Tag Archives: #trump

Not All in Sync

Posted on by

The story that’s tripping off lips
Is whether the buildup in ships
And aircraft we’ve seen
Is likely to mean
A war with Iran’s in the scripts
 
But markets are not all in sync
As equities clearly don’t think
That war would be trouble
While bond traders’ double
Their bets war will drive stocks to drink

Economic data is clearly not a key driver of market movement these days, arguably because we continue to get mixed outcomes, with some things looking good (Initial Claims, Philly Fed) while others are less positive (Trade Balance, Leading Indicators), although granted, it is not clear to me what the Leading Indicators purpose is anymore.  My point, though, is that we have not seen unambiguous strength or weakness across the data set for several months.  This allows every pundit to frame the economic situation through their own personal lens, whether bullish or bearish.  A perfect example is the dichotomy between the strength of US corporate balance sheets, as per Torsten Slok and seen below, 

and the rise in corporate bankruptcies as per this X post from The Kobeissi Letter (a great follow on X) which shows the following chart.

So, which is it? Are things good or bad?  My understanding is that strong balance sheets and a high number of bankruptcies are not typically correlated, but I could be wrong.  

Given the lack of direction, markets have turned their focus to other things, with most headlines currently garnered by the ongoing buildup of US military power in the Middle East as President Trump tries to pressure Iran into ceding its nuclear and missile programs.  (Of course, the announcement that all information on UAP’s (fka UFO’s) has many excited, and of course, the Epstein files continue to garner attention, as does the SAVE Act, but none of those are even remotely related to financial markets.)

But even here, we are seeing very different responses by the financial markets.  For instance, equity markets continue to perform pretty well, even though Tokyo and Australia sank a bit last night.  Look at the monthly and YTD returns in Europe, Japan and Australia below:

                                           Daily   Weekly   Monthly   YTD

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It strikes me that if war was a major concern, investors wouldn’t be stocking up on risk assets.  Rather, havens would be in more demand, which we are also seeing with gold (+0.4%) and silver (+3.3%) rising overnight as despite extreme volatility in the precious metals space, there is clearly underlying demand for these havens.

Bond yields over the past month have declined, indicating that despite ongoing deficit spending, investors are seeking their perceived safety whether in Treasuries, Bunds or JGBs as per the below chart of all three.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Finally, the dollar, despite frequent calls for its death, has been edging higher in a classic risk-off response as no matter how much some may hate the dollar philosophically, when bad things happen, its massive legal and liquidity advantages outweigh virtually everything else.  Once again, the DXY has moved back to the middle of its trading range, just below 98.00 this morning, and to my eyes, shows no signs of an imminent collapse.  Rather, if hostilities do break out in Iran, I expect the greenback to rally to at least the top of this trading range at 100, and depending on the situation, it could easily go higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

All this is to point out that nobody knows nothing.  Narrative writers continue to try to keep up with the action, and it is increasingly difficult to do so as things change on the ground so rapidly.  Let me be clear when I say I have zero inside information regarding any of this, I am merely an observer.  However, my observations are that there will be some type of military action in Iran as to build up this much fire power in a concentrated area and not use it would be remarkable and I can see no way in which the Ayatollah can accept the terms being offered as it would end his leadership if he does.  I guess we will find out soon enough as President Trump has put a 10-day timeline on things.

Arguably, the only market I didn’t mention here was oil (-0.5%) which is consolidating after a 20% rise in the past two months.  Remember, if military activity is directed at oil production or transport, we could see a sharp spike here and that will not help equities or economic data, although both gold and the dollar are likely to benefit.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I don’t think there is anything else to discuss market wise so let’s turn to the data.  This morning brings a bunch of important stuff as follows:

Personal Income0.3%
Personal Spending0.4%
PCE0.3% (2.8% Y/Y)
-ex food & energy0.3% (2.9% Y/Y)
Q4 GDP3.0%
Flash Manufacturing PMI52.6
Flash Services PMI53.0
Michigan Sentiment57.3
New Home Sales730K

Source: tradingecomomics.com

We also hear from two more Fed speakers, but at this point, they are all singing from the same hymnal explaining policy is in a good place and unless there are major changes in the data, there is no reason to change.

Arguably, the PCE data is the key for markets here as if it continues to run hotter than target, hopes for further rate cuts will continue to dissipate.  In fact, the next cut is now priced in for July with a second for October.  

Source: cmegroup.com

Remember, too, at that point it will be Kevin Warsh’s Fed, not Jay Powell’s, and Warsh has a very different idea about the way things need to be done.  Interestingly, as this 4th Turning proceeds and old institutions come under increasing pressure, their efforts to fight back and maintain the status quo is no longer behind the scenes as evidenced by this Bloomberg article this morning.

As I have written before, President Trump is the avatar of the 4th Turning and the institutions that are going to change are desperate to maintain the status quo.  This is, truly, the big fight that will continue through the end of the decade in my view.  Every institution that has been overseeing the global situation, whether politically, financially or militarily, is coming under pressure as income and wealth inequality have driven an ever wider disparity of outcomes.  As much power as the rich have, there are a lot more people who are not rich.  Ask Louis XVI how much being rich helped him.

On a lighter note, I watched the gold medal skating performance of Alysa Liu and it was truly magical.  A much better thought for the weekend!

Good luck and good weekend

Adf

Commodities Blazing

Posted on by

According to Jay and the Fed
The ‘conomy’s moving ahead
So, rates are on hold
With rallies in gold
And stocks and the dollar instead
 
But really, the thing that’s amazing
Is nobody cares about phrasing
Or Dot plots or pressers
‘Cause now all the stressors
Are Trump and commodities blazing

Once upon a time, the FOMC meeting was THE story for markets during the week leading up to the meeting and through the Chair’s press conference explaining the many virtues of what they did and why they did it.  Of course, this has not always been the case.  If we head back to the pre-Alan Greenspan days, the FOMC was peopled by 18 anonymous members and the Fed Chair, at that time Paul Volcker, and nobody ever spoke to the press and only grudgingly to Congress, they simply managed the money supply to the best of their ability to achieve their mandates.  The biggest data point of every week was the Thursday afternoon M2 release, and there was an entire subculture of ‘Fed watchers’, similar to ‘Kremlin watchers’ whose job was to read the tea leaves based on market behavior and data in trying to determine how the Fed would behave going forward.

Almost the only time Chairman Volcker spoke in public was at the semiannual Humphrey-Hawkins testimony to Congress, but he basically never answered any questions and clearly didn’t care what either Senators or Congressmen asked.

But then we got the “Maestro”, Alan Greenspan, who after Black Monday in October 1987, created the first Fed put.  At that time, the rest of the FOMC was still largely anonymous, but Greenspan craved the limelight, if only to try to show how much smarter he was than everybody else.  Famously, he explained in Congressional testimony in 1996, “If you understood what I said I must have misspoken.”  Greenspan was more available to the press than Volcker, but the rest of the committee remained in the background.

However, that simply set the table for the ensuing Fed chairs, Bernanke, Yellen and now Powell, all of whom give press conferences and clearly encouraged their minions to get out there and deliver the message.  As so many struggling leaders explain, it’s not the substance, it’s the messaging that’s the problem.  This is what we have all been dealing with since Bernanke sat down in 2006, mandated press conferences and pushed the narrative as a critical part of policy.

Then, along came President Trump’s second term, and times, they are a-changing.  While Trump rails on Powell to cut rates and lambastes him regularly, it turns out, the combination of new fiscal and economic policy is driving monetary policy into the background, at least from the perspective of market participants.  The result is that while FOMC members still get out there and give interviews regularly, they are never newsworthy.  In fact, my suspicion is that the reason Chairman Powell made his little video announcing the Fed received subpoenas was as an effort to get back on the front page, a place he and his committee members have clearly grown to enjoy, and from which they are increasingly absent.

