laid off 125,000 workers in the past 6 weeks.  That is a devastating number and bodes ill for German economic activity in the future.  As to other European bourses, -0.1% to -0.4% covers the lot.  US futures, though, continue to point higher, up 0.3% at this hour (7:30).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning while European sovereign yields have edged higher by between 1bp and 2bps.  It doesn’t feel like investors there are thinking of better growth, but we did hear from several ECB members that while cuts are not impossible during the rest of the year, they are not certain.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.7%) is back in a modest upswing but still has shown no inclination to move outside that trading range of $60/$65.  It has been more than a month since that range has been broken and absent a major change in the Russia sanctions situation, where Europe actually stops buying Russian oil (as if!) I see no short-term catalyst on the horizon to change this situation.  Clearly, producers are happy enough to produce and sell at this level and demand remains robust.

Turning to the metals markets, I discuss gold (+0.4%) a lot, and given it is making historic highs, that makes sense, but silver (+0.4%) has been outperforming gold for the past month and looks ever more like it is going to make a run for its all-time highs of $49.95 set back in January 1980.  The more recent peak, set in 2011, of $48.50 looks like it is just days away based on the recent rate of climb.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning, with the euro (+0.4%) trading above 1.18 again for the first time since July 1st and there is a great deal of discussion as to how it is going to trade back to, and through, 1.20 soon, a level not seen since 2021.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The narrative is now that the Fed is set to begin cutting rates and the ECB is going to stand pat, the euro will rise.  This is true for GBP (+0.3%) as wel, with the Sterling chart largely the same as the euro one above.  Here’s the thing.  I understand the weak dollar thesis if the Fed gets aggressive, I discussed it above. However, if German manufacturing is contracting that aggressively, and the layoffs numbers are eye opening, can the ECB really stand pat?  Similarly, PM Starmer is under enormous, and growing, pressure to resign with the Labour party in the throes of looking to oust him for numerous reasons, not least of which is the economy is struggling.  So, please tell me why investors will flock to those currencies.  I see the dollar declining, just not as far as most.

Data this morning brings Retail Sales (exp 0.2%, 0.4% -ex autos) along with IP (-0.1%) and Capacity Utilization (77.4%).  However, it is not clear to me that markets will give this data much consideration given the imminence of the FOMC outcome tomorrow.  The current futures pricing has just a 4% probability of a 50bp cut.  I am waiting for the Timiraos article to see if that changes.  Look for it this afternoon.

Good luck

Adf

Not Blazing

Posted on by

Inflation was hot, but not blazing
And so, though I am paraphrasing
A 50 bip cut
Is most likely what
We’ll see next week, ain’t that amazing!
 
Though futures are not there quite yet
The Claims data’s seen as a threat
It’s been four long years
Since Claims caused such fears
Seems Trump, what he wants he will get

 

While I spent most of yesterday discussing the CPI data, which came out on the warm side of things with headline rising 0.4% M/M, a tick higher than forecast, although the Y/Y number at 2.9% was as expected, it seems far more attention than normal was paid to the Initial Claims data.  As it happens, the last time Initial Claims printed this high, 263K, was October 2021.

Source: tradingeconomics.com.

Now, we all remember last September, just prior to the Fed cutting 50bps in a surprise move, and as it happens, the Claims data the week before that jumped as well, a one-off blip to 259K.  Of course, the Fed felt it had a political imperative back then to cut as a means of supporting their preferred candidate for President, VP Harris, but that is another story.  Nonetheless, a precedent has been set that a strong claims number with inflation still warm was sufficient to get them to move.  So, will they cut 50bps next week?

Right now, the Fed funds futures market is still pricing just an 8% probability of that move, so apparently that is not the market perception.  However, this is exactly the time where we should be seeing an article from the Fed Whisperer, Nick Timiraos, at the WSJ (aka Nickileaks), which ought to explain that changes in the labor market are sufficient to overcome any concerns about inflation, especially since there is a growing expectation that a recession is coming.  Look for it on Monday.

But let us consider this for another moment.  Based on BLS data, the median reading for Initial Claims since January 1967 is 339K, far more than we saw yesterday.  In addition, if you look at a long-term chart of the Claims data, or even the shorter-term one above, while it is possible this is the beginning of a trend higher in Claims, there is no evidence yet for that, and blips higher are pretty common throughout the data set.

The one caveat here is that if we look at the recessions highlighted in gray in the above chart, the Claims data didn’t really rise until the end of the recession, so there is a chance that we are seeing the beginnings of bigger problems.  Certainly, if Claims data starts to climb further and we see 300K, there will be a stronger case to anticipate a recession.  But we haven’t yet seen that.  Alas, what we do know from Powell’s last press conference is that the Fed has basically abandoned their inflation target, so despite the fact it has been 54 months (February 2021) since core PCE has been at or below 2.0%, and even though the very idea that rate cuts are appropriate is remarkable, it seems the case for 50bps is strengthening.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But, as Walter Cronkite used to say, “That’s the way it is.”

