Tag Archives: #lowerdollar

Quite Gory

Posted on by

While yesterday, there was one story
‘Bout silver and gold and their glory
By end of the session
The dollar’s depression
Was headlining comments quite gory
 
The narrative now speaks of trends
Which lead to a dollar that ends
The problem they’ve got
Is history’s taught
That cycles and dollars are friends

The dollar is clearly under pressure lately as discussed here yesterday morning.  Using the DXY as our proxy, it has traded and closed through the recent double bottom (see chart below), and the doomsayers are licking their chops that their views of the demise of the dollar are finally coming to fruition. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And I am not here to say the dollar is about to reverse course higher.  While I remain medium and long-term bullish on the buck, it doesn’t feel like the time to get long.  However, look at the chart below, to get a longer-term perspective on the dollar’s history.  This chart starts back in 1985, which is just before the Plaza Accord where it was agreed the dollar was too strong and central banks around the world intervened and altered policy to change it.  But here we are at 96ish in a market that has spent no little time below 80 with several drops below 75.  My point is, the dollar tends towards long cycles.  It is entirely possible that we peaked in late 2022 for this cycle and are now heading lower from there.  But I remain highly confident that it will reverse course and rebound. Not tomorrow, but this is not the end.  Just remember that when you read the eulogies for the buck.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

One other thing that seems to be getting headlines is that the president was asked his views on the dollar’s recent weakness and was (rightly) nonplussed over the issue as described here.  After all, this is a man who constantly rails against the artificial weakness of the yen and the yuan, and who is seeking to rebalance the trade account.  All that points to a weaker dollar, so it beggar’s belief that this is a surprise to the market.

One last thing while I’m on my high horse.  I couldn’t help but notice this article about Banque de France chief Villeroy explaining that the weakening dollar may impact ECB policy-making with a throwaway line about diminishing confidence in the dollar stemming from the unpredictability of US economic policy.  First off, US policy is very clear, run it hot!  And second, it is remarkable that when the euro was tumbling, we never saw this same introspection about Eurozone/EU economic policy and their self-destructive energy policies.  My point is, nothing we are currently witnessing is new in any way at all, but rather part of the longer-term cycle of FX markets.

OK, how has this dollar move impacted other markets?  Well, yesterday’s US equity session was marked by a rotation back to tech as the NASDAQ (+0.9%) had a fine day while the DJIA (-0.8%) fell hard.  This led to a mixed session in Asia with the Nikkei little changed (although other indices there were under steady pressure), while HK (+2.6%) exploded higher on news that China has licensed its first Nvidia H200 chips to Alibaba and someone threw money at China Vanke, one of the collapsing Chinese real estate firms.  The mainland was modestly higher (+0.25%) but there was strength in Korea (+1.7%), Taiwan (+1.5%) and India (+0.6%).  On the downside, Indonesia (-7.3%) tumbled after MSCI indicated they may downgrade the market there to frontier status due to lack of liquidity.

In Europe, red is today’s color led by Spain (-1.1%) and France (-1.0%) with the latter seeing weakness in luxury stocks while the former appears to be unwinding some of its recent strength with no particular catalyst, merely a negative view overall in Europe.  Germany (-0.2%) and the UK (-0.4%) are also softer without anything specific.  As to US futures, at this hour (6:40) they are pointing higher with NASDAQ (+1.1%) leading the way again.  As an aside, the S&P 500 futures are above 7000 now, and the cash market looks set to break that big round number this morning.

In the bond market, as we await the FOMC policy decision (no change expected) and the subsequent press conference, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning after having edged higher by 2bps yesterday.  European sovereign yields are all basically softer by -2bps, perhaps on the back of the euro’s strength.  After all, Villeroy hinted that if the euro remains strong, they may need to cut rates again.  Interestingly, JGB yields (-5bps) fell after BOJ Minutes from the December meeting (remember, they already met again last week) indicated that some members were concerned over the weaker yen driving inflation higher.  Talk about stale news.  My sense here is this is much more about the election and JGB’s will track Takaichi-san’s support level with lower yields coincident with weakening support, potentially preventing her Liz Truss moment.

In the commodity space, oil (0.0%) is unchanged this morning but has rallied more than 7% in the past month after a solid session yesterday.  Looking at the chart, the trend clearly remains lower, but the short-term reversal is also quite clear.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The dollar’s recent weakness is supporting all commodities (given they are generally priced in USD, other nations can afford more with the dollar’s slide), but the bigger picture remains that there is an extraordinarily large amount of the stuff around and much of the angst over its recovery is political (look at Europe) rather than geologic.  Nat Gas (-4.5%) is backing off its extended levels as temperatures are forecast to rebound early next week (cannot happen soon enough for me, where’s global warming when you need it?), but the long-term story here remains positive as it continues to be the energy source of choice for timely access with the least environmental impact.

Turning to metals, gold (+1.6%) continues to trade to new highs on the ‘all of the above’ thesis (weak dollar, debasement trade, geopolitical risk, central bank buying) and shows no signs of slowing down.  Silver (-0.1%), however, has been so incredibly volatile it is starting to become a concern for all involved.  It is not normal for 10%-12% daily moves in any product, let alone one with so much involvement from both retail and institutional players.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The silver market has gone into backwardation which means that there is significant demand for the actual metal.  And prices in Shanghai trade at a significant premium to the COMEX.  Shanghai is a delivery market.  We will need to watch deliveries at futures expirations closely going forward.

Finally, the dollar today is bouncing off yesterday’s session lows but remain under pressure overall.  After trading through 1.20 yesterday, the euro (-0.6%) has backed off a bit and we have seen similar moves through much of the rest of the G10 (GBP -0.6%, SEK -0.7%, NOK -0.7%, CHF -0.9%).  The yen (-0.3%) continues to be caught between potential intervention fears and fears of unfunded spending.  In the EMG bloc, we have seen CE4 currencies all suffer on the order of -0.7% or so, although APAC currencies are little changed this morning.  The one currency bucking the trend is CLP (+0.2%) which remains closely connected to copper (+1.0%).

On the data front, yesterday’s Consumer Confidence Index fell sharply, a further indication that there is a split between most of the economic numbers and people’s beliefs.  Today, aside from the Fed, we hear from the BOC (no change expected) and we get EIA oil inventories with a small draw forecast after several weeks of large builds.  Too, later in the day the Banco do Brazil will announce their policy (no change expected).

The thing that makes me happy is the Fed is an afterthought today.  While the cacophony of noise that comes from media is extremely difficult to parse given the biases underlying almost all one reads or hears, to me, the question will be whether people start to believe things are getting better, and that is more political than economic in my view.  In the meantime, the dollar appears to be set for a bit of further weakness, but do not mistake this for the end of the dollar or the dollar’s role in the global economy.

Good luck

Adf

Totally Wrecked

Posted on by

The chaos is starting to spread
As traders, when they look ahead
Have come to the view
More debt will accrue
And fear that the dollar is dead
 
So, gold and its ilk rise unchecked
While fiat is totally wrecked
Most bonds have a pox
But hope lives for stocks
And crypto? They’re still circumspect

I cannot possibly cover all the things ongoing in the markets right now as it would take a 5000 word note to do so adequately.  As such, I will try to give a high level take in far fewer words.

Headlines – 

  • Minneapolis continues to consume most of the domestic press, but is only tangentially, if at all, related to markets.  Perhaps it questions President Trump’s authority and that is a negative for US assets and the dollar.  
  • Xi Jinping purges his most senior military leader, accused of spying and selling state nuclear secrets to the US. Xi has removed virtually his entire military leadership, probably reducing near term risk of a Taiwan invasion, but ignores economic issues

Currencies – 

  • JPY (+1.2%) remains the top story as speculation remains rife that the BOJ stepped into markets on Friday (I don’t think so) and questions arise as to how soon they will do so. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

 There is a great deal of talk of joint intervention with the US, but I remain skeptical there.  It is critical to understand exactly what joint intervention is and what it represents.  Joint intervention means that the US Treasury is selling its own dollars alongside those of Japan.  That is very different than the Fed, acting on behalf of the Treasury-MOF-BOJ connection executing sales for the MOF.  The former implies a US effort to change the dollar; the latter is simply assisting an ally in our time zone.  I can only think of two times the US intervened, 1985 and 1998.  In the second chart, I highlighted the shape of the move from 1998, which was obviously far sharper than anything we have seen so far. 

