Tag Archives: #silver

Talk of the Town

Posted on by

Two things have been talk of the town
First, silver ne’er seems to go down
But also, of late
The Dow’s in a state
Where it wears the daily stock crown
 
But if we dig deeper, we find
Industrials, as they’re defined
Don’t build many things
Instead, they pull strings
As finance and tech are combined

 

Before I start, this will be the last poetry of 2025.  I want to thank all my readers for continuing to read and I certainly hope I both amused you and highlighted one view of what is driving the zeitgeist in markets these days.  FX poetry will return on January 5th with my annual long-form poetic prognostications.  Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukkah and Happy New Year to you all.

So, I was reading my friend JJ’s evening wrap up from yesterday and he highlighted the fact that the DJIA (+1.3%) made a new all-time high in trading and it was led by…Goldman Sachs.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, I have nothing against Goldman Sachs, per se, but it struck me as odd that Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, was a member of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  It’s not that I wasn’t aware of the fact, but for some reason, this mention stuck out.  So, I thought I might look at the current membership of the Dow and see just how industrial it is.

While you will likely not be surprised that it has several non-industrial, service-based companies in the index, you might be surprised by just how many.  For instance, aside from Goldman, JPMorgan, American Express and Visa are in there as well as United Health and Travelers from the insurance space.  There are major retailers like Walmart, Home Depot, Amazon and McDonalds, along with tech and telecom/media names like Microsoft, Salesforce, Disney and Verizon.  

This is not to say that these are misplaced with respect to their relative importance in the US economy, clearly all are major corporations with long histories of profitability.  But it seems odd to list them as industrial.  I would contend that nothing explains the financialization of the US economy better than the fact that 14 out of the 30 members of the DJIA are service companies rather than producers of stuff.  Maybe they should rename it the Dow Jones Major Corporate Index.

To conclude the equity portion of our discussion, yesterday saw the NASDAQ (-0.25%) decline in the face of a broad overall equity rally as there appears to be a rotation of investors from AI into other things like financials (as hopes of another Fed rate cut spring eternal) and power producers as the power needs of AI keep getting estimated ever higher.  This rally was followed pretty much everywhere around the world as regardless of one’s religion, it appears investors are all counting on Santa to deliver higher prices.  In Asia, Tokyo (+1.4%). HK (+1.75%), China (+0.6%), Australia (+1.2%), Korea (+1.4%) and virtually every other market rallied.  The only data of note here was Japanese IP which came in a tick higher than its preliminary forecast, but to counter that, Nikkei reported that the BOJ, when they meet next week, are definitely going to raise the base rate by 25bps to 0.75%, the highest level since 1994.  That doesn’t seem that bullish, but then, I’m not Japanese.

In Europe, the gains are also universal, albeit less impressive with Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.5%) leading the way and Germany and the UK both only marginally higher.  The most interesting news here is about the EU’s efforts to confiscatethe Russian assets that have been frozen since they invaded Ukraine, but which are being blocked by Belgium where they reside under SWIFT.  And as I type (7:45) US futures are mixed with the Dow (+0.2%) still in favor while NASDAQ (-0.5%) continues to lag.

But the other story that is getting press, and arguably more press, is precious metals.  Silver (+0.9% today, +10% this week, +122% this year) is the leader and is now trading above $64/oz.  This is the very definition of a parabolic move, which is obvious when you look at the silver chart for the past 5 years.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Referring back to JJ’s note, it is important to understand he is a commodity trader of long standing (remarkably even longer than my time in FX) and he discussed silver from an insider’s perspective.  The essence of the issue here is that there are quite a few paper short positions that have existed for a long time.  The rumor has long been that JPMorgan has been preventing silver from rising by playing in futures markets.  But now, real demand, between industrial users (solar panels and electronics) and Asian retail demand from both India and China is far higher than new supply or recovery from scrap, to the tune of 120 million oz/year, and those shorts cannot find the metal to deliver.  The last time there was a squeeze, when the Hunt’s tried to corner the market in 1980, people lined up at stores to sell their silver tea services, bringing metal to the market.  But those are all gone.  I’m not sure what will change this in the short run, but it cannot go up forever.  With that in mind, though, I think precious metals have much further to run as the ongoing debasement of fiat currencies simply adds further to demand.  

Silver managed to drag gold (+1.1% today, +3.0% this week, +65% this year) and platinum (+3.6% today, +7.2% this week, +98% this year) along for the ride and I expect this will continue across the board.  Meanwhile oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning but has fallen -4.0% this week.  The news that the US boarded a Venezuelan oil tanker and took control in an effort to pressure Maduro didn’t seem to concern anyone in the market.  This trend remains clear.  

As to the bond market, this morning yields are higher by 2bps, pretty much across the board of Treasuries and all European sovereigns.  But with that in mind, the 10-year Treasury is still yielding 4.18%, below its worst level immediately following the FOMC meeting, and as I mentioned above, there appears to be a growing belief that Powell’s concern about the labor market will result in more cuts sooner rather than later.  While that is not really playing out in the futures market yet, as you can see below with the next cut priced for April with a 76% probability, that is the narrative that is being promulgated in FinX.  

Source: cmegroup.com

Next week we will get the November NFP report (exp 35K) and all the data we missed in October.  I can assure you if that comes in weak, the idea of a rate cut will explode onto the scene once again.  Too, on Wednesday evening, the WSJpublished an article indicating that Chairman Powell is concerned the employment data is overstating things because of the flaws in the birth/death model.  The point is he may be far more inclined to cut if next Tuesday’s report is weak.

Finally, the dollar is…still here.  It sold off after the Fed, and as I showed yesterday, has fallen back to the middle of its trading range of the past 6 months.  I keep reading how the dollar is the key, but quite frankly, I’m not certain what that key will unlock.  We need out of consensus activities to change the current situation.  After all, the underlying demand for dollars because of the trillions of dollars of debt outstanding outside of the US makes it difficult to get too bearish without a major reason.  If the Fed cut 50bps intermeeting, that would do it, but I’m not holding my breath.

And that’s really it my friends.  There is no data today although we do hear from three Fed speakers.  Given the dissent on the FOMC, I expect that we are going to be need to keep score as to views for a while when these folks speak. 

In the meantime, as I said above, have a wonderful holiday all

Adf

Crazier Still

Posted on by

There once was a time when the Fed
When meeting, and looking ahead
All seemed to agree
The future they’d see
And wrote banal statements, when read
 
But this time is different, it’s true
Though those words most folks should eschew
‘Cause nobody knows
Which way the wind blows
As true data’s hard to construe
 
So, rather than voting as one
Three members, the Chairman, did shun
But crazier still
The dot plot did kill
The idea much more can be done

 

I think it is appropriate to start this morning’s discussion with the dot plot, which as I, and many others, expected showed virtually no consensus as to what the future holds with respect to Federal Reserve monetary policy.  For 2026, the range of estimates by the 19 FOMC members is 175 basis points, the widest range I have ever seen.  Three members see a 25bp hike in 2026 and one member (likely Governor Miran) sees 150bps of cuts.  They can’t all be right!  But even if we look out to the longer run, the range of estimates is 125bps wide.

Personally, I am thrilled at this outcome as it indicates that instead of the Chairman browbeating everyone into agreeing with his/her view, which had been the history for the past 40 years, FOMC members have demonstrated they are willing to express a personal view.