Which brings us to the meeting yesterday where…nothing happened.  Policy rates remain unchanged, as universally expected, two voters wanted 25bp cuts (Miran and Waller), and they admitted that economic activity moved up from “moderate” to “solid”.  In the most stinging rebuke, the market virtually ignored the entire process.  In fact, the discussion about the next Fed chair is ebbing into the background.  My take is this is a better situation for all involved.  I only hope it stays this way.

So, what did happen?  Stocks were flat, bonds were flat, the dollar rebounded a bit, and commodities continue to rocket higher.  Let’s take a turn around markets overnight and start with commodities as that is where all the action is.

Copper (+6.1%) is the overnight star, soaring in Asia to record highs.  As with virtually all commodities right now, blame is laid at the feet of the weakening dollar (it didn’t move overnight) and with uncertainties about President Trump’s next actions and the potential risks attendant to those actions when they occur.  As we have seen with both gold (+1.9%, +27.1% in the past month) and silver (+1.3%, +54.6% in the past month), there is no doubt that fiat currencies are losing their status as a store of value, regardless of the interest rates they pay.  While copper’s movement has not been as extraordinary as that of either gold or silver, the trend, as you can see in the chart below, remains clearly higher.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The underlying reality for all these metals is that the financialization of economies all around the world has resulted in far more market activity than was necessarily warranted by the physical markets.  And physical markets need ounces and pounds of stuff, which have very long lead times to get out of the ground.  As a trader, I look at these moves in precious metals and am very concerned they are overdone but as somebody with a basic understanding of physics, I see no reason to believe that the demand for these metals is going to slow down anytime soon.  The below chart shows just how extraordinary the silver move has been, and the table below it really tells the tale.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

As to oil (+2.6%), it is heading higher this morning on increasing fears that the President is going to initiate a military action to depose the Ayatollah in Iran.  Concerns are rising about Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz as well as its ability to respond via missile attacks.  Remember, though, a market that moves on a political issue will revert once that issue has either occurred, or clearly won’t occur, so do not mistake this move for the beginning of a new trend.  Consider what happened to oil after Russia invade Ukraine and after they invaded Crimea in 2014.

Source: finance.yahoo.com

Turning to the equity markets, yesterday’s US blahs were followed with a bit more price action in Asia as though Japan (-0.7%) slipped a bit, China (+0.8%), HK (+0.5%), Korea (+1.0%) and Taiwan (-0.8%) all so more significant movement, albeit not offering a larger theme given the relative gains and losses.  Elsewhere in the region, the smaller exchanges showed more red than green.  In Europe, Germany (-1.15%) is the dog, falling on idiosyncratic weakness in SAP and Deutsche Bank following weak earnings and forecasts, but the rest of the space is performing well (UK +0.4%, France +0.65%, Spain +0.4%) as earnings there have been relatively solid.  And, at this hour (7:10), US futures are pointing higher by about 0.25% or so as earnings numbers have been strong so far this week, highlighted by Meta last night.

In the bond market, activity is less frenetic with Treasury yields unchanged this morning, European sovereigns catching a bit of a bid as yields slip -2bps across the board and JGB yields (+2bps) rising after the latest poll showing PM Takaichi increasing her odds of getting an LDP majority in the Diet next week.  Something to watch closely going forward is the shape of the yield curve as there is growing concern that long-end rates may rise regardless of the Fed (yet another sign the Fed is losing its sway).  In fact, I suspect if that is the case, that we will see yet another bout of QE, although they will find an alternate name.

Finally, in the FX markets, despite all the pearl clutching about the end of the dollar, there is no movement of note in any currency today, with the entire screen showing gains or losses of 0.3% or less with one exception, CLP (+0.5%) following the remarkable jump in copper’s price.  The linked article is quite funny as they explain all the negatives of a weak dollar and then also explain that ECB members are concerned about a too strong euro.  I am frequently confused by whether a strong currency is good or bad for a nation, but I guess it depends on the narrative you are trying to push.

On the data front, weekly Initial (exp 205K) and Continuing (1860K) Claims come at 8:30 as does the Trade Balance (-$40.5B).  We also see final Nonfarm Productivity (4.9%) and Unit Labor Costs (-1.9%) which if those numbers are met indicate quite positive economic activity.  Then, at 10:00 we see Factory Orders from November (1.6%), but that is such old data I don’t think it matters.

Remember, it is Trump’s world (and Bessent) and we’re just living in it.  The White House is the source of all the news so let’s all be happy that the Fed is fading into the background.  With that in mind, based on President Trump’s goals, a weaker dollar is clearly his desire, at least in the short run, although I continue to see scope for longer term strength.

Good luck

Adf

What We’ve Learned

Posted on by

It wasn’t but three weeks ago
That pundits who felt in the know
Were sure the attack
On Vene would crack
The world, and more chaos bestow
 
But that news, so quickly, has faded
While Greenland fears have been upgraded
The pundits were sure
That war was the cure
And Europe would soon be invaded
 
Now as it turns out, what we’ve learned
Is NATO, which had been concerned
Has ‘greed to a deal
Which stopped Denmark’s squeal
As Trump, to the US, returned

 

It is certainly difficult to keep up with current events these days, especially for the punditry who feel it is critical they demonstrate expertise on every issue, given the speed with which the issues change.  All that effort to understand the geopolitics behind ousting Nicholas Maduro has been forgotten in less than 2 weeks as they needed to pontificate on Greenland and its importance.  If, as the president’s TruthSocial post below is the current lay of the land, by Monday, Greenland will return to its historic obscurity as President Trump will move on to the next issue of his choosing.  In fact, this morning, the WSJ is claiming Cuba is next on the list, which, while it wouldn’t be that surprising, has to date only been mentioned in passing by Mr Trump.

Here’s the thing about all the pontification regarding President Trump, nearly, if not all of it, is simply that, pontification by outsiders who have no idea about what is really happening.  These folks are not sitting in the Oval Office when the President is meeting with his advisors discussing strategy and are generally wishcasting their views and creating a narrative around that.  As I am also an outsider, all I can do is observe and try to ascertain how things might impact markets, but if you are not hearing it from the president or Secretary Rubio or someone like that, it is all speculation.  However, one must admit, it is entertaining!

As I don’t know what the next ‘global crisis’ is going to be ahead of time, let’s turn our attention to markets and how they responded to the president’s speech in Davos as well as the news of the deal framework.

Equities were quite happy.  After the sharp decline seen Sunday night, when the tariff threats were made, the S&P 500 has recouped nearly all of the losses as per the below chart.  Yesterday saw US market gains of 1.2% across the board and futures, this morning, continue to rally, up about 0.5% across the board.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

It should be no surprise that things were bright in Asia as well, with Tokyo (+1.75%) leading the way as almost every exchange in the region was higher by a decent amount (Korea +0.9%, India +0.5%, Taiwan +1.6%, Australia +0.75%) but interestingly, China (0.0%) and HK (+0.2%) were the laggards.  Perhaps good news for the West is not seen that positively there, although the story of regulators in China cracking down on possible stock manipulation by social media influencers has raised some concerns.  After all, one of the biggest issues with investing in China by outsiders is the capriciousness of President Xi and the CCP as they decide what they don’t like that particular day.  

As to Europe, it should be no surprise that there has been a collective sigh of relief from investors there given the removal of the threat of more tariffs and the promises of more defense spending by European nations.  So, gains across the board with the DAX (+1.2%) leading the way although the CAC (+1.1%) is right there as well with most of the rest of the nations seeing gains on the order of 0.5% to 0.75%.