Source: finance.yahoo.com

  • DXY (-0.5%) is falling as well, obviously dragged lower by the dollar’s decline vs. the yen, but the dollar’s weakness is universal today.  As you can see from the chart, the DXY has fallen through the bottom of the trading range at 98.00 and the bears are celebrating the end of the dollar.  But just looking at the chart below, we need to see a more substantial extension, in my view, before concluding the dollar is dead.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Precious Metals – 

MetalPriceDay%WeeklyMonthlyYTDYoY
Gold5090.47101.85+2.0%8.9%17.6%17.95%85.85%
Silver110.347.38+7.2%16.7%53.15%55.05%266.2%
Copper5.99420.048+0.8%1.6%8.4%5.45%42.2%
Platinum2867.20128.8+4.65%21.75%35.2%39.7%205.3%

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I think this table tells the entire story eloquently.  The combination of supply shortages in trading venues, as well as for industrial users, and fears over the collapse of fiat currencies as every government in the world runs it hot and issues massive amounts of debt, has an increasing number of both individuals and institutions looking for someplace to maintain their purchasing power.  Precious metals earned their name and reputation for this very reason.  If anything, the fear is that the speed of the move has been so extraordinary that it must slow down at some point, but so far, that has not been the case.  As you can see in the chart below, the moves in all three have become parabolic, or certainly in silver and platinum.  Historically, prices like this do not continue in this vein, but that doesn’t mean they cannot continue to rise further for a while yet.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to energy, oil (-0.2%) is trading above $60/bbl, but doesn’t show a great deal of interest in breaking in either direction right now.  I imagine a US action in Iran would push prices higher, but do not discount a breakthrough on the Russia/Ukraine war that could have the opposite effect.  However, NatGas (+14.6%) continues to be in massive demand as the 15° temperature outside my window this morning is indicative of what is happening across most of the country.  As well, it seems Germany, which is now hugely reliant on US LNG exports, has run their storage down to a dangerously low 40% or so, far below normal for this time of year.  Until this cold-snap ends, demand will remain exceedingly high.

Stocks – the biggest mover overnight was Tokyo (-1.8%) as the much stronger yen weighed heavily on Japanese exporters like Toyota.  Too, both South Korea (-0.8%) and India (-0.9%) slipped with the former showing concern that there would be intervention in the KRW market and negatively impact Korean exporters while the latter continues to see international capital outflows, with another $3 billion coming out so far this month (which has undermined the INR as well).  But otherwise, not much price action in China, HK or elsewhere in the region.  In Europe, most major bourses are little changed, although there have been modest gains in Spain (+0.5%) and Italy (+0.4%).  The only data of note was German Ifo Business Climate (87.6) which remained unchanged, falling below expectations for a modest gain.   And at this hour (7:45), US futures are virtually unchanged.

Bonds – yields have slipped modestly this morning with Treasuries (-1bps) not really showing signs of serious degradation.  European sovereign yields have fallen further between -3bps (Germany) and -5bps (France) with the latter benefitting from the idea that France would actually pass a budget soon.  JGB yields (-2bps) also slipped as polls show Takaichi-san’s approval ratings are slipping and some are assuming she won’t be able to run it quite as hot if she wins the election in two weeks.

Data this week is dominated by the Fed meeting on Wednesday, although as I have said from the beginning of the year, I think the Fed’s importance has waned relative to the market overall.

TodayDurable Goods3.7%
 -ex Transport0.3%
TuesdayCase Shiller Home Prices1.2%
 Consumer Confidence90.9
WednesdayFOMC Rate Decision3.75% (unchanged)
ThursdayInitial Claims205K
 Continuing Claims1860K
 Trade Balance-$42.1B
 Nonfarm Productivity4.9%
 Unit Labor Costs-1.9%
 Factory Orders1.7%
 -ex Transport0.3%
FridayDec PPI0.2% (2.8% Y/Y)
 -ex food & energy0.3% (2.9% Y/Y)
 Chicago PMI43.8

Source: tradingeconomics.com

And that’s pretty much what we have right now.  Clearly, the biggest signal comes from the precious metals space and indicates, to me at least, that there is huge concern over the way of the world right now.  I guess this is what the 4thTurning looks like.  As I said, if the Treasury is actually going to intervene of their own accord, working alongside the Japanese, that is a distinct negative for the dollar against all currencies and needs to be carefully assessed.  However, if the Fed sells dollars on the BOJ’s behalf, that is likely to have just a temporary impact on the FX markets.  Keep that in mind as we go forward.

Good luck (we all need that right now!)

Adf

Crazier Still

Posted on by

There once was a time when the Fed
When meeting, and looking ahead
All seemed to agree
The future they’d see
And wrote banal statements, when read
 
But this time is different, it’s true
Though those words most folks should eschew
‘Cause nobody knows
Which way the wind blows
As true data’s hard to construe
 
So, rather than voting as one
Three members, the Chairman, did shun
But crazier still
The dot plot did kill
The idea much more can be done

 

I think it is appropriate to start this morning’s discussion with the dot plot, which as I, and many others, expected showed virtually no consensus as to what the future holds with respect to Federal Reserve monetary policy.  For 2026, the range of estimates by the 19 FOMC members is 175 basis points, the widest range I have ever seen.  Three members see a 25bp hike in 2026 and one member (likely Governor Miran) sees 150bps of cuts.  They can’t all be right!  But even if we look out to the longer run, the range of estimates is 125bps wide.

Personally, I am thrilled at this outcome as it indicates that instead of the Chairman browbeating everyone into agreeing with his/her view, which had been the history for the past 40 years, FOMC members have demonstrated they are willing to express a personal view.

Now, generally markets hate uncertainty of this nature, and one might have thought that equity markets, especially, would be negatively impacted by this outcome.  But, since the unwritten mandate of the Fed is to ensure that stock markets never decline, they were able to paper over the lack of consensus by explaining they will be buying $40 billion/month of T-bills to make sure that bank reserves are “ample”.  QT has ended, and while they will continue to go out of their way to explain this is not QE, and perhaps technically it is not, they are still promising to pump nearly $500 billion /year into the economy by expanding their balance sheet.  One cannot be surprised that initially, much of that money is going to head into financial markets, hence today’s rally.

However, if you want to see just how out of touch the Fed is with reality, a quick look at their economic projections helps disabuse you of the notion that there is really much independent thought in the Marriner Eccles Building.  As you can see below, they continue to believe that inflation will gradually head back to their target, that growth will slow, unemployment will slip and that Fed funds have room to decline from here.

I have frequently railed against the Fed and their models, highlighting time and again that their models are not fit for purpose.  It is abundantly clear that every member has a neo-Keynesian model that was calibrated in the wake of the Dot com bubble bursting when interest rates in the US first were pushed down to 0.0% while consumer inflation remained quiescent as all the funds went into financial assets.  One would think that the experience of 2022-23, when inflation soared forcing them to hike rates in the most aggressive manner in history, would have resulted in some second thoughts.  But I cannot look at the table above and draw that conclusion.  Perhaps this will help you understand the growth in the meme, end the fed.

To sum it all up, FOMC members have no consensus on how to behave going forward but they decided that expanding the balance sheet was the right thing to do.  Perhaps they do have an idea, but given inflation is showing no signs of heading back to their target, they decided that the esoterica of the balance sheet will hide their activities more effectively than interest rate announcements.

One of the key talking points this morning revolves around the dollar in the FX markets and how now that the Fed has cut rates again, while the ECB is set to leave them on hold, and the BOJ looks likely to raise them next week, that the greenback will fall further.  Much continues to be made of the fact that the dollar fell about 12% during the first 6 months of 2025, although a decline of that magnitude during a 6-month time span is hardly unique, it was the first such decline that happened during the first 6 months of the year, in 50 years or so.  In other words, much ado about nothing.  

The latest spin, though, is look for the dollar to decline sharply after the rate cut.  I have a hard time with this concept for a few reasons.  First, given the obvious uncertainty of future Fed activity, as per the dot plot, it is unclear the Fed is going to aggressively cut rates from this level anytime soon.  And second, a look at the history of the dollar in relation to Fed activity doesn’t really paint that picture.  The below chart of the euro over the past five years shows that the single currency fell during the initial stages of the Fed’s panic rate hikes in 2022 then rallied back sharply as they continued.  Meanwhile, during the latter half of 2024, the dollar rallied as the Fed cut rates and then declined as they remained on hold.   My point is, the recent history is ambiguous at best regarding the dollar’s response to a given Fed move.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I have maintained that if the Fed cuts aggressively, it will undermine the dollar.  However, nothing about yesterday’s FOMC meeting tells me they are about to embark on an aggressive rate cutting binge.