Now, generally markets hate uncertainty of this nature, and one might have thought that equity markets, especially, would be negatively impacted by this outcome.  But, since the unwritten mandate of the Fed is to ensure that stock markets never decline, they were able to paper over the lack of consensus by explaining they will be buying $40 billion/month of T-bills to make sure that bank reserves are “ample”.  QT has ended, and while they will continue to go out of their way to explain this is not QE, and perhaps technically it is not, they are still promising to pump nearly $500 billion /year into the economy by expanding their balance sheet.  One cannot be surprised that initially, much of that money is going to head into financial markets, hence today’s rally.

However, if you want to see just how out of touch the Fed is with reality, a quick look at their economic projections helps disabuse you of the notion that there is really much independent thought in the Marriner Eccles Building.  As you can see below, they continue to believe that inflation will gradually head back to their target, that growth will slow, unemployment will slip and that Fed funds have room to decline from here.

I have frequently railed against the Fed and their models, highlighting time and again that their models are not fit for purpose.  It is abundantly clear that every member has a neo-Keynesian model that was calibrated in the wake of the Dot com bubble bursting when interest rates in the US first were pushed down to 0.0% while consumer inflation remained quiescent as all the funds went into financial assets.  One would think that the experience of 2022-23, when inflation soared forcing them to hike rates in the most aggressive manner in history, would have resulted in some second thoughts.  But I cannot look at the table above and draw that conclusion.  Perhaps this will help you understand the growth in the meme, end the fed.

To sum it all up, FOMC members have no consensus on how to behave going forward but they decided that expanding the balance sheet was the right thing to do.  Perhaps they do have an idea, but given inflation is showing no signs of heading back to their target, they decided that the esoterica of the balance sheet will hide their activities more effectively than interest rate announcements.

One of the key talking points this morning revolves around the dollar in the FX markets and how now that the Fed has cut rates again, while the ECB is set to leave them on hold, and the BOJ looks likely to raise them next week, that the greenback will fall further.  Much continues to be made of the fact that the dollar fell about 12% during the first 6 months of 2025, although a decline of that magnitude during a 6-month time span is hardly unique, it was the first such decline that happened during the first 6 months of the year, in 50 years or so.  In other words, much ado about nothing.  

The latest spin, though, is look for the dollar to decline sharply after the rate cut.  I have a hard time with this concept for a few reasons.  First, given the obvious uncertainty of future Fed activity, as per the dot plot, it is unclear the Fed is going to aggressively cut rates from this level anytime soon.  And second, a look at the history of the dollar in relation to Fed activity doesn’t really paint that picture.  The below chart of the euro over the past five years shows that the single currency fell during the initial stages of the Fed’s panic rate hikes in 2022 then rallied back sharply as they continued.  Meanwhile, during the latter half of 2024, the dollar rallied as the Fed cut rates and then declined as they remained on hold.   My point is, the recent history is ambiguous at best regarding the dollar’s response to a given Fed move.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I have maintained that if the Fed cuts aggressively, it will undermine the dollar.  However, nothing about yesterday’s FOMC meeting tells me they are about to embark on an aggressive rate cutting binge.

The other noteworthy story this morning is the outcome from China’s Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC).  I have described several times that the President Xi’s government claims they are keen to help support domestic consumption and the housing market despite neither of those things having occurred during the past several years.  Well, Bloomberg was nice enough to create a table highlighting the CEWC’s statements this year and compare them to the past two years.  I have attached it below.

In a testament to the fact that bureaucrats speak the same language, no matter their native tongue, a look at the changes in Fiscal Policy or Top Priority Task, or even Real Estate shows that nothing has changed but the order of the words.  The very fact that they need to keep repeating themselves can readily be explained by the fact that the previous year’s efforts failed.  Why will this time be different?

Ok, a quick tour of markets.   Apparently, Asia was not enamored of the FOMC outcome with Tokyo (-0.9%) and China (-0.9%) both sliding although HK managed to stay put.  Elsewhere in the region, both Korea (-0.6%) and Taiwan (-1.3%) were also under pressure as most markets here were in the red.  The exceptions were India, Malaysia and the Philippines, all of which managed gains of 0.5% or so.  

In Europe, things are a little brighter with modest gains the order of the day led by Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.4%) although both Germany and the UK are barely higher at this hour.  There was no data released in Europe this morning although the SNB did meet and leave rates on hold at 0.0% as universally expected.  There has been a little bit of ECB speak, with several members highlighting that ECB policy is independent of Fed policy but that if Fed cuts force the dollar lower, they may feel the need to respond as a higher euro would reduce inflation.  Alas for the stock market bulls in the US, futures this morning are pointing lower led by the NASDAQ (-0.7%) although that is on the back of weaker than expected Oracle earnings results last night.  Perhaps promising to spend $5 trillion on AI is beginning to be seen as unrealistic, although I doubt that is the case 🤔.

Turning to the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps overnight after falling -5bps yesterday.  Similar price action has been seen elsewhere with European sovereign yields slipping slightly and even JGB yields down -2bps overnight.  Personally, I am a bit confused by this as I have been assured that the Fed cutting rates in this economy would result in a steeper yield curve with long-dated rates rising even though the front end falls.  Perhaps I am reading the data wrong.

In the commodity markets, the one truth is that there are no sellers in the silver market.  It is higher by another 0.5% this morning and above $62/oz as whatever games had been played in the past to cap its price seem to have fallen apart.  Physical demand for the stuff outstrips new supply by about 120 million oz /year, and new mines are scarce on the ground.  This feels like there is further room to run.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the space, gold (-0.2%) which had a nice day yesterday is consolidating, as is copper.  Turning to oil (-1.1%) it continues to drift lower, dragging gasoline along for the ride, something that must make the president quite happy.  You know my views here.

As to the dollar writ large, while it sold off a bit yesterday, as you can see from the below DXY (-0.3%) chart, it is hardly making new ground, rather it is back to the middle of its 6-month range.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This morning more currencies are a bit stronger but in the G10, CHF (+0.45%) is the leader with everything else far less impactful.  And on the flip side, INR (-0.7%) has traded to yet another historic low (USD high) as the new RBI governor has decided not to waste too much money on intervention.  Oh yeah, JPY (+0.2%) has gotten some tongues wagging as now that the Fed cut and the BOJ is ostensibly getting set to hike, there is more concern about the unwind of the carry trade.  My view is, don’t worry unless the BOJ hikes 50bps and promises a lot more on the way.  After all, if the Fed has finished cutting, something that cannot be ruled out, this entire thesis will be destroyed.

On the data front, Initial (exp 220K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims are coming as well as the Trade Balance (-$63.3B).  There are no Fed speakers on the docket, but I imagine we will hear from some anyway, as they cannot seem to shut up.  

It would not surprise me to see the dollar head toward the bottom of this trading range, but I think we need a much stronger catalyst than uncertainty from the Fed to break the range.

Good luck

Adf

All But Assured

Posted on by

A cut has been all but assured
Though since last time we have endured
Some fears Jay’s a hawk
So, when he does talk
Will this cut, at last, be secured?
 
And now there’s a narrative view
Though rates will fall, what he will do
Is try to convey
Now it’s out the way
Another one may not come through

 

Good morning all and welcome to Fed Day.  The question, of course, is will this be a frabjous day?  As I write this morning, the Fed funds futures market continues to price a roughly 90% probability of a 25bp cut this afternoon, but the prospects for future rate cuts have greatly diminished as you can see in the table below from the CME.