In the bond markets, apparently the end of the world has also been postponed.  Yields declined yesterday and this morning, Treasury yields are unchanged at 4.24%.  In Europe, yields have slipped -2bps to -4bps on the continent although UK gilts (+2bps) are bucking the trend, which appears to be an ongoing impact from yesterday’s higher than expected inflation data which continues to point toward stagflation in the UK.  Interestingly, JGB yields (-4bps) have also fallen again, although they certainly remain near recent highs.  PM Takaichi is going to formally dissolve the Diet tonight and the election is slated for February 8th (wouldn’t it be wonderful if US election campaigns were just 2 weeks long!).  While nothing has changed in her fiscal planning, it seems that investors are awaiting the BOJ announcement tonight (no change expected) and have been modestly appeased by a substantial increase in exports although the trade surplus declined slightly.  

I think it is worth looking at the trade balance relative to the yen (-0.2%) as per the below chart.  Recall, historically, Japan ran major trade surpluses, which was always one of the tensions between the US and Japan dating back to President Reagan.  But as you can see below, the blue bars are the monthly trade numbers and since Covid, that situation changed dramatically.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

However, once the yen started to weaken substantially, the lagged effect showed up in trade data as can readily be seen above.  In fact, this is the real tension in Japan, I believe, that the weak yen helps exports significantly, but has become an inflation problem and the government is caught between the two issues.  This is why I believe we will see a weaker yen over time, especially if Takaichi-san comes out of the election with a solid majority.

As I’m on currencies, if we look elsewhere, the dollar, although we have been constantly assured it was collapsing, remains in its trading range.  This morning, the DXY (-0.1%) has edged lower after yesterday’s rebound.  As it happens, yen weakness has been offset by modest euro strength, but the real strength is in the commodity space with NOK (+0.8%), SEK (+0.36%), AUD (+0.6%) and NZD (+0.6%) all having solid sessions.  Now, my take is that the first two are more likely responses to the Greenland issue’s apparent resolution as NOK is rallying despite oil’s (-1.7%) sharp decline.  Remember, both those nations were in the crosshairs of Trump’s mooted tariffs.  On the other hand, last night, the employment situation in Australia perked up nicely which has helped raise market pricing for a rate hike by the RBA and given the strength in commodity prices and the apparent end of another global crisis, has helped support the currency.  Ironically, as I scan the EMG space, movements there have been much smaller overall.

Finally, turning to the rest of the commodity space, for the first time in a week, gold is not higher this morning, but rather essentially unchanged.  Silver (+0.25%) has bounced a tiny bit after selling off somewhat yesterday in NY.  I have maintained that trees don’t grow to the sky, and frankly, the price action here appears tired regarding ever larger gains.  I believe the fundamental story remains in place, but that doesn’t mean silver won’t chop around for a few weeks or months before starting higher again.   Copper (-0.6%) is also under modest pressure this morning and has retreated much further, about -6.3%, from its recent highs at $6.10/lb than the precious metals.  However, the red metal remains much in demand given the underlying electrification story. 

And lastly, a quick look at NatGas (+12%) shows what happens to commodity markets when there is the perception of insufficient supply for the current demand.  This is higher by 75% this week!  And while today in NJ, the temperature is a relatively balmy 34°, the forecast for the coming weekend is much colder and a huge snowfall.  It’s not often you see a movement of this magnitude so here is the chart for the past month.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, today brings the final look at Q3 GDP (exp 4.3%) as well as Initial (212K) and Continuing (1880K) Claims.  Too, we get Personal Income (0.4%) and Spending (0.5%) for November and PCE (0.2%, 2.8% Y/Y) for both headline and core.  The EIA releases its weekly oil inventory data today, a day later than usual because of the holiday Monday, with a modest build expected.

Market participants in all markets appear to have found a comfort zone and are taking risk positions again, at least for now.  All the apocalyptic stories about the world rejecting the dollar and the rise of the BRICS will have to wait for another day.  While I don’t know what the next situation is going to be, I am highly confident we are going to have another geopolitical scenario that is going to result in more screaming, teeth gnashing and pearl clutching by those who continue to believe the rules-based order is the way things should be.  Alas for them, economic power and statecraft is the new world order, and my take is ultimately, the dollar benefits from this pivot.

Good luck

Adf

Clearly Explained

Posted on by

The warmups in Davos for Trump
With Howard and Scott on the stump
Quite clearly explained,
While WEFers complained,
The US was, no more, the chump
 
The globalist world that existed
Is no longer to be assisted
Instead, US goals
Align with Trump’s polls
No matter the words WEF has twisted

 

As we await President Trump’s address in Davos this morning, it is worth recapping the highlights from yesterday’s US speakers, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.   Starting with Lutnick, he explained the White House view as follows; “The Trump Administration and I are here to make a very clear point—globalization has failed the West and the United States of America. It’s a failed policy… and it has left America behind.”  The video is linked above in his name.  It is hard to misunderstand what he is saying, and that is very clearly US policy.

Turning to Secretary Bessent, he explained that the US has spent $22 trillion more than the rest of NATO since 1980 on defense while Europe and Canada created their welfare states.  “The Europeans have been spending the money on social welfare, on roads, on education, and it’s time for them to pay more, which they’ve agreed to do.”  The video clip is linked to his name in the first stanza.  The below graph is telling:

At the same time, Europe continues to buy Russian oil, funding Russia’s war against Europe.

Needless to say, Europeans were unhappy with the commentary as they appeared to be coming under attack from the US.  The market narrative quickly framed around President Trump going too far and how it was going to destroy the US as nobody will want to invest in the US. That is the explanation for yesterday’s decline in US equities (although they fell around the world), the dollar and Treasury bonds (although bonds, too, fell everywhere, notably in Japan).  

Yesterday I sought to disabuse you of the notion that Europe is going to sell all their Treasuries to hurt the US as the results would likely be either irrelevant or horrific for Europe.  So, the narrative pivoted to Trump is bad and destroying the US.  

And yet, remarkably, the world did not end either yesterday or last night, despite what many have explained is inevitable.  This morning markets are somewhat less catastrophic.  It makes sense that markets are going to remain volatile as the underlying theses for international relations adjust to the new reality of power politics and economic statecraft from the previous “Rules Based Order”.  And at this stage, there is no way to know which outcomes are most likely.  The only thing of which I am confident is that we have not seen the end of this play out.  

I must admit, that while I don’t think President Trump cares much about France and President Macron’s comments seeking more Chinese investment in that nation, I suspect that PM Carney’s efforts to cozy up to President Xi will be less welcome based on the Donroe Doctrine of US dominance in the Western Hemisphere.  But I also believe that the power structure between the US and Canada is such that it will ultimately bend to the US’s will.

So, let’s review market activity overnight as we await President Trump’s comments, which I understand have been delayed until 11:30 EST this morning.  Yesterday’s sharp declines around the world have been followed by less dramatic activity last night and so far today.  In Asia, Tokyo (-0.4%) slipped a bit further, but hardly dramatically, as FinMin Katayama focused on the JGB market in comments made in Davos.  “Since last October, our fiscal policy has consistently been responsible and sustainable, not expansionary, and the numbers clearly demonstrate that.  I’d like everyone in the market to calm down.”  I’m sure she would.  And it worked with JGB yields slipping -8bps and 30yr yields falling -17bps.  Elsewhere in Asia, China was flat, HK (+0.4%) rallied a bit along with Korea (+0.5%) while Taiwan (-1.6%) led the way lower across numerous other regional markets.  

In Europe, red is today’s color led by Germany (-0.7%) and Spain (-0.5%) although France and the UK have both only ceded -0.1% so far during the session.  The discussion here continues to revolve around President Trump, the trade deal, and potential new tariffs on nations that try to prevent the US from its Greenland desires.  As to US futures markets, at this hour (6:45) they are slightly firmer, +0.1%, so not yet, at least, indicating the end of the American investment thesis.