The other noteworthy story this morning is the outcome from China’s Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC).  I have described several times that the President Xi’s government claims they are keen to help support domestic consumption and the housing market despite neither of those things having occurred during the past several years.  Well, Bloomberg was nice enough to create a table highlighting the CEWC’s statements this year and compare them to the past two years.  I have attached it below.

In a testament to the fact that bureaucrats speak the same language, no matter their native tongue, a look at the changes in Fiscal Policy or Top Priority Task, or even Real Estate shows that nothing has changed but the order of the words.  The very fact that they need to keep repeating themselves can readily be explained by the fact that the previous year’s efforts failed.  Why will this time be different?

Ok, a quick tour of markets.   Apparently, Asia was not enamored of the FOMC outcome with Tokyo (-0.9%) and China (-0.9%) both sliding although HK managed to stay put.  Elsewhere in the region, both Korea (-0.6%) and Taiwan (-1.3%) were also under pressure as most markets here were in the red.  The exceptions were India, Malaysia and the Philippines, all of which managed gains of 0.5% or so.  

In Europe, things are a little brighter with modest gains the order of the day led by Spain (+0.5%) and France (+0.4%) although both Germany and the UK are barely higher at this hour.  There was no data released in Europe this morning although the SNB did meet and leave rates on hold at 0.0% as universally expected.  There has been a little bit of ECB speak, with several members highlighting that ECB policy is independent of Fed policy but that if Fed cuts force the dollar lower, they may feel the need to respond as a higher euro would reduce inflation.  Alas for the stock market bulls in the US, futures this morning are pointing lower led by the NASDAQ (-0.7%) although that is on the back of weaker than expected Oracle earnings results last night.  Perhaps promising to spend $5 trillion on AI is beginning to be seen as unrealistic, although I doubt that is the case 🤔.

Turning to the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -2bps overnight after falling -5bps yesterday.  Similar price action has been seen elsewhere with European sovereign yields slipping slightly and even JGB yields down -2bps overnight.  Personally, I am a bit confused by this as I have been assured that the Fed cutting rates in this economy would result in a steeper yield curve with long-dated rates rising even though the front end falls.  Perhaps I am reading the data wrong.

In the commodity markets, the one truth is that there are no sellers in the silver market.  It is higher by another 0.5% this morning and above $62/oz as whatever games had been played in the past to cap its price seem to have fallen apart.  Physical demand for the stuff outstrips new supply by about 120 million oz /year, and new mines are scarce on the ground.  This feels like there is further room to run.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to the rest of the space, gold (-0.2%) which had a nice day yesterday is consolidating, as is copper.  Turning to oil (-1.1%) it continues to drift lower, dragging gasoline along for the ride, something that must make the president quite happy.  You know my views here.

As to the dollar writ large, while it sold off a bit yesterday, as you can see from the below DXY (-0.3%) chart, it is hardly making new ground, rather it is back to the middle of its 6-month range.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

This morning more currencies are a bit stronger but in the G10, CHF (+0.45%) is the leader with everything else far less impactful.  And on the flip side, INR (-0.7%) has traded to yet another historic low (USD high) as the new RBI governor has decided not to waste too much money on intervention.  Oh yeah, JPY (+0.2%) has gotten some tongues wagging as now that the Fed cut and the BOJ is ostensibly getting set to hike, there is more concern about the unwind of the carry trade.  My view is, don’t worry unless the BOJ hikes 50bps and promises a lot more on the way.  After all, if the Fed has finished cutting, something that cannot be ruled out, this entire thesis will be destroyed.

On the data front, Initial (exp 220K) and Continuing (1950K) Claims are coming as well as the Trade Balance (-$63.3B).  There are no Fed speakers on the docket, but I imagine we will hear from some anyway, as they cannot seem to shut up.  

It would not surprise me to see the dollar head toward the bottom of this trading range, but I think we need a much stronger catalyst than uncertainty from the Fed to break the range.

Good luck

Adf

Printing Up Gobs

Posted on by

The balance sheet, so said Chair Jay
Is really the very best way
For policy ease
And so, if you please,
QT is soon going away
 
Rate cuts are now back on the table
As we work quite hard to enable
Those folks lacking jobs
By printing up gobs
Of cash, just as fast as we’re able

 

Chairman Powell spoke yesterday morning in Philadelphia at the NABE meeting and the TL; DR is that QT, the process of shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet, is coming to an end.  Below is a chart showing the Fed’s balance sheet assets over the past 20+ years.  I have highlighted the first foray into QE, during the financial crisis, and you can see how that balance sheet has grown and evolved since then.

And the below chart is one I created from FRED data showing the Fed’s balance sheet as a percentage of the nation’s GDP.

Pretty similar looking, right?  The history shows that the GFC qualitatively changed the way the Fed managed monetary policy, and by extension their efforts at managing the economy.  As is frequently the case, QE was envisioned as an emergency policy to address the unfolding financial crisis in 2008, but as Milton Friedman warned us in 1984, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.”  QE is now one of the key tools in the Fed’s toolkit as they try to achieve their mandates.

There has been a great deal of discussion regarding the issue of the size of the Fed’s balance sheet, paying interest on reserves, something that started back in 2008 as well, and what the proper role for the Fed should be.  But I assure you, this is not the venue to determine those answers. 

However, of more importance than the speech, per se, was that during the Q&A that followed, Mr Powell explained that the Fed was soon reaching the point where they were going to end QT, and that they were going to seek to change the tenor of the balance sheet to own more short-term assets, T-bills, than the current allocation of holding more long-term assets including T-bonds and MBS.  And this was what the market wanted to hear.  While both the NASDAQ and S&P 500 both closed slightly lower on the day, as you can see from the chart below, the response to Powell’s speech was immediate and impressive.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Too, other markets also responded to the news in a similar manner, with gold, as per the below chart accelerating its move higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

While the dollar, as per the DXY, responded in an equally forceful manner, falling sharply at the same time.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Summing up, Chairman Powell basically just told us that inflation was no longer a fight they were willing to have and support of the economy and employment is Job #1.  Of course, this may not work out that well for long-term bond yields, which when if inflation rises are likely to rise as well, I think Powell knows that he will be gone by the time that becomes a problem, so maybe doesn’t care as much.

But here’s something to consider; there has been a great deal of talk about the animus between the Fed and the Treasury, or perhaps between Powell and Trump, but Treasury Secretary Bessent has already made clear they will be issuing more T-bills and less T-bonds going forward, which is a perfect fit for the Fed’s proposition to hold more T-bills and less T-bonds going forward.  This is not a coincidence.

Now, while that was the subject that got most tongues wagging in the market, the other story of note was the ongoing trade spat between the US and China.  It is hard to keep up with all the changes although it appears that soy oil imports from China are now on the menu of items to be tariffed, and the WSJ this morning explained that China is going to try to pressure President Trump by doing things to undermine the stock market as they see that as a vulnerability.  Funnily enough, I think Trump cares less about the stock market this time around than last time, as he is far more focused on issues like reindustrialization and jobs here and elevating labor relative to capital, which by its very nature implies stock market underperformance.

But that’s where things stand now. So, let’s take a turn around markets overnight.  Despite a mixed picture in the US, Asian equity markets had a fine time with Tokyo (+1.8%), China (+1.5%) and HK (+1.8%) all rallying sharply on the prospect of further Fed ease.  Regarding trade, given the meeting between Presidents Trump and Xi is still on the schedule, I think that many are watching the public back and forth and assuming it is posturing.  As well, Chinese inflation data was released showing deflation accelerating, -0.3% Y/Y, and that led to thoughts of further Chinese stimulus to support the economy there.  Of course, their stimulus so far has been underwhelming, at best.  Elsewhere in the region, green was also the theme with Korea (+2.7%), India (+0.7%), Taiwan (+1.8%) and Australia (+1.0%) all having strong sessions.  One other thing about India is the central bank there intervened aggressively in the FX market with the rupee (+0.9%) retracing to its strongest level in a month as the RBI starts to get more concerned over the inflationary impacts of a constantly weakening currency.