So, how have markets been digesting this news?  Well, yesterday saw US equity indices make yet another set of new all-time highs on the prospects of a 50bp cut and that has largely fed to other equity markets around the world.  Bond yields remain quiescent, at least out to 10 years, although the really long stuff is having a tougher time, and the dollar remains range bound.  Aside from equities, the only market really moving is precious metals, which continue to rally nonstop.

Starting in Asia, Tokyo (+0.9%) rallied nicely as a combination of anticipated Fed cuts and the calming of trade tensions with the US has investors there feeling giddy.  It, too, has reached new all-time highs.  Hong Kong (+1.1%) also had a good session although China (-0.6%) didn’t follow through as profit taking was evident after what has been a very strong run in mainland stocks lately.  Elsewhere in the region, only two markets (Singapore and Philippines) lagged, and those were very modest declines of -0.3%.  Otherwise, gains of up to 1.5% were the norm.

However, Europe didn’t get that memo this morning with continental bourses all under pressure (DAX -0.3%, CAC -0.5%, IBEX -0.7%) amid a growing realization that the ECB may have finished its cutting cycle, at least according to Madame Lagarde’s comments yesterday expressing confidence the bank is in a “good place”.  However, under the rubric bad news is good, UK stocks (+0.3%) are edging higher after data showed GDP flatlined in July with the Trade deficit rising, and IP falling sharply (-0.9%) as traders are becoming more convinced the BOE will cut rates despite much stickier inflation than their target level.  Remember, too, the BOE’s mandate is entirely inflation focused, but these days, none of that matters!  Finally, US futures are either side of unchanged as I type (7:00).

In the bond market, yields remain in their longer-term downtrend in the US although have edged higher by 1bp overnight.  European sovereign yields are higher by 3bps across the board as there are still growing concerns over French fiscal deficits and the fact that the ECB has finished cutting implies less support there.  It is interesting to look at the difference in performance between US and French 10-year bonds as per the below, as despite much angst over the US fiscal profligacy, which is well-deserved, investors still feel far more comfortable with Treasuries than with OATs.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.3%) is rebounding from yesterday’s decline and, net, continues to go nowhere.  Whatever the catalyst is that will change this view, it has not made an appearance yet.  Meanwhile, like the broken record I am, I see gold (+0.5%) and silver (+1.9%) continuing to rally as more and more investors around the world flock to the precious metals as they fear the destruction of the value of their fiat currencies.  And they are right because there is not a single central bank around (perhaps Switzerland and maybe Norway) that is concerned about inflation as evidenced by the fact that despite the fact inflation rates are running far higher than they had pre-Covid, every central bank is in a cutting cycle except Japan, and they have stopped hiking despite CPI there running at 3.4%!

Finally, the dollar is modestly firmer as I type, although it had been a bit softer overnight, and basically going nowhere fast.  If I look at the movement in the major currencies over the past month, only NOK (+3.0%) stands out on the back of higher than anticipated inflation readings and growing expectations that the Norges Bank, which did cut rates a few months ago, will soon have the highest interest rates in the G10 after the Fed cuts next week and they remain on hold.  As to today’s movement, JPY (-0.35%), NZD (-0.4%) and NOK (-0.3%) are the largest movers, with the EMG seeing even smaller movement than that.  Again, it is difficult to find a compelling short-term story here.

On the data front, this morning brings Michigan Sentiment (exp 58.0) and that’s it.  No Fed speakers ahead of the meeting next week, so we will be reliant on either the White House making some new, unexpected, announcement, or the dollar will take its cues from the equity markets.  It is interesting that the precious metals complex continues to perform well despite the dollar edging higher.  To me, that is the biggest story around.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Markets Ain’t Scared

Posted on by

So, NFP data was wrong
Which many have said all along
Perhaps it was proper
For Trump to just drop her
Creating McTarfer’s swan song
 
Remarkably, though, no one cared
And equity markets ain’t scared
While Treasury yields
Edged higher, it feels
That 50bps is now prepared

 

Like a dog with a bone, I cannot give up the NFP story even though the market clearly didn’t care about the adjustment or had fully priced it in before the release.  In fact, it seems investors, or algos at least, welcomed the fact that the number was so large as it seems to make the case for a 50 basis point cut next week that much stronger.  Certainly, Chairman Powell will have difficult saying that starting a cut cycle with 50bps would be inappropriate given his more politically driven efforts a year ago.

But one final word on this subject is worthwhile I believe, and that is; why does the market pay so much attention to this particular data point?  Consider the following:  according to the BLS, current total employment in the US is approximately 159,540,000.  In fact, that number has been above 150 million since January 2019, although Covid managed to impact that for a few months before it was quickly regained.  

Now, NFP has averaged ~125K since they started keeping records in 1939 with a median reading of 160K.  To modernize the data, since 2000 it has averaged ~93K with a median of 154K.  Consider what that means with respect to the total labor force.  Ostensibly, the most important economic data point of each month represents, on average, 0.06% of the working population.  Additionally, that number is subject to massive revisions both on a monthly basis, and then, as we saw yesterday, there is another annual revision.  I don’t know if Ms. McEntarfer was good at her job or not, but it is not unreasonable to consider that the payrolls data, as currently calculated, does not really represent anything other than statistical noise.   I prepared the below chart to help you visualize how close to zero the NFP number is relative to the working population.  Absent the Covid spike, I would argue that the information that this datapoint delivers, especially in the past 25 years, also approaches zero.