As to the rest of the bond market, away from Japan, yields are basically -1bp lower across Treasuries and European sovereigns as investors await Mr Trump’s comments.  Again, the mooted collapse in the US bond market has yet to appear.  However, there is a popular meme about the Danish pension fund, Akademikerpension, which has announced that it will sell all its US Treasuries by the end of the month, a total of $100 million, due to its perception of increased credit risk.  This has been fodder, though, for those who continue to believe that Europe is going to ditch their Treasuries, and many are calling it a signal.  While certainly a trendy decision, I see it as noise, not signal.

Turning to commodities, one cannot be but impressed with gold’s consistency of late.  It has risen another 2.1% this morning and is now nearing $4900/oz.  I guess $5000/oz is right around the corner.  Looking at the long-term chart below, we have seen a monster rally for the past two years.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

FWIW, which may not be much, I continue to see this as a commentary on all fiat currencies, not the dollar per se as evidenced by the table I created from data on goldbroker.com.  While you can see that the dollar has definitely underperformed during the past year (which we already knew given the early year 10% decline vs. the euro and pound, over time, it is hard to make the case that other currencies are any better.  In fact, I find it particularly surprising that the rand has performed so poorly given its seeming benefits when gold rallies.  And of course, it is no surprise that the yen which has been having a really tough time, is the worst of the lot.

 Historical Returns of Gold 
Currency1 Month1Year5 Year10 Year
EUR9.54%54.22%164.28%300.85%
JPY10.02%76.45%288.91%481.02%
USD9.62%73.45%154.49%331.44%
GBP9.13%59.31%160.26%357.37%
MXN7.04%47.93%127.14%305.03%
ZAR7.35%53.89%179.88%327.69%

As to the other metals, silver (0.0%) seems to be getting tired after its move and has done little over the past several sessions.  Platinum (+1.0%) seems to still have life as does copper (+0.75%).  Turning to energy markets, oil (+0.3%) is trying to figure out whether the geopolitics is going to blow up or fade away and remains right around $60/bbl.  But given the temperature here in New Jersey is 1° this morning, we cannot be surprised that NatGas (+21.5%) has exploded (no pun intended) higher.

Finally, the dollar is a touch softer this morning, but not very much.  The euro is unchanged, and the pound, after some lousy inflation data, has fallen -0.2%.  But JPY (+0.2%) is offsetting that, arguably responding to FinMin Katayama’s comments, although elsewhere, KRW (+1.1%) rebounded after comments from President Lee Jae Myung sought to sooth investors and explain that the government would continue to work to boost economic growth with new policies.   But once again, my recent favorite chart of the DXY shows that this is not a USD story.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

On the data front, aside from the President’s speech today, nothing but tomorrow brings the real data.

ThursdayQ3 GDP4.3%
 Q3 Price Index3.7%
 Initial Claims212K
 Continuing Claims1880K
 Personal Spending (Nov)0.5%
 Personal Income (Nov)0.4%
 PCE (Nov)0.2% (2.8% Y/Y)
 Core PCE (Nov)0.2% (2.8% Y/Y)
FridayFlash PMI Manufacturing52.1
 Flash PMI Services52.8
 Michigan Sentiment54.0

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Don’t forget that next week the FOMC meets, but on the Fed story, today Governor Cook’s case about dismissal will be heard at the Supreme Court, which is, potentially, a much bigger deal.  If the Fed is not protected from Presidential authority, that will certainly change many views on the future, and likely initially, see the dollar and bond markets decline while stocks rally.  But that decision won’t come for months, and remember, we are still awaiting the tariff decision.

There is much we don’t know and volatility remains the most likely outcome.  Be careful out there.

Good luck

Adf

Most Enthralling

Posted on by

Some fractures are starting to show
In markets, as Trump’s blow by blow
Attack on the Danes
And friends, really strains
The view ‘Twenty-Six will lack woe
 
So, equities worldwide are falling
While bond yields, much higher, are crawling
The buck’s in a rut
While oil’s a glut
Thus, gold is the thing, most enthralling

 

“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”  So said Marcellus, when Shakespeare introduced him to the world in 1603(ish) in one of his most brilliant works, Hamlet, and it seems true today, 423 years later.  By now, you are likely aware that President Trump has imposed 10% tariffs, to begin on February 1st, on Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK as he presses his case for US ownership of Greenland.  This is not the venue to discuss the relative merits or pitfalls of the strategy, so I won’t bore you with my views on the subject.  

Rather, this is a venue to discuss the market impacts and how they may evolve, in one poet’s eyes, going forward given the new starting condition.  As I type this morning, investors around the world are extremely unhappy, at least holding paper claims on either assets or governments.  However, holding real assets, notably gold (+1.15% and at new all-time highs), silver (+0.9% and at new all-time highs) and platinum (+1.45%, not quite at new highs yet) are feeling much better.

It is interesting to me that the WEF is meeting this week, and likely no coincidence that President Trump escalated things ahead of the meeting where he is scheduled to speak tomorrow.  It seems that the protagonists in this latest drama are set to meet while in Davos as well, so all these views are subject to change at a moment’s notice.  But for now, since there really is no other story that matters, let’s look at how markets have (mis)behaved since we last saw them here in the US on Friday.

As you can see from the chart below combining the Nikkei 225, the DAX and the S&P 500 futures, the move has been consistent since the close in NY on Friday, with all three main indices lower by between -1.75% (Japan) and -3.1% (Germany), with the US (-2.1%) in the middle.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, that price action has been widespread across the rest of the G10 markets and many EMG markets as well. Only China (-0.2% since Friday) has bucked the trend and remains little changed.  Of course, that makes sense given this spat has nothing to do with China, on the surface.  At this point, I expect that all equity markets are going to remain under pressure until there is some resolution.  While Europe has threatened to invoke its Anti-Coercion Instrument on the US if those tariffs come into being, one must wonder will that do more damage to the US or Europe?  FWIW, I expect some type of resolution to be achieved before the Feb 1 deadline but could easily be wrong about that.  One last thing about tariffs; remember last week when expectations were high that the Supreme Court was going to rule on the legality of the ones already imposed?  That has suddenly gone very quiet.  My take there is the longer we don’t hear anything, the more likely they are not going to stop them.

Perhaps, though, the bond market is the more interesting place to look this morning with government bonds around the world getting sold aggressively.  While all eyes have been focused on the US (+6bps and well above the top of the previous range) and Europe (Germany +5bps, UK +7bps, France +6bps) perhaps the real activity is happening in Japan (+9bps).  In fact, Japanese 30yr yields have exploded higher by 40 basis points since Friday’s close, and I’m confident that has nothing to do with Greenland!

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, it appears that JGB holders are getting increasingly concerned that PM Takaichi is going to really run it hot, with more unfunded fiscal stimulus and are responding accordingly.  The latest Takaichi proposal for the upcoming election is that they are going to remove the GST (VAT tax) on food for 2 years to help alleviate inflation problems.  I certainly like that better than capping prices, but fiscally, it’s a tough road to follow.  

One other bond market story that is making the rounds is the idea that Europeans would attack the US by simultaneously unloading their US Treasury holdings.  We have heard this story before with respect to China, and if you look across all of Europe, between central banks and private investors, there are likely upwards of $2 trillion held there.  But the question I ask every time I hear something of this nature is…what will they do with the proceeds if they were somehow able to coordinate the sales?  First, in the worst case, the Fed would buy them to prevent the market from collapsing.  And second, now they would have a whole lot of dollars that need to be invested elsewhere.  Which markets can absorb that amount of flow?  US equities?  Sure, but would that achieve their goals?  I think not.  If they converted them into euros, a one-way flow of $2 trillion into euros in short order would pretty much render all European manufacturing uncompetitive right away as the euro rose to 1.50 or 1.60 or higher.  Gold?  Think $10k/oz or higher.  Ain’t gonna happen.