In Europe, the CAC (+2.4%) is leading the way higher after LVMH reported better than expected earnings (Isn’t it funny that the US market is dependent on NVDA while the French market is dependent on LVMH?  Talk about differences in the economy!), and while that has given a positive flavor to other markets, they have not seen the same type of movement with the DAX (+0.1%) and IBEX (+0.7%) holding up well while the FTSE 100 (-0.6%) continues to suffer from UK policies.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:40) they are all firmer by 0.5% to 0.9%.

In the bond market, yields continue to edge lower with Treasuries (-2bps) actually lagging the European sovereign market where yields have declined between -3bps and -4bps across the board.  In fact, UK gilts (-5bps) are doing best as investors are growing more comfortable with the idea the BOE is going to cut rates again after some dovish comments from Governor Bailey yesterday.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.2%) is consolidating after it fell again yesterday and is now lower by nearly -6% in the past week.  However, the story continues to be metals with gold (+1.3%), silver (+2.8%), copper (+0.5%) and platinum (+1.7%) all seeing continued demand as the theme of owning stuff that hurts if you drop it on your foot remains a driving force in the markets.  And as long as central banks are hinting that they are going to debase fiat currencies further, this trend will continue.

Finally, the dollar, as discussed above, is softer, down about -0.25% vs. most of its G10 counterparts this morning although NOK (+0.8%) is the leader in what appears to be some profit taking after an exaggerated decline on the back of oil’s decline.  In the EMG bloc, we have already discussed INR, and after that, quite frankly, it has not been all that impressive with the dollar broadly slipping about -0.2% against virtually the rest of the bloc.

On the data front, we see Empire State Manufacturing (exp -1.0) and get the Fed’s Beige Book at 2:00 this afternoon.  Four more Fed speakers are on the docket, with two, Miran and Waller, certainly on board for rate cuts, with the other two, Schmid and Bostic, likely to have a more moderated view.  Earlier this morning Eurozone IP (-1.2%) showed that Europe is hardly moving along that well.  Meanwhile, despite the excitement about Powell’s comments, the Fed funds futures market is essentially unchanged at 98% for an October cut and 95% for another in December.  I understand why the dollar slipped yesterday, but until those numbers start to move more aggressively, I suspect the dollar’s decline will be muted.

One other thing, rumor is that the BLS will be reporting the CPI data a week from Friday at 8:30am as they need it to calculate the COLA for Social Security for 2026.  If that is hot, and I understand that expectations are for 0.35% M/M, Chairman Powell and his crew may find they have a really tough choice to make the following week.

Good luck

Adf

Many Ructions

Posted on by

Just two days before Halloween
When Jay and his minions convene
With great joie de vivre
Investors believe
A quarter-point cut will be seen
 
But what if the model that Jay
Consults might have led him astray
Then Fed fund reductions
May cause many ructions
In markets, and too, the beltway

 

I have often discussed the fact that the models the Fed uses no longer seem to work very effectively as evidenced by the tardiness of their reaction function and the results that occur after the fact.  Consider, the Fed was uniformly convinced that inflation was transitory in 2021 and 2022, right up until it hit 7% when it finally dawned on them that it wasn’t.  I would argue that part of the problem is they continue to utilize a Keynesian framework, which has not proven to be very effective for monetary policy (although it’s great for politicians as a fiscal policy excuse to spend more money.)

But I am just a poet and my voice is not so loud in financial markets.  However, John Mauldin is someone with much greater reach and his letter this week highlighted that exact issue. (For those of you who are not familiar with John, his weekly letter, “Thoughts from the Frontline” is usually an excellent read and completely free, you should sign up.)  At any rate, he reprinted a chart originally in the WSJ that I think does an excellent job of demonstrating the flaws in models developed pre-Covid.

It is quite apparent how this particular model, which appears to use the type of inputs that most econometric models utilize, had done a pretty good job, even throughout the GFC, of anticipating changes in consumer sentiment right up until Covid.  However, it is also clear that since then, it has a terrible track record.  

And this is the problem.  I would wager that every one of the models built by the hundreds of PhD’s at the Fed has a similar problem, things that used to drive economic decision making no longer do.  I guess when people get used to the government supporting them completely, many are willing to sit back and do nothing.  And when that support stops, it appears that people aren’t very happy about that situation.  Go figure!

The bigger picture here is that I believe it is time for the Fed to question its own modeling prowess.  Consider the situation that with interest rates at their current levels of 4% +/- a bit depending on the tenor, many people, especially retirees, were quite content to clip coupons and were spending those funds supporting the economy.  At the same time, interest expense for small companies never really fell that far, so current rates are not deathly. 

But you know who benefits from low interest rates?  The government and large corporations who have access to capital markets and pay the lowest rates.  And even there, companies like Apple, Google and Microsoft have so much cash on hand that they are net earning interest with higher rates.

All this begs the question, what is the purpose of the Fed cutting rates?  A key risk is that inflation will return with a vengeance.  It has been 55 months since core PCE was at or below the Fed’s target level of 2.0% as you can see in the below chart, and I feel confident in saying that when the data is released this Friday, it will not be changing that trend.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, savers will suffer as their income will be reduced, the risk of rising inflation will increase as easier monetary policy typically precedes that type of movement, and long-term yields, which have rebounded recently, run the risk of starting higher again.  Remember what happened last year when the Fed cut, 10-year Treasury yields rose 100bps. (see chart below)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It is far too early to claim the outcome will be the same this time, but it is a real risk.  After all, bond yields have a strong relationship with inflation, running at a long-term correlation of 0.36 and as can be seen in the chart below I prepared from FRED data.

Concluding, the current batch of economic models utilized by analysts and the Fed appear to have limited ability to describe the economy, whether it is because of the asynchronous nature of the current state of the world, or because the unprecedented government responses around the world to the Covid pandemic have changed the way everything works.  The market is pricing a 93% probability of another rate cut in October, and it appears Chairman Powell believes that to be the case.  But is it the right move at this time?  I feel like that is not the question being asked, but it needs to be by people more powerful than this poet.

Ok, I’ll step down from my soapbox to survey the market activity overnight.  Friday’s US closes at yet more all-time highs were followed by a more mixed session in Asia.  While Japanese investors got the joke, with the Nikkei rising 1.0%, Hong Kong (-0.8%) and India (-0.6%) were both under pressure with the former suffering from a strengthening currency and concern about a major typhoon about to hit the island nation, while India is suffering from the backlash of the Trump policy change on H1-b visas, now charging $100,000 for them.  It turns out Indian firms were the largest user of those visas and there is concern over a serious economic impact there.  Otherwise, the region saw a mixture of green (China, Taiwan, Australia, Malaysia) and red (New Zealand, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand).

European bourses, though, are having a tougher time this morning with the continental exchanges all under pressure (DAX -0.7%, CAC -0.3%, IBEX -1.0%, FTSE MIB -1.0%) as concerns rise over the Flash PMI data to be released tomorrow and the idea it may show a much weaker economy than previously considered.  As well, USD futures are softer at this hour (6:40), with all three major indices showing declines on the order of -0.25%.  However, we must keep in mind that the trend in equity markets has been strongly higher so a modest pullback would not be a surprise and perhaps should be welcomed.

In the bond market, yields having moved higher on Friday, are quite stable this morning with Treasury yields unchanged and most of Europe seeing a -1bp decline.  The only outlier here is Japan, where JGB yields topped 1.65%, a new high for the move and the highest level since 2008 as per the below chart from marketwatch.com.  Ueda-san has to start getting worried soon, I think.

In the commodity space, oil (-0.7%) is continuing its recent decline but remains within the trading range and doesn’t appear to have much impetus in the short term in either direction.  However, I continue to look for an eventual decline here.  As to gold (+1.15%) and silver (+1.6%), nothing is going to stop this train.  Well, certainly there is no indication that policy changes are coming anywhere in the world that would force investors to rethink the idea of continuous depreciation of fiat currencies, and let’s face it, that’s all this represents.  I continue to see analysts raise their target price for the barbarous relic and I agree there is plenty of room to run as interest has been modest, at best, by Western investors.