It wasn’t long ago when the market was pricing 100bps more of rate cuts by the end of 2026, meaning a Fed funds rate of 2.50% – 2.75%.  However, the narrative has shifted over the past several weeks after very mixed signals from FOMC speakers and data releases that have indicated the economy is not cratering (e.g. yesterday’s JOLTS data printing at 7.658M, >400K higher than expected).  You may recall that shortly after the last FOMC meeting at the end of October, the probability of today’s rate cut had fallen to just 30%.

It appears that the new discussion point is this will be a hawkish cut, an idiom similar to jumbo shrimp.  At this point, the bulk of the discussion has been around how many dissents will be recorded with the subtext being, what will Chairman Powell have to promise potential dissenters in order to bring them along to his side of the ledger.  My take is if you thought the last press conference was hawkish, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.  In fact, I would not be surprised to see a virtually categoric call to this being the end of the cutting cycle for the foreseeable future.

Remember, we also will see the new dot plots and SEP which will help us understand the broad picture of where FOMC members currently stand on the matter.  Personally, I expect to see a wide disparity between the ends of the distribution, and it wouldn’t surprise me to see some expectations of no rate changes for 2026 with other calls for 150bps of cuts and no consensus view at all. 

At this point, all we can do is wait.  However, the market discussion has centered on the fact that 10-year Treasury yields (+1bp) have been climbing lately, and that this morning they have touched 4.20% again while, at the same time, 2-year Treasury yields (no change) have been slipping as per the below chart I created from FRED data.

The steepening yield curve, which now appears to be turning into a bear steepener (when long dated yields rise more quickly than short-dated yields) is ringing alarm bells in some quarters.  The narrative is that there are growing concerns over both the quantity of debt outstanding and its rate of growth as well as the fact rate cuts will engender future inflation.

A key part of the discussion is the fact that what had been a synchronous system of global central bank policy easing is now starting to split up.  While we have known the BOJ is in a hiking cycle, albeit a slow one, today, the BOC is not only expected to leave rates on hold but explain they have bottomed.  We have heard that, as well, from the RBA earlier this week, and the commentary from the ECB may be coming along those lines.  So, is the US the outlier now?  And will that weaken the dollar?  Those are the key questions we will need to address going forward.

But before we move on, there is one market I must discuss, silver, which exploded to new historic highs yesterday, trading through $60/oz and is higher again this morning by 0.6% and trading at $61/oz.  someone made the point yesterday that for the second time in history, you need just 1 ounce of silver to buy one barrel of WTI.  The first time was back during the silver squeeze in January 1980, but that was quite short-lived (see chart below from macrotrends.com).  This one appears to have legs.  

I don’t know that I can find another indicator that better expresses my views of fiat currency debasement alongside an expanding availability of oil.  To my mind, both these trends remain quite strong, and this is the embodiment of them both combined.

Ok, so as we await the FOMC, let’s see if anybody is doing anything in financial markets of note.  As testament to the fact that virtually everybody is awaiting the Fed this afternoon, US equity markets barely moved yesterday, and Asian markets were similarly quiet, with only Taiwan (+0.8%) moving more than 0.4% in either direction.  The large markets were +/- 0.2% overall.  In Europe, the movement has been slightly larger, but still not impressive with Germany (-0.4%) the laggard of note while the UK (+0.3%) is the leader.  A smattering of data released from the continent doesn’t seem to be having any real impact, nor did comments by Madame Lagarde claiming the rates are in a good place and displaying some optimism on future GDP growth.  Of much greater concern is the headlong rush to a digital euro CBDC, where they are seeking to exert control over the citizenry.  If for no other reason, I would be leery of expecting great things from the Eurozone going forward.  Not surprisingly, at this hour (7:30) US futures are little changed ahead of the meeting.

In the bond market, yields are creeping higher all around the world with European sovereign yields higher between 2bps and 4bps this morning.  Perhaps investors are taking Madame Lagarde’s views to heart.  Or perhaps the fallout from the recently released US National Security Strategy, where the US basically dismisses Europe as strategic, has investors concerned that European governments are going to be spending that much more on defense without having the financial wherewithal to do so effectively, thus will be borrowing a lot and driving yields higher.  At this point, European sovereign yields have risen to levels not seen since the Eurozone bond crisis in 2011, but it feels like they have further to climb (see French 10-year OAT yields below from Marketwatch.com).

In the commodity market, oil (+0.5%) cannot get out of its own way.  While it is a touch higher this morning, it sits at $58.50/bbl, and that long-term trend remains lower.  We’ve already discussed silver and gold (-0.25%) continues to trade either side of $4200 these days, biding its time for its next move (higher I believe).  Copper (+1.4%) is looking good today, although it is hard to find economic news that is driving today’s price action.

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, about 0.1% in the DXY as well as virtually every major currency in the G10.  Interestingly, today’s outlier is SEK (+0.4%) which is rallying despite data showing GDP (-0.3%) slipping on the month while IP (-6.6%) fell sharply.  As to the EMG bloc, there is very little movement of note with the biggest news this evening’s Central Bank of Brazil meeting where they are expected to leave their overnight SELIC rate at 15.0% as inflation there, released this morning at a remarkably precise 4.46% continues to run at the top of their target range of 3.0% +/- 1.5%.

Ahead of the FOMC, we only see the Employment Cost Index (exp 0.9%), a number the Fed watches more closely than the market, and we hear from the BOC who are universally expected to leave Canadian rates on hold at 2.25%.

And that’s really it.  I wouldn’t look for much movement ahead of the 2pm statement release and then the fireworks at 2:30 when Powell speaks can drive things anywhere.  The most compelling story will be the number of dissents on the vote, as there will almost certainly be several.  According to Kalshi, 3 is the majority estimate.  With President Trump continuing to discuss the next Fed chair, I have a feeling there will be 4 and that will be a negative for bonds (higher yields) and a short-term negative for the dollar.  In fact, it is just another reason to hold precious metals.

Good luck

Adf

Nothing is Clear

Posted on by

Though next week the Fed will cut rates
The bond market’s in dire straits
‘Cause nothing is clear
‘Bout growth, and Jay’s fear
Is he’ll miss on both his mandates

 

In the past week, 10-year Treasury yields have risen 13bps, as per the below chart, even though market pricing of a Fed rate cut continues to hover around 88%.  Much to both the Fed’s and the President’s chagrin, it appears the bond market is less concerned with the level of short-term rates than they are of the macroeconomics of deficit spending, and total debt, as well as the potential for future inflation.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t think it is appropriate to describe the current bond market as being run by the bond vigilantes, at least not in the US (Japan may be another story) but it is unquestionable that there is a growing level of discomfort in the administration.  This morning, we will see the September PCE data (exp 0.3%, 2.8% Y/Y headline; 0.2% 2.9% Y/Y Core) which will do nothing to comfort those FOMC members who quaintly still believe that inflation matters.

It’s funny, while the President consistently touts how great things are in the economy, both he and Secretary Bessent continue to push hard for lower interest rates, which historically had been a sign of a weak economy.