Let’s hit the dollar next, which is under pressure across the board.  As I type (7:20), the DXY has fallen -1.0% this morning, a very large move for that index, but remains within the trading range that we have seen since October.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The sell-off in the dollar is almost universal, although interestingly, ZAR (-0.5%), MXN (-0.3%) and CLP (-0.3%) are all bucking that trend.  I understand the nervousness, but it strikes me that none of this conversation is a positive for Europe, excepting the idea they sell all their Treasuries and convert the dollars into euros and pounds, an idea I tried to squash above.  

Finally, let’s look at commodities where the metals, as discussed above are soaring while oil (+0.8%) is picking back up off its end of week lows and currently sits just below $60/bbl.  The Iran situation remains murky, at best, and my sense is we have not heard the last of the situation there, although from what I have seen on X, the rioting has been quelled to some extent.  However, I think there is still enormous pressure on the government there and would not be surprised to see some type of US intrusion. 

But I’m confident the one thing almost all of you are feeling this morning is the bitter cold that has enveloped most of the US as per the weather.com map below.

Given natural gas is the most common fuel for heating homes, we cannot be surprised that its price has skyrocketed today, jumping 24% in the session so far, although it is now simply back to where it was this time last year.  however, a key issue in this market is Europe, which since they virtually shut off Russian gas, is now highly reliant on US LNG to heat their homes.  It turns out that their storage has fallen to slightly less than 50% of capacity, well below their average storage level for this date of 60% – 65%.  European TTF gas, on a like for like basis, currently costs ~$12.25/MMBtu compared to $3.85/MMBtu in the US, even after the massive jump.  Again, Europe has some issues going forward.

On the data front, there is really nothing today or tomorrow of note although Thursday brings GDP amongst other things.  I will review them tomorrow because, after all, markets right now are far more beholden to President Trump and Europe than to data.

Fear is growing more widespread and will likely continue to do so until there is some type of resolution over Greenland.  But then, it will dissipate quickly as consider, two weeks ago we were all Venezuela experts and today, nobody even cares about that nation anymore!

As to the dollar, I expect that when the resolution arrives, the dollar will make up lost ground, but given we are in the midst of a White House bingo game, one needs to play things close to the vest.  Hedges are crucial here.

Good luck

Adf

Too Potent a Force

Posted on by

The headline today’s NFP
As pundits will try to agree
On whether the Fed
When looking ahead
Will like what it is that they see
 
But, too, the Supreme Court is due
To rule whether tariffs imbue
Too potent a force
For Trump, to endorse
Or whether they’ll let them go through

 

As the session begins in NY, markets have been relatively quiet as traders and algorithms await the NFP data this morning.  Recall, Wednesday’s ADP number was a touch softer than forecast, but still, at 41K, back to a positive reading.  Forecasts this morning are as follows:

Nonfarm Payrolls60K
Private Payrolls64K
Manufacturing Payrolls-5K
Unemployment Rate4.5%
Average Hourly Earnings0.3% (3.6% y/Y)
Average Weekly Hours34.3
Participation Rate62.6%
Housing Starts1.33M
Building Permits 1.35M
Michigan Sentiment53.5

Source: trading economics.com

Regarding this data point, there are two things to remember.  First, last month Chairman Powell explained that he and the Fed were coming to the belief that the official data was overstating reality by upwards of 60K jobs due to concerns over the birth/death portion of the model.  That is the factor the BLS includes to estimate the number of new businesses started vs. old ones closed in any given month.  Historically, at economic inflection points, it tends to overstate things when the economy is starting to slow and understate when it is turning up.  

The second thing is that given the changes in the population from the administration’s immigration policy, with net immigration having fallen to zero recently, the number of new jobs required to maintain solid economic growth is much lower than what we have all become used to, which in the past was seen as 150K – 200K.  So, 60K, or even 40K, may be plenty of new jobs to absorb the growth in the labor market, which will come from people re-entering the market who had previously quit looking for a job.

The ancillary data, like ADP and the employment pieces of ISM were both stronger in December than November, so my take is, the estimates are probably reasonable.  I have no strong insight into why it would be dramatically different at this point.  The question is, how will markets respond?  My take is this could well be a ‘good news is bad’ situation where a strong print will see pressure on bonds and stocks as the market reduces its probability of a Fed rate cut (currently 14% for January, 45% for March) even further.  The dollar would benefit, as would oil on the demand story, but I think metals will do little as that story is not growth oriented.  A weak number would see the opposite.

Of course, the other big potential news today is the Supreme Court ruling on the legality of Trump’s tariffs.  The odds markets are at ~70% they will overturn them, but there is the question of whether it will require the government to repay the tariffs or simply stop them.  As well, most of them will be able to be reimposed via different current laws, so net, while a blow to the administration I don’t believe it will have a major long-term impact with repayment the biggest concern.  This particular issue is far too esoteric for a simple poet to prognosticate.

And those are the market stories of note, although we cannot ignore the growing protests in Iran as videos show buildings burning in Tehran and there is word that the Mullahs are at the airport, which if true tells me that the regime is on the edge.  While this would be a great victory for the people of Iran, it would also have a dramatic impact on oil markets and specifically on China.  While sanctions could well be lifted, thus depressing the price as more comes to market, China currently benefits from buying sanctioned oil at a massive discount, and that discount would disappear.

As we await all the news, let’s review the overnight activity.  A mixed US session was followed by strength in Tokyo (+1.6%) as the Japanese government surprised one and all by reporting a stronger 30-year JGB auction than anticipated as well as an uptick in spending by households.  Too, nominal GDP growth has been outpacing deficit growth driving the net debt ratio lower, exactly what the US is seeking to do.  As to the rest of the region, both China (+0.45%) and HK (+0.3%) managed gains, as did Korea and Malaysia but India (-0.7%) continues to lag as it has all year.  Data from China showed inflation fell less than expected, although the Y/Y number remains at just 0.8%.

In Europe, gains are also the norm with France (+0.9%) leading the way with both the UK (+0.55%) and Germany (+0.4%) having solid sessions.  Retail Sales data from the Eurozone was firmer than expected at 2.3%, a rare positive outcome, but showing some support.  As to the US futures market, at this hour (7:30) all three major indices are higher by about 0.15%.

In the bond market, while yields have edged higher by 2bps this morning, as you can see from the chart below, they remain within, albeit at the top, of the recent 4.0% – 4.2% trading range.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The most interesting data point from yesterday was the dramatic decline in the Trade deficit, which fell to -$29B, its lowest level since 2009.  Recall that a long-time issue has been the twin deficits, with the budget and trade deficits linked closely.  I wonder, are we going to see Trump’s efforts at reducing government’s size and reach result in a smaller budget deficit?  Most pundits dismiss this idea, but I’m not so sure.  As to the rest of the world, European sovereigns are essentially unchanged this morning as investors everywhere await the US data and tariff ruling.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.9%) is creeping higher but remains in its downward trend.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Wednesday, we saw a large draw in crude inventories abut a massive build in both gasoline and distillates which feels mildly bearish.  The narrative is the Iran story is getting people nervous for potential short-term disruption, but I remain overall bearish for now.  As to the metals markets, gold (-0.3%) is slipping after having recovered early morning losses yesterday and finishing higher, while silver (+0.6%) is still bouncing along with copper (+1.8%) and platinum (+0.4%). Metals are in demand and supply is short.  Price here have further to rise I believe.

Finally, the dollar continues to rebound off its recent lows with the DXY back to 99 again this morning.  it has rallied in 11 of the past 13 sessions, not typical price action for a trading vehicle that is in decline.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In fact, the greenback is firmer against virtually all its G10 and EMG counterparts this morning with the largest declines seen in JPY (-0.5%), KRW (-0.5%) and NZD (-0.5%) with others typically sliding between -0.1% and -0.3%.  again, it is hard to watch recent price action and see impending weakness.  We will need to see much weaker US data to change my view.  And along those lines, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow number just jumped to 5.4% for Q4 after the Trade data yesterday, again, atypical of further weakness in this sector.