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning with both the euro (+0.25%) and pound (+0.25%) leading the way in the G10, although the yen is basically unchanged.  There was an interesting story in Bloombergdiscussing how volatility in the FX markets has been declining rapidly with many attributing this to the rise of algorithmic trading.  As well, all over X this morning are stories about how the dollar’s decline this year (about -14% vs. the euro) is unprecedented.  It’s not at all which is one of the reasons you need be careful about what people put up there.  It seems that some analysts are putting undue emphasis on the starting point being January 1st, rather than when the market tops.  But saying the dollar is declining in an unprecedented manner is absurd and picayune.  Meanwhile, EMG currencies are all over the place with gainers (KRW +0.4%, ZAR +0.4%) and laggards (MXN -0.5%, INR -0.25%) and everything in between.  

On the data front, PCE is Friday’s offering, but before then there is some stuff and more interestingly, there is lots of Fed speak.

TodayChicago Fed National Activity-0.17
TuesdayFlash Manufacturing PMI52.0
 Flash Services PMI53.9
WednesdayNew Home Sales650K
ThursdayDurable Goods-0.5%
 -ex transport-0.2%
 GDP (Q2)3.3%
 Initial Claims235K
 Continuing Claims1930K
 Existing Home Sales3.96M
FridayPCE0.3% (2.7% Y/Y)
 Core PCE0.2% (2.9% Y/Y)
 Personal Income0.3%
 Personal Spending0.5%
 Michigan Sentiment55.4

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On top of the data, we hear from…wait for it…ten different Fed speakers, including Chair Powell tomorrow, across 16 different events.  I expected to hear from a lot as there is clearly no real consensus at this point in time there.

People love to hate the dollar, and if the Fed is going to ease more aggressively, I understand that, but longer term, I think the story is different.  Just be careful.

Good luck

Adf

A Third Fed Mandate

Posted on by

As Jay and his minions convene
A new man is making the scene
Now, Stephen Miran
A man with a plan
Will help restart Jay’s cash machine
 
But something that’s happened of late
Is talk of a third Fed mandate
Yes, jobs and inflation
Have been the fixation
But long-term yields need be sedate

 

As the FOMC begins their six-weekly meeting this morning, most market participants focus on the so-called ‘dual mandate’ of promoting the goals maximum employment and stable prices.  This, of course, is why everybody focuses on the tension between the inflation and unemployment rates and why the recent revisions to the NFP numbers have convinced one and all that a rate cut is coming tomorrow with the only question being its size.  But there is a third mandate as is clear from the below text of the Federal Reserve Act, which I have copied directly from federalreserve.gov [emphasis added]:

“Section 2A. Monetary policy objectives

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy’s long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.

[12 USC 225a. As added by act of November 16, 1977 (91 Stat. 1387) and amended by acts of October 27, 1978 (92 Stat. 1897); Aug. 23, 1988 (102 Stat. 1375); and Dec. 27, 2000 (114 Stat. 3028).]”

One of the things we have heard consistently from Treasury Secretary Bessent is that he is highly focused on ensuring that longer-term yields do not get too high.  Lately, the market has been working to his advantage with both 10-year, and 30-year yields having declined by more than 25bps in the past month.  And more than 40bps since mid-July.  (Look at the yields listed on the top of the chart below to see their recent peaks, not just the line.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Now, with President Trump’s head of the CEA, Stephen Miran getting voted onto the board to fill the seat that had been held by Governor Adriana Kugler, but heretofore vacant, one would think that the tone of the conversation is going to turn more dovish.  What makes this so odd is that, by their nature, central bankers are doves and seemingly love to print money, so there should be no hesitation to cut rates further.  But…that third mandate opens an entirely different can of worms and brings into play the idea of yield curve control as a way to ensure the Fed “promote(s)…moderate long-term interest rates.”

It was Ben Bernanke, as Chair, who instigated QE during the GFC although he indicated it was an emergency measure.  It was Janet Yellen, as Chair, who normalized QE as one of the tools in the toolbox for the Fed to address its dual mandate.  I believe the case can be made that newly appointed Governor Miran will begin to bang the drum for the Fed to act to ensure moderate long-term interest rates, and there is no better policy to do that than QE/YCC.  Actually, there is a better policy, reduced government spending and less regulation that allows productivity to increase and balances the production-consumption equation, but that is out of the Fed’s hands.

At any rate, we cannot ignore that there could be a subtle change in focus to the statement and perhaps Chairman Powell will discuss this at the press conference.  If this has any validity, a big IF, the market impacts would be significant.  The dollar would start another leg lower, equities would rise sharply, and commodity prices would rise as well.  Bonds, of course, would be held in check regardless of the inflationary consequences.  Just something to keep on your bingo card!

Ok, let’s check out the overnight activity.  While it was quiet in the US yesterday, we did manage to make more new highs in the S&P 500 as all three major indices were higher.  As to Asia, Tokyo (+0.3%) had the same type of session, with modest gains as it takes aim at a new big, round number of 45,000.  China (-0.2%) and HK (0.0%) did little although there was a lot of positivity elsewhere in the region with Korea (+1.2%), India, (+0.7%) and Taiwan (+1.1%) leading the way amidst almost all markets, large and small, showing gains.  Europe, though, is a different story with red today’s color of the day, as Spain (-0.8%) and Germany (-0.6%) leading the down move despite better-than-expected German ZEW data (37.3 vs. 26.3 expected).  One of the things I read this morning was that German auto manufacturers have laid off 125,000 workers in the past 6 weeks.  That is a devastating number and bodes ill for German economic activity in the future.  As to other European bourses, -0.1% to -0.4% covers the lot.  US futures, though, continue to point higher, up 0.3% at this hour (7:30).

In the bond market, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning while European sovereign yields have edged higher by between 1bp and 2bps.  It doesn’t feel like investors there are thinking of better growth, but we did hear from several ECB members that while cuts are not impossible during the rest of the year, they are not certain.

In the commodity space, oil (+0.7%) is back in a modest upswing but still has shown no inclination to move outside that trading range of $60/$65.  It has been more than a month since that range has been broken and absent a major change in the Russia sanctions situation, where Europe actually stops buying Russian oil (as if!) I see no short-term catalyst on the horizon to change this situation.  Clearly, producers are happy enough to produce and sell at this level and demand remains robust.

Turning to the metals markets, I discuss gold (+0.4%) a lot, and given it is making historic highs, that makes sense, but silver (+0.4%) has been outperforming gold for the past month and looks ever more like it is going to make a run for its all-time highs of $49.95 set back in January 1980.  The more recent peak, set in 2011, of $48.50 looks like it is just days away based on the recent rate of climb.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning, with the euro (+0.4%) trading above 1.18 again for the first time since July 1st and there is a great deal of discussion as to how it is going to trade back to, and through, 1.20 soon, a level not seen since 2021.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The narrative is now that the Fed is set to begin cutting rates and the ECB is going to stand pat, the euro will rise.  This is true for GBP (+0.3%) as wel, with the Sterling chart largely the same as the euro one above.  Here’s the thing.  I understand the weak dollar thesis if the Fed gets aggressive, I discussed it above. However, if German manufacturing is contracting that aggressively, and the layoffs numbers are eye opening, can the ECB really stand pat?  Similarly, PM Starmer is under enormous, and growing, pressure to resign with the Labour party in the throes of looking to oust him for numerous reasons, not least of which is the economy is struggling.  So, please tell me why investors will flock to those currencies.  I see the dollar declining, just not as far as most.

Data this morning brings Retail Sales (exp 0.2%, 0.4% -ex autos) along with IP (-0.1%) and Capacity Utilization (77.4%).  However, it is not clear to me that markets will give this data much consideration given the imminence of the FOMC outcome tomorrow.  The current futures pricing has just a 4% probability of a 50bp cut.  I am waiting for the Timiraos article to see if that changes.  Look for it this afternoon.

Good luck

Adf

More Insane

Posted on by

Though debt round the world keeps on growing
The equity run isn’t slowing
But what’s more insane
Is yields slowly wane
Despite signs inflation ain’t slowing
 
The French are the latest to hear
Their credit’s somewhat less sincere
But CBs this week
Seem likely to tweak
Rates lower, and markets will cheer

 

Something is rotten in the state of financial markets, or at least that is the conclusion this poet has drawn (and please do not think I am trying to compare myself to Shakespeare).  No matter what my personal view of the economy may be, I cannot help but look at the recent performance of the equity market and the bond market and be extremely confused.  The chart below shows the past year’s price action in the S&P 500 (blue line) and US 10-year yields (green line). 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Since early June, the two price series, which have historically had a pretty decent correlation, have gone in completely opposite directions.  Equity markets continue to trade to new highs on a regular basis as earnings multiples continue their expansion.  Typically, multiples only expand when growth expectations are rising, and the economy is in an uptrend.  Ergo, if multiples are high and rising, it seems equity investors believe that is the case.  I understand that view as there are strong indications the administration is going to continue to ‘run the economy hot’ meaning do all it can to increase economic activity and allow inflation to rise as well, counting on the fast growth to offset the pain.