But as I have highlighted before, the data is so disparate, every analyst can find something to support their pet theory.  For instance, on the employment front, the weak ADP reading on Wednesday indicated that small businesses were under pressure, yet the Initial Claims data yesterday printed at a remarkably low 191K, which on the surface indicates strong labor demand.  Arguably, that print was impacted by the Thanksgiving holiday so some states didn’t get their data in on time, and we will likely see revisions next week.  But revisions are not nearly as impactful as initial headlines.  Nonetheless, for those pushing economic strength, yesterday’s Claims number was catnip.

So, which is it?  Is the economy strong or weak?  My amateur observation is that we no longer have an ‘economy’ but rather we have multiple industrial and business sectors, each with its own dynamics and cycles, some of which are related but others which are independent.  And so, similar to the idea that the inflation rate that is reported is an average of subcomponents, each of which can have very different trajectories than the others (as illustrated in the chart below), the economy writ large is exactly the same.  So, an analogy might be that AI is akin to Hospital Services in the below chart while heavy industry is better represented by the TV’s line.

But, when we look at the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow forecast below, it continues to show a much stronger economic impulse than the pundits expect.

And quite frankly, if 3.8% is the real growth rate, that is quite strong, certainly relative to the last two decades in the US as evidenced by the below chart I created from FRED data.  The orange line represents 4% and you can see that other than the Covid reopening, we haven’t been at that level for quite a while.

What is the reality?  Everybody has their own reality, just like everybody has their own personal inflation rate.  However, markets have been inclined to believe that the future is bright, which given my ongoing view of every nation ‘running it hot’ makes sense, so keep that in mind regardless of your personal situation.

Ok, let’s look at how markets behaved overnight.  Yesterday’s nondescript day in the US was followed by a mixed Asian session with Tokyo (-1.0%) slipping on concerns that the BOJ is going to raise rates.  I’m not sure why that is news suddenly, but there you go.  However, China (+0.8%), HK (+0.6%), Korea (+1.8%), India (+0.5%) and Taiwan (+0.7%) all continued their recent rallies.  The RBI did cut rates by 25bps, as expected, but that doesn’t seem to have been the driver.  Just good vibes for now.

In Europe, screens are also green this morning, albeit not dramatically so.  Frankfurt (+0.6%) leads the way but Paris (+0.3%), Madrid (+0.2%) and London (+0.1%) are all on the right side of the ledger.  Eurozone growth in Q3 was revised up to 0.3% on the quarter, although that translated into an annual rate of 1.4%, lower than Q2, but the positive revision was enough to get the blood flowing.  That and the idea that European defense companies are going to come back into vogue soon.  And as has been their wont, US futures are higher by 0.2% at this hour (7:35).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are higher by 2bps this morning and European sovereign yields are getting dragged along for the ride, up 1bp to 2bps across the board.  JGB yields also continue to climb and show no sign of stopping at any maturity.  A BOJ rate hike of 25bps is not going to be enough to stop the train of spending and borrowing in Japan, so I imagine there is much further to go here.

In the commodity space, silver (+1.8%) has been getting a lot more press than gold lately as there are ongoing stories about big banks, notably JPM, having large short futures positions that were designed to keep a lid on prices there, but the structural shortage of the metal has started to cause delivery questions on the exchanges all around the world.  So, while it has not yet breached $60/oz, my take is that is the direction and beyond.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Gold’s (+0.4%) story has been told so many times, it is not nearly as interesting now, central bank buying and broader fiat debasement concerns continue to be the key here.  Copper (+1.8%) is also trading at new highs in London and the demand story here knows no bounds, at least not as long as AI and electrification are part of the mix.  As to oil (-0.25%), it is a dull and boring market and will need to see something of note (regime change in Venezuela or peace in Ukraine seem the most likely stories) to wake it up.

Finally, the dollar is still there.  The DXY is trading at 99, below its recent highs but hardly collapsing.  Looking for any outliers today ZAR (+0.4%) is benefitting from the gold rally (platinum rallying too) but otherwise there is nothing of note.  INR (-0.2%) continues to trade around its new big figure of 90.00, but has stopped falling for now, and everything else is dull.

As well as the PCE data, we get September Personal Income (exp 0.3%), Personal Spending (0.3%) and Michigan Sentiment (52.0) with only the Michigan number current.  We are approaching the end of the year and while with this administration, one can never rule out a black swan, my take is positions are being lightened up starting now, and when the December futures contracts mature, we may see very little of interest until the new year.  In the meantime, nothing has changed my big picture view.  For now, absent a very aggressive FOMC cutting rates, the dollar is still the best of a bad bunch.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

A Latent Grim Reaper

Posted on by

The zeitgeist, of late, has been leaning
Toward welcoming gov intervening
Because costs have soared
So, folks once abhorred
Like Socialists, seem more well-meaning
 
Perhaps, though, the story’s much deeper
And points to a latent grim reaper
Elites on one side
Claim Trump’s only lied
While Populists serve as gatekeeper

 

Quite frankly, I feel like markets have become very secondary to an understanding of what is happening in the economy, and while there is intrigue over who may be the next Fed Chair, and correspondingly, if Mr Powell will resign from the FOMC when his chairmanship is up, I believe that pales in comparison to much larger macroeconomic issues with which we all have to deal on a daily basis.  Once again, my weekend reading has highlighted two key pieces that I believe do an excellent job of explaining much of what is going on, not just in the economy, but in the streets.

Last week, I highlighted Michael Green’s piece regarding a new estimate of what the poverty line looks like, putting paid to the idea that the official government level of $31,500 is appropriate, and that in suburban NJ (Caldwell to be exact) it is more like $140K.  Now, you will not be surprised that his piece garnered a great deal of attention given its premise, but I will not go into that.  However, he did write a follow-up piece which is worth reading and where he discusses the reaction.  In brief, whatever number is correct, it is clear that $31.5K is laughably low.   Ultimately, I believe this work has quantified the concept of the “vibecession” which has been making the rounds for a while.  People are allegedly making a decent living and yet are living paycheck to paycheck because the cost of living (not inflation) has risen so remarkably over time and priced many folks out of previously ordinary levels of attainment.

Which brings me to the second key piece I read this weekend, this from Dr Pippa Malmgren, which does a remarkable job explaining how the nation (and not just in the US, but we are more familiar here) has (d)evolved into two groups; Elites and Populists.  The former are the old guard politicians (both Democrats and Republicans), the global organizations like the World Bank, IMF, UN and WEF, and more perniciously in my mind, the so-called deep state.  The latter are personified by President Trump, but include NYC Mayor-elect Mamdani, AfD in Germany, Marine LePen in France and Victor Orban in Hungary, and their followers, to name a few.

The frightening conclusion Dr Malmgren drew was that there is no ability for a nation to continue to operate successfully if the population is split in this manner, and that eventually, one side is going to wind up victorious.  I would say this is the very definition of the 4th Turning and we are living through it.

So, we must ask, what are the potential ramifications from a financial markets perspective with this backdrop?  I have repeatedly highlighted that the Trump administration is going to “run it hot” going forward, meaning the goal will be to increase nominal GDP fast enough to outweigh the inevitable rise in prices.  The idea is if incomes rise quickly enough, people will be able to tolerate rising prices more easily.  

But the one thing of which I am increasingly confident is that prices and their rate of change are going to rise under this scenario.  As central banks leave policy easy, or ease further in an effort to support their respective economies, that is going to be the outcome.  A look at the chart below from the FRED data base of the St Louis Fed shows there is a very strong relationship between CPI and nominal GDP.  In fact, I ran the numbers and the correlation for the past 75 years has been 0.975!  Prices are going to rise friends, alongside M2.