And that’s really all as we covered data up top.  To me, the wild cards are Iran and the USSC.  While I do believe the regime will fall in Iran (they just shut down the internet to try to prevent a further uprising) my take on the Supremes is they may stop further tariffs but will not force repayment.  Net, that won’t change much at all and given the prediction markets are pricing a 70% probability of an end to tariffs, if it happens, it’s already in the price!

Good luck and good weekend

adf

Spinning More Heads

Posted on by

The speed of the change underway
In global relations today
Is spinning more heads
And tearing more threads
Than ever before, one might say
 
For markets, the question of note
Is how will investors all vote
Are bulls still in charge
Or bears now at large
Who seek, excess profits, to smote

 

It is becoming increasingly difficult to focus only on market activity given the extraordinary breadth of important, non-market activities that are ongoing.  When I think back to previous periods of significant market volatility and uncertainty, it was almost always driven by something endogenous to finance and the economy.  Going back to Black Monday in 1987, or the Thai baht crisis in 1997 or the Russia Default in 1998, the dot-com crash in 2000, and the GFC in the wake of the housing bubble (blown by the Fed) in 2008-09, all these periods of significant market volatility were inward looking.

But not today.  Trump 47 has become the most significant presidency since Ronald Reagan with respect to changing both domestic and international realities.  The key difference is that Mr Reagan worked within the then consensus view of international relations, merely pushing them to the limit while Mr Trump sees those views as constrictions needing to be removed.

In fairness, the world was a very different place in the 1980’s, notably for the fact that China was not a major player in any sphere of economic activity and was essentially ignored.  That is no longer the situation, and the entry of another power player has complicated things.  Arguably, this is why the president sees the old rules as obsolete, they were built for a different time with a different cast of characters.  Regardless, for those of us paying attention to markets, it is imperative to widen our view to include international relations as well as international finance.

With that as preamble, a look at today’s headlines reminds us that keeping up with the news is not for the faint of heart.  Starting with Venezuela and the impact on oil (+1.6%), news sources are littered with articles explaining why the US acted as we did and the potential implications for energy markets and energy producing countries.  From what I can tell, Venezuela recognizes that they are completely beholden to US demands at this point with respect to their oil industry (mining as well I presume although that gets less press).  And you can be sure that means they will be expected to pump more, with US corporate help, and direct their sales to the US, as opposed to Cuba, China and Iran.

Despite today’s rally, it remains my strong opinion that the price of oil has further to decline.  The trend continues to be sharply lower, as per the below chart, and the domestic political demand of reducing gasoline prices is going to keep this particular trend intact, I believe.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

News overnight indicated that two more shadow fleet tankers have been apprehended which is simply all part of the same plan, bring Venezuela back online legitimately with a focus to sell to the US.  The other global issue that is going to weigh on the price of oil are the ongoing protests in Iran which if ultimately successful at overthrowing the Ayatollah’s theocracy, will almost certainly bring Iran back into the brotherhood of nations, and see the end of sanctions on Iranian oil.  While that is bad news for China (and India) who buy a lot of cheap sanctioned oil, it will increase production and weigh on market prices.

The other sector of the commodity markets, metals, have been their own roller coaster of late, with far more volatility than any other product, cryptocurrencies included.  It cannot be a surprise that we are seeing prices retrace after the extraordinary price action over the past several months.  The silver (-4.4%) chart below is the very definition of a parabolic move and history has shown that moves of this nature tend to see, at the very least, short-term sharp reversals, even if the ultimate trend is going to continue.  

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The underlying features in these markets remain supply shortages, meaning that there is more industrial demand for utilization than there is new supply that comes to market each year.  In silver, the number apparently is ~100 million ounces, and deliveries of physical metal remain the norm these days.  That is a telling feature of the market as historically, cash settlement was sufficient.  Given the recent run, it is no surprise that gold (-0.8%) and platinum (-6.5%) are also declining sharply, but nothing has changed my view that these will trend higher this year.  One last thing about silver (h/t Alyosha), the Bloomberg commodity index (BCOM) is rebalancing next week and given the huge moves in precious metals, along with the lack of change in percentage allocation, there will be significant selling over the course of the next week, upwards of 70 million ounces of silver, which will go a long way to satisfying the shortage this year.  It will be interesting to see if demand remains intact. 

If we turn to the dollar, rumors of its death remain exaggerated.  Certainly, the price action thus far this year, and even over the past six months, points to gradual strength (see chart below from tradingeconomics.com).

Again, I have a hard time understanding the argument that the dollar will decline this year based on the fact that the US economy continues to outperform the rest of the G10, there are substantial inward investment promises that are beginning to be seen (shipbuilding, semiconductors, steel) and the US interest rate structure remains higher than the rest of the G10.  While I understand markets look forward, it is becoming increasingly difficult for me to see the benefits of European monetary policy as a driver for owning the euro, and given their industrial/energy policies are disastrous, I don’t see the rationale.  The same can be said for the pound, I believe.

In today’s session, while the movement is mostly marginal (EUR 0.0%, GBP -0.1%, SEK -0.3%, AUD -0.4%), the trend remains intact and the movement is broad with almost all G10 and EMG currencies slipping a bit further.  Money goes where it is best treated, and I am hard pressed to find other nations that treat money better.  Although…

The equity markets are a bit shakier this morning after two presidential tweets yesterday regarding institutional ownership of housing (he wants to end that for single family homes) and defense company spending priorities (he wants defense companies to end stock buybacks and dividends and invest in R&D and production).  It is not clear to me whether he can successfully force these actions, but his bully pulpit is significant.  These resulted in sharp declines in directly impacted companies, but regarding defense, he also came out of a meeting with Congressional leaders and said he wants to budget there to grow to $1.5 trillion.  

The upshot is confusion here which was evidenced by more weakness than strength in the US session and similarly, declines in Asia (Japan -1.6%, China -0.8%, HK -1.2%).  Elsewhere in the region, India (-0.9%) continues to be the laggard, but there was more red than green overall.  In Europe, red is also today’s color, albeit not as bright as in Asia.  The DAX (-0.2%), CAC (-0.25%) and FTSE 100 (-0.3%) are emblematic of the situation as investors dismissed better than expected German Factory Order data (+5.6%) although the rest of the data released was mostly at expectations.  I guess the question is does Europe treat money better than the US?  I would argue not, but that’s just my view.  Meanwhile, at this hour (7:55), US futures are down slightly, about -0.1% across the board.

Finally, the bond market remains an afterthought almost everywhere.  Perhaps the most amazing thing President Trump has accomplished is to remove the focus on the latest tick in the 10-year bond as a key metric for the economy.  So, this morning, its 1bp rise just leaves it right in that 4.0% – 4.2% range that has existed for months.  Most European sovereign yields edged higher by about 3bps with Germany (+7bps) the outlier here after that strong Factory Orders data.  Also worth noting is that JGB yields slipped -5bps overnight as the market prepares for the first 30-year JGB auction of the year.  Recent 10-year auctions have been received quite well, hence the anticipation of something good here.

On the data front, Initial (exp 210K) and Continuing (1900K) Claims lead the way along with the Trade Balance (-$58.9B) and then Consumer Credit ($10.0B) this afternoon.  Yesterday’s ADP data was a touch softer than expected but the JOLTS data was much worse, showing a decline in job openings of 300K and falling well short of expectations of 7.6M.  At this point, though, to the extent that people are paying attention to the data, tomorrow’s NFP is of far more import I believe.  

The hardest thing about these markets is the White House bingo card and its surprises that can change working assumptions.  Absent something new there, I see the dollar drifting higher helped by both its recent trend and the short-term pullback in metals.  