However, 10-year Treasury yields have been sliding steadily for the past three months despite the equity market belief in running it hot.  Bond yields have historically been far more sensitive to inflationary pressures and the fact that yields have been declining, down >40bps since early June, would lead to a very different conclusion about the economy, that it is going to see much slower growth and by consequence, reduced inflationary pressures.

I have discussed the asynchronous economy in the past and I believe this is more proof of that thesis.  The equity markets are still being largely driven by the AI/Tech sector and while that is a huge portion of the equity market, its size within the overall economy is pretty small.  Given the capital weightings of both the S&P 500 and NASDAQ, strength in that sector has clearly been sufficient to drive stock indices higher.  However, much of the rest of the economy is not seeing the same benefits, and in fact, there is a portion suffering as AI takes over roles that had been filled by people thus increasing unemployment.  That segment of the economy is much larger, and it seems there is a growing probability that a recession may be coming there.  

Or not, if the administration is able to run it hot.  Ultimately, the thing the makes the least sense to me is that there is no indication that inflation is slowing anywhere back toward the Fed’s alleged 2% target.  Rather CPI looks far more likely to coalesce around the 3.5%-4.0% level which means that PCE, even on a core basis, is going to be hanging around 3.0%.  If the Fed is getting set to cut rates, and by all indication they are going to cut at least 25bps on Wednesday, I think it is clear that 3.0% is the new 2.0%.

And here’s the problem with that. When inflation is low, 2% or less, equities have historically been negatively correlated with bond prices, so if stocks fell, bonds rallied and the 60:40 portfolio had an internal hedge.  But when inflation is higher, and it doesn’t need to be 10%, 4% is enough to change the relationship, equity prices and bond prices tend to move in sync.  This means, if stock prices fall because of a recession, so do bond prices with yields rising.  In that situation, the 60:40 portfolio suffers greatly.  Just think back to 2022 when both equities and bonds fell -30% or so.  Where was inflation?  Right, we were in the throes of the Fed’s last mistake regarding the word transitory.  The below chart is the best I could find to show how things behaved in the 60’s and 70’s with inflation running hot and then how things changed after Mr Volcker began to squash inflation.

Original source: Isabelnet.com

And what of the dollar you may ask?  Well, theoretically, rising inflation should undermine the currency, but rising rates, when central banks fight inflation, should help support it.  However, this time, with rising inflation and the Fed set to cut, it seems the dollar may have some trouble, although as other central banks follow suit, and they will, the dollar will find support.

Ok, let’s see how things behaved overnight.  While Friday’s US session was mixed with only the NASDAQ managing to gain, there was more green in Asia and Europe.  The Japanese celebrated Respect for the Aged Day, so markets there were closed.  However, both HK (+0.2%) and China (+0.25%) managed modest gains despite (because of?) weaker than expected Chinese economic data.  Every aspect of the data, IP, Retail Sales, Investment and Unemployment, printed worse than forecasts and has now encouraged investors to look for further Chinese government stimulus to support the economy.  That theory helped Korea, Malaysia and Indonesia, all showing solid gains, but did nothing for the rest of the region, perhaps most surprisingly Taiwan.

In Europe, Fitch cut France’s credit rating to A+ from AA- based on fiscal deficits and political turmoil (aka no government), yet equity investors saw that as a buy signal with the CAC (+1.15%) leading European shares higher.  The DAX (+0.4%) and IBEX (+0.6%) are also doing well although the FTSE 100 (0.0%) is just treading water.  There has been no data of note, so it appears investors there are anticipating good things from the US where futures are higher by 0.2% at this hour (7:30).

Bond yields in the US are unchanged this morning, but European sovereign yields have slipped -2bps across the board, despite France’s downgrade.  I am really at a loss these days to understand the mind of bond investors.  I guess there is a growing belief that central bank rate cuts are going to help!

In the commodity sector, oil (+0.4%) has edged higher this morning but remains firmly in the middle of its 3-month trading range and is showing no desire to move in either direction.  Metals markets, meanwhile, are basically unchanged this morning, simply sitting at their recent highs with the latest contest on Wall Street being who can forecast the highest price for gold in 2026.  Goldman just explained that $5000/oz is reasonable if just 1% of risk assets move into the relic.

As to the dollar, while it did little most of the evening, as NY is walking in, it is slipping a bit, with the euro (+0.25%) and pound (+0.5%) leading the way higher in the G10, and truthfully across the board as the largest EMG moves are KRW (+0.4%) and HUF (+0.4%) while the rest have moved on the order of 0.1% to 0.2%.  There has been growing chatter that China is now going to allow the renminbi to start to strengthen more steadily (in fairness, it has been strengthening modestly since the beginning of 2025, up about 3% since then), and that this is part of the trade negotiations ongoing with the US currently taking place in Madrid.  But remember, while CNY has been creeping higher this year, a quick look at the chart below shows it has fallen substantially since 2022, having declined more than 17% between 2022 and the beginning of this year.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, in addition to the FOMC, there are several other central bank meetings and some important data as follows:

TodayEmpire State Manufacturing5.0
TuesdayRetail Sales0.3%
 -ex autos0.4%
 Control Group0.4%
 IP-0.1%
 Capacity Utilization77.4%
WednesdayIndonesia Rate Decision5.0% (Unchanged)
 Housing Starts1.37M
 Building Permits1.37M
 Bank of Canada Rate Decision2.5% (-0.25%)
 FOMC Decision4.25% (-0.25%)
 Brazil Rate Decision15.0% (unchanged)
ThursdayBOE Rate Decision4.0% (unchanged)
 Initial Claims240K
 Continuing Claims1950K
 Philly Fed2.3
 South Africa Rate Decision7.0% (unchanged)
 Leading Indicators-0.1%
 BOJ Rate Decision0.5% (unchanged)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

So, while Retail Sales may give us some more color on the strength of the economy, it is really a week filled with central bank policy decisions and the ensuing discussions they have to spin things as they desire.  I imagine we will be getting an article from Nickileaks this afternoon or tomorrow to get Powell’s message out, but it remains to be seen if we are watching bond traders buy the rumor and they are set to sell bonds on the news, especially if the Fed goes 50bps, something that remains a real possibility in my mind, though the futures market is pricing just a 4% chance of that as of this morning.

A 50bp cut will undermine the dollar in the short run and may put pressure on the BOE to cut more rather than hold.  Until then, though, I suspect there will be little net movement in either direction.

Good luck

Adf

Seek the Abyss

Posted on by

As so often has been the case
The market is in Trump’s embrace
Will he make a deal
And sell it with zeal
Or will Putin spit in his face
 
Because of the focus on this
Though PPI data did miss
Most markets held tight
With highs still in sight
As naysayers seek the abyss

 

Based on the fact that equity markets in the US were all essentially unchanged yesterday, I think it is reasonable to assume that investors are waiting to see the outcome of today’s Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska.  I have no opinion on how things will work out, although I am certainly rooting for a result that includes a ceasefire and the next steps toward a lasting peace.  From a direct market perspective, arguably oil (-0.75% this morning) is the one place where the outcome will have an impact.  Any type of deal that results in the promised end to sanctions on Russian oil seem likely to push prices lower.  In this vein, we continue to see the IEA and EIA reduce their demand forecasts (although some of this is because they keep expecting BEVs to replace ICE engines and that is not happening at the pace they would like to see). However, away from oil, I expect that this will be much more important to overall sentiment than anything else.

But sentiment matters a lot.  As does the attention span of traders, which as we already know, approximates the life of a fruit fly.  For instance, yesterday’s PPI data was unambiguously hotter than expected, with both headline and core monthly jumps of 0.9%.  Surprisingly for many economists, it was not goods prices that rose so much, but rather the price of services.  For the narrative, it is much harder to blame service price hikes on tariffs, than goods price hikes, but not to worry, economists are working hard to make that case.  As well, the near universal claim is that CPI is going to rise much more quickly going forward as evidenced by this rise in PPI.  A quick look at the chart below of annualized PPI shows that we are starting to rise above levels last seen in 2018, but if you recall, CPI then was very low, sub 2.0%. The relationship between the two, CPI and PPI, is not as strong as you might expect.