What does this mean?  It means that the debasement of fiat currency is going to continue apace and so commodities, notably precious metals, but also base metals and property are going to be recognized as better stores of wealth.  If you wonder why gold (+0.9%) and silver (+2.2%) are continuing to rocket higher, look no further than this.  What about equities?  For now, I expect they will continue to perform well as all that liquidity will be looking for a home although this morning, not so much as US futures are lower by -0.5% across the board.  Bonds?  This is a tougher call, and I suspect that the yield curve will steepen further as central banks press short rates lower, but inflation undermines long duration fixed income assets.  Finally, the dollar remains, in my view, one of the best of the fiat currencies, but like all of them, will continue to degrade vs. gold and hard assets.

Keeping that in mind, there are two other stories of note this morning, only one of which is impacting markets.  The non-impactful one is that apparently President Trump has selected Kevin Hassett, currently the White House Economic Council Director, as the man to succeed Jay Powell in the chair.  He is a long-time political operative with deep ties in Washington and I presume will get through the vetting and be confirmed on a timely basis.  As I wrote above, it is not clear to me the Fed matters as much as other things in the current environment, although we will continue to hear about it.  In this light, the Fed funds futures market is currently pricing an 87.5% probability of a 25bp cut next week and is back to a 58% probability of a total of 100bps of cuts by the end of 2026 as per the below from the CME.

The other story of note, this one definitely impacting markets, is the news that Ueda-san hinted more definitively at a Japanese rate hike later this month, with Japanese swaps market raising the probability of that hike to 80% from about 60% last week.  The knock-on effects were that 10-year JGB yields jumped 7bps, to 1.86%, their highest level since 2008 and as you can see from the chart below, continue to trend strongly higher.  Of course, given that inflation in Japan remains well above target, it is not that surprising that yields are climbing.  

Too, the other outcome here has been the yen (+0.7%) gaining a little ground, as per the below chart from tradingeconomics.com, and perhaps we have seen a short-term low in the currency.  Certainly, the increasing probability of US rate cuts is weighing on the dollar overall, so that is part of the story, but it remains to be seen if there are going to be wholesale changes in investment allocations that would be necessary to completely reverse the yen’s remarkable weakness over the past nearly four years.

The move in JGB yields has been blamed for the rise in yields around the world with Treasury and European Sovereign yields uniformly higher by 3bps this morning while some other regional Asian yields climbed between 4bps and 6bps.  In the end, inflation remains a problem almost everywhere in the world and I think that is what we are witnessing here.

As well, the JGB move was seen as the cause for Japanese equities’ (-1.9%) very weak performance which also dragged down some other regional markets (Taiwan, Australia, Philippines) but was not enough to undermine the rest of the region.  The flip side of that weakness was China (+1.1%) and HK (+0.7%) where it appears that hopes for a Fed rate cut more than offset weaker than forecast PMI data from China.  Another interesting story from the mainland was that the monthly Housing price data that was compiled by two key private companies was squashed by the Chinese government after China Vanke, one of the largest Chinese property companies, explained they would be late on an interest rate payment.  One can only imagine what that data looked like!

Meanwhile, in Europe, red is the color led by Germany’s DAX (-1.5%) although with weakness across the board (CAC -0.8%, IBEX -0.6%, FTSE MIB -0.9%).  Apparently, the story that progress has been made regarding peace talks in Ukraine is not seen as a positive there.  After all, if there is peace, will European governments still be so keen to build out their military, spending billions of euros at local defense and manufacturing firms?  It seems after a very strong close to the month in November, there is a bit of profit taking underway this morning.

In the commodity space, oil (+1.3%) is bouncing back to its trend line after OPEC confirmed it will not be increasing production in Q1 next year at a meeting yesterday.  I would expect that a real peace deal would be negative for this market as some part of that would be the relaxation of sanctions, I would assume.  But maybe I’m wrong there.  However, I continue to believe the trend is modestly lower going forward as there is far more supply available.  As to the other metals, both copper (+0.6%) and platinum (+1.5%) are continuing their runs higher with no end currently in sight.

Finally, the dollar is softer overall this morning, and while the yen (+0.7%) is the leader, the euro (+0.3%), SEK (+0.3%) and CHF (+0.25%) are also nicely up on the day with the rest of the G10 little changed.  The real movement, though, has been in the EMG bloc with CZK (+0.75%), HUF (+0.5%), PLN (+0.5%), and CLP (+0.4%) all benefitting from the Fed rate cut story as well as Chile’s benefits from copper’s rally.  While a cut seems highly likely, I suspect the real dollar story will be about the dot plot and SEP as well as Powell’s presser next week.

I’ve already run too long so will just mention that ISM Manufacturing (exp 48.9) is due this morning and I will review the week’s data expectations tomorrow.  

The world is changing and I expect that we will continue to see volatility across markets as investors come to grips with those changes, whether simple central bank rate decisions or more complex social movements and electoral outcomes that lead to major policy changes.  Be careful out there.

Good luck

Adf

Soon Will Feel Pain

Posted on by

The future arrived yesterday
As Amazon’s cloud went astray
Along the East Coast
Much business was toast
The question is, who’s forced to pay?
 
Meanwhile, contradictions remain
In markets, which rose once again
Both havens and risk
Have seen, buying, brisk
I fear one side soon will feel pain

 

Arguably, the biggest story yesterday was the outage of Amazon Web Services on the East Coast yesterday morning with the impact dragging through the day.  Apparently a supposedly minor code update had an error of some sort, and that was all it took.  For every business that has been convinced that it is much cheaper and more efficient to move their computing capacity to the ‘cloud’ (and it certainly is on a daily operating basis), this is the risk being taken.  Ease and convenience are wonderful when they are there, but businesses are inherently more fragile because of the movement.  I guess the finance question comes down to how much do businesses save by outsourcing their computing vs. how much does it cost when those systems go down?

I am sure there will be lawsuits galore vs. Amazon for recompense.  I have no idea what the AWS contract looks like, and if they leave themselves an out for situations like this, a sort of force majeure, but you can bet we will hear a lot about it going forward.  Interestingly, Amazon’s stock price rose 1.6% yesterday despite the issue.  Clearly nobody is worried yet.

Speaking of rising stock prices, I continue to observe the ongoing equity rally alongside the ongoing bond market rally and wonder.  As you can see from the chart below, for the past three to four months, the S&P 500 has rallied alongside 10-year bonds (yields falling as the price rose).  For a very long time, those two markets were negatively correlated.  In fact, that was the very genesis of the 60:40 portfolio being a lower risk way to remain invested.  

The thesis was when stocks were rallying (the 60), things were good and while yields might rise, the gain in stocks would outperform the loss in bonds.  Meanwhile, in tough times, when stocks suffered declines, bonds would rally to mitigate some of the losses.  But lately, the two have traded synchronously.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Perhaps, if we zoom out a little further, though, and look at this behavior over the past five years, we can make an observation.  Here is the same chart since late 2020.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, who can remember anything that changed in 2022 in the economy?  That’s right, inflation re-entered the conversation in a very big way.  It turns out that the 60:40 portfolio, and all its adjuncts, like risk parity and volatility targeting, were all designed when inflation was low and stable.  But it appears that once inflation moves above the 3% level, the correlation that was the underlying basis of all those strategies flips.  I’m sure you all remember how awful 2022 was for most investors with both stocks and bonds showing negative returns.  As inflation continues to rise, and there is no reason to expect it to stop that I can see, be prepared for 2022 redux going forward.  Maybe not quite as dramatic, but similar directionally.