Good luck

Adf

The Doctrine, Donroe

Posted on by

There once was a time in the past
When Vene-zu-ela was cast
As queen of the ball
With Maduro’s fall
But life around Trump moves so fast
 
He’s already moved to expand
His target to Denmark’s Greenland
The EU’s gone crazy
And called Trump fugazy
While claiming that they’ll take a stand
 
But really, the Doctrine, Donroe
Explains that the US most grow
Its regional strength
And keep at arm’s length
It’s foes from Beijing to Moscow

 

It is truly difficult to keep up with all the things that are ongoing in the world these days as so much is happening so quickly.  It is very easy to understand Lenin’s quote, “there are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen” given recent events.  This is clearly one of the latter weeks.

So, Trump, after successfully taking down Maduro has turned his sights on Greenland, something he has discussed from Day 1 of this administration, but apparently now, there seems to be a willingness to discuss things on the other side.  At the same time, from what I read on X, the city of Abadan in Iran has basically ‘fallen’, at least with respect to the Iranian regime’s control as the police are marching with the protestors now.  The rumors are that the Ayatollah has already made escape plans to Moscow.

From a geopolitical perspective, if Iran sees a regime change, which appears increasingly likely, and if the US throws its support behind the replacement regime, it would appear to be a significant power play against China.  After all, if sanctioned Iranian and Venezuelan oil was no longer being sold on the cheap to China, two places where they receive a significant amount of their daily requirements, (between 20% – 25% according to Grok) it would be a major blow.  

But from our lens in markets, if the Iranian regime falls and sanctions are lifted, suddenly there is much more unsanctioned oil available, and its price is likely to decline further.  This morning, oil (-0.6%) is slipping further after a sharp decline yesterday with Monday’s rally a wispy memory.  I have maintained the trend here remains lower, and that was without government changes in sanctioned nations.  As you can see from the chart below, nothing about this story has changed.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

In the meantime, be prepared for all those who had just shown their new bona fides about Venezuela to be explaining the Greenland story from their newly acquired “deep” knowledge.  This poet certainly doesn’t know enough about Greenland to make any prognostications, but it would not surprise me if within a matter of weeks, we reach an accord with the territory where the US plays a much greater role in its activities while increasing its military presence on the island.  

And to think, we are just finishing the first week of 2026.  Do not be surprised if, as the year progresses, there are more government changes in Europe as the current leadership there has been shown to be weak and ineffective, and an increasing number of people are unhappy with the situation.  While fears over the fall of NATO are rife now, if Germany, France and the UK wind up having snap elections, a distinct possibility at this point, and the new regimes are AfD, RN and Reform UK led, there could well be much greater agreement on the way forward for the alliance.

However, like most of you, I am neither a politician nor geopolitical analyst, I’m just a poet who watches the world and tries to make sense of how it impacts markets.  So, let’s go down that road.

After another strong equity session in the US, where both the DJIA and S&P 500 made new all-time highs, the story in Asia seemed to be one of some early profit-taking after strong rallies.  So, Japan (-1.1%), China (-0.3%) and HK (-0.9%) all slipped during the session with generally less excitement seen overnight than earlier in the week.  India (-0.1%) continues to lag, and while Korea (+0.6%) managed to maintain its upward momentum, the rest of the region was relegated to +/- 0.4% or less in their movement.  

As to Europe, only the DAX (+0.6%) is showing any positivity this morning, mostly on defense names still performing well, while the UK (-0.6%) is lagging after weaker than expected Construction PMI data (40.1 vs. 42.5 exp) and the rest of the continental bourses are little changed overall.  Eurozone inflation was confirmed at 2.0%, cementing the idea that the ECB will remain on hold, so I suspect opportunities here will rely on global trends.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:10) they are mixed, but with movement less than 0.2% in either direction.

In the bond market, yields are sliding around the world, perhaps on the understanding that oil prices are likely to slide given the potential for new, unsanctioned supply hitting the market.  Certainly, there is no indication that government spending anywhere in the world is going to slow down, so that avenue is still closed.  But, recapping, Treasury yields (-3bps) are not declining as much as most of Europe (-4bps to -5bps) or the UK (-8bps after the weak data).  I continue to believe that this year is going to be extremely dull in bond land as central bank support is going to offset additional issuance.

We’ve already discussed oil, but metals, which is where the real action has been, are all lower this morning, very clearly on profit taking activity.  Consider that gold (chart below from tradingeconomics.com) has been the least remarkable and still rallied 4% since the beginning of the year, so slipping -1.2% this morning can be no surprise.

Meanwhile platinum (-6.1%) which is the least liquid of all the precious metals, saw a nearly 20% gain this week prior to today’s decline.  The chart below is not for the faint of heart!

Source: tradingeconmics.com

Silver (-3.1%) is somewhere in between these two, but the story has not changed at all.  There continues to be significant demand for physical metals with paper futures no longer able to control the price action.  One way to follow this is to look at the price on the Shanghai Futures Exchange where it is all delivery settlement and where the price trades at a substantial premium to the COMEX, on the order of $3-$4/oz.

Finally, the dollar is still there, and vs. most of its counterparts, doing very little this morning.  the outlier today is ZAR (-0.5%) which is obviously hurting on the back of gold and platinum’s weakness.  In fact, it is worth looking at the relationship between ZAR and gold, as per the below chart, to help you understand just how closely tied is the price action between the two.

The other currency that has been trending steadily is CNY, with it breaching the 7.00 level at the end of 2025 for the first time since September 2024.  While this trend has been steady for the past year, a look at the longer-term chart shows the renminbi is nowhere near an extreme in either direction. 

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I maintain my view that if China really does create domestic demand for its products, the renminbi will continue this rally and strengthen further.  But we have heard this same story of Chinese government support for the domestic economy for at least a decade, and it hasn’t shown up yet.

On the data front, ADP Employment (exp 47K), JOLTs Job Openings (7.6M), ISM Services (52.3) and Factory Orders (-1.2%, -0.3% ex Transport) are the key releases this morning.  we also get EIA oil inventory data with expectations for a decent build.  There is only one Fed speaker, Governor Bowman, but the Fed just doesn’t seem as important this year as last.

The dollar is not the focus right now, neither are bonds.  Metals remain top of mind with oil a close second.  While recent price action in the former has been extremely volatile, nothing has changed my view that the long-term trend remains higher there.  Similarly for oil, the long-term trend remains lower with recent events simply adding to the weight.

Good luck

Adf

First Black Swan

Posted on by

‘Ought Twenty-Six barely got started
And Trump has already departed
From previous norms
Of post-Cold War forms
Now socialists are broken-hearted
 
Their man in Caracas is gone
With outrage from Beijing to Bonn
But folks on the street
Believe it’s a treat
Please welcome this year’s first black swan

 

I certainly didn’t have the exfiltration of Venezuelan strongman Nicholas Maduro from his palace in the middle of the night on my bingo card, did you?  But that is what we all woke up to Saturday morning.  In a way, we cannot be surprised as President Trump indicated several weeks ago that he spoke with Maduro, told him if he left, he could have safe passage, and be left alone, but ostensibly Maduro turned him down.  I’m guessing old Nick is questioning that decision right now.

As this all took place Saturday morning, no financial markets, other than cryptocurrencies, are open and based on Bitcoin’s movement of 0.1% as I type, it appears the issue is not seen as a major concern.  There is much discussion regarding what will happen to the price of oil, as unquestionably, Venezuelan oil was part of the decision equation.  But the Venezuelans have been producing less than 1 million bpd, far below their pre-socialist levels, and given they sit on the largest known oil reserves on the planet, far below what their ultimate capabilities can be.  If you’re Chevron’s CEO, you must be thrilled this morning, as they are already operating in country there.

Too, remember that Venezuelan crude is heavy and sour, which is what most Gulf Coast refineries are tuned to utilise to distill diesel, gasoline and other products.  It is too early to know what will happen to oil prices in the short run, but I would suggest that the longer-term view has to be lower prices going forward.  Consider that the US already is the largest producer of oil and oil equivalents (about 20mm bpd) in the world.  I would expect that Venezuela will be exiting OPEC under a new administration there, and with US oil expertise, will be seeking to expand that sector as rapidly as possible.  In fact, achieving 10mm bpd within a few years does not seem unrealistic. 