Data FRED database, calculations @fx_poet

You may recall the angst with which the firing of Ms McEntarfer was met, and given President Trump’s penchant for overstating certain things, it certainly had a bad look about it.  But the evidence seems to point to the fact that the data is not only suspect, given its revision history, but essentially inconsequential relative to the economy.  The fact that the Fed is making policy decisions based on changes in the economy that represent less than 0.1% of the working population, and half that amount of the general population, may be the much larger scandal here.  

Remember, a 4th Turning is all about tearing down old institutions because they no longer are fit for purpose and building new ones to gain trust.  Perhaps NFP as THE monthly number is an institution whose time has passed, and investors (and the Fed) need to find other data to help them evaluate the current economic situation.  Of course, the algos love a single number to which they can be programmed and respond instantaneously, so if NFP loses its cachet, and algos lose some of their power, it would be better for us all, except maybe Ken Griffin and Larry Fink!

Otherwise, the overnight market offered very little new information.  Chinese inflation data continues to show an economy in deflation with the Y/Y result of -0.4% being worse than expected and the 5th negative outcome in the past seven months.  Looking at the chart below, it is becoming clearer that President Xi, despite flowery words about consumption, has no idea how to stimulate domestic activity other than the mercantilist model to which China subscribes.  Now, they overproduce stuff and since the imposition of higher tariffs by the US on Chinese goods, it seems more of that stuff is hanging around at home and driving prices down.  Alas, it seems not enough Chinese want the things they manufacture, hence steadily declining prices.  While it is a different problem than in the US, it is a problem nonetheless for President Xi.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And with that, let’s head to the market activity.  Yesterday’s US rally was followed by strength all around the world as it appears everybody is excited about the prospects of the FOMC cutting rates by 50bps next week. While the Fed funds futures market has barely moved, currently pricing just an 8.2% probability of that move, I am hard pressed to conclude that the rest of the economic and earnings data is so good that equities should be rallying for any other reason.

Anyway, Japan (+0.9%), China (+0.2%), HK (+1.0%), Korea (+1.7%), India (+0.4%) and Taiwan (+1.4%) are pretty definitive proof that everybody is all-in on a 50bp cut by the Fed.  In fact, the worst performer in Asia, Thailand (0.0%) was merely flat on the day.  Turning to Europe, here, too, green is today’s color with Spain (+1.3%), France (+0.6%), Germany (+0.2%) and the UK (+0.5%) all rising nicely.  Domestic issues, which abound throughout Europe, are inconsequential this morning.  and don’t worry, US futures are higher by 0.35% this morning as well.

In the bond market, while yields edged up yesterday a few basis points, this morning they are essentially unchanged across the board in the US, Europe and Japan.  Worries about excessive deficits have been set aside.  A major protest in France today is not impacting markets at all.  Word that the BOJ will consider tightening policy (as if!) despite the political uncertainty has had no impact.  Perhaps we have achieved that long sought equilibrium in rates! 🤣

In the commodity space, oil (+1.1%) rallied after the Israeli attempt to eliminate Hamas leadership in Qatar yesterday ruffled many feathers and was seen as a potential escalation in Middle East conflicts.  But, at $63.30/bbl, WTI remains firmly in the middle of its recent trading range as per the below chart.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

But you know what is not in the middle of its trading range, in fact the only thing with a real trend right now?  That’s right, gold.  A quick look at the below chart from tradingeconomics.com helps you understand why so many market pundits, if not investors, are excited about continued gains here.  Calls for $4000/oz and more by early next year are increasing.  As to the other metals, silver and platinum are following gold higher this morning although copper is unchanged.

Finally, the dollar is little changed vs. most major currencies with the euro and pound having moved 0.1% or less than the close and the same with JPY, CAD, CHF and MXN.  In fact, the biggest mover this morning is NOK (+0.5%) which on top of oil’s rally has benefitted from still firm inflation encouraging the idea that the Norges Bank is going to raise rates when they meet next Thursday.  If they hike after the Fed cuts 50bps, the krone will likely see further strength, at least in the short run.

On the data front this morning, PPI (exp 0.3%, 3.3% Y/Y; 0.3%, 3.5% Y/Y core) is the key release and then the EIA oil inventory data is released at 10:30 with a modest draw expected.  As we remain in the quiet period, no Fed speakers are slated, so the algos will have to live with the PPI data or any other stories they can find.

If the inflation data this week stays quiescent, I think 50bps is likely next week as the employment situation, despite my comments above, will still be seen in a negative light and I think Powell will feel forced to move.  Plus, if Stephen Miran is added to the board this week, there will be increased pressure for just such an outcome.  However, while a Fed aggressively cutting rates should be a dollar negative, I feel like that is becoming the default view, so maybe not so much movement from here.  We need another catalyst.

Good luck

Adf