The one thing that can change that would be the reintroduction of QE or YCC or whatever they decide to call it, as that would, by definition, prevent bonds from selling off dramatically.  Of course, that will only stoke the inflationary fires, so there will still be many issues to address.

In the meantime, let’s see how markets behaved overnight, with the truly noticeable movement continuing in the precious metals space.  Markets are funny things, with the ability to move very far very quickly for no apparent reason.  With that in mind, a case can certainly be made that there is a serious amount of intervention in the precious metals markets lately.  While I am not expert in these markets, I am well aware of the stories that there are a number of major banks, JPM among them, that are running large short positions in these metals and have been charged with preventing the prices rising too far.  The concern seems to be the signal that a runaway gold or silver price would be to markets and people in general.  Last Friday was a major option expiration in the SLV contract and it was remarkable to see the price of silver tumble below a number of large open strike prices. Seemingly to prevent calls to deliver.  A look at the chart below, showing how quickly the price declined into the close, and it is easy to understand the genesis of those conspiracy theories.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Yesterday, the metals all rallied nicely, but this morning, they are all, once again, under severe pressure (Au -2.2%, Ag -4.1%, Cu -1.5%, Pt -4.3%).  Generally, I follow the precious metals as a signal of overall market sentiment, as I believe they are better indicators of fear than bonds.  But I cannot get these movements out of my head as straight up price manipulations and so any signals we are getting are very murky.  This will not last forever, but for now, I expect them to remain quite volatile.  As to oil (+0.8%) it is getting a respite after a really tough run lately, with the price testing its recent lows and a growing chorus of analysts looking at the private data coming out and calling for a US recession.  I don’t know about that, but things are not fantastic, that’s for sure.

But equity markets feel no pain.  After yesterday’s US rally, with all three major indices rising by more than 1%, we saw gains throughout Asia (Nikkei +0.3%, Hang Seng +0.7%, CSI 300 +1.5%) as Takaichi-san was elected PM, as widely expected and investors believe that China is getting set to add fiscal stimulus as an outcome of their Fourth Plenum, with a focus on domestic demand, rather than exporting.  While it is certainly possible that is what they will do, I believe this is the third time, at least, that has been the narrative, and thus far, anything they have done has been ineffectual at best.  Remember, they still have a massively deflating property bubble which is weighing on the domestic economy there.  In the rest of the region, almost all bourses were higher, certainly those of larger nations, with Indonesia (+1.8%) the leader.

In Europe, gains are also widespread, albeit far less impressive with the CAC (+0.4%) the leader and the rest of the major indices higher by between 0.1% and 0.2%.  At this hour, (7:40) US futures are unchanged.

In the bond market, yields around the world continue to edge lower with Treasuries (-1bp) showing the way for all of Europe and for JGBs as well.  it is a bit surprising that JGBs are holding in so well given Takaichi-san’s platform of more unfunded spending.  Perhaps the BOJ is supporting there.

Finally, the dollar is firmer this morning rising against all its G10 counterparts with JPY (-0.8%) the laggard.  It seems the FX market has listened to Takaichi’s plans even if the JGB market hasn’t.  But otherwise, declines of -0.2% to -0.4% are the order of the day in the G10.  In the EMG bloc, ZAR (-0.5%) is feeling the weight of the precious metals rout, while KRW (-0.65%) is under pressure as well with lingering concerns over a trade deal with the US being reached.  Otherwise, though, that -0.2% level is a good proxy for the entire bloc.

The only data today is API oil inventories, and for some reason, despite the Fed’s quiet period, Governor Waller will be speaking today, although he will be making opening remarks at the Payments Innovation Conference in Washington, so will probably not focus on monetary policy.

And that’s really the story.  The government remains shut down with no end to that in sight.  Metals markets are a mess with stories rampant about who is manipulating them, but through it all, stocks go higher, and the dollar remains right in the middle of its recent trading range.  I’m not sure what it will take to change that dynamic and I suspect it will be a gradual situation rather than a single catalyst.  In the end, though, I still like the dollar better than most other currencies.

Good luck

Adf

No Cash Left in the Fisc

Posted on by

Right now, markets keep taking risk
And lately, the pace has been brisk
But coming next week
We could see a peak
If there’s no cash left in the fisc
 
A government shutdown would raise
Concerns about ‘nomic malaise
As well, what I see
Is Trump’s OMB
Is planning a RIF anyways

 

Volatility remains absent from most markets these days, metals excepted, and given the dearth of data until tomorrow’s PCE report, the focus is beginning to turn elsewhere.  Perhaps the biggest story developing right now is the potential US government shutdown if no continuing resolution is passed by Congress.  The government’s fiscal year runs from October 1 through September 30, and the rules are if Congress hasn’t passed appropriations bills by the end of the fiscal year, nonessential services are ended, and government employees are furloughed until that process is completed.  As of right now, the House of Representatives has passed a clean bill, meaning it continues spending at the current rate, and we are all awaiting on the Senate.  However, the Senate needs 60 votes to pass it to overcome the filibuster and right now, the Democratic Minority Leader, Chuck Schumer, claims they will not support the bill.

First, understand this is not unprecedented.  In fact, according to Grok, it has happened 21 times since 1980 with the longest being 35 days in 2018-19 over funding for the border wall.  Now, I ask you, can anyone remember the impact of any of those shutdowns, which in fairness typically last less than a week?  

Next, it is worth understanding what actually happens during a shutdown.  National Parks are closed, while passport services, HUD services, SBA services, scientific research and EPA inspections are the type of things that are put on hold.  Also, the BLS will pause data collection and calculations, although given their recent track record, that may be seen as a benefit!  But things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the Military are all unaffected.

Naturally, there is a lot of politicking ongoing with this process and apparently, President Trump has given marching orders for departments to begin a RIF if the government is shut down.  So, when things reopen, there will be fewer federal employees, one of the goals of this administration, and something that is anathema to his opponents.

From a market perspective, the impact on equity markets during the December 2018 – January 2019 shutdown was actually a rally of just over 10%, although the market did decline in the month leading up to the shutdown.  My point is, there is a lot more politics than economics in this process.

But away from that story, commodities remain the market with the most interest as oil (-0.5%) continues to trade within the range I highlighted earlier this week with a top at $65.50, but has made a technical break above its 50-day moving average, which has the bulls starting to get excited.  As well, the backwardation of the curve is increasing, another bullish sign and much of this is being laid at the feet of President Trump’s seeming turn on the Russia/Ukraine war, where he is quite tired of President Putin’s dissembling.  Certainly, a break above that range top would be at least short term bullish for crude.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the precious metals, while gold continues to trade well, silver has taken the mantle and as you can see from the chart below, is accelerating higher at an even more impressive clip than the yellow metal.  This is a common occurrence as silver historically outperforms gold, on a percentage basis, when both are in bull markets like this.  Just wait until it reaches $50/oz, and makes new all-time highs, and you will see even more discussion of the metals and why they are rallying with inflation concerns a major part of that discussion.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Meanwhile, financial instruments are far less exciting lately with equity markets stabilizing after their recent run and bond markets also doing little.  Granted, we have seen two consecutive down days in US equity markets, but the magnitude of the decline was de minimis, so it is not really telling us very much.  European markets appear more closely linked to the US, with all bourses there lower by between -0.1% and -0.5% this morning although we did see some modest gains in Asia (China +0.6%, Japan +0.3%).  Net, it seems investors are not certain where to turn right now and are waiting for more clarity from the Fed as to whether more rate cuts are on the way.