Now consider that by the end of the decade, the Western hemisphere could well be producing half the world’s oil supply, as already, despite degradation of capabilities in both Venezuela and Mexico, it produces more than one-third of the oil pumped.  That would certainly put a crimp in Russia’s war machine as the price seems far more likely to head toward $50/bbl than $80/bbl or higher, and by all accounts, that would be hard on Russia’s budget.

Too, consider the geopolitical ramifications if China were suddenly paying full price rather than whatever discounts they currently get for sanctioned oil purchases.  As well, what does a lower price do to the Iranian regime’s finances?  Probably not very helpful.

It is way too early to know how things will evolve, but between growth in production in Guyana and Argentina, and the prospects for significant growth in Venezuela going forward, it should become cheaper to fill up your tank going forward.

We will see how markets open Sunday night, and I would not be surprised to see oil rally at the start, but I would contend the politics points to lower prices not higher ones.  

Source: visualcapitalist.com

Note that neither Venezuela nor Argentina make this list individually.   I would wager that by 2027, both will be prominent producers, along with Guyana.

Welcome to 2026!  It is going to be an interesting year.

Good luck

Adf

Buy or Go Short?

Posted on by

The question on tariffs today
Is what will the Court, Supreme, say
Will they agree Trump
Has power to pump
Up taxes with no Senate sway?
 
Or otherwise, will the top court
Decide to, Trump’s tariffs, abort?
And if they decide
That Trump is offside
Is it time to buy or go short?

 

As testament to the idea that no matter the shock to a system, if it is a dynamic system, it will manage to adapt to the new reality, today’s existential question is, what happens if the Supreme Court decides that President Trump’s tariffs are unconstitutional?  Let’s forget for a moment, the fact that they have generated approximately $200 billion in government revenue since their imposition and are forecast to generate upwards of $300 billion next year and $2.5 trillion in the next decade, at least according to the Tax Policy Center (see chart below from taxpolicycenter.org).  Obviously, this is a good chunk of change for a government that has been running $2 trillion annual deficits.

Rather, let us consider the features that have accompanied the tariff negotiations, notably the promised inward investment to the United States.  Although there are several figures that have been mooted, with President Trump claiming $10 trillion, it appears that a fair estimate of the number is half that, so $5 trillion, to be invested in the US, notably in manufacturing capabilities, over time.  That, my friends, is a lot of money.

Now, we all remember what happened when Mr Trump announced those tariffs on Liberation Day back in April, but here is a chart of the S&P 500 to remind us of the size of the initial decline in equity markets.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

The decline from the close on April 2nd to the low on April 7th was ~12%, at which point, things were put on hold for 90 days and a series of furious negotiations began.  But we saw similar dramatic moves across all markets.  For instance, 10-year Treasury yields fell 33bps during that time, before rebounding sharply.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Oil also collapsed on the news, falling from nearly $72/bbl to $56/bbl in that stretch as the announcement shook up virtually all financial markets around the world.

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Perhaps the most surprising outcome was that the dollar actually fell about 3% during that period despite every economist and every textbook explaining that the impact of tariffs on currency markets would be that those countries whose goods were tariffed would see their currencies decline while the one imposing the tariffs would see strength.  (Yet another reason to pay little heed to economists and their theories which sound great but rarely seem to describe reality.)

Source: tradingeconomics.com

I highlight all this movement because the market behavior since then has been nothing but positive.  Equity markets have decided that things are great and rallied dramatically.  Bond markets have absorbed the information and decided it doesn’t matter that much or perhaps priced in the new revenue model as part of finding a new equilibrium around 4%.  Oil markets have other things about which to worry, with the current theme the alleged glut of oil that is around, and the dollar, while it continued to decline a bit further over the ensuing three months, has now seemingly found a bottom, and if anything looks like it is preparing to climb.

But…what if the tariffs must go?  And what if the government must repay those already collected?  If you recall, the narrative about tariffs back in April was that they were the end of the US economy and a disaster.  Obviously, that has not turned out to be the case.  Is the new narrative that the end of tariffs will be a disaster?  That feels like a pretty big reversal of opinion.    

To my thinking, one of the keys to the recent optimism for the US economy, at least for those who are optimistic, is that the inward investment is going to have very positive medium- and long-term impacts on the economy.  They are going to be critical in the reshoring of American manufacturing, whether Japanese investment into US Steel, or Korean investment into shipbuilding or Taiwanese investment into semiconductor manufacturing.  All these things are unalloyed positives for the nation and its future.  But if the tariffs are revoked, will the investments disappear?  That is the $5 trillion question, and one that I believe would be incredibly detrimental to both the nation and its financial markets.  Stocks would fall sharply and so would bonds as growth prospects would shrink and the fiscal imbalance likely grow even further.  The dollar would suffer between the capital outflows, and the fiscal problems and oil would likely fall amid a dramatic reduction in US demand.  Arguably, the only thing that would prosper would be gold, the historic safe haven.  

Which brings the question back to the Supremes (not these Supremes, although the sentiment is right!), will they unleash that chaos?  Or will they find a way to avoid it?  

With so much to consider, let’s do a brief twirl around the world overnight.  Yesterday saw a solid US equity rally across the board which was followed by strength throughout most of Asia (Nikkei +1.3%, Hang Seng +2.1%, CSI 300 +1.4%) with generally lesser gains elsewhere in the region.  Europe, though, is on its back foot with modest declines (UK -0.4%, Germany -0.1%, France -0.4%) after weaker than expected Construction PMI data across the board.  As to US futures, at this hour (7:00) they are very slightly firmer across the board, 0.1% or so.

In the bond market, yesterday saw US yields climb about 6bps after the ADP Employment data was released at a stronger than expected 42K with modest revisions higher to the previous months.  Remember, last month’s revisions lower were for an entire year, not specifically the past two months, so it appears that job growth is still decent, just not quite as strong as last year.  That data helped push yields up around the world, notably with JGB yields higher by 3bps.  But this morning, yields have backed off -3bps in the US and are unchanged across the entire continent and UK.  As to the UK, they left rates on hold at 4.0%, as expected, but the vote was 5 – 4 with 4 votes looking for a cut, so a more dovish signal.

In the commodity markets, oil (+0.8%) is rebounding after a decline yesterday based on a much larger than expected build in EIA inventories while NatGas also climbed on forecasts for colder weather and increased LNG demand in Europe and Asia.  Gold (+0.9%) and silver (+1.4%) continue their rebound from recent lows and seem like they are getting comfortable in their new “homes” of $4000 and $48.00 respectively.

Finally, the dollar is under modest pressure this morning, with the DXY slipping barely below the 100.00 level (currently 99.94) while the euro (+0.25%) and pound (+0.2%) both edge higher.  It appears that the dollar’s recent strength is on hold for today, although my take is it will resume shortly.  While a negative Supreme Court ruling on tariffs is likely to really undercut the greenback, I don’t see anything else in the near term to do the job.

There is no data of note to be released today, but we have an onslaught of Fed speakers, six in total starting at 11:00 this morning.  The Fed funds futures contract is now pricing just a 65% probability of a rate cut next month, as the ADP number encouraged some folks to change their views.  My take is we are going to hear a lot about caution given the absence of data, but I might contend the market is already somewhat cautious, at least the bond market is.

The thing about the tariff issue is it won’t be decided for at least several weeks, if not months, so may hang over the market like the Sword of Damocles.  I have no idea how they will rule, and the commentary from observers of the hearing gave different views based on their political biases, so it is hard to know.  But it is going to matter a lot.  In the meantime, I expect the recent trends to remain in place, so equity strength, little bond movement, little oil movement and dollar strength.

Good luck

Adf