The contra argument here is that corporations, which were able to raise prices rapidly during the pandemic response are finding it more difficult to do so now.  We have discussed several times how corporate profit margins remain extremely high relative to history and what we may be seeing is the beginnings of those margins starting to compress as companies absorb more of the costs, be they tariffs or labor.  I also couldn’t help but notice the article in the WSJ this morning working to explain why tariffs haven’t boosted inflation as much as many economists expected.  Their answer at least according to this research, is that the many exemptions have resulted in tariffs being collected on only about half of imports, which despite all the headlines touting tariffs are now, on average, somewhere near 18%, makes the effective rate below 10%, higher than in the past, but not devastatingly so.  And remember, imports represent about 14% of GDP.  Let’s do that math.  If half of imports are excluded and the average tariff is more like 9%, we’re looking at 60 basis points of price increases, of which corporates are absorbing a great deal.  

One other thing in the article was how it highlighted the exact result that President Trump is seeking when explaining that more companies are searching for alternative sources of goods in the US.

The tariffs, are however, impacting other nations with China last night reporting a much weaker batch of data as per the below:

                                                                                                              Actual          Previous            Forecast

The property market there continues to drag on the economy, but government efforts to prop up consumption seem to be failing and clearly tariffs are impacting IP as less orders from the US result in less production.  Arguably, though, President Xi’s greatest worry is the rise in Unemployment as the one thing he REALLY doesn’t want is a lot of unemployed young males as that is what foments a revolution.  The interesting thing about the market response here is that while the Hang Seng (-1.0%) fell sharply, the CSI 300 (+0.7%) rallied, seemingly on hopes of additional stimulus being necessary and implemented.  One other thing to note about Chinese markets is that yesterday, 40-year Chinese government yields fell below 30-year Japanese yields for the first time ever, a sign that expectations of future Chinese activity are waning.  With this in mind, even though the renminbi has been gradually appreciating this year (even if we ignore the April Liberation Day spike), the Chinese playbook remains mercantilist at its heart.  I would look for a weaker CNY going forward, although the overnight move was just -0.1%.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Ok, let’s look at the rest of markets ahead of the Alaska summit and today’s data.  Tokyo (+1.7%) had a strong session as GDP data from Japan was stronger than expected allaying worries that the tariffs would crush the economy there and bringing rate hikes back onto the table.  Australia (+0.7%), too, had a good session on solid corporate and bank earnings but the rest of the region was pretty nondescript with marginal moves in both directions.  In Europe, gains are the order of the day on the continent (DAX +0.3%, CAC 0.65%, IBEX +0.35%, FTSE MIB +1.1%) as hopes for a formalized trade deal being finalized grow.  However, UK stocks are unchanged on the session as investors here seem to be biding their time ahead of the Trump-Putin summit.  US futures are higher led by DJIA (+0.7%) although that appears to be on news that Berkshire Hathaway has taken a stake in United Health after the stock’s recent beatdown.

In the bond markets, Treasury yields are unchanged this morning although they reversed course yesterday, closing higher by 5bps rather than the -3bp opening, pre-PPI, levels.  But that rebound in yields has been seen throughout Europe where sovereigns on the continent are higher by between 3bps and 4bps and JGB yields (+2bps) rose overnight after the stronger than expected GDP data.

Away from oil, metals markets are doing very little this morning as it appears much of the activity has to do with option expirations in the ETFs SLV and GLD, so price action is likely to be choppy, but not instructive.

Finally, the dollar is softer this morning despite the higher Treasury yields.  One of the interesting things is that despite the hotter PPI data, the probability for a September cut, while falling from a chance of 50bps, to a 92.6% probability of a 25bp cut, is still pricing in an almost certain cut.  Remember, we are still a month away from that meeting and we have Jackson Hole in between as well as another NFP and CPI report so lots of potential drivers to change views.  And there is still a lot of talk of a 50bp cut, although for the life of me, I don’t understand the economic rationale there.  But softer the dollar is, falling against all its G10 brethren, on the order of 0.25% or so, and most EMG counterparts, with many having gained 0.4% or so.  But this is a dollar story today.

On the data front, ahead of the summit, which I believe starts at 2:30pm Eastern time, we see Retail Sales (exp 0.5%, 0.3% -ex autos, 0.4% Control Group) and Empire State Mfg (0.0) at 8:30, as well as IP (0.0%), Capacity Utilization (77.5%) at 9:15 and then Michigan Sentiment (62.0) at 10:00.  Retail Sales should matter most as a strong number there will encourage the equity bulls while a weak number will surely bring out the naysayers.  I still have a bad feeling about markets here, but that is my gut, not based on the data right now.  As to the dollar, there are still huge short positions out there and if rate cuts become further priced in, it can certainly decline further.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Lest ‘Flation Has Spice

Posted on by

The market absorbed CPI
And equities started to fly
Though Core prices rose
T’was Headline, I s’pose
Encouraged investors to buy
 
As well, Fed funds futures now price
The Fed will cut rates this year thrice
The upshot’s the buck
Is down on its luck
Beware though, lest ‘flation has spice

 

Core prices rose a bit more than forecast in yesterday’s CPI report although the headline numbers were a touch softer.  The problem for the Fed, if they are truly concerned about the rate of inflation, is that the strength of the numbers came from core services less shelter, so-called Supercore, a number unimpeded by tariffs, and one that has begun to rise again.  As The Inflation Guy™ makes clear in his analysis yesterday, it is very difficult to look at the data and determine that 2% inflation is coming anytime soon.  I know the market is now virtually certain the Fed is going to cut in September, but despite President Trump’s constant hectoring, I must admit the case for doing so seems unpersuasive to me.

Here are the latest aggregated probabilities from the CME and before you say anything, I recognize the third cut is priced in January, but you need to allow me a little poetic license!

However, since I am just a poet and neither institutions nor algorithms listen to my views, the reality on the ground was that the lower headline CPI number appeared to be the driver yesterday and into today with equities around the world rallying in anticipation of Fed cuts.  As well, the dollar is under more severe pressure this morning on the same basis.  However, it remains difficult for me to look at the situation in nations around the world and conclude that the US economy is going to underperform in any meaningful way over time.  

So, to the extent that a currency’s relative value is based on long-term economic fundamentals, it is difficult to accept that the dollar’s relative fiat value will decline substantially, and permanently, over time.  I use the euro as a proxy for the dollar, which is far better than the DXY in my opinion as the Dollar Index is a geometric average of 6 currencies (EUR, JPY, GBP, CAD, SEK and CHF) with the euro representing 57.6% of the basket.  And I assure you that in the FX markets, nobody pays any attention to the DXY.  Either the euro or the yen is seen as the proxy for the “dollar” and its relative value.  At any rate, if we look at a long-term chart of the euro below, we see that the twenty-year average is above the current value which pundits want to explain as a weak dollar.  Too, understand that back in 1999, when the euro made its debut, it started trading at about 1.17 or so, remarkably right where it is now!

Source: finance.yahoo.com

My point is that the dollar remains the anchor of the global financial system, and given the current trends regarding both economic activity and the likely ensuing central bank policies, as well as the ongoing performance of US assets on a financial basis, while short-term negativity on the dollar can be fine, I would be wary of expecting it to lose its overall place in the world.

Speaking of short-term views, especially regarding central bank activities, it appears clear that the market is adjusting the dollar’s value on this new idea of the Fed cutting more aggressively.  If that is, in fact, what occurs, I accept the dollar can decline relative to other currencies, but I really would be concerned about its value relative to things like commodities.  And that has been my view all along, if the Fed does cut rates, gold is going to be the big beneficiary.

Ok, let’s review how markets have absorbed the US data, as well as other data, overnight.  Yesterday’s record high closings on US exchanges were followed by strength in Tokyo (+1.3%), Hong Kong (+2.6%), China (+0.8%) despite the weakest domestic lending numbers in the history of the series back to 2005.  In fact, other than Australia (-0.6%) every market in Asia rallied.  The Australian story was driven by bank valuations which some feel are getting extreme despite the RBA promising further rate cuts, or perhaps because of that and the pressure it will put on their margins.  Europe, too, is rocking this morning with gains across the board led by Spain (+1.1%) although both Germany (+0.9%) and France (+0.6%) are doing fine.  And yes, US futures are still rising from their highs with gains on the order of 0.3% at this hour (7:45).