The same is true of bond investors who apparently are unconcerned over the shutdown threats, with yields unchanged despite the increasingly combative rhetoric.  We did hear from SF Fed president Daly yesterday, a known dove, who explained that she is coming around to the idea that more cuts are necessary, and they were simply waiting to see how tariffs were going to impact things.  I might argue that she is anxious to cut rates but also doesn’t want to seem to support President Trump’s demands.

Finally, the dollar, after a pretty solid rally yesterday, is essentially unchanged this morning as well.  (That seems to be the theme today, no change.). As I look across my screen, the largest move I see is 0.15%, which is how far CHF has declined on the session, otherwise things have been completely dead.

On the data front, this morning brings the weekly Initial (exp 235K) and Continuing (1930K) Claims data as well as Durable Goods (-0.5%, 0.0% ex-Transport) and the final Q2 GDP reading (3.3%) all at 8:30 with Existing Home Sales (3.96M) at 10:00.  Yesterday saw New Home Sales rise dramatically more than expected at 800K although most analysts expect that number to be revised lower as the Census Bureau gets more information.  Nonetheless, it is a sign that the economy is not collapsing, that’s for sure.  

We also hear from four more Fed speakers today, Williams, Bowman, Barr and Daly again, and we will need to see how they all interpret the current situation.  We learned from the dot plot that there are a lot of different opinions at the Fed right now, and personally, I am very glad to see that.  Given the overall confusion, and the asynchronous nature of the economy right now, it would be more concerning if everyone was on the same page.

As far as the shutdown is concerned, you can be sure that this process will continue until next Tuesday night, at the earliest, if the Democrats cave, and if not, we will then be bombarded by both sides claiming it is the other side’s fault.  Eventually a spending bill will be passed, and as we saw back in 2019, markets pretty much look through this stuff.  Meanwhile, unless the data starts to really deteriorate and brings Fed comments along for that ride, I think the dollar is probably in a rough equilibrium space for now.

Good luck

Adf

A Third Fed Mandate

Posted on by

As Jay and his minions convene
A new man is making the scene
Now, Stephen Miran
A man with a plan
Will help restart Jay’s cash machine
 
But something that’s happened of late
Is talk of a third Fed mandate
Yes, jobs and inflation
Have been the fixation
But long-term yields need be sedate

 

As the FOMC begins their six-weekly meeting this morning, most market participants focus on the so-called ‘dual mandate’ of promoting the goals maximum employment and stable prices.  This, of course, is why everybody focuses on the tension between the inflation and unemployment rates and why the recent revisions to the NFP numbers have convinced one and all that a rate cut is coming tomorrow with the only question being its size.  But there is a third mandate as is clear from the below text of the Federal Reserve Act, which I have copied directly from federalreserve.gov [emphasis added]:

“Section 2A. Monetary policy objectives

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy’s long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.

[12 USC 225a. As added by act of November 16, 1977 (91 Stat. 1387) and amended by acts of October 27, 1978 (92 Stat. 1897); Aug. 23, 1988 (102 Stat. 1375); and Dec. 27, 2000 (114 Stat. 3028).]”

One of the things we have heard consistently from Treasury Secretary Bessent is that he is highly focused on ensuring that longer-term yields do not get too high.  Lately, the market has been working to his advantage with both 10-year, and 30-year yields having declined by more than 25bps in the past month.  And more than 40bps since mid-July.  (Look at the yields listed on the top of the chart below to see their recent peaks, not just the line.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, with President Trump’s head of the CEA, Stephen Miran getting voted onto the board to fill the seat that had been held by Governor Adriana Kugler, but heretofore vacant, one would think that the tone of the conversation is going to turn more dovish.  What makes this so odd is that, by their nature, central bankers are doves and seemingly love to print money, so there should be no hesitation to cut rates further.  But…that third mandate opens an entirely different can of worms and brings into play the idea of yield curve control as a way to ensure the Fed “promote(s)…moderate long-term interest rates.”

It was Ben Bernanke, as Chair, who instigated QE during the GFC although he indicated it was an emergency measure.  It was Janet Yellen, as Chair, who normalized QE as one of the tools in the toolbox for the Fed to address its dual mandate.  I believe the case can be made that newly appointed Governor Miran will begin to bang the drum for the Fed to act to ensure moderate long-term interest rates, and there is no better policy to do that than QE/YCC.  Actually, there is a better policy, reduced government spending and less regulation that allows productivity to increase and balances the production-consumption equation, but that is out of the Fed’s hands.

At any rate, we cannot ignore that there could be a subtle change in focus to the statement and perhaps Chairman Powell will discuss this at the press conference.  If this has any validity, a big IF, the market impacts would be significant.  The dollar would start another leg lower, equities would rise sharply, and commodity prices would rise as well.  Bonds, of course, would be held in check regardless of the inflationary consequences.  Just something to keep on your bingo card!

Ok, let’s check out the overnight activity.  While it was quiet in the US yesterday, we did manage to make more new highs in the S&P 500 as all three major indices were higher.  As to Asia, Tokyo (+0.3%) had the same type of session, with modest gains as it takes aim at a new big, round number of 45,000.  China (-0.2%) and HK (0.0%) did little although there was a lot of positivity elsewhere in the region with Korea (+1.2%), India, (+0.7%) and Taiwan (+1.1%) leading the way amidst almost all markets, large and small, showing gains.  Europe, though, is a different story with red today’s color of the day, as Spain (-0.8%) and Germany (-0.6%) leading the down move despite better-than-expected German ZEW data (37.3 vs. 26.3 expected).  One of the things I read this morning was that German auto manufacturers have laid off 125,000 workers in the past 6 weeks.  That is a devastating number and bodes ill for German economic activity in the future.  As to other European bourses, -0.1% to -0.4% covers the lot.  US futures, though, continue to point higher, up 0.3% at this hour (7:30).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning while European sovereign yields have edged higher by between 1bp and 2bps.  It doesn’t feel like investors there are thinking of better growth, but we did hear from several ECB members that while cuts are not impossible during the rest of the year, they are not certain.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.7%) is back in a modest upswing but still has shown no inclination to move outside that trading range of $60/$65.  It has been more than a month since that range has been broken and absent a major change in the Russia sanctions situation, where Europe actually stops buying Russian oil (as if!) I see no short-term catalyst on the horizon to change this situation.  Clearly, producers are happy enough to produce and sell at this level and demand remains robust.

Turning to the metals markets, I discuss gold (+0.4%) a lot, and given it is making historic highs, that makes sense, but silver (+0.4%) has been outperforming gold for the past month and looks ever more like it is going to make a run for its all-time highs of $49.95 set back in January 1980.  The more recent peak, set in 2011, of $48.50 looks like it is just days away based on the recent rate of climb.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning, with the euro (+0.4%) trading above 1.18 again for the first time since July 1st and there is a great deal of discussion as to how it is going to trade back to, and through, 1.20 soon, a level not seen since 2021.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The narrative is now that the Fed is set to begin cutting rates and the ECB is going to stand pat, the euro will rise.  This is true for GBP (+0.3%) as wel, with the Sterling chart largely the same as the euro one above.  Here’s the thing.  I understand the weak dollar thesis if the Fed gets aggressive, I discussed it above. However, if German manufacturing is contracting that aggressively, and the layoffs numbers are eye opening, can the ECB really stand pat?  Similarly, PM Starmer is under enormous, and growing, pressure to resign with the Labour party in the throes of looking to oust him for numerous reasons, not least of which is the economy is struggling.  So, please tell me why investors will flock to those currencies.  I see the dollar declining, just not as far as most.

Data this morning brings Retail Sales (exp 0.2%, 0.4% -ex autos) along with IP (-0.1%) and Capacity Utilization (77.4%).  However, it is not clear to me that markets will give this data much consideration given the imminence of the FOMC outcome tomorrow.  The current futures pricing has just a 4% probability of a 50bp cut.  I am waiting for the Timiraos article to see if that changes.  Look for it this afternoon.

Good luck

Adf

Both Need Downgrading

Posted on by

Excitement in markets is fading
With GameStop and silver both trading
Much lower today
As sellers convey
The message that both need downgrading

Well, it appears that the GameStop bubble is deflating rapidly this morning, which is only to be expected.  Short interest in the stock has fallen from 140% of market cap to just 39% as of yesterday’s close.  This means that there is precious little reason for it to rally again, as, if you recall, the company’s business model remains a bad fit for the times.  The top tick, last Thursday, was $483 per share.  In the pre-market this morning it is trading at $172, and I anticipate that before the end of the month, it will be trading back to its pre-hype $17-$18 level.  But it was fun while it lasted!

Meanwhile silver, yesterday’s story, has also fallen sharply, -4.7% as I type, as the mania there seems to have been more readily absorbed by a much larger market.  The conspiracy theory that the central banks and JP Morgan have been manipulating the price lower for the past several decades has always been hard to understand but was certainly more widespread than I expected.  The major difference between silver and GME though, is that silver has a real raison d’etre as an industrial metal, as well as a traditional store of wealth and monetary metal.  Last year silver’s price rose 46.5%, leading all precious metals higher.  And, in the event that inflation does begin to show itself again, something I believe is coming soon to a screen near you, there is a strong case to be made for it to rally further.  This is especially so given the ongoing debasement of all fiat currencies by central banks around the world as they print more and more each day.

Down Under the RBA stunned
The market and every hedge fund
Increasing QE
As they want to see
The Aussie increasingly shunned

While other major central banks stood pat in their recent policy meetings, the RBA last night surprised one and all by increasing the amount of QE by A$100 billion, at A$5 billion / month, meaning they will continue the program well into 2022.  As well, they explained that they would not consider raising rates until 2024 at the earliest as they work to push unemployment lower.  This means, the overnight rate will remain at 0.1% and YCC for the 3-year bond will also remain at that level.  Interestingly, the market had tapering on its mind, as ahead of the meeting AUD had rallied nearly 0.6%, with analyst discussions of tapering rampant.  As such, it is no surprise that the currency gave up those gains immediately upon the release of the statement, and has now fallen 0.25% on the day, the worst laggard in the G10.

With the FOMC meeting behind us, Fed speakers are going to be inundating us with their views for the next month, so be prepared for a lot more discussion on this topic.  Remember, before the quiet period ahead of the January meeting, four regional presidents were talking taper, with two seeing the possibility of that occurring late in 2021.  Chairman Powell, however, tried to squelch that theory in the statement and press conference.   Yesterday, uber-dove Neel Kashkari expressed his view that it is “..key for Fed to keep foot on monetary policy gas.”  Meanwhile, Raphael Bostic and Eric Rosengren both harped on the need for additional fiscal stimulus to revive the economy, with Bostic once again explaining that tapering when economic growth picks up will be appropriate, although giving no timeline.  (He was one of the four discussing a taper ahead of the meeting.)  We have seven more speakers this week, some of them multiple times, so there will certainly be headline risk as this debate plays out in public.

But for now, markets are sanguine about the possibility of central bank tightening in any way, shape or form, as once again, risk is being embraced across the board.  Starting in Asia, we saw green results everywhere (Nikkei +1.0%, Hang Seng +1.2%, Shanghai +0.8%), with the same being true in Europe (DAX +1.1%, CAC +1.6%, FTSE 100 +0.5%).  US futures are pointing in the same direction with gains on the order of 0.75% at 7:00am.

Bond markets are also on board the risk train, with yields rising in Treasuries (+2.9 bps) and throughout Europe (Bunds +2.7bps, OATs +2.2bps, Gilts +3.1bps).  Part of this positivity seems to be coming from the release of Eurozone Q4 GDP data, which was not quite as bad, at -0.7% Q/Q (-5.1% Y/Y) as forecast.  That outcome, though, was reasonably well known ahead of time as both Germany and Spain printed Q4 GDP at +0.1% in a surprise last week.  Unfortunately, the ongoing lockdowns throughout Europe, which have been extended into March in some cases, point to another quarter of economic contraction in Q1, thus resulting in a second recession in short order on the continent.  With that in mind, while we have not heard much from ECB speakers lately, it is certainly clear that there is no taper talk in Frankfurt at this time.

Which takes us to the currency markets.  The G10 bloc is split with EUR (-0.25%) matching AUD’s futility, while the rest of the European currencies are all modestly lower.  Commodity currencies, however, are holding their own led by CAD (+0.35%) which is benefitting from oil’s rally (+1.3%), although NOK (+0.1%) has seen less benefit.  EMG currencies, however, lean toward gains this morning, with MXN (+0.8%), BRL (+0.6%) and RUB (+0.6%) leading the way, each benefitting from higher commodity prices.  Even ZAR (+0.5%) is higher despite the lagging in precious metals.  But that story is far more focused on ZAR interest rates, which are an attractive carry play in a risk on scenario.  The laggards in this bloc are basically the CE4, tracking the euro, and even those losses are minimal.

While there is no data this morning in the US, we do have important statistics coming up later in the week as follows:

Wednesday ADP Employment 50K
ISM Services 56.7
Thursday Initial Claims 830K
Continuing Claims 4.7M
Nonfarm Productivity 4.0%
Unit Labor Costs -3.0%
Factory Orders 0.7%
Friday Non Farm Payrolls 60K
Private Payrolls 100K
Manufacturing Payrolls 31K
Unemployment Rate 6.7%
Average Hourly Earnings 0.3% (5.0% Y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours 34.7
Participation Rate 61.5%
Trade Balance -$65.7B
Consumer Credit $12.0B

Source: Bloomberg

So, plenty to see, but will we learn that much?  Obviously, all eyes will be on the payroll data, which given the rise in Initial Claims we have seen during the past month seems unlikely to surprise on the high side.  As such, anticipating sufficient data exuberance to get the Fed doves to talk about tapering seems remote.

Adding it all up leaves the current short dollar squeeze in place, with an opportunity, I think, for the euro to trade back below 1.20 for a time, but nothing we have seen or heard has changed my view that the dollar will fall in the second half of the year.  For those of you with payables, hedging sooner rather than later should be rewarded over time.

Good luck and stay safe
Adf