In the bond market, Treasury yields have slipped -3bps this morning, with investors and traders fully buying into the lower rate idea.  European sovereigns are also rallying with yields declining between -4bps and -5bps at this hour.  JGBs are the exception with yields there edging higher by 2bps, though sitting right at their recent “home” of 1.50%.  as you can see from the chart below, 1.50% appears to be the market’s true comfort level.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the commodity space, oil (-0.6%) continues to slide as hopes for an end to the Russia-Ukraine war rise ahead of the big Trump-Putin meeting on Friday in Alaska.  Nothing has changed my view that the trend here remains lower for the time being as there is plenty of supply to support any increased demand.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Metals, meanwhile, are all firmer this morning with copper (+2.6%) leading the way although both gold (+0.4%) and silver (+1.7%) are responding to the dollar’s decline on the day.

Speaking of the dollar more broadly, its decline is pretty consistent today, sliding between -0.2% and -0.4% vs. almost all its counterparts, both G10 and EMG.  This is clearly a session where the dollar is the driver, not any particular story elsewhere.

On the data front, there is no primary data coming out although we will see the weekly EIA oil inventory numbers later this morning with analysts looking for a modest drawdown.  We hear from three Fed speakers, Bostic, Goolsbee and Barkin, with the latter explaining yesterday that basically, he has no idea what is going on and no strong views about cutting or leaving rates on hold.  If you ever wanted to read some weasel words from someone who has an important role and doesn’t know what to do, the following quote is perfect: “We may well see pressure on inflation, and we may also see pressure on unemployment, but the balance between the two is still unclear.  As the visibility continues to improve, we are well positioned to adjust our policy stance as needed.”  

And that’s all there is today.  The dollar has few friends this morning and I see no reason for any to materialize today.  But longer term, I do not believe a dollar weakening trend can last.

Good luck

Adf

Not Crashing

Posted on by

The data was pretty darn good
And so, it must be understood
The world is not crashing
Though some things are flashing
Red signs, where recession’s a ‘could’

 

A review of yesterday’s economic data shows that Retail Sales were stronger than expected on every metric and subcomponent, Import Prices rose a scant 0.1%, the Philly Fed Index was much stronger than expected and Jobless Claims fell on both an Initial and Continuing basis.  In truth, it was a sweep of positive economic news.  As such, we cannot be surprised that equity markets responded positively, as did the dollar, while bonds held their ground, given the lack of inflationary signals.  But if we look at the movements in markets, they remain very modest overall.  Sure, the S&P 500 made a new high, by 2 points, but if you look at the chart below, since July 3rd, the rally has been 26 points, or 0.4%.  This is hardly the stuff of excitement.

Source: tradingecononmics.com

Of course, this did not stop the pundits who are calling for recession to highlight any negative subtext, nor did it prevent Fed Governor Waller from claiming that a rate cut in July was appropriate because the labor market is on the edge.  But the naysayers find themselves with diminishing attention these days as market price action has been quite positive.  In fact, most markets have shown similar behavior.  Whether gold or oil or other equity indices or bonds, we have been in a narrow range for a while now and it is not clear what it will take to break us out.  But here’s one thought…

On Sunday, Japan
Will vote for their Upper House
Is there change afoot?

While market insiders will discuss today’s options’ expirations as the key driver of things in the short-term, I think we need turn our eyes Eastward to Japan’s Upper House elections this Sunday.  PM Ishiba’s LDP-Komeito coalition is already in a minority status in the more powerful Lower House, a key reason why so little has been accomplished there.  But at least he had a majority in the Upper House to rubber stamp anything that was enacted.  However, signs are pointing to the LDP losing their majority in the Upper House which could well lead to Ishiba getting forced out.

Now, why does this matter to the rest of us?  There is a case to be made that flows in the JGB market are an important driver of global bond flows, including Treasuries.  For instance, Japan is the second largest net creditor nation with about $3.73 trillion invested abroad (according to Grok), much of which is Japanese insurance companies searching for higher yields than have been available there for the past decades. You may remember back in May, when there was a spike in long-dated JGB yields as all maturities from 20 years on out reached new historic highs (see below chart), well above 3.0%. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com’

Now, consider if you were a Japanese life insurer looking to match your assets to your liabilities.  Historically, buying Treasury bonds, with their much higher yield, was the place to be, especially over the past several years when the yen weakened, adding to your JPY gains.  However, that is still a risky trade, and hedging the FX risk is expensive given the yield differential between the US and Japan.  (Hedgers need to sell USD forward and the FX points reduce the effective exchange rate and by extension the benefits of the higher bond yields.)

But now, for the first time ever, JGB yields are above 3.0%, and that can be earned by a Japanese life insurer with zero FX risk, a very attractive proposition.  In fact, Bloomberg has an article this morning discussing just such a situation with one of the larger insurers, Fukoku Life.

Circling back to the election, it appears that the key issues are the rising cost of living and what the government is going to do about it.  Apparently, there are two approaches; the LDP is talking about giving out cash bribes grants of ¥20,000 to individuals while the opposition is talking about reducing consumption taxes on necessities like food.  However, in either case, the reality is that fiscal policy would loosen further with the MOF needing to issue yet more JGBs to make up for either the increased outlays or reduced income.  Add to that the uncertainty over future Japanese policy if the LDP loses its majority, and the pressure from the US regarding tariff negotiations and suddenly, it makes a lot more sense that the knock-on effects of this election can be substantial, at least with respect to the global bond markets and the USDJPY exchange rate.  (It must be said that Japanese inflation data last night actually fell to 3.3%, but that was due entirely to declining oil prices as fresh food prices, the big issue there, continue to rise.)

An election outcome that weakens PM Ishiba, potentially leading to a fall of his government and new elections in the Lower House, would be a distinct negative for the yen, and likely for the JGB market.  The impact would be felt in global bond markets as yields in the back end would almost certainly rise everywhere around the world.  This is not to imply that yields would rise by 100bps or more, but rather that the current trend of rising long-dated yields would continue for the foreseeable future.  And that will make things tough on every government.

Ok, sorry, I went on a bit long there.  A quick turn through markets shows that other than Japan (-0.2%) Asian equity indices were mostly nicely in the green following the US lead with the biggest winners Australia (+1.4%), Hong Kong (+1.3%) and Taiwan (+1.2%).  Meanwhile, in Europe this morning, while green is the color, the movement has been miniscule, averaging about 0.1% gains.  And US futures are also modestly higher at this hour (7:00) about 0.15% across the board.

In the bond market, Treasury yields have edged lower by -2bps but European sovereign yields are all higher by 2bps across the board.  The talk in Europe is over concerns regarding the conclusion of a trade deal with the US, where concerns are growing nothing will be achieved by the end of the month.

In the commodity markets, oil (+1.3%) is continuing its rebound, perhaps on the beginnings of a belief that the economy is not going to crater in the US.  Certainly, yesterday’s data was positive.  As to the metals markets, they are in fine fettle this morning with both gold (+0.4%) and silver (+0.4%) trading back to the middle of their trading ranges and copper (+1.3%) pushing back toward its recent all-time highs.

Finally, the dollar is under pressure this morning, sliding against the euro (+0.25%), pound (+0.2%) and AUD (+0.4%).  But the real movement has been in the commodity space where NOK (+0.8%) and ZAR (+0.7%) are both having solid days.  There continues to be a great deal of discussion regarding President Trump’s desire to fire Chairman Powell with a multitude of articles describing how that would be the end of the world as we know it because the Fed cherishes their “independence”.  Let’s not have that discussion.

On the data front, this morning brings Housing Starts (exp 1.3M) and Building Permits (1.39M) and then Michigan Sentiment (61.5) at 10:00.  There are no Fed speakers on the slate for today although Governor Kugler, not surprisingly, explained that waiting was the right call for the Fed when she spoke yesterday.  

It is a Friday in the summer with relatively unimportant data.  Absent another surprise from the White House Bingo card, I expect a quiet session overall as most traders and investors leave the office early for the weekend.  The dollar’s biggest risk is the Fed does cut early, but if the data keeps cooperating, it will be much harder for dollar bears, especially since so many are already short, to sell it aggressively from here.

Good luck and good weekend

Adf